QUANTUM REALITY FILTERS
|
|
- Κητώ Παπανικολάου
- 7 χρόνια πριν
- Προβολές:
Transcript
1 QUNTUM RELITY FILTERS Stan Gudder Department of Mathematics University of Denver Denver, Colorado bstract n anhomomorphic logic is the set of all possible realities for a quantum system. Our main goal is to find the actual reality φ a for the system. Reality filters are employed to eliminate unwanted potential realities until only φ a remains. In this paper, we consider three reality filters that are constructed by means of quantum integrals. quantum measure µ can generate or actualize a φ if µ() is a quantum integral with respect to φ for a density function f over events. In this sense, µ is an average of the truth values of φ with weights given by f. We mainly discuss relations between these filters and their existence and uniqueness properties. For example, we show that a quadratic reality generated by a quantum measure is unique. In this case we obtain the unique actual quadratic reality. Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one. lbert Einstein 1 Introduction In the past, one of the main goals of physics has been to describe physical reality. Recently however, physicists have embarked on the even more ambitious program of actually finding physical reality. Specifically, their quest is to find the universal truth function φ a. If is any proposition concerning the physical universe, then φ a () is 0 or 1 depending on whether is false 1
2 or true. ssuming that the set of propositions is a Boolean algebra, we can think of as an algebra of subsets of a universe Ω of outcomes. The outcomes are frequently interpreted as paths (or trajectories or histories) of a physical world. The actual physical universe Ω 1 is vast, complicated and probably infinite. To make the situation more manageable, we shall only consider a toy universe Ω with a finite number of elements. This will still enable us to investigate structures that may be applicable to Ω 1. The theory that we present originated with the work of R. Sorkin [12, 13] who was motivated by the histories approach to quantum mechanics and quantum gravity and cosmology [9, 10, 14]. Sorkin called this quantum measure theory and anhomomorphic logic. fter Sorkin s pioneering work, many investigators have developed various aspects of the theory [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 15, 16]. For a classical universe, a truth function would be a homomorphism φ from the algebra of propositions or events to the two-element Boolean algebra Z 2 = {0, 1}. However, because of quantum interference, a truth function describing a quantum reality need not be a homomorphism. We call the set = {φ: Z 2 : φ( ) = 0} the full anhomomorphic logic. The elements of are interpreted as potential realities for a physical system and are called coevents. Our task is to find the actual reality φ a which describes what actually happens. Even if the cardinality n = Ω of Ω is small, the cardinality = 2 (2n 1) of can be immense. Hence, it is important to establish reality filters that filter out unwanted potential realities until we are left with the actual reality φ a. Mathematically, reality filters are requirements that can be employed to distinguish φ a from other possible coevents. One of the main reality filters that has been used is called preclusivity [2, 3, 12, 13, 15]. Nature has provided us with a quantum measure µ which is related to the state of the system. The measure µ is where the physics is contained and information about µ is obtained by observing the physical universe. Specifically, µ is a nonnegative set function on that is more general than an ordinary measure. For, µ() is interpreted as the propensity that the event occurs. If µ() = 0, then does not occur and we say that is precluded. We say that φ is preclusive if φ() = 0 for all precluded. It is generally agreed that φ a should be preclusive. lthough preclusivity is an important reality filter, it is too weak to determine φ a uniquely. Other reality filters that have been used involve the 2
3 algebraic properties of coevents and are called unital, additive, multiplicative and quadratic properties [2, 7, 8, 12, 13, 15]. Unfortunately, there does not seem to be agreement on which, if any, of these properties is appropriate. In this paper we shall consider three other reality filters, two of which were proposed in [8]. These filters involve coevents that determine the quantum measure using an averaging process called a quantum integral. These filters are called 1-generated, 2-generated and actualized. The present paper continues our study of 1-generated and 2-generated coevents and introduces the concept of an actualized coevent. One of our results shows that if φ and ψ are 1-generated by the same quantum measure, then φ = ψ. nother result shows that if φ and ψ are quadratic coevents that are 2-generated by the same quantum measure, then φ = ψ. It follows that the 1- and 2-generated filters uniquely determine a quadratic reality. We also demonstrate that this result does not hold for actualized coevents. Still another result shows that 1-generated coevents are 2-generated and that unital 1-generated coevents are actualized. We give examples of coevents that are 2-generated and actualized but are not 1-generated. We also give an example of a coevent that is actualized but we conjecture is not 2-generated. Quantum measures that 1- or 2-generate a coevent appear to belong to a rather restricted class. The main reason for introducing the actualized filter is that it appears to be more general so it admits a larger set of actualizing quantum measures. We present evidence of this fact by considering a sample space Ω with Ω = 2. Various open problems are presented. These problems mainly concern quantum measures and coevents that correspond to our three reality filters. We begin an approach to one of these problems by characterizing 1-generated coevents. 2 nhomomorphic Logic and Quantum Integrals Let Ω be a finite nonempty set with cardinality Ω = n. We call Ω a sample space. We think of the elements of Ω as outcomes or trajectories of an experiment or physical system and the collection of subsets = 2 Ω of Ω as the possible events. We can also view the elements of as propositions concerning the system. Contact with reality is given by a truth function φ: Z 2 where Z 2 = {0, 1} is the two-element Boolean algebra with 3
4 the usual multiplication and addition given by 0 0 = 1 1 = 0 and 0 1 = 1 0 = 1. For ω Ω we define evaluation map ω : Z 2 given by { ω 1 if ω () = 0 if ω / For classical systems, it is assumed that a truth function φ is a homomorphism; that is, φ satisfies (H1) φ(ω) = 1 (unital) (H2) φ( B) = φ() φ(b) whenever B = (additivity) (H3) φ( B) = φ()φ(b) (multiplicativity) In (H2) B denotes B whenever B =. It is well-known that φ is a homomorphism if and only if φ = ω for some ω Ω. Thus, there are n truth functions for classical systems. s discussed in [2, 12, 13, 15], for a quantum system a truth function need not be a homomorphism. Various conditions for quantum truth functions have been proposed. In [12, 13] it is assumed that quantum truth functions satisfy (H2) and these are called additive truth functions while in [2, 15] it is assumed that quantum truth functions satisfy (H3) and these are called multiplicative truth functions. In [7] it is argued that quantum truth functions need not satisfy (H1), (H2) or (H3) but should be quadratic or grade-2 additive [2, 13] in the sense that (Q4) φ( B C) = φ( B) φ( C) φ(b C) φ() φ(b) φ(c) If φ, ψ : Z 2 we define φψ : Z 2 by (φψ)() = φ()ψ() and φ ψ : Z 2 by (φ ψ)() = φ() ψ() for all. We define the 0 and 1 truth functions by 0() = 0 for all and 1() = 1 if and only if. It can be shown [2, 7, 12] that φ is additive if and only if φ is a degree-1 polynomial φ = ω 1 ω m and that φ is multiplicative if and only if φ is a monomial φ = ω 1ω 2 ω m 4
