CHARACTERIZATION OF BIPOLAR FUZZY IDEALS IN ORDERED GAMMA SEMIGROUPS
|
|
- Ἱππολύτη Ζένια Κορνάρος
- 6 χρόνια πριν
- Προβολές:
Transcript
1 JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL MATHEMATICAL VIRTUAL INSTITUTE ISSN (p) , ISSN (o) /JOURNALS / JOURNAL Vol. 8(2018), DOI: /JIMVI C Former BULLETIN OF THE SOCIETY OF MATHEMATICIANS BANJA LUKA ISSN (o), ISSN X (p) CHARACTERIZATION OF BIPOLAR FUZZY IDEALS IN ORDERED GAMMA SEMIGROUPS V. Chinnadurai and K. Arulmozhi Abstract. In this paper, we introduce the notion of (η, δ) bipolar fuzzy ideal, bi-ideal,interior ideal, (ǫ, ǫ q)-bipolar fuzzy ideal of ordered Γ-semigroups and discuss some of their properties. 1. Introduction Fuzzy set was introduced by Zadeh [17]. Ordered Γ-semigroup was studied by Kehayopula [8]. Bipolar fuzzy set was first studied by Lee [10]. Bipolar fuzzy set is an extension of fuzzy set whose membership degree range is enlarged from the interval [0,1] to [ 1,1]. Faiz Muhammad Khan et al [2] introduced the concepts of (λ, θ)-fuzzy bi-ideal and (λ, θ)-fuzzy subsemigroup. Kazanci and Yamak [4]introduced the concept of a generalized fuzzy bi-ideal in semigroup and established some properties of fuzzy bi-ideals in terms of (ǫ,ǫ q)-fuzzy bi-ideals. Jun et al [3] provided some results on ordered semigroups characterized by their (ǫ, ǫ q)- fuzzy bi-ideals. Kehayopula and Tsingelies [7] initiated the study of fuzzy ordered semigroups. Bhakat and Das [1] introduced the concepts of (ǫ, ǫ q)-fuzzy subgroups using the notion belongingness ( ) and quasi-coincidence (q). In this paper we define the new notions of (η, δ) bipolar fuzzy ideal, bi-ideal,interior ideal, (ǫ, ǫ q)-bipolar fuzzy ideal of ordered Γ-semigroup and discuss some properties with examples Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 03E72, 06D72; Secondary 06F05. Key words and phrases. Ordered Γ-semigroups, bipolar fuzzy set, fuzzy bi-ideals, (η, δ), (ǫ, ǫ q)-fuzzy bi-ideal. 141
2 142 V. CHINNADURAI AND K. ARULMOZHI 2. Preliminaries Definition 2.1. ([14]) An ordered Γ-semigroup (shortly po-γ-semigroup) is a Γ-semigroup S together with an order relation such that a b implies aγc bγc and cγa cγb for all a,b,c S and γ Γ. Definition 2.2. ([14]) Let A and B be two non empty subsets of a Γ- semigroup S. We denote (i) (A] = {t S t hforsomeh A}, (ii) AΓB = {aαb : a A, b B and α Γ}, (iii) A x = {(y,z) S S x yαz}. Definition 2.3. ([9]) A non-empty subset B of a po Γ-semigroup S is called a bi-ideal of S if (i) a B, b S and b a implies b B, (ii) BΓSΓB B. Definition 2.4. ([17]) Let X be a non-empty set. A fuzzy subset µ of X is a function from X into the closed unit interval [0,1]. The set of all fuzzy subsets of X is called the fuzzy power set of X and is denoted by FP(X). Definition 2.5. ([10]) A bipolar fuzzy set A in a universe U is an object having the form A = { x,µ + A (x),µ A (x) : x X }, where µ + A : X [0,1] and µ A : X [ 1,0]. Here µ+ A (x) represents the degree of satisfaction of the element x to the property and µ A (x) represents the degree of satisfaction of x to some implict counter property of A. For simplicity the symbol µ + A A,µ is used for the bipolar fuzzy set A = { x,µ + A (x),µ A (x) : x X }. Definition 2.6. ([2]) A fuzzy subset µ of an ordered Γ-semigroup S is called a (λ, θ)-fuzzy bi-ideal of S if it satisfies the following conditions (i) If x y, then µ(x) µ(y), (ii) max{µ(xy),λ} min{µ(x),µ(y),θ}, (iii) max{µ(xyz),λ} min{µ(x),µ(z),θ}, for all x,y,z S. Definition 2.7. ([5]) A fuzzy subset µ of a po Γ-semigroup S is called a fuzzy bi-ideal of S if (i) If x y, then µ(x) µ(y) and (ii) µ(xαyβz) min{µ(x),µ(z)} for every x,y,z S and every α,β Γ. Definition 2.8. ([11]) A fuzzy subset µ of an ordered Γ-semigroup S is called a fuzzy Γ-subsemigroup of S if (i) x y µ(x) µ(y) for all x,y S, and (ii) µ(xαy) min{µ(x),µ(y)} for all x,y S and α Γ. Definition 2.9. ([12]) A fuzzy subset µ of an ordered Γ-semigroup S is called a fuzzy left (resp. right) ideal of S if (i) x y µ(x) µ(y) for all x,y S, and (ii) µ(xαy) µ(y) (resp. µ(xαy) µ(x)) for all x,y S and α Γ. A fuzzy subset µ of an ordered Γ-semigroup S is called a fuzzy ideal of S, if it is both fuzzy left ideal and fuzzy right ideal.
3 ...BIPOLAR FUZZY IDEALS IN ORDERED Γ-SEMIGROUPS 143 Definition ([15]) Let A be a bipolar fuzzy set, if χ A is the characteriatic function of A, then (χ A ) δ η is defined as { β if x A, (χ A ) β α(x) = α if x / A. Definition ([13]) For two bipolar fuzzy subsets µ = (µ +,µ ) and λ = (λ +,λ ) of S, the product of two bipolar fuzzy subsets is denoted by µ λ and is defined as sup {µ + (s) λ + (t)} if A x 0 (µ + λ + )(x) = (s,t) A x 0 if A x = 0 inf {λ (s) λ (t)} if A x 0 (µ λ )(x) = (s,t) A x 0 if A x = 0 Definition A bipolar (η,δ) fuzzy sub Γ-semigroup B = (µ + B,µ B ) of S is called a bipolar (1,2) fuzzy-γ-ideal of S if (i) max{µ + B (pαqβ(rγs)),η+ } min{µ + B (p),µ+ B (r),µ+ B (s),δ+ } and (ii) min{µ B (pαqβ(rγs)),η } max{µ B (p),µ B (r),µ+ B (s),δ }, for all p,q,r,s S and α,β,γ Γ. 3. (η, δ)- bipolar fuzzy bi-ideals of ordered Γ-semigroups In this section S denote as ordered Γ-semigroup.In what follows, (η +,δ + ) [0,1] and (η,δ ) [ 1,0] be such that 0 η + < δ + 1 and 1 δ < η 0, both (η, δ) [0,1] are arbitrary but fixed. Definition 3.1. A fuzzy subset µ of S is called a (η,δ)-bipolar fuzzy subsemigroup of S if it satisfies the following conditions: (i) p q µ + (p) µ + (q) and p q µ (p) µ (q) (ii) max{µ + (pαq),η + } min{µ + (p),µ + (q),δ + } and min{µ (pαq),η } max{µ (p),µ (q),δ } for all p,q S. Example 3.1. Let S = {a 1,a 2,a 3,a 4 } and Γ = {α} where α is defined on S with the following Cayley table: α a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 1 a 1 a 1 a 1 a 1 a 2 a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 3 a 1 a 3 a 3 a 3 a 4 a 1 a 3 a 3 a 3 := {(a 1,a 1 ),(a 1,a 2 ),(a 1,a 3 ),(a 1,a 4 ),(a 2,a 2 ),(a 2,a 3 ),(a 2,a 4 ),(a 3,a 3 ),(a 4,a 3 ), (a 4,a 4 )}. We give the covering relation and the figure of S. = {(a 1,a 2 ),(a 1,a 3 ),(a 1,a 4 ),(a 2,a 3 ),(a 2,a 4 ),(a 4,a 3 )}.
4 144 V. CHINNADURAI AND K. ARULMOZHI a 3 a 2 a 4 Define bipolar fuzzy subset µ = [µ +,µ ] : S Γ S [0,1] [ 1,0] 0.7 if x = a if x = a 1 µ if x = a 2 (x) = µ 0.7 if x = a 2 (x) = 0.2 if x = a if x = a if x = a if x = a 4 Then µ is a (0.6,0.8) bipolar fuzzy subsemigroup of S. Definition 3.2. A fuzzy subset µ of S is called a (η,δ)-bipolar fuzzy bi-ideal of S if it satisfies the following conditions: (i) if x y, then µ + (x) µ + (y) and x y, then µ (x) µ (y) and min{µ (p),η } max{µ (p),δ } for all p,q S. (ii) max{µ + (pαq),η + } min{µ + (p),µ + (q),δ + } min{µ (pαq),η } max{µ (p),µ (q),δ }. (iii) max{µ + (pαqβr),η + } min{µ + (p),µ + (r),δ + } min{µ (pαqβr),η } max{µ (p),µ (r),δ }, for all p,q,r S and α,β Γ. a 1 Example 3.2. Let S = {a 1,a 2,a 3,a 4 } and Γ = {α,β} where α,β is defined on S with the following Cayley tables: α a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 1 a 1 a 1 a 1 a 1 a 2 a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 3 a 1 a 3 a 3 a 3 a 4 a 1 a 3 a 3 a 3 β a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 1 a 1 a 1 a 1 a 1 a 2 a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 a 3 a 1 a 3 a 3 a 3 a 4 a 1 a 2 a 3 a 4 := {(a 1,a 1 ),(a 1,a 2 ),(a 1,a 3 ),(a 1,a 4 ),(a 2,a 2 ),(a 2,a 3 ),(a 2,a 4 ),(a 3,a 3 ), (a 4,a 3 ), (a 4,a 4 )}. Define bipolar fuzzy subset µ = [µ +,µ ] : S Γ S [0,1] [ 1,0] as 0.81 if x = a if x = a 1 µ if x = a 2 (x) = µ 0.65 if x = a 2 (x) = 0.34 if x = a if x = a if x = a if x = a 4 Then µ is a (0.70,0.90) bipolar fuzzy bi-ideal of S
5 ...BIPOLAR FUZZY IDEALS IN ORDERED Γ-SEMIGROUPS 145 Theorem 3.1. A fuzzy subset µ η is a (η,δ)-bipolar fuzzy ordered Γ-sub semigroup (left, right, bi-ideal, interior ideal, (1, 2)-ideal) of S. Then the lower level set µ η = [µ + η,µ η ] is an ordered Γ-subsemigroup (left, right, bi-ideal, interior ideal, (1, 2)-ideal) of S, where µ + η = {p S µ + (p) > η + } and µ η = {p S µ (p) < η }. Proof. Suppose that µ η is a (η,δ)-bipolar fuzzy ordered Γ-subsemigroup. Let µ + η is a (η +,δ + ) fuzzy Γ-subsemigroup. Let p,q S and α Γ such that p,q µ + η. Then µ + (p) > η +,µ + (q) > η +. Since µ + is a (η +,δ + ) fuzzy subsemigroup, therefore max{µ + (pαq),η + } min{µ + (p),µ + (q),δ + } > min{η +,η +,δ + } = η +. Hence µ + (pαq) > η +. It shows that pαq µ + η. Therefore µ + η is a Γ-subsemigroup of S. Letµ η isa(η,δ )fuzzyorderedγ-subsemigroup. Letp,q S suchthatp,q µ η. Thenµ (p) < η,µ (q) < η.sinceµ isa(η,δ )fuzzyorderedγ-subsemigroup. Therefore min{µ (pαq),η } max{µ (p),µ (q),δ } < max{η,η,δ } = η. Hence µ (pαq) < η. It shows that pαq µ η. Therefore µ η is a Γ-subsemigroup of S. Hence µ η = [µ + η,µ η ] is a Γ-subsemigroup of S. Theorem 3.2. A non-empty subset A of S is an ordered Γ-subsemigroup (left, right, bi-ideal, interior ideal, (1, 2)-ideal) of S if and only if the bipolar fuzzy subset µ = [µ +,µ ] of S defined as µ + (p) = { δ + forallp (A], η + forallp / (A], µ (p) = { δ forallp (A], η forallp / (A], is a (η, δ)-bipolar fuzzy ordered Γ-subsemigroup (left, right, bi-ideal, interior ideal, (1, 2)-ideal) of S. Proof. Assume that A is an ordered Γ-subsemigroup of S. Let p,q S be such that p,q (A] then pαq (A] and α Γ. Hence µ + (pαq) δ + and µ (pαq) δ. Therefore max{µ + (pαq),η + } δ + = min{µ + (p),µ + (q),δ + } and min{µ (pαq),η } δ = max{µ (p),µ (q),δ }. If p / A or q / (A] then min{µ + (p),µ + (q),δ + } = η +, max{µ (p),µ (q),δ } = η.that is max{µ + (pαq), η + } min{µ + (p),µ + (q),δ + } and min{µ (pαq),η } max{µ (p),µ (q),δ }. Therefore µ = [µ +,µ ] is a bipolar fuzzy Γ-subsemigroup of S. Conversely assume that µ = [µ +,µ ] is a bipolar fuzzy Γ-subsemigroup of S. Let p,q (A]. Then µ + (p) δ +,µ + (q) δ + and µ (p) δ,µ(q) δ. Now µ + is (η +,δ + ) and µ is (η,δ )- fuzzy Γ-subsemigroup of S. Therefore max{µ + (pαq),η + } min{µ + (p),µ + (q),δ + } min{δ +,δ +,δ +,} = δ + and min{µ (pαq),η } max{µ (p),µ (q),δ } max{δ,δ,δ,} = δ. It follows that pαq (A]. Therefore A is a ordered Γ-subsemigroup of S. Corollary 3.1. A non-empty subset A of S is an ordered Γ-subsemigroup(left, right, bi-ideal, interior ideal,(1, 2)-ideal) of S if and only if the fuzzy subset µ of S defined as µ + (p) = { 0.5forallp (A], 0forallp / (A], µ (p) = { 0.5forallp (A], 0forallp / (A],
6 146 V. CHINNADURAI AND K. ARULMOZHI is a (ǫ, ǫ q)-bipolar fuzzy subsemigroup(left, right, bi-ideal, interior ideal, (1, 2)- ideal) of S. Proof. The proof follows by taking η + = 0,δ + = 0.5 and η = 0,δ = 0.5 in Theorem 3.2 Theorem 3.3. A fuzzy subset µ of S is a (η,δ)-bipolar fuzzy subsemigroup (left, right, bi-ideal, interior ideal, (1, 2)-ideal) of S if and only if each non-empty level subset ( µ (t,s) ) is a subsemigroup (left, right, bi-ideal, interior ideal, (1, 2)-ideal) of S for all t (η +,δ + ]. and s (η,δ ]. Proof. Assume that µ (t,s) is an ordered Γ-subsemigroup over S for each t [0,1] and s [ 1,0].For each p 1,p 2 S and a (A], let t = min{µ + (p 1 ),µ + (p 2 )} and s = max{µ (p 1 ),µ (p 2 )}, then p 1,p 2 µ (t,s). That is max{µ + ((pγq),η + } t = min{µ + (p 1 ),µ + (p 2 ),δ + } and min{µ (p 1 γp 2 ),η } s = max{µ (p 1 ),µ (p 2 ), δ }. This shows that µ is bipolar fuzzy Γ-subsemigroup over S. Conversely, assume that µ is a bipolar fuzzy ordered Γ-subsemigroup of S. For each a (A],t [0,1] and s [ 1,0] and p 1,p 2 µ (t,s) we have µ + (p 1 ) t,µ + (p 2 ) tandµ (p 1 ) s,µ (p 2 ) s. Since µisabipolarfuzzyγ-subsemigroup of S, max{µ + (p 1 γp 2 ),η + } min{µ + (p 1 ),µ + (p 2,δ + )} t min{µ (p 1 γp 2 ),η } max{µ (p 1 ),µ (p 2,δ )} s, γ Γ. Therefore µ (t,s), this implies that p 1 γp 2 µ (t,s). Therefore µ (t,s) is a Γ- subsemigroup of S for each t [0,1] and s [ 1,0]. Similar proofs holds for left, right, bi-ideal, interior ideal, (1, 2)-ideal also. Example 3.3. Every bipolar fuzzy subsemigroup µ = [µ +,µ ] of ordered Γ- semigroup S is a (η,δ)-bipolar fuzzy subsemigroup of S, but converse is not true. For the Example 3.1, we define bipolar fuzzy subset µ = [µ +,µ ] by 0.65 if x = a if x = a 1 µ if x = a 2 (x) = µ 0.81 if x = a 2 (x) = 0.51 if x = a if x = a if x = a if x = a 4 Then µisa(0.56,0.70)bipolarfuzzyorderedγ-subsemigroupofs, butnotabipolar fuzzy subsemigroup. Since µ + (a 4 αa 4 ) = µ + (a 3 ) = 0.51 min{µ + (a 4 ),µ + (a 4 )} = 0.53 and µ (a 4 αa 4 ) = µ (a 3 ) = 0.68 max{µ (a 4 ),µ (a 4 )} = 0.75 Corollary 3.2. Every (ǫ, ǫ q) bipolar fuzzy ordered Γ-subsemigroup of S is a (η, δ)-bipolar fuzzy ordered Γ-subsemigroup of S, but converse is not true. For the Example 3.1, define bipolar fuzzy subset µ = [µ +,µ ] 0.42 if x = a if x = a 1 µ if x = a 2 (x) = µ 0.30 if x = a 2 (x) = 0.26 if x = a if x = a if x = a if x = a 4
7 ...BIPOLAR FUZZY IDEALS IN ORDERED Γ-SEMIGROUPS 147 Then µ is a (0.35,0.45) bipolar fuzzy ordered Γ-subsemigroup of S, but not a (ǫ,ǫ q) bipolar fuzzy ordered Γ-subsemigroup. Since µ + (a 4 αa 4 ) = µ + (a 3 ) = 0.26 min{µ + (a 4 ),µ + (a 4 )} = 0.30 and µ (a 4 αa 4 ) = µ (a 3 ) = 0.20 max{µ (a 4 ), µ (a 4 )} = Example 3.4. Every bipolar fuzzy bi-ideal µ = [µ +,µ ] of an ordered Γ- semigroup S is a (η,δ)-bipolar fuzzy bi-ideal of S, but converse is not true. For the Example 3.2, we define bipolar fuzzy subset µ = [µ +,µ ] 0.81 if x = a if x = a 1 µ if x = a 2 (x) = µ 0.65 if x = a 2 (x) = 0.34 if x = a if x = a if x = a if x = a 4 Then µ is a (0.70,0.85) bipolar fuzzy bi-ideal of S, but not a bipolar fuzzy biideal, since µ + (a 4 αa 4 βa 4 ) = µ + (a 3 ) = 0.34 min{µ + (a 4 ),µ + (a 4 )} = 0.43 and µ (a 4 αa 4 βa 4 ) = µ (a 3 ) = 0.30 max{µ (a 4 ),µ (a 4 )} = 0.50 Corollary 3.3. Every (ǫ,ǫ q) bipolar fuzzy bi-ideal of S is a (η,δ)-bipolar fuzzy bi-ideal of S, but converse is not true. For the Example 3.2, we define bipolar fuzzy subset µ = [µ +,µ ] 0.43 if x = a if x = a 1 µ if x = a 2 (x) = µ 0.30 if x = a 2 (x) = 0.25 if x = a if x = a if x = a if x = a 4 Then µ is a (0.40,0.47) fuzzy bi-ideal of S, but not a fuzzy bi-ideal, since µ + (a 4 αa 4 βa 4 ) = µ + (a 3 ) = 0.25 min{µ + (a 4 ),µ + (a 4 )} = 0.30 µ (a 4 αa 4 βa 4 ) = µ (a 3 ) = 0.20 min{µ (a 4 ),µ (a 4 )} = as Definition 3.3. If χ A is the characteristic function of A, then (χ A ) δ η is defined (χ + A )δ η(x) = { δ + if x (A], η + if x / (A]. (χ A )δ η(x) = { δ if x (A], η if x / (A]. Theorem 3.4. A non empty subset A of S is a subsemigroup (left, right, biideal, interior ideal, (1, 2)-ideal) of S if and only if fuzzy subset χ A = [χ + (A],χ (A] ] is a (η, δ)-bipolar fuzzy subsemigroup(left, right, bi-ideal, interior ideal, (1, 2)-ideal) of S. Proof. Assume that A is a subsemigroup of S. Then χ (A] is a bipolar fuzzy subsemigroup of S and hence χ (A] is an (η,δ)-bipolar fuzzy subsemigroup of S.
8 148 V. CHINNADURAI AND K. ARULMOZHI Conversely, let p,q S be such that p,q (A]. Then χ + (A] (p) = δ+ = χ + (A] (q) = δ + and χ (A] (p) = δ = χ (A] (q) = δ. Since χ (A] is a (η,δ)-bipolar fuzzy subsemigroup. Consider max{χ + (A] (pαq),η+ } min{χ + (A] (p),χ+ (A] (q),δ+ } = min{δ +,δ +,δ + } = δ + as η + < δ +, this implies that {χ + (A] (pαq)} δ+. Thus pαq (A]. Therefore A is a subsemigroup of S. And min{χ (A] (pαq),η } max{χ (A] (p),χ (A] (q),δ } = max{δ,δ,δ } = δ as δ < η, this implies that {χ (A] (pαq)} δ. Thus pαq (A]. Therefore (A] is a subsemigroup of S. Let p,q S be such that p,q / (A]. Then χ + (A] (p) = η+ = χ + (A] (q) = η+ and χ (A] (p) = η+ = χ (A] (q) = η+. Since χ (A] is a (η,δ)-bipolar fuzzy subsemigroup. max{χ + (A] (pαq),η+ } min{χ + (A] (p),χ+ (A] (q),δ+ } = min{η +,η +,δ + } = η + as η + < δ +, this implies that {χ + (A] (pαq)} η+. Thus pαq (A]. Therefore (A] is a subsemigroup of S. And min{χ (A] (pαq),η } max{χ (A] (p),χ (A] (q),δ } = max{η,η,δ } = η as δ < η, this implies that {χ (A] (pαq)} η. Thus pαq (A]. Therefore (A] is a subsemigroup of S. Similar to proof holds for left, right, bi-ideal, interior ideal, (1, 2)-ideal also. Definition 3.4. Let µ be a bipolar fuzzy subset of an ordered semigroup S. We define the bipolar fuzzy subsets (µ + ) δ η(p) = {µ + (p) δ + } η + and (µ ) δ η(p) = {µ (p) δ } η for all p S. Definition 3.5. Let µ 1 and µ 2 be two bipolar fuzzy subsets of an ordered semigroup S. Then we define the bipolar fuzzy subset (i) (µ + 1 δ η µ + 2 )(x) = {µ+ 1 µ+ 2 (x) δ+ } η +. (ii) (µ 1 δ η µ 2 )(x) = {µ 1 µ 2 (x) δ } η. (iii) (µ + 1 δ η µ + 2 )(x) = {µ+ 1 µ+ 2 (x) δ+ } η +. (iv) (µ 1 δ η µ 2 )(x) = {µ 1 µ 2 (x) δ } η. (v) (µ + 1 δ η µ + 2 )(x) = {µ+ 1 µ+ 2 (x) δ+ } η +.
9 ...BIPOLAR FUZZY IDEALS IN ORDERED Γ-SEMIGROUPS 149 (vi) (µ 1 δ η µ 2 )(x) = {µ 1 µ 2 (x) δ } η. Lemma 3.1. Let A and B be non-empty subsets of S. Then the following hold: (i) ((µ + 1 ) δ η(µ + 2 ))(x) = ((µ+ 1 )δ η (µ + 2 )δ η) and ((µ 1 ) δ η(µ 2 ))(x) = ((µ 1 )δ η (µ 2 )δ η) (ii) ((µ + 1 ) δ η(µ + 2 ))(x) = ((µ+ 1 )δ η (µ + 2 )δ η), ((µ 1 ) δ η(µ 2 ))(x) = ((µ 1 )δ η (µ 2 )δ η) (iii) ((µ + 1 ) δ η(µ + 2 ))(x) = ((µ+ 1 )δ η (µ + 2 )δ η) and ((µ 1 ) δ η(µ 2 ))(x) = ((µ 1 )δ η (µ 2 )δ η) Lemma 3.2. Let A and B be non-empty subsets of S. Then the following hold: (i) (χ + (A] δ η χ + (B] ) = (χ+ A B )δ η and (χ (A] δ η χ (B] ) = (χ A B )δ η. (ii) (χ + (A] δ η χ + (B] ) = (χ+ A B )δ η and (χ (A] δ η χ (A] ) = (χ A B )δ η. (iii) (χ + (A] Γ δ ηχ + B ) = (χ+ (AΓB] )δ η and (χ A Γ δ ηχ (B] ) = (χ (AΓB] )δ η. Proof. (i) and (ii) Straightforward. (iii) Let p S. If p (AΓB], then (χ + (AΓB] )(p) = δ+ and (χ (AΓB] )(p) = δ. Since p aαb for some a (A], b (B] and α Γ, we have (a,b) A p and A p 0. We have (χ + (A] Γ χ + )(p) = sup min{χ + (y),χ+ (z)} (A] (A] (A] p=yαz min{χ + (A] (a),χ+ (A] (b)} = δ + (χ A Γ χ )(p) = inf (B] p=yαz min{χ (y),χ (z)} (A] (A] max{χ (A] (a),χ (A] (b)} = δ Therefore (χ + (A] Γ χ + (B] )(p) = δ+ = (χ + (AΓB] (p) and (χ (A] Γ χ (B] )(p) = δ = (χ (AΓB] (p). If p / (AΓB] then (χ+ (AΓB] )(p) = η+ and (χ (AΓB] )(p) = η. Since p aαb for some a / (A], b / (B] and α Γ. We have (χ + (A] Γ χ + )(p) = sup min{χ + (y),χ+ (z)} (B] (A] (A] p=yαz min{χ + (A] (a),χ+ (A] (b)} = η + (χ (A] Γ χ )(p) = inf (A] p=yαz min{χ (y),χ (z)} (A] (A] max{χ + (A] (a),χ+ (A] (b)} = η Hence(χ + (A] Γχ + (B] )(p) = η+ = (χ + (AΓB] )(p)and(χ (A] Γχ (B] )(p) = η = (χ (AΓB] )(p) Theorem 3.5. Let S be an (η,δ) ordered Γ-semigroup. Let A,B S and {A i i I} be a family of subsets of S then (i) (A] (B] if and only if (χ + (A] )δ η (χ + (B] )δ η and (χ (A] )δ η (χ (B] )δ η. (ii) ( i I χ + (A i] )δ η = (χ + i I(A i] )δ η and ( i I χ (A i] )δ η = (χ i I(A i] )δ η.
10 150 V. CHINNADURAI AND K. ARULMOZHI (iii) ( i I χ + (A i] )δ η = (χ + i I(A i] )δ η and ( i I χ (A i] )δ η = (χ i I(A i] )δ η. Proof. The proof follows from Proposition 2.4 [16]. Proposition 3.1. If A is a (η, δ)- bipolar fuzzy left(subsemigroup, right, interior, (1, 2)-ideal )ideal of S, then A = [(µ + ) δ η,(µ ) δ η] is a bipolar fuzzy left(subsemi group, right, interior, (1, 2)-ideal) ideal of S. Proof. Assume that A is a (η,δ)-bipolar fuzzy left ideal of S. If there exist p,q S, and α Γ then max{(µ + ) δ η(pαq),η + } = max{({µ + (pαq) δ + } η + ),η + } = {µ + (pαq) δ + } η + = {µ + (pαq) η + } {δ + η + } = {(µ + (pαq) η + ) η + } δ + {(µ + (q) δ + ) η + } δ + (µ + ) δ η(q) δ +. and min{(µ ) δ η(pαq),η } = min{({µ (pαq) δ } η ),η } = {µ (pαq) δ } η = {µ (pαq) η } {δ η } = {(µ (pαq) η ) η } δ {(µ (q) δ ) η } δ (µ ) δ η(q) δ } Hence A = [(µ + ) δ η,(µ ) δ η] is a bipolar fuzzy left ideal of S. Similar to proofs hold for subsemigroup, right ideals and interior ideal, (1, 2)-ideal also. Proposition 3.2. If A is a (η,δ)-bipolar fuzzy bi-ideal,then A = [(µ + ) δ η,(µ ) δ η] is a bipolar fuzzy bi-ideal of S. Proof. Assume that A is a (η,δ)-bipolar fuzzy bi-ideal of S. If there exist p,q,r S, and α,β Γ then max{(µ + ) δ η(pαqβr),η + } = max{({µ + (pαqβr) δ + } η + ),η + } = {µ + (pαqβr) δ + } η + = {µ + (pαqβr) η + } {δ + η + } = {µ + (pαqβr) η + } δ + = {(µ + (pαqβr) η + ) η + } δ +
11 ...BIPOLAR FUZZY IDEALS IN ORDERED Γ-SEMIGROUPS 151 {(µ + (p) µ + (r) δ + ) η + } δ + = {(µ + (p) µ + (r) δ + δ + ) η + η + } δ + = {{(µ + (p) δ + ) η + } {(µ + (r) δ + ) η + }} δ + = {(µ + ) δ η(p) (µ + ) δ η(r)} δ +. and min{(µ ) δ η(pαqβr),η } = min{({µ (pαqβr) δ } η ),η } = {µ (pαqβr) δ } η = {µ (pαqβr) η } {δ η } = {µ (pαqβr) η } δ = {(µ (pαqβr) η ) η } δ {(µ (p) µ (r) δ ) η } δ = {(µ (p) µ (r) δ δ ) η η} δ = {{(µ (p) δ ) η } {(µ (r) δ ) η }} δ = {(µ ) δ η(p) (µ ) δ η(r)} δ. By similar way we can show the remaining part of the proposition. Theorem 3.6. Let A = (µ + A,µ A ) be a bipolar (η,δ)- fuzzy right ideal and B = (µ + B,µ B ) be a bipolar (η,δ)- fuzzy left ideal of S then ((A ΓB]) δ η A δ η B and ((A Γ B]) δ η A δ η B. Proof. Let A = (µ + A,µ A ) be a bipolar (η,δ)- fuzzy right ideal and B = (µ + B,µ B ) be a bipolar (η,δ)- fuzzy left ideal of S. Let (p,q) I r. If I r, then r pγq. Thus µ + A (r) µ+ A (pαq) µ+ A (p) and µ A (r) µ A (pαq) µ A (p). Similarly µ + B (r) µ+ B (pαq) µ+ B (q) and µ B (r) µ B (pαq) µ B (q). we have (µ + (A ΓB] ) η δ (r) = (µ + (A ΓB] (r) δ+ ) η + = (max{µ + A (p) µ+ B (q)} δ+ ) η + = (max{µ + A (p) µ+ B (q)} δ+ δ + ) η + = (max{(µ + A (p) δ+ ) (µ + B (q) δ+ )} δ + ) η + ({(µ + A (r) η+ ) (µ + A (r) η+ )} δ + ) η + = ((µ + A (r) η+ ) (µ + B (r) η+ ) δ + ) η + = {((µ + A (r) µ+ B (r)) η+ ) δ + } η + = {((µ + A µ+ B )(r) δ+ } η + = (µ + A δ η B)(r)
12 152 V. CHINNADURAI AND K. ARULMOZHI and (µ (A ΓB] )δ η(r) = (µ (A ΓB] (r) δ ) η = (min{µ A (p) µ B (q)} δ ) η = (min{µ A (p) µ B (q)} δ δ ) η = (min{(µ A (p) δ ) (µ B (q) δ )} δ ) η ({(µ A (r) η ) (µ A (r) η )} δ ) η = ((µ A (r) η ) (µ B (r) η ) δ ) η = {((µ A (r) µ B (r)) η ) δ } η = {((µ A µ B )(r) δ } η = (µ A δ η B)(r) Let p,q / I. If I r =, then (µ + A Γ µ + B )(r) = 0 = (µ A Γ µ B )(r) and α Γ such that r pαq.we have and (µ + (A ΓB] )δ η(r) = (µ + (A ΓB] (p) δ+ ) η + = 0 η + = η + (µ + A B (p) δ+ ) η + = (µ + A B (p) δ+ ) (µ (A ΓB] )δ η(r) = (µ (A ΓB] (r) δ ) η = 0 η = η (µ A B (p) δ ) η = (µ A B (p) δ ) Therefore ((A Γ B]) δ η A δ η B and ((A Γ B]) δ η A δ η B. Corollary 3.4. Let A = (µ + A,µ A ) be a bipolar (ǫ,ǫ q)- fuzzy right ideal and B = (µ + B,µ B ) be a bipolar (ǫ,ǫ q)- fuzzy left ideal of S then ((A ΓB]) A B and ((A Γ B]) A B. Proof. The proof follows taking η + = 0,δ + = 0.5 and η = 0,δ = 0.5 in Theorem 3.6. Corollary 3.5 ([6]). Let S be an ordered Γ-semigroup is regular if and only if every right ideal A and every left ideal B of S then A B = (A Γ B]. Theorem 3.7. An ordered Γ-semigroup S is regular,let A = (µ + A,µ A ) be a bipolar (η,δ)-fuzzy right ideal and B = (µ + B,µ B ) be a bipolar (η,δ)- fuzzy left ideal of S if and only if ((A Γ B]) δ η = A δ η B and ((A Γ B]) δ η = A δ η B.
13 ...BIPOLAR FUZZY IDEALS IN ORDERED Γ-SEMIGROUPS 153 Proof. Let S be an ordered Γ-regular semigroup and A = (µ + A,µ A ) be a bipolar (η,δ)-fuzzy right ideal and B = (µ + B,µ B ) be a bipolar (η,δ)- fuzzy left ideal of S. Let I be a non-empty set, then I r = {(p,q) S S r pγq} from definition 2.2 in (iii). Thus µ + A (r) µ+ A (pαq) µ+ A (p) and µ A (r) µ A (pαq) µ A (p). Similarly µ + B (r) µ+ B (pαq) µ+ B (q) and µ B (r) µ B (pαq) µ B (q). and (µ + (A ΓB] )δ η(r) = (µ + (A ΓB] (r) δ+ ) η + = (max{µ + A (p) µ+ B (q)} δ+ ) η + = (max{µ + A (p) µ+ B (q)} δ+ δ + ) η + = (max{(µ + A (p) δ+ ) (µ + B (q) δ+ )} δ + ) η + ({(µ + A (rαx) η+ ) (µ + A (r) η+ )} δ + ) η + ((µ + A (r) η+ ) (µ + B (r) η+ ) δ + ) η + = {((µ + A (r) µ+ B (r)) η+ ) δ + } η + = {((µ + A µ+ B )(r) δ+ } η + = (µ + A δ η B)(r) (µ (A ΓB] )δ η(r) = (µ (A ΓB] (r) δ ) η = (min{µ A (p) µ B (q)} δ ) η = (min{µ A (p) µ B (q)} δ δ ) η = (min{(µ A (p) δ ) (µ B (q) δ )} δ ) η ({(µ A (rαx) η ) (µ A (r) η )} δ ) η ((µ A (r) η ) (µ B (r) η ) δ ) η = {((µ A (r) µ B (r)) η ) δ } η = {((µ A µ B )(r) δ } η = (µ A δ η B)(r) Thus ((A Γ B]) δ η A δ η B and ((A Γ B]) δ η A δ η B, by Theorem 3.7 and hence ((A Γ B]) δ η = A δ η B and ((A Γ B]) δ η = A δ η B. Conversely assume that ((A Γ B]) δ η = A δ η B and ((A Γ B]) δ η = A δ η B. LetA = (µ + A,µ A )beabipolar(η,δ)-fuzzyrightidealandb = (µ+ B,µ B )beabipolar (η,δ)- fuzzy left ideal of S. Then by Theorem 3.4, χ A be a bipolar (η,δ)-fuzzy right ideal and χ A be a bipolar (η,δ)- fuzzy left ideal of S. By Lemma 3.2 and Theorem 3.5, we have (χ + (A B] )δ η = (χ + A δ ηχ + B ) = (χ+ A Γχ + B )δ η = (χ + (A ΓB] )δ η and (χ (A B] )δ η = (χ δ A η χ B ) = (χ A Γ χ B )δ η = (χ (A ΓB] )δ η. This implies (A B) δ η = ((A Γ B]) δ η. Hence by Corollary 3.5 S is regular.
14 154 V. CHINNADURAI AND K. ARULMOZHI Corollary 3.6. Let A = (µ + A,µ A ) be a bipolar (ǫ,ǫ q)-fuzzy right ideal and B = (µ + B,µ B ) be a bipolar (ǫ,ǫ q)- fuzzy left ideal of an ordered Γ-semigroup S. S is regular if and only if ((A Γ B]) = A B and ((A Γ B]) = A B. Proof. Taking η + = 0,δ + = 0.5 and η = 0,δ = 0.5 in Theorem 3.7 the proof follows. Theorem 3.8. Let A = (µ + A,µ A ) be a bipolar (η,δ)-fuzzy bi-ideal and B = (µ + B,µ B ) be a bipolar (η,δ)- fuzzy left ideal of an ordered Γ-semigroup S. S is regular if and only if (A Γ B) δ η = A δ η B and (A Γ B) δ η = A δ η B. Proof. Let S be an ordered Γ-regular semigroup and A = (µ + A,µ A ) be a bipolar (η,δ)-fuzzy bi-ideal and B = (µ + B,µ B ) be a bipolar (η,δ)- fuzzy left ideal of S. Let I be a non-empty set, then I r = {(p,q) S S r pγq}. Thus µ + A (r) µ+ A (pαq) µ+ A (p) and µ A (r) µ A (pαq) µ A (p). Similarly µ+ B (r) µ + B (pαq) µ+ B (q) and µ B (r) µ B (pαq) µ B (q). For r S, there exists x S such that r rαxβr = rα(xβr) (rαxβr)α(xβr). Then (rαxβr),(xβr) I r. We have (µ + A ΓB )δ η(r) = (µ + A ΓB (r) δ+ ) η + = (max{µ + A (p) µ+ B (q)} δ+ ) η + = (max{µ + A (p) µ+ B (q)} δ+ δ + ) η + = (max{(µ + A (p) δ+ ) (µ + B (q) δ+ )} δ + ) η + ({(µ + A (rαxβr) η+ ) (µ + A (xβr) η+ )} δ + ) η + ((µ + A (r) η+ ) (µ + B (r) η+ ) δ + ) η + = {((µ + A (r) µ+ B (r)) η+ ) δ + } η + = {((µ + A µ+ B )(r) δ+ } η + = (µ + A δ η B)(r) and (µ A ΓB )δ η(r) = (µ A ΓB (r) δ ) η = (min{µ A (p) µ B (q)} δ ) η = (min{µ A (p) µ B (q)} δ δ ) η = (min{(µ A (p) δ ) (µ B (q) δ )} δ ) η ({(µ A (rαxβr) η ) (µ A (xβr) η )} δ ) η ((µ A (r) η ) (µ B (r) η ) δ ) η = {((µ A (r) µ B (r)) η ) δ } η = {((µ A µ B )(r) δ } η = (µ A δ η B)(r)
15 ...BIPOLAR FUZZY IDEALS IN ORDERED Γ-SEMIGROUPS 155 Thus (A Γ B) δ η A δ η B and (A Γ B) δ η A δ η B. Conversely assume that (A Γ B) δ η A δ η B and (A Γ B) δ η A δ η B. Let A = (µ + A,µ A ) be a bipolar (η,δ)-fuzzy bi ideal and B = (µ+ B,µ B ) be a bipolar (η,δ)- fuzzy left ideal of S. Since every bipolar fuzzy (η,δ)-right ideal of S is a bipolar fuzzy (η,δ)-bi-ideal of S. Thus (A Γ B) δ η A δ ηb and (A Γ B) δ η A δ ηb, by Theorem 3.7. Hence S is regular. Corollary 3.7. Let A = (µ + A,µ A ) be a bipolar (ǫ,ǫ q)-fuzzy bi-ideal and B = (µ + B,µ B ) be a bipolar (ǫ,ǫ q)- fuzzy left ideal of an ordered Γ-semigroup S. S is regular if and only if (A Γ B) = A δ η B and (A Γ B) = A δ η B. Proof. Follows from Theorem 3.8 Theorem 3.9. Let A = (µ + A,µ A ) be a bipolar (η,δ)-fuzzy right ideal and B = (µ + B,µ B ) be a bipolar (η,δ)- fuzzy left ideal of an ordered Γ-semigroup S. S weakly regular if and only if (A Γ B) δ η A δ η B and (A Γ B) δ η A δ η B. Proof. Straightforward. Corollary 3.8. Let A = (µ + A,µ A ) be a bipolar (ǫ,ǫ q)-fuzzy right ideal and B = (µ + B,µ B ) be a bipolar (ǫ,ǫ q)- fuzzy left ideal of an ordered Γ-semigroup S. S is weakly regular if and only if (A Γ B) A B and (A Γ B) A B. Proof. Straightforward. Theorem Let A = (µ + A,µ A ) be a bipolar (η,δ)-fuzzy bi-ideal and B = (µ + B,µ B ) be a bipolar (η,δ)- fuzzy left ideal of an ordered Γ-semigroup S. S is weakly regular if and only if (A Γ B) δ η A δ η B and (A Γ B) δ η A δ η B. Proof. Straightforward. Corollary 3.9. Let A = (µ + A,µ A ) be a bipolar (ǫ,ǫ q)-fuzzy bi-ideal and B = (µ + B,µ B ) be a bipolar (ǫ,ǫ q)- fuzzy left ideal of an ordered Γ-semigroup S. S is weakly regular if and only if (A Γ B) A B and (A Γ B) A B. Proof. Straightforward. Acknowledgement : The research of the second author is partially supported by UGC-BSR grant : F.25-1/ (BSR)/7-254/2009(BSR) dated in India. References [1] S. K. Bhakat P. DaS. (ǫ, ǫ, q)-fuzzy subsemigroup. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 80(3)(1996), [2] F. M. Khan, N. H. Sarmin and A. Khan. Some new characterization of ordered semigroups in terms of (λ, θ)-fuzzy bi-ideals. International Journal of Algebra and Statistics, 1(1)(2012), [3] Y. B. Jun, A. Khan and M. Shabir. Ordered semigroups characterized by their (ǫ,ǫ, q)-fuzzy bi-ideals. Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc. (2), 32(3)(2009), [4] O. Kazanci and S. Yamak. Generalized fuzzy bi-ideals of semigroup. Soft Computing, 12(11)(2008),
16 156 V. CHINNADURAI AND K. ARULMOZHI [5] N. Kehayopula. On fuzzy po Γ-semigroups. Armenian Journal of Mathematics 6(2)(2014), [6] N.Kehayopulu and M. Tsingelis. Regular ordered semigroups in terms of fuzzy subsets. Inform. Sci., 176(24)(2006), [7] N. Kehayopulu and M. Tsingelis. Fuzzy sets in ordered groupoids. Semigroup Forum, 65(1)(2002), [8] N. Kehayopulu. On ordered Γ-semigroups. Scientiae Mathematicae Japonicae, 23(e-2010), [9] K. Hila and E. Pisha. On bi-ideals on ordered Γ-semigroups. Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, 40(6)(2011), [10] K. M. Lee. Bi-polar-valued fuzzy sets and their operations. Proc. Int Conf. Intelligent Technologies Bangkok (pp )), Thailand, [11] W. J. Lie. Fuzzy invariant subgroups and fuzzy ideals. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 8(2)(1982), [12] Pavel Pal, Samit Kumar Majumder, Bijan Davvaz, Sujit Kumar Sardar, Regularity of Po- Γ-semigroups in terms of fuzzy subsemigroups and fuzzy bi-ideals. Fuzzy information and Engineering, 7(2015), [13] M. Shabir and Z. Iqbal. Characterizations of ordered semigroups by the properties of their bipolar fuzzy ideals. Information Science Letters., 2(3)(2013), [14] M. K. Sen and A. Seth. On po Γ-semigroups. Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc., 85(5)(1993), [15] M. Shabir and A. Khan. Semigroups characterized by the properties of their fuzzy generalized bi-ideals. New Mathematics and Natural Computation, 4(2)(2008), [16] T. Mahmood, M.Ibrar, A. Khan, H. U. Khan and F. Abbas. Classification of ordered semigroups in terms of bipolar fuzzy bi-ideals. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences (JAEBS), 7(10)(2017), [17] L. A Zadeh. Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8(3)(1965), Receibed by editors ; Revised version ; Available online Department of Mathematics, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Tamilnadu address: kv.chinnadurai@yahoo.com Department of Mathematics, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Tamilnadu address: arulmozhiems@gmail.com
Homomorphism in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Automata
International Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics Systems. ISSN 2248-9940 Volume 3, Number 1 (2013), pp. 39-45 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/ijfms.htm Homomorphism in Intuitionistic
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIntuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 7, 202, no. 6, 769-776 Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings P. K. Sharma P.G. Department of Mathematics D.A.V. College Jalandhar city, Punjab, India pksharma@davjalandhar.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCommutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets S K Mala #1, Dr. MM Shanmugapriya *2 1 PhD Scholar in Mathematics, Karpagam University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu- 641021 Assistant Professor of Mathematics,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 67, 3301-3307 A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Equivalence Relation D. K. Basnet Dept. of Mathematics, Assam University Silchar-788011, Assam, India dkbasnet@rediffmail.com
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2 Composition. Invertible Mappings
Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan Composition. Invertible Mappings In this section we discuss two procedures for creating new mappings from old ones, namely,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Note on Characterization of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals in Γ- Near-Rings
International Journal of Computational Science and Mathematics. ISSN 0974-3189 Volume 3, Number 1 (2011), pp. 61-71 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com A Note on Characterization
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomomorphism of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Groups
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 6, 20, no. 64, 369-378 Homomorphism o Intuitionistic Fuzz Groups P. K. Sharma Department o Mathematics, D..V. College Jalandhar Cit, Punjab, India pksharma@davjalandhar.com
Διαβάστε περισσότερα1. Introduction and Preliminaries.
Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.yu/filomat Filomat 22:1 (2008), 97 106 ON δ SETS IN γ SPACES V. Renuka Devi and D. Sivaraj Abstract We
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSome new generalized topologies via hereditary classes. Key Words:hereditary generalized topological space, A κ(h,µ)-sets, κµ -topology.
Bol. Soc. Paran. Mat. (3s.) v. 30 2 (2012): 71 77. c SPM ISSN-2175-1188 on line ISSN-00378712 in press SPM: www.spm.uem.br/bspm doi:10.5269/bspm.v30i2.13793 Some new generalized topologies via hereditary
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOrdinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit
Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ting Zhang Stanford May 11, 2001 Stanford, 5/11/2001 1 Outline Ordinal Classification Ordinal Addition Ordinal Multiplication Ordinal
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018
Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics(JRM) ISSN: 2395-028 SCITECH Volume 3, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION ublished online: March 29, 208 Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics www.scitecresearch.com/journals
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS
Sahand Communications in Mathematical Analysis (SCMA) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016), 21-27 http://scma.maragheh.ac.ir SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS BAYAZ DARABY 1 AND JAVAD JAFARI 2 Abstract. In the mathematical
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS
MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS FUMIE NAKAOKA AND NOBUYUKI ODA Received 20 December 2005; Revised 28 May 2006; Accepted 6 August 2006 Some properties of minimal closed sets and maximal closed
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTHE SECOND ISOMORPHISM THEOREM ON ORDERED SET UNDER ANTIORDERS. Daniel A. Romano
235 Kragujevac J. Math. 30 (2007) 235 242. THE SECOND ISOMORPHISM THEOREM ON ORDERED SET UNDER ANTIORDERS Daniel A. Romano Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Banja Luka University, Mladena Stojanovića
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGÖKHAN ÇUVALCIOĞLU, KRASSIMIR T. ATANASSOV, AND SINEM TARSUSLU(YILMAZ)
IFSCOM016 1 Proceeding Book No. 1 pp. 155-161 (016) ISBN: 978-975-6900-54-3 SOME RESULTS ON S α,β AND T α,β INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY MODAL OPERATORS GÖKHAN ÇUVALCIOĞLU, KRASSIMIR T. ATANASSOV, AND SINEM TARSUSLU(YILMAZ)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomomorphism and Cartesian Product on Fuzzy Translation and Fuzzy Multiplication of PS-algebras
Annals of Pure and Applied athematics Vol. 8, No. 1, 2014, 93-104 ISSN: 2279-087X (P), 2279-0888(online) Published on 11 November 2014 www.researchmathsci.org Annals of Homomorphism and Cartesian Product
Διαβάστε περισσότεραYoung Bae Jun Madad Khan Florentin Smarandache Saima Anis. Fuzzy and Neutrosophic Sets in Semigroups
Young Bae Jun Madad Khan Florentin Smarandache Saima Anis Fuzzy and Neutrosophic Sets in Semigroups Young Bae Jun, Madad Khan, Florentin Smarandache, Saima Anis Fuzzy and Neutrosophic Sets in Semigroups
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEvery set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set May 6, 2008 Abstract A set of first-order formulas, whatever the cardinality of the set of symbols, is equivalent to an independent
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGenerating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations
Applied Mathematics 06 7 98-07 Published Online January 06 in SciRes http://wwwscirporg/journal/am http://dxdoiorg/036/am067009 Generating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations Yasha iasamidze
Διαβάστε περισσότεραF A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I
F A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I Nr 46 2011 C. Carpintero, N. Rajesh and E. Rosas ON A CLASS OF (γ, γ )-PREOPEN SETS IN A TOPOLOGICAL SPACE Abstract. In this paper we have introduced the concept
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOperation Approaches on α-γ-open Sets in Topological Spaces
Int. Journal of Math. Analysis, Vol. 7, 2013, no. 10, 491-498 Operation Approaches on α-γ-open Sets in Topological Spaces N. Kalaivani Department of Mathematics VelTech HighTec Dr.Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in
Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in : tail in X, head in A nowhere-zero Γ-flow is a Γ-circulation such that
Διαβάστε περισσότεραST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II
ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II 2014/2015: Semester II Tutorial 7 1. Let X be a sample from a population P and consider testing hypotheses H 0 : P = P 0 versus H 1 : P = P 1, where P j is a known
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExample Sheet 3 Solutions
Example Sheet 3 Solutions. i Regular Sturm-Liouville. ii Singular Sturm-Liouville mixed boundary conditions. iii Not Sturm-Liouville ODE is not in Sturm-Liouville form. iv Regular Sturm-Liouville note
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEE512: Error Control Coding
EE512: Error Control Coding Solution for Assignment on Finite Fields February 16, 2007 1. (a) Addition and Multiplication tables for GF (5) and GF (7) are shown in Tables 1 and 2. + 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 3
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs
Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs Who? Nichole Schimanski When? July 27, 2011 Graphs A graph, G, consists of a vertex set, V (G), and an edge set, E(G). V (G) is any finite set E(G) is
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSOME INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY MODAL OPERATORS OVER INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY IDEALS AND GROUPS
IFSCOM016 1 Proceeding Book No. 1 pp. 84-90 (016) ISBN: 978-975-6900-54-3 SOME INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY MODAL OPERATORS OVER INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY IDEALS AND GROUPS SINEM TARSUSLU(YILMAZ), GÖKHAN ÇUVALCIOĞLU,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραJordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 4(2), 2011, pp
Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 4(2), 2011, pp.115-126. α, β, γ ORTHOGONALITY ABDALLA TALLAFHA Abstract. Orthogonality in inner product spaces can be expresed using the notion of norms.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCoefficient Inequalities for a New Subclass of K-uniformly Convex Functions
International Journal of Computational Science and Mathematics. ISSN 0974-89 Volume, Number (00), pp. 67--75 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Coefficient Inequalities for
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPROPERTIES OF CERTAIN INTEGRAL OPERATORS. a n z n (1.1)
GEORGIAN MATHEMATICAL JOURNAL: Vol. 2, No. 5, 995, 535-545 PROPERTIES OF CERTAIN INTEGRAL OPERATORS SHIGEYOSHI OWA Abstract. Two integral operators P α and Q α for analytic functions in the open unit disk
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn Annihilator of Fuzzy Subsets of Modules
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 3, 2009, no. 10, 483-488 On Annihilator of Fuzzy Subsets of Modules Helen K. Saikia 1 and Mrinal C. Kalita 2 1 Department of Mathematics, Gauhati university, Guwahati-781014,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραC.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions
C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions Paul Liu November 15, 2007 Note that these are sample solutions only; in many cases there were many acceptable answers. 1 Reynolds Problem 10.1 1.1 Normal-order
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCongruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 24, no. 5, 239-246 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/.2988/ija.24.422 Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 Ligong An and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραUniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor
Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor Given f L 1 T 1 ), we consider the partial sums of the Fourier series of f: N 1) S N fθ) = ˆfk)e ikθ. k= N A calculation gives the Dirichlet formula
Διαβάστε περισσότεραk A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +
Chapter 3. Fuzzy Arithmetic 3- Fuzzy arithmetic: ~Addition(+) and subtraction (-): Let A = [a and B = [b, b in R If x [a and y [b, b than x+y [a +b +b Symbolically,we write A(+)B = [a (+)[b, b = [a +b
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStatistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests
Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Shirsendu Mukherjee Department of Statistics, Asutosh College, Kolkata, India. shirsendu st@yahoo.co.in So far we have treated the testing of one-sided
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANSFORMATION SEMIGROUPS
GANIT J. Bangladesh Math. oc. IN 606-694) 0) -7 DIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANFORMATION EMIGROUP ubrata Majumdar, * Kalyan Kumar Dey and Mohd. Altab Hossain Department of Mathematics University
