Institut de Recherche MAthématique de Rennes

Σχετικά έγγραφα
Partial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013

Homework 3 Solutions

Srednicki Chapter 55

Example Sheet 3 Solutions

Reminders: linear functions

Finite Field Problems: Solutions

Econ 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1

ECE Spring Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 2

b. Use the parametrization from (a) to compute the area of S a as S a ds. Be sure to substitute for ds!

EE512: Error Control Coding

Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016

derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates

CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS

Appendix to On the stability of a compressible axisymmetric rotating flow in a pipe. By Z. Rusak & J. H. Lee

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II

Second Order RLC Filters

D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation

The Simply Typed Lambda Calculus

Second Order Partial Differential Equations

Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3

Lecture 26: Circular domains

Nonlinear Fourier transform for the conductivity equation. Visibility and Invisibility in Impedance Tomography

Matrices and Determinants

ω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω

Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)

Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations

Απόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.

Solutions to Exercise Sheet 5

C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests

Parametrized Surfaces

Exercises 10. Find a fundamental matrix of the given system of equations. Also find the fundamental matrix Φ(t) satisfying Φ(0) = I. 1.

w o = R 1 p. (1) R = p =. = 1

3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β

Derivation of Optical-Bloch Equations

Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)

1. (a) (5 points) Find the unit tangent and unit normal vectors T and N to the curve. r(t) = 3cost, 4t, 3sint

Problem Set 9 Solutions. θ + 1. θ 2 + cotθ ( ) sinθ e iφ is an eigenfunction of the ˆ L 2 operator. / θ 2. φ 2. sin 2 θ φ 2. ( ) = e iφ. = e iφ cosθ.

Space-Time Symmetries

2 Composition. Invertible Mappings

ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 19/5/2007

Jackson 2.25 Homework Problem Solution Dr. Christopher S. Baird University of Massachusetts Lowell

6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.

Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit

Nonlinear Fourier transform and the Beltrami equation. Visibility and Invisibility in Impedance Tomography

Written Examination. Antennas and Propagation (AA ) April 26, 2017.

= {{D α, D α }, D α }. = [D α, 4iσ µ α α D α µ ] = 4iσ µ α α [Dα, D α ] µ.

ES440/ES911: CFD. Chapter 5. Solution of Linear Equation Systems

DETERMINATION OF DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A 2DOF SYSTEM. by Zoran VARGA, Ms.C.E.

Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

Section 9.2 Polar Equations and Graphs

Forced Pendulum Numerical approach

( )( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) β = Chapter 5 Exercise Problems EX α So 49 β 199 EX EX EX5.4 EX5.5. (a)

Fourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics

forms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with

Problem Set 3: Solutions

k A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +

6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes

Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations

MATH423 String Theory Solutions 4. = 0 τ = f(s). (1) dτ ds = dxµ dτ f (s) (2) dτ 2 [f (s)] 2 + dxµ. dτ f (s) (3)

New bounds for spherical two-distance sets and equiangular lines

The Pohozaev identity for the fractional Laplacian


Tridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008

Geodesic Equations for the Wormhole Metric

( ) 2 and compare to M.

Solution Series 9. i=1 x i and i=1 x i.

Strain gauge and rosettes

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions

Variational Wavefunction for the Helium Atom

Lanczos and biorthogonalization methods for eigenvalues and eigenvectors of matrices

DERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION FOR AN APPLIED FORCE Revision C

1 String with massive end-points

12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Math221: HW# 1 solutions

CHAPTER 48 APPLICATIONS OF MATRICES AND DETERMINANTS

Space Physics (I) [AP-3044] Lecture 1 by Ling-Hsiao Lyu Oct Lecture 1. Dipole Magnetic Field and Equations of Magnetic Field Lines

PARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities

Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor

On a free boundary problem of magnetohydrodynamics in multi-connected domains

Note: Please use the actual date you accessed this material in your citation.

Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs

( y) Partial Differential Equations

Empirical best prediction under area-level Poisson mixed models

Higher Derivative Gravity Theories

The ε-pseudospectrum of a Matrix

Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II

Exercise 1.1. Verify that if we apply GS to the coordinate basis Gauss form ds 2 = E(u, v)du 2 + 2F (u, v)dudv + G(u, v)dv 2

5. Choice under Uncertainty

Section 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas

General 2 2 PT -Symmetric Matrices and Jordan Blocks 1

HOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:

A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation

Transcript:

Oberwolfach meeting on Computational Electromagnetism Feb 22 - Feb 28 Singularities of electromagnetic fields in the Maxwell and eddy current formulations Martin COSTABEL, Monique DAUGE, Serge NICAISE Institut de Recherche MAthématique de Rennes http://perso.univ-rennes1.fr/monique.dauge

