arxiv: v3 [math.ra] 24 Nov 2017

Σχετικά έγγραφα
arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 19 Dec 2017

Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2

EE512: Error Control Coding

Reminders: linear functions

2 Composition. Invertible Mappings

Matrices and Determinants

Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

Example Sheet 3 Solutions

Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)

Homework 3 Solutions

Finite Field Problems: Solutions

Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit

SCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018

Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets

Second Order Partial Differential Equations

A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation

Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set

DIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANSFORMATION SEMIGROUPS

CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS

MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS

Homomorphism in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Automata

Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in

Partial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II

Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests

HOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:

C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions

3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β

Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations

Coefficient Inequalities for a New Subclass of K-uniformly Convex Functions

The Simply Typed Lambda Calculus

Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013

Tridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008

6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.

On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume

On the Galois Group of Linear Difference-Differential Equations

k A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +

TMA4115 Matematikk 3

New bounds for spherical two-distance sets and equiangular lines

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions

UNIT - I LINEAR ALGEBRA. , such that αν V satisfying following condition

Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests

Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II

6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes

SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS

Fourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics

derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates

Generating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations

ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER

Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics

Απόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.

2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)

Spherical Coordinates

( y) Partial Differential Equations

Exercises 10. Find a fundamental matrix of the given system of equations. Also find the fundamental matrix Φ(t) satisfying Φ(0) = I. 1.

Space-Time Symmetries

Solutions to Exercise Sheet 5

Homework 8 Model Solution Section

1. Introduction and Preliminaries.

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

Second Order RLC Filters

( ) 2 and compare to M.

Srednicki Chapter 55

Econ 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1

Strain gauge and rosettes

Dr. D. Dinev, Department of Structural Mechanics, UACEG

Some new generalized topologies via hereditary classes. Key Words:hereditary generalized topological space, A κ(h,µ)-sets, κµ -topology.

Practice Exam 2. Conceptual Questions. 1. State a Basic identity and then verify it. (a) Identity: Solution: One identity is csc(θ) = 1

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

Numerical Analysis FMN011

w o = R 1 p. (1) R = p =. = 1

Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations

Quadratic Expressions

forms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with

DiracDelta. Notations. Primary definition. Specific values. General characteristics. Traditional name. Traditional notation

Section 9.2 Polar Equations and Graphs

ECE Spring Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 2

Jordan Form of a Square Matrix

Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.

Parametrized Surfaces

Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 4(2), 2011, pp

CHAPTER 48 APPLICATIONS OF MATRICES AND DETERMINANTS

Math221: HW# 1 solutions

The k-α-exponential Function

Cyclic or elementary abelian Covers of K 4

Lecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic

Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs

Homomorphism of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Groups

Appendix to On the stability of a compressible axisymmetric rotating flow in a pipe. By Z. Rusak & J. H. Lee

DESIGN OF MACHINERY SOLUTION MANUAL h in h 4 0.

MATH1030 Linear Algebra Assignment 5 Solution

ω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω

Problem Set 3: Solutions

If we restrict the domain of y = sin x to [ π, π ], the restrict function. y = sin x, π 2 x π 2

Exercise 1.1. Verify that if we apply GS to the coordinate basis Gauss form ds 2 = E(u, v)du 2 + 2F (u, v)dudv + G(u, v)dv 2

Transcript:

In the name of Allah Most Gracious Most Merciful. CLASSIFICATIONS OF TWO-DIMENSIONAL JORDAN ALGEBRAS OVER THE ALGEBRAICALLY CLOSED FIELDS AND R arxiv:7.948v [math.ra] 4 Nov 7 H.AHMED U.BEKBAEV I.RAKHIMOV Department of Math. Faculty of Science UPM Selangor Malaysia & Depart. of Math. Faculty of Science Taiz University Taiz Yemen Department of Science in Engineering Faculty of Engineering IIUM Malaysia Institute for Mathematical Research INSPEM UPM Serdang Selangor Malaysia Abstract. The classification up to isomorphism of two-dimensional not necessarily commutative Jordan algebras over algebraically closed fields and R is presented in terms of their matrices of structure constants. Keywords: basis; Jordan algebra; matrix of structural constants. MSC: Primary: Primary 5A7 Secondary H.. Introduction The classification problem of finite dimensional algebras is one of the important problems of algebra. Many authors have considered this problem for different classes of two-dimensional algebras [ 5 6 7 8 9 ] and in [] the problem is considered for all two-dimensional algebras over any field. The approach of [] is basis free invariant approach. Unlike the approach of [] a complete list of isomorphism classes of two-dimensional algebras over algebraically closed fields is presented in [] by the use of structure constants approach and the same approach to the problem over the field of real numbers R has been applied in [4]. One of the interesting classes of algebras is the class of Jordan algebras. In [5 ] and [] the authors determined the isomorphic classes of Jordan algebras commutative case over the field of real numbers and over algebraically closed fields respectively. In this paper we make use results of [] and [4] to give complete lists of two-dimensional not necessarily commutative Jordan algebras over any algebraically closed and real fields by providing lists of canonical representatives of their matrices of structure constants. To the best of the authors knowledge such classifications of two-dimensional Jordan algebras has not been given yet. For some computations we used Computer Software Mathematica.. Preliminaries Let F be any field and A B stand for the Kronecker product that is for the matrix with blocks a ij B where A = a ij and B are matrices over F. emails: houida m7@yahoo.com; bekbaev@iium.edu.my; rakhimov@upm.edu.my.