5 Moreover, one can show [2, 7] that φ is quadratic if and only if φ is a degree-1 polynomial or φ is a degree-2 polynomial of the form φ = ω 1 ω m ω i ω j ω rω s We call = {φ: Z 2 : φ( ) = 0} the full anhomomorphic logic and the elements of are called coevents. There are 2 (2n 1) coevents of which n are classical, 2 n 1 are additive, 2 n 1 are multiplicative and 2 n(n+1)/2 are quadratic. It can be shown that any coevent can be written as a polynomial in the evaluation maps and that such an evaluation map representation is unique up to the order of its terms [2, 7]. pplying (Q4) one can prove by induction that φ is quadratic if and only if m m φ ( 1, m ) = φ( i j ) 1 [1 2 ( 1)m ] φ( i ) (2.1) i<j=1 for all m 3. It follows from (2.1) that a quadratic coevent is determined by its values on singleton and doubleton sets in. Moreover, given any assignment of zeros and ones to the singleton and doubleton sets in, there exists a unique quadratic coevent that has these values. Following [6], if f : Ω R and φ, we define the q-integral fdφ = φ ({ω : f(ω) > λ}) dλ φ ({ω : f(ω) < λ}) dλ 0 where dλ denotes Lebesgue measure on R. If f 0, then fdφ = ({ω : f(ω) > λ}) dλ (2.2) 0 and we shall only integrate nonnegative functions here. Denoting the characteristic function of a set by χ, any f : Ω R + has the canonical representation f = n i=1 α iχ i where 0 < α 1 < < α n and i j =, i j. It follows from (2.2) that ( n ) ( n ) fdφ = α 1 φ i + (α 2 α 1 )φ i + + (α n α n 1 )φ( n ) = i=1 ( n n ) ( n α j [φ i φ j=1 i=j i=j+1 i=2 0 i )] i=1 (2.3) 5
6 It is clear from (2.2) or (2.3) that fdφ 0 if f 0. lso, it is easy to check that αfdφ = α fdφ for all α R. However, the q-integral is not linear because (f + g)dφ fdφ + gdφ in general. Moreover, in general we have fd(φ ψ) fdφ + fdψ s usual in integration theory, for and φ we define fdφ = fχ dφ In general, B fdφ fdφ + B fdφ The q-integral is not even grade-2 additive because, in general fdφ fdφ + fdφ + fdφ fdφ fdφ fdφ B C B C B C B C 3 Reality Filters This section introduces the three quantum reality filters discussed in the introduction. q-measure is a set function µ: R + that satisfies the grade-2 additivity condition µ ( B C) = µ( B)+µ( C)+µ(B C) µ() µ(b) µ(c) (3.1) Condition (3.1) is more general than the usual (grade-1) additivity µ( B) = µ() + µ(b) for measures. q-measure µ is regular if it satisfies (R1) µ() = 0 implies µ( B) = µ(b). (R2) µ( B) = 0 implies µ() = µ(b). It is frequently assumed that a q-measure is regular but, for generality, we shall not make that assumption here. n example of a regular q-measure is a map µ() = ν() 2 where ν : C is a complex measure. Of course, 6
7 complex measures arise in quantum mechanics as amplitude measures. more general example of a regular q-measure is a decoherence functional that is employed in the histories approach to quantum mechanics [9, 10, 13]. q-measure µ is determined by its values on singleton and doubleton sets because it follows from (3.1) and induction that m m µ ({ω 1,..., ω m }) = µ ({ω i, ω j }) (m 2) µ(ω i ) (3.2) i<j=1 for all m 3, where µ(ω i ) is shorthand for µ ({ω i }). We assume that nature provides us with a fixed q-measure µ: R + and that µ() can be interpreted as the propensity that occurs. If µ() = 0, then does not occur and is µ-precluded. We say that φ is µ-preclusive if φ() = 0 whenever µ() = 0. The q-measure µ 1-generates φ if there exists a strictly positive function f : Ω R such that µ() = fdφ for all. We call f a φ-density for µ. Thus, µ is an average over the truth values of φ weighted by the density f. Unfortunately, there are many q-measures that do not 1-generate any coevent. One reason for this is that when Ω = n, then f : Ω R gives at most n pieces of information, while a q-measure is determined by its values on singleton and doubleton sets so n(n + 1)/2 pieces of information may be needed. We therefore introduce a more complicated (and as we shall show, more general) definition. function f : Ω Ω R is symmetric if f(ω, ω ) = f(ω, ω) for all ω, ω Ω. Notice that a symmetric function on Ω Ω has n(n+1)/2 possible values. q-measure µ on 2-generates φ if there exists a strictly positive symmetric function f : Ω Ω R such that [ ] µ() = f(ω, ω )dφ(ω) dφ(ω ) for every. gain, f is a φ-density for µ. It can be shown that if φ is 1- or 2-generated by µ, then φ is µ-preclusive [8]. There are still a considerable number of coevents that are not 2-generated by any q-measures. For example, we conjecture that ω1 ω2 ω3 is not 2- generated by a q-measure. For this reason we introduce what we believe (but have not yet proved) is a more general condition. q-measure µ on actualizes φ if there exists a strictly positive symmetric function f : Ω Ω R such that [ ] µ() = f(ω, ω )dφ(ω) dφ(ω ) 7 i=1
8 for all. lthough we have not been able to show that actualization is more general than 1-generation, the next result shows that this is usually the case. Theorem 3.1. If µ 1-generates φ and µ(ω) 0, then µ actualizes φ. Proof. Since µ 1-generates φ, there exists a density f such that µ() = fdφ for all. Define the strictly positive symmetric function g : Ω Ω R by g(ω, ω ) = f(ω)f(ω )/µ(ω). We then have that [ ] g(ω, ω )dφ(ω) dφ(ω ) = 1 [ ] f(ω)f(ω )dφ(ω) dφ(ω ) µ(ω) = 1 f(ω )µ()dφ(ω ) = µ() µ(ω) for all. Hence, µ actualizes φ with density g. 4 ctualization The 1- and 2-generation filters have already been considered in [8]. Since we have just introduced the actualization filter in this paper, we shall now discuss it in more detail. Let Ω 2 = {ω 1, ω 2 }, 2 = 2 Ω 2 and let 2 be the corresponding full anhomomorphic logic. We shall show that every coevent in 2 is actualized and shall characterize the actualizing q-measures. Now 2 has the eight elements 0, ω1, ω2, ω1 ω2, ω1ω 2, ω1 ω1ω 2, ω2 ω1ω 2 and 1 = ω1 ω2 ω1ω 2. It is clear that 0 is actualized by the zero q-measure. For a > 0 we define the Dirac measure aδ ω1 by { a if ω 1 aδ ω1 () = 0 if ω 1 / Since [ aδ ω1 () = ] adω1(ω) dω1(ω ) it follows that aδ ω1 are the only q-measures that actualize ω1 and a similar result holds for ω2. Lemma 4.1. q-measure µ on 2 actualizes ω 1 ω 2 if and only if µ(ω 2 ) = max (µ(ω 1 ), µ(ω 2 )) min (µ(ω 1 ), µ(ω 2 )) (4.1) 8
9 Proof. Let φ = ω 1 ω 2 and let f : Ω 2 Ω 2 R be a strictly positive symmetric function satisfying For 2 define g : Ω 2 R + by g (ω ) = We then have f(ω 1, ω 2 ) f(ω 1, ω 1 ) f(ω 2, ω 2 ) (4.2) g {ω1 }(ω 1 ) = g {ω1 }(ω 2 ) = {ω 1 } {ω 1 } f(ω, ω )dφ(ω) (4.3) f(ω, ω 1 )dφ(ω) = f(ω 1, ω 1 ) f(ω, ω 2 )dφ(ω) = f(ω 1, ω 2 ) Hence, if µ actualizes φ with φ-density f then µ(ω 1 ) = g {ω1 }(ω )dφ(ω ) = f(ω 1, ω 1 ) f(ω 1, ω 2 ) and similarly, µ(ω 2 ) = f(ω 2, ω 2 ) f(ω 1, ω 2 ). We also have that g Ω2 (ω 1 ) = f(ω, ω 1 )dφ(ω) = f(ω 1, ω 1 ) f(ω 1, ω 2 ) g Ω2 (ω 2 ) = f(ω, ω 2 )dφ(ω) = f(ω 2, ω 2 ) f(ω 1, ω 2 ) Hence, µ(ω 2 ) = g Ω2 (ω )dφ(ω ) = f(ω 2, ω 2 ) f(ω 1, ω 1 ) = µ(ω 2 ) µ(ω 1 ) = max (µ(ω 1 ), µ(ω 2 )) min (µ(ω 1 ), µ(ω 2 )) The only if statement of the theorem holds because we obtain similar results for all orderings of f(ω 1, ω 1 ), f(ω 2, ω 2 ), f(ω 1, ω 2 ). Conversely, suppose that (4.1) holds. We can assume without loss of generality that µ(ω 1 ) µ(ω 2 ) so that µ(ω 2 ) = µ(ω 2 ) µ(ω 1 ). Let f : Ω 2 Ω 2 R be the strictly positive symmetric function given by f(ω 1, ω 2 ) = 9
