Global nonlinear stability of steady solutions of the 3-D incompressible Euler equations with helical symmetry and with no swirl

Σχετικά έγγραφα
Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit

Partial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013

Reminders: linear functions

Local Approximation with Kernels

The Pohozaev identity for the fractional Laplacian

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

J. of Math. (PRC) 6 n (nt ) + n V = 0, (1.1) n t + div. div(n T ) = n τ (T L(x) T ), (1.2) n)xx (nt ) x + nv x = J 0, (1.4) n. 6 n

Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3

Example Sheet 3 Solutions

b. Use the parametrization from (a) to compute the area of S a as S a ds. Be sure to substitute for ds!

Parametrized Surfaces

The Simply Typed Lambda Calculus

ECE Spring Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 2

D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation

Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations

1. (a) (5 points) Find the unit tangent and unit normal vectors T and N to the curve. r(t) = 3cost, 4t, 3sint

EE512: Error Control Coding

2 Composition. Invertible Mappings

12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Homework 8 Model Solution Section

Nonlinear Fourier transform for the conductivity equation. Visibility and Invisibility in Impedance Tomography

Practice Exam 2. Conceptual Questions. 1. State a Basic identity and then verify it. (a) Identity: Solution: One identity is csc(θ) = 1

Tridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008

Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)

Solvability of Brinkman-Forchheimer equations of flow in double-diffusive convection

Iterated trilinear fourier integrals with arbitrary symbols

Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.

Space-Time Symmetries

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions

Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013

L p approach to free boundary problems of the Navier-Stokes equation

Spherical Coordinates

Second Order Partial Differential Equations

Matrices and Determinants

Finite Field Problems: Solutions

Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in

Heisenberg Uniqueness pairs

2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)

2. THEORY OF EQUATIONS. PREVIOUS EAMCET Bits.

Optimal Parameter in Hermitian and Skew-Hermitian Splitting Method for Certain Two-by-Two Block Matrices

5. Choice under Uncertainty

Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests

C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions

Fourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics

3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β

Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

Cyclic or elementary abelian Covers of K 4

STABILITY FOR RAYLEIGH-BENARD CONVECTIVE SOLUTIONS OF THE BOLTZMANN EQUATION

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS

ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?

Solutions to Exercise Sheet 5

SOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM

Takeaki Yamazaki (Toyo Univ.) 山崎丈明 ( 東洋大学 ) Oct. 24, RIMS

Phase-Field Force Convergence

Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs

Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations

Numerical Analysis FMN011

Trigonometric Formula Sheet

1 String with massive end-points

Nonlinear Fourier transform and the Beltrami equation. Visibility and Invisibility in Impedance Tomography

Divergence for log concave functions

Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests

SCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018

Memoirs on Differential Equations and Mathematical Physics

Econ 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1

Homework 3 Solutions

Appendix to On the stability of a compressible axisymmetric rotating flow in a pipe. By Z. Rusak & J. H. Lee

SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS

g-selberg integrals MV Conjecture An A 2 Selberg integral Summary Long Live the King Ole Warnaar Department of Mathematics Long Live the King

DiracDelta. Notations. Primary definition. Specific values. General characteristics. Traditional name. Traditional notation

ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II

Oscillatory integrals

Eulerian Simulation of Large Deformations

Section 9.2 Polar Equations and Graphs

EXISTENCE OF POSITIVE SOLUTIONS FOR SINGULAR FRACTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

( y) Partial Differential Equations

PULLBACK D-ATTRACTORS FOR THE NON-AUTONOMOUS NEWTON-BOUSSINESQ EQUATION IN TWO-DIMENSIONAL BOUNDED DOMAIN. Xue-Li Song.

Overview. Transition Semantics. Configurations and the transition relation. Executions and computation

Απόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set

Section 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas

CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS

Problem Set 3: Solutions

Mock Exam 7. 1 Hong Kong Educational Publishing Company. Section A 1. Reference: HKDSE Math M Q2 (a) (1 + kx) n 1M + 1A = (1) =

DESIGN OF MACHINERY SOLUTION MANUAL h in h 4 0.

New bounds for spherical two-distance sets and equiangular lines

Sequent Calculi for the Modal µ-calculus over S5. Luca Alberucci, University of Berne. Logic Colloquium Berne, July 4th 2008

ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)

SOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM

6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes

Lecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic

Depth versus Rigidity in the Design of International Trade Agreements. Leslie Johns

Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets

Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude

POSITIVE SOLUTIONS FOR A FUNCTIONAL DELAY SECOND-ORDER THREE-POINT BOUNDARY-VALUE PROBLEM

Transcript:

Around Vortices: from Cont. to Quantum Mech. Global nonlinear stability of steady solutions of the 3-D incompressible Euler equations with helical symmetry and with no swirl Maicon José Benvenutti (UNICAMP) Joint work with Helena Judith Nussenzveig Lopes (UFRJ) and Milton da Costa Lopes Filho (UFRJ) IMPA - Rio de Janeiro 17th March 2014

Introduction We extend Burton s results and also the Wan and Pulvirenti results to the 3-D helical Euler equations with no swirl: BURTON G., Global nonlinear stability for steady ideal fluid flow in bounded planar domains, Arc. Rat. M. Anal. (2005). WAN Y., PULVIRENTI M., Nonlinear stability of circular vortex patches, C., Math. Phys. (1985). Burton proved nonlinear L p -stability of steady flows of an ideal fluid in a bounded, simply connected, planar region, that are strict maximisers of kinetic energy on an isovortical surface. Wan and Pulvirenti proved nonlinear stability of circular vortex patches in circular domains.

Introduction We extend Burton s results and also the Wan and Pulvirenti results to the 3-D helical Euler equations with no swirl: BURTON G., Global nonlinear stability for steady ideal fluid flow in bounded planar domains, Arc. Rat. M. Anal. (2005). WAN Y., PULVIRENTI M., Nonlinear stability of circular vortex patches, C., Math. Phys. (1985). Burton proved nonlinear L p -stability of steady flows of an ideal fluid in a bounded, simply connected, planar region, that are strict maximisers of kinetic energy on an isovortical surface. Wan and Pulvirenti proved nonlinear stability of circular vortex patches in circular domains.

Main Ideas 1 o point Reduction by Symmetry: Following Ettinger and Titi, we use the helical symmetry and the additional geometric constraint (no swirl) to setup the reduction of the 3-D vorticity equation: ETTINGER B., TITI E., Global existence and uniqueness of weak solutions of three-dimensional Euler equations with helical symmetry in the absence of vorticity stretching, Siam J. Math. Anal. 41, 269-296 (2009). 2 o point We adjust the techniques developed by Burton and also by Wan and Pulvirenti for this reduced vorticity equation.

Main Ideas 1 o point Reduction by Symmetry: Following Ettinger and Titi, we use the helical symmetry and the additional geometric constraint (no swirl) to setup the reduction of the 3-D vorticity equation: ETTINGER B., TITI E., Global existence and uniqueness of weak solutions of three-dimensional Euler equations with helical symmetry in the absence of vorticity stretching, Siam J. Math. Anal. 41, 269-296 (2009). 2 o point We adjust the techniques developed by Burton and also by Wan and Pulvirenti for this reduced vorticity equation.

Helical Symmetry Notation: x R 3 we define: ρ R R ρ (x) := ρ R S ρ (x) := R ρ (x) + efiniton: A domain Ω R 3 is helical if cos ρ sen ρ 0 sen ρ cos ρ 0 0 0 1 Ω = ρ R S ρ (Ω), ρ R. 0 0 ρ. x, A vector field u : Ω R 3 is helical if R ρ (u(x)) = u(s ρ (x)), x Ω, ρ R. A helical vector field is with no swirl if u(x).(x 2, x 1, 1) = 0, x Ω.

Helical Symmetry

Euler Equations Ω R 3 a helical domain: t u + [u. ]u = p Ω [0, ), div u = 0 Ω [0, ), u.η = 0 Ω [0, ). If (u, p) is a smooth solution, then (R ρ u(t, S ρ (x)), p(t, S ρ (x))) as well. DUTRIFOY, Existence globale en temps de solutions hélicoïdales des équation d Eler, C.R.A. Paris (1999). rot u = (x 2, x 1, 1)ω 3. t ω 3 + (u. )ω 3 = 0.

Euler Equations Ω R 3 a helical domain: t u + [u. ]u = p Ω [0, ), div u = 0 Ω [0, ), u.η = 0 Ω [0, ). If (u, p) is a smooth solution, then (R ρ u(t, S ρ (x)), p(t, S ρ (x))) as well. DUTRIFOY, Existence globale en temps de solutions hélicoïdales des équation d Eler, C.R.A. Paris (1999). rot u = (x 2, x 1, 1)ω 3. t ω 3 + (u. )ω 3 = 0.

