Cosmology with non-minimal derivative coupling

Σχετικά έγγραφα
Nonminimal derivative coupling scalar-tensor theories: odd-parity perturbations and black hole stability

Dark matter from Dark Energy-Baryonic Matter Couplings

Higher Derivative Gravity Theories

Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)

Space-Time Symmetries

Lifting Entry (continued)

6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.

Cosmological dynamics and perturbations in Light mass Galileon models

ECE Spring Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 2

The Simply Typed Lambda Calculus

HOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:

Forced Pendulum Numerical approach

Geodesic Equations for the Wormhole Metric

Exercises 10. Find a fundamental matrix of the given system of equations. Also find the fundamental matrix Φ(t) satisfying Φ(0) = I. 1.

CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS

Econ 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests

3+1 Splitting of the Generalized Harmonic Equations

Second Order RLC Filters

Matrices and Determinants

Symmetric Stress-Energy Tensor

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)

EE512: Error Control Coding

3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β

Homework 3 Solutions

Homework 8 Model Solution Section

DESIGN OF MACHINERY SOLUTION MANUAL h in h 4 0.

Απόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.

Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude

Non-Gaussianity from Lifshitz Scalar

Differential equations

If we restrict the domain of y = sin x to [ π, π ], the restrict function. y = sin x, π 2 x π 2

Dr. D. Dinev, Department of Structural Mechanics, UACEG

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

The kinetic and potential energies as T = 1 2. (m i η2 i k(η i+1 η i ) 2 ). (3) The Hooke s law F = Y ξ, (6) with a discrete analog

If we restrict the domain of y = sin x to [ π 2, π 2

Higher spin gauge theories and their CFT duals

Three coupled amplitudes for the πη, K K and πη channels without data

( y) Partial Differential Equations

Η αλληλεπίδραση ανάμεσα στην καθημερινή γλώσσα και την επιστημονική ορολογία: παράδειγμα από το πεδίο της Κοσμολογίας

Second Order Partial Differential Equations

Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013

Cosmological Space-Times

Srednicki Chapter 55

derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates

ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II

Lifting Entry 2. Basic planar dynamics of motion, again Yet another equilibrium glide Hypersonic phugoid motion MARYLAND U N I V E R S I T Y O F

6.003: Signals and Systems. Modulation

the total number of electrons passing through the lamp.

wave energy Superposition of linear plane progressive waves Marine Hydrodynamics Lecture Oblique Plane Waves:

Strain gauge and rosettes

Variational Wavefunction for the Helium Atom

Lecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals

2. THEORY OF EQUATIONS. PREVIOUS EAMCET Bits.

Example Sheet 3 Solutions

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages until instructed to do so by the Invigilator.

Hartree-Fock Theory. Solving electronic structure problem on computers

[Note] Geodesic equation for scalar, vector and tensor perturbations

Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016

CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS

Numerical Analysis FMN011

SPONTANEOUS GENERATION OF GEOMETRY IN 4D

ω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω

Exercises to Statistics of Material Fatigue No. 5

Review Test 3. MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

Massive gravitons in arbitrary spacetimes

Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations

Derivation of Optical-Bloch Equations

Instruction Execution Times

Partial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013

6.4 Superposition of Linear Plane Progressive Waves

An Inventory of Continuous Distributions

Mean bond enthalpy Standard enthalpy of formation Bond N H N N N N H O O O

[1] P Q. Fig. 3.1

Magnetically Coupled Circuits

Reminders: linear functions

High order interpolation function for surface contact problem

Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence

Torsional Newton-Cartan gravity from a pre-newtonian expansion of GR

Coupling of a Jet-Slot Oscillator With the Flow-Supply Duct: Flow-Acoustic Interaction Modeling

Thermodynamics of the motility-induced phase separation

Lecture 26: Circular domains

Aquinas College. Edexcel Mathematical formulae and statistics tables DO NOT WRITE ON THIS BOOKLET

Spherical Coordinates

Exercise 1.1. Verify that if we apply GS to the coordinate basis Gauss form ds 2 = E(u, v)du 2 + 2F (u, v)dudv + G(u, v)dv 2

