Note on the cross-section in the semi-tensor bundle

Σχετικά έγγραφα
Some properties of semi-tensor bundle

2 Composition. Invertible Mappings

Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

Reminders: linear functions

Example Sheet 3 Solutions

6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set

Partial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013

Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2

Second Order Partial Differential Equations

Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests

Homomorphism in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Automata

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)

Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016

EE512: Error Control Coding

Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)

Matrices and Determinants

ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions

k A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +

derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates

DIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANSFORMATION SEMIGROUPS

A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation

Exercise 1.1. Verify that if we apply GS to the coordinate basis Gauss form ds 2 = E(u, v)du 2 + 2F (u, v)dudv + G(u, v)dv 2

Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in

SCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018

Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs

Parametrized Surfaces

C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions

Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations

D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation

SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS

A summation formula ramified with hypergeometric function and involving recurrence relation

Απόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.

Generating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations

Space-Time Symmetries

ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?

Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets

2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)

On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume

Coefficient Inequalities for a New Subclass of K-uniformly Convex Functions

SOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

Fourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics

Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.

Homework 8 Model Solution Section

Math221: HW# 1 solutions

Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

HOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:

Appendix A. Curvilinear coordinates. A.1 Lamé coefficients. Consider set of equations. ξ i = ξ i (x 1,x 2,x 3 ), i = 1,2,3

Lecture 10 - Representation Theory III: Theory of Weights

Homework 3 Solutions

On the Galois Group of Linear Difference-Differential Equations

Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor

Solutions to Exercise Sheet 5

DiracDelta. Notations. Primary definition. Specific values. General characteristics. Traditional name. Traditional notation

THE BIGRADED RUMIN COMPLEX. 1. Introduction

Practice Exam 2. Conceptual Questions. 1. State a Basic identity and then verify it. (a) Identity: Solution: One identity is csc(θ) = 1

Section 9.2 Polar Equations and Graphs

Spherical Coordinates

12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem

1 String with massive end-points

Solution Series 9. i=1 x i and i=1 x i.

g-selberg integrals MV Conjecture An A 2 Selberg integral Summary Long Live the King Ole Warnaar Department of Mathematics Long Live the King

λρ-calculus 1. each λ-variable is a λρ-term, called an atom or atomic term; 2. if M and N are λρ-term then (MN) is a λρ-term called an application;

THE SECOND ISOMORPHISM THEOREM ON ORDERED SET UNDER ANTIORDERS. Daniel A. Romano

The challenges of non-stable predicates

3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β

Mock Exam 7. 1 Hong Kong Educational Publishing Company. Section A 1. Reference: HKDSE Math M Q2 (a) (1 + kx) n 1M + 1A = (1) =

Lecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic

ECE Spring Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 2

MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS

Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees

A General Note on δ-quasi Monotone and Increasing Sequence

Finite Field Problems: Solutions

Smarandache Curves According to Bishop Frame in Euclidean 3-Space

b. Use the parametrization from (a) to compute the area of S a as S a ds. Be sure to substitute for ds!

SOLVING CUBICS AND QUARTICS BY RADICALS

Strain gauge and rosettes

Numerical Analysis FMN011

Optimal Parameter in Hermitian and Skew-Hermitian Splitting Method for Certain Two-by-Two Block Matrices

The k-α-exponential Function

6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes

ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER

SOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM

CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS

Problem Set 9 Solutions. θ + 1. θ 2 + cotθ ( ) sinθ e iφ is an eigenfunction of the ˆ L 2 operator. / θ 2. φ 2. sin 2 θ φ 2. ( ) = e iφ. = e iφ cosθ.

A Bonus-Malus System as a Markov Set-Chain. Małgorzata Niemiec Warsaw School of Economics Institute of Econometrics

ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 19/5/2007

On the inverse problem of Lagrangian dynamics on Lie algebroids

Some new generalized topologies via hereditary classes. Key Words:hereditary generalized topological space, A κ(h,µ)-sets, κµ -topology.

Tridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008

Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude

n=2 In the present paper, we introduce and investigate the following two more generalized

If we restrict the domain of y = sin x to [ π, π ], the restrict function. y = sin x, π 2 x π 2

General 2 2 PT -Symmetric Matrices and Jordan Blocks 1

Transcript:

NTMSCI 5, No. 2, 212-221 217 212 New Trends in Mathematical Sciences http://dx.doi.org/1.2852/ntmsci.217.171 Note on the cross-section in the semi-tensor bundle Furkan Yildirim Narman Vocational Training School, Ataturk University, Erzurum, Turkey Received: 18 June 217, Accepted: 18 July 217 Published online: 15 August 217. Abstract: Using the fiber bundle M over a manifold B, we define a semi-tensor pull-back bundle tb of type p,q. The complete and horizontal lift of projectable geometric objects on M to the semi-tensor pull-back bundle tb of type p,q are presented. The main purpose of this paper is to study the behaviour of complete lift of vector and affinor tensor of type 1,1 fields on cross-sections for pull-back semi-tensor bundle tb of type p,q. Keywords: Vector field, complete lift, horizontal lift, pull-back bundle, cross-section, semi-tensor bundle. 1 Introduction Let M n be an n-dimensional differentiable manifold of class C and π 1 : M n B m the differentiable bundle determined by a submersion π 1. Suppose thatx i =x a,x α, a,b,...= 1,...,n m;α,,...=n m+1,...,n;i, j,...=1,2,...,n is a system of local coordinates adapted to the bundle π 1 : M n B m, where x α are coordinates in B m, and x a are fiber coordinates of the bundle π 1 : M n B m. Ifx i =x a,x α is another system of local adapted coordinates in the bundle, then we have The Jacobian of 1 has components where { x a = x a x b,x, x α = x α x. x i A i j = x j = A α A a b = xα x. Aa A α Let Tq p x B mx=π 1 x, x=x a,x α M n be the tensor space at a point x B m with local coordinatesx 1,...,x m, we have the holonomous frame field x i 1 x i 2... x ip dx j 1 dx j 2... dx j q, for i {1,...,m p, j {1,...,m q, over U B m of this tensor bundle, and for anyp,q-tensor field t we have [[6], p.163]: t U = t i 1...i p j 1... j q x i 1 x i 2... x ip dx j 1 dx j 2... dx j q, then by definition the set of all pointsx I =x a,x α,x α, x α = t i 1...i p j 1... j q,α=α+ m p+q,i,j,...=1,...,n+m p+q is a semi-tensor bundle t p qb m over the manifold M n., 1 c 217 BISKA Bilisim Technology Corresponding author e-mail: furkan.yildirim@atauni.edu.tr

213 F. Yildirim: Note on the cross-section in the semi-tensor bundle The semi-tensor bundle t p qb m has the natural bundle structure over B m, its bundle projection π : t p qb m B m being defined by π : x a,x α,x α x α. If we introduce a mapping π 2 : t p qb m M n by π 2 : x a,x α,x α x a,x α, then t p qb m has a bundle structure over M n. It is easily verified that π = π 1 π 2. On the other hand, let ε = π : E B denote a fiber bundle with fiber F. Given a manifold B and a map f : B B, one can construct in a natural way a bundle over B with the same fiber: Consider the subset f E = { b,e B E f b = πe together with the subspace topology from B E, and denote by π 1 : f E B, π 2 : f E E the projections. f ε = π 1 : f E B is a fiber bundle with fiber F, called the pull-back bundle of ε via f [[5],[7],[11],[13]]. From the above definition it follows that the semi-tensor bundle t p qb m,π 2 is a pull-back bundle of the tensor bundle over B m by π 1. In other words, the semi-tensor bundle induced or pull-back bundle of the tensor bundle T p q B m, π,b m is the bundle t p q B m,π 2,M n over Mn with a total space { tq p B m= x a,x α,x α M n Tq p x B m : π 1 x a,x α = π x α,x α =x α M n Tq p x B m. To a transformation 1 of local coordinates of M n, there corresponds on t p qb m the coordinate transformation x a = x a x b,x, x α = x α x, x α = t 1... p α 1 =...α q A 1... p α 1...α p A 1... q α 1...α tα 1...α p q = A α A α x. 2 The Jacobian of 2 is given by Ā= A I J = A a b A α t α σ A α Aσ α A α A α, 3 where I =a,α,α, J =b,,, I,J...=1,...,n+m p+q, t α σ = tα 1...α p σ 1...σ q, A α = xα. x It is easily verified that the condition DetĀ is equivalent to the condition: DetA a b,detaα,deta α A α. Also, dimt p qb m =n+m p+q. In the special case n=m, t p qb m is a tensor bundle T p q B m [[9], p.118]. In the special case, the semi-tensor bundles t 1 B m p=1, q= and t 1 B m p=, q=1 are semi-tangent and semi-cotangent bundles, respectively. We note that semi-tangent and semi-cotangent bundle were examined in [[1],[1],[12]] and [[14],[15]], respectively. Also, Fattaev studied the special class of semi-tensor bundle [3]. We denote by I p qt p qb m and I p qb m the modules c 217 BISKA Bilisim Technology