10 f(ω 2, ω 1 ) = 1, f(ω i, ω i ) = µ(ω i ) + 1, i = 1, 2. Then (4.2) holds so by our previous work we have for i = 1, 2 that [ ] f(ω, ω )dφ(ω) dφ(ω ) = f(ω i, ω i ) f(ω 1, ω 2 ) = µ(ω i ) {ω i } and [ ] f(ω, ω )dφ(ω) dφ(ω ) = f(ω 2, ω 2 ) f(ω 1, ω 1 ) = µ(ω 2 ) µ(ω 1 ) = µ(ω 2 ) Hence, µ actualizes φ with φ-density f. Notice if we let µ(ω 2 ) = 0 and µ(ω 1 ) = µ(ω 2 ) = 1 in Lemma 4.1, µ becomes the Dirac measure δ ω1. This shows that δ ω1 actualizes both ω1 and ω1 ω2 so actualizing q-measures need not be unique. lso, note that ω1 ω2 is not δ ω1 -preclusive. Lemma 4.2. q-measure µ on 2 actualizes ω 1ω 2 if and only if µ(ω 1 ) = µ(ω 2 ) = 0 and µ(ω 2 ) > 0 Proof. Let φ = ω 1ω 2 and let f : Ω 2 Ω 2 R be a strictly positive symmetric function satisfying f(ω 1, ω 2 ) f(ω 1, ω 1 ) f(ω 2, ω 2 ) Employing the notation of (4.3) we have that g {ω1 }(ω 1 ) = f(ω, ω 1 )dφ(ω) = 0 {ω 1 } and similarly, g {ω1 }(ω 2 ) = 0. Hence, if µ actualizes φ with φ-density f then µ(ω 1 ) = g {ω1 }(ω )dφ(ω ) = 0 and similarly, µ(ω 2 ) = 0. We also have that g Ω2 (ω 1 ) = f(ω, ω 1 )dφ(ω) = f(ω 1, ω 2 ) g Ω2 (ω 2 ) = f(ω, ω 2 )dφ(ω) = f(ω 1, ω 2 ) 10
11 Hence, µ(ω 2 ) = g Ω2 (ω )dφ(ω ) = f(ω 1, ω 2 ) The only if statement of the theorem holds because we obtain similar results for all orderings of f(ω 1, ω 1 ), f(ω 2, ω 2 ), f(ω 1, ω 2 ). Conversely, suppose that µ(ω 1 ) = µ(ω 2 ) = 0 and µ(ω 2 ) > 0. Let f : Ω 2 Ω 2 R be the strictly positive symmetric function given by f(ω i, ω j ) = µ(ω 2 ), i = 1, 2. By our previous work µ actualizes φ with φ-density f. Notice that the q-measure in Lemma 4.2 is not regular. Lemma 4.3. q-measure µ on 2 actualizes 1 = ω 1 ω 2 ω 1ω 2 if and only if µ(ω 1 ), µ(ω 2 ) 0 and µ(ω 2 ) = max (µ(ω 1 ), µ(ω 2 )). Proof. Let φ = 1 and let f : Ω 2 Ω 2 R be a strictly positive symmetric function satisfying f(ω 1, ω 2 ) f(ω 1, ω 1 ) f(ω 2, ω 2 ) Employing the notation of (4.3) we have that g {ω1 }(ω 1 ) = f(ω, ω 1 )dφ(ω) = f(ω 1, ω 1 ) {ω 1 } g {ω1 }(ω 2 ) = f(ω, ω 2 )dφ(ω) = f(ω 1, ω 2 ) {ω 1 } Hence, if µ actualizes φ with φ-density f then µ(ω 1 ) = g {ω1 }(ω )dφ(ω ) = f(ω 1, ω 1 ) and similarly, µ(ω 2 ) = f(ω 2, ω 2 ). We also have that g Ω2 (ω 1 ) = f(ω, ω 1 )dφ(ω) = f(ω 1, ω 1 ) g Ω2 (ω 2 ) = f(ω, ω 2 )dφ(ω) = f(ω 2, ω 2 ) Hence, µ(ω 2 ) = g Ω2 (ω )dφ(ω ) = f(ω 2, ω 2 ) = µ(ω 2 ) = max (µ(ω 1 ), µ(ω 2 )) 11
12 The only if statement of the theorem holds because we obtain similar results for all orderings of f(ω 1, ω 1 ), f(ω 2, ω 2 ), f(ω 1, ω 2 ). Conversely, suppose that µ(ω 1 ), µ(ω 2 ) 0 and µ(ω 2 ) = max (µ(ω 1 ), µ(ω 2 )). We can assume without loss of generality that µ(ω 1 ) µ(ω 2 ) so that µ(ω 2 ) = µ(ω 2 ). Define the strictly positive symmetric function f : Ω 2 Ω 2 R by f(ω 2, ω 2 ) = µ(ω 2 ) and f(ω 1, ω 2 ) = f(ω 2, ω 1 ) = f(ω 1, ω 1 ) = µ(ω 1 ) By our previous work, µ actualizes φ with φ-density f. Lemma 4.4. q-measure µ on 2 actualizes ω 1 ω 1ω 2 if and only if µ(ω 2 ) = 0. Proof. Let φ = ω 1 ω 1ω 2. If µ actualizes φ then µ(ω 2 ) = 0 because φ(ω 2 ) = 0. Conversely, suppose µ(ω 2 ) = 0. Let f : Ω 2 Ω 2 R be the strictly positive symmetric function given by f(ω 2, ω 2 ) = 1, f(ω 1, ω 2 ) = f(ω 2, ω 1 ) = 1 + µ(ω 2 ) + µ(ω 1 ) f(ω 1, ω 1 ) = 1 + µ(ω 2 ) + 2µ(ω 1 ) Since g {ω1 }(ω 1 ) = f(ω 1, ω 1 ), g {ω1 }(ω 2 ) = f(ω 1, ω 2 ) we have that g {ω2 }(ω )dφ(ω ) = f(ω 1, ω 1 ) f(ω 1, ω 2 ) = µ(ω 1 ) Of course, g {ω2 } = 0 so that g {ω2 }(ω )dφ(ω ) = 0 = µ(ω 2 ) We also have g Ω2 (ω 2 ) = g Ω2 (ω 2 ) = f(ω, ω 1 )dφ(ω) = f(ω 1, ω 1 ) f(ω 1, ω 2 ) = µ(ω 1 ) f(ω, ω 2 )dφ(ω) = f(ω 1, ω 2 ) f(ω 2, ω 2 ) = µ(ω 2 ) + µ(ω 1 ) Hence, g Ω2 (ω )dφ(ω ) = g Ω2 (ω 2 ) g Ω2 (ω 1 ) = µ(ω 2 ) We conclude that µ actualizes φ with φ-density f. 12
13 These lemmas show that the actualization filter need not produce a unique coevent. That is, a q-measure may actualize more than one coevent. For example let f be the density function given by f(ω 1, ω 1 ) = 2 and f(ω 1, ω 2 ) = f(ω 2, ω 1 ) = f(ω 2, ω 2 ) = 1 Then the Dirac measure δ ω1 actualizes both ω1 ω2 and ω1 ω1ω 2 with density f. However, ω1 ω2 is not δ ω1 -preclusive so a preclusivity filter would eliminate ω1 ω2. Unfortunately, δ ω1 also actualizes ω1 with density g(ω i, ω j ) = 1, i, j = 1, 2. Of course, all these coevents are quadratic. By contrast, we shall show in Section 5 that if a quadratic coevent is 1- or 2-generated by a q-measure, then it is unique. Let Ω 3 = {ω 1, ω 2, ω 3 }, 3 = 2 Ω 3 and let 3 be the corresponding full anhomomorphic logic. Since 3 = 2 7 = 128 we cannot discuss them all so we consider a few examples. Example 1. We have shown in [8] that φ = ω1 ω2 ω3 is not 1-generated and we conjecture that φ is also not 2-generated. We now show that φ is actualized by the q-measure µ on 3 given by µ( ) = 0, µ(ω 1 ) = 5, µ(ω 2 ) = µ ({ω 2, ω 3 }) = 3, µ(ω 3 ) = µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 6, µ ({ω 1, ω 3 }) = 9 and µ(ω 3 ) = 4. To show that µ is indeed a q-measure we have that 3 i<j=1 µ ({ω i, ω j }) 3 µ(ω i ) = = 4 = µ(ω 3 ) i=1 Define the density function f by f(ω 1, ω 2 ) = f(ω 1, ω 3 ) = 1, f(ω 2, ω 3 ) = f(ω 1, ω 1 ) = 5, f(ω 2, ω 2 ) = 7, f(ω 3, ω 3 ) = 10. For all 3 let [ ] µ () = f(ω, ω )dφ(ω) dφ(ω ) (4.4) Employing the notation (4.3) we obtain g {ω1 }(ω 1 ) = f(ω 1, ω 1 ) = 5, g {ω1 }(ω 2 ) = f(ω 1, ω 2 ) = 1, g {ω1 }(ω 3 ) = f(ω 1, ω 3 ) = 1 It follows that µ (ω 1 ) = f(ω 1, ω 2 ) + f(ω 1, ω 1 ) f(ω 1, ω 3 ) = 5 13
14 In a similar way we have that We also have that µ (ω 2 ) = f(ω 1, ω 2 ) + f(ω 2, ω 2 ) f(ω 2, ω 3 ) = 3 µ (ω 3 ) = f(ω 1, ω 3 ) + f(ω 3, ω 3 ) f(ω 2, ω 3 ) = 6 g {ω1,ω 2 }(ω 1 ) = f(ω 1, ω 1 ) f(ω 1, ω 2 ) = 4 g {ω1,ω 2 }(ω 2 ) = f(ω 2, ω 2 ) f(ω 1, ω 2 ) = 6 g {ω1,ω 2 }(ω 3 ) = f(ω 2, ω 3 ) f(ω 1, ω 3 ) = 4 and hence, µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 6. Continuing the computations gives g {ω1,ω 3 }(ω 1 ) = f(ω 1, ω 1 ) f(ω 1, ω 3 ) = 4 g {ω1,ω 3 }(ω 2 ) = f(ω 2, ω 3 ) f(ω 1, ω 2 ) = 4 g {ω1,ω 3 }(ω 3 ) = f(ω 3, ω 3 ) f(ω 1, ω 3 ) = 9 and hence, µ ({ω 1, ω 3 }) = 9. We also have that g {ω2,ω 3 }(ω 1 ) = f(ω 1, ω 3 ) f(ω 1, ω 2 ) = 0 g {ω2,ω 3 }(ω 2 ) = f(ω 2, ω 2 ) f(ω 2, ω 3 ) = 2 g {ω2,ω 3 }(ω 3 ) = f(ω 3, ω 3 ) f(ω 2, ω 3 ) = 5 and hence, µ ({ω 2, ω 3 }) = 3. Finally, g Ω3 (ω 1 ) = f(ω 1, ω 2 ) + f(ω 1, ω 1 ) f(ω 1, ω 3 ) = 5 g Ω3 (ω 2 ) = f(ω 1, ω 2 ) + f(ω 2, ω 2 ) f(ω 2, ω 3 ) = 3 g Ω3 (ω 3 ) = f(ω 1, ω 2 ) + f(ω 3, ω 3 ) f(ω 2, ω 3 ) = 6 and hence, µ (Ω 3 ) = 4. Since µ() = µ () for all 3 we conclude that µ actualizes φ. Example 2. This example shows that δ ω1 actualizes the coevent φ = ω 1 ω 1ω 2ω 3 with density given by f(ω i, ω j ) = 1 for i j = 1, 2, 3, f(ω i, ω i ) = 2, i = 1, 2, 3. s before, define µ by (??). s in previous calculations, we have g {ω1 }(ω i ) = f(ω 1, ω i ), i = 1, 2, 3 and hence, µ (ω 1 ) = f(ω 1, ω 1 ) f(ω 1, ω 3 ) = 1 14
