arxiv: v4 [math.lo] 15 Jun 2010
|
|
- Λίγεια Πανταζής
- 6 χρόνια πριν
- Προβολές:
Transcript
1 DIAMONDS arxiv: v4 [math.lo] 15 Jun 2010 SAHARON SHELAH Abstract. If λ = χ + = 2 χ > ℵ 1 then diamond on λ holds. Moreover, if λ = χ + = 2 χ and S {δ < λ : cf(δ) cf(χ)} is stationary then S holds. Earlier this was known only under additional assumptions on χ and/or S. Date: Oct.7, Research supported by the United-States-Israel Binational Science Foundation (Grant No ), Publication No The author thanks Alice Leonhardt for the beautiful typing. 1
2 2 SAHARON SHELAH 1. Introduction We prove in this paper several results about diamonds. Let us recall the basic definitions and sketch the (pretty long) history of the related questions. The diamond principle was formulated by Jensen, who proved that it holds in L for every regular uncountable cardinal κ and stationary S κ. This is a prediction principle, which asserts the following: Definition 1.1. S (the set version). Assume κ = cf(κ) > ℵ 0 and S κ is stationary, S holds when there is a sequence A α : α S such that A α α for every α S and the set {α S : A α = A α } is a stationary subset of κ for every A κ. The diamond sequence A α : α S guesses enough (i.e., stationarily many) initial segments of every A κ. Several variants of this principle were formulated, for example: Definition 1.2. S. Assume κ = cf(κ) > ℵ 0 and S is a stationary subset of κ. Now S holds when thereisasequence A α : α S suchthateacha α isasubfamilyofp(α), A α α and for every A κ there exists a club C κ such that A α A α for every α C S. We know that S holds in L for every regular uncountable κ and stationary S κ. Kunen proved that S S. Moreover, if S 1 S 2 are stationary subsets of κ then S 2 S 1 (hence S1 ). But the assumption V = L is heavy. Trying to avoid it, we can walk in several directions. On weaker relatives see [Sh:829] and references there. We can also use other methods, aiming to prove the diamond without assuming V = L. There is another formulation of the diamond principle, phrased via functions (instead of sets). Since we use this version in our proof, we introduce the following: Definition 1.3. S (the functional version). Assume λ = cf(λ) > ℵ 0,S λ,s is stationary. S holds if there exists a diamond sequence g δ : δ S which means that g δ δ δ for every δ S, and for every g λ λ the set {δ S : g δ = g δ } is a stationary subset of λ. By Gregory [Gre76] and Shelah [Sh:108] we know that assuming λ = χ + = 2 χ and κ = cf(κ) cf(χ),κ < λ, and GCH holds (or actually just χ κ = χ or ( α < χ)( α κ < χ) cf(χ) < κ), then S holds (recall that S λ κ λ κ = {δ < λ : cf(δ) = κ}). We have got also results which show that the failures of the diamond above a strong limit cardinal are limited. For instance, if λ = χ + = 2 χ > µ and µ > ℵ 0 is strong limit, then (by [Sh:460]) the set {κ < µ : S fails} is bounded in µ κ λ (recall that κ is regular). Note that the result here does not completely subsume the earlier results when λ = 2 χ = χ + as we get diamond on every stationary set S λ\scf(χ) λ, but not S ; this is inherent as noted in 3.4. In [Sh:829], a similar, stronger result is proved for S λ κ : for every λ = χ + = 2 χ > µ,µ strong limit for some finite d Reg µ, for every regular κ < µ not from d we have S λ κ, and even S for most stationary S Sκ λ. In fact, for the relevant good stationary sets S Sκ λ we get S. Also weaker related results are proved there for other regular λ (mainly λ = cf(2 χ )).
3 DIAMONDS 3 The present work does not resolve: Problem 1.4. Assume χ is singular, λ = χ + = 2 χ, do we have S λ? (You may cf(χ) even assume G.C.H.). However, the full analog result for 1.4 consistently fails, see [Sh:186] or [Sh:667]; that is: if G.C.H., χ > cf(χ) = κ then we can force a non-reflecting stationary S Sκ χ+ such that the diamond on S fails and cardinalities and cofinalities are preserved; also G.C.H. continue to hold. But if χ is strong limit, λ = χ + = 2 χ, still we know something on guessing equalities for every stationarys Sκ; λ see [Sh:667]. Note that this S (by [Sh:186], [Sh:667]) in some circumstances has to be small ( ) if (χ is singular, 2 χ = χ + = λ,κ = cf(χ) and) we have the square χ (i.e. there exists a sequence C δ : δ < λ,δ is a limit ordinal, so that C δ is closed and unbounded in δ, cf(δ) < χ C δ < χ and if γ is a limit point of C δ then C γ = C δ γ) then S λ κ holds, moreover, if S S λ κ reflects in a stationary set of δ < λ then S holds, see [Sh:186, 3]. Also note that our results are of the form S for every stationary S S for suitable S λ. Now usually this was deduced from the stronger statement S. However, the results on S cannot be improved, see 3.4. Also if χ is regular we cannot improve the result to S λ χ, see [Sh:186] or [Sh:587], even assuming G.C.H. Furthermore the question on ℵ2 when 2 ℵ1 = ℵ 2 = 2 ℵ0 was raised. Concerning this we show in 3.2 that ℵ S 2 may fail (this works in other ℵ 1 cases, too). Question 1.5. Can we deduce any ZFC result on λ strongly inaccessible? By Džamonja-Shelah [DjSh:545] we know that failure of SNR helps (SNR stands for strong non-reflection), a parallel here is 2.3(2). For λ = λ <λ = 2 µ weakly inaccessible we know less, still see [Sh:775], [Sh:898] getting a weaker relative of diamond, see Definition 3.5(2). Again failure of SNR helps. On consistency results on SNR see Cummings-Džamonja-Shelah [CDSh:571], Džamonja-Shelah [DjSh:691]. We thank the audience in the JerusalemLogicSeminar for their comments in the lecture on this work in Fall We thank the referee for many helpful remarks. In particular, as he urged for details, the proof of 2.5(1),(2) just said like 2.3, instead we make the old proof of 2.3(1) prove2.5(1),(2) by minor changes and make explicit 2.5(3) which earlier was proved by repeat of the second half of the proof of 2.3(1). We thank Shimoni Garti for his help in the proofreading. Notation ) If κ = cf(κ) < λ = cf(λ) then we let Sκ λ := {δ < λ : cf(δ) = κ}. 2) D λ is the club filter on λ for λ a regular uncountable cardinal.
