Origin of Pure Spinor Superstring
|
|
- Κύνθια Βλαβιανός
- 6 χρόνια πριν
- Προβολές:
Transcript
1 Origin of Pure Spinor Superstring based on JHEP05(2005)046 (hep-th/ ) with Y. Kazama Jul. 19, Nagoya Univ. Yuri Aisaka ( ) Univ. of Tokyo (Komaba)
2 Origin of PSS in a nutshell Berkovits Pure Spinor Formalism Canonical (Dirac) quantization Derived from a classical action (essentially GS) with reparam, kappa, plus a hidden sym. 1
3 Motivation Modern string theory rounds about D-branes; But strings in (D-brane sourced) Ramond-Ramond BG s: Poorly understood Super-Poincaré covariant formulation should help: Standard RNS & GS: Either SUSY or Lorentz is opaque RNS: - Worldsheet SUSY powerful scheme of super CFT, but with spin structures, GSO, supermoduli, bosonization, picture etc. - No built-in spacetime spinor Conceptually hard to handle RR fields GS: - Fully covariant classically - Less understood worldsheet sym (kappa) - Hard to quantize except in (semi-)lc gauge PS formalism Berkovits (2000 ) A new covariant worldsheet formalism with some promising results Like GS, has built-in spacetime SUSY no conceptual difficulty with RR 2
4 With PS formalism, one hopes to understand: Strings in various BG s esp. AdS+RR String side of the AdS/CFT conjecture String spectrum in AdS 5 S 5 Quantum integrability of string side Higher genus computation Supermembrane / M(atrix) theory 3
5 Plan: 1. Introduction Motivation Review of GS; treatment of kappa & its difficulty Siegel s approach to GS 2. Review of PS Basics, Achievments & Challenges 3. Origin of PS Classical action for PS Derivation of PS via canonical quantization 4. Summary and Outlook 4
6 Classical GS action type IIB: (x m, θ Aα ) = (x m, θ α, ˆθ α ) i = 0, 1; m = 0 9; α = 1 16; A = 1, 2 where L GS = L K + L WZ { L K = 1 2 gg ij Π m i Π jm L WZ = ɛ ij Π m i (W jm Ŵ jm ) ɛ ij Wi m Ŵ jm Π m i = i x m Wi m Ŵi m, Wi m = iθγ m i θ, Ŵi m = iˆθγ m iˆθ, Γ m = ( 0 γ mαβ γ m αβ 0 ) SO(9, 1) Wess-Zumino term: Topological (no dep on g ij ) Gives rise to κ-sym (local fermionic sym; halves on-shell DOF s of θ Aα ) Due to kappa, (Semi-)LC quant: easy Covariant quant: hard Shall demonstrate for superparticle 5
7 Difficulty of Covariant Quant of GS N = 1 Brink-Schwarz Superparticle (generalisation to N = 2 is trivial) L BS = 1 2e Π2, Π m = ẋ m iθγ m θ Zero-mode part of string Kappa without WZ Symmetries: Super-Poincaré Reparam: τ τ Kappa: for a fermionic param κ α (τ) δθ α = ip m (γ m κ) α, δx m = iθγ m δθ, δe = 4e θκ 6
8 Canonical Treatment of BS I Fix reparam to conformal gauge e = 1 Canonical momenta & Poisson bracket: p m = L ẋ = Π m, p m α = L θ = ip m(γ m θ) α α {x m, p n } P = δ m n, {θ α, p β } P = δ α β Phase space constraints: D α = p α ip m (γ m θ) α 0 Gauge orbits (1st cls) Constraint surface (2nd cls) Gauge slice T = 1 2 pm p m 0 (Virasoro) Constraint algebra: {T, T } P = {T, D α } P = 0, {D α, D β } P = 2ip m γ m αβ rank 8 (p2 = 0) first class (gauge syms) 8 second class (rels between p α and θ α ) constraint surface For (Dirac) quantization, must separate explicitly; hard to maintain covariance 7
9 Canonical treatment of BS II Explicit splitting of D α (assume p + 0): Dȧ = pȧ ip θȧ ip i γȧb i θ b Kȧ = Dȧ 1 γ i p +pi ȧb D b : 1st cls (kappa) D a = p a ip + θ a ip i γ i aḃ θ ḃ : 2nd cls Indeed from {D α, D β } P = 2ip m γαβ m, easy to see φ I = (T, Kȧ, D a ) ( ) {D a, D b } P = 2ip + δ ab, {D a, Kḃ} P = {Kȧ, Kḃ} P = 2i p 2 δȧḃ p 0 ( Virasoro) {φ I, φ J } P 0 2p + δȧḃ + A way to see relation between kappa and conformal syms: (kappa) 2 = (Virasoro) Vectors: V ± = V 0 ± V 9, γ ± = γ 0 ± γ 9 Spinors: θ α = (θ a, θȧ) ( ) ( γ γ = 0 1, γ i i ) ( ) = aḃ 8 γȧb i, γ = γ ± : SO(8) chirality projector 8
10 Canonical treatment of BS III Quantization is most easily done by fixing kappa Semi lightcone gauge: γ + θ = 0 θȧ = 0 (Kȧ, θȧ) : 2nd class Dirac bracket on φ I (D a, Kȧ, θȧ) = 0 (Symplectic structure on φ I = 0) {A, B} D = {A, B} P {A, φ I } P {φ I, φ J } 1 P {φ J, B} P = {A, B} P 1 2ip +{A, D a} P {D a, B} P + {A, Kȧ} P {θȧ, B} P + {A, θȧ} P {Kȧ, B} P Indep variables (x m, p n ; S a = 2p + θ a ) has canonical brackets: (D a = p a ip + θ a = 0 (θ a, p a ) become self-conjugate) {x m, p n } D = η mn, {S a, S b } D = iδ ab with single 1st cls constraint T = 1 2 p2 = 0 9
11 Canonical quantization of BS Quantization is now easy: Replace {, } D by quantum commutators: {x m, p n } D = η mn [x m, p n ] = iη mn {S a, S b } D = iδ ab {S a, S b } = δ ab On quantum states, impose T = 1 2 p2 = 0 (or invoke BRST) Remarks: Usually, we further fix T imposing x + = τ etc. (full LC gauge) (x m, p n ; S a ) with canonical brackets are sometimes called free To sum up, (1) In a non-covariant gauge (θȧ = 0) BS can be systematically quantized: L BS free fields + constraint T (2) Covariant quantization is bound to be difficult: D α = 0 contains first and second cls constraint 10
