Supplemental Material to Comparison of inferential methods in partially identified models in terms of error in coverage probability
|
|
- Μυρρίνη Βαρουξής
- 6 χρόνια πριν
- Προβολές:
Transcript
1 Supplemetal Material to Compariso of iferetial methods i partially idetified models i terms of error i coverage probability Federico A. Bugi Departmet of Ecoomics Duke Uiversity federico.bugi@duke.edu. September 22, 2014 Abstract This supplemet provides all the ecessary results to show that a stadardized versio of the statistics cosidered i Bugi (2014) satisfy the same coclusios regardig the rate of covergece of the error i the coverage probability. To establish these fidigs, we require stregtheig the fiite momet requiremets from fiite fourth absolute momets to slightly over sixth absolute momets. Thaks to a aoymous referee for suggestig me to explore this extesio. assistace. Ay ad all errors are my ow. Takuya Ura provided excellet research 1
2 1 Itroductio Bugi (2014) cosiders the problem of iferece i a partially idetified momet (i)equality models based o the criterio fuctio approach. Accordig to Assumptios CF.1-CF.2, the sample aalogue criterio fuctios are of the followig form Q (θ) = G([ m,j (θ)] J j=1), (1.1) where G is a o-stochastic fuctio. The fact that G is o-stochastic implies that the sample momet coditios are ot allowed to be stadardized, i.e., divided by the sample stadard deviatio. This could be cosidered a importat limitatio relative to the existig literature. The objective of this supplemet is to show that the results i Bugi (2014) ca be exteded to allow for stadardized sample momet coditios, i.e., criterio fuctios of the form Q (θ) = G([ m,j (θ)/ˆσ,j (θ)] J j=1), (1.2) where ˆσ,j 2 (θ) 1 (m(w i, θ) m,j (θ)) 2 is the sample variace of m j (W i, θ) for j = 1,..., J. The strategy to establish these results follows the oe used i Bugi (2014). The results i that paper are based o several represetatio theorems that express a statistic of iterest as a well-uderstood radom variable plus a error term, which is show to coverge to zero at a sufficietly fast rate. These type of represetatio results are obtaied for the sample statistic ad each of the approximatig statistics (bootstrap, asymptotic approximatio, subsamplig 1, ad subsamplig 2). This supplemet shows that stadardizatio adds a ew compoet to the error term of each of these represetatio results. As a cosequece, all of the results i Bugi (2014) exted for the criterio fuctios i Eq. (1.2) as log as this additioal compoet coverges to zero at a appropriate rate. This supplemet shows that occurs, provided that we stregthe the fiite momet requiremets from fiite fourth absolute momets to slightly over sixth absolute momets. We itroduce the followig otatio i additio to the oe used i Bugi (2014). For all j = 1,..., J, where the superscript s i v s,j (θ), ṽs,j 2 Assumptios σ 2 j (θ) V [m j (Z, θ)] ˆσ,j(θ) 2 1 (m j (Z i, θ) m,j (θ)) 2 σ,j(θ) 2 1 (m j (Z i, θ) E[m j (Z i, θ)]) 2 v s,j(θ) ( m,j (θ) E[m j (Z, θ)])/σ j (θ), ṽ s,j(θ) ( m,j (θ) E[m j (Z, θ)])/ˆσ,j (θ), v s,,j (θ) ( m,j(θ) m,j (θ) ) /ˆσ,j (θ), (θ), ad vs,,j (θ) deotes that the sample statistic is stadardized. I order to develop the results i this supplemet, we replace Assumptios A.5, CF.1, ad CF.2 i Bugi (2014) by the followig alterative assumptios. Assumptio A.5. E[ m(z, θ) 6+δ ] < for some δ > 0. 2
3 Assumptio CF.1. The populatio criterio fuctio is Q(θ) = G([E[m j (Z, θ)]/σ j (θ)] J j=1 ), where G : R J + R is a o-stochastic ad o-egative fuctio that is strictly icreasig i every coordiate, weakly covex, cotiuous, homogeeous of degree β > 0, ad satisfies G(y) = 0 if ad oly if y = 0 J. Assumptio CF.2. The populatio criterio fuctio is Q(θ) = G([E[m j (Z, θ)]/σ j (θ)] J j=1 ), where G : R J + R is oe of the followig two fuctios: (a) G(x) = J j=1 ϖ jx j or (b) G(x) = maxϖ j x j J j=1, where ϖ R J + is a arbitrary vector of positive costats. Assumptio A.5 stregthes the fiite momet requiremets from fiite fourth absolute momets i Assumptio A.5 to slightly over sixth absolute momets. By virtue of Assumptios CF.1-CF.2, the properly scaled sample aalogue criterio fuctio is ow give by Eq. (1.2). 3 Represetatio results with stadardizatio This sectio establishes represetatio results for the sample statistic ad each of the approximatig statistics. We ote that all the proofs ad several itermediate results are collected i the appedix of this supplemet. We begi with the represetatio result for the stadardized sample statistic. Theorem 3.1 (Represetatio result - Sample statistic). Assume Assumptios A.1-A.3, CF.1, ad that θ satisfies Assumptios A.4 ad A.5. Let ρ rak(v [m(z, θ)]). 1. If θ Θ I, the Q (θ) = H( Ȳ) + δ, where (a) for ay C <, P ( δ > C 1/2 ) = o( 1/2 ). (b) Ȳ : Ω R ρ is a zero mea sample average of i.i.d. observatios from a distributio with o-sigular variace-covariace matrix V = I ρ ad fiite fourth momets, (c) H : R ρ R is cotiuous, o-egative, weakly covex, ad homogeeous of degree β. H(y) = 0 implies for some o-zero vector b R ρ, b y 0. For ay µ > 0, ay h µ > 0, ay C 2 > 0, ay positive sequece g 1, ad ay positive sequece ε 1 with ε = o(1), H 1 (h ε ) y C 2 g H 1 (h) η where η = O( g ε ), uiformly i h. (d) If we add Assumptio CF.2, the for ay µ > 0, ay h µ > 0 ad ay sequece ε 1 with ε = o(1), H 1 (h ε ) H 1 (h) γ where γ O(ε ), uiformly i h. 2. If θ It(Θ I ), the lim ifq (θ) = 0 a.s. As a ext step, we cosider the stadardized versio of each of the approximatig statistics i Bugi (2014): bootstrap, asymptotic approximatio, subsamplig 1, ad subsamplig 2. I each case, oe ca stadardize resamplig momet iequalities usig: (a) the sample stadard deviatio or (b) the resamplig stadard deviatio. Both of these optios give the same formal results but the latter requires slightly loger argumets. For the sake of brevity, we express our approximatio i terms of the first optio. I particular: For the bootstrap, we replace Bugi (2014, Eq. (3.2)) with Q (θ) = G([ ( m,j(θ) m,j (θ) ) /ˆσ,j (θ)] 1[ m,j (θ)/ˆσ,j (θ) τ / ] J j=1) = G([v,s,j (θ)] 1[ m,j (θ)/ˆσ,j (θ) τ / ] J j=1), where m (θ) is the sample mea for the bootstrap sample. 3
4 For the asymptotic approximatio, we replace Bugi (2014, Eq. (4.2)) with Q AA [ ] (θ) = G ζ i (m j (Z i, θ) m,j (θ)) /ˆσ,j (θ) where ζ i is a i.i.d. sample with ζ i N(0, 1), idepedet of Z i. For subsamplig 1, we replace Bugi (2014, Eq. (5.2)) with 1[ m,j (θ)/ˆσ,j (θ) τ / ] Q SS1 (θ) = G([ b ( m SS,b,j(θ) m,j (θ))/ˆσ,j (θ)] 1[ m,j (θ)/ˆσ,j (θ) τ / ] J j=1), where m SS,b (θ) is the sample mea for the subsamplig sample. For subsamplig 2, we replace Bugi (2014, Eq. (5.4)) with Q SS2 (θ) = G([ b m SS,b,j(θ)/ˆσ,j (θ)] J j=1). where m SS,b (θ) is the sample mea for the subsamplig sample. We ow establish the aalogous represetatio results for each of these stadardized approximatio methods. It is relevat to poit out that the proofs of each of these build heavily o the correspodig represetatio results i Bugi (2014). Theorem 3.2 (Represetatio result - Bootstrap). Assume Assumptios A.1-A.3, CF.1, ad that θ satisfies Assumptios A.4-A.5. Let ρ rak(v [m(z, θ)]). 1. If θ Θ I the Q (θ) = H( Ȳ ) + δ, where (a) for ay C <, P ( δ > C 1/2 X ) = o( 1/2 ) a.s. (b) Ȳ X : Ω R ρ is a zero (coditioal) mea sample average of i.i.d. observatios from a distributio with a (coditioal) variace-covariace matrix ˆV which is o-sigular a.s. ad fiite (coditioal) fourth momets a.s., ad ˆV I p O p ( 1/2 ). (c) H : R ρ R is the same fuctio as i Theorem If θ It(Θ I ), the lim ifq (θ) = 0 a.s. Theorem 3.3 (Represetatio result - AA). Assume Assumptios A.1-A.3, CF.1, ad that θ satisfies Assumptios A.4-A.5. Let ρ rak(v [m(z, θ)]). 1. If θ Θ I the Q AA (θ) = H( Ȳ AA ) + δ AA, where (a) for ay C <, P ( δ AA > C 1/2 X ) = o( 1/2 ) a.s. (b) Ȳ AA X : Ω R ρ is a zero (coditioal) mea sample average of i.i.d. observatios from a distributio with a (coditioal) variace-covariace matrix ˆV which is o-sigular a.s. ad fiite (coditioal) fourth momets a.s., ad ˆV I p O p ( 1/2 ). (c) H : R ρ R is the same fuctio as i Theorem If θ It(Θ I ), the lim ifq AA (θ) = 0 a.s. J j=1, 4
