Fermionic Superstring Loop Amplitudes in the Pure Spinor Formalism
|
|
- Ἀχιλλεύς Σπυρόπουλος
- 6 χρόνια πριν
- Προβολές:
Transcript
1 Fermionic Superstring Loop Amplitudes in the Pure Spinor Formalism Christian Stahn (UNC) UNC String Theory Seminar, 3 May 2007 based on arxiv:
2 Outline Introduction Methods for kinematic factor evaluation Superfield components Integration in pure spinor superspace Reduction to kinematic bases Application to one- and two-loop amplitudes One loop Two loops Discussion
3 Pure spinor quantisation of the superstring [Berkovits (2000)] Problems with superstring quantisation: RNS: Spacetime susy only after summation over spin structures GS: Need to go to light cone gauge Flat-space action: S = d 2 z ( 12 x m xm p α θ α pᾱ θᾱ + w α λ wᾱ λᾱ) α + Bosonic ghost λ subject to pure spinor constraint: Critical in ten dimensions. λγ m λ = 0 BRST operator Q = λ α d α : cohomology reproduces superstring spectrum Tree amplitudes agree with RNS [Berkovits & Vallilo (2000)] Relate to GS formalism in semi-lightcone gauge
4 Pure spinor loop amplitudes Multiloop amplitudes constructed in pure spinor formulation, and used to prove vanishing theorems [Berkovits (2004)]. Massless multiloop amplitude: Need at least four external states. One-loop amplitude: A = K K d 2 τ (Im τ) 5 d 2 z 2 d 2 z 3 d 2 z 4 G(z i, z j ) k i k j Kinematic factors expressed as pure spinor superspace integrals : K 1-loop = (λa)(λγ m W )(λγ n W )F mn i<j K 2-loop = (λγ mnpqr λ)(λγ s W )F mn F pq F rs Covariant zero mode integration: λ 3 θ 5 = 1. Superfields: A α (γ a θ) α ζ a + (uγ a θ)(γ a θ) α +... D β D β and A α Am W α D β F mn, where D α = α k a(γ a θ) α. Bosonic amplitudes agree with RNS [Berkovits & Mafra, Mafra (2005)]
5 The problems addressed in this talk Evaluation of pure spinor superspace integrals in kinematic factors: K 2-loop = (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] W (θ))f mn (θ)f pq (θ)f rs (θ) Expand superfields, saturate θ 5 +ka 2 kmk 2 p 3 kr 4 (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] u 1 )(θγ ab n θ)(θγ b u 2 )(θγ q u 3 )(θγ s u 4 ) + Evaluate correlator = (u 1 γ mpr u 2 )(u 3 γ a u 4 ) + (u 1 γ ai 1i 2 u 2 )(u 3 γ mpr i 1 i 2 u 4 ) + +ε ampr i 1...i 6 (u 1 γ i 3...i 9 u 2 )(u 3 γ i 1i 2 i7i 8 i 9 u 4 ) + Reduce to kinematic basis (Use on-shell identities) K = s 12 [ (u1 /k 3 u 2 )(u 3 /k 1 u 4 ) (u 1 /k 2 u 3 )(u 2 /k 1 u 4 ) + (u 1 /k 2 u 4 )(u 2 /k 1 u 3 ) ]
6 The problems addressed in this talk Evaluation of pure spinor superspace integrals in kinematic factors: K 2-loop = (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] W (θ))f mn (θ)f pq (θ)f rs (θ) Expand superfields, saturate θ 5 +ka 2 kmk 2 p 3 kr 4 (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] u 1 )(θγ ab n θ)(θγ b u 2 )(θγ q u 3 )(θγ s u 4 ) + Evaluate correlator = (u 1 γ mpr u 2 )(u 3 γ a u 4 ) + (u 1 γ ai 1i 2 u 2 )(u 3 γ mpr i 1 i 2 u 4 ) + +ε ampr i 1...i 6 (u 1 γ i 3...i 9 u 2 )(u 3 γ i 1i 2 i7i 8 i 9 u 4 ) + Reduce to kinematic basis (Use on-shell identities) K = s 12 [ (u1 /k 3 u 2 )(u 3 /k 1 u 4 ) (u 1 /k 2 u 3 )(u 2 /k 1 u 4 ) + (u 1 /k 2 u 4 )(u 2 /k 1 u 3 ) ]
7 The problems addressed in this talk Evaluation of pure spinor superspace integrals in kinematic factors: K 2-loop = (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] W (θ))f mn (θ)f pq (θ)f rs (θ) Expand superfields, saturate θ 5 +ka 2 kmk 2 p 3 kr 4 (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] u 1 )(θγ ab n θ)(θγ b u 2 )(θγ q u 3 )(θγ s u 4 ) + Evaluate correlator = (u 1 γ mpr u 2 )(u 3 γ a u 4 ) + (u 1 γ ai 1i 2 u 2 )(u 3 γ mpr i 1 i 2 u 4 ) + +ε ampr i 1...i 6 (u 1 γ i 3...i 9 u 2 )(u 3 γ i 1i 2 i7i 8 i 9 u 4 ) + Reduce to kinematic basis (Use on-shell identities) K = s 12 [ (u1 /k 3 u 2 )(u 3 /k 1 u 4 ) (u 1 /k 2 u 3 )(u 2 /k 1 u 4 ) + (u 1 /k 2 u 4 )(u 2 /k 1 u 3 ) ]
8 The problems addressed in this talk Evaluation of pure spinor superspace integrals in kinematic factors: K 2-loop = (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] W (θ))f mn (θ)f pq (θ)f rs (θ) Expand superfields, saturate θ 5 +ka 2 kmk 2 p 3 kr 4 (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] u 1 )(θγ ab n θ)(θγ b u 2 )(θγ q u 3 )(θγ s u 4 ) + Evaluate correlator = (u 1 γ mpr u 2 )(u 3 γ a u 4 ) + (u 1 γ ai 1i 2 u 2 )(u 3 γ mpr i 1 i 2 u 4 ) + +ε ampr i 1...i 6 (u 1 γ i 3...i 9 u 2 )(u 3 γ i 1i 2 i7i 8 i 9 u 4 ) + Reduce to kinematic basis (Use on-shell identities) K = s 12 [ (u1 /k 3 u 2 )(u 3 /k 1 u 4 ) (u 1 /k 2 u 3 )(u 2 /k 1 u 4 ) + (u 1 /k 2 u 4 )(u 2 /k 1 u 3 ) ]
9 The problems addressed in this talk Evaluation of pure spinor superspace integrals in kinematic factors: K 2-loop = (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] W (θ))f mn (θ)f pq (θ)f rs (θ) Expand superfields, saturate θ 5 +ka 2 kmk 2 p 3 kr 4 (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] u 1 )(θγ ab n θ)(θγ b u 2 )(θγ q u 3 )(θγ s u 4 ) + Evaluate correlator = (u 1 γ mpr u 2 )(u 3 γ a u 4 ) + (u 1 γ ai 1i 2 u 2 )(u 3 γ mpr i 1 i 2 u 4 ) + +ε ampr i 1...i 6 (u 1 γ i 3...i 9 u 2 )(u 3 γ i 1i 2 i7i 8 i 9 u 4 ) + Reduce to kinematic basis (Use on-shell identities) K = s 12 [ (u1 /k 3 u 2 )(u 3 /k 1 u 4 ) (u 1 /k 2 u 3 )(u 2 /k 1 u 4 ) + (u 1 /k 2 u 4 )(u 2 /k 1 u 3 ) ]
