Original Article. (

Transcript

1 > > Original >? 4 < <? >> < >?? < >?? >> < >?? <? >> > >@ < > >> <? ><? >> HSEQ <@> @ >?? > >? > @ > >???> >?? @ >?>? > >? > >? >?>? >. <? > @ @ >? > 5 >> > > > >? <@ >? > <? < > >>? > <? > >?> >> >?> < @ @?> >? @>??> >?> >. > <@?? < >?>? @ @> > >?>.(3) > >> > >> > < >?? >> <@> ( heidarnia@modares.ac.ir) 87/ 7/0?>? 88/3/19 :??

2 47 9?> Botvin >>> >? > @ @? >> >? @ @ >> >. @? > <? >@? - > < < >? > (Trans theoretical model) @ > @? >?>. @ @@ >? @ > @ > < @? @ < (Health belief model) (Planned <(Reasoned actions theory) >?? >.(4<5) @ @ @?>> >.>?>> >> @ > > @ @ @> @?> @>?@? @>? >? > > < >?> @ > >?> -1.(10) > > >> @ - >? >? @ -3.(1) >?>> @ > > @ >??? > -6?> > >? > > >>

3 TTM?? > (Environmental/ Behavioral processes) > >? >?> > <(Consciousness > > <(Emotional arousal /Dramatic <(Social- > relationships) <(Counter- conditioning) @ @ > @ >??. > (Value of >??> > > >?> @?. >???> @? @ > >?@? > >> > > @ (Cons (Pros >?>. > > <>>> > > > >? @>@ >?@ > >> > @ ) ( > @ @? @ > >> > > > >@?> >? >? > > >?> @ > > > (Individual @ @ TTM >> @ > @ @? @??> >> < > < >?> > >?? > >. > > <>?>> (Change processes) < >> (Experimental processes)

4 >?@?? @ @ > @ >? > >?> < > <? < > < > >?> @ >?>? <??>? > > >> >? < > <? < > > >>@ > > < < <. >? > > > > >@ > <@ > @ >?> >?? >? @ >? > > > : > >? >? >. > -1 > > @ >? @ >.>?>? @ > >> >. >?? > >?> > Health @ @??> (Safety > @ @ > >> >.?> 10 Z β = ( Z ) ( 1 ) α + Zβ P P 0 n = ( P P ) 0 1 Z α ( 1/ 96+ 1/ 64) 0/ 3( 0/ 8) n = 3 / 1104 = = 77 8 / ( 0/ ) 0/ 04 P TTM @> > = P0 + P1. > 0/ 4 0/ = = P > > < 19/ > < @ > >. >? > >> > <?>

5 TTM?? @ < > > @ > >> >?? >? >?> < > >?> @ 5 <? > >> > < > <? < > < > > <. @>??> @ >> @?> 80 <@> > @ > >@> @?> @ @ >?> @@ @?>? @ <? > > > >?> > > @> > @ > @ > >?>? @ @ >?>? @?? @ > > @ 18.?>? > <> > > >?>..?> @ @??> >?? > > >?> > > > >? >. >?> >? >?>? @@ > @ @ @ >? < @ >?? @

6 51 p-value > / NS 5 /1±1/ 89 4 /5±1/ 95 > NS 6 /1±1/ 78 5 /98±1/ 91 NS 5 /96±½ 5 /6±/ 3 >??> NS 6 /96±1/ 67 6 /6±1/ 9 >??> > 0 /0 6 /8±1/ 75 6 /4±1/ 95 NS 31 /99±6/ /15±7/ / NS 4 /8±1/ 5 4 /33±1/ NS 5 /1±1/ 77 4 /4±1/ >?> NS 5 /03±1/ 8 4 /6±/ 0 NS 5 /1±1/ 68 5 /1±1/ NS 4 /64±1/ 7 4 NS 4 /11±7/ 63 3 /15±8/? * Not significant > @ > > >? > <? >?> > > > >?> > 17/1 <?>>? @ @ < @?> >>>?> > @ @ > >@>??> >?> >. > > @ @? > @.(p<0001) @ > > <(NS) @ >? @ >? @ @ @ > @ @ >??>? > @ >?> > @>??> p-value > 0/0 5/08±1/ 71 / * 4/3±1/9 > 0/05 6/35±1/ 78 5/5±1/ 8 0/001 6/±1/ 7 5/±/ 1 >??> 0/03 7/01±1/ 67 6 /1±1/ 77 >??> > < 0/0001 6/9±1/ 65 5/9±1/ 8 < 0/ /8±8/ 1 8 /13±7/ / 0/000 5/0±1/ 8 4/01±1/ 0/01 4/99±1/ 9 4 /1±/ >?> 0/000 5/35±1/ 71 3/98±1/ 8 0/003 6/05±/ 0 4 /8±1/ 0/01 5/48±/ 7 4 < 0/0001 6/73±8/ 11 1 /5±7/ 87? > ±

7 >? @ >? > >?@ @ > > - >@? > > 6/35 5?> >?> @ >? @ > > > @ >?> > @ <@ >?>?? > >>.(p=0/001) > > > >?? >@? > >??>.>?> > > < @ @? > 6/9 @ @> > @?> @ @ > > > @? > > > <@ @ >??>?>.>?>> (pros) > >?>?> > > > >?>?> 56/43 > @ >> >. > > TTM > @? > (p<0/0001) > (p=0/004) @ @ >? "> > >?> > > @ >?> @ (13) > >. >??> > > > > > >. @ > > >?> > >?>> @ >>?> >? >.(13) 60 >@ > > >? @?> @ >? > > > @ @ > >??? >? > >@> (DARE) > >.(3) >? > >? >?

8 53 >?> > > > > @ > > > > > >?.(30) <>?>> Mc > @ >>@? >? @? > @@ @ >?> >> > > @ @? > > > (1985) Mc Guire >?> >??@ > > >? > >?@ > > > @???>? > > > > >> > @ >??@ > < > > @ >?? >?>?? (p<0/0001) 8 >?> >??>?> > @ >? > > 5/11 >?? @ > @ @ > @?> >?> @ >.(8<7) >?>> > «> > > >> > > >?>? >? >?>>? > Mc @ @? @ >.(9) @ @ @ >.?> > @ < >@

9 > >> > > @ >? > @ >? > >> > > > > @ > @> @ >> @ < > > >@> >?>. > >?> > @ >? > <?>> @?> > @ > >?> > @?> > @> > > >?? <>@?? @>? > >> > > @?> @ < >> > > > >.> >? REFERENCES 1. UNESCO. Prevention of drug abuse through education and information: an inter-miscibility within the context of human development. Prevention Education Series 1994; 1: -4.. Spain National Plan on Drugs. National Drugs Stragey Spain: Spain National Plan an Drugs; 000. p Shope JT, Compleand LA, Marcus BC, Kamp ME. Effectiveness of a school based substance abuse prevention program. J Drug Educ 1996; 6: Bandura A. Social learning theory. Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; Bandura A. Self-regulation of motivation and action through internal standards and goal systems. In: Pervin A, ed. Goal concepts in personality and social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbum Associates; p Deputy for Prevention of Rehabilitation Organization. Report of reception & follow up units about self-refer addicts in Iran. Tehran: Rehabilitation Organization; [In Persian]

10 Hesser JE. The Adolescent substance Abuse Survey, Report for statewide Results. Rhode Island: Rhode Island Department of Health office of health statistics; 000. p Gossop M, Grant M. Preventing and controlling drug abuse. Geneva: World Health Organization; p McCaffrey BR. The National Drug Controls Strategy 1998: Aten Year Plan. Washington, DC: Office of National Drug Control Policy; p Bengert R. The effects of school-based substance abuse addiction: a meta-analysis. J Drug Educ 1988; 18: Karney A, Hines M. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a Drug Prevention Education program. J Drug Educ 1980; 10: Botvin G. Adolescent tobacco, alcohol and drug abuse. Prevention strategies, empirical finding a assessment issue. J Develop Behav Pediatr 1998; 13: Botvin G, Griffin K, eds. School-based program in lowinson substance abuse: a comprehensive textbook. 4 th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott William & Wilkins; 005. p Botvin G, Griffin K. Diaz T, William T. Drug abuse prevention among minority adolescents: post test and oneyear follow up of a school based prevention intervention. Prev Sci 001; : Prochaska JO, Diclemente CC. Stages and process of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psych 1983; 51: Catania JA. Towards an understanding of risk behavior: an AIDS risk reduction model (ARRM). Health Educ Quarterly 1990; 17: Andersen BL, Cacioppo JT. Delay in seeking a cancer diagnosis. Br J Soc Psychol 1995; 34: Weinstein ND, Rothman AJ, Sutton SR. Stage theories of health behavior: conceptual and methodological issues. Health Psychol 1998; 17: Velicer WF, Prochaska JO, Fava JL, Norman GJ, Redding CA. Smoking cessation and stress management: application of the trans-theoretical model of behavior change. Homeostasis 1998; 38: McGuire WJ. The yin and yang of progress in social psychology. J Personal Soc Psychol 1973; 6: Butler JT. Principles of health education and health promotion. Colorado: Morton Publishing Company Colorado; Prochaska JO. Strong and weak principles from pre-contemplation to action on the basis of twelve problem behaviors. Health Psychol 1994; 13: Swadi H. individual risk factors for adolescent substance use. Drug Alcohol Depend 1999; 55: Brug J, Glanz K, Kok G. The relationship between self-efficacy, attitudes, intake compared to others, consumption and stages of change related to fruit and vegetables. Am J Health Promot 1997; 1: Campbell MK, Symons M, Demark- Wahnefreid W, Kalsbeek W, Dodds J, Cowan A, et al. Stages of change and psychosocial correlated of fruit and vegetables consumption among rural African American church members. Am J Health Promot 1998; 1: Fontaine K, Smith S. Optimistic bias in cancer risk perception: a cross national study. Psychosoc Reports 1995; 77: Weinstein N. Unrealistic optimism about future life events. J Personal Soc Psychol 1980; 39: Mc Gahee T, Tingen M. The effects of a smoking prevention curriculum on fifth yarde children s attitudes, subjective norms and refusal skills. J School Health 1985; 55: Karimi Y, ed. Attitude and attitude change. 1 st edition. Tehran: Nashr-e-Virayesh institute; 000. [In Persian] 30. Kandel D, Kessler R, Margulies R. Antecedents of developmental analysis. In: Kandel D, ed. Longitudinal research on drug use: empirical findings and methodological issues. New York: Willey; Scriven A, Stoddard L. Empowering schools: translating health promotion principles in to practice. Health educ 003; 103: