LESSON OBJECTIVE: The student demonstrates understanding of the historical and literary meaning of Matthew 5:33-37 and related texts.

Transcript

1 Lesson Nine: OATHS Matthew 5:33-37 LESSON OBJECTIVE: The student demonstrates understanding of the historical and literary meaning of Matthew 5:33-37 and related texts. LESSON INDICATORS: Upon successful completion of this lesson the student: 1. Parses all substantives and verb forms in Matt. 5: Classifies all subordinate clauses in Matt. 5: Classifies all sentences in Matt. 5: Translates by dynamic-equivalent method all sentences in Matt. 5: Determines the most likely reading of Matt. 5:33-37 where textual variants are listed. 6. Assesses the literary structure of Matt. 5: Evaluates the exegetical issues in Matt. 5: Completes the exegetical outline of Matt. 5: Parse the following: GRAMMATICAL ANALYSIS: Πα' λιν η κου' σατε ε ρρε'θη τοι^ς α ρχαι'οις Ου κ ε πιορκη' σεις α ποδω' σεις τω,^ κυρι'ω, τοὺς ο«ρκους σου

2 Classify the following subordinate clause(s): ο«τι ε ρρε'θη τοι^ς α ρχαι'οις, Ου κ ε πιορκη'σεις, α ποδω' σεις δὲ τω,^ κυρι'ω, τοὺς ο«ρκους σου~ Function(s): Ου κ ε πιορκη'σεις, α ποδω' σεις δὲ τω,^ κυρι'ω, τοὺς ο«ρκους σου~ Function(s): Classify the above sentence in Matt. 5:33: Function: Translate the above sentence in Matt. 5:33 by the dynamic-equivalent method: ************************************************************ Parse the following: ε γὼ λε'γω υ µι^ν µὴ ο µο' σαι ο«λως ε ν τω,^ ου ρανω,^ θρο' νος ε στὶν του^ θεου^ ε ν τη,^ γη,^ 2

3 υ ποπο' διο' ν ε στιν τω^ ν ποδω^ ν αυ του^ ει ς Ιεροσο' λυµα πο' λις ε στὶν του^ βασιλε'ως µεγα' λου ε ν τη,^ κεφαλη,^ σου ο µο' ση, ς ου δυ' νασαι µι'αν τρι'χα λευκὴν ποιη^σαι µε'λαιναν Classify the following subordinate clause(s): ο«τι θρο' νος ε στὶν του^ θεου^ Function(s): ο«τι υ ποπο' διο' ν ε στιν τω^ ν ποδω^ ν αυ του^ Function(s): 3

4 ο«τι πο' λις ε στὶν του^ µεγα' λου βασιλε'ως Function(s): ο«τι ου δυ' νασαι µι'αν τρι'χα λευκὴν ποιη^σαι η µε'λαιναν Function(s): Classify the above sentence in Matt. 5:34-36: Function: 4

5 Translate the above sentence in Matt. 5:34-36 by the dynamic-equivalent method: ************************************************************ Parse the following: ε»στω ο λο' γος υ µω^ ν τὸ περισσὸν του' των ε κ του^ πονηρου^ ε στιν. Classify the above sentence in Matt. 5:37: Function: Translate the above sentence in Matt. 5:37 by the dynamic-equivalent method: ************************************************************ 5

6 TEXTUAL VARIANTS: PASSAGE: 5:37 APPARATUS USED: UBS 3rd CLASSIFICATION OF WITNESSES Variant Alexandrian Western Unclassified Byzantine Readings (Aland I-II) (Aland IV) (Aland III) (Aland V) EVALUATION OF EXTERNAL EVIDENCE 1. Date. 2. Geographical Distribution. 3. Textual Relationships. 6

7 Summary of the External Evidence EVALUATION OF THE INTERNAL EVIDENCE 1. Transcriptional Probabilities, i.e. what scribes likely did when copying the N.T. (1) Shorter/Longer Reading. (2) Reading Different from Parallel. (3) More Difficult Reading. (4) Reading Which Best Explains Origin of Other(s). 7

8 2. Intrinsic Probablities, i.e. what the author himself likely wrote. Summary of Internal Evidence CONCLUSION 8

9 BLOCK DIAGRAM: 5.33 Πα'λιν (48) η κου'σατε ο«τι ε ρρε'θη τοι^ς α ρχαι'οις, Ου κ ε πιορκη'σεις, δὲ α ποδω'σειςτω,^ κυρι'ω, τοὺς ο«ρκους σου δὲ (49) ε γὼ λε'γω υ µι^ν µὴ ο µο'σαι ο«λως µη'τε ε ν τω,^ ου ρανω,^, ο«τι θρο'νος ε στὶν του^ θεου^ 5.35 µη'τε ε ν τη,^ γη,^, ο«τι υ ποπο'διο'ν ε στιν τω^ν ποδω^ν αυ του^ µη'τε ει ς Ι εροσο'λυµα, ο«τι πο'λις ε στὶν του^ µεγα'λου βασιλε'ως 5.36 µη'τε ε ν τη,^ κεφαλη,^ σου ο µο'ση,ς, ο«τι ου δυ'νασαι µι'αν τρι'χα λευκὴν ποιη^σαι η µε'λαιναν δὲ (50) ε»στω ο λο'γος υ µω^ν ναὶ ναι', ου ου» δὲ ε κ του^ πονηρου^ (51) τὸ περισσὸν του'των...ε στιν. 9

10 Complete the following literary analysis: SEMANTIC DIAGRAM: Semantic Diagram: Conne- Sent Verb Analysis: Other ective Func Tense: Pers: Num: Subject: Links: (48) (49) (50) (51) Summarize findings, i.e., possible literary patterns, poetical structures et al.: EXEGETICAL ISSUES: 1. Identify the literary role of this pericope in the Sermon on the Mount. Use 2. Identify the form of the premise statement(s) of Antithesis 4 as apodictic or casuistic. See Appendix Seventeen. 10

