COLOR FIGURES Electroweak model and constraints on new physics (Figure.).... 0 Electroweak model and constraints on new physics (Figure.).... 0 Electroweak model and constraints on new physics (Figure.3).... 0 Electroweak model and constraints on new physics (Figure.4).... 0 CKM quark-mixing matrix (Figure.).............. 03 CP violation in meson decays (Figure.)............. 03 CP violation in meson decays (Figure.3)............. 04 Neutrino mixing (Figure 3.)................... 04 Neutrino mixing (Figure 3.)................... 05 Quark model (Figure 4.3).................... 06 Quark model (Figure 4.8).................... 06 Structure functions (Figure 6.3).................. 07 Big-Bang cosmology (Figure 9.5)................. 07 Big-Bang nucleosynthesis (Figure 0.)............... 08 The Cosmological Parameters (Figure.)............. 08 The Cosmological Parameters (Figure.)............. 09 The Cosmological Parameters (Figure.3)............. 09 Cosmic Rays (Figure 4.3).................... Cosmic Rays (Figure 4.9).................... Cosmic Rays (Figure 4.).................... Passage of particles through matter (Figure 7.7)........... Passage of particles through matter (Figure 7.8)........... Plots of cross sections and related quantities (Figure 40.6)....... 3 Plots of cross sections and related quantities (Figure 40.7)....... 4 Plots of cross sections and related quantities (Figure 40.)...... 5 The Mass of the W boson (Figure )................ 6 Searches for Higgs Bosons (Figure )................ 6 Searches for Higgs Bosons (Figure 3)................ 7 Searches for Higgs Bosons (Figure 4)................ 7 Searches for Higgs Bosons (Figure 5)................ 8 Searches for Higgs Bosons (Figure 6)................ 8 Searches for Higgs Bosons (Figure 7)................ 9 Searches for Higgs Bosons (Figure 8)................ 9 Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment (Figure )........... 0 Neutrinoless Double-fi Decay (Figure )............... 0 Solar neutrinos Review (Figure )................. Solar neutrinos Review (Figure )................. Solar neutrinos Review (Figure 3)................. Solar neutrinos Review (Figure 4)................. 3 V ud ;V us, the Cabbibo Angle, and CKM Unitarity (Figure )...... 3 CP Violation in K L Decays (Figure )............... 4 CP Violation in K L Decays (Figure )............... 4 D 0 D 0 Mixing (Figure )..................... 5 B 0 B 0 Mixing (Figure )..................... 5 Determination of jv cb j (Figure ).................. 6 Determination of jv cb j (Figure ).................. 6 Determination of jv cb j (Figure 3).................. 7 Supersymmetry, Part I (Theory, Figure ).............. 7 Supersymmetry, Part II (Experiment, Figure )........... 8 Supersymmetry, Part II (Experiment, Figure............ 8 Supersymmetry, Part II (Experiment, Figure 3............ 9 Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking (Figure )........ 9 Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking (Figure 3)........ 30 Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking (Figure 4)........ 30 Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking (Figure 6)........ 3 Extra Dimentions (Figure ).................... 3
Color figures 0 Electroweak model and constraints on new physics (p.5) 0.50 0.45 current future SM Qweak sin ^ θ (MZ W ) 0.40 0.35 APV A PV ν-dis A FB 0.30 Z-pole 0.5 0.00 0.0 0. 0 00 Q [GeV] Figure.: Scale dependence of the weak mixing angle defined in the MS scheme [37]. The minimum of the curve corresponds to Q = M W, below which we switch to an effective theory with the W ± bosons integrated out, and where the fi-function for the weak mixing angle changes sign. At thelocation of the W -boson mass and each fermion mass, there are also discontinuities arising from scheme dependent matching terms which are necessary to ensure that the various effective field theories within a given loop order describe the same physics. However, in the MS scheme these are very small numerically and barely visible in the figure provided one decouples quarks at Q = bm q ( bm q ). The width of the curve reflects the SM uncertainty which is strongly dominated by the experimental error on bs Z. The theory uncertainty from strong interaction effects is at the level of ±7 5 [37]. Electroweak model and constraints on new physics (p.9) 00 all data (90% CL) 500 00 M H [GeV] 0 50 0 Γ Ζ, σ had, R l, R q asymmetries low-energy M W m t excluded 0 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 m t [GeV] Figure.: One-standard-deviation (39.35%) uncertainties in M H as a function of m t for various inputs, and the 90% CL region ( χ = 4:605) allowed by all data. ff s (M Z ) = 0:0 is assumed except for the fits including the Z-lineshape data. The 95% direct lower limit from LEP is also shown.
