1. Introduction and Preliminaries.
|
|
- Φαίδρα Καλάρης
- 8 χρόνια πριν
- Προβολές:
Transcript
1 Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: Filomat 22:1 (2008), ON δ SETS IN γ SPACES V. Renuka Devi and D. Sivaraj Abstract We consider a collection of subsets of a set X defined in terms of a function on (X), called the γ open sets, which is not a topology but we show that some of the results established for topologies are valid for this collection. In particular, we define δ γ open sets in a γ space and characterize its properties. Also, we discuss the properties of γ rare sets and characterize δ γ open sets in terms of γ rare sets. 1. Introduction and Preliminaries. Let X be a nonempty set and Γ = {γ : (X) (X) γ(a) γ(b) whenever A B}. Also, the subcollections, Γ 1 = {γ Γ γ(x) = X} and Γ 2 = {γ Γ γ(γ(a)) = γ(a) for every subset A of X } of Γ are defined in [3]. If γ Γ, a subset A of X is said to be γ open if A γ(a) [3]. The complement of a γ open set is γ closed. The family of all γ open sets is denoted by µ γ. In [3, Proposition 1.1], it is established that µ γ and arbitrary union of members of µ γ is again in µ γ. Collection of subsets of X satisfying these two conditions is called a generalized topology in [4]. X need not be γ open [3] and so need not be γ closed. X is γ open if γ Γ 1 [3]. The intersection of two γ open sets need not be γ open [3]. The γ interior of A is the largest γ open set contained in A and is denoted by i γ (A). Therefore, A is γ open if and only if A = i γ (A). The smallest γ closed set containing A is called the γ closure of A and is denoted by c γ (A). Therefore, A is γ closed if and only if A = c γ (A). In [3], it is established that c γ Γ 2, i γ Γ 2, i γ c γ = i γ c γ Γ 2, c γ i γ Γ 2 and X i γ (A) = c γ (X A). A subset A of X is said to be γ semiopen [5] if there exists a γ open set G such that G A c γ (G). The complement of a γ semiopen set is said to be γ semiclosed. It is easy to verify that A is γ semiopen if and only if A c γ i γ (A) and A is γ semiclosed if and only if i γ (A) = i γ c γ (A) A. Recall that, a subset A of X is said to be γ dense if X = c γ (A). σ(γ) is the family of all γ semiopen sets, π(γ) = {A X A 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 54 A 05, 54 A 10. Keywords and Phrases. γ open, γ interior, γ closure, γ semiopen, γ preopen, γα open, γβ open, γb open sets and generalized topology. Received: November 16, 2007 Communicated by Dragan S. Djordjević
2 98 V. Renuka Devi and D. Sivaraj i γ c γ (A)} is the family of all γ preopen sets [4], α(γ) = {A X A i γ c γ i γ (A)} is the family of all γα open sets [4], β(γ) = {A X A c γ i γ c γ (A)} is the family of all γβ open sets [4] and b(γ) = {A X A c γ i γ (A) i γ c γ (A)} is the family of all γb open sets [7]. The interior and closure operators of these generalized topologies are respectively denoted by, i σ and c σ, i π and c π, i α and c α, i β and c β and i b and c b. It is clear that µ γ α(γ) σ(γ) π(γ) b(γ) β(γ). In [7], a new family of functions defined on (X), denoted by Γ 4, is introduced. Γ 4 = {γ Γ G γ(a) γ(g A) for every γ open set G and A X}. If γ Γ 4, then the pair (X, µ γ ) is called a γ space. In [7, Example 2.2], it is established that µ γ is not a topology on X even if γ Γ 4 but the intersection of two γ open sets is γ open. It is interesting to note that in a topological space (X, τ), if i is the interior operator, then i Γ 4 and the i space is nothing but the topological space (X, τ). The following lemma will be useful in the sequel. Lemma 1.1. If (X, µ γ ) is a γ space, then the following hold. (a) If A and B are γ open sets, then A B is a γ open set [7, Theorem 2.1]. (b)i γ (A B) = i γ (A) i γ (B) for every subsets A and B of X [7, Theorem 2.3(a)]. (c) c γ (A B) = c γ (A) c γ (B) for every subsets A and B of X [7, Theorem 2.3(b)]. (d) c γ (c σ (A)) = c γ (A) for every subset A of X [7, Theorem 2.5(f)]. (e) i γ c γ (i π (A)) = i γ c γ (c π (A)) = i γ c γ (A) = i π (c γ (A)) for every subset A of X [7, Theorem 2.7(f)]. (f)c γ (i π (A)) = c γ i γ c γ (A) for every subset A of X [7, Theorem 2.7(v)]. (g) If X is a nonempty set, A is a subset of X and γ Γ, then i γ (c σ (A)) = i γ c γ (A) [7, Theorem 2.4(e)]. 2. More results in γ spaces In this section, we establish some of the properties of i γ and c γ in a γ space and also we prove that i γ Γ 4. Also, we characterize γβ open sets, γ locally closed sets and γ preopen sets. Theorem 2.1. If (X, µ γ ) is a γ space, then the following hold. (a) If G is γ open and A X, then G i γ (A) = i γ (G A) and so i γ Γ 4. (b) If G is γ open and A X, then G c γ (A) c γ (G A). (c) i γ (A F ) i γ (A) F where F is γ closed and A X. (d) c γ (A F ) = c γ (A) F where F is γ closed and A X. (e) If G is γ open and D is γ dense, then c γ (G D) = c γ (G). Proof. (a) Let G be γ open and A be any subset of X. Then G i γ (A) is a γ open set by Lemma 1.1(a), such that G i γ (A) G A. Therefore, G i γ (A) i γ (G A) = i γ (G) i γ (A) = G i γ (A), by Lemma 1.1(b). Therefore, G i γ (A) = i γ (G A). Since the set of all i γ open sets coincides with the set of all γ open sets, it follows that i γ Γ 4. (b) Let x G c γ (A) and U be an arbitrary γ open set containing x. Since U G is a γ open set containing x and x c γ (A), (U G) A and so U (G A) which implies that x c γ (G A). Therefore, G c γ (A) c γ (G A). (c) Now X i γ (A F ) = c γ (X (A F )) = c γ ((X A) (X F )) c γ (X A)
3 On δ sets in γ spaces 99 (X F ), by (b). Therefore, X i γ (A F ) (X i γ (A)) (X F ) = X (i γ (A) F ) and so i γ (A F ) i γ (A) F. (d) Now X c γ (A F ) = i γ (X (A F )) = i γ ((X A) (X F )) = i γ (X A) (X F ) = (X c γ (A)) (X F ) = X (c γ (A) F ) and so c γ (A F ) = c γ (A) F. (e) Since G D G, c γ (G D) c γ (G). By (b), c γ (G D) c γ (D) G = G which implies that c γ (G D) c γ (G) and so c γ (G D) = c γ (G). The following Theorem 2.2 shows that the intersection of two γα open sets is a γα open set and the intersection of a γ semiopen (resp. γ preopen, γβ open, γb open) set with a γα open set is a γ semiopen (resp. γ preopen, γβ open, γb open) set. We will use Lemma 1.1(a), Lemma 1.1(b) and Lemma 1.1(c) in the following Theorem without mentioning them explicitly. Theorem 2.2. If (X, µ γ ) is a γ space, then the following hold. (a)g A is γ semiopen (resp.γ preopen, γβ open, γb open) whenever G is γα open and A is γ semiopen (resp.γ preopen, γβ open, γb open). (b)g A is γα open whenever G and A are γα open. Proof. (a) Suppose G is γα open and A is γ semiopen. Then G A i γ c γ i γ (G) c γ i γ (A) c γ (i γ c γ i γ (G) i γ (A)) = c γ i γ (c γ i γ (G) i γ (A)) c γ i γ c γ (i γ (G) i γ (A)) = c γ i γ c γ i γ (G A) = c γ i γ (G A). Therefore, G A is γ semiopen. Suppose G is γα open and A is γ preopen. Then G A i γ c γ i γ (G) i γ c γ (A) = i γ (c γ i γ (G) i γ c γ (A)) i γ c γ (i γ (G) i γ c γ (A)) = i γ c γ i γ (i γ (G) c γ (A)) i γ c γ i γ c γ (i γ (G) A) i γ c γ (G A) and so G A is γ preopen. Suppose G is γα open and A is γβ open. Then G A i γ c γ i γ (G) c γ i γ c γ (A) c γ (i γ c γ i γ (G) i γ c γ (A)) = c γ i γ (c γ i γ (G) i γ c γ (A)) c γ i γ c γ (i γ (G) i γ c γ (A)) = c γ i γ c γ i γ (i γ (G) c γ (A)) c γ i γ c γ i γ c γ (G A) = c γ i γ c γ (G A) and so G A is γβ open. Suppose G is γα open and A is γb open. Then G A G (c γ i γ (A) i γ c γ (A)) = (G c γ i γ (A)) (G i γ c γ (A)) c γ i γ (G A) i γ c γ (G A) and so G A is γb open. (b) Suppose G and A are γα open. Then G A i γ c γ i γ (G) i γ c γ i γ (A) i γ (c γ i γ (G) i γ c γ i γ (A)) i γ c γ (i γ (G) i γ c γ i γ (A)) = i γ c γ i γ (i γ (G) c γ i γ (A)) i γ c γ i γ c γ (i γ (G) i γ (A)) i γ c γ i γ c γ i γ (G A) = i γ c γ i γ (G A) and so G A is γα open. Theorem 2.3. If (X, µ γ ) is a γ space, G is γ open and A X, then the following hold. (a)g i σ (A) i σ (G A). (b)g i α (A) i α (G A). (c)g i π (A) i π (G A). (d)g i β (A) i β (G A). (e)g i b (A) i b (G A). (f)g c σ (A) c σ (G A). (g)g c α (A) c α (G A). (h)g c π (A) c π (G A). (i)g c β (A) c β (G A). (j)g c b (A) c b (G A).
4 100 V. Renuka Devi and D. Sivaraj Proof. (a) Let G be γ open and A be a subset of X. Then G i σ (A) is a γ semiopen set by Theorem 2.2(a), such that G i σ (A) G A. Therefore, G i σ (A) i σ (G A). Similarly, we can prove (b), (c) (d) and (e). (f) Let x G c σ (A) and U be an arbitrary σ open set containing x. Since U G is a σ open set containing x and x c σ (A), (U G) A and so U (G A) which implies that x c σ (G A). Therefore, G c σ (A) c σ (G A). Similarly, we can prove (g), (h), (i) and (j). The following Corollary 2.4 shows that if γ Γ 4, then i α Γ 4 and Theorem 2.3(b) above is also true for γα open sets. The proof follows from Theorem 2.2(b) and the fact that the set of all γα open sets coincides with the set of all i α open sets. Corollary 2.4. If (X, µ γ ) is a γ space, G and A are subsets of X, then the following hold. (a) i α (G A) = i α (G) i α (A). (b) If G is γα open, then G i α (A) = i α (G A). (c) i α Γ 4. The following Corollary 2.5 follows from Theorem 2.3. Corollary 2.5. If (X, µ γ ) is a γ space, A X and G is γ open, then the following hold. (a) c σ (G c σ (A)) = c σ (G A). (b) c α (G c α (A)) = c α (G A). (c) c π (G c π (A)) = c π (G A). (d) c β (G c β (A)) = c β (G A). (e) c b (G c b (A)) = c b (G A). Let X be any nonempty set and γ Γ. A subset A of X is said to be γ regular [3] if A = γ(a). The following Theorem 2.6 shows that the intersection of two i γ c γ regular sets is again a i γ c γ regular set and Theorem 2.7 below gives characterizations of γβ open sets in γ spaces. Theorem 2.6. If (X, µ γ ) is a γ space, and A and B are i γ c γ regular sets, then A B is a i γ c γ regular set. Proof. Suppose A and B are i γ c γ regular sets. Now A B = i γ c γ (A) i γ c γ (B) = i γ (c γ (A) c γ (B)) by Lemma 1.1(b) and so i γ c γ (A) i γ c γ (B) i γ c γ (A B). Since the intersection of two γ open set is a γ open set, by Lemma 1.1(a), A B = i γ (A B) i γ c γ (A B). Therefore, A B = i γ c γ (A B) which implies that A B is i γ c γ regular. Theorem 2.7. If (X, µ γ ) is a γ space and A is a subset of X, then the following statements are equivalent. (a) A is γβ open. (b) c γ (A) = c γ i γ c γ (A). (c) c γ (A) is c γ i γ regular. (d) There is a γ preopen set U such that U A c γ (U). (e) c γ (A) is γ semiopen. (f) c σ (A) is γ semiopen.
