arxiv: v1 [math.ca] 16 Jul 2016

Σχετικά έγγραφα
SCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018

2 Composition. Invertible Mappings

Homomorphism in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Automata

Coefficient Inequalities for a New Subclass of K-uniformly Convex Functions

The k-α-exponential Function

A summation formula ramified with hypergeometric function and involving recurrence relation

PROPERTIES OF CERTAIN INTEGRAL OPERATORS. a n z n (1.1)

Fourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics

Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor

Math221: HW# 1 solutions

A General Note on δ-quasi Monotone and Increasing Sequence

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set

Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2

SOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM

Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets

Matrices and Determinants

Solutions to Exercise Sheet 5

3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β

Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations

Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests

The k-bessel Function of the First Kind

Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit

Homework 8 Model Solution Section

MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests

C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions

ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II

On the k-bessel Functions

Example Sheet 3 Solutions

Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in

Palestine Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2(1) (2013), Palestine Polytechnic University-PPU 2013

Practice Exam 2. Conceptual Questions. 1. State a Basic identity and then verify it. (a) Identity: Solution: One identity is csc(θ) = 1

Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)

EE512: Error Control Coding

HOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:

n=2 In the present paper, we introduce and investigate the following two more generalized

Partial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)

Generalized fractional calculus of the multiindex Bessel function

derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates

SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS

CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS

Subclass of Univalent Functions with Negative Coefficients and Starlike with Respect to Symmetric and Conjugate Points

Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs

Srednicki Chapter 55

A Two-Sided Laplace Inversion Algorithm with Computable Error Bounds and Its Applications in Financial Engineering

Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.

STRONG DIFFERENTIAL SUBORDINATIONS FOR HIGHER-ORDER DERIVATIVES OF MULTIVALENT ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY LINEAR OPERATOR

The k-fractional Hilfer Derivative

Reminders: linear functions

A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation

ON NEGATIVE MOMENTS OF CERTAIN DISCRETE DISTRIBUTIONS

DIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANSFORMATION SEMIGROUPS

Fractional Calculus of a Class of Univalent Functions With Negative Coefficients Defined By Hadamard Product With Rafid -Operator

SOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM

k A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +

Problem Set 3: Solutions

Section 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas

Generating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations

On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume

Some new generalized topologies via hereditary classes. Key Words:hereditary generalized topological space, A κ(h,µ)-sets, κµ -topology.

POSITIVE SOLUTIONS FOR A FUNCTIONAL DELAY SECOND-ORDER THREE-POINT BOUNDARY-VALUE PROBLEM

SPECIAL FUNCTIONS and POLYNOMIALS

2. THEORY OF EQUATIONS. PREVIOUS EAMCET Bits.

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

GÖKHAN ÇUVALCIOĞLU, KRASSIMIR T. ATANASSOV, AND SINEM TARSUSLU(YILMAZ)

Homomorphism and Cartesian Product on Fuzzy Translation and Fuzzy Multiplication of PS-algebras

Solution Series 9. i=1 x i and i=1 x i.

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

1. Introduction and Preliminaries.

Homework 3 Solutions

The Negative Neumann Eigenvalues of Second Order Differential Equation with Two Turning Points

Integrals in cylindrical, spherical coordinates (Sect. 15.7)

Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations

Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016

Quadratic Expressions

The semiclassical Garding inequality

EXISTENCE OF POSITIVE SOLUTIONS FOR SINGULAR FRACTIONAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS

On Generating Relations of Some Triple. Hypergeometric Functions

Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II

Takeaki Yamazaki (Toyo Univ.) 山崎丈明 ( 東洋大学 ) Oct. 24, RIMS

CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS

Cyclic or elementary abelian Covers of K 4

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings

Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of a non-local boundary value problem of Sturm Liouville differential equation

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

On a Subclass of k-uniformly Convex Functions with Negative Coefficients

2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)

ON INTEGRAL MEANS FOR FRACTIONAL CALCULUS OPERATORS OF MULTIVALENT FUNCTIONS. S. Sümer Eker 1, H. Özlem Güney 2, Shigeyoshi Owa 3

Boundedness of Some Pseudodifferential Operators on Bessel-Sobolev Space 1

Second Order Partial Differential Equations

: Monte Carlo EM 313, Louis (1982) EM, EM Newton-Raphson, /. EM, 2 Monte Carlo EM Newton-Raphson, Monte Carlo EM, Monte Carlo EM, /. 3, Monte Carlo EM

The k-mittag-leffler Function

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions

Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 4(2), 2011, pp

Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude

b. Use the parametrization from (a) to compute the area of S a as S a ds. Be sure to substitute for ds!