15 It is clear that g {ω2 }(ω i ) = g {ω3 }(ω i ) = 0 for i = 1, 2, 3 and hence, µ (ω 2 ) = µ (ω 3 ) = 0. We also have that for i = 1, 2, 3 and hence, g {ω1,ω 2 }(ω i ) = g {ω1,ω 3 }(ω i ) = f(ω 1, ω i ) µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = µ ({ω 1 ω 3 }) = f(ω 1, ω 1 ) f(ω 1, ω 2 ) = 1 Moreover, g {ω2,ω 3 }(ω i ) = 0 for i = 1, 2, 3 so that µ ({ω 2, ω 3 }) = 0. Finally, g Ω3 (ω 1 ) = f(ω 1, ω 1 ) f(ω 1, ω 2 ) = 1, g Ω3 (ω 2 ) = g Ω3 (ω 3 ) = 0 so that µ (Ω 3 ) = 1. Since δ ω1 () = µ () for all 3 we conclude that δ ω1 actualizes φ. Of course, δ ω1 also actualizes ω1 so we again have nonuniqueness. Example 3. Calculations similar to those in the previous two examples show that φ = ω1 ω2 ω3 ω1ω 2 is actualized by the q-measure µ given by µ( ) = 0, µ(ω 1 ) = µ(ω 3 ) = 1, µ(ω 2 ) = µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 4, µ(ω 3 ) = µ ({ω 1, ω 3 }) = 3 and µ ({ω 2, ω 3 }) = 2. The corresponding density is given by f(ω 1, ω 1 ) = f(ω 2, ω 2 ) = 2 f(ω 3, ω 3 ) = f(ω 1, ω 2 ) = 4 f(ω 1, ω 3 ) = 5, f(ω 2, ω 3 ) = 8 It can be shown that φ is also actualized by the q-measure ν given by ν( ) = 0, ν(ω 1 ) = ν ({ω 2, ω 3 }) = ν(ω 3 ) = 0 ν(ω 2 ) = ν(ω 3 ) = ν ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = ν ({ω 1, ω 3 }) = 1 The corresponding density is given by f(ω i, ω j ) = 1 for i, j = 1, 2, 3, (i, j) (2, 3) or (3, 2) and f(ω 2, ω 3 ) = 2. In the second case, φ is not ν-preclusive. 5 Generation This section discusses existence and uniqueness properties of 1- and 2- generated coevents. We first consider existence. It is clear that any coevent in 2 is 1- and 2-generated (and actualized). We now discuss coevents in = n that are 1-generated. 15
16 q-measure on whose only values are 0 or 1 is called a pure q-measure. pure q-measure can also be thought of as a coevent in and such coevents are called pure coevents. Thus, a pure coevent is an element of that is also a q-measure. lthough this appears to be rather specialized, there are quite a few pure coevents and most q-measures can be written as convex combinations of pure q-measures. It is clear that any φ 2 is a pure coevent. It can be shown that of the 128 coevents in 3, 34 are pure [7]. Example 4. Examples of pure coevents in 3 are ω 1, ω 1 ω 2, ω 1 ω 1ω 2, ω 1ω 2, ω 1 ω 2 ω 1ω 2, ω 1 ω 1ω 2 ω 2ω 3, ω 1 ω 2 ω 1ω 2 ω 1 ω 3, ω 1 ω 1ω 2 ω 1ω 3 ω 2ω 3, ω 1 ω 2 ω 3 ω 1ω 2 ω 1ω 3 ω 2ω 3 and the rest are obtained by symmetry. n example of a φ 3 that is not pure is φ = ω 1 ω 2 ω 3. Indeed, φ(ω 3 ) = 1 and φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + φ ({ω 1, ω 3 }) + φ ({ω 2, ω 3 }) φ(ω 1 ) φ(ω 2 ) φ(ω 3 ) = 3 nother example of a nonpure element of 3 is ψ = ω 1 ω 2ω 3. Indeed, ψ(ω 3 ) = 0 and ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + ψ ({ω 1, ω 3 }) + ψ ({ω 2, ω 3 }) ψ(ω 1 ) ψ(ω 2 ) ψ(ω 3 ) = 2 Lemma 5.1. If φ is pure, then φ is quadratic. Proof. We must show that if φ satisfies φ( B C) = φ( B) + φ( C) + φ(b C) φ() φ(b) φ(c) (5.1) then φ satisfies φ( B C) = φ( B) φ( C) φ(b C) φ() φ(b) φ(c) (5.2) Suppose the left hand side of (5.2) is 1. Then there are an odd number of 1s on the right hand side of (5.1). Hence, the right hand side of (5.2) is 1. Suppose the left hand side of (5.2) is 0. Then there are an even number of 1s on the right hand side of (5.1). Hence, the right hand side of (5.2) is 0. We conclude that (5.2) holds so φ is quadratic. The converse Lemma 5.1 does not hold. For instance, in Example 4 we showed that the quadratic coevent ω 1 ω 2 ω 3 is not pure. 16
17 Theorem 5.2. coevent φ is 1-generated if and only if φ is pure. Proof. It is clear that if φ is pure, then φ 1-generates itself. Conversely, suppose φ n is 1-generated by the q-measure µ with φ-density f. We can reorder the ω i Ω n if necessary and assume that f(ω i ) = a i, i = 1,..., n, where 0 < a 1 a 2 a n. Since µ() = fdφ for every n we have µ(ω i ) = a i φ(ω i ), i = 1, 2,..., n and for i < j = 1, 2,..., n that µ ({ω i, ω j }) = fdφ = a i φ ({ω i, ω j }) + (a j a i )φ(ω j ) (5.3) {ω i,ω j } Letting i < j < k with i, j, k = 1,..., n, and = {ω i, ω j, ω k } we have µ() = fdφ = a i φ() + (a j a i )φ ({ω j, ω k }) + (a k a j )φ(ω k ) (5.4) pplying (5.3) and grade-2 additivity of µ gives µ() = a i φ ({ω i, ω j }) + (a j a i )φ(ω j ) + a i φ ({ω i, ω k }) + (a k a i )φ(ω k ) + a j φ ({ω j, ω k }) + (a k a j )φ(ω k ) a i φ(ω i ) a j φ(ω j ) a k φ(ω k ) (5.5) Equating (5.4) and (5.5) we see that all the terms cancel except those with a factor of a i. Canceling the a i gives φ() = φ ({ω i, ω j })+φ ({ω i, ω k })+φ ({ω j, ω k }) φ(ω i ) φ(ω j ) φ(ω k ) (5.6) We can now proceed by induction to show that φ satisfies (3.2) and thus is a q-measure. Instead of carrying out the general induction step which is quite cumbersome, we shall verify (3.2) for B = {ω i, ω j, ω k, ω l } where i, j, k, l {1, 2,... n} with i < j < k < l. s in (5.3) we have by (5.6) that µ(b) = fdφ = a i φ(b) + (a j a i )φ ({ω j, ω k, ω l }) B + (a k a j )φ ({ω k, ω l }) + (a l a k )φ(ω l ) (5.7) = a i φ(b) + (a j a i ) [φ ({ω j, ω k }) + φ ({ω j, ω l }) + φ ({ω k, ω l }) φ(ω j ) φ(ω k ) φ(ω l )] + (a k a j )φ ({ω k, ω l }) + (a l a k )φ(ω l ) 17
18 gain, applying (5.3) and grade-2 additivity of µ gives µ(b) = a i φ ({ω i, ω j }) + (a j a i )φ(ω j ) + a i φ ({ω i, ω k }) + (a k a i )φ(ω k ) + a i φ ({ω i, ω l }) + (a l a i )φ(ω l ) + a j φ ({ω j, ω k }) + (a k a j )φ(ω k ) + a j φ ({ω j, ω l }) + (a l a j )φ(ω l ) + a k φ ({ω k, ω l }) + (a l a k )φ(ω l ) 2 [a i φ(ω i ) + a j φ(ω j ) + a k φ(ω k ) + a l φ(ω l )] (5.8) Equating (5.7) and (5.8) we see that all the terms cancel except those with a factor a i. Canceling the a i shows that (3.2) holds for φ with m = 4. It follows from Theorem 5.2 that if φ is 1-generated then φ is 2-generated. Indeed if φ is 1-generated then φ is 2-generated by itself because [ ] dφ(ω) dφ(ω ) = φ()dφ = φ() 2 = φ() Similar to Theorem 3.1 it also follows from Theorem 5.2 that if φ is unital and 1-generated then φ is actualized. Indeed, we then have [ ] dφ(ω) dφ(ω ) = φ()dφ = φ()φ(ω) = φ() Using these filters we see that the actual reality corresponding to a pure q- measure is itself. The next example shows that 2-generation is strictly more general than 1-generation. Example 5. It is easy to check that φ = ω 1 ω 2 ω 3 ω 1ω 2 is not pure so φ is not 1-generated. Let µ be the q-measure on 3 defined by µ( ) = µ(ω 3 ) = 0, µ(ω 3 ) = µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 2, µ(ω 1 ) = µ(ω 2 ) = µ ({ω 1, ω 3 }) = µ ({ω 2, ω 3 }) = 1 It can be shown that µ 2-generates φ with φ-density f given by f(ω 1, ω 1 ) = f(ω 2, ω 2 ) = 1 and f(ω 3, ω 3 ) = f(ω 1, ω 2 ) = f(ω 1, ω 3 ) = f(ω 2, ω 3 ) = 2 The next two results concern the uniqueness of 1- and 2-generated coevents. Theorem 5.3. If µ 1-generates φ and ψ then φ = ψ. 18
19 Proof. We have that µ() = fdφ = gdψ for all where f is a φ-density and g is a ψ-density for µ. Since fdφ = f(ω)φ(ω) {ω} we conclude that f(ω)φ(ω) = g(ω)ψ(ω) for every ω Ω. Hence, φ(ω) = 1 if and only if ψ(ω) = 1 and in this case f(ω) = g(ω) = µ(ω) Thus, φ and ψ agree on singleton sets and µ(ω) = 0 if and only if φ(ω) = 0. Suppose that 0 < µ(ω 1 ) µ(ω 2 ). Then f(ω 1 ) f(ω 2 ) and Similarly, g(ω 1 ) g(ω 2 ). Since we have that φ(ω 1 ) = φ(ω 2 ) = ψ(ω 1 ) = ψ(ω 2 ) = 1 {ω 1,ω 2 } fdφ = {ω 1,ω 2 } gdψ f(ω 1 )φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + [f(ω 2 ) f(ω 1 )] φ(ω 2 ) = g(ω 1 )ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + [g(ω 2 ) g(ω 1 )] ψ(ω 2 ) (5.9) Hence, φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }). Next suppose that µ(ω 1 ) = 0 and µ(ω 2 ) 0. Then φ(ω 1 ) = ψ(ω 1 ) = 0 and φ(ω 2 ) = ψ(ω 2 ) = 1. gain (5.9) holds. Hence, φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 0 if and only if ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 0. The case µ(ω 1 ) = µ(ω 2 ) = 0 is similar. We conclude that φ and ψ agree on doubleton sets. Since φ and ψ are quadratic by Lemma 5.1, and quadratic coevents are determined by their values on singleton and doubleton sets, φ and ψ coincide. Theorem 5.4. If µ 2-generates φ and ψ and both φ and ψ are quadratic, then φ = ψ. 19