4 4 SAHARON SHELAH 2. Diamond on successor cardinals Recall (needed only for part (2) of the Theorem 2.3): Definition ) We say λ on S has κ-snr or SNR(λ,S,κ) or λ has strong nonreflection for S in κ when S Sκ λ := {δ < λ : cf(δ) = κ} so λ = cf(λ) > κ = cf(κ) andthereareh : λ κandaclub E ofλsuchthat foreveryδ S E forsomeclub C of δ, the function h C is one-to-one and even increasing; (note that without loss of generality α nacc(e) α successor and without loss of generality E = λ, so µ Reg λ\κ + SNR(µ,S µ,κ)). If S = Sκ λ we may omit it. Remark 2.2. Note that by Fodor s lemma if cf(δ) = κ > ℵ 0 and h is a function from some set δ and the range of h is κ then the following conditions are equivalent: (a) h is one-to-one on some club of δ (b) h is increasing on some club of δ (c) Rang(h S) is unbounded in κ for every stationary subset S of δ. Our main theorem is: Claim 2.3. Assume λ = 2 χ = χ +. 1) If S λ is stationary and δ S cf(δ) cf(χ) then S holds. 2) If ℵ 0 < κ = cf(χ) < χ and S fails where S = S λ κ (or just S S λ κ is a stationary subset of λ) then we have SNR(λ,κ) or just λ has strong non-reflection for S S λ κ in κ. Definition ) For a filter D on a set I let Dom(D) := I and S is called D-positive when S I (I\S) / D and D + = {S Dom(D) : S is D-positive} and we let D+A = {B I : B (I\A) D} (so if D = D λ, the club filter on the regular uncountable λ then D + is the family of stationary subsets of X). 2) For D a filter on a regular uncountable cardinal λ which extends the club filter, let D means: there is f = f α : α S which is a diamond sequence for D (or a D-diamond sequence) which means that S D + and for every g λ λ the set {α < λ : g α = f α } belongs to D + ; so f is also a diamond sequence for the filter D + S, (clearly S means Dλ +S for S a stationary subset of the regular uncountable λ). A somewhat more general version of the theorem is Claim ) Assume λ = χ + = 2 χ and D is a λ-complete filter on λ which extends the club filter. If S D + and δ S cf(δ) cf(χ) then we have D+S. 2) We have D when: (a) λ = λ <λ (b) f = f α : α < λ lists { α λ : α < λ} (c) S D + (d) ū = u α : α S and u α α for every α S (e) χ = sup{ u α + : α < λ} < λ (f) D is a χ + -complete filter on λ extending the club filter (g) ( g λ λ)( D+ δ S)[δ = sup{α u δ : g α {f β : β u δ }}].
5 DIAMONDS 5 3) Assume λ = χ + = 2 χ and ℵ 0 < κ = cf(χ) < χ,s Sκ λ is stationary, and D is a λ-complete filter extending the club filter on λ to which S belongs. If D fails then SNR(λ, S, κ). Proof. Proof of 2.3 Part (1) follows from 2.5(1) for D the filter D λ + S. Part (2) follows from 2.5(3) for D the filter D λ +S. 2.3 Proof. Proof of 2.5 Proof of part (1) Clearly we can assume Let 0 χ > ℵ 0 as for χ = ℵ 0 the statement is empty. 1 f α : α < λ list the set {f : f is a function from β to λ for some β < λ}. For each α < λ clearly α χ so let 2,α u α,ε : ε < χ be -increasing continuous with union α such that ε < χ u α,ε ℵ 0 + ε < χ. For g λ λ let h g λ λ be defined by 3,g h g (α) = Min{β < λ : g α = f β }. Let cd, cd ε : ε < χ be such that 4 (a) cd is a one-to-one function from χ λ onto λ such that cd(ᾱ) sup{α ε : ε < χ} (when ᾱ = α ε : ε < χ ) (b) for ε < χ, cd ε is a function from λ to λ such that ᾱ = α ε : ε < χ χ λ cd ε (cd(ᾱ)) = α ε (they exist as λ = λ χ, in the present case this holds as 2 χ = χ + = λ). Now we let (for β < λ,ε < χ): 5 f 1 β,ε be the function from Dom(f β) into λ defined by f 1 β,ε (α) = cd ε(f β (α)) so Dom(f 1 β,ε ) = Dom(f β). Without loss of generality 6 α S α is a limit ordinal. For g λ λ and ε < χ we let S ε g = Next we shall show { δ S : δ = sup{α u δ,ε : for some β u δ,ε we have g α = f 1 β,ε } }. 7 for some ε( ) < χ for every g λ λ the set S ε( ) g is a D-positive subset of λ.
6 6 SAHARON SHELAH Proof of 7 Assume this fails, so for every ε < χ there is g ε λ λ such that S ε g ε is not D-positive and let E ε be a member of D disjoint to S ε g ε. Define g λ λ by g(α) := cd( g ε (α) : ε < χ ) and let h g λ λ be as in 3,g, i.e. h g (α) = Min{β : g α = f β }. Let E = {δ < λ : δ is a limit ordinal such that α < δ h g (α) < δ}, clearly it is a club of λ hence it belongs to D and so E = {E ε : ε < χ} E belongs to D as D is λ-complete and χ+1 < λ. As S is a D-positive subset of λ there is δ E S. For each α < δ as δ E E clearly h g (α) < δ and α as well as h g (α) belong to {u δ,ε : ε < χ} = δ, but u δ,ε : ε < χ is -increasing hence ε δ,α = min{ε : α u δ,ε and h g (α) u δ,ε} is not just well defined but also ε [ε δ,α,χ) {α,h g (α)} u δ,ε. As cf(δ ) cf(χ), by an assumption on S, it follows that for some ε( ) < χ the set B := {α < δ : ε δ,α < ε( )} is unbounded below δ. So (a) α B {α,h g (α)} u δ,ε( ) and (b) α B g α = f hg(α) [g ε α = fh 1 ] g g(α),ε ε( ) α = fh 1. g(α),ε( ) ε<χ But δ E E ε( ) hence δ / Sg ε( ) ε( ) by the choice of E ε( ), but by (a) + (b) and the definition of Sg ε( ) ε( ) recalling δ S we have sup(b) = δ δ Sg ε( ) ε( ), (where h g (α) plays the role of β in the definition of Sg ε above), contradiction. So the proof of 7 is finished. Let χ = ( ε( ) +ℵ 0 ) hence δ S u δ,ε( ) χ and χ + < λ as χ < χ < λ because ℵ 0,ε( ) < χ < λ. Now we apply 2.5(2) which is proved below with λ,s,d,χ +, fβ,ε( ) 1 : β < λ, u δ,ε( ) : δ S here standing for λ,s,d,χ, f,ū there. The conditions there are satisfied hence also the conclusion which says that D holds. 2.5(1) Proof. Proof of 2.5(2) Let 1 cd ε : ε < χ and cd be as in 4 in the proof of part (1), possible as we are assuming χ < λ = λ <λ 2 for β < λ and ζ < χ let f 2 β,ζ be the function with domain Dom(f β) such that f 2 β,ζ (α) = cd ζ(f β (α)) 3 for g λ λ define h g λ λ as in 3 in the proof of part (1), i.e. h g (α) = Min{β : g α = f β }. If2 <χ < λourlife iseasierbut wedonotassumethis. Forδ S letξ δ beacardinal, and let (α 1 δ,ξ,α2 δ,ξ ) : ξ < ξ δ list the set {(α 1,α 2 ) u δ u δ : Dom(f α2 ) = α 1 }, note that ξ δ < χ, recalling u δ < χ by clause (e) of the assumption. We now try to choose ( v ε,g ε,e ε ) by induction on ε < χ, (note that v ε is defined from g ζ : ζ < ε (see clause (e) of 4 below) so we choose just (g ε,e ε )), such that: 4 (a) E ε is a member of D and E ζ : ζ ε is -decreasing with ζ (b) v ε = v ε δ : δ S E ε when E ε = {E ζ : ζ < ε} λ so is λ if ε = 0 (c) v ζ δ : ζ ε is -decreasing with ζ for each δ S E ε (d) g ε λ λ