Διαβάστε περισσότερα4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)
84 CHAPTER 4. STATIONARY TS MODELS 4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(,) This section is an introduction to a wide class of models ARMA(p,q) which we will consider in more detail later in this
Διαβάστε περισσότεραORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER
ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER Abstract. We define ordinal arithmetic and show laws of Left- Monotonicity, Associativity, Distributivity, some minor related properties and the Cantor Normal Form.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSEMIGROUP ACTIONS ON ORDERED GROUPOIDS. 1. Introduction and prerequisites
ao DOI: 10.2478/s12175-012-0080-3 Math. Slovaca 63 (2013), No. 1, 41 52 SEMIGROUP ACTIONS ON ORDERED GROUPOIDS Niovi Kehayopulu* Michael Tsingelis** (Communicated by Miroslav Ploščica ) ABSTRACT. In this
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe strong semilattice of π-groups
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS Vol. 11, No. 3, 2018, 589-597 ISSN 1307-5543 www.ejpam.com Published by New York Business Global The strong semilattice of π-groups Jiangang Zhang 1,, Yuhui
Διαβάστε περισσότεραReminders: linear functions
Reminders: linear functions Let U and V be vector spaces over the same field F. Definition A function f : U V is linear if for every u 1, u 2 U, f (u 1 + u 2 ) = f (u 1 ) + f (u 2 ), and for every u U
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 3: Ordinal Numbers
Chapter 3: Ordinal Numbers There are two kinds of number.. Ordinal numbers (0th), st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th,..., ω, ω +,... ω2, ω2+,... ω 2... answers to the question What position is... in a sequence? What
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.
Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequalit for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x,, z X. Prove that d(x, z) d(, z) d(x, ). (ii): Reverse triangle inequalit for norms:
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe operators over the generalized intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Int. J. Nonlinear Anal. Appl. 8 (2017) No. 1, 11-21 ISSN: 2008-6822 (electronic) http://dx.doi.org/10.22075/ijnaa.2017.11099.1542 The operators over the generalized intuitionistic fuzzy sets Ezzatallah
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSequent Calculi for the Modal µ-calculus over S5. Luca Alberucci, University of Berne. Logic Colloquium Berne, July 4th 2008
Sequent Calculi for the Modal µ-calculus over S5 Luca Alberucci, University of Berne Logic Colloquium Berne, July 4th 2008 Introduction Koz: Axiomatisation for the modal µ-calculus over K Axioms: All classical
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIntuitionistic Supra Gradation of Openness
Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences 2(3) (2008), 291-307 An International Journal c 2008 Dixie W Publishing Corporation, U. S. A. Intuitionistic Supra Gradation of Openness A. M. Zahran 1, S. E.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOther Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests
Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Side-Note: So far we have seen a few approaches for creating tests such as Neyman-Pearson Lemma ( most powerful tests of H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 :
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3
Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 1 State vector space and the dual space Space of wavefunctions The space of wavefunctions is the set of all
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA summation formula ramified with hypergeometric function and involving recurrence relation
South Asian Journal of Mathematics 017, Vol. 7 ( 1): 1 4 www.sajm-online.com ISSN 51-151 RESEARCH ARTICLE A summation formula ramified with hypergeometric function and involving recurrence relation Salahuddin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)
Uppsala Universitet Matematiska Institutionen Andreas Strömbergsson Prov i matematik Funktionalanalys Kurs: F3B, F4Sy, NVP 2005-03-08 Skrivtid: 9 14 Tillåtna hjälpmedel: Manuella skrivdon, Kreyszigs bok
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics
Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics Nov 1, 01 In this lecture we examine root systems from an axiomatic point of view. 1 Reflections If v R n, then it determines a hyperplane, denoted P v, through the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMatrices and Determinants
Matrices and Determinants SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Q 1. For what value of k do the following system of equations possess a non-trivial (i.e., not all zero) solution over the set of rationals Q? x + ky + 3z
Διαβάστε περισσότερα5. Choice under Uncertainty
5. Choice under Uncertainty Daisuke Oyama Microeconomics I May 23, 2018 Formulations von Neumann-Morgenstern (1944/1947) X: Set of prizes Π: Set of probability distributions on X : Preference relation
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe k-α-exponential Function
Int Journal of Math Analysis, Vol 7, 213, no 11, 535-542 The --Exponential Function Luciano L Luque and Rubén A Cerutti Faculty of Exact Sciences National University of Nordeste Av Libertad 554 34 Corrientes,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCyclic or elementary abelian Covers of K 4
Cyclic or elementary abelian Covers of K 4 Yan-Quan Feng Mathematics, Beijing Jiaotong University Beijing 100044, P.R. China Summer School, Rogla, Slovenian 2011-06 Outline 1 Question 2 Main results 3
Διαβάστε περισσότερα12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem
Tutorial 12: Radon-Nikodym Theorem 1 12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem In the following, (Ω, F) is an arbitrary measurable space. Definition 96 Let μ and ν be two (possibly complex) measures on (Ω, F). We say
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn Intuitionistic Fuzzy LI -ideals in Lattice Implication Algebras
Journal of Mathematical Research with Applications Jul., 2015, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 355 367 DOI:10.3770/j.issn:2095-2651.2015.04.001 Http://jmre.dlut.edu.cn On Intuitionistic Fuzzy LI -ideals in Lattice
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFinite Field Problems: Solutions
Finite Field Problems: Solutions 1. Let f = x 2 +1 Z 11 [x] and let F = Z 11 [x]/(f), a field. Let Solution: F =11 2 = 121, so F = 121 1 = 120. The possible orders are the divisors of 120. Solution: The
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics
Fourier Series MATH 211, Calculus II J. Robert Buchanan Department of Mathematics Spring 2018 Introduction Not all functions can be represented by Taylor series. f (k) (c) A Taylor series f (x) = (x c)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGreen s Relations and Partial Orders on Semigroups of Partial Linear Transformations with Restricted Range
Thai Journal of Mathematics Volume 12 2014 Number 1 : 81 93 http://thaijmathincmuacth ISSN 1686-0209 Green s Relations and Partial Orders on Semigroups of Partial Linear Transformations with Restricted
Διαβάστε περισσότεραw o = R 1 p. (1) R = p =. = 1
Πανεπιστήµιο Κρήτης - Τµήµα Επιστήµης Υπολογιστών ΗΥ-570: Στατιστική Επεξεργασία Σήµατος 205 ιδάσκων : Α. Μουχτάρης Τριτη Σειρά Ασκήσεων Λύσεις Ασκηση 3. 5.2 (a) From the Wiener-Hopf equation we have:
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS
CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS Shiah-Sen Wang The graphs are prepared by Chien-Lun Lai Based on : Precalculus: Mathematics for Calculus by J. Stuwart, L. Redin & S. Watson, 6th edition, 01, Brooks/Cole Chapter
Διαβάστε περισσότερα3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β
3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS Page Theorem cos(αβ cos α cos β -sin α cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α NOTE: cos(αβ cos α cos β cos(α-β cos α -cos β Proof of cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α Let s use a unit circle
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMINIMAL INTUITIONISTIC GENERAL L-FUZZY AUTOMATA
italian journal of pure applied mathematics n. 35 2015 (155 186) 155 MINIMAL INTUITIONISTIC GENERAL L-UZZY AUTOMATA M. Shamsizadeh M.M. Zahedi Department of Mathematics Kerman Graduate University of Advanced
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA General Note on δ-quasi Monotone and Increasing Sequence
International Mathematical Forum, 4, 2009, no. 3, 143-149 A General Note on δ-quasi Monotone and Increasing Sequence Santosh Kr. Saxena H. N. 419, Jawaharpuri, Badaun, U.P., India Presently working in
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFuzzy Soft Rings on Fuzzy Lattices
International Journal of Computational Science and Mathematics. ISSN 0974-389 Volume 3, Number 2 (20), pp. 4-59 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Fuzzy Soft Rings on Fuzzy
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe challenges of non-stable predicates
The challenges of non-stable predicates Consider a non-stable predicate Φ encoding, say, a safety property. We want to determine whether Φ holds for our program. The challenges of non-stable predicates
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAbstract Storage Devices
Abstract Storage Devices Robert König Ueli Maurer Stefano Tessaro SOFSEM 2009 January 27, 2009 Outline 1. Motivation: Storage Devices 2. Abstract Storage Devices (ASD s) 3. Reducibility 4. Factoring ASD
Διαβάστε περισσότεραON FUZZY BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES IN ŠOSTAK S SENSE (II)
Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 25 (2010), No. 3, pp. 457 475 DOI 10.4134/CKMS.2010.25.3.457 ON FUZZY BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES IN ŠOSTAK S SENSE (II) Ahmed Abd El-Kader Ramadan, Salah El-Deen Abbas, and Ahmed Aref
Διαβάστε περισσότεραBounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees
Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees Thomas F. Kent Andrea Sorbi Università degli Studi di Siena Italia July 18, 2007 Goal: Introduce a form of Σ 0 2-permitting for the enumeration degrees. Till now,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραderivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates
derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates swapnizzle 03-03- :5:43 We begin by recognizing the familiar conversion from rectangular to spherical coordinates (note that φ is used
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008
Tridiagonal matrices Gérard MEURANT October, 2008 1 Similarity 2 Cholesy factorizations 3 Eigenvalues 4 Inverse Similarity Let α 1 ω 1 β 1 α 2 ω 2 T =......... β 2 α 1 ω 1 β 1 α and β i ω i, i = 1,...,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραInverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. ------------------ ----------------------------- -----------------
Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. 1. Sin ( ) = a) b) c) d) Ans b. Solution : Method 1. Ans a: 17 > 1 a) is rejected. w.k.t Sin ( sin ) = d is rejected. If sin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 3 Solutions
Homework 3 Solutions Igor Yanovsky (Math 151A TA) Problem 1: Compute the absolute error and relative error in approximations of p by p. (Use calculator!) a) p π, p 22/7; b) p π, p 3.141. Solution: For
Διαβάστε περισσότεραω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ω ω + 1 ω + 2 ω + 3 ω + 4 ω2 ω2 + 1 ω2 + 2 ω2 + 3 ω3 ω3 + 1 ω3 + 2 ω4 ω4 + 1 ω5 ω 2 ω 2 + 1 ω 2 + 2 ω 2 + ω ω 2 + ω + 1 ω 2 + ω2 ω 2 2 ω 2 2 + 1 ω 2 2 + ω ω 2 3 ω 3 ω 3 + 1 ω 3 + ω ω 3 +
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE
Lecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE BLUE: Robustness of LSE against normality We now study properties of l τ β and σ 2 under assumption A2, i.e., without the normality assumption on ε. From Theorem
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMean-Variance Analysis
Mean-Variance Analysis Jan Schneider McCombs School of Business University of Texas at Austin Jan Schneider Mean-Variance Analysis Beta Representation of the Risk Premium risk premium E t [Rt t+τ ] R1
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn New Subclasses of Analytic Functions with Respect to Conjugate and Symmetric Conjugate Points
Global Journal of Pure Applied Mathematics. ISSN 0973-768 Volume, Number 3 06, pp. 849 865 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/gjpam.htm On New Subclasses of Analytic Functions with
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSemigroups of Linear Transformations with Invariant Subspaces
International Journal of Algebra, Vol 6, 2012, no 8, 375-386 Semigroups of Linear Transformations with Invariant Subspaces Preeyanuch Honyam Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science Chiang Mai University,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA new modal operator over intuitionistic fuzzy sets
1 st Int. Workshop on IFSs, Mersin, 14 Nov. 2014 Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets ISSN 1310 4926 Vol. 20, 2014, No. 5, 1 8 A new modal operator over intuitionistic fuzzy sets Krassimir Atanassov 1, Gökhan
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe semiclassical Garding inequality
The semiclassical Garding inequality We give a proof of the semiclassical Garding inequality (Theorem 4.1 using as the only black box the Calderon-Vaillancourt Theorem. 1 Anti-Wick quantization For (q,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSubclass of Univalent Functions with Negative Coefficients and Starlike with Respect to Symmetric and Conjugate Points
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 2, 2008, no. 35, 1739-1748 Subclass of Univalent Functions with Negative Coefficients and Starlike with Respect to Symmetric and Conjugate Points S. M. Khairnar and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume
BULETINUL ACADEMIEI DE ŞTIINŢE A REPUBLICII MOLDOVA. MATEMATICA Numbers 2(72) 3(73), 2013, Pages 80 89 ISSN 1024 7696 On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume I.S.Gutsul Abstract. In
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS
CHAPTER 5 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS EXERCISE 104 Page 8 1. Find the positive root of the equation x + 3x 5 = 0, correct to 3 significant figures, using the method of bisection. Let f(x) =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn a Subclass of k-uniformly Convex Functions with Negative Coefficients
International Mathematical Forum, 1, 2006, no. 34, 1677-1689 On a Subclass of k-uniformly Convex Functions with Negative Coefficients T. N. SHANMUGAM Department of Mathematics Anna University, Chennai-600
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions
SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES GLMA Linear Mathematics 00- Examination Solutions. (a) i. ( + 5i)( i) = (6 + 5) + (5 )i = + i. Real part is, imaginary part is. (b) ii. + 5i i ( + 5i)( + i) = ( i)( + i)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Simply Typed Lambda Calculus
Type Inference Instead of writing type annotations, can we use an algorithm to infer what the type annotations should be? That depends on the type system. For simple type systems the answer is yes, and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPractice Exam 2. Conceptual Questions. 1. State a Basic identity and then verify it. (a) Identity: Solution: One identity is csc(θ) = 1
Conceptual Questions. State a Basic identity and then verify it. a) Identity: Solution: One identity is cscθ) = sinθ) Practice Exam b) Verification: Solution: Given the point of intersection x, y) of the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGAUGES OF BAIRE CLASS ONE FUNCTIONS
GAUGES OF BAIRE CLASS ONE FUNCTIONS ZULIJANTO ATOK, WEE-KEE TANG, AND DONGSHENG ZHAO Abstract. Let K be a compact metric space and f : K R be a bounded Baire class one function. We proved that for any
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραJesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013
Notes on Average Scattering imes and Hall Factors Jesse Maassen and Mar Lundstrom Purdue University November 5, 13 I. Introduction 1 II. Solution of the BE 1 III. Exercises: Woring out average scattering
Διαβάστε περισσότεραON INTUITIONISTIC PRODUCT FUZZY GRAPHS
ITALIAN JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS N. 38 2017 (113-126) 113 ON INTUITIONISTIC PRODUCT FUZZY GRAPHS Talal AL-Hawary Mathematics Department Yarmouk University Irbid, Jordan talalhawary@yahoo.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic
Lecture 2 Soundness and completeness of propositional logic February 9, 2004 1 Overview Review of natural deduction. Soundness and completeness. Semantics of propositional formulas. Soundness proof. Completeness
Διαβάστε περισσότεραON NEGATIVE MOMENTS OF CERTAIN DISCRETE DISTRIBUTIONS
Pa J Statist 2009 Vol 25(2), 135-140 ON NEGTIVE MOMENTS OF CERTIN DISCRETE DISTRIBUTIONS Masood nwar 1 and Munir hmad 2 1 Department of Maematics, COMSTS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραQuadratic Expressions
Quadratic Expressions. The standard form of a quadratic equation is ax + bx + c = 0 where a, b, c R and a 0. The roots of ax + bx + c = 0 are b ± b a 4ac. 3. For the equation ax +bx+c = 0, sum of the roots
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSolution Series 9. i=1 x i and i=1 x i.
Lecturer: Prof. Dr. Mete SONER Coordinator: Yilin WANG Solution Series 9 Q1. Let α, β >, the p.d.f. of a beta distribution with parameters α and β is { Γ(α+β) Γ(α)Γ(β) f(x α, β) xα 1 (1 x) β 1 for < x
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II
Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II October 18, 2012 1 Review First let us recall the situation. Let g be a simple algebra, with maximal toral subalgebra h (which we are calling a CSA, or Cartan Subalgebra).
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe k-bessel Function of the First Kind
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 7, 01, no. 38, 1859-186 The k-bessel Function of the First Kin Luis Guillermo Romero, Gustavo Abel Dorrego an Ruben Alejanro Cerutti Faculty of Exact Sciences National
Διαβάστε περισσότερα