Situation Ω C Conductor body Ω C : polyhedron with boundary B. Conductivity σ C, permittivity ε C and permeability µ C. Exterior region Ω E := B(0,R) \ Ω C. Conductivity σ E =0, permittivity ε E and permeability µ E. Region of interest Ω=B(0,R)=Ω C Ω E Ω E with σ, ε and µ defined on Ω. Perfect conductor boundary conditions on Ω = Ω E \ B

Outline Maxwell problem for an imperfect conductor. Gauge conditions Regularized variational form. Singularities of Type 1 and 2. Sobolev and weighted Sobolev regularity. Eddy current problem. Gauge conditions Regularized variational form. Eddy current pb as a limit of Maxwell (as δ ωεσ 1 0 ). Singularities of Type 1 and 2 (are also limits as δ 0 ). Regularity: The field inside a convex conductor is more regular than outside. Singularities of electromagnetic fields in the eddy current limit 2

Maxwell problem for a conductor Conductor body Ω C : polyhedron with boundary B (connected components B i ). Conductivity σ C, permittivity ε C and permeability µ C. Exterior region Ω E := B(0,R) \ Ω C for R large enough. Conductivity σ E =0, permittivity ε E and permeability µ E. Region of interest Ω=B(0,R)=Ω C Ω E. Conductivity σ, permittivity ε and permeability µ defined on Ω. Frequency ω, fixed. Perfect conductor boundary conditions on Ω = Ω E \ B. Source current density j 0 in L 2 (R 3 ) 3, with support in Ω C and divergence free, i.e. div j 0 =0in Ω C and j 0 n =0on B. Find the electromagnetic field (E, H) (i) curl E = iω µh in Ω, (Maxwell) (ii) curl H = (σ + iω ε)e + j 0 in Ω, (iii) E n = 0 & H n =0 on Ω. Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor Eddy 3

Conditions on the divergence of the electric field Taking the divergence of equation (ii) Therefore div αe =0, with α C = σ C + iω ε C and α E = iω ε E. (1) div E C =0 and div E E =0 (2) α C E C n = α E E E n on B. Equation (ii) also yields that E C = curl ψ with ψ =(iωε C + σ C ) 1 (H J 0 ) where J 0 is a vector potential for j 0. By localization around B i : E C n ds = B i div{curl(µ i ψ)} dx =0. Ω C Combining with (2) B i E E n ds =0 Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor Eddy 4

Regularized variational formulation We propose a variational space independent of σ, ε and ω : { Y(Ω) = u L 2 (Ω) 3 : curl u L 2 (Ω) 3, div u C L 2 (Ω C ), div u E L 2 (Ω E ) } u n =0 on Ω, B i u E n ds =0. The associate variational forms are for u, v Y(Ω) ( a(u, v) = µ 1 curl u curl v ω 2 εu v ) dx + iω σ C u C v C dx Ω Ω C a reg (u, v) =a(u, v) + div u C div v C dx + Ω C div u E div v E dx. Ω E The electric field E solution of (Maxwell) is the only solution of E Y(Ω), v Y(Ω), a reg (E, v) = iω(j 0,v) ΩC. Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor Eddy 5

Corner singularities, general recipe Fix a corner O (here O B ). Let (ρ, ϑ) be polar coordinates centered in O. Around O, the 3D space is shared into two complementary cones Γ C and Γ E reproducing the sharing by Ω C and Ω E : R 3 = Γ C Γ E. The general recipe consists in looking for solutions u of the form ρ λ U(ϑ) of the principal part of the associated elliptic bvp, with zero RHS: curl(µ 1 C curl u C) div u C =0 in Γ C, curl(µ 1 E curl u E ) div u E =0 in Γ E, [u n] =0, [αu n] =0 on I:= Γ C = Γ E, [µ 1 curl u n] =0, [curl u n] =0 on I, [div αu] =0, [α 1 n div αu] =0 on I. Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor 6

Corner singularities, Maxwell recipe Set q C = div α C u C, q E = div α E u E and ψ C = µ 1 C q C =0 in Γ C, q E =0 in Γ E, [q] =0, [α 1 n q]=0 on I. curl ψ C = q C, div(µ C ψ C )=0 in Γ C, curl ψ E = q E, div(µ E ψ E )=0 in Γ E, [ψ n] =0, [µψ n] =0 on I. curl u C = µ C ψ C, div α C u C = q C in Γ C, curl u E = µ E ψ E, div α E u E = q E in Γ E, [u n] =0, [αu n] =0 on I. curl u C, ψ E = µ 1 E curl u E. Type 3: Type 2: Type 1: general q particular ψ, particular u q =0, general ψ, particular u q =0, ψ =0, general u Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor 7