0 Color figures Electroweak model and constraints on new physics (p.30) M W [GeV] 80.50 80.45 80.40 80.35 80.30 direct (σ) indirect (σ) all data (90% CL) M = 0 GeV H M = 00 GeV H M = 400 GeV H M = 800 GeV H 80.5 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 m t [GeV] Figure.3: One-standard-deviation (39.35%) region in M W as a function of m t for the direct and indirect data, and the 90% CL region ( χ =4:605) allowed by all data. The SM prediction as a function of M H is also indicated. The widths of the M H bands reflect the theoretical uncertainty from ff(m Z ). Electroweak model and constraints on new physics (p.3).5.00 0.75 0.50 0.5 Γ Z, σ had, R l, R q asymmetries M W ν scattering Q W E 58 T 0.00-0.5-0.50-0.75 -.00 -.5 -.5 -.00-0.75-0.50-0.5 0.00 0.5 0.50 0.75.00.5 S all: M H = 7 GeV all: M H = 340 GeV all: M H = 00 GeV Figure.4: ff constraints (39.35 %) on S and T from various inputs combined with M Z. S and T represent the contributions of new physics only. (Uncertainties from m t are included in the errors.) The contours assume M H = 7 GeV except for the central and upper 90% CL contours allowed by all data, which are for M H = 340 GeV and 00 GeV, respectively. Data sets not involving M W are insensitive tou. Due to higher order effects, however, U = 0 has to be assumed in all fits. ff s is constrained using the fi lifetime as additional input in all fits.
Color figures 03 CKM quark-mixing matrix (p.4).5 excluded area has CL > 0.95 γ sin β m d excluded at CL > 0.95 ms & md 0.5 η 0 ε K V ub /V cb γ α β α -0.5 α ε K - γ sol. w/ cos β < 0 (excl. at CL > 0.95) -.5 - -0.5 0 0.5.5 ρ Figure.: Constraints on the μρ; μ plane. The shaded areas have 95% CL. CP violation in meson decays (p.50) V td V tb * V ud V ub * α=ϕ β=ϕ γ=ϕ 3 V cd V cb * Figure.: plane. Graphical representation of the unitarity constraint V ud Vub Λ + V cd V cb Λ + V td V tb Λ = 0 as a triangle in the complex
04 Color figures CP violation in meson decays (p.53) Figure.3: Summary of the results [49] of time-dependent analyses of b! qqs decays, which are potentially sensitive to new physics. Sub-dominant corrections are expected to be smallest for the modes shown in green (darker). Results for final states including K 0 mesons combine CP-conjugate K S and K L measurements. The final state K + K K 0 is not a CP eigenstate; the mixture of CP-even and CP-odd components is taken into account in obtaining an effective value for f S f. Correlations between C f and S f are expected to be small and are not shown. Neutrino mixing (p.59) Figure 3.: The region allowed for the neutrino parameters m fi and fi by the solar and KamLAND data. The best-fit point, indicated by the star, is m fi =(8:0+0:6 0:4 ) 5 ev and fi =(33:9 +:4 : )ffi : [].
06 Color figures Quark model (p.68) 0 +- 5 r 0 M G 8 6 4 3 ++ ++ 0 ++ -+ 0 -+ +- 3 -- 3 +- -- -- +- 4 3 M G (GeV) 0 ++ -+ +- -- 0 Figure 4.3: Predicted glueball mass spectrum from the lattice (from Ref. 9). Quark model (p.7).6.4 3S. P D GeV S P 9.8 9.6 9.4 S Figure 4.8: The spectrum of radial and orbital levels from Ref. [37]. Closed and open symbols are from coarse and fine lattices respectively. Squares and triangles denote unquenched and quenched results respectively. Lines represent experiment.
Color figures 07 Structure functions (p.84) Q (GeV ) 6 5 4 3 - -6-5 -4-3 - - x Figure 6.3: Kinematic domains in x and Q probed by fixed-target and collider experiments, shown together with the important constraints they make on the various parton distributions. Big-Bang cosmology (p.8) Figure 9.5: The galaxy power spectrum from the dfgrs, shown in dimensionless form, (k) / k 3 P (k). The solid points with error bars show the power estimate. The window function correlates the results at different k values, and also distorts the large-scale shape of the power spectrum An approximate correction for the latter effect has been applied. The solid and dashed lines show various CDM models, all assuming n =. For the case with non-negligible baryon content, a big-bang nucleosynthesis value of Ω b h = 0:0 is assumed, together with h = 0:7. A good fit is clearly obtained for Ω m h ' 0:.
08 Color figures 0.7 0.6 0.005 4 He Big-Bang nucleosynthesis (p.0) Baryon density Ω B h 0.0 0.0 0.03 0.5 Y p D 0.4 H 0.3 3 4 5 D/H p 3 He/H p BBN CMB Figure 0.: The abundances of 4 He, D, 3 He and 7 Li as predicted by the standard model of big-bang nucleosynthesis. Boxes indicate the observed light element abundances (smaller boxes: ff statistical errors; larger boxes: ±ff statistical and systematic errors). The narrow vertical band indicates the CMB measure of the cosmic baryon density. 9 7 Li/H p 5 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Baryon-to-photon ratio η The Cosmological Parameters (p.8) 3 No Big Bang SNe: Knop et al. (003) CMB: Spergel et al. (003) Clusters: Allen et al. (00) Supernovae Figure.: This shows the preferred region in the Ω m Ω Λ plane from the compilation of supernovae data in Ref. 7, and also the complementary results coming from some other observations. Ω Λ 0 CMB expands forever recollapses eventually Clusters flat closed open 0 3 Ω M
Color figures 09 The Cosmological Parameters (p.8) Figure.: The angular power spectrum of the cosmic microwave background temperature from WMAP3. The solid line shows the prediction from the best-fitting ΛCDM model []. The error bars on the data points (which are tiny for most of them) indicate the observational errors, while the shaded region indicates the statistical uncertainty from being able to observe only one microwave sky,known as cosmic variance, which is the dominant uncertainty on large angular scales. [Figure courtesy NASA/WMAP Science Team.] The Cosmological Parameters (p.9) 5.0 k [h/mpc] 0.0 0.05 0. dfgrs - Cole et al. (005) SDSS - Tegmark et al. (004) log P(k) [P(k) in h 3 Mpc 3 ] 4.5 4.0 4.5.5 log k.0 [k in h/mpc] Figure.3: The galaxy power spectrum from the dfgrs, shown in dimensionless form, (k) / k 3 P (k). The solid points with error bars show the power estimate. The window function correlates the results at different k values, and also distorts the large-scale shape of the power spectrum An approximate correction for the latter effect has been applied. The solid and dashed lines show various CDM models, all assuming n =. For the case with non-negligible baryon content, a big-bang nucleosynthesis value of Ω b h = 0:0 is assumed, together with h = 0:7. A good fit is clearly obtained for Ω m h ' 0:.
Color figures Cosmic Rays (p.46) 000 Altitude (km) 5 5 3 0 Vertical flux [m s sr ] 00 0 0. _ ν µ + ν µ µ + + µ p + n e + + e π + + π 0.0 0 00 400 600 800 00 Atmospheric depth [g cm ] Figure 4.3: Vertical fluxes of cosmic rays in the atmosphere with E > GeV estimated from the nucleon flux of Eq. (4:). The points show measurements of negative muons with E μ > GeV [4,4 6]. Cosmic Rays (p.50) Flux dφ/de E.5 [m s sr GeV.5 ] 4 3 + AGASA + Akeno 0 km + Akeno km AUGER BLANCA CASA-MIA DICE BASJE-MAS EAS-Top Fly s Eye Haverah Park Haverah Park Fe Haverah Park p HEGRA HiRes-I HiRes-II KNEE +++ + + ++ +++++ + ++ ++ + + + + + ++ + ++++++ +++++++++ + + + +++ ++ + ++ + +++++ + + + ++ + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + HiRes/MIA KASCADE (e/m QGSJET) KASCADE (e/m SIBYLL) KASCADE (h/m) KASCADE (nn) MSU Mt. Norikura SUGAR Tibet ASγ Tibet ASγ-III Tunka-5 Yakutsk direct : JACEE RUNJOB SOKOL Grigorov ANKLE 4 5 6 7 8 9 Energy E [GeV] Figure 4.9: The all-particle spectrum: for references see [65]. Figure used by permission of author.
Color figures Cosmic Rays (p.50) Flux E 3 [m s sr ev ] HiRes- Monocular HiRes- Monocular AGASA Auger SD 0. 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5 0 0.5 log (E ) [ev] Figure 4.: Expanded view of the highest energy portion of the cosmic-ray spectrum. Ξ [78]( HiRes monocular), ffl [78]( HiRes monocular), N [79]( Auger) H [76]( AGASA). Passage of particles through matter (p.6) /x (MeV g cm ) 0.50.00.50.00.50 f ( /x).0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0. p/x w 500 MeV pion in silicon 640 µm (49 mg/cm ) 30 µm (74.7 mg/cm ) 60 µm (37.4 mg/cm ) 80 µm (8.7 mg/cm ) Mean energy loss rate 0.0 0 00 300 400 500 600 /x (ev/µm) Figure 7.7: Straggling functions in silicon for 500 MeV pions, normalized to unity at the most probable value ffi p =x. The width w is the full width at half maximum.
