Some new generalized topologies via hereditary classes. Key Words:hereditary generalized topological space, A κ(h,µ)-sets, κµ -topology.

Σχετικά έγγραφα
1. Introduction and Preliminaries.

F A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I

Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit

MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS

Operation Approaches on α-γ-open Sets in Topological Spaces

Homomorphism in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Automata

A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation

2 Composition. Invertible Mappings

Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets

Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs

SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS

Reminders: linear functions

ON FUZZY BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES IN ŠOSTAK S SENSE (II)

Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in

Intuitionistic Supra Gradation of Openness

Coefficient Inequalities for a New Subclass of K-uniformly Convex Functions

Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 4(2), 2011, pp

C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings

ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set

Homomorphism and Cartesian Product on Fuzzy Translation and Fuzzy Multiplication of PS-algebras

ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II

Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.

Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor

SCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018

EE512: Error Control Coding

Example Sheet 3 Solutions

A Note on Characterization of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals in Γ- Near-Rings

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)

k A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +

Homomorphism of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Groups

Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2

Knaster-Reichbach Theorem for 2 κ

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests

5. Choice under Uncertainty

Fuzzifying Tritopological Spaces

On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume

PROPERTIES OF CERTAIN INTEGRAL OPERATORS. a n z n (1.1)

Lecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic

Finite Field Problems: Solutions

2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)

On Annihilator of Fuzzy Subsets of Modules

CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS

CHARACTERIZATION OF BIPOLAR FUZZY IDEALS IN ORDERED GAMMA SEMIGROUPS

Sequent Calculi for the Modal µ-calculus over S5. Luca Alberucci, University of Berne. Logic Colloquium Berne, July 4th 2008

Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests

A General Note on δ-quasi Monotone and Increasing Sequence

Matrices and Determinants

Homework 3 Solutions

Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3

On Pseudo δ-open Fuzzy Sets and Pseudo Fuzzy δ-continuous Functions

Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics

12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem

ON INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY SUBSPACES

Generalized Double Star Closed Sets in Interior Minimal Spaces

Chapter 3: Ordinal Numbers

GAUGES OF BAIRE CLASS ONE FUNCTIONS

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions

Tridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008

3.2 Simple Roots and Weyl Group

Abstract Storage Devices

ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 19/5/2007

Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations

THE SECOND ISOMORPHISM THEOREM ON ORDERED SET UNDER ANTIORDERS. Daniel A. Romano

Fourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics

Subclass of Univalent Functions with Negative Coefficients and Starlike with Respect to Symmetric and Conjugate Points

557: MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS II RESULTS FROM CLASSICAL HYPOTHESIS TESTING

Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations

Partial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013

Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees

A Conception of Inductive Logic: Example

The Simply Typed Lambda Calculus

On density of old sets in Prikry type extensions.

Cyclic or elementary abelian Covers of K 4

Lecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE

2. THEORY OF EQUATIONS. PREVIOUS EAMCET Bits.

Overview. Transition Semantics. Configurations and the transition relation. Executions and computation

Young Bae Jun Madad Khan Florentin Smarandache Saima Anis. Fuzzy and Neutrosophic Sets in Semigroups

GÖKHAN ÇUVALCIOĞLU, KRASSIMIR T. ATANASSOV, AND SINEM TARSUSLU(YILMAZ)

3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β

New bounds for spherical two-distance sets and equiangular lines

Chapter 2. Ordinals, well-founded relations.

The challenges of non-stable predicates

Generating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations

Iterated trilinear fourier integrals with arbitrary symbols

Math 6 SL Probability Distributions Practice Test Mark Scheme

Takeaki Yamazaki (Toyo Univ.) 山崎丈明 ( 東洋大学 ) Oct. 24, RIMS

The strong semilattice of π-groups

DIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANSFORMATION SEMIGROUPS

ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?

Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II

CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS

Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)

ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 6/5/2006

Practice Exam 2. Conceptual Questions. 1. State a Basic identity and then verify it. (a) Identity: Solution: One identity is csc(θ) = 1

Second Order RLC Filters

Roman Witu la 1. Let ξ = exp(i2π/5). Then, the following formulas hold true [6]:

The operators over the generalized intuitionistic fuzzy sets

Lecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals

Transcript:

Bol. Soc. Paran. Mat. (3s.) v. 30 2 (2012): 71 77. c SPM ISSN-2175-1188 on line ISSN-00378712 in press SPM: www.spm.uem.br/bspm doi:10.5269/bspm.v30i2.13793 Some new generalized topologies via hereditary classes M.Rajamani, V.Inthumathi and R.Ramesh abstract: In this paper, we introduce and study the notions of A κ (H, µ) in hereditary generalized topological spaces introduced by Csaszar. Using these notions we obtain new generalized topologies κµ via hereditary classes. Key Words:hereditary generalized topological space, A κ(h,µ)-sets, κµ -topology Contents 1 Introduction and Preliminaries 71 2 A κ(h,µ) sets via hereditary classes 72 3 Some new generalized topologies via hereditary classes 74 1. Introduction and Preliminaries In 1990, Jankovic and Hamlett [5] obtained a new topology τ from the old one via ideals. In 2002, Csaszar [1], introduced the notions of generalized topology. In 2007, Csaszar [2], showed that the construction leading from a topology τ and an ideal of sets to another topology remains valid, if topology is replaced by generalized topology and ideal by hereditary classes and he constructed the generalized topology µ. In this paper we continue the study of construction of such generalized topologies by using µ-semi-open, µ-α-open, µ-pre-open and µ-β-open sets via hereditary classes. Let X be any nonempty set and µ be a GT [1] of subsets of X. A nonempty family H of subsets of X is said to be a hereditary class [2], if A H and B A, then B H. A generalized topological space (X,µ) with a hereditary class H is hereditary generalized topological space and denoted by (X,µ,H). For each A X, A (H,µ)={x X : A V / H for every V µ such that x V }[2]. For A X, define c µ(a) = A A (H,µ) and µ = {A X : X A = c µ(x A)}. A subset A of (X, µ) is µ-α-open [3] (resp.µ-semiopen [3], µ-preopen [3], µ-β-open [3]), if A i µ c µ i µ (A) (resp.a c µ i µ (A),A i µ c µ (A),A c µ i µ c µ (A)). We denote the family of all µ-α-open sets, µ-semiopen sets, µ-preopen sets and µ-βopen sets by α(µ), σ(µ), π(µ) and β(µ). On GT, µ α(µ) σ(µ) β(µ) and α(µ) π(µ) β(µ)[3]. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 54A05 71 Typeset by B S P M style. c Soc. Paran. de Mat.

72 M.Rajamani, V.Inthumathi and R.Ramesh 2. A κ(h,µ) sets via hereditary classes Definition 2.1 Let A be a subset of hereditary generalized topological space (X, µ, H) and κ {α(µ),σ(µ),π(µ),β(µ)}. Then A κ(h,µ) = {x X : A U / H for every U κ}. When there is no ambiguity, We simply write A, A α, A σ, A π and A β for A (H,µ), A α(h,µ), A σ(h,µ), A π(h,µ) and A β (H,µ), respectively. Proposition 2.2 Let A be a subset of hereditary generalized topological space (X, µ,h). Then A β (H,µ) A π(h,µ) A α(h,µ) A (H,µ). The converse of the assertions of Proposition 2.2 need not be true as shown in the following example. Example 2.3 Let X = {a,b,c,d,e}, µ = {, {a}, {b}, {a,b}, {b,d,e}, {a,b,d,e}, {a,c,d,e},x} and H = {, {c}}. 1. Let A = {c,e}. Then A = {c,d,e} {e} = A α. 2. Let A = {a,d}. Then A α = {a,c,d,e} {a,c,d} = A π. 3. Let A = {a}. Then A π = {a,c} {a} = A β. Proposition 2.4 Let A be a subset of hereditary generalized topological space (X, µ,h). Then A β (H,µ) A σ(h,µ) A α(h,µ) A (H,µ). The converse of the assertions of Proposition 2.4 need not be true as shown in the following example. Example 2.5 Let X = {a,b,c,d,e}, µ = {, {a}, {c}, {a,b}, {a,c}, {a,b,c}, {a,c,d,e}, {b,c,d,e},x} and H = {, {a}, {b}}. 1. Let A = {a,b,c}. Then A = {b,c,d,e} {b,c} = A β. 2. Let A = {d}. Then A = {d,e} {d} = A α. 3. Let A = {c}. Then A α = {c,d,e} {c} = A σ. Lemma 2.6 Let (X,µ,H) be a hereditary generalized topological space, κ {α(µ),σ(µ),π(µ),β(µ)}, κ A H imply κ A κ =. Hence H κ = X κ, if H H. Proof: Let x κ A κ, implies κ A / H. Now H H implies κ H H for x / H κ, thus H κ X κ. On the other hand X κ H κ. Hence H κ = X κ. Definition 2.7 Let (X,µ,H) be a hereditary generalized topological space, let x X and κ {α(µ),σ(µ),π(µ),β(µ)}. Then a subset N of X is said to be κ- neighbourhood of x, if there exists a κ-open set U such that x U N. Set of all κ-neighbourhoods of x is denoted by κn(x).