5 Theorem 3.4 (Represetatio result - SS1). Assume Assumptios A.1-A.3, CF.1, ad that θ satisfies Assumptios A.4-A.5. Let ρ rak(v [m(z, θ)]). 1. If θ Θ I the Q SS1 (θ) = H( b Ȳ SS ) + δss1, where (a) lim ifp (δ SS1 b = 0 X, ) 1[ v (m θ ) τ ] ad lim ifδ SS1 = 0, a.s. (b) Ȳ SS X : Ω R ρ is a zero (coditioal) mea sample average of b observatios sampled without replacemet from a distributio with a (coditioal) variace-covariace matrix ˆV which is o-sigular a.s. ad fiite (coditioal) fourth momets a.s., ad ˆV I ρ O p ( 1/2 ). (c) H : R ρ R is the same fuctio as i Theorem If θ It(Θ I ), the lim ifq SS1 (θ) = 0 a.s. Theorem 3.5 (Represetatio result - SS2). Assume Assumptios A.1-A.3, CF.1, ad that θ satisfies Assumptios A.4-A.5. Let ρ rak(v [m(z, θ)]). 1. If θ Θ I, the Q SS2 (θ) = H( b Ȳ SS ) + δss2, where (a) for some C > 0, P ( δ SS2 b > C, (l l )b / X ) = o(b 1/2 ) a.s. (b) Ȳ SS X : Ω R ρ is a zero (coditioal) mea sample average of b observatios sampled without replacemet from a distributio with a (coditioal) variace-covariace matrix ˆV which is o-sigular a.s. ad fiite (coditioal) fourth momets a.s., ad ˆV I ρ O p ( 1/2 ). (c) H : R ρ R is the same fuctio as i Theorem If θ It(Θ I ), the lim ifq SS2 (θ) = 0 a.s. Remark 3.1. Notice that the represetatio result for the sample statistic (i.e. Theorem 3.1) is the oly oe of these results that requires slightly more tha fiite sixth absolute momets i Assumptio A.5. All other represetatio results i this supplemet ca be established oly usig fiite fourth absolute momets. 4 Coclusio This supplemet provides all the ecessary results to show that a stadardized versio of the statistics cosidered by Bugi (2014) satisfy the same coclusios regardig rate of covergece of the error i the coverage probability. Our strategy is to establish that all the represetatio results used i Bugi (2014) for o-stadardized statistics ca also be established for stadardized statistics, both for the sample statistic ad for all approximatig statistics (bootstrap, asymptotic approximatio, subsamplig 1, ad subsamplig 2). To establish these result we employ slightly loger formal argumets ad we stregthe the fiite momet requiremets from fiite fourth absolute momets to slightly more tha fiite sixth absolute momets. Usig the represetatio results i this supplemet, oe ca repeat the argumets i Bugi (2014) to establish the exact same rates of covergece of the error i the coverage probability. 5
6 Appedix A Appedix A.1 Proofs of theorems Proof of Theorem 3.1. Part 1. We show the result by slightly modifyig the argumets i Bugi (2014, Part 1, Theorem A.1). Let Σ V [m(z, θ)] ad, thus, ρ = rak(v [m(z, θ)]), ad let D Diag(Σ) ad Ω D 1/2 ΣD 1/2. By defiitio, there are (J ρ) coordiates of D 1/2 m(z i, θ) that ca be expressed as a liear combiatio of the remaiig ρ coordiates of D 1/2 m(z i, θ) for all i = 1,..., (a.s.). We refer to these ρ coordiates as the fudametal coordiates. Without loss of geerality, we ca rearrage D 1/2 m(z i, θ) s.t. the fudametal coordiates are the last ρ oes. This implies that there is a matrix A R (J ρ) ρ s.t. D 1/2 m(z i, θ) = [A, I ρ] m j(z i, θ)/σ j(θ) ρ j=1 for all i = 1,...,, a.s. (A.1) Let Ω ρ deote the variace-covariace matrix of m j(z i, θ)/σ j(θ) ρ j=1, which is ecessarily positive defiite ad let Ω 1/2 ρ deote the iverse of its square root. The, we defie Y i Ω 1/2 ρ (m j(z i, θ) E[m j(z i, θ)])/σ j(θ) ρ j=1 for all i = 1,..., ad the matrix B [A, I ρ] Ωρ 1/2 R J ρ. By these defiitios ad by Eq. (A.1), we the coclude that BY i = D 1/2 (m(z i, θ) E[m(Z i, θ)]) for all i = 1,...,. Accordig to this defiitio, v(θ) s = BȲ, E[Yi] = 0ρ, V (Yi) = Ip, ad E[ Yi c ] < for all c > 0 s.t. E[ m(z, θ) c ] <. Moreover, m(z i, θ) are i.i.d., ad so Y i are also i.i.d. Let B j R 1 ρ deote the j th row of B. The fuctio H(y) : R ρ R is defied as H(y) G([B jy] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1). The same argumets i Bugi (2014, Theorem A.1) ca be used to show that this fuctio has all the desired properties. By defiitio, H( Ȳ) G([Bj Ȳ ] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1)) = G([v s,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1)) ad δ Q (θ) H( Ȳ). I tur, δ = δ,1 + δ,2 where δ,1 Q (θ) G( [ ṽ s,j(θ) ] 1[E[mj(Z, θ)] = 0]J j=1), δ,2 G( [ ṽ s,j(θ) ] 1[E[mj(Z, θ)] = 0]J j=1) G( [ v s,j(θ) ] 1[E[mj(Z, θ)] = 0]J j=1). (A.2) We cosider these two terms i separate steps. Step 1 shows that shows that P ( δ,1 > 0) = o( 1/2 ) by a slightly modifyig the argumets i Bugi (2014, Theorem A.1) ad Step 2 shows that P ( δ,2 > C 1/2 ) = o( 1/2 ) for all C <. The combiatio of these two steps completes the proof of this part. Step 1: Argumet for δ,1. Sice θ Θ I Θ I the E[m(Z, θ)] 0 J. Let S j 1,..., J : E[m j(z, θ)] = 0, S 1,..., J/S (which may be empty), η mi j S E[m j(z, θ)]/σ j(θ) > 0 if S ad η 0 if S =. For ay j = 1,..., J, cosider the followig argumet. First, otice that: [ m,j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ)] = [ m,j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] + [ m,j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] > 0] Secod, otice that: [ṽ,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0]. [ m,j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ)] = [ m,j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] + [ m,j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] > 0] [ṽ,j(θ)] s 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0]+ = [v,j(θ) s + E j[m j(z, θ)]/σ j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] > 0](σ j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ)) [ṽ s,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] + [v s,j(θ) + η] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] > 0](σ j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ)). From both of these, we extract the followig coclusios. If S = the δ,1 = 0 ad so P ( δ,1 > 0) = 0 = o( 1/2 ). If S the otice that mi j S v s,j(θ) + η 0 δ,1 = 0. Therefore, P ( δ,1 > 0) P (mi j S v s,j(θ) + 6
7 η < 0). Thus, the proof of this step is completed by showig that: P (mi v,j(θ) s + η < 0) = o( 1/2 ). j S To show this, otice that for ay λ (1/4, 1/2) we have that: P (mi v,j(θ) s + η < 0) = P ( j Sv,j(θ) s < η ) P ( v,j(θ) s > η ) j S j S j S[1[ λ > η] + P ( v s,j(θ) > λ )] = o( 1/2 ), where the rate of covergece follows from η > 0 (S 1 ) ad Lemma ) A.2. Step 2: Argumet for δ,2. We show that P ( δ,2 > C 1/2 = o( 1/2 ) for all C <. This part of the proof is the oly geuiely ew part of the argumet relative to Bugi (2014, Theorem A.1). Fix c > 0 arbitrarily small so that δ > (4 + 2δ)2c + 4 ad so O( 1/2 δ/4+(1+δ/2)2c ) = o( 1/2 ). The, P ( δ,2 > C 1/2 ) = P ( δ,2 > C 1/2 J j=1 v,j(θ) s c/2β ˆσ,j(θ) σ j(θ) 1/2 2c ) +P ( δ,2 > C 1/2 J j=1 v,j(θ) s > c/2β ˆσ,j(θ) σ j(θ) > 1/2 2c ) J J P ( v,j(θ) s > c/2β ) + P ( ˆσ,j(θ) σ j(θ) > 1/2 2c ), j=1 j=1 where the iequality holds by Lemma A.4 for all sufficietly large. The first sum is o( 1/2 ) by Lemma A.2 (with λ = c/2β) ad the secod sum is o( 1/2 ) by Lemma A.8 (with λ = 2c). This completes the proof of this step. Part 2. If θ It(Θ I) the E[m j(z, θ)] > 0 for all j = 1,..., J. Defie η = mi j=1,...,je[m j(z, θ)]/σ j(θ) > 0. Cosider ay positive sequece ε 1 s.t. l l /ε = o(1) ad ε / = o(1). Suppose that the evet v s (m θ ) ε occurs. The, for all large eough, Q (θ) G([( ε / + η) ] J j=1) = 0. Therefore, lim if v s (m θ ) ε lim ifq (θ) = 0. By the LIL, P (lim if v s (m θ ) ε ) = 1 ad the result follows. Proof of Theorem 3.2. Part 1. We show the results by slightly modifyig the argumets i Bugi (2014, Part 1, Theorem A.2). Let the matrices Σ R J J, D Diag(Σ), A R (J ρ) ρ, Ω ρ R ρ ρ, ad B [A, I ρ] Ω 1/2 ρ R J ρ be defied as i proof of Theorem 3.1. Also, defie ˆΣ ˆV [m(z, θ)] ad ˆD Diag(ˆΣ). Sice bootstrap samples are costructed from the origial radom sample, it has to be the case that the coordiates of m(z i, θ) ca be arraged ito the same ρ fudametal ad (J ρ) o-fudametal coordiates described i Theorem 3.1. I particular, the bootstrap sample satisfies Eq. (A.1). The, by the argumet i Theorem 3.1, we defie Yi Ωρ 1/2 (m j(zi, θ) m,j(θ))/ˆσ j(θ) ρ j=1 for all i = 1,...,, which ca be show to satisfy BYi = ˆD 1/2 (m(zi, θ) m (θ)) for all i = 1,...,. Accordig to this defiitio of Y i, v s, (θ) = BȲ, E[Yi X ] = 0 ρ, V [Yi X ] = ˆV where ˆV = Ω 1/2, where ˆΩ ρ deotes the sample correlatio of m j(z, θ) ρ j=1. By the SLLN, ˆΣ Σ = o(1) a.s. which ρ ˆΩρΩ 1/2 ρ implies that ˆD D = o(1) a.s. ad ˆΩ ρ Ω ρ = o(1) a.s. By this ad the CMT, it the follows that ˆV I ρ = o(1) a.s., implyig that ˆV is o-sigular, a.s. By a similar argumet, the SLLN implies that E( Y i c X ) < for all c > 0 s.t. E[ m(z, θ) c ] <. Moreover, Y i X are i.i.d. because m(z i, θ) X are i.i.d. Fially, if we add Assumptio A.5, the CLT ad Slutzky s theorem imply that (ˆΩ ˆΩ) = O p(1) ad, so, ˆV I ρ O p( 1/2 ). Let H(y) : R ρ R be defied as i Theorem 3.1. The same argumets i Bugi (2014, Theorem A.1) ca be used to show that this fuctio has all the desired properties. By defiitio, it the follows that H( Ȳ ) G([B j Ȳ ] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1)) = G([v,s,j (θ)] 1[E[mj(Z, θ)] = 0]J j=1)) ad δ Q (θ) H( Ȳ ). To coclude the proof, it suffices to show that this error term satisfies P ( δ > 0 X ) = o( 1/2 ). Sice θ Θ I Θ I the E[m j(z, θ)] 0 j = 1,..., J. Let S j 1,..., J : E[m j(z, θ)] > 0, 7
8 S 1,..., J/S (which may be empty), η mi j S E[m j(z, θ)]/σ j(θ) > 0 if S ad η 0 if S =, σ 2 L(θ) mi j=1,...,j σ 2 j (θ), σ 2 H(θ) max j=1,...,j σ 2 j (θ), C L (1 + σ 2 L(θ)/(2σ 2 H)) 1/2, ad C H (1 σ 2 L(θ)/(2σ 2 H)) 1/2 > 0. Cosider the followig derivatio: v s (m θ ) τ /C H ˆσ 2 (θ) σ 2 (θ) σ 2 L(θ)/2 J j=1 ṽ s,j(m θ ) (σ j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ))/(τ /C H) C L σ j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ) C H J j=1 ( m,j(θ) E[m j(z, θ)]) /ˆσ,j(θ) τ C L σ j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ) C H j S m,j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ) τ j S m,j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ) C L η τ j S m,j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ) τ j S m,j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ) > τ = Q (θ) = 0, where all iclusios are based o elemetary argumets ad the last iclusio holds for all sufficietly large. From here, it the follows that P (δ = 0 X ) 1/2 (P ( v s (m θ ) > τ /C H X ) + P ( ˆσ 2 (θ) σ 2 (θ) > σ 2 L(θ)/2 X ) 1) 1/2 = (1[ v s (m θ ) > τ /C H] + 1[ ˆσ 2 (θ) σ 2 (θ) > σ 2 L(θ)/2]) 1/2. where the equality uses the fact that, coditioally o X, the evets v s (m θ ) > τ /C H ad ˆσ 2 (θ) σ 2 (θ) > σ 2 L(θ)/2 are o-stochastic. To complete the proof, it suffices to show that P (lim if v s (m θ ) > τ /C H) = 1 ad P (lim if ˆσ 2 (θ) σ 2 (θ) < σ 2 L(θ)/2) = 1. These two results follow from the LIL ad the SLLN, respectively. Part 2. If θ It(Θ I) the E[m j(z, θ)] > 0 for all j = 1,..., J. Let η mi j=1,...,j E[m j(z, θ)]/σ j(θ) > 0, σ 2 L(θ) mi j=1,...,j σ 2 j (θ), σ 2 H(θ) max j=1,...,j σ 2 j (θ), C L (1 + σ 2 L(θ)/(2σ 2 H)) 1/2, ad C H (1 σ 2 L(θ)/(2σ 2 H)) 1/2 > 0. By the same argumet as i part 1, we have the followig derivatio: v s (m θ ) τ /C H ˆσ 2 (θ) σ 2 (θ) σ 2 L(θ)/2 J j=1 ṽ s,j(m θ ) (σ j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ))/(τ /C H) C L σ j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ) C H J j=1 ( m,j(θ) E[m j(z, θ)]) /ˆσ,j(θ) τ C L σ j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ) C H J j=1 m,j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ) C L η τ j S m,j(θ)/ˆσ,j(θ) > τ = Q (θ) = 0, where all iclusios are based o elemetary argumets ad the last iclusio holds for all sufficietly large. From here, it the follows that lim if v s (m θ ) τ /C H lim if ˆσ 2 (θ) σ 2 (θ) σ 2 L(θ)/2 = lim if v s (m θ ) τ /C H ˆσ 2 (θ) σ 2 (θ) σ 2 L(θ)/2 lim ifq (θ) = 0. To complete the proof, it suffices to show that P (lim if v s (m θ ) > τ /C H) = 1 ad P (lim if ˆσ 2 (θ) σ 2 (θ) < σ 2 L(θ)/2) = 1. These two results follow from the LIL ad the SLLN, respectively. Proof of Theorem 3.3. This proof follows closely the argumets used to prove Theorem 3.2. The oly differece is that we replace Y i with Yi AA defied by Yi AA Ω 1/2 ρ ζ i(m j(zi, θ) m,j(θ))/ˆσ j(θ) ρ j=1. Proof of Theorem 3.4. This proof follows closely the argumets used to prove Theorem 3.2. The oly differece is that we replace Y i with Yi SS b SS defied by Yi Ω 1/2 ρ (m j(zi SS, θ) m,j(θ))/ˆσ j(θ) ρ j=1. Proof of Theorem 3.5. We show the results by slightly modifyig the argumets i Bugi (2014, Theorem A.15). Sice the structure of this proof is differet from the oe used to prove Theorems 3.3 or 3.4, we cover the mai differeces. Part 1. Defie δ SS 2 Q SS 2 (θ) G([vs,SS b (m, j,θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1), where v s,ss b( m SS,j(θ) m,j(θ))/ˆσ,j(θ). Parts (b)-(c) follow from Theorem 3.4 so we focus o part (a). (m j,θ) 8
