Galois and Residuated Connections on Sets and Power Sets



Σχετικά έγγραφα
The Properties of Fuzzy Relations

Homomorphism in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Automata

Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets

Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit

A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation

2 Composition. Invertible Mappings

SCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018

THE SECOND ISOMORPHISM THEOREM ON ORDERED SET UNDER ANTIORDERS. Daniel A. Romano

Homomorphism of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Groups

Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs

MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings

Fuzzifying Tritopological Spaces

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set

Homomorphism and Cartesian Product on Fuzzy Translation and Fuzzy Multiplication of PS-algebras

Chapter 3: Ordinal Numbers

Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2

Some new generalized topologies via hereditary classes. Key Words:hereditary generalized topological space, A κ(h,µ)-sets, κµ -topology.

Reminders: linear functions

ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II

EE512: Error Control Coding

k A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +

Intuitionistic Supra Gradation of Openness

C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions

1. Introduction and Preliminaries.

Homework 8 Model Solution Section

SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS

A summation formula ramified with hypergeometric function and involving recurrence relation

Quick algorithm f or computing core attribute

Generating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations

F A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I

5. Choice under Uncertainty

Cyclic or elementary abelian Covers of K 4

A Note on Characterization of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals in Γ- Near-Rings

Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests

SOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests

SOME INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY MODAL OPERATORS OVER INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY IDEALS AND GROUPS

Operation Approaches on α-γ-open Sets in Topological Spaces

Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.

2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)

F19MC2 Solutions 9 Complex Analysis

SOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM

Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in

Example Sheet 3 Solutions

CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS

On the Galois Group of Linear Difference-Differential Equations

Solutions to Exercise Sheet 5

Lecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic

DIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANSFORMATION SEMIGROUPS

Second Order Partial Differential Equations

GÖKHAN ÇUVALCIOĞLU, KRASSIMIR T. ATANASSOV, AND SINEM TARSUSLU(YILMAZ)

The k-α-exponential Function

A Lambda Model Characterizing Computational Behaviours of Terms

A Bonus-Malus System as a Markov Set-Chain. Małgorzata Niemiec Warsaw School of Economics Institute of Econometrics

Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations

Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor

Solution Series 9. i=1 x i and i=1 x i.

Tridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008

Coefficient Inequalities for a New Subclass of K-uniformly Convex Functions

Affine Weyl Groups. Gabriele Nebe. Summerschool GRK 1632, September Lehrstuhl D für Mathematik

Takeaki Yamazaki (Toyo Univ.) 山崎丈明 ( 東洋大学 ) Oct. 24, RIMS

2. THEORY OF EQUATIONS. PREVIOUS EAMCET Bits.

Main source: "Discrete-time systems and computer control" by Α. ΣΚΟΔΡΑΣ ΨΗΦΙΑΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΔΙΑΛΕΞΗ 4 ΔΙΑΦΑΝΕΙΑ 1

On Intuitionistic Fuzzy LI -ideals in Lattice Implication Algebras

ΠΤΥΧΙΑΚΗ ΕΡΓΑΣΙΑ ΒΑΛΕΝΤΙΝΑ ΠΑΠΑΔΟΠΟΥΛΟΥ Α.Μ.: 09/061. Υπεύθυνος Καθηγητής: Σάββας Μακρίδης

Iterated trilinear fourier integrals with arbitrary symbols

Matrices and Determinants

ACTA MATHEMATICAE APPLICATAE SINICA Nov., ( µ ) ( (

Sequent Calculi for the Modal µ-calculus over S5. Luca Alberucci, University of Berne. Logic Colloquium Berne, July 4th 2008

Chap. 6 Pushdown Automata

Fourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics

Strain gauge and rosettes

Homework 3 Solutions

On the k-bessel Functions

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER

Finite Field Problems: Solutions

ON FUZZY BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES IN ŠOSTAK S SENSE (II)

Trigonometry 1.TRIGONOMETRIC RATIOS

The operators over the generalized intuitionistic fuzzy sets

Covariance and Pseudo-Covariance of Complex Uncertain Variables

D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation

ω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω

ON NEGATIVE MOMENTS OF CERTAIN DISCRETE DISTRIBUTIONS

Subclass of Univalent Functions with Negative Coefficients and Starlike with Respect to Symmetric and Conjugate Points

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions

The k-bessel Function of the First Kind

Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013

dim(u) = n 1 and {v j } j i

The challenges of non-stable predicates

SPECIAL FUNCTIONS and POLYNOMIALS

Overview. Transition Semantics. Configurations and the transition relation. Executions and computation

Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3

Section 8.2 Graphs of Polar Equations

TMA4115 Matematikk 3

Practice Exam 2. Conceptual Questions. 1. State a Basic identity and then verify it. (a) Identity: Solution: One identity is csc(θ) = 1

ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΠΕΙΡΑΙΩΣ ΤΜΗΜΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ ΠΜΣ «ΠΡΟΗΓΜΕΝΑ ΣΥΣΤΗΜΑΤΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ» ΚΑΤΕΥΘΥΝΣΗ «ΕΥΦΥΕΙΣ ΤΕΧΝΟΛΟΓΙΕΣ ΕΠΙΚΟΙΝΩΝΙΑΣ ΑΝΘΡΩΠΟΥ - ΥΠΟΛΟΓΙΣΤΗ»

Jordan Form of a Square Matrix

Transcript:

Galois and Residuated Connections on Sets and Power Sets Yong Chan Kim 1 and Jung Mi Ko 2 Department of Mathematics, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, 201-702, Korea Abstract We investigate the relations between various connections on set and those on power set. Moreover, we give their examples. Key Words: Galois, dual Galois, residuated and dual residuated connections 1. Introduction and Preliminaries An information consists of X, Y, R where X is a set of objects, Y is a set of attributes and R is a relation between X and Y. Wille [11] introduced the formal concept lattices by allowing some uncertainty in data as examples as Galois, dual Galois, residuated and dual residuated connections. Formal concept analysis is an important mathematical tool for data analysis and knowledge processing [1-5,8,9,11]. In this paper, we show that Galois, dual Galois, residuated and dual residuated connections on set induce various connections on power sets. In particular, we give their examples. Let X be a set. A relation e X X X is called a partially order set simply, posetif it is reflexive, transitive and anti-symmetric. We can define a poset e P X P X P X as A, B e P X iff A B for A, B P X. If X, e X is a poset and we define a function x, y e 1 X iff y, x e X, then X, e 1 X is a poset. Definition 1.1. [10] Let X, e X and Y,e Y be posets and f : X Y and g : Y X maps. 1 e X,f,g,e Y is called a Galois connection if for all x X, y Y, y, fx e Y iff x, gy e X. 2e X,f,g,e Y is called a dual Galois connection if for all x X, y Y, fx,y e Y iff gy,x e Y. 3 e X,f,g,e Y is called a residuated connection if for all x X, y Y, fx,y e Y iff x, gy e Y. 4 e X,f,g,e Y is called a dual residuated connection if for all x X, y Y, y, fx e Y iff gy,x e Y. 5 f is an isotone map if fx 1,fx 2 e Y for all x 1,x 2 e X. 6 f is an antitone map if fx 2,fx 1 e Y for all x 1,x 2 e X. Theorem 1.2. [10] Let X, e X and Y,e Y be a poset and f : X Y and g : Y X maps. 1 e X,f,g,e Y is a Galois connection if f,g are antitone maps and y, fgy e Y and x, gfx e X. Manuscript received Nov. 14, 2010; revised May. 27, 2011. 2 e X,f,g,e Y is a dual Galois connection if f,g are antitone maps and fgy,y e Y and gfx,x e X. 3 e X,f,g,e Y is a residuated connection if f,g are isotone maps and fgy,y e Y and x, gfx e X. 4 e X,f,g,e Y is called a dual residuated connection if f,g are isotone maps and y, fgy e Y and gfx,x e X. Theorem 1.3. [9] 1 e P X,F,G,e P Y is a Galois connection iff F i Γ A i= i Γ F A i. 2 e P X,F,G,e P Y is a residuated connection iff F i Γ A i= i Γ F A i. 3 e P X,F,G,e P Y is a dual Galois connection iff F i Γ A i= i Γ F A i. 4 e P X,F,G,e P Y is a dual residuated connection iff F i Γ A i= i Γ F A i. 2. Galois and Residuated Connections on Sets and Power Sets Theorem 2.1. Let X, e X and Y,e Y be a poset and f : X Y and g : Y X maps. For each A P X and B P Y, we define operations as follows: F 1 A ={y Y x Xx A fx,y e Y }, F 2 A ={y Y x Xx A y, fx e Y }, G 1 B ={x X y Y y B x, gy e X }, G 2 B ={x X y Y y B gy,x e X }, H 1 B ={x X y Y y B &x, gy e X }, H 2 B ={x X y Y y B &gy,x e X }, I 1 A ={y Y x Xx A &y, fx e Y }, I 2 A ={y Y x Xx A &fx,y e Y },

J 1 B ={x X y Y x, gy e X y B}, J 2 B ={x X y Y gy,x e X y B}, K 1 A ={y Y x Xfx,y e Y x A}, K 2 A ={y Y x Xy, fx e Y x A}, L 1 B ={x X y Y y B c &x, gy e X }, L 2 B ={x X y Y y B c &gy,x e X }, M 1 A ={y Y x Xx A c &y, fx e Y }, M 2 A ={y Y x Xx A c &fx,y e Y }, Then the following statements hold: 1 F 1 {x} =I 2 {x} =M 2 {x} c =e Y fx, F 2 {x} = I 1 {x} = M 1 {x} c = e Y 1 fx, K 2 {x} c =e Y 1 fx c, K 1 {x} c =e Y c fx. 2 G 1 {y} = H 1 {y} = L 1 {y} c = e X 1 gy, G 2 {y} = H 2 {y} = L 2 {y} c = e X gy. J 1 {y} c =e X 1 gy c, J 2 {y} c =e X c gy. 3 e X,f,g,e Y is a Galois connection iff e P X,F 2,G 1,e P Y is a Galois connection iff e P X,K 2,H 1,e P Y is a dual residuated connection iff e P X,M 1,L 1,e P Y is a dual Galois connection iff e P X,I 1,J 1,e P Y is a residuated connection. 4 e X,f,g,e Y is a residuated connection iff e P X,F 1,G 1,e P Y is a Galois connection iff e P X,K 1,H 1,e P Y is a dual residuated connection iff e P X,M 2,L 1,e P Y is a dual Galois connection iff e P X,I 2,J 1,e P Y is a residuated connection. 5 e X,f,g,e Y is a dual Galois connection iff e P X,F 1,G 2,e P Y is a Galois connection iff e P X,K 1,H 2,e P Y is a dual residuated connection iff e P X,M 2,L 2,e P Y is a dual Galois connection iff e P X,I 2,J 2,e P Y is a residuated connection. 6 e X,f,g,e Y is a dual residuated connection iff e P X,F 2,G 2,e P Y is a Galois connection iff e P X,K 2,H 2,e P Y is a dual residuated connection iff e P X,M 1,L 2,e P Y is a dual Galois connection iff e P X,I 1,J 2,e P Y is a residuated connection. 7 If f i Γ x i = i Γ fx i for x i X, there exists a function g : Y X such that e X,f,g,e Y is a Galois connection. Moreover, e P X,F 2,G 1,e P Y is a Galois connection, e P X,K 2,H 1,e P Y is a dual residuated connection, e P X,M 1,L 1,e P Y is a dual Galois connection and e P X,I 1,J 1,e P Y is a residuated connection. 8 If f i Γ x i = i Γ fx i for x i X, there exists a function g : Y X such that a residuated connection. Moreover, e P X,F 1,G 1,e P Y is a Galois connection, e P X,K 1,H 1,e P Y is a dual residuated connection, e P X,M 2,L 1,e P Y is a dual Galois connection and e P X,I 2,J 1,e P Y is a residuated connection. 9 If f i Γ x i = i Γ fx i for x i X, there exists a function g : Y X such that e X,f,g,e Y is a dual Galois connection. Moreover, e P X,F 1,G 2,e P Y is a Galois connection, e P X,K 1,H 2,e P Y is a dual residuated connection, e P X,M 2,L 2,e P Y is a dual Galois connection and e P X,I 2,J 2,e P Y is a residuated connection. 10 If f i Γ x i = i Γ fx i for x i X, there exists a function g : Y X such that e X,f,g,e Y is a dual residuated connection. Moreover, e P X,F 2,G 2,e P Y is a Galois connection and e P X,K 2,H 2,e P Y is a dual residuated connection, e P X,M 1,L 2,e P Y is a dual Galois connection and e P X,I 1,J 2,e P Y is a residuated connection. Proof. 1 y F 1 {x} iff z Xz {x} fz,y e Y iff fx,y e Y. Similarly, F 2 {x} = e Y 1 fx. We K 1{x} c = e Y c fx from: y K 1 {x} c iff z Xfz,y e Y z {x} c iff z Xz {x} fz,y e Y iff fx,y e Y. Similarly, K 2 {x} c =e Y 1 fx c. Other cases and 2 are similarly proved as in 1. 3 First, if x, gy e X iff y, fx e Y, then A, G 1 B e P X iff B,F 2 A e P Y. B,F 2 A e P Y iff y Y y B y F 2 A iff y Y y B x Xx A y, fx e Y iff y Y x X x A y B x, gy e X iff x X x A y Y y B x, gy e X iff x X x A x G 1 B iff A, G 1 B e P X. Conversely, put A = {x} and B = {y}. Since F 2 {x} =e Y 1 fx and G 1{y} =e X 1 gy from 1 and 2, we y, fx e Y iff {y},f 2 {x} e P Y iff {x},g 1 {y} e P X iff x, gy e X. Second, if x, gy e X iff y, fx e Y, then H 1 B,A e P X iff B,K 2 A e P Y.

I 1 A,B e P Y iff A, J 1 B e P X. H 1 B,A e P X iff x Xx H 1 B x A iff x X y Y x, gy e X & y B x A iff x X y Y y B x, gy e X x A iff y Y y B x Xy, fx e Y x A iff y Y y B y K 2 A iff B,K 2 A e P X. Put A = {x} c and B = {y}. Since K 2 {x} c = e Y 1 fx c and H 1 {y} = e X 1 gy from 1 and 2, we x, gy e X iff H 1 {y}, {x} c e P X iff {y},k 2 {x} c e P Y iff y, fx e Y. Third, if x, gy e X iff y, fx e Y, then L 1 B,A e P X iff M 1 A,B e P Y. M 1 A,B e P Y iff y Y y M 1 A y B iff y Y z Xz A c &y, fz e Y y B iff y Y z Xz A c y, fz e Y y B iff z Xz A c y Y y, fz R y B iff z X y Y z,gy e X & y B c z A iff L 1 B,A e P X. Put A = {x} c and B = {y} c. Since M 1 {x} c = e Y 1 fx and L 1{y} c =e X 1 gy from 1 and 2, we I 1 A,B e P Y iff y Y y I 1 A y B iff y Y x Xx A &y, fx e Y y B iff y Y x Xx A y, fx e Y y B iff x Xx A y Y x, gy e X y B iff x Xx A x J 1 B iff A, J 1 B e P X. Put A = {x} and B = {y} c. Since I 1 {x} = e Y 1 fx and J 1{y} c = e X 1 gy c from 1 and 2, we y, fx e Y iff y I 1 {x} c iff I 1 {x}, {y} c e P Y iff {x},j 1 {y} c e P X iff x J 1 {y} c iff x, gy e X. 4 Let x, gy e X iff fx,y e Y be given. Then A, G 1 B e P X iff B,F 1 A e P Y from: B,F 1 A e P Y iff y Y y B y F 1 A iff y Y y B x Xx A fx,y e Y iff y Y x X x A y B x, gy e X iff x X x A y Y y B x, gy e X iff x X x A x G 1 B iff A, G 1 B e P X. Conversely, put A = {x} and B = {y}. Since F 1 {x} = e Y fx and G 1 {y} =e X 1 gy from 1 and 2, we fx,y e Y iff y F 1 {x} y, fx e Y iff y M 1 {x} c c iff M 1 {x} c, {y} c e P Y iff L 1 {y} c, {x} c e P X iff x L 1 {y} c c iff x, gy e X. iff {y},f 1 {x} e P Y iff {x},g 1 {y} e P X iff x G 1 {x} iff x, gy e X. Forth, if x, gy e X iff y, fx e Y, then Second, if x, gy e X iff fx,y e Y, then

H 1 B,A e P X iff B,K 1 A e P Y from: H 1 B,A e P X iff x Xx H 1 B x A iff x X y Y x, gy e X & y B x A iff x X y Y y B x, gy e X x A iff y Y y B x Xfx,y e Y x A iff y Y y B y K 1 A iff B,K 1 A e P Y. Put A = {x} c and B = {y}. Since K 1 {x} c = e Y c fx and H 1{y} =e X 1 gy from 1 and 2, we x, gy e X iff x H 1 {y} iff H 1 {y}, {x} c e P X iff {y},k 1 {x} c e P Y iff y K 1 {x} iff fx,y e Y. Third, if x, gy e X iff fx,y e Y, then L 1 B,A e P X iff M 2 A,B e P Y. M 2 A,B e P Y iff y Y y M 2 A y B iff y Y z Xz A c &fz,y e Y y B iff y Y z Xz A c fz,y e Y y B iff z Xz A c y Y fz,y R y B iff z X y Y z,gy e X & y B c z A iff L 1 B,A e P X. Put A = {x} c and B = {y} c. Since M 2 {x} c = e Y fx and L 1 {y} c =e X 1 gy from 1 and 2, we fx,y e Y iff y M 2 {x} c c iff M 2 {x} c, {y} c e P Y iff L 1 {y} c, {x} c e P X iff x L 1 {y} c c iff x, gy e X. Forth, if x, gy e X iff fx,y e Y, then I 2 A,B e P Y iff A, J 1 B e P X. I 2 A,B e P Y iff y Y y I 2 A y B iff y Y x Xx A &fx,y e Y y B iff y Y x Xx A fx,y e Y y B iff x Xx A y Y x, gy e X y B iff x Xx A x J 1 B iff A, J 1 B e P X. Put A = {x} and B = {y} c. Since I 2 {x} = e Y fx and J 1 {y} c = e X 1 gy c from 1 and 2, we fx,y e Y iff y I 1 {x} c iff I 1 {x}, {y} c e P Y iff {x},j 1 {y} c e P X iff x J 1 {y} c iff x, gy e X. 5 and 6 are similarly proved as in 3 and 4. 7 Define gy = {x y fx}. Ify fx, then x gy. Ifx gy, then fx fgy = f x = fx y. Hence e X,f,g,e Y is a Galois connection. Others follow 3. 8 Define gy = {x fx y}. If fx y, then x gy. If x gy, then fx fgy = f x = fx y. Hence e X,f,g,e Y is a residuated connection. Others follow 4. 9 Define gy = {x fx y}. Iffx y, then gy x. Ifgy x, then fx fgy = f x = fx y. Hence e X,f,g,e Y is a dual Galois connection. Others follow 5. 10 Define gy = {x y fx}. If y fx, then gy x. If gy x, then fx fgy = f x = fx y. Hence e X,f,g,e Y is a dual residuated connection. Others follow 6. Example 2.2. Let X = {a, b, c, d},e X and Y = {x, y, z},e Y be a poset with e X = {a, a, a, b, a, c, a, d, b, b, b, d, c, c, c, d, d, d}. e Y = {x, x, x, y, x, z, y, y, z,y, z,z}. 1 Let f : X Y as fa =x, fb =z,fc = fd =y. Then f i Γ x i = i Γ fx i for x i X. Define gw = {s X fs w}. Then g : Y X as gx =a, gy =d, gz =b. Then e X,f,g,e Y is a residuated connection. By Theorem 2.1 1 and 2, we obtain F 1 = I 2 {a} =M 2 {a} c ={x, y, z} =e Y fa, F 1 = I 2 {b} =M 2 {a} c ={y, z} =e Y fb, F 1 = I 2 {c} =M 2 {a} c ={y} =e Y fc, F 1 = I 2 {d} =M 2 {a} c ={y} =e Y fd. K 1 {a} c = =e Y c fa, K 1 {b} c = {x} =e Y c fb, K 1 {c} c = {x, z} =e Y c fc, K 1 {d} c = {x, z} =e Y c fd.

G 1 = H 1 {x} =L 1 {x} c ={a} =e X 1 gx, G 1 = H 1 {y} =L 1 {y} c =X =e Y 1 gy, G 1 = H 1 {z} =L 1 {z} c ={a, b} =e Y 1 gz. J 1 {x} c ={b, c, d} =e X 1 gx c, J 1 {y} c = =e Y 1 gy c, J 1 {z} c ={c, d} =e Y 1 gz c. We obtain F 1 : P X P Y and G 1 : P Y P X as follows: Y if A {, {a}}, F 1 A = {y, z} if A {{b}, {a, b}}, {y} otherwise, X G 1 B = {a, b} {a} if B {, {y}}, if B {{z}, {y, z}}, otherwise. Then e P X,F 1,G 1,e P Y is a Galois connection. We obtain K 1 : P X P Y and H 1 : P Y P X as follows: K 1 A = H 1 B = Y if A = X, {x} if a A, {a, b} A, {x, z} if {a, b} A X, otherwise, if B =, X if y B, {a, b} if z B,y B, {a} otherwise. Then e P X,K 1,H 1,e P Y is a dual residuated connection. We obtain M 2 : P X P Y and L 1 : P Y P X as follows: if A = X, {y} if A {{a, b}, {a, b, c}, {a, b, d}}, M 2 A = {y, z} if A {{a}, {a, d}, {a, c, d}}, if B = X, {a} if B = {y, z}, L 1 B = {a, b} if B {{y}, {x, y}, X otherwise. Then e P X,M 2,L 1,e P Y is a dual Galois connection. We obtain I 2 : P X P Y and J 1 : P Y P X as follows: if A =, {z} if A {{c}, {d}, {c, d}}, I 2 A = {y, z} if A {{b}, {b, c}, {b, d}, {b, c, d}}, X if B = Y, {b, c, d} if B = {y, z}, J 1 B = {c, d} if B {{y}, {x, y}}, otherwise. Then e P X,I 2,J 1,e P Y is a residuated connection. 2 Let f : X Y as fa =y, fb =z,fc = fd =x. Then f i Γ x i = i Γ fx i for x i X. Define gw = {s X fs w}. Then g : Y X as gx =d, gy =a, gz =b. Then e X,f,g,e Y is a Galois connection. By Theorem 2.1 1 and 2, we obtain F 2 = I 1 {a} =M 1 {a} c =Y =e Y 1 fa, F 2 = I 1 {b} =M 1 {b} c ={x, z} =e Y 1 F 2 = I 1 {c} =M 1 {c} c ={x} =e Y 1 fc, F 2 = I 1 {d} =M 1 {d} c ={x} =e Y 1 fb, fd. G 1 = H 1 {x} =L 1 {x} c =X =e X 1 gx, G 1 = H 1 {y} =L 1 {y} c ={a} =e Y 1 gy, G 1 = H 1 {z} =L 1 {z} c ={a, b} =e Y 1 J 1 {x} c = =e X 1 gx c, J 1 {y} c ={b, c, d} =e Y 1 J 1 {z} c ={c, d} =e Y 1 K 2 {a} c K 2 {b} c K 2 {c} c K 2 {d} c = =e 1 = {y} =e 1 = {y, z} =e 1 = {y, z} =e 1 gy c, gz c. Y c fa, Y c fb, Y c fc, Y c fd. gz. We obtain F 2 : P X P Y and G 1 : P Y P X as follows: Y if A {, {a}}, F 2 A = {x, z} if A {{b}, {a, b}}, {x} otherwise, X if B {, {x}}, G 1 B = {a, b} if B {{z}, {x, z}}, {a} otherwise. Then e P X,F 2,G 1,e P Y is a Galois connection. We obtain K 2 : P X P Y and H 1 : P Y P X as follows: Y if A = X, {y} if a A, {a, b} A, K 2 A = {y, z} if {a, b} A X, otherwise, H 1 B = if B =, X if x B, {a, b} if z B,x B, {a} otherwise. Then e P X,K 2,H 1,e P Y is a dual residuated connection.

We obtain M 1 : P X P Y and L 1 : P Y P X as follows: if A = X, {x} if A {{a, b}, {a, b, c}, {a, b, d}}, M 1 A = {x, z} if A {{a}, {a, c}, {a, d}, {a, c, d}}, if B = Y, {a} if B = {x, z}, L 1 B = {a, b} if B {{x}, {x, y}}, X otherwise. Then e P X,M 1,L 1,e P Y is a dual Galois connection. We obtain I 1 : P X P Y and J 1 : P Y P X as follows: if A =, {z} if A {{c}, {d}, {c, d}}, I 1 A = {x, z} if A {{b}, {b, c}, {b, d}, {b, c, d}}, X if B = Y, {b, c, d} if B = {x, z}, J 1 B = {b, d} if B {{x}, {x, y}}, otherwise. Then e P X,I 1,J 1,e P Y is a residuated connection. References [1] R. Bělohlávek, Similarity relations in concept lattices, J. Logic and Computation, vol. 10, no 6,pp.823-845, 2000. [2] R. Bělohlávek, Lattices of fixed points of Galois connections, Math. Logic Quart., vol. 47, pp.111-116, 2001. [3] R. Bělohlávek, Concept lattices and order in fuzzy logic, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic, vol. 128, pp.277-298, 2004. [5] G. Georgescu, A. Popescue, Non-dual fuzzy connections, Arch. Math. Log., vol. 43, pp. 1009-1039, 2004. [6] J.G. Garcia, I.M. Perez, M.A.P. Vicente, D. Zhang, Fuzzy Galois connections categorically, Math. Log. Quart., vol. 56, pp. 131-147, 2010. [7] H. Lai, D. Zhang, Concept lattices of fuzzy contexts: Formal concept analysis vs. rough set theory, Int. J. Approx. Reasoning, vol. 50, pp.695-707, 2009. [8] Y.C. Kim, J.W. Park, Join preserving maps and various concepts, Int.J. Contemp. Math. Sciences, vol. 5, no.5, pp.243-251, 2010. [9] J.M. Ko, Y.C. Kim, Various connections and their relations, submit to Int. J. Fuzzy Logic and Intelligent Systems. [10] Ewa. Orlowska, I. Rewitzky, Algebras for Galoisstyle connections and their discrete duality, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol.161, pp.1325-1342, 2010. [11] R. Wille, Restructuring lattice theory; an approach based on hierarchies of concept, in: 1. RivalEd., Ordered Sets, Reidel, Dordrecht, Boston, 1982. [12] Wei Yao, Ling-Xia Lu, Fuzzy Galois connections on fuzzy posets, Math. Log. Quart., vol. 55, pp. 105-112, 2009. Yong Chan Kim He received the M.S and Ph.D. degrees in Department of Mathematics from Yonsei University, in 1984 and 1991, respectively. From 1991 to present, he is a professor in the Department of Mathematics, Gangneung -Wonju University. His research interests are fuzzy topology and fuzzy logic. E-mail : yck@gwnu.ac.kr [4] R. Bělohlávek, Fuzzy relational systems, Kluwer Academic Publisher, New York, 2002. fuzzy logic. Jung Mi Ko She received the M.S and Ph.D. degrees in Department of Mathematics from Yonsei University, in 1983 and 1988, respectively. From 1988 to present, she is a professor in Department of Mathematics, Gangneung- Wonju University. Her research interests are E-mail: jmko@gwnu.ac.kr