5 On δ sets in γ spaces 101 (g) c π (A) is γβ open. Proof. The equivalence of (a) and (b) is clear. (a) (c). If A is γβ open, then c γ (A) = c γ i γ c γ (A) and so c γ (A) is c γ i γ regular. (c) (d). Let U = i π (A). Then U is a γ preopen set such that U A. Now c γ (U) = c γ (i π (A)) = c γ i γ c γ (A), by Lemma 1.1(f). Therefore, c γ (U) = c γ (A) and so U A c γ (U). (d) (a). Suppose U is a γ preopen set such that U A c γ (U). Then c γ (U) = c γ (A). Since U is γ preopen, U i γ c γ (U) and so A c γ (A) = c γ (U) c γ i γ c γ (U) c γ i γ c γ (A) and so A is γβ open. (c) implies (e) is clear. (e) (f). Suppose c γ (A) is γ semiopen. Now i γ c γ (A) = i γ c σ (A), by Lemma 1.1(g) and so i γ c γ (A) c σ (A) c γ (c σ (A)) = c γ (A), by Lemma 1.1(d). Therefore, i γ c γ (A) c σ (A) c γ (A) c γ i γ c γ (A). Since i γ c γ (A) is γ open, c σ (A) is γ semiopen. (f) (a). Suppose c σ (A) is γ semiopen. Then, A c σ (A) c γ i γ (c σ (A)) = c γ i γ c γ (A), by Lemma 1.1(g) and so A is γβ open. (a) (g). Suppose A is γβ open. Since every γ open set is a γ preopen set, c π (A) c γ (A) c γ i γ c γ (A) = c γ i γ c γ (c π (A)), by Lemma 1.1(e) and so (g) follows. (g) (a). Suppose c π (A) is γβ open. Then A c π (A) c γ i γ c γ (c π (A)) = c γ i γ c γ (A), by Lemma 1.1(e). Therefore, A is γβ open. Let X be a nonempty set and γ Γ. A subset A of X is said to be γ locally closed if A = G F where G is γ open and F is γ closed. Since X is γ closed, every γ open set is a γ locally closed set. The following Theorem 2.8 gives a characterization of γ locally closed sets, the proof is similar to the proof of the characterizations of locally closed sets [1] in any topological space and hence is omitted. Theorem 2.9 shows that for γ dense sets, the concepts γ open and γ locally closed on the subsets of X are equivalent. Theorem 2.8. Let X be a nonempty set, γ Γ and A be a subset of X. Then the following statements are equivalent. (a) A is γ locally closed. (b) A = G c γ (A) for some γ open set G. (c) c γ (A) A is γ closed. (d) A (X c γ (A)) is γ open. (e) A i γ (A (X c γ (A))). Theorem 2.9. Let X be a nonempty set, γ Γ and A be a γ dense subset of X. Then the following statements are equivalent. (a) A is γ open. (b) A is γ locally closed. Proof. Enough to prove (b) implies (a). Suppose A is γ dense and γ locally closed. Then A = G c γ (A) for some γ open set G. Therefore, A = G X = G and so A is γ open. The following Theorem 2.10 gives decompositions of γ open sets in γ spaces. Theorem Let (X, µ γ ) be a γ space and A be a subset of X. Then the following statements are equivalent. (a) A is γ open.
6 102 V. Renuka Devi and D. Sivaraj (b) A is γα open and γ locally closed. (c) A is γ preopen and γ locally closed. Proof. It is enough to prove that (c) implies (a). (c) (a). Suppose A is γ preopen and γ locally closed. Since A is γ preopen, A i γ c γ (A). Since A is γ locally closed, A = G c γ (A) for some γ open set G. Now A = A i γ c γ (A) = (G c γ (A)) i γ c γ (A) = G i γ c γ (A) = i γ (G c γ (A)), by Lemma 1.1(b). Therefore, A = i γ (A) which implies that A is γ open. The following Theorem 2.11 gives characterizations of γ preopen sets in a γ space. Theorem Let (X, µ γ ) be a γ space and A X. Then the following statements are equivalent. (a) A π(γ). (b) There is an i γ c γ regular set G such that A G and c γ (A) = c γ (G). (c) A = G D where G is a i γ c γ regular set and D is a γ dense set. (d) A = G D where G is a γ open set and D is a γ dense set. Proof. (a) (b). If A π(γ), then A i γ c γ (A) c γ (A) which implies that c γ (A) c γ i γ c γ (A) c γ (A) and so c γ i γ c γ (A) = c γ (A). Let G = i γ c γ (A). Then A G and i γ c γ (G) = i γ c γ i γ c γ (A) = i γ c γ (A) = G which implies that G is i γ c γ regular. Also c γ (G) = c γ i γ c γ (G) = c γ (A). (b) (c). Let G be an i γ c γ regular set such that A G and c γ (A) = c γ (G). Let D = A (X G). Then A = G D where G is i γ c γ regular. Now c γ (D) = c γ (A (X G)) = c γ (A) c γ (X G) = c γ (G) c γ (X G) = c γ (G (X G)) = c γ (X) = X. Hence D is γ dense. (c) (d). The proof follows from the fact that every i γ c γ regular set is a γ open set. (d) (a). Suppose A = G D where G is γ open and D is γ dense. Now G = G X = G c γ (D) c γ (G D) and so G = i γ (G) i γ c γ (G D) = i γ c γ (A) which implies that A i γ c γ (A). Hence A π(γ). 3. δ γ open Sets Let X be a nonempty set, γ Γ and A X. A is said to be δ γ open or A δ γ if and only if i γ c γ (A) c γ i γ (A). In topological spaces, the set of all δ i open sets coincides with the set of all δ sets [2]. The γ boundary of a subset A of X, denoted by bd γ (A), is given by bd γ (A) = c γ (A) i γ (A) = c γ (A) c γ (X A). A subset A of X is said to be µ γ rare if i γ c γ (A) =. In topological spaces, the set of all µ i rare sets coincides with the set of all nowhere dense sets. Every µ γ rare set is a δ γ open set, since i γ c γ (A) = c γ i γ (A). It is easy to show that every γ closed set is a δ γ open set. The following Theorem 3.1 gives some properties of µ γ rare sets. Theorem 3.1. Let X be a nonempty set and γ Γ. Then the following hold. (a) is µ γ rare. (b) Subset of a µ γ rare set is a µ γ rare set. (c) If A is a µ γ rare set, then bd γ (A) is a µ γ rare set.
