arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 19 Feb 2017

Μέγεθος: px
Εμφάνιση ξεκινά από τη σελίδα:

Download "arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 19 Feb 2017"

Transcript

1 Lorentz Violating p-form Gauge Theories in Superspace arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 19 Feb 2017 Sudhaker Upadhyay, a Mushtaq B. Shah b and Prince A. Ganai b a Centre for Theoretical Studies, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur , WB, India b Department of Physics, National Institute of Technology, Srinagar, Kashmir , India sudhakerupadhyay@gmail.com, mbstheory72@gmail.com, princeganai@nitsri.net Abstract: Very special relativity VSR) keeps the main features of special relativity but breaks rotational invariance due to an intrinsic preferred direction. We study the VSR modified extended BRST and anti-brst symmetry of the Batalin-Vilkovisky BV) actions corresponding to the p = 1, 2, 3-form gauge theories. Within VSR framework, we discuss the extended BRST invariant and extended BRST and anti-brst invariant superspace formulations for these BV actions. Here we observe that the VSR modified extended BRST invariant BV actions corresponding to the p = 1,2,3-form gauge theories can be written manifestly covariant manner in a superspace with one Grassmann coordinate. Moreover, two Grassmann coordinates are required to describe the VSR modified extended BRST and extended anti-brst invariant BV actions in a superspace. These results are consistent with the Lorentz invariant special relativity) formulation. Keywords: Very Special Relativity, p-form gauge theory, Superspace.

2 Contents 1 Overview and motivation 1 2 Non-Abelian 1-form gauge theory: VSR modified BV action in superspace VSR modified extended BRST invariant BV action VSR modified extended BRST invariant superspace formulation VSR modified extended anti-brst symmetry form gauge theory: VSR modified BV action in superspace VSR modified extended BRST invariant BV action VSR modified extended BRST invariant superspace formulation VSR modified extended anti-brst invariant BV action VSR modified extended BRST and anti-brst invariant superspace formulation form gauge theory: VSR modified BV action in superspace VSR modified extended BRST invariant BV action VSR modified extended BRST invariant BV action in superspace VSR modified extended anti-brst invariant BV action VSR modified extended BRST and anti-brst invariant superspace formulation 29 5 Concluding Remarks 30 A Mathematical details of VSR modified Abelian 2-form gauge theory in superspace 32 B Mathematical details of VSR modified Abelian 3-form gauge theory 33 1 Overview and motivation The standard model, although phenomenologically successful, is unable to explain a variety of issues satisfactorily [1]. The standard model is assumed to be an effective description that works in the low-energy limit of a more fundamental theory having a quantum description of gravitation also). However, the natural scale for a fundamental theory including gravity is governed by the Planck mass. This leads to an interesting question that whether any aspects of this underlying theory could be revealed through the definite experiment with present techniques. To understand this properly, one possibility may be to examine 1

3 proposed fundamental theories for effects that are qualitatively different from standardmodel physics. In this regard, one possibility is that the new physics involves a violation of Lorentz symmetry. In this connection, Cohen and Glashow proposed that the laws of physics need not be invariant under the full Lorentz group but rather under its proper subgroup [2]. An advantage of this hypothesis is that while Lorentz symmetry is violated, the theory still follows the basic postulates of special relativity, like the constancy of the velocity of light. Any scheme with proper Lorentz subgroups along with translations is referred to as very special relativity VSR). As an observable consequences of VSR, a novel mechanism for neutrino masses without introducing new particles has been studied in Ref. [3]. Few other observable consequences of VSR have also been given in [4, 5]. In recent past, VSR has been studied in various contexts. For instance, the idea of VSR is implemented to de Sitter spacetime where breaking of de Sitter invariance arises in two different ways [6]. Also, it has been shown that the gauge field in quantum gauge perspective acquire mass naturally without the conventional Higgs mechanism [7]. The modifications due to VSR have also been analyzed for the reducible gauge theories using the BV formulation [8]. Within VSR framework, the event space underlying the dark matter and the dark gauge fields supports the algebraic structure [9]. The VSR effect to curved space-times shows that the SIM2) symmetry, which leaves the preferred null direction invariant, does not provide the complete couplings to the gravitational background [10]. The proper Lorentz subgroups together with translations are realized in the non-commutative space-time where the behavior of non-commutativity parameter θ µν is found lightlike [11, 12]. In VSR scenario, N = 1 SUSY gauge theories contain two conserved supercharges rather than the usual four [13]. The effects of quantum correction to VSR is studied to produce a curved space-time with a cosmological constant [14], whereit is shown that the symmetry group ISIM2) does admit a 2-parameter family of continuous deformations. Recently, a violation of Lorentz invariance in quantum electrodynamics induced by a very high frequency background wave is studied, where averaging observables over the rapid field oscillations provides an effective theory [15]. The quantum electrodynamics and the massive spin-1 particle are discussed in VSR in Refs. [16, 17]. The spontaneous symmetry-breaking mechanism to give a flavor-dependent VSR mass to the gauge bosons is studied in [18]. Interestingly, a quantum field theoretic structure suitable to describe the dark matter suggest that VSR plays the same role for the dark matter fields as special relativity does for the standard model fields [9]. On the other hands, the supersymmetric version [19] of a non-abelian gauge theory is a super-geometrical theory of a constrained super 1-form [20]. It is well-known that in a superspace formulation there exists a superconnection which is the gauge superfield in a superspace. This, eventually, extends the relation of 1-forms and gauge theories in ordinary spacetime to the superspace. As a result, the entire formalism of differential geometry is valid in the superspace approach. The higher order p-forms theories have been studied [20], which contain the gauge superfields characterized by gauge parameters ofp 1)-forms. The importance of such formulation lies to the fact that the well-known formulation of simple supergravity in eleven dimensions [21] explicitly contains a 3-form component gauge field and its extension to superspace [22] naturally includes the introduction of a super 3-form 2

4 gauge superfield. A simple reduction of eleven dimensions to four-dimensions then leads to 3-form gauge superfield in the N = 8 supergravity. Also, antisymmetric tensor fields describe the low energy excitations in string theories [23, 24]. The study of higher-form gauge theory is also important for the classical string theories [25], vortex motion in an irrotational, incompressible fluid [26, 27], dual formulation of the Abelian Higgs model [28, 29] and for supergravity multiplets [30]. To quantize the p-form gauge theories, BV formulation is one of the most general and powerful approaches [31 37]. One of the important illustrations of this formulation is that it provides a systematic way of accretion of the nontrivial ghost for ghost structure for the case of reducible gauge theories. It has been observed that the antifields of the BV formulation coincide with antighosts of certain collective fields, which ensure that Schwinger-Dyson equations are satisfied as a consequence of the gauge symmetry algebra [38, 39]. Also the quantum corrections for anomalous gauge theories can be evaluated from the functional measure as long as a suitable regularization procedure is introduced [40]. A superspace formalism for the Lorentz invariant BV action of 1-form, 2-form and 3-form gauge theories have been studied [41 43]. The extended BRST and extended anti-brst invariant formulations including some shift symmetry) of the Lorentz invariant BV action have also been studied [41, 42, 44], which lead to the proper identification of the antifields through equations of motion of auxiliary field variables. The importance of shift symmetries introduced through collective fields lies to the fact that it ensure that Schwinger-Dyson equations at the level of the BRST algebra can be performed within the Feynman path integral [38]. According to the field redefinition theorem, the particular choice of variables should have no influence on physical quantities like S-matrix elements, which appreciates to formulate the quantization prescription in a more coordinate-independent manner. In Refs. [38, 39], Schwinger-Dyson equations is accomplished in different field variables following shift symmetry. Although VSR has been studied in various contexts, but the extended BRST and extended anti-brst invariant formulations with their superspace description remain unstudied in VSR framework. This provides us an opportunity to bridge this gap. We consider a non-abelian 1-form gauge theory in VSR context which remains invariant under a non-local Lorentz breaking) gauge transformation. The equations of motion in VSR-type Lorentz gauge leads a Proca type equation which confirms that non-abelian vector to have a mass. Although this describes a theory with mass but remains invariant under a VSR modified) gauge transformation. This leads to a redundancy in gauge degrees of freedom if we quantize it without fixing a gauge. Therefore, utilizing Faddeev- Popov procedure, we construct an effective action which admits a VSR modified) BRST transformation. Furthermore, we study the extended BRST symmetry which includes a shift symmetry. This extra symmetry is then gauge fixed adding new ghosts, antighosts, and auxiliary fields) in such a way that the original action is recovered after the extra fields are integrated out. In order to recover original theory or to compensate these additional fields), we further introduce anti-ghosts with exactly opposite ghost numbers. Within formulation, these anti-ghosts coincide with the antifields of the BV formulation analogous to Lorentz invariant case. We further provide a superspace description of VSR modified non-abelian 1-form gauge theory possessing extended BRST symmetry with the help of 3

5 coordinates x µ,θ). The superspace description of this theory having extended anti-brst invariance only needs another fermionic variable θ together with x µ. However, we found that even in VSR modified theory possessing both the extended BRST and extended anti- BRST invariance, one needs a superspace with two grassmann parameters θ, θ together with x µ to provide a superfields description. We generalize the results of non-abelian 1- form gauge theory to the higher-form for instance 2, 3-form) gauge theories also to show consistency of results. The paper is organized as following. In section II, we outline non-abelian 1-form gauge theory in VSR. Here, we study the VSR modified extended BRST and extended anti-brst transformations which include a shift symmetry) for the BV action of theory. Within this section, we demonstrate a superspace description for the 1-form gauge theory having extended BRST invariance and extended anti-brst invariance as the separate cases. Section III is devoted to the generalization of results for the non-abelian 1-form gauge theory to the Abelian 2-form gauge theory. We further generalize these results to the Abelian 3-form gauge theory case in section IV. The paper is summarize with future remarks in the last section. The lengthy calculations are reported in Appendix sections. 2 Non-Abelian 1-form gauge theory: VSR modified BV action in superspace In this section, we describe the VSR modified BV action for non-abelian 1-form gauge Yang-Mills) theory in superspace. Let us review first the VSR description of non-abelian 1-form gauge theory following Ref. [18]. We start by defining the classical Lagrangian density in VSR as follows [18] L 0 = 1 4 Tr [ Faµν Fa µν ], 2.1) where field-strength tensor F µν is given by F µν = F µν 1 ) m2 n ν n D) 2nα F µα n µ n D) 2nα F να, 2.2) with F µν = µ A ν ν A µ i[a µ,a ν ]+ 1 ) 1 2 m2 n ν n ) 2 µn A) m2 n µ n ) 2 νn A) ) i2 [ ] 1 m2 n ) 2n A,n µa ν n ν A µ ). 2.3) The vector n µ is a constant null vector i.e. n 2 = 0), which transforms under a VSR transformation so that any term containing ratios involving n µ are invariant. Thecovariant derivative is determined by imposing the proper transformation [ property ) ] for the covariant derivative as follows: D µ = µ i[a µ, ] i 2 m2 n 1 µ,. We use following definition to handle the non-local terms [18] 1 n D = 0 n ) 2 n A db e bn D. 2.4) 4

6 The equations of motion for the vector field satisfying VSR type Lorentz gauge condition leads to a Proca equation which suggest that vector field has mass [18]. This Lagrangian is also invariant under a VSR modified non-local) gauge transformation δa µ = µ λ i[a µ,λ]+ i ) 1 2 m2 n µ λ, n ) 2n A 1 2 m2 n µ 1 n ) λ ) + i 2 m2 n µ 1 n ) 2n [A,λ] ), 2.5) where λ is an infinitesimal parameter. Being a VSR modified) gauge invariant, the non- Abelian 1-form gauge theory contains redundant degrees of freedom. To quantize the theory correctly we need to choose a gauge appropriately. In this context, the gauge-fixed Lagrangian density together with the ghost term is given by L gf = Tr [B µ A µ B m2 n nµ A µ +i C )C + C µ [A µ,c]+ m2 2 C [ m2 2 C n A n C, n ) 2 ) 1 n [n A,C] ])], 2.6) where B a is an auxiliary field. Here we note that, in comparison to VSR modified covariant gauges, the gauge-fixed Lagrangian density takes simplest form [8] in VSR modified lightcone gauge, η A = 0, where η µ is an arbitrary constant vector that defines a preferred axis in space. Now, the effective quantum Lagrangian density for Yang-Mills theory in VSR is given by L = L 0 +L gf. 2.7) This Lagrangian density leads to following vector field and ghost propagators respectively: [ ) µν 1 α 1 = p 2 + η µν 1 2α 1 p 2 + p µ p ν m2 n µ p ν +n ν p µ 1 ) n p m4 nµ n ν )] n p) 2, 1 gh = p ) This implies clearly that both the gauge field and ghost field have same mass m, consequently, this mass generation is different from Higgs mechanism. This is matter of calculation only to show that this effective Lagrangian density 2.7) is invariant under the following BRST transformations: s b A µ = µ C m2 n n µc i[a µ,c]+i m2 2 =: D µ C, [ C, ) n A ]+i m2 1 n ) 2 2 n µ n ) 2n [A,C], s b C = ic 2, s b C = ib, sb B = ) This BRST transformations are nilpotent in nature, i.e., s 2 b = 0. Since the gauge fixing and ghost part of the effective Lagrangian density is BRST-exact, so these can also be 5

7 expressed in terms of BRST variation of gauge-fixing fermion Ψ). Thus, The effective Lagrangian density can also be expressed as L = L 0 +Trs b Ψ), 2.10) where the explicit form of the gauge-fixing fermion Ψ is Ψ = i C µ A µ 1 ) 2n nµ A µ. 2.11) One could also check that the effective Lagrangian density 2.7) is also invariant under the another nilpotent transformation where the role of ghost and anti-ghost fields are interchanged. These so-called anti-brst transformations are s ab A µ = µ C = D µ C, n n µ C i[a µ, C]+i m2 2 [ C, n A n ) 2 ]+i m2 2 n µ ) 1 n ) 2n [A, C], s ab C = i C2, s ab C = ib +ic C, s ab B = i[b, C]. 2.12) The gauge-fixing and ghost parts of the Lagrangian density are anit-brst exact also and can also be described in terms of anti-brst variation of some another gauge-fixing fermion. Here, we would like to state that the VSR gauge fields are massive with a common mass, however, in nature gauge fields may have different masses due to the spontaneous symmetry breaking in VSR with non-abelian gauge symmetry Ref. [18]. In such a way, the fields can have the usual mass due to spontaneous symmetry breaking in addition to a flavor-dependent VSR mass. 2.1 VSR modified extended BRST invariant BV action Now, there exists an interesting question that if the gauge field in VSR is being displaced as A µ A µ µ: does the gauge symmetry still remain and moreover, how does this shift symmetry affect the underlying BRST structure. In this context, we shift all the fields within VSR framework) from their original value as follows A µ A µ µ, C C C, C C C, B B B. 2.13) Under these shifts, the Lagrangian density 2.7) in VSR is modified by L = LA µ µ,C C, C C,B B). 2.14) This Lagrangian density is, of course, invariant under the BRST transformation 2.9) with respect to the shifted fields A µ µ,C C, C C,B B. In addition, it is also invariant under the local shift symmetry s b φ = Rx), s b φ = Rx), where collective fields φ and φ are A µ,c, C,B) and µ, C, C, B) respectively, and Rx) is the generic notation for the Slavnov variations of fields φ and φ. This deserves further being gauge fixed and, in turn, leads to an additional BRST symmetry. Together, the BRST symmetries will be referred 6

8 to as the extended BRST symmetry. The extended BRST symmetry transformations corresponding to Lagrangian density 2.14) in VSR are, where s b A µ = ψ µ, s b Ā µ = ψ µ D A Ā) µ C C), s b C = ǫ, s b C = ǫ ic C) 2, s b C = ǫ, s b C = ǫ ib B), sb B = ρ, s b B = ρ, 2.15) D µ A Ā) C C) m2 = µ C C) n n µc C) [ ] m2 n A Ā) i[a Ā,C C]+i C C, 2 n ) 2 ) + i m2 1 2 n µ n ) 2n [A Ā,C C]. 2.16) However, ψ µ,ǫ, ǫ and ρ refer the ghost fields associated with shift symmetry for A µ,c, C and B respectively. Due to nilpotency property of extended BRST symmetry 2.15), it is evident that the variation of these ghost fields ψ µ,ǫ, ǫ and ρ under extended BRST transformation vanish. Now, in order to make theory unchanged, we need to remove the contribution of these ghosts from the physical states. Thus, we introduce the anti-fields anti-ghost) A µ,c, C and B corresponding to each ghost field which compensates the net contribution of these ghosts. The BRST variation of these anti-fields are defined by s b A µ = ζ µ, s b C = σ, s b C = σ, s b B = υ, 2.17) where ζ µ,σ, σ and υ are auxiliary fields corresponding to shifted fields µ, C, C and B and do not change under BRST transformation. In order to fix the gauge for shift symmetry, we add following gauge fixing term to the VSR quantum action 2.7) and we call the resulting Lagrangian density as BV action): [ L gf = Tr ζ µ Ā µ A µ [ ψ µ D µ A Ā) C C) ] +σ C C [ ǫ ib B)] σ C + C [ ǫ ic C) 2] + υ B ] +B ρ. 2.18) In this way, all the tilde fields will vanish and we then recover our original theory. We note that this gauge-fixed Lagrangian density, Lgf, is also invariant under the extended BRST symmetry transformations 2.15). Now, by integrating out the auxiliary fields ζ µ,σ, σ and υ, this reads [ L gf = Tr A µψ µ D µ C) C ǫ a ib)+ C ǫ ic 2) ] +B ρ. 2.19) Since, the gauge-fixed Lagrangian density 2.6) is BRST-exact and therefore, once can express this in terms of a general gauge-fixing fermion ΨA µ, C,C,B) as L gf = s b Ψ = δψ ψ µ + δψ δψ δψ ǫ+ ρ, 2.20) δa µ δc δ C ǫ δb 7

9 In the last term, the BRST transformations 2.15) are utilized. Thus, after integrating out the auxiliary fields we set all the fields associated to the shift symmetry to zero, we have the BV action as L eff = L 0 +L gf + L gf, [ = L+Tr A µ δψ ) δa µ ψ µ + C + δψ ) ǫ C δψ ) δc δ C ǫ + B δψ )ρ+a µd ] µ C +ic B i C C ) δb To obtain the identifications on the anti-fields in VSR, it is sufficient to integrate out the ghosts associated with the shift symmetry A µ = δψ δa µ, C = δψ δc, C = δψ δ C, B = δψ δb. 2.22) However, for the VSR modified gauge-fixing fermion given in 2.11), we determine the anti-ghost fields as following: Ā a i µ = i µ C + 2n n µ C, Ca = 0, Ca = i µ A aµ + i 2n n µa aµ, B a = ) Here we observe that analogous to Lorentz invariant case, antifields get identification naturally. This clarifies the geometric interpretation of the anti-fields on the line of Maurer- Cartan 1-forms. Plugging these anti-ghost fields in 2.21), we can recover the original Lagrangian density of YM theory in VSR. 2.2 VSR modified extended BRST invariant superspace formulation We know that superspace formulations for gauge theories can be built up in such a manner that the BRST transformations are realized as translations along the Grassmannian coordinate [46]. In order to describe the VSR modified BRST invariant BV action in superspace, we need an extra Grassmannian) coordinate θ together with x µ. Superspace formulations for the VSR modified BRST transformation are obtained by associating with each field a superfield of the form A µ x,θ) = A µ x)+θd µ C, Cx,θ) = Cx)+iθC 2, Cx,θ) = Cx)+iθB. 2.24) The shifted superfields in VSR will be consistent only if these can be written by A µ x,θ) = A µ x,θ) µx,θ) = A µ µ)+θD A Ā) µ C C), Cx,θ) = Cx,θ) Cx,θ) = C C)+iθC C) 2, Cx,θ) = Cx,θ) Cx,θ) = Cx) Cx)+iθB B). 2.25) 8

10 This, however, does not determine the individual superfields uniquely and there is the arbitrariness. So, to be consistent with above discussion, we can define the original superfields and tilde superfields with the help of extended BRST transformation as follows, A µ x,θ) = A µ +θψ µ, Ā µ x,θ) = µ +θψ µ D A Ā) µ C C)), Cx,θ) = C +θǫ, Cx,θ) = C +θ ǫ ic 2 C) ), Cx,θ) = C +θ ǫ, Cx,θ) = C θ ǫ ib +i B), Bx,θ) = B +θρ. 2.26) Exploiting BRST transformations 2.17), we introduce the super anti-fields with one grassmannian coordinate in VSR as Ā µ x,θ) = A µ θζ µ, C x,θ) = C x,θ) θσ, C x,θ) = C x,θ) θ σ, B x,θ) = B x,θ) θṽ. 2.27) We find that the appropriate combinations of superfields of 2.26) and 2.27), leads to the gauge-fixed Lagrangian density corresponding to shift symmetry in VSR2.18) as following: [ L gf = Tr Ā θ µ A µ + C C ) ] C C B B. 2.28) The VSR modified gauge-fixed fermion 2.11) in extended BRST superspace formulation can be written as Ωx,θ) = i C µ 1 ) [ 2n n µ A µ +iθ C µ 1 ) 2n n µ ψ µa ǫ µ 1 ] 2n n µ )A µ. 2.29) Here, it is evident that θ component of the above expression gives the gauge fixing Lagrangian density corresponding to the original BRST symmetry 2.6), i.e., [ ] L gf = Tr θ Ωx,θ), 2.30) Being the θ component of a super gauge-fixed fermion, the invariance under the extended BRST transformations is evident. 2.3 VSR modified extended anti-brst symmetry In this subsection, we construct the VSR-modified extended anti-brst transformation. The importance of anti-brst transformation lies in the fact that while the anti-brst invariance does not lead to any additional information beyond what BRST invariance 9

11 provides, it helps put the theory in a proper geometrical setting. The extended anti-brst transformations which leaves the BV action invariant are, s ab A µ = A µ +DA Ā) µ C C), sab Ā µ = A µ, s ab C = C +i C C) 2, s ab C = C, s ab C = C ib +i B +ic C) C C), sab C = C, s ab B = B i[b B), C C], sab B = B, s ab ψ µ = ζ µ +D µ A Ā) A Ā) B B) [D µ C C)] C C), s ab ǫ = σ [B B,C C]+ C C)C C) 2, s ab ǫ = σ [B B, C C], sab ρ = ṽ. 2.31) Rest fields, whose anti-brst transformations are not written here do not change under the extended anti-brst transformation. To describe the superspace formulation of Yang- Mills theory in VSR having both the extended BRST and extended anti-brst invariance, we need two extra Grassmannian coordinates θ, θ. It is now straightforward to write the superfields in this formulation where the BRST and anti-brst transformations merely correspond to translations in the θ and θ coordinates respectively. Thus, we see that the results of superspace description of Lorentz invariant 1-form theory [42] also hold in the case of Lorentz breaking theory. 3 2-form gauge theory: VSR modified BV action in superspace The study of Abelian 2-form gauge theory is important because it plays a crucial role in studying the theory for classical strings [25], vortex motion in an irrotational, incompressible fluid [26, 27] and the dual formulation of the Abelian Higgs model [28]. In this section, we discuss the VSR modified extended BRST and extended anti-brst transformations which include a shift symmetry) for the BV action of 2-form gauge theory. We further demonstrate a superspace description for the 2-form gauge theory having extended BRST invariance and extended anti-brst invariance. To do so, we start with the classical Lagrangian density for Abelian rank-2 antisymmetric tensor field B µν ) theory in VSR as [7, 8] L 0 = 1 12 F µνρ Fµνρ, 3.1) where F µνρ is the VSR-modified field-strength tensor defined as F µνρ µ B νρ + ν B ρµ + ρ B µν 1 2 n n µb νρ 1 2 n n νb ρµ 1 2 n n ρb µν. Here n µ is a fixed null vector and transforms multiplicatively, as before, under a VSR transformation to ensure the invariance of nonlocal terms. This field-strength tensor and, consequently, Lagrangian density is not invariant under the Lorentz invariant gauge transformation δb µν = µ ζ ν ν ζ µ, where ζ µ x) is an arbitrary vector field. Rather, this is invariant under the following VSR-modified gauge transformation δb µν = µ ζ ν ν ζ µ 1 2n n µζ ν + 1 2n n νζ µ. 3.2) 10

12 Since the Lagrangian density is invariant under above non-local transformation, hence, to quantize this theory following BRST technique, it is necessary to introduce two anticommuting vector fields ρ µ and ρ µ, a commuting vector field β µ, two anticommuting scalar fields χ and χ, and the commuting scalar fields σ,ϕ and σ [31]. Involving all these fields, the gauge breaking term together with the ghosts is given as [7] L gf = i ρ ν µ µ ρ ν µ ν ρ µ ρ ν + 1 2n nν ρ+ 1 2n ν n ρ 1 m 4 ) 4n ) 2nν n ρ σ µ µ )σ +β ν µ B µν m2 β ν n n µb µν +λ 1 β ν β ν β ν ν ϕ i χ µ ρ µ + i 2 m2 χ 1 n n µρ µ iλ 2 χχ i ρ µ µ χ i 2n ρµ n µ χ, 3.3) k 1 and k 2 are arbitrary gauge parameters. The ghost and ghost of ghost propagators in momentum space are given, respectively, by [8] [ Dµν gh k) = 1 k 2 + g µν + k ] µk ν, D ggh 1 p) = p 2 +m2. 3.4) These expressions suggest that ghost and ghost of ghost have same mass m. Also, these propagators follow a large momentum behavior similar to the Lorentz-invariant case. Therefore, the 2-form theory in VSR is a renormalizable theory. By incorporating the gauge breaking term 3.3), the Lagrangian density in VSR reads effectively L = L 0 +L gf, 3.5) which is invariant under the following nilpotent BRST transformation: s b B µν = µ ρ ν ν ρ µ 1 2n n µρ ν + 1 2n n νρ µ ), s b ρ µ = i µ σ + i 2n n µσ, s b σ = 0, s b ρ µ = iβ µ, s b β µ = 0, s b σ = χ, s b χ = 0, s b ϕ = χ, s b χ = ) Since the gauge-fixing and ghost part of the effective Lagrangian density is BRST-exact and therefore can be expressed in terms of BRST variation of some gauge-fixed fermion Ψ. Therefore, L gf = s b Ψ, 3.7) where Ψ has the following form: Ψ = i σ 2 [ ρ ν µ B µν + σ µ ρ µ +ϕ µ ρ µ ρ ν k 1 β ν ϕk ρ ν 2 χ 2 n n µρ µ ϕ 2 n n µb µν ] n n µ ρ µ. 3.8) This gauge-fixed fermion is very important to identify the anti-fields of BV action. 11

13 3.1 VSR modified extended BRST invariant BV action The extended BRST and extended anti-brst invariant formulations of the Lorentz invariant BV action lead to the proper identification of the antifields through equations of motion of auxiliary field variables [41, 42, 44]. The study of extended including shift) symmetries introduced through collective fields is important because it ensure that Schwinger-Dyson equations at the level of the BRST algebra can be performed within the Feynman path integral [38]. In this subsection, we study the VSR modified extended BRST invariant BV action. To do so, we first deviate all the fields from their original values. This enlarges in a trivial way the symmetry content of the theory, adding extra shift symmetries. To study the extended BRST structure of the Abelian rank-2 tensor field theory in VSR, we shift all the fields of theory from their original values as follows B µν B µν,ρ µ ρ µ, ρ µ ρ µ,σ µ σ µ, σ µ σ µ,β µ β µ,χ χ, χ χ,ϕ ϕ. This leads to the following shifted Lagrangian density: L = L 0 B µν B µν )+L gf B µν B µν,ξ Ξ), 3.9) where Ξ Ξ = ρ µ ρ µ, ρ µ ρ µ,σ µ σ µ, σ µ σ µ,β µ β µ,χ χ, χ χ,ϕ ϕ. The explicit form of L gf B µν B µν,ξ Ξ) is given by L gf = i [ µ ρ ν µ ρ ν + ρ ν ρ ν µ ρ ν µ ρ ν ρ ν ρ ν µ ρ ν ν ρ µ + 12 µ ρ ν n nν ρ µ + ν ρ µ1 2n n µ ρ ν 1 ) m 2 2 n µ ρ ν n ν ρ µ + µ ρ ν ν ρ µ 1 4 n 2 µ ρ ν n nν ρ µ 1 µ m2 ν ρ 2 n n µ ρ ν + 1 ) m 2 2 n µ ρ ν n ν ρ µ µ ρ µ µ ρ ν ρ ν ρ ν + µ ρ ν µ ρ ν 4 n + ρ ν ρ ν + µ ρ ν ν ρ µ 1 µ m2 µ ρ 2 n nν ρ µ 1 2 ν ρ µ m2 n n µ ρ ν + 1 m 2 ) 2 n µ ρ ν n ν ρ µ 4 n µ ρ ν ν ρ µ µ ρ ν n nν ρ µ + 1 µ m2 ν ρ 2 n n µ ρ µ 1 ) m 2 2 n µ ρ ν n ν ρ µ + µ σ µ σ 4 n µ σ µ σ µ σ µ σ + µ σ µ σ + σσ σ σ σσ + σ σ + β ν µ B µν β ν Bµν µ +β ν ν ϕ β ν µ B µν β ν Bµν µ + β ν ν ϕ+ β ν ϕ β ν ν ϕ β ν 2 n nν ϕ β ν β ν n n µb µν β ν n n µ B µν β ν 2 n nν ϕ+ β ν 2 i χ 2 + χ 2 χ µ ρ µ χ µ ρ µ χ µ ρ µ + χ µ ρ µ χ 2 n nν ϕ+ β ν 2 ) n ρ i χ µ ρ µ χ µ ρ µ χ µ ρ µ + χ µ ρ µ χ n 2 n n ρ χ 2 n n µb µν + β ν 2 n n µ B µν n nν ϕ+k 1 β ν β ν k 1 β ν βν k 1 βν β ν +k 1 βν βν n n ρ+ χ 2 n n ρ+ χ 2 n n ρ n n ρ+ χ 2 n n ρ ]. 3.10) ) n n ρ k 2 χ χ+k 2 χ χ+k 2 χ χ k 2 χ χ This Lagrangian density coincides with L gf of 3.3) when bar fields vanish. It is evident that this Lagrangian density is invariant under the BRST transformation 3.6) for the 12

14 shifted fields. In addition, there exists the following shift symmetry also: s b Φx) = αx), s b Φx) = αx), 3.11) which leaves this Lagrangian density invariant. Here Φ and Φ are generic notation for all fields and shifted fields respectively. The form the extended BRST symmetry. The extended BRST transformation, which is comprised by the BRST symmetry along with the above shift symmetry, is then given by s b Φx) = αx), s b Φx) = αx) βx), 3.12) where βx) refers the original BRST transformation collectively, whereas αx) refers the shift transformation collectively. In order to quantize theory collectively, we need to fix the gauge for all the local symmetry. Therefore, corresponding to this local shift symmetry, one needs the theory to be gauge-fixed and this leads to an additional BRST symmetry [42]. The extended BRST symmetry transformation for all the fields are given by s b B µν = ψ µν, s b Bµν = ψ µν µ ρ ν µ ρ ν ν ρ µ + ν ρ µ 3.13) 1 2n n µρ ν + 1 2n n µ ρ ν + 1 2n n µ ρ µ 1 2n n µ ρ µ ), s b ρ µ = ǫ µ +i µ σ i µ σ + i 2n n µσ + i 2n n µ σ, s b ρ µ = ξ µ, s b ρ µ = ξ µ iβ µ +i β µ, s b σ = ε, s b σ = ε, s b β µ = η µ, s b βµ = η µ, s b σ = ψ, s b χ = η, s b σ = ψ + χ χ, s b χ = η, s b ϕ = φ χ+ χ, s b χ = Σ, s b ϕ = φ, s b χ = Σ, s b ξ i = 0, ξ i [ψ µν,ǫ µ,ξ µ,ε,η µ,ψ,η,φ,σ]. 3.14) The fields ψ µν, ǫ µ, ξ µ, ε, η µ, ψ, η, φ and Σ are introduced as ghost fields associated with the shift symmetry corresponding to the fields B µν, ρ µ, ρ µ, σ, β µ, σ, χ, ϕ and χ respectively. Further, we add following antighost fields B µν, ρ µ, ρ µ, σ, σ, β µ, χ, χ and ϕ corresponding to the fields B µν, ρ µ, ρ µ, σ, β µ, σ, χ, ϕ and χ respectively with opposite statistics. These antighost fields transform under BRST transformations as following: s b B µν = L µν, s b ρ µ = M µ, s b ρ µ = M µ, s b σ = N, s b σ = N, s b β µ = S µ, s b χ = O, s b χ = Ō, s bϕ = T, 3.15) where L µν,m µ, M µ,n, N,S µ,o,ō,t are the Nakanishi-Lautrup type auxiliary fields and do not change under BRST transformation which ensure the nilpotency of BRST symmetry. Now, we fix the gauge for shift symmetry in VSR by choosing the following gauge-fixed Lagrangian density: L gf = L Bµν µν Bµνψ µν µ ρ ν + µ ρ ν + ν ρ µ ν ρ µ + 1 2n nµ ρ ν 1 2n nµ ρ ν 1 2n nν ρ µ + 1 2n nν ρ µ )+ M µ ρ µ + ρ µ ǫµ +i µ σ i µ σ i 1 2n nµ σ + i 1 2n nµ σ)+m µ ρ µ +ρ µ ξµ iβ µ +i β µ )+N σ σ ε+ N σ σ ψ χ+ χ) + Ō χ+ χ Σ+O χ+χ η +T ϕ ϕ φ χ+ χ)+s µ βµ βµ ηµ, 3.16) 13

15 which sets all the bar fields to zero and thus we recover the original theory. This gaugefixing term is also invariant under the extended BRST symmetry transformations given in Eqs. 3.14) and 3.15). The gauge-fixed extended Lagrangian density, L gf, after exploiting the equations of motion of auxiliary fields has the following form: L gf = Bµνψ µν µ ρ ν + ν ρ µ + 1 2n nµ ρ ν 1 2n nν ρ µ )+ ρ µǫ µ +i µ σ i 2n nµ σ)+ρ µξ µ iβ µ ) σ ǫ σ ψ χ)+ χ Σ+χ η ϕ φ χ) βµη µ. 3.17) As the gauge-fixed fermion Ψ for Abelian rank-2 antisymmetric tensor field in VSR depends only on the original fields, then the most general gauge-fixed Lagrangian density is given by δψ δψ δψ L gf = s b Ψ = ψ µν +ǫ µ +ξ µ +ε δψ δb µν δρ µ δ ρ µ δσ + ψ δψ δ σ +η δψ µ +Σ δψ δβ µ δχ +ηδψ δ χ +φδψ δϕ. 3.18) Utilizing the fermionic and bosonic behavior of fields, this can further be written as L gf = δψ δb µν ψ µν + δψ δρ µ ǫ µ + δψ δ ρ µ ξ µ δψ δσ ε δψ δ σ ψ δψ η µ + δψ δψ Σ+ δβ µ δχ δ χ η δψ φ. 3.19) δϕ Now, we are able to write the effective Lagrangian density in VSR, L eff = L 0 +L gf + L gf, as follows L eff = 1 12 F Fµνρ µνρ +Bµν µ ρ ν ν ρ µ 1 2n nµ ρ ν + 1 ) 2n nν ρ µ + i ρ µ µ σ 1 ) 2n nµ σ iρ µβ µ + σ χ+ϕ χ Bµν + δψ ) δb µν ψ µν + ρ µ + δψ ) δ ρ µ ξ µ + ρ µ + δψ ) δρ µ ǫ µ σ + δψ ) ε σ + δψ ) ψ δσ δ σ + χ + δψ ) Σ+ χ + δψ ) η ϕ + δψ ) φ βµ + δψ ) δχ δ χ δϕ δβ µ η µ, 3.20) here expressions 3.1), 3.17) and 3.19) are utilized. Exploiting the equations of motion of ghost fields associated with the shift symmetry, we get the following identifications of antighost fields: B µν = δψ δb µν, ρ µ = δψ δρ µ, ρ µ = δψ δ ρ µ, σ = δψ δσ, σ = δψ δ σ, χ = δψ δχ, χ = δψ δ χ, β µ = δψ δβ µ, ϕ = δψ δϕ. 3.21) 14

16 With a particular expression of gauge-fixed fermion Ψ as given in 3.8), these leads to Bµν = i µ 1 ) 2n n µ ρ ν, ρ µ = i µ 1 ) 2n n µ σ, 3.22) ρ µ = i ν B νµ 1 ) 2n nν B νµ k 1 β µ, σ = 0, σ = i µ 1 ) 2n n µ ρ µ, χ = 0, χ = ik 2 ϕ, βµ = ik 1 ρ µ, ϕ = i µ ρ µ 1 ) 2n n µ ρ µ k 2 χ. 3.23) Here we see that these antighost fields coincide with the antifields of the theory. We note that these antifields are nonlocal which describe the features of VSR. Thus, analogous to Lorentz invariant theory, the antifields are obtained naturally in VSR also. One can see that these identifications lead the effective Lagrangian density to their original form as given in Eq. 3.5). Now, we can describe the gauge-fixing part of the effective Lagrangian density in terms of the BRST variation of a generalized gauge-fixed fermion as follows L eff = L 0 B µν B µν )+s b B Bµν µν +ρ µ ρ µ + ρ µ ρ µ +σ σ + σ σ +βµ β µ + χ χ+ χ χ+ϕ ϕ), L 0 B µν B µν )+s b Φ Φ. 3.24) Here Φ and Φ are the generic notation for antifields and corresponding) shifted fields, respectively. The ghost number of Φ Φ is 1. We thus recover the BV action for Abelian 2-form gauge theory in VSR with the identification of antifields. 3.2 VSR modified extended BRST invariant superspace formulation In this section we discuss a superspace formalism of the VSR modified 2-form theory having extended BRST invariance. In this regard, we extend the space to a superspace x µ,θ) by introducing a fermionic coordinate θ. In this superspace, the superconnection 2-form is defined by ω 2) = 1 2! B µνx,θ)dx µ dx ν )+M µ x,θ)dx µ dθ)+nx,θ)dθ dθ), 3.25) n n µ ) +dθ n n θ ) is the exterior derivative. By requiring where d = dx µ µ i 2 θ i 2 the field strength, F 3) = dω 2), to vanish along the θ direction, we get the following form of the component of the superfields in VSR B µν x,θ) = B µν x)+θs b B µν ), M µ x,θ) = ρ µ x)+θs b ρ µ ), Nx,θ) = σx)+θs b σ). 3.26) 15

17 In the similar fashion, we are able to write all the fields involved in extended BV action in superspace as B µν x,θ) = B µν x)+θψ µν, M µ x,θ) = ρ µ x)+θǫ µ, B µν x,θ) = B µν x)+θψ µν µ ρ ν + µ ρ ν + ν ρ µ ν ρ µ + 1 2n n µρ ν 1 2n n µ ρ ν 1 2n n νρ µ + 1 2n n ν ρ µ ), M µ x,θ) = ρ µ x)+θǫ µ i µ σ +i µ σ + i 2n n µσ i 2n n µ σ), Nx,θ) = σx)+θε, Nx,θ) = σx)+θε, M µ x,θ) = ρ µ x)+θξ µ, M µ x,θ) = ρ µ x)+θξ µ iβ µ +i β µ ), S µ x,θ) = β µ x)+θη µ, Sµ x,θ) = β µ x)+θη µ, Ñx,θ) = σx)+θψ, Ñx,θ) = σx)+θψ χ+ ψ), Ox,θ) = χx)+θσ, Ōx,θ) = χx)+θσ, Õx,θ) = χx)+θη, Õx,θ) = χx)+θη, T x,θ) = ϕx)+θφ, Tx,θ) = ϕx)+θφ χ+ χ). 3.27) The components of antifields of the theory in superspace is written by B µν = B µν +θl µν, M µ = ρ µ +θm µ, M µ = ρ µ +θ M µ, S µ = β µ +θs µ, N = σ +θn, Ñ = σ +θ N, Ō = χ +θo, T = ϕ +θt, Õ = χ +θō. 3.28) Exploiting expressions 3.27) and 3.28), we derive δ B µν B µν = L Bµν µν Bµν ψ µν µ ρ ν + µ ρ ν + ν ρ µ ν ρ µ + 1 2n nµ ρ ν 1 2n nµ ρ ν 1 2n nν ρ µ + 1 ) 2n nν ρ µ, δ M µ M µ = M µ ρ µ + ρ µ ǫ µ +i µ σ i µ σ i 2n nµ σ + i ) 2n nµ σ, δ M µ Mµ = M µ ρ µ +ρ µξ µ iβ µ +i β µ ), δ N N = N σ σ δ ε, Ñ Ñ = N σ σ ψ χ+ χ), δ Õ Ō = Ō χ+ δ χ Σ, δ T T = T ϕ ϕ φ χ+ χ), ÕŌ = O χ+χ η, δ S µ S µ = S µ βµ β µη µ. 3.29) Here, we note that the RHS of the sum of above expressions coincides with the gauge-fixed Lagrangian density corresponding to the shift symmetry 3.16). Thus, the gauge-fixed 16

18 Lagrangian density in superspace can be written as L gf = δ [ B Bµν µν + M Mµ µ + Mµ Mµ + N N + Ñ Ñ + Õ Ō+ ÕŌ + T T ] + S µ Sµ. 3.30) Similar to the Lorentz invariant theory, the invariance of Lgf under the extended BRST transformation is evident from the above expression as it belongs to the θ component of superfields. As the gauge-fixing fermion depends on the original fields, the component form of fermionic superfield Γx, θ) in superspace is defined as [ Γx,θ) = Ψx)+θ δψ ψ µν + δψ ǫ µ + δψ δb µν δρ µ + δψ δ χ η δψ ] δϕ φ ξ µ δψ δ ρ µ δσ ε δψ δ σ ψ δψ δβ µ η µ + δψ δχ Σ. 3.31) From the above expression, the most general VSR-modified gauge-fixed Lagrangian density L gf can be described in the superspace by L gf = δγx,θ). 3.32) Being the θ component of fermionic superfield, it is evident that L gf is invariant under the extended BRST transformation. Thus, the VSR-modified effective Lagrangian density in this superspace formalism is identified as L eff = L 0 B µν B µν )+ δ [ B Bµν µν + M M µ µ + Mµ Mµ + N N + Ñ Ñ + Õ Ō + ÕŌ + T T ] + S Sµ µ +Γx,θ). 3.33) In VSR framework also, we observe that using equations of motion of auxiliary fields and ghost fields of the shift symmetry, this effective Lagrangian density reduces to the original BRST invariant Lagrangian density. 3.3 VSR modified extended anti-brst invariant BV action In this subsection, we discuss the VSR modified extended anti-brst invariant BV action for the Abelian rank-2 antisymmetric tensor field. First of all, let us write the VSR modified anti-brst symmetry transformation s ab ), which leaves the Lagrangian density 3.5) for the 2-form gauge theory invariant, as follows, s ab B µν = µ ρ ν ν ρ µ 1 2n n µ ρ ν + 1 2n n ν ρ µ, s ab ρ µ = i µ i ) 2n n µ σ, s ab σ = 0,s ab ρ µ = iβ µ, s ab β µ = 0, s ab σ = χ, s ab χ = 0, s ab ϕ = χ, s ab χ = ) This VSR modified anti-brst transformation is nilpotent and plays an important role in defining physical unitarity. However, this transformation does not anticommute with 17

19 the BRST transformation 3.6) in absolute fashion, i.e. {s b,s ab } 0 for some fields. One should not bother for this in real sense as the absolutely anticommutativity can be achieved on ground of Curci-Ferrari CF) type restriction. This is emphasized in the next section in case of Abelian 3-form gauge theory) with more details. The VSR modified gauge-fixed fermion corresponding to the anti-brst transformation, Ψ, is defined by [ Ψ = i ρ ν µ B µν 1 2n n µb µν +k 1 β ν ) σ µ ρ µ +σ 1 2n n µ ρ µ + ϕ µ ρ µ 1 ] 2n n µρ µ +k 2 χ). 3.35) As the the gauge-fixing part of the Lagrangian density is anti-brst exact and, thus, can be written in terms of anti-brst variation of Ψ as following: L gf = s ab Ψ. 3.36) To discuss the extended anti-brst symmetry within VSR framework, we do follow the same procedure as in the case of BRST transformation. Thus, here we demand that extended anti-brst operation on Φ Φ) should have same structure of the original anti- BRST transformations with shifted fields. This requirement leads to the following VSR modified extended anti-brst transformations: s ab Bµν = Bµν, s ab B µν = Bµν + µ ρ ν µ ρ ν ν ρ µ + ν ρ µ i 2n n µ ρ ν + i 2n n µ ρ ν + i 2n n ν ρ µ i 2n n ν ρ µ ), s ab ρ µ = ρ µ, s ab ρ µ = ρ µ, s ab ρ µ = ρ µ i µ σ +i µ σ + i 2n n µσ i 2n n µ σ, s ab ρ µ = ρ µ iβ µ +i β µ, s ab σ = σ, s ab σ = σ, s ab βµ = βµ, s ab β µ = βµ, s ab σ = σ, s ab σ = σ χ+ χ, s ab χ = χ, s ab χ = χ, s ab ϕ = ϕ, s ab ϕ = ϕ χ+ χ, s ab χ = χ, s ab χ = χ. 3.37) The antifields B µν, ρ µ,ρ µ, σ,β µ,ψ,σ,χ,ϕ and χ do not vary under extended anti- BRST transformations as the transformations are nilpotent in nature. Moreover, the ghost fields of the shift symmetry transform under VSR modified extended anti-brst transformations as follows, s ab ψ µν = L µν, s ab ǫ µ = M µ, s ab ξ µ = M µ, s ab ε = N, s ab ψ = N, s ab η µ = S µ, s ab Σ = O, s ab η = Ō, s abφ = T, s ab Mµ = O, s ab L µν = 0, s ab M µ = 0, s ab N = 0, s ab N = 0, s ab S µ = 0, s ab O = 0, s ab Ō = 0, s ab T. 3.38) The transformations 3.37) and 3.38) together leads to complete extended anti-brst transformations in VSR framework, which leave the shifted effective Lagrangian density invariant. With the help of these set of extended anti-brst transformation, it is straightforward to construct the superspace having extra fermion coordinate θ along with x µ. 18

20 3.4 VSR modified extended BRST and anti-brst invariant superspace formulation In this subsection, we develop a superspace formulation for VSR modified 2-form gauge theory which is manifestly invariant under the both extended BRST and extended anti- BRST transformations. To define a superspace for such theory, we need two Grassmannian coordinates, θ and θ, together with x µ. Therefore, the superfields here depend on superspace x µ,θ, θ). Within VSR framework, the super connection 2-form ω 2) ) and the field strength F 3) ), respectively, are ω 2) = 1 2! B µνx,θ, θ)dx µ dx ν )+M µ x,θ, θ)dx µ dθ)+nx,θ, θ)dθ dθ) + M µ x, θ, θ)dx µ d θ)+ñx, θ, θ)d θ d θ)+t x, θ, θ)dθ d θ), 3.39) F 3) = dω 2). Here, the exterior derivative d has the following form: d = dx µ µ 1 ) 2n n µ +dθ θ 1 ) 2n n θ +d θ θ 1 2 n n θ 3.40) ). 3.41) The components of the superfields can be computed by requiring the field strength to vanish along the directions of θ and θ. The explicit expressions for these superfields are calculated in A.1). Exploiting the expressions of superfields given in A.1), we compute the following expressions: ψ µν µ ρ ν + µ ρ ν + ν ρ µ ν ρ µ ψ µν1 2n nµ ρ ν 1 2n nµ ρ ν 1 2n nν ρ µ + 1 ) 2n nν ρ µ, M Mµ µ = M µ ρ µ + ρ µ ǫ µ +i µ σ i µ σ i 2n nµ σ + i ) 2n nµ σ +M µ ρ µ + ρ µ ξµ iβ µ +i β µ ), 1 δ δ 2δ θ B Bµν µν = L Bµν µν Bµν δ δ θ δ 1 δ δ 2δ θ N N = N σ σ 1 δ δ ε, Ñ Ñ = 2δ θ N σ σ ψ χ+ χ), δ δ ÕŌ δ θ = Ō χ+ χ Σ+O χ+χ 1 δ δ η, 2δ θ T T = T ϕ ϕ φ χ+ χ), 1 δ δ 2δ θ S Sµ µ = S µ βµ βµ ηµ. 3.42) By adding all the equations of above expression side by side, we get, remarkably, that this is nothing but the expression of Lagrangian density, Lgf, given in Eq. 3.16). Thus, we can write L gf = 1 δ δ [ Bµν 2δ θ Bµν +2 Mµ Mµ + N N + Ñ Ñ +2 ÕŌ+ T T + S ] µ Sµ. 3.43) Eventually, we see that L gf is nothing but the θ θ component of the composite superfields. Therefore, this certifies the invariance of the L gf under both the extended BRST and 19

21 extended anti-brst transformations. The component form of super gauge-fixing fermion in this superspace is given by Γx,θ, θ) = Ψ+θs b Ψ+ θs ab Ψ+θ θs b s ab Ψ, 3.44) to express the L gf as δ [ ] δ θ)γx,θ, θ). The θ θ component of Γx,θ, θ) vanishes due to equations of motion in the theories having both BRST and anti-brst invariance. Therefore, the effective Lagrangian density 3.24), which is invariant under both the extended BRST and the extended anti-brst transformations, can be expressed in superspace by L eff = L 0 B µν B µν )+ 1 δ δ [ Bµν 2δ θ Bµν +2 Mµ Mµ + N N + Ñ Ñ +2 ÕŌ+ T T + S ] µ Sµ + δ [ ] δ θ)γx,θ, θ). 3.45) Here, we found that the gauge fixing parts of the effective Lagrangian density is the θ components of the certain functional. Thus we observe that the VSR modified 2-form gauge theory in superspace described by two fermionic parameters also follow the same structure as the Lorentz invariant case. 4 3-form gauge theory: VSR modified BV action in superspace VSR generalization to the tensor field reducible gauge) theories has also been done using a BV formulation [7, 8]. A rigorous construction of quantum field theory in VSR framwork is also studied [45]. In this connection, we would like study the BV action tensor field of rank- 3 in superspace. In particular, we generalize our previous results for the case of Abelian 3-form gauge theory which is relevant as it plays a crucial role to study the excitations of the quantized versions of strings, superstrings and related extended objects. The classical Lagrangian density for the Abelian 3-form gauge theory in VSR is given by [7, 8], as L 0 = 1 24 F µνηξ Fµνηξ, 4.1) where the 4-form field strength tensor F µνηξ ) has the following form: F µνηξ = µ B νηξ ν B ηξµ + η B ξµν ξ B µνη 1 2n n µb νηξ + 1 2n n νb ηξµ 1 2n n ηb ξµν + 1 2n n ξb µνη. 4.2) HereB µνη istotally antisymmetricrank-3tensorgaugefieldandn µ isaconstantnullvector. The Lagrangian density 4.1) is not invariant under standard gauge transformation as the Lorentz invariance is broken by choosing an specific direction. However, this Lagrangian density is invariant under the following VSR modified gauge transformation δb µνη = µ λ νη + ν λ ηµ + η λ µν 1 2n n µλ νη 1 2n n νλ ηµ 1 2n n ηλ µν, 4.3) 20

22 where λ µν is an arbitrary antisymmetric parameter. As this is a VSR modified) gauge invariant theory, it contains redundant degrees of freedom. From the expression of 4.3), it is evident that the theory is reducible. Therefore, to quantize this theory correctly we need to fix the gauge appropriately. The gauge-fixed Lagrangian density in VSR is calculated by L B gf = µb µνη B νη 1 2n nµ B µνη B νη B µν B µν + µ c νη µ c νη + c νη c νη + ν c ηµ µ c νη 1 ν c ηµ 2n nµ c νη µ c νη1 2n n ν c ηµ +n ν c ηµ1 4n nµ c νη + µ c µν µ c νη 1 µ c µν 2n nµ c νη µ c νη1 2n n η c µν +n η c µν1 4n n η c µν µ βν µ β ν βν β ν + ν βµ µ β ν 1 ν βµ 2n nµ β ν µ β ν1 2n n ν β µ + 1 4n n ν β µ n µ β ν BB B2 1 + µ c µν f ν µ c µν Fν 1 2n n µ c µν f ν + 1 2n n µc µν Fν + µ c 2 µ c 2 + c 2 c 2 + f µ f µ F µ F µ + µ β µ B 2 1 2n n µβ µ B 2 + µ φ µ B 1 µ βµ B 1 2n n µφ µ B n n µ β µ B. 4.4) Here, keeping the reducible nature of the theory, we have introduced extra auxiliary and ghost fields. For instance, antisymmetric ghost and antighost fields c µν and c µν are Grassmannian and the vector field φ µ, antisymmetric auxiliary fields B µν, B µν and auxiliary fields B,B 1,B 2 are bosonic. The fields β µ and β µ are ghost of ghosts and are bosonic in nature. However, c 2 and c 2 are ghost of ghost of ghosts with fermionic nature. The rest of the Grassmannian fields, i.e., c 1, c 1,f µ and F µ are auxiliary fields. It has been shown in Ref. [8] that the ghosts c µν and c µν, ghost of ghosts β µ and β µ and ghost of ghost of ghosts c 2 and c 2, are massive. To write the absolutely anticommuting BRST and anti-brst invariant BV action for 3-form gauge theory in VSR, we consider an equivalent candidate to the above gauge-fixing Lagrangian density as following: L B gf = µ B µνη Bνη + 1 2n nµ B µνη Bνη B µν B µν + µ c νη µ c νη + c νη c νη + ν c ηµ µ c νη 1 ν c ηµ 2n nµ c νη µ c νη1 2n n ν c ηµ +n ν c ηµ1 4n nµ c νη + µ c µν µ c νη 1 µ c µν 2n nµ c νη µ c νη1 2n n η c µν +n η c µν1 4n n η c µν µ βν µ β ν βν β ν + ν βµ µ β ν 1 ν βµ 2n nµ β ν µ β ν1 2n n ν β µ + 1 4n n ν β µ n µ β ν BB B2 1 + µ c µν fν µ c µν F ν + 1 2n n µ c µν F ν 1 2n n µc µν fν + µ c 2 µ c 2 + c 2 c 2 + f µ f µ F µ F µ + µ β µ B 2 1 2n n µβ µ B 2 + µ φ µ B 1 µ βµ B 1 2n n µφ µ B n n µ β µ B. 4.5) 21

23 These two Lagrangian densities are equivalent as they describe same dynamics of the theory on the following CF type restricted surface: f µ +F µ = µ c 1 1 2n n µc 1, fµ + F µ = µ c 1 1 2n n µ c 1, B µν + B µν = µ φ ν ν φ µ 1 2n n µφ ν + 1 2n n νφ µ. 4.6) The VSR modified BRST transformations which leave the effective Lagrangian density, L = L 0 +L B gf, invariant are given by s b B µνη = µ c νη + ν c ηµ + η c µν 1 2n n µc νη 1 2n n νc ηµ 1 2n n ηc µν ), s b c µν = B µν, s b B µν = µ f ν ν f µ 1 2n n µf ν + 1 2n n νf µ, s b βµ = F µ, s b β µ = µ 1 2n n µ)c 2, s b F µ = µ 1 2n n µ)b, s b fµ = µ 1 2n n µ)b 1, s b c 2 = B 2, s b c 1 = B, s b φ µ = f µ, s b c 1 = B 1, s b [c 2,f µ, F µ,b,b 1,B 2,B µν ] = ) Since the gauge fixed Lagrangian density L B gf is BRST exact, so it can be written in terms of BRST variation of a gauge-fixing fermion Ψ as where the explicit form of Ψ is as following: L B gf = s bψ, 4.8) Ψ = 1 2 c 2B B 2c 1 2 c 1 1B µ β ν ν βµ 1 2n n µ β ν + 1 2n n ν β µ )c µν + 2 c 1 µν B µν µ c 2 β µ + 1 2n n β) c 2 β µ F µ φ fµ µ 1 3 B µνη µ c νη ηµ + ν c + η c µν 1 2n nµ c µη 1 2n nν c ηµ 1 ) µν nη c. 4.9) 2n Here, one can see the VSR modification in the gauge-fixing fermion clearly. The anti-brst symmetry transformations s ab ) for the above Lagrangian densities are given by s ab B µνη = µ c νη + ν c ηµ + η c µν 1 2n n µ c νη 1 2n n ν c ηµ 1 2n n η c µν ) s ab c µν = µ βν ν βµ 1 2n n µ β ν + 1 2n n ν β µ, s ab c µν = B µν, s ab B µν = µ fν νfµ 1 2n n µ f ν + 1 2n n ν f µ, s ab β µ = F µ, s ab βµ = = µ c 2 1 2n n µ c 2, s ab Fµ = µ B n n µb 2, s ab f µ = µ B n n µb 1, s ab c 2 = B, s ab c 1 = B 1, s ab φ µ = f µ, s ab c 1 = B 2, s ab [ c 2, f µ,f µ,b,b 1,B 2, B µν ] = ) 22

24 Since both the BRST and anti-brst transformations are absolutely anticommuting in nature, so both the BRST and anti-brst exact Lagrangian densities can be expressed as follows, L B gf = s bs ab [ 1 2 c 2c c 1c c µνc µν β µ β µ 1 2 φ µφ µ 1 6 B µνηb µνη ]. 4.11) Now, we will study the construction of VSR modified extended BRST transformation for Abelian 3-form gauge theory in next subsection. 4.1 VSR modified extended BRST invariant BV action Following the previous sections, we generalize the VSR modified extended BRST construction for the case of Abelian 3-form gauge theory in VSR. In this regard, we shift all the fields from their original values as follows B µνη B µνη B µνη, c µν c µν c µν, c µν c µν c µν, B µν B µν B µν, B µν B µν Bµν, β µ β µ β µ, βµ β µ βµ, F µ F µ F µ, F µ F µ Fµ, f µ f µ f µ, fµ f µ fµ, c 2 c 2 c 2, c 2 c 2 c 2, c 1 c 1 c 1, c 1 c 1 c 1, φ µ φ µ φ µ, B B B, B 1 B 1 B 1, B 2 B 2 B ) Following the above shifts in fields, the effective Lagrangian density of the theory is modified by L = LB µνη B µνη,c µν c µν, c µν c µν,b µν B µν, B µν Bµν,β µ β µ, β µ βµ, F µ F µ, F µ Fµ,f µ f µ, f µ fµ,c 2 c 2, c 2 c 2,c 1 c 1, c 1 c 1,φ µ φ µ, B B,B 1 B 1,B 2 B 2 ). 4.13) This Lagrangian density is invariant under the BRST transformation 4.7) with respect to the shifted fields. In addition, it is also invariant under the extended BRST transformations of fields given as s b Φx) = αx), s b Φx) = αx) βx), 4.14) where Φx) and Φx) represent the collective original and shifted fields respectively. Here βx) refers the original BRST transformation of with respect to the shifted fields, whereas αx) corresponds the ghost fields associated with shift symmetry collectively. The explicit form of the extended BRST transformation 4.14) is given explicitly in Eq. B.2) of Appendix B. Now, in order to make theory unchanged, we need to remove the contribution of these ghosts from the physical states. To do so, we further introduce the following antifields anti-ghost): Bµνη, c µν, c µν, B µν, B µν, ηµ, β µ, F µ, F µ, fµ, f µ, c 2, c 2, c 1, c 1, φ µ, B, B1, B 2 to the theory. The BRST variation of these antifields are given in B.3). Now, to remove the redundancies, we fix the gauge for shift symmetry, which is achieved by adding 23

Space-Time Symmetries

Space-Time Symmetries Chapter Space-Time Symmetries In classical fiel theory any continuous symmetry of the action generates a conserve current by Noether's proceure. If the Lagrangian is not invariant but only shifts by a

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.

6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq. 6.1. Dirac Equation Ref: M.Kaku, Quantum Field Theory, Oxford Univ Press (1993) η μν = η μν = diag(1, -1, -1, -1) p 0 = p 0 p = p i = -p i p μ p μ = p 0 p 0 + p i p i = E c 2 - p 2 = (m c) 2 H = c p 2

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3

Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 1 State vector space and the dual space Space of wavefunctions The space of wavefunctions is the set of all

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)

Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required) Phys460.nb 81 ψ n (t) is still the (same) eigenstate of H But for tdependent H. The answer is NO. 5.5.5. Solution for the tdependent Schrodinger s equation If we assume that at time t 0, the electron starts

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Symmetric Stress-Energy Tensor

Symmetric Stress-Energy Tensor Chapter 3 Symmetric Stress-Energy ensor We noticed that Noether s conserved currents are arbitrary up to the addition of a divergence-less field. Exploiting this freedom the canonical stress-energy tensor

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

HOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:

HOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch: HOMEWORK 4 Problem a For the fast loading case, we want to derive the relationship between P zz and λ z. We know that the nominal stress is expressed as: P zz = ψ λ z where λ z = λ λ z. Therefore, applying

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

= {{D α, D α }, D α }. = [D α, 4iσ µ α α D α µ ] = 4iσ µ α α [Dα, D α ] µ.

= {{D α, D α }, D α }. = [D α, 4iσ µ α α D α µ ] = 4iσ µ α α [Dα, D α ] µ. PHY 396 T: SUSY Solutions for problem set #1. Problem 2(a): First of all, [D α, D 2 D α D α ] = {D α, D α }D α D α {D α, D α } = {D α, D α }D α + D α {D α, D α } (S.1) = {{D α, D α }, D α }. Second, {D

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Partial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013

Partial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013 The boundary element method March 26, 203 Introduction and notation The problem: u = f in D R d u = ϕ in Γ D u n = g on Γ N, where D = Γ D Γ N, Γ D Γ N = (possibly, Γ D = [Neumann problem] or Γ N = [Dirichlet

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates

derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates swapnizzle 03-03- :5:43 We begin by recognizing the familiar conversion from rectangular to spherical coordinates (note that φ is used

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

EE512: Error Control Coding

EE512: Error Control Coding EE512: Error Control Coding Solution for Assignment on Finite Fields February 16, 2007 1. (a) Addition and Multiplication tables for GF (5) and GF (7) are shown in Tables 1 and 2. + 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 3

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Απόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.

Απόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ. Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο The time integral of a force is referred to as impulse, is determined by and is obtained from: Newton s 2 nd Law of motion states that the action

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

2 Composition. Invertible Mappings

2 Composition. Invertible Mappings Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan Composition. Invertible Mappings In this section we discuss two procedures for creating new mappings from old ones, namely,

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Higher Derivative Gravity Theories

Higher Derivative Gravity Theories Higher Derivative Gravity Theories Black Holes in AdS space-times James Mashiyane Supervisor: Prof Kevin Goldstein University of the Witwatersrand Second Mandelstam, 20 January 2018 James Mashiyane WITS)

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1) 84 CHAPTER 4. STATIONARY TS MODELS 4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(,) This section is an introduction to a wide class of models ARMA(p,q) which we will consider in more detail later in this

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Homework 3 Solutions

Homework 3 Solutions Homework 3 Solutions Igor Yanovsky (Math 151A TA) Problem 1: Compute the absolute error and relative error in approximations of p by p. (Use calculator!) a) p π, p 22/7; b) p π, p 3.141. Solution: For

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS

CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS CHAPTER 5 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS EXERCISE 104 Page 8 1. Find the positive root of the equation x + 3x 5 = 0, correct to 3 significant figures, using the method of bisection. Let f(x) =

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016

Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016 Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016 Silvio Capobianco Exercise 1.7 Let H(n) = J(n + 1) J(n). Equation (1.8) tells us that H(2n) = 2, and H(2n+1) = J(2n+2) J(2n+1) = (2J(n+1) 1) (2J(n)+1)

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set May 6, 2008 Abstract A set of first-order formulas, whatever the cardinality of the set of symbols, is equivalent to an independent

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Second Order Partial Differential Equations

Second Order Partial Differential Equations Chapter 7 Second Order Partial Differential Equations 7.1 Introduction A second order linear PDE in two independent variables (x, y Ω can be written as A(x, y u x + B(x, y u xy + C(x, y u u u + D(x, y

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

The kinetic and potential energies as T = 1 2. (m i η2 i k(η i+1 η i ) 2 ). (3) The Hooke s law F = Y ξ, (6) with a discrete analog

The kinetic and potential energies as T = 1 2. (m i η2 i k(η i+1 η i ) 2 ). (3) The Hooke s law F = Y ξ, (6) with a discrete analog Lecture 12: Introduction to Analytical Mechanics of Continuous Systems Lagrangian Density for Continuous Systems The kinetic and potential energies as T = 1 2 i η2 i (1 and V = 1 2 i+1 η i 2, i (2 where

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude

Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude Jan Behrens 2012-12-31 In this paper we shall provide a method to approximate distances between two points on earth

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Shirsendu Mukherjee Department of Statistics, Asutosh College, Kolkata, India. shirsendu st@yahoo.co.in So far we have treated the testing of one-sided

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II

ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II 2014/2015: Semester II Tutorial 7 1. Let X be a sample from a population P and consider testing hypotheses H 0 : P = P 0 versus H 1 : P = P 1, where P j is a known

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Strain gauge and rosettes

Strain gauge and rosettes Strain gauge and rosettes Introduction A strain gauge is a device which is used to measure strain (deformation) on an object subjected to forces. Strain can be measured using various types of devices classified

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Example Sheet 3 Solutions

Example Sheet 3 Solutions Example Sheet 3 Solutions. i Regular Sturm-Liouville. ii Singular Sturm-Liouville mixed boundary conditions. iii Not Sturm-Liouville ODE is not in Sturm-Liouville form. iv Regular Sturm-Liouville note

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Math221: HW# 1 solutions

Math221: HW# 1 solutions Math: HW# solutions Andy Royston October, 5 7.5.7, 3 rd Ed. We have a n = b n = a = fxdx = xdx =, x cos nxdx = x sin nx n sin nxdx n = cos nx n = n n, x sin nxdx = x cos nx n + cos nxdx n cos n = + sin

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Matrices and Determinants

Matrices and Determinants Matrices and Determinants SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Q 1. For what value of k do the following system of equations possess a non-trivial (i.e., not all zero) solution over the set of rationals Q? x + ky + 3z

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations

Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations 99 Section 8. Trigonometric Equations Objective 1: Solve Equations Involving One Trigonometric Function. In this section and the next, we will exple how to solving equations involving trigonometric functions.

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests

Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Side-Note: So far we have seen a few approaches for creating tests such as Neyman-Pearson Lemma ( most powerful tests of H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 :

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Reminders: linear functions

Reminders: linear functions Reminders: linear functions Let U and V be vector spaces over the same field F. Definition A function f : U V is linear if for every u 1, u 2 U, f (u 1 + u 2 ) = f (u 1 ) + f (u 2 ), and for every u U

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Problem Set 9 Solutions. θ + 1. θ 2 + cotθ ( ) sinθ e iφ is an eigenfunction of the ˆ L 2 operator. / θ 2. φ 2. sin 2 θ φ 2. ( ) = e iφ. = e iφ cosθ.

Problem Set 9 Solutions. θ + 1. θ 2 + cotθ ( ) sinθ e iφ is an eigenfunction of the ˆ L 2 operator. / θ 2. φ 2. sin 2 θ φ 2. ( ) = e iφ. = e iφ cosθ. Chemistry 362 Dr Jean M Standard Problem Set 9 Solutions The ˆ L 2 operator is defined as Verify that the angular wavefunction Y θ,φ) Also verify that the eigenvalue is given by 2! 2 & L ˆ 2! 2 2 θ 2 +

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES GLMA Linear Mathematics 00- Examination Solutions. (a) i. ( + 5i)( i) = (6 + 5) + (5 )i = + i. Real part is, imaginary part is. (b) ii. + 5i i ( + 5i)( + i) = ( i)( + i)

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013

Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013 Notes on Average Scattering imes and Hall Factors Jesse Maassen and Mar Lundstrom Purdue University November 5, 13 I. Introduction 1 II. Solution of the BE 1 III. Exercises: Woring out average scattering

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Math 6 SL Probability Distributions Practice Test Mark Scheme

Math 6 SL Probability Distributions Practice Test Mark Scheme Math 6 SL Probability Distributions Practice Test Mark Scheme. (a) Note: Award A for vertical line to right of mean, A for shading to right of their vertical line. AA N (b) evidence of recognizing symmetry

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Srednicki Chapter 55

Srednicki Chapter 55 Srednicki Chapter 55 QFT Problems & Solutions A. George August 3, 03 Srednicki 55.. Use equations 55.3-55.0 and A i, A j ] = Π i, Π j ] = 0 (at equal times) to verify equations 55.-55.3. This is our third

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions

C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions Paul Liu November 15, 2007 Note that these are sample solutions only; in many cases there were many acceptable answers. 1 Reynolds Problem 10.1 1.1 Normal-order

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Econ 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1

Econ 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8  questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1 Eon : Fall 8 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 Email questions or omments to Dan Fetter Problem. Let X be a salar with density f(x, θ) (θx + θ) [ x ] with θ. (a) Find the most powerful level α test

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2

Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 24, no. 5, 239-246 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/.2988/ija.24.422 Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 Ligong An and

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

( ) 2 and compare to M.

( ) 2 and compare to M. Problems and Solutions for Section 4.2 4.9 through 4.33) 4.9 Calculate the square root of the matrix 3!0 M!0 8 Hint: Let M / 2 a!b ; calculate M / 2!b c ) 2 and compare to M. Solution: Given: 3!0 M!0 8

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Exercises 10. Find a fundamental matrix of the given system of equations. Also find the fundamental matrix Φ(t) satisfying Φ(0) = I. 1.

Exercises 10. Find a fundamental matrix of the given system of equations. Also find the fundamental matrix Φ(t) satisfying Φ(0) = I. 1. Exercises 0 More exercises are available in Elementary Differential Equations. If you have a problem to solve any of them, feel free to come to office hour. Problem Find a fundamental matrix of the given

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Notes on the Open Economy

Notes on the Open Economy Notes on the Open Econom Ben J. Heijdra Universit of Groningen April 24 Introduction In this note we stud the two-countr model of Table.4 in more detail. restated here for convenience. The model is Table.4.

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Problem Set 3: Solutions

Problem Set 3: Solutions CMPSCI 69GG Applied Information Theory Fall 006 Problem Set 3: Solutions. [Cover and Thomas 7.] a Define the following notation, C I p xx; Y max X; Y C I p xx; Ỹ max I X; Ỹ We would like to show that C

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

MATH423 String Theory Solutions 4. = 0 τ = f(s). (1) dτ ds = dxµ dτ f (s) (2) dτ 2 [f (s)] 2 + dxµ. dτ f (s) (3)

MATH423 String Theory Solutions 4. = 0 τ = f(s). (1) dτ ds = dxµ dτ f (s) (2) dτ 2 [f (s)] 2 + dxµ. dτ f (s) (3) 1. MATH43 String Theory Solutions 4 x = 0 τ = fs). 1) = = f s) ) x = x [f s)] + f s) 3) equation of motion is x = 0 if an only if f s) = 0 i.e. fs) = As + B with A, B constants. i.e. allowe reparametrisations

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation

A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 67, 3301-3307 A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Equivalence Relation D. K. Basnet Dept. of Mathematics, Assam University Silchar-788011, Assam, India dkbasnet@rediffmail.com

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

THE ENERGY-MOMENTUM TENSOR IN CLASSICAL FIELD THEORY

THE ENERGY-MOMENTUM TENSOR IN CLASSICAL FIELD THEORY THE ENERGY-MOMENTUM TENSOR IN CLASSICAL FIELD THEORY Walter Wyss Department of Physics University of Colorado Boulder, CO 80309 (Received 14 July 2005) My friend, Asim Barut, was always interested in classical

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets

Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets S K Mala #1, Dr. MM Shanmugapriya *2 1 PhD Scholar in Mathematics, Karpagam University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu- 641021 Assistant Professor of Mathematics,

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem

12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem Tutorial 12: Radon-Nikodym Theorem 1 12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem In the following, (Ω, F) is an arbitrary measurable space. Definition 96 Let μ and ν be two (possibly complex) measures on (Ω, F). We say

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit

Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ting Zhang Stanford May 11, 2001 Stanford, 5/11/2001 1 Outline Ordinal Classification Ordinal Addition Ordinal Multiplication Ordinal

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Assalamu `alaikum wr. wb.

Assalamu `alaikum wr. wb. LUMP SUM Assalamu `alaikum wr. wb. LUMP SUM Wassalamu alaikum wr. wb. Assalamu `alaikum wr. wb. LUMP SUM Wassalamu alaikum wr. wb. LUMP SUM Lump sum lump sum lump sum. lump sum fixed price lump sum lump

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

The Simply Typed Lambda Calculus

The Simply Typed Lambda Calculus Type Inference Instead of writing type annotations, can we use an algorithm to infer what the type annotations should be? That depends on the type system. For simple type systems the answer is yes, and

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

forms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with

forms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with Week 03: C lassification of S econd- Order L inear Equations In last week s lectures we have illustrated how to obtain the general solutions of first order PDEs using the method of characteristics. We

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Section 9.2 Polar Equations and Graphs

Section 9.2 Polar Equations and Graphs 180 Section 9. Polar Equations and Graphs In this section, we will be graphing polar equations on a polar grid. In the first few examples, we will write the polar equation in rectangular form to help identify

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

k A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +

k A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R + Chapter 3. Fuzzy Arithmetic 3- Fuzzy arithmetic: ~Addition(+) and subtraction (-): Let A = [a and B = [b, b in R If x [a and y [b, b than x+y [a +b +b Symbolically,we write A(+)B = [a (+)[b, b = [a +b

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

b. Use the parametrization from (a) to compute the area of S a as S a ds. Be sure to substitute for ds!

b. Use the parametrization from (a) to compute the area of S a as S a ds. Be sure to substitute for ds! MTH U341 urface Integrals, tokes theorem, the divergence theorem To be turned in Wed., Dec. 1. 1. Let be the sphere of radius a, x 2 + y 2 + z 2 a 2. a. Use spherical coordinates (with ρ a) to parametrize.

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Homework 8 Model Solution Section

Homework 8 Model Solution Section MATH 004 Homework Solution Homework 8 Model Solution Section 14.5 14.6. 14.5. Use the Chain Rule to find dz where z cosx + 4y), x 5t 4, y 1 t. dz dx + dy y sinx + 4y)0t + 4) sinx + 4y) 1t ) 0t + 4t ) sinx

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

The challenges of non-stable predicates

The challenges of non-stable predicates The challenges of non-stable predicates Consider a non-stable predicate Φ encoding, say, a safety property. We want to determine whether Φ holds for our program. The challenges of non-stable predicates

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 19/5/2007

ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 19/5/2007 Οδηγίες: Να απαντηθούν όλες οι ερωτήσεις. Αν κάπου κάνετε κάποιες υποθέσεις να αναφερθούν στη σχετική ερώτηση. Όλα τα αρχεία που αναφέρονται στα προβλήματα βρίσκονται στον ίδιο φάκελο με το εκτελέσιμο

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

SCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018

SCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018 Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics(JRM) ISSN: 2395-028 SCITECH Volume 3, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION ublished online: March 29, 208 Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics www.scitecresearch.com/journals

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

(As on April 16, 2002 no changes since Dec 24.)

(As on April 16, 2002 no changes since Dec 24.) ~rprice/area51/documents/roswell.tex ROSWELL COORDINATES FOR TWO CENTERS As on April 16, 00 no changes since Dec 4. I. Definitions of coordinates We define the Roswell coordinates χ, Θ. A better name will

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Section 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas

Section 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas 09 Section 7. Double and Half Angle Fmulas To derive the double-angles fmulas, we will use the sum of two angles fmulas that we developed in the last section. We will let α θ and β θ: cos(θ) cos(θ + θ)

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II

8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II 8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II MIT OpenCourseWare Lecture Notes Hong Liu, Fall 200 Lecture 2 3: GENERAL ASPECTS OF QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS 3.: RENORMALIZED LAGRANGIAN Consider the Lagrangian

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Tutorial problem set 6,

Tutorial problem set 6, GENERAL RELATIVITY Tutorial problem set 6, 01.11.2013. SOLUTIONS PROBLEM 1 Killing vectors. a Show that the commutator of two Killing vectors is a Killing vector. Show that a linear combination with constant

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Relativistic particle dynamics and deformed symmetry

Relativistic particle dynamics and deformed symmetry Relativistic particle dynamics and deformed Poincare symmetry Department for Theoretical Physics, Ivan Franko Lviv National University XXXIII Max Born Symposium, Wroclaw Outline Lorentz-covariant deformed

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Forced Pendulum Numerical approach

Forced Pendulum Numerical approach Numerical approach UiO April 8, 2014 Physical problem and equation We have a pendulum of length l, with mass m. The pendulum is subject to gravitation as well as both a forcing and linear resistance force.

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Non-Abelian Gauge Fields

Non-Abelian Gauge Fields Chapter 5 Non-Abelian Gauge Fields The simplest example starts with two Fermions Dirac particles) ψ 1, ψ 2, degenerate in mass, and hence satisfying in the absence of interactions γ 1 i + m)ψ 1 = 0, γ

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics

Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics Nov 1, 01 In this lecture we examine root systems from an axiomatic point of view. 1 Reflections If v R n, then it determines a hyperplane, denoted P v, through the

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

General 2 2 PT -Symmetric Matrices and Jordan Blocks 1

General 2 2 PT -Symmetric Matrices and Jordan Blocks 1 General 2 2 PT -Symmetric Matrices and Jordan Blocks 1 Qing-hai Wang National University of Singapore Quantum Physics with Non-Hermitian Operators Max-Planck-Institut für Physik komplexer Systeme Dresden,

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II

Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II October 18, 2012 1 Review First let us recall the situation. Let g be a simple algebra, with maximal toral subalgebra h (which we are calling a CSA, or Cartan Subalgebra).

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Variational Wavefunction for the Helium Atom

Variational Wavefunction for the Helium Atom Technische Universität Graz Institut für Festkörperphysik Student project Variational Wavefunction for the Helium Atom Molecular and Solid State Physics 53. submitted on: 3. November 9 by: Markus Krammer

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Derivation of Optical-Bloch Equations

Derivation of Optical-Bloch Equations Appendix C Derivation of Optical-Bloch Equations In this appendix the optical-bloch equations that give the populations and coherences for an idealized three-level Λ system, Fig. 3. on page 47, will be

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS

CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS Shiah-Sen Wang The graphs are prepared by Chien-Lun Lai Based on : Precalculus: Mathematics for Calculus by J. Stuwart, L. Redin & S. Watson, 6th edition, 01, Brooks/Cole Chapter

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Finite Field Problems: Solutions

Finite Field Problems: Solutions Finite Field Problems: Solutions 1. Let f = x 2 +1 Z 11 [x] and let F = Z 11 [x]/(f), a field. Let Solution: F =11 2 = 121, so F = 121 1 = 120. The possible orders are the divisors of 120. Solution: The

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 7 Oct 2010

arxiv: v2 [hep-th] 7 Oct 2010 Generalized BRST transformation in Abelian rank-2 antisymmetric tensor field theory arxiv:1004.0330v2 [hep-th] 7 Oct 2010 Sudhaker Upadhyay and Bhabani Prasad Mandal Department of Physics, Banaras Hindu

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Solutions to Exercise Sheet 5

Solutions to Exercise Sheet 5 Solutions to Eercise Sheet 5 jacques@ucsd.edu. Let X and Y be random variables with joint pdf f(, y) = 3y( + y) where and y. Determine each of the following probabilities. Solutions. a. P (X ). b. P (X

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β

3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β 3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS Page Theorem cos(αβ cos α cos β -sin α cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α NOTE: cos(αβ cos α cos β cos(α-β cos α -cos β Proof of cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α Let s use a unit circle

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Tridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008

Tridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008 Tridiagonal matrices Gérard MEURANT October, 2008 1 Similarity 2 Cholesy factorizations 3 Eigenvalues 4 Inverse Similarity Let α 1 ω 1 β 1 α 2 ω 2 T =......... β 2 α 1 ω 1 β 1 α and β i ω i, i = 1,...,

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. ------------------ ----------------------------- -----------------

Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. ------------------ ----------------------------- ----------------- Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. 1. Sin ( ) = a) b) c) d) Ans b. Solution : Method 1. Ans a: 17 > 1 a) is rejected. w.k.t Sin ( sin ) = d is rejected. If sin

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes

6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes 122 CHAPTER 6. ARMA MODELS 6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes The purpose of forecasting is to predict future values of a TS based on the data collected to the present. In this section we will discuss a linear

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

PARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities

PARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities PARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities tanθ = sinθ cosθ cotθ = cosθ sinθ BASIC IDENTITIES cscθ = 1 sinθ secθ = 1 cosθ cotθ = 1 tanθ PYTHAGOREAN IDENTITIES sin θ + cos θ =1 tan θ +1= sec θ 1 + cot

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Physics 582, Problem Set 2 Solutions

Physics 582, Problem Set 2 Solutions Physics 582, Problem Set 2 Solutions TAs: Hart Goldman and Ramanjit Sohal Fall 2018 Symmetries and Conservation Laws In this problem set we return to a study of scalar electrodynamics which has the Lagrangian

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Lecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic

Lecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic Lecture 2 Soundness and completeness of propositional logic February 9, 2004 1 Overview Review of natural deduction. Soundness and completeness. Semantics of propositional formulas. Soundness proof. Completeness

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

DIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANSFORMATION SEMIGROUPS

DIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANSFORMATION SEMIGROUPS GANIT J. Bangladesh Math. oc. IN 606-694) 0) -7 DIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANFORMATION EMIGROUP ubrata Majumdar, * Kalyan Kumar Dey and Mohd. Altab Hossain Department of Mathematics University

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation

D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation MATH 467 Partial Differential Equations J. Robert Buchanan Department of Mathematics Fall 2018 Objectives In this lesson we will learn: a change of variable technique

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Potential Dividers. 46 minutes. 46 marks. Page 1 of 11

Potential Dividers. 46 minutes. 46 marks. Page 1 of 11 Potential Dividers 46 minutes 46 marks Page 1 of 11 Q1. In the circuit shown in the figure below, the battery, of negligible internal resistance, has an emf of 30 V. The pd across the lamp is 6.0 V and

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Physical DB Design. B-Trees Index files can become quite large for large main files Indices on index files are possible.

Physical DB Design. B-Trees Index files can become quite large for large main files Indices on index files are possible. B-Trees Index files can become quite large for large main files Indices on index files are possible 3 rd -level index 2 nd -level index 1 st -level index Main file 1 The 1 st -level index consists of pairs

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

ω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω

ω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ω ω + 1 ω + 2 ω + 3 ω + 4 ω2 ω2 + 1 ω2 + 2 ω2 + 3 ω3 ω3 + 1 ω3 + 2 ω4 ω4 + 1 ω5 ω 2 ω 2 + 1 ω 2 + 2 ω 2 + ω ω 2 + ω + 1 ω 2 + ω2 ω 2 2 ω 2 2 + 1 ω 2 2 + ω ω 2 3 ω 3 ω 3 + 1 ω 3 + ω ω 3 +

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

ψ ( 1,2,...N ) = Aϕ ˆ σ j σ i χ j ψ ( 1,2,!N ) ψ ( 1,2,!N ) = 1 General Equations

ψ ( 1,2,...N ) = Aϕ ˆ σ j σ i χ j ψ ( 1,2,!N ) ψ ( 1,2,!N ) = 1 General Equations General Equations Our goal is to construct the best single determinant wave function for a system of electrons. By best we mean the determinant having the lowest energy. We write our trial function as

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume

On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume BULETINUL ACADEMIEI DE ŞTIINŢE A REPUBLICII MOLDOVA. MATEMATICA Numbers 2(72) 3(73), 2013, Pages 80 89 ISSN 1024 7696 On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume I.S.Gutsul Abstract. In

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?

ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =? Teko Classes IITJEE/AIEEE Maths by SUHAAG SIR, Bhopal, Ph (0755) 3 00 000 www.tekoclasses.com ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION # Question Type A.Single Correct Type Q. (A) Sol least

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Démographie spatiale/spatial Demography

Démographie spatiale/spatial Demography ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΙΑΣ Démographie spatiale/spatial Demography Session 1: Introduction to spatial demography Basic concepts Michail Agorastakis Department of Planning & Regional Development Άδειες Χρήσης

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Non-commutative Gauge Theories and Seiberg Witten Map to All Orders 1

Non-commutative Gauge Theories and Seiberg Witten Map to All Orders 1 Non-commutative Gauge Theories and Seiberg Witten Map to All Orders 1 Kayhan ÜLKER Feza Gürsey Institute * Istanbul, Turkey (savefezagursey.wordpress.com) The SEENET-MTP Workshop JW2011 1 K. Ulker, B Yapiskan

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

( y) Partial Differential Equations

( y) Partial Differential Equations Partial Dierential Equations Linear P.D.Es. contains no owers roducts o the deendent variables / an o its derivatives can occasionall be solved. Consider eamle ( ) a (sometimes written as a ) we can integrate

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Μηχανική Μάθηση Hypothesis Testing

Μηχανική Μάθηση Hypothesis Testing ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΚΡΗΤΗΣ Μηχανική Μάθηση Hypothesis Testing Γιώργος Μπορμπουδάκης Τμήμα Επιστήμης Υπολογιστών Procedure 1. Form the null (H 0 ) and alternative (H 1 ) hypothesis 2. Consider

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Second Order RLC Filters

Second Order RLC Filters ECEN 60 Circuits/Electronics Spring 007-0-07 P. Mathys Second Order RLC Filters RLC Lowpass Filter A passive RLC lowpass filter (LPF) circuit is shown in the following schematic. R L C v O (t) Using phasor

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in

Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in : tail in X, head in A nowhere-zero Γ-flow is a Γ-circulation such that

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Mean bond enthalpy Standard enthalpy of formation Bond N H N N N N H O O O

Mean bond enthalpy Standard enthalpy of formation Bond N H N N N N H O O O Q1. (a) Explain the meaning of the terms mean bond enthalpy and standard enthalpy of formation. Mean bond enthalpy... Standard enthalpy of formation... (5) (b) Some mean bond enthalpies are given below.

Διαβάστε περισσότερα