CHAPTER 3 Application of Differential Subordination, Ruscheweyh Derivative and Linear Operator for Analytic and Meromorphic Functions
|
|
- Ἠώς Αντωνιάδης
- 5 χρόνια πριν
- Προβολές:
Transcript
1 CHAPTER 3 Application of Differential Subordination, Ruscheweyh Derivative and Linear Operator for Analytic and Meromorphic Functions Introduction This Chapter is mainly concerned with the study of application of differential subordination, linear operator and Ruscheweyh derivative to analytic and meromorphic functions. The study of differential subordination in the complex plane C is the generalization of a differential inequality on the real line. The concept of differential subordination plays a very important role in functions of real or complex variable. This concept is also used in finding the information about the range of original function. In the theory of complex-valued function, there are several differential applications in which a characterization of a function is determined from a differential condition. Miller and Mocanu [16] have contributed number of papers on differential subordination. The study of differential subordination stems out from text books by Duren [7], Goodman [9] and Pommerenke [22]. Firstly, we have studied the application of linear operator on meromorphically univalent functions involving differential subordination, by making use of the Briot-Bouquet differential subordination, we study several inclusion relationships and other interesting properties and characteristics of the 121
2 subclasses of meromorphically univalent functions in the punctured unit disk U = {z C :0< z < 1} = U \{0} which are defined here by a linear operator. We have also obtained here result about the convolution properties for functions belonging to the class Σ λ,k m (A, B). Such type of study was carried out by several authors e.g. Patel and Sahoo [20], Srivastava and Patel [27], Miller and Mocanu [15]. Secondly, we have studied the application of subordination and Ruscheweyh derivative for p-valent functions with negative coefficients having Taylor series of the form: f(z) =z p a k z k, (a k 0,p IN), which are analytic in the unit disk U and satisfying: z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) D λ+p 1 f(z) p +(pb +(A B)(p α))z, z U, 1+Bz where 1 B<A 1, 0 α<p,λ> p. We have investigated the properties of the class A p (A, B, α, λ) ofp-valent functions with negative coefficients defined by Ruscheweyh derivative and subordination. We obtain coefficient bounds, convolution properties for the class A p (A, B, α, λ) under the assumption 1 B<0. We also obtain the class preserving operator of the form: G c (z) = c + p z c z 0 s c 1 f(s)ds, c > p for the class A p (A, B, α, λ). Such type of study was carried out by various authors e.g. Aouf [4] has studied Ruscheweyh derivative and subordination for analytic univalent functions. Obradović and Owa [18] have also contributed in the same field stated above. Patel and Rout [19] have also tackled application of differential subordination. 122
3 Joshi and Srivastava [10] have studied p-valent meromorphic functions by making use of Ruscheweyh derivative and subordination. Motivated by these researcherswehaveobtainedniceresults. Thirdly, we have discussed the application of differential subordination for certain subclass of meromorphically functions with positive coefficients defined by linear operator having Taylor series of the form: f(z) =z p + a k z k (for any m p, p IN, a k 0), which are analytic and p-valent in the punctured unit disk U and satisfying the condition: zp+1 (L n f(z)) p 1+Az 1+Bz, (n IN 0). We obtain the coefficient bounds, δ-neighbourhood and integral representation.also we have obtained convex combination, arithmetic mean and convolution properties. 3.1 Application of Linear Operator on Meromorphically Univalent Functions Involving Differential Subordination For any integer m > 1, let Σ m denote the class of all meromorphic functions f(z) normalized by f(z) = 1 z + a n z n, (3.1) which are analytic and univalent in the punctured unit disk U. Let Σ s m and Σc m denote the subclasses of Σ m defined respectively as follows: n=m 123
4 A function f of the form (3.1) is in the class Σ s m if and only if { } Re zf (z) > 0 (z U = {z C : z < 1}). f(z) A function f of the form (3.1) is in the class Σ c m if and only if { ( )} Re 1+ zf (z) > 0, (z U). f (z) The class Σ s 0 and similar other classes have been extensively studied by Clunie [6], Pommerenke [21], Royster [23] and others. For functions f(z) Σ m given by (3.1), and g(z) Σ m defined by g(z) = 1 z + b n z n (m> 1). (3.2) n=m We define the Hadamard product (or convolution) of f(z) andg(z) by (f g)(z) = 1 z + a n b n z n =(g f)(z) (m> 1,z U). (3.3) n=m Following the recent work of Liu and Srivastava [13], for a function f(z) in the class Σ m given by (3.1), the linear operator denoted by L k is defined as follows: L 0 f(z) =f(z), L 1 f(z) = 1 z + (n +2)a n z n = (z2 f(z)), z n=m and (in general) L k f(z) =L(L k 1 f(z)) = 1 z + (n +2) k a n z n = (z2 L k 1 f(z)) n=m z (k IN). (3.4) It is easily verified from (3.4) that z(l k f(z)) = L k+1 f(z) 2L k f(z) (f Σ m ; k IN 0 = IN {0}). (3.5) 124
5 The case m = 0 of the linear operator L k was considered earlier by Uralegaddi and Somanatha [28]. Making use of the principle of differential subordination as well as the linear operator L k, we introduce a subclass of the function class Σ m as follows: For a function f Σ m,wesaythatf is in the class Σ λ,k m (A, B) if and only if satisfies z2 ((L k f(z)) + λz(l k f(z)) ) 1 2λ 1+Az 1+Bz (z U), (3.6) where 0 λ< 1 2, 1 B < A 1,k IN 0 = IN {0},m > 1. For convenience, we write Σ λ,k m (1 2α, 1) = Σλ,k m (α), where Σ λ,k m (α) denotes the class of functions in Σ m satisfying the following inequality: Re{ z 2 ((L k f(z)) + λz(l k f(z)) )} > (1 2λ)α (0 λ< 1 2, 0 α<1,k IN 0,z U). We write Σ 0,0 0 (α) = Σ(α) (0 α<1). It is known [17] functions in Σ(α) are meromorphically univalent in U.Ifλ = 0, then the class Σ λ,k m (α) reduces to the class Σ k m (α) contains the functions in Σ m satisfying Re{ z 2 (L k f(z)) } >α. If m = 0 and k = 0, then the class Σ λ,k m (A, B) reduces to the class Σ λ (A, B), studied by Patel and Sahoo [20]. Theorem :Let0<λ< 1 2 then z 2 (L k f(z)) Q(z) 1+Az 1+Bz and 1 B<A 1. If f Σλ,k m (A, B), 125 (z U), (3.7)
