Summary of the model specified

Σχετικά έγγραφα
MATHACHij = γ00 + u0j + rij

Multilevel models for analyzing people s daily moving behaviour

Table 1: Military Service: Models. Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4 Model 5 Model 6 Model 7 Model 8 Model 9 num unemployed mili mili num unemployed

SECTION II: PROBABILITY MODELS

Λογαριθμικά Γραμμικά Μοντέλα Poisson Παλινδρόμηση Παράδειγμα στο SPSS

Queensland University of Technology Transport Data Analysis and Modeling Methodologies

5.4 The Poisson Distribution.

Aquinas College. Edexcel Mathematical formulae and statistics tables DO NOT WRITE ON THIS BOOKLET

Supplementary Appendix

Bayesian statistics. DS GA 1002 Probability and Statistics for Data Science.

FORMULAS FOR STATISTICS 1


Statistics 104: Quantitative Methods for Economics Formula and Theorem Review

Chapter 1 Introduction to Observational Studies Part 2 Cross-Sectional Selection Bias Adjustment

Άσκηση 10, σελ Για τη μεταβλητή x (άτυπος όγκος) έχουμε: x censored_x 1 F 3 F 3 F 4 F 10 F 13 F 13 F 16 F 16 F 24 F 26 F 27 F 28 F


255 (log-normal distribution) 83, 106, 239 (malus) 26 - (Belgian BMS, Markovian presentation) 32 (median premium calculation principle) 186 À / Á (goo

Προσομοίωση Μοντέλων Επιχειρησιακών Διαδικασιών

Lecture 7: Overdispersion in Poisson regression

Δείγμα πριν τις διορθώσεις

Supplementary figures

Προσομοίωση BP με το Bizagi Modeler

Elements of Information Theory

Does anemia contribute to end-organ dysfunction in ICU patients Statistical Analysis

6. MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION

Αξιολόγηση των Φασματικού Διαχωρισμού στην Διάκριση Διαφορετικών Τύπων Εδάφους ΔΙΠΛΩΜΑΤΙΚΗ ΕΡΓΑΣΙΑ. Σπίγγος Γεώργιος


DATA SHEET Surface mount NTC thermistors. BCcomponents

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests

Si + Al Mg Fe + Mn +Ni Ca rim Ca p.f.u

Math 6 SL Probability Distributions Practice Test Mark Scheme

Daewoo Technopark A-403, Dodang-dong, Wonmi-gu, Bucheon-city, Gyeonggido, Korea LM-80 Test Report

Biostatistics for Health Sciences Review Sheet

Architecture οf Integrated Ιnformation Systems (ARIS)

Υπολογιστική Φυσική Στοιχειωδών Σωματιδίων

Bayesian Estimation and Population Analysis. Objective. Population Data. 26 July Chapter 34 1

ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 24/3/2007

Solution Series 9. i=1 x i and i=1 x i.

Ramin Nobakht. Rockwell Semiconductor Systems. IEEE 802.3ab Interim. San Jose, CA February 12-13, 1998

Περιεχόμενα. Πρόλογος 17 ΚΕΦΑΛΑΙΟ 1 23

Simon et al. Supplemental Data Page 1

Thermistor (NTC /PTC)

Module 5. February 14, h 0min


Estimation for ARMA Processes with Stable Noise. Matt Calder & Richard A. Davis Colorado State University

Numerical Methods for Civil Engineers. Lecture 10 Ordinary Differential Equations. Ordinary Differential Equations. d x dx.

ΛΟΓΙΣΜΙΚΟ ΠΡΟΣΟΜΟΙΩΣΗΣ ANYLOGIC

LAMPIRAN. Lampiran I Daftar sampel Perusahaan No. Kode Nama Perusahaan. 1. AGRO PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia AgroniagaTbk.

Μηχανική Μάθηση Hypothesis Testing

1η εργασία για το μάθημα «Αναγνώριση προτύπων»

Lampiran 1 Hasil Kuesioner NO CI1 CI2 CI3 CT1 CT2 CT3 CS1 CS2 CS3 CL1 CL2 CL

Project: 296 File: Title: CMC-E-600 ICD Doc No: Rev 2. Revision Date: 15 September 2010


ΕΙΣΑΓΩΓΗ ΣΤΟ SPSS. Θα επιλέξουμε Type in data ώστε να εισάγουμε νέα στοιχεία και θα επιλέξουμε ΟΚ.

Υγιεινή Εγκαταστάσεων Βιομηχανιών Τροφίμων

Supplementary Material for The Cusp Catastrophe Model as Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Mixture Structural Equation Models

1 (forward modeling) 2 (data-driven modeling) e- Quest EnergyPlus DeST 1.1. {X t } ARMA. S.Sp. Pappas [4]

ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΚΡΗΤΗΣ. Ψηφιακή Οικονομία. Διάλεξη 8η: Producer Behavior Mαρίνα Μπιτσάκη Τμήμα Επιστήμης Υπολογιστών

DETERMINATION OF THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF GLAZED LIQUID HEATING SOLAR COLLECTORS


!"!"!!#" $ "# % #" & #" '##' #!( #")*(+&#!', & - #% '##' #( &2(!%#(345#" 6##7

Εργαστήριο στατιστικής Στατιστικό πακέτο S.P.S.S.

Προβλέψεις ισοτιμιών στο EViews

Metal Oxide Varistors (MOV) Data Sheet

ΓΕΩΜΕΣΡΙΚΗ ΣΕΚΜΗΡΙΩΗ ΣΟΤ ΙΕΡΟΤ ΝΑΟΤ ΣΟΤ ΣΙΜΙΟΤ ΣΑΤΡΟΤ ΣΟ ΠΕΛΕΝΔΡΙ ΣΗ ΚΤΠΡΟΤ ΜΕ ΕΦΑΡΜΟΓΗ ΑΤΣΟΜΑΣΟΠΟΙΗΜΕΝΟΤ ΤΣΗΜΑΣΟ ΨΗΦΙΑΚΗ ΦΩΣΟΓΡΑΜΜΕΣΡΙΑ

Spatiotemporal footprint of the WNV in Greece : Analysis & Risk Αssessment in a GIS Εnvironment

ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΘΕΣΣΑΛΙΑΣ ΤΜΗΜΑ ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΩΝ ΜΗΧΑΝΙΚΩΝ ΤΟΜΕΑΣ ΥΔΡΑΥΛΙΚΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΠΕΡΙΒΑΛΛΟΝΤΙΚΗΣ ΤΕΧΝΙΚΗΣ. Ειδική διάλεξη 2: Εισαγωγή στον κώδικα της εργασίας

Πρόβλημα 1: Αναζήτηση Ελάχιστης/Μέγιστης Τιμής

Shenzhen XXX OPTO Co.,Ltd

Γενικευμένα Γραμμικά Μοντέλα (GLM) Επισκόπηση

ΕΚΤΙΜΗΣΗ ΤΟΥ ΚΟΣΤΟΥΣ ΤΩΝ ΟΔΙΚΩΝ ΑΤΥΧΗΜΑΤΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΔΙΕΡΕΥΝΗΣΗ ΤΩΝ ΠΑΡΑΓΟΝΤΩΝ ΕΠΙΡΡΟΗΣ ΤΟΥ

SQC and Digital Engineering Technological Trends in Design Parameter Optimization and Current Issues

Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations

MOTORCAR INSURANCE I

ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 6/5/2006

Lampiran 1 Output SPSS MODEL I

Lampiran 2 Hasil Kuesioner No. BA1 BA2 BA3 BA4 PQ1 PQ2 PQ3 PQ4 PQ

ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 19/5/2007

Μενύχτα, Πιπερίγκου, Σαββάτης. ΒΙΟΣΤΑΤΙΣΤΙΚΗ Εργαστήριο 6 ο

ΜΕΤΑΠΤΥΧΙΑΚΗ ΔΙΠΛΩΜΑΤΙΚΗ ΕΡΓΑΣΙΑ «ΘΕΜΑ»

ΜΕΘΟΔΟΙ ΕΡΥΕΝΑΣ ΔΙΑΛΕΞΗ 3: ΔΙΕΡΕΥΝΗΤΙΚΗ ΣΤΑΤΙΣΤΙΚΗ ΑΝΑΛΥΣΗ ΜΙΑ ΕΠΙΣΚΟΠΗΣΗ

Προσομοίωση Μοντέλων Επιχειρησιακών Διαδικασιών

ΠΑΡΑΔΕΙΓΜΑΤΑ ΕΠΙΧΕΙΡΗΣΙΑΚΗΣ ΕΡΕΥΝΑΣ ΜΕ ΤΗ ΧΡΗΣΗ Η/Υ (3 ο Φυλλάδιο)

: Monte Carlo EM 313, Louis (1982) EM, EM Newton-Raphson, /. EM, 2 Monte Carlo EM Newton-Raphson, Monte Carlo EM, Monte Carlo EM, /. 3, Monte Carlo EM

Supplementary Materials: A Preliminary Link between Hydroxylated Metabolites of Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Free Thyroxin in Humans

519.22(07.07) 78 : ( ) /.. ; c (07.07) , , 2008

APPENDICES APPENDIX A. STATISTICAL TABLES AND CHARTS 651 APPENDIX B. BIBLIOGRAPHY 677 APPENDIX C. ANSWERS TO SELECTED EXERCISES 679

The Political Economy of Heterogeneity and Conflict

ΠΕΡΙΓΡΑΦΙΚΗ και ΕΠΑΓΩΓΙΚΗ ΣΤΑΤΙΣΤΙΚΗ

SÔntomec plhroforðec gia to glpsol (glpk)

HMY 795: Αναγνώριση Προτύπων. Διάλεξη 2

Αν οι προϋποθέσεις αυτές δεν ισχύουν, τότε ανατρέχουµε σε µη παραµετρικό τεστ.

Global energy use: Decoupling or convergence?

Generalized additive models in R

SOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM

ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II

OLS. University of New South Wales, Australia

Numerical Analysis FMN011

5. Partial Autocorrelation Function of MA(1) Process:

Δείγμα (μεγάλο) από οποιαδήποτε κατανομή

Transcript:

Program: HLM 7 Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling Authors: Stephen Raudenbush, Tony Bryk, & Richard Congdon Publisher: Scientific Software International, Inc. (c) 2010 techsupport@ssicentral.com www.ssicentral.com Module: HLM2.EXE (7.01.21202.1001) Date: 14 March 2014, Friday Time: 17:32:14 Problem Title: no title The data source for this run = replicate_jls The command file for this run = C:\Users\migrant\AppData\Local\Temp\whlmtemp.hlm Output file name = E:\Istanbul\hlm2.html The maximum number of level-1 units = 123 The maximum number of level-2 units = 67 The maximum number of micro iterations = 14 Method of estimation: restricted PQL Maximum number of macro iterations = 100 Distribution at Level-1: Poisson The outcome variable is MIGR_REL Summary of the model specified Level-1 Model E(MIGR_REL ti π i ) = λ ti log[λ ti ] = η ti η ti = π 0i + π 1i *(EXECUTIV ti ) + π 2i *(WP_HLM ti ) + π 3i *(MONATE ti ) + π 4i *(ANFRAGEN ti ) + π 5i *(POSITION ti ) Level-2 Model π 0i = β 00 + β 01 *(GEN_HLM_ i ) + β 02 *(GENDER i ) + β 03 *(POL_LEVE i ) + β 04 *(VISMIN_M i ) + β 05 *(ZEIT_MEA i ) + β 06 *(LEFT_RIG i ) + β 07 *(STADT_LA i ) + β 08 *(VOLKSPAR i ) + r 0i

π 1i = β 10 π 2i = β 20 π 3i = β 30 π 4i = β 40 π 5i = β 50 MONATE ANFRAGEN have been centered around the grand mean. ZEIT_MEA has been centered around the grand mean. Level-1 variance = σ 2 /λ ti Mixed Model η ti = β 00 + β 01 *GEN_HLM_ i + β 02 *GENDER i + β 03 *POL_LEVE i + β 04 *VISMIN_M i + β 05 *ZEIT_MEA i + β 06 *LEFT_RIG i + β 07 *STADT_LA i + β 08 *VOLKSPAR i + β 10 *EXECUTIV ti + β 20 *WP_HLM ti + β 30 *MONATE ti + β 40 *ANFRAGEN ti + β 50 *POSITION ti + r 0i The value of the log-likelihood function at iteration 6 = -5.297682E+002 Unit-Specific Model, PQL Estimation - (macro iteration 11) σ 2 = 2.47203 τ INTRCPT1,π 0 0.75354 Random level-1 coefficient Reliability estimate INTRCPT1,π 0 0.538 The value of the log-likelihood function at iteration 2 = -2.777355E+002 Final estimation of fixed effects: (Unit-specific model) INTRCPT2, β 00 1.297237 0.468989 2.766 58 0.008

GEN_HLM_, β 01-0.184587 0.324633-0.569 58 0.572 GENDER, β 02-0.135596 0.302034-0.449 58 0.655 POL_LEVE, β 03 0.303475 0.425687 0.713 58 0.479 VISMIN_M, β 04 0.688737 0.361524 1.905 58 0.062 ZEIT_MEA, β 05 0.039651 0.031163 1.272 58 0.208 LEFT_RIG, β 06-0.389362 0.510696-0.762 58 0.449 STADT_LA, β 07 1.030629 0.416879 2.472 58 0.016 VOLKSPAR, β 08-1.105078 0.352687-3.133 58 0.003 INTRCPT2, β 10-1.006610 0.252015-3.994 51 <0.001 INTRCPT2, β 20 0.113155 0.090800 1.246 51 0.218 INTRCPT2, β 30 0.011894 0.005902 2.015 51 0.049 INTRCPT2, β 40 0.012326 0.002501 4.928 51 <0.001 INTRCPT2, β 50-0.438453 0.221235-1.982 51 0.053 INTRCPT2, β 00 1.297237 3.659173 (1.431,9.357) GEN_HLM_, β 01-0.184587 0.831447 (0.434,1.593) GENDER, β 02-0.135596 0.873195 (0.477,1.599) POL_LEVE, β 03 0.303475 1.354557 (0.578,3.176) VISMIN_M, β 04 0.688737 1.991200 (0.966,4.106) ZEIT_MEA, β 05 0.039651 1.040447 (0.978,1.107) LEFT_RIG, β 06-0.389362 0.677489 (0.244,1.883) STADT_LA, β 07 1.030629 2.802829 (1.217,6.457) VOLKSPAR, β 08-1.105078 0.331185 (0.163,0.671) INTRCPT2, β 10-1.006610 0.365456 (0.220,0.606) INTRCPT2, β 20 0.113155 1.119805 (0.933,1.344) INTRCPT2, β 30 0.011894 1.011965 (1.000,1.024) INTRCPT2, β 40 0.012326 1.012402 (1.007,1.017)

INTRCPT2, β 50-0.438453 0.645034 (0.414,1.006) Final estimation of fixed effects (Unit-specific model with robust standard s) INTRCPT2, β 00 1.297237 0.403787 3.213 58 0.002 GEN_HLM_, β 01-0.184587 0.287358-0.642 58 0.523 GENDER, β 02-0.135596 0.274496-0.494 58 0.623 POL_LEVE, β 03 0.303475 0.392748 0.773 58 0.443 VISMIN_M, β 04 0.688737 0.314250 2.192 58 0.032 ZEIT_MEA, β 05 0.039651 0.028279 1.402 58 0.166 LEFT_RIG, β 06-0.389362 0.454987-0.856 58 0.396 STADT_LA, β 07 1.030629 0.442505 2.329 58 0.023 VOLKSPAR, β 08-1.105078 0.289083-3.823 58 <0.001 INTRCPT2, β 10-1.006610 0.379109-2.655 51 0.011 INTRCPT2, β 20 0.113155 0.113392 0.998 51 0.323 INTRCPT2, β 30 0.011894 0.005786 2.056 51 0.045 INTRCPT2, β 40 0.012326 0.004334 2.844 51 0.006 INTRCPT2, β 50-0.438453 0.239265-1.832 51 0.073 INTRCPT2, β 00 1.297237 3.659173 (1.630,8.212) GEN_HLM_, β 01-0.184587 0.831447 (0.468,1.478) GENDER, β 02-0.135596 0.873195 (0.504,1.513) POL_LEVE, β 03 0.303475 1.354557 (0.617,2.974) VISMIN_M, β 04 0.688737 1.991200 (1.061,3.735) ZEIT_MEA, β 05 0.039651 1.040447 (0.983,1.101) LEFT_RIG, β 06-0.389362 0.677489 (0.272,1.685) STADT_LA, β 07 1.030629 2.802829 (1.156,6.797) VOLKSPAR, β 08-1.105078 0.331185 (0.186,0.591)

INTRCPT2, β 10-1.006610 0.365456 (0.171,0.782) INTRCPT2, β 20 0.113155 1.119805 (0.892,1.406) INTRCPT2, β 30 0.011894 1.011965 (1.000,1.024) INTRCPT2, β 40 0.012326 1.012402 (1.004,1.021) INTRCPT2, β 50-0.438453 0.645034 (0.399,1.043) Final estimation of variance components Random Effect Variance Deviation Component χ 2 INTRCPT1, r 0 0.86806 0.75354 58 469.29201 <0.001 level-1, e 1.57227 2.47203 The value of the log-likelihood function at iteration 2 = -2.767388E+002 Final estimation of fixed effects: (Population-average model) INTRCPT2, β 00 1.475585 0.426579 3.459 58 0.001 GEN_HLM_, β 01-0.152282 0.298847-0.510 58 0.612 GENDER, β 02-0.170666 0.277078-0.616 58 0.540 POL_LEVE, β 03 0.267420 0.388833 0.688 58 0.494 VISMIN_M, β 04 0.747599 0.334042 2.238 58 0.029 ZEIT_MEA, β 05 0.030445 0.028479 1.069 58 0.289 LEFT_RIG, β 06-0.413138 0.451290-0.915 58 0.364 STADT_LA, β 07 1.097965 0.383998 2.859 58 0.006 VOLKSPAR, β 08-1.150305 0.326801-3.520 58 <0.001 INTRCPT2, β 10-1.022605 0.209263-4.887 51 <0.001 INTRCPT2, β 20 0.127743 0.088653 1.441 51 0.156

INTRCPT2, β 30 0.012347 0.005988 2.062 51 0.044 INTRCPT2, β 40 0.012062 0.002074 5.817 51 <0.001 INTRCPT2, β 50-0.443392 0.167415-2.648 51 0.011 INTRCPT2, β 00 1.475585 4.373593 (1.862,10.274) GEN_HLM_, β 01-0.152282 0.858746 (0.472,1.562) GENDER, β 02-0.170666 0.843103 (0.484,1.468) POL_LEVE, β 03 0.267420 1.306589 (0.600,2.846) VISMIN_M, β 04 0.747599 2.111923 (1.082,4.122) ZEIT_MEA, β 05 0.030445 1.030913 (0.974,1.091) LEFT_RIG, β 06-0.413138 0.661571 (0.268,1.633) STADT_LA, β 07 1.097965 2.998058 (1.390,6.467) VOLKSPAR, β 08-1.150305 0.316540 (0.165,0.609) INTRCPT2, β 10-1.022605 0.359657 (0.236,0.547) INTRCPT2, β 20 0.127743 1.136261 (0.951,1.358) INTRCPT2, β 30 0.012347 1.012423 (1.000,1.025) INTRCPT2, β 40 0.012062 1.012135 (1.008,1.016) INTRCPT2, β 50-0.443392 0.641856 (0.459,0.898) Final estimation of fixed effects (Population-average model with robust standard s) INTRCPT2, β 00 1.475585 0.308727 4.780 58 <0.001 GEN_HLM_, β 01-0.152282 0.235152-0.648 58 0.520 GENDER, β 02-0.170666 0.210260-0.812 58 0.420 POL_LEVE, β 03 0.267420 0.301952 0.886 58 0.379 VISMIN_M, β 04 0.747599 0.260398 2.871 58 0.006

ZEIT_MEA, β 05 0.030445 0.020618 1.477 58 0.145 LEFT_RIG, β 06-0.413138 0.336685-1.227 58 0.225 STADT_LA, β 07 1.097965 0.349554 3.141 58 0.003 VOLKSPAR, β 08-1.150305 0.238799-4.817 58 <0.001 INTRCPT2, β 10-1.022605 0.253972-4.026 51 <0.001 INTRCPT2, β 20 0.127743 0.110268 1.158 51 0.252 INTRCPT2, β 30 0.012347 0.005903 2.092 51 0.041 INTRCPT2, β 40 0.012062 0.002578 4.679 51 <0.001 INTRCPT2, β 50-0.443392 0.146172-3.033 51 0.004 INTRCPT2, β 00 1.475585 4.373593 (2.357,8.115) GEN_HLM_, β 01-0.152282 0.858746 (0.536,1.375) GENDER, β 02-0.170666 0.843103 (0.553,1.284) POL_LEVE, β 03 0.267420 1.306589 (0.714,2.392) VISMIN_M, β 04 0.747599 2.111923 (1.254,3.557) ZEIT_MEA, β 05 0.030445 1.030913 (0.989,1.074) LEFT_RIG, β 06-0.413138 0.661571 (0.337,1.298) STADT_LA, β 07 1.097965 2.998058 (1.489,6.036) VOLKSPAR, β 08-1.150305 0.316540 (0.196,0.511) INTRCPT2, β 10-1.022605 0.359657 (0.216,0.599) INTRCPT2, β 20 0.127743 1.136261 (0.911,1.418) INTRCPT2, β 30 0.012347 1.012423 (1.000,1.024) INTRCPT2, β 40 0.012062 1.012135 (1.007,1.017) INTRCPT2, β 50-0.443392 0.641856 (0.479,0.861)