10 The problems addressed in this talk Evaluation of pure spinor superspace integrals in kinematic factors: K 2-loop = (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] W (θ))f mn (θ)f pq (θ)f rs (θ) Expand superfields, saturate θ 5 +ka 2 kmk 2 p 3 kr 4 (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] u 1 )(θγ ab n θ)(θγ b u 2 )(θγ q u 3 )(θγ s u 4 ) + Evaluate correlator = (u 1 γ mpr u 2 )(u 3 γ a u 4 ) + (u 1 γ ai 1i 2 u 2 )(u 3 γ mpr i 1 i 2 u 4 ) + +ε ampr i 1...i 6 (u 1 γ i 3...i 9 u 2 )(u 3 γ i 1i 2 i7i 8 i 9 u 4 ) + Reduce to kinematic basis (Use on-shell identities) K = s 12 [ (u1 /k 3 u 2 )(u 3 /k 1 u 4 ) (u 1 /k 2 u 3 )(u 2 /k 1 u 4 ) + (u 1 /k 2 u 4 )(u 2 /k 1 u 3 ) ]
11 The problems addressed in this talk Evaluation of pure spinor superspace integrals in kinematic factors: K 2-loop = (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] W (θ))f mn (θ)f pq (θ)f rs (θ) Expand superfields, saturate θ 5 +ka 2 kmk 2 p 3 kr 4 (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] u 1 )(θγ ab n θ)(θγ b u 2 )(θγ q u 3 )(θγ s u 4 ) + Evaluate correlator = (u 1 γ mpr u 2 )(u 3 γ a u 4 ) + (u 1 γ ai 1i 2 u 2 )(u 3 γ mpr i 1 i 2 u 4 ) + +ε ampr i 1...i 6 (u 1 γ i 3...i 9 u 2 )(u 3 γ i 1i 2 i7i 8 i 9 u 4 ) + Reduce to kinematic basis (Use on-shell identities) K = s 12 [ (u1 /k 3 u 2 )(u 3 /k 1 u 4 ) (u 1 /k 2 u 3 )(u 2 /k 1 u 4 ) + (u 1 /k 2 u 4 )(u 2 /k 1 u 3 ) ]
12 Outline Introduction Methods for kinematic factor evaluation Superfield components Integration in pure spinor superspace Reduction to kinematic bases Application to one- and two-loop amplitudes One loop Two loops Discussion
13 Superfield recursion relations [Ooguri et al. (2000), Grassi & Tamassia (2004), Policastro & Tsimpis (2006)] A α (x, θ) = (θγa ) α ζ a (θγa ) α (θγ a u) +? A m, W α, F mn =? Choose a gauge θ α A α = 0. On-shell identities 2D (α A β) = γ m αβa m, D α W β = 1 4 (γmn ) α β F mn lead to recursion relations A (n) α = 1 n+1 (γm θ) α A (n 1) m A (n) m = 1 n (θγ mw (n 1) ) W α(n) = 1 2n (γmn θ) α m A (n 1) n where f (n) = 1 n! θαn θ α 1 (Dα1 D αn f ). Can solve: obtain e.g. A (n) m from ζ, u via derivative operator O m q = 1 2 (θγ m qp θ) p : A (2k) m = 1 (2k)! [Ok ] m q ζ q, A (2k+1) m = 1 (2k+1)! [Ok ] m q (θγ q u).
14 Outline Introduction Methods for kinematic factor evaluation Superfield components Integration in pure spinor superspace Reduction to kinematic bases Application to one- and two-loop amplitudes One loop Two loops Discussion
15 Pure spinor integrals: Tensorial formulae Recall: Lorentz invariant integration T αβγ,δ 1...δ 5 λ α λ β λ γ θ δ 1... θ δ5 = T (αβγ),[δ 1...δ 5] with normalisation (λγ m θ)(λγ n θ)(λγ p θ)(θγ mnp θ) = 1. Uniquely determined by symmetry λ (α λ β λ γ) : Sym 3 S + = [00003] [10001] θ [δ 1... θ δ5] : Alt 5 S + = [00030] [11010]. Can therefore derive tensorial expressions such as (λγ mnpqr θ)(λγ a θ)(λγ b θ)(θγ cde θ) ( = 1 42 δ mnpqr abcde + ) 1 5! εmnpqr abcde Generally, by Fierzing, reduce to three basic correlators: (λγ [5] λ)(λ{γ [1] or γ [3] or γ [5] }θ)(θγ [3] θ)(θγ [3] θ).
16 Tensorial formulae: example application Example from two-loop four-fermion amplitudes: F = (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] u 1 )(θγ n ab θ)(θγ b u 2 )(θγ q u 3 )(θγ s u 4 ). After Fierz transformations: ( F = (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ c θ)(θγ ab n θ)(θγ jkl θ) (u 1 γ s] γ c γ b u 2 ) ! ! 16 (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ cde θ)(θγ ab n θ)(θγ jkl θ) (u 1 γ s] γ cde γ b u 2 ) (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ cdefg θ)(θγ ab n θ)(θγ jkl θ) (u 1 γ s] γ cdefg γ b u 2 )) 1 3! 16 (u 3γ q γ jkl γ s u 4 ), Use correlator formulae such as (λγ mnpqr λ)(λγ abcde θ)(θγ fgh θ)(θγ jkl θ) ( = 16 7 δ mnpqr [ ] δ m n p abc δf j δg d δ q k ( δe h δ r l +2δl e δ r h)+δ m n ab δfg cd δ p q jk (δe h δ r l 3δl e δ r h) Fairly complicated m n p q r + 1 5! εmnpqr m n p q r ) [abcde][fgh][jkl](fgh jkl)
17 Reduction to traces and bilinears Covariant expression for correlator, using gamma matrices: λ α λ β λ γ θ δ 1... θ δ5 = N 1 [ (γ m ) αδ 1 (γ n ) βδ 2 (γ p ) γδ 3 (γ mnp ) δ 4δ 5 ] (αβγ)[δ 1...δ 5] Normalisation constant N fixed by N (λγ x θ)(λγ y θ)(λγ z θ)(θγ xyz θ) = [ (γ m ) αδ 1 (γ n ) βδ 2 (γ p ) γδ 3 (γ mnp ) δ 4δ 5 ](αβγ)[δ 1...δ 5] (γ x ) αδ1 (γ y ) βδ2 (γ z ) γδ3 (γ xyz ) δ4 δ 5 = 1 60 Tr(γ xγ m ) Tr(γ y γ n ) Tr(γ z γ p ) Tr(γ xyz γ pnm ) Tr(γ zγ pnm γ zyx γ n γ x γ m γ y γ p ) (60 terms) = Use computer algebra to carry out spinor index symmetrisations simplify γ products and traces (e.g. Mathematica with GAMMA)
18 Reduction to traces and bilinears (2) Allows for easier evaluation of fermionic correlators: N (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] u 1 )(θγ n ab θ)(θγ b u 2 )(θγ q u 3 )(θγ s u 4 ) = 1 60 Tr(γ xγ ab nγ y γ mnpq[r )(u 3 γ q γ xyz γ s u 4 )(u 1 γ s] γ z γ b u 2 ) (u 2γ b γ xyz γ q u 3 )(u 1 γ s γ y γ ab nγ x γ mnpq[r γ z γ s] u 4 ), (24 terms) Simpler because: no Fierzing necessary fewer open indices fewer ε terms easier to put on computer
19 Component approach Can also use gamma matrix expression λ α λ β λ γ θ δ 1... θ δ5 = N 1 [ (γ m ) αδ 1 (γ n ) βδ 2 (γ p ) γδ 3 (γ mnp ) δ 4δ 5 ] to compute correlators of particular spinor components. Example: Check coefficients in t mnm 1n 1...m 4 n 4 (αβγ)[δ 1...δ 5] 10 (λγ p γ m 1n 1 θ)(λγ q γ m 2n 2 θ)(λγ r γ m 3n 3 θ)(θγ m γ n γ pqr γ m 4n 4 θ) ( = 2 45 η mn t m 1n 1...m 4 n 4 ) εmnm 1n 1...m 4 n 4 Choose particular index values. Expand integrand and evaluate correlators on all monomials (here, about 10 5 ) : (λγ p γ 12 θ)(λγ q γ 21 θ)(λγ r γ 34 θ)(θγ 0 γ 0 γ pqr γ 43 θ) = 12 λ 1 λ 1 λ 1 θ 1 θ 9 θ 10 θ 11 θ λ 16 λ 16 λ 16 θ 5 θ 6 θ 7 θ 8 θ 16 = Probably unsuitable for more complex applications.