6 where the function Q(z) is given by Q(z) = { A B +(1 A B )(1 + Bz) 1 2F 1 ( 1, 1; 1 λ+mλ λ(1+m) ; Bz 1+Bz ), B 0 1+ (1 2λ)A λ(1+m)+1 z B =0, and Q(z) is the best dominant of (3.7) and 2 F 1 is the Gaussian hypergeometric function given by the Definition Furthermore, Σ λ,k m (A, B) Σλ,k m (σ(λ, A, B)), (3.8) where σ(λ, A, B) = { A The result is the best possible. ( ) +(1 A )(1 B B B) 1 2F 1 1, 1; 1 λ+mλ ; B, B 0 λ(1+m) B λ A, B =0,. λ(1+m)+1 Proof : Let the function φ(z) defined by φ(z) = z 2 (L k f(z)) (z U). (3.9) Then φ(z) is of the form (0.15) and is analytic in U. Differentiating (3.9), we get φ(z)+ λzφ (z) 1 2λ = ((L k f(z)) + λz(l k f(z)) ) z2 1+Az 1 2λ 1+Bz (z U). By using Lemma (0.2.2) for γ = 1 2λ, we deduce that λ z 2 (L k f(z)) Q(z) = 1 2λ 1 2λ z { λ(1+m)} z λ(1 + m) = ( ) 1+At dt 1+Bt t { λ(1+m)} 1 1 2λ 0 { ( A +(1 A)(1 + B B Bz) 1 2F 1 1, 1; 1 λ+mλ; Bz λ(1+m) 1+Bz 1+ (1 2λ)A λ(1+m)+1 ), (B 0) z, (B =0), 126
7 by change of variables followed by the use of the identities (0.18), (0.19) and (0.20) (with b =1andc = a + 1). This proves the assertion (3.7) of Theorem Next, to prove (3.8), it suffices to show that inf {Re(Q(z))} = Q( 1). (3.10) z <1 We have for z r<1, { } 1+Az Re 1+Bz 1 Ar 1 Br ( z r<1). Setting G(s, z) = 1+Asz 1+Bsz and dµ(s) = 1 2λ λ(1 + m) s 1 3λ λm λ(1+m) ds, 0 s 1, which is a positive measure on the closed interval [0, 1], we get Q(z) = 1 0 G(s, z)dµ(s), so that Re{Q(z)} Letting r ( ) 1 Asr dµ(s) =Q( r) 1 Bsr ( z r<1). in the above inequality, we obtain the assertion (3.8) of Theorem Finally, the result in (3.8) is best possible as the function Q(z) is the best dominant of (3.7). Corollary : For 0 λ 2 <λ 1 < 1, 1 B<A 1,m > 1 and 2 k IN 0,wehave Proof :Letf Σ λ 1,k m m (A, B) Σλ 2,k m (A, B). Σ λ 1,k (A, B). Then by Theorem 3.1.1, f Σ0,k(A, B). Since z2 {(L k f(z)) + λ 2 z(l k f(z)) } 1 2λ { 2 = 1 λ 2(1 2λ 1 ) λ 1 (1 2λ 2 ) { z2 {(L k f(z)) + λ 1 z(l k f(z)) } 1 2λ 1 } ( z 2 (L k f(z)) )+ λ 2(1 2λ 1 ) λ 1 (1 2λ 2 ) } Az 1+Bz, m
8 we see that f Σ λ 2,k m (A, B). Putting A =1 2α (0 α<1) and B = 1 in Theorem 3.1.1, we have Corollary :For0<λ< 1 2,m> 1 andk IN 0,wehave Σ λ,k m (α) Σλ,k m (σ(λ, α)), where { ( σ(λ, α) =α +(1 α) 2F 1 1, 1; 1 λ + mλ λ(1 + m) ; 1 ) } 1. 2 The result is best possible. The above corollaries are new results and not found in the literature. Putting A =1 2α (0 α<1),b = 1,m=0andk =0inTheorem 3.1.1, we have Corollary [20] :For0<λ< 1 2,wehave Σ λ (α) Σ λ (σ(λ, α)), where { σ(λ, α) =α +(1 α) 2F 1 (1, 1; 1 λ λ ; 1 } 2 ) 1. The result is the best possible. If m =0andk =0,weget Corollary [20] :For0 λ 2 <λ 1 < 1, 1 B<A 1, we have 2 Σ λ 1 (A, B) Σ λ 2 (A, B). Letting m =0andk = 0 in Theorem 3.1.1, we have Corollary [20] : Let 0 <λ< 1 2 and 1 B < A 1. If f Σ λ (A, B), then z 2 f (z) Q(z) 1+Az 1+Bz 128 (z U), ( )
9 where the function Q(z) given by Q(z) = { A +(1 A)(1 + B B Bz) 1 2F 1 (1, 1; 1 λ; Bz λ 1+Bz B 0 1+ (1 2λ)A 1+λ B =0, and Q(z) is the best dominant of ( ). Furthermore, Σ λ (A, B) Σ λ (σ(λ, A, B)), where σ(λ, A, B) = The result is best possible. Theorem :Letf Σ k m R = The result is best possible. { A +(1 A)(1 B B B) 1 2F 1 (1, 1; 1 λ; B ), B 0 λ B λ A B =0,. 1+λ (α). Then f Σλ,k m (α) in z <R,where ( λ2 (1 + m) 2 +(1 2λ) 2 λ(1 + m) 1 2λ Proof :Sincef Σ k m(α), we can write ) 1 1+m. z 2 (L k f(z)) = α +(1 α)u(z), (3.11) where u(z) is of the form (0.15), is analytic and has a positive real part in U. Differentiating (3.11) followed by a simple calculation, it follows that { } { Re z2 ((L k f(z)) + λz(l k f(z)) )+α = Re u(z)+ λ } (1 2λ)(1 α) 1 2λ zu (z). (3.12) Now, using the well-known estimate [14] zu (z) Re{u(z)} 2(1 + m)rm+1 1 r 2(m+1) ( z = r<1) (3.13) 129
10 in (3.13), deduce that { } { Re z2 ((L k f(z)) + λz(l k f(z)) )+α Re{u(z)} 1 (1 2λ)(1 α) 2λ(1 + m)r m+1 (1 2λ)(1 r 2(m+1) ) (3.14) It is easily seen that the right-hand side of (3.14) is positive, when z <R for R given as in Theorem Hence f Σ λ,k m (α) for z <R. To show that the bound R is best possible, we consider the function f Σ m defined by z 2 (L k f(z)) = α +(1 α) 1+zm+1 1 z m+1 (0 α<1, z U). Noting that }. z2 ((L k f(z)) + λz(l k f(z)) )+α (1 2λ)(1 α) = (1 2λ)(1 z2(m+1) )+2λ(m +1)z m+1 (1 2λ)(1 z) 2(m+1) =0 for z = R exp ( iπ 1+m), we complete the proof of Theorem Putting m =0andk = 0 in Theorem 3.1.2, we get Corollary [20] :Iff Σ(α), then f Σ λ (α) in z <R,where R = λ2 +(1 2λ) 2 λ. 1 2λ The result is best possible. Theorem : Let f Σ λ,k m (A, B), (0 λ< 1 2 ). Then the function F δ defined by satisfies F δ (f)(z) = δ z t δ f(t)dt (δ >0; z U ), (3.15) z δ+1 0 z2 ((L k F δ (f)(z)) + λz(l k F δ (f)(z)) ) 1 2λ 130 Θ(z) 1+Az 1+Bz (z U), (3.16)
11 where the function Θ(z) is given by Θ(z) = { A B +(1 A B )(1 + Bz) 1 2F 1 (1, 1; δ m+1 +1; Bz Bz+1 1+ Aδ δ+m+1 ) (B 0) z (B =0) and Θ(z) is the best dominant of (3.16). Furthermore, where σ(δ, A, B) = F δ Σ λ,k m (σ(δ, A, B)), (3.17) { A +(1 A)(1 B B B) 1 δ 2F 1 (1, 1; +1; B ) (B 0) m+1 B 1 1 Aδ (B =0). δ+m+1 The result is the best possible. Proof :Let φ(z) = z2 ((L k F δ (f)(z)) + λz(l k F δ (f)(z)) ) 1 2λ (z U). (3.18) We note that φ(z) is of the form (0.15) and is analytic in U with φ(0) = 1. Using the following operator identity: z((l k F δ (f)(z)) )=δl k f(z) (δ +1)L k F δ (f)(z) (3.19) in (3.18), and differentiating the resulting equation with respect to z, we find that φ(z)+ zφ (z) δ = z2 ((L k f(z)) + λz(l k f(z)) ) 1 2λ 1+Az 1+Bz, (z U), which with the aid of Lemma for γ = δ, yields φ(z) Θ(z) = δ m +1 z z δ m+1 0 ( ) 1+At m+1 1 dt. 1+Bt The assertions (3.16) and (3.17) can now be deduced on the same lines that t δ proved in Theorem This completes the proof of Theorem
12 Letting λ =0,A =1 2α (0 α<1) and B = 1 in Theorem 3.1.3, we get Corollary :Iff Σ k m (α), then the function F δ defined by (3.15) is in the class Σ k m(η(δ, α)), where { ) } δ η(δ, α) =α +(1 α) 2F 1 (1, 1; m +1 +1; The result is best possible. The above corollary is new result and not found in the literature. Letting λ =0,A =1 2α (0 α<1),b = 1,m =0andk =0in Theorem 3.1.3, we get Corollary [20] :Iff Σ(α), then the function F δ defined by (3.15) is in the class Σ(η(δ, α)), where { η(δ, α) =α +(1 α) The result is best possible. ( 2F 1 1, 1; δ +1; 1 ) } 1. 2 Theorem :LetF δ Σ λ,k m (α). Then the function f, given by (3.15) is in the class Σ λ,k m (α) for z < R, where δ2 +(m +1) R = 2 (m +1). δ The result is best possible. Proof :SinceF δ Σ λ,k m (α), we have z2 ((L k F δ (f)(z)) + λz(l k F δ (f)(z)) ) 1 2λ = α +(1 α)u(z), (3.20) where u(z) is analytic,u(0) = 0, and Re{u(z)} > 0 in U. Using (3.19) in (3.20) and differentiating the resulting equation, we obtain { } Re z2 ((L k f(z)) + λz(l k f(z)) )+α = Re (1 2λ)(1 α) 132 { u(z)+ zu (z) δ }. (3.21)
13 By using (3.13) in (3.21) and proceeding as in Theorem 3.1.2, we get the assertion of Theorem The bound R can be seen to be sharp by taking f Σ m defined by (3.15) and z2 ((L k F δ (f)(z)) + λz(l k F δ (f)(z)) ) 1 2λ = α +(1 α) 1+zm+1 1 z m+1 (z U). (3.22) Letting m =0andk = 0 in Theorem 3.1.4, we have Corollary [20] : If F δ (f)(z) Σ λ (α), then the function f, givenby (3.15) is in the class Σ λ (α) for z < R, where R = δ δ The result is best possible. Theorem :Letf Σ λ,k m (A, B) andletg(z) Σ m satisfy the following inequality: Re(zg(z)) > 1 2 (z U). Then the function (f g)(z) Σ λ,k m (A, B). Proof :Wecanwrite z2 ((L k (f g)(z)) + λz(l k (f g)(z)) ) 1 2λ = z2 ((L k f(z)) + λz(l k f(z)) ) zg(z) 1 2λ (3.23) since Re(zg(z)) > 1 2 in U, and {z2 ((L k f(z)) + λz(l k f(z)) )}/(1 2λ) is subordinate to the convex (univalent) function (1 + Az)/(1 + Bz), it follows from (3.23) and Lemma that z2 ((L k (f g)(z)) + λz(l k (f g)(z)) ) 1 2λ Az 1+Bz (z U).
14 This proves the theorem. 3.2 Application of Subordination and Ruscheweyh Derivative for p-valent Functions with Negative Coefficients Let T (p) denote the subclass of A(p) consisting of functions f of the form: f(z) =z p a k z k, (a k 0,p IN), (3.24) which are analytic and p-valent in the unit disk U. Definition :Letf(z) T (p) is said to be a member of the D(δ, β, λ, p) if f(z) satisfies the inequality { } z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) Re >δ z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) D λ+p 1 f(z) D λ+p 1 f(z) p + β, (3.25) where 0 β<p,δ 0,λ > p, p IN, z U and the operator D λ+p 1 denotes Ruscheweyh derivative operator [24], satisfying the condition D λ+p 1 f(z) = and if f(z) be defined by (3.24), then D λ+p 1 f(z) =z p z p f(z) (1 z) p+λ Γ(λ + k) Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a kz k. The family D(δ, β, λ, p) is of special interest to us for it contains many wellknown as well as classes of analytic functions. In particular, for δ =0,p=1 and 0 λ 1 it provides a transition from starlike functions to convex functions. More specifically, D(0, β,0, 1) is the family of functions starlike of order β and D(0,β,1, 1) is the family of functions convex of order β. For 134
15 D(δ, 0, 0, 1) we obtain the class of uniformly δ-starlike functions introduced by Kanas and Wiśniowska [11] which can begeneralized to D(δ, β, 0, 1), the class of uniformly δ-starlike functions of order β. Generally speaking, D(δ, β, λ, p), consists of functions G(z) =D λ+p 1 f(z) which are uniformly δ-starlike of order β in U. Definition :LetM(A, B, α, p) consist of all analytic functions h in U for which h(0) = p and h(z) p +[pb +(A B)(p α)]z, 1+Bz where 1 B<A 1, 0 <A 1, 0 α<p. Definition : For A, B fixed, 1 B<A 1and0 α<p,let A p (A, B, α, λ) denote the class of functions f D(δ, β, λ, p) of the form (3.24) for which z(dλ+p 1 f(z)) D λ+p 1 f(z) M(A, B, α, p) and z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) D λ+p 1 f(z) p +(pb +(A B)(p α))z, z U (3.26) 1+Bz where denotes subordination. From the Definition, it follows that f(z) A p (A, B, α, λ) ifandonly if there exists a function w(z) analyticinu and satisfying w(0) = 0 and w(z) < 1forz U, such that z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) D λ+p 1 f(z) = p +[pb +(A B)(p α)]w(z), z U. (3.27) 1+Bw(z) This condition (3.27) is equivalent to z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) p D λ+p 1 f(z) pb +(A B)(p α) B z(dλ+p 1 f(z)) < 1,z U. (3.28) D λ+p 1 f(z) 135
16 When λ =1 p, then the class A p (A, B, α, λ) reduces to the class A p (A, B, α, 1 p) studied in [3]. Lemma [1] :LetA(z) =p + k=p M(A, B, α, p). Then for k p, A k (A B)(p α). A k z k be analytic in U and belong to Lemma [1] :TheclassM(A, B, α, p) is a convex set. Theorem :Letf T(p). Then f is in D(δ, β, λ, p) if and only if Γ(λ + k) [k(1 + δ) (β + δp)] Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a k <p β. (3.29) Proof : Suppose that f D(δ, β, λ, p). Using the fact that for real γ, Re(w) >δ w p + β if and only if Re[w(1 + δe iγ ) pδe iγ ] >βand letting w = z(dλ+p 1 f(z)) D λ+p 1 f(z) in (3.25), we obtain { } z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) Re (1 + δe iγ ) pδe iγ >β, D λ+p 1 f(z) which is equivalent to (p β) Γ(λ+k) (k β) Γ(λ+p)(k p)! a kz k p δe iγ Γ(λ+k) (k p) Γ(λ+p)(k p)! a kz k p Re 1 > 0. Γ(λ+k) Γ(λ+p)(k p)! a kz k p The above inequality must hold for all z in U. Letting z 1 yields (p β) Γ(λ+k) (k β) a Γ(λ+p)(k p)! k δe iγ Γ(λ+k) (k p) Re 1 Γ(λ+k) Γ(λ+p)(k p)! a k and so by the mean value theorem, we have Γ(λ + k) Re (p β) (k β) Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a k δe iγ Γ(λ+p)(k p)! a k > 0 Γ(λ + k) (k p) Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a k > 0. Therefore, we obtain Γ(λ + k) [k(1 + δ) (β + δp)] Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a k <p β. 136
17 Conversely, let (3.29) hold. We will show that (3.25) is satisfied and so f D(δ, β, λ, p). Using the fact that Re(w) >δif and only if w (p + δ) < w +(p δ), it is sufficient to show that ( ) z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) p + δ z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) D λ+p 1 f(z) p D λ+p 1 f(z) + β ( ) < z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) + p δ z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) D λ+p 1 f(z) p D λ+p 1 f(z) β. For letting e iθ = Dλ+p 1 f(z) D λ+p 1 f(z) E = ( ) z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) + p δ z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) D λ+p 1 f(z) p D λ+p 1 f(z) β = 1 D λ+p 1 f(z) z(dλ+p 1 f(z)) +(p β)d λ+p 1 f(z) δe iθ z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) pd λ+p 1 f(z) > z p D λ+p 1 f(z) [ (2p β) ] Γ(λ + k) (k + p β + δ(k p)) Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a k and F = = ( ) z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) p + δ z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) D λ+p 1 f(z) p D λ+p 1 f(z) + β 1 D λ+p 1 f(z) z(dλ+p 1 f(z)) (p + β)d λ+p 1 f(z) δe iθ z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) pd λ+p 1 f(z) < z p D λ+p 1 f(z) [ β + ] Γ(λ + k) (k p β + δ(k p)) Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a k. It is easy to verify that E F >0 if (3.29) holds and so the proof is complete. Remark :Letf D(δ, β, λ, p). Then a k < (p β)γ(k + p)(k p)!, k = p +1,p+2,. [k(1 + δ) (β + δp)]γ(λ + k) 137
18 Remark : Theorem for the special cases D(0, β,0, 1) and D(0, β,1, 1) leads to results obtained by Silverman [26]. Remark :Since D(δ, β, λ 1,p) D(δ, β, λ 2,p). Γ(λ 2 +k) Γ(λ 2 +p)(k p)! < Γ(λ 1+k) Γ(λ 1 +p)(k p)! for λ 2 <λ 1,wenotethat Now, we state a necessary and sufficient coefficient inequality. Theorem :Letf(z) =z p a k z k,a k 0, be analytic in U. Then f A p (A, B, α, λ) if and only if Γ(λ + k) [(k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α)] Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a k (A B)(p α). The result is sharp. Proof :Let z =1. Then z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) pd λ+p 1 f(z) (3.30) [pb +(A B)(p α)]d λ+p 1 f(z) Bz(D λ+p 1 f(z)) = Γ(λ + k) (k p) Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a kz k (A B)(p Γ(λ + k) α)zp [(A B)(p α) B(k p)] Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a kz k Γ(λ + k) [(k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α)] Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a k (A B)(p α) 0 by (3.30). Hence by the principle of maximum modulus f(z) A p (A, B, α, λ). To prove the converse, let us assume that f(z) =z p A p (A, B, α, λ). Then z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) D λ+p 1 f(z) p pb +(A B)(p α) B z(dλ+p 1 f(z)) D λ+p 1 f(z) 138 a k z k,a k 0isin
19 = (A B)(p α)zp Γ(λ+k) (k p) a Γ(λ+p)(k p)! kz k Γ(λ+k) [(A B)(p α) (k p)b] a Γ(λ+p)(k p)! kz k < 1 for all z U. Using the fact that Re(z) z for all z, it follows that Γ(λ+k) (k p) Γ(λ+p)(k p)! a kz k p Re (A B)(p α) < 1,z U. Γ(λ+k) [(A B)(p α) (k p)b] Γ(λ+p)(k p)! a kz k p (3.31) Now choose the values of z on the real axis so that z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) /D λ+p 1 f(z) is real. Upon clearing the denominator in (3.31) and letting z 1 through positive values, we obtain Γ(λ + k) (k p) Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a k (A B)(p α) which implies that Γ(λ + k) [(A B)(p α) (k p)b] Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a k, Γ(λ + k) [(k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α)] Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a k (A B)(p α). The function f(z) =z p (A B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! ((k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α))γ(λ + k) zk, shows that the inequality (3.30) is sharp. Remark : Let f(z) =z p Then a k z k,a k 0, is in A p (A, B, α, λ). a k (A B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! [(k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α)]γ(λ + k), k p +1,p IN 139
20 with equality for each k, for functions of the form f k (z) =z p (A B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! [(k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α)]γ(λ + k) zk,k p +1,p IN (3.32) 1 B Theorem : D(δ, β, λ, p) =A p (A, B, α, λ) if 1+δ. (A B)(p α) p β Proof : By Definition we have A p (A, B, α, λ) D(δ, β, λ, p). Assume that f be an arbitrary element of D(δ, β, λ, p). Then we have [k(1 + δ) (β + δp)] p β Γ(λ+k) Γ(λ+p)(k p)! a k < 1 by Theorem for showing f A p (A, B, α, λ) it is sufficient to show that (3.30) hold true, but (3.30) holds true, when 1+ which is equivalent to (k p)(1 B) (A B)(p α) 1 B 1+δ (A B)(p α) p β k(1 + δ) (δ + pβ), p β and this completes the proof. Now, if we set δ = λ =0,p=1,thenf D(0,β,0, 1) is starlike of order β and if we put δ = λ 1=0,p=1,thenf D(0,β,1, 1) is convex of order β, therefore we have the following corollary. Corollary :Let 1 B (A B)(p α) 1, p =1 (3.33) p β (1) Let λ =0. Thenf is starlike of order β if and only if zf (z) f(z) 1+[B +(A B)(1 α)]z. 1+Bz (2) Let λ =1. Thenf is convex of order β if and only if 1+ zf (z) f (z) 1+[B +(A B)(1 α)]z. 1+Bz 140
21 Theorem :Let0 α 2 <α 1 <p.thena p (A, B, α 1,λ) A p (A, B, α 2,λ). Proof :Letf A p (A, B, α 1,λ). Then [(k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α 1 )]Γ(λ + k) a k 1, (A B)(p α 1 )Γ(λ + p)(k p)! we must prove [(k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α 2 )]Γ(λ + k) a k 1. (3.34) (A B)(p α 2 )Γ(λ + p)(k p)! But (3.34) holds true if (k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α 2 ) (A B)(p α 2 ) (k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α 1). (A B)(p α 1 ) Then by hypothesis the preceding inequality definitely holds true. Theorem :Letf A p (A, B, α, λ). Then the function (λ + p) Dλ+p f(z) λ is in M(A, B, α, p). D λ+p 1 f(z) Proof : By the easily verified identity z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) =(λ + p)d λ+p f(z) λd λ+p 1 f(z), we have z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) D λ+p 1 f(z) and since f A p (A, B, α, λ), then =(λ + p) Dλ+p f(z) D λ+p 1 f(z) λ (λ + p) Dλ+p f(z) λ M(A, B, α, p). D λ+p 1 f(z) Remark :Iff A p (A, B, α, λ), then by Lemma for every t (0 <t<1), we have (1 t) z(dλ+p 1 f(z)) D λ+p 1 f(z) [ ] + t (λ + p) Dλ+p f(z) D λ+p 1 f(z) λ M(A, B, α, p). 141
