Generalized Double Star Closed Sets in Interior Minimal Spaces

Σχετικά έγγραφα
MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS

1. Introduction and Preliminaries.

F A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I

Operation Approaches on α-γ-open Sets in Topological Spaces

Homomorphism in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Automata

Some new generalized topologies via hereditary classes. Key Words:hereditary generalized topological space, A κ(h,µ)-sets, κµ -topology.

A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation

2 Composition. Invertible Mappings

Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit

Finite Field Problems: Solutions

Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set

SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS

2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)

Intuitionistic Supra Gradation of Openness

Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2

SCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018

Coefficient Inequalities for a New Subclass of K-uniformly Convex Functions

Homomorphism and Cartesian Product on Fuzzy Translation and Fuzzy Multiplication of PS-algebras

ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II

Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs

Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.

A Note on Characterization of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals in Γ- Near-Rings

Reminders: linear functions

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests

MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS

EE512: Error Control Coding

C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions

Fuzzifying Tritopological Spaces

Homomorphism of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Groups

Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings

ON FUZZY BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES IN ŠOSTAK S SENSE (II)

Example Sheet 3 Solutions

Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics

Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 4(2), 2011, pp

3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β

Chapter 3: Ordinal Numbers

Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II

Fourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions

On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume

ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER

6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.

5. Choice under Uncertainty

Sequent Calculi for the Modal µ-calculus over S5. Luca Alberucci, University of Berne. Logic Colloquium Berne, July 4th 2008

The Simply Typed Lambda Calculus

THE SECOND ISOMORPHISM THEOREM ON ORDERED SET UNDER ANTIORDERS. Daniel A. Romano

Generating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations

GÖKHAN ÇUVALCIOĞLU, KRASSIMIR T. ATANASSOV, AND SINEM TARSUSLU(YILMAZ)

DIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANSFORMATION SEMIGROUPS

CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS

On Annihilator of Fuzzy Subsets of Modules

ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 19/5/2007

Knaster-Reichbach Theorem for 2 κ

Cyclic or elementary abelian Covers of K 4

λρ-calculus 1. each λ-variable is a λρ-term, called an atom or atomic term; 2. if M and N are λρ-term then (MN) is a λρ-term called an application;

Second Order Partial Differential Equations

Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)

Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees

Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations

Strukturalna poprawność argumentu.

Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)

Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor

ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?

Overview. Transition Semantics. Configurations and the transition relation. Executions and computation

Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations

12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem

Practice Exam 2. Conceptual Questions. 1. State a Basic identity and then verify it. (a) Identity: Solution: One identity is csc(θ) = 1

3.2 Simple Roots and Weyl Group

Jordan Form of a Square Matrix

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

A General Note on δ-quasi Monotone and Increasing Sequence

UNIT - I LINEAR ALGEBRA. , such that αν V satisfying following condition

Homework 3 Solutions

Subclass of Univalent Functions with Negative Coefficients and Starlike with Respect to Symmetric and Conjugate Points

Matrices and Determinants

Lecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic

derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates

ON INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SUBSPACES

Strain gauge and rosettes

ω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω

Main source: "Discrete-time systems and computer control" by Α. ΣΚΟΔΡΑΣ ΨΗΦΙΑΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΔΙΑΛΕΞΗ 4 ΔΙΑΦΑΝΕΙΑ 1

The challenges of non-stable predicates

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3

Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude

Chapter 2. Ordinals, well-founded relations.

Tridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008

ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 6/5/2006

Abstract Storage Devices

Mean-Variance Analysis

TMA4115 Matematikk 3

CHARACTERIZATION OF BIPOLAR FUZZY IDEALS IN ORDERED GAMMA SEMIGROUPS

CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS

Space-Time Symmetries

Srednicki Chapter 55

Εγχειρίδια Μαθηµατικών και Χταποδάκι στα Κάρβουνα

Transcript:

IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM) e-issn: 2278-5728, p-issn: 2319-765X. Volume 11, Issue 4 Ver. II (Jul - Aug. 2015), PP 56-61 www.iosrjournals.org Generalized Double Star Closed Sets in Interior Minimal Spaces B. Uma Devi 1 and Dr. S. Somasundaram 2 Department of Mathematics, S. T. Hindu College, Nagercoil, Tamilnadu, India. 1 Department of Mathematics, ManonmaniamSundaranar University, Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu, India. 2 Abstract: The aim of this paper is to introduce and investigate Generalized Double Star Closed set in Interior Minimal spaces. Several properties of these new notions are investigated. Keywords: M-g** Separationspace, Maximal M-g**closed, Maximal M-g**open, Minimal M-g**closed, Minimal M-g** open I. Introduction Norman Levine [1] introduced the concepts of generalized closed sets in topological spaces.closed sets are fundamental objects in a topological space. For example, one can define the topology on a set by using either the axioms for the closed sets or the Kuratowski closure axioms. By definition, a subset A of a topological space X is called generalized closed if cla U whenever A U and U is open. This notion has been studied by many topologists because generalized closed sets are not only natural generalization of closed sets but also suggest several new properties of topological spaces. Nakaoka and Oda[2,3,4] have introduced minimal open sets and maximal open sets, which are subclasses of open sets. Later on many authors concentrated in this direction and defined many different types of minimal and maximal open sets. Inspired with these developments we further study a new type of closed and open sets namely Minimal M-g**Open sets, Maximal M-g** Closed sets. In this paper a space X means a Minimal space (X, M). For any subset A of X its M-interior and M-closure are denoted respectively by the symbols M-int(A) and M-cl(A). II. Preliminaries Definition 1A is said to be M-g ** closed (M-generalized double star closed) if M-cl(A) U whenever A U and U is M-g*open. Definition2A is said to be M-g ** open(m-generalized double star open) if M-cl(A) U whenever A U and U is M-g*closed. Theorem3EveryM-closed set is M-g**closed. ProofLet A be an M-closed subset of X.Let A U and U be M-g*open.Since A is M-closed, then M-cl(A) =A. So M-cl(A) U.Thus A is M-g**closed. Converse is not true Theorem4If A is M-g**closed and A B M-cl(A), then B is M-g**closed. ProofSince B M-cl(A), M-cl(B) M-cl(A). Let B U and U be M-g*open.Since A B, A is M-g**closed and U is M-g*open. Gives M-cl(A) U. Since B M-cl(A), M-cl(B) M-cl(A). M-cl(B) U.Hence B is M- g**closed. Theorem5EveryM-open set is M-g**open. ProofLet A be a M-open set of X.Then A c is M-closed set. By Theorem3, A c is M-g**closed, then A is M- g**open. Converse is not true Theorem6If A is M-g**open and M-int(A) B A. Then B is M-g**open. ProofA is M-g**open. Hence A c is M-g**closed. Also M-Int(A) B A gives[m-int(a)] c B c A c. So A c B c M-cl(A c ). Thus B c is M-g**closed and hence B is M-g**open. Theorem7IfA and B are M-g**closed sets in X and M-cl(A B) = M-cl(A) M-cl(B), then A B is also M- g**closed set in X. DOI: 10.9790/5728-11425661 www.iosrjournals.org 56 Page

ProofSuppose that Uis M-g*open and A B U. Then A U and B U.Since A and B are M-g**closed subsets in X,M-cl(A) U and M cl(b) U.Hence M-(A) M-(B) U. GivenM-cl(A B) = M-cl(A) M-cl(B) U. Therefore A B is alsom-g**closed set in X. Definition8A Interior minimal space (X, M) is said to be am-g**t 0 space if for every pair of points x y in X either there existsm-g**open set U such that x U, y U or y U, x U. Theorem9EveryM-T 0 space is M-g**T 0 space but not conversely. Proof is obvious since every M-open set is M-g**open. Definition10An Interior minimal space (X, M) is said to be a M-g**T 1 space if for every pair of points x y in X there existsm-g**open sets U and V such that x U, y U and y V, x V. Theorem11EveryM-T 1 space is M-g**T 1 space. Proof is obvious since every M-open set is M-g**open. Definition12An Interior minimal space(x, M) is said to be a M-g**T 2 space if for every pair of distinct points x, y in X there exists disjointm-g**open sets U and V in X such that U V =. Theorem13EveryM-T 2 space is M-g**T 2 space. Proof is obvious since every M-open set is M-g**open. Theorem14EveryM-g**T 2 space is M-g**T 1 space but not conversely. Proof is obvious from the definitions. Theorem15Any singleton set in an Interior minimal space is either M-semiclosed or M-g**open ProofLet {x} be a singleton set in an Interior minimal space X.If {x} is M-semiclosed, then proof is over.if {x} is not a M-semiclosed set, Then {x} c is not M-semiopen.Therefore X is the only M-semiopen set containing {x} c and{x} c is M-g**closed. Hence {x} is M-g**open. Thus {x} is M-semiclosed or M-g*s*open. Definition16An Interior minimal space X is called M-g**T1 /3 space if every M-gclosed set in X is M-g**closed in X. Theorem17An Interior minimal space X is M-g**T 1/3 if and only if every M-gopen set is M-g**open. ProofLet X be M-g**T 1/3. Let A be M-gopen set.to prove, A is M-g**open.Since A is M-gopen then A c is M- gclosed.thus A c is M-g**closed. [X is M-g**T 1/3 ] givesa is M-g**open.Conversely,Suppose every M-gopen is M-g**open.Then every M-gclosed set is M-g**closed.Hence X is M-g**T 1/3. Definition18An Interior minimal space X is called M-g**T 1/2 space if every M-g**closed set is M-closed. Theorem19An Interior minimal space X is M-g**T 1/2 if and only if every M-g**open set is M-open. ProofLet X be M-g**T 1/2 and let A be M-g**open.Then A c is M-g**closed and so A c is M-closed.Thus A is M- open. Conversely,Suppose every M-g**open set is M-open.Let A be any M-g**closed set.then A c is M-g**open gives A c is M-open and A is M-closed.Thus every M-g**closed set is M-closed set.hence X is M-g**T 1/2. 3. Minimal M-g**open sets and Maximal M-g**closed sets We now introduce Minimal M-g**open sets and Maximal M-g**closed sets in Interior minimal spaces as follows. Definition1A proper nonempty M-g**open subset U of X is said to be a Minimal M-g**open set if any M- g**open set contained in U is or U. RemarkMinimalM-open set and Minimal M-g**open set are independent to each other. Theorem2 (i) Let U be a Minimal M-g**open set and W be am-g**open set. Then U W = or U W. (ii) Let U and V be Minimal M-g**open sets. DOI: 10.9790/5728-11425661 www.iosrjournals.org 57 Page

Then U V = or U = V. Proof (i) Let U be a Minimal M-g**open set and W be am-g**open set.if U W =, then there is nothing to prove. If U W. Then U W U. Since U is a Minimal M-g**open set, we have U W = U. Therefore U W. (ii) Let U and V be Minimal M-g**open sets. If U V, then U V and V U by (i). Therefore U = V. Theorem3Let U be a Minimal M-g**open set. If x U, then U W for some M-g**open set W containing x. ProofLet U be a Minimal M-g**open set and x U.Let W be any other M-g**open set. U W = or U W. If U W x U x W. Since W is arbitrary, there exists am-g**open set W containing x such that U W. Theorem4Let U be a Minimal M-g**open set.then U = {WW is a M-g**open set of X containing x} for any element x of U. ProofBy Theorem3, and U is a Minimal M-g**open set containing x, then U W for some M-g**open set W containing x.we have U {WW is a M-g**open set of X containing x} U. Thus U = {WW is a M- g**open set of X containing x} U. Theorem5Let V be a nonempty finite M-g**open set. Then there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M- g**open set U such that U V. ProofLet V be a nonempty finite M-g**open set. If V is a Minimal M-g**open set, we may set U = V. If V is not a Minimal M-g**open set, then there exists (finite) M-g**open set V 1 such that V 1 V. If V 1 is a Minimal M-g**open set, we may set U = V 1. If V 1 is not a Minimal M-g**open set, then there exists (finite)mg**open set V 2 such that V 2 V 1. Continuing this process, we have a sequence of M-g**open sets V V 1 V 2 V 3... V k...since V is a finite set, this process repeats only finitely. Then finally we get a Minimal M-g**open set U = V n for some positive integer n. Hence there exists atleast one Minimal M-g**open set U such that U V. [An Interior minimal space X is said to be M-locally finite space if each of its elements is contained in a finite M-g**open set.] Corollary6Let X be am-locally finite space and V be a nonempty M-g**open set. Then there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**open set U such that U V. ProofLet X be a M-locally finite space and V be a nonempty M-g**open set.let x V.Since X is M-locally finite space, we have a finite M-open set V x such that x V x.then V V x is a finite M-g**open set. By Theorem5, there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**open set U such that U V Vx.That is U V V x V. Hence there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**open set U such that U V. Corollary7Let V be a finite Minimal M-open set. Then there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**open set U such that U V. ProofLet V be a finite Minimal M-open set. Then V is a nonempty finite M-g**open set. By Theorem5, there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**open set U such that U V. Theorem8Let U; U λ be Minimal M-g**open sets for any element λ Γ. If U λ Γ U λ, then there exists an element λ Γ such that U = U λ. ProofLet U λ Γ U λ. Then U ( λ Γ U λ ) = U. That is λ Γ (U U λ ) = U.Also by Theorem2 (ii), U U λ = or U = U λ for any λ Γ.Then there exists an element λ Γ such that U = U λ. Theorem9Let U; U λ be Minimal M-g**open sets for any λ Γ. If U = U λ for any λ Γ, then ( λ Γ U λ ) U =. ProofSuppose that ( λ Γ U λ ) U for any λ Γ such that U U λ. That is λ Γ (U λ U). Then there exists an element λ Γ such that U U λ.by Theorem2(ii), we have U = U λ, which contradicts the fact that U U λ for any λ Γ.Hence ( λ Γ U λ ) U =. We now introduce Maximal M-g**closed sets in Interior Minimal spaces as follows. Definition10A proper nonempty M-g**closed set F X is said to be Maximal M-g**closed setif any M- g**closed set containing F is either X or F. DOI: 10.9790/5728-11425661 www.iosrjournals.org 58 Page

RemarkEvery Maximal M-closed sets are Maximal M-g**closed sets. Generalized Double Star Closed Sets In Interior Minimal Spaces Theorem11A proper nonempty subset F of X is Maximal M-g**closed set if and only if X\F is a Minimal M- g**open set. ProofLet F be a Maximal M-g**closed set. Suppose X\F is not a Minimal M-g**open set. Then there exists amg**open set U X\F such that U X\F. That is F X\U and X\U is am-g**closed set gives a contradiction to F is a Maximal M-g**closed set.so X\F is a Minimal M-g**open set. Conversely, Let X\F be a Minimal M-g**open set. Suppose F is not a Maximal M-g**closed set. Then there exists am-g**closed set E F such that F E X. That is X\E X\F and X\E is am-g**open set gives a contradiction to X\F is a Minimal M-g**open set. Thus F is a Maximal M-g**closed set. Theorem12 (i) Let F be a Maximal M-g**closed set and W be am-g**closed set. Then F W = X or W F. (ii) Let F and S be Maximal M-g**closed sets. Then F S = X or F = S. Proof(i)Let F be a Maximal M-g**closed set and W be a M-g**closed set. If F W = X, then there is nothing to prove.suppose F W X. Then F F W.Therefore F W= F implies W F. (ii) Let F and S be Maximal M-g**closed sets.if F S X, then we have F S and S F by (i).therefore F = S. Theorem13Let F α, F β, F δ be Maximal M-g**closed sets such that F α F β. If F α F β F δ, then either F α = F δ or F β = F δ ProofGiven that F α F β F δ. If F α = F δ then there is nothing to prove. If F α F δ then we have to prove F β = F δ.now F β F δ = F β (F δ X) = F β (F δ (F α F β )(by Theorem12(ii)) = F β ((F δ F α ) (F δ F β )) = (F β F δ F α ) (F β F δ F β ) = (F α F β ) (F δ F β ) (by F α F β F δ ) = (F α F δ ) F β = X F β (Since F α and F δ are Maximal M-g**closed sets by Theorem12(ii), F α F δ = X)= F β. That isf β F δ = F β implies F β F δ. Since F β and F δ are Maximal M-g**closed sets, we have F β = F δ Therefore F β = F δ Theorem14Let F α, F β and F δ be different Maximal M-g**closed sets to each other. Then (F α F β ) (F α F δ ). ProofLet (F α F β ) (F α F δ ) (F α F β ) (F δ F β ) (F α F δ ) (F δ F β )gives(f α F δ ) F β F δ (F α F β ).Since by Theorem12(ii), F α F δ = X and F α F β = X givesx F β F δ X.That is F β F δ. From the definition of Maximal M-g**closed set, we get F β = F δ which gives a contradiction to the fact that F α, F β and F δ are different to each other. Thus(F α F β ) (F α F δ ). Theorem15Let F be a Maximal M-g**closed set and x be an element of F. Then F = { SS is a M-g**closed set containing x such that F S X}. ProofBy Theorem13, and fact that F is a M-g**closed set containing x, we have F {SS is a M-g**closed set containing x such that F S X} F.So we have F = {SS is a M-g**closed set containing x such that F S X}. Theorem16Let F be a Maximal M-g**closed set. If x is an element of X\F. Then X\F E for any M- g**closed set E containing x. ProofLet F be a Maximal M-g**closed set and x is in X\F. E F for any M-g**closed set E containing x.then E F = X (by Theorem12 (ii)). Thus X\F E. Minimal M-g**closed set and Maximal M-g**open set We now introduce Minimal M-g**closed sets and Maximal M-g**open sets in Interior Minimal spaces as follows. Definition17A proper nonempty M-g**closed subset F of X is said to be a Minimal M-g**closed set if any M- g**closed set contained in F is or F. RemarkMinimalM-closed and Minimal M-g**closed set are independent to each other. DOI: 10.9790/5728-11425661 www.iosrjournals.org 59 Page

