Strategic management application for secondary school principals in Taif city from the agents and teachers point of view

Transcript

1 , 2,29, : , , 2,29, 2, ; , :,,,,,, 1235, 363,,, ;,,, :,,, α 0.05,,,,, : Strategic management application for secondary school principals in Taif city from the agents and teachers point of view Amjad Mahmoud Mohammed Daradkah (1), and Mohamed Sahman Habash Al - Olayan (2) Taif University (Received 15/02/2017; accepted 10/04/2017) Abstract: This study aimed to know the degree of application of the strategic management at the secondary school at the city Taif, obstacles, and to know obstacles facing the application of the strategic management, and suggestion of improvement, and to know the different views of participants according to variables(job title, classrooms, scientific, years of experience, and the number of training sessions).. it has been used descriptive method, the study sample consisted of (363) agents and teachers, were chosen randomly from the (1235), it has been used aquestionnaire, The first is the reality of the application of strategic management divided into five areas: analysis of the internal environment, analysis of the external environment, formulation of strategy, implementation of strategy, evaluation and strategic control; the second is the obstacles to the application of strategic management; the third is the proposals that contribute to the application Strategic management. It was sure to validity and reliability. The results of the study responses on the degree of application for the strategic management among the principals of general education schools in Taif were average, and their response to the obstacles of application was medium. Their response was also to the proposed solutions with an agree level. There were no statistically significant differences at (α 0.05) between the responses of the study on the degree of application of strategic management, according to the variables of the study. Key words: Internal Environment, External Environment, Strategy, Evaluation, Supervision. (1) Associate Professor of Educational Administration, Taif University. Taif, Saudi Arabia, P.O. Box (888), Postal Code: (21944).,,, , 888,, (2) Researcher, Ministry of Education. amdaradkah@yahoo.com : 2 223

2 :,,,, 2,2008,,, 452,2006,,,, : ;,, ;,.,, 2,2010,, 224

3 , 2,29, 2003,, :, Seibert, 2004,,,,, Dephi,, 3,2008,,,(Nicoline & Antje, 2006, 2) (Paul, 2003, 289) (Tummala & Tang, 1995),,,,,, 225

4 :, 2005,,,,,,,,, %82.8, %84.4,,,,, :,, 2005,,,, :, %30.4 %

5 , 2,29,,, :,, (David, 2006),,,,,,, 2006,, 2006,, :,,, Steadham,

6 :,, 2008,, Boal, Schultz,,, 2008,, :, 2007) :,,,,,,, 228

7 , 2,29,,,, 2010, ,,, :,, 2010,, % , %68.2 %70, %77.6 %71.1 %68.1,,,, %68 80 (Quist, 2009),,,,,,,,, 229

8 :,,, R= ,,, 2012,,,,, 2012,,,,,,,,, :

9 , 2,29,,,, : EFQM 2004, 2013,,,,, 27,,,,,, 2012,,,,,, 2012, 231

10 :,, (α 0.05,,, 2014,, 2010, 2012, , , 2005, 2010, 2006,, 2005, 2010, (David, 2006) Seibert, ,,, α=0.05, α=0.05,,, 5 α=0.05, 10 5, ,, :, 232

11 , 2,29, : ;,,,,,, 2010, 2012,,, 2005, 2014,, 2010, 2012, 2013, 2008, 2005, 2010, :,,,,,,, 233

12 :, 1? 2? 3 (α 0.05,,?, : : , ,,, ;, : :? 234

13 , 2,29,, : 34,2004 : :, : 67,2012, :,,,, : :, 235

14 :,, , : 1, , : %29.39 : :,,,, : : : 1436 % %100.0 : : :

15 , 2,29, 10 : 2 : 9 : 3 : 7 : 4 8 : : : : : 12 : : : 14 : :,, 3, 4, 5 1, 2 : : 1, 15, :,,, : ; 79,,,, :, :,, 67 : : 7 : : :

16 :, : 67 : 2, 30,, :,, %80 : 3 ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **

17 , 2,29,, :, : 4 **0.772 ** **0.643 ** **0.775 ** **0.817 ** **0.794 ** **0.782 ** **0.747 ** (Test, Retest),,, 0.88, , :,

18 :, : ,,, , :, 1 5 = : = :,4=1 5= :,0.80=5 4= : : : : 10 : 10 5 : 5 : : 240

19 , 2,29,?, : : : : , , 0.82, 2.75, , 0.63 : 241

20 :,, , 2012 : : :? 8, 2.55, ,.93,, 2008, : , 1.23,

21 , 2,29, 2012 : : :? 9, 2, , 1.29, 1.07, 2.33, 0.56, 2.97,, :

22 :, 2012 (α 0.05,,?, Independent sample T test,,, 5, , 1.21, , 1.15, 3.52, 1.28, 3.68, 0.48, : 1 :

23 , 2,29, 10 * (α 0.05 ) * ,,,, 10, α 0.05, T : 2 : *

24 :, α 0.05 * ,,, , α 0.05, T : 3 : 12 * *

25 , 2,29, 12 * α 0.05 * 0013,0038, ,, 2010, 2013, , α ,,, T, , , : 4 : *

26 :, α 0.05 * : 1 ; :, α , T,, , 2010 : 248

27 , 2,29, ,,, 2010,,, 2012, 28, , ,, 2005,,,,, 2008,,,, 2010, ,, 8, 9,, * * * : : 2014,,, 2012, 249

28 :, : : Boal, B., & Schultz, p. (2007). storytelling, Tim, and evolution: the role of strategic leadership in complex adaptive systems. journal The leadership quarterly, USA, (18), David, N. (2006). Strategic management of educational development in Singapore publishing company. Nicoline, F., & Antje, K. (2006). Strategic management of higher education institutions: performance funding and research output. Paper submitted to the Conference on Indicators on Science, Technology and Innovation, Special session on Indicators for strategic management of higher education institutions, Lugarno 15th to 17th of November Paul, B. (2003). Seeking success through strategic management development. Journal of European Industrial Training, 27(6), Quist, H.(2009). A credible leader for Turbulent times: examining the qualities necessary for leading into the future. journal strategic leader ship, (2 ), Seibert, M. (2004). The identification of strategic management counseling competencies essential for the Small Business and Technology Development Center, North Carolina state university, 1215, 0ct Steadham, K. (2006). strategic management competencies among chief human resource officers in Texas public community colleges, DAT-, A11/67P Tummala, B., & Tang, P. (1995). Strategic management and Strategic planning. Fifth Edition Irwin Inc.USA. University. Dissertation abstracts, DAI-A 50//0, * * * 2006,, 2012,,, 2005,,,, 2002,,,, 2013,,, 2006,,, 2008,, 82 1, 11, 2006,,, 2008,,, 250