Euler Equations Ω R 3 a helical domain: t u + [u. ]u = p Ω [0, ), div u = 0 Ω [0, ), u.η = 0 Ω [0, ). If (u, p) is a smooth solution, then (R ρ u(t, S ρ (x)), p(t, S ρ (x))) as well. DUTRIFOY, Existence globale en temps de solutions hélicoïdales des équation d Eler, C.R.A. Paris (1999). rot u = (x 2, x 1, 1)ω 3. t ω 3 + (u. )ω 3 = 0.

Euler Equations Ω R 3 a helical domain: t u + [u. ]u = p Ω [0, ), div u = 0 Ω [0, ), u.η = 0 Ω [0, ). If (u, p) is a smooth solution, then (R ρ u(t, S ρ (x)), p(t, S ρ (x))) as well. DUTRIFOY, Existence globale en temps de solutions hélicoïdales des équation d Eler, C.R.A. Paris (1999). rot u = (x 2, x 1, 1)ω 3. t ω 3 + (u. )ω 3 = 0.

Reduced Equations Ω o := {(x 1, x 2 ); (x 1, x 2, 0) Ω}, ξ(x 1, x 2 ) := ω 3 (x 1, x 2, 0), ( ) ( 1 + x 2 v(x 1, x 2 ) := 2 x 1 x 2 u 1 x 1 x 2 1 + x1 2 u 2 (x1,x 2,0) ). t ξ + (v. )ξ = 0 Ω o [0, ), div v = 0 Ω o [0, ), v.η o = 0 Ω o [0, ).

Reduced Equations Ω o := {(x 1, x 2 ); (x 1, x 2, 0) Ω}, ξ(x 1, x 2 ) := ω 3 (x 1, x 2, 0), ( ) ( 1 + x 2 v(x 1, x 2 ) := 2 x 1 x 2 u 1 x 1 x 2 1 + x1 2 u 2 (x1,x 2,0) ). t ξ + (v. )ξ = 0 Ω o [0, ), div v = 0 Ω o [0, ), v.η o = 0 Ω o [0, ).

Biot-Savart Law If Ω o is simply connected, we have the Biot- Savart Law: v = G[ξ]. { L[ G[ξ]] = ξ in Ωo, G[ξ] Ωo = 0. L[. ] = div [ {K(x 1, x 2 )[. ]}, 1 1 + x 2 K(x 1, x 2 ) = 2 x 1 x 2 1+x1 2+x 2 2 x 1 x 2 1 + x1 2 ].

Biot-Savart Law If Ω o is simply connected, we have the Biot- Savart Law: v = G[ξ]. { L[ G[ξ]] = ξ in Ωo, G[ξ] Ωo = 0. L[. ] = div [ {K(x 1, x 2 )[. ]}, 1 1 + x 2 K(x 1, x 2 ) = 2 x 1 x 2 1+x1 2+x 2 2 x 1 x 2 1 + x1 2 ].

Weak Solutions Definition Let p > 4 3, Ω o bounded, smooth and simply connected and ξ 0 L p (Ω o ). Then ξ L Loc ([0, ), Lp (Ω o )) is a weak solution with initial data ξ 0 if ξ(t, x)φ t (t, x)dxdt + ξ(t, x)v(t, x) φ(t, x)dxdt 0 Ω o 0 Ω o = ξ 0 (x)φ(0, x)dx, Ω o φ C0 ([0, ) Ω o).

Steady Solutions Theorem Let p > 4 3, Ω o = B R 2(0, R) and g L p (0, R 2 ) monotonic. Then ξ(x) = g( x 2 ) is a steady solution. Proof: Rmk: (x 2, x 1, 1)g( x 2 ) is a steady helical vorticity. Rmk 2: (x 2, x 1, 1)X (0,1) ( x ) is the helical vortex patch. ( ) ( ) L[ G[ξ]] = r G[ξ] r + 1 r G[ξ] 1+r 2 r. 1+r 2 L[ G[ξ]] = ξ and G[ξ] Ωo = 0 = div{vξ} = 0. v = G[ξ] = x (1 + x 2 ) 2 x 2 x 2 0 g(s)ds.