Maxwell Corner Singularities of Type 1 u C = Φ C and u E = Φ E with div Φ C =0 in Γ C, div Φ E =0 in Γ E, [Φ] = 0, [α n Φ] = 0 on I. The singular density Φ is in H 1 loc (R3 ) and is a singularity of the Laplace transmission problem with α : α = α C = σ C + iω ε C in Γ C and α = α E = iω ε E in Γ E. The singularities Φ=ρ λ ϕ(ϑ) with Re λ>0 and λ(λ +1)=ν eigenvalue and ϕ eigenvector of the problem (with G C =Γ C S 2 and G E =Γ E S 2 ) ϕ H 1 (S 2 ), ψ H 1 (S 2 ) α C ϕ ψ + G C α E ϕ ψ = ν G E { G C α C ϕψ + } α E ϕψ G E For wedges, this reduces to a 1D angular version: θ and λ 2 = ν. Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor Eddy 8

Maxwell Corner Singularities of Type 2 ψ C = Ψ C and ψ E = Ψ E with div Ψ C =0 in Γ C, div Ψ E =0 in Γ E, [Ψ] = 0, [µ n Ψ] = 0 on I. The density Ψ is a singularity ρ λ ψ(ϑ) of the Laplace transmission problem with µ : µ = µ C in Γ C and µ = µ E in Γ E. Then u =(λ +1) 1 (µ Ψ x r) with r solution of r C =0 in Γ C, r E =0 in Γ E, [r] =0, [α n r]=[αµ]( Ψ x) n on I. Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor Eddy 9

Sobolev regularity Let β α and β µ be the limiting regularity Sobolev exponents for the transmission Laplace operators div α and div µ respectively. Note that 3 2 <β µ < 2 and 1 <β α. Then E C H s (Ω C ) and E E H s (Ω E ), s <min{β α 1,β µ }. Moreover with E = Φ +E reg E reg C Hs (Ω C ) and E reg E H s (Ω E ), s <min{β α,β µ }. Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor Eddy 10

Weighted Sobolev spaces Isotropic spaces (Kondrat ev) and m N, β R Wβ {u m(ω) = L 2 loc (Ω) : α, α m, α u L 2 (V 0 ), } c corner, rc β+ α α u L 2 (Vc). Isotropic spaces (Nazarov-Plamenevskii) D = C or E, and m N, β R { K m β (Ω D)= u L 2 loc (Ω D) : α, α m, α u L 2 (V 0 ), c corner, e edge, r β+ α c α u L 2 (V 0 c ) r β+ α e α u L 2 (V e 0 ) and rβ+ α e α u L 2 (V e }. c) Anisotropic spaces (with α =(α,α 3 ) transverse - longitudinal to the edge) { M m β (Ω D)= u L 2 loc (Ω D) : α, α m, α u L 2 (V 0 ), c corner, rc β+ α α u L 2 (V c 0) e edge, r β+ α e α u L 2 (V e 0) and rα 3 c r β+ α e α u L 2 (V c e ) } Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor 11

Weighted (anisotropic) Sobolev regularity Suppose j 0 smooth. Let β α and β µ be the limiting regularity Sobolev exponents for the transmission Laplace operators div α and div µ respectively. Splitting of the electric field E = Φ +E reg with E reg C M β (Ω C) and E reg E M β (Ω E), β <min{β α,β µ } and the potential Φ=Φ 0 +Φ 1 +Φ reg, Φ reg H (Ω) and Φ 0 C M β (Ω C), Φ 0 E M β (Ω E), Φ 1 W β (Ω). Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor Conclusion 12

Eddy current equations Recall Maxwell equations. Find the electromagnetic field (E, H) curl E = iω µh in Ω, (Maxwell) curl H = (σ + iω ε)e + j 0 in Ω, E n = 0 & H n =0 on Ω. The Eddy Current equations are defined for σ>>εby setting ε to 0 in (Maxwell). Find the electromagnetic field (E, H) curl E = iω µh in Ω, (Eddy c.) curl H = σe + j 0 in Ω, E n = 0 & H n =0 on Ω. Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor Maxwell 13

Conditions on the divergence of the electric field Taking the divergence of the 2d equation div σe =0, with σ = σ C in Ω C and σ E =0. Therefore div E C =0 and E C n =0 on B We have nothing on div E E. We impose as gauge conditions, the conditions we obtained from (Maxwell) before passing to the limit: div E E =0 and B i E E n ds =0 Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor Maxwell 14

The eddy current equations as limiting equations Set ωε = δ ε where δ>0 is a small parameter ε has the same order of magnitude as σ C. The assumption that δ is small reflects the fact that the product ωε is small with respect to σ C. We write (Maxwell) and (Eddy c.) in a unified way, for δ>0 and δ =0, resp.: curl E δ = iω µh δ in Ω, (P δ ) curl H δ = (σ + iδ ε)e δ + j 0 in Ω, E δ n = 0 & H δ n =0 on Ω. Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor Maxwell 15

