1), 2) The mere exposure e#ect as an implicit memory phenomenon. Shinobu IKOMA (Institute of Psychology, University of Tsukuba)

3 1 2005 113 131 1), 2) 3) The mere exposure e#ect as an implicit memory phenomenon Shinobu IKOMA (Institute of Psychology, University of Tsukuba) The mere exposure e#ect, where repeated exposure to a given object increases one s liking of it, has been well-known for decades. This article argues that the e#ect is an implicit memory phenomenon. It is clearly dissociated from explicit memory in a number of ways, such as experimental variables, participant variables, and stochastic independence. However, there also appear to be some differences between this e#ect and direct priming e#ects. Some of the controversies surrounding the mere exposure e#ect (such as the validity of perceptual fluency/attributional models, the relation to classical conditioning, structural evaluations of the mere exposure e#ect, and individual di#erences) are reviewed and directions for future research are discussed. Key words : mere exposure e#ect, implicit memory, perceptual fluency, dissociation Zajonc (1998) Maslow (1937) (1979) Solomon & Postman (1952) Stang (1974) 20 1920 Meyer (1903) Zajonc (1968) 1) 1988; 1995 1987, 2002 1996; 2001; 1999; 1998 1999 2001 1981, 1982a, 1982b 2002 2) 3) 1980 Kunst-Wilson & Zajonc (1980) Zajonc (1980) Zajonc (1968) 1996; 2001 80 (implicit memory) 20 2000; 1999 90 113

3 1 70 Grush (1979), Harrison (1977) (1979), Stang (1974) (dissociation) (1992) 3 2 Graf & Schacter (1985) Warrington & Weiskrantz, 1974 Johnson, Kim, & Risse (1985, Exp. 1) Marie, Gabrieli, Vaidya, Brown, Pratto, Zajonc, & Shaw (2001) (2001) 2 2 2 Greve & Bauer (1990) LF (2001) 2 Willems, Adam, & Van der Linden (2002) Winograd, Goldstein, Monarch, Peluso, & Goldman (1999) Halpern & O Connor (2000) Halpern & O Connor (2000) Esiri, Pearson, & Powell, 1986 Willems et al. (2002) Wiggs (1993, Exp. 3) Gaudreau & Peretz (1999) Halpern & O Connor (2000) Jones (1983) (1998) 1999 2 3 114

Seamon, Williams, Crowley, Kim, Langer, Orne, & Wishengrad (1995) 3 Seamon et al. (1995) (Krishnan & Shapiro, 1996) (Butler & Berry, 2002) (Wilson, 1979) (M. A. Lee, Sundberg, & Bernstein, 1993, Exp. 1) (Bonnano & Stillings, 1986, Exp. 1 & 2) (Seamon, Ganor-Stern, Crowley, Wilson, Weber, O Rourke, & Mahoney, 1997, Exp. 1 & 2) Seamon et al. (1995) (2003) 2 Moreland & Zajonc (1977, Exp. 2) Moreland & Zajonc (1977) (2000) Brooks & Watkins, 1989; 1982b 2 2 Matlin (1971) (Anand & Sternthal, 1991; Wilson, 1979) Seamon et al. (1995, Exp. 1) Anand, Holbrook, & Stephens (1988) (Vanhuele, 1994) Anand & Sternthal (1991) Anand et al. (1988) Halpern & O Connor (2000) d 3 Sloman, Hayman, Ohta, Law, & Tulving (1988, Exp. 2) 72 (2001) (2000) 3 7 115

3 1 Komatsu & Ohta (1984) 5 Mitchell & Brown (1988) 6 Snodgrass & Surprenant (1989) Seamon, Brody, & Kau# (1983a) 1 1 Bornstein (1994) 1 Bornstein (2002) Peretz, Gaudreau, & Bonnel (1998) 1 4 Van den Bergh & Vrana (1998) 6 Pliner (1982) 1 Haller, Rummel, Henneberg, Pollmer, & Köster (1999) 28.8 Garcia-Gomez, Simon, Beauchamp, & Mennella (2001) 2003; 1999; 1998; 2000 U U 2000, 2001; 2002 2003; Ohta, 2002; 1999 (Gaudreau & Peretz, 1999; Halpern & O Connor, 2000; Wiggs, 1993, Exp. 3) 1999 Bornstein (1989) 12 Fantz (1964) Bornstein (1989) (1999) Smith (2000) 4 Heingartner & Hall (1974, Exp. 2) (2003) (1999) 14 (Trehub, Cohen, Thorpe, & Morrongiello, 1986) (Crowder, Reznick, & Rosenkrantz, 1991) 116

Johansen-Berg (2001) 30 3 2001 U Bornstein (1989) 4 3 (Stang, 1974; Zajonc, 1968, 1971) Zajonc & Rajecki (1969) Hansen & Bartsch (2001) 1 Kitao & Inoue, 1998, Exp. 2 Blum & Yonelinas, 2001; Bowers & Schacter, 1990; 2005 (2005) 1 3 2 1979 U Bornstein (1989) 98 10 6 Seamon et al. (1995) / 1 5 1 4 Schacter, Cooper, Delaney, Peterson, & Tharan (1991, Exp. 1) 1 Ganor-Stern, Seamon, & Carrasco, 1998 Kitao & Inoue (1998, Exp. 1) 1 4 1996, 2 1 2 / Schacter, Cooper, & Delaney (1990a, 1990b) / Seamon et al. (1995) 3 Seamon & Delgado (1999), Williams & Tarr (1997) 117

3 1 1993; 1998 Schacter et al. (1990a, 1990b) (Carrasco & Seamon, 1996) Warrington & Weiskrantz (1968) 1999 Bornstein (1989) (1997) U (2001) (2002) Cutting (2003) (1999) Gaudreau & Peretz (1999) Peretz et al. (1998) Schick, McGlynn, & Woolam (1972) (1999) Ye & van Raaij (1997) Martindale, Moore, & West (1988, Exp. 3) (1992) Kruglanski, Freund, & Bar-Tal (1996) Schick et al. (1972) Grush (1979), Harrison (1977), (1979) (Bornstein & D Agostino, 1992) Vanhuele (1995) (false fame e#ect: Jacoby, Kelly, Brown, & Jasechko, 1989; Jacoby, Woloshyn, & Kelley, 1989) 1 118

(Squire & McKee, 1993) (Dywan & Jacoby, 1990) 2002, 2 (2001) (2001) 2 Bornstein (1989) 1977 Bornstein (1989) Greene, 1990; 1996, 2; Kitao & Inoue, 1998; 1996, 2 (1998) U Brooks & Watkins, 1989; 2000; Johnson et al., 1985, Exp. 1; M. A. Lee et al., 1993; Moreland & Zajonc, 1977 U U A. Y. Lee (2001, Exp. 2) 1 U U (1999, 2001) (1999, 2001) (1999, 2001) 119

3 1 (Bornstein & D Agostino, 1992) 1999 Zajonc (2001) Burgess & Sales (1971) (Exp. 1) (Exp. 2) Saegart, Swap, & Zajonc (1973) 2 Butler & Berry (2002) Burgess & Sales (1971) (Exp. 1) (Exp. 2) (1995) 5 U (Hull, 1943; Rescorla & Wagner, 1972) (Zajonc, 1968, 1971; Stang, 1974) (1995) 5 3 15 (Zajonc et al., 1971, Exp. 3) (Van den Bergh & Vrana, 1998) 3 15 U 2 3 2 (implicit learning) (1995) (structural mere exposure e#ect) Gordon & Holyoak (1983) 2000; 2003, 2; (2003) Gordon & Holyoak (1983) 120

Newell & Bright (2003) Bornstein, 1989; Bornstein & D Agostino, 1992; Zajonc, 2001; Fox & Burns (1993) Newell & Bright (2001) Kuhn & Dienes (2002) Rhodes, Halberstadt, & Brajkovich (2001) Matsuda & Kusumi 2002a, 2002b, 2003; 2001 1999a Maddi, 1968 Bornstein (1989) Burgess & Sales (1971) 5 (Locus of Control (LC)) (Rotter, 1966) Bornstein, Kale, & Cornell (1990, Exp. 1) LC LC Landau, Otani, & Libkuman (1993) Schick et al. (1972) Mueller, Elser, & Rollack, 1993 1999; Ryan & Eich, 2000; 2003; 1995 Marie et al. (2001) BPRS (Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale) (Overall & Gorham, 1962) Halpern & O Connor (2000) MMSE (Mini-Mental State Examination) (Folstein, Folstein, & McHugh, 1975) Newlin & Pretorius (1991) (Goodwin, 1985) 121

3 1 Newlin & Pretorius (1991) Bornstein (1989) Bornstein et al. (1990, Exp. 1) (boredom proneness) (Farmer & Sundberg, 1986) Van den Bergh & Vrana (1998) 3 (imagery ability) Hansen & Bartsch (2001) PNS (personal need for structure) PNS (1979) (Anand, Holbrook, & Stephens, 1988; Anand & Sternthal, 1991, Exp. 2; Barchas & Perlaki, 1986; Compton, Williamson, Murphy, & Heller, 2002; Seamon et al., 1983b, Exp. 3 & 4; Zárate, Sanders, & Garza, 2000, Exp. 1) Elliot & Dolan (1998) 2003; 2003 Bornstein (1989) Smith (2000) (2002) (1999) Newlin & Pretorius (1991) 1999 2003; 2000 1999b, 2000 122

2003 58, 448 454. (Akitsuki, Y., & Kawashima, R. 2003 Functional mapping of emotion. The Medical Frontline, 58, 448 454.) Anand, P., Holbrook, M. B., & Stephens, D. 1988 The formation of a#ective judgements: The cognitive-a#ective model versus the independence hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 386 391. Anand, P., & Sternthal, B. 1991 Perceptual fluency and a#ect without cognition. Memory & Cognition, 19, 293 300. 2003 2 10, 25 33. (Ayabe-Kanamura, S., Kobayakawa, T., & Saito, S. 2003 Odor preferences in two-yearold children: Which do children prefer a rose-like odor or a skatol odor? Japanese Journal of Research on Emotion, 10, 25 33.) Barchas, P. R., & Perlaki, K. M. 1986 Processing of preconsciously acquired information measured by hemispheric asymmetry and selection accuracy. Journal of Neuroscience, 100, 343 349. Blum, D., & Yonelinas, A. P. 2001 Transfer across modality in perceptual implicit memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 147 154. Bonnano, G. A., & Stillings, N. A. 1986 Preference, familiarity, and recognition after repeated brief exposures to random geometric shapes. American Journal of Psychology, 99, 403 415. Bornstein, R. F. 1989 Exposure and a#ect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968 1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265 289. Bornstein, R. F. 1994 Are subliminal mere exposure e#ects a form of implicit learning? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 398 399. Bornstein, R. F. 2002 Consciousness organizes more than itself: Findings from subliminal mere exposure research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 332 333. Bornstein, R. F., & D Agostino, P. R. 1992 Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure e#ect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 545 552. Bornstein, R. F., Kale, A. R., & Cornell, K. R. 1990 Boredom as a limiting condition on the mere exposure e#ect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 791 800. Bowers, J. S., & Schacter, D. L. 1990 Implicit memory and test awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 404 416. Brooks, J. O. III, & Watkins, M. J. 1989 Recognition memory and the mere exposure e#ect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 968 976. Burgess, T. D. G. III, & Sales, S. M. 1971 Attitudinal e#ects of mere exposure : A reevaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 461 472. Butler, L. T., & Berry, D. C. 2002 The influence of a#ective statements on performance on implicit and explicit memory tasks. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 829 843. Carrasco, M., & Seamon, J. 1996 Priming impossible figures in the object decision test: The critical importance of perceived stimulus complexity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 344 351. Compton, R. J., Williamson, S., Murphy, S. G., & Heller, W. 2002 Hemispheric di#erences in a#ective response: E#ects of mere exposure. Social Cognition, 20, 1 17. Crowder, R. G., Reznick, J. S., & Rosenkrantz, S. L. 1991 Perception of the major/minor distinction: V. Preferences among infants. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 29, 187 188. Cutting, J. E. 2003 Gustave Caillebotte, French Impressionism, and mere exposure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 319 343. Dywan, J., & Jacoby, L. L. 1990 E#ects of aging on source monitoring: Di#erences in 123

3 1 susceptibility to false fame. Psychology and Aging, 5, 379 387. Elliot, R., & Dolan, R. J. 1998 Neural response during preference and memory judgements for subliminally presented stimuli: A functional neuroimaging study. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 4697 4704. Esiri, M. M., Pearson, R. C. A., & Powell, T. P. S. 1986 The cortex of the primary auditory area in Alzheimer s disease. Brain Research, 366, 385 387. Fantz, R. L. 1964 Visual experiences in infants: Decreased attention to familiar patterns vs. novel ones. Science, 146, 668 670. Farmer, R., & Sundberg, N. D. 1986 Boredom proneness: The development and correlates of a new scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 50, 4 17. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. 1975 Mini-Mental State : A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189 198. Fox, S. E., & Burns, D. J. 1993 The mere exposure e#ect for stimuli presented below recognition threshold: A failure to replicate. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 391 396. 2003 45, 466 479. (Furuhashi, K. 2003 Age-related di#erences in memory in adults. Japanese Psychological Review, 45, 466 479.) Ganor-Stern, D., Seamon, J. G., & Carrasco, M. 1998 The role of attention and study time in explicit and implicit memory for unfamiliar visual stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1187 1195. Garcia-Gomez, P., Simon, C., Beauchamp, G. K., & Mennella, J. A. 2001 Flavor experiences during formula feeding are related to childhood preferences. Chemical Senses, 26, 1039 1040. (Abstract) Gaudreau, D., & Peretz, I. 1999 Implicit and explicit memory for music in old and young adults. Brain and Cognition, 40, 126 129. Goodwin, D. W. 1985 Alcoholism and genetics. Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 171 174. Gordon, P. C., & Holyoak, K. J. 1983 Implicit learning and generalization of the mere exposure e#ect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 492 500. Graf, P., & Schacter, D. L. 1985 Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 501 518. Greene, R. L. 1990 Spacing e#ects on implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 1004 1011. Greve, K. W., & Bauer, R. M. 1990 Implicit learning of new faces in prosopagnosia: An application of the mere-exposure paradigm. Neuropsychologia, 28, 1035 1041. Grush, J. E. 1979 A summary review of mediating explanations of exposure phenomena. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 154 159. Haller, R., Rummel, C., Henneberg, S., Pollmer, U., & Köster, E. P. 1999 The influences of early experience with vanillin on food preference later in life. Chemical Senses, 24, 465 467. Halpern, A. R., & O Connor, M. G. 2000 Implicit memory for music in Alzheimer s disease. Neuropsychology, 14, 391 397. Hansen, T., & Bartsch, R. A. 2001 The positive correlation between personal need for structure and the mere exposure e#ect. Social Behavior and Personality, 29, 271 276. 2000 4 64 200. (Hara, N., & Terasawa, T.) 2001 65 890. (Hara, N., & Terasawa, T.) 1996 (Harada, E.) 1999 42, 156 171. 124

(Harada, E. T. 1999 Implicit memory and memory misattributions. Japanese Psychological Review, 42, 156 171.) 2001 19, 107 113. (Harada, E. T. 2001 Introduction to the process-dissociation procedure: A psychological method for parallel processing models. Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science, 19, 107 113.) 1999 TV 63 522. (Harada, E., & Tokosumi, A.) Harrison, A. A. 1977 Mere exposure. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press. Pp. 39 83. 2005 29, 47 60. (Hayashi, M., & Ohta, N. 2005 The contaminating e#ect of conscious recollection on priming procedures. Tsukuba Psychological Research, 29, 47 60.) 1996 28 (1), 51 57. (Hayashi, S. 1996 Spacing e#ects in explicit and implicit memory test. Waseda Psychological Reports, 28(1), 51 57.) Heingartner, A., & Hall, J. V. 1974 A#ective consequences in adults and children of repeated exposure to auditory stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 719 723. Hull, C. L. 1943 Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton. 1999 42, 243 256. (Ikegami, T. 1999 Implicit memory as a social adaptive system: Social psychological approach to implicit memory. Japanese Psychological Review, 42, 243 256.) 2003 67 875. (Ikoma, S.) 1993 57 756. (Imai, H., Yutani, M., & Takano, Y.) 1981 45 379. (Inomata, S.) 1982a 8 (Inomata, S.) 1982b (II) 46 172. (Inomata, S.) 1996 (2) 60 678. (Ishida, E., Mori, T., & Shimojo, S.) 2000 64 496. (Ishii, K., & Kitayama, S.) Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C. M., Brown, J., & Jasenchko, J. 1989 Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 326 338. Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V., & Kelly, C. 1989 Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 115 125. Johansen-Berg, H. 2001 Music to your baby s ears. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 377. Johnson, M. K., Kim, J. K., & Risse, G. 1985 Do alcoholic Korsako# s syndrome patients acquire a#ective reactions? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 22 36. Jones, G. V. 1983 On double dissociation of function. Neuropsychologia, 21, 397 400. 2002 66 125

3 1 721. (Kajikami, M., Terasawa, T., & Hara, N.) 2001 17, 241 247. (Kan, Y., Mochizuki, S., & Kawamura, M. 2001 The mere exposure e#ect in anterograde amnesic patients. Japanese Journal of Neuropsychology, 17, 241 247.) 1999 Pp. 147 152. (Kato, T.) 1996 Pp. 55 70. (Kawaguchi, J.) 1988 Pp. 129 145. (Kinjo, S.) 2002 2 41, 84 97. (Kitamura, H. 2002 e#ects of mood states on information processing strategies: Studies of automatic and controlled processing using misattribution manipulation of mood and false fame task. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 84 97.) Kitao, N., & Inoue, T. 1998 The e#ects of spaced repetition on explicit and implicit memory. Psychologia, 41, 114 119. 1977 48, 175 177. (Kobayashi, S. 1977 Intentional and incidental learnings of pictures and words. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 48, 175 177.) 1999a 42, 202 218. (Komatsu, S. 1999a Memory rehabilitation capitalizing on preserved implicit memory in amnesic patients. Japanese Psychological Research, 42, 202 218.) 1999b 42, 126 131. (Komatsu, S. 1999b New measurements underpinning the development of implicit memory research: Comments on Fujita s article. Japanese Psychological Review, 42, 126 131.) 2000 Pp. 125 148. (Komatsu, S.) Komatsu, S., & Ohta, N. 1984 Priming e#ects in word-fragment completion for short- and long-term retention intervals. Japanese Psychological Research, 26, 191 200. 1999 38, 155 168. (Komatsu, S., & Ohta, N. 1999 Current trends and future directions in memory research. Annual Report of Educational Psychology in Japan, 38, 155 168.) Krishnan, H. S., & Shapiro, S. 1996 Comparing implicit and explicit memory for brand names from advertisements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 2, 147 163. Kruglanski, A. W., Freund, T., & Bar-Tal, D. 1996 Motivational e#ects in the mereexposure paradigm. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 479 499. Kuhn, G., & Dienes, Z. 2002 Can implicit learning in music go beyond the learning of adjacent chunks? Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 66. Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. 1980 A#ective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557 558. Landau, J. D., Otani, H., & Libkuman, T. M. 1993 Locus of control and implicit memory. The Journal of General Psychology, 120, 499 507. Lee, A. Y. 2001 The mere exposure e#ect: An uncertainty reduction explanation revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1255 1266. Lee, M. A., Sundberg, J. L., & Bernstein, I. H. 1993 Concurrent processes: The a#ectcognition relationship within the context of the mere exposure phenomenon. Percep- 126

tion & Psychophysics, 54, 33 42. Maddi, S. R. 1968 Meaning, novelty, and a#ect: Comments on Zajonc s paper. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement, 9(2, Pt. 2), 28 29. Marie, A., Gabrieli, D. E., Vaidya, C., Brown, B., Pratto, F., Zajonc, R. B., & Shaw, R. J. 2001 The mere exposure e#ect in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 27, 297 303. Martindale, C., Moore, K., & West, A. 1988 Relationship of preference judgements to typicality, novelty, and mere exposure. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 6, 79 96. Maslow, A. H. 1937 The influence of familiarization on preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 21, 162 180. Matlin, M. W. 1971 Response competition, recognition, and a#ect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 295 300. 2001 65 233. (Matsuda, K., & Kusumi, T.) Matsuda, K., & Kusumi, T. 2002a A mere exposure e#ect for the concept formation: The e#ect of typicality and the number of exposures on a#ect and recognition judgment. Poster presented at 3rd Tsukuba International Conference on Memory. Matsuda, K., & Kusumi, T. 2002b The mere exposure e#ect in concept formation. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 42. Matsuda, K., & Kusumi, T. 2003 A mere exposure e#ect for the concept formation: 2. The e#ect of duration on the typicality and the a#ective judgments. Poster presented at 4th Tsukuba International Conference on Memory. 2003 10, 207 222. (Matsuda, K., Ohta, N., & Kusumi, T. 2003 Long-term reminiscence e#ect of implicit memory by the incidental learning. Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 10, 207 222.) Meyer, M. 1903 Experimental studies in the psychology of music. American Journal of Psychology, 14, 456 476. 1999 42, 239 242. (Mimura, M. 1999 Comments on Komori and Ikeda s article. Japanese Psychological Review, 42, 239 242.) Mitchell, D. B., & Brown, A. S. 1988 Persistent repetition priming in picture naming and its dissociation from recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 213 222. 1979 Mere exposure e#ect 19, 165 174. (Mitsui, H. 1979 A review of mere exposure e#ect. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 165 174.) Moreland, R. L., & Zajonc, R. B. 1977 Is stimulus recognition a necessary condition for the occurrence of exposure e#ects? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 191 199. Mueller, J. H., Elser, M. J., & Rollack, D. N. 1993 Test anxiety and implicit memory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 531 533. 1995 2(3), 12 23. (Murakoshi, S., & Matui, T. 1995 Implicit learning. Cognitive Studies: Bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society, 2(3), 12 23.) Newlin, D. B., & Pretorius, M. B. 1991 Nonassociative mechanisms in preferences for alcoholic flavors: Di#erences between sons of alcoholics and sons of nonalcoholics. Addictive Behaviors, 16, 481 487. Newell, B. R., & Bright, J. E. H. 2001 The relationship between the structural mere exposure e#ect and the implicit learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54 A, 1087 1104. Newell, B. R., & Bright, J. E. H. 2003 The subliminal mere exposure e#ect does not generalize to structurally related stimuli. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 61 68. 127

3 1 2002 (Japanese Cognitive Science Society) 1999 63 603. (Nishino, Y.) 2000 19, 1 8. (Nishino, Y. 2000 Long-term retention for pictorial representation in the structural description system. Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science, 19, 1 8.) 1999 1999, 59 66. (Nito, H., Hayashi, A., & Minami, Y. 1999 The development of melody perception in infants. RIEEC annual report, 1999, 59 66.) 2003 Pp. 116 122. (Ohira, H.) 1992 II Pp. 92 119. (Ohta, N.) Ohta, N. 2002 The need for a lifespan developmental approach within memory research is more urgent than ever. In P. Graf, & N. Ohta (Eds.), Lifespan development of human memory. Cambridge: MIT Press. Pp. 3 12. 1999 42, 185 201. (Ohta, N., Takegata, R., Ishihara, O., Terasawa, T., Takahashi, H., & Kawano, R. 1999 Aging memory: Focussing on implicit memory. Japanese Psychological Review, 42, 185 201.) 2000 64 590. (Okada, A.) 1999 42, 466 486. (Okada, K. 1999 E#ects of mood on implicit memory: Focused on depression, anxiety, and fear. Japanese Psychological Review, 42, 466 486.) 1995 48, 87 94. (Osada, M., & Kobayashi, S. 1995 Level of rating for dress and e#ect of mere exposure. Journal of the Textile Machinery Society of Japan, 48, 87 94.) Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. 1962 The brief psychiatric rating scale. Psychological Reports, 10, 799 812. Peretz, I., Gaudreau, D., & Bonnel, A.-M. 1998 Exposure e#ects on music preference and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 26, 884 902. Pliner, P. 1982 The e#ects of mere exposure on liking for edible substances. Appetite: Journal for Intake Research, 3, 283 290. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. 1972 A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the e#ectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black, & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Pp. 64 99. Rhodes, G., Halberstadt, J., & Brajkovich, G. 2001 Generalization of mere exposure e#ects to averaged composite faces. Social Cognition, 19, 57 70. Rotter, J. B. 1966 Generalized expectancies of internal vs. external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80 (1, Whole No. 609). Ryan, L., & Eich, E. 2000 Mood dependence and implicit memory. In E. Tulving, & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 91 105. Saegert, S., Swap, W., & Zajonc, R. B. 1973 Exposure, context, and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psy- 128

chology, 25, 234 242. 1987 2 Pp. 1 56. (Saito, I.) 2002 (Saito, I.) 1997 21, 123 131. (Sakamoto, K.) 2001 p. 182. (Sakamoto, K.) 1999 63 508. (Sakamoto, K., Ohsu, A., & Sakamoto, A.) 1992 (Sato, T.) 1998 62 602. (Sato, W., Aoki, S., & Miyahara, M.) Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., & Delaney, S. M. 1990a Implicit memory for visual objects and the structural description system. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 367 372. Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., & Delaney, S. M. 1990b Implicit memory for unfamiliar objects depends on access to structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 5 24. Schacter, D. L., Cooper, L. A., Delaney, S. M., Peterson, M. A., & Tharan, M. 1991 Implicit memory for possible and impossible objects: Constraints on the construction of structural descriptions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 3 19. Schick, C., McGlynn, R. P., & Woolam, D. 1972 Perception of cartoon humor as a function of familiarity and anxiety level. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 22 25. Seamon, J. G., Brody, N., & Kau#, D. M. 1983a A#ective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: II. E#ect of delay between study and test. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 187 189. Seamon, J. G., Brody, N., & Kau#, D. M. 1983b A#ective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: E#ects of shadowing, masking, and cerebral laterality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 544 555. Seamon, J. G., & Delgado, M. R. 1999 Recognition memory and a#ective preference for depth-rotated solid objects: Part-based structural descriptions may underlie the mere exposure e#ect. Visual Cognition, 6, 145 164. Seamon, J. G., Ganor-Stern, D., Crowley, M. J., Wilson, S. M., Weber, W. J., O Rourke, C. M., & Mahoney, J. K. 1997 A mere exposure e#ect for transformed three-dimensional objects: E#ects of reflection, size, or color changes on a#ect and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 25, 367 374. Seamon, J. G., Williams, P. C., Crowley, M. J., Kim, I. J., Langer, S. A., Orne, P. J., & Wishengrad, D. L. 1995 The mere exposure e#ect is based on implicit memory: E#ects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and a#ect judgements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 711 721. Sloman, S. A., Hayman, C. A. G., Ohta, N., Law, J., & Tulving, E. 1988 Forgetting in primed fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 223 239. Smith, E. R. 2000 Subjective experience of familiarity: Functional basis in connectionist memory. In H. Bless, & J. P. Forgas (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behavior. Philadelphia: Psychology Press. Pp. 109 124. Snodgrass, J. G., & Surprenant, A. 1989 E#ect of retention interval on implicit and 129

3 1 explicit memory for pictures. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 395 398. Solomon, R. L., & Postman, L. 1952 Frequency of usage as a determinant of recognition thresholds for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 195 201. 1998 14, 157 164. (Soma, Y. 1998 Cognitive neuropsychology seen from a standpoint of clinical neuropsychology. Japanese Journal of Neuropsychology, 14, 157 164.) Squire, L. R., & McKee, R. D. 1993 Declarative and nondeclarative memory in opposition: When prior events influence amnesic patients more than normal subjects. Memory & Cognition, 21, 424 430. Stang, D. J. 1974 Methodological factors in mere exposure research. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1014 1025. 2003 90, 193 199. (Tagami, K. 2003 The severity of depression and implicit memory biases. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Hirosaki University, 90, 193 199.) 1999 42, 172 184. (Tajika, H. 1999 The development of children s implicit memory. Japanese Psychological Review, 42, 172 184.) 1998 62 806. (Terasawa, T.) 2001 1 Pp. 101 124. (Terasawa, T.) 2000 64 766. (Terasawa, T., & Hara, N.) Trehub, S. E., Cohen, A. J., Thorpe, L. A., & Morrongiello, B. A. 1986 Development of the perception of musical relations: Semitone and diatonic structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 295 301. Van den Bergh, O., & Vrana, S. R. 1998 Repetition and boredom in a perceptual fluency/attributional model of a#ective judgements. Cognition and Emotion, 12, 533 553. Vanhuele, M. 1994 Mere exposure and the cognitive a#ective debate revisited. Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 264 269. Vanhuele, M. 1995 Why familiar stimuli are better liked. A study on the cognitive dynamics linking recognition and the mere exposure e#ect. Advances in Consumer Research, 22, 171 175. 2003 36, 14. (Wakisaka, T.) Warrington, E. K., & Weiskrantz, L. 1968 New method of testing long-term retention with special reference to amnesic patients. Nature, 217, 972 974. Warrington, E. K., & Weiskrantz, L. 1974 The e#ect of prior learning on subsequent retention in amnesic patients. Neuropsychologia, 12, 419 428. Wiggs, C. L. 1993 Aging and memory for frequency of occurrence of novel, visual stimuli: Direct and indirect measures. Psychology and Aging, 8, 400 410. Willems, S., Adam, S., & Van der Linden, M. 2002 Normal mere exposure e#ect with impaired recognition in Alzheimer s disease. Cortex, 38, 77 86. Williams, P., & Tarr, M. J. 1997 Structural processing and implicit memory for possible and impossible figures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1344 1361. Wilson, W. R. 1979 Feeling more than we can know: Exposure e#ects without learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 811 821. Winograd, E., Goldstein, F. C., Monarch, E. S., Peluso, J. P., & Goldman, W. P. 1999 The mere exposure e#ect in patients with Alzheimer s disease. Neuropsychology, 13, 41 46. 130

2002 66 186. (Yamada, A., & Kishimoto, W.) 1995 59 656. (Yamamoto, Y., Matui, T., & Terasawa, T.) 2001 22, 40 49. (Yamashita, M. 2001 Feeling of familiarity on recognition. Psychological Research, Nihon University, 22, 40 49.) Ye, G., & van Raaij, W. F. 1997 What inhibits the mere-exposure e#ect: Recollection or familiarity? Journal of Economic Psychology, 17, 629 648. 1998 / spacing 62 805. (Yoshida, T.) Zajonc, R. B. 1968 Attitudinal e#ects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph Supplement, 9 (2, Pt. 2), 1 27. Zajonc, R. B. 1971 Attraction, a$liation, and attachment. In J. E. Eisenberg, & W. S. Dillon (Eds.), Man and beast: Comparative social behavior. Washington DC: Smithsonian Institution Press. Pp. 141 179. Zajonc, R. B. 1980 Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151 175. Zajonc, R. B. 1998 Emotions. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology Volume I. 4th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill. Pp. 591 632. Zajonc, R. B. 2001 Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 224 228. Zajonc, R. B., & Rajecki, D. W. 1969 Exposure and a#ect: A field experiment. Psychonomic Science, 17, 216 217. Zárate, M. A., Sanders, J. D., & Garza, A. A. 2000 Neurological disassociations of social perception processes. Social Cognition, 18, 223 251. 2003 8 31 2005 4 26 131