20 Outline Introduction Methods for kinematic factor evaluation Superfield components Integration in pure spinor superspace Reduction to kinematic bases Application to one- and two-loop amplitudes One loop Two loops Discussion
21 Purely bosonic expressions Easy to algorithmically deal with bosonic on-shell identitites: momentum conservation i k i = 0 and masslessness ki 2 = 0: eliminate one momentum (e.g. k 4 ) and set all ki 2 to zero eliminate one quadratic invariant (e.g. s 23 s 12 s 13 ) equation of motion for polarisation vector k i ζ i = 0: set all k i ζ i to zero replace one extra k ζ, e.g. k 3 ζ 4 ( k 1 k 2 ) ζ 4 For gauge invariant expressions: start with Fi ab = 2k [a i ζ b] i, e.g. gauge invariant k 4 ζ 1 ζ 2 ζ 3 ζ 4 scalars: Tr(F 1 F 2 F 3 F 4 ) Tr(F 1 F 2 F 4 F 3 ) Tr(F 1 F 3 F 2 F 4 ) Tr(F 1 F 2 ) Tr(F 3 F 4 ) Tr(F 1 F 3 ) Tr(F 2 F 4 ) Tr(F 1 F 4 ) Tr(F 2 F 3 ) gauge invariant k 6 ζ 1 ζ 2 ζ 3 ζ 4 scalars: additionally terms like k 3 F 1 F 2 k 3 Tr(F 3 F 4 ), k 4 F 1 F 3 k 2 Tr(F 2 F 4 )
22 Fermions: Fierz identities Spinors more complicated. Example question: which scalars from u 1 u 2 u 3 u 4? start from T 1 (1234) = (u 1 γ a u 2 )(u 3 γ a u 4 ), T 3 (1234) = (u 1 γ abc u 2 )(u 3 γ abc u 4 ). Fierz transformations T 3 (1234) = 12T 1 (1234) 24T 1 (1324) (γ a ) (αβ (γ a ) γ)δ = 0 T 1 (1234) + T 1 (1324) + T 1 (1423) = 0 leaves two scalars T 1 (1234) and T 1 (1324) agrees with rep theory, (S + ) 4 = Easy to computerise in matrix representation for γ a : Reduce to independent monomials u α 1 uβ 2 uγ 3 uδ 4, e.g. T 1 (1234) = 2u 9 1 u9 2 u1 3u u 10 1 u10 2 u1 3u
23 Fermions: Dirac equation In one- and two-loop amplitudes: need (k 2 or k 4 ) u 1 u 2 u 3 u 4. Spinors subject to /k i u i = 0 Useful observation: only need one k into (u i γ [n] u j ) bilinears. Thus consider (k 2 or k 4 ) (u 1 u 2 u 3 u 4 scalar or 2-tensor) Computer treatment: solve Dirac equation with SO(8) spinors ( ) ( ) ( ) u s u = u c with γ u s +u s u c = u c. Obtain coupled equations (k 0 + k 9 )u s (σ k)u c = 0, (k 0 k 9 )u c (σ T k)u s = 0 with solution u s = (σ k)u c / 2k +. Everything reduced to independent monomials in (u c i )1...8
24 Using particular momenta This algorithm reduces all scalars containing k i and u i to fαβγδ (k i )(u c 1 )α (u c 2 )β (u c 3 )γ (u c 4 )δ Problem: manifest Lorentz invariance broken by γ a matrix rep. difficult to deal with the f αβγδ (k i ) (e.g. terms proportional to ki 2 = 0) One solution: substitute sets of particular vectors for k i, e.g. k µ 1 = (5, 3, 0,..., 0, 4) k µ 2 k µ 3 = (5, 3, 0,..., 4, 0) k µ 4 = ( 5, 0, 3,..., 4, 0) = ( 5, 0, 3,..., 0, 4) Results: Algorithms to find independent scalars, decomposition algorithms, e.g. for k 2 u 1... u 4 scalars, (u 1 /k 3 u 2 )(u 3 /k 1 u 4 ) s 12 T 1 (1234) (u 1 /k 2 u 3 )(u 2 /k 1 u 4 ) s 13 T 1 (1234) (u 1 /k 2 u 4 )(u 2 /k 1 u 3 ) s 13 T 1 (1324)
25 The problems addressed in this talk Evaluation of pure spinor superspace integrals in kinematic factors: K 2-loop = (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] W (θ))f mn (θ)f pq (θ)f rs (θ) Expand superfields, saturate θ 5 +ka 2 kmk 2 p 3 kr 4 (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] u 1 )(θγ ab n θ)(θγ b u 2 )(θγ q u 3 )(θγ s u 4 ) + Evaluate correlator = (u 1 γ mpr u 2 )(u 3 γ a u 4 ) + (u 1 γ ai 1i 2 u 2 )(u 3 γ mpr i 1 i 2 u 4 ) + +ε ampr i 1...i 6 (u 1 γ i 3...i 9 u 2 )(u 3 γ i 1i 2 i7i 8 i 9 u 4 ) + Reduce to kinematic basis (Use on-shell identities) K = s 12 [ (u1 /k 3 u 2 )(u 3 /k 1 u 4 ) (u 1 /k 2 u 3 )(u 2 /k 1 u 4 ) + (u 1 /k 2 u 4 )(u 2 /k 1 u 3 ) ]
26 Outline Introduction Methods for kinematic factor evaluation Superfield components Integration in pure spinor superspace Reduction to kinematic bases Application to one- and two-loop amplitudes One loop Two loops Discussion
27 One-loop massless four-point amplitude Derived in pure spinor formalism [Berkovits (2004)]: A = K K Kinematic factor: Saturate θ 5 : d 2 τ (Im τ) 5 d 2 z 2 d 2 z 3 d 2 z 4 G(z i, z j ) k i k j K = (λa 1 )(λγ m W 2 )(λγ n W 3 )F 4,mn + ( cycl(234) ) X ABCD = i<j (λa (A) 1 )(λγm W (B) 2 )(λγ n W (C) 3 )F (D) 4,mn with A + B + C + D = 5. Parities of A, B, C, D bosonic or fermionic external states
28 Four bosons (Review of [Mafra (2005)]) Can evaluate correlator for one labelling, and then symmetrise: K (4B) 1-loop = (λa 1 )(λγ m W 2 )(λγ n W 3 )F 4B 4,mn + ( cycl (234) ) = X X X X ( cycl (234) ) Result must be a linear combination of single trace Tr(F (1 F 2 F 3 F 4) ) and double trace Tr(F (1 F 2 ) Tr(F 3 F 4) ). Pure spinor integrals: X 3110 = F mnf 1 pqf 2 rsf 3 tu 4 (λγ [t γ pq θ)(λγ u] γ rs θ)(λγ a θ)(θγ amn θ), X 1112 = k mζ 4 nf 1 pqf 2 rsf 3 tu 4 (λγ [m γ pq θ)(λγ a] γ rs θ)(λγ n θ)(θγ tu a θ), X 1310 = 5 16 k mζ 3 nf 1 pqf 2 rsf 3 tu 4 (λγ [t γ ma θ)(λγ u] γ rs θ)(λγ n θ)(θγ pq a θ). Reduce to traces: X 3110 = N 1[ 1 60 Tr(γ aγ z ) Tr(γ xyz γ anm ) Tr(γ x γ qp γ [t ) Tr(γ y γ sr γ u] ) Tr(γ[u γ rs γ zyx γ qp γ t] γ x γ a γ y γ mna γ z ) = ( 1 35 δmp rs δ nq tu δmn tu δrs pq 1 90 δmn rs δ pq tu δmn pr δ qs tu ] (60 terms) ) [mn][pq][rs][tu](pq rs)
29 Four bosons (2) Contract with field strengths, momenta and polarisations, and symmetrise: X ( cycl(234) ) = Tr(F (1F 2 F 3 F 4) ) 1 56 Tr(F (1F 2 ) Tr(F 3 F 4) ) X ( cycl(234) ) = Tr(F (1F 2 F 3 F 4) ) Tr(F (1F 2 ) Tr(F 3 F 4) ) X ( cycl(234) ) ( = Tr(F(1 F 2 F 3 F 4) ) Tr(F (1 F 2 ) Tr(F 3 F 4) ) ) Total: K 4B 1-loop = 3 64 ( 4 Tr(F(1 F 2 F 3 F 4) ) Tr(F (1 F 2 ) Tr(F 3 F 4) ) ) = t 8F 4 Agrees with Green-Schwarz and RNS results
30 Four fermions Could similarly evaluate: K (4F) 1-loop = (λa 1 )(λγ m W 2 )(λγ n W 3 )F 4,mn 4F + ( cycl (234) ) Note the symmetry: cycl(234) implies complete antisymmetry in u 2, u 3, u 4 on k 2 u 1 u 2 u 3 u 4 scalars, [234] is equivalent to [1234] there is only one antisymmetric k 2 u 1 u 2 u 3 u 4 scalar Thus the result is fixed by symmetry: K 4F 1-loop (u 1 /k 3 u 2 )(u 3 /k 1 u 4 ) (u 1 /k 2 u 3 )(u 2 /k 1 u 4 ) + (u 1 /k 2 u 4 )(u 2 /k 1 u 3 ) Again, agrees with previously known expressions
31 Symmetrisations more tricky now: Two bosons, two fermions K1-loop(f 2B2F 1 f 2 b 3 b 4 ) = (1 π 34 ) (λa (even) 1 )(λγ m W (even) 2 )(λγ n W (odd) 3 )F (even) 4,mn + (λa (even) 1 )(λγ m W (odd) 3 )(λγ n W (odd) 4 )F (odd) 2,mn. First line has wrong [34] symmetry and must give zero. Fermionic expansion: K 2B2F 1-loop = (1 π 34 ) (X X X X 2012 ) + X 2111, Typical correlator: X 4010 = 1 60 k 1 q k 3 b ζ3 c k 4 mζ 4 n Reduce to u 1 u 2 bilinears: (λγ a θ)(θγ a pq θ)(θγ p u 1 )(λγ [m u 2 )(λγ n] γ bc θ) X 4010 = δq[b mn (u 1 γ c] u 2 ) δq[m bc (u 1γ n] u 2 ) δbc mn(u 1 γ q u 2 ) δ[m q (u 1 γ n]bc u 2 ) δ[b q (u 1 γ c]mn u 2 ) δ[b [m (u 1γ c]q n] u 2 ) (u 1γ bcmnq u 2 )
32 Two bosons, two fermions (2) Contract with k and ζ, and expand in kinematic basis C 1... C 5 : (1 π 34 )X 4010 = ( 1, 12, 12, 1, 2) C 1...C 5 (1 π 34 )X 2210 = (31, 30, 30, 1, 2) C 1...C 5 (1 π 34 )X 2030 = (0, 21, 21, 0, 0) C 1...C 5 (1 π 34 )X 2012 = ( 30, 39, 39, 0, 0) C 1...C 5 X 2111 = (1, 0, 4, 1, 0) C 1...C 5 Terms with the wrong [34] symmetry cancel: (1 π 34 ) (X X X X 2012 ) = 0 Remaining part agrees with GS and RNS: ( ) K1-loop 2B2F = X 2111 = s 13 (u 2 /ζ 3 (/k 2 +/k 3 )/ζ 4 u 1 )+s 23 (u 2 /ζ 4 (/k 1 +/k 3 )/ζ 3 u 1 )
33 Outline Introduction Methods for kinematic factor evaluation Superfield components Integration in pure spinor superspace Reduction to kinematic bases Application to one- and two-loop amplitudes One loop Two loops Discussion
34 Two-loop massless four-point amplitude A = 4 d 2 Ω 11 d 2 Ω 12 d 2 Ω 22 i=1 ( exp ) d 2 i,j k i k j G(z i, z j ) z i (det Im Ω) 5 K (k i, z i ) Fermionic zero mode integrals: K = (λγ mnpqr λ)(λγ s ( ) W 1 )F 2,mn F 3,pq F 4,rs + perm(1234) K K K 14 Kinematic factors K ij : K 12 = 4 W [1 F 2] F [3 F 4] + 4 W[3 F 4] F [1 F 2] Biholomorphic one-form, ij = (z i, z j ) = ω 1 (z i )ω 2 (z j ) ω 2 (z i )ω 1 (z j )
35 Four bosons (Review of [Berkovits & Mafra (2005)]) All three kinematic factors equivalent; consider K 4B 12 = 4 W [1 F 2] F [3 F 4] 4B + 4 W [3 F 4] F [1 F 2] 4B = (1 π 12 )(1 π 34 )(1 + π 13 π 24 ) W 1 F 2 F 3 F 4 4B Fermionic expansion: W1 F 2 F 3 F 4B 4 = Y Y Y Y Y 1022 = (1 + π 23 )(1 π 24 ) ( 1 3 Y ) Y Y Y 1022 Introduce symmetrisation operator: K12 4B = ( S 1 4B 3 Y ) Y Y Y 1022, S 4B = (1 π 12 )(1 π 34 )(1 + π 13 π 24 )(1 + π 23 )(1 π 24 ). Non-zero correlators: Y 3200 = k a 1 Fcdk 1 mf 2 ef 2 F pqf 3 rs 4 (λγ mnpqr λ)(λγ s γ ab θ)(θγ cd b θ)(θγ ef n θ), Y 1022 = 1 64 F abf 1 mnk 2 p 3 Fcd 3 k r 4 Fef 4 (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] γ ab θ)(θγ cd q θ)(θγ ef s θ).
36 Four bosons (2) Symmetriser S 4B projects out k F terms: S 4B (Y Y 1022 ) = (s 13 s 23 ) ( 4 Tr(F (1 F 2 F 3 F 4) ) Tr(F (1 F 2 ) Tr(F 3 F 4) ) ) Very simple result: K 4B 12 = (s 13 s 23 )t 8 F 4 Trivially obtain K 13 and K 14. Total: K2-loop 4B ( ) = (s13 s 23 ) (s 12 s 23 ) (s 12 s 13 ) t8 F 4 Agrees with (relatively recent!) RNS result [d Hoker, Phong (2001)]. Note product structure, with one half being the one-loop kinematic factor
37 Very similar calculation: Four fermions K 4F 12 = (1 π 12 )(1 π 34 )(1 + π 13 π 24 ) W 1 F 2 F 3 F 4 4F = 4(1 π 12 ) W 1 F 2 F 3 F 4 4F = S 4F ( 1 3 Y Y 0311 ) with symmetrisation S 4F = 4(1 π 12 )(1 π 23 )(1 + π 24 ). Two correlators have to be computed: Y 2111 = ( 2)k 1 a k 2 mk 3 p k 4 r (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] γ ab θ)(θγ b u 1 )(θγ n u 2 )(θγ q u 3 )(θγ s u 4 ) = ( 19, 21, 21, 19, 17, 17, 0, 0, 0, 0) B 1...B 10, Y 0311 = ( 2 3 )k 2 a k 2 mk 3 p k 4 r (λγ mnpq[r λ)(λγ s] u 1 )(θγ n ab θ)(θγ b u 2 )(θγ q u 3 )(θγ s u 4 ) = ( 14, 16, 0, 2, 8, 8, 0, 5, 5, 0) B 1...B 10.
38 Four fermions (2) Act with symmetriser S 4F and obtain the one-loop u 4 scalar: K 4F 12 = S 4F ( 1 3 Y Y 0311 ) = 1 45 ( 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) B 1...B 10 = 1 45 s 12 ( (u1 /k 3 u 2 )(u 3 /k 1 u 4 ) (u 1 /k 2 u 3 )(u 2 /k 1 u 4 ) + (u 1 /k 2 u 4 )(u 2 /k 1 u 3 ) ). Total result, including K 13 and K 14 : K 4F 2-loop = 1 45 (s s s ) ( (u 1 /k 3 u 2 )(u 3 /k 1 u 4 ) (u 1 /k 2 u 3 )(u 2 /k 1 u 4 ) + (u 1 /k 2 u 4 )(u 2 /k 1 u 3 ) ) Again simple product structure, with one-loop factor
39 Two bosons, two fermions Exchange symmetry prevents simple product structure with one-loop factor: K2-loop 2B2F 1j kl [ f j (s 12, s 13 )K1-loop(f 2B2F 1 f 2 b 3 b 4 ) ]. j=1,2,3 (Note that any f (s 12, s 13 ) has identical symmetry under 1 2 and 3 4, and is symmetric under (1, 3) (2, 4)). Instead, find with K12 2B2F = (1 π 12 )(1 π 34 ) K K13 2B2F = (2 1 + π 12 + π π 12 π 34 ) K K14 2B2F = (1 + 2π π 34 + π 12 π 34 ) K K = (λ 3 W (even) 1 )F (odd) 2 F (even) 3 F (even) 4 + (λ 3 W (odd) 3 )F (even) 4 F (odd) 1 F (odd) 2
40 Two bosons, two fermions (2) Correlators in K : combination of ten k 3 u 1 u 2 F 3 F 4 scalars. Images of the symmetrisers are spanned by s 12, s 13 times (u 1 γ a u 2 ) ( ka 3 Fbc 3 F bc 4 2Fab 3 F bck 4 c 1 + 2FabF 4 bc 3 k c 1 ) Tensor structure thus fixed up to three constants: K2-loop 2B2F = [ c 1 s (c 2 s 12 + c 3 s 13 ) ] +((c 3 c 2 )s 12 + c 3 s 13 ) (u 1 γ a u 2 ) ( ka 3 Fbc 3 F bc 4 2Fab 3 F bck 4 c 1 + 2FabF 4 bc 3 k c 1 )
41 Discussion Summary: The pure spinor formalism yields manifestly supersymmetric loop amplitudes Superspace integration not (much) more complicated for fermions than for bosons Some amplitudes fixed or highly constrained by exchange symmetries Outlook: Improve computer algebra: custom-made Mathematica algorithms vs. specialised program (e.g. Cadabra) Methods applicable to future higher-loop amplitudes
6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.
6.1. Dirac Equation Ref: M.Kaku, Quantum Field Theory, Oxford Univ Press (1993) η μν = η μν = diag(1, -1, -1, -1) p 0 = p 0 p = p i = -p i p μ p μ = p 0 p 0 + p i p i = E c 2 - p 2 = (m c) 2 H = c p 2
Διαβάστε περισσότερα= {{D α, D α }, D α }. = [D α, 4iσ µ α α D α µ ] = 4iσ µ α α [Dα, D α ] µ.
PHY 396 T: SUSY Solutions for problem set #1. Problem 2(a): First of all, [D α, D 2 D α D α ] = {D α, D α }D α D α {D α, D α } = {D α, D α }D α + D α {D α, D α } (S.1) = {{D α, D α }, D α }. Second, {D
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSpace-Time Symmetries
Chapter Space-Time Symmetries In classical fiel theory any continuous symmetry of the action generates a conserve current by Noether's proceure. If the Lagrangian is not invariant but only shifts by a
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath221: HW# 1 solutions
Math: HW# solutions Andy Royston October, 5 7.5.7, 3 rd Ed. We have a n = b n = a = fxdx = xdx =, x cos nxdx = x sin nx n sin nxdx n = cos nx n = n n, x sin nxdx = x cos nx n + cos nxdx n cos n = + sin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3
Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 1 State vector space and the dual space Space of wavefunctions The space of wavefunctions is the set of all
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHigher Derivative Gravity Theories
Higher Derivative Gravity Theories Black Holes in AdS space-times James Mashiyane Supervisor: Prof Kevin Goldstein University of the Witwatersrand Second Mandelstam, 20 January 2018 James Mashiyane WITS)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPhys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)
Phys460.nb 81 ψ n (t) is still the (same) eigenstate of H But for tdependent H. The answer is NO. 5.5.5. Solution for the tdependent Schrodinger s equation If we assume that at time t 0, the electron starts
Διαβάστε περισσότεραRevisiting the S-matrix approach to the open superstring low energy eective lagrangian
Revisiting the S-matrix approach to the open superstring low energy eective lagrangian IX Simposio Latino Americano de Altas Energías Memorial da América Latina, São Paulo. Diciembre de 2012. L. A. Barreiro
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSrednicki Chapter 55
Srednicki Chapter 55 QFT Problems & Solutions A. George August 3, 03 Srednicki 55.. Use equations 55.3-55.0 and A i, A j ] = Π i, Π j ] = 0 (at equal times) to verify equations 55.-55.3. This is our third
Διαβάστε περισσότεραReminders: linear functions
Reminders: linear functions Let U and V be vector spaces over the same field F. Definition A function f : U V is linear if for every u 1, u 2 U, f (u 1 + u 2 ) = f (u 1 ) + f (u 2 ), and for every u U
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMATH423 String Theory Solutions 4. = 0 τ = f(s). (1) dτ ds = dxµ dτ f (s) (2) dτ 2 [f (s)] 2 + dxµ. dτ f (s) (3)
1. MATH43 String Theory Solutions 4 x = 0 τ = fs). 1) = = f s) ) x = x [f s)] + f s) 3) equation of motion is x = 0 if an only if f s) = 0 i.e. fs) = As + B with A, B constants. i.e. allowe reparametrisations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSymmetric Stress-Energy Tensor
Chapter 3 Symmetric Stress-Energy ensor We noticed that Noether s conserved currents are arbitrary up to the addition of a divergence-less field. Exploiting this freedom the canonical stress-energy tensor
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMatrices and Determinants
Matrices and Determinants SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Q 1. For what value of k do the following system of equations possess a non-trivial (i.e., not all zero) solution over the set of rationals Q? x + ky + 3z
Διαβάστε περισσότεραforms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with
Week 03: C lassification of S econd- Order L inear Equations In last week s lectures we have illustrated how to obtain the general solutions of first order PDEs using the method of characteristics. We
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION FOR AN APPLIED FORCE Revision C
DERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION FOR AN APPLIED FORCE Revision C By Tom Irvine Email: tomirvine@aol.com August 6, 8 Introduction The obective is to derive a Miles equation which gives the overall response
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTutorial problem set 6,
GENERAL RELATIVITY Tutorial problem set 6, 01.11.2013. SOLUTIONS PROBLEM 1 Killing vectors. a Show that the commutator of two Killing vectors is a Killing vector. Show that a linear combination with constant
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS
CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS Shiah-Sen Wang The graphs are prepared by Chien-Lun Lai Based on : Precalculus: Mathematics for Calculus by J. Stuwart, L. Redin & S. Watson, 6th edition, 01, Brooks/Cole Chapter
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραConcrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016
Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016 Silvio Capobianco Exercise 1.7 Let H(n) = J(n + 1) J(n). Equation (1.8) tells us that H(2n) = 2, and H(2n+1) = J(2n+2) J(2n+1) = (2J(n+1) 1) (2J(n)+1)
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2 Composition. Invertible Mappings
Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan Composition. Invertible Mappings In this section we discuss two procedures for creating new mappings from old ones, namely,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS
CHAPTER 5 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS EXERCISE 104 Page 8 1. Find the positive root of the equation x + 3x 5 = 0, correct to 3 significant figures, using the method of bisection. Let f(x) =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 3 Solutions
Homework 3 Solutions Igor Yanovsky (Math 151A TA) Problem 1: Compute the absolute error and relative error in approximations of p by p. (Use calculator!) a) p π, p 22/7; b) p π, p 3.141. Solution: For
Διαβάστε περισσότεραJesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013
Notes on Average Scattering imes and Hall Factors Jesse Maassen and Mar Lundstrom Purdue University November 5, 13 I. Introduction 1 II. Solution of the BE 1 III. Exercises: Woring out average scattering
Διαβάστε περισσότεραderivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates
derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates swapnizzle 03-03- :5:43 We begin by recognizing the familiar conversion from rectangular to spherical coordinates (note that φ is used
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDr. D. Dinev, Department of Structural Mechanics, UACEG
Lecture 4 Material behavior: Constitutive equations Field of the game Print version Lecture on Theory of lasticity and Plasticity of Dr. D. Dinev, Department of Structural Mechanics, UACG 4.1 Contents
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II
Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II October 18, 2012 1 Review First let us recall the situation. Let g be a simple algebra, with maximal toral subalgebra h (which we are calling a CSA, or Cartan Subalgebra).
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSpinors and σ-matrices in 10 dimensions It is well known that in D-dimensional space-time Dirac spinor has 2 D 2
PiTP Study Guide to Spinors in D and 0D S.J.Gates Jr. John S. Toll Professor of Physics Director Center for String and Particle Theory University of Maryland Tel: 30-405-6025 Physics Department Fax: 30-34-9525
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:
HOMEWORK 4 Problem a For the fast loading case, we want to derive the relationship between P zz and λ z. We know that the nominal stress is expressed as: P zz = ψ λ z where λ z = λ λ z. Therefore, applying
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΑπόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.
Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο The time integral of a force is referred to as impulse, is determined by and is obtained from: Newton s 2 nd Law of motion states that the action
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEE512: Error Control Coding
EE512: Error Control Coding Solution for Assignment on Finite Fields February 16, 2007 1. (a) Addition and Multiplication tables for GF (5) and GF (7) are shown in Tables 1 and 2. + 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 3
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPartial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013
The boundary element method March 26, 203 Introduction and notation The problem: u = f in D R d u = ϕ in Γ D u n = g on Γ N, where D = Γ D Γ N, Γ D Γ N = (possibly, Γ D = [Neumann problem] or Γ N = [Dirichlet
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas
09 Section 7. Double and Half Angle Fmulas To derive the double-angles fmulas, we will use the sum of two angles fmulas that we developed in the last section. We will let α θ and β θ: cos(θ) cos(θ + θ)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραECE Spring Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 2
ECE 634 Spring 6 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes Fields in a Source-Free Region Example: Radiation from an aperture y PEC E t x Aperture Assume the following choice of vector potentials: A F = =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραC.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions
C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions Paul Liu November 15, 2007 Note that these are sample solutions only; in many cases there were many acceptable answers. 1 Reynolds Problem 10.1 1.1 Normal-order
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExercises 10. Find a fundamental matrix of the given system of equations. Also find the fundamental matrix Φ(t) satisfying Φ(0) = I. 1.
Exercises 0 More exercises are available in Elementary Differential Equations. If you have a problem to solve any of them, feel free to come to office hour. Problem Find a fundamental matrix of the given
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic
Lecture 2 Soundness and completeness of propositional logic February 9, 2004 1 Overview Review of natural deduction. Soundness and completeness. Semantics of propositional formulas. Soundness proof. Completeness
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPractice Exam 2. Conceptual Questions. 1. State a Basic identity and then verify it. (a) Identity: Solution: One identity is csc(θ) = 1
Conceptual Questions. State a Basic identity and then verify it. a) Identity: Solution: One identity is cscθ) = sinθ) Practice Exam b) Verification: Solution: Given the point of intersection x, y) of the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOrbital angular momentum and the spherical harmonics
Orbital angular momentum and the spherical harmonics March 8, 03 Orbital angular momentum We compare our result on representations of rotations with our previous experience of angular momentum, defined
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCongruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 24, no. 5, 239-246 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/.2988/ija.24.422 Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 Ligong An and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSymmetries and Feynman Rules for Ramond Sector in WZW-type Superstring Field Theories
Symmetries and Feynman Rules for Ramond Sector in WZW-type Superstring Field Theories Hiroshi Kunitomo YITP 215/3/5 @Nara Women s U. Nara arxiv:1412.5281, 153.xxxx Y TP YUKAWA INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL
Διαβάστε περισσότερα4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)
84 CHAPTER 4. STATIONARY TS MODELS 4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(,) This section is an introduction to a wide class of models ARMA(p,q) which we will consider in more detail later in this
Διαβάστε περισσότεραProblem Set 9 Solutions. θ + 1. θ 2 + cotθ ( ) sinθ e iφ is an eigenfunction of the ˆ L 2 operator. / θ 2. φ 2. sin 2 θ φ 2. ( ) = e iφ. = e iφ cosθ.
Chemistry 362 Dr Jean M Standard Problem Set 9 Solutions The ˆ L 2 operator is defined as Verify that the angular wavefunction Y θ,φ) Also verify that the eigenvalue is given by 2! 2 & L ˆ 2! 2 2 θ 2 +
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Simply Typed Lambda Calculus
Type Inference Instead of writing type annotations, can we use an algorithm to infer what the type annotations should be? That depends on the type system. For simple type systems the answer is yes, and
Διαβάστε περισσότερα( ) 2 and compare to M.
Problems and Solutions for Section 4.2 4.9 through 4.33) 4.9 Calculate the square root of the matrix 3!0 M!0 8 Hint: Let M / 2 a!b ; calculate M / 2!b c ) 2 and compare to M. Solution: Given: 3!0 M!0 8
Διαβάστε περισσότεραUV fixed-point structure of the 3d Thirring model
UV fixed-point structure of the 3d Thirring model arxiv:1006.3747 [hep-th] (PRD accepted) Lukas Janssen in collaboration with Holger Gies Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena Theoretisch-Physikalisches
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 8.3 Trigonometric Equations
99 Section 8. Trigonometric Equations Objective 1: Solve Equations Involving One Trigonometric Function. In this section and the next, we will exple how to solving equations involving trigonometric functions.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008
Tridiagonal matrices Gérard MEURANT October, 2008 1 Similarity 2 Cholesy factorizations 3 Eigenvalues 4 Inverse Similarity Let α 1 ω 1 β 1 α 2 ω 2 T =......... β 2 α 1 ω 1 β 1 α and β i ω i, i = 1,...,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNew bounds for spherical two-distance sets and equiangular lines
New bounds for spherical two-distance sets and equiangular lines Michigan State University Oct 8-31, 016 Anhui University Definition If X = {x 1, x,, x N } S n 1 (unit sphere in R n ) and x i, x j = a
Διαβάστε περισσότερα( y) Partial Differential Equations
Partial Dierential Equations Linear P.D.Es. contains no owers roducts o the deendent variables / an o its derivatives can occasionall be solved. Consider eamle ( ) a (sometimes written as a ) we can integrate
Διαβάστε περισσότερα3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β
3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS Page Theorem cos(αβ cos α cos β -sin α cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α NOTE: cos(αβ cos α cos β cos(α-β cos α -cos β Proof of cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α Let s use a unit circle
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities
PARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities tanθ = sinθ cosθ cotθ = cosθ sinθ BASIC IDENTITIES cscθ = 1 sinθ secθ = 1 cosθ cotθ = 1 tanθ PYTHAGOREAN IDENTITIES sin θ + cos θ =1 tan θ +1= sec θ 1 + cot
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIf we restrict the domain of y = sin x to [ π, π ], the restrict function. y = sin x, π 2 x π 2
Chapter 3. Analytic Trigonometry 3.1 The inverse sine, cosine, and tangent functions 1. Review: Inverse function (1) f 1 (f(x)) = x for every x in the domain of f and f(f 1 (x)) = x for every x in the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions
SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES GLMA Linear Mathematics 00- Examination Solutions. (a) i. ( + 5i)( i) = (6 + 5) + (5 )i = + i. Real part is, imaginary part is. (b) ii. + 5i i ( + 5i)( + i) = ( i)( + i)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 10 - Representation Theory III: Theory of Weights
Lecture 10 - Representation Theory III: Theory of Weights February 18, 2012 1 Terminology One assumes a base = {α i } i has been chosen. Then a weight Λ with non-negative integral Dynkin coefficients Λ
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIf we restrict the domain of y = sin x to [ π 2, π 2
Chapter 3. Analytic Trigonometry 3.1 The inverse sine, cosine, and tangent functions 1. Review: Inverse function (1) f 1 (f(x)) = x for every x in the domain of f and f(f 1 (x)) = x for every x in the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExample Sheet 3 Solutions
Example Sheet 3 Solutions. i Regular Sturm-Liouville. ii Singular Sturm-Liouville mixed boundary conditions. iii Not Sturm-Liouville ODE is not in Sturm-Liouville form. iv Regular Sturm-Liouville note
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMicro-Note on solving super p=2 form A MN
Micro-Note on solving super p=2 form A MN Sunny Guha April 10, 2016 1 Introduction Superforms are extended versions of differential forms which include superspace coordinates. For example a one-form superform
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSecond Order RLC Filters
ECEN 60 Circuits/Electronics Spring 007-0-07 P. Mathys Second Order RLC Filters RLC Lowpass Filter A passive RLC lowpass filter (LPF) circuit is shown in the following schematic. R L C v O (t) Using phasor
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPartial Trace and Partial Transpose
Partial Trace and Partial Transpose by José Luis Gómez-Muñoz http://homepage.cem.itesm.mx/lgomez/quantum/ jose.luis.gomez@itesm.mx This document is based on suggestions by Anirban Das Introduction This
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDiracDelta. Notations. Primary definition. Specific values. General characteristics. Traditional name. Traditional notation
DiracDelta Notations Traditional name Dirac delta function Traditional notation x Mathematica StandardForm notation DiracDeltax Primary definition 4.03.02.000.0 x Π lim ε ; x ε0 x 2 2 ε Specific values
Διαβάστε περισσότεραProblem Set 3: Solutions
CMPSCI 69GG Applied Information Theory Fall 006 Problem Set 3: Solutions. [Cover and Thomas 7.] a Define the following notation, C I p xx; Y max X; Y C I p xx; Ỹ max I X; Ỹ We would like to show that C
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOther Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests
Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Side-Note: So far we have seen a few approaches for creating tests such as Neyman-Pearson Lemma ( most powerful tests of H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 :
Διαβάστε περισσότεραarxiv: v2 [hep-th] 4 Jun 2015
On the N = 4, d = 4 pure spinor measure factor Thales Azevedo arxiv:1412.5927v2 hep-th 4 Jun 2015 ICTP South American Institute for Fundamental Research Instituto de Física Teórica, UNESP - Univ. Estadual
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNumerical Analysis FMN011
Numerical Analysis FMN011 Carmen Arévalo Lund University carmen@maths.lth.se Lecture 12 Periodic data A function g has period P if g(x + P ) = g(x) Model: Trigonometric polynomial of order M T M (x) =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTMA4115 Matematikk 3
TMA4115 Matematikk 3 Andrew Stacey Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet Trondheim Spring 2010 Lecture 12: Mathematics Marvellous Matrices Andrew Stacey Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDESIGN OF MACHINERY SOLUTION MANUAL h in h 4 0.
DESIGN OF MACHINERY SOLUTION MANUAL -7-1! PROBLEM -7 Statement: Design a double-dwell cam to move a follower from to 25 6, dwell for 12, fall 25 and dwell for the remader The total cycle must take 4 sec
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFinite Field Problems: Solutions
Finite Field Problems: Solutions 1. Let f = x 2 +1 Z 11 [x] and let F = Z 11 [x]/(f), a field. Let Solution: F =11 2 = 121, so F = 121 1 = 120. The possible orders are the divisors of 120. Solution: The
Διαβάστε περισσότερα= λ 1 1 e. = λ 1 =12. has the properties e 1. e 3,V(Y
Stat 50 Homework Solutions Spring 005. (a λ λ λ 44 (b trace( λ + λ + λ 0 (c V (e x e e λ e e λ e (λ e by definition, the eigenvector e has the properties e λ e and e e. (d λ e e + λ e e + λ e e 8 6 4 4
Διαβάστε περισσότεραw o = R 1 p. (1) R = p =. = 1
Πανεπιστήµιο Κρήτης - Τµήµα Επιστήµης Υπολογιστών ΗΥ-570: Στατιστική Επεξεργασία Σήµατος 205 ιδάσκων : Α. Μουχτάρης Τριτη Σειρά Ασκήσεων Λύσεις Ασκηση 3. 5.2 (a) From the Wiener-Hopf equation we have:
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGeometry of the 2-sphere
Geometry of the 2-sphere October 28, 2 The metric The easiest way to find the metric of the 2-sphere (or the sphere in any dimension is to picture it as embedded in one higher dimension of Euclidean space,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAbstract Storage Devices
Abstract Storage Devices Robert König Ueli Maurer Stefano Tessaro SOFSEM 2009 January 27, 2009 Outline 1. Motivation: Storage Devices 2. Abstract Storage Devices (ASD s) 3. Reducibility 4. Factoring ASD
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe ε-pseudospectrum of a Matrix
The ε-pseudospectrum of a Matrix Feb 16, 2015 () The ε-pseudospectrum of a Matrix Feb 16, 2015 1 / 18 1 Preliminaries 2 Definitions 3 Basic Properties 4 Computation of Pseudospectrum of 2 2 5 Problems
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 8 Model Solution Section
MATH 004 Homework Solution Homework 8 Model Solution Section 14.5 14.6. 14.5. Use the Chain Rule to find dz where z cosx + 4y), x 5t 4, y 1 t. dz dx + dy y sinx + 4y)0t + 4) sinx + 4y) 1t ) 0t + 4t ) sinx
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSecond Order Partial Differential Equations
Chapter 7 Second Order Partial Differential Equations 7.1 Introduction A second order linear PDE in two independent variables (x, y Ω can be written as A(x, y u x + B(x, y u xy + C(x, y u u u + D(x, y
Διαβάστε περισσότερα1 String with massive end-points
1 String with massive end-points Πρόβλημα 5.11:Θεωρείστε μια χορδή μήκους, τάσης T, με δύο σημειακά σωματίδια στα άκρα της, το ένα μάζας m, και το άλλο μάζας m. α) Μελετώντας την κίνηση των άκρων βρείτε
Διαβάστε περισσότερα( )( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) β = Chapter 5 Exercise Problems EX α So 49 β 199 EX EX EX5.4 EX5.5. (a)
hapter 5 xercise Problems X5. α β α 0.980 For α 0.980, β 49 0.980 0.995 For α 0.995, β 99 0.995 So 49 β 99 X5. O 00 O or n 3 O 40.5 β 0 X5.3 6.5 μ A 00 β ( 0)( 6.5 μa) 8 ma 5 ( 8)( 4 ) or.88 P on + 0.0065
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in
Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in : tail in X, head in A nowhere-zero Γ-flow is a Γ-circulation such that
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSOLVING CUBICS AND QUARTICS BY RADICALS
SOLVING CUBICS AND QUARTICS BY RADICALS The purpose of this handout is to record the classical formulas expressing the roots of degree three and degree four polynomials in terms of radicals. We begin with
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHartree-Fock Theory. Solving electronic structure problem on computers
Hartree-Foc Theory Solving electronic structure problem on computers Hartree product of non-interacting electrons mean field molecular orbitals expectations values one and two electron operators Pauli
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSymmetries and Feynman Rules for Ramond Sector in WZW-type Superstring Field Theories
Symmetries and Feynman Rules for Ramond Sector in WZW-type Superstring Field Theories Hiroshi Kunitomo (YITP) 215/5/11 SFT215@Sichuan U. arxiv:1412.5281, 15x.xxxxx Y TP YUKAWA INSTITUTE FOR THEORETICAL
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDerivation of Optical-Bloch Equations
Appendix C Derivation of Optical-Bloch Equations In this appendix the optical-bloch equations that give the populations and coherences for an idealized three-level Λ system, Fig. 3. on page 47, will be
Διαβάστε περισσότεραVariational Wavefunction for the Helium Atom
Technische Universität Graz Institut für Festkörperphysik Student project Variational Wavefunction for the Helium Atom Molecular and Solid State Physics 53. submitted on: 3. November 9 by: Markus Krammer
Διαβάστε περισσότεραInverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. ------------------ ----------------------------- -----------------
Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. 1. Sin ( ) = a) b) c) d) Ans b. Solution : Method 1. Ans a: 17 > 1 a) is rejected. w.k.t Sin ( sin ) = d is rejected. If sin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?
Teko Classes IITJEE/AIEEE Maths by SUHAAG SIR, Bhopal, Ph (0755) 3 00 000 www.tekoclasses.com ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION # Question Type A.Single Correct Type Q. (A) Sol least
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn the Galois Group of Linear Difference-Differential Equations
On the Galois Group of Linear Difference-Differential Equations Ruyong Feng KLMM, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Ruyong Feng (KLMM, CAS) Galois Group 1 / 19 Contents 1 Basic Notations and Concepts
Διαβάστε περισσότερα9.09. # 1. Area inside the oval limaçon r = cos θ. To graph, start with θ = 0 so r = 6. Compute dr
9.9 #. Area inside the oval limaçon r = + cos. To graph, start with = so r =. Compute d = sin. Interesting points are where d vanishes, or at =,,, etc. For these values of we compute r:,,, and the values
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPhys624 Quantization of Scalar Fields II Homework 3. Homework 3 Solutions. 3.1: U(1) symmetry for complex scalar
Homework 3 Solutions 3.1: U(1) symmetry for complex scalar 1 3.: Two complex scalars The Lagrangian for two complex scalar fields is given by, L µ φ 1 µ φ 1 m φ 1φ 1 + µ φ µ φ m φ φ (1) This can be written
Διαβάστε περισσότεραApproximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude
Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude Jan Behrens 2012-12-31 In this paper we shall provide a method to approximate distances between two points on earth
Διαβάστε περισσότεραdim(u) = n 1 and {v j } j i
SOLUTIONS Math B4900 Homework 1 2/7/2018 Unless otherwise specified, U, V, and W denote vector spaces over a common field F ; ϕ and ψ denote linear transformations; A, B, and C denote bases; A, B, and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραk A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +
Chapter 3. Fuzzy Arithmetic 3- Fuzzy arithmetic: ~Addition(+) and subtraction (-): Let A = [a and B = [b, b in R If x [a and y [b, b than x+y [a +b +b Symbolically,we write A(+)B = [a (+)[b, b = [a +b
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNon-Abelian Gauge Fields
Chapter 5 Non-Abelian Gauge Fields The simplest example starts with two Fermions Dirac particles) ψ 1, ψ 2, degenerate in mass, and hence satisfying in the absence of interactions γ 1 i + m)ψ 1 = 0, γ
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 19/5/2007
Οδηγίες: Να απαντηθούν όλες οι ερωτήσεις. Αν κάπου κάνετε κάποιες υποθέσεις να αναφερθούν στη σχετική ερώτηση. Όλα τα αρχεία που αναφέρονται στα προβλήματα βρίσκονται στον ίδιο φάκελο με το εκτελέσιμο
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOrdinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit
Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ting Zhang Stanford May 11, 2001 Stanford, 5/11/2001 1 Outline Ordinal Classification Ordinal Addition Ordinal Multiplication Ordinal
Διαβάστε περισσότερα1 11D spinor conventions
This note spells out some details in the on-shell superfield formulation of D supergravity in the 980 paper of Brink and Howe. D spinor conventions. Gamma matrices Our convention for -dimensional Gamma
Διαβάστε περισσότερα6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes
122 CHAPTER 6. ARMA MODELS 6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes The purpose of forecasting is to predict future values of a TS based on the data collected to the present. In this section we will discuss a linear
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAreas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates
Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAssalamu `alaikum wr. wb.
LUMP SUM Assalamu `alaikum wr. wb. LUMP SUM Wassalamu alaikum wr. wb. Assalamu `alaikum wr. wb. LUMP SUM Wassalamu alaikum wr. wb. LUMP SUM Lump sum lump sum lump sum. lump sum fixed price lump sum lump
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPHY 396 K/L. Solutions for problem set #12. Problem 1: Note the correct muon decay amplitude. The complex conjugate of this amplitude
PHY 396 K/L. Solutions for problem set #. Problem : Note the correct muon decay amplitude M(µ e ν µ ν e = G F ū(νµ ( γ 5 γ α u(µ ū(e ( γ 5 γ α v( ν e. ( The complex conjugate of this amplitude M = G F
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCHAPTER 48 APPLICATIONS OF MATRICES AND DETERMINANTS
CHAPTER 48 APPLICATIONS OF MATRICES AND DETERMINANTS EXERCISE 01 Page 545 1. Use matrices to solve: 3x + 4y x + 5y + 7 3x + 4y x + 5y 7 Hence, 3 4 x 0 5 y 7 The inverse of 3 4 5 is: 1 5 4 1 5 4 15 8 3
Διαβάστε περισσότερα