ISO Sample Report

Transcript

1 PAGE NO. 1 MULTIPASS FILTER TEST REPORT SHEET - ISO 16889:1999 Test Lab: Fluid Technologies, Inc. Test Date: 00/00/0000 Operator: AAA Customer: A Housing ID: C Min. Element BP (in. water): F OPERATING CONDITIONS Test Fluid Type: MIL-H-5606 Ref: MIL-H-5606 Viscosity (mm 2 /s): 13 Temperature ( o C): 38 Antistatic Additive Type: Stadis 450 Conductivity (ps/m) 660 Test Contaminant Type: ISO MEDIUM Batch No.: 5006M Test System Flowrate: (lpm) Initial Volume (liters): 50.0 Base gravimetric level: 10.8 (mg/l) Final Volume (liters): 51.0 Injection System Injection Parameters Initial Final Average Injection Parameters System Volume (l) Injection flow (l/min) 0.30 Concentration (mg/l) Concentration (mg/l) Particle Counting System Counter Sensor Flow Rate (ml/min) Dilution Ratio Upstream 50 None Downstream 50 None Counter Calibration: Method: ISO Date: Jul-02 TEST RESULTS Element Integrity Bubble Point to ISO 2942 (in. water): 10.0 Wetting Fluid: 5606 Differential Pressure Housing P: (kpad) Clean Assembly P 2 : (kpad) Clean Element P: 2.6 (kpad) Final P Element: (kpad) Differential Pressure versus Contaminant Added Time Interval Test Time Element P Inj. Mass Time Interval Test Time Element P Inj. Mass (%) (min) (kpad)) (grams) (%) (min) (kpad) (grams) Rentention Capacity (ISO A3 Test Dust) Mass Injected M i (g): Retained capacity C r (g): % Upstream Conc. G 80 (mg/l): 15.9 Filtration Ratio β x(c) Average Filtration Ratio Particle Size: µm(c)

2 PAGE NO. 2 TEST REPORT SHEET (continued) Customer: A Housing ID: C Min. Element BP (in. water): F TEST RESULTS Particle Size Number of Particles per Millilieter and Filtration Ratio 5.0 um(c) 10.0 um(c) 15.0 um(c) 20.0 um(c) 25.0 um(c) 30.0 um(c) 35.0 um(c) 40.0 um(c) Initial Clean FILTRATION EFFICIENCY 10 % Upstream Downstream Beta FILTRATION EFFICIENCY 20 % Upstream Downstream Beta FILTRATION EFFICIENCY 30 % Upstream Downstream Beta FILTRATION EFFICIENCY 40 % Upstream Downstream Beta FILTRATION EFFICIENCY 50 % Upstream Downstream Beta FILTRATION EFFICIENCY 60 % Upstream Downstream Beta FILTRATION EFFICIENCY 70 % Upstream Downstream Beta FILTRATION EFFICIENCY 80 % Upstream Downstream Beta FILTRATION EFFICIENCY 90 % Upstream Downstream Beta FILTRATION EFFICIENCY % Upstream Downstream Beta Avg. Upstream Avg. Downstream Avg. Beta Avg. Efficiency (%)

3 PAGE NO. 3 Differential Pressure versus Contaminant Added Element Differential Pressure (kpad) ISO A3 Test Dust Injected (grams)

4 PAGE NO. 4 Filtration Ratio versus Particle Size 00 0 Filtration Ratio, βx(c) Particle Size, µm(c)

5 PAGE NO. 5 Filtration Ratio versus Percent Test Time Filtration Ratio, βx(c) Percent Test Time 5.0 um(c) 10.0 um(c) 15.0 um(c) 20.0 um(c) 25.0 um(c) 30.0 um(c) 35.0 um(c) 40.0 um(c)

6 PAGE NO. 6 Filtration Ratio versus Element Differential Pressure Filtration Ratio, βx(c) Element Differential Pressure (kpad) 5.0 um(c) 10.0 um(c) 15.0 um(c) 20.0 um(c) 25.0 um(c) 30.0 um(c) 35.0 um(c) 40.0 um(c)