Nonminimal derivative coupling scalar-tensor theories: odd-parity perturbations and black hole stability

Σχετικά έγγραφα
Higher Derivative Gravity Theories

Cosmology with non-minimal derivative coupling

3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β

Exercises 10. Find a fundamental matrix of the given system of equations. Also find the fundamental matrix Φ(t) satisfying Φ(0) = I. 1.

Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations

Geodesic Equations for the Wormhole Metric

ECE Spring Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 2

Matrices and Determinants

D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation

6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.

2 Composition. Invertible Mappings

Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)

Example Sheet 3 Solutions

Space-Time Symmetries

Symmetric Stress-Energy Tensor

Finite Field Problems: Solutions

Dark matter from Dark Energy-Baryonic Matter Couplings

2. THEORY OF EQUATIONS. PREVIOUS EAMCET Bits.

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

The Simply Typed Lambda Calculus

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

forms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with

DESIGN OF MACHINERY SOLUTION MANUAL h in h 4 0.

Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations

derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates

MATH423 String Theory Solutions 4. = 0 τ = f(s). (1) dτ ds = dxµ dτ f (s) (2) dτ 2 [f (s)] 2 + dxµ. dτ f (s) (3)

Homework 3 Solutions

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)

Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions

( y) Partial Differential Equations

Srednicki Chapter 55

Appendix to On the stability of a compressible axisymmetric rotating flow in a pipe. By Z. Rusak & J. H. Lee

Forced Pendulum Numerical approach

Second Order RLC Filters

The kinetic and potential energies as T = 1 2. (m i η2 i k(η i+1 η i ) 2 ). (3) The Hooke s law F = Y ξ, (6) with a discrete analog

Homework 8 Model Solution Section

Second Order Partial Differential Equations

Partial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013

Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2

HOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:

Απόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.

b. Use the parametrization from (a) to compute the area of S a as S a ds. Be sure to substitute for ds!

Cosmological Space-Times

DiracDelta. Notations. Primary definition. Specific values. General characteristics. Traditional name. Traditional notation

Derivation of Optical-Bloch Equations

CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS

Parametrized Surfaces

= {{D α, D α }, D α }. = [D α, 4iσ µ α α D α µ ] = 4iσ µ α α [Dα, D α ] µ.

Testing for Indeterminacy: An Application to U.S. Monetary Policy. Technical Appendix

Econ 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1

ES440/ES911: CFD. Chapter 5. Solution of Linear Equation Systems

SPECIAL FUNCTIONS and POLYNOMIALS

Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013

Physics 582, Problem Set 2 Solutions

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

Local Approximation with Kernels

EE512: Error Control Coding

Variational Wavefunction for the Helium Atom

Solutions to Exercise Sheet 5

SOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM

Fourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics

DERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION FOR AN APPLIED FORCE Revision C

9.09. # 1. Area inside the oval limaçon r = cos θ. To graph, start with θ = 0 so r = 6. Compute dr

ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 19/5/2007

Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor

Exercise 1.1. Verify that if we apply GS to the coordinate basis Gauss form ds 2 = E(u, v)du 2 + 2F (u, v)dudv + G(u, v)dv 2

Lecture 26: Circular domains

Exercises to Statistics of Material Fatigue No. 5

Section 9.2 Polar Equations and Graphs

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests

( ) 2 and compare to M.

Problem 3.1 Vector A starts at point (1, 1, 3) and ends at point (2, 1,0). Find a unit vector in the direction of A. Solution: A = 1+9 = 3.

You may not start to read the questions printed on the subsequent pages until instructed to do so by the Invigilator.

Section 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas

ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?

6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes

Differential equations

Bessel functions. ν + 1 ; 1 = 0 for k = 0, 1, 2,..., n 1. Γ( n + k + 1) = ( 1) n J n (z). Γ(n + k + 1) k!

On the Einstein-Euler Equations

Spherical Coordinates

P AND P. P : actual probability. P : risk neutral probability. Realtionship: mutual absolute continuity P P. For example:

Cosmological dynamics and perturbations in Light mass Galileon models

g-selberg integrals MV Conjecture An A 2 Selberg integral Summary Long Live the King Ole Warnaar Department of Mathematics Long Live the King

Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests

1 String with massive end-points

Physics 554: HW#1 Solutions

2. Μηχανικό Μαύρο Κουτί: κύλινδρος με μια μπάλα μέσα σε αυτόν.