7 DIAMONDS 7 Next (e) vδ ε = {ξ < ξ δ : if ζ < ε then g ζ α 1 δ,ξ = f2 α 2,ζ} δ,ξ (so if ε is a limit ordinal then vδ ε = v ζ δ and ε = 0 vε δ = ξ δ ) (f) if δ E ε S then v ε+1 δ ζ<ε v ε δ or δ > sup{α1 δ,ξ : ξ vε+1 δ }. 1 we cannot carry the induction, that is for all ε < χ. Why? Assume toward contradiction that ( v ε,g ε,e ε ) : ε < χ is well defined. Let E := {E ε : ε < χ}, it is a member of D as D is χ + -complete. Define g λ λ by g(α) := cd( g ε (α) : ε < χ ). Let E = {δ < λ : δ a limit ordinal such that h g (α) < δ and δ > sup(dom(f α ) Rang(f α )) for every α < δ}, so E is a club of λ hence it belongs to D. By assumption (g) of the claim the set S g := {δ S : δ = sup{α u δ : ( β u δ )(f β = g α)}} is D-positive, so we can choose δ E E S g. Hence B := {α u δ : ( β u δ )(f β = g α)} is an unbounded subset of u δ and let h : B u δ be h(α) = min{β u δ : f β = g α}, clearly h is a function from B into u δ. Now α B ζ < χ f h(α) = g α ζ < χ fh(α),ζ 2 = g ζ α, so for α B the pair (α,h(α)) belongs to {(α 1 δ,ξ,α2 δ,ξ ) : ξ vε δ } for every ε < χ. Hence for any ε < χ we have B {α 1 δ,ξ : ξ vε δ } so δ = sup{α1 δ,ξ : ξ vε δ }. So for the present δ, in clause (f) of 4 the second possibility never occurs. So clearly vδ ε : ε < χ is strictly -decreasing, i.e. is -decreasing which is impossible as vδ 0 = ξδ < χ. So we have proved 1 hence we can assume 2 there is ε < χ such that we have defined our triple for every ζ < ε but we cannot define for ε. So we have ( v ζ,g ζ,e ζ ) : ζ < ε. As in 4 (e), let 1 E ε be λ if ε = 0 and {E ζ : ζ < ε} if ε > 0 and let S := S E ε. Clearly v ε is well defined, see clauses (b),(e) of 4, and for δ S let F δ = {f 2 α 2 δ,ξ,ε : ξ v ε δ }, so each member is a function from some α u δ δ into some ordinal < δ. Let 2 S 1 := {δ S : there are f,f F δ which are incompatible as functions} 3 S 2 := {δ S : δ / S 1 but the function {f : f F δ } has domain δ} 4 S 3 = S \(S 1 S 2 ). For δ S3 let g δ = {f : f F δ}, so by the definition of Sl : l = 1,2,3 clearly gδ δ δ. Now if gδ : δ S 3 is a diamond sequence for D then we are done. So assume that this fails, so for some g λ λ and member E of D we have δ S3 E g δ g δ. Without loss of generality E is included in E ε. But then we could have chosen (g,e) as (g ε,e ε ), recalling v ε was already chosen. Easily the triple (g ε,e ε, v ε ) is as required in 1, contradicting the choice of ε in 2 so we are done proving part (2) of Theorem 2.3 hence also part (1). 2.5(2)
8 8 SAHARON SHELAH Proof. Proof of part (3) We use cd,cd ε (for ε < χ), u α,ε : ε < χ : α < λ, f α : α < λ, f 1 α,ε : α < λ,ε < χ and S ε g for ε < κ as in the proof of part (1). Recall κ, a regular uncountable cardinal, is the cofinality of the singular cardinal χ and let χ γ : γ < κ be increasing with limit χ. For every γ < κ we ask: The γ-question: Do we have: for every g λ λ, the following is a D-positive subset of λ: {δ S : S γ [g] δ is a stationary subset of δ} where S γ [g] := {ζ < λ: cf(ζ) [ℵ 0,κ), sup(u ζ,χγ ) = ζ and for arbitrarily large α u ζ,χγ for some β u ζ,χγ and ε < χ γ, we have Dom(f β ) = α and g α = f 1 β,ε }. Case 1: For some γ < κ, the answer is yes. Choose C δ : δ S such that C δ is a club of δ of order type cf(δ) = κ. For δ S S λ κ let u δ := {u α,χγ : α C δ }. Clearly 2 u δ κ+χ γ < χ 3 for every g λ λ for D-positively many δ S, we have δ = sup{α u δ : g α {f 1 β,ε : ε < χ γ and β u δ }}. Why 3 holds? Given g λ λ, let h g λ λ be defined by h g (α) = min{β < λ : g α = f β }, so h g (α) α (but is less than λ). Let E g = {δ < λ : δ is a limit ordinal such that ( α < δ)h g (α) < δ}, so E g is a club of λ and let E g be the set of accumulation points of E g, so E g, too, is a club of λ. By the assumption of this case, the set S := {δ S : δ S γ [g] is a stationary subset of λ} is D-positive, hence S := S E g is a D-positive subset of λ. Let δ S, by E g s definition, we can find Bδ 0 E g δ unbounded in δ, so without loss of generality Bδ 0 is closed. But S γ [g] δ is a stationary subset of δ, recalling δ S, so Bδ 1 = B0 δ S γ[g] C δ is a stationary subset of δ as Bδ 0,C δ are closed unbounded subsets of δ. Clearly ζ Bδ 1 ζ C δ u ζ,χγ u δ by the definitions of Bδ 1 and u δ. Also ζ Bδ 1 ζ S γ[g] (ζ is a limit ordinal) ζ = sup(u ζ,χγ ) = sup{α u ζ,χγ : ( β u ζ,χγ )( ε < χ γ )(g α = fβ,ε 1 )} ((ζ is a limit ordinal) ζ = sup{α u δ ζ : ( β u δ \α)( ε < χ γ )(g α = fβ,ε 1 )}). As Bδ 1 is unbounded in δ being stationary we are done proving 3. Now without loss of generality every δ S is divisible by χ hence δ = χ γ δ and let u δ = u δ {χ γ α +ε : α u δ,ε < χ γ }, so u δ is an unbounded subset of δ, and let f β = f1 α,ε when β = χ γα+ε,ε < χ γ. So translating what we have is: 4 (a) f α : α < λ is a sequence of members of {β λ : β < λ} (b) for δ S,u δ is an unbounded subset of δ of cardinality χ γ χ γ = χ γ (< χ) (c) for every g λ λ for D-positively many δ S we have δ = sup{α u δ : ( β u δ )(g α = f β )}. Now we can apply part (2) with f α : α < λ, u δ : δ S replacing f, u δ : δ S. So as there we can prove S, hence we are done. Case 2: For every γ < κ the answer is no.