Regularized variational formulations We propose a variational space independent of σ, ε and ω : { Y(Ω) = u L 2 (Ω) 3 : curl u L 2 (Ω) 3, div u C L 2 (Ω C ), div u E L 2 (Ω E ) } u n =0 on Ω, B i u E n ds =0. The associate variational forms are for u, v Y(Ω) a δ ( (u, v) = µ 1 curl u curl v ωδ εu v ) dx + iω σ C u C v C dx Ω Ω C a δ reg (u, v) =aδ (u, v) + div u C div v C dx + Ω C div u E div v E dx. Ω E The electric field E solution of (P δ ) solves E δ Y(Ω), v Y(Ω), a δ reg (E, v) = iω(j 0,v) ΩC. Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor Maxwell 16

The eddy current limit Theorem (i) δ 0 > 0 s. t. the sesquilinear forms a δ reg are uniformly coercive for δ [0,δ 0]. (ii) We have the uniform bound: C >0, δ [0,δ 0 ], E δ Y(Ω) C. (iii) We have the convergence as δ 0 : C >0, δ [0,δ 0 ], E δ E 0 Y(Ω) Cδ. The singularities are of Type 1 and 2, also in the limit δ =0, and they depend continuously on δ.../... Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor Maxwell 17

Eddy current Corner Singularities of Type 1 u C = Φ C and u E = Φ E with div Φ C =0 in Γ C, div Φ E =0 in Γ E, [Φ] = 0, n Φ C =0 on I. We have either (i) or (ii) (i) Φ C is a singularity of the Laplace Neumann problem, Φ E has the same degree λ. (ii) Φ C =0and Φ E is a singularity of the Laplace Dirichlet problem. Skip to Type 2 Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor Maxwell 18

Using the harmonic extension P E from G C := Γ C S 2 into G E := Γ E S 2, we can write the singularities eigenvalue pb in the unified way for δ =0and δ>0 : Find (ϕ C, ϕ 0 ) H 1 (G C ) H0 1(G E), (ψ C, ψ 0 ) H 1 (G C ) H0 1(G E) : a δ (ϕ C, ϕ 0 ; ψ C, ψ 0 ) = νb δ (ϕ C, ϕ 0 ; ψ C, ψ 0 ) The singularity of Type 1 is u = Φ with Φ C = r λ ϕ C and Φ E = r λ (P E ϕ C + ϕ 0 ). Let η = iδ ε E. σ C + iδ ε C The forms a δ and b δ depend continuously on δ [0,δ 0 ] : a δ = ϕ C ψ C + η G C P E ϕ C P E ψ C + G E G E ϕ 0 ψ 0 and b δ = G C ϕ C ψ C + η G E ( PE ϕ C P E ψ C + ϕ 0 P E ψ C ) + G E ( PE ϕ C ψ 0 + ϕ 0 ψ 0 ). Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor Maxwell 19

Eddy current Corner Singularities of Type 2 ψ C = Ψ C and ψ E = Ψ E with div Ψ C =0 in Γ C, div Ψ E =0 in Γ E, [Ψ] = 0, [µ n Ψ] = 0 on I. The density Ψ is a singularity ρ λ ψ(ϑ) of the Laplace transmission problem with µ : µ = µ C in Γ C and µ = µ E in Γ E. Then u =(λ +1) 1 (µ Ψ x r) with r solution of r C =0 in Γ C, r E =0 in Γ E, [r] =0, n r C = µ C ( Ψ C x) n on I. Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor Maxwell 20

Sobolev regularity Let β Dir E, βneu C and β µ be the limiting regularity Sobolev exponents for the Dirichlet pb on Ω E, Neumann pb on Ω C and the transmission pb div µ respectively: Then 3 2 <β µ < 2 and 3 2 < min{βneu C, βdir E } < 2 E C H s (Ω C ) Moreover s <min{βc Neu 1,β µ }. and { E E H s (Ω E ), s <min E = Φ +E reg } min{βc Neu, βdir E } 1,β µ. with E reg C Hs (Ω C ) s <min{β Neu C, β µ} and E reg E H s (Ω E ), s <min{min{βc Neu, βdir E },β µ}. Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor Maxwell 21

Conclusion: How to approximate these solutions? Combining with FEM techniques already investigated for Maxwell equations in polyhedral bodies, we may hope that the following will provide good approximations (considered the nasty singularities): Curl-Conforming Elements (first NÉDÉLEC family of edge elements) used with a Lagrange multiplier in Ω E (KIKUSHI formulation) Weighted Regularization Method with nodal FEM in Ω C and Ω E. Singular Complement Method (for axisymmetric domains only). The performances of all methods may hopefully be dramatically improved by the use of anisotropic refinement along edges and at corners, and higher degree polynomials. Plan Regularity and Singularities for a polyhedral conductor Maxwell 22