H. Ahmed U.Bekbaev I.Rakhimov Definition.. A vector space A over F with multiplication : A A A given by uv u v such that αu+βv w = αu w+βv w w αu+βv = αw u+βw v whenever uvw A and αβ F is said to be an algebra. Definition.. Two algebras A and B are called isomorphic if there is an invertible linear map f : A B such that fu A v = fu B fv whenever uv A. Let A be a m-dimensional algebra over F and e = e e...e m be its basis. Then the bilinear map is represented by a matrix A = A k ij Mm m ;F as follows u v = eau v for u = euv = ev where u = u u...u m T and v = v v...v m T are column coordinate vectors of u and v respectively. Thematrix A Mm m ;F definedabove is called the matrix of structural constants MSC of A with respect to the basis e. Further we assume that a basis e is fixed and we do not make a difference between the algebra A and its MSC A. If e = e e...e m is another basis of A e g = e with g G = GLm;F and A is MSC of A with respect to e then it is known that A = gag is valid see []. Thus we can reformulate the isomorphism of algebras as follows. Definition.. Two m-dimensional algebras A B over F given by their matrices of structure constants A B are said to be isomorphic if B = gag holds true for some g GLm;F. α α Further we consider only the case m = and for the simplicity we use A = α α 4 β β β β 4 for MSC where α α α α 4 β β β β 4 stand for any elements of F. Due to [] we have the following classification theorems according to CharF CharF = and CharF = cases respectively. Theorem.4. Over an algebraically closed field F CharF and any non-trivial -dimensional algebra is isomorphic to only one of the following algebras listed by their matrices of structure constants: α α A c = α + α 4 where c = α α α 4 β F 4 β α α + α α α A c = where c = α β β F β β α β β α A c = where c = β β F β β α A 4 c = where c = α β F β α α A 5 c = where c = α F α α α α A 6 c = where c = α β F β α α β α α

Classification of two-dimensional real Jordan algebras A 7 c = where c = β F β α A 8 c = where c = α F α α A 9 = A = A = A =. Theorem.5. Over an algebraically closed field F CharF = any non-trivial -dimensional algebra is isomorphic to only one of the following algebras listed by their matrices of structure constants: α α A c = α + α 4 where c = α α α 4 β F 4 β α α + α α A c = where c = α β β F β β α A c = where c = β β F β β α A 4 c = where c = α β F β α α A 5 c = where c = α F α α A 6 c = where c = α β F β α α α A 7 c = where c = α F α α α A 8 c = where c = α F α α A 9 = A = A = A =. Theorem.6. Over an algebraically closed field F CharF = any non-trivial -dimensional algebra is isomorphic to only one of the following algebras listed by their matrices of structure constant matrices: α α A c = α + α 4 where c = α α α 4 β F 4 β α α + α

