400 Vol., No., pp., * * R.... * * Email : matsutoeng.hokudai.ac.jp Zeiss
401 Petts Becker Petts Petts Opaluch Joos. I L T M P TMP MP IM A IP B LM C TMP LM D LM B LM E * LP F * km TMP C TP E * TP G *
402... IM IP km LM.. LM TMP km LM km km LM : LM : LP.. TMP TP m TP. LM TMP IM
403 LM TMP /. IM IP LM TMP LM LM LM LP TP TP LM TMP TMP LM. IM / IM Zeiss
404 IM. IP / IM IM IP LM LM LM TMP TP TP
405 LM / LM / LM / TMP / TP / m TP /.
406 IM LM TMP TP LM TMP TP IP IM IP IP LM TMP TP TP IM IP LM LM LM LM TP IM IP TP TP LM LM IM LM IM IP LM TP TP TP IP IM TP IM TP IM LM IP TP IM LM TMP LM TP TP TP IM LM TP IP TP IM LM TP TP
407 IP. LM / LM / LM / LM / / A A B TMP LM LM LM LM LP
408 LP / TMP /. A, A A B LM, LM LM, LM, LM LP LM Zeiss. LP LM
409 LP B. Rahardyan, T. Matsuto, Y. Kakuta and N. Tanaka : Resident s Concerns and Attitudes towards Solid Waste Management Facilities, Waste Management, Vol., pp. pp. C. Zeiss and J. Atwater : Waste Disposal Facilities and Community Response : Tracing Pathways from Facility Impacts to Community Attitude, Can. J. Civ. Eng., Vol., pp. J. Petts and G. Eduljee : Environmental Impact Assessment for Waste Treatment and Disposal Facilities, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, U. K. H. Becker : A Social Impact Assessment, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol., No., pp. J. Petts: Effective Waste Management: Understanding and Dealing with Public Concerns, Waste Management & Research, Vol., No., pp. M. L. Lima : Individual and Social Determinants of Attitudes towards the Construction of Waste Incinerator : Two Case Studies, The Annual Meeting of the Society for Risk Analysis Europe, The Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey J. J. Opaluch, S. K. Swallow, T. Weaver, C. W. Wessels and D. Wichlens : Evaluation Impacts from Noxious Facilities : Including Public Preferences in Current Siting Mechanisms, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management Vol., pp. W. Joos, V. Carabias, H. Winistoerfer and A. Stuecheli : Social Aspects of Public Waste Management in Switzerland, Waste Management, Vol., No., pp. Analysis of Determining Factors regarding Opposition by Host Community for Solid Waste Management Facilities from Hearing Survey Toshihiko Matsuto* and Yuka Fujimoto * * Laboratory of Solid Waste Disposal Engineering, Hokkaido University * Laboratory of Solid Waste Disposal Engineering, Hokkaido University TOSTEM Corporation Correspondence should be addressed to Toshihiko Matsuto : Laboratory of Solid Waste Disposal Engineering, Hokkaido University Kita Nishi, Kitaku, Sapporo Japan Abstract Hearing surveys were conducted in order to determine the reasons behind hostcommunity opposition to the construction of solid waste management SWM facilities. The ten SWM facilities surveyed include incinerators, landfill, and shreddingseparation facilities for municipal and industrial solid waste. Four to six residents living in proximity to the facility were selected at each location, and asked to talk freely about the facility and what they thought of it. It was concluded that the reasons for opposition can be categorized into two groups physical and nonphysical impacts and a lack of trust in the operators, planners, and overall decision making process. The two categories were specific to all the facilities surveyed, regardless of the type of facility or the type of solid waste it handles. Acceptance by the locals suggested that at least one of the two should be positive. Nevertheless, in cases where construction of a facility was accepted, it was suggested that credibility and reliability of operators is far more critical in reducing opposition and building good relations with the surrounding residents. Key words : solid waste management facility, resident, opposition to construction, hearing survey