NTMSCI 5, No. 2, 212-221 217 / www.ntmsci.com 214 over F t p qb m and FB m of all tensor fields of type p,q on t p qb m and B m respectively, where F t p qb m and FB m denote the rings of real-valued C functions on t p qb m and B m, respectively. 2 Vertical lifts of tensor fields and γ operator If ψ t p qb m, it is regarded, in a natural way, by contraction on t p qb m, which we denote by ıψ. If ψ has the local expression ψ = ψ j 1... j q i 1...i p j1... jq dx i 1... dx i p in a coordinate neighborhood Ux α B m, then ıψ = ψt has the local expression with respect to the coordinatesx a,x α,x α in π 1 U [4]. ıψ = ψ j 1... j q i 1...i p t i 1...i p j 1... j q Suppose that A I p qb m. Then there is a unique vector fields vv A I 1 t p qb m such that for ψ t p qb m [8]: vv Aıψ= v A π 2 = ψa π 1 π 2 = ψa π = vv ψa, 4 where vv ψa is the vertical lift of the function ψa FB m. We note that the vertical lift vv f = f π of the arbitrary function f FB m is constant along each fiber of π : tqb p m B m. If vv A= vv A a a + vv A α α + vv A α α, then we have from 4 vv A= vv A a t α 1...α p a ψ 1... q α 1...α p + vv A α t α 1...α p α ψ 1... q α 1...α p + vv A α ψ θ 1...θ q σ 1...σ p = ψ θ 1...θ q σ 1...σ p A σ 1...σ p θ 1...θ q. But ψ θ 1...θ q σ 1...σ p, a ψ 1... q α 1...α p and α ψ 1... q α 1...α p can take any preassigned valued at each point. Thus we have vv A a t α 1...α p =, vv A α t α 1...α p =, vv A α = A σ 1...σ p θ 1...θ q. Hence vv A α = at all points of tqb p m except possibly those at which all the components x α = t α 1...α p are zero: that is, at points of the base space. Thus we see that the components vv A α are zero a point such that x α, that is, on tqb p m B m. However, tqb p m B m is dense in tqb p m and the components of vv A are continuous at every point of tqb p m. Hence, we have vv A α = at all points of tqb p m. Consequently, the vertical lift vv A of A to tqb p m has components vv A= with respect to the coordinatesx a,x α,x α on t p qb m. vv A a vv A α vv A α = A α 1...α p, 5 Let ϕ I 1 1 B m. We define a vector field γϕ in π 1 U by γϕ = γϕ = q µ=1 tα 1...α p ϕ ε µ ϕ α λ ε x, p 1,q x, p,q 1 6 with respect to the coordinates x b,x,x on t p qb m. From 3 we easily see that the vector fields γϕ and γϕ defined in each π 1 U t p qb m determine respectively global vertical vector fields on t p qb m. We call γϕ or γϕ the verticalvector lift of the tensor field ϕ I 1 1 B m to t p qb m. For any ϕ I 1 1 B m, if we take account of 3 and 6, we can prove c 217 BISKA Bilisim Technology

215 F. Yildirim: Note on the cross-section in the semi-tensor bundle thatγϕ = Āγϕ where γϕ is a vector field defined by γϕ =γϕ I = ϕ α λ ε. 7 Let ϕ I 1 1 B m. On putting γϕ = γϕ I = q µ=1 tα 1...α p ϕ ε µ, 8 we easily see that γϕ = Ā γϕ. 3 Complete lifts of vector fields We now denote by I p qm n the module over FM n of all tensor fields of typep,q on M n, where FM n denotes the ring of real-valued C functions on M n. Let X I 1 M n be a projectable vector field [9] with projection X = X α x α α i.e. X = X a x a,x α a + X α x α α. On putting cc cc X = cc X = cc X X ε X α λ q µ=1 tα 1...α p µ X ε, 9 we easily see that cc X = Ā cc X. The vector field cc X is called the complete lift of X to the semi-tensor bundle tqb p m. 4 Horizontal lifts of vector fields Let X I 1 M n be a projectable vector field [9] with projection X = X α x α α i.e. X = X a x a,x α a + X α x α α. If we take account of 3, we can prove that HH X = Ā HH X, where HH X is a vector field defined by HH X = X X l q µ=1 Γ l ε µ t α 1...α p p λ=1 Γ α λ lε t α 1...ε...α p, 1 with respect to the coordinatesx b,x,x on t p qb m. We call HH X the horizontal lift of the vector field X to t p qb m. Theorem 1. If X I 1 M n then cc X HH X = γ ˆ X γ ˆ X, where the symmetric affine connection ˆ is the given by Γ α θ = Γ α θ. c 217 BISKA Bilisim Technology

NTMSCI 5, No. 2, 212-221 217 / www.ntmsci.com 216 Proof. From 7, 8, 9 and 1, we have cc X HH X = X X ε X α λ q µ=1 tα 1...α p µ X ε X l q µ=1 Γ l ε µ t α 1...α p p λ=1 Γ α λ lε = ε X α λ + Γ α λ lε X l q µ=1 tα 1...α p µ X ε + Γl ε µ X l = ε X α λ + Γ α λ lε X l = = X l ε X α λ + Γ α λ εl {{ ˆ ε X α λ ˆ ε X α λ = γ ˆ ε X α λ γˆ µ X ε = γ ˆ X γ ˆ X. Thus, we have Theorem 1. q µ=1 tα 1...α p µ X ε + Γl ε µ X l q µ=1 tα 1...α p q µ=1 tα 1...α p ˆ µ X ε µ X ε + Γ ε µ l X l {{ ˆ µ X ε t α 1...ε...α p 5 Cross-sections in the semi-tensor bundle Let ξ IqB p m be a tensor field on B m. Then the correspondence x ξ x, ξ x being the value of ξ at x M n, determines a cross-section ξ of semi-tensor bundle. Thus if σ ξ : B m Tq p B m is a cross-section of Tq p B m, π,b m, such that π σ ξ = I Bm, an associated cross-section ξ : M n tqb p m of semi-tensor bundle tqb p m,π 2,M n defined by [[2], p. 217-218], [[9], p. 126-127]: ξ x a,x α = x a,x α,σ ξ π 1 x a,x α = x a,x α,σ ξ x α = x a,x α,ξ α 1...α p x. If the tensor field ξ has the local components ξ α 1...α p x, the cross-section ξ M n of tqb p m is locally expressed by x b = x b, x = x, x = ξ α 1...α p x, with respect to the coordinates x B = x b,x,x in t p qb m. Differentiating 11 by x c, we see that n m tangent vector fields B c c=1,...,n m to ξ M n have components c x b B c = xb x c = cx B = c x, c ξ α 1...α p 11 c 217 BISKA Bilisim Technology