7 On δ sets in γ spaces 103 Proof. (a) If M γ = {A A µ γ }, then c γ i γ (X) = c γ (M γ ) = X and so X c γ i γ (X) = which implies that i γ c γ ( ) =. (b) The proof is clear. (c) Since A is µ γ rare, i γ c γ (A) =. Now i γ c γ (bd γ (A)) = i γ c γ (c γ (A) i γ (A)) = i γ c γ (c γ (A) (X i γ (A))) i γ (c γ (A) c γ (X i γ (A))) i γ c γ (A) =. Therefore, bd γ (A) is a µ γ rare set. The following Theorems 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4 deal with µ γ rare sets and γ boundary of subsets of X in a γ space, which are essential to characterize δ γ open sets in Theorem 3.9. Also, in a γ space, one can easily prove the formulas 1 to 15 in [6, Page 56]. Theorem 3.2. Let (X, µ γ ) be a γ space and A and B be subsets X. Then the following hold. (a) If A is γ open, then bd γ (A) = c γ (A) A is µ γ rare. (b)bd γ (A B) bd γ (A) bd γ (B). Proof. (a) i γ c γ (c γ (A) A) = i γ c γ (c γ (A) (X A)) i γ (c γ (A) c γ (X A)) = i γ c γ (A) i γ c γ (X A) = i γ c γ (A) i γ (X A) = i γ c γ (A) (X c γ (A)) =. (b) bd γ (A B) = c γ (A B) c γ (X (A B)) = c γ (A B) (c γ (X A) c γ (X B)) (c γ (A) c γ (B)) (c γ (X A) c γ (X B)) = (c γ (A) (c γ (X A) c γ (X B))) (c γ (B) (c γ (X A) c γ (X B))) (c γ (A) c γ (X A)) (c γ (B) c γ (X B)) = bd γ (A) bd γ (B). Theorem 3.3. Let (X, µ γ ) be a γ space. If A and B are µ γ rare subsets of X, then A B is also a µ γ rare set. Proof. i γ c γ (A B) = i γ (c γ (A) c γ (B)), by Lemma 1.1(c) and so i γ c γ (A B) i γ c γ (A) c γ (B) = c γ (B) by Theorem 2.1(c). Therefore, i γ c γ (A B) i γ c γ (B) = and so A B is µ γ rare. Theorem 3.4. If (X, µ γ ) is a γ space, G is γ open and both A Gand G A are µ γ rare, then B H and H B are µ γ rare, where H = X c γ (G) and B = X A. Proof. Since A c γ (G) A G and A G is µ γ rare, A c γ (G) is µ γ rare. Since c γ (G) A = (G A) ((c γ (G) G) A), by Theorem 3.1(b) and Theorem 3.3, c γ (G) A is µ γ rare. Now B H = B (X c γ (G)) = (X A) c γ (G) = c γ (G) A and H B = (X c γ (G)) B = (X c γ (G)) (X A) = A c γ (G). Therefore, B H and H B are µ γ rare. The following Theorem 3.5 shows that every γ semiopen is a δ γ open set and the complement of a δ γ open set is a δ γ open set. Theorems 3.6 and 3.8 give more properties of δ γ open sets. Theorem 3.5. Let X be a nonempty set and γ Γ. Then the following hold. (a) If A is γ semiopen, then A δ γ. (b) If A δ γ, then X A δ γ. Proof. (a) If A is γ semiopen, then A c γ i γ (A). Now, i γ c γ (A) i γ c γ c γ i γ (A) c γ i γ (A) and so A δ γ. (b) A δ γ implies that i γ c γ (A) c γ i γ (A) and so X c γ i γ (A) X i γ c γ (A) which in turn implies that i γ (X i γ (A)) c γ (X c γ (A)) and so i γ c γ (X A) c γ i γ (X A). Hence X A δ γ. Theorem 3.6. Let (X, µ γ ) be a γ space. If A δ γ and B δ γ, then A B δ γ.
8 104 V. Renuka Devi and D. Sivaraj Proof. A, B δ γ implies that i γ c γ (A) c γ i γ (A) and i γ c γ (B) c γ i γ (B). Now i γ c γ (A B) i γ (c γ (A) c γ (B)) = i γ c γ (A) i γ c γ (B) by Lemma 1.1(b). Since A δ γ, it follows that i γ c γ (A B) c γ i γ (A) i γ c γ (B) c γ (i γ (A) i γ c γ (B)), by Theorem 2.1(b). Since B δ γ, i γ c γ (A B) c γ (i γ (A) c γ i γ (B)) c γ c γ (i γ (A) i γ (B)) = c γ (i γ (A) i γ (B)) = c γ i γ (A B). Hence i γ c γ (A B) c γ i γ (A B) and so A B δ γ. Corollary 3.7. Let (X, µ γ ) be a γ space. If A δ γ and B δ γ, then A B δ γ. Proof. The proof follows from Theorem 3.5(b) and Theorem 3.6. Theorem 3.8. Let (X, µ γ ) be a γ space and A and B be subsets of X such that A δ γ. Then i γ c γ (A B) = i γ c γ (A) i γ c γ (B). Proof. Since i γ c γ (A)and i γ c γ (B) are γ open sets, i γ c γ (A) i γ c γ (B) is also γ open by Lemma 1.1(a) and so i γ c γ (A) i γ c γ (B) = i γ (i γ c γ (A) i γ c γ (B)) i γ (c γ i γ (A) i γ c γ (B)), since A δ γ. Therefore, i γ c γ (A) i γ c γ (B) i γ c γ (i γ (A) i γ c γ (B)) i γ c γ (i γ (A) c γ (B)) i γ c γ c γ (i γ (A) B) i γ c γ (A B). Also, i γ c γ (A B) i γ (c γ (A) c γ (B)) = i γ c γ (A) i γ c γ (B). Hence i γ c γ (A B) = i γ c γ (A) i γ c γ (B). Theorem 3.9. Let (X, µ γ ) be a γ space and A X. Then the following are equivalent. (a) A δ γ. (b) A is the union of a γ semiopen set and a µ γ rare set. (c) A is the union of a γ open set and a µ γ rare set. (d) bd γ (A) is µ γ rare. (e) There is a γ open set G such that A G and G A are µ γ rare. (f) A = B C where B is γ semiopen and C is γ closed. (g) A = B C where B is γ semiopen and C is γα closed. (h) A = B C where B is γ semiopen and C is γ semiclosed. Proof. (a) (b). A = (A c γ i γ (A)) (A c γ i γ (A)). Let B = A c γ i γ (A) and C = A c γ i γ (A). Then i γ (A) B and B c γ i γ (A) which implies that B c γ i γ (B) and so B is γ semiopen. Now C i γ (A) = (A c γ i γ (A)) i γ (A) = and c γ (C) i γ (A) = c γ (A c γ i γ (A)) i γ (A) (c γ (A) i γ c γ i γ (A)) i γ (A) =. Again, by Lemma 1.1(b), i γ c γ (C) = i γ c γ (A c γ i γ (A)) i γ (c γ (A) i γ c γ i γ (A)) = i γ c γ (A) c γ i γ c γ i γ (A) = i γ c γ (A) c γ i γ (A), since c γ i γ Γ 2. Since A δ γ, i γ c γ (C) c γ i γ (A) c γ i γ (A) = and so C is µ γ rare. (b) (c). Suppose A = B C where B is γ semiopen and C is µ γ rare. Since B is γ semiopen, there exists a γ open set G such that G B c γ (G) and so B = G (B G). Since B G c γ (G) G and c γ (G) G is µ γ rare by Theorem 3.2(a), B G is µ γ rare. Therefore, A = G (B G) C and so (c) follows from Theorem 3.3. (c) (d). Suppose A = G B where G is γ open and B is µ γ rare. Now bd γ (A) = bd γ (G B) bd γ (G) bd γ (B), by Theorem 3.2(b). By Theorem 3.2(a), bd γ (G) is µ γ rare and by Theorem 3.1(c), bd γ (B) is µ γ rare. By Theorem 3.3, bd γ (G) bd γ (B) is µ γ rare and so bd γ (A) is µ γ rare. (d) (e). Suppose G = i γ (A). Then G A = and A G = A i γ (A) c γ (A) i γ (A) = bd γ (A). G is the required γ open set such that G A and A G are µ γ rare. (e) (f). Suppose G is a γ open set such that G A and A G are µ γ rare sets. If H = G c γ (G A), then H is a γ open set such that H A and so H A is
9 On δ sets in γ spaces 105 µ γ rare. Moreover, A H = A (G c γ (G A)) = (A G) c γ (G A). Since G A and A G are µ γ rare, it follows that A H is µ γ rare. Thus A = H (A H), union of a γ open set and a µ γ rare set which is nothing but (c). If B = X A and K = X c γ (H), then B K and K B are µ γ rare by Theorem 3.4. Thus K is a γ open set such that B K and K B are µ γ rare. Therefore, by (c), B = U R where U is γ open and R is µ γ rare. Hence A = (X U) (X R) where X U is γ closed. Now, c γ i γ (X R) = X i γ c γ (R) = X and so X R is γ semiopen. Therefore, A is the intersection of a γ closed set and a γ semiopen set. (f) (g). The proof follows from the fact that every γ closed set is a γα closed set. (g) (h). The proof follows from the fact that every γα closed set is a γ semiclosed set. (h) (a). Suppose A = B C where B is γ semiopen and C is γ semiclosed. Now i γ c γ (A) = i γ c γ (B C) i γ c γ (c γ i γ (B) C) i γ (c γ i γ (B) c γ (C)) = i γ c γ i γ (B) i γ c γ (C) c γ i γ (B) i γ c γ (C) c γ (i γ (B) i γ c γ (C)) = c γ (i γ (B) i γ (C)), since C is γ semiclosed. Therefore, i γ c γ (A) c γ i γ (B C) = c γ i γ (A). Hence A is δ γ open. REFERENCES [1 ] N. Bourbaki, General Topology (Part I), Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., [2 ] C. Chattopadhyay and C. Bandyopadhyay, On structure of δ sets, Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc., 83(1991), [3 ] Á. Császár, Generalized Open Sets, Acta Math. Hungar., 75(1-2)(1997), [4 ] Á. Császár, Generalized topology, generalized continuity, Acta Math. Hungar., 96(2002), [5 ] A. Güldürdek and O. B. Özbakir, On γ semiopen sets, Acta Math. Hungar., 109(4)(2005), [6 ] K. Kuratowski, Topology I, Academic Press, New York, [7 ] P. Sivagami, Remark on γ interior, Acta Math. Hungar., To appear. Address V. Renuka Devi: Department of Mathematics, A. J. College, Sivakasi, Tamil Nadu, INDIA renu siva2003@yahoo.com D. Sivaraj:
10 106 V. Renuka Devi and D. Sivaraj Department of Computer Applications, D. J. Academy for Managerial Excellence, Coimbatore , Tamil Nadu, INDIA ttn sivaraj@yahoo.com
Some new generalized topologies via hereditary classes. Key Words:hereditary generalized topological space, A κ(h,µ)-sets, κµ -topology.
Bol. Soc. Paran. Mat. (3s.) v. 30 2 (2012): 71 77. c SPM ISSN-2175-1188 on line ISSN-00378712 in press SPM: www.spm.uem.br/bspm doi:10.5269/bspm.v30i2.13793 Some new generalized topologies via hereditary
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOperation Approaches on α-γ-open Sets in Topological Spaces
Int. Journal of Math. Analysis, Vol. 7, 2013, no. 10, 491-498 Operation Approaches on α-γ-open Sets in Topological Spaces N. Kalaivani Department of Mathematics VelTech HighTec Dr.Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala
Διαβάστε περισσότεραF A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I
F A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I Nr 46 2011 C. Carpintero, N. Rajesh and E. Rosas ON A CLASS OF (γ, γ )-PREOPEN SETS IN A TOPOLOGICAL SPACE Abstract. In this paper we have introduced the concept
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS
MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS FUMIE NAKAOKA AND NOBUYUKI ODA Received 20 December 2005; Revised 28 May 2006; Accepted 6 August 2006 Some properties of minimal closed sets and maximal closed
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2 Composition. Invertible Mappings
Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan Composition. Invertible Mappings In this section we discuss two procedures for creating new mappings from old ones, namely,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 67, 3301-3307 A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Equivalence Relation D. K. Basnet Dept. of Mathematics, Assam University Silchar-788011, Assam, India dkbasnet@rediffmail.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOrdinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit
Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ting Zhang Stanford May 11, 2001 Stanford, 5/11/2001 1 Outline Ordinal Classification Ordinal Addition Ordinal Multiplication Ordinal
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomomorphism in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Automata
International Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics Systems. ISSN 2248-9940 Volume 3, Number 1 (2013), pp. 39-45 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/ijfms.htm Homomorphism in Intuitionistic
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEvery set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set May 6, 2008 Abstract A set of first-order formulas, whatever the cardinality of the set of symbols, is equivalent to an independent
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS
Sahand Communications in Mathematical Analysis (SCMA) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016), 21-27 http://scma.maragheh.ac.ir SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS BAYAZ DARABY 1 AND JAVAD JAFARI 2 Abstract. In the mathematical
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)
Uppsala Universitet Matematiska Institutionen Andreas Strömbergsson Prov i matematik Funktionalanalys Kurs: F3B, F4Sy, NVP 2005-03-08 Skrivtid: 9 14 Tillåtna hjälpmedel: Manuella skrivdon, Kreyszigs bok
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIntuitionistic Supra Gradation of Openness
Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences 2(3) (2008), 291-307 An International Journal c 2008 Dixie W Publishing Corporation, U. S. A. Intuitionistic Supra Gradation of Openness A. M. Zahran 1, S. E.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomomorphism and Cartesian Product on Fuzzy Translation and Fuzzy Multiplication of PS-algebras
Annals of Pure and Applied athematics Vol. 8, No. 1, 2014, 93-104 ISSN: 2279-087X (P), 2279-0888(online) Published on 11 November 2014 www.researchmathsci.org Annals of Homomorphism and Cartesian Product
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCommutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets S K Mala #1, Dr. MM Shanmugapriya *2 1 PhD Scholar in Mathematics, Karpagam University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu- 641021 Assistant Professor of Mathematics,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExample Sheet 3 Solutions
Example Sheet 3 Solutions. i Regular Sturm-Liouville. ii Singular Sturm-Liouville mixed boundary conditions. iii Not Sturm-Liouville ODE is not in Sturm-Liouville form. iv Regular Sturm-Liouville note
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs
Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs Who? Nichole Schimanski When? July 27, 2011 Graphs A graph, G, consists of a vertex set, V (G), and an edge set, E(G). V (G) is any finite set E(G) is
Διαβάστε περισσότεραReminders: linear functions
Reminders: linear functions Let U and V be vector spaces over the same field F. Definition A function f : U V is linear if for every u 1, u 2 U, f (u 1 + u 2 ) = f (u 1 ) + f (u 2 ), and for every u U
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStatistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests
Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Shirsendu Mukherjee Department of Statistics, Asutosh College, Kolkata, India. shirsendu st@yahoo.co.in So far we have treated the testing of one-sided
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in
Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in : tail in X, head in A nowhere-zero Γ-flow is a Γ-circulation such that
Διαβάστε περισσότεραORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER
ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER Abstract. We define ordinal arithmetic and show laws of Left- Monotonicity, Associativity, Distributivity, some minor related properties and the Cantor Normal Form.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018
Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics(JRM) ISSN: 2395-028 SCITECH Volume 3, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION ublished online: March 29, 208 Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics www.scitecresearch.com/journals
Διαβάστε περισσότεραC.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions
C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions Paul Liu November 15, 2007 Note that these are sample solutions only; in many cases there were many acceptable answers. 1 Reynolds Problem 10.1 1.1 Normal-order
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.
Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequalit for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x,, z X. Prove that d(x, z) d(, z) d(x, ). (ii): Reverse triangle inequalit for norms:
Διαβάστε περισσότερα3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β
3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS Page Theorem cos(αβ cos α cos β -sin α cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α NOTE: cos(αβ cos α cos β cos(α-β cos α -cos β Proof of cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α Let s use a unit circle
Διαβάστε περισσότεραST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II
ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II 2014/2015: Semester II Tutorial 7 1. Let X be a sample from a population P and consider testing hypotheses H 0 : P = P 0 versus H 1 : P = P 1, where P j is a known
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIntuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 7, 202, no. 6, 769-776 Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings P. K. Sharma P.G. Department of Mathematics D.A.V. College Jalandhar city, Punjab, India pksharma@davjalandhar.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn Pseudo δ-open Fuzzy Sets and Pseudo Fuzzy δ-continuous Functions
Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sciences, Vol. 5, 2010, no. 29, 1403-1411 On Pseudo δ-open Fuzzy Sets and Pseudo Fuzzy δ-continuous Functions A. Deb Ray Department of Mathematics West Bengal State University Berunanpukuria,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραON FUZZY BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES IN ŠOSTAK S SENSE (II)
Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 25 (2010), No. 3, pp. 457 475 DOI 10.4134/CKMS.2010.25.3.457 ON FUZZY BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES IN ŠOSTAK S SENSE (II) Ahmed Abd El-Kader Ramadan, Salah El-Deen Abbas, and Ahmed Aref
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTHE SECOND ISOMORPHISM THEOREM ON ORDERED SET UNDER ANTIORDERS. Daniel A. Romano
235 Kragujevac J. Math. 30 (2007) 235 242. THE SECOND ISOMORPHISM THEOREM ON ORDERED SET UNDER ANTIORDERS Daniel A. Romano Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Banja Luka University, Mladena Stojanovića
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 3 Solutions
Homework 3 Solutions Igor Yanovsky (Math 151A TA) Problem 1: Compute the absolute error and relative error in approximations of p by p. (Use calculator!) a) p π, p 22/7; b) p π, p 3.141. Solution: For
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPROPERTIES OF CERTAIN INTEGRAL OPERATORS. a n z n (1.1)
GEORGIAN MATHEMATICAL JOURNAL: Vol. 2, No. 5, 995, 535-545 PROPERTIES OF CERTAIN INTEGRAL OPERATORS SHIGEYOSHI OWA Abstract. Two integral operators P α and Q α for analytic functions in the open unit disk
Διαβάστε περισσότερα4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)
84 CHAPTER 4. STATIONARY TS MODELS 4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(,) This section is an introduction to a wide class of models ARMA(p,q) which we will consider in more detail later in this
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGenerating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations
Applied Mathematics 06 7 98-07 Published Online January 06 in SciRes http://wwwscirporg/journal/am http://dxdoiorg/036/am067009 Generating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations Yasha iasamidze
Διαβάστε περισσότεραJordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 4(2), 2011, pp
Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 4(2), 2011, pp.115-126. α, β, γ ORTHOGONALITY ABDALLA TALLAFHA Abstract. Orthogonality in inner product spaces can be expresed using the notion of norms.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCongruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 24, no. 5, 239-246 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/.2988/ija.24.422 Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 Ligong An and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραUniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor
Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor Given f L 1 T 1 ), we consider the partial sums of the Fourier series of f: N 1) S N fθ) = ˆfk)e ikθ. k= N A calculation gives the Dirichlet formula
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFuzzifying Tritopological Spaces
International Mathematical Forum, Vol., 08, no. 9, 7-6 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com https://doi.org/0.988/imf.08.88 On α-continuity and α-openness in Fuzzifying Tritopological Spaces Barah M. Sulaiman
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΕγχειρίδια Μαθηµατικών και Χταποδάκι στα Κάρβουνα
[ 1 ] Πανεπιστήµιο Κύπρου Εγχειρίδια Μαθηµατικών και Χταποδάκι στα Κάρβουνα Νίκος Στυλιανόπουλος, Πανεπιστήµιο Κύπρου Λευκωσία, εκέµβριος 2009 [ 2 ] Πανεπιστήµιο Κύπρου Πόσο σηµαντική είναι η απόδειξη
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA General Note on δ-quasi Monotone and Increasing Sequence
International Mathematical Forum, 4, 2009, no. 3, 143-149 A General Note on δ-quasi Monotone and Increasing Sequence Santosh Kr. Saxena H. N. 419, Jawaharpuri, Badaun, U.P., India Presently working in
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANSFORMATION SEMIGROUPS
GANIT J. Bangladesh Math. oc. IN 606-694) 0) -7 DIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANFORMATION EMIGROUP ubrata Majumdar, * Kalyan Kumar Dey and Mohd. Altab Hossain Department of Mathematics University
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 3: Ordinal Numbers
Chapter 3: Ordinal Numbers There are two kinds of number.. Ordinal numbers (0th), st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th,..., ω, ω +,... ω2, ω2+,... ω 2... answers to the question What position is... in a sequence? What
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEE512: Error Control Coding
EE512: Error Control Coding Solution for Assignment on Finite Fields February 16, 2007 1. (a) Addition and Multiplication tables for GF (5) and GF (7) are shown in Tables 1 and 2. + 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 3
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomomorphism of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Groups
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 6, 20, no. 64, 369-378 Homomorphism o Intuitionistic Fuzz Groups P. K. Sharma Department o Mathematics, D..V. College Jalandhar Cit, Punjab, India pksharma@davjalandhar.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFinite Field Problems: Solutions
Finite Field Problems: Solutions 1. Let f = x 2 +1 Z 11 [x] and let F = Z 11 [x]/(f), a field. Let Solution: F =11 2 = 121, so F = 121 1 = 120. The possible orders are the divisors of 120. Solution: The
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGeneralized Double Star Closed Sets in Interior Minimal Spaces
IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM) e-issn: 2278-5728, p-issn: 2319-765X. Volume 11, Issue 4 Ver. II (Jul - Aug. 2015), PP 56-61 www.iosrjournals.org Generalized Double Star Closed Sets in Interior Minimal
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGÖKHAN ÇUVALCIOĞLU, KRASSIMIR T. ATANASSOV, AND SINEM TARSUSLU(YILMAZ)
IFSCOM016 1 Proceeding Book No. 1 pp. 155-161 (016) ISBN: 978-975-6900-54-3 SOME RESULTS ON S α,β AND T α,β INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY MODAL OPERATORS GÖKHAN ÇUVALCIOĞLU, KRASSIMIR T. ATANASSOV, AND SINEM TARSUSLU(YILMAZ)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics
Fourier Series MATH 211, Calculus II J. Robert Buchanan Department of Mathematics Spring 2018 Introduction Not all functions can be represented by Taylor series. f (k) (c) A Taylor series f (x) = (x c)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραKnaster-Reichbach Theorem for 2 κ
Knaster-Reichbach Theorem for 2 κ Micha l Korch February 9, 2018 In the recent years the theory of the generalized Cantor and Baire spaces was extensively developed (see, e.g. [1], [2], [6], [4] and many
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCoefficient Inequalities for a New Subclass of K-uniformly Convex Functions
International Journal of Computational Science and Mathematics. ISSN 0974-89 Volume, Number (00), pp. 67--75 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Coefficient Inequalities for
Διαβάστε περισσότερα5. Choice under Uncertainty
5. Choice under Uncertainty Daisuke Oyama Microeconomics I May 23, 2018 Formulations von Neumann-Morgenstern (1944/1947) X: Set of prizes Π: Set of probability distributions on X : Preference relation
Διαβάστε περισσότεραInverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. ------------------ ----------------------------- -----------------
Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. 1. Sin ( ) = a) b) c) d) Ans b. Solution : Method 1. Ans a: 17 > 1 a) is rejected. w.k.t Sin ( sin ) = d is rejected. If sin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3
Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 1 State vector space and the dual space Space of wavefunctions The space of wavefunctions is the set of all
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSequent Calculi for the Modal µ-calculus over S5. Luca Alberucci, University of Berne. Logic Colloquium Berne, July 4th 2008
Sequent Calculi for the Modal µ-calculus over S5 Luca Alberucci, University of Berne Logic Colloquium Berne, July 4th 2008 Introduction Koz: Axiomatisation for the modal µ-calculus over K Axioms: All classical
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Note on Characterization of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals in Γ- Near-Rings
International Journal of Computational Science and Mathematics. ISSN 0974-3189 Volume 3, Number 1 (2011), pp. 61-71 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com A Note on Characterization
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSubclass of Univalent Functions with Negative Coefficients and Starlike with Respect to Symmetric and Conjugate Points
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 2, 2008, no. 35, 1739-1748 Subclass of Univalent Functions with Negative Coefficients and Starlike with Respect to Symmetric and Conjugate Points S. M. Khairnar and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008
Tridiagonal matrices Gérard MEURANT October, 2008 1 Similarity 2 Cholesy factorizations 3 Eigenvalues 4 Inverse Similarity Let α 1 ω 1 β 1 α 2 ω 2 T =......... β 2 α 1 ω 1 β 1 α and β i ω i, i = 1,...,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS
CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS Shiah-Sen Wang The graphs are prepared by Chien-Lun Lai Based on : Precalculus: Mathematics for Calculus by J. Stuwart, L. Redin & S. Watson, 6th edition, 01, Brooks/Cole Chapter
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume
BULETINUL ACADEMIEI DE ŞTIINŢE A REPUBLICII MOLDOVA. MATEMATICA Numbers 2(72) 3(73), 2013, Pages 80 89 ISSN 1024 7696 On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume I.S.Gutsul Abstract. In
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 8.3 Trigonometric Equations
99 Section 8. Trigonometric Equations Objective 1: Solve Equations Involving One Trigonometric Function. In this section and the next, we will exple how to solving equations involving trigonometric functions.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic
Lecture 2 Soundness and completeness of propositional logic February 9, 2004 1 Overview Review of natural deduction. Soundness and completeness. Semantics of propositional formulas. Soundness proof. Completeness
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPractice Exam 2. Conceptual Questions. 1. State a Basic identity and then verify it. (a) Identity: Solution: One identity is csc(θ) = 1
Conceptual Questions. State a Basic identity and then verify it. a) Identity: Solution: One identity is cscθ) = sinθ) Practice Exam b) Verification: Solution: Given the point of intersection x, y) of the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS
CHAPTER 5 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS EXERCISE 104 Page 8 1. Find the positive root of the equation x + 3x 5 = 0, correct to 3 significant figures, using the method of bisection. Let f(x) =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOther Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests
Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Side-Note: So far we have seen a few approaches for creating tests such as Neyman-Pearson Lemma ( most powerful tests of H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 :
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSolution Series 9. i=1 x i and i=1 x i.
Lecturer: Prof. Dr. Mete SONER Coordinator: Yilin WANG Solution Series 9 Q1. Let α, β >, the p.d.f. of a beta distribution with parameters α and β is { Γ(α+β) Γ(α)Γ(β) f(x α, β) xα 1 (1 x) β 1 for < x
Διαβάστε περισσότεραRoman Witu la 1. Let ξ = exp(i2π/5). Then, the following formulas hold true [6]:
Novi Sad J. Math. Vol. 43 No. 1 013 9- δ-fibonacci NUMBERS PART II Roman Witu la 1 Abstract. This is a continuation of paper [6]. We study fundamental properties applications of the so called δ-fibonacci
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE
Lecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE BLUE: Robustness of LSE against normality We now study properties of l τ β and σ 2 under assumption A2, i.e., without the normality assumption on ε. From Theorem
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCHARACTERIZATION OF BIPOLAR FUZZY IDEALS IN ORDERED GAMMA SEMIGROUPS
JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL MATHEMATICAL VIRTUAL INSTITUTE ISSN (p) 2303-4866, ISSN (o) 2303-4947 www.imvibl.org /JOURNALS / JOURNAL Vol. 8(2018), 141-156 DOI: 10.7251/JIMVI1801141C Former BULLETIN OF
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAbstract Storage Devices
Abstract Storage Devices Robert König Ueli Maurer Stefano Tessaro SOFSEM 2009 January 27, 2009 Outline 1. Motivation: Storage Devices 2. Abstract Storage Devices (ASD s) 3. Reducibility 4. Factoring ASD
Διαβάστε περισσότεραk A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +
Chapter 3. Fuzzy Arithmetic 3- Fuzzy arithmetic: ~Addition(+) and subtraction (-): Let A = [a and B = [b, b in R If x [a and y [b, b than x+y [a +b +b Symbolically,we write A(+)B = [a (+)[b, b = [a +b
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn Annihilator of Fuzzy Subsets of Modules
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 3, 2009, no. 10, 483-488 On Annihilator of Fuzzy Subsets of Modules Helen K. Saikia 1 and Mrinal C. Kalita 2 1 Department of Mathematics, Gauhati university, Guwahati-781014,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραProblem Set 3: Solutions
CMPSCI 69GG Applied Information Theory Fall 006 Problem Set 3: Solutions. [Cover and Thomas 7.] a Define the following notation, C I p xx; Y max X; Y C I p xx; Ỹ max I X; Ỹ We would like to show that C
Διαβάστε περισσότερα6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.
6.1. Dirac Equation Ref: M.Kaku, Quantum Field Theory, Oxford Univ Press (1993) η μν = η μν = diag(1, -1, -1, -1) p 0 = p 0 p = p i = -p i p μ p μ = p 0 p 0 + p i p i = E c 2 - p 2 = (m c) 2 H = c p 2
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStrain gauge and rosettes
Strain gauge and rosettes Introduction A strain gauge is a device which is used to measure strain (deformation) on an object subjected to forces. Strain can be measured using various types of devices classified
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAreas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates
Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe k-α-exponential Function
Int Journal of Math Analysis, Vol 7, 213, no 11, 535-542 The --Exponential Function Luciano L Luque and Rubén A Cerutti Faculty of Exact Sciences National University of Nordeste Av Libertad 554 34 Corrientes,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGAUGES OF BAIRE CLASS ONE FUNCTIONS
GAUGES OF BAIRE CLASS ONE FUNCTIONS ZULIJANTO ATOK, WEE-KEE TANG, AND DONGSHENG ZHAO Abstract. Let K be a compact metric space and f : K R be a bounded Baire class one function. We proved that for any
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II
Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II October 18, 2012 1 Review First let us recall the situation. Let g be a simple algebra, with maximal toral subalgebra h (which we are calling a CSA, or Cartan Subalgebra).
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas
09 Section 7. Double and Half Angle Fmulas To derive the double-angles fmulas, we will use the sum of two angles fmulas that we developed in the last section. We will let α θ and β θ: cos(θ) cos(θ + θ)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSrednicki Chapter 55
Srednicki Chapter 55 QFT Problems & Solutions A. George August 3, 03 Srednicki 55.. Use equations 55.3-55.0 and A i, A j ] = Π i, Π j ] = 0 (at equal times) to verify equations 55.-55.3. This is our third
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Conception of Inductive Logic: Example
A Conception of Inductive Logic: Example Patrick Maher Department of Philosophy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign This paper presents a simple example of inductive logic done according to the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραderivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates
derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates swapnizzle 03-03- :5:43 We begin by recognizing the familiar conversion from rectangular to spherical coordinates (note that φ is used
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAreas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates
Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath221: HW# 1 solutions
Math: HW# solutions Andy Royston October, 5 7.5.7, 3 rd Ed. We have a n = b n = a = fxdx = xdx =, x cos nxdx = x sin nx n sin nxdx n = cos nx n = n n, x sin nxdx = x cos nx n + cos nxdx n cos n = + sin
Διαβάστε περισσότερα12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem
Tutorial 12: Radon-Nikodym Theorem 1 12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem In the following, (Ω, F) is an arbitrary measurable space. Definition 96 Let μ and ν be two (possibly complex) measures on (Ω, F). We say
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExercises 10. Find a fundamental matrix of the given system of equations. Also find the fundamental matrix Φ(t) satisfying Φ(0) = I. 1.
Exercises 0 More exercises are available in Elementary Differential Equations. If you have a problem to solve any of them, feel free to come to office hour. Problem Find a fundamental matrix of the given
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCyclic or elementary abelian Covers of K 4
Cyclic or elementary abelian Covers of K 4 Yan-Quan Feng Mathematics, Beijing Jiaotong University Beijing 100044, P.R. China Summer School, Rogla, Slovenian 2011-06 Outline 1 Question 2 Main results 3
Διαβάστε περισσότεραYoung Bae Jun Madad Khan Florentin Smarandache Saima Anis. Fuzzy and Neutrosophic Sets in Semigroups
Young Bae Jun Madad Khan Florentin Smarandache Saima Anis Fuzzy and Neutrosophic Sets in Semigroups Young Bae Jun, Madad Khan, Florentin Smarandache, Saima Anis Fuzzy and Neutrosophic Sets in Semigroups
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPartial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013
The boundary element method March 26, 203 Introduction and notation The problem: u = f in D R d u = ϕ in Γ D u n = g on Γ N, where D = Γ D Γ N, Γ D Γ N = (possibly, Γ D = [Neumann problem] or Γ N = [Dirichlet
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS
MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS FUMIE NAKAOKA AND NOBUYUKI ODA Received 20 December 2005; Revised 28 May 2006; Accepted 6 August 2006 Some properties of minimal closed sets and maximal closed
Διαβάστε περισσότερα6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes
122 CHAPTER 6. ARMA MODELS 6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes The purpose of forecasting is to predict future values of a TS based on the data collected to the present. In this section we will discuss a linear
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics
Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics Nov 1, 01 In this lecture we examine root systems from an axiomatic point of view. 1 Reflections If v R n, then it determines a hyperplane, denoted P v, through the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?
Teko Classes IITJEE/AIEEE Maths by SUHAAG SIR, Bhopal, Ph (0755) 3 00 000 www.tekoclasses.com ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION # Question Type A.Single Correct Type Q. (A) Sol least
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSOME INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY MODAL OPERATORS OVER INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY IDEALS AND GROUPS
IFSCOM016 1 Proceeding Book No. 1 pp. 84-90 (016) ISBN: 978-975-6900-54-3 SOME INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY MODAL OPERATORS OVER INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY IDEALS AND GROUPS SINEM TARSUSLU(YILMAZ), GÖKHAN ÇUVALCIOĞLU,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSecond Order Partial Differential Equations
Chapter 7 Second Order Partial Differential Equations 7.1 Introduction A second order linear PDE in two independent variables (x, y Ω can be written as A(x, y u x + B(x, y u xy + C(x, y u u u + D(x, y
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMatrices and Determinants
Matrices and Determinants SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Q 1. For what value of k do the following system of equations possess a non-trivial (i.e., not all zero) solution over the set of rationals Q? x + ky + 3z
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMean-Variance Analysis
Mean-Variance Analysis Jan Schneider McCombs School of Business University of Texas at Austin Jan Schneider Mean-Variance Analysis Beta Representation of the Risk Premium risk premium E t [Rt t+τ ] R1
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn density of old sets in Prikry type extensions.
On density of old sets in Prikry type extensions. Moti Gitik December 31, 2015 Abstract Every set of ordinals of cardinality κ in a Prikry extension with a measure over κ contains an old set of arbitrary
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΑπόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.
Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο The time integral of a force is referred to as impulse, is determined by and is obtained from: Newton s 2 nd Law of motion states that the action
Διαβάστε περισσότερα