ΑΡΙΣΤΟΤΕΛΕΙΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗΣ ΤΜΗΜΑ ΟΔΟΝΤΙΑΤΡΙΚΗΣ ΕΡΓΑΣΤΗΡΙΟ ΟΔΟΝΤΙΚΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΑΝΩΤΕΡΑΣ ΠΡΟΣΘΕΤΙΚΗΣ

Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set

Lecture 21: Scattering and FGR

DERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION FOR AN APPLIED FORCE Revision C

Section 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas

1 String with massive end-points

Math221: HW# 1 solutions

Theory of Cosmological Perturbations

Local Approximation with Kernels

Galatia SIL Keyboard Information

Finite Field Problems: Solutions

PARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities

Math 6 SL Probability Distributions Practice Test Mark Scheme

Transcript:

Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia 8th Spontaneous Workshop on Cosmology Institut d Etude Scientifique de Cargèse, Corsica May 13, 2014

Plan Plan Scalar fields: minimal and nonminimal coupling to gravity Horndeski theory Scalar fields with nonminimal derivative coupling Cosmological models with nonminimal derivative coupling Perturbations Summary Based on Sushkov, PRD 80, 103505 (2009) Saridakis, Sushkov, PRD 81, 083510 (2010) Sushkov, PRD 85, 123520 (2012) Skugoreva, Sushkov, Toporensky, PRD 88, 083539 (2013)

Scalar fields minimally coupled to gravity S = d 4 x g [ L GR + L S ] L GR gravitational Lagrangian general relativity; L GR = R square gravity; L GR = R + cr 2 f(r)-theories; L GR = f(r) etc... L S scalar field Lagrangian; ordinary STT; L S = ɛ( φ) 2 2V (φ) ɛ = +1 canonical scalar field ɛ = 1 phantom or ghost scalar field with negative kinetic energy V (φ) potential of self-action K-essence; L s = K(X) [X = ( φ) 2 ] etc...

Scalar fields nonminimally coupled to gravity Bergmann-Wagoner-Nordtvedt scalar-tensor theories S = d 4 x g [ f(φ)r h(φ)( φ) 2 2V (φ) ] f(φ)r = nonminimal coupling between φ and R

Scalar fields nonminimally coupled to gravity Bergmann-Wagoner-Nordtvedt scalar-tensor theories S = d 4 x g [ f(φ)r h(φ)( φ) 2 2V (φ) ] f(φ)r = nonminimal coupling between φ and R Conformal transformation to the Einstein frame (Wagoner, 1970): g µν = f(φ)g µν ; dφ dψ = f fh + 3 2 ( df dφ ) 2 1/2 S = d 4 x [ ] g R ɛ( ψ) 2 2U(ψ) ψ = new scalar field U(ψ) = new effective potential [ ( ) ] 2 ɛ = sign fh + 3 df 2 dφ

Scalar fields nonminimally coupled to gravity General scalar-tensor theories S = d 4 x g [ F (φ, R) ( φ) 2 2V (φ) ] F (φ, R) = generalized nonminimal coupling between φ and R

Scalar fields nonminimally coupled to gravity General scalar-tensor theories S = d 4 x g [ F (φ, R) ( φ) 2 2V (φ) ] F (φ, R) = generalized nonminimal coupling between φ and R Conformal transformation to the Einstein frame (Maeda, 1989): g µν = Ω 2 Ω 2 g µν ; 16π F (φ, R) R S = d 4 x g [ ] R 16π h(φ)ψ 1 ( φ) 2 3 32π ψ 2 ( ψ) 2 + U(φ, ψ) ψ Ω 2 = new (second!) scalar field U(φ, ψ) = new effective potential

Scalar fields nonminimally coupled to gravity Some remarks: A nonminimal scalar field is conformally equivalent to the minimal one possessing some effective potential V (φ) A behavior of the scalar field is encoded in the potential V (φ) The potential V (φ) is a very important ingredient of various cosmological models: a slowly varying potential behaves like an effective cosmological constat providing one or more than one inflationary phases. An appropriate choice of V (φ) is known as a problem of fine tuning of the cosmological constant.

Scalar fields nonminimally coupled to gravity Some remarks: A nonminimal scalar field is conformally equivalent to the minimal one possessing some effective potential V (φ) A behavior of the scalar field is encoded in the potential V (φ) The potential V (φ) is a very important ingredient of various cosmological models: a slowly varying potential behaves like an effective cosmological constat providing one or more than one inflationary phases. An appropriate choice of V (φ) is known as a problem of fine tuning of the cosmological constant.

Scalar fields nonminimally coupled to gravity Some remarks: A nonminimal scalar field is conformally equivalent to the minimal one possessing some effective potential V (φ) A behavior of the scalar field is encoded in the potential V (φ) The potential V (φ) is a very important ingredient of various cosmological models: a slowly varying potential behaves like an effective cosmological constat providing one or more than one inflationary phases. An appropriate choice of V (φ) is known as a problem of fine tuning of the cosmological constant.

Nonminimal derivative coupling generalization S = d 4 x g [ R g µν φ,µ φ,ν 2V (φ) ] F (φ, R, R µν,... ) nonminimal coupling generalization! K(φ, φ,µ, φ ;µν,..., R, R µν,... ) nonminimal derivative coupling generalization!

Nonminimal derivative coupling generalization S = d 4 x g [ R g µν φ,µ φ,ν 2V (φ) ] F (φ, R, R µν,... ) nonminimal coupling generalization! K(φ, φ,µ, φ ;µν,..., R, R µν,... ) nonminimal derivative coupling generalization!

Nonminimal derivative coupling generalization S = d 4 x g [ R g µν φ,µ φ,ν 2V (φ) ] F (φ, R, R µν,... ) nonminimal coupling generalization! K(φ, φ,µ, φ ;µν,..., R, R µν,... ) nonminimal derivative coupling generalization!

Horndeski (Galileon) theory In 1973, Horndeski derived the action of the most general scalar-tensor theories with second-order equations of motion G.Horndeski, IJTP 10, 363 (1974) Horndeski Lagrangian: L = i L i L 2 =K(φ, X), X = 1 2 ( φ)2 L 3 =G 3 (φ, X) φ, L 4 =G 4 (φ, X)R + G 4,X (φ, X) [ ( φ) 2 ( µ ν φ) 2], L 5 =G 5 (φ, X)G µν µ ν φ + 1 6 G 5,X(φ, X) [ ( φ) 3 3( φ)( µ ν φ) 2 + ( µ ν φ) 3], Notice: Generally, there are no conformal transformations which transform the Horndeski theory to the Einstein frame!

Theory with nonminimal kinetic coupling Action: S = d 4 x { } R g 8π [ɛgµν + κg µν ]φ,µ φ,ν 2V (φ) Field equations: G µν = 8π [ T µν + κθ µν ], [ɛg µν + κg µν ] µ ν φ = V φ T µν =ɛ µ φ ν φ 1 2 ɛg µν( φ) 2 g µν V (φ), Θ µν = 1 2 µφ ν φ R + 2 α φ (µ φr α ν) 1 2 ( φ)2 G µν + α φ β φ R µανβ + µ α φ ν α φ µ ν φ φ + g µν [ 1 2 α β φ α β φ + 1 2 ( φ)2 α φ β φ R αβ] Notice: The field equations are of second order!

Cosmological models: General formulas Ansatz: Sushkov, 2009; Saridakis, Sushkov, 2010 ds 2 = dt 2 + a 2 (t)dx 2, φ = φ(t) Field equations: a(t) cosmological factor, H = ȧ/a Hubble parameter 3H 2 = 4π φ 2 ( ɛ 9κH 2) + 8πV (φ), 2Ḣ + 3H2 = 4π φ [ ( 2 ɛ + κ 2Ḣ + 3H2 + 4H φ φ 1)] + 8πV (φ), [ (ɛ 3κH 2 )a 3 φ] = a 3 dv (φ) dφ

Cosmological models: General formulas Ansatz: Sushkov, 2009; Saridakis, Sushkov, 2010 ds 2 = dt 2 + a 2 (t)dx 2, φ = φ(t) Field equations: a(t) cosmological factor, H = ȧ/a Hubble parameter 3H 2 = 4π φ 2 ( ɛ 9κH 2) + 8πV (φ), 2Ḣ + 3H2 = 4π φ [ ( 2 ɛ + κ 2Ḣ + 3H2 + 4H φ φ 1)] + 8πV (φ), [ (ɛ 3κH 2 )a 3 φ] = a 3 dv (φ) dφ V (φ) const = φ = C a 3 (ɛ 3κH 2 )