217 F. Yildirim: Note on the cross-section in the semi-tensor bundle which are tangent to the cross-section ξ M n. Thus B c have components B c : B B c δ b c =, with respect to the coordinatesx b,x,x in t p qb m. Where δ b c = A b c = xb x c. Let X I 1 M n be a projectable vector field [9] with projection X = X α x α α i.e. X = X a x a,x α a + X α x α α. We denote by BX the vector field with local components BX : B B c X c = δc b X c A b c X c = = with respect to the coordinatesx b,x,x in t p qb m, which is defined globally along ξ M n., 12 Differentiating 11 by x θ, we have vector fields C θ θ = n m+1,...,n with components which are tangent to the cross-section ξ M n. θ x b C θ = xb x θ = θ x B = θ x, θ ξ α 1...α p Thus C θ have components C θ : Cθ B = A b θ δ θ θ ξ α 1...α p, with respect to the coordinatesx b,x,x in t p qb m. Where A b θ = xb x θ,δ θ = A θ = x x θ. Let X I 1 M n be a projectable vector field [9] with projection X = X α x α α i.e. X = X a x a,x α a + X α x α α. We denote by CX the vector field with local components CX : Cθ B X θ = A b θ X θ X X θ θ ξ α 1...α p with respect to the coordinatesx b,x,x in t p qb m, which is defined globally along ξ M n., 13 c 217 BISKA Bilisim Technology

NTMSCI 5, No. 2, 212-221 217 / www.ntmsci.com 218 On the other hand, the fibre is locally expressed by x b = const., x = const., x = t α 1...α p = t α 1...α p, t α 1...α p being considered as parameters. Thus, on differentiating with respect to x = t α 1...α p, we easily see that the vector fields E θ θ = n+1,...,n+m p+q with components E θ : E θ B θ x b = θ x B = θ x is tangent to the fibre, where δ is the Kronecker symbol. θ t α 1...α p = δ θ 1...δ θ q 1 q δ α 1 γ 1...δ α p γ p Let ξ be a tensor field of typep,q with local components on B m. ξ = ξ γ 1...γ p θ 1...θ q dx θ 1... dx θ q γ1... γp We denote by Eξ the vector field with local components which is tangent to the fibre. Eξ : E θ B ξ γ 1...γ p θ 1...θ q = ξ α 1...α p, 14 According to 12 and 13, we define new projectable vector field H y with respect to the coordinatesx b,x,x in t p qb m, where BX+CX = H X A b c X c A b θ X θ H X = + X = X. 15 X θ θ ξ α 1...α p X θ θ ξ α 1...α p We consider in π 1 U tqb p m, n+m p+q local vector fields B c, C θ and E θ along ξ M n. They form a local family of frames {B c,c θ,e θ along ξ M n, which is called the adaptedb,c,e-frame of ξ M n in π 1 U. We can state following theorem: Theorem 2. Let e a vector field on M n with projection X on B m. We have along ξ M n the formulas i cc X = H X+ E L X ξ, ii vv ξ = Eξ 16 c 217 BISKA Bilisim Technology

219 F. Yildirim: Note on the cross-section in the semi-tensor bundle for any t I p qb m, where L X ξ denotes the Lie derivative of ξ with respect to X. Proof. i Using 9, 14 and 15, we have H X+ E L X ξ = X + X θ θ ξ α 1...α p X θ θ ξ α 1...α p q µ=1 µ X ξ α 1...α p 1... q + p λ=1 X α λ ξ α 1...ε...α p = X = cc X. p λ=1 X α λ ξ α 1...ε...α p q µ=1 µ X ξ α 1...α p 1... q Thus, we have 16. ii This immediately follows from 5. On the other hand, on putting C = E, we write the adapted frame of ξ M n as frame {B b,c,c of ξ M n is given by the matrix Ã= ÃA B = δb a x a δ α ξ σ 1...σ p α 1...α q δ 1 α 1...δ q α q δ σ 1 γ 1...δ σ p γ p {B b,c,c. The adapted. 16 Since the matrix à in 16 is non-singular, it has the inverse. Denoting this inverse byã 1, we have 1 δc 1 à b θ x b = ÃB C = δ θ θ ξ σ 1...σ p δ θ 1...δ θ q 1 q δ σ 1 γ 1...δ σ p γ q 1 1 where Ãà =à A B ÃB C = δ A C = Ĩ, where A=a,α,α, B= b,,, C= c,θ,θ., 17 Proof. In fact, from 16 and 17, we easily see that 1 δ 1 b Ãà a x a δc b θ x b = à A B ÃB C = δ α δ ξ σ 1...σ p α 1...α q δ 1 α 1...δ q α q δ σ 1 γ 1...δ σ θ p γ p θ ξ σ 1...σ p δ θ 1...δ θ q 1 q δ σ 1 γ 1...δ σ p γ q δc a θ x a + θ x a δ = δθ α c a = δ α θ ξ σ 1...σ p α 1...α q θ ξ σ 1...σ p α 1...α q δ θ 1 α 1...δ θ θ =δc A = Ĩ. q α q δα θ Let A IqB p m. If we take account of 5 and 16, we can easily prove that vv A = à vv A, where vv A I 1 t qb p m is a vector field defined by vv A a vv A= vv A α =, vv A α with respect to the adapted frame {B b,c,c of ξ M n. A α 1...α p Taking account of 9, 1 and 16, we see that the complete lift cc X and horizontal lift HH X have respectively c 217 BISKA Bilisim Technology