On the Galois Group of Linear Difference-Differential Equations

Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013

Appendix to On the stability of a compressible axisymmetric rotating flow in a pipe. By Z. Rusak & J. H. Lee

Transcript:

On Chebyshev type Inequalities using Generalized k-fractional Integral Operator arxiv:1607.04727v1 math.ca 16 Jul 2016 V aijanath L.Chinchane Department of Mathematics, Deogiri Institute of Engineering and Management Studies Aurangabad-431005, INDIA chinchane85@gmail.com Abstract In this paper, using generalized k-fractional integral operator (in terms of the Gauss hypergeometric function), we establish new results on generalized k-fractional integral inequalities by considering the extended Chebyshev functional in case of synchronous function and some other inequalities. Keywords : Chebyshev inequality, generalized k-fractional integral. Mathematics Subject Classification : 26D10, 26A33. 1 Introduction In recent years, many authors have worked on fractional integral inequalities by using different fractional integral operator such as Riemann-Liouville, Hadamard, SaigoandErdelyi-Kober, see1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,11,13,15. In 12 S. Kilinc and H. Yildirim establish new generalized k-fractional integral inequalities involving Gauss hypergeometric function related to Chebyshev functional. In 5, 10 authors gave the following fractional integral inequalities, using the Hadamard and Riemann-Liouville fractional integral for extended Chebyshev functional. Theorem 1.1 Let f and g be two synchronous function on 0,, and r,p,q : 0, ) 0, ). Then for all t > 0, α > 0, we have 2 H D1,t α r(t) HD1,t α p(t) HD1,t α (qfg)(t)+ H D1,t α q(t) HD1,t α (pfg)(t) + 2 H D1,t α p(t) HD1,t α q(t) HD1,t α (rfg)(t) HD α 1,t r(t) HD α 1,t (pf)(t) H D α 1,t (qg)(t)+ H D α 1,t (qf)(t) H D α 1,t (pg)(t) + HD1,t α p(t) HD1,t α (rf)(t) HD1,t α (qg)(t)+ H D1,t α (qf)(t) HD1,t α (rg)(t) + HD1,t α q(t) HD1,t α (rf)(t) H D1,t α (pg)(t)+ H D1,t α (pf)(t) H D1,t α (rg)(t) (1.1) 1

Theorem 1.2 Let f and g be two synchronous function on 0,, and r,p,q : 0, ) 0, ). Then for all t > 0, α > 0, we have: HD1,t α r(t) HD1,t α q(t) H D1,t(pfg)(t)+2 β H D1,t α p(t) H D1,t(qfg)(t)+ β H D1,tq(t) β H D1,t α (pf g)(t) + HD1,t α p(t) HD β 1,t q(t)+ H D β 1,t p(t) HD1,t α q(t) D1,t α (rfg)(t) H HD1,t α r(t) HD1,t α (pf)(t) HD1,t(qg)(t)+ β H D1,t(qf)(t) β H D1,t + α (pg)(t) HD α 1,t p(t) HD α 1,t (rf)(t) HD β 1,t (qg)(t)+ H D β 1,t (qf)(t) HD α 1,t (rg)(t) + HD α 1,t q(t) HD α 1,t (rf)(t) HD β 1,t(pg)(t)+ H D β 1,t(pf)(t) H D α 1,t (rg)(t). (1.2) The main objective of this paper is to establish some Chebyshev type inequalities and some other inequalities using generalized k-fractional integral operator. The paper has been organized as follows. In Section 2, we define basic definitions related to generalized k-fractional integral operator. In section 3, we obtain Chebyshev type inequalities using generalized k-fractional. In Section 4, we prove some inequalities for positive continuous functions. 2 Preliminaries In this section, we present some definitions which will be used later discussion. Definition 2.1 Two function f and g are said to synchronous (asynchronous) on a,b, if ((f(u) f(v))(g(u) g(v))) ( )0, (2.1) for all u,v 0, ). Definition 2.2 12, 15 The function f(x), for all x > 0 is said to be in the L p,k 0, ), if { ( } )1 L p,k 0, ) = f : f Lp,k 0, ) = f(x) p x k p dx < 1 p < k 0, 0 (2.2) 2

Definition 2.3 12, 14, 15 Let f L 1,k 0, ),. The generalized Riemann- Liouville fractional integral I α,k f(x) of order α,k 0 is defined by I α,k f(x) = (k +1)1 α Γ(α) x 0 (x k+1 t k+1 ) α 1 t k f(t)dt. (2.3) Definition 2.4 12, 15 Let k 0,α > 0µ > 1 and β,η R. The generalized k-fractional integral (in terms of the Gauss hypergeometric function)of order α for real-valued continuous function f(t) is defined by f(t) = (k +1)µ+β+1 t (k+1)( α β 2µ) Γ(α) t 2F 1 (α+β +µ, η;α;1 ( τ t )k+1 )τ k f(τ)dτ. n=0 0 τ (k+1)µ (t k+1 τ k+1 ) α 1 (2.4) where, the function 2 F 1 ( ) in the right-hand side of (2.4) is the Gaussian hypergeometric function defined by (a) n (b) n t n 2F 1 (a,b;c;t) = (c) n n!, (2.5) and (a) n is the Pochhammer symbol (a) n = a(a+1)...(a+n 1) = Γ(a+n), (a) 0 = 1. Γ(a) Consider the function F(t,τ) = (k +1)µ+β+1 t (k+1)( α β 2µ) τ (k+1)µ Γ(α) (t k+1 τ k+1 ) α 1 2 F 1 (α+β +µ, η;α;1 ( τ t )k+1 ) (α+β +µ) n ( n) n = t (k+1)( α β 2µ η) τ (k+1)µ (t k+1 τ k+1 ) α 1+n (k +1) µ+β+1 Γ(α+n)n! n=0 = τ(k+1)µ (t k+1 τ k+1 ) α 1 (k +1) µ+β+1 + t k+1 (α+β +2µ)Γ(α) τ (k+1)µ (t k+1 τ k+1 ) α (k +1) µ+β+1 (α+β +µ)( n) + t k+1 (α+β +2µ+1)Γ(α+1) τ (k+1)µ (t k+1 τ k+1 ) α+1 (k +1) µ+β+1 (α+β +µ)(α+β +µ+1)( n)( n+1) +... t k+1 (α+β +2µ+1)Γ(α+2)2! (2.6) It is clear that F(t,τ) is positive because for all τ (0,t), (t > 0) since each term of the (2.6) is positive. 3

3 Fractional Integral Inequalities for Extended Chebyshev Functional In this section, we establish some Chebyshev type fractional integral inequalities by using the generalized k-fractional integral (in terms of the Gauss hypergeometric function) operator. The following lemma is used for the our main result. Lemma 3.1 Let f and g be two synchronous function on 0,, and x,y : 0, ) 0, ) be two nonnegative functions. Then for all k 0, t > 0, α > max{0, β µ}, β < 1, µ > 1, β 1 < η < 0, we have, x(t) (yfg)(t)+ (yg)(t)+ y(t) (xf g)(t) (yf)(t) (xg)(t). (3.1) Proof: Since f and g are synchronous on 0, for all τ 0, ρ 0, we have (f(τ) f(ρ))(g(τ) g(ρ)) 0. (3.2) From (3.2), f(τ)g(τ)+f(ρ)g(ρ) f(τ)g(ρ)+f(ρ)g(τ). (3.3) Now, multiplying both side of (3.3) by τ k x(τ)f(t,τ), τ (0,t), t > 0. Then the integrating resulting identity with respect to τ from 0 to t, we obtain by definition (2.4) (xfg)(t)+f(ρ)g(ρ) (x)(t) (yg)(t) +f(ρ) (xg)(t). (3.4) Now, multiplying both side of (3.4) by ρ k y(ρ)f(t,ρ), ρ (0,t), t > 0, where F(t,ρ) defined in view of (2.6). Then the integrating resulting identity with respect to ρ from 0 to t, we obtain by definition (2.4) y(t) g(ρ) (xfg)(t)+ (yfg)(t) (x)(t) (yf)(t) (xg)(t). + (3.5) This complete the proof of (3.1) Now, we gave our main result here. Theorem 3.2 Let f and g be two synchronous function on 0,, and r,p,q : 0, ) 0, ). Then for all k 0, t > 0, α > max{0, β µ}, 4

β < 1, µ > 1, β 1 < η < 0, we have, 2 r(t) p(t) (qfg)(t)+ q(t) (pf g)(t) + 2 p(t) r(t) p(t) q(t) q(t) (pf)(t) (qg)(t)+ (qf)(t) (pg)(t) + (rf)(t) (qg)(t)+ (qf)(t) (rg)(t) + (rf)(t) (pg)(t)+ (pf)(t) (rg)(t) (3.6) Proof: To prove above theorem, putting x = p, y = q, and using lemma 3.1, we get p(t) (pf)(t) (qfg)(t)+ Now, multiplying both side by (3.7) r(t) r(t) p(t) (pf)(t) q(t) (pf g)(t) (qg)(t)+ (qf)(t) (pg)(t). r(t), we have putting x = r,y = q, and using lemma 3.1, we get r(t) (rf)(t) (pf g)(t) (qfg)(t)+ q(t) (qg)(t)+ (qf)(t) (pg)(t), (qfg)(t)+ multiplying both side by (3.9) p(t) p(t) r(t) q(t) (qg)(t)+ (qf)(t) (rg)(t), p(t), we have q(t) (rf g)(t) (qfg)(t)+ (rf)(t) (qg)(t)+ (qf)(t) (rg)(t). (3.7) (3.8) (3.9) (3.10) With the same arguments as before, we can write q(t) r(t) (pfg)(t)+ p(t) q(t) (rf)(t) (pg)(t)+ (pf)(t) (rg)(t). (3.11) 5

Adding the inequalities (3.8), (3.10) and (3.11), we get required inequality (3.6). Here, we give the lemma which is useful to prove our second main result. Lemma 3.3 Let f and g be two synchronous function on 0,. and x,y : 0, 0,. Then for all k 0, t > 0, α > max{0, β µ},γ > max{0, δ υ} β,δ < 1, υ,µ > 1, β 1 < η < 0, δ 1 < ζ < 0, we have, x(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ I γ,δ,ζ,υ (yfg)(t)+i γ,δ,ζ,υ (yg)(t)+i γ,δ,ζ,υ Proof: Now multiplying both side of (3.4) by y(t) (xf g)(t) (yf)(t) (xg)(t). (3.12) (k +1) υ+δ+1 t (k+1)( δ γ 2υ) ρ (k+1)υ y(ρ) (t k+1 ρ k+1 ) γ 1 2 F 1 (γ +δ +υ, ζ;γ;1 ( ρ (3.13) t )k+1 )ρ k which remains positive in view of the condition stated in (3.12), ρ (0,t), t > 0, we obtain (k +1) υ+δ+1 t (k+1)( δ γ 2υ) ρ (k+1)υ y(ρ) (t k+1 ρ k+1 ) γ 1 2 F 1 (γ +δ +υ, ζ;γ;1 ( ρ t )k+1 )ρ k (xf g)(t) + (k +1)υ+δ+1 t (k+1)( δ γ 2υ) ρ (k+1)υ y(ρ)f(ρ)g(ρ) (t k+1 ρ k+1 ) γ 1 2 F 1 (γ +δ +υ, ζ;γ;1 ( ρ t )k+1 )ρ k x(t) (k +1) υ+δ+1 t (k+1)( δ γ 2υ) ρ (k+1)υ y(ρ)g(ρ) (t k+1 ρ k+1 ) γ 1 2 F 1 (γ +δ +υ, ζ;γ;1 ( ρ t )k+1 )ρ k + (k +1)υ+δ+1 t (k+1)( δ γ 2υ) ρ (k+1)υ y(ρ)f(ρ) (t k+1 ρ k+1 ) γ 1 2 F 1 (γ +δ +υ, ζ;γ;1 ( ρ t )k+1 )ρ k (xg)(t), (3.14) then integrating (3.14) over (0,t), we obtain (xfg)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ I γ,δ,ζ,υ this ends the proof of inequality (3.12). y(t)+ (x)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ yg(t)+ 6 (yf g)(t) (xg)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ yf(t), (3.15)

Theorem 3.4 Let f and g be two synchronous function on 0,, and r,p,q : 0, ) 0, ). Then for all t > 0, α > 0, we have: r(t) q(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ + r(t) p(t) q(t) p(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (pfg)(t)+2 q(t)+i γ,δ,ζ,υ (pf)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (rf)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (rf)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ p(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ p(t) q(t) (pg)(t)+i γ,δ,ζ,υ (qfg)(t)+i γ,δ,ζ,υ (qf)(t) (qf)(t) q(t) (pf g)(t) (pg)(t) + (rg)(t) +. (pf)(t) (rg)(t) (3.16) Proof: To prove above theorem, putting x = p, y = q, and using lemma 3.3 we get p(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (pf)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (qfg)(t)+i γ,δ,ζ,υ q(t) (pf g)(t) (qf)(t) (pg)(t). Now, multiplying both side by (3.17) r(t), we have r(t) p(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (qfg)(t)+i γ,δ,ζ,υ r(t) (pf)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ putting x = r, y = q, and using lemma 3.3, we get r(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (rf)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (qfg)(t)+i γ,δ,ζ,υ q(t) (pf g)(t) (3.17), (qf)(t) (pg)(t) q(t) multiplying both side by (3.19) p(t), we have p(t) r(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (qfg)(t)+i γ,δ,ζ,υ p(t) (rf)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ qf)(t) (rg)(t), q(t) (qf)(t) (rg)(t) With the same argument as before, we obtain q(t) r(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (pfg)(t)+i γ,δ,ζ,υ p(t) q(t) (rf)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (pg)(t)+(pf)(t) (rg)(t). 7 (3.18) (3.19). (3.20) (3.21)

Adding the inequalities (3.18), (3.20) and (3.21), we follows the inequality (3.16). Remark 3.1 If f,g,r,p and q satisfies the following condition, 1. The function f and g is asynchronous on 0, ). 2. The function r,p,q are negative on 0, ). 3. Two of the function r,p,q are positive and the third is negativeon 0, ). then the inequality 3.6 and 3.16 are reversed. 4 Other fractional integral inequalities In this section, we proved some fractional integral inequalities for positive and continuous functions which as follows: Theorem 4.1 Suppose that f, g and h be three positive and continuous functions on 0,, such that (f(τ) f(ρ))(g(τ) g(τ))(h(τ)+h(ρ)) 0; τ,ρ (0,t) t > 0, (4.1) and x be a nonnegative function on 0, ). Then for all k 0, t > 0, α > max{0, β µ},γ > max{0, δ υ} β,δ < 1, υ,µ > 1, β 1 < η < 0, δ 1 < ζ < 0, we have, + + (x)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (xfg)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (xfgh)(t)+ I γ,δ,ζ,υ (xgh)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (xh)(t)+ (xgh)(t)+ + (xh)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (xf g)(t) (xfgh)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (x)(t) (xg)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (xf h)(t) (xfh)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (xg)(t). (4.2) Proof: Since f, g and h be three positive and continuous functions on 0, by (4.1), we can write f(τ)g(τ)h(τ)+f(ρ)g(ρ)h(ρ)+f(τ)g(τ)h(ρ)+f(ρ)g(ρ)h(τ) f(τ)g(ρ)h(τ)+f(τ)g(ρ)h(ρ)+f(ρ)g(τ)h(τ)+f(ρ)g(τ)h(ρ). (4.3) Now, multiplying both side of (4.3) by τ k x(τ)f(t,τ), τ (0,t), t > 0. Then the integrating resulting identity with respect to τ from 0 to t, we obtain by 8

definition (2.4) +f(ρ)g(ρ) (xfgh)(t)+f(ρ)g(ρ)h(ρ) (xh)(t) g(ρ) +f(ρ) (xgh)(t)+f(ρ)h(ρ) (xg)(t). Now multiplying both side of (4.4) by x(t)+g(τ)h(ρ) (xfh)(t)+g(ρ)h(ρ) (4.4) (k +1) υ+δ+1 t (k+1)( δ γ 2υ) ρ (k+1)υ x(ρ) (t k+1 ρ k+1 ) γ 1 2 F 1 (γ +δ +υ, ζ;γ;1 ( ρ (4.5) t )k+1 )ρ k which remains positive in view of the condition stated in (4.2), ρ (0,t), t > 0 and integrating resulting identity with respective ρ from 0 to t, we obtain +I γ,δ,ζ,υ I γ,δ,ζ,υ +I γ,δ,ζ,υ (xfgh)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (xh)(t) xg(t) x(t)+i γ,δ,ζ,υ (xgf)(t)+i γ,δ,ζ,υ (xfh)(t)+i γ,δ,ζ,υ (xgh)(t)+i γ,δ,ζ,υ (xfgh)(t) x(t) (xfg)(t) (xh)(t) (xgh)(t) (xfh)(t) (xg)(t). (4.6) which implies the proof inequality 4.2. Here, we give another inequality which is as follows. Theorem 4.2 Let f, g and h be three positive and continuous functions on 0,, which satisfying the condition (4.1) and x and y be two nonnegative functions on 0, ). Then for all k 0, t > 0, α > max{0, β µ},γ > max{0, δ υ} β,δ < 1, υ,µ > 1, β 1 < η < 0, δ 1 < ζ < 0, we have, + + (x)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (xfg)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ I γ,δ,ζ,υ (xgh)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (yfgh)(t)+ (yh)(t)+ (ygh)(t)+ (yf)(t)+ (xh)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (yf g)(t) (xfgh)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ y(t) (xg)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (yf h)(t) (xfh)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (yg)(t). (4.7) Proof: Multiplying both side of (4.3) by τ k x(τ)f(t,τ), τ (0,t), t > 0, where F(t, τ) defined by (2.6). Then the integrating resulting identity with 9

respect to τ from 0 to t, we obtain by definition (2.4) (xfgh)(t)+f(ρ)g(ρ)h(ρ) +f(ρ)g(ρ) +f(ρ) x(t)+g(τ)h(ρ) (xh)(t) g(ρ) (xfh)(t)+g(ρ)h(ρ) (xgh)(t)+f(ρ)h(ρ) (xg)(t). Now multiplying both side of (4.8) by (4.8) (k +1) υ+δ+1 t (k+1)( δ γ 2υ) ρ (k+1)υ y(ρ) (t k+1 ρ k+1 ) γ 1 2 F 1 (γ +δ +υ, ζ;γ;1 ( ρ (4.9) t )k+1 )ρ k which remains positive in view of the condition stated in (4.7), ρ (0,t), t > 0 and integrating resulting identity with respective ρ from 0 to t, we obtain +I γ,δ,ζ,υ I γ,δ,ζ,υ +I γ,δ,ζ,υ (xfgh)(t)i γ,δ,ζ,υ (yh)(t) (yg)(t) (yf)(t) y(t)+i γ,δ,ζ,υ (xgf)(t)+i γ,δ,ζ,υ (yfgh)(t) x(t) (yfg)(t) (xh)(t) (xfh)(t)+i γ,δ,ζ,υ (xgh)(t)+i γ,δ,ζ,υ which implies the proof inequality 4.7. References (ygh)(t) (yfh)(t) (xg)(t). (4.10) 1 G. A. Anastassiou, Fractional Differentiation Inequalities, Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, New York, NY, 2009. 2 D.Baleanu, J.A.T.Machado and C.J.Luo, Fractional Dynamic and Control, Springer, 2012, pp.159-171. 3 S. Belarbi and Z. Dahmani, On some new fractional integral inequality, J. Inequal. Pure and Appl. Math., 10(3)(2009), Art.86, 5 pp. 4 V. L. Chinchane and D. B. Pachpatte, A note on some integral inequalities via Hadamard integral, J. Fractional Calculus Appl. 4(11)(2013), 1-5. 5 V. L. Chinchane and D. B. Pachpatte, On some integral inequalities using Hadamard fractional integral, Malaya J. Math. 1(1)(2012), 62-66. 10

6 V.L. Chinchane and D. B. Pachpatte, Some new integral inequalities using Hadamard fractional integral operator, Adv. Inequal. Appl. 2014, 2014:12. 7 V.L. Chinchane and D. B. Pachpatte, New fractional inequalities via Hadamard fractional integral, Internat. J. Functional Analyisis, Operator Theory and Application, 5, 3(2013), 165-176. 8 V.L. Chinchane and D. B. Pachpatte, On some new Grüss-type inequality using Hadamard fractional integral operator, J. Fractional Calculus Appl. Vol. 5(3S) No. 12, pp. 1-10. 9 Z. Dahmani, The Riemann-Liouville operator to genarate some new inequalities, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. volume 12(2011), No.4, pp.452-455. 10 Z. Dahmani, Some results associate with fractional integrals involving the extended Chebyshev, Acta Univ. Apulensis Math. Inform. 27(2011), pp.217-224. 11 S.L.Kalla and A. Rao, On Grüss type inequality for hypergeometric fractional integrals, Matematiche (Catania) 66(1)(2011), 57-64. Amersterdam, 2006. 12 S.Kilinc and H.Yildirim, Generalized fractional integral inequalities involving Hypergeometic operators, International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 101(1), 2015, 71-82. 13 S. D. Purohit and R. K. Raina, Chebyshev type inequalities for the Saigo fractional integral and their q- analogues, J. Math. Inequal., 7(2),(2013), 239-249. 14 S.G.Somko, A.A.Kilbas and O.I.Marichev, Fractional Integral and Derivative Theory and Application, Gordon and Breach, Yverdon, Switzerland, 1993. 15 H. Yildirim and Z. Kirtay, Ostrowski inequality for generalized fractional integral and related equalities,malaya J. Mat. 2(3), (2014), 322-329. 11