9 DIAMONDS 9 Let (g γ,e γ ) exemplify that the answer for γ is no; so g γ λ λ and E γ D. Let E = E γ, so E is a member of D. Let g λ λ be defined by g(α) = cd( g γ (α) : γ<κ γ < κ ˆ(0) χ ), i.e. cd ε (g(α)) is g γ (α) if γ < κ and is 0 if ε [κ,χ). Let E g := {δ < λ : δ a limit ordinal such that if α < λ then h g (α) < δ and δ > sup(dom(f α ) Rang(f α ))}. We now define h : λ κ as follows 5 for β < λ (a) if cf(β) / [ℵ 0,κ) or β / E g then h(β) = 0 (b) otherwise Now h(β) = min{γ < κ : β = sup{α 1 u β,χγ : for some α 2 u β,χγ and ε < χ γ we have g α 1 = f 1 α 2,ε }}. 6 h : λ κ is well defined. Why 6 holds? Let β < λ. If cf(β) / [ℵ 0,κ) or β / E g then h(α) = 0 < κ by clause (a) of 5. So assume cf(β) [ℵ 0,κ) and β E g. Let γ 1 β,ε : ε < cf(β) be increasing with limit β and let γ 2 β,ε = min{γ : g γ1 β,ε = f γ}, so ε < cf(β) γ 2 β,ε < β as β E g. But u β,χζ : ζ < cf(χ) is -increasing with union β so for each ε < cf(β) there is ζ = ζ β,ε < cf(χ) such that {γ 1 β,ε,γ2 β,ε } u β,χ ζ. As cf(β) < κ = cf(χ) for some ζ < κ the set {ε < cf(β) : ζ β,ε < ζ} is unbounded in cf(β). So ζ can serve as γ in clause (b) of 5 so h(β) is well defined, in particular is less than κ so we have proved 6. 7 if δ S E γ then for some club C of δ the function h C is increasing. Why 7 holds? If not, then by Fodor s lemma for some γ < κ the set {δ δ S : h(δ ) γ} is a stationary subset of δ, and we get contradiction to the choice of E γ so 7 holds indeed. So h is as promised in the claim. Note Observation 2.6. If κ < λ are regular, S λ κ strongly does not reflect in λ for every κ Reg κ and Π(Reg κ ) < λ, then : (a) S λ <κ can be divided to Π(Reg κ ) sets, each not reflecting in any δ S λ <κ in particular (b) S λ ℵ 0 can be divided to Π(Reg κ ) sets each not reflecting in any δ S λ <κ. Remark ) Of course if λ has κ-snr then this holds for every regular λ (κ,λ). 2) We may state the results, using λ κ (see below).
10 10 SAHARON SHELAH Definition 2.8. For each regular κ let λ κ = Min{λ : λ regular fails to have κ SNR}, and let λ κ be (or not defined) if there is no such λ.
11 DIAMONDS 11 A known question was: 3. Consistent failure on S 2 1 Question 3.1. For θ {ℵ 0,ℵ 1 } do we have (2 ℵ0 = 2 ℵ1 = ℵ 2 ℵ S 2 )? θ So for θ = ℵ 0 the answer is yes (by 2.3(1)), but what about θ = ℵ 1? We noted some years ago that easily: Claim 3.2. Assume V = GCH or even just 2 ℵ l = ℵ l+1 for l = 0,1,2. Then some forcing notion P satisfies (a) P is of cardinality ℵ 3 (b) forcing with P preserves cardinals and cofinalities (c) in V P,2 ℵ0 = 2 ℵ1 = ℵ 2,2 ℵ2 = ℵ 3 (d) in V P, S fails where S = {δ < ℵ 2 : cf(δ) = ℵ 1 }, moreover ( ) there is a sequence Ā = A δ : δ S where A δ an unbounded subset of δ of order type ω 1 satisfying ( ) if f = f δ : δ S,f δ (A δ) (ω 1 ), then there is f (ω2) (ω 1 ) such that δ S δ > sup({α A δ : f(α) f δ (α)}). Remark 3.3. Similarly for other cardinals. Proof. There is an ℵ 1 -complete ℵ 3 -c.c. forcing notion P not collapsing cardinals, not changing cofinalities, preserving 2 ℵ l = ℵ l for l = 0,1,2 and P = ℵ 3 such that in V P, we have ( ), in fact more 1 than ( ) holds - see [Sh:587]. Let Q be the forcing of adding ℵ 2 Cohen or just any c.c.c. forcing notion of cardinality ℵ 2 adding ℵ 2 reals (can be Q, a P-name). Now we shall show that P Q, equivalently P Q is as required: Clause (a): P Q = ℵ 3 ; trivial. Clause (b): Preserving cardinals and cofinalities; obvious as both P and Q do this. Clause (c): Easy. Clause (d): In V P we have ( ) as exemplified by say Ā = A δ : δ S. We shall show that V P Q = Ā satisfies ( ). Otherwise in VP Q we have f = f δ : δ S say in V[G P,G Q ] a counterexample then in V[G P ] for some q Q and f we have V[G P ] = (q Q f = f δ : δ S where f δ : A δ ω 1 for each δ S form a counterexample to ( ) ). Now in V[G P ] we can define ḡ = g 1 δ : δ S V[G P] where g 1 δ domain A δ, by g 1 δ(α) = {i : q f δ(α) i}. a function with 1 I.e. there is Ā = A δ : δ S where A δ is an unbounded subset of δ of order type ω 1 satisfying: if f = f δ : δ S,f δ (A δ) ω 1 then there is f (ω 2) ω 1 such that for every δ S ℵ 2 ℵ 1 for every α A δ large enough we have f(α) = f δ (α).
12 12 SAHARON SHELAH SoinV[G P ]wehaveq Q ( α A δ )f δ(α) gδ 1(α)}. Alsog1 δ (α)isacountable δ S subset of ω 1 as Q satisfies the c.c.c. For δ S we define a function g δ : A δ ω 1 by letting g δ (α) = (sup(gδ 1(α))+1 hence g δ (α) < ω 1 so g δ : δ S is as required on f in ( ) in V[G P ], of course. Apply clause ( ) in V[G P ] to g δ : δ S so we can find g : ω 2 ω 1 such that δ > sup{α A δ,g δ (α) > g(α)}. Now g is as required also in V[G P ][G Q ]. 3.2 δ S We may wonder can we strengthen the conclusion of 2.3 to S (of course the demand in clause (e) and (f) in claim 3.4 below are necessary, i.e. otherwise S holds). The answer is not as: (the restriction in (e) and in (f) are best possible). Observation 3.4. Assume λ = λ <λ,s S λ κ. Then for some P (a) P is a forcing notion (b) P is of cardinality λ + satisfying the λ + -c.c. (c) forcing with P does not collapse cardinals and does not change cofinality (d) forcing with P adds no new η λ> Ord (e) S fails for every stationary subset S of λ such that (α) S Sκ λ when ( µ < λ)[µ <κ>tr = λ] or just (β) α S α <cf(α)>tr > α (f) (Dl) S, see below, fails for every S Sκ λ when α S = λ. α <cf(α)>tr Recalling Definition ) For µ κ = cf(κ) let µ <κ>tr = { T : T κ µ is closed under initial segments (i.e. a subtree) such that T κ> µ µ}. 2) For λ regular uncountable and stationary S λ let (Dl) S mean that there is a sequence P = P δ : δ S witnessing it which means: ( ) P (a) P δ δ δ has cardinality < λ (b) for every f λ λ the set {δ S : f δ P δ } is stationary (for λ successor it is equivalent to S ; for λ strong inaccessible it is trivial). Proof. Proof of 3.4 Use P = adding λ +,λ-cohen subsets. The proof is straight. 3.4 Remark 3.6. The consistency results in 3.4 are best possible, see [Sh:829]. References [Gre76] John Gregory, Higher Souslin trees and the generalized continuum hypothesis, Journal of Symbolic Logic 41 (1976), no. 3, [Sh:108] Saharon Shelah, On successors of singular cardinals, Logic Colloquium 78 (Mons, 1978), Stud. Logic Foundations Math, vol. 97, North-Holland, Amsterdam-New York, 1979, pp [Sh:186], Diamonds, uniformization, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (1984), [Sh:460], The Generalized Continuum Hypothesis revisited, Israel Journal of Mathematics 116 (2000), , math.lo/
13 DIAMONDS 13 [DjSh:545] Mirna Dzamonja and Saharon Shelah, Saturated filters at successors of singulars, weak reflection and yet another weak club principle, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 79 (1996), , math.lo/ [CDSh:571] James Cummings, Mirna Dzamonja, and Saharon Shelah, A consistency result on weak reflection, Fundamenta Mathematicae 148 (1995), , math.lo/ [Sh:587] Saharon Shelah, Not collapsing cardinals κ in (< κ) support iterations, Israel Journal of Mathematics 136 (2003), , math.lo/ [Sh:667], Successor of singulars: combinatorics and not collapsing cardinals κ in (< κ)- support iterations, Israel Journal of Mathematics 134 (2003), , math.lo/ [DjSh:691] Mirna Dzamonja and Saharon Shelah, Weak reflection at the successor of a singular cardinal, Journal of the London Mathematical Society 67 (2003), 1 15, math.lo/ [Sh:775] Saharon Shelah, Middle Diamond, Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (2005), , math.lo/ [Sh:829], More on the Revised GCH and the Black Box, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 140 (2006), , math.lo/ [Sh:898], pcf and abelian groups, Forum Mathematicum preprint, Einstein Institute of Mathematics, Edmond J. Safra Campus, Givat Ram, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 91904, Israel, and, Department of Mathematics, Hill Center - Busch Campus, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 110 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ USA address: shelah@math.huji.ac.il URL:
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set May 6, 2008 Abstract A set of first-order formulas, whatever the cardinality of the set of symbols, is equivalent to an independent
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOrdinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit
Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ting Zhang Stanford May 11, 2001 Stanford, 5/11/2001 1 Outline Ordinal Classification Ordinal Addition Ordinal Multiplication Ordinal
Διαβάστε περισσότεραORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER
ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER Abstract. We define ordinal arithmetic and show laws of Left- Monotonicity, Associativity, Distributivity, some minor related properties and the Cantor Normal Form.
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2 Composition. Invertible Mappings
Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan Composition. Invertible Mappings In this section we discuss two procedures for creating new mappings from old ones, namely,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCardinals. Y = n Y n. Define h: X Y by f(x) if x X n X n+1 and n is even h(x) = g
Cardinals 1. Introduction to Cardinals We work in the base theory ZF. The definitions and many (but not all) of the basic theorems do not require AC; we will indicate explicitly when we are using choice.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn density of old sets in Prikry type extensions.
On density of old sets in Prikry type extensions. Moti Gitik December 31, 2015 Abstract Every set of ordinals of cardinality κ in a Prikry extension with a measure over κ contains an old set of arbitrary
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExample Sheet 3 Solutions
Example Sheet 3 Solutions. i Regular Sturm-Liouville. ii Singular Sturm-Liouville mixed boundary conditions. iii Not Sturm-Liouville ODE is not in Sturm-Liouville form. iv Regular Sturm-Liouville note
Διαβάστε περισσότεραST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II
ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II 2014/2015: Semester II Tutorial 7 1. Let X be a sample from a population P and consider testing hypotheses H 0 : P = P 0 versus H 1 : P = P 1, where P j is a known
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStatistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests
Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Shirsendu Mukherjee Department of Statistics, Asutosh College, Kolkata, India. shirsendu st@yahoo.co.in So far we have treated the testing of one-sided
Διαβάστε περισσότεραKnaster-Reichbach Theorem for 2 κ
Knaster-Reichbach Theorem for 2 κ Micha l Korch February 9, 2018 In the recent years the theory of the generalized Cantor and Baire spaces was extensively developed (see, e.g. [1], [2], [6], [4] and many
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSINGULAR CARDINALS AND SQUARE PROPERTIES
SINGULAR CARDINALS AND SQUARE PROPERTIES MENACHEM MAGIDOR AND DIMA SINAPOVA Abstract. We analyze the effect of singularizing cardinals on square properties. By work of Džamonja-Shelah and of Gitik, if
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSplitting stationary sets from weak forms of Choice
Splitting stationary sets from weak forms of Choice Paul Larson and Saharon Shelah February 16, 2008 Abstract Working in the context of restricted forms of the Axiom of Choice, we consider the problem
Διαβάστε περισσότεραC.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions
C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions Paul Liu November 15, 2007 Note that these are sample solutions only; in many cases there were many acceptable answers. 1 Reynolds Problem 10.1 1.1 Normal-order
Διαβάστε περισσότεραUniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor
Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor Given f L 1 T 1 ), we consider the partial sums of the Fourier series of f: N 1) S N fθ) = ˆfk)e ikθ. k= N A calculation gives the Dirichlet formula
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs
Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs Who? Nichole Schimanski When? July 27, 2011 Graphs A graph, G, consists of a vertex set, V (G), and an edge set, E(G). V (G) is any finite set E(G) is
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 3: Ordinal Numbers
Chapter 3: Ordinal Numbers There are two kinds of number.. Ordinal numbers (0th), st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th,..., ω, ω +,... ω2, ω2+,... ω 2... answers to the question What position is... in a sequence? What
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEE512: Error Control Coding
EE512: Error Control Coding Solution for Assignment on Finite Fields February 16, 2007 1. (a) Addition and Multiplication tables for GF (5) and GF (7) are shown in Tables 1 and 2. + 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 3
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)
Uppsala Universitet Matematiska Institutionen Andreas Strömbergsson Prov i matematik Funktionalanalys Kurs: F3B, F4Sy, NVP 2005-03-08 Skrivtid: 9 14 Tillåtna hjälpmedel: Manuella skrivdon, Kreyszigs bok
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomomorphism in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Automata
International Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics Systems. ISSN 2248-9940 Volume 3, Number 1 (2013), pp. 39-45 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/ijfms.htm Homomorphism in Intuitionistic
Διαβάστε περισσότεραON INCOMPACTNESS FOR CHROMATIC NUMBER OF GRAPHS SH1006 SAHARON SHELAH
ON INCOMPACTNESS FOR CHROMATIC NUMBER OF GRAPHS SH1006 SAHARON SHELAH Abstract. We deal with incompactness. Assume the existence of non-reflecting stationary subset of the regular cardinal λ of cofinality
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in
Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in : tail in X, head in A nowhere-zero Γ-flow is a Γ-circulation such that
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 67, 3301-3307 A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Equivalence Relation D. K. Basnet Dept. of Mathematics, Assam University Silchar-788011, Assam, India dkbasnet@rediffmail.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ω ω + 1 ω + 2 ω + 3 ω + 4 ω2 ω2 + 1 ω2 + 2 ω2 + 3 ω3 ω3 + 1 ω3 + 2 ω4 ω4 + 1 ω5 ω 2 ω 2 + 1 ω 2 + 2 ω 2 + ω ω 2 + ω + 1 ω 2 + ω2 ω 2 2 ω 2 2 + 1 ω 2 2 + ω ω 2 3 ω 3 ω 3 + 1 ω 3 + ω ω 3 +
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.
Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequalit for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x,, z X. Prove that d(x, z) d(, z) d(x, ). (ii): Reverse triangle inequalit for norms:
Διαβάστε περισσότεραarxiv: v2 [math.lo] 21 Jun 2010
BLACK BOXES arxiv:0812.0656v2 [math.lo] 21 Jun 2010 SAHARON SHELAH Abstract. We shall deal comprehensively with Black Boxes, the intention being that provably in ZFC we have a sequence of guesses of extra
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS
Sahand Communications in Mathematical Analysis (SCMA) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016), 21-27 http://scma.maragheh.ac.ir SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS BAYAZ DARABY 1 AND JAVAD JAFARI 2 Abstract. In the mathematical
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPartial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013
The boundary element method March 26, 203 Introduction and notation The problem: u = f in D R d u = ϕ in Γ D u n = g on Γ N, where D = Γ D Γ N, Γ D Γ N = (possibly, Γ D = [Neumann problem] or Γ N = [Dirichlet
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 3 Solutions
Homework 3 Solutions Igor Yanovsky (Math 151A TA) Problem 1: Compute the absolute error and relative error in approximations of p by p. (Use calculator!) a) p π, p 22/7; b) p π, p 3.141. Solution: For
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPhys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)
Phys460.nb 81 ψ n (t) is still the (same) eigenstate of H But for tdependent H. The answer is NO. 5.5.5. Solution for the tdependent Schrodinger s equation If we assume that at time t 0, the electron starts
Διαβάστε περισσότερα3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β
3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS Page Theorem cos(αβ cos α cos β -sin α cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α NOTE: cos(αβ cos α cos β cos(α-β cos α -cos β Proof of cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α Let s use a unit circle
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018
Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics(JRM) ISSN: 2395-028 SCITECH Volume 3, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION ublished online: March 29, 208 Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics www.scitecresearch.com/journals
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 9.2 Polar Equations and Graphs
180 Section 9. Polar Equations and Graphs In this section, we will be graphing polar equations on a polar grid. In the first few examples, we will write the polar equation in rectangular form to help identify
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFinite Field Problems: Solutions
Finite Field Problems: Solutions 1. Let f = x 2 +1 Z 11 [x] and let F = Z 11 [x]/(f), a field. Let Solution: F =11 2 = 121, so F = 121 1 = 120. The possible orders are the divisors of 120. Solution: The
Διαβάστε περισσότεραInverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. ------------------ ----------------------------- -----------------
Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. 1. Sin ( ) = a) b) c) d) Ans b. Solution : Method 1. Ans a: 17 > 1 a) is rejected. w.k.t Sin ( sin ) = d is rejected. If sin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραConcrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016
Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016 Silvio Capobianco Exercise 1.7 Let H(n) = J(n + 1) J(n). Equation (1.8) tells us that H(2n) = 2, and H(2n+1) = J(2n+2) J(2n+1) = (2J(n+1) 1) (2J(n)+1)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCongruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 24, no. 5, 239-246 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/.2988/ija.24.422 Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 Ligong An and
Διαβάστε περισσότερα5. Choice under Uncertainty
5. Choice under Uncertainty Daisuke Oyama Microeconomics I May 23, 2018 Formulations von Neumann-Morgenstern (1944/1947) X: Set of prizes Π: Set of probability distributions on X : Preference relation
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 8.3 Trigonometric Equations
99 Section 8. Trigonometric Equations Objective 1: Solve Equations Involving One Trigonometric Function. In this section and the next, we will exple how to solving equations involving trigonometric functions.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραProblem Set 3: Solutions
CMPSCI 69GG Applied Information Theory Fall 006 Problem Set 3: Solutions. [Cover and Thomas 7.] a Define the following notation, C I p xx; Y max X; Y C I p xx; Ỹ max I X; Ỹ We would like to show that C
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOther Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests
Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Side-Note: So far we have seen a few approaches for creating tests such as Neyman-Pearson Lemma ( most powerful tests of H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 :
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics
Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics Nov 1, 01 In this lecture we examine root systems from an axiomatic point of view. 1 Reflections If v R n, then it determines a hyperplane, denoted P v, through the
Διαβάστε περισσότερα4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)
84 CHAPTER 4. STATIONARY TS MODELS 4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(,) This section is an introduction to a wide class of models ARMA(p,q) which we will consider in more detail later in this
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS
MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS FUMIE NAKAOKA AND NOBUYUKI ODA Received 20 December 2005; Revised 28 May 2006; Accepted 6 August 2006 Some properties of minimal closed sets and maximal closed
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTHE GENERAL INDUCTIVE ARGUMENT FOR MEASURE ANALYSES WITH ADDITIVE ORDINAL ALGEBRAS
THE GENERAL INDUCTIVE ARGUMENT FOR MEASURE ANALYSES WITH ADDITIVE ORDINAL ALGEBRAS STEFAN BOLD, BENEDIKT LÖWE In [BoLö ] we gave a survey of measure analyses under AD, discussed the general theory of order
Διαβάστε περισσότεραBounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees
Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees Thomas F. Kent Andrea Sorbi Università degli Studi di Siena Italia July 18, 2007 Goal: Introduce a form of Σ 0 2-permitting for the enumeration degrees. Till now,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSolutions to Exercise Sheet 5
Solutions to Eercise Sheet 5 jacques@ucsd.edu. Let X and Y be random variables with joint pdf f(, y) = 3y( + y) where and y. Determine each of the following probabilities. Solutions. a. P (X ). b. P (X
Διαβάστε περισσότεραApproximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude
Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude Jan Behrens 2012-12-31 In this paper we shall provide a method to approximate distances between two points on earth
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEcon 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1
Eon : Fall 8 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 Email questions or omments to Dan Fetter Problem. Let X be a salar with density f(x, θ) (θx + θ) [ x ] with θ. (a) Find the most powerful level α test
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic
Lecture 2 Soundness and completeness of propositional logic February 9, 2004 1 Overview Review of natural deduction. Soundness and completeness. Semantics of propositional formulas. Soundness proof. Completeness
Διαβάστε περισσότεραANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?
