Recapitula*on of Rela*vity and Space Charge

Σχετικά έγγραφα
Απόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.

1 String with massive end-points

Homework 8 Model Solution Section

( y) Partial Differential Equations

Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013

HOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:

Second Order Partial Differential Equations

Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)

MATH423 String Theory Solutions 4. = 0 τ = f(s). (1) dτ ds = dxµ dτ f (s) (2) dτ 2 [f (s)] 2 + dxµ. dτ f (s) (3)

CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS

Matrices and Determinants

Parametrized Surfaces

The kinetic and potential energies as T = 1 2. (m i η2 i k(η i+1 η i ) 2 ). (3) The Hooke s law F = Y ξ, (6) with a discrete analog

Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests

[1] P Q. Fig. 3.1

2 Composition. Invertible Mappings

ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II

Solution Series 9. i=1 x i and i=1 x i.

b. Use the parametrization from (a) to compute the area of S a as S a ds. Be sure to substitute for ds!

Example 1: THE ELECTRIC DIPOLE

6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.

Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3

C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions

derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates

Exercises 10. Find a fundamental matrix of the given system of equations. Also find the fundamental matrix Φ(t) satisfying Φ(0) = I. 1.

Forced Pendulum Numerical approach

Written Examination. Antennas and Propagation (AA ) April 26, 2017.

D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation

Space-Time Symmetries

EE512: Error Control Coding

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?

What happens when two or more waves overlap in a certain region of space at the same time?

The Simply Typed Lambda Calculus

상대론적고에너지중이온충돌에서 제트입자와관련된제동복사 박가영 인하대학교 윤진희교수님, 권민정교수님

Fourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics

the total number of electrons passing through the lamp.

Problem Set 9 Solutions. θ + 1. θ 2 + cotθ ( ) sinθ e iφ is an eigenfunction of the ˆ L 2 operator. / θ 2. φ 2. sin 2 θ φ 2. ( ) = e iφ. = e iφ cosθ.

Lifting Entry (continued)

k A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +

Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016

Pg The perimeter is P = 3x The area of a triangle is. where b is the base, h is the height. In our case b = x, then the area is

Example Sheet 3 Solutions

Section 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas

DESIGN OF MACHINERY SOLUTION MANUAL h in h 4 0.

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions

Solutions to Exercise Sheet 5

Space Physics (I) [AP-3044] Lecture 1 by Ling-Hsiao Lyu Oct Lecture 1. Dipole Magnetic Field and Equations of Magnetic Field Lines

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

Probability and Random Processes (Part II)

Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests

1 Lorentz transformation of the Maxwell equations

Strain gauge and rosettes

9.09. # 1. Area inside the oval limaçon r = cos θ. To graph, start with θ = 0 so r = 6. Compute dr

Srednicki Chapter 55

Finite Field Problems: Solutions

Differential equations

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)

forms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with

Higher Derivative Gravity Theories

Math221: HW# 1 solutions

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set

Homework 3 Solutions

6.4 Superposition of Linear Plane Progressive Waves

Lecture 26: Circular domains

Practice Exam 2. Conceptual Questions. 1. State a Basic identity and then verify it. (a) Identity: Solution: One identity is csc(θ) = 1

Reminders: linear functions

Derivation of Optical-Bloch Equations

SOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM

PhysicsAndMathsTutor.com

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

Geodesic Equations for the Wormhole Metric

Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit

Oscillatory Gap Damping

Appendix A. Curvilinear coordinates. A.1 Lamé coefficients. Consider set of equations. ξ i = ξ i (x 1,x 2,x 3 ), i = 1,2,3

3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β

5.4 The Poisson Distribution.

Exercises to Statistics of Material Fatigue No. 5

SCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018

Numerical Analysis FMN011

Econ 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1

Μονοβάθμια Συστήματα: Εξίσωση Κίνησης, Διατύπωση του Προβλήματος και Μέθοδοι Επίλυσης. Απόστολος Σ. Παπαγεωργίου

Answer sheet: Third Midterm for Math 2339

ADVANCED STRUCTURAL MECHANICS

1. (a) (5 points) Find the unit tangent and unit normal vectors T and N to the curve. r(t) = 3cost, 4t, 3sint

SPECIAL FUNCTIONS and POLYNOMIALS

Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude

( ) Sine wave travelling to the right side

DERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION FOR AN APPLIED FORCE Revision C

Integrals in cylindrical, spherical coordinates (Sect. 15.7)

Lecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals

wave energy Superposition of linear plane progressive waves Marine Hydrodynamics Lecture Oblique Plane Waves:

Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations

Problem Set 3: Solutions

ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 19/5/2007

Phys624 Quantization of Scalar Fields II Homework 3. Homework 3 Solutions. 3.1: U(1) symmetry for complex scalar

= λ 1 1 e. = λ 1 =12. has the properties e 1. e 3,V(Y

Appendix to On the stability of a compressible axisymmetric rotating flow in a pipe. By Z. Rusak & J. H. Lee

TMA4115 Matematikk 3

Transcript:

Recapitula*on of Rela*vity and Space Charge Massimo.Ferrario@LNF.INFN.IT Erice 11 March 017

Relativity - Basic principles The Principle of Relativity The laws of physics are invariant (i.e. identical) in all inertial systems (nonaccelerating frames of reference) => All experiments run the same in all inertial frames of reference The Principle of Invariant Light Speed The speed of light in a vacuum is the same for all observers, regardless of the motion of the light source => c = 9979458 m/s

Inertial Systems

Galileo Transformations

Wave Equation?

Galileo Transformations Fail!

In both reference frames a spherical wave propagates with velocity c and must remain spherical

Derivation of Lorentz Transformations +

Lorentz Transformations γ = 1 1 β β = v c

Lorentz Transformations and the invariance of light vector

Lorentz Transformations and the invariance of wave equation

The consequences of Lorentz Transformations Time Dilation: Δt = γδ t" Length Contraction: Δx = Δ " x γ

Rela*vis*c dynamics

Fundamental relations of the relativistic dynamics Rest Energy Relativistic momentum Relativistic γ-factor Total Energy Kinetic Energy W = 0 m0c p = γm o v, β <1 always! 1 γ = 1 β γ 1 always! W = γ m0c = γ W = W0 + p c m = γ m 0 W 0 W k = W W 0 = = (γ 1)m 0 c 1 m 0 v se β <<1 Newton s nd Law! F = d! p = d dt dt (m! v) Lorentz Force! F = q (! E +! v! B )

Relativistic equation of motion γ = 1 1 β β = v c 1 + β γ γ Acceleration does not generally point in the direction of velocity a v a // v m // = m o γ 3 ( v) A moving body is more inert in the longitudinal direction than in the transverse direction

Longitudinal motion in the laoratory frame ==> ex: beam dynamics in a relativistic capacitor Consider longitudinal motion only : γ 3 dβ dt = a o c a o = ee z m o β β o dβ ( 1 β ) 3 / = a o c t t o dt β β oγ o = a o 1 β c ( t t o )

Solving explicitly for β one can find: β( t) = a o ( t t o ) + cβ o γ o ( ) c + cβ o γ o + a o ( t t o ) After separating the variables one can integrate once more to obtain the position as a function of time : ( ) z o = c z t a o % ' ' & % 1 + β o γ o + a o ' & c ( ) t t o ( * ) ( γ * o * = h t ) ( ) In the non relativistic limit: z( t) z o = β o c( t t o ) + 1 a o ( t t o) $ & % The previous solution can be written also in the form: c z( t) z o + γ o a o ' ) ( $ c & β o γ o + c t t o % a o ( ) ' ) ( $ = c & a o % ' ) ( the corresponding world line in the Minkowsky space-time (ct,z) is an hyperbola

==> hyperbolic motion in the simpler case with initial conditions: $ β o = 0 & % γ o = 1 & ' z o = 0 and shifted variable: Z( t) = z( t) + c a o # Z( t) ( ct) = c % $ a o & ( ' Therefore such motion is called hyperbolic motion. It describes the motion of a particle that arrives from large positive z, slows down and stops at turning point Z t = c a o then it accelerates back up the z axis. The world-line is asymptotic to the light cones, and obviously, it will never reach the speed of light.

