Dielectric Boundary Forces in Variational Implicit-Solvent Modeling of Biomolecules

Σχετικά έγγραφα
Phase-Field Force Convergence

Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set

Phase-Field Variational Implicit Solvation

ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II

Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests

Parametrized Surfaces

2 Composition. Invertible Mappings

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

Lecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals

1. (a) (5 points) Find the unit tangent and unit normal vectors T and N to the curve. r(t) = 3cost, 4t, 3sint

Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)

The Pohozaev identity for the fractional Laplacian

Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013

Fourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics

Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor

Απόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.

Econ 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1

Local Approximation with Kernels

Partial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013

SOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM

Global nonlinear stability of steady solutions of the 3-D incompressible Euler equations with helical symmetry and with no swirl

J. of Math. (PRC) 6 n (nt ) + n V = 0, (1.1) n t + div. div(n T ) = n τ (T L(x) T ), (1.2) n)xx (nt ) x + nv x = J 0, (1.4) n. 6 n

Homework 8 Model Solution Section

Example Sheet 3 Solutions

Solutions to Exercise Sheet 5

ECE Spring Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 2

3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β

SOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

Spherical Coordinates

b. Use the parametrization from (a) to compute the area of S a as S a ds. Be sure to substitute for ds!

Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude

Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3

DiracDelta. Notations. Primary definition. Specific values. General characteristics. Traditional name. Traditional notation

Exercises to Statistics of Material Fatigue No. 5

HOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:

Lecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE

ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?

Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees

Homework 3 Solutions

Arithmetical applications of lagrangian interpolation. Tanguy Rivoal. Institut Fourier CNRS and Université de Grenoble 1

On the Galois Group of Linear Difference-Differential Equations

CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS

Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in

Heisenberg Uniqueness pairs

Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs

DETERMINATION OF DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A 2DOF SYSTEM. by Zoran VARGA, Ms.C.E.

6. MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION

Graded Refractive-Index

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)

Integrals in cylindrical, spherical coordinates (Sect. 15.7)

Second Order Partial Differential Equations

ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER

Matrices and Determinants

Optimal Impartial Selection

wave energy Superposition of linear plane progressive waves Marine Hydrodynamics Lecture Oblique Plane Waves:

derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates

High order interpolation function for surface contact problem

Finite Field Problems: Solutions

SCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018

EE512: Error Control Coding

C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions

Space-Time Symmetries

Mock Exam 7. 1 Hong Kong Educational Publishing Company. Section A 1. Reference: HKDSE Math M Q2 (a) (1 + kx) n 1M + 1A = (1) =

DERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION FOR AN APPLIED FORCE Revision C

Figure A.2: MPC and MPCP Age Profiles (estimating ρ, ρ = 2, φ = 0.03)..

Higher Derivative Gravity Theories

6.4 Superposition of Linear Plane Progressive Waves

Finite difference method for 2-D heat equation

Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.

D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation

Cyclic or elementary abelian Covers of K 4

Forced Pendulum Numerical approach

Mean-Variance Analysis

Empirical best prediction under area-level Poisson mixed models

1 String with massive end-points

the total number of electrons passing through the lamp.

Takeaki Yamazaki (Toyo Univ.) 山崎丈明 ( 東洋大学 ) Oct. 24, RIMS

Lecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic

Divergence for log concave functions

Supporting Information

2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)

J. of Math. (PRC) Banach, , X = N(T ) R(T + ), Y = R(T ) N(T + ). Vol. 37 ( 2017 ) No. 5

ω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω

Distances in Sierpiński Triangle Graphs

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

Iterated trilinear fourier integrals with arbitrary symbols

[1] P Q. Fig. 3.1

Second Order RLC Filters

Solution Series 9. i=1 x i and i=1 x i.

Written Examination. Antennas and Propagation (AA ) April 26, 2017.

forms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with

The Simply Typed Lambda Calculus

ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 19/5/2007

6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.

Transcript:

Dielectric Boundary Forces in Variational Implicit-Solvent Modeling of Biomolecules Bo Li Department of Mathematics and NSF Center for Theoretical Biological Physics UC San Diego Collaborators: Hsiao-Bing Cheng, Li-Tien Cheng, Xiaoliang Cheng, and Zhengfang Zhang Funding: NIH, NSF, and Zhejiang Univ. Lu Foundation ICMCEC, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing June 17, 2011

Outline 1. Introduction 2. The Poisson Boltzmann Theory 3. The Coulomb-Field Approximation 4. The Yukawa-Field Approximation 5. Conclusions and Discussions

1. Introduction

Biomolecular Interactions Variational Implicit-Solvent Model (VISM) (Dzubiella, Swanson, & McCammon, 2006) min G[Γ] = Equilibrium structures Equilibrium dielectric boundary (or solute-solvent interface) Minimum solvation free energy n dielectric boundary Ω w Ω m ε m=1 ε =80 w Γ x Q i i

n dielectric boundary Ω w Ω m ε m=1 ε =80 w Γ x Q i i Free-energy functional G[Γ] = P Vol (Ω m ) + γ 0 Γ (1 2τH)dS + ρ w U (i) i LJ ( x x i )dv x Ω w + G ele [Γ] (electrostatic free energy) Level-set simulations of BphC. Left: no charges. Right: with charges.

Charges Point charges: Q i at x i Mobile ions: valence Z j, volume V j, bulk c j, temperature T Dielectric coefficient { εm ε 0 in Ω m ε Γ = ε w ε 0 in Ω w Continuum electrostatics n dielectric boundary Ω w Ω m ε m=1 ε =80 w Γ x Q i i dielectric boundary Γ = potential ψ Γ = free energy G ele [Γ] (Normal component of) Dielectric boundary force (DBF) F n = δ Γ G ele [Γ]

Mathematical definition of δ Γ G ele [Γ] : Shape derivatives Let V C c (R 3, R 3 ). Define x : [0, ) R 3 R 3 by {ẋ = V(x) for t > 0, x(0, X) = X. Denote T t (X) = x(t, X). Then T t (X) = X + tv(x) + O(t 2 ) for small t > 0. Define δ Γ,V G ele [Γ] = d G ele [Γ t ] G ele [Γ] dt G ele [Γ t ] = lim. t=0 t 0 t Structure Theorem. There exists w : Γ R such that δ Γ,V G ele [Γ] = Γ w(x)[v(x) n(x)]ds X V C c (R 3, R 3 ). Shape derivative δ Γ G elel [Γ](X) = w(x) X Γ

Basic properties Let J t (X) = det T t (X). Then dj t dt = J t( V) T t. Let A(t) = J t ( T t ) 1 ( T t ) T. Then If u L 2 (Ω) then If u H 1 (Ω) then A (t) = [ (( V) T t ) ( T t ) 1 (( V) T t ) T t ( T t ) 1 (( V) T t ) T ( T t ) ] A(t). lim u T t = u and lim u Tt 1 = u in L 2 (Ω). t 0 t 0 (u T 1 t For any u H 1 (Ω) and t 0, ) = ( T 1 t ) T ( u Tt 1 ), (u T t ) = ( T t ) T ( u T t ). d dt (u T t) = ( u V) T t.

2. The Poisson Boltzmann Theory

The (generalized) Poisson Boltzmann equation (PBE) ε Γ ψ χ w B (ψ) = f Continuum electrostatics Poisson s equation: ε Γ ψ = ρ Charge density: ρ = f + χ w ρ i Boltzmann distribution: ρ i = B (ψ) (χ w = 1 in Ω w and χ w = 0 in Ω m.) Examples of B = B(ψ) Nonlinear PBE without size effect β 1 ( j c j e βz j eψ 1 ) Linearized PBE 1 2 κ2 ψ 2 n dielectric boundary Ω w Nonlinear PBE ( with size effect (βv) 1 log 1 + v ) j c j e βz o jeψ Ω m B ε m=1 ε =80 w Γ x Q i i ψ

The (generalized) Poisson Boltzmann equation (PBE) ε Γ ψ χ w B (ψ) = f Electrostatic free energy: G[Γ] = G ele [Γ] G[Γ] = Ω [ ε ] Γ 2 ψ 2 + f ψ χ w B(ψ) dv The region Ω is the union of Ω m, Ω w, and Γ. The integral as a functional of ψ is concave. The PBE is the Euler Lagrange equation of the functional.

Notations Hg(Ω) 1 = {φ H 1 (Ω) : φ = g on Ω} [ G[Γ, φ] = ε ] Γ 2 φ 2 + f φ χ w B(φ) dv Ω Theorem. G[Γ, ] : H 1 g(ω) R has a unique maximizer ψ 0 : Γ-uniformly bounded in H 1 (Ω) and L (Ω), and the unique solution to the PBE. Proof. Step 1. Existence and uniqueness by the direct method, using the concavity. Step 2. Key: The L -bound. Let λ > 0 and define λ if ψ 0 (X) < λ, ψ λ (X) = ψ 0 (X) if ψ 0 (X) λ, λ if ψ 0 (X) > λ. G[Γ, ψ 0 ] G[Γ, ψ λ ], ψ λ ψ 0, the properties of B, and the uniqueness of maximizer = ψ 0 = ψ λ for large λ. Step 3. Regularity theory and routine calculations. Q.E.D.

Electrostatic free energy: G[Γ] = max φ H 1 g (Ω) G[Γ, φ] Theorem. Assume n points from Ω m to Ω w and f H 1 (Ω). Then δ Γ G[Γ] = ε w 2 ψ+ 0 2 ε m 2 ψ 0 2 ε w ψ 0 + n 2 + ε m ψ0 n 2 + B(ψ 0 ) = 1 ( 1 1 ) ε Γ ψ 0 n 2 + ε w ε m (I n n) ψ 0 2 + B(ψ 0 ). 2 ε m ε w 2 Consequence: Since ε w > ε m, the force F n = δ Γ G[Γ] < 0. B. Chu, Molecular Forces Based on the Baker Lectures of Peter J. W. Debye, John Wiley & Sons, 1967: Under the combined influence of electric field generated by solute charges and their polarization in the surrounding medium which is electrostatic neutral, an additional potential energy emerges and drives the surrounding molecules to the solutes.

Proof of Theorem. Let V C c (R 3, R 3 ) be local, Γ 0 = Γ, and G[Γ t ] = G[Γ t, ψ t ] = max φ H 1 g (Ω) G[Γ t, φ]. Hence ψ t is the solution to the PBE corresponding to Γ t. Denote z(t, φ) = G[Γ t, φ Tt 1 ]. We have G[Γ t ] = max z(t, φ). φ Hg(Ω) 1 Step 1. Easy to verify for 0 < t 1 that z(t, ψ 0 ) z(0, ψ 0 ) t Hence G[Γ t] G[Γ] t t z(ξ, ψ 0 ) G[Γ t] G[Γ] t z(t, ψ t T t ) z(0, ψ t T t ). t t z(η, ψ t T t ), ξ, η [0, t].

Step 2. Direct calculations lead to [ t z(t, φ) = ε Γ 2 A (t) φ φ + (( (fv)) T t )φj t Ω χ w B(φ)(( V) T t )J t ]dv. Replacing t by η and φ by ψ t T t, respectively, we obtain lim tz(η, ψ t T t ) = t z(0, ψ 0 ) t 0 and hence provided that δ Γ,V G[Γ] = t z(0, ψ 0 ), lim ψ t T t ψ 0 H t 0 1 (Ω) = 0.

Step 3. The limit follows from: lim ψ t T t ψ 0 H t 0 1 (Ω) = 0 Weak form of the Euler Lagrange equation for the maximization of z(t, ) by ψ t T t for t > 0 and by ψ 0 for t = 0, respectively; Subtract one from the other; Use the properties of T t (X) and the convexity of B. Step 4. We now have δ Γ,V G[Γ] = t z(0, ψ 0 ). Direct calculations complete the proof. Q.E.D.

3. The Coulomb-Field Approximation

ε =1 m Ω m Ω m ε m=1 ε =80 Ω w w Γ Electrostatic free energy 1 G ele [Γ] = Ω 2 E 1 sol D sol dv Ω 2 E vac D vac dv Electric field and displacement: E = ψ and D = εε 0 E. The charge density ρ = i Q iδ xi ε m ε 0 ψ vac = ρ = ψ vac (x) = Q i i 4πε 0 ε m x x i ε 0 ε Γ ψ sol = ρ = ψ sol =? Poisson s equation = D sol = D vac

The Coulomb-field approximation: D sol D vac 1 G ele [Γ] = Ω 2 E 1 sol D sol dv Ω 2 E vac D vac dv = 1 1 D sol 2 dv 1 1 D vac 2 dv 2 Ω ε 0 ε Γ 2 Ω ε 0 ε m 1 1 D vac 2 dv 1 1 D vac 2 dv 2 Ω ε 0 ε Γ 2 Ω ε 0 ε m = 1 1 ε 0 ε m ψ vac 2 dv 1 1 ε 0 ε m ψ vac 2 dv 2 Ω ε 0 ε Γ 2 Ω ε 0 ε m = 1 1 ε 0 ε m ψ vac 2 dv 1 1 ε 0 ε m ψ vac 2 dv 2 Ω w ε 0 ε w 2 Ω w ε 0 ε m = 1 ( 1 32π 2 1 ) Q i (x x i ) 2 ε 0 ε m ε w x x i 3 dv. Ω w i