Teko Classes IITJEE/AIEEE Maths by SUHAAG SIR, Bhopal, Ph (0755) 3 00 000 www.tekoclasses.com ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION # Question Type A.Single Correct Type Q. (A) Sol least
Διαβάστε περισσότεραderivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates
derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates swapnizzle 03-03- :5:43 We begin by recognizing the familiar conversion from rectangular to spherical coordinates (note that φ is used
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNOTES ON SQUARES, SCALES, AND REFLECTION
NOTES ON SQUARES, SCALES, AND REFLECTION MAXWELL LEVINE 1. Some Basic Facts Proposition 1. If κ
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe challenges of non-stable predicates
The challenges of non-stable predicates Consider a non-stable predicate Φ encoding, say, a safety property. We want to determine whether Φ holds for our program. The challenges of non-stable predicates
Διαβάστε περισσότερα6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.
6.1. Dirac Equation Ref: M.Kaku, Quantum Field Theory, Oxford Univ Press (1993) η μν = η μν = diag(1, -1, -1, -1) p 0 = p 0 p = p i = -p i p μ p μ = p 0 p 0 + p i p i = E c 2 - p 2 = (m c) 2 H = c p 2
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMain source: "Discrete-time systems and computer control" by Α. ΣΚΟΔΡΑΣ ΨΗΦΙΑΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΔΙΑΛΕΞΗ 4 ΔΙΑΦΑΝΕΙΑ 1
Main source: "Discrete-time systems and computer control" by Α. ΣΚΟΔΡΑΣ ΨΗΦΙΑΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΔΙΑΛΕΞΗ 4 ΔΙΑΦΑΝΕΙΑ 1 A Brief History of Sampling Research 1915 - Edmund Taylor Whittaker (1873-1956) devised a
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNew bounds for spherical two-distance sets and equiangular lines
New bounds for spherical two-distance sets and equiangular lines Michigan State University Oct 8-31, 016 Anhui University Definition If X = {x 1, x,, x N } S n 1 (unit sphere in R n ) and x i, x j = a
Διαβάστε περισσότεραarxiv:math/ v1 [math.lo] 15 Oct 1996
ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS 95 (1996), 61 114 FURTHER CARDINAL ARITHMETIC BY arxiv:math/9610226v1 [math.lo] 15 Oct 1996 Saharon Shelah Institute of Mathematics The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomomorphism of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Groups
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 6, 20, no. 64, 369-378 Homomorphism o Intuitionistic Fuzz Groups P. K. Sharma Department o Mathematics, D..V. College Jalandhar Cit, Punjab, India pksharma@davjalandhar.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals
Lecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals Confidence Intervals θ: an unknown parameter of interest We want to find limits θ and θ such that Gt = P nˆθ θ t If G 1 1 α is known, then P θ θ = P θ θ = 1 α
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMatrices and Determinants
Matrices and Determinants SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Q 1. For what value of k do the following system of equations possess a non-trivial (i.e., not all zero) solution over the set of rationals Q? x + ky + 3z
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGenerating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations
Applied Mathematics 06 7 98-07 Published Online January 06 in SciRes http://wwwscirporg/journal/am http://dxdoiorg/036/am067009 Generating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations Yasha iasamidze
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANSFORMATION SEMIGROUPS
GANIT J. Bangladesh Math. oc. IN 606-694) 0) -7 DIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANFORMATION EMIGROUP ubrata Majumdar, * Kalyan Kumar Dey and Mohd. Altab Hossain Department of Mathematics University
Διαβάστε περισσότεραReminders: linear functions
Reminders: linear functions Let U and V be vector spaces over the same field F. Definition A function f : U V is linear if for every u 1, u 2 U, f (u 1 + u 2 ) = f (u 1 ) + f (u 2 ), and for every u U
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPCF: THE ADVANCED PCF THEOREMS E69 SAHARON SHELAH
PCF: THE ADVANCED PCF THEOREMS E69 SAHARON SHELAH Abstract. This is a revised version of [Sh:430, 6]. Date: January 21, 2016. The author thanks Alice Leonhardt for the beautiful typing. I thank Peter Komjath
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 2. Ordinals, well-founded relations.
Chapter 2. Ordinals, well-founded relations. 2.1. Well-founded Relations. We start with some definitions and rapidly reach the notion of a well-ordered set. Definition. For any X and any binary relation
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΜηχανική Μάθηση Hypothesis Testing
ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΚΡΗΤΗΣ Μηχανική Μάθηση Hypothesis Testing Γιώργος Μπορμπουδάκης Τμήμα Επιστήμης Υπολογιστών Procedure 1. Form the null (H 0 ) and alternative (H 1 ) hypothesis 2. Consider
Διαβάστε περισσότεραP-IDEAL DICHOTOMY AND WEAK SQUARES
P-IDEAL DICHOTOMY AND WEAK SQUARES DILIP RAGHAVAN Abstract. We answer a question of Cummings and Magidor by proving that the P-ideal dichotomy of Todorčević refutes κ,ω for any uncountable κ. We also show
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions
SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES GLMA Linear Mathematics 00- Examination Solutions. (a) i. ( + 5i)( i) = (6 + 5) + (5 )i = + i. Real part is, imaginary part is. (b) ii. + 5i i ( + 5i)( + i) = ( i)( + i)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Simply Typed Lambda Calculus
Type Inference Instead of writing type annotations, can we use an algorithm to infer what the type annotations should be? That depends on the type system. For simple type systems the answer is yes, and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCyclic or elementary abelian Covers of K 4
Cyclic or elementary abelian Covers of K 4 Yan-Quan Feng Mathematics, Beijing Jiaotong University Beijing 100044, P.R. China Summer School, Rogla, Slovenian 2011-06 Outline 1 Question 2 Main results 3
Διαβάστε περισσότερα1. Introduction and Preliminaries.
Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.yu/filomat Filomat 22:1 (2008), 97 106 ON δ SETS IN γ SPACES V. Renuka Devi and D. Sivaraj Abstract We
Διαβάστε περισσότεραF A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I
F A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I Nr 46 2011 C. Carpintero, N. Rajesh and E. Rosas ON A CLASS OF (γ, γ )-PREOPEN SETS IN A TOPOLOGICAL SPACE Abstract. In this paper we have introduced the concept
Διαβάστε περισσότερα12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem
Tutorial 12: Radon-Nikodym Theorem 1 12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem In the following, (Ω, F) is an arbitrary measurable space. Definition 96 Let μ and ν be two (possibly complex) measures on (Ω, F). We say
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCoefficient Inequalities for a New Subclass of K-uniformly Convex Functions
International Journal of Computational Science and Mathematics. ISSN 0974-89 Volume, Number (00), pp. 67--75 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Coefficient Inequalities for
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS
CHAPTER 5 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS EXERCISE 104 Page 8 1. Find the positive root of the equation x + 3x 5 = 0, correct to 3 significant figures, using the method of bisection. Let f(x) =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:
HOMEWORK 4 Problem a For the fast loading case, we want to derive the relationship between P zz and λ z. We know that the nominal stress is expressed as: P zz = ψ λ z where λ z = λ λ z. Therefore, applying
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΑπόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.
Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο The time integral of a force is referred to as impulse, is determined by and is obtained from: Newton s 2 nd Law of motion states that the action
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIntuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 7, 202, no. 6, 769-776 Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings P. K. Sharma P.G. Department of Mathematics D.A.V. College Jalandhar city, Punjab, India pksharma@davjalandhar.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCommutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets S K Mala #1, Dr. MM Shanmugapriya *2 1 PhD Scholar in Mathematics, Karpagam University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu- 641021 Assistant Professor of Mathematics,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS
CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS Shiah-Sen Wang The graphs are prepared by Chien-Lun Lai Based on : Precalculus: Mathematics for Calculus by J. Stuwart, L. Redin & S. Watson, 6th edition, 01, Brooks/Cole Chapter
Διαβάστε περισσότερα9.09. # 1. Area inside the oval limaçon r = cos θ. To graph, start with θ = 0 so r = 6. Compute dr
9.9 #. Area inside the oval limaçon r = + cos. To graph, start with = so r =. Compute d = sin. Interesting points are where d vanishes, or at =,,, etc. For these values of we compute r:,,, and the values
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 8 Model Solution Section
MATH 004 Homework Solution Homework 8 Model Solution Section 14.5 14.6. 14.5. Use the Chain Rule to find dz where z cosx + 4y), x 5t 4, y 1 t. dz dx + dy y sinx + 4y)0t + 4) sinx + 4y) 1t ) 0t + 4t ) sinx
Διαβάστε περισσότεραk A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +
Chapter 3. Fuzzy Arithmetic 3- Fuzzy arithmetic: ~Addition(+) and subtraction (-): Let A = [a and B = [b, b in R If x [a and y [b, b than x+y [a +b +b Symbolically,we write A(+)B = [a (+)[b, b = [a +b
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSequent Calculi for the Modal µ-calculus over S5. Luca Alberucci, University of Berne. Logic Colloquium Berne, July 4th 2008
Sequent Calculi for the Modal µ-calculus over S5 Luca Alberucci, University of Berne Logic Colloquium Berne, July 4th 2008 Introduction Koz: Axiomatisation for the modal µ-calculus over K Axioms: All classical
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 19/5/2007
Οδηγίες: Να απαντηθούν όλες οι ερωτήσεις. Αν κάπου κάνετε κάποιες υποθέσεις να αναφερθούν στη σχετική ερώτηση. Όλα τα αρχεία που αναφέρονται στα προβλήματα βρίσκονται στον ίδιο φάκελο με το εκτελέσιμο
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM
SOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM Solutions to Question 1 a) The cumulative distribution function of T conditional on N n is Pr T t N n) Pr max X 1,..., X N ) t N n) Pr max
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIterated trilinear fourier integrals with arbitrary symbols
Cornell University ICM 04, Satellite Conference in Harmonic Analysis, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea August 6, 04 Motivation the Coifman-Meyer theorem with classical paraproduct(979) B(f, f )(x) :=
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3
Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 1 State vector space and the dual space Space of wavefunctions The space of wavefunctions is the set of all
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath 6 SL Probability Distributions Practice Test Mark Scheme
Math 6 SL Probability Distributions Practice Test Mark Scheme. (a) Note: Award A for vertical line to right of mean, A for shading to right of their vertical line. AA N (b) evidence of recognizing symmetry
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume
BULETINUL ACADEMIEI DE ŞTIINŢE A REPUBLICII MOLDOVA. MATEMATICA Numbers 2(72) 3(73), 2013, Pages 80 89 ISSN 1024 7696 On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume I.S.Gutsul Abstract. In
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStrain gauge and rosettes
Strain gauge and rosettes Introduction A strain gauge is a device which is used to measure strain (deformation) on an object subjected to forces. Strain can be measured using various types of devices classified
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II
Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II October 18, 2012 1 Review First let us recall the situation. Let g be a simple algebra, with maximal toral subalgebra h (which we are calling a CSA, or Cartan Subalgebra).
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOnline Appendix I. 1 1+r ]}, Bψ = {ψ : Y E A S S}, B W = +(1 s)[1 m (1,0) (b, e, a, ψ (0,a ) (e, a, s); q, ψ, W )]}, (29) exp( U(d,a ) (i, x; q)
Online Appendix I Appendix D Additional Existence Proofs Denote B q = {q : A E A S [0, +r ]}, Bψ = {ψ : Y E A S S}, B W = {W : I E A S R}. I slightly abuse the notation by defining B q (L q ) the subset
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPractice Exam 2. Conceptual Questions. 1. State a Basic identity and then verify it. (a) Identity: Solution: One identity is csc(θ) = 1
Conceptual Questions. State a Basic identity and then verify it. a) Identity: Solution: One identity is cscθ) = sinθ) Practice Exam b) Verification: Solution: Given the point of intersection x, y) of the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA General Note on δ-quasi Monotone and Increasing Sequence
International Mathematical Forum, 4, 2009, no. 3, 143-149 A General Note on δ-quasi Monotone and Increasing Sequence Santosh Kr. Saxena H. N. 419, Jawaharpuri, Badaun, U.P., India Presently working in
Διαβάστε περισσότεραforms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with
Week 03: C lassification of S econd- Order L inear Equations In last week s lectures we have illustrated how to obtain the general solutions of first order PDEs using the method of characteristics. We
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE
Lecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE BLUE: Robustness of LSE against normality We now study properties of l τ β and σ 2 under assumption A2, i.e., without the normality assumption on ε. From Theorem
Διαβάστε περισσότερα