Color figures Passage of particles through matter (p.6) ( p/x) / de/dx min.00 0.95 0.90 0.85 0.80 0.75 0.70 0.65 0.60 x = 640 µm (49 mg/cm ) 30 µm (74.7 mg/cm ) 60 µm (37.4 mg/cm ) 80 µm (8.7 mg/cm ) 0.55 0.50 0.3 3 30 0 300 00 βγ (= p/m) Figure 7.8: Most probable energy loss in silicon, scaled to the mean loss of a minimum ionizing particle, 388 ev/μm (.66 MeV g cm ).
Color figures 3 Plots of cross sections and related quantities (p.333) ff and R in e + e Collisions - -3-4 ρ ω φ ρ J/ψ ψ(s) Υ Z σ[pb] -5-6 -7-8 3 J/ψ ψ(s) Υ Z φ R ω ρ ρ - s [GeV] Figure 40.6: World data on the total cross section of e + e! hadrons and the ratio R(s) = ff(e + e! hadrons; s)=ff(e + e! μ + μ ;s). ff(e + e! hadrons; s) is the experimental cross section corrected for initial state radiation and electron-positron vertex loops, ff(e + e! μ + μ ;s) = 4ßff (s)=3s. Data errors are total below GeV and statistical above GeV. The curves are an educative guide: the broken one (green) is a naive quark-parton model prediction and the solid one (red) is 3-loop pqcd prediction (see Quantum Chromodynamics" section of this Review, Eq. (9:) or, for more details, K. G. Chetyrkin et al., Nucl. Phys. B586, 56 (000) (Erratum ibid. B634, 43 (00)). Breit-Wigner parameterizations of J=ψ, ψ(s), and (ns);n = ; ; 3; 4 are also shown. The full list of references to the original data and the details of the R ratio extraction from them can be found in [arxiv:hep-ph/034]. Corresponding computerreadable data files are available at http://pdg.ihep.su/xsect/contents.html. (Courtesy of the COMPAS(Protvino) and HEPDATA(Durham) Groups, August 005. Corrections by P. Janot (CERN) and M. Schmitt (Northwestern U.))
4 Color figures Plots of cross sections and related quantities (p.334) R in Light-Flavor, Charm, and Beauty Threshold Regions ρ ω φ u, d, s ρ 3looppQCD Naive quark model R - 7 6 5 4 3 Sum of exclusive measurements Inclusive measurements 0.5.5.5 3 J/ψ ψ(s) Mark-I Mark-I + LGW Mark-II PLUTO DASP Crystal Ball BES ψ 3770 ψ 4040 ψ 460 ψ 445 c 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 8 7 6 Υ(S) Υ(S) Υ(3S) Υ(4S) b 5 4 3 MD- ARGUS CLEO CUSB DHHM Crystal Ball CLEO II DASP LENA 9.5.5 s [GeV] Figure 40.7: R in the light-flavor, charm, and beauty threshold regions. Data errors are total below GeV and statistical above GeV. The curves are the same as in Fig. 40.6. Note: CLEO data above (4S) were not fully corrected for radiative effects, and we retain them on the plot only for illustrative purposes with a normalization factor of 0.8. The full list of references to the original data and the details of the R ratio extraction from them can be found in [arxiv:hep-ph/034]. The computer-readable data are available at http://pdg.ihep.su/xsect/contents.html (Courtesy of the COMPAS(Protvino) and HEPDATA(Durham) Groups, August 005.)
Color figures 5 Plots of cross sections and related quantities (p.338) p (p) p Σ p π p K p Total cross section (mb) - - γp -3 γγ sgev -4 0. 0. 3 4 p p Re (T ) Im (T ) π p K p 0.0-0. pp π + p K + p -0. s GeV s GeV sgev.6 3 4.6 3 4.6 3 4 Figure 40.: Summary of hadronic, flp, and flfl total cross sections, and ratio of the real to imaginary parts of the forward hadronic amplitudes. Corresponding computer-readable data files may be found at pdg.lbl.gov/xsect/contents.html. (Courtesy of the COMPAS group, IHEP, Protvino, August 005.)
6 Color figures The Mass of the W boson (p.360) σ WW (pb) 0 LEP PRELIMINARY YFSWW and RacoonWW 8 7 6 0 90 95 00 05 60 80 00 s (GeV) Figure : Measurement of the W -pair production cross section as a function of the center of mass energy [], compared to the predictions of RACOONWW [3] and YFSWW [4]. The shaded area represents the uncertainty on the theoretical predictions, estimated to be ±% for p s<70 GeV and ranging from 0.7 to 0.4% above 70 GeV. Searches for Higgs Bosons (p.39) - ln(q) 5 0 5 (a) ALEPH - ln(q) 50 40 30 LEP 5 0 0 0-5 - -0 Observed Expected for background Expected for signal plus background - 0 4 6 8 4 6 8 0 m H (GeV/c ) -30 6 8 4 6 8 0 m H (GeV/c ) Figure : Observed (solid line), and expected behaviors of the test statistic lnq for the background (dashed line), and the signal + background hypothesis (dash-dotted line) as a function of the test mass m H. Left: ALEPH data alone; right: LEP data combined. The dark and light shaded areas represent the 68% and 95% probability bands about the background expectation (from Ref. 7).
Color figures 7 Searches for Higgs Bosons (p.39) Tevatron Run II Preliminary Cross-Section Br (pb) - WH eνbb D0: 38 pb - ZH νν bb CDF: 89 pb - SM WH Wbb ZH νν bb D0: 6 pb - WH WWW D0: 363-384 pb - SM ZH Zbb WH lνbb CDF: 39 pb - H WW (*) lνlν CDF: 84 pb - SM WH WWW H WW (*) lνlν D0: 99-35 pb - WH WWW CDF: 94 pb - SM gg H WW (*) - 0 30 40 50 60 70 80 m H (GeV) Figure 3: Upper bounds, obtained by the Tevatron experiments CDF and D0, for the cross-sections of event topologies motivated by Higgs boson production in the SM. The curves in the opper part represent the 95% CL experimental limits; the curves in the lower part are the SM predictions (from Ref. 30). Searches for Higgs Bosons (p.393) tanβ (b) m h -max Excluded by LEP Theoretically Inaccessible 0 0 40 60 80 0 0 40 m h (GeV/c ) Figure 4: The MSSM exclusion limits, at 95% CL (light-green) and 99.7% CL (dark-green), obtained by LEP for the m h0 -max benchmark scenario, with m t =74:3 GeV. The figure shows the excluded and theoretically inaccessible regions in the (m h0 ; tan fi) projection. The upper edge of the parameter space is sensitive to the top quark mass; it is indicated, from left to right, for m t = 69.3, 74.3, 79.3 and 83.0 GeV. The dashed lines indicate the boundaries of the regions which are expected to be excluded on the basis of Monte Carlo simulations with no signal (from Ref. 36).
8 Color figures tan β 0 80 60 40 Searches for Higgs Bosons (p.393) no mixing m h max CDF DØ m h max CDF and DØ MSSM Higgs Searches Preliminary 0 LEP no mixing 0 80 0 0 40 60 80 00 m A (GeV/c ) Figure 5: The MSSM exclusion limits, at 95% CL obtained by the Tevatron experiments CDF and D0, and by LEP, for the no-mixing (light color shadings) and the m H 0 max (darker color shadings) benchmark scenarios, projected onto the (m A 0; tan fi) plane of the parameter space. CDF uses adatasampleof3pb to search for the fi + fi final state, and D0 uses 60 pb of data to search for the h 0! bb final state. One should be aware that the exclusion is sensitive to the sign and magnitude of the Higgs mass parameter used, namely μ = 00 GeV. The LEP limits are obtained for a top quark mass of 74.3 GeV (the Tevatron results are not sensitive to the precise value of the top mass). Searches for Higgs Bosons (p.394) tanβ (c) Excluded by LEP Theoretically inaccessible 0 0 40 60 80 0 0 40 m H (GeV/c ) Figure 6: The MSSM exclusion limits, at 95% CL (light-green) and 99.7% CL (dark-green), obtained by LEP for a CP-violating scenario with μ =TeV and M SUSY = 500 GeV, and with m t =74:3 GeV. The figure shows the excluded and theoretically inaccessible regions in the (m H ; tan fi) projection. The dashed lines indicate the boundaries of the regions which are expected to be excluded on the basis of Monte Carlo simulations with no signal (from Ref. 36).