G ele [Γ] = 1 ( 1 32π 2 1 ) ε 0 ε m ε w Ω w Exact for a single-particle, spherical solute! i Q i (x x i ) x x i 3 2 dv Born s calculation (1920) G ele [Γ] = 1 2 Q ψ reac(o) = 1 2 Q (ψ sol ψ vac )(O) Q O R εm ε w ψ reac (r) = ( 1 1 ε m ε w ( 1 1 ε m ε w ) Q 4πε 0 R ) Q 4πε 0 r if r < R if r > R Q2 G ele [Γ] = 32π 2 ε 0 R ( 1 ε m 1 ε w ψ ) reac O R r

G ele [Γ] = 1 ( 1 32π 2 ε 0 1 16π 2 ε 0 1 ε m ε w ( 1 1 ε m ε w ) i Q 2 i Ω w ) Q i Q j i<j dv x x i 4 (x x i ) (x x j ) Ω w x x i 3 x x j 3 dv Generalized Born models (Still, Tempczyk, Hawley, & Hendrickson, 1990) G elec = 1 ( 1 32π 2 1 ) Qi 2 1 ( 1 ε 0 ε m ε w R i 16π 2 1 ) Q i Q j ε 0 ε m ε w f ij i i<j Generalized Born radii R i : R 1 dv i = Ω w x x i 4 Interpolation: f ij = x i x j 2 + R i R j exp ( x i x j 2 4R i R j )

G ele [Γ] = 1 ( 1 32π 2 1 ) ε 0 ε m ε w Ω w i Q i (x x i ) x x i 3 Theorem. Assume the normal n points from Ω m to Ω w. Then ( 1 1 δ Γ G ele [Γ] = 32π 2 1 ) Q i (x x i ) 2 ε 0 ε m ε w x x i 3 x Γ. i Proof. Let V Cc (R 3, R 3 ) with V(x i ) = 0 for all i. Then G ele [Γ t ] = w(x)dv = w(t t (X))J t (X)dV. T t(ω w) Ω w d dt G ele [Γ t ] = [ w T t(x)j t (X) + w(x)j t(x)] dv t=0 Ω w t=0 = [ w V(X) + w(x) V(X)] dv Ω w = (wv)dv = w(v n)ds. Q.E.D. Ω w Γ 2 dv

4. The Yukawa-Field Approximation

Definition. The Yukawa potential Y µ for µ > 0 is Y µ (x) = 1 4πr e µr (r = x ). It is the fundamental solution to + µ 2, i.e., ( + µ 2 )Y µ = δ and Y µ ( ) = 0. A property: R 3 Y µ dv = 1 µ 2.

ε =1 m Ω m Ω m ε m=1 ε =80 κ w Ω w Γ Electrostatic free energy 1 G ele [Γ] = 2 E sol D sol dv Poisson s equation: ε m ε 0 ψ vac = i Q iδ xi Ω Ω 1 2 E vac D vac dv = ψ vac (x) = i Q i 4πε 0 ε m x x i The Debye Hückel (or linearized Poisson Boltzmann) equation: ε 0 ε Γ ψ sol χ w ε w κ 2 ψ sol = i Q iδ xi = ψ sol =?

Definition. A Yukawa-field approximation is D vac (x) = Q i (x x i ) i 4π x x i D sol (x) 3 if x Ω m, x x i i, i f i(x, κ, Γ) Q i(x x i ) 4π x x i 3 if x Ω w. The electrostatic solvation free energy with the Yukawa-field approximation G ele [Γ] = 1 32π 2 ε 0 Ω w 1 ε w 1 ε m i f i (x, κ, Γ) Q i(x x i ) x x i 3 i Q i (x x i ) x x i 3 2 dv 2

Conditions on all f i (, κ, Γ) : Ω w R: (1) κ = 0 = f i (, κ, Γ) = 1 for all i; (2) f i (x, κ, Γ) Q i(x x i ) 4π x x i 3 e κr r as r = x ; (3) Exact for a spherical solute. Ω m ε m=1 ε =80 κ w Ω w Γ x Final formulas f i (x, κ, Γ) = 1 + κ x x i 1 + κli m (x) e κlw i (x) li m (x) = [x i, x] Ω m li w (x) = [x i, x] Ω w xi Γ Ωm Ω w

f i (x, κ, Γ) = 1 + κ x x i 1 + κli m (x) e κlw i (x) Exact for a single-particle, spherical solute! Q 4πε w ε 0 R(1 + κr) + Q ( 1 4πε m ε 0 x 1 R ψ sol (x) = Q e κ( x R) 4πε w ε 0 (1 + κr) x ) if x < R, if x > R. D sol (x) = Qx 4π x 3 if x < R, 1 + κ x 1 + κr e κ( x R) Qx 4π x 3 if x > R. Q O R εm ε w

f i (x, κ, Γ) = 1 + κ x x i 1 + κli m (x) e κlw i (x) Asymptotic analysis with κ 1 for a model system D sol (x) Q(1 + κ x )e κ(r R 3+R 2 R 1 ) 4π(1 + κ(r 3 R 2 + R 1 )) x 3x x Ω w O Q R R 3 r 1 R 2

Assume a total of N solute particles x i. The electrostatic free energy with the Yukawa-field approximation is 1 G ele [Γ] = 1 N 32π 2 f ε 0 Ω w ε w i (x, κ, Γ) Q 2 i(x x i ) x x i 3 i=1 1 2 N Q i (x x i ) ε m x x i 3 dv i=1 [ 1 = F(x, l1 w (x),...,ln w ε (x)) 1 ] C(x) dv w ε m Ω w Theorem. Assume n points from Ω m to Ω w. Denote L w i (x) = {x i + s(x x i ) : 1s < } Ω w for x Ω w. Then [ 1 δ Γ G ele [Γ](x) = F(x, l1 w (x),...,ln w ε (x)) 1 ] C(x) w ε m N i=1 1 x x i 2 L w i (x) y x i 2 i F(y)dl y x Γ.

First Proof. Partition of unity. Local polar coordinates. Apply a generalized version of Leibniz formula: d dy b(y) a Second Proof. f (x, y)dx = Local perturbation. Level-set representation. Co-area formula {φ>t} Q.E.D. u dx = t ( b(y) a {φ=s} y f (x, y)dx + d b(y)f (b(y), y). dy ) u φ ds ds. Ω xi Γ P Λ B(z,d) Ω + 0 x

5. Conclusions and Discussions

Summary Mathematical notion and tool: shape derivatives. Definition and formulas for the dielectric boundary force. The Poisson Boltzmann theory The Coulomb-field approximation The Yukawa-field approximation The dielectric boundary force always pushes charged solutes. Proof of existence and uniqueness of solution to the PBE.

Current work: Incorporate the dielectric boundary force into the level-set variational implicit-solvent model. The dielectric boundary force is part of the normal velocity for the level-set relaxation. Numerical implementation The Poisson Boltzmann theory: Need a highly accurate and efficient numerical method. The Coulomb-field approximation: Simple implementation, very efficient but less accurate. The Yukawa-field approximation: Difficult to implement.

Include ionic size effects with different ionic sizes and valences. No explicit PBE type of equation for non-uniform ion sizes. Constrained optimization method. Discovery: the valence-to-volume ratio of ions is the key parameter in the stratification of multivalent counterions near a charged surface. Concentration of counterion (M) 15 10 5 0 (a) 5 10 15 20 25 Distance to a charged surface From S. Zhou, Z. Wang, and B. Li, Phys. Rev. E, 2011 (in press). +3 +2 +1

Main References H.-B. Cheng, L-T. Cheng, and B. Li, Yukawa-field approximation of electrostatic free energy and dielectric boundary force, 2011 (submitted). B. Li, X. Cheng, and Z. Zhang, Dielectric boundary force in molecular solvation with the Poisson Boltzmann free energy: A shape derivative approach, 2011 (submitted). Other Closely Related References B. Li, Minimization of electrostatic free energy and the Poisson Boltzmann equation for molecular solvation with implicit solvent, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 40, 2536 2566, 2009. B. Li, Continuum electrostatics for ionic solutions with nonuniform ionic sizes, Nonlinearity, 22, 811 833, 2009. S. Zhou, Z. Wang, and B. Li, Mean-field description of ionic size effects with non-uniform ionic sizes: A numerical approach, Phys. Rev. E, 2011 (in press).

Thank you!