Cosmological models: I. No kinetic coupling Trivial model without kinetic coupling (κ = 0) S = d 4 x [ ] R g 8π ( φ)2

Cosmological models: I. No kinetic coupling Trivial model without kinetic coupling (κ = 0) S = d 4 x [ ] R g 8π ( φ)2 Solution: a 0 (t) = t 1/3 ; φ 0 (t) = 1 2 3π ln t ds 2 0 = dt 2 + t 2/3 dx 2 t = 0 is an initial singularity

Cosmological models: II. No free kinetic term Model without free kinetic term (ɛ = 0) S = d 4 x [ ] R g 8π κgµν φ,µ φ,ν

Cosmological models: II. No free kinetic term Solution: Model without free kinetic term (ɛ = 0) S = d 4 x [ ] R g 8π κgµν φ,µ φ,ν a(t) = t 2/3 ; φ(t) = ds 2 0 = dt 2 + t 4/3 dx 2 t 2 3π κ, κ < 0 t = 0 is an initial singularity

Cosmological models: III. Ordinary scalar field without potential Model for an ordinary scalar field (ɛ = 1) without potential (V = 0) S = d 4 x { } R g 8π (gµν + κg µν )φ,µ φ,ν

Cosmological models: III. Ordinary scalar field without potential Model for an ordinary scalar field (ɛ = 1) without potential (V = 0) S = d 4 x { } R g 8π (gµν + κg µν )φ,µ φ,ν Asymptotic for t : a(t) a 0 (t) = t 1/3 ; φ(t) φ 0 (t) = 1 2 3π ln t Notice: At large times the model with κ 0 has the same behavior like that with κ = 0

Cosmological models: III. Ordinary scalar field without potential Asymptotics for early times The case κ < 0: a t 0 t 2/3 ; t φ t 0 2 3π κ ds 2 t 0 = dt 2 + t 4/3 dx 2 t = 0 is an initial singularity The case κ > 0: a t e Hκt ; φ t Ce t/ κ ds 2 t = dt 2 + e 2Hκt dx 2 de Sitter asymptotic with H κ = 1/ 9κ

Cosmological models: III. Ordinary scalar field without potential Plots of α = ln a in case κ 0, ɛ = 1, V = 0. (a) κ < 0; κ = 0; 1; 10; 100 De Sitter asymptotics: α(t) = t/3 κ (b) κ > 0; κ = 0; 1; 10; 100 Notice: In the model with nonmnimal kinetic coupling one get de Sitter phase without any potential!

Cosmological models: IV. Phantom scalar field without potential Plots of α(t) in case κ < 0, ɛ = 1, V = 0 (a) (9k 2 ) 1 < α 2 < (3k 2 ) 1 (b) α 2 > (3k 2 ) 1 De Sitter asymptotics: α 1(t) = t/ 9 κ (dash-dotted), α 2(t) = t/ 3 κ (dotted).

Cosmological models: V. Constant potential Models with the constant potential V (φ) = Λ/8π = const S = d 4 x [ ] R 2Λ g [ɛg µν + κg µν ]φ,µ φ,ν 8π

Cosmological models: V. Constant potential Models with the constant potential V (φ) = Λ/8π = const S = d 4 x [ ] R 2Λ g [ɛg µν + κg µν ]φ,µ φ,ν 8π There are two exact de Sitter solutions: I. α(t) = H Λ t, φ(t) = φ 0 = const, II. α(t) = t, φ(t) = 3κHΛ 2 1 3 κ 8πκ H Λ = Λ/3 1/2 t,

Cosmological models: V. Constant potential Plots of α(t) in case κ > 0, ɛ = 1, V = Λ (a) H 2 Λ < α2 < 1/9κ (b) 1/9κ < α 2 < 1/3κ < H 2 Λ De Sitter asymptotics: α 1(t) = H Λt (dashed), α 2(t) = t/ 9κ (dash-dotted), α 3(t) = t/ 3κ (dotted).

Cosmological models: V. Constant potential Plots of α(t) in cases κ > 0, ɛ = 1 and κ < 0, ɛ = 1 (a) κ < 0, ɛ = 1 (b) κ > 0, ɛ = 1 De Sitter asymptotic: α 1(t) = H Λt (dashed).

Cosmological models: V. Constant potential Plots of α(t) in case κ < 0, ɛ = 1 (a) H 2 Λ < 1/9 κ < α 2 < 1/3 κ (b) H 2 Λ < 1/9 κ < 1/3 κ < α 2 (c) α 2 < H 2 Λ < 1/9 κ (d) α 2 < 1/9 κ < H 2 Λ De Sitter asymptotics: α 1(t) = H Λt (dashed), α 2(t) = t/ 9κ (dash-dotted), α 3(t) = t/ 3κ (dotted).

Cosmological models: VI. Power-law potential S = d 4 x { R g 8π [ g µν + κg µν] } φ,µ φ,ν m 2 φ 2 Asymptotics: H t 1/ 9κ(1 + 1 2 κm2 ) primary inflation H <t< 1/ ( ) 1 3κ 1 ± 6 κm2 secondary inflation H t 2 [ ] sin 2mt 1 oscillatory asymptotic or graceful exit 3t 2mt from inflation

Cosmological scenarios with nonminimal kinetic coupling and matter Sushkov, PRD 85 (2012) 123520 S = d 4 x { } R 2Λ g [g µν + κg µν ]φ,µ φ,ν + S matter 8π

Cosmological scenarios with nonminimal kinetic coupling and matter Sushkov, PRD 85 (2012) 123520 S = d 4 x { } R 2Λ g [g µν + κg µν ]φ,µ φ,ν + S matter 8π Stress-energy tensor: T µν = diag(ρ, p, p, p) Field equations: 3H 2 = 4π φ 2 ( 1 9κH 2) + Λ + 8πρ, 2Ḣ + 3H2 = 4π φ [ ( 2 1 + κ 2Ḣ + 3H2 + 4H φ φ 1)] + Λ 8πp [ (1 3κH 2 )a 3 φ] = 0

Cosmological scenarios with nonminimal kinetic coupling and matter Sushkov, PRD 85 (2012) 123520 S = d 4 x { } R 2Λ g [g µν + κg µν ]φ,µ φ,ν + S matter 8π Stress-energy tensor: T µν = diag(ρ, p, p, p) Field equations: 3H 2 = 4π φ 2 ( 1 9κH 2) + Λ + 8πρ, 2Ḣ + 3H2 = 4π φ [ ( 2 1 + κ 2Ḣ + 3H2 + 4H φ φ 1)] + Λ 8πp [ (1 3κH 2 )a 3 φ] = 0 = φ = C a 3 (1 3κH 2 )

Realistic cosmological scenario: Master equation Perfect fluid: ρ i = ρ i0 a, p 3(1+wi) i = w i ρ i Density parameters: Ω mi0 = ρ i0, Ω φ0 = C2 /2, Ω Λ0 = Λ ρ cr ρ cr 8πρ cr ρ cr = 3H0 2 /8π Modified Friedmann equation: H 2 = H 2 0 [ Ω Λ0 + i Constraint for parameters: ] Ω mi0 a + Ω φ0(1 9κH 2 ) 3(1+wi) a 6 (1 3κH 2 ) 2 Ω Λ0 + i Ω mi0 + Ω φ0(1 9κH 2 0 ) (1 3κH 2 0 )2 = 1

Realistic cosmological scenario: Simple model No coupling: κ = 0; No cosmological constant: Λ = 0 Pressureless matter: p = 0; ρ = ρ 0 /a 3 H 2 = H 2 0 [ Ωm0 a 3 + Ω ] φ0 a 6 ; Ω m0 + Ω φ0 = 1 Scale factor a(t) a(t) (t t ) δ Hubble parameter H(a) H = ȧ/a H(a) at a 0 H(a) 0 at a Acceleration parameter q(a) q = äa/ȧ 2 q is negative Ω φ0 = 0; 0.25; 0.5; 0.75; 1, and Ω m0 = 1 Ω φ0

Realistic cosmological scenario: Simple model with cosmological constant No coupling: κ = 0 H 2 = H 2 0 [ Ω Λ0 + Ω m0 a 3 + Ω ] φ0 a 6 ; Ω Λ0 + Ω m0 + Ω φ0 = 1 Scale factor a(t) a(t) (t t ) 1/3 at t t a(t) e H Λt at t Hubble parameter H(a) H = ȧ/a H(a) at a 0 H(a) H Λ at a Acceleration parameter q(a) q = äa/ȧ 2 q changes its sign Ω φ0 = 0.23, Ω Λ0 = 0; 0.07; 0.27; 0.47; 0.73, and Ω m0 = 1 Ω φ0 Ω Λ0

Realistic cosmological scenario with kinetic coupling κ > 0 H 2 = H 2 0 [ Ω Λ0 + Ω m0 a 3 + Ω φ0(1 9κH 2 ] ) a 6 (1 3κH 2 ) 2 Universal asymptotic: H H κ = 1/ 9κ at a 0 Notice: The asymptotic H H κ at early cosmological times is only determined by the coupling parameter κ and does not depend on other parameters!