12 Siegel s approach to GS (1986) Gave up classical action. Instead, asked Can one find a set of 1st cls constraints ( BRST ) s.t. Free fields + BRST = superstring? L = 1 2 x x p α θ α ˆp α ˆθ α At the time 1. Appropriate BRST was not found. 2. Also, c tot 0 = 1 2 Π Π d α θ α ˆd α ˆθ α (SUSY inv) Using pure spinor λ α, one can. Berkovits (2000) 11
13 Review of PS Superstring Pure Spinor (PS) Berkovits (2000-) Cartan (1913) Bosonic chiral spinor λ α with non-linear PS constraint: λ α γ m αβ λβ = 0 Not all 10 conditions are indep because of a Fierz In fact, only 5 constraints are indep. PS: 16 5 = 11 indep components. (λγ m λ)(λγ m λ) = 0 Under U(5) SO(9, 1): 16 = PS cond λ I = 1 8 λ 1 + ɛ IJKLMλ JK λ LM 12
14 PS formalism for superstring (Shall concentrate on the holomorphic sector) Worldsheet free CFT with vanishing center GS sector: x m, (p α, θ α ) PS sector: (ω α, λ α ) weight (1, 0) T (z) = 1 2 xm x m (c=10) p α θ α ( 32) ω α λ α (22) Free : not genuinely; But physical quantities can be computed with covariant rules BRST op: bosonic ghost against d α = p α + i(γ m θ) α p m (γm θ) α (θγ m θ), d α (z)d β (w) = 2γ m Π m /(z w) Q B = λ α d α Q 2 B = 2 λγ m λπ m = 0 Cohomology of Q B = Spacetime spectrum Passed various checks, and more! 13
15 Achievements of PS: Basics Explicit forms of Q B -inv massless vertex ops: U(z) = λ α A α (x, θ) Superfield form. of Super-Maxwell: Q B U = 0 Correct constraint: (unintegrated) γ αβ m 1 m 2...m 5 D α A β = 0, (D α = α i(γ m θ) m ) δu = Q B Ω Gauge transf. A α (x, θ) a m (x), ψ α (x): photon, photino wave func; for plane waves: U B m (λγ m θ)e ik x, k 2 = 0 (weight = 0) Also, integrated vertex ops are available U F α (λγ m θ)(γ m θ) α e ik x Similar for 1st-massive modes (alas, much much more complicated) 14
16 Super-Poincaré covariant rule to compute N-pt tree amplitudes A = U 1 (z 1 )U 2 (z 2 )U 3 (z 3 ) [dz 4 ]V 4 (z 4 ) [dz N ]V N (z N )... : CFT correlation func. of vertex ops. Zero-mode prescription for θ and λ: Read off the coeff. of Coincides with RNS results. (λγ m θ)(λγ n θ)(λγ r θ)(θγ mnr θ) Similar for loops finiteness proof (2004) Construction of boundary states 15
17 Achievements of PS: Applications PS analogue of Metsaev-Tseytlin GS action for AdS 5 S 5 One-loop conformal invariant Construction of infinite non-local conserved charges Supermembrane (difficult) Extended formulations with PS cond removed Genuine free (ω α, λ α ) with ghosts which effectively impose PS cond SB: covariant Komaba: minimal extension Add BRST quartet (ω I, λ I, b I, c I ) (SO(9, 1) U(5)) Quantum operator mapping to RNS / GS: Q PS Q RNS Q GS Relation to doubly supersymmetric formulation (aka superembedding) 16
18 Challenges of PS All rules postulated by hand What is Q B the BRST of? Is λ α a BRST ghost?; Origin of λγ m λ = 0? Where is Virasoro? (Q = ct vs λd?) Nature of worldsheet symmetry is obscure (Drawback of the powerful free field postulate) Desirable to have the underlying classical action for PS Geometrical understanding of Berkovits measure Application to 11D supermembranes Can we find one?...yes! 17
19 Origin of PS Superstring Classical PS Action I [hep-th/ ] (with Y. Kazama) Recall the classical GS action: L GS = L K + L WZ { L K = 1 2 gg ij Π m i Π jm L WZ = ɛ ij Π m i (W jm Ŵ jm ) ɛ ij Wi m Ŵ jm Π m i = i x m W m i Classical PS can be obtained simply by (1) gauging the origin of θ A : Ŵi m, Wi m θ A Θ A = θ A θ A (2) shifting ( to have SUSY in (x m, θ Aα ) sector) = i θγ m i θ x m y m = x m i(θγ m θ) i(ˆθγ mˆ θ) 18
20 Classical PS Action II Then, GS action turns to L PS = L K + L WZ { L K = 1 2 gg ij Π m i Π jm L WZ = ɛ ij Π m i (W jm Ŵ jm ) ɛ ij Wi m Ŵ jm Π m i = i y m W m i Θ = θ θ, Ŵi m, Wi m = iθγ m i Θ y m = x m i(θγ m θ) i(ˆθγ mˆ θ) By construction, has hidden local symmetry 2: δ θ = δθ = χ, δx m = iχγ m Θ, (δθ = δy m = 0) can be used to kill θ (equivalence to GS is manifest) or, kept along quantization Berkovits BRST sym: Q B = λ α d α 19
21 Symmetries of Classical PS Common with GS: Reparam. + Weyl Kappa among (y m, Θ α, g ij ) Super-Poincaré δ θ = 0, δθ = ɛ, δx m = iɛγ m θ, (δθ = ɛ, δy m = iɛγ m Θ) New to PS: Hidden local symmetry We now canonically quantize L PS θ Aα (GS): fix to semi-lc Physical sector (x m, θ Aα ): can maintain covariance 20
22 Canonical Quantization of PS Canonical mom. Poisson bracket: k m = L ẋ m, k α = L θ α, k α = L θ α {x m (σ), k n (σ )} P = η mn δ(σ σ ), { θ α (σ), p β (σ )} P = δ α βδ(σ σ ) {θ α (σ), p β (σ )} P = δ α βδ(σ σ ), (rest) = 0 Constraints (left/right(hatted): particle 2): T = 1 4 Πm Π m + 1 Θ α D α = (Virasoro) 0, ˆT = (Π m k m + 1 y m 2W1 m Π m 0 + Π m 1 ) (ˆΠ m ˆΠ m 0 ˆΠ m 1 ) D α = k α i(γ m θ) α k m i(γ m Θ) α (k m + Π m 1 W 1m ) 0, ˆ D α = D α = k α + i(γ m θ) α k m + i(γ m Θ) α (k m + Π m 1 W 1m) 0, ˆD α = Expect (1st cls: , 2nd cls: 8) 2 constraints. 21