NTMSCI 5, No. 2, 212-221 217 / www.ntmsci.com 22 components with respect to the adapted frame cc X : X L X ξ α 1...α p, HH X : X X ξ α 1...α p {B b,c,c of ξ M n, where cc X = Ã cc X We now, from equations 7, 8 and 16 see that γϕ and γϕ have respectively components γϕ =γϕ I = p λ=1 ξ α 1...ε...α p ϕ α λ ε with respect to the adapted frame {B b,c,c of ξ M n., γϕ = γϕ I = and HH X = Ã HH X. q µ=1 ξ α 1...α p ϕ ε µ Let S I 1 2 M n now. If we take account of 16, we see thatγs = ÃγS. γs is given by γs=γs I J =, p λ=1 S λ ε ξ 1...ε... p α 1...α q with respect to the adapted frame {B b,c,c, where S λ ε are local componenets of S on B m. BX, CX and Eξ also have components: X α BX =,CX = X α,eξ = ξ α 1...α p respectively, with respect to the adapted frame {B b,c,c of the cross-section ξ M n determined by a tensor field ξ of typep,q in M n. Acknowledgment The authors would like to thanks the referees for useful and improving comments. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors contributions All authors have contributed to all parts of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. c 217 BISKA Bilisim Technology

221 F. Yildirim: Note on the cross-section in the semi-tensor bundle References [1] T.V. Duc, Structure presque-transverse. J. Diff. Geom., 141979, No:2, 215-219. [2] C.J. Isham, Modern differential geometry for physicists, World Scientific, 1999. [3] H. Fattaev, The Lifts of Vector Fields to the Semitensor Bundle of the Type 2,, Journal of Qafqaz University, 25 29, no. 1, 136-14. [4] A. Gezer and A. A. Salimov, Almost complex structures on the tensor bundles, Arab. J. Sci. Eng. Sect. A Sci. 33 28, no. 2, 283 296. [5] D. Husemoller, Fibre Bundles. Springer, New York, 1994. [6] V. Ivancevic and T. Ivancevic, Applied Differential Geometry, A Modern Introduction, World Scientific, Singapore, 27. [7] H.B. Lawson and M.L. Michelsohn, Spin Geometry. Princeton University Press., Princeton, 1989. [8] A.J. Ledger and K. Yano, Almost complex structure on tensor bundles, J. Dif. Geom. 1 1967, 355-368. [9] A. Salimov, Tensor Operators and their Applications. Nova Science Publ., New York, 213. [1] A. A. Salimov and E. Kadıoğlu, Lifts of derivations to the semitangent bundle, Turk J. Math. 24 2, 259-266. [11] N. Steenrod, The Topology of Fibre Bundles. Princeton University Press., Princeton, 1951. [12] V. V. Vishnevskii, Integrable affinor structures and their plural interpretations. Geometry, 7.J. Math. Sci. New York 18 22, no. 2, 151-187. [13] G. Walschap, Metric Structures in Differential Geometry, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 24. [14] F. Yıldırım, On a special class of semi-cotangent bundle, Proceedings of the Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics, ANAS 41 215, no. 1, 25-38. [15] F. Yıldırım and A. Salimov, Semi-cotangent bundle and problems of lifts, Turk J. Math, 214, 38, 325-339. c 217 BISKA Bilisim Technology