Steady Solutions Theorem Let p > 4 3, Ω o = B R 2(0, R) and g L p (0, R 2 ) monotonic. Then ξ(x) = g( x 2 ) is a steady solution. Proof: Rmk: (x 2, x 1, 1)g( x 2 ) is a steady helical vorticity. Rmk 2: (x 2, x 1, 1)X (0,1) ( x ) is the helical vortex patch. ( ) ( ) L[ G[ξ]] = r G[ξ] r + 1 r G[ξ] 1+r 2 r. 1+r 2 L[ G[ξ]] = ξ and G[ξ] Ωo = 0 = div{vξ} = 0. v = G[ξ] = x (1 + x 2 ) 2 x 2 x 2 0 g(s)ds.

Steady Solutions Theorem Let p > 4 3, Ω o = B R 2(0, R) and g L p (0, R 2 ) monotonic. Then ξ(x) = g( x 2 ) is a steady solution. Proof: Rmk: (x 2, x 1, 1)g( x 2 ) is a steady helical vorticity. Rmk 2: (x 2, x 1, 1)X (0,1) ( x ) is the helical vortex patch. ( ) ( ) L[ G[ξ]] = r G[ξ] r + 1 r G[ξ] 1+r 2 r. 1+r 2 L[ G[ξ]] = ξ and G[ξ] Ωo = 0 = div{vξ} = 0. v = G[ξ] = x (1 + x 2 ) 2 x 2 x 2 0 g(s)ds.

Steady Solutions Theorem Let p > 4 3, Ω o = B R 2(0, R) and g L p (0, R 2 ) monotonic. Then ξ(x) = g( x 2 ) is a steady solution. Proof: Rmk: (x 2, x 1, 1)g( x 2 ) is a steady helical vorticity. Rmk 2: (x 2, x 1, 1)X (0,1) ( x ) is the helical vortex patch. ( ) ( ) L[ G[ξ]] = r G[ξ] r + 1 r G[ξ] 1+r 2 r. 1+r 2 L[ G[ξ]] = ξ and G[ξ] Ωo = 0 = div{vξ} = 0. v = G[ξ] = x (1 + x 2 ) 2 x 2 x 2 0 g(s)ds.

Steady Solutions Theorem Let p > 4 3, Ω o = B R 2(0, R) and g L p (0, R 2 ) monotonic. Then ξ(x) = g( x 2 ) is a steady solution. Proof: Rmk: (x 2, x 1, 1)g( x 2 ) is a steady helical vorticity. Rmk 2: (x 2, x 1, 1)X (0,1) ( x ) is the helical vortex patch. ( ) ( ) L[ G[ξ]] = r G[ξ] r + 1 r G[ξ] 1+r 2 r. 1+r 2 L[ G[ξ]] = ξ and G[ξ] Ωo = 0 = div{vξ} = 0. v = G[ξ] = x (1 + x 2 ) 2 x 2 x 2 0 g(s)ds.

Steady Solutions Theorem Let p > 4 3, Ω o = B R 2(0, R) and g L p (0, R 2 ) monotonic. Then ξ(x) = g( x 2 ) is a steady solution. Proof: Rmk: (x 2, x 1, 1)g( x 2 ) is a steady helical vorticity. Rmk 2: (x 2, x 1, 1)X (0,1) ( x ) is the helical vortex patch. ( ) ( ) L[ G[ξ]] = r G[ξ] r + 1 r G[ξ] 1+r 2 r. 1+r 2 L[ G[ξ]] = ξ and G[ξ] Ωo = 0 = div{vξ} = 0. v = G[ξ] = x (1 + x 2 ) 2 x 2 x 2 0 g(s)ds.

Steady Solutions Theorem Let p > 4 3, Ω o = B R 2(0, R) and g L p (0, R 2 ) monotonic. Then ξ(x) = g( x 2 ) is a steady solution. Proof: Rmk: (x 2, x 1, 1)g( x 2 ) is a steady helical vorticity. Rmk 2: (x 2, x 1, 1)X (0,1) ( x ) is the helical vortex patch. ( ) ( ) L[ G[ξ]] = r G[ξ] r + 1 r G[ξ] 1+r 2 r. 1+r 2 L[ G[ξ]] = ξ and G[ξ] Ωo = 0 = div{vξ} = 0. v = G[ξ] = x (1 + x 2 ) 2 x 2 x 2 0 g(s)ds.

Steady Solutions Definition If 4 3 < p, we define E : Lp (Ω o ) R by E[ξ] := 1 ξ(x)g[ξ](x)dx. 2 Ω o Definition Let f L p (Ω o ). Then g L p (Ω o ) is a rearrangement of f if f 1 [β, ) = g 1 [β, ), β R.

Steady Solutions Definition If 4 3 < p, we define E : Lp (Ω o ) R by E[ξ] := 1 ξ(x)g[ξ](x)dx. 2 Ω o Definition Let f L p (Ω o ). Then g L p (Ω o ) is a rearrangement of f if f 1 [β, ) = g 1 [β, ), β R.

Steady Solutions Theorem Let 4 3 < p <, f Lp (Ω o ) and R the set of the rearrangements of f with the L p (Ω o ) topology. Then E : R R attains its supremum. Furthermore, if ξ R is a local maximiser, then ξ is a steady solution.

Proof: G : L p L p is compact strictly positive symmetric linear operator. E[ξ] := 1 2 Ω o ξ(x)g[ξ](x)dx attains its supremum on the rearrangements of f and if ξ is a maximiser then ξ = φ(g[ξ]) for some monotonic function φ : R R. BURTON G., Rearrangements of functions, maximization of convex funcionals, and vortex rings, Math Anal. 276. 225-253 (1987). div{vξ} = div{v.φ(g[ξ])} = (v. )φ(g[ξ]) = φ (G[ξ])(v. )G[ξ] = φ (G[ξ])( G[ξ]. )G[ξ] = 0.

Proof: G : L p L p is compact strictly positive symmetric linear operator. E[ξ] := 1 2 Ω o ξ(x)g[ξ](x)dx attains its supremum on the rearrangements of f and if ξ is a maximiser then ξ = φ(g[ξ]) for some monotonic function φ : R R. BURTON G., Rearrangements of functions, maximization of convex funcionals, and vortex rings, Math Anal. 276. 225-253 (1987). div{vξ} = div{v.φ(g[ξ])} = (v. )φ(g[ξ]) = φ (G[ξ])(v. )G[ξ] = φ (G[ξ])( G[ξ]. )G[ξ] = 0.

Existence of Weak Solutions Theorem Let be p > 4 3, Ω o R 2 bounded, smooth and simply connected and ξ 0 L p (Ω o ). Then there exists ξ L ([0, ), L p (Ω o )) weak solution with initial data ξ 0.

Stability for Steady Solutions Theorem Let 2 p <, Ω o R 2 bounded, smooth and simply connected and f L p (Ω o ). Let ξ 0 the strict maximiser of E : R R. Then ɛ > 0, δ > 0, such that if ξ(0) L p (Ω o ), ξ(0) ξ 0 L p (Ω 0 ) < δ and ξ L ([0, ), L p (Ω o )) is a solution with initial data ξ(0) given by the previous theorem, then ξ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω 0 ) < ɛ, t 0.

Proof: Let ɛ > 0, 0 < δ < ɛ 2 and ξ L ([0, ), L p (Ω o )) a weak solution such that ξ(0) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) < δ. Let τ such that τ + div (vτ) t = 0, τ(0) = ξ 0. (τ ξ) + div (v(τ ξ)) t = 0, τ(0) ξ(0) = ξ 0 ξ(0). ξ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) ξ(t) τ(t) L p (Ω o) + τ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) ɛ 2 + τ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o).

Proof: Let ɛ > 0, 0 < δ < ɛ 2 and ξ L ([0, ), L p (Ω o )) a weak solution such that ξ(0) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) < δ. Let τ such that τ + div (vτ) t = 0, τ(0) = ξ 0. (τ ξ) + div (v(τ ξ)) t = 0, τ(0) ξ(0) = ξ 0 ξ(0). ξ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) ξ(t) τ(t) L p (Ω o) + τ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) ɛ 2 + τ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o).

Proof: Let ɛ > 0, 0 < δ < ɛ 2 and ξ L ([0, ), L p (Ω o )) a weak solution such that ξ(0) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) < δ. Let τ such that τ + div (vτ) t = 0, τ(0) = ξ 0. (τ ξ) + div (v(τ ξ)) t = 0, τ(0) ξ(0) = ξ 0 ξ(0). ξ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) ξ(t) τ(t) L p (Ω o) + τ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) ɛ 2 + τ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o).

Proof: For M = R Lp w, β > 0 such that { sup E[ζ] ; ζ M [B L p (Ω o)(ξ 0, ɛ ] } c 2 ) < E[ξ 0 ] β. ξ(t) is E-conservative and δ small enough = E[τ(t)] E[ξ 0 ] E[τ(t)] E[ξ(t)] + E[ξ(0)] E[ξ 0 ] β 2 + β 2 = β, t 0. E[τ(t)] E[ξ 0 ] β, t 0. = τ(t) / [ B L p (Ω o)(ξ 0, ɛ 2 )] c, t 0. ξ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) ɛ 2 + τ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) ɛ 2 + ɛ = ɛ, t 0. 2

Proof: For M = R Lp w, β > 0 such that { sup E[ζ] ; ζ M [B L p (Ω o)(ξ 0, ɛ ] } c 2 ) < E[ξ 0 ] β. ξ(t) is E-conservative and δ small enough = E[τ(t)] E[ξ 0 ] E[τ(t)] E[ξ(t)] + E[ξ(0)] E[ξ 0 ] β 2 + β 2 = β, t 0. E[τ(t)] E[ξ 0 ] β, t 0. = τ(t) / [ B L p (Ω o)(ξ 0, ɛ 2 )] c, t 0. ξ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) ɛ 2 + τ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) ɛ 2 + ɛ = ɛ, t 0. 2

Proof: For M = R Lp w, β > 0 such that { sup E[ζ] ; ζ M [B L p (Ω o)(ξ 0, ɛ ] } c 2 ) < E[ξ 0 ] β. ξ(t) is E-conservative and δ small enough = E[τ(t)] E[ξ 0 ] E[τ(t)] E[ξ(t)] + E[ξ(0)] E[ξ 0 ] β 2 + β 2 = β, t 0. E[τ(t)] E[ξ 0 ] β, t 0. = τ(t) / [ B L p (Ω o)(ξ 0, ɛ 2 )] c, t 0. ξ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) ɛ 2 + τ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) ɛ 2 + ɛ = ɛ, t 0. 2

Proof: For M = R Lp w, β > 0 such that { sup E[ζ] ; ζ M [B L p (Ω o)(ξ 0, ɛ ] } c 2 ) < E[ξ 0 ] β. ξ(t) is E-conservative and δ small enough = E[τ(t)] E[ξ 0 ] E[τ(t)] E[ξ(t)] + E[ξ(0)] E[ξ 0 ] β 2 + β 2 = β, t 0. E[τ(t)] E[ξ 0 ] β, t 0. = τ(t) / [ B L p (Ω o)(ξ 0, ɛ 2 )] c, t 0. ξ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) ɛ 2 + τ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) ɛ 2 + ɛ = ɛ, t 0. 2

Proof: For M = R Lp w, β > 0 such that { sup E[ζ] ; ζ M [B L p (Ω o)(ξ 0, ɛ ] } c 2 ) < E[ξ 0 ] β. ξ(t) is E-conservative and δ small enough = E[τ(t)] E[ξ 0 ] E[τ(t)] E[ξ(t)] + E[ξ(0)] E[ξ 0 ] β 2 + β 2 = β, t 0. E[τ(t)] E[ξ 0 ] β, t 0. = τ(t) / [ B L p (Ω o)(ξ 0, ɛ 2 )] c, t 0. ξ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) ɛ 2 + τ(t) ξ 0 L p (Ω o) ɛ 2 + ɛ = ɛ, t 0. 2

Other Results Theorem Let 2 p <, Ω o = B R 2(0, R), g L p (0, R 2 ) monotonic and ξ 0 (x) = g( x 2 ). Then ɛ > 0, δ > 0, such that if ξ(0) L p (Ω o ), ξ 0 ξ(0) L p (Ω o) δ and ξ is a solution with initial data ξ(0), then ξ 0 ξ(t) L p (Ω o) ɛ, t 0. T [ξ] = x 2 ξ(x)dx. Ω o

Other Results Theorem Let 2 p <, Ω o = B R 2(0, R), g L p (0, R 2 ) monotonic and ξ 0 (x) = g( x 2 ). Then ɛ > 0, δ > 0, such that if ξ(0) L p (Ω o ), ξ 0 ξ(0) L p (Ω o) δ and ξ is a solution with initial data ξ(0), then ξ 0 ξ(t) L p (Ω o) ɛ, t 0. T [ξ] = x 2 ξ(x)dx. Ω o

Other Results Theorem Let Ω o = B R 2(0, R). Then ɛ > 0, δ > 0 such that if 0 Ω o, λ R, ξ(0) = λx 0, ξ(0) X BR 2 (0,1) L 1 (Ω o) < δ and ξ L ([0, ), L (Ω o )) the solution with initial data ξ(0), then ξ(t) X BR 2(0,1) L 1 (Ω o) < ɛ, t 0.

Thank You Very Much!