9 For arbitrary δ (0, 1/2), let S j 1,..., J : E[m j(z, θ)] = 0, S 1,..., J/S, η mi j S E[m j(z, θ)]/σ j(θ) > 0, σ 2 L(θ) mi j=1,...,j σ 2 j (θ), λ max j=1,...,j(1 + δ) 2V [m j(z, θ)], ad let A defied as follows: A v s,ss (m j,θ) b (1 δ)/2 J j=1 v s (m j,θ ) λ l l J j=1 ˆσ 2 (θ) σ 2 (θ) σ 2 L(θ)/2. (A.3) For ay C > 0, otice that: be bp ( δ SS 2 > C (l l )b / X ) b P (A c X ) + b P ( δ SS 2 > C (l l )b / A X ). (A.4) The proof is completed by showig that the two terms o the RHS of Eq. (A.4) are o(1), a.s. We begi with the first term i the RHS of Eq. (A.4). Cosider the followig derivatio: bp (A c X ) = = J j=1 J j=1 bp ( v s,ss b (m, j,θ) > b (1 δ)/2 X ) + J j=1 bp ( v(m s j,θ ) > λ l l X )+ J j=1 bp ( ˆσ,j(θ) 2 σj 2 (θ) > σl(θ)/2 X 2 ) bp ( v s,ss b (m, j,θ) > b (1 δ)/2 X ) + J j=1 b1( v(m s j,θ ) > λ l l )+, b1( ˆσ,j(θ) 2 σj 2 (θ) > σl(θ)/2), 2 J j=1 where the first equality follows from elemetary argumets ad the secod equality follows from the fact that v (m j,θ ) X is determiistic. Fix j = 1,..., J ad ε > 0 arbitrarily. By the LIL, lim if v (m j,θ ) λ l l J j=1 a.s. ad so P (lim b 1( v (m j,θ ) > λ l l ) = 0) = 1. By the SLLN, lim if ˆσ 2,j(θ) σ 2 j (θ) σ 2 L(θ)/2 a.s. ad so P (lim b 1( ˆσ 2,j(θ) σ 2 j (θ) > σ 2 L(θ)/2) = 0) = 1. Next, cosider the followig derivatio: P (lim ifp ( v s,ss b (m, j,θ) > b (1 δ)/2 X ) b ε) ( ) lim ifp ( v s,ss b P (m, j,θ) > b (1 δ)/2 X )b (δ 1) (1 + ε) lim ifb (δ 1/2) (1 + ε) ε P (lim ifp ( v s,ss b (m, j,θ) > b (1 δ)/2 X )b (δ 1) (1 + ε)) +P (lim ifb (δ 1/2) (1 + ε) ε) 1 = P (lim ifp ( v s,ss b (m, j,θ) > b (1 δ)/2 X )b (δ 1) (1 + ε)) P (lim if1 1 + ε) = 1, where the two first two iequalities follow from elemetary argumets, the followig equality follows from b (δ 1/2) = o(1), ad the third iequality is show later i Eq. (A.5). To complete this argumet, cosider the followig derivatio: E(v s,ss = = b (m, j,θ) 2 X ) ( ( q 1 q s=1 b 1 q 1 q s=1 b 1 b a=1 b (mj(xss i,s, θ) m,j(θ)) 2 /ˆσ 2,j(θ)+ b b=1,b a (mj(xss a,s, θ) m,j(θ))(m j(x SS 1 (mj(xi, θ) m,j(θ))2 /ˆσ 2,j(θ)+ ) b,s, θ) m,j(θ))/ˆσ,j(θ) 2 ) +2 1 ( 1) 1 a=1 b=1,b a (mj(xa, θ) m,j(θ))(mj(x b, θ) m,j(θ))/ˆσ 2,j(θ) where the first equality holds by expadig squares, the followig equality holds by the fact that we are samplig without replacemet, ad the fial iequality holds by verifyig that, i the previous lie, the first term equals oe ad the secod term is o-positive by the egative associated produced by samplig without replacemet (see Joag-Dev ad Proscha (1983, Sectio 3.2(a))). Chebyshev s iequality the implies that 1 E(v s,ss b (m, j,θ) 2 X ) P ( v s,ss b (m, j,θ) > b (1 δ)/2 X )b (1 δ), (A.5) which completes the proof for the first term o the RHS of Eq. (A.4). 1, 9
10 We ow cosider the secod term RHS of Eq. (A.4). Coditio o X ad assume that A occurs. The, Q SS 2 (θ) = G([vs,SS b (m, j,θ) + b /v(m s j,θ ) + b E[m j(z, θ)]/ˆσ,j(θ)] J j=1) G([v s,ss b (m, j,θ) λ (l l )b / + b E[m j(z, θ)]/ˆσ,j(θ)] J j=1) [v s,ss G b (m, j,θ) λ J (l l )b /] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0]+ [ b 1/2 δ λ (l l )b / + b 2η] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] > 0] = G([v s,ss (m j,θ) λ (l l )b /] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1) G([v s,ss (m j,θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1 + λ (l l )b /1 J), j=1 (A.6) (A.7) where the first equality is elemetary, the secod iequality holds because G is icreasig ad A implies that v(m s j,θ ) λ l l, the secod iequality follows from the fact that A implies that v s,ss b (m, j,θ) > b (1 δ)/2, the ext equality follows for all large eough as η, λ, δ > 0, ad the fial iequality holds by elemetary argumets. By usig similar argumets, we ca establish a aalogous lower boud for Q s,ss 2 (θ). As a cosequece, if A occurs, Q SS 2 (θ) [ G([v s,ss (m j,θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1 λ (l l )b /1 J), G([v s,ss (m j,θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1 + λ (l l )b /1 J) By Assumptio CF.2, x R J ad ε > 0, D > 0 s.t. G(x + ε) G(x) D ε. If we set C = Dλ > 0, δ SS 2 b =, QSS 2 (θ) G([vs,SS b (m, j,θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1) max r 1,1 G([v s,ss (m j,θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1 + rλ (l l )b /1 J) G([v s,ss (m j,θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1) D λ (l l )b / 1 J = Dλ (l l )b /. This completes the argumet for the secod term o the RHS of Eq. (A.4). Part 2. Sice Q SS 2 b (θ) 0, it suffices to show that, b P (Q SS 2 (θ) > 0 X) = o(1). For arbitrary δ (0, 1/2), let η mi j=1,...,j E[m j(z, θ)]/σ j(θ) > 0 ad let A be defied as i Eq. (A.3). By elemetary argumets bp (Q SS 2 b (θ) > 0 X), b P (A c X ) + b P (Q SS 2 (θ) > 0 A X). We ca ow repeat argumets used i part 1 to argue that both terms o the RHS are o(1), a.s. O the oe had, the same argumet as i part 1 implies that b P (A c X ) = o(1) a.s. O the other had, if A occurs, the argumet used i Eq. (A.6) implies that Q SS 2 (θ) G([ b1/2 δ λ (l l )b / + η2 b ] J j=1). Sice η, δ > 0, the RHS expressio is equal to zero for all large eough. This the implies that b P (Q SS 2 (θ) > 0 A X) = o(1), completig the proof. A.2 Proofs of itermediate results Lemma A.1. Assume Assumptio A.1 ad that θ Θ satisfies E[ m(z, θ) 2+ψ ] < for some ψ > 0. For all j = 1,..., J, [ E m j(z i, θ) E[m j(z i, θ)] 2+ψ] <, E [ (m j(z i, θ) E[m j(z i, θ)]) 2 σ 2 j (θ) 1+ψ/2] <. ] Proof. Fix j = 1,..., J arbitrarily ad let σ 2 σ 2 j (θ) ad M i m j(z i, θ) for all i = 1,...,. By Assumptio A.5 ad Holder s iequality, E[ M i ] 2+ψ E[ M i 2+ψ ] <. Aother applicatio of Holder s iequality yields M i E[M i] 2+ψ M i 2+ψ + E[M i] 2+ψ ad, so, E M i E[M i] 2+ψ E M i 2+ψ + E[M i] 2+ψ <. This proves the first result. 10
11 Defie Y i (M i E[M i]) 2 /σ 2 1 ad φ ψ/2. By defiitio, [ E[ (M i E[M i]) 2 σ 2 1+φ ] = σ 2+φ (Mi E[Mi])2 1+φ] E 1 = σ 2+φ E[ Y i 1+φ ]. σ 2 So, it suffices to show that E[ Y i 1+φ ] <. For the remaider of the proof let β > 1 be arbitrarily chose. Notice that E[ Y i 1+φ ] = E[ Y i 1+φ 1[ Y i > β]] + E[ Y i 1+φ 1[ Y i β]] E[ Y i 1+φ 1[ Y i > β]] + β 1+φ. So, it suffices to show that E[ Y i 1+φ 1[ Y i > β]] <. Sice β > 1, it follows that (M i E[M i]) 2 Y i > β > β + 1 σ 2 Y i (Mi E[Mi])2 σ 2 ad, therefore, E[ Y i 1+φ 1[ Y i > β]] E [ E [ Mi E[Mi] σ Mi E[Mi] σ 2+ψ [ (Mi E[M i]) 2 ] ] 1 > β + 1 σ 2 ] 2+ψ = 1 σ 2+ψ E[ Mi E[Mi] 2+ψ ] <. This proves the secod result ad completes the proof. Remark A.1. Lemma A.1 ca be used with ψ = 2 uder Assumptio A.5 or with ψ > 4 uder Assumptio A.5. Lemma A.2. Assume Assumptio A.1 ad that θ Θ satisfies Assumptio A.5. For all j = 1,..., J ad c > 0, P [ v s,j(θ) > c ] = o( 1/2 ). Proof. For ay ψ > 0, cosider the followig argumet based o Chebyshev s iequality: P [ v s,j(θ) > c ] (2+ψ)c = P [ v s,j(θ) 2+ψ > (2+ψ)c ] (2+ψ)c E[ v,j(θ) s 2+ψ ] = E 2+ψ [m j(z, θ) E[m j(z, θ)]] 1/2 σ j(θ) = σ (2+ψ) j (θ) 1 ψ/2 E 2+ψ [m j(z, θ) E[m j(z, θ)]] [( )] σ (2+ψ) j (θ) 1 ψ/2 E m j(z, θ) E[m j(z, θ)] 2+ψ [ σ (2+ψ) j (θ) ψ/2 E m j(z, θ) E[m j(z, θ)] 2+ψ]. From this, Lemma A.1 with ψ = 2, ad Assumptio A.5, we coclude that where we have used that c > 0 ad ψ 1. P [ v s,j(θ) > c ] = O( ψ/2 (2+ψ)c ) = o( 1/2 ), 11
12 Lemma A.3. Assume Assumptio CF.1 ad that θ Θ I satisfies Assumptio A.4. The, δ,2 i Eq. (A.2) satisfies [ ( ) ] δ,2 1 max j=1,...,j ˆσ,j (θ) σ j (θ) β 1 G([v,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1), mi j=1,...,j σ j (θ) Proof. For each j = 1,..., J, defie v L,j(θ) miṽ s,j(θ), v s,j(θ) ad v H,j(θ) maxṽ s,j(θ), v s,j(θ). Sice θ Θ I, E[m(Z, θ)] 0 J. Defie S 0, (θ) j = 1,..., J : E[m j(z, θ)] = 0 v L,j(θ) < 0 (which may be empty). First, cosider the case whe S 0, (θ) =. I this case, either E[m j(z, θ)] > 0 or 0 v L,j(θ) v H,j(θ) for all j = 1,..., J. Therefore, [ṽ s,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1 = [v s,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1 = 0 J, ad, thus, δ,2 = 0, ad the statemet holds. Secod, cosider the case whe S 0, (θ). Defie α max j S0, (θ)v L,j(θ)/v H,j(θ) 1. Now cosider the followig derivatio: α β G([v H,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1) = G([αv H,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] j S0, (θ), 0 j S0, (θ)) G([v L,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] j S0, (θ), 0 j S0, (θ)) = G([v L,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1) where the first equality follows from homogeeity of degree β ad the fact that [αv H,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] = 0 for all j S 0, (θ), the first iequality follows from the mootoicity of G ad αv H,j(θ) < v L,j(θ)/v H,j(θ)v H,j(θ) = v L,j(θ) for all j S 0, (θ), ad the fial equality follows from the fact that [v L,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] = 0 for all j S 0, (θ). From here, cosider the followig derivatio: δ,2 G([v L,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1) G([v H,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1) (α β 1)G([v,j(θ)] H 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1) [ ( ) β ˆσ,j(θ) max max j=1,...,j σ, σ j(θ) 1] G([v,j(θ)] s 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1) j(θ) ˆσ,j(θ) ) β ˆσ (max j=1,...,j max,j (θ) σ j (θ) σ L + 1, 1 (θ) 1 1 ˆσ,j (θ) σ j (θ) σ L (θ) G([v,j(θ)] s 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1) [ ( ) β maxj=1,...,j ˆσ,j(θ) σj(θ) 1 1] G([v,j(θ)] s 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1), σ L(θ) where all iequalities are elemetary ad based o the defiitio of α ad the mootoicity of G. Lemma A.4. Assume Assumptio CF.1 ad that θ Θ I satisfies Assumptio A.4. The, c > 0, N N s.t. N, δ,2 i Eq. (A.2) satisfies max ˆσ,j(θ) σj(θ) 1/2 2c j=1,...,j max j=1,...,k vs,j(θ) c/2β Proof. First, assume that max j=1,...,j ˆσ,j(θ) σ j(θ) 1/2 2c. δ,2 1/2 c. This implies that max j=1,...,j ˆσ,j(θ) σ j(θ) / mi j=1,...,j σ j(θ) 1/2 for all sufficietly large. For x [0, 1/2] cosider the fuctio f(x) = (1 x) β 1. By the itermediate value theorem, there is x [0, 1/2] s.t. f(x) < β2 (β+1) x. Therefore, [ ( 1 ) β maxj=1,...,j ˆσ,j(θ) σj(θ) 1] mi j=1,...,j σ j(θ) f(x) = f(0) + f ( x)x = β(1 x) (β+1) x ad, so, β2 (β+1) max ˆσ,j(θ) σj(θ) j=1,...,j β2(β+1) 1/2 2c. 12
13 Secod, assume that max j=1,...,j v,j(θ) c/2β. If we combie this with the mootoicity ad the homogeeity of G we deduce that G([v s,j(θ)] 1[E[m j(z, θ)] = 0] J j=1) c/2 G(1 J j=1). By combiig these two steps with Lemma A.3, we coclude that max j=1,...,j ˆσ,j(θ) σ j(θ) 1/2 2c ad max j=1,...,j v s,j(θ) c/2β imply that, for all sufficietly large, δ,2 β2 (β+1) 1/2 2c c/2 G(1 J j=1) β2 (β+1) G(1 J j=1) 1/2 1.5c. The RHS is less tha 1/2 c for all sufficietly large, ad this completes the proof. Lemma A.5. Assume Assumptio A.1 ad that θ Θ satisfies E[ m(z, θ) 2+ψ ] < for some ψ > 0. For all j = 1,..., J ad ay sequece a 1 = o(1), P ( σ,j(θ) σ j(θ) > σa )(3σ j(θ)a ) 1+ψ/2 ψ/2 E[ (m j(z i, θ) E[m j(z i, θ)]) 2 σ 2 j (θ) 1+ψ/2 ]. Proof. Cosider the followig argumet: P ( σ,j(θ) σ j(θ) > σ j(θ)a ) = P ( σ,j(θ) σ j(θ) > σ j(θ)a σ,j(θ) σ j(θ) < σ j(θ)a ) = P ( σ,j(θ) > σ j(θ) (1 + a ) σ,j(θ) < σ j(θ) (1 a )) ( ( σ 2,j (θ) σj 2 (θ)) > σj 2 (θ)(2a + a 2 ) ) = P ( σ 2,j (θ) σj 2 (θ)) < σj 2 (θ)( 2a + a 2 ) P ( ( σ 2,j(θ) σ 2 j (θ)) > σ 2 j (θ)(2a + a 2 ) ) +P ( ( σ 2,j(θ) σ 2 j (θ)) < σ 2 j (θ)( 2a + a 2 ) ) P ( ( σ 2,j(θ) σ 2 j (θ)) > 3σ 2 j (θ)a ) + P ( ( σ 2,j (θ) σ 2 j (θ)) > 3σ 2 j (θ)a ) P ( σ 2,j(θ) σ 2 j (θ) > 3σ 2 j (θ)a ), where all relatioships are elemetary ad we have used that a = o(1) implies that there is large eough s.t. 2a + a 2 < 3a ad 2a + a 2 > 3a. From here we coclude that P ( σ,j(θ) σ j(θ) > σ j(θ)a )(3σ j(θ)a ) 1+ψ/2 P ( σ 2,j(θ) σ 2 j (θ) > 3σ 2 j (θ)a )(3σ j(θ)a ) 1+ψ/2 where we have used Markov s ad Holder s iequalities. E( σ,j(θ) 2 σj 2 (θ) 1+ψ/2 ) ( = E (mj(zi, θ) E[mj(Zi, θ)])2 σ 2 j (θ) ) 1+ψ/2 ( = ψ/2 E (mj(zi, θ) E[mj(Zi, ) θ)])2 σj 2 (θ) 1+ψ/2 ( ψ/2 E (mj(zi, θ) E[mj(Zi, ) θ)])2 σj 2 (θ) 1+ψ/2 [ = ψ/2 E (m j(z i, θ) E[m j(z i, θ)]) 2 σj 2 (θ) 1+ψ/2], Lemma A.6. Assume Assumptio A.1 ad that θ Θ satisfies E[ m(z, θ) 2+ψ ] < for some ψ > 0. For all j = 1,..., J ad ay sequece a 1 = o(1), P ( σ,j(θ) ˆσ,j(θ) > a )(3σ j(θ)a ) 1+ψ/2 1 ψ E[ m j(z i, θ) E[m j(z i, θ)] 2+ψ ] + ψ/2 E[ (m j(z i, θ) E[m j(z i, θ)]) 2 σ 2 j (θ) 1+ψ/2 ]. 13
14 Proof. First, cosider the followig argumet: P ( σ,j(θ) ˆσ,j(θ) > a ) (3σ j(θ)a ) 1+ψ/2 = P ( σ 2,j(θ) ˆσ 2,j(θ) 1+ψ/2 > (3σ j(θ)a ) 1+ψ/2 )(3σ j(θ)a ) 1+ψ/2 E( σ,j(θ) 2 ˆσ,j(θ) 2 1+ψ/2 ) ( = E [(mj(zi, θ) m,j(θ))2 (m j(z i, θ) E[m j(z i, θ)]) 2 ] 1+ψ/2 ) = E( m,j(θ) E[m j(z i, θ)] 2+ψ ) 1 ψ E( m j(z i, θ) E[m j(z i, θ)] 2+ψ ), where every relatioship is elemetary. Now, cosider the followig derivatio: P ( σ,j(θ) ˆσ,j(θ) > a ) = P (ˆσ,j(θ) > a + σ,j(θ) ˆσ,j(θ) < a + σ,j(θ)) = P (ˆσ,j(θ) 2 σ,j(θ) 2 > a 2 + 2a σ,j(θ) ˆσ,j(θ) 2 σ,j(θ) 2 < a 2 2a σ,j(θ)) P (ˆσ,j(θ) 2 σ,j(θ) 2 > a 2 (1 + 2σ j(θ)) + 2a σ j(θ) ˆσ,j(θ) 2 σ,j(θ) 2 < a 2 a 2 (1 + 2σ j(θ)) 2a σ j(θ)) +P ( σ,j(θ) ˆσ,j(θ) > σ j(θ)a ) P ( ˆσ,j(θ) 2 σ,j(θ) 2 > 3a 2 σ j(θ)) + P ( σ,j(θ) ˆσ,j(θ) > σ j(θ)a ), where all relatioships are elemetary ad we have used that a = o(1) implies that there is large eough s.t. a 2 (1 + 2σ j(θ)) + 2a σ j(θ) < 3a σ j(θ) ad a 2 (1 + 2σ j(θ)) 2a σ j(θ) > 3a σ j(θ). From here we coclude that P ( σ,j(θ) ˆσ,j(θ) > a )(3σ j(θ)a ) 1+ψ/2 P ( ˆσ,j(θ) 2 ˆσ,j(θ) 2 > 3a σ j(θ))(3σ j(θ)a ) 1+ψ/2 + P ( σ,j(θ) σ j(θ) > σ j(θ)a )(3σ j(θ)a ) 1+ψ/2 1 ψ E( m j(z i, θ) E[m j(z i, θ)] 2+ψ ) + ψ/2 E[ (m j(z i, θ) E[m j(z i, θ)]) 2 σj 2 (θ) 1+ψ/2 ], where we have used Lemma A.5. Lemma A.7. Assume Assumptio A.1 ad that θ Θ satisfies E[ m(z, θ) 2+ψ ] < for some ψ > 0. For all j = 1,..., J ad ay sequece a 1 = o(1), P ( ˆσ,j(θ) σ j(θ) > 2a )(3σ j(θ)a ) 1+ψ/2 1 ψ E[ m j(z i, θ) E[m j(z i, θ)] 2+ψ ] + ψ/2 2E[ (m j(z i, θ) E[m j(z i, θ)]) 2 σj 2 (θ) 1+ψ/2 ]. Proof. By triagular iequality, ˆσ,j(θ) σ j(θ) ˆσ,j(θ) σ,j(θ) + σ,j(θ) σ j(θ) ad therefore P ( ˆσ,j(θ) σ j(θ) > 2a ) P ( ˆσ,j(θ) σ,j(θ) > a σ,j(θ) σ j(θ) > a ) P ( ˆσ,j(θ) σ,j(θ) > a ) + P ( σ,j(θ) σ j(θ) > a ). The result follows from the previous iequality ad Lemmas A.5 ad A.6. Lemma A.8. Assume Assumptio A.1 ad that θ Θ satisfies E[ m(z, θ) 2+ψ ] < for some ψ > 0. For all j = 1,..., J ad ay c > 0, P ( ˆσ,j(θ) σ j(θ) > 1/2 c ) = O( 1/2 ψ/4+(1+ψ/2)c ). Uder Assumptio A.5 the RHS expressio is o( 1/2 ) for a choice of c > 0 that is small eough. Proof. Let c (0, 1/2). By Lemmas A.1 ad A.7 applied to a = 1/2 c /2 = o(1), we coclude that P ( ˆσ,j(θ) σ j(θ) > 1/2 c ) = (3σ 1/2 c /2) 1 ψ/2 O( 1 ψ + ψ/2 ) = O( 1/2 ψ/4+(1+ψ/2)c ). 14
15 To complete the proof, we otice that O( 1/2 ψ/4+(1+ψ/2)c ) = o( 1/2 ) if ad oly if ψ > (4 + 2ψ)c + 4. By makig c arbitrarily small, the coditio ca be achieved wheever ψ > 4, i.e., uder Assumptio A.5. Refereces Bugi, F. A. (2014): A compariso of iferetial methods i partially idetified models i terms of error i coverage probability (Formerly circulated as Bootstrap Iferece i Partially Idetified Models Defied by Momet Iequalities: Coverage of the Elemets of the Idetified Set ), Accepted for publicatio i Ecoometric Theory o August 11, Joag-Dev, K. ad F. Proscha (1983): Negative associatio of radom variables with applicatios, The Aals of Statistics, 11,
Homework for 1/27 Due 2/5
Name: ID: Homework for /7 Due /5. [ 8-3] I Example D of Sectio 8.4, the pdf of the populatio distributio is + αx x f(x α) =, α, otherwise ad the method of momets estimate was foud to be ˆα = 3X (where
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLast Lecture. Biostatistics Statistical Inference Lecture 19 Likelihood Ratio Test. Example of Hypothesis Testing.
