An Introduction to Supersymmetry

Μέγεθος: px
Εμφάνιση ξεκινά από τη σελίδα:

Download "An Introduction to Supersymmetry"

Transcript

1 An Introduction to Supersymmetry Voja Radovanović Faculty of Physics University of Belgrade Belgrade, godine 1 Notation and conventions 1.1 Lorentz and SL(2, C) symmetries In these lectures we use mostly minus metric, i.e. g µν = diag(1, 1, 1, 1). Lorentz transformations leave metric unchanged, Λ T gλ = g. The proper orthochronous Lorentz transformations, L +, consisting of boosts and rotations, satisfy the following two conditions: det Λ = 1, Λ (1) These transformations are a subgroup of Lorentz group. Lorentz algebra has six generators, M µν = M νµ. The commutation relations are [M µν, M ρσ ] = i(g µσ M νρ + g νρ M µσ g µρ M νσ g νσ M µρ ). The generators of rotations are J i = 1 2 ϵ ijkm jk, while generators corresponding to the boosts are N k = M 0k. Further, one can introduce the following complex combinations A i = 1 2 (J i + in i ) and B i = 1 2 (J i in i ). It is easy to prove that [A i, A j ] = iϵ ijl A l, [B i, B j ] = iϵ ijl B l, [A i, B j ] = 0. This is a well known result which gives a connection between the Lorentz algebra and two SU(2) algebras. Irreducible representations (i. e. fields) of the Lorentz group are classified by two quantum numbers (j 1, j 2 ) which come from above two SU(2) groups. L + is double connected (due to SO(3) subgroup) and non-compact group. To discuss its representations one has to consider its universally covering group, SL(2, C). SL(2, C) is the group of 2 2 complex matrices with unit determinant. Pauli matrices are given by σ µ = (1, σ), σ µ = (1, σ), where σ 1 = ( ) 0 1, σ = ( ) ( ) 0 i 1 0 and σ i 0 3 =

2 To find the connection between SL(2, C) and L + we define one-to-one map between Minkowski coordinates, x µ and 2 2 Hermitian matrices: ( ) X = x µ σ µ = X x0 + x = 3 x 1 ix 2. (2) x 0 + ix 2 x 0 x 3 Let us now transform X to another Hermitian matrix in the following way X X = MXM, where M SL(2, C). This transformation preserves the interval, i.e. det X = det X x 2 = x 2. From it follows that x µ = 1 2 Tr( σµ X ) = 1 2 Tr ( σ µ Mσ ν M )x ν = Λ µ νx ν, (3) Λ µ ν = 1 2 Tr ( σ µ Mσ ν M ). The mapping M Λ(M) is 2 1 homomorphism between SL(2, C) and L +. This mapping is not an isomorphism since matrices ±M correspond to Lorentz matrix Λ. SL(2, C) is simply connected, so it is the universal covering group of L Representations A left-handed Weyl spinor, ψ α (x) is two component object, which transforms in the following way ψ α(λx) = Mα β ψ β (x) (4) under SL(2, C) transformations. The matrix M belongs SL(2, C) group. Indices α and β take values 1, 2. In Quantum Field Theory ψ α (x) is an operator. Its transformation law under Lorentz transformations is U 1 (Λ)ψ α (x)u(λ) = Mα β ψ β (Λ 1 x). (5) Let us define ψ α = (ψ α ), where dagger denotes Hermitian conjugation of the field operator. If ψ α is a classical Grassmann field, we use complex conjugation, i.e. ψ α = (ψ α ). The complex conjugation is defined in a such way that it has properties similar to the hermitian conjugation. For example, both of them reverse the order of fermions. The complex conjugate representation is ψ α = (M ) β ψ α β. (6) ψ β is a right handed Weyl spinor or dotted spinor. Left-handed spinor ψ α is also called undotted spinor. These two representations of SL(2, C) are inequivalent. Now, we introduce invariant tensors for SL(2, C). Antisymmetric tensors are defined by ( ) 0 1 ϵ αβ = ϵ α β = (7) 1 0 2

3 ϵ αβ = ϵ α β = (ϵ αβ ) 1 = (ϵ α β) 1 = ( 0 ) (8) It is easy to prove ϵ αβ ϵ βγ = δ γ α and ϵ α βϵ β γ = δ γ α. From ϵ αβ Mγ α M β δ = ϵ γδ det M = ϵ γδ (9) it follows that ϵ αβ is an invariant tensor. Similarly, ϵ αβ, ϵ α β and ϵ α β are invariant tensors. The invariant tensors are used for lowering or raising spinor indices: Let us find the transformation law for ψ α : ψ α = ϵ αβ ψ β, ψ α = ϵ αβ ψ β, (10) ψ α = ϵ α β ψ β, ψ α = ϵ α β ψ β. (11) ψ α = ϵ αβ ψ β = ϵ αβ M γ β ϵ γδψ δ = (ϵ 1 Mϵ) α δψ δ = (M T 1 ) α δψ δ. (12) Spinors ψ α and ψ α transform according to equivalent representations. Similarly, we get ψ α = (M 1 ) α β ψ β, (13) i. e. spinors ψ α and ψ α transform under equivalent representations. The fields ψ α and ψ α are right-handed Weyl spinors. Undotted and dotted representation are very often called fundamental and antifundamental representations. The left-handed (or undotted ) spinors are ( 1, 0) 2 irreducible representation, while right-handed (or dotted) spinors are (0, 1). 2 Multiplying these spinors with each other we get higher spinors. They have dotted and undotted indices, ψ α1...α n α 1... α m and transform as follows ψ α 1...α n α 1... α m = M β 1 α 1... M β n α n (M ) β 1 α 1... (M ) β m α m ψ β1...β n β1... β m. These spinors are generally reducible. The ( irreducible ) spinors are ψ (α1,...,α n )( α 1,..., α m ), where (..) n denotes symmetrization. They belong to, m irreducible representation of SL(2, C). Let us 2 2 list some important irreducible representations: (0, 0) scalar or singlet representation (1/2, 0) left handed Weyl spinor (0, 1/2) right-handed Weyl spinor (1/2, 1/2) vector (1, 0) self-dual tensor (0, 1) antiself-dual tensor. From Mσ µ M = (Λ 1 ) µ ρσ ρ follows that matrices σ µ are invariant tensors. The matrix σ µ has the following spinorial indices σ µ α α. (14) 3

4 Raising the spinorial indices on σ µ we obtain It is easy to show The matrices σ µ and σ µ satisfy the following identites: Transformation laws for quantum Weyl fields are: where M SL(2, C). ( σ µ ) αβ = ϵ α γ ϵ βγ σ µ γ γ = (σµ ) β α. (15) ( σ µ ) αβ = (1, σ) αβ. (16) Tr(σ µ σ ν ) = 2g µν (17) σ µ α α ( σ µ) ββ = δ β αδ β α (18) σ µ α α ( σ µ) ββ = 2ϵ α βϵ αβ (19) (σ µ σ ν + σ ν σ µ ) β α = 2g µν δ β α. (20) U 1 (Λ)ψ α (x)u(λ) = M β α ψ β (Λ 1 x), ( 1 2, 0) U 1 (Λ)ψ α (x)u(λ) = (M 1 ) α β ψ β (Λ 1 x), ( 1 2, 0) U 1 (Λ) ψ α (x)u(λ) = (M ) β α ψ β(λ 1 x), (0, 1 2 ) U 1 (Λ) ψ α (x)u(λ) = (M 1 ) α β ψ β(λ 1 x), (0, 1 2 ), (21) 1.3 Dirac and Majorana spinors Weyl representation of γ µ matrices is given by ( ) 0 σ γ µ µ = σ µ 0. (22) γ 5 matrix is defined by Dirac spinor is γ 5 = iγ 0 γ 1 γ 2 γ 3 = Ψ D = ( ) φα χ α ( ) and it belong to the reducible representation (0, 1 2 ) ( 1 2, 0). Adjoint Dirac spinor is ψ D = ψ β = ( χ α φ α ). (23), (24) (25) 4

5 where β = ( ) ( ) 0 1 = 0 δ β α 1 0 δα β 0. (26) The matrices γ 0 and β are numerically equal, but have different spinorial structure. Majorana spinor satisfies the condition Ψ M = C Ψ T M, were C = iγ0 γ 2 is the charge conjugation matrix. It is easy to show that ( ) ϵαβ 0 C = α β. 0 ϵ Majorana condition leads to ψ α = χ α, so Majorana spinor is ( ) ψα Ψ M = ψ α. (27) 1.4 Generators in (anti)fundamental representations Under Lorentz transformation Dirac spinors transform as ψ D(Λx) = e i 4 ω µνσ µν ψ D (x). (28) The matrices Σ µν are where 1 2 Σµν = i ( ) σ 4 [γµ, γ ν µν 0 ] = i 0 σ µν, (29) σ µν = 1 4 (σµ σ ν σ ν σ µ ) σ µν = 1 4 ( σµ σ ν σ ν σ µ ). Spinorial indices of these matrices are (σ µν ) α β by M β α = (M ) β α = (M 1T ) α β = (M 1 ) α β = and ( σ µν ) α β. Therefore, the M matrices are given (e 1 2 ω µνσ µν) β α (e β 1 ωµν σµν) 2 α (e 1 2 ωµνσµν) α β (e 1 2 ω µν σ µν) α β,,. (30) Matrices iσ µν and i σ µν are generators of Lorentz group, and they satisfy 1 1 We use the convention in which ϵ 0123 = ϵ 0123 = +1 ϵ µνρσ σ ρσ = 2iσ µν ϵ µνρσ σ ρσ = 2i σ µν. (31) 5

6 σ µν and σ µν are a self-dual tensor and an anti-self-dual tensor, respectively. We can define (σ µν ϵ) αβ and (ϵ σ µν ) α β by (σ µν ϵ) αβ = (σ µν ) α γ ϵ γβ, (32) They satisfy 1.5 Bilinear quantities Weyl spinors anticommute, i.e Let us define the product of Weyl spinors in the following way (ϵ σ µν ) α β = ϵ α γ ( σ µν ) γ β. (33) (σ µν ϵ) αβ = (σ µν ϵ) βα (ϵ σ µν ) α β = (ϵ σ µν ) β α. (34) ψ α χ β = χ β ψ α. (35) ψχ = ψ α χ α = ψ 1 χ 1 + ψ 2 χ 2 = ψ 2 χ 1 ψ 1 χ 2. (36) Similarly, we introduce ψ χ = ψ α χ α. (37) In our convection dotted indices are contracted from lower left to upper right, while undotted indices are contracted from upper left to lower right. ψχ and ψ χ are invariant under SL(2, C). Four-vectors and tensors are defined as ψσ µ χ = ψ α σ µ α α χ α, ψ σ µ χ = ψ α ( σ µ ) αα χ α, ψσ µν χ = ψ α (σ µν ) α β χ β, ψ σ µν χ = ψ α ( σ µν ) α β χ β. (38) The bilinear quantities defined above satisfy the following properties: φχ = χφ, φ χ = χ φ, φσ µ χ = χ σ µ φ, φσ µ σ ν χ = χσ ν σ µ φ, φ σ µ σ ν χ = χ σ ν σ µ φ, φσ µν χ = χσ µν φ, φ σ µν χ = χ σ µν φ, φσ µν φ = 0, φ σ µν φ = 0. (39) 6

7 Pauli matrices are hermitian. Their complex conjugation gives (σ µ α β ) = ϵ α βϵ βα ( σ µ ) βα = σ µ αβ = σµ β α, (40) ( σ µ αβ ) = ϵ αγ ϵ β δ(σ µ ) γ δ = σ µα β = σ µ βα. (41) Taking complex conjugation of Lorentz generators we obtain The following relations are useful: ((σ µν ) α β ) = ( σ µν ) β α, (( σ µν ) α β) = (σ µν ) β α. (42) ((σ µν ϵ) αβ ) = (ϵ σ µν ) β α, (43) ((ϵ σ µν ) α β) = (σ µν ϵ) βα. (44) Hermitian conjugation changes the order of spinors. For example: The following identities can be shown similarly: (ψχ) = (ψ α χ α ) = χ α ψ α = ψ α χ α = ψ χ. (45) ( ψ χ) = ψχ, (ψσ µ χ) = χσ µ ψ, ( ψ σ µ χ) = χ σ µ ψ, (ψσ µν χ) = ψ σ µν χ, ( ψ σ µν χ) = ψσ µν χ. (46) 1.6 Identites with σ matrices The list of useful identities with σ matrices is given below: Tr(σ µ σ ν ) = 2g µν (47) σ µ α α ( σ µ) ββ = δ β αδ β α (48) σ µ α α ( σ µ) ββ = 2ϵ α βϵ αβ (49) (σ µ σ ν + σ ν σ µ ) β α = 2g µν δ β α (50) ( σ µ σ ν + σ ν σ µ ) α β = 2g µν δ β α (51) (σ µ σ ν ) β α = g µν δ β α + 2(σ µν ) β α (52) ( σ µ σ ν ) α β = g µν δ β α + 2( σµν ) α β. (53) 7

8 From it follows γ µ γ ν γ ρ = (g µν g ρσ g νρ g νσ + g µσ g ρν )γ σ + iϵ σµνρ γ 5 γ σ (54) The trace identities are: σ µ σ ν σ ρ = g µν σ ρ g µρ σ ν + g νρ σ µ iϵ σµνρ σ σ σ µ σ ν σ ρ = g µν σ ρ g µρ σ ν + g νρ σ µ + iϵ σµνρ σ σ. (55) Tr(σ µν σ ρσ ) = 1 2 (gνρ g µσ g µρ g νσ + iϵ µνρσ ) (56) 1.7 Fierz identities Tr( σ µν σ ρσ ) = 1 2 (gνρ g µσ g µρ g νσ iϵ µνρσ ). (57) Fierz identities are very helpful in calculations with spinors. The following relations can be easily obtained θ α θ β = 1 2 ϵαβ θθ (58) θ α θ β = 1 2 ϵ αβθθ θ α θ β = 1 2 ϵ α β θ θ θ α θ β = 1 2 ϵ α β θ θ. (59) With a help of the previous identities the following Fierz rearrangement formulas can be proven (θϕ)(θψ) = 1 (θθ)(ϕψ), (60) 2 ( θ ϕ)( θ ψ) = 1 ( θ θ)( ϕ ψ), 2 (θσ µ θ)(θσ ν 1 θ) = 2 gµν (θθ)( θ θ), (θσ µ θ)θα = 1 2 σµ α β θ β(θθ), (θσ µ θ) θ α = 1 2 σµ β α θβ ( θ θ), ( θ λ)(χσ µ θ) 1 = ( θ θ)(χσ µ λ), 2 (θλ)( χ σ µ θ) = 1 2 (θθ)( χ σµ λ), (θσ ν ψ)(θσ µ λ) = 1 2 (θθ)( ψ σ ν σ µ λ), (61) 8

9 χ α (ξη) + ξ α (ηχ) + η α (χξ) = 0, (62) χ α ( ξ η) + ξ α ( η χ) + η α ( χ ξ) = 0. (63) As a example, let us check (60). Applying (58), the left hand side of (60) becomes (θϕ)(θψ) = 1 2 ϵαβ (θθ)ϕ α ψ β = 1 (θθ)(ϕψ). (64) 2 Remaining identities can be proven in a similar way. Let us generalize identities (58-59) to the case of two different spinors. We obtain θ α ψ α = 1 2 (θσµ ψ)(σµ ) α α (65) ψ α χ β = 1 2 ϵ αβψχ (ψσµν χ)(σ µν ϵ) αβ ψ α χ β = 1 2 ϵ α β ψ χ ( χ σµν ψ)(ϵ σµν ) β α. (66) Let us prove (65). The left hand side of (65) is a product of dotted and undotted spinors. Since we can assume ( 1 2, 0) (0, 1 2 ) = (1 2, 1 2 ) where A µ is a four-vector. Multiplying (67) by σ ν αα we obtain 1.8 Partial derivatives θ α ψ α = A µ σ µα α, (67) A µ = 1 2 θσµ ψ. Partial derivatives with respect to the anticommuting variables are denoted by α = θ α, α = θ α, α = θ α, α = θ α. (68) Indices on partial derivatives are lowered or raised by ϵ symbol. Note that, there is one extra minus sign: The following derivatives are frequently used: α = ϵ αβ β, α = ϵ αβ β α = ϵ α β β, α = ϵ α β β. (69) θ β θ α = αθ β = δ β α, θ β θ α = αθ β = ϵ βα (70) α θ β = δ β α, α θ β = ϵ β α (71) 9

10 Complex conjugation of derivative is defined by This is in accordance with definition of conjugation 2 Supersymmetric algebra 2.1 N = 1 Super Poincare algebra α (θθ) = 2θ α (72) α ( θ θ) = 2 θ α (73) α (θθ) = 2θ α (74) α ( θ θ) = 2 θ α (75) ( )(θθ) = α α (θθ) = 4 (76) ( )( θ θ) = α α ( θ θ) = 4. (77) ( α ) = α. (78) δ β α = ( αθ β ) = θ β( α ) = ( α ) θ β = α θ β. (79) To start with, let us state the Coleman-Mandula theorem: Only possible Lie symmetry of a nontrivial S matrix is a direct product of Poincare and internal symmetry. The assumptions in Coleman-Mandula theorem are the following: the particles are massive, theory is local, unitary and relativistic covariant. Thus, generators of the Lie symmetry are: momenta, P µ, angular momenta, M µν and bosonic generators B r. These bosonic generators are Lorentz scalars. This theorem can be evaded using the graded Lie symmetry instead of the usual Lie symmetry. The graded Lie algebra is a generalization of Lie algebra, containing bosonic and fermionic generators. The graded vector space (precisely Z 2 graded) is a direct sum V = L 0 L 1. The elements of L 0 are bosons or even elements, while the elements of L 1 are fermions or odd elements. The grading is defined by { 0, X L 0 X =. (1) 1, X L 1 Between elements of the graded vector space Lie product [, } is defined, with the following properties: 1. [X, Y } = ( ) X Y [Y, X}, 2. ( ) X Z [X, [Y, Z}} + ( ) Y X [Y, [Z, X}} + ( ) Z Y [Z, [X, Y }} = 0. (2) 10

11 The Lie product of two bosons or one fermion and one boson is a commutator. In the case two fermions Lie product is an anticommutator, i.e. [B 1, B 2 } = [B 1, B 2 ], [B 1, F 1 } = [B 1, F 1 ], [F 1, F 2 } = {F 1, F 2 }. (3) The second property is super-jacobi identity. Super Poincare algebra is an extension of Poincare algebra which includes the fermionic generators in addition to the bosonic ones. These fermionic generators transform bosonic state into fermionic and vice verse. The fermionic generators are left-handed and right-handed spinors, Q α and Q α. This statement is known as the Haag Loppusanski Sonius theorem. The Lie product of generators is a commutator or anticommutator, and it must be linear in terms of generators. First, we have to find [P µ, Q α ]. We assume that From this expression it follows that Applying super Jacobi identity we obtain [P µ, Q α ] = cσ µ Q β α β. (4) [P µ, Q β] = c σ µ βγ Q γ. (5) [P µ, [P ν, Q α ]] + [P ν, [Q α, P µ ]] + [Q α, [P µ, P ν ]] = 0 c 2 (σ νµ ) β α Q β = 0, and finally we conclude c = 0, i. e. [P µ, Q α ] = 0. Since Q α is a Weyl spinor, it transforms as follows ) β e i 2 ωµν M µν Q α e i 2 ωµν M µν = (e 1 2 ωµν σ µν Q β. Expanding the previous expression in the first order in ω µν we obtain In the same way, one can show that α [M µν, Q α ] = i(σ µν ) β α Q β. (6) [M µν, Q α ] = i( σ µν ) α β Q β. (7) Let us find the anticommutator {Q α, Q β }. Due to index structure this anticommutator has the form {Q α, Q β } = d(σ µν ) α β M µν, (8) where d is an arbitrary constant. Applying the super Jacobi identity [P µ, {Q a, Q β }] + {Q α, [Q β, P µ ]} {Q β, [P µ, Q α ]} = 0 11

12 we find d = 0. Thus, {Q α, Q β } = 0. Finally, we have to find {Q α, Q β}. Taking into account the index structure of this expression we find The factor 2 is fixed by a convection. Simple (or N = 1) Super Poincare algebra is {Q α, Q β} = 2σ µ α β P µ. (9) [P µ, P ν ] = 0, (10) [M µν, P ρ ] = i(g νρ P µ g µρ P ν ), (11) [M µν, M ρσ ] = i(g µρ M νσ + g νσ M µρ g νρ M µσ g µσ M νρ ), (12) {Q α, Q β } = { Q α, Q β} = 0, {Q α, Q β} = 2σ µ α β P µ, (13) [Q α, P µ ] = [ Q α, P µ ] = 0, [Q α, M µν ] = i(σ µν ) β α Q β, [ Q α, M µν ] = i( σ µν ) α β Q β. 2.2 Extended Super Poincare algebra Fermionic generators can have an additional index coming from some internal symmetry group: Q A α (A = 1,..., N ). In this case N = 1 supersymmetry is extended to the N extended supersymmetry: [P µ, P ν ] = 0, (14) [M µν, P ρ ] = i(g νρ P µ g µρ P ν ), [M µν, M ρσ ] = i(g µρ M νσ + g νσ M µρ g νρ M µσ g µσ M νρ ), {Q A α, Q B β } = ϵ αβ Z AB, { Q Ȧ α, Q Ḃ β } = ϵ α β Z AB, {Q A α, Q Ḃ β } = 2δAB σ µ α β P µ, [Q A α, P µ ] = [ Q Ȧ α, P µ ] = 0, [Q A α, M µν ] = i(σ µν ) α β Q A β, [ Q αa, M µν ] = i( σ µν ) α β Q βa [B r, B s ] = if rst B t [B r, Q A α] = (b r ) A CQ C α [B r, Q Ȧ α] = Q αc (b r ) C A (15) Central charge, Z AB = Z BA commutes with all generators in the algebra. It is a linear combination of the internal symmetry generators, Z AB = λ ABr B r. The largest possible internal 12

13 symmetry group is U(N). If Z = 0, SUSY algebra is invariant under Q A α U A B Q B α. If Z 0, {Q, Q} relation spoils this invariance. In this case the algebra is invariant under some subgroup of U(N). In N = 1 SUSY, central charge is zero, Z = 0: there is only one index, so Z can t be antisymmetric. In this case, U(1) symmetry is called R-symmetry: 3 Superspace and Superfields [Q α, R] = Q α, [ Q α, R] = Q α. (16) In this section we introduce the concept of superspace. Fields on superspace are called superfields. Supersymmetry is realized as a translation in superspace. A superspace is an extension of Minkowski space-time where we add four Grassmann coordinates θ α, θ α to the four bosonic Minkowski coordinates. These coordinates satisfy [x µ, x ν ] = [x µ, θ α ] = [x µ, θ α ] = 0 {θ α, θ α } = {θ α, θ β } = { θ α, θ β} = 0. (1) Thus, superspace is parametrized by the coordinates: x µ, θ α, θ α. For later convenience we calculate [ξq, θ Q] = ξ α Q α θ α Q α θ α Q α ξ α Q α = ξ α θ α Q α Q α + θ α ξ α Q α Q α = ξ α θ α {Q α, Q α } = ξ α θ α {Q α, Q α } = 2ξ α σ µ α α θ α P µ. (2) In this part of Lectures, SUSY generators are denoted by Q, Q. Any element of super Poincare group can be written in the form We use the notation Actually, G(x, θ, θ) is an element of the coset space e i(xµ P µ+θ α Q α+ θ α Q α) e 1 2 ωµν M µν. (3) G(x, θ, θ) = e i(xµ P µ +θ α Q α + θ α Q α). (4) Super Poincare group/lorentz group. A superspace can be realized as a coset space. For details, see [1, 5]. The product of two elements, G(a, ξ, ξ)g(x, θ, θ) is found applying Baker Campbell Hausdorff formula and (2). The result is e A e B = e A+B+ 1 2 [A,B]+... G(a, ξ, ξ)g(x, θ, θ) = G(x µ + a µ + iξσ µ θ iθσ µ ξ, θ + ξ, θ + ξ). (5) 13

14 The left multiplication in the group induces the following transformation of supercoordinates: x µ x µ + δx µ = x µ + a µ + iξσ µ θ iθσ µ ξ θ θ + ξ θ θ + ξ, where ξ is a constant parameter of SUSY transformation. Under infinitesimal translation x = x + a a classical scalar field φ(x) transforms as φ(x) φ (x) = φ(x a). The form-variation of the scalar field is given by δφ(x) = φ (x) φ(x) = a µ µ φ(x). (6) From δφ(x) = ia µ P µ φ we conclude that P µ = i µ is a representation of momenta in the space of functions. The momentum is represented as a differential operator in accordance to quantum mechanics. In QFT a scalar field is an operator in Hilbert space. Transformation law under translations is given by φ(x) φ (x) = e iaµ P µ φ(x)e iaµ P µ = φ(x a), (7) where P µ are four-momenta. Then we obtain δφ = φ (x) φ(x) = i[a µ P µ, φ] = a µ µ φ. (8) Generally, infinitesimal variation of field under transformations of symmetry is given by δφ = i[ d 3 xj 0, φ], (9) where j 0 is zero component of the Noether current density. Variations of a quantum and classical field are related by the correspondence principle. If the canonical Poisson bracket of two observable gives a third observable {A, B} = C, then after quantization the commutator of corresponding operators have to satisfy i[â, ˆB] = Ĉ. For details see the book [6]. A scalar superfield is a function of superspace coordinates, F = F (x, θ, θ). A superfield can be expanded in power series of θ and θ as F (x, θ, θ) = f(x) + θϕ(x) + θ χ(x) + θθm(x) + θ θn(x) + θσ µ θvµ (x) +θθ θ λ(x) + θ θθφ(x) + θθ θ θd(x). (10) This expansion consists of finite number of terms, due to the anticommuting properties of θ, θ coordinates. The coefficients f(x), ϕ(x), χ(x), m(x), n(x), v µ (x), λ(x), φ(x) and d(x) in the expansion (10) are usual fields in Minkowski space time. Superfield (10) contains 16 fermionic 14

15 and 16 bosonic degrees of freedom. There is an equal number of bosonic and fermionic degrees of freedom in any supersymmetric multiplet. A superfield has to satisfy some transformation properties. Under super Poincare transformation 2 x µ x = x µ δx µ = x µ a µ iξσ µ θ + iθσ µ ξ a classical scalar superfield transforms as θ θ = θ ξ θ θ = θ ξ, (11) The infinitesimal variation of the superfield is given by F (x, θ, θ) = F (x + δx, θ + ξ, θ + ξ). (12) δf = F (x, θ, θ) F (x, θ, θ) where we introduce the differential operators: = F (x + a µ + iξσ µ θ iθσ µ ξ, θ + ξ, θ + ξ) F (x, θ, θ) = (a µ + iξσ µ θ iθσ µ ξ) µ F + ξ α α F + ξ α α F = (a µ µ + ξ α Q α + ξ α Q α )F, (13) From 3 δf = i(a µ P µ + ξ α Q α + ξ α Q α )F it follows Q α = α + i(σ µ θ)α µ Q α = α + i σ µ αα θ α µ. (14) P µ = i µ, (15) Q α = iq α = i α σ µ α α θ α µ, (16) Q α = i Q α = i α ( σ µ θ) α µ. (17) One can check that Q α = (Q α ) = ϵ α β Q β = i Q α, where Q α = α (θσ µ ) α µ. The operators P µ, Q α and Q α satisfy super Poincare algebra, as we expect. For example, {Q α, Q α } = {Q α, Q α } = 2σ µ α α i µ = 2σ µ α α P µ. (18) Under supertanslation (11) the quantum superfield F (x, θ, θ) transforms as 2 Note minus signs in coordinate transformations. 3 The parameters are a, ξ, ξ. e i(aµ P µ +ξ α Q α + ξ α Q α) F (x, θ, θ)e i(aµ P µ +ξ α Q α + ξ α Q α ) = F (x + a µ + iξσ µ θ iθσ µ ξ, θ + ξ, θ + ξ) = F + δf. (19) 15

16 Expanding the first line of (19) we obtain From the second line in (19) we again obtain e i(aµ P µ +ξ α Q α + ξ α Q α) F (x, θ, θ)e i(aµ P µ +ξ α Q α + ξ α Q α) = F (x, θ, θ) + i[a µ P µ + ξ α Q α + ξ α Q α, F ]. (20) δf = (a µ µ + ξ α Q α + ξ α Q α )F. Under the SUSY infinitesimal transformation the variation of of quantum superfields is given by δ ξ F = i[ξ α Q α + ξ α Q α, F ] = (ξ α Q α + ξ α Q α )F. (21) Applying (10) we find SUSY variations for components in supermultiplet: δ ξ f = ξϕ + ξ χ, (22) δ ξ ϕ α = 2ξ α m + σ µ ξ ) α α α (v µ i µ f, (23) δ ξ χ α = 2 ξ α n + ξ α σ µ α α( vµ + i µ f ), (24) δ ξ m = ξ λ i 2 ξ σ µ µ ϕ, (25) δ ξ n = ξφ i 2 ξσµ µ χ, (26) δ ξ v µ = ξσ µ λ + φσµ ξ i 2 ξσ ν σ µ ν ϕ + i 2 ξ σ ν σ µ ν χ, (27) δ ξ λ α = 2 ξ α d i( σ µ ξ) α ( µ m) i 2 ( σν σ µ ξ) α µ v ν, (28) δ ξ φ α = 2ξ α d iσ µ α α ξ α µ n + i 2 σν α α σ µ αβ ξ β µ v ν, (29) δ ξ d = i 2 ξσµ µ λ + i 2 µφσ µ ξ. (30) Note that a SUSY variation of the highest component, d(x) is a total derivative. Let us apply two successive supersymmetric transformations on a superfield, δ η δ ξ F. Transformation with the parameter ξ, is followed by the second transformation with parameter η. The second transformation acts only on the field F, i.e. δ η δ ξ F = δ η (ξq + ξ Q)F = (ξq + ξ Q)(ηQ + η Q)F. A commutator of two SUSY transformations can be found easily. Result is given by [δ η, δ ξ ]F = 2i(ξσ µ η ησ µ ξ) µ F. (31) We see that commutator of two SUSY transformations is a translation, i.e. the supersymmetric algebra is closed. 16

17 3.1 Covariant Fermionic Derivatives Supercovariant derivatives are defined by D α = α iσ µ α α θ α µ, (32) D α = α + iθ α σ µ α α µ. (33) With a help of ( α ) = α and (σ µ α β ) θ β = σ µ β α θβ we get (D α ) = D α. Derivatives with upper indices are The following anticommutation relations are very useful: D α = ϵ αβ D β = α + i θ β σ µ βα µ D α = α iσ µ αα θ α µ. (34) {D α, D β } = { D α, D β} = {D α, Q β } = {D α, Q α } = { D α, Q α } = { D α, Q β} = 0, (35) One can check that: {Q α, Q α } = {D α, D α } = 2iσ µ α α µ. (36) D 2 = D α D α = α α 2iσ µ α α θ α µ α + θ θ, (37) D 2 = D α D α = α α 2i σ µ αα θ α µ α + θθ. (38) 3.2 Chiral and antichiral superfields An arbitrary superfield (10) is a reducible supersymmetric multiplet. One can impose some constraints on the superfield to get irreducible representations of supersymmetry. A chiral superfield Φ(x, θ, θ) is defined by the following constraint D α Φ(x, θ, θ) = 0, and it is a irreducible superfield. This constraint is compatible with supersymmetry, δ ξ ( D α Φ) = D α (δ ξ Φ), (39) since supercovariant derivative anticommutes with supercharges. We now want to solve this constraint. It can be proven that D α F = χ α + θ α σ µ α α (vµ + i µ f) + 2n θ α + (θθ) ( λ α i2 ) σµα α µϕ α + (θσ µ θ) ( σ µβ α φ β i ) 2 ( ν χ σ µ σ ν ) α The condition D α F = 0 implies + 2(θθ) θ α d i 2 ϵαβ (θθ)σ µ α α σν β β θ β µ v ν + i( θ θ)θ α σ µ α α µn i 2 (θθ)( θ θ)σ µ α α µφ α. (40) χ = 0, n = 0, v µ = i µ f, φ = 0, λ α = i 2 σµ α α µϕ α, d = 1 f. (41) 4 17