The problem of relativistic bunch length Low energy electron bunch injected in a linac: Length contraction? γ 1 γ =1000 L b = 3mm L b " L b = L! b γ = 3µm

Bunch length in the laboratory frame S Let consider an electron bunch of initial length L o inside a capacitor when the field is suddenly switched on at the time t o. L( t) = z ( h t) z ( t t) ( ) = L o + h( t) L t ( ) h t ( ) = L o Thus a simple computation show that no observable contraction occurs in the laboratory frame, as should be expected since both ends are subject to the same acceleration at the same time.

Bunch length in the moving frame S More interesting is the bunch dynamics as seen by a moving reference frame S, that we assume it has a relative velocity V with respect to S such that at the end of the process the accelerated bunch will be at rest in the moving frame S. It is actually a deceleration process as seen by S Lorentz transformations: leading for the tail particle to: # t " o,t = t o = 0 $ % z " o,t = z o,t = 0 + % c t " = γ' ct V & c z ( - *, ) -. z " = γ ( z Vt) and for the head particle to: % ' t o,h " = V c γ ol " o < t o & ' ( z o,h " = γ o " L o > z o,h The key point is that as seen from S the decelerating force is not applied simultaneously along the bunch but with a delay given by: Δ t # o = t # o,h t # o,t = V c γ # o L o < 0

At the end of the process when both particle have been subject to the same decelerating field for the same amount of time the bunch length results to be: L " t " ( ) = " ( γ L o + h "( t ")) h " t " ( ) = " γ L o ( ) " z " t " z o = c & ( & 1 + β " o γ " o + a o ( a o ( ' c ' ) ( t " t " o,h ) + * " γ o ) + + = h " t " * ( )

Electromagne*c Fields of a moving charge

Fields of a point charge with uniform motion o y o q y v " E = " B = 0 q 4πε o r " r " 3 x,x z z vt is the position of the point charge in the lab. frame O. In the moving frame O the charge is at rest The electric field is radial with spherical symmetry The magnetic field is zero E! x = q x! q y! q z! E! 4πε 3 y = E! o r! 4πε 3 z = o r! 4πε 3 r! o

Relativistic transforms of the fields from O to O % E x = E " ' x & E y = γ( E " y + v B " z ) ' ( E z = γ( E " z v B " y ) % B x = B " ' x & B y = γ( B " y v E " z / c ) ' ( B z = γ( B " z + v E " y / c ) + x " = γ( x vt) - y " = y -, z " = z - % c t " = γ ' ct v & c x ( *.- ) ( z ) 1 / r " = x " + y " + " [ ] 1/ r " = γ ( x vt) + y + z

E x = E " x = E y = γ E # y = E z = γ E # z = q x " 4πε o r " = 3 q y # 4πε o r # 3 = q z # 4πε o r # 3 = q 4πε o q 4πε o q 4πε o γ( x vt) [ γ ( x vt) + y + z ] 3 / γy [ γ ( x vt) + y + z ] 3 / γz [ γ ( x vt) + y + z ] 3 / The field pattern is moving with the charge and it can be observed at t=0: E = q 4πε o γ r [ γ x + y + z ] 3 / The fields have lost the spherical symmetry

E = q 4πε o γ r [ γ x + y + z ] 3 / y t=0 z r θ x = r cosθ y + z = r sin θ x γ x + y + z = r γ ( 1 β sin θ) E = ( ) q 1 β 4πε o r 1 β sin θ ( ) 3 / r r

E = γ = q 1 β 4πε o r 1 β sin θ 1 1 β ( ) ( ) 3 / r r β = 0 E = θ = 0 E // = θ = π E = q 1 4πε o r r r q 1 4πε o γ r q 4πε o γ r r r r r γ * * 0 γ * * γ =1 γ >1 γ >>1

! " B = 0 B is transverse to the direction of motion B B B x y z = 0 = ve = ve y z / c / c!!! v E B = c γ

Space Charge

σ x,y,z << λ D σ x,y,z >> λ D

Continuous Uniform Cylindrical Beam Model I ρ = π R v R J = I π R Gauss s law ε o E ds = Ampere s law ρdv I E r = πε o R v r for r R I 1 E r = πε o v r for r > R Ir B dl = µ o J ds B ϑ = µ o πr for r R I B ϑ = µ o for r > R πr B ϑ = β c E r

Lorentz Force F r = e( E r βcb ϑ ) = e( 1 β )E r = ee r γ has only radial component and is a linear function of the transverse coordinate The attractive magnetic force, which becomes significant at high velocities, tends to compensate for the repulsive electric force.