Definition18A proper nonempty M-g**open U X is said to be a Maximal M-g**open setif any M-g**open set containing U is either X or U. RemarkMaximalM-open set and Maximal M-g**open set are independent to each other. Theorem19A proper nonempty subset U of X is Maximal M-g**open set if and only ifx\u is a Minimal M- g**closed set. ProofLet U be a Maximal M-g**open set. Suppose X\U is not a Minimal M-g**closed set. Then there exists M- g**closed set V X\U such that V X\U. That is U X\V and X\V is am-g**open set gives a contradiction to U is a Minimal M-g**closed set. Conversely, Let X\U be a Minimal M-g**closed set.suppose U is not a Maximal M-g**open set. Then there exists M-g**open set E U such that U E X. That is X\E X\U and X\E is am-g**closed set which is a contradiction for X\U is a Minimal M-g**closed set.therefore U is a Maximal M-g**closed set. Theorem20 (i) Let U be a Minimal M-g**closed set and W be am-g**closed set. Then U W = or U W. (ii) Let U and V be Minimal M-g**closed sets. Then U V = or U = V. Proof (i) Let U be a Minimal M-g**closed set and W be am-g**closed set. If U W =, then there is nothing to prove.if U W. Then U W U. Since U is a Minimal M-g**closed set, we have U W = U.Therefore U W. (ii) Let U and V be Minimal M-g**closed sets. If U V, then U V and V U by (i). Therefore U = V. Theorem21Let V be a nonempty finite M-g**closed set. Then there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M- g**closed set U such that U V. ProofLet V be a nonempty finite M-g**closed set. If V is a minimal M-g**closed set, we may set U = V.If V is not a Minimal M-g**closed set, then there exists (finite) M-g**closed set V 1 such that V 1 V. If V 1 is a Minimal M-g**closed set, we may set U = V 1.If V 1 is not a minimal M-g**closed set, then there exists (finite)m-g**closed set V 2 such that V 2 V 1. Continuing this process, we have a sequence of M-g**closed sets V V 1 V 2 V 3... V k Since V is a finite set, this process repeats only finitely. Then finally we get a Minimal M-g**closed set U = V n for some positive integer n. Corollary22Let X be a M-locally finite space and V be a nonempty M-g**closed set. Then there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**closed set U such that U V. ProofLet X be a M-locally finite space and V be a nonempty M-g**closed set. Let x V.Since X is M-locally finite space, we have a finite M-open set V x such that x V x. Then V V x is a finite M-g**closed set. By Theorem21, there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**closed set U such that U V V x. That is U V V x V. Hence there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**closed set U such that U V. Corollary23Let V be a finite Minimal M-open set. Then there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**closed set U such that U V. ProofLet V be a finite Minimal M-open set. Then V is a nonempty finite M-g**closed set. By Theorem21,there exists at least one (finite) Minimal M-g**closed set U such that U V. Theorem24Let U; U λ be Minimal M-g**closed sets for any element λ Γ. If U λ Γ U λ, then there exists an element λ Γ such that U = U λ. ProofLet U λ Γ U λ. Then U ( λ Γ U λ ) = U. That is λ Γ (U U λ ) = U. Also by Theorem20(ii), U U λ = or U = U λ for any λ Γ. This implies that there exists an element λ Γ such that U = U λ. Theorem25Let U; U λ be Minimal M-g**closed sets for any λ Γ. If U = U λ for any λ Γ, then ( λ Γ U λ ) U =. ProofSuppose that ( λ Γ U λ ) U. That is λ Γ (U λ U). Then there exists an element λ Γ such that U U λ. By Theorem20(ii), we have U = U λ, which contradicts the fact that U U λ for any λ Γ. Hence ( λ Γ U λ ) U =. DOI: 10.9790/5728-11425661 www.iosrjournals.org 60 Page

Theorem26A proper nonempty subset F of X is Maximal M-g**open set if and only ifx\f is a Minimal M- g**closed set. ProofLet F be a Maximal M-g**open set. Suppose X\F is not a Minimal M-g**open set. Then there exists M- g**open set U X\F such that U X\F. That is F X\U and X\U is am-g**open set which is a contradiction for F is a Minimal M-g**closed set. Conversely, Let X\F be a Minimal M-g**closed set. Suppose F is not a Maximal M-g**open set. Then there exists M-g**open set E F such that F E X. That is X\E X\F and X\E is am-g**open set which is a contradiction for X\F is a Minimal M-g**closed set. Thus F is a Maximal M-g**open set. Theorem27 (i) Let F be a Maximal M-g**open set and W be am-g**open set. Then F W = X or W F. (ii) Let F and S be Maximal M-g**open sets. Then F S=X or F = S. Proof (i) Let F be a Maximal M-g**open set and W be am-g**open set.if F W = X, then there is nothing to prove. Suppose F W X. Then F F W.Therefore F W = F givesw F. (ii) Let F and S be Maximal M-g**open sets.if F S X, then we have F S and S F by (i). Therefore F = S. Theorem28Let F α, F β, F δ be Maximal M-g**open sets such that F α F β. If F α F β F δ, then either F α = F δ or F β = F δ ProofGiven that F α F β F δ. If F α = F δ then there is nothing to prove. If F α F δ then we have to prove F β = F δ. Now F β F δ = F β (F δ X) = F β (F δ (F α F β )(by Theorem27(ii)) = F β ((F δ F α ) (F δ F β )) = (F β F δ F α ) (F β F δ F β ) = (F α F β ) (F δ F β ) (by F α F β F δ ) = (F α F δ ) F β = X F β. (Since F α and F δ are Maximal M-g**open sets by Theorem27 (ii), F α F δ = X)= F β.that is F β F δ = F β. Thus F β F δ. Since F β and F δ are Maximal M-g**open sets, we have F β = F δ. Therefore F β = F δ. Theorem29Let F α, F β and F δ be different Maximal M-g**open sets to each other. Then (F α F β ) (F α F δ ). ProofLet (F α F β ) (F α F δ ) (F α F β ) (F δ F β ) (F α F δ ) (F δ F β ) (F α F δ ) F β F δ (F α F β ).(Since by Theorem27(ii), F α F δ = X and F α F β = X X F β F δ X F β F δ. From the definition of Maximal M-g**open set it follows that F β = F δ, which is a contradiction to the fact that F α, F β and F δ are different to each other. Therefore (F α F β ) (F α F δ ). Theorem30Let F be a Maximal M-g**open set. If x is an element of X \ F. Then X\F E for any M-g**open set E containing x. ProofLet F be a Maximal M-g**open set and x X\F. E F for any M-g**open set E containing x. Then E F = X by Theorem27(ii).Therefore X\F E. References [1]. F. Nakaoka and N. Oda, On Minimal Closed Sets, Proceeding of Topological spaces Theory and its Applications, 5(2003), 19-21. [2]. F. Nakaoka and N. Oda, Some Properties of Maximal Open Sets, Int. J. Math. Sci. 21,(2003)1331-1340. [3]. A. Vadivel and K. Vairamanickam, Minimal rgα-open Sets and Maximal rgα-closed Sets, Submitted to Journal of Tripura Mathematical Society [4]. S. Balasubramanian, C. Sandhya and P. A. S. Vyjayanthi, On v-closed sets (In press) ActaCienciaIndica. DOI: 10.9790/5728-11425661 www.iosrjournals.org 61 Page