11 Ου κ ε πιορκη' σεις: α ποδω' σεις τω,^ κυρι'ω, τοὺς ο«ρκους σου: 3. Compare Lev. 19:12 to Matt. 5:33. First, complete a semantic diagram of Lev. 19:12; then summarize similarities and differences between the two. καὶ (1) ου κ ο µει^σθε τω,^ ο νοµατι' µου ε π α δι'κω, καὶ (2) ου βεβηλω'σετε τὸ ο»νοµα του^ θεου^ υ µω^ν (3) ε γω' ει µι κυ'ριος ο θεὸς υ µω^ν. 4. Compare Num. 30:2-3 to Matt. 5:33. First, complete a semantic diagram of Num. 30:2-3; then summarize similarities and differences between the two. 1 (Α) 30.2 καὶ ε λα'λησεν Μωυση^ς πρὸς τοὺς α»ρχονταβ τω^ν φυλω^ν Ισραηλ λε'γων (1) Του^το τὸ ρ η^µα, ο σενε'ταξεν κυ'ριος (2) 30.3 α»νθρωπος α»νθρωπος...ου βεβηλω'σει τὸ ρ η^µα αυ του^ ο ς α ν ευ»ξηται ευ χὴν κυρι'ω, η ο µο'ση, ο«ρκον η ο ρι'σηται ο ρισµω,^ περὶ τη^ς ψυχη^ς αυ του^ (3) πα'ντα...ποιη'σει. ο«σα ε ὰν ε ξε'λθη, ε κ του^ στο'µατος αυ του^ 1 The larger context of Num. 30:1-16 should be consulted; additionally, see Deut. 23:21-23; Ps. 50:14; Exod. 20:7. 11

12 5. Compare Shevuoth 3:1 to Matt. 5: Summarize similarities and differences between the two. 2 Shevuoth 3:1. Oaths are of two kinds, which are actually four kinds; they are I swear that I will eat, or, I swear that I will not eat, or, I swear that I have eaten, or, I swear that I have not eaten. If one said, I swear that I will not eat, and he ate the smallest quantity, he is liable. This is the opinion of R. Akiba. 2 Additional discussion of Jewish oath making can be found in tractate Nedarim [2.2] of the Mishnah as well as in Philo, Spec. Laws NT examples of these two kinds of oaths include the following: Assertive Oaths: Promissory Oaths: Matt. 26:74 [//Mk. 14:71] Mk. 6:23 Heb. 7:21 [Ps. 110:4] Lu. 1:73 [Gen. 22:16-17] Rev. 10:6 Acts 2:30 [Ps. 131:11] Heb. 2:11 [Num. 14:21-23] Heb. 2:18 [Ps. 95:11] Heb. 6:13-14 [Gen. 22:17] 12

13 6. Compare Jas. 5:12 to Matt. 5: First, complete a semantic diagram of Jas. 5:12; then summarize similarities and differences between the two δε' πρὸ πα'ντων α δελφοι' µου, (1) µὴ ο µνυ'ετε, µη'τε τὸν ου ρανὸν µη'τε τὴν γη^ν µη'τε α»λλον τινὰ ο«ρκον δὲ (2) η»τω υ µω^ν τὸ Ναὶ ναὶ καὶ (3) τὸ Ου ου», ι«να µὴ υ πὸ κρι'σιν πε'σητε. 13

14 7. Compare Matt. 23:16-22 to Matt. 5: First, complete a semantic diagram of Matt. 23:16-22; then summarize similarities and differences between the two. 3 (1) Ου αὶ υ µι^ν, ο δηγοὶ τυφλοὶ οι λε'γοντες, Ο ς α ν ο µο'ση, ε ν τω,^ ναω,^, ου δε'ν ε στιν δ ο«ς α ν ο µο'ση, ε ν τω,^ χρυσω,^ του^ ναου^ ο φει'λει µωροὶ καὶ τυφλοι', γὰρ (2) τι'ς µει'ζων ε στι'ν, (3) ο χρυσὸς η (4) ο ναὸς ο α για'σας τὸν χρυσο'ν; καὶ Ος α ν ο µο'ση, ε ν τω,^ θυσιαστηρι'ω,, (5) ου δε'ν ε στιν δ ο ς α ν ο µο'ση, ε ν τω,^ δω'ρω, τω,^ ε πα'νω αυ του^ (6) ο φει'λει τυφλοι', γὰρ (7) τι' µει^ζον -----, (8) τὸ δω^ρον , η (9) τὸ θυσιαστη'ριον , τὸ α για'ζον τὸ δω^ρον; ου ν ο ο µο'σας ε ν τω,^ θυσιαστηρι'ω, (10) ο µνυ'ει ε ν αυ τω,^ καὶ ε ν πα^σι τοι^ς ε πα'νω αυ του^ καὶ ο ο µο'σας ε ν τω,^ ναω,^ (11) ο µνυ'ει ε ν αυ τω,^ καὶ ε ν τω,^ κατοικου^ντι αυ το'ν καὶ 3 Also to be consulted are Matt. 15:5-6 and Mk. 7:

15 ο ο µο'σας ε ν τω,^ ου ρανω,^ (12) ο µνυ'ει ε ν τω,^ θρο'νω, του^ θεου^ καὶ ε ν τω,^ καθηµε'νω, ε πα'νω αυ του^. 15

16 EXEGETICAL OUTLINE: Complete the following outline according to the guidelines in Appendix Five: I. (48-49) A. (48) B. (49) II. (50-51) A. (50) B. (51) 16