Last Lecture Biostatistics 602 - Statistical Iferece Lecture 19 Likelihood Ratio Test Hyu Mi Kag March 26th, 2013 Describe the followig cocepts i your ow words Hypothesis Null Hypothesis Alterative Hypothesis
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSUPPLEMENT TO ROBUSTNESS, INFINITESIMAL NEIGHBORHOODS, AND MOMENT RESTRICTIONS (Econometrica, Vol. 81, No. 3, May 2013, )
Ecoometrica Supplemetary Material SUPPLEMENT TO ROBUSTNESS, INFINITESIMAL NEIGHBORHOODS, AND MOMENT RESTRICTIONS (Ecoometrica, Vol. 81, No. 3, May 213, 1185 121) BY YUICHI KITAMURA,TAISUKE OTSU, ANDKIRILL
Διαβάστε περισσότερα1. For each of the following power series, find the interval of convergence and the radius of convergence:
Math 6 Practice Problems Solutios Power Series ad Taylor Series 1. For each of the followig power series, fid the iterval of covergece ad the radius of covergece: (a ( 1 x Notice that = ( 1 +1 ( x +1.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSolutions: Homework 3
Solutios: Homework 3 Suppose that the radom variables Y,, Y satisfy Y i = βx i + ε i : i,, where x,, x R are fixed values ad ε,, ε Normal0, σ ) with σ R + kow Fid ˆβ = MLEβ) IND Solutio: Observe that Y
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 17: Minimum Variance Unbiased (MVUB) Estimators
ECE 830 Fall 2011 Statistical Sigal Processig istructor: R. Nowak, scribe: Iseok Heo Lecture 17: Miimum Variace Ubiased (MVUB Estimators Ultimately, we would like to be able to argue that a give estimator
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIntroduction of Numerical Analysis #03 TAGAMI, Daisuke (IMI, Kyushu University)
Itroductio of Numerical Aalysis #03 TAGAMI, Daisuke (IMI, Kyushu Uiversity) web page of the lecture: http://www2.imi.kyushu-u.ac.jp/~tagami/lec/ Strategy of Numerical Simulatios Pheomea Error modelize
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle
Chemistry 460 Sprig 015 Dr. Jea M. Stadard March, 015 The Heiseberg Ucertaity Priciple A policema pulls Werer Heiseberg over o the Autobah for speedig. Policema: Sir, do you kow how fast you were goig?
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΜια εισαγωγή στα Μαθηματικά για Οικονομολόγους
Μια εισαγωγή στα Μαθηματικά για Οικονομολόγους Μαθηματικά Ικανές και αναγκαίες συνθήκες Έστω δυο προτάσεις Α και Β «Α είναι αναγκαία συνθήκη για την Β» «Α είναι ικανή συνθήκη για την Β» Α is ecessary for
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSupplemental Material: Scaling Up Sparse Support Vector Machines by Simultaneous Feature and Sample Reduction
Supplemetal Material: Scalig Up Sparse Support Vector Machies by Simultaeous Feature ad Sample Reductio Weizhog Zhag * 2 Bi Hog * 3 Wei Liu 2 Jiepig Ye 3 Deg Cai Xiaofei He Jie Wag 3 State Key Lab of CAD&CG,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΨηφιακή Επεξεργασία Εικόνας
ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΙΩΑΝΝΙΝΩΝ ΑΝΟΙΚΤΑ ΑΚΑΔΗΜΑΪΚΑ ΜΑΘΗΜΑΤΑ Ψηφιακή Επεξεργασία Εικόνας Φιλτράρισμα στο πεδίο των συχνοτήτων Διδάσκων : Αναπληρωτής Καθηγητής Νίκου Χριστόφορος Άδειες Χρήσης Το παρόν εκπαιδευτικό
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA study on generalized absolute summability factors for a triangular matrix
Proceedigs of the Estoia Acadey of Scieces, 20, 60, 2, 5 20 doi: 0.376/proc.20.2.06 Available olie at www.eap.ee/proceedigs A study o geeralized absolute suability factors for a triagular atrix Ere Savaş
Διαβάστε περισσότεραProof of Lemmas Lemma 1 Consider ξ nt = r
Supplemetary Material to "GMM Estimatio of Spatial Pael Data Models with Commo Factors ad Geeral Space-Time Filter" (Not for publicatio) Wei Wag & Lug-fei Lee April 207 Proof of Lemmas Lemma Cosider =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSupplement to A theoretical framework for Bayesian nonparametric regression: random series and rates of contraction
Supplemet to A theoretical framework for Bayesia oparametric regressio: radom series ad rates of cotractio A Proof of Theorem 31 Proof of Theorem 31 First defie the followig quatity: ɛ = 3 t α, δ = α α
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn Certain Subclass of λ-bazilevič Functions of Type α + iµ
Tamsui Oxford Joural of Mathematical Scieces 23(2 (27 141-153 Aletheia Uiversity O Certai Subclass of λ-bailevič Fuctios of Type α + iµ Zhi-Gag Wag, Chu-Yi Gao, ad Shao-Mou Yua College of Mathematics ad
Διαβάστε περισσότεραp n r.01.05.10.15.20.25.30.35.40.45.50.55.60.65.70.75.80.85.90.95
r r Table 4 Biomial Probability Distributio C, r p q This table shows the probability of r successes i idepedet trials, each with probability of success p. p r.01.05.10.15.0.5.30.35.40.45.50.55.60.65.70.75.80.85.90.95
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn Generating Relations of Some Triple. Hypergeometric Functions
It. Joural of Math. Aalysis, Vol. 5,, o., 5 - O Geeratig Relatios of Some Triple Hypergeometric Fuctios Fadhle B. F. Mohse ad Gamal A. Qashash Departmet of Mathematics, Faculty of Educatio Zigibar Ade
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOther Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests
Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Side-Note: So far we have seen a few approaches for creating tests such as Neyman-Pearson Lemma ( most powerful tests of H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 :
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSupplementary Materials: Trading Computation for Communication: Distributed Stochastic Dual Coordinate Ascent
Supplemetary Materials: Tradig Computatio for Commuicatio: istributed Stochastic ual Coordiate Ascet Tiabao Yag NEC Labs America, Cupertio, CA 954 tyag@ec-labs.com Proof of Theorem ad Theorem For the proof
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEvery set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set May 6, 2008 Abstract A set of first-order formulas, whatever the cardinality of the set of symbols, is equivalent to an independent
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2 Composition. Invertible Mappings
Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan Composition. Invertible Mappings In this section we discuss two procedures for creating new mappings from old ones, namely,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΣτα επόμενα θεωρούμε ότι όλα συμβαίνουν σε ένα χώρο πιθανότητας ( Ω,,P) Modes of convergence: Οι τρόποι σύγκλισης μιας ακολουθίας τ.μ.