18 Introducing new notation: a general expression for a chiral superfield is f A, ϕ 2ψ, m F (42) Φ(x, θ, θ) = A(x) + 2θψ(x) + θθf (x) iθσ µ θ µ A(x) + i 2 (θθ)( µ ψ(x)σ µ θ) 1 4 (θθ)( θ θ) A(x). (43) The chiral supermultiplet consists of a complex scalar field A (2 d.o.f.), a left-handed Weyl-spinor ψ α (4 d.o.f.) and a complex scalar field F (2 d.o.f). Notice that the number of fermionic and bosonic d.o.f. is equal. By introducing chiral supercoordinate: we can rewrite the chiral superfield in the form: y µ = x µ i(θσ µ θ), (44) Φ(y, θ) = A(y) + 2θψ(y) + θθf (y). (45) From general transformation rules (22-30), one can easily find transformation laws for components of a chiral multiplet: δ ξ A = 2ξψ, δ ξ ψ α = 2F ξ α i 2 µ Aσ µ α α ξ α, δ ξ F = i 2 µ ψσ µ ξ. (46) The components A, ψ and F of a chiral multiplet transform into each other, so the multiplet is irreducible. Also, we see that θθ-component of a chiral superfield transforms into itself plus a divergence term. θθ component of superfield is called F term. An antichiral superfield Ψ(x, θ, θ) is determined by the condition D α Ψ(x, θ, θ) = 0. (47) If Φ(x, θ, θ) is a chiral superfield, than Φ (x, θ, θ) is antichiral. An antichiral superfield can be expressed in y = x µ + i(θσ µ θ) coordinate as follows Φ(x, θ, θ) = A (y ) + 2 θ ψ(y ) + θ θf (y ). (48) Rewriting the antichiral superfield in terms of x, θ, θ coordinates we find Φ(x, θ, θ) = A + 2 θ ψ + θ θf + i µ A θσ µ θ i ( θ θ)(θσ µ 1 µ ψ) 2 4 A (θθ)( θ θ). (49) 18

19 3.3 Products of Chiral and Antichiral SF If Φ i and Φ j are two chiral superfields, then their product Φ i Φ j is again a chiral superfield since D α (Φ i Φ j ) = ( D α Φ i )Φ j + Φ i D α Φ j = 0. In components this product is ( Φ i Φ j = A i (y) + )( 2θψ i (y) + θθf i (y) A j (y) + ) 2θψ j (y) + θθf j (y) = A i A j (y) + 2θ(A i ψ j + A j ψ i )(y) + θθ(f i A j + F j A i ψ i ψ j )(y), (50) where we apply (60). So, from two chiral multiplets we get another chiral multiplet with components (A i, ψ i, F i ) (A j, ψ j, F j ) = (A i A j, A i ψ j + A j ψ i, A i F j + F i A j ψ i ψ j ). (51) And triple product of chiral multiplets is again a chiral multiplet: (A i, ψ i, F i ) (A j, ψ j, F j ) (A k, ψ k, F k ) = (A i A j, A i ψ j + A j ψ i, A i F j + F i A j ψ i ψ j ) (A k, ψ k, F k ) = (A i A j A k, A i ψ j A k + A j ψ i A k + A i A j ψ k, A i A j F k A i ψ j ψ k + ciclic ijk). (52) The product of a chiral and an anti-chiral superfied is ΦΦ = A A + 2A θψ + 2A θ ψ + θθa F + θ θf A + θσ µ θ( ia µ A + ia µ A + ψσ µ ψ) + i A (θθ)( µ ψσ µ θ) i + 2(θθ)( θ ψ)f (θθ)(ψσ µ θ) µ A i ( θ θ)(θσ µ ψ) µ A + 2( θ θ)(θψ)f i ( θ θ)(θσ µ µ ψ)a 2 2 ( + (θθ)( θ θ) 1 4 A A 1 4 A A i 2 µψσ µ ψ + F F µa µ A + i ) 2 ψσµ µ ψ. (53) The product ΦΦ is neither a chiral nor the anti-chiral field, since it do not satisfy any of constrains introduce above. This superfield is a real field. Its highest component θθ θ θ is known as D term and it transforms as space time derivative under SUSY. 3.4 Wess Zumino model We want to construct a Lagrangian that is SUSY invariant and renormalizable for chiral and anti-chiral fields. First, we consider only one superfield Φ. The ΦΦ θθ θ θ term is a kinetic term ΦΦ θθ θ θ = 1 4 A A 1 4 A A i 2 µψσ µ ψ + F F µa µ A + i 2 ψσµ µ ψ = A A + i ψ σ µ µ ψ + F F, (54) where we discard surface terms. The term ΦΦ θθ θ θ is SUSY invariant. However, it is itself a derivative term, so it does not contribute to the Lagrangian. Consider therefore the SUSY invariant term ΦΦ θθ : ΦΦ θθ = 2AF ψψ. (55) 19

20 There is one more renormalizable term, namely Φ 3 θθ : Φ 3 θθ = 3A 2 F 3Aψψ. (56) The higher order terms in chiral fields are not renormalizable. Thus, SUSY invariant Lagrangian is given by L = ΦΦ ( 1 θθ θ θ + 2 mφ2 θθ + 1 ) 3 λφ3 θθ + h.c., (57) where m and λ are coupling constants is SUSY invariant. In terms of component fields, the Lagrangian reads: L = A A + i ψ σ µ µ ψ + F F + m 2 (2AF ψψ) + m 2 (2A F ψ ψ) + λ(a 2 F Aψψ + A 2 F A ψ ψ). (58) This is the Lagrangian that is SUSY invariant and renormalizable. It is called Wess-Zumino model. This model was constructed in 1974 by J. Wess and B. Zumino. It was the first four dimensional supersymmetric model. The fields F and F are auxiliary fields, since Lagrangian does not contain their derivatives. These fields can be eliminated from Lagrangian using the equation of motion F = ma λa 2. In this way we obtain so called on-shell Lagrangian: L = µ A µ A + i ψ σ µ µ ψ ma + λa mψψ 1 2 m ψ ψ λaψψ λa i ψ ψ. (59) More general, with more than one chiral superfield, Lagrangian is L = Φ i Φ i θθ θ θ + (W [Φ i ] θθ + h.c.), (60) where the superpotential W is an analytic function of the chiral superfields: W [Φ i ] = 1 2 m ijφ i Φ j λ ijkφ i Φ j Φ k. (61) The quantities m ij and λ ijk are some totally symmetric constant coefficients. Lagrangian in terms of component fields reads L = µ A i µ A i +i ψ ( i σ µ µ ψ i +Fi F i + m ij A i F j 1 ) 2 m ijψ i ψ j +λ ijk A i A j F k λ ijk A i ψ j ψ k +c.c. (62) The previous Lagrangian gives the following equations of motion A i = m ij F j + 2λ ijk A jf k λ ijk ψj ψk i σ µ µ ψ i = m ij ψj + 2λ ijk A j ψ k F i = m ij A j λ ijk A ja k. (63) 20

21 The auxiliary fields F i can be integrated out using equations of motion (63). In that way we obtain L = µ A i µ A i + i ψ i σ µ µ ψ i m ij A j + λ ijk A j A k m ijψ i ψ j 1 2 m ij ψ i ψj λ ijk A i ψ j ψ k λ ijk A i ψ j ψk. (64) The last two terms are Yukawa interaction and we can define effective potential as: 3.5 Vector superfield V m ij A j + λ ijk A j A k 2 = F i 2. (65) An irreducble multiplet can be obtained imposing the reality condition V (x, θ, θ) = V (x, θ, θ). (66) This superfield is co called the vector superfield. It has the following form V (x, θ, θ) = C(x) + 2θχ(x) + 2 θ χ(x) + θθm(x) + θ θm (x) + θσ µ θvµ (x) i ) ( + (θθ) θ ( λ(x) σ µ µ χ(x) + ( θ θ)θ λ(x) i ) σ µ µ χ(x) (D(x) 2 (θθ)( θ θ) 1 ) 2 C(x). (67) The reality condition implies C = C, v µ = v µ and D = D. A vector multiplet consists of 8 bosonic and 8 fermionic degrees of freedom. The canonical dimension of a vector field is one, [v µ ] = 1. Knowing [θ] = [ θ] = 1 2 implies and subsequently [V ] = 0, (68) [C] = 0, [χ] = [ χ] = 1 2, [M] = [M ] = 1, [λ] = [ λ] = 3, [D] = 2. (69) 2 Let iλ be a chiral SF: iλ = f + 2θφ + θθf i(θσ µ θ) µ f The following combination is a vector SF: i 2 θθ( θ σ µ µ φ) 1 4 (θθ)( θ θ) f. (70) iλ iλ = 2Ref + 2θφ + 2 θ φ + θθf + θ θf + 2(θσ µ θ) µ Imf i (θθ)( θ σ µ µ φ) i ( θ θ)(θσ µ µ φ) (θθ)( θ θ) Ref. (71) We define a super-gauge transformation for the vector superfield in the following way: V (x, θ, θ) = V (x, θ, θ) + i(λ(x, θ, θ) Λ (x, θ, θ)), (72) 21