4 H. Ahmed U.Bekbaev I.Rakhimov α α A c = β β α β β α A c = where c = β β F β β α A 4 c = where c = α β F β α α A 5 c = where c = α F α α α α A 6 c = β α α β α α A 7 c = where c = β F β α A 8 c = where c = α F α α A 9 = A = A = A =. where c = α β β F where c = α β F. Classification of -dimensional Jordan algebras over algebraically closed fields Recall that an algebra A is said to be a Jordan algebra if u v u = u v u for all uv A. In terms of its MSC A the condition above is written as follows: AA A AE AE Au e i u u = i = x for u = e = e = E =. y Thecondition above in terms of xy and α α α α 4 β β β β 4 is given as a system of equations as follows. x α α β +x yα β x α α β x yα β +x yα α 4 β +xy α α 4 β +y α 4 β x α 4 β + x α β β +x yα β +xy α 4 β x yα α β xy α α β xy α β y α α 4 β x yα 4 β β +x yα β β xy α 4 β xy α 4 β β 4 +xy α β β 4 +y α 4 β β 4 y α 4 β β 4 = x yα α β xy α α β xy α β y α α 4 β +x α β +x yα β β +xy α 4 β β x yα β xy α β +x β β +x yβ +x yα β +xy α α β +xy α α β + y α α 4 β x α β β +x yα β β x yα β β xy α 4 β β x yα β β +xy α β β xy α β β +x yβ β x yα β xy α β y α 4 β +x yα β β 4 + xy α β β 4 +xy α β β 4 +y α 4 β β 4 x β β 4 xy α β β 4 y α β β 4 +xy β β 4 +y α β β 4 x yβ β β 4 xy β β 4 xy β β 4 +y β β 4 y β β 4 =

Classification of two-dimensional real Jordan algebras 5 x α α x yα α +x α α +x yα α +xy α α +xy α x yα α 4 xy α α α 4 + y α α 4 y α α 4 x α β +x α α 4 β x yα α 4 β +x yα α 4 β x yα β x α α β x yα α β x yα β +x yα α 4 β xy α α 4 β x α 4 β β x yα 4 β + x α α β +x yα α β +x yα α 4 β +xy α α 4 β +xy α α 4 β +y α 4 β x yα 4 β β xy α β 4 x yα α β 4 xy α α β 4 xy α β 4 +xy α α 4 β 4 y α α 4 β 4 +x α β β 4 +x yα β β 4 xy α 4 β β 4 +x yα β β 4 +xy α β 4 = x α α β x yα β +x α α β +x yα β x yα α 4 β xy α α 4 β y α 4 β +x α 4 β x α β β x yα β xy α 4 β +x yα α β +xy α α β +xy α β +y α α 4 β + x yα 4 β β x yα β β +xy α 4 β +xy α 4 β β 4 xy α β β 4 y α 4 β β 4 +y α 4 β β 4 =. Equating the coefficients at x x yxy y to zero we get the system of equations with respect to α α α α 4 β β β β 4 :. α α β α α β α 4 β +α β β = α β α β +α α 4 β +α β α α β α 4 β β +α β β = α α 4 β +α 4 β α α β α β α 4 β α 4β β 4 +α β β 4 = α 4 β α α 4 β +α 4 β β 4 α 4 β β 4 = α β +β β α β β β β 4 = α α β +α β β α β +β +α β +α β β α β β α β β + β β α β +α β β 4 β β β 4 = α α β α β +α 4 β β α β +α α β +α α β α 4 β β +α β β α β β α β +α β β 4 +α β β 4 α β β 4 +β β 4 β β 4 β β4 = α α 4 β +α α 4 β α 4 β +α 4β β 4 α β β 4 +α β β 4 +β β4 β β4 = α α +α α α β +α α 4 β α α β α 4 β β +α α β +α β β 4 = α α +α α α α 4 α α 4 β +α α 4 β α β α α β α β + α α 4 β α 4 β +α α β +α α 4 β α 4 β β α α β 4 +α β β 4 +α β β 4 = α α +α α α α 4 α α 4 β +α α 4 β +α α 4 β α β 4 α α β 4 α β 4 +α α 4 β 4 α 4 β β 4 +α β4 = α α 4 α α 4 +α 4 β α α 4 β 4 =. Theorem.. Over an algebraically closed field F CharF and 5 any nontrivial - dimensional Jordan algebra is isomorphic to only one of the following algebras listed by their matrices of structure constants where i F stands for a fixed element for which i = : J = A = J = A = α J α = A 4 α +α = +α α + where α F and α 5± 5 J 4 α = A 4 α α α α = α α where α F α +

6 H. Ahmed U.Bekbaev I.Rakhimov J 5 α = A 4 α α α α = α α α + where α F and α J 6 = A 5 5 5 = 5 5 5+ 5 J 7 = A 5 5+ 5 = 5 5 5+ 5 5 5 J 8 = A 8 = J 9 = A 8 i = i + i + i J = A 8 + i = + i i i J = A =. 5 5 Proof. To prove we make use the above presented results of [] and test the system of equations. for a consistency. α α For A α α α 4 β = α + α 4 the system of equations. becomes β α α + α. α β α α β α 4 β = α +α α α +α α β α β α 4 β +α α 4 β = +α α +α α α +α α α 4 +α α 4 +α α 4 β = α 4 +α α 4 +α α α 4 +α 4 β = α β +α β +α β = α +5α 6α β +α β 6α α β = +4α 4α +α α 6α α β 4α β 6α β α 4 β = α α α α 4 +α α 4 α α 4 α 4 β α α 4 β = α +α α α β +α α 4 β = α +α +7α α +6α α +α α 4 6α α 4 +α 4 β = +5α +8α +6α +α 4 α α 4 +α α 4 6α α α 4 = α 4 +α α 4 +α α 4 +α 4 α α 4 =. Due to the equation of. the following two cases occur: Case. α +α α +α 4 β =. Then due to the equation 4 one has α 4 = in particular α = α α and α α =. This implies that either α = or α =. In both cases the equation provides a contradiction. So in Case the system of equations. has no solution. Case. β =. Then due to the equation 6 one has α =. In α = case the equation 7 provides a contradiction in α = the equation implies α = and the equation 4 implies α 4 = but the equation provides a contradiction. In α = case the equation implies α = and the equation 4 implies α 4 = but the equation 7 provides a contradiction. So there is no Jordan algebra among A. For A α β β = α β β α + the system of equations. becomes

Classification of two-dimensional real Jordan algebras 7 β = β +α β = +α α +β = α β +α β +β β = α +α α α β +α β +β α β +β = β +α β +β β = +α α = α β β β = α α β +α β β = α =. Hence one gets and we obtain the following Jordan algebras β = α = and β = ± J = A = J = A =. For A β β = the equation of. gives a contradiction and therefore β β there is no Jordan algebra among A. α For A 4 α β = the system of equations. is equivalent to β α + So Note that: α +α α α β +α β +β α β +β =. β = +α or β = α α or β = α α. in α = cases α α = α α = in α = 5± 5 cases +α is equal to one of ± α α. Therefore in this case one has the following Jordan algebras: α J α = A 4 α +α = where α F and α 5± 5 +α α + J 4 = A 4 α α α α = α α where α F α + J 5 = A 4 α α α α = α α where α F and α. α + α For A 5 α = the system of equations. is equivalent to α α + and therefore one has 5α +5α = J 6 = A 5 5 5 5 5 = 5 5 J 7 = A 5 5+ 5 5+ 5 = 5+ 5 5 5. 5 5

8 H. Ahmed U.Bekbaev I.Rakhimov α For A 6 α β = we obtain β α + α β = α β = α = β α β +α β = 5α +8α 6α = α = β +α β = +4α 6α = and evidently it has no solution. For A 7 β = case the equation of. gives a contradiction. β α For A 8 α = the system of equations. is equivalent to α α and therefore 5α +8α 6α = α = or α = i or α = + i where i is a fixed element such that i =. Due to it one gets Jordan algebras J 8 = A 8 = J 9 = A 8 i = i + i + i J = A 8 + i = + i i i. In A 9 A A cases there are no Jordan algebras. The algebra A = is a Jordan algebra. Accordingly for CharF = and 5 cases we state the following theorems. Theorem.. Over an algebraically closed field F CharF = any nontrivial -dimensional Jordan algebra is isomorphic to only one of the following algebras listed by their matrices of structure constants: J = A = where β F α J α = A 4 α = where α F α + J α = A 4 α α +α = α J 4 = A 5 α = α + J 5 = A 8 = J 6 = A = J 7 = A =. α α +α α + where α F and α +α + where α F and α +α + = Theorem.. Over an algebraically closed field F CharF = any nontrivial -dimensional Jordan algebra is isomorphic to only one of the following algebras listed by their matrices of structure constants where i F stands for a fixed element for which i = :

Classification of two-dimensional real Jordan algebras 9 J = A = J = A = J = A 4 α α = α α α + J 4 = A 4 α α α α = α α α + J 5 = A 4 α α α α = α α α + +i J 6 = A 5 +i = i i i J 7 = A 5 i = i +i +i J 8 = A 8 +i = i i i J 9 = A 8 i = +i +i J = A = J = A =. where α F and α ±i where α F and α Theorem.4. Over an algebraically closed field F CharF = 5 any nontrivial -dimensional Jordan algebra is isomorphic to only one of the following algebras listed by their matrices of structure constants where i F stands for a fixed element for which i = : J 5 = A = J 5 = A = α J 5 = A 4 α +α = +α α + J 45 = A 4 α α α α = α α α + J 55 = A 4 α α α α = α α where α α + J 65 = A 8 = = i J 75 = A 8 i J 85 = A 8 + i + i + i = + i i i

H. Ahmed U.Bekbaev I.Rakhimov J 95 = A 9 = = J 5 = A =. A Jordan algebra A is said to be commutative if u v = v u whenever uv A. From the results presented above one can easily derive the following classification results on commutative Jordan algebras. Corollary.5. Over an algebraically closed field F of characteristic not every nontrivial - dimensional commutative Jordan algebra is isomorphic to only one algebra listed below by MSC: J c = J c = J c = J 4c = J 5c =. Corollary.6. Over any algebraically closed field F of characteristic every nontrivial -dimensional commutative Jordan algebra is isomorphic to only one algebra listed below by MSC: J c = J c = J c = J 4c =. Corollary.7. Over any algebraically closed field F of characteristic every nontrivial -dimensional commutative Jordan algebra is isomorphic to only one algebra listed below by MSC: J c = J c = J c = J 4c = J 5c =. 4. Classification of -dimensional real Jordan algebras Due to [4] we have the following classification theorem. Theorem 4.. Any non-trivial -dimensional real algebra is isomorphic to only one of the following listed by their matrices of structure constants algebras: α α A r c = α + α 4 where c = α α α 4 β R 4 β α α + α α A r c = where β c = α β β R β β α α A r c = where β c = α β β R β β α A 4r c = where c = β β R β β α A 5r c = where c = α β R β α α A 6r c = where c = α R α α α A 7r c = where β c = α β R β α α

Classification of two-dimensional real Jordan algebras α A 8r c = where β c = α β R β α α A 9r c = where c = β R β α A r c = where c = α R α α A r = A r = A r = A 4r = A 5r = As an application of Theorem 4. we prove the next result. Theorem 4.. Any non-trivial two-dimensional real Jordan algebra is isomorphic to only one of the following listed by their matrices of structure constants algebras: J r = A r = J r = A r = J r = A r = J 4r = A r = α J 5r α = A 5r α +α = where α R and α +α α + 5± 5 J 6r α = A 5r α α α α = α α where α α + J 7r α = A 5r α α α α = α α where < α < α + J 8r = A 6r 5 5 = 5 5 5 5 5+ 5 J 9r = A 6r 5+ 5 = 5+ 5 5 5 5 5 J r = A r = J r = A 5r =. Proof. To prove we test the system of equations. for a consistency. α α For A r α α α 4 β = α + α 4 the system of equations. becomes β α α + α.. Due to the equation of. the following two cases occur: Case. α +α α +α 4 β =. Then due to the equation 4 one has α 4 = in particular α = α α and α α =. This implies that either α = or α =. In both cases the equation provides a contradiction. So in Case the system of equations. has no solution. Case. β =. Due to the equation 6 one has α =. In α = case the equation 7 provides a contradiction in α = the equation implies α = and the equation 4 implies α 4 = but the.

H. Ahmed U.Bekbaev I.Rakhimov equation provides a contradiction. In α = case the equation implies α = and the equation 4 implies α 4 = but the equation 7 provides a contradiction. So there is no Jordan algebra among A r. α For A r α β β = the system of equations. becomes β β α + β = β +α β = +α α +β = α β +α β +β β = α +α α α β +α β +β α β +β = β +α β +β β = +α α = α β β β = α α β +α β β = α =. Hence one gets β = α = and β = ± and we obtain the following Jordan algebras J r = A r = J r = A r =. α For A r α β β = the system of equations. becomes β β α 4. β = β α β = α +α β = α β +α β +β β = α +α α α β +α β +β α β +β = β α β β β = α +α = α β +β β = α +α +β α β +β = α =. Due to the equations and in the system of equations 4. we get β = α = then β = ± hence we obtain the following Jordan algebras J r = A r = J 4r = A r =. For A 4r β β = the equation of. gives a contradiction and therefore β β there is no Jordan algebra among A 4r. α For A 5r α β = the system of equations. is equivalent to β α + α +α α α β +α β +β α β +β =. So β equals one of + α α α α α. Note that in α = cases α α = α α = and in α = 5± 5 cases +α is equal to one of ± α α. Therefore in this case one has the following Jordan algebras α J 5r α = A 5r α +α = whereα Randα +α α + 5± 5 J 6r α = A 5r α α α α = α α where α α + J 7r α = A 5r α α α α = α α where < α <. α + α For A 6r α = the system of equations. is equivalent to α α + 5α +5α =

Classification of two-dimensional real Jordan algebras and therefore one has J 8r = A 6r 5 5 = 5 5 5 5 5+ 5 J 9r = A 6r 5+ 5 = 5+ 5 5. 5 5 5 α For A 7r α β = we obtain β α + α β = α β = α = β α β +α β = 5α +8α 6α = α = β +α β = +4α 6α =. and evidently it has no solution. α For A 8r α β = case the equations and 8 of. give a contradiction. β α α For A 9r β = case the equation of. gives a contradiction. β α For A r α = the system of equations. is equivalent to α α 5α +8α 6α = and therefore α = and one gets Jordan algebra J r = A r = InA r A r A r A 4r casestherearenojordanalgebras. ThealgebraA 5r = is a Jordan algebra.. Remark 4.. In [] one can find a classification of two-dimensional power associative real algebras given as A A AσB B B B 4 B 5 where σ R. In our notations they are: A is the trivial algebra A = J 5r +σ Aσ = J 5r +σ σ +σ where σ ± 5 A = J r A + 5 = J 6r 5+ 5 A 5 = J 7r 5 5 B = J r B = J 6r B = J r B 4 = J r B 5 = J 6r. So the representatives of non power associative Jordan algebras are: J r J 4r J 6r α where α < and α 5+ 5 J 7r α where < α < and α 5 5 J 8r J 9r. In particular we would like to note that J 6r = is an example of Jordan algebra which is not power associative over any field F.

4 H. Ahmed U.Bekbaev I.Rakhimov From the results presented above one can easily derive the following classification results on commutative Jordan algebras. Corollary 4.4. Any non-trivial two-dimensional commutative real Jordan algebra is isomorphic to only one of the following listed by their matrices of structure constants algebras: J cr = J cr = J cr = J 4cr = J 5cr = J 6cr =. Remark 4.5. Classification of nontrivial two-dimensional real commutative Jordan algebras has been presented in [] as the algebras AB B B B 4 B 5 and they are isomorphic respectively to the algebras J cr J 6cr J 4cr J cr J cr J 5cr from Corollary.. Remark 4.6. When we compare our results with that of [5] we find that the system of equations. in commutative case α = α β = β and the system of equations 4 in [5] are the same. There are the following isomorphisms between representatives of Corollary. and that of [5] : J cr ψ J cr ψ 5 J cr ψ 4 J 4cr ψ J 5cr ψ and J 6cr ψ. References [] H. Ahmed U. Bekbaev I.Rakhimov 7 Complete classification of two-dimensional algebras AIP Conference Proceedings 876; doi.6/.498965. [] S.C. Althoen K.D. Hansen 99 Two-dimensional real algebras with zero divisors. Acta Sci.Math.Sceged 56 4. [] S.C. AlthoenL.D. Kugler 98 When is R a division algebra? Amer. Math. Monthly 9 65 65. [4] U. Bekbaev 7 Complete classifications of two-dimensional general commutative commutative Jordan division and evolution real algebras arxiv: 75.7 5. [5] J.M.A. Bermúdez R. Campoamor-Stursberg L. Garca Vergnolle J. S. Hernández 8 Contractions d algbres de Jordan en dimension Journal of Algebra 9 6 95-49. [6] J.M.A. Bermúdez J. Fresán J.S. Hernández 7 On the variety of two-dimensional real associative algebras Int. J. Contemp. Math. Sciences 6 9 5. [7] I. Burdujan 985 Types of nonisomorphic two-dimensional real division algebras. Proceedings of the national conference on algebra Romanianla/c si984 An./c t. Univ. al. I.Cuza Ia/c si Sec/c t. I a Mat.N.S 9 5. [8] A.L. Cali M. Josephy 985 Two-dimensional real division algebras. Rev. Un. Mat. Argentina 5 6. [9] R. Durán Díaz J. Muñoz Mesqué A. Peinado Domínques Classifying quadratic maps from plane to plane Linear Algebra and its Applications 64. [] M. Goze E. Remm -dimensional algebras African Journal of Mathematical Physics 8 9. [] M. Goze E. Remm 7 -Dimensional Algebras Application to Jordan G-Associative and Hom-Associative Algebras Journal of Generalized Lie Theory and Applications :. [] H. P. Petersson The classification of two-dimensional nonassicative algebras Result. Math. 54. [] E.W. Wallace 97 Two-dimensional power associative algebras Mathematics Magazine 4 58-6.