Στα πόμνα θωρούμ ότι όλα συμβαίνουν σ ένα χώρο πιθανότητας ( Ω,,). Modes of covergece: Οι τρόποι σύγκλισης μιας ακολουθίας τ.μ. { } ίναι οι ξής: σ μια τ.μ.. Ισχυρή σύγκλιση strog covergece { } lim = =.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II
ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II 2014/2015: Semester II Tutorial 7 1. Let X be a sample from a population P and consider testing hypotheses H 0 : P = P 0 versus H 1 : P = P 1, where P j is a known
Διαβάστε περισσότερα1. Matrix Algebra and Linear Economic Models
Matrix Algebra ad Liear Ecoomic Models Refereces Ch 3 (Turkigto); Ch 4 5 (Klei) [] Motivatio Oe market equilibrium Model Assume perfectly competitive market: Both buyers ad sellers are price-takers Demad:
Διαβάστε περισσότεραL.K.Gupta (Mathematic Classes) www.pioeermathematics.com MOBILE: 985577, 4677 + {JEE Mai 04} Sept 0 Name: Batch (Day) Phoe No. IT IS NOT ENOUGH TO HAVE A GOOD MIND, THE MAIN THING IS TO USE IT WELL Marks:
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSolve the difference equation
Solve the differece equatio Solutio: y + 3 3y + + y 0 give tat y 0 4, y 0 ad y 8. Let Z{y()} F() Taig Z-trasform o both sides i (), we get y + 3 3y + + y 0 () Z y + 3 3y + + y Z 0 Z y + 3 3Z y + + Z y
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLAD Estimation for Time Series Models With Finite and Infinite Variance
LAD Estimatio for Time Series Moels With Fiite a Ifiite Variace Richar A. Davis Colorao State Uiversity William Dusmuir Uiversity of New South Wales 1 LAD Estimatio for ARMA Moels fiite variace ifiite
Διαβάστε περισσότεραC.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions
C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions Paul Liu November 15, 2007 Note that these are sample solutions only; in many cases there were many acceptable answers. 1 Reynolds Problem 10.1 1.1 Normal-order
Διαβάστε περισσότεραINTEGRATION OF THE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION CURVE
INTEGRATION OF THE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION CURVE By Tom Irvie Email: tomirvie@aol.com March 3, 999 Itroductio May processes have a ormal probability distributio. Broadbad radom vibratio is a example. The purpose
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPresentation of complex number in Cartesian and polar coordinate system
1 a + bi, aεr, bεr i = 1 z = a + bi a = Re(z), b = Im(z) give z = a + bi & w = c + di, a + bi = c + di a = c & b = d The complex cojugate of z = a + bi is z = a bi The sum of complex cojugates is real:
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIIT JEE (2013) (Trigonomtery 1) Solutions
L.K. Gupta (Mathematic Classes) www.pioeermathematics.com MOBILE: 985577, 677 (+) PAPER B IIT JEE (0) (Trigoomtery ) Solutios TOWARDS IIT JEE IS NOT A JOURNEY, IT S A BATTLE, ONLY THE TOUGHEST WILL SURVIVE
Διαβάστε περισσότεραUniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor
Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor Given f L 1 T 1 ), we consider the partial sums of the Fourier series of f: N 1) S N fθ) = ˆfk)e ikθ. k= N A calculation gives the Dirichlet formula
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSUPERPOSITION, MEASUREMENT, NORMALIZATION, EXPECTATION VALUES. Reading: QM course packet Ch 5 up to 5.6
SUPERPOSITION, MEASUREMENT, NORMALIZATION, EXPECTATION VALUES Readig: QM course packet Ch 5 up to 5. 1 ϕ (x) = E = π m( a) =1,,3,4,5 for xa (x) = πx si L L * = πx L si L.5 ϕ' -.5 z 1 (x) = L si
Διαβάστε περισσότεραn r f ( n-r ) () x g () r () x (1.1) = Σ g() x = Σ n f < -n+ r> g () r -n + r dx r dx n + ( -n,m) dx -n n+1 1 -n -1 + ( -n,n+1)
8 Higher Derivative of the Product of Two Fuctios 8. Leibiz Rule about the Higher Order Differetiatio Theorem 8.. (Leibiz) Whe fuctios f ad g f g are times differetiable, the followig epressio holds. r
Διαβάστε περισσότεραw o = R 1 p. (1) R = p =. = 1
Πανεπιστήµιο Κρήτης - Τµήµα Επιστήµης Υπολογιστών ΗΥ-570: Στατιστική Επεξεργασία Σήµατος 205 ιδάσκων : Α. Μουχτάρης Τριτη Σειρά Ασκήσεων Λύσεις Ασκηση 3. 5.2 (a) From the Wiener-Hopf equation we have:
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in
Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in : tail in X, head in A nowhere-zero Γ-flow is a Γ-circulation such that
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExample Sheet 3 Solutions
Example Sheet 3 Solutions. i Regular Sturm-Liouville. ii Singular Sturm-Liouville mixed boundary conditions. iii Not Sturm-Liouville ODE is not in Sturm-Liouville form. iv Regular Sturm-Liouville note
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 3: Asymptotic Normality of M-estimators
Lecture 3: Asymptotic Istructor: Departmet of Ecoomics Staford Uiversity Prepared by Webo Zhou, Remi Uiversity Refereces Takeshi Amemiya, 1985, Advaced Ecoometrics, Harvard Uiversity Press Newey ad McFadde,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραProblem Set 3: Solutions
CMPSCI 69GG Applied Information Theory Fall 006 Problem Set 3: Solutions. [Cover and Thomas 7.] a Define the following notation, C I p xx; Y max X; Y C I p xx; Ỹ max I X; Ỹ We would like to show that C
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn Inclusion Relation of Absolute Summability
It. J. Cotemp. Math. Scieces, Vol. 5, 2010, o. 53, 2641-2646 O Iclusio Relatio of Absolute Summability Aradhaa Dutt Jauhari A/66 Suresh Sharma Nagar Bareilly UP) Idia-243006 aditya jauhari@rediffmail.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOrdinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit
Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ting Zhang Stanford May 11, 2001 Stanford, 5/11/2001 1 Outline Ordinal Classification Ordinal Addition Ordinal Multiplication Ordinal
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMATH 38061/MATH48061/MATH68061: MULTIVARIATE STATISTICS Solutions to Problems on Matrix Algebra
MATH 38061/MATH48061/MATH68061: MULTIVARIATE STATISTICS Solutios to Poblems o Matix Algeba 1 Let A be a squae diagoal matix takig the fom a 11 0 0 0 a 22 0 A 0 0 a pp The ad So, log det A t log A t log
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThree Classical Tests; Wald, LM(Score), and LR tests
Eco 60 Three Classical Tests; Wald, MScore, ad R tests Suppose that we have the desity l y; θ of a model with the ull hypothesis of the form H 0 ; θ θ 0. et θ be the lo-likelihood fuctio of the model ad
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDiane Hu LDA for Audio Music April 12, 2010
Diae Hu LDA for Audio Music April, 00 Terms Model Terms (per sog: Variatioal Terms: p( α Γ( i α i i Γ(α i p( p(, β p(c, A j Σ i α i i i ( V / ep β (i j ij (3 q( γ Γ( i γ i i Γ(γ i q( φ q( ω { } (c A T
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEcon 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1
Eon : Fall 8 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 Email questions or omments to Dan Fetter Problem. Let X be a salar with density f(x, θ) (θx + θ) [ x ] with θ. (a) Find the most powerful level α test
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Two-Sided Laplace Inversion Algorithm with Computable Error Bounds and Its Applications in Financial Engineering
Electronic Companion A Two-Sie Laplace Inversion Algorithm with Computable Error Bouns an Its Applications in Financial Engineering Ning Cai, S. G. Kou, Zongjian Liu HKUST an Columbia University Appenix
Διαβάστε περισσότεραBessel function for complex variable
Besse fuctio for compex variabe Kauhito Miuyama May 4, 7 Besse fuctio The Besse fuctio Z ν () is the fuctio wich satisfies + ) ( + ν Z ν () =. () Three kids of the soutios of this equatio are give by {
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS
CHAPTER 5 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS EXERCISE 104 Page 8 1. Find the positive root of the equation x + 3x 5 = 0, correct to 3 significant figures, using the method of bisection. Let f(x) =
Διαβάστε περισσότερα4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)
84 CHAPTER 4. STATIONARY TS MODELS 4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(,) This section is an introduction to a wide class of models ARMA(p,q) which we will consider in more detail later in this
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 3 Solutions
Homework 3 Solutions Igor Yanovsky (Math 151A TA) Problem 1: Compute the absolute error and relative error in approximations of p by p. (Use calculator!) a) p π, p 22/7; b) p π, p 3.141. Solution: For
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStatistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests
Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Shirsendu Mukherjee Department of Statistics, Asutosh College, Kolkata, India. shirsendu st@yahoo.co.in So far we have treated the testing of one-sided
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Equivalence Theorem in Optimal Design
he Equivalece heorem i Optimal Desig Raier Schwabe & homas Schmelter, Otto vo Guericke Uiversity agdeburg Bayer Scherig Pharma, Berli rschwabe@ovgu.de PODE 007 ay 4, 007 Outlie Prologue: Simple eamples.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMatrices and Determinants
Matrices and Determinants SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Q 1. For what value of k do the following system of equations possess a non-trivial (i.e., not all zero) solution over the set of rationals Q? x + ky + 3z
Διαβάστε περισσότεραBiorthogonal Wavelets and Filter Banks via PFFS. Multiresolution Analysis (MRA) subspaces V j, and wavelet subspaces W j. f X n f, τ n φ τ n φ.
Chapter 3. Biorthogoal Wavelets ad Filter Baks via PFFS 3.0 PFFS applied to shift-ivariat subspaces Defiitio: X is a shift-ivariat subspace if h X h( ) τ h X. Ex: Multiresolutio Aalysis (MRA) subspaces
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018
Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics(JRM) ISSN: 2395-028 SCITECH Volume 3, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION ublished online: March 29, 208 Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics www.scitecresearch.com/journals
Διαβάστε περισσότεραORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER
ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER Abstract. We define ordinal arithmetic and show laws of Left- Monotonicity, Associativity, Distributivity, some minor related properties and the Cantor Normal Form.
Διαβάστε περισσότερα= {{D α, D α }, D α }. = [D α, 4iσ µ α α D α µ ] = 4iσ µ α α [Dα, D α ] µ.
PHY 396 T: SUSY Solutions for problem set #1. Problem 2(a): First of all, [D α, D 2 D α D α ] = {D α, D α }D α D α {D α, D α } = {D α, D α }D α + D α {D α, D α } (S.1) = {{D α, D α }, D α }. Second, {D
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFinite Field Problems: Solutions
Finite Field Problems: Solutions 1. Let f = x 2 +1 Z 11 [x] and let F = Z 11 [x]/(f), a field. Let Solution: F =11 2 = 121, so F = 121 1 = 120. The possible orders are the divisors of 120. Solution: The
Διαβάστε περισσότεραUniform Estimates for Distributions of the Sum of i.i.d. Random Variables with Fat Tail in the Threshold Case
J. Math. Sci. Uiv. Tokyo 8 (2, 397 427. Uiform Estimates for Distributios of the Sum of i.i.d. om Variables with Fat Tail i the Threshold Case By Keji Nakahara Abstract. We show uiform estimates for distributios
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEE512: Error Control Coding
EE512: Error Control Coding Solution for Assignment on Finite Fields February 16, 2007 1. (a) Addition and Multiplication tables for GF (5) and GF (7) are shown in Tables 1 and 2. + 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 3
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.
Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequalit for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x,, z X. Prove that d(x, z) d(, z) d(x, ). (ii): Reverse triangle inequalit for norms:
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals
Lecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals Confidence Intervals θ: an unknown parameter of interest We want to find limits θ and θ such that Gt = P nˆθ θ t If G 1 1 α is known, then P θ θ = P θ θ = 1 α
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCOMMON RANDOM FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN SYMMETRIC SPACES
Iteratioal Joural of Avacemets i Research & Techology, Volume, Issue, Jauary-03 ISSN 78-7763 COMMON RANDOM FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN SYMMETRIC SPACES Dr Neetu Vishwakarma a Dr M S Chauha Sagar Istitute of
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDegenerate Perturbation Theory
R.G. Griffi BioNMR School page 1 Degeerate Perturbatio Theory 1.1 Geeral Whe cosiderig the CROSS EFFECT it is ecessary to deal with degeerate eergy levels ad therefore degeerate perturbatio theory. The
Διαβάστε περισσότεραα β
6. Eerg, Mometum coefficiets for differet velocit distributios Rehbock obtaied ) For Liear Velocit Distributio α + ε Vmax { } Vmax ε β +, i which ε v V o Give: α + ε > ε ( α ) Liear velocit distributio
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas
09 Section 7. Double and Half Angle Fmulas To derive the double-angles fmulas, we will use the sum of two angles fmulas that we developed in the last section. We will let α θ and β θ: cos(θ) cos(θ + θ)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPhys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)
Phys460.nb 81 ψ n (t) is still the (same) eigenstate of H But for tdependent H. The answer is NO. 5.5.5. Solution for the tdependent Schrodinger s equation If we assume that at time t 0, the electron starts
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFREE VIBRATION OF A SINGLE-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM SYSTEM Revision B
FREE VIBRATION OF A SINGLE-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM SYSTEM Revisio B By Tom Irvie Email: tomirvie@aol.com February, 005 Derivatio of the Equatio of Motio Cosier a sigle-egree-of-freeom system. m x k c where m
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAdaptive Covariance Estimation with model selection
Adaptive Covariace Estimatio with model selectio Rolado Biscay, Hélèe Lescorel ad Jea-Michel Loubes arxiv:03007v [mathst Mar 0 Abstract We provide i this paper a fully adaptive pealized procedure to select
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSrednicki Chapter 55
Srednicki Chapter 55 QFT Problems & Solutions A. George August 3, 03 Srednicki 55.. Use equations 55.3-55.0 and A i, A j ] = Π i, Π j ] = 0 (at equal times) to verify equations 55.-55.3. This is our third
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Non-Stochastic Steady State
July 25, 24 Techical Appedix: The Dyamic System I this appedix I preset the full derivatio of the approximated dyamic system, its properties, ad the procedure for computig secod momets. I rely heavily
Διαβάστε περισσότερα3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β
3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS Page Theorem cos(αβ cos α cos β -sin α cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α NOTE: cos(αβ cos α cos β cos(α-β cos α -cos β Proof of cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α Let s use a unit circle
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE
Lecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE BLUE: Robustness of LSE against normality We now study properties of l τ β and σ 2 under assumption A2, i.e., without the normality assumption on ε. From Theorem
Διαβάστε περισσότεραData Dependence of New Iterative Schemes
Mathematics Volume : 4 Issue : 6 Jue 4 ISSN - 49-555X Data Depedece of New Iterative Schemes KEYWORDS CR Iteratio Data Depedece New Multistep Iteratio Quasi Cotractive * Aarti Kadia Assistat Professor
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath221: HW# 1 solutions
Math: HW# solutions Andy Royston October, 5 7.5.7, 3 rd Ed. We have a n = b n = a = fxdx = xdx =, x cos nxdx = x sin nx n sin nxdx n = cos nx n = n n, x sin nxdx = x cos nx n + cos nxdx n cos n = + sin
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2. THEORY OF EQUATIONS. PREVIOUS EAMCET Bits.
EAMCET-. THEORY OF EQUATIONS PREVIOUS EAMCET Bits. Each of the roots of the equation x 6x + 6x 5= are increased by k so that the new transformed equation does not contain term. Then k =... - 4. - Sol.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 4.1 Solutions Math 5110/6830
Homework 4. Solutios Math 5/683. a) For p + = αp γ α)p γ α)p + γ b) Let Equilibria poits satisfy: p = p = OR = γ α)p ) γ α)p + γ = α γ α)p ) γ α)p + γ α = p ) p + = p ) = The, we have equilibria poits
Διαβάστε περισσότεραResearch Article Finite-Step Relaxed Hybrid Steepest-Descent Methods for Variational Inequalities
Hidawi Publishig Corporatio Joural of Iequalities ad Applicatios Volume 2008, Article ID 598632, 13 pages doi:10.1155/2008/598632 Research Article Fiite-Step Relaxed Hybrid Steepest-Descet Methods for
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSolution Series 9. i=1 x i and i=1 x i.
Lecturer: Prof. Dr. Mete SONER Coordinator: Yilin WANG Solution Series 9 Q1. Let α, β >, the p.d.f. of a beta distribution with parameters α and β is { Γ(α+β) Γ(α)Γ(β) f(x α, β) xα 1 (1 x) β 1 for < x
Διαβάστε περισσότεραReminders: linear functions
Reminders: linear functions Let U and V be vector spaces over the same field F. Definition A function f : U V is linear if for every u 1, u 2 U, f (u 1 + u 2 ) = f (u 1 ) + f (u 2 ), and for every u U
Διαβάστε περισσότερα6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes
122 CHAPTER 6. ARMA MODELS 6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes The purpose of forecasting is to predict future values of a TS based on the data collected to the present. In this section we will discuss a linear
Διαβάστε περισσότεραF19MC2 Solutions 9 Complex Analysis
F9MC Solutions 9 Complex Analysis. (i) Let f(z) = eaz +z. Then f is ifferentiable except at z = ±i an so by Cauchy s Resiue Theorem e az z = πi[res(f,i)+res(f, i)]. +z C(,) Since + has zeros of orer at
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSpherical shell model
Nilsso Model Spherical Shell Model Deformed Shell Model Aisotropic Harmoic Oscillator Nilsso Model o Nilsso Hamiltoia o Choice of Basis o Matrix Elemets ad Diagoaliatio o Examples. Nilsso diagrams Spherical
Διαβάστε περισσότερα6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.
6.1. Dirac Equation Ref: M.Kaku, Quantum Field Theory, Oxford Univ Press (1993) η μν = η μν = diag(1, -1, -1, -1) p 0 = p 0 p = p i = -p i p μ p μ = p 0 p 0 + p i p i = E c 2 - p 2 = (m c) 2 H = c p 2
Διαβάστε περισσότεραInverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. ------------------ ----------------------------- -----------------
Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. 1. Sin ( ) = a) b) c) d) Ans b. Solution : Method 1. Ans a: 17 > 1 a) is rejected. w.k.t Sin ( sin ) = d is rejected. If sin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:
HOMEWORK 4 Problem a For the fast loading case, we want to derive the relationship between P zz and λ z. We know that the nominal stress is expressed as: P zz = ψ λ z where λ z = λ λ z. Therefore, applying
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 8.3 Trigonometric Equations
99 Section 8. Trigonometric Equations Objective 1: Solve Equations Involving One Trigonometric Function. In this section and the next, we will exple how to solving equations involving trigonometric functions.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION Revision D
By Tom Irvie Email: tomirvie@aol.com July, DERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION Revisio D Itroductio The obective is to derive Miles equatio. This equatio gives the overall respose of a sigle-degree-of-freedom
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOutline. Detection Theory. Background. Background (Cont.)
Outlie etectio heory Chapter7. etermiistic Sigals with Ukow Parameters afiseh S. Mazloum ov. 3th Backgroud Importace of sigal iformatio Ukow amplitude Ukow arrival time Siusoidal detectio Classical liear
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPartial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013
The boundary element method March 26, 203 Introduction and notation The problem: u = f in D R d u = ϕ in Γ D u n = g on Γ N, where D = Γ D Γ N, Γ D Γ N = (possibly, Γ D = [Neumann problem] or Γ N = [Dirichlet
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSpace-Time Symmetries
Chapter Space-Time Symmetries In classical fiel theory any continuous symmetry of the action generates a conserve current by Noether's proceure. If the Lagrangian is not invariant but only shifts by a
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSupplementary Material For Testing Homogeneity of. High-dimensional Covariance Matrices
Supplementary Material For Testing Homogeneity of High-dimensional Covariance Matrices Shurong Zheng, Ruitao Lin, Jianhua Guo, and Guosheng Yin 3 School of Mathematics & Statistics and KLAS, Northeast
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExercises to Statistics of Material Fatigue No. 5
Prof. Dr. Christine Müller Dipl.-Math. Christoph Kustosz Eercises to Statistics of Material Fatigue No. 5 E. 9 (5 a Show, that a Fisher information matri for a two dimensional parameter θ (θ,θ 2 R 2, can
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 67, 3301-3307 A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Equivalence Relation D. K. Basnet Dept. of Mathematics, Assam University Silchar-788011, Assam, India dkbasnet@rediffmail.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Simply Typed Lambda Calculus
Type Inference Instead of writing type annotations, can we use an algorithm to infer what the type annotations should be? That depends on the type system. For simple type systems the answer is yes, and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic
Lecture 2 Soundness and completeness of propositional logic February 9, 2004 1 Overview Review of natural deduction. Soundness and completeness. Semantics of propositional formulas. Soundness proof. Completeness
Διαβάστε περισσότεραConcrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016
Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016 Silvio Capobianco Exercise 1.7 Let H(n) = J(n + 1) J(n). Equation (1.8) tells us that H(2n) = 2, and H(2n+1) = J(2n+2) J(2n+1) = (2J(n+1) 1) (2J(n)+1)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSecond Order RLC Filters
ECEN 60 Circuits/Electronics Spring 007-0-07 P. Mathys Second Order RLC Filters RLC Lowpass Filter A passive RLC lowpass filter (LPF) circuit is shown in the following schematic. R L C v O (t) Using phasor
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAppendix S1 1. ( z) α βc. dβ β δ β
Appendix S1 1 Proof of Lemma 1. Taking first and second partial derivatives of the expected profit function, as expressed in Eq. (7), with respect to l: Π Π ( z, λ, l) l θ + s ( s + h ) g ( t) dt λ Ω(
Διαβάστε περισσότερα