WP4 Development of APW governance. Municipality of Ilida Zafeiropoulos Dionysios Information Technology Engineer of Ilida

Transcript

1 WP4 Development of APW governance Municipality of Ilida Zafeiropoulos Dionysios Information Technology Engineer of Ilida

2 P5(Ilida) s contribution on WP /4.1.4/Adaptation of guidelines to Greece P5 will cooperate with P6 in transferring all guides to Greece /4.2.2/Local round-tables for institutional coordination in Greece P5 will organize in its own territory at least 2 round tables with partners and stakeholders on the topic of APW management and disposal.-already done one round table (November 2014) /4.3.2/Memorandum of Understanding - Greece P5 will bring outcomes of the round tables for institutional coordination into a comprehensive document for Greek territories. This will provide local template tools for the integrated management of the lifecycle of agricultural waste /4.3.4/Strategic local action plans Greece As an outcome from institutional coordination, P5 will develop a planning tool for Greek territories, that closes the path of coordination, and can also include proposals to higher institutional hierarchical level.

3 Conclusions Exploited from Ilida s Deliverables relevant to WP4 1. APW quantities are quite significant tn/years APW are produced in Ileia Perfectute(1926 tn/year Ilida Contribution) 2. 10% of the total APW of whole Greece 2. There is no specific APW management system of the APW flows. 3. The problem is not adequately acknowledged and so far there is no concrete, functional and complete solution by an official recognized organization/ institution.

4 Graph1: Cultivation(Ha) per Region of Ileia Perfecture Πύργου Δ.Δ. Ωλένης, 8170,92, 7% Πύργου Δ.Δ. Πύργου, 6733,4, 6% Πύργου Δ.Δ. Ιαρδανού, 2735,15, Πύργου Δ.Δ. Βώλακος, 2561,36, Ανδραβίδας-Κυλλήνης Δ.Δ Ανδραβίδας, 2094,77, Βουπράσιο, 7146,53, 6% Κάστρου, 2034,05, Λεχαινών, 4135,75, 4% Πηνειού Δ.Δ. Τραγανού, 1829,9, Πηνειού Δ.Δ. Γαστούνης, 3489,47, 3% Ανδρίτσαινας-Κρεσταίνων Δ.Δ. Αλιφείρας, 3839,52, 3% Ανδρίτσαινας-Κρεσταίνων Δ.Δ.Ανδρίτσαινης, 3093,95, 3% Πηνειού Δ.Δ. Βαρθολομιού, 2416,03, Ανδρίτσαινας-Κρέσταινας Δ.Δ.Σκιλλούντος, 10003,1, 9% Ήλιδας-Πηνείας, 7559,18, 6% Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας Δ.Δ. Φολόης, 9390,48, 8% Ήλιδας-Αμαλιάδας, 12531,73, 11% Ζαχάρως Δ.Δ. Φιγαλείας, 4207,82, 4% Ζαχάρως Δ.Δ. Ζαχάρως, 6882,81, 6% Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας Δ.Δ. Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας, 7690,4, 7% Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας Δ.Δ. Λάμπειας, Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας Δ.Δ. Λασιώνος, 2163,69, 6436,01, 5%

5 Graph1-2: Cultivation Area (Ha) per Region of Ilida

6 Graph2: APW-Plastik Films(kgrs/ha) per Region of Ileia Perfecture Πύργου Δ.Δ. Πύργου, , 11% Πύργου Δ.Δ. Ιαρδανού, 90275, 1% Πύργου Δ.Δ. Βώλακος, 67713,4, 1% Πηνειού Δ.Δ. Τραγανού, ,1, 3% Πηνειού Δ.Δ. Γαστούνης, ,5, 11% Πηνειού Δ.Δ. Βαρθολομιού, , 4% Πύργου Δ.Δ. Ωλένης, 98121,2, 1% Δ. Ανδραβίδας-Κυλλήνης Δ.Δ Ανδραβίδας, ,1, 5% Βουπράσιο, ,2, 17% Κάστρου, ,1, Λεχαινών, ,9, 9% Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας Δ.Δ. Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας, , Ανδρίτσαινας-Κρεσταίνων Δ.Δ. Αλιφείρας, 43451,5, 1% Ανδρίτσαινας-Κρεσταίνων Δ.Δ.Ανδρίτσαινης, 14832, 0% Ανδρίτσαινας-Κρέσταινας Δ.Δ.Σκιλλούντος, ,4, 4% Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας Δ.Δ. Φολόης, 41253,6, 0% Ήλιδας-Πηνείας, ,7, Ήλιδας-Αμαλιάδας, ,8, 23% Ζαχάρως Δ.Δ. Φιγαλείας, 42703,6, Ζαχάρως Δ.Δ. Ζαχάρως, ,1, 1% Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας Δ.Δ. Λάμπειας, 559,5, 0% Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας Δ.Δ. Λασιώνος, 4093,4, 0%

7 Graph3: APW-Pesticide Containers (1lt/ha) per Region of Ileia Perfecture Πύργου Δ.Δ. Ωλένης 20618,47 9% Πύργου Δ.Δ. Πύργου 18116,935 8% Ανδραβίδας-Κυλλήνης Δ.Δ Ανδραβίδας 3811,31 Βουπράσιο 12928,95 6% Κάστρου 12928,95 6% Πύργου Δ.Δ. Ιαρδανού 8296,055 4% Πύργου Δ.Δ. Βώλακος 7603,75 3% Πηνειού Δ.Δ. Τραγανού 3487,68 Πηνειού Δ.Δ. Γαστούνης 6692,39 3% Πηνειού Δ.Δ. Βαρθολομιού 4404,06 Ήλιδας-Πηνείας 12259,19 5% Ήλιδας-Αμαλιάδας 29114,585 13% Ζαχάρως Δ.Δ. Φιγαλείας 4680,965 Ζαχάρως Δ.Δ. Ζαχάρως 15538,015 7% Λεχαινών 7434,47 3% Ανδρίτσαινας-Κρεσταίνων Δ.Δ. Αλιφείρας 5935,19 3% Ανδρίτσαινας-Κρεσταίνων Δ.Δ.Ανδρίτσαινης 2234,6 1% Ανδρίτσαινας-Κρέσταινας Δ.Δ.Σκιλλούντος 24863,4 11% Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας Δ.Δ. Φολόης 10245,33 4% Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας Δ.Δ. Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας 17156,965 7% Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας Δ.Δ. Λάμπειας 537,86 0% Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας Δ.Δ. Λασιώνος 3562,4

8 Graph4: APW-Plastic Sacks Fertilizers (50lt/year) per Region of Ileia Perfecture Ανδραβίδας-Κυλλήνης Δ.Δ Ανδραβίδας 21034,93 Βουπράσιο 60668,78 5% Πηνειού Δ.Δ. Τραγανού, 24546,6, Πηνειού Δ.Δ. Γαστούνης, 38533,28, 3% Πύργου Δ.Δ. Ωλένης, 78738,7, 7% Πύργου Δ.Δ. Πύργου, 91984,35, 8% Πύργου Δ.Δ. Ιαρδανού, 38313,25, 3% Πύργου Δ.Δ. Βώλακος, 33292,65, 3% Πηνειού Δ.Δ. Βαρθολομιού, 22173,3, Ήλιδας-Πηνείας, 59415,95, 5% Ήλιδας-Αμαλιάδας, ,55, 11% Ζαχάρως Δ.Δ. Φιγαλείας, 23112, Ζαχάρως Δ.Δ. Ζαχάρως, 76636,6, 7% Κάστρου, 60668,78, 5% Λεχαινών, 37964,76, 3% Ανδρίτσαινας-Κρεσταίνων Δ.Δ. Αλιφείρας, 29964,8, 3% Ανδρίτσαινας-Κρεσταίνων Δ.Δ.Ανδρίτσαινης, 11476,85, 1% Ανδρίτσαινας-Κρέσταινας Δ.Δ.Σκιλλούντος, ,89, 11% Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας Δ.Δ. Φολόης, 50106,3, 4% Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας Δ.Δ. Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας, 83300,1, 7% Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας Δ.Δ. Λάμπειας, 2665,2, 0% Αρχαίας Ολυμπίας Δ.Δ. Λασιώνος, 22755,7,

9 What we suggest PROPOSAL - If there is budget 1. From a potential extension of the AWARD program, 2. Or from the absorption of the non utilized funds of the program from our budget or from general budget

10 Sources for Data Collection The P5 (Municipality of Ilida) contribution to the web - GIS for Greece is appointed to give data to P6, who will upload them with their data to the Greek GIS. DATA COLLECTION The sources we have chosen to collect and to evaluate data as well to submit technical advice are from: 1. Hellenic Statistical Authority. 2. Greek Payment Authority of Common Agricultural Policy(O.P.E.K.E.P.E). 3. Greek Agricultural Insurance Organization (E.L.G.A). 4. Local agricultural associations. 5. Local farmers. 6. Local agroplastic retail sellers. 7. West Greece Region agronomists. 8. Mapping and Cadastral Organization of Greece (O.K.X.E)

11 PROPOSAL for the potential extension of the AWARD program, for the absorption of the non utilized funds of the program The AWARD program gives via its deliverables directions for the APW management. It does not include though a complete application for specifying these flows or a tool specifying the APW flows on geographical, quantitative, qualitative and time criteria, as well as the APW producers

12 PROPOSAL for the potential extension of the AWARD program, for the absorption of the non utilized funds of the program The AWARD program gives via its deliverables directions for the APW management. It does not include though a complete application for specifying these flows or a tool specifying the APW flows on geographical, quantitative, qualitative and time criteria, as well as the APW producers

13 PROPOSAL for the potential extension of the AWARD program, for the absorption of the non utilized funds of the program Our proposal is to create a piloting application(web/mobile), where all the detailed and named records, including the farmers, areas, cultivation types, location, the plastics used and so on, will be compiled. The user/operator of this application will know immediately when, where, what quantity, what APW type and who has APW produced. Therefore we have the platform of an economic and proper waste flow management

14 PROPOSAL for the potential extension of the AWARD program, for the absorption of the non utilized funds of the program The greenhouse films for example, are dumped during a specific period of time. We can inform the farmers via SMS on their mobiles, for instance, that at certain spots of their area and for a particular period of time, there will be collection points, such as special bins. The same can be applied for pesticides bins. Cultivations are sprayed at specific time periods. Through cross-examination of the data, we can learn if the quantities collected, correspond to the quantities used. Depended on the utilities attached to the application, we can cross- examine, check and specify when the APW management takes place and by whom. So we have a tool for develeoping the optimum APW collection

15 PROPOSAL for the potential extension of the AWARD program, for the absorption of the non utilized funds of the program We consider that such an extension can upgrade the performance of the program and will give tangible results. Those results not only will they be recognized be external organizations, but also can act as a useful tool for whom(government -stakeholders) may wish to apply a complete APW management in the near future.

16 Thanks for your attention Website: