Resilient static output feedback robust H control for controlled positive systems

Transcript

1 DOI: /CA Control heory & Applications Vol. 31 No. 5 May 2014 H,, (, ), (LMI),, H,,,,, H,, ; H ; ; ; P273 A Resilient static output feedback robust H control for controlled positive systems SONG Shi-jun, FENG Jun-e, MENG Min (School of Mathematics, Shandong University, Jinan Shandong , China) Abstract: Firstly, by means of a small scalar, a sufficient condition of resilient static output feedback robust H control for controlled positive systems is obtained via linear matrix inequality (LMI) and bounded real lemma, which is useful for the design of resilient static output feedback controller because the controller parameter is separated from the unknown parameter. hen, based on the above condition, an inference for the special case of the control matrix is given and a sufficient condition of resilient static output feedback robust H control for more general controlled positive systems is established. Furthermore, the desired controller gain matrix can be derived via the cone complementarity linearization techniques directly. Finally, a numerical simulation to show the validity of the results is presented. Key words: positive systems; robust H control; resilient static output feedback; cone complementarity linearization; linear matrix inequality 1 (Introduction), [1 3]., [4 8].,,, H,.,. [9] [10], H [11 13]., H [14 15].,, [16 17].,, [18 19], H,, H,, H,, ; fengjune@sdu.edu.cn. ( , ); (JQ201219); (BS2011SF009, BS2011DX019).

2 R n n x 1 c 11 x 1 c 12 x 1 c 1n, R m n m n, I x XC = 2 c 21 x 2 c 22 x 2 c 2n, L 2 [0, ) [0, )..., ; [A] ij A i j x n c n1 x n c n2 x n c nn, A Metzler, A, XC, XC 0., A 0(A 0) A XA Metzler ( ), A B A B 0, A [A m, A M ] A m A A M, A > 0(A < ẋ(t) = Ax(t) + Bw(t) + B 1 u(t), 0) A ( ) ; µ(a) z(t) = Cx(t) + D 1 u(t), A, µ(a) = max{re λ : λ σ(a)}, (3) y(t) = C 1 x(t), σ(a) A x(0) = x 0, 2 (Problem formulation and preliminaries) ẋ(t) = Ax(t) + Bw(t), z(t) = Cx(t) + Dw(t), x(0) = x 0, (1) x(t) R n, w(t) R p, w(t) L 2 [0, ), z(t) R s, A, B, C, D, 1 [2] x 0 0, w(t) 0, x(t) 0, z(t) 0, t > 0, (1) 1 [2] (1)A Metzler, B 0, C 0, D 0. 2 [3] Metzler M, N R n n, M N, µ(m) µ(n). 3 [10] γ > 0, (1) (s) = C(sI A) 1 B + D (s) < γ, P > 0, P A + A P P B C B P γi D < 0. (2) C D γi 4 X, C 0, A Metzler, XC 0, XA Metzler x 1 c 11 c 12 c 1n x X = 2..., C = c 21 c 22 c 2n..., xn c n1 c n2 c nn x 1, x 2,, x n > 0, c ij 0, 1 i, j n, x(t) R n, u(t) R m, w(t) R p, w(t) L 2 [0, ), z(t) R s, y(t) R q, A [A m, A M ], A m, A M, B 1, C 1, D 1, B, C (3) u(t) = (K + K)y(t), (4) K, K [K m, K M ], K m K M (4), { ẋ(t) = A c x(t) + Bw(t), z(t) = C c x(t), A c = A + B 1 KC 1 + B 1 KC 1, C c = C + D 1 KC 1 + D 1 KC 1. (5) (4), (5) zw (s) = C c (si A c ) 1 B zw (s) < γ, (6) γ > 0, 1 K m = K M, K M 0. 1, 1 K m, K M, K m K M, K = K M + K m, k = K M K m, 2 2 (4) u(t) = (K + K + K K )y(t) = (F + F )y(t), (7) F = K + K, F = K K, F [ k, k ],, (4) (7) 3 (Main results), B 1, D 1

3 5 H 673 B 1, D 1, B 2 0, B 3 0, D 2 0, P A d + A d P P B Cd D 3 0 B 1 = B 2 + B 3, D 1 = D 2 + D 3, γi 0 < 0, (18) 1 γ > 0, ε > 0 (3), A [A m, A M ], B 0, C 0, C 1 0, K P > 0, Q > 0, ε 1 P I + εa d P B Cd εq 0 0 < 0, (8) 0 P Q = I, (9) [A f ] ij 0, 1 i j n, (10) [C f ] ij 0, 1 i, j n, (11) A d = A M + B 1 KC 1 + B 2 K M C 1 + B 3 K m C 1, C d = C + D 1 KC 1 + D 2 K M C 1 + D 3 K m C 1, A f = A m + B 1 KC 1 + B 2 K m C 1 + B 3 K M C 1, C f = C + D 1 KC 1 + D 2 K m C 1 + D 3 K M C 1, (4), (5) zw (s) (6). A [A m, A M ], K [K m, K M ], B 2 0, B 3 0, D 2 0, D 3 0, C 1 0 A d A c A f, (12) C d C c C f. (13) (10)--(11), A f Metzler, C f 0, A c, A d Metzler, C c, C d 0, 1, (5) (8) (9), Schur, ε 1 P + (I + εa d )ε 1 P (I + εa d ) + γ 1 P BB P + γ 1 C d C d < 0, (14) P A d + A d P + εa d P A d + γ 1 P BB P + γ 1 C d C d < 0. (15) P, ε > 0, (15) (16), A d P A d 0. (16) P A d + A d P + γ 1 P BB P + γ 1 C d C d < 0. (17) Schur,, P A d + A d P P B Cd µ γi 0 < 0. (19), A c, A d Metzler, B 0, P, 4, P A c P A d Metzler, P B 0. A d A c, P A d P A c. (11)(13), P A c + A c P P B Cc γi 0 P A d + A d P P B Cd γi 0 (20) Metzler 2 P A c + A c P P B Cc µ γi 0 P A d + A d P P B Cd µ γi 0, (21) P A c + A c P P B Cc µ γi 0 < 0, (22) P A c + A c P P B Cc γi 0 < 0, (23) 3, (5) zw (s)(6). 2 1 (3) H, 1, LMI, 1, K P, 1, (3), B 1, D 1, B 1 0, D 1 0, 1 γ > 0, ε > 0 (3), A [A m, A M ], B 0, B 1 0, C 0, D 1 0, C 1 0, K

4 P > 0, Q > 0, ε 1 P I + εa d P B Cd εq 0 0 < 0, (24) 0 P Q = I, (25) [A f ] ij 0, 1 i j n, (26) [C f ] ij 0, 1 i, j n, (27) A d = A M + B 1 KC 1 + B 1 K M C 1, C d = C + D 1 KC 1 + D 1 K M C 1, A f = A m + B 1 KC 1 + B 1 K m C 1, C f = C + D 1 KC 1 + D 1 K m C 1, (4), (5) zw (s) (6). 1, B 2 = B 1, B 3 = 0, D 2 = D 1, D 3 = 0, 3 B 1 0, D 1 0, B 1 0, D 1 0, B 1 0, D 1 0,,, (3), B 1, C 1, D 1, B 1 [B m, B M ], C 1 [C m, C M ], D 1 [D m, D M ], B m 0, C m 0, D m 0, (3) H K,, K = K 1 + K 2, K 1 0, K 2 0, (4), u(t) = K 1 y(t) + K 2 y(t) + Ky(t), (28) 2 γ > 0, ε > 0 (3), A [A m, A M ], B 1 [B m, B M ], C 1 [C m, C M ], D 1 [D m, D M ], B m 0, C m 0, D m 0, B 0, C 0, K 1 0, K 2 0, P > 0, Q > 0, ε 1 P I + εa d P B Cd εq 0 0 < 0, (29) 0 P Q = I, (30) [A f ] ij 0, 1 i j n, (31) [C f ] ij 0, 1 i, j n, (32) A d = A M +B M K 1 C M +B m K 2 C m +B M K M C M, C d = C +D M K 1 C M +D m K 2 C m +D M K M C M, A f = A m +B m K 1 C m +B M K 2 C M +B M K m C M, C f = C +D m K 1 C m +D M K 2 C M +D M K m C M, (28), (5) zw (s) (6). A [A m, A M ], K [K m, K M ], B 1 [B m, B M ], C 1 [C m, C M ], D 1 [D m, D M ], K = K 1 + K 2, K 1 0, K 2 0, B m 0, C m 0, D m 0, A d A c A f, (33) 1, 4 C d C c C f, (34) 2(3) H, [20], ( 2)K. 1 1 (29)(31) (32), ( ˆP 0, ˆQ 0, ˆK 10, ˆK 20 ). i = 0, ˆP 0, ˆQ 0 2 ( ˆP i, ˆQ i ), min {tr( ˆP ˆQ i + ˆP i ˆQ)}, ˆP, ˆQ, ˆK 1, ˆK 2 (29)(31) (32). ( ˆP, ˆQ, ˆK 1, ˆK 2 ). 3 (31) (32) ˆP A s + A ˆP ˆP s B Cs γi 0 < 0, A s =A M +B M ˆK1 C M +B m ˆK2 C m +B M K M C M, C s =C +D M ˆK1 C M +D m ˆK2 C m +D M K M C M, u(t) = ˆK 1 y(t) + ˆK 2 y(t) + Ky(t), 4 i > N 0, N 0,., i = i + 1, ( ˆP i, ˆQ i ) = ( ˆP, ˆQ), , ε > 0 (29) (32),,, ε, (29) (32),

5 5 H 675 (28) K , K, K m K 1 = , K 2 = , K M, K m, K M. 2 X R m q,, X, K m = K m X, K M = K M + X, K m, K M 2 (29) (32) 3, K m + X, K M X K, K m + X K, K M X K,, K, K, 4 (Numerical simulation) (3), A m = , A M = , B = , B m = , B M = , C = [1 0 0], C m =[ ], C M =[ ], D m =[ ], D M = [0 1 0], K M = 0.1, K m = , H γ = 0.2, ε = 0.1., A M Metzler, A m Metzler, (3) A M , , , (3) 2, MALAB LMI P = , Q = , , K = x(0) = [1 2 3], 1, 2,,, 1 Fig. 1 State variables of open-loop system 2 Fig. 2 State variables of close-loop system, X = 0.001, 2, , 2,, 314 K m, K M K, K m = 0.414, K M = (Conclusions) H, H,

6 676 31, (References): [1] BERMAN A, NEUMANN M, SERN R J. Nonnegative Matrices in Dynamic Systems [M]. New York: Wiley, [2] FARINA L, RINALDI S. Positive Linear Systems: heory and its Applications [M]. New York: Wiley, [3] BERMAN A, PLEMMONS R J. Nonnegative Matrices in the Mathematical Sciences [M]. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, [4] MASON O. Diagonal Riccati stability and positive time-delay systems [J]. Systems & Control Letters, 2012, 61(1): [5] LIU X, YU W, WANG L. Stability analysis of positive systems with bounded time-varying delays [J]. IEEE ransactions on Circuits and Systems, 2009, 56(7): [6] GURVIS L, SHOREN R, MASON O. On the stability of switched positive linear systems [J]. IEEE ransactions on Automatic Control, 2007, 52(6): [7], [J]. (), 2011, 41(3): (LI Zhenbo, ZHU Shuqian. Resilient static output feedback stabilization for controlled positive time-delay systems [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Engineering Science), 2011, 41(3): ) [8] FENG J, LAM J, LI P, et al. Decay rate constrained stabilization of positive systems using static output feedback [J]. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2011, 21(1): [9] DOYLE J C, GLOVER K, KHARGONEKAR P P, et al. State-space solutions to standard H 2 and H control problems [J]. IEEE ransactions on Automatic Control, 1989, 34(8): [10] GAHINE P, APKARIAN P. A linear matrix inequality approach to H control [J]. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 1994, 4(4): [11],,,. H [J]., 2007, 24(4): (ZHU Shuqian, ZHANG Chenghui, LI Zhenbo, et al. Delaydependent robust resilient H control for uncertain singular timedelay systems [J]. Control heory & Applications, 2007, 24(4): ) [12] FENG J, XU S. Robust H control with maximal decay rate for linear discrete-time stochastic systems [J]. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 2009, 353(1): [13] YANG G, WANG J. Non-fragile H control for linear systems with multiplicative controller gain variations [J]. Automatica, 2001, 37(5): [14] ANAKA, LANGBOR C. he bounded real lemma for internally positive systems and H structured static state feedback [J]. IEEE ransactions on Automatic Control, 2011, 56(9): [15] LI P, LAM J, SHU Z. H positive filtering for positive linear discrete-time systems: an augmentation approach [J]. IEEE ransactions on Automatic Control, 2010, 55(10): [16] RAMI M A. Solvability of static output-feedback stabilization for LI positive systems [J]. Systems & Control Letters, 2011, 60(9): [17] CUI P, ZHANG C. Observer design and output feedback stabilization for linear singular time-delay systems with unknown inputs [J]. Journal of Control heory and Applications, 2008, 6(2): [18],, H [J]. (), 2011, 46(1): (SUN Lin, ZHENG Yu, YAO Juan. Robust non-fragile H state feedback control for uncertainty discrete singular systems [J]. Journal of Shandong University (Nature Science), 2011, 46(1): ) [19],,,. [M]., (LU Renquan, SU Hongye, XUE Anke, et al. Robust Control heory of Singular Systems [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2008.) [20] EI GHAOUI L, OUSRY F, RAMI M A. A cone complementarity linearization algorithm for static output-feedback and related problems [J]. IEEE ransactions on Automatic Control, 1997, 42(8): (1988 ),,,, songshijun1210@hotmail.com; (1971 ),,,, Itô, (1988 ),,,, mengmin52111@163.com.