20 Proof. We have that µ() = = [ ] f(ω, ω )dφ(ω) dφ(ω ) [ ] g(ω, ω )dψ(ω) dψ(ω ) (5.10) for all. Letting = {ω} in (5.10) we conclude that f(ω, ω)φ(ω) = g(ω, ω)ψ(ω) for all ω Ω. Hence, φ(ω) = 1 if and only if ψ(ω) = 1 and in this case f(ω, ω) = g(ω, ω) = µ(ω). We conclude that φ and ψ agree on singleton sets and µ(ω) = 0 if and only if ψ(ω) = 0. Suppose 0 < µ(ω 1 ) µ(ω 2 ). Then f(ω 1, ω 1 ) f(ω 2, ω 2 ) and φ(ω 1 ) = φ(ω 2 ) = ψ(ω 1 ) = ψ(ω 2 ) = 1 ssume that f(ω 2, ω 2 ) f(ω 1, ω 2 ). Case 1. g(ω 1, ω 1 ) g(ω 2, ω 2 ) g(ω 1, ω 2 ) Letting h f (ω ) = f(ω, ω )dφ(ω), h g (ω ) = we have that {ω 1,ω 2 } Hence, µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = {ω 1,ω 2 } h f (ω 1 ) = µ(ω 1 )φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + f(ω 1, ω 2 ) µ(ω 1 ) h f (ω 2 ) = µ(ω 2 )φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + f(ω 1, ω 2 ) µ(ω 2 ) {ω 1,ω 2 } h f (ω )dφ(ω ) g(ω, ω )dφ(ω) = [µ(ω 2 )φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + f(ω 1, ω 2 ) µ(ω 2 )] φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + [µ(ω 1 ) µ(ω 2 )] φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + µ(ω 2 ) µ(ω 1 ) (5.11) If φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 0, then µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = µ(ω 2 ) µ(ω 1 ). Since (5.11) also applies for ψ, we conclude that ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 0. If φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 1, then µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = f(ω 1, ω 2 ). gain, (5.11) also applies for ψ so ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 1. 20
21 Case 2. g(ω 1, ω 1 ) g(ω 1, ω 2 ) g(ω 2, ω 2 ) We now have that h g (ω 1 ) = µ(ω 1 )ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + g(ω 1, ω 2 ) µ(ω 1 ) h g (ω 2 ) = g(ω 1, ω 2 )ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + µ(ω 2 ) g(ω 1, ω 2 ) If ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 1, then µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = {ω 1,ω 2 } h g (ω )dψ(ω ) = µ(ω 2 ) and hence f(ω 1, ω 2 ) = µ(ω 2 ) so that φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 1. If ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 0, then µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = h g (ω )dψ(ω ) = 2g(ω 1, ω 2 ) µ(ω 1 ) µ(ω 2 ) {ω 1,ω 2 } or µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = µ(ω 2 ) + µ(ω 1 ) 2g(ω 1, ω 2 ) whichever is nonnegative. If φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 1, then 2g(ω 1, ω 2 ) µ(ω 1 ) µ(ω 2 ) = f(ω 1, ω 2 ) µ(ω 2 ) so that 2g(ω 1, ω 2 ) 2µ(ω 2 ) + µ(ω 1 ) which is a contradiction. We could also have µ(ω 2 ) + µ(ω 1 ) 2g(ω 1, ω 2 ) = f(ω 1, ω 2 ) µ(ω 2 ) so that 2g(ω 1, ω 2 ) µ(ω 1 ) which is a contradiction. ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 0 if and only if φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 0. Case 3. g(ω 1, ω 2 ) g(ω 1, ω 1 ) g(ω 2, ω 2 ) We now have that Hence, µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = h g (ω 1 ) = g(ω 1, ω 2 )ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + µ(ω 1 ) g(ω 1, ω 2 ) h g (ω 2 ) = g(ω 1, ω 2 )ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + µ(ω 2 ) g(ω 1, ω 2 ) {ω 1,ω 2 } h g (ω )dψ(ω ) We conclude that = [g(ω 1, ω 2 )ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + µ(ω 1 ) g(ω 1, ω 2 )] ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + µ(ω 2 ) µ(ω 1 ) 21
22 If ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 0, then µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = µ(ω 2 ) µ(ω 1 ) so that φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 0. If ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 1, then µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = µ(ω 2 ) > µ(ω 2 ) µ(ω 1 ) This implies that φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 1. There are other cases, including the case where f(ω 1, ω 2 ) f(ω 2, ω 2 ), but the results are similar. It follows that in all possible cases where µ(ω 1 ), µ(ω 2 ) 0 we have φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }). We now consider the situation in which µ(ω 1 ) = µ(ω 2 ) = 0. Then ssume that and We then have that Hence, φ(ω 1 ) = φ(ω 2 ) = ψ(ω 1 ) = ψ(ω 2 ) = 0 f(ω 1, ω 1 ) f(ω 2, ω 2 ) f(ω 1, ω 2 ) (5.12) g(ω 1, ω 1 ) g(ω 2, ω 2 ) g(ω 1, ω 2 ) h f (ω 1 ) = f(ω 1, ω 1 )φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }), h f (ω 2 ) = f(ω 2, ω 2 )φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = f(ω 1, ω 1 )φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = g(ω 1, ω 1 )ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) and φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }). ll the other cases in this situation are similar. The last situation that needs to be considered is µ(ω 1 ) = 0, µ(ω 2 ) > 0. Then φ(ω 1 ) = ψ(ω 1 ) = 0, φ(ω 2 ) = ψ(ω 2 ) = 1 and f(ω 2, ω 2 ) = g(ω 2, ω 2 ) = µ(ω 2 ) ssuming that (5.12) holds, we treat the three cases considered before. Case 1. g(ω 1, ω 1 ) g(ω 2, ω 2 ) g(ω 1, ω 2 ) We now have that h f (ω 1 ) = f(ω 1, ω 1 )φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + f(ω 1, ω 2 ) f(ω 1, ω 1 ) h f (ω 2 ) = µ(ω 2 )φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) 22
23 Since we obtain similar results for h g, we conclude that µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = µ(ω 2 )φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = µ(ω 2 )ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) Hence, φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }). Case 2. g(ω 1, ω 1 ) g(ω 1, ω 2 ) g(ω 2, ω 2 ) s in Case 1 we have that µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = µ(ω 2 )φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }). lso, h g (ω 1 ) = g(ω 1, ω 1 )ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + g(ω 1, ω 2 ) g(ω 1, ω 1 ) h g (ω 2 ) = g(ω 1, ω 2 )ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + µ(ω 2 ) g(ω 1, ω 2 ) If ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 1, then µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = µ(ω 2 ) = µ(ω 2 )φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) so that φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 1. If ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 0, then µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = µ(ω 2 ) + g(ω 1, ω 1 ) 2g(ω 1, ω 2 ) = µ(ω 2 )φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) If φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 1 we obtain the contradiction, g(ω 1, ω 1 ) = 2g(ω 1, ω 2 ) so φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 0. lternatively, we could have µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 0 so again, φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = 0. Case 3. g(ω 1, ω 2 ) g(ω 1, ω 1 ) g(ω 2, ω 2 ) We now have that µ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = g(ω 1, ω 2 )ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) + µ(ω 2 ) g(ω 1, ω 2 ) = µ(ω 2 )φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) Just as in Case 2 we conclude that ψ ({ω 1, ω 2 }) = φ ({ω 1, ω 2 }). The other cases are similar to the three cases considered. We have shown that φ and ψ coincide for all singleton and doubleton sets. Since φ and ψ are quadratic, it follows that φ = ψ. cknowledgement. The author thanks the referee for correcting mistakes in the original manuscript and making suggestions that greatly improve this paper. 23
24 References [1] F. Dowker and Y. Ghazi-Tabatabai, The Kochen-Specker theorem revisited in quantum measure theory, J. Phys. 41, (2008). [2] Y. Ghazi-Tabatabai, Quantum measure theory: a new interpretation, arxiv: quant-ph ( ), [3] Y. Ghazi-Tabatabai and P. Wallden, The emergence of probabilities in anhomomorphic logic, J. Phys. 42, (2009). [4] S. Gudder, Finite quantum measure spaces, mer. Math. Monthly (2010). [5] S. Gudder, Quantum measure theory, Math. Slovaca (to appear). [6] S. Gudder, Quantum measure and integration theory, arxiv: quant-ph ( ), 2009 and J. Math. Phys. (to appear). [7] S. Gudder, n anhomomorphic logic for quantum mechanics, arxiv: quant-ph ( ), [8] S. Gudder, Quantum integrals and anhomomorphic logics, arxiv: quantph ( ), [9] J. J. Halliwell, Partial decoherence of histories and the Diosi test, arxiv: quant-ph ( ), 2009 and Quantum Information Processing (to appear). [10] X. Martin, D. O Connor and R. Sorkin, The random walk in generalized quantum theory, Phys. Rev. 071, (2005). [11] R. Salgado, Some identities for the quantum measure and its generalizations, Mod. Phys. Letts. 17 (2002), [12] R. Sorkin, Quantum mechanics as quantum measure theory, Mod. Phys. Letts. 9 (1994), [13] R. Sorkin, Quantum measure theory and its interpretation, in Proceedings of the 4th Drexel Symposium on quantum nonintegrability, eds. D. Feng and B.-L. Hu, (1994). 24
25 [14] R. Sorkin, Quantum mechanics without the wave function, J. Phys. 40 (2007), [15] R. Sorkin, n exercise in anhomomorphic logic, J. Phys. (to appear). [16] S. Surya and P. Wallden, Quantum covers in quantum measure theory, arxiv, quant-ph ( ),
2 Composition. Invertible Mappings
Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan Composition. Invertible Mappings In this section we discuss two procedures for creating new mappings from old ones, namely,
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set May 6, 2008 Abstract A set of first-order formulas, whatever the cardinality of the set of symbols, is equivalent to an independent
EE512: Error Control Coding
EE512: Error Control Coding Solution for Assignment on Finite Fields February 16, 2007 1. (a) Addition and Multiplication tables for GF (5) and GF (7) are shown in Tables 1 and 2. + 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 3
A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 67, 3301-3307 A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Equivalence Relation D. K. Basnet Dept. of Mathematics, Assam University Silchar-788011, Assam, India dkbasnet@rediffmail.com
Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit
Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ting Zhang Stanford May 11, 2001 Stanford, 5/11/2001 1 Outline Ordinal Classification Ordinal Addition Ordinal Multiplication Ordinal
ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II
ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II 2014/2015: Semester II Tutorial 7 1. Let X be a sample from a population P and consider testing hypotheses H 0 : P = P 0 versus H 1 : P = P 1, where P j is a known
C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions
C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions Paul Liu November 15, 2007 Note that these are sample solutions only; in many cases there were many acceptable answers. 1 Reynolds Problem 10.1 1.1 Normal-order
Example Sheet 3 Solutions
Example Sheet 3 Solutions. i Regular Sturm-Liouville. ii Singular Sturm-Liouville mixed boundary conditions. iii Not Sturm-Liouville ODE is not in Sturm-Liouville form. iv Regular Sturm-Liouville note
4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)
84 CHAPTER 4. STATIONARY TS MODELS 4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(,) This section is an introduction to a wide class of models ARMA(p,q) which we will consider in more detail later in this
Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016
Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016 Silvio Capobianco Exercise 1.7 Let H(n) = J(n + 1) J(n). Equation (1.8) tells us that H(2n) = 2, and H(2n+1) = J(2n+2) J(2n+1) = (2J(n+1) 1) (2J(n)+1)
HOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:
HOMEWORK 4 Problem a For the fast loading case, we want to derive the relationship between P zz and λ z. We know that the nominal stress is expressed as: P zz = ψ λ z where λ z = λ λ z. Therefore, applying
Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in
Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in : tail in X, head in A nowhere-zero Γ-flow is a Γ-circulation such that
Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor
Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor Given f L 1 T 1 ), we consider the partial sums of the Fourier series of f: N 1) S N fθ) = ˆfk)e ikθ. k= N A calculation gives the Dirichlet formula
Problem Set 3: Solutions
CMPSCI 69GG Applied Information Theory Fall 006 Problem Set 3: Solutions. [Cover and Thomas 7.] a Define the following notation, C I p xx; Y max X; Y C I p xx; Ỹ max I X; Ỹ We would like to show that C
Lecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic
Lecture 2 Soundness and completeness of propositional logic February 9, 2004 1 Overview Review of natural deduction. Soundness and completeness. Semantics of propositional formulas. Soundness proof. Completeness
Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 24, no. 5, 239-246 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/.2988/ija.24.422 Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 Ligong An and
Finite Field Problems: Solutions
Finite Field Problems: Solutions 1. Let f = x 2 +1 Z 11 [x] and let F = Z 11 [x]/(f), a field. Let Solution: F =11 2 = 121, so F = 121 1 = 120. The possible orders are the divisors of 120. Solution: The
CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS
CHAPTER 5 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS EXERCISE 104 Page 8 1. Find the positive root of the equation x + 3x 5 = 0, correct to 3 significant figures, using the method of bisection. Let f(x) =
Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations
99 Section 8. Trigonometric Equations Objective 1: Solve Equations Involving One Trigonometric Function. In this section and the next, we will exple how to solving equations involving trigonometric functions.
Fourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics
Fourier Series MATH 211, Calculus II J. Robert Buchanan Department of Mathematics Spring 2018 Introduction Not all functions can be represented by Taylor series. f (k) (c) A Taylor series f (x) = (x c)
derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates
derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates swapnizzle 03-03- :5:43 We begin by recognizing the familiar conversion from rectangular to spherical coordinates (note that φ is used
Homework 3 Solutions
Homework 3 Solutions Igor Yanovsky (Math 151A TA) Problem 1: Compute the absolute error and relative error in approximations of p by p. (Use calculator!) a) p π, p 22/7; b) p π, p 3.141. Solution: For
Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)
Phys460.nb 81 ψ n (t) is still the (same) eigenstate of H But for tdependent H. The answer is NO. 5.5.5. Solution for the tdependent Schrodinger s equation If we assume that at time t 0, the electron starts
Tridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008
Tridiagonal matrices Gérard MEURANT October, 2008 1 Similarity 2 Cholesy factorizations 3 Eigenvalues 4 Inverse Similarity Let α 1 ω 1 β 1 α 2 ω 2 T =......... β 2 α 1 ω 1 β 1 α and β i ω i, i = 1,...,
Chapter 3: Ordinal Numbers
Chapter 3: Ordinal Numbers There are two kinds of number.. Ordinal numbers (0th), st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th,..., ω, ω +,... ω2, ω2+,... ω 2... answers to the question What position is... in a sequence? What
Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.
Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequalit for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x,, z X. Prove that d(x, z) d(, z) d(x, ). (ii): Reverse triangle inequalit for norms:
ω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ω ω + 1 ω + 2 ω + 3 ω + 4 ω2 ω2 + 1 ω2 + 2 ω2 + 3 ω3 ω3 + 1 ω3 + 2 ω4 ω4 + 1 ω5 ω 2 ω 2 + 1 ω 2 + 2 ω 2 + ω ω 2 + ω + 1 ω 2 + ω2 ω 2 2 ω 2 2 + 1 ω 2 2 + ω ω 2 3 ω 3 ω 3 + 1 ω 3 + ω ω 3 +
Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3
Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 1 State vector space and the dual space Space of wavefunctions The space of wavefunctions is the set of all
Homomorphism in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Automata
International Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics Systems. ISSN 2248-9940 Volume 3, Number 1 (2013), pp. 39-45 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/ijfms.htm Homomorphism in Intuitionistic
Math221: HW# 1 solutions
Math: HW# solutions Andy Royston October, 5 7.5.7, 3 rd Ed. We have a n = b n = a = fxdx = xdx =, x cos nxdx = x sin nx n sin nxdx n = cos nx n = n n, x sin nxdx = x cos nx n + cos nxdx n cos n = + sin
Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics
Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics Nov 1, 01 In this lecture we examine root systems from an axiomatic point of view. 1 Reflections If v R n, then it determines a hyperplane, denoted P v, through the
Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests
Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Shirsendu Mukherjee Department of Statistics, Asutosh College, Kolkata, India. shirsendu st@yahoo.co.in So far we have treated the testing of one-sided
3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β
3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS Page Theorem cos(αβ cos α cos β -sin α cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α NOTE: cos(αβ cos α cos β cos(α-β cos α -cos β Proof of cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α Let s use a unit circle
Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests
Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Side-Note: So far we have seen a few approaches for creating tests such as Neyman-Pearson Lemma ( most powerful tests of H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 :
Matrices and Determinants
Matrices and Determinants SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Q 1. For what value of k do the following system of equations possess a non-trivial (i.e., not all zero) solution over the set of rationals Q? x + ky + 3z
6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes
122 CHAPTER 6. ARMA MODELS 6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes The purpose of forecasting is to predict future values of a TS based on the data collected to the present. In this section we will discuss a linear
6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.
6.1. Dirac Equation Ref: M.Kaku, Quantum Field Theory, Oxford Univ Press (1993) η μν = η μν = diag(1, -1, -1, -1) p 0 = p 0 p = p i = -p i p μ p μ = p 0 p 0 + p i p i = E c 2 - p 2 = (m c) 2 H = c p 2
MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS
MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS FUMIE NAKAOKA AND NOBUYUKI ODA Received 20 December 2005; Revised 28 May 2006; Accepted 6 August 2006 Some properties of minimal closed sets and maximal closed
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem
Tutorial 12: Radon-Nikodym Theorem 1 12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem In the following, (Ω, F) is an arbitrary measurable space. Definition 96 Let μ and ν be two (possibly complex) measures on (Ω, F). We say
SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS
Sahand Communications in Mathematical Analysis (SCMA) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016), 21-27 http://scma.maragheh.ac.ir SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS BAYAZ DARABY 1 AND JAVAD JAFARI 2 Abstract. In the mathematical
SCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018
Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics(JRM) ISSN: 2395-028 SCITECH Volume 3, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION ublished online: March 29, 208 Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics www.scitecresearch.com/journals
Απόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.
Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο The time integral of a force is referred to as impulse, is determined by and is obtained from: Newton s 2 nd Law of motion states that the action
k A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +
Chapter 3. Fuzzy Arithmetic 3- Fuzzy arithmetic: ~Addition(+) and subtraction (-): Let A = [a and B = [b, b in R If x [a and y [b, b than x+y [a +b +b Symbolically,we write A(+)B = [a (+)[b, b = [a +b
ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER
ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER Abstract. We define ordinal arithmetic and show laws of Left- Monotonicity, Associativity, Distributivity, some minor related properties and the Cantor Normal Form.
1. Introduction and Preliminaries.
Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.yu/filomat Filomat 22:1 (2008), 97 106 ON δ SETS IN γ SPACES V. Renuka Devi and D. Sivaraj Abstract We
MA 342N Assignment 1 Due 24 February 2016
M 342N ssignment Due 24 February 206 Id: 342N-s206-.m4,v. 206/02/5 2:25:36 john Exp john. Suppose that q, in addition to satisfying the assumptions from lecture, is an even function. Prove that η(λ = 0,
Solutions to Exercise Sheet 5
Solutions to Eercise Sheet 5 jacques@ucsd.edu. Let X and Y be random variables with joint pdf f(, y) = 3y( + y) where and y. Determine each of the following probabilities. Solutions. a. P (X ). b. P (X
Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets S K Mala #1, Dr. MM Shanmugapriya *2 1 PhD Scholar in Mathematics, Karpagam University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu- 641021 Assistant Professor of Mathematics,
CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS
CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS Shiah-Sen Wang The graphs are prepared by Chien-Lun Lai Based on : Precalculus: Mathematics for Calculus by J. Stuwart, L. Redin & S. Watson, 6th edition, 01, Brooks/Cole Chapter
Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs
Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs Who? Nichole Schimanski When? July 27, 2011 Graphs A graph, G, consists of a vertex set, V (G), and an edge set, E(G). V (G) is any finite set E(G) is
Reminders: linear functions
Reminders: linear functions Let U and V be vector spaces over the same field F. Definition A function f : U V is linear if for every u 1, u 2 U, f (u 1 + u 2 ) = f (u 1 ) + f (u 2 ), and for every u U
Μηχανική Μάθηση Hypothesis Testing
ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΚΡΗΤΗΣ Μηχανική Μάθηση Hypothesis Testing Γιώργος Μπορμπουδάκης Τμήμα Επιστήμης Υπολογιστών Procedure 1. Form the null (H 0 ) and alternative (H 1 ) hypothesis 2. Consider
PARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities
PARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities tanθ = sinθ cosθ cotθ = cosθ sinθ BASIC IDENTITIES cscθ = 1 sinθ secθ = 1 cosθ cotθ = 1 tanθ PYTHAGOREAN IDENTITIES sin θ + cos θ =1 tan θ +1= sec θ 1 + cot
Partial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013
The boundary element method March 26, 203 Introduction and notation The problem: u = f in D R d u = ϕ in Γ D u n = g on Γ N, where D = Γ D Γ N, Γ D Γ N = (possibly, Γ D = [Neumann problem] or Γ N = [Dirichlet
5. Choice under Uncertainty
5. Choice under Uncertainty Daisuke Oyama Microeconomics I May 23, 2018 Formulations von Neumann-Morgenstern (1944/1947) X: Set of prizes Π: Set of probability distributions on X : Preference relation
Strain gauge and rosettes
Strain gauge and rosettes Introduction A strain gauge is a device which is used to measure strain (deformation) on an object subjected to forces. Strain can be measured using various types of devices classified
Srednicki Chapter 55
Srednicki Chapter 55 QFT Problems & Solutions A. George August 3, 03 Srednicki 55.. Use equations 55.3-55.0 and A i, A j ] = Π i, Π j ] = 0 (at equal times) to verify equations 55.-55.3. This is our third
The challenges of non-stable predicates
The challenges of non-stable predicates Consider a non-stable predicate Φ encoding, say, a safety property. We want to determine whether Φ holds for our program. The challenges of non-stable predicates
ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?
Teko Classes IITJEE/AIEEE Maths by SUHAAG SIR, Bhopal, Ph (0755) 3 00 000 www.tekoclasses.com ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION # Question Type A.Single Correct Type Q. (A) Sol least
Coefficient Inequalities for a New Subclass of K-uniformly Convex Functions
International Journal of Computational Science and Mathematics. ISSN 0974-89 Volume, Number (00), pp. 67--75 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Coefficient Inequalities for
Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II
Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II October 18, 2012 1 Review First let us recall the situation. Let g be a simple algebra, with maximal toral subalgebra h (which we are calling a CSA, or Cartan Subalgebra).
New bounds for spherical two-distance sets and equiangular lines
New bounds for spherical two-distance sets and equiangular lines Michigan State University Oct 8-31, 016 Anhui University Definition If X = {x 1, x,, x N } S n 1 (unit sphere in R n ) and x i, x j = a
The Simply Typed Lambda Calculus
Type Inference Instead of writing type annotations, can we use an algorithm to infer what the type annotations should be? That depends on the type system. For simple type systems the answer is yes, and
DIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANSFORMATION SEMIGROUPS
GANIT J. Bangladesh Math. oc. IN 606-694) 0) -7 DIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANFORMATION EMIGROUP ubrata Majumdar, * Kalyan Kumar Dey and Mohd. Altab Hossain Department of Mathematics University
2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)
Uppsala Universitet Matematiska Institutionen Andreas Strömbergsson Prov i matematik Funktionalanalys Kurs: F3B, F4Sy, NVP 2005-03-08 Skrivtid: 9 14 Tillåtna hjälpmedel: Manuella skrivdon, Kreyszigs bok
Generating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations
Applied Mathematics 06 7 98-07 Published Online January 06 in SciRes http://wwwscirporg/journal/am http://dxdoiorg/036/am067009 Generating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations Yasha iasamidze
Space-Time Symmetries
Chapter Space-Time Symmetries In classical fiel theory any continuous symmetry of the action generates a conserve current by Noether's proceure. If the Lagrangian is not invariant but only shifts by a
Problem Set 9 Solutions. θ + 1. θ 2 + cotθ ( ) sinθ e iφ is an eigenfunction of the ˆ L 2 operator. / θ 2. φ 2. sin 2 θ φ 2. ( ) = e iφ. = e iφ cosθ.
Chemistry 362 Dr Jean M Standard Problem Set 9 Solutions The ˆ L 2 operator is defined as Verify that the angular wavefunction Y θ,φ) Also verify that the eigenvalue is given by 2! 2 & L ˆ 2! 2 2 θ 2 +
Second Order RLC Filters
ECEN 60 Circuits/Electronics Spring 007-0-07 P. Mathys Second Order RLC Filters RLC Lowpass Filter A passive RLC lowpass filter (LPF) circuit is shown in the following schematic. R L C v O (t) Using phasor
forms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with
Week 03: C lassification of S econd- Order L inear Equations In last week s lectures we have illustrated how to obtain the general solutions of first order PDEs using the method of characteristics. We
Econ 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1
Eon : Fall 8 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 Email questions or omments to Dan Fetter Problem. Let X be a salar with density f(x, θ) (θx + θ) [ x ] with θ. (a) Find the most powerful level α test
( y) Partial Differential Equations
Partial Dierential Equations Linear P.D.Es. contains no owers roducts o the deendent variables / an o its derivatives can occasionall be solved. Consider eamle ( ) a (sometimes written as a ) we can integrate
Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees
Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees Thomas F. Kent Andrea Sorbi Università degli Studi di Siena Italia July 18, 2007 Goal: Introduce a form of Σ 0 2-permitting for the enumeration degrees. Till now,
Practice Exam 2. Conceptual Questions. 1. State a Basic identity and then verify it. (a) Identity: Solution: One identity is csc(θ) = 1
Conceptual Questions. State a Basic identity and then verify it. a) Identity: Solution: One identity is cscθ) = sinθ) Practice Exam b) Verification: Solution: Given the point of intersection x, y) of the
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. ------------------ ----------------------------- -----------------
Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. 1. Sin ( ) = a) b) c) d) Ans b. Solution : Method 1. Ans a: 17 > 1 a) is rejected. w.k.t Sin ( sin ) = d is rejected. If sin
Cyclic or elementary abelian Covers of K 4
Cyclic or elementary abelian Covers of K 4 Yan-Quan Feng Mathematics, Beijing Jiaotong University Beijing 100044, P.R. China Summer School, Rogla, Slovenian 2011-06 Outline 1 Question 2 Main results 3
On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume
BULETINUL ACADEMIEI DE ŞTIINŢE A REPUBLICII MOLDOVA. MATEMATICA Numbers 2(72) 3(73), 2013, Pages 80 89 ISSN 1024 7696 On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume I.S.Gutsul Abstract. In
Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude
Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude Jan Behrens 2012-12-31 In this paper we shall provide a method to approximate distances between two points on earth
Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013
Notes on Average Scattering imes and Hall Factors Jesse Maassen and Mar Lundstrom Purdue University November 5, 13 I. Introduction 1 II. Solution of the BE 1 III. Exercises: Woring out average scattering
Homomorphism of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Groups
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 6, 20, no. 64, 369-378 Homomorphism o Intuitionistic Fuzz Groups P. K. Sharma Department o Mathematics, D..V. College Jalandhar Cit, Punjab, India pksharma@davjalandhar.com
Lecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE
Lecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE BLUE: Robustness of LSE against normality We now study properties of l τ β and σ 2 under assumption A2, i.e., without the normality assumption on ε. From Theorem
Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 4(2), 2011, pp
Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 4(2), 2011, pp.115-126. α, β, γ ORTHOGONALITY ABDALLA TALLAFHA Abstract. Orthogonality in inner product spaces can be expresed using the notion of norms.
Section 9.2 Polar Equations and Graphs
180 Section 9. Polar Equations and Graphs In this section, we will be graphing polar equations on a polar grid. In the first few examples, we will write the polar equation in rectangular form to help identify
Main source: "Discrete-time systems and computer control" by Α. ΣΚΟΔΡΑΣ ΨΗΦΙΑΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΔΙΑΛΕΞΗ 4 ΔΙΑΦΑΝΕΙΑ 1
Main source: "Discrete-time systems and computer control" by Α. ΣΚΟΔΡΑΣ ΨΗΦΙΑΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΔΙΑΛΕΞΗ 4 ΔΙΑΦΑΝΕΙΑ 1 A Brief History of Sampling Research 1915 - Edmund Taylor Whittaker (1873-1956) devised a
Second Order Partial Differential Equations
Chapter 7 Second Order Partial Differential Equations 7.1 Introduction A second order linear PDE in two independent variables (x, y Ω can be written as A(x, y u x + B(x, y u xy + C(x, y u u u + D(x, y
F A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I
F A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I Nr 46 2011 C. Carpintero, N. Rajesh and E. Rosas ON A CLASS OF (γ, γ )-PREOPEN SETS IN A TOPOLOGICAL SPACE Abstract. In this paper we have introduced the concept
Some new generalized topologies via hereditary classes. Key Words:hereditary generalized topological space, A κ(h,µ)-sets, κµ -topology.
Bol. Soc. Paran. Mat. (3s.) v. 30 2 (2012): 71 77. c SPM ISSN-2175-1188 on line ISSN-00378712 in press SPM: www.spm.uem.br/bspm doi:10.5269/bspm.v30i2.13793 Some new generalized topologies via hereditary
SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions
SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES GLMA Linear Mathematics 00- Examination Solutions. (a) i. ( + 5i)( i) = (6 + 5) + (5 )i = + i. Real part is, imaginary part is. (b) ii. + 5i i ( + 5i)( + i) = ( i)( + i)
Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates
Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the
Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates
Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the
Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 7, 202, no. 6, 769-776 Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings P. K. Sharma P.G. Department of Mathematics D.A.V. College Jalandhar city, Punjab, India pksharma@davjalandhar.com
Section 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas
09 Section 7. Double and Half Angle Fmulas To derive the double-angles fmulas, we will use the sum of two angles fmulas that we developed in the last section. We will let α θ and β θ: cos(θ) cos(θ + θ)
10.7 Performance of Second-Order System (Unit Step Response)
Lecture Notes on Control Systems/D. Ghose/0 57 0.7 Performance of Second-Order System (Unit Step Response) Consider the second order system a ÿ + a ẏ + a 0 y = b 0 r So, Y (s) R(s) = b 0 a s + a s + a
dim(u) = n 1 and {v j } j i
SOLUTIONS Math B4900 Homework 1 2/7/2018 Unless otherwise specified, U, V, and W denote vector spaces over a common field F ; ϕ and ψ denote linear transformations; A, B, and C denote bases; A, B, and
Pg The perimeter is P = 3x The area of a triangle is. where b is the base, h is the height. In our case b = x, then the area is
Pg. 9. The perimeter is P = The area of a triangle is A = bh where b is the base, h is the height 0 h= btan 60 = b = b In our case b =, then the area is A = = 0. By Pythagorean theorem a + a = d a a =
Notes on the Open Economy
Notes on the Open Econom Ben J. Heijdra Universit of Groningen April 24 Introduction In this note we stud the two-countr model of Table.4 in more detail. restated here for convenience. The model is Table.4.
THE SECOND ISOMORPHISM THEOREM ON ORDERED SET UNDER ANTIORDERS. Daniel A. Romano
235 Kragujevac J. Math. 30 (2007) 235 242. THE SECOND ISOMORPHISM THEOREM ON ORDERED SET UNDER ANTIORDERS Daniel A. Romano Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Banja Luka University, Mladena Stojanovića
( ) 2 and compare to M.
Problems and Solutions for Section 4.2 4.9 through 4.33) 4.9 Calculate the square root of the matrix 3!0 M!0 8 Hint: Let M / 2 a!b ; calculate M / 2!b c ) 2 and compare to M. Solution: Given: 3!0 M!0 8