22 where Λ(x, θ, θ) is a chiral superfield. Under the super gauge transformations the components of a vector superfield transform as C C + 2Ref, χ χ + φ, M M + F, v µ v µ + µ (2Imf), λ λ, D D. (73) The fields λ and D are gauge invariant, while v µ transforms as the usual gauge field with U(1) gauge parameter 2Imf. This means that the super-gauge symmetry is larger then usual gauge symmetry. The super-gauge symmetry can be fixed by the following choice of parameters 2Ref = C, φ = χ, F = M. (74) This gauge choice is known as Wess-Zumino gauge. In the WZ gauge a vector superfield is given by V WZ = θσ µ θvµ + (θθ)( θ λ) + ( θ θ)(θλ) (θθ)( θ θ)d. (75) Supersymmetry does not preserve WZ gauge, i.e. a supersymmetric transformation of a vector superfield in Wess-Zumino gauge gives a superfield which is not in this gauge. However, a suitable combination of supersymmetry transformation followed by a super gauge transformation preserves the Wess-Zumino gauge. The fields in the vector multiplet are: a vector gauge field v µ, a gaugino, λ α and an auxiliary field, D. We can perform further transformations that leave us within the WZ gauge with iλ = iimf + θσ µ θ µ Imf i 4 (θθ)( θ θ) Imf. (76) This transformation will not change the conditions C = χ = M = 0, and gives v µ v µ + µ (2Imf), λ λ, D D, (77) which is just the ordinary U(1) gauge transformation. It easy to prove that V 2 W Z(x, θ, θ) = 1 2 (θθ)( θ θ)v µ (x)v µ (x) (78) V n W Z(x, θ, θ) = 0, n 3. (79) So, we find e V WZ = 1 + V WZ V WZ 2 = 1 + θσ µ θvµ + (θθ)( θ λ) + ( θ θ)(θλ) + 1 (D 2 (θθ)( θ θ) + 12 ) vµ v µ. (80) 22

23 3.6 Lagrangian for Abelian gauge theory In order to construct a kinetic term for a vector superfield, we have to find a supersymmetric analog of the field strength. Abelian field strength superfields are W α = 1 4 D 2 D α V, W α = 1 4 D2 D α V. (81) One can check that both W α and W α are gauge invariant quantities: W α = 1 4 D 2 D α V 1 4 D 2 D α (V + iλ iλ ) = W α i 4 D 2 D α Λ = W α i 4 D β D βd α Λ = W α i 4 D ( β { D β, ) β D α } D α D Λ = W α + i 4 D β{ D β, D α }Λ = W α + i ( ) β D 2i(σ µ ) 4 α β µ Λ = W α 1 2 (σµ ) α β µ D βλ = W α (82) and satisfy D α W α = D α W α = 0. W α and W α are a chiral and an antichiral spinorial superfields. It can be proven that W α = λ α (y) + θ α D(y) + i(θθ)σ µ α α µ λ α (y) i(σ µν θ) α F µν (y), (83) W α = λ α (y ) + θ α D(y ) iϵ α β( σ µν θ) βf µν (y ) i( θ θ)( µ λ(y )σ µ ) α, (84) where F µν = µ v ν ν v µ. It can be shown that W α W α θθ = iλσ µ µ λ i µ λ σ µ λ + D F µν F µν + i 1 2 F µν Fµν, (85) where F µν = 1ϵ 2 µνρσf ρσ is the dual tensor of F µν. The last term in (85) is a total derivative. Lagrangian for the pure super Abelian gauge theory is given by L = 1 ( W α θθ W α + 4 W ) α α W = 1 θ θ 4 F µν F µν + iλσ µ 1 µ λ + 2 D2, (86) up to a total derivative term. The first term in (86) is Maxwell action. Next, let us consider a coupling of the Abelian gauge superfield, V to chiral superfields, Φ i Under the Abelian super-gauge transformation the chiral and antichiral superfields transform as Φ i = e 2igt iλ Φ i, (87) 23

24 Φ = e 2igt iλ Φi, (88) where t i is (real) charge of superfield Φ i. The term Φ i Φ i is not super gauge invariant, but the term Φ i e 2gt iv Φ i is: Φ i e 2gt iv Φ i Φ i e 2igt iλ (z) e 2gt i(v +iλ iλ ) e 2igt iλ(z) Φ i (89) = Φ i e 2gt iv Φ i. (90) In the WZ gauge only three terms in expression Φ i e 2gt iv Φ i do not vanish: Φ i e 2gt iv Φ i W Z = Φ i Φ i + 2gt i Φi V W Z Φ i + 2g 2 t 2 i Φ i V 2 W ZΦ i. (91) It can be shown that the highest component of Φ i e 2gt iv Φ i is given (up to total derivative terms) by Φ i e 2gt iv W Z Φ i θθ θ θ = Fi F i + (D µi A i )(D µ A i ) + iψ i σ µ D ψ µi i where we introduce covariant derivatives as The action is S = d 4 x i + gt i D A i 2 g 2[( ψ i λ)ai + (ψ i λ)a i ], (92) D µi A i = ( µ + igt i v µ )A i (93) D µi ψ i = ( µ + igt i v µ )ψ i. (94) ( Φ i e 2gtiV Φ i θθ θ θ W α W α θθ + 1 ) 4 W α W α θ θ + W [Φ i ] θθ + W [ Φ i ] θ θ. (95) The superpotential W (Φ) has to respect super-gauge symmetry. Now, we can write down the full Lagrangian in components forms L = Fi F i + (D µ i A i) (D µi A i ) + iψ i σ µ D ψ µi i + gt i DA i A i 2gt i [( ψ i λ)ai + (ψ i λ)a i ] D2 1F 4 µνf µν + iλσ µ µ λ W +F i A i 1 2 W 2 A i A j ψ i ψ j + Fi W 1 2 W ψ 2 i ψj. (96) A i A i A j Here, we can use the equations of motion to integrate out auxiliary fields: F i = W A i F i = W A i D = gt i A i A i. (97) Substituting these results in (96) we obtain the on-shell Lagrangian: L = W 2 φ i + (D µ i A i) (D µi A i ) + iψ i σ µ D ψ µi i 1(gt 2 ia i A i ) 2 2gt i [( ψ i λ)ai + (ψ i λ)a i ] 1F 4 µνf µν + iλσ µ µ λ 1 2 W 2 A i A j ψ i ψ j W A i A j In this theory A is a scalar, λ is a gaugino and ψ is a chiral fermion. 24 ψ i ψj. (98)

25 3.7 Super Quantum Electrodynamics Super QED is a supersymmetric extension of the standard QED. Let Φ + = (A +, ψ +, F + ) and Φ = (A, ψ, Φ ) be two chiral superfields with charges q and q. Under U(1) super gauge transformations they transform as follows Φ + Φ + = e 2iqΛ(z) Φ +, (99) Φ Φ = e 2iqΛ(z) Φ. (100) The action is given by S = d 8 z( Φ+ e 2qV Φ + + Φ e 2qV Φ + δ (2) ( θ)( 1 4 W α W α + mφ + Φ ) ( ) 1 ) + δ (2) (θ) 4 W α W α + m Φ + Φ. (101) Note that the mass terms mφ ± Φ ± are absent since they are not the super gauge invariant. The Lagrangian in component form is given by L = F D µ A iψ + σ µ D µ ψ + 2q[(ψ + λ)a + + h.c.] + qa +A + D + F 2 + D µ A 2 + iψ σ µ D µ ψ + 2q[(ψ λ)a + h.c.] qa A D D2 1 4 F µνf µν + iλσ µ µ λ + m(a+ F + A F + ψ + ψ ) + m(a +F + A F + ψ + ψ ). Substituting the equations of motion into Lagrangian in (102) we obtain the on-shell Lagrangian: where (102) F ± = ma (103) D = qa +A + + qa A (104) L = 1 4 F µνf µν + iλσ µ µ λ + iψ+ σ µ D µ ψ + + iψ σ µ D µ ψ + D µ A D µ A 2 q 2 (A +A + A A ) m 2 (A +A + φ A ) m(ψ + ψ + ψ + ψ ) 2q[(ψ + λ)a + + ( ψ + λ)a+ (ψ λ)a ( ψ λ)a ], (105) We introduce Dirac spinor for matter fields: D = µ + iqa µ. (106) Ψ = ( (ψ+ ) α ( ψ ) α ) (107) 25

26 and the Majorana spinor for gaugino field λ M = ( λα λ α ) In terms of Dirac and Majorana spinors Lagrangian (105) reads L = 1 4 F µνf µν + i 2 λ Mγ µ µ λm + i Ψγ µ D µ Ψ m ΨΨ. (108) + D µ A D µ A 2 m 2 ( A A 2 ) q 2 ( A A 2 ) 2 2q(A + λ M Ψ L A λm Ψ R + c.c). (109) 3.8 Non-Abelian Super Yang-Mills theories In the previous section we discussed the supersymmetric U(1) gauge theories. Now, we generalize the Abelian symmetry to the non Abelian one. Let us consider a simple connected group G. The hermitian generators of G are T a and they satisfy [T a, T b ] = if abc T c, (110) where f abc are structure constants. Chiral superfields transform under rigid transformations as follows Φ I = exp( igλ a T a ) IJ Φ J, where Λ a are constant real parameters and g is a coupling constant. The kinetic term Φ I Φ I is invariant under the rigid transformations. To localize this symmetry in the superspace, the parameters Λ a have to become chiral functions. The superfields, Φ I and Φ I transform under gauge transformation in the following way Φ I = exp( igλ) IJ Φ J, Φ I = Φ J exp( igλ ) JI, (111) where Λ = 2gΛ a (x, θ, θ)t a, Λ = 2gΛ a (x, θ, θ)t a are the chiral and antichiral superfields. The term Φ I Φ I is not gauge invariant. To recover invariance we introduce a vector (or gauge or Yang-Mills) superfield V = 2gV a T a. It is a Hermitian matrix transforming under the adjoint representation of G. In order for the term Φ I (e V ) IJ Φ J to be invariant under super-gauge transformation, the super gauge transformation of the vector superfield has to be given by e +V = e iλ e +V e +iλ. (112) Writing V = V + δv, where δv is an infinitesimal change of vector superfield in the first order in Λ, we obtain e V +δv e V = δv (V δv + δv V ) (δv V 2 + V δv V + V 2 δv ) (113) On the other hand, from (112) it follows e V +δv e V = e V iλ iλ e V = iλ iλ + V iλ iλ V + i 2 V 2 Λ i 2 Λ V (114) 26

27 To solve these equations we assume that δv is a expansion in powers of V δv = δv (0) + δv (1) + δv (2) (115) The term δv (n) is n th order in power of the vector superfield. Comparing (113) and (114) we find Collecting these terms together we obtain or in component notation δv (0) = i(λ Λ ), δv (1) = i 2 [V, Λ + Λ ], δv (2) = i 12 [V, [V, Λ Λ ]]. (116) δv = i(λ Λ ) + i 2 [V, Λ + Λ ] + i 12 [V, [V, Λ Λ ]] +..., (117) δv a = i(λ Λ ) a gf abc V b (Λ + Λ ) c i 3 g2 f dbc f aed V e V b (Λ Λ ) c + O(V 3 ). (118) It can be shown that we can impose the Wess Zumino gauge V WZ = (θσ µ θ)vµ + (θθ)(θλ) + ( θ θ)(θλ) (θθ)( θ θ)d. (119) We use the notation v µ = 2gv a µt a, D = 2gD a T a... where v a µ are the gauge fields. The Wess- Zumino gauge does not fix super gauge symmetry completely. The super gauge transformations determined by iλ = iimf + (θσ µ θ) µ Imf i 4 (θθ)( θ θ)imf (120) preserve WZ gauge. This residual symmetry corresponds to usual gauge symmetry. The vector superfield transformation is given by: δv WZ = i(λ Λ ) + i 2 [V WZ, Λ + Λ ]. (121) To find the Lagrangian for super Yang Mills fields we introduce two new superfields W α = 1 4 D 2 ( e V D α e +V ), W α = D2 ( e +V D α e V ). (122) It is clear that W α and W α are chiral and antichiral superfields, respectively. The superfield strength W α can be expanded in V : W α = 1 4 D 2 D α V 1 8 D 2 [D α V, V ] 1 24 D 2 [[D α V, V ], V ] (123) 27

28 In the Abelian case this expression reduces to W α = 1 4 D 2 D α V, as we expected. It can be shown that W α transforms covariantly under the super gauge transformations: In the Wess-Zumino gauge we have Finally, we arrive at W α = 2gW a αt a, where W α e iλ W α e +iλ. (124) W α = 1 4 D 2 D α V WZ 1 8 D 2 [D α V WZ, V WZ ]. (125) W a α = λ a α(y) + θ α D a (y) + iθθ(σ µ D µ λa (y)) α i(σ µν θ) α F a µν(y). (126) The term Tr(W α W α ) is super gauge and Lorentz invariant. Its θθ component is invariant under supersymmetry. Therefore, the Lagrangian for the super-non-abelian gauge field is where L = 1 ( 16g 2 k Tr W α θθ W α + W α α W θ θ ) ) (127) = 1 4 F a µνf µν a + iλ a σ µ (D µ λ) a Da D a, (128) (D µ λ) a = µ λa gf abc v b µ λ c, F a µν = µ v a ν ν v a µ gf abc v b mv c ν, and the constant k is determined by Tr(T a T b ) = 1 2 kδab. Lagrangian (128) describes super-yang-mills theory without matter fields. The Lagrangian for matter sector is given by L matter = Φe V Φ + W (Φ) + W ( Φ), (129) (θθ)( θ θ) θθ where the superpotential W (Φ) is a gauge invariant quantity i.e. it belongs to a singlet representation of G. In the Wess-Zumino gauge the kinetic term for matter fields, Φe V Φ = Φ I (e V ) IJ Φ J is given by Φe V Φ = ΦΦ + ΦV Φ ΦV 2 Φ. (130) Its D-component is Φe V Φ (θθ)( θ θ) = F F + (D µ A) (D µ A) i ψ σ µ D µ ψ + ga DA 2gA (ψλ) 2g( ψ λ)a, (131) θ θ where: D µ A = ( µ + igv a µt a )A, D µ ψ = ( µ + igv a µt a )ψ. (132) 28

29 Let us stress that the fields A, ψ and F transform under fundamental, while D, λ and v µ under adjoint representation of G. Adding all terms together we obtain the off-shell Lagrangian: References L = 1F a 4 µνf a µν i λ a σ µ D µ λ a + (D µ A) (D µ A) i ψ σ µ D µ ψ +ga D a T a A 2gψ I λ a TIJ a A J 2g λ a ψi TIJ a A J ( ) W + F I A I 1 2 W 2 A I A J ψ I ψ J + h.c Da D a + F I F I. (133) [1] J. Wess and J. Bagger, Supersymmetry and Supergravity, Princeton UP, (1991) [2] I. Buchbinder and S. Kuzenko, Ideas and Methods of Supersymmetry and Supergravity, Taylor and Francis (1998) [3] P. Srivastrava, Supersymmetry, Superfields and Supergravity, Adam Hilger (1986) [4] D. Bailin and A. Love, Supersymmetric Gauge Field Theory and String Theory, IOP (1994) [5] B. Allanach and F. Quevedo, Supersymmetry and Extra Dimensions, Cambridge Lecture Notes (2015) [6] D. Freedman and A. van Proeyen, Supergravity, CUP (2012) [7] M. Dress, R. M. Godbole and P. Roy, Theory and Phenomenology of Sparticles, World Scientific (2008) 29

6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.

6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq. 6.1. Dirac Equation Ref: M.Kaku, Quantum Field Theory, Oxford Univ Press (1993) η μν = η μν = diag(1, -1, -1, -1) p 0 = p 0 p = p i = -p i p μ p μ = p 0 p 0 + p i p i = E c 2 - p 2 = (m c) 2 H = c p 2

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3

Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 1 State vector space and the dual space Space of wavefunctions The space of wavefunctions is the set of all

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

= {{D α, D α }, D α }. = [D α, 4iσ µ α α D α µ ] = 4iσ µ α α [Dα, D α ] µ.

= {{D α, D α }, D α }. = [D α, 4iσ µ α α D α µ ] = 4iσ µ α α [Dα, D α ] µ. PHY 396 T: SUSY Solutions for problem set #1. Problem 2(a): First of all, [D α, D 2 D α D α ] = {D α, D α }D α D α {D α, D α } = {D α, D α }D α + D α {D α, D α } (S.1) = {{D α, D α }, D α }. Second, {D

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Space-Time Symmetries

Space-Time Symmetries Chapter Space-Time Symmetries In classical fiel theory any continuous symmetry of the action generates a conserve current by Noether's proceure. If the Lagrangian is not invariant but only shifts by a

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

2 Composition. Invertible Mappings

2 Composition. Invertible Mappings Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan Composition. Invertible Mappings In this section we discuss two procedures for creating new mappings from old ones, namely,

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Dirac Matrices and Lorentz Spinors

Dirac Matrices and Lorentz Spinors Dirac Matrices and Lorentz Spinors Background: In 3D, the spinor j = 1 representation of the Spin3) rotation group is constructed from the Pauli matrices σ x, σ y, and σ k, which obey both commutation

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Symmetric Stress-Energy Tensor

Symmetric Stress-Energy Tensor Chapter 3 Symmetric Stress-Energy ensor We noticed that Noether s conserved currents are arbitrary up to the addition of a divergence-less field. Exploiting this freedom the canonical stress-energy tensor

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

1 Poincare group and spinors

1 Poincare group and spinors Introduction on Supersymmetry Di Xu 1 Poincare group and spinors A Poincare transformation P is a proper Lorentz transformation Λ followed by a translation a. The generators of the Poincare group are the

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Homework 4 Solutions Weyl or Chiral representation for γ-matrices. Phys624 Dirac Equation Homework 4

Homework 4 Solutions Weyl or Chiral representation for γ-matrices. Phys624 Dirac Equation Homework 4 Homework 4 Solutions 4.1 - Weyl or Chiral representation for γ-matrices 4.1.1: Anti-commutation relations We can write out the γ µ matrices as where ( ) 0 σ γ µ µ = σ µ 0 σ µ = (1, σ), σ µ = (1 2, σ) The

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Higher Derivative Gravity Theories

Higher Derivative Gravity Theories Higher Derivative Gravity Theories Black Holes in AdS space-times James Mashiyane Supervisor: Prof Kevin Goldstein University of the Witwatersrand Second Mandelstam, 20 January 2018 James Mashiyane WITS)

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Tutorial problem set 6,

Tutorial problem set 6, GENERAL RELATIVITY Tutorial problem set 6, 01.11.2013. SOLUTIONS PROBLEM 1 Killing vectors. a Show that the commutator of two Killing vectors is a Killing vector. Show that a linear combination with constant

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Relativistic particle dynamics and deformed symmetry

Relativistic particle dynamics and deformed symmetry Relativistic particle dynamics and deformed Poincare symmetry Department for Theoretical Physics, Ivan Franko Lviv National University XXXIII Max Born Symposium, Wroclaw Outline Lorentz-covariant deformed

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Second Order Partial Differential Equations

Second Order Partial Differential Equations Chapter 7 Second Order Partial Differential Equations 7.1 Introduction A second order linear PDE in two independent variables (x, y Ω can be written as A(x, y u x + B(x, y u xy + C(x, y u u u + D(x, y

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

EE512: Error Control Coding

EE512: Error Control Coding EE512: Error Control Coding Solution for Assignment on Finite Fields February 16, 2007 1. (a) Addition and Multiplication tables for GF (5) and GF (7) are shown in Tables 1 and 2. + 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 3

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates

derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates swapnizzle 03-03- :5:43 We begin by recognizing the familiar conversion from rectangular to spherical coordinates (note that φ is used

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Orbital angular momentum and the spherical harmonics

Orbital angular momentum and the spherical harmonics Orbital angular momentum and the spherical harmonics March 8, 03 Orbital angular momentum We compare our result on representations of rotations with our previous experience of angular momentum, defined

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Example Sheet 3 Solutions

Example Sheet 3 Solutions Example Sheet 3 Solutions. i Regular Sturm-Liouville. ii Singular Sturm-Liouville mixed boundary conditions. iii Not Sturm-Liouville ODE is not in Sturm-Liouville form. iv Regular Sturm-Liouville note

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Partial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013

Partial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013 The boundary element method March 26, 203 Introduction and notation The problem: u = f in D R d u = ϕ in Γ D u n = g on Γ N, where D = Γ D Γ N, Γ D Γ N = (possibly, Γ D = [Neumann problem] or Γ N = [Dirichlet

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

forms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with

forms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with Week 03: C lassification of S econd- Order L inear Equations In last week s lectures we have illustrated how to obtain the general solutions of first order PDEs using the method of characteristics. We

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

HOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:

HOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch: HOMEWORK 4 Problem a For the fast loading case, we want to derive the relationship between P zz and λ z. We know that the nominal stress is expressed as: P zz = ψ λ z where λ z = λ λ z. Therefore, applying

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)

Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required) Phys460.nb 81 ψ n (t) is still the (same) eigenstate of H But for tdependent H. The answer is NO. 5.5.5. Solution for the tdependent Schrodinger s equation If we assume that at time t 0, the electron starts

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Math221: HW# 1 solutions

Math221: HW# 1 solutions Math: HW# solutions Andy Royston October, 5 7.5.7, 3 rd Ed. We have a n = b n = a = fxdx = xdx =, x cos nxdx = x sin nx n sin nxdx n = cos nx n = n n, x sin nxdx = x cos nx n + cos nxdx n cos n = + sin

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS

CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS Shiah-Sen Wang The graphs are prepared by Chien-Lun Lai Based on : Precalculus: Mathematics for Calculus by J. Stuwart, L. Redin & S. Watson, 6th edition, 01, Brooks/Cole Chapter

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Srednicki Chapter 55

Srednicki Chapter 55 Srednicki Chapter 55 QFT Problems & Solutions A. George August 3, 03 Srednicki 55.. Use equations 55.3-55.0 and A i, A j ] = Π i, Π j ] = 0 (at equal times) to verify equations 55.-55.3. This is our third

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

MATH423 String Theory Solutions 4. = 0 τ = f(s). (1) dτ ds = dxµ dτ f (s) (2) dτ 2 [f (s)] 2 + dxµ. dτ f (s) (3)

MATH423 String Theory Solutions 4. = 0 τ = f(s). (1) dτ ds = dxµ dτ f (s) (2) dτ 2 [f (s)] 2 + dxµ. dτ f (s) (3) 1. MATH43 String Theory Solutions 4 x = 0 τ = fs). 1) = = f s) ) x = x [f s)] + f s) 3) equation of motion is x = 0 if an only if f s) = 0 i.e. fs) = As + B with A, B constants. i.e. allowe reparametrisations

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Non-Abelian Gauge Fields

Non-Abelian Gauge Fields Chapter 5 Non-Abelian Gauge Fields The simplest example starts with two Fermions Dirac particles) ψ 1, ψ 2, degenerate in mass, and hence satisfying in the absence of interactions γ 1 i + m)ψ 1 = 0, γ

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Spinors and σ-matrices in 10 dimensions It is well known that in D-dimensional space-time Dirac spinor has 2 D 2

Spinors and σ-matrices in 10 dimensions It is well known that in D-dimensional space-time Dirac spinor has 2 D 2 PiTP Study Guide to Spinors in D and 0D S.J.Gates Jr. John S. Toll Professor of Physics Director Center for String and Particle Theory University of Maryland Tel: 30-405-6025 Physics Department Fax: 30-34-9525

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions

C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions Paul Liu November 15, 2007 Note that these are sample solutions only; in many cases there were many acceptable answers. 1 Reynolds Problem 10.1 1.1 Normal-order

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS

CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS CHAPTER 5 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS EXERCISE 104 Page 8 1. Find the positive root of the equation x + 3x 5 = 0, correct to 3 significant figures, using the method of bisection. Let f(x) =

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1) 84 CHAPTER 4. STATIONARY TS MODELS 4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(,) This section is an introduction to a wide class of models ARMA(p,q) which we will consider in more detail later in this

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Lecture 2 The Wess-Zumino Model

Lecture 2 The Wess-Zumino Model Lecture 2 The Wess-Zumino Model Outline Review: two component spinors. The simplest SUSY Lagrangian: the free Wess-Zumino model. The SUSY algebra and the off-shell formalism. Noether theorem for SUSY:

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β

3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β 3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS Page Theorem cos(αβ cos α cos β -sin α cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α NOTE: cos(αβ cos α cos β cos(α-β cos α -cos β Proof of cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α Let s use a unit circle

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set May 6, 2008 Abstract A set of first-order formulas, whatever the cardinality of the set of symbols, is equivalent to an independent

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Problem Set 9 Solutions. θ + 1. θ 2 + cotθ ( ) sinθ e iφ is an eigenfunction of the ˆ L 2 operator. / θ 2. φ 2. sin 2 θ φ 2. ( ) = e iφ. = e iφ cosθ.

Problem Set 9 Solutions. θ + 1. θ 2 + cotθ ( ) sinθ e iφ is an eigenfunction of the ˆ L 2 operator. / θ 2. φ 2. sin 2 θ φ 2. ( ) = e iφ. = e iφ cosθ. Chemistry 362 Dr Jean M Standard Problem Set 9 Solutions The ˆ L 2 operator is defined as Verify that the angular wavefunction Y θ,φ) Also verify that the eigenvalue is given by 2! 2 & L ˆ 2! 2 2 θ 2 +

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Matrices and Determinants

Matrices and Determinants Matrices and Determinants SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Q 1. For what value of k do the following system of equations possess a non-trivial (i.e., not all zero) solution over the set of rationals Q? x + ky + 3z

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Απόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.

Απόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ. Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο The time integral of a force is referred to as impulse, is determined by and is obtained from: Newton s 2 nd Law of motion states that the action

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Physics 582, Problem Set 2 Solutions

Physics 582, Problem Set 2 Solutions Physics 582, Problem Set 2 Solutions TAs: Hart Goldman and Ramanjit Sohal Fall 2018 Symmetries and Conservation Laws In this problem set we return to a study of scalar electrodynamics which has the Lagrangian

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

The kinetic and potential energies as T = 1 2. (m i η2 i k(η i+1 η i ) 2 ). (3) The Hooke s law F = Y ξ, (6) with a discrete analog

The kinetic and potential energies as T = 1 2. (m i η2 i k(η i+1 η i ) 2 ). (3) The Hooke s law F = Y ξ, (6) with a discrete analog Lecture 12: Introduction to Analytical Mechanics of Continuous Systems Lagrangian Density for Continuous Systems The kinetic and potential energies as T = 1 2 i η2 i (1 and V = 1 2 i+1 η i 2, i (2 where

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

k A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +

k A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R + Chapter 3. Fuzzy Arithmetic 3- Fuzzy arithmetic: ~Addition(+) and subtraction (-): Let A = [a and B = [b, b in R If x [a and y [b, b than x+y [a +b +b Symbolically,we write A(+)B = [a (+)[b, b = [a +b

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Phys624 Quantization of Scalar Fields II Homework 3. Homework 3 Solutions. 3.1: U(1) symmetry for complex scalar

Phys624 Quantization of Scalar Fields II Homework 3. Homework 3 Solutions. 3.1: U(1) symmetry for complex scalar Homework 3 Solutions 3.1: U(1) symmetry for complex scalar 1 3.: Two complex scalars The Lagrangian for two complex scalar fields is given by, L µ φ 1 µ φ 1 m φ 1φ 1 + µ φ µ φ m φ φ (1) This can be written

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES GLMA Linear Mathematics 00- Examination Solutions. (a) i. ( + 5i)( i) = (6 + 5) + (5 )i = + i. Real part is, imaginary part is. (b) ii. + 5i i ( + 5i)( + i) = ( i)( + i)

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Reminders: linear functions

Reminders: linear functions Reminders: linear functions Let U and V be vector spaces over the same field F. Definition A function f : U V is linear if for every u 1, u 2 U, f (u 1 + u 2 ) = f (u 1 ) + f (u 2 ), and for every u U

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Tridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008

Tridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008 Tridiagonal matrices Gérard MEURANT October, 2008 1 Similarity 2 Cholesy factorizations 3 Eigenvalues 4 Inverse Similarity Let α 1 ω 1 β 1 α 2 ω 2 T =......... β 2 α 1 ω 1 β 1 α and β i ω i, i = 1,...,

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Homework 3 Solutions

Homework 3 Solutions Homework 3 Solutions Igor Yanovsky (Math 151A TA) Problem 1: Compute the absolute error and relative error in approximations of p by p. (Use calculator!) a) p π, p 22/7; b) p π, p 3.141. Solution: For

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2

Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 24, no. 5, 239-246 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/.2988/ija.24.422 Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 Ligong An and

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Lecture 10 - Representation Theory III: Theory of Weights

Lecture 10 - Representation Theory III: Theory of Weights Lecture 10 - Representation Theory III: Theory of Weights February 18, 2012 1 Terminology One assumes a base = {α i } i has been chosen. Then a weight Λ with non-negative integral Dynkin coefficients Λ

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II

8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II 8.324 Relativistic Quantum Field Theory II MIT OpenCourseWare Lecture Notes Hong Liu, Fall 200 Lecture 2 3: GENERAL ASPECTS OF QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS 3.: RENORMALIZED LAGRANGIAN Consider the Lagrangian

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

THE ENERGY-MOMENTUM TENSOR IN CLASSICAL FIELD THEORY

THE ENERGY-MOMENTUM TENSOR IN CLASSICAL FIELD THEORY THE ENERGY-MOMENTUM TENSOR IN CLASSICAL FIELD THEORY Walter Wyss Department of Physics University of Colorado Boulder, CO 80309 (Received 14 July 2005) My friend, Asim Barut, was always interested in classical

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016

Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016 Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016 Silvio Capobianco Exercise 1.7 Let H(n) = J(n + 1) J(n). Equation (1.8) tells us that H(2n) = 2, and H(2n+1) = J(2n+2) J(2n+1) = (2J(n+1) 1) (2J(n)+1)

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

( ) 2 and compare to M.

( ) 2 and compare to M. Problems and Solutions for Section 4.2 4.9 through 4.33) 4.9 Calculate the square root of the matrix 3!0 M!0 8 Hint: Let M / 2 a!b ; calculate M / 2!b c ) 2 and compare to M. Solution: Given: 3!0 M!0 8

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Partial Trace and Partial Transpose

Partial Trace and Partial Transpose Partial Trace and Partial Transpose by José Luis Gómez-Muñoz http://homepage.cem.itesm.mx/lgomez/quantum/ jose.luis.gomez@itesm.mx This document is based on suggestions by Anirban Das Introduction This

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013

Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013 Notes on Average Scattering imes and Hall Factors Jesse Maassen and Mar Lundstrom Purdue University November 5, 13 I. Introduction 1 II. Solution of the BE 1 III. Exercises: Woring out average scattering

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests

Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Side-Note: So far we have seen a few approaches for creating tests such as Neyman-Pearson Lemma ( most powerful tests of H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 :

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

4 Dirac Equation. and α k, β are N N matrices. Using the matrix notation, we can write the equations as imc

4 Dirac Equation. and α k, β are N N matrices. Using the matrix notation, we can write the equations as imc 4 Dirac Equation To solve the negative probability density problem of the Klein-Gordon equation, people were looking for an equation which is first order in / t. Such an equation is found by Dirac. It

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude

Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude Jan Behrens 2012-12-31 In this paper we shall provide a method to approximate distances between two points on earth

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

ECE Spring Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 2

ECE Spring Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 2 ECE 634 Spring 6 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes Fields in a Source-Free Region Example: Radiation from an aperture y PEC E t x Aperture Assume the following choice of vector potentials: A F = =

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II

Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II October 18, 2012 1 Review First let us recall the situation. Let g be a simple algebra, with maximal toral subalgebra h (which we are calling a CSA, or Cartan Subalgebra).

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

1 String with massive end-points

1 String with massive end-points 1 String with massive end-points Πρόβλημα 5.11:Θεωρείστε μια χορδή μήκους, τάσης T, με δύο σημειακά σωματίδια στα άκρα της, το ένα μάζας m, και το άλλο μάζας m. α) Μελετώντας την κίνηση των άκρων βρείτε

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

In this way we will obtain all possible (finite dimensional) representations of the Lorentz group. In order to obtain the transformation law for spinors we will consider the set of 2 2 complex matrices

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Srednicki Chapter 36

Srednicki Chapter 36 Srednicki Chapter 36 QFT Problems & Solutions A. George March 1, 13 Srednicki 36.1. Using the results of problem.9, show that, for a rotation by an angle θ about the z axis, we have: DΛ = exp iθs 1 and

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes

6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes 122 CHAPTER 6. ARMA MODELS 6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes The purpose of forecasting is to predict future values of a TS based on the data collected to the present. In this section we will discuss a linear

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

ω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω

ω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ω ω + 1 ω + 2 ω + 3 ω + 4 ω2 ω2 + 1 ω2 + 2 ω2 + 3 ω3 ω3 + 1 ω3 + 2 ω4 ω4 + 1 ω5 ω 2 ω 2 + 1 ω 2 + 2 ω 2 + ω ω 2 + ω + 1 ω 2 + ω2 ω 2 2 ω 2 2 + 1 ω 2 2 + ω ω 2 3 ω 3 ω 3 + 1 ω 3 + ω ω 3 +

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Finite Field Problems: Solutions

Finite Field Problems: Solutions Finite Field Problems: Solutions 1. Let f = x 2 +1 Z 11 [x] and let F = Z 11 [x]/(f), a field. Let Solution: F =11 2 = 121, so F = 121 1 = 120. The possible orders are the divisors of 120. Solution: The

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Section 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas

Section 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas 09 Section 7. Double and Half Angle Fmulas To derive the double-angles fmulas, we will use the sum of two angles fmulas that we developed in the last section. We will let α θ and β θ: cos(θ) cos(θ + θ)

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

DiracDelta. Notations. Primary definition. Specific values. General characteristics. Traditional name. Traditional notation

DiracDelta. Notations. Primary definition. Specific values. General characteristics. Traditional name. Traditional notation DiracDelta Notations Traditional name Dirac delta function Traditional notation x Mathematica StandardForm notation DiracDeltax Primary definition 4.03.02.000.0 x Π lim ε ; x ε0 x 2 2 ε Specific values

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Homework 8 Model Solution Section

Homework 8 Model Solution Section MATH 004 Homework Solution Homework 8 Model Solution Section 14.5 14.6. 14.5. Use the Chain Rule to find dz where z cosx + 4y), x 5t 4, y 1 t. dz dx + dy y sinx + 4y)0t + 4) sinx + 4y) 1t ) 0t + 4t ) sinx

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Parametrized Surfaces

Parametrized Surfaces Parametrized Surfaces Recall from our unit on vector-valued functions at the beginning of the semester that an R 3 -valued function c(t) in one parameter is a mapping of the form c : I R 3 where I is some

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation

D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation MATH 467 Partial Differential Equations J. Robert Buchanan Department of Mathematics Fall 2018 Objectives In this lesson we will learn: a change of variable technique

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit

Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ting Zhang Stanford May 11, 2001 Stanford, 5/11/2001 1 Outline Ordinal Classification Ordinal Addition Ordinal Multiplication Ordinal

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations

Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations 99 Section 8. Trigonometric Equations Objective 1: Solve Equations Involving One Trigonometric Function. In this section and the next, we will exple how to solving equations involving trigonometric functions.

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation

A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 67, 3301-3307 A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Equivalence Relation D. K. Basnet Dept. of Mathematics, Assam University Silchar-788011, Assam, India dkbasnet@rediffmail.com

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

1 Lorentz transformation of the Maxwell equations

1 Lorentz transformation of the Maxwell equations 1 Lorentz transformation of the Maxwell equations 1.1 The transformations of the fields Now that we have written the Maxwell equations in covariant form, we know exactly how they transform under Lorentz

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Symmetry. March 31, 2013

Symmetry. March 31, 2013 Symmetry March 3, 203 The Lie Derivative With or without the covariant derivative, which requires a connection on all of spacetime, there is another sort of derivation called the Lie derivative, which

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Micro-Note on solving super p=2 form A MN

Micro-Note on solving super p=2 form A MN Micro-Note on solving super p=2 form A MN Sunny Guha April 10, 2016 1 Introduction Superforms are extended versions of differential forms which include superspace coordinates. For example a one-form superform

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

General 2 2 PT -Symmetric Matrices and Jordan Blocks 1

General 2 2 PT -Symmetric Matrices and Jordan Blocks 1 General 2 2 PT -Symmetric Matrices and Jordan Blocks 1 Qing-hai Wang National University of Singapore Quantum Physics with Non-Hermitian Operators Max-Planck-Institut für Physik komplexer Systeme Dresden,

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

PARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities

PARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities PARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities tanθ = sinθ cosθ cotθ = cosθ sinθ BASIC IDENTITIES cscθ = 1 sinθ secθ = 1 cosθ cotθ = 1 tanθ PYTHAGOREAN IDENTITIES sin θ + cos θ =1 tan θ +1= sec θ 1 + cot

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

SOLVING CUBICS AND QUARTICS BY RADICALS

SOLVING CUBICS AND QUARTICS BY RADICALS SOLVING CUBICS AND QUARTICS BY RADICALS The purpose of this handout is to record the classical formulas expressing the roots of degree three and degree four polynomials in terms of radicals. We begin with

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Strain gauge and rosettes

Strain gauge and rosettes Strain gauge and rosettes Introduction A strain gauge is a device which is used to measure strain (deformation) on an object subjected to forces. Strain can be measured using various types of devices classified

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

( y) Partial Differential Equations

( y) Partial Differential Equations Partial Dierential Equations Linear P.D.Es. contains no owers roducts o the deendent variables / an o its derivatives can occasionall be solved. Consider eamle ( ) a (sometimes written as a ) we can integrate

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Shirsendu Mukherjee Department of Statistics, Asutosh College, Kolkata, India. shirsendu st@yahoo.co.in So far we have treated the testing of one-sided

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume

On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume BULETINUL ACADEMIEI DE ŞTIINŢE A REPUBLICII MOLDOVA. MATEMATICA Numbers 2(72) 3(73), 2013, Pages 80 89 ISSN 1024 7696 On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume I.S.Gutsul Abstract. In

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Fourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics

Fourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics Fourier Series MATH 211, Calculus II J. Robert Buchanan Department of Mathematics Spring 2018 Introduction Not all functions can be represented by Taylor series. f (k) (c) A Taylor series f (x) = (x c)

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in

Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in : tail in X, head in A nowhere-zero Γ-flow is a Γ-circulation such that

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

(dx i ) 2. i=1. i=1. ds 2 = ds 2 (1.2.1)

(dx i ) 2. i=1. i=1. ds 2 = ds 2 (1.2.1) 1.2 REVIEW OF SPECIAL RELATIVITY Einstein s theory of special relativity requires every physical law to be the same in all inertial systems (the form of the law is covariant) and that the speed of light

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

DERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION FOR AN APPLIED FORCE Revision C

DERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION FOR AN APPLIED FORCE Revision C DERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION FOR AN APPLIED FORCE Revision C By Tom Irvine Email: tomirvine@aol.com August 6, 8 Introduction The obective is to derive a Miles equation which gives the overall response

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Exercises 10. Find a fundamental matrix of the given system of equations. Also find the fundamental matrix Φ(t) satisfying Φ(0) = I. 1.

Exercises 10. Find a fundamental matrix of the given system of equations. Also find the fundamental matrix Φ(t) satisfying Φ(0) = I. 1. Exercises 0 More exercises are available in Elementary Differential Equations. If you have a problem to solve any of them, feel free to come to office hour. Problem Find a fundamental matrix of the given

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

MA 342N Assignment 1 Due 24 February 2016

MA 342N Assignment 1 Due 24 February 2016 M 342N ssignment Due 24 February 206 Id: 342N-s206-.m4,v. 206/02/5 2:25:36 john Exp john. Suppose that q, in addition to satisfying the assumptions from lecture, is an even function. Prove that η(λ = 0,

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics

Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics Nov 1, 01 In this lecture we examine root systems from an axiomatic point of view. 1 Reflections If v R n, then it determines a hyperplane, denoted P v, through the

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

dim(u) = n 1 and {v j } j i

dim(u) = n 1 and {v j } j i SOLUTIONS Math B4900 Homework 1 2/7/2018 Unless otherwise specified, U, V, and W denote vector spaces over a common field F ; ϕ and ψ denote linear transformations; A, B, and C denote bases; A, B, and

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

ψ ( 1,2,...N ) = Aϕ ˆ σ j σ i χ j ψ ( 1,2,!N ) ψ ( 1,2,!N ) = 1 General Equations

ψ ( 1,2,...N ) = Aϕ ˆ σ j σ i χ j ψ ( 1,2,!N ) ψ ( 1,2,!N ) = 1 General Equations General Equations Our goal is to construct the best single determinant wave function for a system of electrons. By best we mean the determinant having the lowest energy. We write our trial function as

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

2. THEORY OF EQUATIONS. PREVIOUS EAMCET Bits.

2. THEORY OF EQUATIONS. PREVIOUS EAMCET Bits. EAMCET-. THEORY OF EQUATIONS PREVIOUS EAMCET Bits. Each of the roots of the equation x 6x + 6x 5= are increased by k so that the new transformed equation does not contain term. Then k =... - 4. - Sol.

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Second Order RLC Filters

Second Order RLC Filters ECEN 60 Circuits/Electronics Spring 007-0-07 P. Mathys Second Order RLC Filters RLC Lowpass Filter A passive RLC lowpass filter (LPF) circuit is shown in the following schematic. R L C v O (t) Using phasor

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Dirac Matrices and Lorentz Spinors

Dirac Matrices and Lorentz Spinors Dirac Matrices and Lorentz Spinors Background: In 3D, the spinor j = 2 1 representation of the Spin3) rotation group is constructed from the Pauli matrices σ x, σ y, and σ z, which obey both commutation

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

On the Galois Group of Linear Difference-Differential Equations

On the Galois Group of Linear Difference-Differential Equations On the Galois Group of Linear Difference-Differential Equations Ruyong Feng KLMM, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China Ruyong Feng (KLMM, CAS) Galois Group 1 / 19 Contents 1 Basic Notations and Concepts

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Appendix to On the stability of a compressible axisymmetric rotating flow in a pipe. By Z. Rusak & J. H. Lee

Appendix to On the stability of a compressible axisymmetric rotating flow in a pipe. By Z. Rusak & J. H. Lee Appendi to On the stability of a compressible aisymmetric rotating flow in a pipe By Z. Rusak & J. H. Lee Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 5 4, pp. 5 4 This material has not been copy-edited or typeset

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

SCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018

SCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018 Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics(JRM) ISSN: 2395-028 SCITECH Volume 3, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION ublished online: March 29, 208 Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics www.scitecresearch.com/journals

Διαβάστε περισσότερα