On Lie Reduction of the MHD Equations to Ordinary Differential Equations

Σχετικά έγγραφα
D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

Exercises 10. Find a fundamental matrix of the given system of equations. Also find the fundamental matrix Φ(t) satisfying Φ(0) = I. 1.

Απόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

Example Sheet 3 Solutions

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions

forms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with

DiracDelta. Notations. Primary definition. Specific values. General characteristics. Traditional name. Traditional notation

Reminders: linear functions

Second Order Partial Differential Equations

Homework 3 Solutions

6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.

ω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω

Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3

Space-Time Symmetries

Partial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013

If we restrict the domain of y = sin x to [ π, π ], the restrict function. y = sin x, π 2 x π 2

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

The Negative Neumann Eigenvalues of Second Order Differential Equation with Two Turning Points

If we restrict the domain of y = sin x to [ π 2, π 2

Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)

On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume

Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations

Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2

DESIGN OF MACHINERY SOLUTION MANUAL h in h 4 0.

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

The Simply Typed Lambda Calculus

Matrices and Determinants

SPECIAL FUNCTIONS and POLYNOMIALS

Math221: HW# 1 solutions

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)

Srednicki Chapter 55

g-selberg integrals MV Conjecture An A 2 Selberg integral Summary Long Live the King Ole Warnaar Department of Mathematics Long Live the King

EE512: Error Control Coding

Second Order RLC Filters

Fourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics

1 String with massive end-points

PARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities

Appendix to On the stability of a compressible axisymmetric rotating flow in a pipe. By Z. Rusak & J. H. Lee

derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates

Problem Set 9 Solutions. θ + 1. θ 2 + cotθ ( ) sinθ e iφ is an eigenfunction of the ˆ L 2 operator. / θ 2. φ 2. sin 2 θ φ 2. ( ) = e iφ. = e iφ cosθ.

2 Composition. Invertible Mappings

Strain gauge and rosettes

Trigonometric Formula Sheet

L p approach to free boundary problems of the Navier-Stokes equation

Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations

Spherical Coordinates

CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS

Numerical Analysis FMN011

Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude

Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016

ExpIntegralE. Notations. Primary definition. Specific values. Traditional name. Traditional notation. Mathematica StandardForm notation

Notations. Primary definition. Specific values. General characteristics. Traditional name. Traditional notation. Mathematica StandardForm notation

Equations. BSU Math 275 sec 002,003 Fall 2018 (Ultman) Final Exam Notes 1. du dv. FTLI : f (B) f (A) = f dr. F dr = Green s Theorem : y da

CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS

SOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM

Global nonlinear stability of steady solutions of the 3-D incompressible Euler equations with helical symmetry and with no swirl

Practice Exam 2. Conceptual Questions. 1. State a Basic identity and then verify it. (a) Identity: Solution: One identity is csc(θ) = 1

ES440/ES911: CFD. Chapter 5. Solution of Linear Equation Systems

Lecture 26: Circular domains

Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013

Tutorial problem set 6,

The kinetic and potential energies as T = 1 2. (m i η2 i k(η i+1 η i ) 2 ). (3) The Hooke s law F = Y ξ, (6) with a discrete analog

Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees

ECE 308 SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS FALL 2017 Answers to selected problems on prior years examinations

Solutions to Exercise Sheet 5

( )( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) β = Chapter 5 Exercise Problems EX α So 49 β 199 EX EX EX5.4 EX5.5. (a)

On the Galois Group of Linear Difference-Differential Equations

C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions

Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests

Tridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008

Finite Field Problems: Solutions

Differential equations

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set

High order interpolation function for surface contact problem

Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II

Paper Reference. Paper Reference(s) 6665/01 Edexcel GCE Core Mathematics C3 Advanced. Thursday 11 June 2009 Morning Time: 1 hour 30 minutes

3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β

Derivation of Optical-Bloch Equations

5. Choice under Uncertainty

ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?

DERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION FOR AN APPLIED FORCE Revision C

HOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:

arxiv: v1 [math.ra] 19 Dec 2017

SCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018

Geodesic Equations for the Wormhole Metric

Trigonometry 1.TRIGONOMETRIC RATIOS

Vol. 37 ( 2017 ) No. 3. J. of Math. (PRC) : A : (2017) k=1. ,, f. f + u = f φ, x 1. x n : ( ).

Section 8.2 Graphs of Polar Equations

Mock Exam 7. 1 Hong Kong Educational Publishing Company. Section A 1. Reference: HKDSE Math M Q2 (a) (1 + kx) n 1M + 1A = (1) =

SOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM

MATHEMATICS. 1. If A and B are square matrices of order 3 such that A = -1, B =3, then 3AB = 1) -9 2) -27 3) -81 4) 81

A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation

6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes

( ) 2 and compare to M.

Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor

Section 9.2 Polar Equations and Graphs

k A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +

Quadratic Expressions

Transcript:

Symmetry in Nonlinear Mathematical Physics 1997, V.1, 227 231. On Lie Reduction of the MHD Equations to Ordinary Differential Equations Victor POPOVYCH Institute of Mathematics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 3 Tereshchenkivs ka Str., Kyiv 4, Ukraine Abstract The MHD equations describing flows of a viscous homogeneous incompressible fluid of finite electrical conductivity are reduced to ordinary differential equations by means of Lie symmetries. The MHD equations (the MHDEs) describing flows of a viscous homogeneous incompressible fluid of finite electrical conductivity have the following form: u t +( u ) u u + p + H rot H = 0, H t rot ( u H) ν m H = 0, div u =0, div H =0. (1) System (1) is very complicated and the construction of new exact solutions is a difficult problem. Following [1], in this paper we reduce the MHDEs (1) to ordinary differential equations by means of three-dimensional subalgebras of the maximal Lie invariance algebra of the MHDEs. In (1) and below, u = {u a (t, x)} denotes the velocity field of a fluid, p = p(t, x) denotes the pressure, H = {H a (t, x)} denotes the magnetic intensity, ν m is the coefficient of magnetic viscosity, x = {x a }, t = / t, a = / x a, = { a }, = is the Laplacian. The kinematic coefficient of viscosity and fluid density are set equal to unity, permeability is done (4π) 1. Subscript of a function denotes differentiation with respect to the corresponding variables. The maximal Lie invariance algebra of the MHDEs (1) is an infinite-dimensional algebra A(MHD) with the basis elements (see [2]) t, D = t t + 1 2 x a a 1 2 ua u a 1 2 Ha H a p p, J ab = x a b x b a + u a u b u b u a + H a H b H b H a,a<b, R( m) =R( m(t)) = m a a + m a t u a m a ttx a p, Z(η) =Z(η(t)) = η p, (2) where m a = m a (t) andη = η(t) are arbitrary smooth functions of t (for example, from C ((t 0,t 1 ), R) ). We sum over repeated indices. The indices a, b take values in {1, 2, 3} and the indices i, j in {1, 2}. The algebra A(MHD) is isomorphic to the maximal Lie invariance algebra A(NS) of the Navier-Stokes equations [3, 4, 5]. Besides continuous transformations generated by operators (2), the MHDEs admit discrete transformations I b of the form t = t, x b = x b, x a = x a, p = p, ũ b = u b, Hb = H b, ũ a = u a, Ha = H a,a b, where b is fixed.

228 V. Popovych We construct a complete set of A(MHD)-inequivalent three-dimensional subalgebras of A(MHD) and choose those algebras from this set which can be used to construct ansatzes for the MHD field. The list of the classes of these algebras is given below. 1. A 3 1 = D, t,j 12. 2. A 3 2 = D + 1 2 κj 12, t,r(0, 0, 1), where κ 0. Here and below, κ, σ ij, ε i, µ, andν are real constants. 3. A 3 3 = D, J 12 + R(0, 0,ν t 1/2 ln t )+Z(νε 2 t 1 ln t + ε 1 t 1 ), R(0, 0, t σ+1/2 )+Z(ε 2 t σ 1 ), where σν =0, σε 2 =0, ε 1 0, and ν 0. 4. A 3 4 = t,j 12 + R(0, 0,νt)+Z(νε 2 t + ε 1 ),R(0, 0,e σt )+Z(ε 2 e σt ), where σν =0, σε 2 =0, σ { 1; 0; 1}, and, if σ =0, the constants ν, ε 1,andε 2 satisfy one of the following conditions: ν =1,ε 1 0; ν =0,ε 1 =1,ε 2 0; ν = ε 1 =0,ε 2 {0; 1}. 5. A 3 5 = D + κj 12, R( t 1/2 f ij (t)â(t) e j)+z( t 1 f ij (t)ε j ),i=1, 2, 6. A 3 6 = t + κj 12,R(f ij (t)ǎ(t) e j)+z(f ij (t)ε j ),i=1, 2, Here, (f 1j (t),f 2j (t)),j =1, 2, are solutions of the Cauchy problems fτ ij = σ ik f kj, f ij (0) = δ ij, where τ =ln t in the case of the algebra A 3 5 and τ = t in the case of the algebra A3 6. e i = const : e i e j = δ ij,δ ij is the Kronecker delta, σ ii (σ 12 σ 21 2κK e 1 e 2 )=0, ε i (σ ik σ kj e j 2κσ ij K e j )= 0, σ 12 + σ 21 =0. cos ζ sin ζ 0 0 1 0 Â(t) =A(κ ln t ), A(ζ) = sin ζ cos ζ 0, K = 1 0 0, Ǎ(t) =A(κt). 0 0 1 0 0 0 κε l K e k e l =0ifσ kj =0andε k (2κK e k e l σ kl )=0ifσ kj = σ ll =0, where k and l take fixed values from {1; 2}, k l. To simplify parameters in A 3 5 and A3 6, one can also use the adjoint actions generated by I b,d,j 12, and, if κ =0,J 23 and J 31. 7. A 3 7 = J 12 + R(0, 0,η 3 ),R(η 1,η 2, 0), R( η 2,η 1, 0), where η a are smooth functions of t, η i η i 0,η 3 0,ηttη 1 2 η 1 ηtt 2 = 0. The algebras A 3 7 (η1,η 2,η 3 ) and A 3 7 ( η1, η 2, η 3 ) are equivalent if E i R\{0}, δ R, (b ij ) O(2): η i ( t) =E 2 b ij η i (t), η 3 ( t) =E 1 η 3 (t), where t = E1 t 2 + δ. 8. A 3 8 = R( ma ),a= 1, 3, where m a are smooth functions of t, rank ( m 1, m 2, m 3 )=3, m a tt m b m a m b tt =0. The algebras A 3 8 ( m1, m 2, m 3 ) and A 3 8 ( m 1, m 2, m 3 ) are equivalent if E 1 R\{0}, δ R, B O(3), and (d ab ) : det(d ab ) 0 such that m a ( t) =d ab B m b (t), where t = E 2 1 t + δ.

On Lie Reduction of the MHD Equations to Ordinary Differential Equations 229 The way of obtaining (and the form of writing down) the algebras A 3 1 A3 8 differs slightly from the one used in [1]. By means of subalgebras A 3 1 A3 8, one can construct the following ansatzes that reduce the MHDEs to ODEs: 1. u 1 = x 1 R 2 ϕ 1 x 2 (Rr) 1 ϕ 2 + x 1 x 3 r 1 R 2 ϕ 3, u 2 = x 2 R 2 ϕ 1 + x 1 (Rr) 1 ϕ 2 + x 2 x 3 r 1 R 2 ϕ 3, u 3 = x 3 R 2 ϕ 1 rr 2 ϕ 3, p = R 2 h, where ω = arctan r/x 3, the expressions for H a are obtained by means of the substitution of ψ a for ϕ a in the expressions for u a. Here and below, ϕ a = ϕ a (ω), ψ a = ψ a (ω), h = h(ω), R = (x 2 1 + x2 2 + x2 3 )1/2, r =(x 2 1 + x2 2 )1/2. The numeration of ansatzes and reduced systems corresponds to that of the algebras above. All the parameters satisfy the equations given for these algebras. 2. u 1 = r 2 (x 1 ϕ 1 x 2 ϕ 2 ), u 2 = r 2 (x 2 ϕ 1 + x 1 ϕ 2 ), u 3 = r 1 ϕ 3, p = r 2 h, where ω = arctan x 2 /x 1 κ ln r, the expressions for H a are obtained by means of substituting ψ a for ϕ a in the expressions for u a. 3. u 1 = r 2 (x 1 ϕ 1 x 2 ϕ 2 )+ 1 2 x 1t 1, u 2 = r 2 (x 2 ϕ 1 + x 1 ϕ 2 )+ 1 2 x 2t 1, u 3 = t 1/2 ϕ 3 +(σ + 1 2 )x 3t 1 + ν t 1/2 t 1 arctan x 2 /x 1, H 1 = r 2 (x 1 ψ 1 x 2 ψ 2 ), H 2 = r 2 (x 2 ψ 1 + x 1 ψ 2 ), H 3 = t 1/2 ψ 3, p = t 1 h + 1 8 x ax a t 2 1 2 σ2 x 2 3 t 2 + ε 1 t 1 arctan x 2 /x 1 + ε 2 x 3 t 3/2, where ω = t 1/2 r. 4. u 1 = r 2 (x 1 ϕ 1 x 2 ϕ 2 ), u 2 = r 2 (x 2 ϕ 1 + x 1 ϕ 2 ), u 3 = ϕ 3 + σx 3 + ν arctan x 2 /x 1, H 1 = r 2 (x 1 ψ 1 x 2 ψ 2 ), H 2 = r 2 (x 2 ψ 1 + x 1 ψ 2 ), H 3 = ψ 3, p = h 1 2 σ2 x 2 3 + ε 1 arctan x 2 /x 1 + ε 2 x 3, where ω = r. 5. u = t 1/2 t 1 Â(t) v + 1 2 xt 1 κk xt 1, H = t 1/2 t 1 Â(t) G, p = t 1 q + 1 8 x ax a t 2 + 1 2 κ2 x i x i t 2, (3) where y = t 1/2 Â(t) T x. 6. u = Ǎ(t) v κk x, H = Ǎ(t) G, p = q + 1 2 κ2 x i x i, (4) where y = Ǎ(t)T x.

230 V. Popovych In (3) and (4) v, G, q, and ω are defined by means of the following formulas: v = ϕ(ω)+σ ij ( e i y) e j, G = ψ(ω), q = h(ω)+ε i ( e i y) 1 2 ( d i y)( e i y) 1 2 ( d i e 3 )ω( e i y), where ω =( e 3 y), e 3 = e 1 e 2, d i = σ ik σ kj e j 2κσ ij K e j. 7. u 1 = ϕ 1 cos z ϕ 2 sin z + x 1 θ 1 + x 2 θ 2, u 2 = ϕ 1 sin z + ϕ 2 cos z x 1 θ 2 + x 2 θ 1, u 3 = ϕ 3 + ηt 3 (η 3 ) 1 x 3, H 1 = ψ 1 cos z ψ 2 sin z, H 2 = ψ 1 sin z + ψ 2 cos z, H 3 = ψ 3, p = h 1 2 η3 tt(η 3 ) 1 x 2 3 1 2 ηj tt ηj (η i η i ) 1 r 2, where ω = t, θ 1 = η i tη i (η j η j ) 1,θ 2 =(η 1 t η 2 η 1 η 2 t )(η j η j ) 1,z= x 3 /η 3. 8. u = ϕ + λ 1 ( n a x) m a t, H = ψ, p = h λ 1 ( m a tt x)( n a x)+ 1 2 λ 2 ( m b tt m a )( n a x)( n b x), where ω = t, m a tt m b m a m b tt =0,λ= m 1 m 2 m 3 0, n 1 = m 2 m 3, n 2 = m 3 m 1, n 3 = m 1 m 2. Substituting the ansatzes 1 8 into the MHDEs, we obtain the following systems of ODE in the functions ϕ a,ψ a, and h: 1. ϕ 3 ϕ 1 ω ψ 3 ψω 1 ϕ 1 ωω ϕ 1 ω cot ω ϕ a ϕ a 2h =0, ϕ 3 ϕ 2 ω ψ 3 ψω 2 ϕ 2 ωω ϕ 2 ω cot ω + ϕ 2 sin 2 ω +(ϕ 3 ϕ 2 ψ 3 ψ 2 )cotω =0, ϕ 3 ϕ 3 ω ψ 3 ψω 3 ϕ 3 ωω ϕ 3 ω cot ω + ϕ 3 sin 2 ω 2ϕ 1 ω + h ω + ψωψ a a ((ϕ 2 ) 2 (ψ 2 ) 2 )cotω =0, ϕ 3 ψω 1 ψ 3 ϕ 1 ω ν m (ψωω 1 + ψω 1 cot ω) =0, ϕ 3 ψω 2 ψ 3 ϕ 2 ω ν m (ψωω 2 + ψω 2 cot ω ψ 2 sin 2 ω)+2(ψ 1 ϕ 2 ψ 2 ϕ 1 )+ (ψ 3 ϕ 2 ψ 2 ϕ 3 )cotω =0, ϕ 3 ψω 3 ψ 3 ϕ 3 ω ν m (ψωω 3 + ψω 3 cot ω ψ 3 sin 2 ω +2ψω)+2(ψ 1 1 ϕ 3 ψ 3 ϕ 1 )=0, ϕ 3 ω + ϕ 3 cot ω + ϕ 1 =0, ψω 3 + ψ 3 cot ω + ψ 1 =0. 2. ϕ 2 ϕ 1 ω ψ 2 ψω 1 νϕ 1 ωω ϕ i ϕ i + ψ i ψ i 2 h κ h ω =0, ϕ 2 ϕ 2 ω ψ 2 ψω 2 νϕ 2 ωω 2(ϕ 1 ω + κϕ 2 ω)+ h ω =0, ϕ 2 ϕ 3 ω ψ 2 ψω 3 νϕ 3 ωω ϕ 1 ϕ 3 + ψ 1 ψ 3 2κϕ 3 ω ϕ 3 =0, ϕ 2 ψω 1 ψ 2 ϕ 1 ω νψωω 1 =0, ϕ 2 ψω 2 ψ 2 ϕ 2 ω νψωω 2 +2(ψ 1 ϕ 2 ψ 2 ϕ 1 ) 2ν m (ψω 1 + κψω)=0, 2 ϕ 2 ψω 3 ψ 2 ϕ 3 ω νψωω 3 + ψ 1 ϕ 3 ψ 3 ϕ 1 ν m (2κψω 3 + ψ 3 )=0, ϕ 2 ω =0, ψ2 ω =0,

On Lie Reduction of the MHD Equations to Ordinary Differential Equations 231 where ϕ 2 = ϕ 2 κϕ 1, ψ 2 = ψ 2 κψ 1, h = h + 1 2 ψa ψ a,ν=1+κ 2, ν = ν m (1 + κ 2 ). 3-4. ω 1 (ϕ 1 ϕ 1 w ψ 1 ψω) 1 ϕ 1 ωω + ω 1 ϕ 1 ω ω 2 (ϕ i ϕ i ψ i ψ i )+ ω(h + 1 2 ω 2 ψ i ψ i + 1 2 (ψ3 ) 2 ) ω =0, ω 1 (ϕ 1 ϕ 2 w ψ 1 ψω) 2 ϕ 2 ωω + ω 1 ϕ 2 ω + ε 1 =0, ω 1 (ϕ 1 ϕ 3 w ψ 1 ψω) 3 ϕ 3 ωω ω 1 ϕ 3 ω + νεω 2 ϕ 2 + εσϕ 3 + ε 2 =0, ω 1 (ϕ 1 ψw 1 ψ 1 ϕ 1 ω) ν m (ψωω 1 ω 1 ψω) 1 εδψ 1 =0, ω 1 (ϕ 1 ψw 2 ψ 1 ϕ 2 ω) ν m (ψωω 2 ω 1 ψω)+2ω 2 2 (ψ 1 ϕ 2 ψ 2 ϕ 1 ) εδψ 2 =0, ω 1 (ϕ 1 ψw 3 ψ 1 ϕ 3 ω) ν m (ψωω 3 + ω 1 ψω) 3 νεω 2 ψ 2 (σ + δ)εψ 3 =0, ϕ 1 ω +(σ + 3 2 δ)εω =0, ψ1 ω =0, where ε =signt and δ = 1 in case 3 and ε =1andδ = 0 in case 4. 5-6. ϕ 3 ϕ ω ψ 3 ψω + σ ij ϕ i e j 2κK ϕ ε ϕ ωω +(h ω + ψ ψ ω ) e 3 + ε i e i +2κωσ ij (K e j e 3 ) e i = 0, ϕ 3 ψω ψ 3 ϕ ω σ ij ψ i e j ν m ε ϕ ωω δψ = 0, ϕ 3 ω + σ ii + 3 2 δ =0, ψ3 ω =0, where ϕ a = e a ϕ, ψ a = e a ψ; ε =signt and δ = 1 in case 5 and ε =1andδ = 0 in case 6. 7. ϕ 1 ω + ϕ 1 (θ 1 +(η 3 ) 2 )+ϕ 2 (θ 2 (η 3 ) 1 ϕ 3 )+ψ 3 (η 3 ) 1 ψ 2 =0, ϕ 2 ω ϕ 1 (θ 2 (η 3 ) 1 ϕ 3 )+ϕ 2 (θ 1 +(η 3 ) 2 ) ψ 3 (η 3 ) 1 ψ 1 =0, ϕ 3 ω + ηw(η 3 3 ) 1 ϕ 3 =0, ψω 1 + ψ 1 ( θ 1 + ν m (η 3 ) 2 ) ψ 2 (θ 2 +(η 3 ) 1 ϕ 3 )+ψ 3 (η 3 ) 1 ϕ 2 =0, ψω 2 + ψ 1 (θ 2 +(η 3 ) 1 ϕ 3 )+ψ 2 ( θ 1 + ν m (η 3 ) 2 ) ψ 3 (η 3 ) 1 ϕ 1 =0, ψw 3 ψ 3 ηw(η 3 3 ) 1 =0, 2θ 1 + ηw(η 3 3 ) 1 =0. 8. ϕ ω + λ 1 ( n a ϕ) m a ω = 0, ψω λ 1 ( n a ψ) m a ω = 0, n a m a ω =0. References [1] Fushchych W.I. and Popowych R.O., Symmetry reduction and exact solution of the Navier-Stokes equations, J. Nonlin. Math. Phys., 1994, V.1, N1, 75 113; N2, 158 188. [2] Nucci M.C., Group analysis for MHD equations, in: Atti Sem. Mat. Fis. Univ. Modena, 1984, V. XXXIII, 21 34. [3] Danilov Yu.A., Group properties of the Maxwell and Navier-Stokes equations, Preprint, Acad. Sci. USSR, Kurchatov In-t of Atomic Energy, Moscow, 1967. [4] Bytev V.O., Group properties of the Navier-Stokes equations, in: Chislennye metody mekhaniki sploshnoy sredy, V.3, 13 17, Comp. Center, Siberian Dep. Acad. Sci. USSR, Novosibirsk, 1972. [5] Lloyd S.P., The infinitesimal group of the Navier-Stokes equations, Acta Mech., 1981, V.38, N1 2, 85 98.