Global weak solution to the viscous two-phase model with finite energy
|
|
- Σατανᾶς Δαγκλής
- 5 χρόνια πριν
- Προβολές:
Transcript
1 Global weak solution to the viscous two-phase model with finite energy Alexis Vasseur Huanyao Wen Cheng Yu April 23, 217 Abstract In this paper, we prove the existence of global weak solutions to the compressible Navier- Stokes equations when the pressure law is in two variables. The method is based on the Lions argument and the Feireisl-Novotny-Petzeltova method. The main contribution of this paper is to develop a new argument for handling a nonlinear pressure law P (ρ, n) = ρ γ + n α where ρ, n satisfy the mass equations. This yields the strong convergence of the densities, and provides the existence of global solutions in time, for the compressible barotropic Navier-Stokes equations, with large data. The result holds in three space dimensions on condition that the adiabatic constants γ > 9 5 and α 1. Our result is the first global existence theorem on the viscous compressible two-phase model with pressure law in two variables, for large initial data, in the multidimensional space. keywords. two-phase model, compressible Navier-Stokes equations, global weak solutions. AMS Subject Classifications (21). 76T1, 35Q3, 35D3 1 Introduction We are particularly interested in the Dirichlet problem of a viscous two-phase model. The model is governed by the following compressible Navier-Stokes equations with a pressure law in two variables. Our paper is devoted to the proof of the existence of global weak solutions to the following system n t + div(nu) =, ρ t + div(ρu) =, (ρ + n)u ] t + div (ρ + n)u u ] + P (n, ρ) = µ u + (µ + λ) divu with the initial and boundary conditions on (, ), (1.1) n(x, ) = n (x), ρ(x, ) = ρ (x), (ρ + n)u(x, ) = M (x) for x, (1.2) u = for t, (1.3) where P (n, ρ) = ρ γ + n α denotes the pressure for γ > 1 and α 1, u stands for the velocity of fluid, ρ and n are the densities of two phases, µ and λ are the viscosity coefficients. Here we assume that µ and λ are fixed constants, and µ >, 2µ + 3λ. Department of Mathematics, The University of Texas at Austin, USA; vasseur@math.utexas.edu. School of Mathematics, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China; mahywen@scut.edu.cn. Department of Mathematics, The University of Texas at Austin, USA; yucheng@math.utexas.edu. 1
2 The two-phase model was originally developed by Zuber and Findlay 35], Wallis 33], and Ishii 2, 21]. In the case α = 1 in (1.1), this corresponds to the hydrodynamic equations in 6, 3]. It could be derived from the coupled system by the compressible Navier-Stokes equations and a kinetic equation, by using asymptotic analysis, see 6, 3]. In the case α = 2 in (1.1), it is related to a similar but different model, i.e., a compressible Oldroyd-B type model with stress diffusion, see 1]. Compared to the classical compressible Navier-Stokes equations, here the pressure law P (ρ, n) = ρ γ + n α is in two variables. In this context, the existence of weak solutions to equations (1.1) remained open until now. We refer the reader to 2, 3, 4, 2, 21, 33, 35] for more physical background and discussion of numerical studies for such mathematical models. Compared to incompressible flow, it is a tough problem to handle the issue of the vacuum in the study of the compressible flows. The first existence result on the compressible Navier-Stokes equations in one dimensional space was established by Kazhikhov and Shelukhin 23], where the initial density should be bounded away from zero due to the obstacle from the vacuum. This result has been extended by Hoff 15] and Serre 31] for the discontinuous initial data, and by Mellet- Vasseur 29] in the case of density dependent viscosity coefficient. For 2D or 3D case, the first global existence with the small initial data was proved by Matsumura and Nishida 26, 27, 28], and later by Hoff 16, 17, 18] for discontinuous initial data. Lions in 24] introduced the concept of renormalized solutions for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations which can control the possible oscillation of density. This removes the barrier of vacuum. Thus the global existence for γ 9 5 concerning large initial data was constructed by Lions 24] and then later improved by Jiang and Zhang 22] for spherically symmetric initial data for γ > 1 and by Feireisl-Novotný-Petzeltová 13] and Feireisl 14] for γ > 3 2, and even to Navier-Stokes-Fourier system. It is crucial in 24, 22, 13] to obtain the higher integrability of the density due to the elliptic structure of the pressure P = ρ γ. Relying on this structure, Lions deduced that the density ρ is uniformly bounded in L γ+ 2γ 3 1. However, as 1 γ 3 2, the construction of the weak solutions for large data remains largely open, see 25]. The primary difficulty is the possible concentration of the convective term for this case. Very recently, Hu 19] studied the concentration phenomenon of the kinetic energy, ρ u 2, associated to isentropic compressible Navier-Stokes equations for 1 γ 3 2. Here, we have to mention the work of Bresch-Jabin 5], where the authors proved global existence of appropriate weak solutions for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations for more general pressure law in one variable. The problem becomes even more challenging when pressure law is in two variables as follows P (ρ, n) = ρ γ + n α. To the best of our knowledge, the only available results on global existence of the solutions to system (1.1) with large initial data concern the one-dimensional case, see 9, 11]. See also 8, 1, 34] for more relevant works. In 1], Barrett-Lu-Suli established the existence of weak solutions to a compressible Oldroyd-B type model with the pressure law P = ρ γ + n 2, but the equation of n has a term ɛ n. This provides higher regularity of n due to the parabolic structure. Our goal of this current paper is to establish the existence of global weak solution to (1.1) with large data. The main obstacles are from the nonlinear pressure law in two variables. One is the concentration phenomenon of convective term related to n, that is nu u when 1 α 3 2. This is reminiscent to improving the range of γ for the weak solution to the compressible Navier-Stokes equations, which is a long standing open problem. The other is oscillation of the pressure term ρ γ + n α because we have to handle the cross products like ρ γ n and n α ρ for the compactness. To control these possible oscillation and concentration, a novel approach will be developed in the paper. Our approach relies 2
3 on a commutator lemma. By the following energy inequality (1.4), we see that u L 2 (, T ; H 1 ()). To apply a commutator lemma for (1.1) 1 and(1.1) 2, the densities ρ and n are needed to be bounded in L 2 (, T ; L 2 ()). This requires γ + 2γ because ρ is bounded in 2γ Lγ+ 3 1 (, T ; ), that is, γ 9 5. Due to one more technical reason for (5.36), we need γ > 9 5. The current work is the first result on global solutions to the viscous two-phase model (1.1) with large initial data in high dimensions. Meanwhile, it is an extension for the works of 24, 13] to a nonlinear pressure law P (ρ, n) = ρ γ + n α in two variables. The new argument developed in this paper allows us to handle the more general pressure law, and helps us to study the other challenging models in the complex fluids. This provides new insight for improving the range of γ for the weak solution to the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. For any smooth solution of system (1.1), the following energy inequality holds for any time t T : d (ρ + n) u 2 + G α (n) + 1 dt 2 γ 1 ργ] dx + µ u 2 + (µ + λ) divu 2] dx, (1.4) where As usual, we assume that G α (n) = (ρ + n ) u 2 { n ln n n + 1, for α = 1, 2 n α α 1, for α > 1. + G α (n ) + 1 ] γ 1 ργ dx < in the whole paper. Thus, we set the following restriction on the initial data inf ρ, x inf x n, ρ L γ (), G α (n ) L 1 (), (1.5) and M ρ + n L 2 () where M ρ + n = on {x ρ (x) + n (x) = }. (1.6) The energy inequality allows us to give the following definition of weak solutions in the energy space. Definition 1.1 We call (ρ, n, u) : (, ) R + R + R 3 a global weak solution of (1.1)-(1.3) if for any < T < +, ρ L (, T ; L γ () ), G α (n) L (, T ; L 1 () ), ρ + nu L (, T ; L 2 () ), u L 2(, T ; H 1 ()), (ρ, n, u) solves the system (1.1) in D (Q T ), where Q T = (, T ), ( ρ, n, (ρ + n)u ) (x, ) = ( ρ (x), n (x), M (x) ), for a.e. x, The energy inequality (1.4) holds in D ( R 3 (, T ) ), (1.1) 1 and(1.1) 2 hold in D ( R 3 (, T ) ) provided ρ, n, u are prolonged to be zero on R 3 /, 3
4 the equation (1.1) 1 and (1.1) 2 are satisfied in the sense of renormalized solutions, i.e., t b(f) + div ( b(f)u ) + b (f)f b(f)]divu = holds in D (Q T ), for any b C 1 (R) such that b (z) for all z R large enough, where f = ρ, n. The weak solution in the sense of above definition is called a renormalized solution. The renormalized solution was first introduced by DiPerna-Lions 7] for the kinetic equation. It has been used in the compressible Navier-Stokes equations by Lions 24]. The main result of this paper reads as follows Theorem 1.2 Let the initial data be under the conditions (1.5)-(1.6), and { n c ρ on if α 1, γ + τ), 1 c ρ n c ρ on if α γ + τ, ) where c is a positive constant and τ = min { 1, 2γ 3 1, γ } 3, then there exists a global weak solution (ρ, n, u) to (1.1)-(1.3) for any γ > 9 5 and α 1. The proof of Theorem 1.2 will be done by means of an error estimate (Theorem 2.2) and the following approximation system n t + div(nu) = ɛ n, ρ t + div(ρu) = ɛ ρ, (ρ + n)u ] t + div (ρ + n)u u ] + (n α + ρ γ ) + δ (ρ + n) β + ɛ u (ρ + n) = µ u + (µ + λ) divu with suitable regularized initial and boundary conditions, where ɛ > and δ > are small, and β > large enough. This approximation was motivated by the work of 13]. It can be solved by the Galerkin argument in the similar way as 13]. To recover a weak solution to (1.1), we have to develop new argument to handle the difficulty resulting from the pressure law in two variables. Our main tool is Theorem 2.2, which allows us to control the error of two variables in some sense. This yields the compactness of the sequence of solutions. Our novelty is stated as follows. In Section 2, we develop a new tool to handle the pressure law in two variables. In particular, for any ρ K and n K which are the solutions to the following equations respectively, and (ρ K ) t + div(ρ K u K ) = ν K ρ K, ρ K t= = ρ, ν K ρ K ν =, n K (n K ) t + div(n K u K ) = ν K n K, n K t= = n, ν K ν = with ν K, and ν K as K +, then for any s > 1, lim K + T (1.7) ρ K a K a s dx dt =, (1.8) where a K = n K ρk if ρ K, a = n ρ if ρ, a K, a C for some positive constant C independent of K, a K ρ K = n K, aρ = n, and (n, ρ) is the limit of (n K, ρ K ) in a suitable weak topology. This 4