23 Constraint algebra (omit δ-funcs): {T, } P 0, { D α, D β } P = 2iγαβ m Π m {D α, D β } P = { D α, D β } P = 2iγαβ m Π m { α, } P = 0 T (Virasoro): just measures weight 1st cls D α : just as GS 8 1st cls (κ) and 8 2nd cls α = D α + D α = p α + p α ip m (Θγ m ): generates the hidden sym 16 1st cls Below, (1) we fix κ by imposing semi-lc gauge: γ + θ = 0 θȧ = 0 (2) Reduce the phase space to Σ : θȧ = D α = 0 (x m, p n, S a ; p α, θ α ) (3) On Σ, we will be left with st cls constraints (T, D α ) Can invoke BRST: introduce ghosts (b, c) and (ω α, λ α ) to define Q = λ α α + ct +, Q 2 = 0 ((b, c) and S a kill a part of λ α PS constraint) 22
24 A digression on left/right splitting Similar for ( ˆT, ˆ α, ˆD α ); but at this stage, Holomorphicity Spinor species (A = 1, 2) Constraint alg splits into holomorphic/anti-hol part: {D α, ˆD β } P = 0, etc. But unlike GS, left/right variables are still entangling: More on this later Π m = k m + 1 x m i 1 (θγ m θ + ˆθγ }{{ mˆ θ) 2W } 1 m 1 y m 23
25 Explicit separation of κ Assuming Π + 0, able to separate 1st and 2nd cls. in D α : { D a { D a, D D α b } P = 2iδ ab Π + Kȧ = Dȧ 1 Π i γ i D Π + ȧb b 1st cls. = Kappa sym. Indeed { Kȧ, Kḃ} P = 8iδȧḃ T + f α D α 0, T T/Π + T = T/Π + is a good combination: {T, T } P = 0 ( Π + weight 1) T 0 T 0 (Π + 0) Can use T instead of T 24
26 1st cls constraints on reduced phase space On the constrained surface Σ : φ I (D a, θȧ, Kȧ) 0 with Dirac bracket {A, B} D = {A, B} P {A, φ I } P {φ I, φ J } 1 P {φ J, B} P T and D α = (D a, Dȧ) yield (1 + 16) 1st cls constraints with simple algebra: {Dȧ(σ), Dḃ(σ )} D = 8iδȧḃ T δ(σ σ ) {T (σ), (σ )} D = {D a (σ), (σ )} D = 0 Now Dȧ carries the info of Kappa Kȧ: (Kappa) 2 = Virasoro So far, so good. 25
27 Non-Canonical Dirac Brackets However, the phase space variables are no more canonical wrt the induced Symplectic structure (Dirac bracket) on eg. Σ : D a = Kȧ = θȧ = 0 {x m (σ), k n (σ )} D = η mn δ(σ σ ) + (i/2π + )(γ m θ) c (γ n Θ) c σ δ(σ σ ) {k m (σ), k n (σ )} D = (i/2) σ [(1/Π + )(γ m Θ) c (γ n Θ) c σ δ(σ σ )] Is not surprising; but problematic for quantization. Can one find a canonical basis? Yes, and with local combination of original fields. 26
28 Canonical Basis for {x m (σ), p n (σ )} D = η mn δ(σ σ ), {θ α (σ), p β (σ )} D = δ α β δ(σ σ ) {S a (σ), S b (σ )} D = iδ ab δ(σ σ ), (rest) = 0 p m = k m + i 1 (θγ m θ) i 1 (ˆθγ mˆ θ) p a = k a i( 1 x + iθγ + 1 θ) θ a + [2(γ i 1 θ) a θγ i θ + (γ i θ) a 1 ( θγ i θ)] [ pȧ = kȧ + i(γ m θ)ȧ 2i θγ m 1 θ + i θγ m 1 θ i 1 ( θγ m θ) ] [ i(γ i θ)ȧ 1 x i 3iθγ i 1 θ + 2iθγ i 1 θ + i 1 (ˆ θγ iˆθ) ] S a = 2Π + θ a & similar for Ŝ a, ˆp a and ˆpȧ Also, complete left/right separation takes place: eg. Π m = k m + 1 x m + i 1 (θγ m θ + ˆθγ mˆ θ) 2W m 1 Π m = p m + 1 x m + 2i 1 (θγ m θ) 2W m 1 27
29 Quantization Quantization is trivial: just replace {A, B} D i[a, B}: [p m, x n ] = iη mn, {p α, θ β } = iδ β α, {S a, S b } = δ ab Spectrum dictated by (1 + 16) 2 1st cls constraints: T, (D a, Dȧ) 0 {Dȧ(σ), Dḃ(σ )} D = 8iδȧḃ T (w)δ(σ σ ) {T (σ), (σ )} D = {D a (σ), (σ )} D = 0 28
30 Obtained system as a free CFT Or in CFT language, we get conformal fields with free field OPE s: Constraints are where x m (z)x n (w) = η mn log(z w), S a (z)s b (w) = δ ab /(z w) p α (z)θ β (w) = δ α β /(z w) T = 1 4 Π Π Π +, D a = d a + i 2Π + S a Dȧ = dȧ + i 2 Π +Πi (γ i S)ȧ + 2 Π +(γi S)ȧ(Sγ i θ) Π m = π m 1 2 S) i 2π +(Sγm π +(Sγ θ), (Π+ = π + ) π m = i x m + θγ m θ d α = p α + i(γ m θ) α x m (γm θ) α (θγ m θ) 29
31 Separating S a from (x m, p α, θ α ), we get T = 1 π m π m 2 π π +S c S c + i π +S c θ c + i (Sγ i θ) (π + ) 3πi 1 θ) θċ θċ 2 log π + (π + ) 2(Sγi (π + ) 2 2π + D a = d a + i 2π + S a 2 Dȧ = dȧ + i (γ i π +πi S)ȧ 1 S)ȧ(Sγ i θ)+ 4 2 θȧ π +(γi π + 2 π+ θȧ (π + ) 2 some ordering ambiguities; Can fix it demanding the constraint alg close quantum mechanically: Dȧ(z)Dḃ(w) = 4δ ȧḃ T (w) z w, (rest) = 0 Those were already engineered by Berkovits-Marchioro [hep-th/ ] as a 1st cls algebra containing d α. 30
32 Derivation of PS Now, we can BRST quantize the system in a standard way: Introduce fermionic (b, c), bosonic ( ω α, λ α ) ghosts and define Q = ( λ α D α + T c λȧ λȧb) Q 2 = 0; Cohom of Q = spectrum This completes the quantization. Q must have correct cohom; a tricky way to quantize GS Furthermore, can show the equivalence with PS: cohom of Q = cohom of Q B (Q B = where λ α is constrained λγ m λ = 0 (PS) λ α d α ) Basic idea of the proof: (1) Split λ to PS direction and the rest: λ = (λ, λ ) = (2) (λ, ω ; c, b, S a ) forms 5 KO quartet and decouples cohomologically 31
33 Derivation of Q B via Similarity Transf Berkovits-Marchioro Bring a constant spinor rȧ satisfying rȧ λȧ = 1, rȧrȧ = 0 Able to define a projector to PS space: Pȧḃ = λȧrḃ 1 2 r ȧ λḃ, P ab = 1 2 γi aḃ P ḃċ λċ(γ i r) b, P ȧḃ = δ ȧḃ P ȧḃ P ab = δ ab P ab Then, one can show λ α (P λ) α, λγ m λ = 0, λ α (P λ) α where e Z e Y e X Qe X e Y e Z = δ b + δ + Q B X = c(rċdċ), Y = 1 2 (P S) c (PS) c, Z = d c(ps) c 2i + 4( θ ȧλȧ)( θḃrḃ) π + δ b = 2b( λγ + λ), δ = 2iλ c (PS) c, Q B = λ α d α {δ b, δ } = {δ b, Q B } = {δ, Q B } = 0 32
34 Summary Derived Berkovits Q B from first principles Origin of PS Classical GS action with a hidden local sym. (completely covariant) Hidden sym Q B = λ α d α (λ α : BRST ghost) Reparam (b, c)-ghost + GS S a 5 PS constraint λγ m λ = 0 33
35 Outlooks Should be able to derive Berkovits measure (Tree & Loop) Improve the last step; more clever gauge fixing? Supermembrane (or super p-branes) Just like Siegel/Berkovits, ask Can one find a clever set of 1st cls constraint s.t. Free fields + BRST = Supermembrane Appropriate constraints are not known; classical PS action might provide some hints. Application to strings in various BG s Derivation of PS in curved BG. esp. AdS 5 S 5 34
6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.
6.1. Dirac Equation Ref: M.Kaku, Quantum Field Theory, Oxford Univ Press (1993) η μν = η μν = diag(1, -1, -1, -1) p 0 = p 0 p = p i = -p i p μ p μ = p 0 p 0 + p i p i = E c 2 - p 2 = (m c) 2 H = c p 2
Διαβάστε περισσότεραderivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates
derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates swapnizzle 03-03- :5:43 We begin by recognizing the familiar conversion from rectangular to spherical coordinates (note that φ is used
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSpace-Time Symmetries
Chapter Space-Time Symmetries In classical fiel theory any continuous symmetry of the action generates a conserve current by Noether's proceure. If the Lagrangian is not invariant but only shifts by a
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3
Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 1 State vector space and the dual space Space of wavefunctions The space of wavefunctions is the set of all
Διαβάστε περισσότεραC.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions
C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions Paul Liu November 15, 2007 Note that these are sample solutions only; in many cases there were many acceptable answers. 1 Reynolds Problem 10.1 1.1 Normal-order
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPhys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)
Phys460.nb 81 ψ n (t) is still the (same) eigenstate of H But for tdependent H. The answer is NO. 5.5.5. Solution for the tdependent Schrodinger s equation If we assume that at time t 0, the electron starts
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:
HOMEWORK 4 Problem a For the fast loading case, we want to derive the relationship between P zz and λ z. We know that the nominal stress is expressed as: P zz = ψ λ z where λ z = λ λ z. Therefore, applying
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in
Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in : tail in X, head in A nowhere-zero Γ-flow is a Γ-circulation such that
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMatrices and Determinants
Matrices and Determinants SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Q 1. For what value of k do the following system of equations possess a non-trivial (i.e., not all zero) solution over the set of rationals Q? x + ky + 3z
Διαβάστε περισσότεραRelativistic particle dynamics and deformed symmetry
Relativistic particle dynamics and deformed Poincare symmetry Department for Theoretical Physics, Ivan Franko Lviv National University XXXIII Max Born Symposium, Wroclaw Outline Lorentz-covariant deformed
Διαβάστε περισσότερα( y) Partial Differential Equations
Partial Dierential Equations Linear P.D.Es. contains no owers roducts o the deendent variables / an o its derivatives can occasionall be solved. Consider eamle ( ) a (sometimes written as a ) we can integrate
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Simply Typed Lambda Calculus
Type Inference Instead of writing type annotations, can we use an algorithm to infer what the type annotations should be? That depends on the type system. For simple type systems the answer is yes, and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραECE Spring Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 2
ECE 634 Spring 6 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes Fields in a Source-Free Region Example: Radiation from an aperture y PEC E t x Aperture Assume the following choice of vector potentials: A F = =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions
SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES GLMA Linear Mathematics 00- Examination Solutions. (a) i. ( + 5i)( i) = (6 + 5) + (5 )i = + i. Real part is, imaginary part is. (b) ii. + 5i i ( + 5i)( + i) = ( i)( + i)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II
Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II October 18, 2012 1 Review First let us recall the situation. Let g be a simple algebra, with maximal toral subalgebra h (which we are calling a CSA, or Cartan Subalgebra).
Διαβάστε περισσότεραb. Use the parametrization from (a) to compute the area of S a as S a ds. Be sure to substitute for ds!
MTH U341 urface Integrals, tokes theorem, the divergence theorem To be turned in Wed., Dec. 1. 1. Let be the sphere of radius a, x 2 + y 2 + z 2 a 2. a. Use spherical coordinates (with ρ a) to parametrize.
Διαβάστε περισσότερα= {{D α, D α }, D α }. = [D α, 4iσ µ α α D α µ ] = 4iσ µ α α [Dα, D α ] µ.
PHY 396 T: SUSY Solutions for problem set #1. Problem 2(a): First of all, [D α, D 2 D α D α ] = {D α, D α }D α D α {D α, D α } = {D α, D α }D α + D α {D α, D α } (S.1) = {{D α, D α }, D α }. Second, {D
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics
Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics Nov 1, 01 In this lecture we examine root systems from an axiomatic point of view. 1 Reflections If v R n, then it determines a hyperplane, denoted P v, through the
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2 Composition. Invertible Mappings
Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan Composition. Invertible Mappings In this section we discuss two procedures for creating new mappings from old ones, namely,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHigher spin gauge theories and their CFT duals
Higher spin gauge theories and their CFT duals E-mail: hikida@phys-h.keio.ac.jp 2 AdS Vasiliev AdS/CFT 4 Vasiliev 3 O(N) 3 Vasiliev 2 W N 1 AdS/CFT g µν Vasiliev AdS [1] AdS/CFT anti-de Sitter (AdS) (CFT)
Διαβάστε περισσότερα3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β
3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS Page Theorem cos(αβ cos α cos β -sin α cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α NOTE: cos(αβ cos α cos β cos(α-β cos α -cos β Proof of cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α Let s use a unit circle
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAbstract Storage Devices
Abstract Storage Devices Robert König Ueli Maurer Stefano Tessaro SOFSEM 2009 January 27, 2009 Outline 1. Motivation: Storage Devices 2. Abstract Storage Devices (ASD s) 3. Reducibility 4. Factoring ASD
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSymmetries and Feynman Rules for Ramond Sector in WZW-type Superstring Field Theories
Symmetries and Feynman Rules for Ramond Sector in WZW-type Superstring Field Theories Hiroshi Kunitomo YITP 215/3/5 @Nara Women s U. Nara arxiv:1412.5281, 153.xxxx Y TP YUKAWA INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL
Διαβάστε περισσότεραT-duality and noncommutativity in type IIB superstring theory
T-duality and noncommutativity in type IIB superstring theory B. Nikolić and B. Sazdović Institute of Physics, 111 Belgrade, P.O.Box 57, SERBIA Abstract In this article we investigate noncommutativity
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFinite Field Problems: Solutions
Finite Field Problems: Solutions 1. Let f = x 2 +1 Z 11 [x] and let F = Z 11 [x]/(f), a field. Let Solution: F =11 2 = 121, so F = 121 1 = 120. The possible orders are the divisors of 120. Solution: The
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSrednicki Chapter 55
Srednicki Chapter 55 QFT Problems & Solutions A. George August 3, 03 Srednicki 55.. Use equations 55.3-55.0 and A i, A j ] = Π i, Π j ] = 0 (at equal times) to verify equations 55.-55.3. This is our third
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNotes on the Open Economy
Notes on the Open Econom Ben J. Heijdra Universit of Groningen April 24 Introduction In this note we stud the two-countr model of Table.4 in more detail. restated here for convenience. The model is Table.4.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 19/5/2007
Οδηγίες: Να απαντηθούν όλες οι ερωτήσεις. Αν κάπου κάνετε κάποιες υποθέσεις να αναφερθούν στη σχετική ερώτηση. Όλα τα αρχεία που αναφέρονται στα προβλήματα βρίσκονται στον ίδιο φάκελο με το εκτελέσιμο
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDerivation of Optical-Bloch Equations
Appendix C Derivation of Optical-Bloch Equations In this appendix the optical-bloch equations that give the populations and coherences for an idealized three-level Λ system, Fig. 3. on page 47, will be
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPartial Trace and Partial Transpose
Partial Trace and Partial Transpose by José Luis Gómez-Muñoz http://homepage.cem.itesm.mx/lgomez/quantum/ jose.luis.gomez@itesm.mx This document is based on suggestions by Anirban Das Introduction This
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEE512: Error Control Coding
EE512: Error Control Coding Solution for Assignment on Finite Fields February 16, 2007 1. (a) Addition and Multiplication tables for GF (5) and GF (7) are shown in Tables 1 and 2. + 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 3
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic
Lecture 2 Soundness and completeness of propositional logic February 9, 2004 1 Overview Review of natural deduction. Soundness and completeness. Semantics of propositional formulas. Soundness proof. Completeness
Διαβάστε περισσότεραProblem Set 3: Solutions
CMPSCI 69GG Applied Information Theory Fall 006 Problem Set 3: Solutions. [Cover and Thomas 7.] a Define the following notation, C I p xx; Y max X; Y C I p xx; Ỹ max I X; Ỹ We would like to show that C
Διαβάστε περισσότεραApproximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude
Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude Jan Behrens 2012-12-31 In this paper we shall provide a method to approximate distances between two points on earth
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION FOR AN APPLIED FORCE Revision C
DERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION FOR AN APPLIED FORCE Revision C By Tom Irvine Email: tomirvine@aol.com August 6, 8 Introduction The obective is to derive a Miles equation which gives the overall response
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath 6 SL Probability Distributions Practice Test Mark Scheme
Math 6 SL Probability Distributions Practice Test Mark Scheme. (a) Note: Award A for vertical line to right of mean, A for shading to right of their vertical line. AA N (b) evidence of recognizing symmetry
Διαβάστε περισσότερα1 String with massive end-points
1 String with massive end-points Πρόβλημα 5.11:Θεωρείστε μια χορδή μήκους, τάσης T, με δύο σημειακά σωματίδια στα άκρα της, το ένα μάζας m, και το άλλο μάζας m. α) Μελετώντας την κίνηση των άκρων βρείτε
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn the Galois Group of Linear Difference-Differential Equations
On the Galois Group of Linear Difference-Differential Equations Ruyong Feng KLMM, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Ruyong Feng (KLMM, CAS) Galois Group 1 / 19 Contents 1 Basic Notations and Concepts
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas
09 Section 7. Double and Half Angle Fmulas To derive the double-angles fmulas, we will use the sum of two angles fmulas that we developed in the last section. We will let α θ and β θ: cos(θ) cos(θ + θ)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGeneral 2 2 PT -Symmetric Matrices and Jordan Blocks 1
General 2 2 PT -Symmetric Matrices and Jordan Blocks 1 Qing-hai Wang National University of Singapore Quantum Physics with Non-Hermitian Operators Max-Planck-Institut für Physik komplexer Systeme Dresden,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραD Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation
D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation MATH 467 Partial Differential Equations J. Robert Buchanan Department of Mathematics Fall 2018 Objectives In this lesson we will learn: a change of variable technique
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS
CHAPTER 5 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS EXERCISE 104 Page 8 1. Find the positive root of the equation x + 3x 5 = 0, correct to 3 significant figures, using the method of bisection. Let f(x) =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραVariational Wavefunction for the Helium Atom
Technische Universität Graz Institut für Festkörperphysik Student project Variational Wavefunction for the Helium Atom Molecular and Solid State Physics 53. submitted on: 3. November 9 by: Markus Krammer
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPartial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013
The boundary element method March 26, 203 Introduction and notation The problem: u = f in D R d u = ϕ in Γ D u n = g on Γ N, where D = Γ D Γ N, Γ D Γ N = (possibly, Γ D = [Neumann problem] or Γ N = [Dirichlet
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMATH423 String Theory Solutions 4. = 0 τ = f(s). (1) dτ ds = dxµ dτ f (s) (2) dτ 2 [f (s)] 2 + dxµ. dτ f (s) (3)
1. MATH43 String Theory Solutions 4 x = 0 τ = fs). 1) = = f s) ) x = x [f s)] + f s) 3) equation of motion is x = 0 if an only if f s) = 0 i.e. fs) = As + B with A, B constants. i.e. allowe reparametrisations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStrain gauge and rosettes
Strain gauge and rosettes Introduction A strain gauge is a device which is used to measure strain (deformation) on an object subjected to forces. Strain can be measured using various types of devices classified
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStatistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests
Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Shirsendu Mukherjee Department of Statistics, Asutosh College, Kolkata, India. shirsendu st@yahoo.co.in So far we have treated the testing of one-sided
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHigher Derivative Gravity Theories
Higher Derivative Gravity Theories Black Holes in AdS space-times James Mashiyane Supervisor: Prof Kevin Goldstein University of the Witwatersrand Second Mandelstam, 20 January 2018 James Mashiyane WITS)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExample Sheet 3 Solutions
Example Sheet 3 Solutions. i Regular Sturm-Liouville. ii Singular Sturm-Liouville mixed boundary conditions. iii Not Sturm-Liouville ODE is not in Sturm-Liouville form. iv Regular Sturm-Liouville note
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 8 Model Solution Section
MATH 004 Homework Solution Homework 8 Model Solution Section 14.5 14.6. 14.5. Use the Chain Rule to find dz where z cosx + 4y), x 5t 4, y 1 t. dz dx + dy y sinx + 4y)0t + 4) sinx + 4y) 1t ) 0t + 4t ) sinx
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFinite difference method for 2-D heat equation
Finite difference method for 2-D heat equation Praveen. C praveen@math.tifrbng.res.in Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Center for Applicable Mathematics Bangalore 560065 http://math.tifrbng.res.in/~praveen
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEvery set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set May 6, 2008 Abstract A set of first-order formulas, whatever the cardinality of the set of symbols, is equivalent to an independent
Διαβάστε περισσότεραUV fixed-point structure of the 3d Thirring model
UV fixed-point structure of the 3d Thirring model arxiv:1006.3747 [hep-th] (PRD accepted) Lukas Janssen in collaboration with Holger Gies Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena Theoretisch-Physikalisches
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOther Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests
Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Side-Note: So far we have seen a few approaches for creating tests such as Neyman-Pearson Lemma ( most powerful tests of H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 :
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAssalamu `alaikum wr. wb.