Some new generalized topologies via hereditary classes 73 Proposition 2.8 Let A be a subset of hereditary generalized topological space (X, µ,h) and κ {α(µ),σ(µ),π(µ),β(µ)}. Then A κ c κ (A). Proof: Let x / c κ (A). Then there exists a U κn(x) such that U A = H, so that x / A κ. Hence A κ c κ (A). Proposition 2.9 Let κ {α(µ),σ(µ),π(µ),β(µ)} and A be a κ-closed subset of hereditary generalized topological space (X,µ,H). Then A κ A. Proof: Let A be κ-closed. By Proposition 2.8 we have A κ c κ (A) = A. Remark 2.10 Let A be a subset of hereditary generalized topological space (X, µ, H) and κ {α(µ),σ(µ),π(µ),β(µ)}. Then 1. A κ(h,µ) = A (H,µ), if κ = µ. 2. If H =, then A κ(h,µ) = c κ (A). 3. If H = P(X), then A κ(h,µ) =. 4. If A H, then A κ =. Theorem 2.11 If A and B are subsets of hereditary generalized topological space (X,µ,H) and κ {α(µ),σ(µ),π(µ),β(µ)}. Then 1. A B, then A κ B κ. 2. A κ = c κ (A κ) c κ (A) and A κ is κ-closed set in (X,µ,H). 3. (A κ) κ A κ. 4. (A B) κ = A κ B κ. 5. A κ B κ = (A B) κ B κ (A B) κ. 6. If U µ, then U A κ = U (U A) κ (U A) κ. 7. If H 0 H, then (A H 0 ) κ = A κ = (A H 0 ) κ. 8. If H 1 H 2, then A κ(h 2 ) A κ(h 1 ). 9. A κ(h 1 H 2 ) = A κ(h 1 ) A κ(h 2 ). Proof: 1. Suppose that A B and x / B κ. Then there exists a U κn(x) such that U B H. Since A B, U A U B H and x / A κ. Hence A κ B κ. 2. We know that A κ c κ (A κ), Let x / A κ. Then there exists a U κn(x) such that U A H. By Lemma 2.6, κ A κ = involving x / c κ (A κ), c κ (A κ) A κ c κ (A κ) and A κ = c κ (A κ). 3. By 2, A κ is κ-closed and by Proposition 2.9, (A κ) κ A κ.

74 M.Rajamani, V.Inthumathi and R.Ramesh 4. Let A,B A B. By (1), we have A κ (A B) κ and B κ (A B) κ. Therefore, A κ B κ (A B) κ, let x (A B) κ. Then for every U κn(x), (U A) (U B) = U (A B) / H. Therefore, U A / H or U B / H. This implies that x A κ or x B κ, that is x A κ B κ. Therefore, we have (A B) κ A κ B κ. Consequently, we obtain (A B) κ = A κ B κ. 5. Since A = (A B) (B A), by (4) we have A κ = (A B) κ (B A) κ and hence A κ B κ = A κ (X B κ) = [(A B) κ (B A) κ] (X B κ) = [(A B) κ (X B κ)] [(B A) κ (X B κ)] = [(A B) κ B κ] (A B) κ. 6. Suppose that U µ and x U A κ. Then x U and x A κ. Let V be any κ-open set containing x. Then V U κn(x) and V (U A) = (V U) A / H. This shows that x (U A) κ and hence we obtain U A κ (U A) κ. Moreover, U A A and by (1), (U A) κ A κ and U (U A) κ U A κ. Therefore, U A κ = U (U A) κ. 7. Since H 0 H, (A H 0 ) κ = A κ (H 0 ) κ = A κ. Also A H 0 = (A H 0 ) H 0 implies that (A H 0 ) κ = (A H 0 ) κ (H 0 ) κ = (A H 0 ) κ. 8. Let H 1 H 2 and x A κ(h 2 ). Then U A / H 2, for every U κn(x). This implies that U A / H 1, for every U κn(x). Hence A κ(h 2 ) A κ(h 1 ). 9. Let x / (A κ(h 1 ) A κ(h 2 )). Then x / both A κ(h 1 ) and A κ(h 2 ). Now, x / A κ(h 1 ) implies that there exist atleast one U κn(x) such that U A H 1. Again x / A κ(h 2 ) implies that there exists atleast one U κn(x) such that U A H 2. Therefore, there exists atleast one U κn(x) such that U A H 1 H 2, which implies that x / A κ(h 1 H 2 ). Thus, (A κ(h 1 ) A κ(h 2 )) A κ(h 1 H 2 ). Let x A κ(h 1 H 2 ). Then for each U κn(x), U A / (H 1 H 2 ). Since U A / H 1 H 2, either U A / H 1 or U A / H 2. If U A / H 1, then x A κ(h 1 ), otherwise, x A κ(h 2 ). Thus x A κ(h 1 ) A κ(h 2 ). Therefore, A κ(h 1 H 2 ) A κ(h 1 ) A κ(h 2 ). Consequently, we have A κ(h 1 H 2 ) = A κ(h 1 ) A κ(h 2 )). Corollary 2.12 Let A be a subset of hereditary generalized topological space (X, κ, H) and κ {α(µ),σ(µ),π(µ),β(µ)}. Then (A κ) κ A κ = c κ (A κ) c κ (A). 3. Some new generalized topologies via hereditary classes Let (X,µ,H) be a hereditary generalized topological space. For A X, define c κa = A A κ, κ {α(µ),σ(µ),π(µ),β(µ)}. According to [2], Corollary 3.4, c κ is enlarging, monotone and idempotent. Thus according to [3], Lemma 1.4, there exist generalized topologies κµ, where κ {α(µ),σ(µ),π(µ),β(µ)} such that c κa is the intersection of all κµ -closed super sets of M; M κµ iff X M = c κ(x M). Also c κ(a) = A c κ (A κ) c κ (A). Definition 3.1 A subset A of a hereditary generalized topological space (X,µ,H) is said to be κµ -closed if A κ A. Lemma 3.2 The sets {M H : M κµ,h H} constitute a base B for κµ.

Some new generalized topologies via hereditary classes 75 Proof: Let M κµ, H H implies M H κµ since F = X (M H) = X (M (X H)) = (X M) H is κµ -closed by Definition 3.1, x / F iff x M H, hence x M and M F = M ((X M) H) = (M (X M)) (M H) = M H H so that x / Fκ, Fκ F. Thus B κµ. If A κµ then B = X A is κµ -closed, hence Bκ B. Thus x A implies x / B and x / Bκ so that there exists M κµ such that x M and H = M B H, therefore x M H X B = A. Hence A is the union of sets in B. Proposition 3.3 Let A be a subset of a generalized topological space (X,µ,H). Then 1. A β (H,µ ) A σ(h,µ ) A α(h,µ ) A (H,µ ). 2. A β (H,µ ) A π(h,µ ) A α(h,µ ) A (H,µ ). The converse of the assertions of Proposition 3.3 need not be true as shown in the following examples. Example 3.4 Let X = {a,b,c,d,e}, µ = {, {a}, {b}, {a,b}, {b,d,e}, {a,b,d,e}, {a,c,d,e},x} and H = {, {c}}. 1. Let A = {d}. Then A (H,µ ) = {c,d,e} {d} = A α(h,µ ). 2. Let A = {b,d}. Then A α(h,µ ) = {b,c,d,e} {b,d} = A σ(h,µ ). 3. Let A = {a,c,d}. Then A σ(h,µ ) = {a,c,d,e} {a,d} = A β (H,µ ). Example 3.5 Let X = {a,b,c,d,e}, µ = {, {a}, {b}, {a,b}, {b,d,e}, {a,b,d,e}, {a,c,d,e},x} and H = {, {c}}. 1. Let A = {e}. Then A (H,µ ) = {c,d,e} {e} = A α(h,µ ). 2. Let A = {b,e}. Then A α(h,µ ) = {b,c,d,e} {b,e} = A π(h,µ ). 3. Let A = {a,e}. Then A π(h,µ ) = {a,c,e} {a,e} = A β (H,µ ). Remark 3.6 Let (X,µ,H) be a hereditary generalized topological space. Then µ α(µ ) σ(µ ) β(µ ) and µ α(µ ) π(µ ) β(µ ). Theorem 3.7 Let (X, µ, H) be a hereditary generalized topological space, κ {α(µ),σ(µ),π(µ),β(µ)} and A A κ. Then 1. A κ = c κ (A κ) = c κ (A). 2. c κ (A) = c κ(a) 3. i κ (X A) = i κ(x A).

76 M.Rajamani, V.Inthumathi and R.Ramesh Proof: 1.For every subset A of X, we have A κ = c κ (A κ) c κ (A) by Theorem 2.11. A A κ implies c κ (A) c κ (A κ) and so A κ = c κ (A κ) = c κ (A). 2.Clearly for every subset A of X, c κ(a) c κ (A). Let x / c κ(a), then there exists a κµ open set U containing x such that U A =. By Lemma 3.2 there exists a M κµ and H H such that x M H U. U A = (M H) A =. By Theorem 2.11 (M A) H = ((M A) H) κ = (M A) κ H κ = (M A) κ = M A κ M A =. Since M is κµ-open set containing x, x / c κ (A) and c κ (A) c κ(a). Hence c κ (A) = c κ(a) which proves (2). 3. If A A κ, then c κ (A) = c κ(a) by (2) and so X c κ (A) = X c κ(a) implies i κ (X A) = i κ(x A). Theorem 3.8 Let (X,µ,H) be a hereditary generalized topological space. Then, 1. A σ(h,σ(µ))= A α(h,σ(µ)) = A σ(h,µ). 2. A π(h,σ(µ))= A β (H,σ(µ)) = A β (H,µ). 3. A π(h,β(µ))= A β (H,β(µ)) = A β (H,µ). 4. A α(h,β(µ))= A σ(h,β(µ)) = A β (H,µ). 5. A π(h,π(µ))= A α(h,π(µ)) = A π(h,µ). Proof: 1. Let x A σ(h,σ(µ)). Then there exists a x U σ(σ) such that A U / H. By Theorem 2.3, of [3], σ(σ) = α(σ) = σ. Hence x A α(h,σ(µ)) and x A σ(h,µ). Thus A σ(h,σ(µ)) A α(h,σ(µ)) and A σ(h,σ(µ)) A σ(h,µ). Similarly A α(h,σ(µ)) A σ(h,σ(µ)) and A σ(h,µ) A σ(h,σ(µ)). Hence A σ(h,σ(µ)) = A α(h,σ(µ)) = A σ(h,µ). Proof of 2, 3, 4 and 5 are similar as in proof 1. Theorem 3.9 Let (X,µ,H) be a hereditary generalized topological space and κ {α(µ),σ(µ),π(µ),β(µ)}. Then A κ(h,α(µ)) = A κ(h,µ). Proof: Let x A κ(h,α(µ)) then for any U κ(α) such that A U / H. By Theorem 2.5, of [3], κ(α) = κ(µ). Hence x A κ(h,µ). Thus A κ(h,α(µ)) A κ(x,µ). Similarly A κ(h,µ) A κ(h,α(µ)). Hence A κ(h,α(µ)) = A κ(h,µ). Corollary 3.10 Let (X, µ, H) be a hereditary generalized topological space and κ {α(µ),σ(µ),π(µ),β(µ)}. Then A κ(h,β(µ))=a β (H,µ). Theorem 3.11 Let µ and µ are GT s on X and H be a hereditary class. 1. If µ µ β(µ), then A α(h,µ ) A α(h,µ). 2. If µ µ α(µ), then A α(h,µ) = A α(h,µ ).

Some new generalized topologies via hereditary classes 77 Proof: (1). Let x A α(h,µ ). Then there exists a U α(µ ) such that U A H. By Theorem 2.2, of [4], α(µ) α(µ ). We have U A H for any U α(µ) and hence x A α(h,µ). Thus A α(h,µ ) A α(h,µ). (2). Let x A α(h,µ). Then for any U α(µ), U A / H. By Corollary 2.3, of [4], α(µ) = α(µ ). We have U A H when U α(µ ) and hence x A α(h,µ ). Thus A α(h,µ) A α(h,µ ). Similarly A α(h,µ ) A α(h,µ). Hence A α(h,µ) = A α(h,µ ). References 1. A.Csaszar, Generalized topology, generalized continuity, Acta Math. Hungar., 96(2002), 351-357. 2. A.Csaszar, Modification of generalized topologies via hereditary classes, Acta Math. Hungar., 115(2007), 29-36. 3. A.Csaszar, Generalized open sets in generalized topologies, Acta Math. Hungar., 106(1-2)(2005), 53-66. 4. A.Csaszar, Monotonicity properties of operations on generalized topologies, Acta Math. Hungar., 108(4)(2005), 351-354. 5. D. Jankovic and T. R. Hamlett, New topologies from old via ideals, Amer Math. Monthly, (4)(1990), 295-310. M.Rajamani, V.Inthumathi and R.Ramesh Department of Mathematics, N G M College, Pollachi - 642 001, Tamil Nadu, India. E-mail address: rajkarthy@yahoo.com