Realistic cosmological scenario: Numerical solutions Scale factor a(t) Hubble parameter H(a) Acceleration parameter q

Realistic cosmological scenario: Estimations H κ t f 60 e-folds t f 10 35 sec the end of initial inflationary stage H κ = 1/ 9κ 6 10 36 sec 1 κ 10 74 sec 2 or l κ = κ 1/2 10 27 cm

Realistic cosmological scenario: Estimations H κ t f 60 e-folds t f 10 35 sec the end of initial inflationary stage H κ = 1/ 9κ 6 10 36 sec 1 κ 10 74 sec 2 or l κ = κ 1/2 10 27 cm H 0 70 (km/sec)/mpc 10 18 sec 1 Present Hubble parameter γ = 3κH0 2 10 109 Extremely small! [ H 2 = H0 2 Ω Λ0 + Ω m0 a 3 + Ω φ0(1 9κH 2 ] ) a 6 (1 3κH 2 ) 2 Ω Λ0 + Ω m0 + Ω φ0 1 Ω Λ0 = 0.73, Ω φ0 = 0.23, Ω m0 = 0.04 q 0 = 0.25

Perturbations Perturbed FRW metric: g µν = ḡ µν + h µν background metric: ḡ 00 = 1, ḡ i0 = ḡ 0i = 0, ḡ ij = a 2 (t)δ ij metric perturbations (Newtonian gauge): h 00 = Φ, h 0i = h i0 = 0, h ij =a 2 (Ψδ ij + i C j + j C i + Θ ij ) Perturbed SET: δt 00 =ρφ + δρ, δt i0 = (ρ + p)δu i, δt ij =ph ij + a 2 δ ij δp Perturbed scalar field: φ (x, t) = φ 0 (t) + δφ (x, t)

Perturbations: Perturbed equations Perturbed Einstein equations P 1 Φ + P 2 Ψ + P3 2 Ψ + P 4 δ φ + P 5 2 δφ + P 6 δρ = 0, Q 1 Φ + Q 2 Φ + Q3 2 Φ + Q 4 Ψ + Q5 Ψ + Q6 2 Ψ +Q 7 δ φ + Q 8 δ φ + Q 9 2 δφ + Q 10 δp = 0, R 1 i Φ + R 2 i Ψ + R3 i δφ + R 4 i δ φ + R 5 2 Ċ i + R 6 δu i = 0, S 1 i j Φ + S 2 i j Ψ + S 3 i j δφ ( ) ( ) +S 4 i Ċ j + j Ċ i + S 5 i Cj + j Ci +S 6 θij + S 7 θij + S 8 2 θ ij = 0 P i, Q j, R k, S l coefficients depending on unperturbed values P 1 = 8π (ρ + 92 κh2 φ ) 2, and so on...

Tensor perturbations Two polarizations: θ ij θ +, θ Equation for tensor modes (1 + 4πκ φ ( 2 ) θ + 3H + 4πκ(2 φ φ + 3H φ ) 2 k ) θ 2 + a 2 (1 4πκ φ 2 )θ = 0 The case 4πκ φ 2 1: The case 4πκ φ 2 1: θ + θ + 3H θ + k2 a 2 θ = 0 ( 2 φ ) φ + 3H θ k2 a 2 θ = 0

Conclusions The non-minimal kinetic coupling provides an essentially new inflationary mechanism which does not need any fine-tuned potential. At early cosmological times the coupling κ-terms in the field equations are dominating and provide the quasi-de Sitter behavior of the scale factor: a(t) e Hκt with H κ = 1/ 9κ and κ 10 74 sec 2 (or l κ κ 1/2 10 27 cm) The model provides a natural mechanism of epoch change without any fine-tuned potential.

THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION!