32 5 213 1 Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering Vol. 32 No. 5 October 213 * 11624 3 6 6 3 1 mm 2 2 mm R318 A 258-821 213 5-526-6 Ultrasound Probe Calibration Method Based on Optical Tracking Systems REN Liang QIU Tian-Shuang * GUO Yong Department of Biomedical Engineering Dalian University of Technology Dalian 11624 China Abstract Ultrasound probe calibration is a necessary step in the process of 3D ultrasound imaging by a freehand 2D ultrasound probe. In order to calibrate ultrasound probe quickly and effectively with small number of calibration images a flexible calibration method based on optical tracker was presented for determining the unknown transformation matrix. First a calibration pattern containing two mutually perpendicular planes was developed. In the process of calibration the calibration pattern was scanned by a freehand 2D ultrasound probe. Transformation matrice were calculated from camera to calibration pattern and from ultrasound probe to ultrasound image. There were 3 crosspoints between ultrasound beam and three orthogonal axes of the pattern in each trial which setup 6 calibration equations. The unknown transformation matrix and 2 scaling factors were solved by nonlinear fitting when at least 2 calibration images were captured. Experiments with synthetic data show that calibration error decreases with increased number of images. The error was 1 mm when the number of images was 3. Experiments with real data show that our method has high accuracy with only 2 calibration images meeting the demand of ultrasound surgical navigation and lays the groundwork for 3D ultrasound imaging reconstruction. Key words ultrasound probe calibration 3D freehand imaging optical tracker 1 X-ray CT MRI 2 doi 1. 3969 /j. issn. 258-821. 213. 5. 3 213-3-12 213-8-13 6117218 611391 22BAJ18B6 * E-mail qiutsh@ dlut. edu. cn
5 527 3 3 4 2 2. 5 mm 5 4 1. mm 2. 4 mm 1 6 1. 1 N 1 4 7-8 M C N D I 3 T CM T DC T ID T CM C M T DC D C T ID I D 9 O M ABC O M CDE 14 F G H M C 1 D I 1 7-8 11 P P M = T CM T DC T ID P I 1 8 cosαcosβ cosαsinβsinγ - sinαcosγ cosαsinβcosγ + sinαsinγ t x sinαcosβ sinαsinβsinγ + cosαcosγ sinαsinβcosγ - cosαsinγ t T ID t x t y t z y α β γ = 2 - sinβ cosβsinγ cosβcosγ t z 1 P M = X M Y M Z M 1 T P M 1. 2 P I = s x u s y v 1 T P 1 F 1 I s x s y x s x u T CM T DC s P M F = = T CM T DC T ID y v 3 T ID t x t y t z α β γ 6 1 1 M C 3 T ID t x t y t z α β γ s x s y Y Z G H I D T ID 6 8 N 6N 8 2
528 32 Fig. 1 1 Illustration of ultrasound probe calibration 3 M X Δf = f ψ - f^ x s x u Δψ Δf f ψ s f X i = = T CM T DC i T y v ID 4 f^ ψ j J f ψ ψ Δf 1 1 Levenberg-Marquardt i = 1 2 N Δψ = ψ j+1 - ψ j = J T J + ηi -1 J T Δf 7 f X 2 i = f X 3 i = 4 η I J Δf Δψ ψ f Y 1 i = f Y 3 i = f Z 1 i = f Z 2 i = f i t x t y t z α β γ s x s y = f i ψ = f X 2 i f X 3 i f Y 1 i = 5 f Y 3 i f Z 1 i f Z 2 i i = 1 2 N ψ = t x t y t z α β γ s x s y N 2 f ψ = f N ψ = f t x t y t z α β f ψ f^ f 1 ψ f 2 ψ γ s x s y = ψ j + δf^ ψ j δψ ψ - ψ j 6 2 j = 1 2 ψ j = δf^ ψ j δψ ψ - ψ j = J 2. 1 2 Matlab 1 T CM 1 T DC i 1 3 P I i 6 3 F G H f^ i ψ = f F 2 i f F 3 i f G 1 i f G 3 i f H 1 i f H 2 i f i ψ = [ ] Δ f i ψ = f^ i ψ f i ψ 3 N N Δf i ψ i = 1 E mean = 8 3N
5 529 2 N 1 8 E mean N 1 2. 2 2. 2. 1 2 A B 25 mm 15 mm 2 mm 3 PC 1 24 768 11 1 mm C M T CM 5 7 Aloka Prosund α7 2. 2. 2 4 1 2 a b C M T CM Fig. 2 Calibration setup for real experiments. 2 5 a Calibration equipment b Calibration pattern D C T DC i 1 3 3 F G H 3 4 T ID t x t y t z α β γ s x s y 8 E mean N 3 3 F G H Fig. 3 F G H in ultrasound image 3. 1 1 4 2 ~ 1 5 1 8 E mean N
53 32 5 mm 4 1 mm 2 mm Fig. 5 Calibration results with real data 4 Fig. 4 Calibration results with simulation data 8 3. 2 2 ~ 1 5 1 1 8 E mean. 1 mm N 1 5 2 2. 5 mm 4 1. mm 2. 4 mm 7-8 1 Cambridge 4 1 7 Cross-wire Single-wall Threewire 3 1 Tab. 1 5 Calibration results with real data Cross-wire Single-wall Cambridge Three-wire 1 7 19 19 19 45 2 39 4 1 /mm 1. 47 3. 27. 92 5. 37. 91 4. 8 1. 1. 51 /mm 1. 12 2. 18 1. 33 1. 63. 39 * 2. 4 1. 6 * 7 4 8 Cross-wire Single-wall Three-wire 3 7-8 8
5 531 1 7-8 Crosswire Single-wall Three-wire 1 4 1 mm 7 - J 8 J 211 ultrasound-based navigation in laparoscopic surgery J Transactions on Medical Imaging 28 27 2 255-27. 5 IEEE 24 527-53. 7 J 28 3-D freehand ultrasound J 1998 24 6 855-869. 3 9 Birkfellner W Watzinger F Wanschitz F et al. 2 8 4 1. 1 mm 2. 4 1 Chaoui J Dardenne G Hamitouche C et al. Virtual movements-based calibration method of ultrasound probe for computer assisted surgery C / /IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging From Nano to Macro. Bostoa IEEE 29 127-121. 2.. 27 26 5 719-723. 3.. 3 6 938-945. 4 Nakamoto M Nakada K Sato Y et al. Intraoperative magnetic tracker calibration using a magneto-optic hybrid tracker for 3 - D. IEEE 5 Marie-Ange J Louis-Gilles D Marie-Hélène RC et al. Performance evaluation of a medical robotic 3D-ultrasound imaging system J. Medical Image Analysis 28 12 3 275-29. 6 Boctor E Viswanathan A Choti M et al. A novel closed form solution for ultrasound calibration C / /IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging Nano to Macro. Arlington.. 27 2 25-254. 8 Prager RW Rohling RN Gee AH et al. Rapid calibration for. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology Systematic distortions in magnetic position digitizers J. Medical Physics 1998 25 11 2242-2248. 1 Mercier L Lang T Lindseth F et al. A review of calibration techniques for freehand 3 - D ultrasound systems J. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology 25 31 4 449-471. 11 Zhang Zhengyou. A flexible new technique for camera calibration J. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 2 22 11 133-1334.