Generalized Double Star Closed Sets in Interior Minimal Spaces
|
|
- Εὐνίκη Βιτάλη
- 7 χρόνια πριν
- Προβολές:
Transcript
1 IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM) e-issn: , p-issn: X. Volume 11, Issue 4 Ver. II (Jul - Aug. 2015), PP Generalized Double Star Closed Sets in Interior Minimal Spaces B. Uma Devi 1 and Dr. S. Somasundaram 2 Department of Mathematics, S. T. Hindu College, Nagercoil, Tamilnadu, India. 1 Department of Mathematics, ManonmaniamSundaranar University, Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu, India. 2 Abstract: The aim of this paper is to introduce and investigate Generalized Double Star Closed set in Interior Minimal spaces. Several properties of these new notions are investigated. Keywords: M-g** Separationspace, Maximal M-g**closed, Maximal M-g**open, Minimal M-g**closed, Minimal M-g** open I. Introduction Norman Levine [1] introduced the concepts of generalized closed sets in topological spaces.closed sets are fundamental objects in a topological space. For example, one can define the topology on a set by using either the axioms for the closed sets or the Kuratowski closure axioms. By definition, a subset A of a topological space X is called generalized closed if cla U whenever A U and U is open. This notion has been studied by many topologists because generalized closed sets are not only natural generalization of closed sets but also suggest several new properties of topological spaces. Nakaoka and Oda[2,3,4] have introduced minimal open sets and maximal open sets, which are subclasses of open sets. Later on many authors concentrated in this direction and defined many different types of minimal and maximal open sets. Inspired with these developments we further study a new type of closed and open sets namely Minimal M-g**Open sets, Maximal M-g** Closed sets. In this paper a space X means a Minimal space (X, M). For any subset A of X its M-interior and M-closure are denoted respectively by the symbols M-int(A) and M-cl(A). II. Preliminaries Definition 1A is said to be M-g ** closed (M-generalized double star closed) if M-cl(A) U whenever A U and U is M-g*open. Definition2A is said to be M-g ** open(m-generalized double star open) if M-cl(A) U whenever A U and U is M-g*closed. Theorem3EveryM-closed set is M-g**closed. ProofLet A be an M-closed subset of X.Let A U and U be M-g*open.Since A is M-closed, then M-cl(A) =A. So M-cl(A) U.Thus A is M-g**closed. Converse is not true Theorem4If A is M-g**closed and A B M-cl(A), then B is M-g**closed. ProofSince B M-cl(A), M-cl(B) M-cl(A). Let B U and U be M-g*open.Since A B, A is M-g**closed and U is M-g*open. Gives M-cl(A) U. Since B M-cl(A), M-cl(B) M-cl(A). M-cl(B) U.Hence B is M- g**closed. Theorem5EveryM-open set is M-g**open. ProofLet A be a M-open set of X.Then A c is M-closed set. By Theorem3, A c is M-g**closed, then A is M- g**open. Converse is not true Theorem6If A is M-g**open and M-int(A) B A. Then B is M-g**open. ProofA is M-g**open. Hence A c is M-g**closed. Also M-Int(A) B A gives[m-int(a)] c B c A c. So A c B c M-cl(A c ). Thus B c is M-g**closed and hence B is M-g**open. Theorem7IfA and B are M-g**closed sets in X and M-cl(A B) = M-cl(A) M-cl(B), then A B is also M- g**closed set in X. DOI: / Page
2 ProofSuppose that Uis M-g*open and A B U. Then A U and B U.Since A and B are M-g**closed subsets in X,M-cl(A) U and M cl(b) U.Hence M-(A) M-(B) U. GivenM-cl(A B) = M-cl(A) M-cl(B) U. Therefore A B is alsom-g**closed set in X. Definition8A Interior minimal space (X, M) is said to be am-g**t 0 space if for every pair of points x y in X either there existsm-g**open set U such that x U, y U or y U, x U. Theorem9EveryM-T 0 space is M-g**T 0 space but not conversely. Proof is obvious since every M-open set is M-g**open. Definition10An Interior minimal space (X, M) is said to be a M-g**T 1 space if for every pair of points x y in X there existsm-g**open sets U and V such that x U, y U and y V, x V. Theorem11EveryM-T 1 space is M-g**T 1 space. Proof is obvious since every M-open set is M-g**open. Definition12An Interior minimal space(x, M) is said to be a M-g**T 2 space if for every pair of distinct points x, y in X there exists disjointm-g**open sets U and V in X such that U V =. Theorem13EveryM-T 2 space is M-g**T 2 space. Proof is obvious since every M-open set is M-g**open. Theorem14EveryM-g**T 2 space is M-g**T 1 space but not conversely. Proof is obvious from the definitions. Theorem15Any singleton set in an Interior minimal space is either M-semiclosed or M-g**open ProofLet {x} be a singleton set in an Interior minimal space X.If {x} is M-semiclosed, then proof is over.if {x} is not a M-semiclosed set, Then {x} c is not M-semiopen.Therefore X is the only M-semiopen set containing {x} c and{x} c is M-g**closed. Hence {x} is M-g**open. Thus {x} is M-semiclosed or M-g*s*open. Definition16An Interior minimal space X is called M-g**T1 /3 space if every M-gclosed set in X is M-g**closed in X. Theorem17An Interior minimal space X is M-g**T 1/3 if and only if every M-gopen set is M-g**open. ProofLet X be M-g**T 1/3. Let A be M-gopen set.to prove, A is M-g**open.Since A is M-gopen then A c is M- gclosed.thus A c is M-g**closed. [X is M-g**T 1/3 ] givesa is M-g**open.Conversely,Suppose every M-gopen is M-g**open.Then every M-gclosed set is M-g**closed.Hence X is M-g**T 1/3. Definition18An Interior minimal space X is called M-g**T 1/2 space if every M-g**closed set is M-closed. Theorem19An Interior minimal space X is M-g**T 1/2 if and only if every M-g**open set is M-open. ProofLet X be M-g**T 1/2 and let A be M-g**open.Then A c is M-g**closed and so A c is M-closed.Thus A is M- open. Conversely,Suppose every M-g**open set is M-open.Let A be any M-g**closed set.then A c is M-g**open gives A c is M-open and A is M-closed.Thus every M-g**closed set is M-closed set.hence X is M-g**T 1/2. 3. Minimal M-g**open sets and Maximal M-g**closed sets We now introduce Minimal M-g**open sets and Maximal M-g**closed sets in Interior minimal spaces as follows. Definition1A proper nonempty M-g**open subset U of X is said to be a Minimal M-g**open set if any M- g**open set contained in U is or U. RemarkMinimalM-open set and Minimal M-g**open set are independent to each other. Theorem2 (i) Let U be a Minimal M-g**open set and W be am-g**open set. Then U W = or U W. (ii) Let U and V be Minimal M-g**open sets. DOI: / Page
3 Then U V = or U = V. Proof (i) Let U be a Minimal M-g**open set and W be am-g**open set.if U W =, then there is nothing to prove. If U W. Then U W U. Since U is a Minimal M-g**open set, we have U W = U. Therefore U W. (ii) Let U and V be Minimal M-g**open sets. If U V, then U V and V U by (i). Therefore U = V. Theorem3Let U be a Minimal M-g**open set. If x U, then U W for some M-g**open set W containing x. ProofLet U be a Minimal M-g**open set and x U.Let W be any other M-g**open set. U W = or U W. If U W x U x W. Since W is arbitrary, there exists am-g**open set W containing x such that U W. Theorem4Let U be a Minimal M-g**open set.then U = {WW is a M-g**open set of X containing x} for any element x of U. ProofBy Theorem3, and U is a Minimal M-g**open set containing x, then U W for some M-g**open set W containing x.we have U {WW is a M-g**open set of X containing x} U. Thus U = {WW is a M- g**open set of X containing x} U. Theorem5Let V be a nonempty finite M-g**open set. Then there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M- g**open set U such that U V. ProofLet V be a nonempty finite M-g**open set. If V is a Minimal M-g**open set, we may set U = V. If V is not a Minimal M-g**open set, then there exists (finite) M-g**open set V 1 such that V 1 V. If V 1 is a Minimal M-g**open set, we may set U = V 1. If V 1 is not a Minimal M-g**open set, then there exists (finite)mg**open set V 2 such that V 2 V 1. Continuing this process, we have a sequence of M-g**open sets V V 1 V 2 V 3... V k...since V is a finite set, this process repeats only finitely. Then finally we get a Minimal M-g**open set U = V n for some positive integer n. Hence there exists atleast one Minimal M-g**open set U such that U V. [An Interior minimal space X is said to be M-locally finite space if each of its elements is contained in a finite M-g**open set.] Corollary6Let X be am-locally finite space and V be a nonempty M-g**open set. Then there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**open set U such that U V. ProofLet X be a M-locally finite space and V be a nonempty M-g**open set.let x V.Since X is M-locally finite space, we have a finite M-open set V x such that x V x.then V V x is a finite M-g**open set. By Theorem5, there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**open set U such that U V Vx.That is U V V x V. Hence there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**open set U such that U V. Corollary7Let V be a finite Minimal M-open set. Then there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**open set U such that U V. ProofLet V be a finite Minimal M-open set. Then V is a nonempty finite M-g**open set. By Theorem5, there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**open set U such that U V. Theorem8Let U; U λ be Minimal M-g**open sets for any element λ Γ. If U λ Γ U λ, then there exists an element λ Γ such that U = U λ. ProofLet U λ Γ U λ. Then U ( λ Γ U λ ) = U. That is λ Γ (U U λ ) = U.Also by Theorem2 (ii), U U λ = or U = U λ for any λ Γ.Then there exists an element λ Γ such that U = U λ. Theorem9Let U; U λ be Minimal M-g**open sets for any λ Γ. If U = U λ for any λ Γ, then ( λ Γ U λ ) U =. ProofSuppose that ( λ Γ U λ ) U for any λ Γ such that U U λ. That is λ Γ (U λ U). Then there exists an element λ Γ such that U U λ.by Theorem2(ii), we have U = U λ, which contradicts the fact that U U λ for any λ Γ.Hence ( λ Γ U λ ) U =. We now introduce Maximal M-g**closed sets in Interior Minimal spaces as follows. Definition10A proper nonempty M-g**closed set F X is said to be Maximal M-g**closed setif any M- g**closed set containing F is either X or F. DOI: / Page
4 RemarkEvery Maximal M-closed sets are Maximal M-g**closed sets. Generalized Double Star Closed Sets In Interior Minimal Spaces Theorem11A proper nonempty subset F of X is Maximal M-g**closed set if and only if X\F is a Minimal M- g**open set. ProofLet F be a Maximal M-g**closed set. Suppose X\F is not a Minimal M-g**open set. Then there exists amg**open set U X\F such that U X\F. That is F X\U and X\U is am-g**closed set gives a contradiction to F is a Maximal M-g**closed set.so X\F is a Minimal M-g**open set. Conversely, Let X\F be a Minimal M-g**open set. Suppose F is not a Maximal M-g**closed set. Then there exists am-g**closed set E F such that F E X. That is X\E X\F and X\E is am-g**open set gives a contradiction to X\F is a Minimal M-g**open set. Thus F is a Maximal M-g**closed set. Theorem12 (i) Let F be a Maximal M-g**closed set and W be am-g**closed set. Then F W = X or W F. (ii) Let F and S be Maximal M-g**closed sets. Then F S = X or F = S. Proof(i)Let F be a Maximal M-g**closed set and W be a M-g**closed set. If F W = X, then there is nothing to prove.suppose F W X. Then F F W.Therefore F W= F implies W F. (ii) Let F and S be Maximal M-g**closed sets.if F S X, then we have F S and S F by (i).therefore F = S. Theorem13Let F α, F β, F δ be Maximal M-g**closed sets such that F α F β. If F α F β F δ, then either F α = F δ or F β = F δ ProofGiven that F α F β F δ. If F α = F δ then there is nothing to prove. If F α F δ then we have to prove F β = F δ.now F β F δ = F β (F δ X) = F β (F δ (F α F β )(by Theorem12(ii)) = F β ((F δ F α ) (F δ F β )) = (F β F δ F α ) (F β F δ F β ) = (F α F β ) (F δ F β ) (by F α F β F δ ) = (F α F δ ) F β = X F β (Since F α and F δ are Maximal M-g**closed sets by Theorem12(ii), F α F δ = X)= F β. That isf β F δ = F β implies F β F δ. Since F β and F δ are Maximal M-g**closed sets, we have F β = F δ Therefore F β = F δ Theorem14Let F α, F β and F δ be different Maximal M-g**closed sets to each other. Then (F α F β ) (F α F δ ). ProofLet (F α F β ) (F α F δ ) (F α F β ) (F δ F β ) (F α F δ ) (F δ F β )gives(f α F δ ) F β F δ (F α F β ).Since by Theorem12(ii), F α F δ = X and F α F β = X givesx F β F δ X.That is F β F δ. From the definition of Maximal M-g**closed set, we get F β = F δ which gives a contradiction to the fact that F α, F β and F δ are different to each other. Thus(F α F β ) (F α F δ ). Theorem15Let F be a Maximal M-g**closed set and x be an element of F. Then F = { SS is a M-g**closed set containing x such that F S X}. ProofBy Theorem13, and fact that F is a M-g**closed set containing x, we have F {SS is a M-g**closed set containing x such that F S X} F.So we have F = {SS is a M-g**closed set containing x such that F S X}. Theorem16Let F be a Maximal M-g**closed set. If x is an element of X\F. Then X\F E for any M- g**closed set E containing x. ProofLet F be a Maximal M-g**closed set and x is in X\F. E F for any M-g**closed set E containing x.then E F = X (by Theorem12 (ii)). Thus X\F E. Minimal M-g**closed set and Maximal M-g**open set We now introduce Minimal M-g**closed sets and Maximal M-g**open sets in Interior Minimal spaces as follows. Definition17A proper nonempty M-g**closed subset F of X is said to be a Minimal M-g**closed set if any M- g**closed set contained in F is or F. RemarkMinimalM-closed and Minimal M-g**closed set are independent to each other. DOI: / Page
5 Definition18A proper nonempty M-g**open U X is said to be a Maximal M-g**open setif any M-g**open set containing U is either X or U. RemarkMaximalM-open set and Maximal M-g**open set are independent to each other. Theorem19A proper nonempty subset U of X is Maximal M-g**open set if and only ifx\u is a Minimal M- g**closed set. ProofLet U be a Maximal M-g**open set. Suppose X\U is not a Minimal M-g**closed set. Then there exists M- g**closed set V X\U such that V X\U. That is U X\V and X\V is am-g**open set gives a contradiction to U is a Minimal M-g**closed set. Conversely, Let X\U be a Minimal M-g**closed set.suppose U is not a Maximal M-g**open set. Then there exists M-g**open set E U such that U E X. That is X\E X\U and X\E is am-g**closed set which is a contradiction for X\U is a Minimal M-g**closed set.therefore U is a Maximal M-g**closed set. Theorem20 (i) Let U be a Minimal M-g**closed set and W be am-g**closed set. Then U W = or U W. (ii) Let U and V be Minimal M-g**closed sets. Then U V = or U = V. Proof (i) Let U be a Minimal M-g**closed set and W be am-g**closed set. If U W =, then there is nothing to prove.if U W. Then U W U. Since U is a Minimal M-g**closed set, we have U W = U.Therefore U W. (ii) Let U and V be Minimal M-g**closed sets. If U V, then U V and V U by (i). Therefore U = V. Theorem21Let V be a nonempty finite M-g**closed set. Then there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M- g**closed set U such that U V. ProofLet V be a nonempty finite M-g**closed set. If V is a minimal M-g**closed set, we may set U = V.If V is not a Minimal M-g**closed set, then there exists (finite) M-g**closed set V 1 such that V 1 V. If V 1 is a Minimal M-g**closed set, we may set U = V 1.If V 1 is not a minimal M-g**closed set, then there exists (finite)m-g**closed set V 2 such that V 2 V 1. Continuing this process, we have a sequence of M-g**closed sets V V 1 V 2 V 3... V k Since V is a finite set, this process repeats only finitely. Then finally we get a Minimal M-g**closed set U = V n for some positive integer n. Corollary22Let X be a M-locally finite space and V be a nonempty M-g**closed set. Then there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**closed set U such that U V. ProofLet X be a M-locally finite space and V be a nonempty M-g**closed set. Let x V.Since X is M-locally finite space, we have a finite M-open set V x such that x V x. Then V V x is a finite M-g**closed set. By Theorem21, there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**closed set U such that U V V x. That is U V V x V. Hence there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**closed set U such that U V. Corollary23Let V be a finite Minimal M-open set. Then there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**closed set U such that U V. ProofLet V be a finite Minimal M-open set. Then V is a nonempty finite M-g**closed set. By Theorem21,there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**closed set U such that U V. Theorem24Let U; U λ be Minimal M-g**closed sets for any element λ Γ. If U λ Γ U λ, then there exists an element λ Γ such that U = U λ. ProofLet U λ Γ U λ. Then U ( λ Γ U λ ) = U. That is λ Γ (U U λ ) = U. Also by Theorem20(ii), U U λ = or U = U λ for any λ Γ. This implies that there exists an element λ Γ such that U = U λ. Theorem25Let U; U λ be Minimal M-g**closed sets for any λ Γ. If U = U λ for any λ Γ, then ( λ Γ U λ ) U =. ProofSuppose that ( λ Γ U λ ) U. That is λ Γ (U λ U). Then there exists an element λ Γ such that U U λ. By Theorem20(ii), we have U = U λ, which contradicts the fact that U U λ for any λ Γ. Hence ( λ Γ U λ ) U =. DOI: / Page
6 Theorem26A proper nonempty subset F of X is Maximal M-g**open set if and only ifx\f is a Minimal M- g**closed set. ProofLet F be a Maximal M-g**open set. Suppose X\F is not a Minimal M-g**open set. Then there exists M- g**open set U X\F such that U X\F. That is F X\U and X\U is am-g**open set which is a contradiction for F is a Minimal M-g**closed set. Conversely, Let X\F be a Minimal M-g**closed set. Suppose F is not a Maximal M-g**open set. Then there exists M-g**open set E F such that F E X. That is X\E X\F and X\E is am-g**open set which is a contradiction for X\F is a Minimal M-g**closed set. Thus F is a Maximal M-g**open set. Theorem27 (i) Let F be a Maximal M-g**open set and W be am-g**open set. Then F W = X or W F. (ii) Let F and S be Maximal M-g**open sets. Then F S=X or F = S. Proof (i) Let F be a Maximal M-g**open set and W be am-g**open set.if F W = X, then there is nothing to prove. Suppose F W X. Then F F W.Therefore F W = F givesw F. (ii) Let F and S be Maximal M-g**open sets.if F S X, then we have F S and S F by (i). Therefore F = S. Theorem28Let F α, F β, F δ be Maximal M-g**open sets such that F α F β. If F α F β F δ, then either F α = F δ or F β = F δ ProofGiven that F α F β F δ. If F α = F δ then there is nothing to prove. If F α F δ then we have to prove F β = F δ. Now F β F δ = F β (F δ X) = F β (F δ (F α F β )(by Theorem27(ii)) = F β ((F δ F α ) (F δ F β )) = (F β F δ F α ) (F β F δ F β ) = (F α F β ) (F δ F β ) (by F α F β F δ ) = (F α F δ ) F β = X F β. (Since F α and F δ are Maximal M-g**open sets by Theorem27 (ii), F α F δ = X)= F β.that is F β F δ = F β. Thus F β F δ. Since F β and F δ are Maximal M-g**open sets, we have F β = F δ. Therefore F β = F δ. Theorem29Let F α, F β and F δ be different Maximal M-g**open sets to each other. Then (F α F β ) (F α F δ ). ProofLet (F α F β ) (F α F δ ) (F α F β ) (F δ F β ) (F α F δ ) (F δ F β ) (F α F δ ) F β F δ (F α F β ).(Since by Theorem27(ii), F α F δ = X and F α F β = X X F β F δ X F β F δ. From the definition of Maximal M-g**open set it follows that F β = F δ, which is a contradiction to the fact that F α, F β and F δ are different to each other. Therefore (F α F β ) (F α F δ ). Theorem30Let F be a Maximal M-g**open set. If x is an element of X \ F. Then X\F E for any M-g**open set E containing x. ProofLet F be a Maximal M-g**open set and x X\F. E F for any M-g**open set E containing x. Then E F = X by Theorem27(ii).Therefore X\F E. References [1]. F. Nakaoka and N. Oda, On Minimal Closed Sets, Proceeding of Topological spaces Theory and its Applications, 5(2003), [2]. F. Nakaoka and N. Oda, Some Properties of Maximal Open Sets, Int. J. Math. Sci. 21,(2003) [3]. A. Vadivel and K. Vairamanickam, Minimal rgα-open Sets and Maximal rgα-closed Sets, Submitted to Journal of Tripura Mathematical Society [4]. S. Balasubramanian, C. Sandhya and P. A. S. Vyjayanthi, On v-closed sets (In press) ActaCienciaIndica. DOI: / Page
MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS
MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS FUMIE NAKAOKA AND NOBUYUKI ODA Received 20 December 2005; Revised 28 May 2006; Accepted 6 August 2006 Some properties of minimal closed sets and maximal closed
Διαβάστε περισσότερα1. Introduction and Preliminaries.
Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.yu/filomat Filomat 22:1 (2008), 97 106 ON δ SETS IN γ SPACES V. Renuka Devi and D. Sivaraj Abstract We
Διαβάστε περισσότεραF A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I
F A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I Nr 46 2011 C. Carpintero, N. Rajesh and E. Rosas ON A CLASS OF (γ, γ )-PREOPEN SETS IN A TOPOLOGICAL SPACE Abstract. In this paper we have introduced the concept
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOperation Approaches on α-γ-open Sets in Topological Spaces
Int. Journal of Math. Analysis, Vol. 7, 2013, no. 10, 491-498 Operation Approaches on α-γ-open Sets in Topological Spaces N. Kalaivani Department of Mathematics VelTech HighTec Dr.Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomomorphism in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Automata
International Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics Systems. ISSN 2248-9940 Volume 3, Number 1 (2013), pp. 39-45 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/ijfms.htm Homomorphism in Intuitionistic
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSome new generalized topologies via hereditary classes. Key Words:hereditary generalized topological space, A κ(h,µ)-sets, κµ -topology.
Bol. Soc. Paran. Mat. (3s.) v. 30 2 (2012): 71 77. c SPM ISSN-2175-1188 on line ISSN-00378712 in press SPM: www.spm.uem.br/bspm doi:10.5269/bspm.v30i2.13793 Some new generalized topologies via hereditary
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 67, 3301-3307 A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Equivalence Relation D. K. Basnet Dept. of Mathematics, Assam University Silchar-788011, Assam, India dkbasnet@rediffmail.com
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2 Composition. Invertible Mappings
Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan Composition. Invertible Mappings In this section we discuss two procedures for creating new mappings from old ones, namely,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOrdinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit
Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ting Zhang Stanford May 11, 2001 Stanford, 5/11/2001 1 Outline Ordinal Classification Ordinal Addition Ordinal Multiplication Ordinal
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFinite Field Problems: Solutions
Finite Field Problems: Solutions 1. Let f = x 2 +1 Z 11 [x] and let F = Z 11 [x]/(f), a field. Let Solution: F =11 2 = 121, so F = 121 1 = 120. The possible orders are the divisors of 120. Solution: The
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCommutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets S K Mala #1, Dr. MM Shanmugapriya *2 1 PhD Scholar in Mathematics, Karpagam University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu- 641021 Assistant Professor of Mathematics,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEvery set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set May 6, 2008 Abstract A set of first-order formulas, whatever the cardinality of the set of symbols, is equivalent to an independent
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS
Sahand Communications in Mathematical Analysis (SCMA) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016), 21-27 http://scma.maragheh.ac.ir SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS BAYAZ DARABY 1 AND JAVAD JAFARI 2 Abstract. In the mathematical
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)
Uppsala Universitet Matematiska Institutionen Andreas Strömbergsson Prov i matematik Funktionalanalys Kurs: F3B, F4Sy, NVP 2005-03-08 Skrivtid: 9 14 Tillåtna hjälpmedel: Manuella skrivdon, Kreyszigs bok
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIntuitionistic Supra Gradation of Openness
Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences 2(3) (2008), 291-307 An International Journal c 2008 Dixie W Publishing Corporation, U. S. A. Intuitionistic Supra Gradation of Openness A. M. Zahran 1, S. E.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCongruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 24, no. 5, 239-246 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/.2988/ija.24.422 Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 Ligong An and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018
Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics(JRM) ISSN: 2395-028 SCITECH Volume 3, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION ublished online: March 29, 208 Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics www.scitecresearch.com/journals
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCoefficient Inequalities for a New Subclass of K-uniformly Convex Functions
International Journal of Computational Science and Mathematics. ISSN 0974-89 Volume, Number (00), pp. 67--75 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Coefficient Inequalities for
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomomorphism and Cartesian Product on Fuzzy Translation and Fuzzy Multiplication of PS-algebras
Annals of Pure and Applied athematics Vol. 8, No. 1, 2014, 93-104 ISSN: 2279-087X (P), 2279-0888(online) Published on 11 November 2014 www.researchmathsci.org Annals of Homomorphism and Cartesian Product
Διαβάστε περισσότεραST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II
ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II 2014/2015: Semester II Tutorial 7 1. Let X be a sample from a population P and consider testing hypotheses H 0 : P = P 0 versus H 1 : P = P 1, where P j is a known
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs
Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs Who? Nichole Schimanski When? July 27, 2011 Graphs A graph, G, consists of a vertex set, V (G), and an edge set, E(G). V (G) is any finite set E(G) is
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.
Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequalit for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x,, z X. Prove that d(x, z) d(, z) d(x, ). (ii): Reverse triangle inequalit for norms:
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Note on Characterization of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals in Γ- Near-Rings
International Journal of Computational Science and Mathematics. ISSN 0974-3189 Volume 3, Number 1 (2011), pp. 61-71 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com A Note on Characterization
Διαβάστε περισσότεραReminders: linear functions
Reminders: linear functions Let U and V be vector spaces over the same field F. Definition A function f : U V is linear if for every u 1, u 2 U, f (u 1 + u 2 ) = f (u 1 ) + f (u 2 ), and for every u U
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStatistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests
Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Shirsendu Mukherjee Department of Statistics, Asutosh College, Kolkata, India. shirsendu st@yahoo.co.in So far we have treated the testing of one-sided
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS
MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS FUMIE NAKAOKA AND NOBUYUKI ODA Received 20 December 2005; Revised 28 May 2006; Accepted 6 August 2006 Some properties of minimal closed sets and maximal closed
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEE512: Error Control Coding
EE512: Error Control Coding Solution for Assignment on Finite Fields February 16, 2007 1. (a) Addition and Multiplication tables for GF (5) and GF (7) are shown in Tables 1 and 2. + 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 3
Διαβάστε περισσότεραC.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions
C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions Paul Liu November 15, 2007 Note that these are sample solutions only; in many cases there were many acceptable answers. 1 Reynolds Problem 10.1 1.1 Normal-order
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFuzzifying Tritopological Spaces
International Mathematical Forum, Vol., 08, no. 9, 7-6 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com https://doi.org/0.988/imf.08.88 On α-continuity and α-openness in Fuzzifying Tritopological Spaces Barah M. Sulaiman
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomomorphism of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Groups
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 6, 20, no. 64, 369-378 Homomorphism o Intuitionistic Fuzz Groups P. K. Sharma Department o Mathematics, D..V. College Jalandhar Cit, Punjab, India pksharma@davjalandhar.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in
Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in : tail in X, head in A nowhere-zero Γ-flow is a Γ-circulation such that
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIntuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 7, 202, no. 6, 769-776 Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings P. K. Sharma P.G. Department of Mathematics D.A.V. College Jalandhar city, Punjab, India pksharma@davjalandhar.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραON FUZZY BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES IN ŠOSTAK S SENSE (II)
Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 25 (2010), No. 3, pp. 457 475 DOI 10.4134/CKMS.2010.25.3.457 ON FUZZY BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES IN ŠOSTAK S SENSE (II) Ahmed Abd El-Kader Ramadan, Salah El-Deen Abbas, and Ahmed Aref
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExample Sheet 3 Solutions
Example Sheet 3 Solutions. i Regular Sturm-Liouville. ii Singular Sturm-Liouville mixed boundary conditions. iii Not Sturm-Liouville ODE is not in Sturm-Liouville form. iv Regular Sturm-Liouville note
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics
Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics Nov 1, 01 In this lecture we examine root systems from an axiomatic point of view. 1 Reflections If v R n, then it determines a hyperplane, denoted P v, through the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραJordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 4(2), 2011, pp
Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 4(2), 2011, pp.115-126. α, β, γ ORTHOGONALITY ABDALLA TALLAFHA Abstract. Orthogonality in inner product spaces can be expresed using the notion of norms.
Διαβάστε περισσότερα3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β
3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS Page Theorem cos(αβ cos α cos β -sin α cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α NOTE: cos(αβ cos α cos β cos(α-β cos α -cos β Proof of cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α Let s use a unit circle
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 3: Ordinal Numbers
Chapter 3: Ordinal Numbers There are two kinds of number.. Ordinal numbers (0th), st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th,..., ω, ω +,... ω2, ω2+,... ω 2... answers to the question What position is... in a sequence? What
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II
Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II October 18, 2012 1 Review First let us recall the situation. Let g be a simple algebra, with maximal toral subalgebra h (which we are calling a CSA, or Cartan Subalgebra).
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics
Fourier Series MATH 211, Calculus II J. Robert Buchanan Department of Mathematics Spring 2018 Introduction Not all functions can be represented by Taylor series. f (k) (c) A Taylor series f (x) = (x c)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions
SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES GLMA Linear Mathematics 00- Examination Solutions. (a) i. ( + 5i)( i) = (6 + 5) + (5 )i = + i. Real part is, imaginary part is. (b) ii. + 5i i ( + 5i)( + i) = ( i)( + i)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume
BULETINUL ACADEMIEI DE ŞTIINŢE A REPUBLICII MOLDOVA. MATEMATICA Numbers 2(72) 3(73), 2013, Pages 80 89 ISSN 1024 7696 On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume I.S.Gutsul Abstract. In
Διαβάστε περισσότεραORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER
ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER Abstract. We define ordinal arithmetic and show laws of Left- Monotonicity, Associativity, Distributivity, some minor related properties and the Cantor Normal Form.
Διαβάστε περισσότερα6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.
6.1. Dirac Equation Ref: M.Kaku, Quantum Field Theory, Oxford Univ Press (1993) η μν = η μν = diag(1, -1, -1, -1) p 0 = p 0 p = p i = -p i p μ p μ = p 0 p 0 + p i p i = E c 2 - p 2 = (m c) 2 H = c p 2
Διαβάστε περισσότερα5. Choice under Uncertainty
5. Choice under Uncertainty Daisuke Oyama Microeconomics I May 23, 2018 Formulations von Neumann-Morgenstern (1944/1947) X: Set of prizes Π: Set of probability distributions on X : Preference relation
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSequent Calculi for the Modal µ-calculus over S5. Luca Alberucci, University of Berne. Logic Colloquium Berne, July 4th 2008
Sequent Calculi for the Modal µ-calculus over S5 Luca Alberucci, University of Berne Logic Colloquium Berne, July 4th 2008 Introduction Koz: Axiomatisation for the modal µ-calculus over K Axioms: All classical
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Simply Typed Lambda Calculus
Type Inference Instead of writing type annotations, can we use an algorithm to infer what the type annotations should be? That depends on the type system. For simple type systems the answer is yes, and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTHE SECOND ISOMORPHISM THEOREM ON ORDERED SET UNDER ANTIORDERS. Daniel A. Romano
235 Kragujevac J. Math. 30 (2007) 235 242. THE SECOND ISOMORPHISM THEOREM ON ORDERED SET UNDER ANTIORDERS Daniel A. Romano Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Banja Luka University, Mladena Stojanovića
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGenerating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations
Applied Mathematics 06 7 98-07 Published Online January 06 in SciRes http://wwwscirporg/journal/am http://dxdoiorg/036/am067009 Generating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations Yasha iasamidze
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGÖKHAN ÇUVALCIOĞLU, KRASSIMIR T. ATANASSOV, AND SINEM TARSUSLU(YILMAZ)
IFSCOM016 1 Proceeding Book No. 1 pp. 155-161 (016) ISBN: 978-975-6900-54-3 SOME RESULTS ON S α,β AND T α,β INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY MODAL OPERATORS GÖKHAN ÇUVALCIOĞLU, KRASSIMIR T. ATANASSOV, AND SINEM TARSUSLU(YILMAZ)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANSFORMATION SEMIGROUPS
GANIT J. Bangladesh Math. oc. IN 606-694) 0) -7 DIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANFORMATION EMIGROUP ubrata Majumdar, * Kalyan Kumar Dey and Mohd. Altab Hossain Department of Mathematics University
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS
CHAPTER 5 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS EXERCISE 104 Page 8 1. Find the positive root of the equation x + 3x 5 = 0, correct to 3 significant figures, using the method of bisection. Let f(x) =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn Annihilator of Fuzzy Subsets of Modules
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 3, 2009, no. 10, 483-488 On Annihilator of Fuzzy Subsets of Modules Helen K. Saikia 1 and Mrinal C. Kalita 2 1 Department of Mathematics, Gauhati university, Guwahati-781014,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 19/5/2007
Οδηγίες: Να απαντηθούν όλες οι ερωτήσεις. Αν κάπου κάνετε κάποιες υποθέσεις να αναφερθούν στη σχετική ερώτηση. Όλα τα αρχεία που αναφέρονται στα προβλήματα βρίσκονται στον ίδιο φάκελο με το εκτελέσιμο
Διαβάστε περισσότεραKnaster-Reichbach Theorem for 2 κ
Knaster-Reichbach Theorem for 2 κ Micha l Korch February 9, 2018 In the recent years the theory of the generalized Cantor and Baire spaces was extensively developed (see, e.g. [1], [2], [6], [4] and many
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCyclic or elementary abelian Covers of K 4
Cyclic or elementary abelian Covers of K 4 Yan-Quan Feng Mathematics, Beijing Jiaotong University Beijing 100044, P.R. China Summer School, Rogla, Slovenian 2011-06 Outline 1 Question 2 Main results 3
Διαβάστε περισσότεραλρ-calculus 1. each λ-variable is a λρ-term, called an atom or atomic term; 2. if M and N are λρ-term then (MN) is a λρ-term called an application;
λρ-calculus Yuichi Komori komori@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences, Chiba University Arato Cho aratoc@g.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Sciences,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSecond Order Partial Differential Equations
Chapter 7 Second Order Partial Differential Equations 7.1 Introduction A second order linear PDE in two independent variables (x, y Ω can be written as A(x, y u x + B(x, y u xy + C(x, y u u u + D(x, y
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOther Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests
Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Side-Note: So far we have seen a few approaches for creating tests such as Neyman-Pearson Lemma ( most powerful tests of H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 :
Διαβάστε περισσότερα4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)
84 CHAPTER 4. STATIONARY TS MODELS 4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(,) This section is an introduction to a wide class of models ARMA(p,q) which we will consider in more detail later in this
Διαβάστε περισσότεραBounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees
Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees Thomas F. Kent Andrea Sorbi Università degli Studi di Siena Italia July 18, 2007 Goal: Introduce a form of Σ 0 2-permitting for the enumeration degrees. Till now,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραInverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. ------------------ ----------------------------- -----------------
Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. 1. Sin ( ) = a) b) c) d) Ans b. Solution : Method 1. Ans a: 17 > 1 a) is rejected. w.k.t Sin ( sin ) = d is rejected. If sin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStrukturalna poprawność argumentu.
Strukturalna poprawność argumentu. Marcin Selinger Uniwersytet Wrocławski Katedra Logiki i Metodologii Nauk marcisel@uni.wroc.pl Table of contents: 1. Definition of argument and further notions. 2. Operations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPhys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)
Phys460.nb 81 ψ n (t) is still the (same) eigenstate of H But for tdependent H. The answer is NO. 5.5.5. Solution for the tdependent Schrodinger s equation If we assume that at time t 0, the electron starts
Διαβάστε περισσότεραUniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor
Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor Given f L 1 T 1 ), we consider the partial sums of the Fourier series of f: N 1) S N fθ) = ˆfk)e ikθ. k= N A calculation gives the Dirichlet formula
Διαβάστε περισσότεραANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?
Teko Classes IITJEE/AIEEE Maths by SUHAAG SIR, Bhopal, Ph (0755) 3 00 000 www.tekoclasses.com ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION # Question Type A.Single Correct Type Q. (A) Sol least
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOverview. Transition Semantics. Configurations and the transition relation. Executions and computation
Overview Transition Semantics Configurations and the transition relation Executions and computation Inference rules for small-step structural operational semantics for the simple imperative language Transition
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 8.3 Trigonometric Equations
99 Section 8. Trigonometric Equations Objective 1: Solve Equations Involving One Trigonometric Function. In this section and the next, we will exple how to solving equations involving trigonometric functions.
Διαβάστε περισσότερα12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem
Tutorial 12: Radon-Nikodym Theorem 1 12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem In the following, (Ω, F) is an arbitrary measurable space. Definition 96 Let μ and ν be two (possibly complex) measures on (Ω, F). We say
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPractice Exam 2. Conceptual Questions. 1. State a Basic identity and then verify it. (a) Identity: Solution: One identity is csc(θ) = 1
Conceptual Questions. State a Basic identity and then verify it. a) Identity: Solution: One identity is cscθ) = sinθ) Practice Exam b) Verification: Solution: Given the point of intersection x, y) of the
Διαβάστε περισσότερα3.2 Simple Roots and Weyl Group
44 CHAPTER 3. ROOT SYSTEMS 3.2 Simple Roots and Weyl Group In this section, we fix a root system Φ of rank l in a euclidean space E, with Weyl group W. 3.2.1 Bases and Weyl chambers Def. A subset of Φ
Διαβάστε περισσότεραJordan Form of a Square Matrix
Jordan Form of a Square Matrix Josh Engwer Texas Tech University josh.engwer@ttu.edu June 3 KEY CONCEPTS & DEFINITIONS: R Set of all real numbers C Set of all complex numbers = {a + bi : a b R and i =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA General Note on δ-quasi Monotone and Increasing Sequence
International Mathematical Forum, 4, 2009, no. 3, 143-149 A General Note on δ-quasi Monotone and Increasing Sequence Santosh Kr. Saxena H. N. 419, Jawaharpuri, Badaun, U.P., India Presently working in
Διαβάστε περισσότεραUNIT - I LINEAR ALGEBRA. , such that αν V satisfying following condition
UNIT - I LINEAR ALGEBRA Definition Vector Space : A non-empty set V is said to be vector space over the field F. If V is an abelian group under addition and if for every α, β F, ν, ν 2 V, such that αν
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 3 Solutions
Homework 3 Solutions Igor Yanovsky (Math 151A TA) Problem 1: Compute the absolute error and relative error in approximations of p by p. (Use calculator!) a) p π, p 22/7; b) p π, p 3.141. Solution: For
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSubclass of Univalent Functions with Negative Coefficients and Starlike with Respect to Symmetric and Conjugate Points
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 2, 2008, no. 35, 1739-1748 Subclass of Univalent Functions with Negative Coefficients and Starlike with Respect to Symmetric and Conjugate Points S. M. Khairnar and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMatrices and Determinants
Matrices and Determinants SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Q 1. For what value of k do the following system of equations possess a non-trivial (i.e., not all zero) solution over the set of rationals Q? x + ky + 3z
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic
Lecture 2 Soundness and completeness of propositional logic February 9, 2004 1 Overview Review of natural deduction. Soundness and completeness. Semantics of propositional formulas. Soundness proof. Completeness
Διαβάστε περισσότεραderivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates
derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates swapnizzle 03-03- :5:43 We begin by recognizing the familiar conversion from rectangular to spherical coordinates (note that φ is used
Διαβάστε περισσότεραON INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SUBSPACES
Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 24 (2009), No. 3, pp. 433 450 DOI 10.4134/CKMS.2009.24.3.433 ON INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SUBSPACES Ahmed Abd El-Kader Ramadan and Ahmed Aref Abd El-Latif Abstract. We introduce a
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStrain gauge and rosettes
Strain gauge and rosettes Introduction A strain gauge is a device which is used to measure strain (deformation) on an object subjected to forces. Strain can be measured using various types of devices classified
Διαβάστε περισσότεραω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ω ω + 1 ω + 2 ω + 3 ω + 4 ω2 ω2 + 1 ω2 + 2 ω2 + 3 ω3 ω3 + 1 ω3 + 2 ω4 ω4 + 1 ω5 ω 2 ω 2 + 1 ω 2 + 2 ω 2 + ω ω 2 + ω + 1 ω 2 + ω2 ω 2 2 ω 2 2 + 1 ω 2 2 + ω ω 2 3 ω 3 ω 3 + 1 ω 3 + ω ω 3 +
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMain source: "Discrete-time systems and computer control" by Α. ΣΚΟΔΡΑΣ ΨΗΦΙΑΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΔΙΑΛΕΞΗ 4 ΔΙΑΦΑΝΕΙΑ 1
Main source: "Discrete-time systems and computer control" by Α. ΣΚΟΔΡΑΣ ΨΗΦΙΑΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΔΙΑΛΕΞΗ 4 ΔΙΑΦΑΝΕΙΑ 1 A Brief History of Sampling Research 1915 - Edmund Taylor Whittaker (1873-1956) devised a
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe challenges of non-stable predicates
The challenges of non-stable predicates Consider a non-stable predicate Φ encoding, say, a safety property. We want to determine whether Φ holds for our program. The challenges of non-stable predicates
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAreas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates
Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAreas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates
Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3
Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 1 State vector space and the dual space Space of wavefunctions The space of wavefunctions is the set of all
Διαβάστε περισσότεραApproximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude
Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude Jan Behrens 2012-12-31 In this paper we shall provide a method to approximate distances between two points on earth
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 2. Ordinals, well-founded relations.
Chapter 2. Ordinals, well-founded relations. 2.1. Well-founded Relations. We start with some definitions and rapidly reach the notion of a well-ordered set. Definition. For any X and any binary relation
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008
Tridiagonal matrices Gérard MEURANT October, 2008 1 Similarity 2 Cholesy factorizations 3 Eigenvalues 4 Inverse Similarity Let α 1 ω 1 β 1 α 2 ω 2 T =......... β 2 α 1 ω 1 β 1 α and β i ω i, i = 1,...,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 6/5/2006
Οδηγίες: Να απαντηθούν όλες οι ερωτήσεις. Ολοι οι αριθμοί που αναφέρονται σε όλα τα ερωτήματα είναι μικρότεροι το 1000 εκτός αν ορίζεται διαφορετικά στη διατύπωση του προβλήματος. Διάρκεια: 3,5 ώρες Καλή
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAbstract Storage Devices
Abstract Storage Devices Robert König Ueli Maurer Stefano Tessaro SOFSEM 2009 January 27, 2009 Outline 1. Motivation: Storage Devices 2. Abstract Storage Devices (ASD s) 3. Reducibility 4. Factoring ASD
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMean-Variance Analysis
Mean-Variance Analysis Jan Schneider McCombs School of Business University of Texas at Austin Jan Schneider Mean-Variance Analysis Beta Representation of the Risk Premium risk premium E t [Rt t+τ ] R1
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTMA4115 Matematikk 3
TMA4115 Matematikk 3 Andrew Stacey Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet Trondheim Spring 2010 Lecture 12: Mathematics Marvellous Matrices Andrew Stacey Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCHARACTERIZATION OF BIPOLAR FUZZY IDEALS IN ORDERED GAMMA SEMIGROUPS
JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL MATHEMATICAL VIRTUAL INSTITUTE ISSN (p) 2303-4866, ISSN (o) 2303-4947 www.imvibl.org /JOURNALS / JOURNAL Vol. 8(2018), 141-156 DOI: 10.7251/JIMVI1801141C Former BULLETIN OF
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS
CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS Shiah-Sen Wang The graphs are prepared by Chien-Lun Lai Based on : Precalculus: Mathematics for Calculus by J. Stuwart, L. Redin & S. Watson, 6th edition, 01, Brooks/Cole Chapter
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSpace-Time Symmetries
Chapter Space-Time Symmetries In classical fiel theory any continuous symmetry of the action generates a conserve current by Noether's proceure. If the Lagrangian is not invariant but only shifts by a
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSrednicki Chapter 55
Srednicki Chapter 55 QFT Problems & Solutions A. George August 3, 03 Srednicki 55.. Use equations 55.3-55.0 and A i, A j ] = Π i, Π j ] = 0 (at equal times) to verify equations 55.-55.3. This is our third
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΕγχειρίδια Μαθηµατικών και Χταποδάκι στα Κάρβουνα
[ 1 ] Πανεπιστήµιο Κύπρου Εγχειρίδια Μαθηµατικών και Χταποδάκι στα Κάρβουνα Νίκος Στυλιανόπουλος, Πανεπιστήµιο Κύπρου Λευκωσία, εκέµβριος 2009 [ 2 ] Πανεπιστήµιο Κύπρου Πόσο σηµαντική είναι η απόδειξη
Διαβάστε περισσότερα