Color figures 9 Searches for Higgs Bosons (p.395) (GeV/ c ) ± 60 40 0 0 Theoretically inaccessible SM Expected SM ± σ Expected CDF Run II Excluded LEP Excluded Theoretically inaccessible 60 40 0 0 m H 80 80 60 LEP (ALEPH, DELPHI, L3 and OPAL) ± ± Assuming H τν or H cs only 60 - tan β Figure 7: Summary of the 95% CL exclusions in the (m H +, tan fi) plane obtained by LEP [48] and CDF. The size of the data sample used by CDF, the choice of the top quark mass, and the soft SUSY breaking parameters to which the CDF exclusions apply, are indicated in the figure. The full lines indicate the SM expectation (no H ± signal) and the horizontal hatching represents the ±ff bands about the SM expectation (from Ref. 5). Searches for Higgs Bosons (p.396) Coupling (h ll ) - - -3-4 -5 L3, OPAL, DELPHI ll ±± H µµ ±± L DO H OPAL Exclusion Single Production ±± H ee CDF: H H H H ±± L ±± L ±± L ±± R µµ ee eµ µµ 90 0 0 30 40 50 60 70 ±± H Mass (GeV/c ) Figure 8: The 95% c.l. exclusion limits on the couplings to leptons of right- and left-handed doubly-charged Higgs bosons, obtained by LEP and Tevatron experiments (from Ref. 63).
0 Color figures Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment (p.438) DEHZ (e + e -based) 7 ± 80 DEHZ (τ-based) 4 ± 68 HMNT (e + e -based) 37 ± 74 GJ (e + e -based) 86 ± 93 TY (e + e -based) 74 ± 59 N (e + e -based, TH value) 388 ± 64 BNL-E8 (average) 0 ± 63 BNL-E8 004-700 -600-500 -400-300 -00-0 0 0 a µ a µ exp Figure : Compilation of recently published results for a μ (in units of ), subtracted by the central value of the experimental average (3). The shaded band indicates the experimental error. The SM predictions are taken from: DEHZ [3], HMNT [6], GJ [8], TY [9], N [0]. Note that the quoted errors do not include the uncertainty on the subtracted experimental value. To obtain for each theory calculation a result equivalent to Eq. (6), one has to add the errors from theory and experiment in quadrature. Neutrinoless Double-fi Decay (p.480) Figure : The left panel shows the dependence of hm fifi i on the absolute mass of the lightest neutrino m min. The middle panel shows hm fifi i as a function of the summed neutrino mass M, while the right panel depicts hm fifi i as a function of the mass hm fi i. In all panels the width of the hatched areas is due to the unknown Majorana phases and thus irreducible. The allowed areas given by the solid lines are obtained by taking into account the errors of the oscillation parameters. The two sets of solid lines correspond to the normal and inverted hierarchies. These sets merge into each other for hm fifi i 0: ev, which corresponds to the degenerate mass pattern.
Color figures Solar Neutrinos Review (p.486) Figure : The solar neutrino spectrum predicted by the BS05(OP) standard solar model []. The neutrino fluxes from continuum sources are given in units of number cm s MeV at one astronomical unit, and the line fluxes are given in number cm s. Solar Neutrinos Review (p.489) s - ) 6 cm - ( φ µτ 6 5 4 φ BS05 SSM NC φµτ 68% C.L. 68%, 95%, 99% C.L. 3 φ φ φ φ SNO CC SNO NC SNO ES SK ES 68% C.L. 68% C.L. 68% C.L. 68% C.L. 0 0 0.5.5.5 3 3.5 6 φ ( cm - s - e ) Figure : Fluxes of 8 B solar neutrinos, ffi(ν e ), and ffi(ν μ or fi ), deduced from the SNO's charged-current (CC), ν e elastic scattering (ES), and neutral-current (NC) results for the salt phase measurement []. The Super-Kamiokande ES flux is from Ref. [34]. The BS05(OP) standard solar model prediction [] is also shown. The bands represent the ff error. The contours show the 68%, 95%, and 99% joint probability forffi(ν e )andffi(ν μ or fi ). This figure is taken from Ref. [].
Color figures Solar Neutrinos Review (p.490) Figure 3: Allowed regions of neutrino-oscillation parameters from the KamLAND 766 ton yr exposure μν e data []. The LMA region from solar-neutrino experiments [9] is also shown. This figure is taken from Ref. [].
Color figures 3 Solar Neutrinos Review (p.49) Figure 4: Update of the global neutrino oscillation contours given by the SNO Collaboration assuming that the 8 B neutrino flux is free and the hep neutrino flux is fixed. (a) Solar global analysis. (b) Solar global + KamLAND. This figure is taken from Ref. []. V ud, V us, the Cabibbo Angle, and CKM Unitarity (p.680) PDG 0 K + e3 (005) PDG 0 K L e3 (005) K L m3 (005) K S e3 (005) Unitarity K + K L K S f + (0)(- V ud - V ub ) / 0. 0.5 0. 0.5 IV us I f + (0) Figure : Comparison of determinations of jv us jf + (0) from this review (labeled 005), from the PDG 00, and with the prediction from unitarityusingjv ud j and the Leutwyler-Roos calculation of f + (0) [8]. For f + (0)( jv ud j jv ub j ) =, the inner error bars are from the quoted uncertainty inf + (0); the total uncertainties include the jv ud j and jv ub j errors.
4 Color figures CP Violation in K L Decays (p.685) Figure : ffi + vs m for experiments which do not assume CPT invariance. m measurements appear as vertical bands spanning m ± ff, cut near the top and bottom to aid the eye. Most ffi + measurements appear as diagonal bands spanning ffi + ± ff ffi. Data are labeled by letters: b" FNAL KTeV, c" CERN CPLEAR, d" FNAL E773, e" FNAL E73, f" CERN, g" CERN NA3, and are cited in Table. The narrow band j" shows ffi SW. The ellipse a" shows the χ = contour of the fit result. CP Violation in K L Decays (p.686) Figure : ffi + vs fi S. fi S measurements appear as vertical bands spanning fi S ± ff, some of which are cut near the top and bottom to aid the eye. Most ffi + measurements appear as diagonal or horizontal bands spanning ffi + ± ff ffi. Data are labeled by letters: b" FNAL KTeV, c" CERN CPLEAR, d" FNAL E773, e" FNAL E73, f" CERN, g" CERN NA3, h" CERN NA48, i" CERN NA3, and are cited in Table. The narrow band j" shows ffi SW. The ellipse a" shows the fit result's χ = contour.
Color figures 5 D 0 D 0 Mixing (p.730) Figure : Allowed regions in the x 0 y 0 plane. The allowed region for y is the average of the results from E79 a, FOCUS b, CLEO c, BABAR d, and Belle e. Also shown is the limit from D 0! K (Λ)`ν from Belle f and limits from D! Kß from CLEO g, BABAR h, Belle i and FOCUS j. The CLEO, BABAR and Belle results allow CP violation in the decay and mixing amplitudes, and in the interference between these two processes. The FOCUS result does not allow CP violation. We assume ffi = 0 to place the y results. A non-zero ffi would rotate the D 0! CP eigenstates confidence region clockwise about the origin by ffi. All results are consistent with the absence of mixing. B s oscillation amplitude.5 0.5 0-0.5 -.5 0.5 0-0.5 - B 0 B 0 Mixing (p.839) Published results only data ±.645 σ data ±.645 σ (stat only) data ± σ 95% CL limit 4.4 ps -.645 σ sensitivity 8. ps - All results data ±.645 σ data ±.645 σ (stat only) data ± σ 95% CL limit 6.7 ps -.645 σ sensitivity 5.6 ps - April 006 0.5 5 7.5.5 5 7.5 0.5 5 m s (ps - ) Figure : Combined measurements of the B 0 s oscillation amplitude as a function of m s, based on published results only (top) or on all published and unpublished results (bottom) available at the end of April 006. The measurements are dominated by statistical uncertainties. Neighboring points are statistically correlated.
6 Color figures Determination of V cb and V ub (p.869) ] -3 F() V cb [ 45 40 35 χ = OPAL (part. reco.) ALEPH DELPHI CLEO OPAL (excl.) AVERAGE DELPHI (part. reco.) BELLE BABAR 30 HFAG Winter05 prel. χ /dof = 30.4/4 0 0.5.5 ρ Figure : Measurements of jv cb jf() and ρ along with the average determined from a χ fit. The hatched area corresponds to the χ =contour. This plot is taken from [3]. Determination of V cb and V ub (p.870) ] -3 V cb [ 50 χ = BELLE CLEO G() 40 ALEPH AVERAGE 30 0 HFAG Winter05 prel. χ /dof = 0.3/ 4 0 0.5.5 ρ Figure : Measurements of jv cb jf() and ρ along with the average determined from a χ fit. The hatched area corresponds to the χ =contour. This plot is taken from [3].
Color figures 7 Determination of V cb and V ub (p.877) 3.5.5 f 0 (q ) HPQCD f + (q ) HPQCD f 0 (q ) Fermilab/MILC f + (q ) Fermilab/MILC 0.5 0 0 4 6 8 4 6 8 0 4 6 8 q in GeV Figure 3: The form factors f 0 (q ) and f + (q )versus q by the Fermilab/MILC [] and HPQCD [3] collaborations. The full curves are the BK parameterization [4] fits to the simulation results at large q, with f 0 (0) and f + (0) constrained to be equal. Errors are statisical plus systematic added in quadrature. Supersymmetry, Part I (Theory) (p.4) 700 m[gev] 600 500 msugra SPS a /SPA q L g q R t b b 400 H 0,A 0 H ± χ 0 χ 0 4 3 χ ± t 300 00 ll νl τ ν τ χ 0 χ ± 0 h 0 lr τ χ 0 0 Figure : Mass spectrum of supersymmetric particles and Higgs bosons for the msugra reference point SPS a 0. The masses of the first and second generation squarks, sleptons and sneutrinos are denoted collectively by eq, è and eν`, respectively. Taken from Ref. [7].
8 Color figures Supersymmetry,Part II (Experiment) (p.) heavy sfermions gaugino-like M large robust limits 3 GeV/c cross section reduced, limits weakened slightly higgsino-like M small robust limits 0 GeV depending on M 0 0 χ χ production leptonic BR enhanced τ BR enhanced 0 χ 0 χ production light sfermions no exclusion in the corridor Mχ+- Μ ν - GeV/c Figure : Heuristic diagram of the interplay of chargino field content and sfermion masses. generic squark mass (GeV/c ) Supersymmetry,Part II (Experiment) (p.5) 500 400 300 00 0 msugra ALEPH D equal masses CDF MSSM squarks lighter than χ ~ 0 LEP 0 0 0 00 300 400 500 600 700 gluino mass (GeV/c ) Figure : Regions in the M eg -M eq plane excluded by searches for jets and missing energy at CDF, Dχ, and LEP.
Color figures 9 neutralino mass (GeV/c ) Supersymmetry,Part II (Experiment) (p.6) 0 50 stable t ~ ALEPH LEP CDF cχ ~ 0 indirect mass limit 0 LEP bwχ ~ 0 0 50 0 50 top squark mass (GeV/c ) Figure 3: Regions excluded in the (M et,m eχ ) plane. The results for the ceχ 0 decay mode are displayed from LEP and CDF. A DELPHI result for stable stops is indicated for M et < M eχ. Finally, the indirect limit on M eχ is also shown. There is effectively no exclusion in the region where et! bw eχ 0. Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking (p.49) M(jj) (GeV) 0 00 80 D0 Run II Preliminary M(jj) (GeV) 0 00 80 Data 60 60 40 40 0 0 0 0 80 80 60 60 40 40 M(jj) (GeV) 0 00 80 50 0 50 00 50 300 350 400 M(Wjj) (GeV) Physics Background M(jj) (GeV) 0 00 80 50 0 50 00 50 300 350 400 M(Wjj) (GeV) Technicolor Signal 60 60 40 40 0 0 0 0 80 80 60 60 40 40 50 0 50 00 50 300 350 400 M(Wjj) (GeV) 50 0 50 00 50 300 350 400 M(Wjj) (GeV) Figure : Search for a light technirho decaying to W ± and a ß T, and in which the ß T decays to two jets including at least one b quark [9]. The four panes show the invariant mass of the dijet pair and that of the W +dijet system, for the backgrounds (bottom left), the expected signal (bottom right), the data (top right), and the overlay of all (top left).
30 Color figures Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking (p.49) B(ρ T,ω T ee) x Cross Section (pb) - Theory (Eichten, Lane, Womersley) M ρ,ω -M π = 0 GeV M T = 0 GeV M T = 00 GeV M T = 300 GeV M T = 400 GeV - σ 95 from D0 Data 0 50 00 50 300 350 400 450 500 M ρ,ω (GeV) Figure 3: 95% CL cross-section limit [] for a light techniomega and a light technirho decaying to `+`. Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking (p.50) DELPHI M(π T ) [GeV/c ] 0 0 e + e - π T π T ;π T W L e + e - ρ T (γ) : ρ T hadrons ρ T W + LW - L N D =9 80 60 0 00 300 400 M(ρ T ) [GeV/c ] Figure 4: 95% CL exclusion region [] in the technirho-technipion mass plane obtained from searches by the DELPHI collaboration at LEP, for nine technifermion doublets. The dashed line shows the expected limit for the 4-jet analysis.
Color figures 3 Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking (p.5) Figure 6: 95% CL exclusion region [7] in the technirho-technipion mass plane for pair produced technipions, with leptoquark couplings, decaying to bν. Extra Dimensions (p.67) Figure : Experimental limits on ff and of Eq. (8), which parametrize deviations from Newton's law. From ref. [33].
3