22 Vol.22 No. 2005 2 ENGINEERING MECHANICS Feb. 2005 000-4750(2005)0-059-05 * ( 00084) (CFS) (M-φ) (P-) CFS 8 CFS P- CFS CFS (CFS) TU38 A NONLINEAR ANALYSIS OF CARBON FIBER SHEET CONFINED CONCRETE COLUMNS LI Jing, * QIAN Jia-ru (Tsinghua University, Beijing 00084, China) Abstract: With gradual increase of curvature and step-by-step numerical integration method, the section moment-curvature (M-φ) relationship curve of carbon fiber sheet (CFS) confined concrete column as well as the lateral force - top displacement (P-) curve of CFS confined concrete column subjected to monotonic increasing lateral load are obtained. A computer program is developed to perform full-range nonlinear analysis of CFS confined concrete columns subjected to monotonic increasing lateral load. The calculated P-curves of 8 CFS confined concrete column specimens and unconfined concrete column specimen are in good agreement with the experimental results. The influence of confinement degree of CFS and the axial load ratio on the post-yield deformation capacity of the CFS confined concrete column is investigated. Key words: carbon fiber sheet (CFS); reinforced concrete column; CFS confinement degree; axial force ratio; deformation capacity (CFS) [~6] CFS CFS CFS 2003-05-02 2003-07-03 (50238030) (977) ( ) * (946) (E-mail: qianjr@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn)
60 0.033( 0 ) > 0 β = (6) 0.308( 0 ) 0 ε / ε = + 2. λ (7). (3)(4)(7) f c0 ε c0 ε cu f y ε y ε s,h E s E s CFS 0.0 E s f FS = ρ FS (8) f c0 σ ρ CFS f CFS f y Es εy εs,h Es' ε.2 Fig. Stress-strain relation curve of reinforcement CFS CFS (M-φ) [7] CFS [8] CFS 3 (2) ) ϕ 2) yi ε c,i = ϕ( R y i ) R 3) (2) 3 2 4) N σ da () x 2 CFS n h h M = N i ( R yi ) + N s ( a ) + N s ( a) Fig.2 Stress-strain relation curve of CFS confined concrete i= 2 2 ax x : y = () 2 + ( a 2) x + x As' εc' 0 x > : y = β ( x ) + (2) ε σ x =, y = σ ε CFS ε cc f cc f ε CFS cc cc f ε aβ cc cc ε ccu cc f c0 = + 0. 3 FS ε cc/ ε c0 + 0. 87 f / λ (3) = (4) a = 2 (.55 + ) (5) FS ccu cu 60 FS λ λ < FS0 = 0 FS 0 FS FS 0 λ > 2,2,3 0 λ FS0.68(0.9 np ) 0.9 ab = 0 λ (9) n p CFS λab σ c,i i = c,i c,i N s = Asσ s N s = A s σ s N = N + σ A + σ h/2 dac,i As b i y i s s εs' εc,i s As φ y R 3 Fig.3 Coordinate system, strip elements and strain M distribution of the column cross section εs
6 n a a n 0.4-0.44 5) 0.79-0.85 CFS ε c ε ccu 4 CFS t.3 n 0.22-0.25 0.42-0.48 4 CFS 2 3 600 mm CFS δ = l M ( x) φ( x)dx (0) 5 mm 0 4Φ6 δ l φ(x) φ6-00 x m m+ φ 0 ~ φ m M (x) [9] l l p0 l p 4 P p0 5 ( : mm) M-φ Fig.5 Dimensions and reinforcement of specimens (Unit:mm) lp P l φy Fig.4 φu lp P lp0 l φy 4 φu Treatment of plastic hinge zone 3 P- ) P 85%2) ε 2 ε 3) θ ( ccu ) /20 u 2 φ c 00mm 0.8 CFS t 0.mm f FS 2. 403MPa EFS 2 8 CFS 24GPa ε u 0.0665 2.2 5 5 CFS t 2 3 500mm 4 Table Parameters of specimens 2φ6 φ6-00 2φ6 n t f c/mpa YW-0 0.44 26.3 0.00 YW- 0.43 26.6 0.2 YW-2 0.43 26.8 0.26 YW-3 0.4 27.95 0.50 YW-4 0.42 27.4 0.76 YL- 0.25 28.3 0.20 YL-2 0.24 30.4 0.23 YL-3 0.22 32.2 0.43 YL-4 0.24 29.5 0.7 2 200mm
62 CFS P δ 6 P δ P δ 2 [0] 2 Table 2 Comparison of nonlinear analysis results, test results (a) YW-0 (c) YW-2 (e) YW-4 (g) YL-2 (b) YW- (d) YW-3 (f) YL- (h) YL-3 (i) YL-4 CFS ( ) 6 P- 600600mm Fig.6 Comparison of the nonlinear analysis results and the test results of P-curves of specimens and code formula results P u/kn u ì δ YW-0 96.4 94.3 88.9-7.8% 0.09 0.09.8.9 YW- 97.6 97.8 92.6-5.2% 0.023 0.028 2. 2.4 YW-2 98.4 98.8 93.9-4.6% 0.029 0.030 3.0 2.7 YW-3 96.8 94.6 90.9-6.% 0.032 0.035 3.3 3.3 YW-4 83. 85.8 83.5 0.4% 0.033 0.034 3.6 4. YL- 68.2 68. 67.3 -.4% 0.037 0.09 5.6 3.3 YL-2 69. 69.0 68.0 -.5% 0.039 0.020 5.4 3.6 YL-3 70.8 70.2 68.7-2.9% 0.040 0.026 5.5 4.7 YL-4 70.4 70.3 69.0-2.2% 0.044 0.033 5.9 6.0 P u u µ δ 0.7 CFS ) CFS 2) CFS CFS 3) CFS YW-0 0.09 0.09 CFS 4) CFS CFS CFS 3 CFS P-δ C35 0.4% 0.8%
63 600mmCFS 0 23456 7 00.0.22 0.330.440.550.66 0.77 0.33 n 0.80.9 n t 0.30.360.4 0.47 n 0.55 0.60.70.8 0.9 P /kn =0.66 =0.44 =0.66 =0.22 =0.44 =0 =0.22 λ FS =0 P /kn (a) n=0.6 =0.66 =0.44 =0.22 =0 P /kn (b) n=0.7 =0.66 =0.44 =0.22 =0 (c) n=0.8 (d) n =0.9 CFS 7 P-δ Fig.7 Influence of on P-δ curve of column under () different axial force ratio CFS 7 n 0.60.70.8 0.9 00.220.44 0.66 P-δ 8 0.6-0.9 (2) CFS - µ δ -θ u 7 8 ) 0-0.77 (3) CFS CFS 2) CFS (4) CFS 3) CFS (5) n 0.6 0.33 µ δ 4 n 0.9 0.55 CFS µ δ 44) ( ) 4 0.05n 0.60.7 µ δ (a) λ µ δ θu λ θ FS (b) FS u 8 θ u Fig.8 Influence of on target displacement ductility µ δ and target drift ratio θ u under different axial force ratio 4 µ δ ( 99 )
99 the large-scale slender reinforced concrete columns [J]. [7],,,. Journal of Tianjin University, 200, 34(2): 268-272. (in [J]., 986, 4(): 2-23. Wang Xingfeng, Shi Defang, Zhang Binghua, et al. Optimization of pick-up point arrangement for long prestressed concrete piles [J]. The Ocean Engineering, 986, 4(): 2-23. (in [8], [J]., 200, 34(2): 268-272. Liu Shutang, Li Zhanjun. The double-crane and five-hoist point rope system for the whole erection of [9],,. [J]., 2000, 22(3): 3-34. Gan Fenglin, Xiao Qi, Zhang Li. Optimization of three-point lifting in pole tower integral hoisting [J].. Mechanics In Engineering, 2000, 22(3): 3-34. (in [0] Winter G, Periaux J. Genetic Algorithms in Engineering and Computer Science [M]. John Wiley & Sons, 995. ( 63 ) [] Karbhari V M and Gao Y. Composite jacketed concrete under uniaxial compression-verification of simple design equation [J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 997, 9(4): 85-93. [2] Nanni A and Bradford N M. FRP jacketed concrete under uniaxial compression [J]. Construction and Building Materials, 995, 9(2): 5-24. [3],,. [J]. ), 200, 6(): 3-6. Jiang Hao, Xiong Guangjin. Investigation of compressive performance of hybrid confined with CFS/GFS [J]. Journal of Shantou University (Natural Science), 200, 6(): 3-6. (in [4] Mirmiran A, Shahawy M, Echary H E, Mastrapa J C and Pico O. Effect of column parameters on FRP confined concrete [J]. Journal of Composites for Construction, 998, 2(4): 75-85. [5],,, [J]., 2002, 30(2): 6-9. Zhang Ke, Yue Qingrui, Ye Lieping, Zhao Shuhong. Experimental study of ductility improvement of concrete column strengthened with CFS [J]. Industrial Buildings, 2002, 30(2): 6-9. (in [6],, [J]., 2002, 32(0): Lin Dayan, Wang Chuanzhi. Complete stress-strain / curves of concrete confined with rectangular stirrups[c]. (Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete structures, 42-45. Wu Gang, Lu Zhitaou, Jiang Jianbiao. Experimental study of earthquake resistance behavior of reinforced concrete columns confined with CFS [J]. Building Structures, 2002, 32(0): 42-45. (in [7],. [C]., 3,, 98. 9-37. Technical reports TR-3, Tsinghua University Press, 98. 9-37. (in [8] Li Jing, Qian Jiaru and Jiang Jianbiao. Experimental Investigation of Axial Compressive Behavior of FRP Confined Concrete Columns[P]. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Building Technology (ABT 2002), Hong Kong, December, 2002. 289-296. [9],. [M]. :., 985. Zhu Bolong, Dong Zhenxiang. Nonlinear Analysis of Reinforced Concrete[M]. Shanghai: Tongjing University Press, 985. (in [0] : (GB 5000-2002)[S]. :, 2002. National Standard of the People s Republic of China.. Code for design of concrete structures (GB5000-2002) [S]. Beijing: China Building Industry Press, 2002. (in