LUMP SUM Assalamu `alaikum wr. wb. LUMP SUM Wassalamu alaikum wr. wb. Assalamu `alaikum wr. wb. LUMP SUM Wassalamu alaikum wr. wb. LUMP SUM Lump sum lump sum lump sum. lump sum fixed price lump sum lump
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities
PARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities tanθ = sinθ cosθ cotθ = cosθ sinθ BASIC IDENTITIES cscθ = 1 sinθ secθ = 1 cosθ cotθ = 1 tanθ PYTHAGOREAN IDENTITIES sin θ + cos θ =1 tan θ +1= sec θ 1 + cot
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSecond Order Partial Differential Equations
Chapter 7 Second Order Partial Differential Equations 7.1 Introduction A second order linear PDE in two independent variables (x, y Ω can be written as A(x, y u x + B(x, y u xy + C(x, y u u u + D(x, y
Διαβάστε περισσότεραInverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. ------------------ ----------------------------- -----------------
Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. 1. Sin ( ) = a) b) c) d) Ans b. Solution : Method 1. Ans a: 17 > 1 a) is rejected. w.k.t Sin ( sin ) = d is rejected. If sin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMicro-Note on solving super p=2 form A MN
Micro-Note on solving super p=2 form A MN Sunny Guha April 10, 2016 1 Introduction Superforms are extended versions of differential forms which include superspace coordinates. For example a one-form superform
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSymmetric Stress-Energy Tensor
Chapter 3 Symmetric Stress-Energy ensor We noticed that Noether s conserved currents are arbitrary up to the addition of a divergence-less field. Exploiting this freedom the canonical stress-energy tensor
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOrbital angular momentum and the spherical harmonics
Orbital angular momentum and the spherical harmonics March 8, 03 Orbital angular momentum We compare our result on representations of rotations with our previous experience of angular momentum, defined
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 9.2 Polar Equations and Graphs
180 Section 9. Polar Equations and Graphs In this section, we will be graphing polar equations on a polar grid. In the first few examples, we will write the polar equation in rectangular form to help identify
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFermionic Superstring Loop Amplitudes in the Pure Spinor Formalism
Fermionic Superstring Loop Amplitudes in the Pure Spinor Formalism Christian Stahn (UNC) UNC String Theory Seminar, 3 May 2007 based on arxiv:0704.0015 Outline Introduction Methods for kinematic factor
Διαβάστε περισσότεραforms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with
Week 03: C lassification of S econd- Order L inear Equations In last week s lectures we have illustrated how to obtain the general solutions of first order PDEs using the method of characteristics. We
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCongruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 24, no. 5, 239-246 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/.2988/ija.24.422 Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 Ligong An and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΑπόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.
Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο The time integral of a force is referred to as impulse, is determined by and is obtained from: Newton s 2 nd Law of motion states that the action
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDr. D. Dinev, Department of Structural Mechanics, UACEG
Lecture 4 Material behavior: Constitutive equations Field of the game Print version Lecture on Theory of lasticity and Plasticity of Dr. D. Dinev, Department of Structural Mechanics, UACG 4.1 Contents
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008
Tridiagonal matrices Gérard MEURANT October, 2008 1 Similarity 2 Cholesy factorizations 3 Eigenvalues 4 Inverse Similarity Let α 1 ω 1 β 1 α 2 ω 2 T =......... β 2 α 1 ω 1 β 1 α and β i ω i, i = 1,...,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAffine Weyl Groups. Gabriele Nebe. Summerschool GRK 1632, September Lehrstuhl D für Mathematik
Affine Weyl Groups Gabriele Nebe Lehrstuhl D für Mathematik Summerschool GRK 1632, September 2015 Crystallographic root systems. Definition A crystallographic root system Φ is a finite set of non zero
Διαβάστε περισσότεραRevisiting the S-matrix approach to the open superstring low energy eective lagrangian
Revisiting the S-matrix approach to the open superstring low energy eective lagrangian IX Simposio Latino Americano de Altas Energías Memorial da América Latina, São Paulo. Diciembre de 2012. L. A. Barreiro
Διαβάστε περισσότεραJesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013
Notes on Average Scattering imes and Hall Factors Jesse Maassen and Mar Lundstrom Purdue University November 5, 13 I. Introduction 1 II. Solution of the BE 1 III. Exercises: Woring out average scattering
Διαβάστε περισσότεραST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II
ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II 2014/2015: Semester II Tutorial 7 1. Let X be a sample from a population P and consider testing hypotheses H 0 : P = P 0 versus H 1 : P = P 1, where P j is a known
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEcon 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1
Eon : Fall 8 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 Email questions or omments to Dan Fetter Problem. Let X be a salar with density f(x, θ) (θx + θ) [ x ] with θ. (a) Find the most powerful level α test
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSymmetries and Feynman Rules for Ramond Sector in WZW-type Superstring Field Theories
Symmetries and Feynman Rules for Ramond Sector in WZW-type Superstring Field Theories Hiroshi Kunitomo (YITP) 215/5/11 SFT215@Sichuan U. arxiv:1412.5281, 15x.xxxxx Y TP YUKAWA INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOverview. Transition Semantics. Configurations and the transition relation. Executions and computation
Overview Transition Semantics Configurations and the transition relation Executions and computation Inference rules for small-step structural operational semantics for the simple imperative language Transition
Διαβάστε περισσότερα9.09. # 1. Area inside the oval limaçon r = cos θ. To graph, start with θ = 0 so r = 6. Compute dr
9.9 #. Area inside the oval limaçon r = + cos. To graph, start with = so r =. Compute d = sin. Interesting points are where d vanishes, or at =,,, etc. For these values of we compute r:,,, and the values
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 10 - Representation Theory III: Theory of Weights
Lecture 10 - Representation Theory III: Theory of Weights February 18, 2012 1 Terminology One assumes a base = {α i } i has been chosen. Then a weight Λ with non-negative integral Dynkin coefficients Λ
Διαβάστε περισσότεραInstruction Execution Times
1 C Execution Times InThisAppendix... Introduction DL330 Execution Times DL330P Execution Times DL340 Execution Times C-2 Execution Times Introduction Data Registers This appendix contains several tables
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNew bounds for spherical two-distance sets and equiangular lines
New bounds for spherical two-distance sets and equiangular lines Michigan State University Oct 8-31, 016 Anhui University Definition If X = {x 1, x,, x N } S n 1 (unit sphere in R n ) and x i, x j = a
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThree coupled amplitudes for the πη, K K and πη channels without data
Three coupled amplitudes for the πη, K K and πη channels without data Robert Kamiński IFJ PAN, Kraków and Łukasz Bibrzycki Pedagogical University, Kraków HaSpect meeting, Kraków, V/VI 216 Present status
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 8.3 Trigonometric Equations
99 Section 8. Trigonometric Equations Objective 1: Solve Equations Involving One Trigonometric Function. In this section and the next, we will exple how to solving equations involving trigonometric functions.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΙΩΑΝΝΗ ΑΘ. ΠΑΠΑΪΩΑΝΝΟΥ
ΑΡΙΣΤΟΤΕΛΕΙΟ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΟΝΙΚΗΣ ΣΧΟΛΗ ΓΕΩΠΟΝΙΑΣ, ΔΑΣΟΛΟΓΙΑΣ ΚΑΙ ΦΥΣΙΚΟΥ ΠΕΡΙΒΑΛΛΟΝΤΟΣ ΤΜΗΜΑ ΓΕΩΠΟΝΙΑΣ ΤΟΜΕΑΣ ΑΓΡΟΤΙΚΗΣ ΟΙΚΟΝΟΜΙΑΣ ΙΩΑΝΝΗ ΑΘ. ΠΑΠΑΪΩΑΝΝΟΥ Πτυχιούχου Γεωπόνου Κατόχου Μεταπτυχιακού
Διαβάστε περισσότεραω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ω ω + 1 ω + 2 ω + 3 ω + 4 ω2 ω2 + 1 ω2 + 2 ω2 + 3 ω3 ω3 + 1 ω3 + 2 ω4 ω4 + 1 ω5 ω 2 ω 2 + 1 ω 2 + 2 ω 2 + ω ω 2 + ω + 1 ω 2 + ω2 ω 2 2 ω 2 2 + 1 ω 2 2 + ω ω 2 3 ω 3 ω 3 + 1 ω 3 + ω ω 3 +
Διαβάστε περισσότεραParametrized Surfaces
Parametrized Surfaces Recall from our unit on vector-valued functions at the beginning of the semester that an R 3 -valued function c(t) in one parameter is a mapping of the form c : I R 3 where I is some
Διαβάστε περισσότεραF-TF Sum and Difference angle
F-TF Sum and Difference angle formulas Alignments to Content Standards: F-TF.C.9 Task In this task, you will show how all of the sum and difference angle formulas can be derived from a single formula when
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNumerical Analysis FMN011
Numerical Analysis FMN011 Carmen Arévalo Lund University carmen@maths.lth.se Lecture 12 Periodic data A function g has period P if g(x + P ) = g(x) Model: Trigonometric polynomial of order M T M (x) =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMatrices and vectors. Matrix and vector. a 11 a 12 a 1n a 21 a 22 a 2n A = b 1 b 2. b m. R m n, b = = ( a ij. a m1 a m2 a mn. def
Matrices and vectors Matrix and vector a 11 a 12 a 1n a 21 a 22 a 2n A = a m1 a m2 a mn def = ( a ij ) R m n, b = b 1 b 2 b m Rm Matrix and vectors in linear equations: example E 1 : x 1 + x 2 + 3x 4 =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGraded Refractive-Index
Graded Refractive-Index Common Devices Methodologies for Graded Refractive Index Methodologies: Ray Optics WKB Multilayer Modelling Solution requires: some knowledge of index profile n 2 x Ray Optics for
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExercises to Statistics of Material Fatigue No. 5
Prof. Dr. Christine Müller Dipl.-Math. Christoph Kustosz Eercises to Statistics of Material Fatigue No. 5 E. 9 (5 a Show, that a Fisher information matri for a two dimensional parameter θ (θ,θ 2 R 2, can
Διαβάστε περισσότεραdepartment listing department name αχχουντσ ϕανε βαλικτ δδσϕηασδδη σδηφγ ασκϕηλκ τεχηνιχαλ αλαν ϕουν διξ τεχηνιχαλ ϕοην µαριανι
She selects the option. Jenny starts with the al listing. This has employees listed within She drills down through the employee. The inferred ER sttricture relates this to the redcords in the databasee
Διαβάστε περισσότεραg-selberg integrals MV Conjecture An A 2 Selberg integral Summary Long Live the King Ole Warnaar Department of Mathematics Long Live the King
Ole Warnaar Department of Mathematics g-selberg integrals The Selberg integral corresponds to the following k-dimensional generalisation of the beta integral: D Here and k t α 1 i (1 t i ) β 1 1 i
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 3 Solutions
Homework 3 Solutions Igor Yanovsky (Math 151A TA) Problem 1: Compute the absolute error and relative error in approximations of p by p. (Use calculator!) a) p π, p 22/7; b) p π, p 3.141. Solution: For
Διαβάστε περισσότερα8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II
8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II MIT OpenCourseWare Lecture Notes Hong Liu, Fall 200 Lecture 2 3: GENERAL ASPECTS OF QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS 3.: RENORMALIZED LAGRANGIAN Consider the Lagrangian
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS
CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS Shiah-Sen Wang The graphs are prepared by Chien-Lun Lai Based on : Precalculus: Mathematics for Calculus by J. Stuwart, L. Redin & S. Watson, 6th edition, 01, Brooks/Cole Chapter
Διαβάστε περισσότεραBounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees
Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees Thomas F. Kent Andrea Sorbi Università degli Studi di Siena Italia July 18, 2007 Goal: Introduce a form of Σ 0 2-permitting for the enumeration degrees. Till now,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe kinetic and potential energies as T = 1 2. (m i η2 i k(η i+1 η i ) 2 ). (3) The Hooke s law F = Y ξ, (6) with a discrete analog
Lecture 12: Introduction to Analytical Mechanics of Continuous Systems Lagrangian Density for Continuous Systems The kinetic and potential energies as T = 1 2 i η2 i (1 and V = 1 2 i+1 η i 2, i (2 where
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDETERMINATION OF DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A 2DOF SYSTEM. by Zoran VARGA, Ms.C.E.
DETERMINATION OF DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A 2DOF SYSTEM by Zoran VARGA, Ms.C.E. Euro-Apex B.V. 1990-2012 All Rights Reserved. The 2 DOF System Symbols m 1 =3m [kg] m 2 =8m m=10 [kg] l=2 [m] E=210000
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume
BULETINUL ACADEMIEI DE ŞTIINŢE A REPUBLICII MOLDOVA. MATEMATICA Numbers 2(72) 3(73), 2013, Pages 80 89 ISSN 1024 7696 On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume I.S.Gutsul Abstract. In
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDESIGN OF MACHINERY SOLUTION MANUAL h in h 4 0.
DESIGN OF MACHINERY SOLUTION MANUAL -7-1! PROBLEM -7 Statement: Design a double-dwell cam to move a follower from to 25 6, dwell for 12, fall 25 and dwell for the remader The total cycle must take 4 sec
Διαβάστε περισσότερα