5 helps us to study the pressure law in two variables. We are able to pass to the limits as ɛ and δ relying on (1.8) because it is true even for ν K =. In section 3, we solve the approximation system by the Galerkin argument. For the Galerkin level, we point out that n k c ρ k is a solution of the following parabolic equation (n k c ρ k ) t + div ] (n k c ρ k )u k = ɛ (nk c ρ k ), (n k c ρ k ) t= = n,δ c ρ,δ, (n k c ρ k ) ν =, where n,δ and ρ,δ are given by (3.4). The maximum principle gives us that n k could be bounded by ρ k. This implies that n k at least has the same integrability as ρ k. It allows us to avoid concentration phenomenon of convective term nu u for each level approximation, even if 1 α 9 5. In section 4, we study the limits as ɛ goes to zero. The focus of this section is to prove n α + ρ γ + δ(ρ + n) β = n α + ρ γ + δ(ρ + n) β. Here and always, f is the weak limit of f ɛ. One of the key step is to control the product of n α ɛ + ρ γ ɛ and n ɛ + ρ ɛ, we rewrite them as follows n α ɛ + ρ γ ɛ =ρ γ ɛ + a α ɛ ρ α ɛ = ρ γ ɛ + a α ρ α ɛ + (a α ɛ a α )ρ α ɛ, n ɛ + ρ ɛ =ρ ɛ + a ɛ ρ ɛ = ρ ɛ + aρ ɛ + (a ɛ a)ρ ɛ, where a ɛ = nɛ ρ ɛ if ρ ɛ, a = n ρ if ρ, a ɛ, a c, and a ɛ ρ ɛ = n ɛ, aρ = n, (ρ, n) is the limit of (ρ ɛ, n ɛ ) in a suitable weak topology. Here we want to show (a α ɛ a α )ρ α ɛ (n ɛ + ρ ɛ ) and (a ɛ a)ρ ɛ (ρ γ ɛ + a α ρ α ɛ ) in some sense as ɛ. This can be done because ρ ɛ and n ɛ are bounded uniformly for ɛ in L β+1 (Q T ) where β > max{α, γ, 4}, and T ρ ɛ a ɛ a 2 dx dt =. lim ɛ + It is an application of (1.8) with ν K = ɛ. In section 5, we recover the weak solution by letting δ goes to zero. The highlight of this section is to show n α + ρ γ = n α + ρ γ, which is similar to the limits in term of ɛ. However, we loose the regularity resulting from δ(ρ+n) β. we have to use a cut-off function which was used in 13] to show the strong convergence of ρ δ and n δ. With (1.8) for ν K =, the compactness could be done. At this level of approximation, we require γ > 9 5 such that ρ δ is bounded in L γ+θ (Q T ) with γ + θ > 2 for some θ satisfying θ < γ 3 and θ min { 1, 2γ 3 1}. 2 An error estimate The main objective of this section is to prove the following Theorem 2.2. The key estimate (2.17) in Theorem 2.2 is crucial to obtain the weak stability of solutions to (1.1). We begin with the following Lemma
6 Lemma 2.1 Let {(g K, h K )} K=1 be a sequence with the following properties (g K, h K ) (g, h) weakly in L p (Q T ) as K, (2.9) for any given p > 1, g K, h K, and T T lim a K h K dx dt ha h dx dt, (2.1) K + where a K = h K gk if g K, a h = h g if g, a K, a h C for some positive constant C independent of K, and a K g K = h K, a h g = h, then T lim g K a K a h 2 dx dt =. (2.11) K + In particular, for any s > 1. Proof. T one obtains T lim K + Note that g K a K a h 2 dx dt = T lim g K a K a h s dx dt =, (2.12) K + T T T a K h K dx dt 2 h K a h dx dt + g K a 2 h dx dt, T T T g K a K a h 2 dx dt ha h dx dt 2 ha h dx dt + ha h dx dt =, where we have used a K g K = h K, a h g = h, (2.1) and the weak compactness of g K and h K in (2.9). This deduces (2.11). By the Hölder inequality and (2.11), (2.12) follows for s (1, 2). If s 2, ), note that (a K a h ) is bounded in L ( (, T ) ). This allows us to have (2.12). Theorem 2.2 Let ν K as K +, and ν K. If ρ K and n K are the solutions to and (ρ K ) t + div(ρ K u K ) = ν K ρ K, ρ K t= = ρ, ν K ρ K ν =, (2.13) (n K ) t + div(n K u K ) = ν K n K, n K t= = n, ν K n K ν =, (2.14) respectively, with C > independent of K such that n K (x, t) C ρ K (x, t) for any (x, t), (2.15) ρ K L (,T ;L 2 ()) C, ν K ρ K L 2 (,T ;L 2 ()) C, ν K n K L 2 (,T ;L 2 ()) C, 6
7 for any K > and any t > : Then, up to a subsequence, we have u K L 2 (,T ;H 1 ()) C, n 2 K n 2 dx dx. (2.16) ρ K ρ n K n, ρ K ρ weakly in L (, T ; L 2 ()), u K u weakly in L 2 (, T ; H 1 ()); and for any s > 1, T lim ρ K a K a s dx dt =, (2.17) K + where a K = n K ρk if ρ K, a = n ρ if ρ, a K, a C for some positive constant C, and a K ρ K = n K, aρ = n. Remark 2.3 If ν K >, u K is smooth enough and ρ K is bounded by below, then (2.16) is verified. In fact, choosing ϕ(ρ K, n K ) = n2 K ρk, one obtains Note that ϕ(ρ K, n K ) t + ν K ( 2 ϕ ρ 2 K and ϕ is convex, thus we have + div(ϕu K ) + ϕ ρ K ρ K + ϕ n K n K ϕ] ρ K ϕ ρ 2 K n K 2 2 ϕ + 2 ρ K n K ) ν K ϕ =. ρ K n K ϕ ρ K + ϕ n K ϕ = ρ K n K d ϕ(ρ K, n K ) dx. dt We will rely on the following lemma to prove our main result of this section. Lemma 2.4 Let β : R N R be a C 1 function with β(x) L (R N ), and R ( L 2 (, T ; L 2 ()) ) N, u L 2 (, T ; H 1 ()) satisfy in the distribution sense. Then we have t R + div(u R) =, R t= = R (x) (2.18) (β(r)) t + div(β(r)u) + β(r) R β(r)]divu = (2.19) in the distribution sense. Moreover, if R L (, T ; L γ ()) for γ > 1, then R C(, T ]; L 1 ()), and so β(r) dx(t) = β(r ) dx t β(r) R β(r)]divu dx dt. 7
8 Remark 2.5 If N = 1, it is the result of Feireisl 14]. To prove Lemma 2.4, we shall rely on the following lemma which was called the commutator lemma. Lemma ]. There exists C > such that for any ρ L 2 (R d ) and u H 1 (R d ), In addition, η σ div(ρu) div(u(ρ η σ )) L 1 (R d ) C u H 1 (R d ) ρ L 2 (R d ). η σ div(ρu) div(u(ρ η σ )) in L 1 (R d ), as σ, where η σ = 1 η( x σ d σ ), and η(x) is a smooth even function compactly supported in the space ball of radius 1, and with integral equal to 1. Proof of Lemma 2.4. Here, we devote the proof of Lemma 2.4. The first two steps are similar to the work of 13]. Step 1: Proof of (2.19). Applying the regularizing operator f f η σ to both sides of (2.18), we obtain (R σ ) t + div(u R σ ) = S σ, (2.2) almost everywhere on O Ō (, T ) provided σ > small enough, where S σ = div(u R σ ) (div(u R)) σ, and f σ (x) = f η σ. Thanks to Lemma 2.6, we conclude that S σ in L 1 (O) as σ. Equation (2.2) multiplied by β(r), where β is a C 1 function, gives us β(r σ )] t + divβ(r σ )u] + β(r σ ) R σ β(r σ )]divu = β(r σ ) S σ. This yields (2.19) by letting σ. Step 2: Continuity of R in the strong topology. By (2.19), we have t T K (R) + div(t K (R)u) + ( T K (R) R T K (R))divu = in D ((, T ) ), (2.21) where T k (R) is a cutoff function verifying T K (R) = T K ( R ), and T K (z) = KT ( z K ), and T (z) = z for any z, 1], and it is concave on, ), T (z) = 2 for anyz 3, and T is a C function. We conclude that T K (R) is bounded in C(, T ]; L 2 weak ()) due to R L (, T ; L 2 ()). Thanks to (2.21), we have T K (R) belong to C(, T ]; L γ weak ()) (2.22) 8
9 for any K 1. Applying the same argument as in step 1 for (2.21), we have t T K (R)] σ + div(t K (R)] σ u) = A σ K a.e. on (, T ) U, (2.23) where U is a compact subset of. Thanks to Lemma 2.6, A σ K is bounded in L2 (, T ; L 1 ()). Meanwhile, using 2T K (R)] σ to multiply (2.23), we have t (T K (R)] σ ) 2 + div((t K (R)] σ ) 2 u) + (T K (R)] σ ) 2 divu = 2T K (R)] σ A σ K. Thus, for any test function η D(), the family of functions with respect to σ for fixed K t (T K (R)] σ ) 2 (t, x)η(x) dx, σ > is precompact in C, T ]. Note that T K (R)] σ T K (R)] in L 2 () for any t, T ] as σ, we obtain t (T K (R)]) 2 (t, x)η(x) dx is in C, T ] for any fixed η(x). Thus, T K (R) C(, T ]; L 2 ()) for any fixed K 1. It allows us to have thanks to (2.22). Step 3: Final inequality. R (C(, T ]; L 1 ())) N, Taking integration on (2.19) with respect to t, we have β(r(t)) dx = β(r(s)) dx where < s < t < T. Thanks to R (C(, T ]; L 1 ())) N, we are able to let s, thus for any t T. β(r(t)) dx = β(r ) dx t s t β(r) R β(r)]divu dx dt, β(r) R β(r)]divu dx dt Now, we are going to prove our main result in this section-theorem 2.2. Proof of Theorem 2.2. Up to a subsequence, ρ K ρ, n K n weakly in L (, T ; L 2 ()), u K u weakly in L 2 (, T ; H 1 ()), (2.24) as K. Passing to the limit as K in (2.13) and (2.14) respectively, we have ρ t + div(ρu) =, ρ t= = ρ, 9
10 and and n t + div(nu) =, n t= = n, n C ρ a.e. on (, T ). Using Lemma 2.4 with R = (n, ρ) and u = u, β σ (n, ρ) = σ n2, thus we have, thanks to Lemma 2.4: (ρ+σ) 2 for almost everywhere t, T ]. Note that n(t, x) 2 ρ(t, x) + σ dx = n 2 ρ + σ dx σ n 2 ρ + σ n2 ρ and t n2 ρ+σ, note that β σ(r) R β σ (R) = n 2 ρ + σ n2 ρ, n 2 divu dx dt, (ρ + σ) 2 by the dominated convergence theorem, we obtain the following equality by letting σ goes to zero, n(t, x) 2 ρ(t, x) dx = n 2 dx (2.25) ρ for almost everywhere t, T ]. By (2.16) and (2.25), one obtains that n K (t, x) 2 ρ K (t, x) dx = n(t, x) 2 n K a K dx ρ(t, x) dx = na dx (2.26) for almost everywhere t, T ]. Thanks to (2.24), setting (n K, ρ K ) = (h K, g K ) for Lemma 2.1, one obtains (2.17) for any s > 1. 3 Faedo-Galerkin approach In this section, we construct a global weak solution (ρ, n, u) to the following approximation (3.1)- (3.3) with a finite energy. In addition, a particular connection between ρ and n is given in Lemma 3.1. It will be crucial in this paper. Motivated by the work of 13], we propose the following approximation system n t + div(nu) = ɛ n, ρ t + div(ρu) = ɛ ρ, (ρ + n)u ] t + div (ρ + n)u u ] + (n α + ρ γ ) + δ (ρ + n) β + ɛ u (ρ + n) = µ u + (µ + λ) divu on (, ), with initial and boundary condition ( ρ, n, (ρ + n)u ) t= = (ρ,δ, n,δ, M,δ ) on, (3.2) (3.1) 1
11 ( ρ ν, n ν, u) =, (3.3) where ɛ, δ >, β > max{α, γ}, M,δ = (ρ,δ + n,δ )u,δ and n,δ, ρ,δ C 3 (), u,δ C 3() satisfying < δ ρ,δ δ 1 2β, < δ n,δ c ρ,δ, ( n,δ ν, ρ,δ ν ) =, ( ) lim ρ,δ ρ L δ γ () + n,δ n L γ () + n,δ n L α () =, u δ = ϕ δ ρ,δ η +n δ ( ρ M,δ +n ), (3.4) ρ,δ + n,δ u,δ M ρ +n in L 2 () as δ, m,δ M in L 1 () as δ, where δ (, 1), η is the standard mollifier, ϕ δ C (), ϕ δ 1 on and ϕ δ 1 on { x dist(x, ) > δ }. We are able to use Faedo-Galerkin approach to construct a global weak solution to (3.1), (3.2) and (3.3). To begin with, we consider a sequence of finite dimensional spaces X k = span{ψ j } k j=1] 3, k {1, 2, 3, }, where {ψ i } i=1 is the set of the eigenfunctions of the Laplacian: ψ i = λ i ψ i on, ψ i =. For any given ɛ, δ >, we shall look for the approximate solution u k C(, T ]; X k ) (for any fixed T > ) given by the following form: t ] (ρ k + n k )u k (t) ψ dx m,δ ψ dx = µ uk + (µ + λ) divu k ψ dx ds t div ] ] (3.5) (ρ k + n k )u k u k + (n α k + ρ γ k ) + δ (ρ k + n k ) β + ɛ u k (ρ k + n k ) ψ dx ds for t, T ] and ψ X k, where ρ k = ρ k (u k ) and n k = n k (u k ) satisfying t n k + div(n k u k ) = ɛ n k, From Remark 2.3, we have Using the convexity of ϕ(ρ, n) = n2 ρ t ρ k + div(ρ k u k ) = ɛ ρ k, n k t= = n,δ, ρ k t= = ρ,δ, ( ρ k ν, n k ν ) =. n 2 k n 2 dx dx for every t >. ρ k ρ and letting k, we have n 2 ρ dx (3.6) n 2 ρ dx, for every t >. (3.7) 11
12 This holds for the solutions of the each level approximation. Due to Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2 in 13], the problem (3.5) can be solved on a short time interval, T k ] for T k T by a standard fixed point theorem on the Banach space C(, T k ]; X k ). To show that T k = T, we need the uniform estimates resulting from the following energy equality d dt + + where (ρk + n k ) u k 2 + G α (n k ) + 1 γ 1 ργ k + 2 µ u k 2 + (µ + λ) divu k 2] dx ɛαn α 2 k δ β 1 (ρ k + n k ) β] dx n k 2 + ɛγρ γ 2 k ρ k 2 + ɛβδ(ρ k + n k ) β 2 (ρ k + n k ) 2] dx =, on (, T k ), G α (n k ) = n k ln n k n k + 1, for α = 1, n α k α 1, for α > 1. This could be done by differentiating (3.5) with respect to time, taking ψ = u k (t) and using (3.6). We refer the readers to 13] for more details. Thus, we obtain a solution (ρ k, n k, u k ) to (3.5)-(3.6) globally in time t. The next step is to pass the limit of (ρ k, n k, u k ) as k. Following the same arguments of Section 2.3 of 13], energy equality (3.8) gives us the following bounds (3.8) < 1 c k ρ k (x, t), n k (x, t) c k for a.e.(x, t) (, T ), (3.9) sup ρ k (t) γ L γ () C(ρ, n, M ), (3.1) t,t ] sup n k (t) α L α () C(ρ, n, M ) for α 1, (3.11) t,t ] δ sup ρ k (t) + n k (t) β L t,t ] β () C(ρ, n, M ), (3.12) sup ρ k + n k (t)u k (t) 2 L 2 () C(ρ, n, M ), (3.13) t,t ] and T u k (t) 2 H 1 () dt C(ρ, n, M ), (3.14) T ( ɛ ρk (t) 2 L 2 () + n k(t) 2 ) L 2 () dt C(β, δ, ρ, n, M ), (3.15) ρ k + n k L β+1 (Q T ) C(ɛ, β, δ, ρ, n, M ), (3.16) where Q T = (, T ) and β 4. To gain higher integrability estimate of n k independent of k, ɛ, and δ when α is less than γ, we need the following lemma. 12
13 Lemma 3.1 If (ρ k, n k, u k ) is a solution to (3.5) and (3.6), then the following inequality holds for a.e. (x, t) Q T. n k (x, t) c ρ k (x, t) (3.17) Proof. It is easy to check that n k c ρ k is a solution of the following parabolic equation (n k c ρ k ) t + div ] (n k c ρ k )u k = ɛ (nk c ρ k ), (n k c ρ k ) t= = n,δ c ρ,δ, (n k c ρ k ) ν =. (3.17) can be obtained by applying the maximum principle on it. With the help of (3.1), (3.11), and (3.17), it yields the following estimate on n k sup n k (t) α 1 L α 1 () C(ρ, n, M ), (3.18) t,t ] where α 1 = max{α, γ}. Relying on the above uniform estimates, i.e., (3.1)-(3.17) and (3.18), and the Aubin-Lions lemma, we are able to recover the global solution to approximation system (3.1)-(3.3) by passing to the limit for (ρ k, n k, u k ) as k. We have the following Proposition on the weak solutions of the approximation (3.1), (3.2) and (3.3). Proposition 3.2 Suppose β > max{4, α, γ}. For any given ɛ, δ >, there exists a global weak solution (ρ, n, u) to (3.1), (3.2) and (3.3) such that for any given T >, the following estimates sup (ρ(t), n(t)) γ L γ () C(ρ, n, M ), (3.19) t,t ] sup n(t) α L α () C(ρ, n, M ), (3.2) t,t ] δ sup (ρ(t), n(t)) β L t,t ] β () C(ρ, n, M ), (3.21) sup ρ + n(t)u(t) 2 L 2 () C(ρ, n, M ), (3.22) t,t ] T u(t) 2 H 1 () dt C(ρ, n, M ), (3.23) and T ɛ ( ρ(t), n(t)) 2 L 2 () dt C(β, δ, ρ, n, M ), (3.24) (ρ(t), n(t)) L β+1 (Q T ) C(ɛ, β, δ, ρ, n, M ) (3.25) 13
14 hold, where the norm (, ) denotes +, and ρ, n a.e. on Q T. In addition, ρ and n satisfy n(x, t) c ρ(x, t) for a.e. (x, t) Q T. (3.26) Finally, there exists r > 1 such that ρ t, n t, 2 ρ, 2 n L r (Q T ) and the equations (3.1) 1 and (3.1) 2 are satisfied a.e. on Q T. Remark 3.3 The solution (ρ, n, u) stated in Proposition 3.2 actually depends on ɛ and δ. We omit the dependence in the solution itself for brevity. 4 The vanishing viscosity limit ɛ + The goal of this section is to pass to the limit of (ρ ɛ, n ɛ, u ɛ ) as ɛ goes to zero. To vanish ɛ, the uniform estimates are needed. Compared to the work of 13], the pressure law here is in two variables, which bring new difficulty-possible oscillation of ρ γ +n α. The uniform estimates resulting from the energy inequality in Proposition 3.2 and Lemma 4.1 are not enough to handle the weak limit of such a pressure. In Section 3.1, we pass to the limits for the weak solution constructed in Proposition 3.2 as ɛ goes to zero by standard compactness argument. In Section 3.2, we will focus on the weak limit of the pressure and the strong convergence of ρ ɛ and n ɛ. In this section, let C denote a generic positive constant depending on the initial data and δ but independent of ɛ. 4.1 Passing to the limit as ɛ + The uniform estimates resulting from (3.19), (3.2), and (3.21) are not enough to obtain the convergence of the pressure term ρ γ ɛ + n α ɛ. Thus we need to obtain higher integrability estimates of the pressure term uniformly for ɛ. First, following the same argument in 13], we are able to get the following estimate in Lemma 4.1. Lemma 4.1 Let (ρ, n, u) be the solution stated in Proposition 3.2, then for β > 4. T (n α+1 + ρ γ+1 + δρ β+1 + δn β+1 ) dx dt C With Lemma 4.1 and (3.26), one obtains the following bound on n, which is crucial to get the convergence of n α. Corollary 4.2 Let (ρ, n, u) be the solution stated in Lemma 3.2, then T n γ+1 dx dt C. (4.1) In this step, we fix δ > and shall let ɛ +. Then the solution (ρ, n, u) constructed in Proposition 3.2 is naturally dressed in the subscript ɛ, i.e., (ρ ɛ, n ɛ, u ɛ ). 14
15 With (3.19)-(3.24), Lemma 4.1, and (4.1), letting ɛ + (take the subsequence if necessary), we have (ρ ɛ, n ɛ ) (ρ, n) in C(, T ]; L β weak ()) and weakly in Lβ+1 (Q T ) as ɛ +, (ɛ ρ ɛ, ɛ n ɛ ) weakly in L 2 (, T ; H 1 ()) as ɛ +, u ɛ u weakly in L 2 (, T ; H 1 ()) as ɛ +, 2γ γ+1 (ρ ɛ + n ɛ )u ɛ (ρ + n)u in C(, T ]; Lweak ) C(, T ]; H 1 ()) as ɛ +, (ρ ɛ u ɛ, n ɛ u ɛ ) (ρu, nu) in D (Q T ) as ɛ +, (4.2) (ρ ɛ + n ɛ )u ɛ u ɛ (ρ + n)u u in D (Q T ) as ɛ +, n α ɛ + ρ γ ɛ + δ(ρ ɛ + n ɛ ) β n α + ρ γ + δ(ρ + n) β weakly in L β+1 β (Q T ) as ɛ +, ɛ u ɛ (ρ ɛ + n ɛ ) in L 1 (Q T ) as ɛ +. By virtue of (3.26) and (4.2) 1, we have n ɛ (x, t) c ρ ɛ (x, t) and n(x, t) c ρ(x, t) for a.e. (x, t) Q T. (4.3) With (4.2) 1 and (4.2) 4, we get ( ρ, n, (ρ + n)u ) t= = (ρ,δ, n,δ, M,δ ). In summary, the limit (ρ, n, u) solves the following system in the sense of distribution on Q T for any T > : n t + div(nu) =, ρ t + div(ρu) =, (4.4) ] (ρ + n)u t + div (ρ + n)u u ] + (n α + ρ γ + δ(ρ + n) β ) = µ u + (µ + λ) divu with initial and boundary condition ( ρ, n, (ρ + n)u ) t= = (ρ,δ, n,δ, M,δ ), (4.5) u =, (4.6) where f(t, x) denotes the weak limit of f ɛ (t, x) as ɛ. To this end, we have to show that n α + ρ γ + δ(ρ + n) β = n α +ρ γ +δ(ρ+n) β, which is a nonlinear two-variables function in term of ρ and n. It seems that the argument in 13] fails here due to the difficulty resulting from the new variable n. New ideas are necessary to handle this weak limit. We are going to focus on this issue next subsection. 4.2 The weak limit of pressure The main task of this subsection is to develop new argument to handle the possible oscillation for the pressure n α ɛ + ρ γ ɛ + δ(ρ ɛ + n ɛ ) β. To achieve this goal, we have to show the strong convergence of ρ ɛ and n ɛ. It allows us to have the following Proposition on its weak limit. 15
16 Proposition 4.3 a.e. on Q T. n α + ρ γ + δ(ρ + n) β = n α + ρ γ + δ(ρ + n) β To prove this proposition, we shall rely on the following lemmas. The first one is on the effective viscous flux for two-variables pressure function. In particular, let H ɛ :=n α ɛ + ρ γ ɛ + δ(ρ ɛ + n ɛ ) β (2µ + λ)divu ɛ, H :=n α + ρ γ + δ(ρ + n) β (2µ + λ)divu, then we will have the following lemma. The proof is very similar to the work of 13]. Lemma 4.4 Let (ρ ɛ, n ɛ, u ɛ ) be the solution stated in Lemma 3.2, and (ρ, n, u) be the limit in the sense of (4.2), then T T lim ψ φh ɛ (ρ ɛ + n ɛ ) dx dt = ψ φh(ρ + n) dx dt, (4.7) ɛ + for any ψ C (, T ) and φ C (). The key idea of proving Proposition 4.3 is to rewrite the terms related pressure as follows n α ɛ + ρ γ ɛ =ρ γ ɛ + a α ɛ ρ α ɛ = ρ γ ɛ + a α ρ α ɛ + (a α ɛ a α )ρ α ɛ, n ɛ + ρ ɛ =ρ ɛ + a ɛ ρ ɛ = ρ ɛ + aρ ɛ + (a ɛ a)ρ ɛ, where a ɛ = nɛ ρ ɛ if ρ ɛ, a = n ρ if ρ, a ɛ, a c, and a ɛ ρ ɛ = n ɛ, aρ = n, (ρ, n) is the limit of (ρ ɛ, n ɛ ) in a suitable weak topology. We are able to apply the ideas in 13] to handle the product ρ γ ɛ + a α ρ α ɛ and ρ ɛ + aρ ɛ, because a is bounded in L (, T ; L ()). What we expect is to show the terms (a α ɛ a α )ρ α ɛ (ρ ɛ + n ɛ ) and (a ɛ a)ρ ɛ (ρ γ ɛ + a α ρ α ɛ ) approach to zero as ɛ goes to zero. We divide the proof of Proposition 4.3 into several steps as follows: Step 1: Control ρ ɛ and n ɛ in L log L. The current step of our proof is to control ρ ɛ and n ɛ in the space of L log L, which is a little better than L 1. It will help us to obtain the strong convergence of ρ ɛ and n ɛ. We give our control in the following lemma. Lemma 4.5 Let (ρ ɛ, n ɛ ) be the solution stated in Proposition 3.2, and (ρ, n) be the limit in the sense of (4.2), then ρɛ log ρ ɛ ρ log ρ + n ɛ log n ɛ n log n ] (t) dx t (ρ + n)divu dx ds t (ρ ɛ + n ɛ )divu ɛ dx ds (4.8) for a.e. t (, T ). Proof. Since n ɛ and ρ ɛ solve (3.1) 1 and (3.1) 2 a.e. on Q T, respectively, we have b(f ɛ )] t + div ( b(f ɛ )u ɛ ) + b (f ɛ )f ɛ b(f ɛ ) ] divu ɛ = ɛ b(f ɛ ) ɛb (f ɛ ) f ɛ 2 on Q T, (4.9) 16
17 where f ɛ = ρ ɛ, n ɛ, and b C 2, ). Taking b(z) = (z + 1 j ) log(z + 1 j ) in (4.9), and integrating it over (, t) for t, T ], we have (f ɛ + 1 j ) log(f ɛ + 1 t j )(t) dx + fɛ 1 j log(f ɛ + 1 j )] divu ɛ dx ds (f,ɛ + 1 j ) log(f,ɛ + 1 j ) dx, (4.1) where we have used the convexity of b and the boundary condition (3.3). Letting j in (4.1), one obtains t (f ɛ log f ɛ )(t) dx + f ɛ divu ɛ dx ds f,δ log f,δ dx, (4.11) where f ɛ = ρ ɛ, n ɛ and f,δ = ρ,δ, n,δ. Since the limit (n, u) and (ρ, u) solve (4.4) 1 and (4.4) 2 in the sense of renormalized solutions, we can take β(z) = z log z in accordance with Remark 1.1 in 13] or by approximating the function z log z by a sequence of such the β(z) stated in Lemma 2.4 and then passing to the limit. This allows us to have t (f log f)(t) dx + fdivu dx ds = f,δ log f,δ dx, (4.12) where f = ρ, n and f,δ = ρ,δ, n,δ. By (4.11) and (4.12), (4.8) follows. Step 2: Control the right hand side of (4.8) With the help of Theorem 2.2, we are able to control the right hand side of (4.8). The following two lemmas of this step shows us how to control it. Lemma 4.6 Let (ρ ɛ, n ɛ ) be the solution stated in Proposition 3.2, and (ρ, n) be the limit in the sense of (4.2), then t ψ φ(ρ + n)n α + ρ γ dx ds for any t, T ] and any ψ C, t], φ C() where ψ, φ. t ψ φ(ρ + n)(n α + ρ γ ) dx ds Proof. Note that n α ɛ + ρ γ ɛ =ρ γ ɛ + a α ɛ ρ α ɛ = ρ γ ɛ + a α ρ α ɛ + (a α ɛ a α )ρ α ɛ, n ɛ + ρ ɛ =ρ ɛ + a ɛ ρ ɛ = ρ ɛ + aρ ɛ + (a ɛ a)ρ ɛ, where a ɛ = nɛ ρ ɛ if ρ ɛ, a = n ρ if ρ, a ɛ, a c, and a ɛ ρ ɛ = n ɛ, aρ = n, (ρ, n) is the limit of (ρ ɛ, n ɛ ) in a suitable weak topology. 17
18 For any ψ C, t], φ C() where ψ, φ, we have t ψ φ(n α ɛ + ρ γ ɛ )(ρ ɛ + n ɛ ) dx ds t = ψ φ(ρ γ ɛ + a α ρ α ɛ ) ( ) ρ ɛ + aρ ɛ + (a ɛ a)ρ ɛ dx ds t + ψ φ(a α ɛ a α )ρ α ( ) ɛ ρɛ + aρ ɛ + (a ɛ a)ρ ɛ dx ds t t = ψ φ(ρ γ ɛ + a α ρ α ɛ )(ρ ɛ + aρ ɛ ) dx ds + t + ψ φ(a α ɛ a α )ρ α ɛ (ρ ɛ + n ɛ ) dx ds = 3 II i. i=1 ψ φ(ρ γ ɛ + a α ρ α ɛ )(a ɛ a)ρ ɛ dx ds (4.13) For II 2, there exists a positive integer k large enough such that due to the assumption that max{α, γ} < β. Using the Hölder inequality, Lemma 4.1 and (4.14), we have ( T II 2 C ( T C max{ k γ k 1, k α k 1 } β (4.14) ) 1 ( ρ ɛ a ɛ a k k T dx dt Choosing ν k = ɛ for Theorem 2.2, we conclude that ) k 1 ρ ɛ ρ γ ɛ + a α ρ α ɛ k k k 1 dx dt (4.15) ) 1 ρ ɛ a ɛ a k k dx dt. ( T ) 1 ρ ɛ a ɛ a k k dx dt as ɛ goes to zero. Thus, we have II 2 as ɛ. For II 3, there exists a positive integer k 1 large enough such that k 1 (α ) k 1 k 1 1 < β + 1 (4.16) due to the assumption α < β. We employ the Hölder inequality to have ( T II 3 C ( T C ρ (α+1 1 ) k 1 k 1 k 1 1 ɛ ρ ɛ a α ɛ a α ) 1 k1 dx dt ) k 1 1 ( k 1 T dx dt ρ ɛ a α ɛ a α ) 1 k1 k 1 dx dt k 1 (4.17) 18
19 as ɛ +, where we have used (3.26), (4.16), Lemma 4.1, and the fact that T ρ ɛ a α ɛ a α T k1 dx dt α k ( 1 ρ ɛ max{aɛ, a} ) α 1 a ɛ a k1 dx dt C T ρ ɛ a ɛ a k1 dx dt (4.18) as ɛ +, due to Theorem 2.2 with ν K = ɛ. In fact, ρ ɛ L (, T ; L β ()) for β > 4, and u ɛ L 2 (, T ; H 1 ()), and ɛ ρɛ L 2 (,T ;L 2 ()) C, ɛ n ɛ L 2 (,T ;L 2 ()) C, and for any ɛ > and any t > : n 2 ɛ n 2 dx dx. ρ ɛ ρ Thus, we are able to apply Theorem 2.2 to control (4.18). By virtue of (4.13), (4.15) and (4.17), one deduces that lim ɛ + t ψ φ(n α ɛ + ρ γ ɛ )(ρ ɛ + n ɛ ) dx ds = = t t t ψ ψ ψ φ(ρ γ + a α ρ α )(ρ + aρ) dx ds φρ γ + a α ρ α (ρ + aρ) dx ds φρ γ + a α ρ α (ρ + n) dx ds (4.19) where we have used (ρ γ + a α ρ α )(ρ + aρ) ρ γ + a α ρ α (ρ + aρ) because the functions z z γ + a α z α and z z + az are increasing functions. On the other hand, t t ψ φ(ρ + n)n α + ρ γ dx ds = lim ψ φ(ρ + n)(n α ɛ + ɛ + ρ γ ɛ ) dx ds t = lim ψ φ(ρ + n)(a α ρ α ɛ + ɛ + ρ γ ɛ ) dx ds t (4.2) + lim ψ φ(ρ + n)ρ α ɛ + ɛ (a α ɛ a α ) dx ds t = ψ φ(ρ + n)a α ρ α + ρ γ dx ds, thanks to lim ɛ + t ψ φ(ρ + n)ρ α ɛ (a α ɛ a α ) dx ds as ɛ +. By (4.19) and (4.2), we complete the proof of the lemma. Since ψ and φ are arbitrary, we immediately get Corollary 4.7 Let (ρ ɛ, n ɛ ) be the solution stated in Proposition 3.2, and (ρ, n) be the limit in the sense of (4.2), then a.e. on (, T ). (ρ + n)n α + ρ γ (ρ + n)(n α + ρ γ ) (4.21) 19
20 Now we control the right hand side of (4.8) in the following lemma. Lemma 4.8 Let (ρ ɛ, n ɛ ) be the solution stated in Lemma 3.2, and (ρ, n) be the limit in the sense of (4.2), then for a.e. t (, T ). t (ρ + n)divu dx ds lim ɛ + t (ρ ɛ + n ɛ )divu ɛ dx ds (4.22) Proof. For ψ j C (, t), φ j C () given by as j, and ψ j C (, T ), ψ j (t) 1 for any t 1 j, T 1 j ], ψ j 1, ψ j 1, (4.23) φ j C (), φ j (x) 1 for any x { x dist(x, ) 1 j }, φj 1, φ j 1, (4.24) as j, respectively, then = t t = 1 2µ + λ (ρ + n)divu dx ds t ψ j φ j (ρ + n)divu dx ds + (1 ψ j φ j )(ρ + n)divu dx ds t ψ j φ j (ρ + n)n α + ρ γ dx ds + 1 t ψ j φ j (ρ + n)δ(ρ + n) 2µ + λ β dx ds t t ψ j φ j (ρ + n)h dx ds + (1 ψ j φ j )(ρ + n)divu dx ds 1 2µ + λ =RHS 1 + RHS 2 + RHS 3 + RHS 4, where we have used and For RHS 2, we have RHS 2 = 1 2µ + λ (2µ + λ)divu = n α + ρ γ + δ(ρ + n) β H, n α + ρ γ + δ(ρ + n) β = n α + ρ γ + δ(ρ + n) β. t ψ j 1 lim inf 2µ + λ ɛ + t φ j (ρ + n)δ(ρ + n) β dx ds ψ j φ j δ(ρ ɛ + n ɛ )(ρ ɛ + n ɛ ) β dx ds, (4.25) (4.26) becuase z z and z z β are increasing functions. 2
21 By virtue of (4.25), (4.21), (4.26), and (4.7), we have t (ρ + n)divu dx ds 1 t 2µ + λ lim ψ j φ j (n α ɛ + ɛ + ρ γ ɛ )(ρ ɛ + n ɛ ) dx ds + 1 t lim inf ψ j φ j (ρ ɛ + n ɛ )δ(ρ ɛ + n ɛ ) β dx ds 2µ + λ ɛ + 1 t t 2µ + λ lim ψ j φ j (ρ ɛ + n ɛ )H ɛ dx ds + (1 ψ j φ j )(ρ + n)divu dx ds ɛ + t t lim (ρ ɛ + n ɛ )divu ɛ dx ds + lim (ψ j φ j 1)(ρ ɛ + n ɛ )divu ɛ dx ds ɛ + ɛ + t + (1 ψ j φ j )(ρ + n)divu dx ds. Letting j in (4.27), we complete the proof of the lemma. (4.27) Step 3: Strong convergence of ρ ɛ and n ɛ Here our main task is to show the strong convergence of ρ ɛ and n ɛ. This yields Proposition 4.3. In particular, With (4.22), letting ɛ + in (4.8), we deduce that ] ρ log ρ ρ log ρ + n log n n log n (t) dx. Thanks to the convexity of z z log z, we have ρ log ρ ρ log ρ and n log n n log n a.e. on Q T. This turns out that ] ρ log ρ ρ log ρ + n log n n log n (t) dx =. Hence we get ρ log ρ = ρ log ρ and n log n = n log n a.e. on Q T, which combined with Lemma 4.1 implies strong convergence of ρ ɛ, n ɛ in L β (Q T ). Thus we complete the proof. With Proposition 4.3, we recover a global weak solution to the system (4.4), (4.5) and (4.6) with n α + ρ γ + δ(ρ + n) β replaced by n α + ρ γ + δ(ρ + n) β. Proposition 4.9 Suppose β > max{4, α, γ}. For any given δ >, there exists a global weak solution (ρ δ, n δ, u δ ) to the following system over (, ): n t + div(nu) =, ρ t + div(ρu) =, ] (ρ + n)u t + div (ρ + n)u u ] (4.28) + (n α + ρ γ + δ(ρ + n) β ) = µ u + (µ + λ) divu, 21
22 with initial and boundary condition ( ρ, n, (ρ + n)u ) t= = (ρ,δ, n,δ, M,δ ) on, (4.29) such that for any given T >, the following estimates u = for t, (4.3) sup (ρ δ (t), n δ (t)) γ L γ () C(ρ, n, M ), (4.31) t,t ] sup n δ (t) α L α () C(ρ, n, M ), (4.32) t,t ] δ sup (ρ δ (t), n δ (t)) β L t,t ] β () C(ρ, n, M ), (4.33) sup ρ δ + n δ (t)u δ (t) 2 L 2 () C(ρ, n, M ), (4.34) t,t ] T u δ (t) 2 H 1 () dt C(ρ, n, M ), (4.35) and (ρ δ (t), n δ (t)) L β+1 (Q T ) C(β, δ, ρ, n, M ) (4.36) hold, where the norm (, ) denotes +. Besides, we have n δ (x, t) c ρ δ (x, t) for a.e. (x, t) Q T. (4.37) 5 Passing to the limit in the artificial pressure term as δ + In this section, we shall recover the weak solution to (1.1)-(1.3) by passing to the limit of (ρ δ, n δ, u δ ) as δ. Note that the estimate (4.36) depends on δ. Thus to begin with, we shall get the higher integrability estimates of the pressure term uniformly for δ. Let C be a generic constant independent of δ which will be used throughout this section. 5.1 Passing to the limit as δ + We can follow the similar argument as in 13] to have the higher integrability estimates of ρ and n in the following lemma. We only need to modify the proof a little bit on n. Lemma 5.1 Let (ρ δ, n δ, u δ ) be the solution stated in Proposition 4.9, then T + ρ γ+θ δ + δρ β+θ δ (n α+θ δ + δn β+θ δ ) dxdt C (5.1) for any positive constant θ satisfying θ < γ 3 and θ min{1, 2γ 3 1} for γ ( 3 2, ). 22
23 In view of (5.1) and (4.37), we have the following corollary. Corollary 5.2 Let (ρ δ, n δ, u δ ) be the solution stated in Proposition 4.9, then T n γ+θ δ dx dt C. (5.2) With (4.31), (4.32), (4.34), (4.35), (4.37), (5.1), and (5.2), letting δ + (take the subsequence if necessary), we have (ρ δ, n δ ) (ρ, n) in C(, T ]; L γ weak ()) and weakly in Lγ+θ (Q T ) as δ +, n δ n in C(, T ]; L α weak ()) as δ + for α > 1, u δ u weakly in L 2 (, T ; H 1 ()) as δ +, γ+1 (ρ δ + n δ )u δ (ρ + n)u in C(, T ]; Lweak ) C(, T ]; H 1 ()) as δ +, (ρ δ u δ, n δ u δ ) (ρu, nu) in D (Q T ) as δ +, 2γ (5.3) (ρ δ + n δ )u δ u δ (ρ + n)u u in D (Q T ) as δ +, n α δ + ργ δ nα + ρ γ weakly in L γ+θ min{ γ δ(ρ δ + n δ ) β in L 1 (Q T ) as δ +, n(x, t) c ρ(x, t) for a.e. (x, t) Q T., α+θ α } (Q T ) as δ +, In summary, the limit (ρ, n, u) solves the following system in the sense of distribution over, T ] for any given T > : n t + div(nu) =, ρ t + div(ρu) =, (ρ + n)u ] t + div (ρ + n)u u ] + (ρ γ + n α ) = µ u + (µ + λ) divu, with initial and boundary condition (5.4) (ρ, n, (ρ + n)u) t= = (ρ, n, M ) on, (5.5) u = for t, (5.6) where the convergence of the approximate initial data in (4.29) is due to (3.4). To recover a weak solution to (1.1)-(1.3), we only need to show the following claim: Claim. ρ γ + n α = ρ γ + n α. 5.2 The weak limit of pressure The objective of this subsection is to show the strong convergence of ρ δ and n δ as δ goes to zero. This allows us to prove ρ γ + n α = ρ γ + n α as δ. From now, we need that ρ δ is bounded in L q (Q T ) for some q a little bit bigger than 2. By Lemma 5.1, this leads us to the restriction γ >
24 We consider a family of cut-off functions introduced in 13] and references therein, i.e., where T C (R) satisfying T k (z) = kt ( z ), z R, k = 1, 2, k T (z) = z for z 1, T (z) = 2 for z 3. T is concave. The cut-off functions will be used in particular to handle the cross terms due to the two-variable pressure, see the proof of Lemma 5.5. Since ρ δ L 2 (Q T ), u δ L 2 (, T ; H 1 ()), Lemma 2.4 suggests that (ρ δ, u δ ) is a renormalized solution of (5.4) 2. Thus we have T k (ρ δ )] t + divt k (ρ δ )u δ ] + T k (ρ δ)ρ δ T k (ρ δ )]divu δ = in D (Q T ). (5.7) For any given k, T k (ρ δ ) is bounded in L (Q T ). Passing to the limit as δ + (taking the subsequence if necessary), we have This yields Similarly, we have and Denote T k (ρ δ ) T k (ρ) weak in L (Q T ), T k (ρ δ ) T k (ρ) in C(, T ]; L p weak ()), for any p 1, ), T k (ρ δ ) T k (ρ) in C(, T ]; H 1 ()), T k (ρ δ)ρ δ T k (ρ δ )]divu δ T k (ρ)ρ T k(ρ)]divu weakly in L 2 (Q T ). T k (ρ)] t + divt k (ρ)u] + T k (ρ)ρ T k(ρ)]divu = in D (R 3 (, T )). (5.8) T k (n δ )] t + divt k (n δ )u δ ] + T k (n δ)n δ T k (n δ )]divu δ = in D (Q T ), (5.9) T k (n)] t + divt k (n)u] + T k (n)n T k(n)]divu = in D (R 3 (, T )). (5.1) H δ :=ρ γ δ + nα δ (2µ + λ)divu δ, H :=ρ γ + n α (2µ + λ)divu. We will have the following Lemma on H δ and H. Lemma 5.3 Let (ρ δ, n δ, u δ ) be the solution stated in Proposition 4.9 and (ρ, n, u) be the limit, then T lim ψ φh δ Tk (ρ δ ) + T k (n δ ) ] T dx dt = ψ φh T k (ρ) + T k (n) ] dx dt, (5.11) δ + for any ψ C (, T ) and φ C (). Proof. The proof is similar to work of 13]. Now let us to devote our proof to the following Proposition. 24
25 Proposition 5.4 For any γ > 9 5 and α 1, then a.e. on Q T. There are two steps to prove it. Step 1: Study for the weak limit of ρ γ δ + nα δ n α + ρ γ = n α + ρ γ (5.12) Relying on Theorem 2.2 with ν K =, we are able to show the following lemma. It is crucial to obtain Proposition 5.4. Lemma 5.5 Let (ρ δ, n δ ) be the solutions constructed in Propsotion 4.9, and (ρ, n) be the limit, then t (ρ t ψ φ T k (ρ) + T k (n)] γ + n α) dx ds ψ φ T k (ρ) + T k (n) ]( ρ γ + n α) dx ds. (5.13) for any t, T ] and any ψ C, t], φ C() where ψ, φ, and n c ρ on Q T, if α 1, γ + τ), 1 c ρ n c ρ on Q T, if α γ + τ, ). Proof. lim t δ + t = lim δ + = + lim δ + 4 i=1 ψ φ T k (ρ δ ) + T k (n δ ) ]( ρ γ δ + ) nα δ dx ds t ψ φt k (ρ δ )ρ γ δ dx ds + lim ψ φt k (ρ δ )n α δ + δ dx ds t ψ φt k (n δ )ρ γ δ dx ds + lim ψ φt k (n δ )n α δ + δ dx ds t IV i. (5.14) For IV 1, since z T k (z) and z z γ are increasing functions, we have t lim δ + t = ψ = t + t ψ ψ t + t ψ ψ ψ φ T k (ρ δ ) T k (ρ) ] ρ γ δ ργ] dx ds t φt k (ρ)ρ γ dx ds ψ φt k (ρ)ρ γ dx ds φt k (ρ)ρ γ dx ds t φt k (ρ)ρ γ dx ds ψ φt k (ρ)ρ γ dx ds φ T k (ρ) T k (ρ) ]( ρ γ ρ γ) dx ds t φt k (ρ)ρ γ dx ds ψ φt k (ρ)ρ γ dx ds t ψ φt k (ρ)ρ γ dx ds (5.15) 25
26 where we have used the fact ρ γ ρ γ and T k (ρ) T k (ρ), which could be done by the convexity of z z γ and the concavity of z T k (z). Thanks to (5.15), we have t ψ φt k (ρ)ρ γ dx ds t ψ φt k (ρ)ρ γ dx ds = lim δ + Similar to (5.16), we have t ψ φt k (n)n α dx ds lim δ + t t ψ φt k (ρ δ )ρ γ δ dx ds = IV 1. (5.16) ψ φt k (n δ )n α δ dx ds = IV 4. (5.17) For IV 2, we need to discuss the size of α in order to guarantee the boundedness of ρ α δ in Lq (Q T ) for some q > 1. For α 1, γ + τ), there exists a positive θ > and a positive integer k 2 large enough such that αk 2 k < γ + θ < γ + τ. (5.18) k 2 1 In this case, ρ α δ IV 2 = lim δ + γ+θ is bounded in L α t (Q T ) for γ+θ α > 1. Then ψ φt k (ρ δ )ρ α δ (aα δ aα ) dx ds + lim δ + ( t ) 1 ρ δ a α δ + δ aα k2 dx ds 2kC lim t + ψ φt k (ρ)ρ α a α dx ds ( t 2kCα lim δ + t + ψ φt k (ρ)ρ α a α dx ds ( t 2kCα lim δ + t ( t k 2 ψ ρ φt k (ρ δ )ρ α δ aα dx ds αk 2 k k 2 1 δ ρ δ ( max{aδ, a} ) α 1 a δ a k 2 dx dt ) 1 k 2 ρ δ a δ a ) 1 k2 k dx dt 2 + t ) k 2 1 k dx ds 2 ψ φt k (ρ)ρ α a α dx ds. In view of Theorem 2.2 with ν K =, (5.19), and the arguments similar to (5.15), we have t IV 2 ψ φt k (ρ)ρ α a α dx ds t t ] = ψ φt k (ρ)n α dx ds + ψ φt k (ρ) ρ α a α n α dx ds t t ] = ψ φt k (ρ)n α dx ds + lim ψ φt k (ρ)ρ α δ + δ a α a α δ dx ds t = ψ φt k (ρ)n α dx ds. (5.19) (5.2) For α γ + τ, ), we need the initial assumption 1 c ρ n in addition such that 1 c ρ δ n δ on Q T. (5.21) 26
27 In fact, the proof of (5.21) is similar to (4.37). By virtue of (5.1) and (5.21), we have ρ α+θ δ dx dt C. Q T In this case, ρ α α+θ δ is bounded in L α (Q T ) for α+θ α enough such that > 1. Then we can choose the integer k 2 large αk 2 k k 2 1 < α + θ. Repeating the arguments in (5.19) and (5.2), we get For IV 3, we have IV 3 = lim t δ + t = lim δ + ψ ψ IV 2 t φt k (n δ )ρ γ δ dx ds ( ) φt k aρδ ρ γ δ dx ds + lim δ + Similar to the proof of (5.16), we have δ + t t lim ψ = lim δ + t ( ) ψ φt k aρδ ρ γ δ dx ds φt k ( aρ ) ρ γ dx ds ψ φt k (ρ)n α dx ds. (5.22) t ψ φ ( ) ( )] T k aρδ Tk nδ ρ γ dx ds + ( ) ] ψ φ T k (n δ ) T k aρδ ρ γ δ dx ds. t ( ) ψ φt k n ρ γ dx ds In view of Theorem 2.2 with ν K =, in particular, of (2.17), we have n δ aρ δ a.e. in Q T as δ + (take the subsequence if necessary). This implies that T k ( aρδ ) Tk ( nδ ) a.e. in QT (5.23) as δ + (take the subsequence if necessary). This, with the help of the Egrov theorem and ( ) ( )] T k aρδ Tk nδ ρ γ L γ+θ γ (Q T ) for any given k, yields Similarly, we have lim δ + lim δ + t t ψ φ ( ) ( )] T k aρδ Tk nδ ρ γ dx ds =. ( ) ] ψ φ T k (n δ ) T k aρδ ρ γ δ dx ds =. 27
28 Thus IV 3 t ( ) ψ φt k n ρ γ dx ds. (5.24) (5.14) combined with the estimates of IV i, i=1,2,3,4, i.e., (5.16), (5.17), (5.2), (5.22), and (5.24), we have t (ρ ψ φ T k (ρ) + T k (n)] γ + n α) dx ds where we have used lim δ + t ψ φ T k (ρ δ ) + T k (n δ ) ]( (5.25) ρ γ δ + ) nα δ dx ds. ρ γ + n α = ρ γ + n α. (5.25) implies (5.13). The proof of the lemma is complete. Since ψ and φ are arbitrary, we immediately get Corollary 5.6 Let (ρ δ, n δ ) be the solutions constructed in Proposition 4.9, and (ρ, n) be the limit, then ] (ρ T k (ρ) + T k (n) γ + n α) T k (ρ) + T k (n) ]( ρ γ + n α) a.e. on (, T ). Step 2: Strong convergence of ρ δ and n δ Here, we want to show the strong convergence of ρ δ and n δ. This allows us to have Proposition 5.4. As in 13], we define z log z, z k, L k (z) = z T k (s) z log k + z s 2 ds, z k, satisfying L k (z) = β k z 2k for all z 3k, where 3k T k (s) β k = log k + k s 2 ds We denote b k (z) := L k (z) β k z where b k (z) = for all large z, and k b k (z)z b k(z) = T k (z). (5.26) Note that ρ δ, n δ L β+1 (Q T ), ρ, n L γ+θ (Q T ), and u δ, u L 2 (, T ; H 1()) where β 4, θ < γ 3, θ min{1, 2γ 3 1} and γ > 9 5. By Lemma 2.4, we conclude that (n δ, u δ ), (ρ δ, u δ ), (n, u) and (ρ, u) are the renormalized solutions of (4.28) i and (5.4) i for i = 1, 2, respectively. Thus we have b k (f δ )] t + div ] b k (f δ )u δ + b k (f δ )f δ b k (f δ ) ] divu δ = in D (Q T ), b k (f)] t + div b k (f)u ] + b k (f)f b k(f) ] divu = in D (Q T ), 28
29 where f δ = ρ δ, n δ and f = ρ, n. Thanks to (5.26) and b k (z) = L k (z) β k z, we arrive at { L k (ρ δ ) + L k (n δ )] t + div ( L k (ρ δ ) + L k (n δ ) ) u δ ] + Tk (ρ δ ) + T k (n δ ) ] divu δ = in D (Q T ), L k (ρ) + L k (n)] t + div ( L k (ρ) + L k (n) ) u ] + T k (ρ) + T k (n) ] divu = in D (Q T ). This gives L k (ρ δ ) L k (ρ) + L k (n δ ) L k (n)] t + div ( L k (ρ δ ) + L k (n δ ) ) u δ ( L k (ρ) + L k (n) ) u ] + T k (ρ δ ) + T k (n δ ) ] divu δ T k (ρ) + T k (n) ] divu =. Taking φ j as the test function of (5.27), and letting δ, we have L k (ρ) L k (ρ) + L k (n) L k (n)]φ j dx t ( lim Lk (ρ δ ) + L k (n δ ) ) u δ ( L k (ρ) + L k (n) ) u ] φ j dx ds δ + t ( Tk + lim (ρ δ ) + T k (n δ ) ] divu δ T k (ρ) + T k (n) ] divu) φ j dx ds =, δ + where φ j C (), φ j (x) 1 for any x { x 1} dist(x, ), φj 1, j φ j c j, φ j 1 as m for some positive c independent of j. Letting j in (5.28), we gain L k (ρ) L k (ρ) + L k (n) L k (n)] dx = lim δ + t In view of Lemma 5.3, we have lim δ + t = 1 2µ + λ lim δ + 1 2µ + λ lim δ + = 1 t 2µ + λ 1 2µ + λ lim δ + 1 2µ + λ lim δ + ( Tk (ρ δ ) + T k (n δ ) ] divu δ T k (ρ) + T k (n) ] divu) dx ds. Tk (ρ δ ) + T k (n δ ) ] divu δ dx ds t t t t Tk (ρ δ ) + T k (n δ ) ] (2µ + λ)divu δ ρ γ δ ] nα δ dx ds Tk (ρ δ ) + T k (n δ ) ] ρ γ δ + ] nα δ dx ds ψ j φ j Tk (ρ) + T k (n) ] (2µ + λ)divu ρ γ + n α] dx ds (1 ψ j φ j ) T k (ρ δ ) + T k (n δ ) ] (2µ + λ)divu δ ρ γ δ ] nα δ dx ds Tk (ρ δ ) + T k (n δ ) ] ρ γ δ + ] nα δ dx ds, (5.27) (5.28) (5.29) (5.3) (5.31) 29
30 where ψ j and φ j are given by (4.23) and (4.24) respectively. Letting j in (5.31), we have lim δ + t = 1 2µ + λ t 1 2µ + λ lim δ + Tk (ρ δ ) + T k (n δ ) ] divu δ dx ds t Tk (ρ) + T k (n) ] (2µ + λ)divu ρ γ + n α] dx ds Tk (ρ δ ) + T k (n δ ) ] ρ γ δ + ] nα δ dx ds. In view of (5.3) and (5.32), we have L k (ρ) L k (ρ) + L k (n) L k (n)] dx = 1 t ( Tk (ρ) + T k (n) )( ρ 2µ + λ γ + n α) dx ds 1 t 2µ + λ lim Tk (ρ δ ) + T k (n δ ) ]( ρ γ δ + δ + ) nα δ dx ds t + T k (ρ) T k (ρ) + T k (n) T k (n)]divu dx ds, with Corollary 5.6, which gives L k (ρ) L k (ρ) + L k (n) L k (n)] dx t (5.32) T k (ρ) T k (ρ) + T k (n) T k (n)]divu dx ds. (5.33) Here we are able to control the right-hand side of (5.33) as in the following lemma. Lemma 5.7 t lim k T k (ρ) T k (ρ) + T k (n) T k (n)]divu dx ds =. (5.34) Proof. Recalling that T (z) z for all z, we have T k (ρ) T k (ρ) L 2 (Q T ) lim inf δ + T k(ρ) T k (ρ δ ) L 2 (Q T ) C lim inf δ + ρ + ρ δ L γ+θ (Q T ) C, where we have used the Hölder inequality, γ +θ 2, (5.1) and (5.3). With the help of this estimate and (5.3), one deduces t T k (ρ) T k (ρ)]divu dx ds T k (ρ) T k (ρ) divu dx ds + T k (ρ) T k (ρ) divu dx ds Q t {ρ k} Q t {ρ k} T k (ρ) T k (ρ) L 2 (Q T ) divu L 2( + Tk (ρ) T Q t {ρ k}) k (ρ) ( L 2 divu L Q t {ρ k}) 2 (Q T ) C divu L 2( + C Tk (ρ) T Q t {ρ k}) k (ρ) ( ) L 2. Q t {ρ k} 3 (5.35)
31 Note that T k (z) = z if z k, we have T k (ρ) T k (ρ) L 2( = ρ Tk (ρ) ( ) Q t {ρ k}) L 2 Q t {ρ k} lim inf ρ δ + δ T k (ρ δ ) L 2 (Q T ) = lim inf ρ δ + δ T k (ρ δ ) L 2 (Q T {ρ δ >k}) 2 lim inf ρ δ L δ + 2 (Q T {ρ δ >k}) γ+θ 1 2k 2 lim inf δ + ρ δ γ+θ 2 L γ+θ (Q T ) (5.36) as k, due to (5.1) and the assumption γ > 9 5 such that γ + θ > 2. By (5.35) and (5.36), we conclude t T k (ρ) T k (ρ)]divu dx ds =. (5.37) Similarly, we have lim k t lim k T k (n) T k (n)]divu dx ds =. (5.38) With (5.37) and (5.38), (5.34) follows. Note that (5.33) and (5.34), we have lim sup k L k (ρ) L k (ρ) + L k (n) L k (n)] dx. (5.39) By the definition of L( ), it is not difficult to justify that ] lim L k (ρ) ρ log ρ L k 1 () + L k (n) n log n L 1 () =, ] lim L k (ρ) ρ log ρ L 1 () + L k (n) n log n L 1 () =. k (5.4) Since ρ log ρ ρ log ρ and n log n n log n due to the convexity of z z log z, we have ρ log ρ ρ log ρ + n log n n log n] dx, (5.41) where we have used (5.39) and (5.4). Thus we obtain ρ log ρ = ρ log ρ and n log n = n log n. It allows us to have the strong convergence of ρ δ and n δ in L γ (Q T ) and in L α (Q T ) respectively. Therefore we proved (5.12). With Proposition 5.4, the proof of Theorem 1.2 can be done. Acknowledgements A. Vasseur s research was supported in part by NSF grant DMS A part of the work was done when H.Wen visited Department of Mathematics at the University of Texas at Austin, Texas, USA in September 216. He would like to thank the department for its hospitality. H.Wen s research was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China # and supported by GDUPS (216). 31
Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor
Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor Given f L 1 T 1 ), we consider the partial sums of the Fourier series of f: N 1) S N fθ) = ˆfk)e ikθ. k= N A calculation gives the Dirichlet formula
Διαβάστε περισσότεραST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II
ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II 2014/2015: Semester II Tutorial 7 1. Let X be a sample from a population P and consider testing hypotheses H 0 : P = P 0 versus H 1 : P = P 1, where P j is a known
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExample Sheet 3 Solutions
Example Sheet 3 Solutions. i Regular Sturm-Liouville. ii Singular Sturm-Liouville mixed boundary conditions. iii Not Sturm-Liouville ODE is not in Sturm-Liouville form. iv Regular Sturm-Liouville note
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGLOBAL WEAK SOLUTIONS TO COMPRESSIBLE QUANTUM NAVIER-STOKES EQUATIONS WITH DAMPING
GLOBAL WEAK SOLUTIOS TO COMPRESSIBLE QUATUM AVIER-STOKES EQUATIOS WITH DAMPIG ALEXIS F. VASSEUR AD CHEG YU Abstract. The global-in-time existence of weak solutions to the barotropic compressible quantum
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2 Composition. Invertible Mappings
Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan Composition. Invertible Mappings In this section we discuss two procedures for creating new mappings from old ones, namely,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραforms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with
Week 03: C lassification of S econd- Order L inear Equations In last week s lectures we have illustrated how to obtain the general solutions of first order PDEs using the method of characteristics. We
Διαβάστε περισσότεραConcrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016
Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016 Silvio Capobianco Exercise 1.7 Let H(n) = J(n + 1) J(n). Equation (1.8) tells us that H(2n) = 2, and H(2n+1) = J(2n+2) J(2n+1) = (2J(n+1) 1) (2J(n)+1)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEE512: Error Control Coding
EE512: Error Control Coding Solution for Assignment on Finite Fields February 16, 2007 1. (a) Addition and Multiplication tables for GF (5) and GF (7) are shown in Tables 1 and 2. + 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 3
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPartial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013
The boundary element method March 26, 203 Introduction and notation The problem: u = f in D R d u = ϕ in Γ D u n = g on Γ N, where D = Γ D Γ N, Γ D Γ N = (possibly, Γ D = [Neumann problem] or Γ N = [Dirichlet
Διαβάστε περισσότερα6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes
122 CHAPTER 6. ARMA MODELS 6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes The purpose of forecasting is to predict future values of a TS based on the data collected to the present. In this section we will discuss a linear
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEvery set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set May 6, 2008 Abstract A set of first-order formulas, whatever the cardinality of the set of symbols, is equivalent to an independent
Διαβάστε περισσότεραProblem Set 3: Solutions
CMPSCI 69GG Applied Information Theory Fall 006 Problem Set 3: Solutions. [Cover and Thomas 7.] a Define the following notation, C I p xx; Y max X; Y C I p xx; Ỹ max I X; Ỹ We would like to show that C
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:
HOMEWORK 4 Problem a For the fast loading case, we want to derive the relationship between P zz and λ z. We know that the nominal stress is expressed as: P zz = ψ λ z where λ z = λ λ z. Therefore, applying
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA bound from below for the temperature in compressible Navier-Stokes equations
A bound from below for the temperature in compressible Navier-Stokes equations Antoine Mellet, Alexis Vasseur September 5, 7 Abstract: We consider the full system of compressible Navier-Stokes equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 8.3 Trigonometric Equations
99 Section 8. Trigonometric Equations Objective 1: Solve Equations Involving One Trigonometric Function. In this section and the next, we will exple how to solving equations involving trigonometric functions.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStatistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests
Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Shirsendu Mukherjee Department of Statistics, Asutosh College, Kolkata, India. shirsendu st@yahoo.co.in So far we have treated the testing of one-sided
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOther Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests
Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Side-Note: So far we have seen a few approaches for creating tests such as Neyman-Pearson Lemma ( most powerful tests of H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 :
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS
CHAPTER 5 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS EXERCISE 104 Page 8 1. Find the positive root of the equation x + 3x 5 = 0, correct to 3 significant figures, using the method of bisection. Let f(x) =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραC.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions
C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions Paul Liu November 15, 2007 Note that these are sample solutions only; in many cases there were many acceptable answers. 1 Reynolds Problem 10.1 1.1 Normal-order
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018
Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics(JRM) ISSN: 2395-028 SCITECH Volume 3, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION ublished online: March 29, 208 Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics www.scitecresearch.com/journals
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOrdinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit
Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ting Zhang Stanford May 11, 2001 Stanford, 5/11/2001 1 Outline Ordinal Classification Ordinal Addition Ordinal Multiplication Ordinal
Διαβάστε περισσότεραderivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates
derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates swapnizzle 03-03- :5:43 We begin by recognizing the familiar conversion from rectangular to spherical coordinates (note that φ is used
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCoefficient Inequalities for a New Subclass of K-uniformly Convex Functions
International Journal of Computational Science and Mathematics. ISSN 0974-89 Volume, Number (00), pp. 67--75 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Coefficient Inequalities for
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΑπόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.
Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο The time integral of a force is referred to as impulse, is determined by and is obtained from: Newton s 2 nd Law of motion states that the action
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath221: HW# 1 solutions
Math: HW# solutions Andy Royston October, 5 7.5.7, 3 rd Ed. We have a n = b n = a = fxdx = xdx =, x cos nxdx = x sin nx n sin nxdx n = cos nx n = n n, x sin nxdx = x cos nx n + cos nxdx n cos n = + sin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCongruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 24, no. 5, 239-246 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/.2988/ija.24.422 Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 Ligong An and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 67, 3301-3307 A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Equivalence Relation D. K. Basnet Dept. of Mathematics, Assam University Silchar-788011, Assam, India dkbasnet@rediffmail.com
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)
Uppsala Universitet Matematiska Institutionen Andreas Strömbergsson Prov i matematik Funktionalanalys Kurs: F3B, F4Sy, NVP 2005-03-08 Skrivtid: 9 14 Tillåtna hjälpmedel: Manuella skrivdon, Kreyszigs bok
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEXISTENCE OF GLOBAL WEAK SOLUTIONS FOR 2D SHALLOW WATER EQUATIONS WITH ITS DEGENERATE VISCOSITY
EXISTENCE OF GLOBAL WEAK SOLUTIONS FOR 2D SHALLOW WATER EQUATIONS WITH ITS DEGENERATE VISCOSITY ALEXIS F. VASSEUR AND CHENG YU Abstract. In this paper, we prove the existence of global weak solutions for
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPhys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)
Phys460.nb 81 ψ n (t) is still the (same) eigenstate of H But for tdependent H. The answer is NO. 5.5.5. Solution for the tdependent Schrodinger s equation If we assume that at time t 0, the electron starts
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 3 Solutions
Homework 3 Solutions Igor Yanovsky (Math 151A TA) Problem 1: Compute the absolute error and relative error in approximations of p by p. (Use calculator!) a) p π, p 22/7; b) p π, p 3.141. Solution: For
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSolutions to Exercise Sheet 5
Solutions to Eercise Sheet 5 jacques@ucsd.edu. Let X and Y be random variables with joint pdf f(, y) = 3y( + y) where and y. Determine each of the following probabilities. Solutions. a. P (X ). b. P (X
Διαβάστε περισσότεραForced Pendulum Numerical approach
Numerical approach UiO April 8, 2014 Physical problem and equation We have a pendulum of length l, with mass m. The pendulum is subject to gravitation as well as both a forcing and linear resistance force.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAreas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates
Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics
Fourier Series MATH 211, Calculus II J. Robert Buchanan Department of Mathematics Spring 2018 Introduction Not all functions can be represented by Taylor series. f (k) (c) A Taylor series f (x) = (x c)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.
Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequalit for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x,, z X. Prove that d(x, z) d(, z) d(x, ). (ii): Reverse triangle inequalit for norms:
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas
09 Section 7. Double and Half Angle Fmulas To derive the double-angles fmulas, we will use the sum of two angles fmulas that we developed in the last section. We will let α θ and β θ: cos(θ) cos(θ + θ)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραJesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013
Notes on Average Scattering imes and Hall Factors Jesse Maassen and Mar Lundstrom Purdue University November 5, 13 I. Introduction 1 II. Solution of the BE 1 III. Exercises: Woring out average scattering
Διαβάστε περισσότεραApproximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude
Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude Jan Behrens 2012-12-31 In this paper we shall provide a method to approximate distances between two points on earth
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEcon 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1
Eon : Fall 8 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 Email questions or omments to Dan Fetter Problem. Let X be a salar with density f(x, θ) (θx + θ) [ x ] with θ. (a) Find the most powerful level α test
Διαβάστε περισσότερα4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)
84 CHAPTER 4. STATIONARY TS MODELS 4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(,) This section is an introduction to a wide class of models ARMA(p,q) which we will consider in more detail later in this
Διαβάστε περισσότεραD Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation
D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation MATH 467 Partial Differential Equations J. Robert Buchanan Department of Mathematics Fall 2018 Objectives In this lesson we will learn: a change of variable technique
Διαβάστε περισσότερα3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β
3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS Page Theorem cos(αβ cos α cos β -sin α cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α NOTE: cos(αβ cos α cos β cos(α-β cos α -cos β Proof of cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α Let s use a unit circle
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE
Lecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE BLUE: Robustness of LSE against normality We now study properties of l τ β and σ 2 under assumption A2, i.e., without the normality assumption on ε. From Theorem
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAreas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates
Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Simply Typed Lambda Calculus
Type Inference Instead of writing type annotations, can we use an algorithm to infer what the type annotations should be? That depends on the type system. For simple type systems the answer is yes, and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMatrices and Determinants
Matrices and Determinants SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Q 1. For what value of k do the following system of equations possess a non-trivial (i.e., not all zero) solution over the set of rationals Q? x + ky + 3z
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS
Sahand Communications in Mathematical Analysis (SCMA) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016), 21-27 http://scma.maragheh.ac.ir SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS BAYAZ DARABY 1 AND JAVAD JAFARI 2 Abstract. In the mathematical
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals
Lecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals Confidence Intervals θ: an unknown parameter of interest We want to find limits θ and θ such that Gt = P nˆθ θ t If G 1 1 α is known, then P θ θ = P θ θ = 1 α
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Pohozaev identity for the fractional Laplacian
The Pohozaev identity for the fractional Laplacian Xavier Ros-Oton Departament Matemàtica Aplicada I, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (joint work with Joaquim Serra) Xavier Ros-Oton (UPC) The Pohozaev
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFinite Field Problems: Solutions
Finite Field Problems: Solutions 1. Let f = x 2 +1 Z 11 [x] and let F = Z 11 [x]/(f), a field. Let Solution: F =11 2 = 121, so F = 121 1 = 120. The possible orders are the divisors of 120. Solution: The
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in
Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in : tail in X, head in A nowhere-zero Γ-flow is a Γ-circulation such that
Διαβάστε περισσότεραarxiv: v2 [math.ap] 11 Nov 2015
1 arxiv:154.686v [math.ap] 11 Nov 15 Global Existence of Weak Solutions to the Barotropic Compressible Navier-Stokes Flows with Degenerate Viscosities Jing LI a,b, Zhouping XIN b a. Institute of Applied
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic
Lecture 2 Soundness and completeness of propositional logic February 9, 2004 1 Overview Review of natural deduction. Soundness and completeness. Semantics of propositional formulas. Soundness proof. Completeness
Διαβάστε περισσότεραArithmetical applications of lagrangian interpolation. Tanguy Rivoal. Institut Fourier CNRS and Université de Grenoble 1
Arithmetical applications of lagrangian interpolation Tanguy Rivoal Institut Fourier CNRS and Université de Grenoble Conference Diophantine and Analytic Problems in Number Theory, The 00th anniversary
Διαβάστε περισσότεραJ. of Math. (PRC) 6 n (nt ) + n V = 0, (1.1) n t + div. div(n T ) = n τ (T L(x) T ), (1.2) n)xx (nt ) x + nv x = J 0, (1.4) n. 6 n
Vol. 35 ( 215 ) No. 5 J. of Math. (PRC) a, b, a ( a. ; b., 4515) :., [3]. : ; ; MR(21) : 35Q4 : O175. : A : 255-7797(215)5-15-7 1 [1] : [ ( ) ] ε 2 n n t + div 6 n (nt ) + n V =, (1.1) n div(n T ) = n
Διαβάστε περισσότεραInverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. ------------------ ----------------------------- -----------------
Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. 1. Sin ( ) = a) b) c) d) Ans b. Solution : Method 1. Ans a: 17 > 1 a) is rejected. w.k.t Sin ( sin ) = d is rejected. If sin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER
ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER Abstract. We define ordinal arithmetic and show laws of Left- Monotonicity, Associativity, Distributivity, some minor related properties and the Cantor Normal Form.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExercises 10. Find a fundamental matrix of the given system of equations. Also find the fundamental matrix Φ(t) satisfying Φ(0) = I. 1.
Exercises 0 More exercises are available in Elementary Differential Equations. If you have a problem to solve any of them, feel free to come to office hour. Problem Find a fundamental matrix of the given
Διαβάστε περισσότεραWeak solution to compressible hydrodynamic flow of liquid crystals in 1-D
Weak solution to compressible hydrodynamic flow of liquid crystals in 1-D Shijin Ding Changyou Wang Huanyao Wen Abstract We consider the equation modeling the compressible hydrodynamic flow of liquid crystals
Διαβάστε περισσότερα1 String with massive end-points
1 String with massive end-points Πρόβλημα 5.11:Θεωρείστε μια χορδή μήκους, τάσης T, με δύο σημειακά σωματίδια στα άκρα της, το ένα μάζας m, και το άλλο μάζας m. α) Μελετώντας την κίνηση των άκρων βρείτε
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3
Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 1 State vector space and the dual space Space of wavefunctions The space of wavefunctions is the set of all
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSecond Order RLC Filters
ECEN 60 Circuits/Electronics Spring 007-0-07 P. Mathys Second Order RLC Filters RLC Lowpass Filter A passive RLC lowpass filter (LPF) circuit is shown in the following schematic. R L C v O (t) Using phasor
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSecond Order Partial Differential Equations
Chapter 7 Second Order Partial Differential Equations 7.1 Introduction A second order linear PDE in two independent variables (x, y Ω can be written as A(x, y u x + B(x, y u xy + C(x, y u u u + D(x, y
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSolvability of Brinkman-Forchheimer equations of flow in double-diffusive convection
Solvability of Brinkman-Forchheimer equations of flow in double-diffusive convection Mitsuharu ÔTANI Waseda University, Tokyo, JAPAN One Forum, Two Cities: Aspect of Nonlinear PDEs 29 August, 211 Mitsuharu
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOnline Appendix I. 1 1+r ]}, Bψ = {ψ : Y E A S S}, B W = +(1 s)[1 m (1,0) (b, e, a, ψ (0,a ) (e, a, s); q, ψ, W )]}, (29) exp( U(d,a ) (i, x; q)
Online Appendix I Appendix D Additional Existence Proofs Denote B q = {q : A E A S [0, +r ]}, Bψ = {ψ : Y E A S S}, B W = {W : I E A S R}. I slightly abuse the notation by defining B q (L q ) the subset
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions
SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES GLMA Linear Mathematics 00- Examination Solutions. (a) i. ( + 5i)( i) = (6 + 5) + (5 )i = + i. Real part is, imaginary part is. (b) ii. + 5i i ( + 5i)( + i) = ( i)( + i)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραk A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +
Chapter 3. Fuzzy Arithmetic 3- Fuzzy arithmetic: ~Addition(+) and subtraction (-): Let A = [a and B = [b, b in R If x [a and y [b, b than x+y [a +b +b Symbolically,we write A(+)B = [a (+)[b, b = [a +b
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSrednicki Chapter 55
Srednicki Chapter 55 QFT Problems & Solutions A. George August 3, 03 Srednicki 55.. Use equations 55.3-55.0 and A i, A j ] = Π i, Π j ] = 0 (at equal times) to verify equations 55.-55.3. This is our third
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIterated trilinear fourier integrals with arbitrary symbols
Cornell University ICM 04, Satellite Conference in Harmonic Analysis, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea August 6, 04 Motivation the Coifman-Meyer theorem with classical paraproduct(979) B(f, f )(x) :=
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 9.2 Polar Equations and Graphs
180 Section 9. Polar Equations and Graphs In this section, we will be graphing polar equations on a polar grid. In the first few examples, we will write the polar equation in rectangular form to help identify
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomomorphism in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Automata
International Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics Systems. ISSN 2248-9940 Volume 3, Number 1 (2013), pp. 39-45 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/ijfms.htm Homomorphism in Intuitionistic
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCommutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets S K Mala #1, Dr. MM Shanmugapriya *2 1 PhD Scholar in Mathematics, Karpagam University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu- 641021 Assistant Professor of Mathematics,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II
Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II October 18, 2012 1 Review First let us recall the situation. Let g be a simple algebra, with maximal toral subalgebra h (which we are calling a CSA, or Cartan Subalgebra).
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNew bounds for spherical two-distance sets and equiangular lines
New bounds for spherical two-distance sets and equiangular lines Michigan State University Oct 8-31, 016 Anhui University Definition If X = {x 1, x,, x N } S n 1 (unit sphere in R n ) and x i, x j = a
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Two-Sided Laplace Inversion Algorithm with Computable Error Bounds and Its Applications in Financial Engineering
Electronic Companion A Two-Sie Laplace Inversion Algorithm with Computable Error Bouns an Its Applications in Financial Engineering Ning Cai, S. G. Kou, Zongjian Liu HKUST an Columbia University Appenix
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHigher Derivative Gravity Theories
Higher Derivative Gravity Theories Black Holes in AdS space-times James Mashiyane Supervisor: Prof Kevin Goldstein University of the Witwatersrand Second Mandelstam, 20 January 2018 James Mashiyane WITS)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS
MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS FUMIE NAKAOKA AND NOBUYUKI ODA Received 20 December 2005; Revised 28 May 2006; Accepted 6 August 2006 Some properties of minimal closed sets and maximal closed
Διαβάστε περισσότερα( y) Partial Differential Equations
Partial Dierential Equations Linear P.D.Es. contains no owers roducts o the deendent variables / an o its derivatives can occasionall be solved. Consider eamle ( ) a (sometimes written as a ) we can integrate
Διαβάστε περισσότερα557: MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS II RESULTS FROM CLASSICAL HYPOTHESIS TESTING
Most Powerful Tests 557: MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS II RESULTS FROM CLASSICAL HYPOTHESIS TESTING To construct and assess the quality of a statistical test, we consider the power function β(θ). Consider a
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn a Subclass of k-uniformly Convex Functions with Negative Coefficients
International Mathematical Forum, 1, 2006, no. 34, 1677-1689 On a Subclass of k-uniformly Convex Functions with Negative Coefficients T. N. SHANMUGAM Department of Mathematics Anna University, Chennai-600
Διαβάστε περισσότεραANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?
Teko Classes IITJEE/AIEEE Maths by SUHAAG SIR, Bhopal, Ph (0755) 3 00 000 www.tekoclasses.com ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION # Question Type A.Single Correct Type Q. (A) Sol least
Διαβάστε περισσότεραω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ω ω + 1 ω + 2 ω + 3 ω + 4 ω2 ω2 + 1 ω2 + 2 ω2 + 3 ω3 ω3 + 1 ω3 + 2 ω4 ω4 + 1 ω5 ω 2 ω 2 + 1 ω 2 + 2 ω 2 + ω ω 2 + ω + 1 ω 2 + ω2 ω 2 2 ω 2 2 + 1 ω 2 2 + ω ω 2 3 ω 3 ω 3 + 1 ω 3 + ω ω 3 +
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA General Note on δ-quasi Monotone and Increasing Sequence
International Mathematical Forum, 4, 2009, no. 3, 143-149 A General Note on δ-quasi Monotone and Increasing Sequence Santosh Kr. Saxena H. N. 419, Jawaharpuri, Badaun, U.P., India Presently working in
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPhase-Field Force Convergence
Phase-Field Force Convergence Bo Li Department of Mathematics and Quantitative Biology Graduate Program UC San Diego Collaborators: Shibin Dai and Jianfeng Lu Funding: NSF School of Mathematical Sciences
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSTABILITY FOR RAYLEIGH-BENARD CONVECTIVE SOLUTIONS OF THE BOLTZMANN EQUATION
STABILITY FOR RAYLEIGH-BENARD CONVECTIVE SOLUTIONS OF THE BOLTZMANN EQUATION L.Arkeryd, Chalmers, Goteborg, Sweden, R.Esposito, University of L Aquila, Italy, R.Marra, University of Rome, Italy, A.Nouri,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSpace-Time Symmetries
Chapter Space-Time Symmetries In classical fiel theory any continuous symmetry of the action generates a conserve current by Noether's proceure. If the Lagrangian is not invariant but only shifts by a
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs
Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs Who? Nichole Schimanski When? July 27, 2011 Graphs A graph, G, consists of a vertex set, V (G), and an edge set, E(G). V (G) is any finite set E(G) is
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 8 Model Solution Section
MATH 004 Homework Solution Homework 8 Model Solution Section 14.5 14.6. 14.5. Use the Chain Rule to find dz where z cosx + 4y), x 5t 4, y 1 t. dz dx + dy y sinx + 4y)0t + 4) sinx + 4y) 1t ) 0t + 4t ) sinx
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS
CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS Shiah-Sen Wang The graphs are prepared by Chien-Lun Lai Based on : Precalculus: Mathematics for Calculus by J. Stuwart, L. Redin & S. Watson, 6th edition, 01, Brooks/Cole Chapter
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLocal Approximation with Kernels
Local Approximation with Kernels Thomas Hangelbroek University of Hawaii at Manoa 5th International Conference Approximation Theory, 26 work supported by: NSF DMS-43726 A cubic spline example Consider
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFinite difference method for 2-D heat equation
Finite difference method for 2-D heat equation Praveen. C praveen@math.tifrbng.res.in Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Center for Applicable Mathematics Bangalore 560065 http://math.tifrbng.res.in/~praveen
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAppendix S1 1. ( z) α βc. dβ β δ β
Appendix S1 1 Proof of Lemma 1. Taking first and second partial derivatives of the expected profit function, as expressed in Eq. (7), with respect to l: Π Π ( z, λ, l) l θ + s ( s + h ) g ( t) dt λ Ω(
Διαβάστε περισσότεραReminders: linear functions
Reminders: linear functions Let U and V be vector spaces over the same field F. Definition A function f : U V is linear if for every u 1, u 2 U, f (u 1 + u 2 ) = f (u 1 ) + f (u 2 ), and for every u U
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMA 342N Assignment 1 Due 24 February 2016
M 342N ssignment Due 24 February 206 Id: 342N-s206-.m4,v. 206/02/5 2:25:36 john Exp john. Suppose that q, in addition to satisfying the assumptions from lecture, is an even function. Prove that η(λ = 0,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStrain gauge and rosettes
Strain gauge and rosettes Introduction A strain gauge is a device which is used to measure strain (deformation) on an object subjected to forces. Strain can be measured using various types of devices classified
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAppendix to On the stability of a compressible axisymmetric rotating flow in a pipe. By Z. Rusak & J. H. Lee
Appendi to On the stability of a compressible aisymmetric rotating flow in a pipe By Z. Rusak & J. H. Lee Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 5 4, pp. 5 4 This material has not been copy-edited or typeset
Διαβάστε περισσότεραParametrized Surfaces
Parametrized Surfaces Recall from our unit on vector-valued functions at the beginning of the semester that an R 3 -valued function c(t) in one parameter is a mapping of the form c : I R 3 where I is some
Διαβάστε περισσότερα