Solutions to the Schrodinger equation atomic orbitals. Ψ 1 s Ψ 2 s Ψ 2 px Ψ 2 py Ψ 2 pz

ω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω

Math221: HW# 1 solutions

Problem 3.16 Given B = ˆx(z 3y) +ŷ(2x 3z) ẑ(x+y), find a unit vector parallel. Solution: At P = (1,0, 1), ˆb = B

The Pohozaev identity for the fractional Laplacian

Numerical Analysis FMN011

3+1 Splitting of the Generalized Harmonic Equations

Cyclic or elementary abelian Covers of K 4

1. (a) (5 points) Find the unit tangent and unit normal vectors T and N to the curve. r(t) = 3cost, 4t, 3sint

Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3

Transcript:

Nonminimal derivative coupling scalar-tensor theories: odd-parity perturbations and black hole stability A. Cisterna 1 M. Cruz 2 T. Delsate 3 J. Saavedra 4 1 Universidad Austral de Chile 2 Facultad de Física, Universidad Veracruzana 3 University of Mons - UMONS, Bélgica 4 PUCV-Chile Escuela de Física Fundamental, 2016

Outline 1 Horndeski theories 2 The model 3 Application to BHs

Horndeski theory Inputs Modify gravity theory. Scalar-tensor theory. Non-minimal kinetic scalar field.

Modify gravity theory As we know GR enjoys the following main properties Einstein equations G µν = κt µν. Is invariant under diffeomorphisms µ G µν = 0 Possesses second order and symmetric EOM 2 g µν (x) x 2 The spacetime is four-dimensional Only one field enters in the purely gravitational description of the theory, the metric field, g µν (x)

In order to describe new gravitational phenomena through modifications of GR, we need to relax at least one of the previous features. Many examples of modified theories are known today: Higher dimensional theories as Lovelock Higher derivative theories Massive gravity theories, bigravity, f (R)-gravity... Brans-Dicke theory

Let us describe gravity with one extra degree of freedom ( S[g µν, φ, ψ] = φr ω(φ) ) φ µφ µ φ V (φ) d 4 x + S m [g, ψ], Here the gravity sector is described by g µν and φ(x). The matter field are coupled only with the metric tensor. Now we can ask ourself, which is the most general scalar-tensor theory which yields second order equations of motion, for both, the metric and the scalar field? This question was answered by Horndeski 40 years ago.

L H = k 1 (ρ, φ)δ µνρ αβγ µ α φr νσ βγ 4 3 k 1,ρ(φ, ρ)δ µνρ αβγ µ α φ ν β φ σ γ φ + k 3 (φ, ρ)δ µνρ αβγ αφ µ φr νσ βγ +... Here ρ = µ φ µ φ is the standard kinetic term of the scalar field.

Was proven that this Lagrangian is equivalent to the Lagrangian coming from covariantized Galileons L = K (φ, ρ) G 3 (φ, ρ) φ + G 4 (φ, ρ)r + G 4,ρ (φ, ρ)[( φ) 2 ( µ ν φ) 2 ] + G 5 (φ, ρ)g µν µ ν φ G 5,ρ 6 [( φ)3 3 φ( µ ν φ) 2 + ( µ ν φ) 3 ], Now commun sectors of the theory can be recognized easily, Brans-Dicke theory, K-essence, GR, etc. In particular our interest is focused on the theory described by the following term G 5 (φ, ρ)g µν µ ν φ which gives us non minimally kinetic coupled scalar fields G µν µ φ ν φ

Why second order theories? For the free particle we have: L fp = 1 2 mẋ 2 V }{{} Legendre transform H fp = p2 2m + V. Figure: Energy of particle

Ghost states... Figure: Energy of particle

Towards odd parity perturbations The model Equations of motion Odd-parity perturbations

The model The action we are working with take the form S[g µν, φ] = d 4 x [ 1 g 2κ (R 2Λ) 1 ] 2 (αgµν βg µν ) µ φ ν φ V (φ) We have: E µν = G µν + Λg µν κ [αt µν + βθ µν ] = 0, and µ (αg µν ν φ βg µν ν φ) dv (φ) dφ = 0,

For simplicity T µν = µφ νφ 1 2 gµν αφ α φ 1 gµνv (φ), α Θ µν = 1 2 µφ νφr 2 αφ (µφr α ν) α φ β φr µανβ + 1 2 Gµν αφ α φ ( µ α φ)( ν αφ) + ( µ νφ) φ + g µν [ 1 2 ( φ)2 + αφ β φr αβ + 1 ] 2 ( α β φ)( α β φ).

The perturbed metric ds 2 = A(r)dt 2 + B(r)dr 2 [ ] dz 2 + C(r) 1 kz 2 + (1 kz2 )(dϕ + k 1 dt + k 2 dr + k 3 dz) 2, φ = φ 0 (r) + ɛφ(t, r, z)

Considering the Einstein field equations only at first order in ɛ, we find that E t r = ɛκ dφ 0 dr E r z = ɛκ dφ 0 dr + O(ɛ 2 ) = 0, [ ( α t Φ A β 1 ABC 2 [ ( α zφ B β B 2 C A r C r A + 1 Cr 2 4 C 1 2 kb Cr r A r C r A + 1 Cr 2 4 C 1 2 ) t Φ ] + O(ɛ 2 ) = 0, ( ) ) ] ACr + CA r r zφ A Φ = 0

BUT! [ { Eϕ r = A 1 + βκ ( ) } ] 2 dφ0 (1 kz 2 ) 2 ( zk 2 r k 3 ) z C 2B dr [{ + 1 + βκ ( ) } ] 2 dφ0 (1 kz 2 ) ( r k 1 t k 2 ) = 0, t 2B dr [ Eϕ t = { B C 1 βκ ( ) } ] 2 dφ0 (1 kz 2 ) 2 ( zk 1 t k 3 ) z A 2B dr [ { + C 2 1 + βκ ( ) } ] 2 dφ0 (1 kz 2 )( r k 1 t k 2 ) = 0, r AB 2B dr [ Eϕ z = { A C 1 + βκ ( ) } ] 2 dφ0 ( zk 2 r k 3 ) r B 2B dr [ + { B C 1 βκ ( ) } ] 2 dφ0 ( t k 3 zk 1 ) = 0. t A 2B dr

The important thing is... [ C 2 P (+) AB r 1 C A Q = C A B P(r) (±) = 1 ± βκ 2B ] 1 Q + (1 kz 2 ) 2 [ P ( ) r z 1 (1 kz 2 ) B P (+)(1 kz 2 ) 2 ( z k 2 r k 3 ), ) 2. ( dφ0 dr The mathematical methods courses are useful! Q = Q(r, t)d(z) ] Q = C z A 2 t Q. (1)

The master equation Ψ(r, t) = [ CP ( ) ] 1/2 Q(r, t) Fourier decomposition: Ψ = Ψ ω e iωt dt ( HΨ ω := 2 Ψ ω r 2 + A γ + 3 CP (+) 4C 2 1 2P ( ) d 2 P ( ) dr 2 + = 2 Ψ ω r 2 1 dc dp ( ) 2CP ( ) dr dr + V Ψω = ω2 eff Ψω, ( ) dc 2 1 dr 2C ) d 2 C dr 2 + 3 4P( ) 2 Ψ ω = ω 2 eff Ψω, ( ) 2 dp( ) dr ω 2 eff = P ( ) P (+) ω 2.

The spectrum dr (Ψ ω ) HΨ ω = dr [ DΨ ω 2 +V S Ψ ω 2] (Ψ ω DΨ ω ) Boundary, where D = r + S and If we choose S = 1 dc 2C dr + 1 V S = V + ds dr S2. (2) dp ( ) 2P ( ) dr, we find A V S = γ. (3) CP (+)

The solution For spherically symmetric spacetimes ( ) αβk A(r) = r 2 L 2 + k ( ) α + βλ 2 arctan r βk αβk µ α α βλ r r + 3α + βλ α βλ k, and B(r) = α2 ((α βλ) r 2 + 2βk) 2 (α βλ) 2 (αr 2 + βk) 2 A(r), C(r) = r, α + βλ < 0.

Slowly-rotating objects k 1 = ω(r). Then the frame dragging function satisfies [ { C 2 1 + βκ ( ) } ] 2 dφ0 (1 kz 2 ) r r AB 2B dr ω(r) = 0. Solving we have The GR case ω(r) = c 1 + c 2 r.

Thank you for your attention!