2011 5 1001-4918 2011 05-0498-505 B844. 2 A * 1 2 2 1. 030006 2. 030031 370 1 15 16 13 14 2 1 2011 Belsky 1981 Bandura 1986 Kelly 2000 Kitzmann 2000 Kinsfogel & Grych 2004 2003 Fergusson & Horwood 1999 2008 Cummings & Davies 2002 David & Murphy 2007 Lindsey Caldera & Tankersley 2009 Grych & Fincham 1990 Cummings Goeke-Morey & Papp 2004 2008 2008 498 * 10YJAXLX021. E-mail wangxch9@ 126. com Bandura 1990 Bandura 1990 1999 2002
2010 Bandura 1999 Bandura Paciello Fida Tramontano Lupinetti & Caprara 2008 Hymel Henderson & Bonanno 2005 Pelton Gound Forehand & Brody 2004 14 ~ 16 Bandura Barbaranelli Caprara & Pastorelli 1996 Paciello et al. 2008 15 17 Hyde Shaw & Moilanen 2010 18 2. 1 20 400 Caprara Fida Vecchione Tramontano & Barbaranelli 2009 179 191 143 227 181 142 47 2010 12 17 14. 28 SD Kiriakidis 2008 69 16 73 17 17 Hodgdon 2009 2. 2 2. 2. 1 2006 Grych Seid Pelton et al. Fincham 1992 2004 38 2 15 3 1 ~ 3 17 Hyde et al. Kinsfogel & Grych 2004 Paciello et al. 2008 2 400 370 92. 5% 167 203 = 1. 26 12 16 13 82 14 113 15 2010 499
2011 5 χ2 / df = 1. 67 NFI = 0. 87 NNFI = 0. 92 IFI = 0. 93 CFI = 0. 93 RMSEA = 0. 042 α χ2 / df = 1. 95 NFI = 0. 90 NNFI = 0. 90 IFI = 0. 91 0. 81 CFI = 0. 91 RMSEA = 0. 048 2. 3 α 0. 83 2. 2. 2 Bandura 1996 SPSS16. 0 Lisrel8. 70 32 799 3 10 ~ 15 3. 1 0. 82 366 14 6 4 0. 87 ~ 0. 93 Paciello et al. 2008 Paciello et al. 2008 5 12 17 13 14 15 16 F 3 329 = 0. 59 p > 0. 05 F 1 329 = 24. 09 p < 0. 001 70. 69 ± 17. 92 60. 95 ± 15. 75 F 3 329 = 4. 51 p < 0. 01 1 1 t 10. 51 ± 4. 08 8. 16 ± 3. 09 6. 048 *** 2010 χ2 / df = 1. 97 NFI = 0. 91 NNFI = 0. 95 IFI = 0. 95 CFI = 0. 95 RMSEA = 0. 053 α 0. 89 0. 71 0. 55 0. 66 0. 61 0. 50 0. 56 0. 49 0. 60 2. 2. 3 2008 Buss Perry 1992 29 5 0. 18 p < 0. 001 0. 94 0. 80 500 8. 86 ± 3. 10 7. 57 ± 2. 55 4. 211 *** 6. 75 ± 2. 93 5. 72 ± 2. 21 3. 714 *** 9. 51 ± 3. 25 8. 26 ± 3. 08 3. 643 *** 10. 36 ± 3. 22 9. 24 ± 2. 95 3. 351 *** 7. 80 ± 2. 75 6. 69 ± 2. 41 3. 976 *** 9. 38 ± 2. 99 8. 63 ± 2. 63 2. 468 * 8. 01 ± 3. 18 6. 89 ± 2. 78 3. 449 ** * p < 0. 05 **p < 0. 01 ***p < 0. 001. 15 16 13 14 1
0. 41 0. 20 ~ 0. 42 0. 19 0. 12 ~ 0. 19 3. 2. 2 1 3. 2 3. 2. 1 2 2 0. 26 0. 12 ~ 0. 24 2 3 0. 24 0. 52 0. 22 χ2 / df = 11. 91 p < 0. 001 0. 11 0. 22 0. 52 0. 35 0. 24 + 0. 22 0. 52 31. 43% 2 501
2011 5 4 4. 1 Aquino Reed Thau & Freeman 2007 Detert et al. 2008 2010 15 16 13 14 McAlister 2001 Detert Trevino & Sweitzer 2008 Barchia & Bussey 2011 13 2009 15 16 15 16 14-20 3 χ2 df χ2 / df NFI NNFI IFI CFI RMSEA M 357. 98 150 2. 39 0. 91 0. 94 0. 95 0. 95 0. 061 M 346. 07 149 2. 32 0. 92 0. 94 0. 95 0. 95 0. 060 Paciello et al. 2008 14-16 Bandura Bandura 2004 Eisenberg 2000 Eisenberg Fabes & Spinrad 2006 Hardy & Carlo 2005 Kinsfogel Grych 2004 4. 2 Kinsfogel & Grych 2004 Kinsfogel Grych 2004 Grych & Fincham 1990 Cummings et 31. 43% al. 2004 2008 2008 502
503
2011 5 Pelton et al. 2004 Paciello et al. 2008 Caprara et al. 2009 Hyde et al. 2010 2010 Pelton et al. 2004 Hyde et al. 2010 Kinsfogel & Grych 2004 Kluwer Academic. - 374. aggression efficacy moral disengagement and Aggressive Behavior 37 2 107-120. Developmental Psychology 17 1 3-23. 4. 3 Differences 47 5 504-509. 63. Child Psychology 5 1 Annual Review of Psychology 51 665-697. 15 16 13 14 2 Psychology and Psychiatry 40 4 Bandura A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs NJ Prentice Hall. 504 Bandura A. 1990. Mechanisms of moral disengagement in W. Reich ed. origins of terrorism psychologies ideologies states of mind. New York Cambridge University Press. Bandura A. 1999. Moral disengagement in the perpetuation of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review 3 3 193-209. Bandura A. 2002. Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education 31 2 101-119. Bandura A. 2004. Selective exercise of moral agency. In T. A. Thorkildsen & H. J. Walberg Eds. Nurturing morality. Boston Bandura A. Barbaranelli C. Caprara G. V. & Pastorelli C. 1996. Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71 2 364 Barchia K. & Bussey K. 2011. Individual and collective social cognitive influences on peer aggression Exploring the contribution of collective efficacy. Belsky J. 1981. Early human experience A family perspective. Buss A. H. Perry M. 1992. The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63 3 452-459. Caprara G. V. Fida R. Vecchione M. Tramontano C. & Barbaranelli C. 2009. Assessing civic moral disengagement Dimensionality and construct validity. Personality and Individual Cummings E. M. & Davies P. T. 2002. Effects of marital conflict on children Recent advances and emerging themes in process-oriented research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 43 1 31 - Cummings E. M. Goeke-Morey M. C. & Papp L. M. 2004. Everyday marital conflict and child aggression. Journal of Abnormal 32 3 191-202. David K. M. & Murphy B. C. 2007. Interparental conflict and preschoolers peer relations The moderating roles of temperament and gender. Social Development 16 1 1-23. Detert J. R. Trevino L. K. & Sweitzer V. L. 2008. Moral disengagement in ethical decision making A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of AppliedPsychology 93 2 374-391. Eisenberg N. 2000. Emotion regulation and moral development. Eisenberg N. Fabes R. A. & Spinrad T. L. 2006. Prosocial development. Hoboken NJ John. Fergusson D. M. & Horwood L. J. 1999. Prospective childhood predictors of deviant peer affiliations in adolescence. Journal of Child 581-592. Grych J. H. & Fincham F. D. 1990. Marital conflict and children s adjustment A cognitive contextual framework. Psychological Bulletin 108 2 267-290. Grych H. Seid M. & Fincham F. D. 1992. Assessing marital conflict from the child s perspective The children s perception of
inter-parental conflict scale. Child Development 63 3 558-572. Hardy S. A. & Carlo G. 2005. Identity as a source of moral motivation. Human Development 48 4 232-256. Hodgdon H. B. 2009. Child Maltreatment and Aggression The Mediating Role of Moral Disengagement Emotion Regulation and Emotional Callousness Among Juvenile Offenders. Unpublished Doctorial Dissertation Temple University. Hyde L. W. Shaw D. S. & Moilanen K. L. 2010. Developmental precursors of moral disengagement and the role of moral disengagement in the development of antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 38 2 197-209. Hymel S. Henderson N. R. & Bonanno R. A. 2005. Moral disengagement A framework for understanding bullying among adolescents. Journal of Social Sciences 8 1-11. Kelly J. B. 2000. Children s adjustment in conflicted marriage and divorce A decade review of research. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 39 8 963-973. Kinsfogel K. M. & Grych J. H. 2004. Interparental conflict and adolescent dating relationships Integrating cognitive emotional and peer influences. Journal of Family Psychology 18 3 505-515. Kitzmann K. M. 2000. Effects of marital conflict on subsequent triadic family interactions and parenting. Developmental Psychology 36 1 3-13. Lindsey E. W. Caldera Y. M. & Tankersley L. 2009. Marital conflict and the quality of young children s peer play behavior The mediating and moderating role of parent-child emotion reciprocity and attachment security. Journal of Family Psychology 23 2 130-145. McAlister A. L. 2001. Moral disengagement Measurement and modification. Journal of Peace Research 38 1 87-99. Paciello M. Fida R. Tramontano C. Lupinetti C. & Caprara G. V. 2008. Stability and change of moral disengagement and its impact on aggression and violence in late adolescence. Child Development 79 5 1288-1309. Pelton J. Gound M. Forehand R. & Brody G. 2004. The moral disengagement scale Extension with an American minority sample. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 26 1 31-39.. 2003.. 17 8 554-556.. 2008.. 16 2 198-199.. 2008..... 2008. 7. 22 11 791-795.. 2010.. 18 2 177-179.. 2009..... 2010.. 18 4 671-678.. 2010.. 4 364-370.. 2011.. 43 1 42-51.. 2008.. 8 10-18.. 2006.. 29 2 454-456. Interparental Conflict and Aggressive Behavior The Mediating Effect of the Moral Disengagement YANG Ji-ping 1 2 WANG Xing-chao 2 1. College of Educational Science Shanxi University Taiyuan 030006 2. Business College of Shanxi University Taiyuan 030031 Abstract In order to investigate the moral disengagement of junior high school students and its relation to their interparental conflict and aggressive behavior 370 students completed the Moral Disengagement Scale the Children s Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale and the Aggression Questionnaire. The results indicated as follows 1 The boys score of moral disengagement was significantly higher than that of girls student s moral disengagement showed significant age differences. 2 Moral disengagement mediated the relation between interparental conflict and aggressive behavior. Key words junior high school student interparental conflict moral disengagement aggressive behavior 505