Bunched Uniform Cylindrical Beam Model L(t) R(t) (0,0) s l v z = βc Longitudinal Space Charge field in the bunch moving frame: ρ = Q πr L E z s,r = 0 ( ) = ρ 4πε o R π L ( l s ) rdrdϕd l & ( l s ) + r 3 / ) 0 0 0 '( * + E z ( s,r = 0) = ρ % ε 0 &' ( ) R + ( L s ) R + s + s L ( )*

Radial Space Charge field in the bunch moving frame by series representation of axisymmetric field: $ E r (r, s) ρ & % ε 0 s ' E z (0, s) ) r ( + [ ] r3 16 + E r (r, s ) = ρ ε 0 % ' &' ( L s ) R + ( L + s ) s R + s ( * )* r

Lorentz Transformation back to the Lab frame E z = E z E r = γ E r L = γl ρ = ρ γ s = γs E z (0, s) = ρ " R +γ (L s) R +γ s +γ s L γ ε #$ 0 ( ) % &' E r (r,s) = γρ & ( (L s) ε 0 ( + ' R + γ (L s) s R + γ s ) + r + * It is still a linear field with r but with a longitudinal correlation s

E z (0,s,γ ) = I πγε 0 R βc h s,γ ( ) E r (r,s,γ ) = Ir πε 0 R βc g s,γ ( ) γ= 1 γ = 5 γ = 10 F r = ee r γ = eir πγ ε 0 R βc g s,γ ( ) R s (t) L(t) Δt

The Laminar beam

Trace space of an ideal laminar beam " x $ # x! = dx dz = p x $ % p z p x << p z X Paraxial approx. X

Trace space of a laminar beam X X

Trace space of non laminar beam X X

Geometric emittance: Ellipse equation: ε g γx + αx x $ + β x $ = ε g Twiss parameters: βγ α = 1! Ellipse area: A = πε g β = α

rms emittance σ x' x σ x ε rms + + f x,! x ( x )dx d x! =1 f! x, x! rms beam envelope: + + σ x = x = x f ( x, x &)dxd x & Define rms emittance: ( ) = 0 γx + αx $ x + β $ x = ε rms such that: σ x = x = βε rms σ x' = x! = γε rms Since: α = β $ β = x ε rms it follows: α = 1 ε rms d dz x = x x % ε rms = σ xx' ε rms

σ x = x = βε rms σ x' = x ' = γε rms σ xx' = x x! = αε rms It holds also the relation: γβ α = 1 Substituting α,β,γ we get σ x' σ x " σ xx' $ ε rms ε rms # ε rms % ' & =1 We end up with the definition of rms emittance in terms of the second moments of the distribution: ε rms = ( x ) σ x σ x' σ xx' = x x" x "

What does rms emittance tell us about trace space distributions under linear or non-linear forces acting on the beam? x ε rms = x x # x x # x a a a x a x Assuming a generic x, x " correlation of the type: x! = Cx n When n = 1 ==> ε rms = 0 ε rms = C ( x x n x n+1 ) When n = 1 ==> ε rms = 0

Envelope Equation without Acceleration Now take the derivatives: dσ x dz = d dz d σ x dz = d dz x = 1 σ x σ xx' = 1 dσ xx' σ x σ x dz d dz x = 1 x x! σ x σ xx' σ = 1 x ' 3 x σ x = σ xx' σ x ( x x!! ) σ xx' σ x 3 = σ x' + x x!! σ x σ xx' 3 σ x And simplify: σ!! x = σ xσ x' σ xx' x x!! 3 σ x σ x = ε rms σ + x x!! 3 x σ x We obtain the rms envelope equation in which the rms emittance enters as defocusing pressure like term. σ!! x x x!! σ x = ε rms 3 σ x

σ!! x x x!! σ x = ε rms σ x 3 Assuming that each particle is subject only to a linear focusing force, without acceleration: x!! + k x x = 0 take the average over the entire particle ensemble σ x " + k x σ x = ε rms σ x 3 x x!! = k x x We obtain the rms envelope equation with a linear focusing force in which the rms emittance enters as defocusing pressure like term.

Bunched Uniform Cylindrical Beam Model E z (0,s,γ ) = I πγε 0 R βc h s,γ ( ) E r (r,s,γ ) = Ir πε 0 R βc g s,γ ( ) γ= 1 γ = 5 γ = 10 R s (t) L(t) Δt

Lorentz Force F r = e( E r βcb ϑ ) = e( 1 β )E r = ee r γ is a linear function of the transverse coordinate dp r dt = F r = ee r γ = eir πγ ε 0 R βc g s,γ ( ) The attractive magnetic force, which becomes significant at high velocities, tends to compensate for the repulsive electric force. Therefore space charge defocusing is primarily a non-relativistic effect. F x = eix πγ ε 0 σ x βc g s,γ ( )

Envelope Equation with Space Charge Single particle transverse motion: dp x dt d dt x!! = = F x p x = p x! = βγm o c x! ( p x! ) = βc d dz p x! F x βcp ( ) = F x F x = eix πγ ε 0 σ x βc g s,γ ( ) x!! = k sc s,γ ( ) σ x x

Now we can calculate the term x x " that enters in the envelope equation σ x " = ε rms 3 σ x x " x σ x!! x = k sc σ x x x x!! = k sc σ x x =k sc Including all the other terms the envelope equation reads: σ!! x + k σ x = Space Charge De-focusing Force ε n ( βγ) σ + k sc 3 x σ x Emittance Pressure External Focusing Forces Laminarity Parameter: ( ρ = βγ ) k sc σ x ε n

The beam undergoes two regimes along the accelerator σ x " + k σ x = ε n ( βγ) σ + k sc 3 x σ x ρ>>1 Laminar Beam σ x " + k σ x = ε n ( βγ) σ + k sc 3 x σ x ρ<<1 Thermal Beam

Laminarity parameter ρ = Iσ γi A ε Iσ q n γi A ε = 4I n γ ' I A ε n γ Transition Energy (ρ=1) γ tr = I # γ I A ε n ρ I=4 ka ε th = 0.6 µm E acc = 5 MV/m I=1 ka Potential space charge emittance growth I=100 A ρ = 1

Space charge induced emihance oscilla*ons in a laminar beam

Neutral Plasma Surface charge density Surface electric field Restoring force Plasma frequency Plasma oscillations

Neutral Plasma Oscillations Instabilities EM Wave propagation Single Component Cold Relativistic Plasma Magnetic focusing Magnetic focusing

( ) σ " + k s σ = k sc s,γ σ Equilibrium solution: ( ) = k sc( s,γ ) σ eq s,γ k s Single Component Relativistic Plasma k s = qb mcβγ Small perturbation: σ( ζ ) = σ eq ( s) +δσ ( s) δ σ # s ( ) + k s δσ ( s) = 0 δσ ( s) = δσ o ( s)cos( k s z) Perturbed trajectories oscillate around the equilibrium with the same frequency but with different amplitudes: σ( s) = σ eq ( s) +δσ o ( s)cos( k s z)

Emittance Oscillations are driven by space charge differential defocusing in core and tails of the beam p x Projected Phase Space x Slice Phase Spaces

Perturbed trajectories oscillate around the equilibrium with the same frequency but with different amplitudes X X

Envelope oscillations drive Emittance oscillations σ(z) ε(z) ε rms = ( x ) sin k s z σ x σ x' σ xx' = x x % x % ( )

References: [10] C. Prior, Special Relativity, CAS Proceedings, CERN 006-01 [11] W. Greiner CLASSICAL MECHANICS - Point Particles and Relativity, Springer