22 Theorem :Letf A p (A, B, α, λ). Then D λ+p 1 f(z)isina p (A, B, α, λ 1 ) if p <λ 1 0. Proof :Sincef A p (A, B, α, λ), then [(1 B)(k p)+(a B)(p α)]γ(λ + k) a k 1 (3.35) (A B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! also we have L(z) =D λ+p 1 f(z) =z p Γ(λ + k) Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a kz k. We must show that z(dλ 1 +p 1 L(z)) M(A, B, α, p), equivalently, we must D λ 1 +p 1 L(z) show that z(d λ1+p 1 L(z)) pd λ1+p 1 L(z) y(d λ 1+p 1 L(z)) Bz(D λ 1+p 1 L(z)) < 1, (3.36) where y = pb +(A B)(p α), therefore, we have z(d λ1+p 1 L(z)) pd λ1+p 1 L(z) y(d λ 1+p 1 L(z)) Bz(D λ 1+p 1 L(z)) (k p) Γ(λ 1+k)Γ(λ+k)a k z k 1 Γ(λ 1 +p)γ(λ+p)[(k p)!] 2 = (y pb) (y kb) Γ(λ 1+k)Γ(λ+k)a k z k 1 Γ(λ 1 +p)γ(λ+p)[(k p)!] 2 (A B)(p α) so with respect to (3.35) if (k p) Γ(λ 1 +k)γ(λ+k) Γ(λ 1 a +p)γ(λ+p)[(k p)!] 2 k (B(p k)+(a B)(p α)) Γ(λ 1 +k) Γ(λ 1 +p)(k p)!, Γ(λ 1 +k)γ(λ+k)a k Γ(λ 1 +p)γ(λ+p)[(k p)!] 2 p, then (3.36) holds true, but λ 1 + p Γ(λ 1+k) Γ(λ 1 <prequires that λ +p)(k p)! 1 0, therefore (3.36) holds true if p <λ 1 0 and the proof is complete. Theorem :Letf A p (A, B, α, λ). Then the function z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) is in A p (A, B, α, λ 1 ), when λ 1 inf k [ ] 1 Γ(λ + k) 2 Γ(λ + p)(k p)! p. 142
23 Proof :Wehave also we have we want to prove [ ] (1 B)(k p)+(a B)(p α) Γ(λ + k) (A B)(p α) Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a k 1 z(d λ+p 1 f(z)) = z p [ (1 B)(k p)+(a B)(p α) (A B)(p α) Therefore (3.37) holds true if Γ(λ + k)a k k Γ(λ + p)(k p)! zk, ] ka k Γ(λ 1 + k) Γ(λ 1 + p)(k p)! Γ(λ 1 + k) k Γ(λ 1 + p)(k p)! Γ(λ + k) Γ(λ + p)(k p)! Γ(λ+k) 1. (3.37) or equivalently λ 1 1 p, this completes the proof. 2 Γ(λ+p)(k p)! Theorem :Letf(z) isina p (A, B, α, λ). Then the integral operator is in A p (A, B, α, λ). Proof :Letf(z) =z p G c (z) = c + p z c G c (z) = c + p z c = c + p z c = z p z 0 s c 1 f(s)ds, c > p (3.38) a k z k and G c (z) be given by (3.38). Then z 0 z 0 s [s c 1 p ( s p+c 1 ( ) c + p a k z k. c + k a k s k ] ds a k s k+c 1 ) ds 143
24 Since f(z) A p (A, B, α, λ), we have Γ(λ + k) [(1 B)(k p)+(a B)(p α)] Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a k (A B)(p α). Thus ( ) Γ(λ + k) c + p [(1 B)(k p)+(a B)(p α)] a k Γ(λ + p)(k p)! c + k Γ(λ + k) [(1 B)(k p)+(a B)(p α)] Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a k (A B)(p α), which implies that G c (z) A p (A, B, α, λ). This proves the theorem. Theorem : Let c be a real number such that c> p. If G c (z) A p (A, B, α, λ), then the function f(z) defined by (3.38) is p-valently starlike of order δ(0 δ<p)in z <R,where R =inf k (3.32). { } 1 (p δ)(c + p)[(1 B)(k p)+(a B)(p α)]γ(λ + k) k p. (k δ)(c + k)(a B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! The bound for z is sharp for each k with the function being of the form Proof : Let G c (z) =z p Theorem 3.2.2, we have d k z k,d k 0, be in A p (A, B, α, λ). Then by Γ(λ + k) [(1 B)(k p)+(a B)(p α)]d k Γ(λ + p)(k p)! (A B)(p α). (3.39) Also, it follows from (3.38) that f(z) = (zc G c (z)) z 1 c p + c = z p ( ) c + k d k z k. c + p 144
25 In order to obtain the required result it is sufficient to show that zf (z) f(z) p p δ in z <R. (3.40) Now zf (z) f(z) p = (k p)(c+k) d (c+p) k z k p (k p)(c+k) d (c+p) k z k p 1 ( ) c+k d c+p k z k p 1 ( ). c+k d c+p k z k p The last expression will be bounded above by (p δ) if (k δ)(c + k) (p δ)(c + p) d k z k p 1. (3.41) In view of (3.39), it follows that (3.40) is true if (k δ)(c + k) (p δ)(c + p) z k p or if z [(1 B)(k p)+(a B)(p α)]γ(λ + k),k p +1,p IN (A B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! { } 1 (p δ)(c + p)[(1 B)(k p)+(a B)(p α)]γ(λ + k) k p (k δ)(c + k)(a B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! (3.42) for k p +1,p IN. Letting z = R in (3.41), the result follows. This completes the proof of theorem. For two power series f(z) =z p a k z k and g(z) =z p we define the convolution as the power series (f g)(z) =z p b k z k, a k b k z k. Here, we prove some convolution results for functions belonging to the class A p (A, B, α, λ). Theorem :Letf(z) =z p a k z k and g(z) =z p b k z k are in A p (A, B, α, λ) and(k p)(1 B) (A B)(p α) 0, (k p +1). Then F (z) =z p (a 2 k + b2 k )zk is also in A p (A, B, α, λ). 145
26 Proof :Sincef(z) A p (A, B, α, λ), we have so that Similarly Hence Γ(λ + k) [(k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α)] Γ(λ + p)(k p)! a k (A B)(p α), [ ] 2 [(k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α)] 2 a 2 Γ(λ + k) k [(A B)(p α)] 2. Γ(λ + p)(k p)! [ ] 2 [(k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α)] 2 b 2 Γ(λ + k) k [(A B)(p α)] 2. Γ(λ + p)(k p)! 1 2 [ ((k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α))γ(λ + k) (A B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! In view of Theorem 3.2.2, it is sufficient to show that [ ((k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α))γ(λ + k) (A B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! Thus (3.43) will be satisfied if, for k p +1,p IN, ((k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α))γ(λ + k) (A B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! [ ((k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α))γ(λ + k) ] 2 (a 2 k + b 2 k) 1. ] (a 2 k + b2 k ) 1. (3.43) ] (A B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! or if (k p)(1 B) (A B)(p α) 0, (k p +1). (3.44) The left hand side of (3.44) is an increasing function of k, hence (3.44) is satisfied for all k p +1if(1 B) (A B)(p α) 0, which is certainly true by our assumption. Hence the result. 146
27 Theorem :Letf(z) =z p a k z k and g(z) =z p in A p (A, B, α, λ). Then (f g)(z) A p (A, B, α, λ), where { [ ] 2 (1 B)+(A B)(p α) Γ(λ + k) λ 1 inf p} k (A B)(p α) Γ(λ + p)(k p)! Proof : By the hypothesis, we can write [ ] ((k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α))γ(λ + k) a k 1 (A B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! and [ ((k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α))γ(λ + k) (A B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! ] b k 1 and by applying the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality, we have [ ] ((k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α))γ(λ + k) ak b k (A B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! ( [ ] ) 1/2 ((k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α))γ(λ + k) a k (A B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! ( [ ] ) 1/2 ((k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α))γ(λ + k) b k. (A B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! However, we obtain b k z k be. [ ] ((k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α))γ(λ + k) ak b k 1. (3.45) (A B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! Now we want to prove [ ] ((k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α))γ(λ1 + k) a k b k 1. (3.46) (A B)(p α)γ(λ 1 + p)(k p)! Let (3.46) holds true. Then we have [ (k p)(1 B)+(A B)(p α) (A B)(p α) ] ak Γ(λ + k) b k ak b k Γ(λ + p)(k p)! 147 Γ(λ 1+k) Γ(λ 1+p)(k p)! Γ(λ+k) Γ(λ+p)(k p)! 1. (3.47)
28 Therefore (3.47) (consequently (3.46)) holds true if ak b k But from (3.45) we conclude that ak b k Γ(λ+k) Γ(λ+p)(k p)! Γ(λ 1 +k). (3.48) Γ(λ 1 +p)(k p)! (A B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! [(1 B)+(A B)(p α)]γ(λ + k). (3.49) In view of (3.49) the inequality (3.48) holds true if (A B)(p α)γ(λ + p)(k p)! [(1 B)+(A B)(p α)]γ(λ + k) Γ(λ+k) Γ(λ+p)(k p)! Γ(λ 1 +k) Γ(λ 1 +p)(k p)! or equivalently λ 1 + p [ [(1 B)+(A B)(p α)] (A B)(p α) Γ(λ+k) Γ(λ+p)(k p)! ] 2 and this inequality gives the required result. 3.3 Application of Differential Subordination for Certain Subclass of Meromorphically p-valent Functions with Positive Coefficients Defined by Linear Operator Let L(p, m) be a class of all meromorphic functions f(z) oftheform: f(z) =z p + a k z k, (for any m p, p IN,a k 0, k m), (3.50) which are analytic and p-valent in the punctured unit disk U. Following the recent work of Liu and Srivastava [13], we now define a linear operator L n as follows: 148
29 Definition :Letf(z) be a function in the class L(p, m) given by (3.50), we define a linear operator L n by L 0 f(z) =f(z),l 1 f(z) =z p + andingeneral (p + k +1)a k z k = (zp+1 f(z)) z p L n f(z) =L(L n 1 f(z)) = z p + (p+k +1) n a k z k = (zp+1 L n 1 f(z)) z p, (n IN). (3.51) It is easily verified from (3.51) that z(l n f(z)) = L n+1 f(z) (p +1)L n f(z), (f L(p, m), n IN 0 = IN {0}). Definition :LetA and B ( 1 B<A 1,B 0) be fixed parameters, we say that a function f(z) L(p, m) isintheclassl(p, m, n, A, B), if it satisfies the following subordination condition: zp+1 (L n f(z)) p 1+Az 1+Bz (n IN 0; z U). (3.52) By the definition of differential subordination, (3.52) is equivalent to the following condition: z p+1 (L n f(z)) + p Bz p+1 (L n f(z)) + pa < 1, (z U). We can write L(p, m, n, 1 2β, 1) = L(p, m, n, β), where L(p, m, n, β) denotes the class of functions in L(p, m) satisfying the p following: Re{ z p+1 (L n f(z)) } >β (0 β<p; z U). The following theorem gives a sufficient and necessary condition for a function f(z) tobeintheclassl(p, m, n, A, B). 149
30 Theorem : Let the function f(z) of the form (3.50), be in L(p, m). Then the function f(z) isintheclassl(p, m, n, A, B) if and only if k(1 B)(p + k +1) n a k < (A B)p, (3.53) where 1 B<A 1,B 0,p IN,n IN 0,m p. The result is sharp for the function f(z) givenby f(z) =z p + (A B)p k(1 B)(p + k +1) n zk, k m. Proof : Assume that the condition (3.53) is true. We must show that f L(p, m, n, A, B), or equivalently we prove that z p+1 (L n f(z)) + p Bz p+1 (L n f(z)) + Ap < 1, (3.54) we have z p+1 (L n f(z)) + p Bz p+1 (L n f(z)) + Ap = The last inequality is true by (3.53). = z p+1 ( pz (p+1) + k(p + k +1) n a k z k 1 )+p Bz p+1 ( pz (p+1) + k(p + k +1) n a k z k 1 )+Ap k(p + k +1) n a k z k+p (A B)p + B k(p + k +1) n a k z k+p k(p + k +1) n a k (A B)p + B < 1. k(k + p +1) n a k Conversely, suppose that f(z) L(p, m, n, A, B). We must show that the condition (3.53) holds true. We have z p+1 (L n f(z)) + p Bz p+1 (L n f(z)) + Ap < 1, 150
31 hence we have k(p + k +1) n a k z k+p (A B)p + B < 1. k(p + k +1) n a k z k+p Since Re(z) z, sowehave k(p + k +1) n a k z k+p Re (A B)p + B < 1. k(p + k +1) n a k z k+p We choose the values of z on the real axis and letting z 1.Thenwehave k(p + k +1) n a k (A B)p + B < 1, k(p + k +1) n a k then k(1 B)(p + k +1) n a k < (A B)p and the proof is complete. Remark :Letf(z) L(p, m, n, A, B). Then we have a k < (A B)p k(1 B)(p + k +1) n, k m. We also note that if 0 <n 1 n 2,thenL(p, m, n 2,A,B) L(p, m, n 1,A,B). Definition :Let 1 B<A 1,B 0,m p, n IN 0,p IN and δ 0, we define the δ - neighbourhood of a function f L(p, m) by { N δ (f) = g L(p, m) :g(z) =z p + b k z k, } k(1 B)(p + k +1) n and a k b k δ. (A B)p (3.55) Goodman [8], Ruscheweyh [25] and Altintas and Owa [2] have investigated neighbourhood for analytic univalent functions. We consider this concept for the class L(p, m, n, A, B). 151
32 Theorem : Let the function f(z) defined by (3.50) be in L(p, m, n, A, B). For every complex number µ with µ <δ,δ 0, let f(z)+µz p L(p, m, n, A, B). 1+µ Then N δ (f) L(p, m, n, A, B),δ 0. Proof : Since f L(p, m, n, A, B), f satisfies (3.53) we can write for γ C, γ =1,that [ ] z p+1 (L n f(z)) + p γ, (3.56) Bz p+1 (L n f(z)) + pa equivalently, we must have (f Q)(z) z p 0, z U, (3.57) where Q(z) =z p + e k z k, such that e k = γk(1 B)(p+k+1)n (A B)p e k k(1 B)(p+k+1)n and k m, p IN,n IN (A B)p 0. then Since f(z)+µz p Now assume 1 1+µ L(p, m, n, A, B), therefore by (3.57) 1+µ ( ) 1 f(z)+µz p Q(z) 0, z p 1+µ (f Q)(z) z p f Q z p + µ satisfying ( ) 1 (f Q)(z)+µz p 0. (3.58) z p 1+µ <δ. Then by (3.58), we have 1+µ µ 1+µ 1 1+µ that is a contradiction by µ <δ, therefore Let g(z) =z p + b k z k N δ (f). Then (f Q)(z) z p (f Q)(z) z p δ. > µ δ 1+µ 0, δ (g Q)(z) z p ((f g) Q)(z) z p (a k b k )e k z k [ ] k(1 B)(p + k +1) a k b k e k z k < z m n a k b k δ, (A B)p 152
33 therefore (g Q)(z) 0andwegetg(z) L(p, m, n, A, B), z p so N δ (f) L(p, m, n, A, B). Theorem :Letf(z) be defined by (3.50) and the partial sums S 1 (z) and S q (z) be defined by S 1 (z) =z p and Also suppose that S q (z) =z p + m+q 2 C k a k 1, where a k z k, q 2, m p, p IN. C k = k(1 B)(p + k +1)n. (A B)p Then (i) f L(p, m, n, A, B) { } (ii) Re f(z) S q(z) > 1 1 C m+q 1, (3.59) { } Re Sq(z) > C m+q 1 f(z) 1+C m+q 1, z U, q 2. (3.60) Proof : (i) since z p +µz p = z p L(p, m, n, A, B), µ < 1, then by Theorem 3.3.2, we have N 1 (z p ) L(p, m, n, A, B),p IN(N 1 (z p )denoting 1+µ the 1-neighbourhood). Now since C k a k 1, then f N 1 (z p )and f L(p, m, n, A, B). (ii) Since {C k } is an increasing sequence, we obtain Setting m+q 2 a k + C m+q 1 k=q+m 1 a k C k a k 1. (3.61) ( ( f(z) G 1 (z) =C m+q 1 S q (z) 1 1 C m+q 1 )) = C m+q 1 k=q+m 1 1+ m+q 2 a k z k+p a k z k+p
34 From (3.61)we get G 1 (z) 1 G 1 (z)+1 = 2 2 m+q m+q 2 C m+q 1 a k k=q+m 1 a k C m+q 1 C m+q 1 k=q+m 1 a k z k+p + C m+q 1 k=q+m 1 a k 1. a k z k+p k=q+m 1 a k z k+p { } This proves (3.59). Therefore, Re(G 1 (z)) > 0andweobtainRe f(z) S q(z) > 1 1 C m+q 1. Now, by the same way, we can prove the assertion (3.60), with setting ( Sq (z) G 2 (z) =(1+C m+q 1 ) f(z) This completes the proof. C m+q 1 1+C m+q 1 In the next theorem, we obtain the integral representation for L n f(z). Theorem :Letf L(p, m, n, A, B). Then z L n p(aψ(t) 1) f(z) = t p+1 (1 Bψ(t)) dt, where ψ(z) < 1,z U. 0 Proof :Letf(z) L(p, m, n, A, B). Letting zp+1 (L n f(z)) = y(z). Then we p have y(z) 1+Az or we can write y(z) 1 1+Bz By(z) A < 1, consequently we have y(z) 1 By(z) A = ψ(z), ψ(z) < 1, z U. ). So we can write Therefore we have z p+1 (L n f(z)) p (L n f(z)) = = 1 Aψ(z) 1 Bψ(z). p(aψ(z) 1) z p+1 (1 Bψ(z)), 154
35 hence L n f(z) = and this gives the required result. z 0 p(aψ(t) 1) t p+1 (1 Bψ(t)) dt, In this theorem, we find the convex combination for the class L(p, m, n, A, B). Theorem :Let f i (z) =z p + a k,i z k, (a k,i 0,i=1, 2,,l,k m, m p) be in L(p, m, n, A, B). Then F (z) = l c i f i (z) L(p, m, n, A, B), where l c i =1. i=1 Proof : By Theorem 3.3.1, we can write for every i {1, 2,,l} k(1 B)(p + k +1) n a k,i < 1, (A B)p therefore F (z) = But i=1 ) l l c i (z p + a k,i z k = z p + ( c i a k,i )z k. i=1 i=1 k(1 B)(p + k +1) n l ( c i a k,i ) (A B)p i=1 [ l ] k(1 B)(p + k +1) n = a k,i c i < 1, (A B)p i=1 then F (z) L(p, m, n, A, B), so the proof is complete. In the following theorem, we shall prove that the class L(p, m, n, A, B) is closed under arithmetic mean. Theorem :Letf 1 (z),f 2 (z),,f l (z) defined by f i (z) =z p + a k,i z k, (a k,i 0,i=1, 2,,l,k m, m p) (3.62) 155
36 be in the class L(p, m, n, A, B). Then the arithmetic mean of f i (z) (i =1, 2,,l) defined by h(z) = 1 l l f i (z) (3.63) i=1 is also in the class L(p, m, n, A, B). Proof : By (3.62), (3.63) we can write ( ) h(z) = 1 l z p + a k,i z k = z p + l i=1 ( 1 l ) l a k,i z k. Since f i (z) L(p, m, n, A, B) for every i =1, 2,,l,sobyusingTheorem i= , we prove that ( ) k(1 B)(p + k +1) n 1 l a k,i l i=1 ( = 1 l ) k(1 B)(p + k +1) n a k,i < 1 l l i=1 The proof is complete. l (A B)p. i=1 Theorem :Letf(z) andg(z) beintheclassl(p, m, n, A, B) such that f(z) =z p + a k z k, g(z) =z p + b k z k. (3.64) Then T (z) =z p + (a 2 k + b2 k )zk is in the class L(p, m, n, A 1,B 1 ) such that A 1 (1 B 1 )µ 2 + B 1,where µ = 2p(A B) m(m + p +1)n (1 B). Proof :Sincef,g L(p, m, n, A, B) so Theorem yields ([k(1 B)(p + k +1) n /(A B)p]a k ) 2 < 1 156
37 and ([k(1 B)(p + k +1) n /(A B)p]b k ) 2 < 1. We obtain from the last two inequalities 1 2 [k(1 B)(p + k +1)n /(A B)p] 2 (a 2 k + b 2 k) < 1. (3.65) But T (z) L(p, m, n, A 1,B 1 ) if and only if [k(1 B 1 )(p + k +1) n /(A 1 B 1 )p](a 2 k + b2 k ) < 1, (3.66) where 1 B 1 <A 1 1andB 1 0, however, (3.65) implies (3.66) if [k(1 B 1 )(p + k +1) n /(A 1 B 1 )p] 1 2 [k(1 B)(p + k +1)n /(A B)p] 2. Hence if 1 B 1 A 1 B 1 k(p + k +1)n α 2, 2p k m where α = 1 B A B. This is equivalent to A 1 B 1 1 B 1 2p k(p + k +1) n α 2. So we can write A 1 B 1 1 B 1 2p(A B) 2 m(m + p +1) n (1 B) 2 = µ2. (3.67) Hence T (z) L(p, m, n, A 1,B 1 )ifa 1 (1 B 1 )µ 2 + B 1. Theorem :Letf(z) andg(z) of the form (3.64) be in L(p, m, n, A, B). Then convolution (or Hadamard product) of two functions f and g is in the class, that is, (f g)(z) L(p, m, n, A 1,B 1 ), where A 1 (1 B 1 )v + B 1 and v = p(a B) 2 m(1 B) 2 (m + p +1) n. 157
38 Proof : Since f, g L(p, m, n, A, B). By using Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and Theorem 3.3.1, we obtain ( k(1 B)(p + k +1) n ) 1/2 k(1 B)(p + k +1) n ak b k a k (A B)p (A B)p ( ) 1/2 k(1 B)(p + k +1) n b k < 1. (3.68) (A B)p We must find the values of A 1,B 1 so that k(1 B 1 )(p + k +1) n a k b k < 1, (3.69) (A 1 B 1 )p therefore by (3.68), (3.69) holds true if by (3.68) we have a k b k < ak b k < (1 B)(A 1 B 1 ),k m, m p, (3.70) (1 B 1 )(A B) (A B)p k(1 B)(p+k+1) n, therefore (3.70) holds true if k(1 B 1 )(p + k +1) n (A 1 B 1 )p [ ] k(1 B)(p + k +1) n 2. (A B)p Hence if 1 B 1 k(1 B)2 (p + k +1) n, k m A 1 B 1 (A B) 2 p which is equivalent to so we can write A 1 B 1 1 B 1 A 1 B 1 1 B 1 HencewegetA 1 v(1 B 1 )+B 1. p(a B) 2 k(1 B) 2 (p + k +1) n, p(a B) 2 m(1 B) 2 (m + p +1) n = v. This completes the proof. 158
39 REFERENCES [1] R. Aghalary and S. R. Kulkarni, Some theorems on univalent functions, J. Indian Acad. Math., 24 No. 1 (2002), [2] O. Altintas and S. Owa, Neighborhoods of certain analytic functions with negative coefficients, IJMMS, 19 (1996), [3] M. K. Aouf, A generalization of multivalent functions with negative coefficients II, Bull. Korean Math. Soc., 25(2) (1988), [4], On a new criterion for univalent functions of order alpha, Rendiconti di Mathematica, Serie VII Vol. 11, Roma (1991), [5] M. K. Aouf and H. M. Hossen, New criteria for meromorphic p-valent starlike functions, Tsukuba J. Math., 17 (1993), [6] J. Clunie, On meromorphic schlicht functions, J. London Math. Soc., 34 (1959), [7] P. L. Duren, Univalent Functions, Grundelheren der Mathematschen Wissenchaften 259, Springer-Verlag, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Tokyo, [8] A. W. Goodman, Univalent functions and non-analytic curves, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 8 (1957),
40 [9], Univalent Functions, Vols. 1-2, Mariner, Tampa, Florida, (1983). [10] S.B. Joshi and H. M. Srivastava, A certain family of meromorphically multivalent functions, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 38 (1999), [11] S. Kanas and A. Wiśniowska, Conic domains and starlike functions, Rev. Roumaine Math. Pures Appl., 45(3) (2000), [12] J. -L. Liu and H. M. Srivastava, Classes of meromorphically multivalent functions associated with the generalized hypergeometric functions, Math. Comput. Modelling, 39 (2004), [13], Subclasses of meromorphically multivalent functions associated with a certain linear operator, Math. Comput. Modelling, 39 (2004), [14] T. H. MacGREGOR, Radius of univalence of certain analytic functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 14 (1963), [15] S. S. Miller and P. T. Mocanu, Differential subordinations and univalent functions, Michigan Math. J., 28 (1981), [16], Differential subordinations : Theory and Applications, Series on Monographs and Text Books in Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol.225, Marcel Dekker, New York and Basel,
41 [17] M. Nunokawa, On some remarks for the univalency of a meromorphic functions, Preprint. [18] M. Obradović and S. Owa, A note on certain class defined by Ruscheweyh derivatives, Publications de L institut Mathématique, Nouvelle Série toma, 43 (57) (1988), [19] J. Patel and S. Rout, An application of differential subordinations, Rendiconti di Mathematica, Serie VII Vol. 14, Roma (1994), [20] J. Patel and P. Sahoo, On certain subclasses of meromorphically univalent functions, KYUNGPOOK Math. J., 42 (2002), [21] Ch. Pommerenke, On meromorphic starlike functions, Pacific J. Math., 13 (1963), [22], Univalent Functions, Vanderhoeck and Ruprecht, Gottingen, (1975). [23] W. C. Royster, Mermorphic starlike multivalent functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 107 (1963), [24] S. Ruscheweyh, New criteria for univalent functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 49 (1975), [25], Neighborhoods of univalent functions, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 81 (1981), [26] H. Silverman, Univalent functions with negative coefficients, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 51 (1975),
42 [27] H. M. Srivastava and J. Patel, Applications of differential subordination to certain subclasses of meromorphically multivalent functions, J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. Vol. 6, Art. 88 (2005), [28] B. A. Uralegaddi and C. Somanatha, New criteria for meromorphic starlike univalent functions, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc., 43 (1991),
On a Subclass of k-uniformly Convex Functions with Negative Coefficients
International Mathematical Forum, 1, 2006, no. 34, 1677-1689 On a Subclass of k-uniformly Convex Functions with Negative Coefficients T. N. SHANMUGAM Department of Mathematics Anna University, Chennai-600
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSubclass of Univalent Functions with Negative Coefficients and Starlike with Respect to Symmetric and Conjugate Points
Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 2, 2008, no. 35, 1739-1748 Subclass of Univalent Functions with Negative Coefficients and Starlike with Respect to Symmetric and Conjugate Points S. M. Khairnar and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPROPERTIES OF CERTAIN INTEGRAL OPERATORS. a n z n (1.1)
GEORGIAN MATHEMATICAL JOURNAL: Vol. 2, No. 5, 995, 535-545 PROPERTIES OF CERTAIN INTEGRAL OPERATORS SHIGEYOSHI OWA Abstract. Two integral operators P α and Q α for analytic functions in the open unit disk
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCoefficient Inequalities for a New Subclass of K-uniformly Convex Functions
International Journal of Computational Science and Mathematics. ISSN 0974-89 Volume, Number (00), pp. 67--75 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Coefficient Inequalities for
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2 Composition. Invertible Mappings
Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan Composition. Invertible Mappings In this section we discuss two procedures for creating new mappings from old ones, namely,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSTRONG DIFFERENTIAL SUBORDINATIONS FOR HIGHER-ORDER DERIVATIVES OF MULTIVALENT ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY LINEAR OPERATOR
Khayyam J. Math. 3 217, no. 2, 16 171 DOI: 1.2234/kjm.217.5396 STRONG DIFFERENTIA SUBORDINATIONS FOR HIGHER-ORDER DERIVATIVES OF MUTIVAENT ANAYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY INEAR OPERATOR ABBAS KAREEM WANAS
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMeromorphically Starlike Functions at Infinity
Punjab University Journal of Mathematics (ISSN 1016-2526) Vol. 48(2)(2016) pp. 11-18 Meromorphically Starlike Functions at Infinity Imran Faisal Department of Mathematics, University of Education, Lahore,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραn=2 In the present paper, we introduce and investigate the following two more generalized
MATEMATIQKI VESNIK 59 (007), 65 73 UDK 517.54 originalni nauqni rad research paper SOME SUBCLASSES OF CLOSE-TO-CONVEX AND QUASI-CONVEX FUNCTIONS Zhi-Gang Wang Abstract. In the present paper, the author
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCERTAIN SUBCLASSES OF UNIFORMLY STARLIKE AND CONVEX FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY CONVOLUTION WITH NEGATIVE COEFFICIENTS
MATEMATIQKI VESNIK 65, 1 (2013), 14 28 March 2013 originalni nauqni rad research paper CERTAIN SUBCLASSES OF UNIFORMLY STARLIKE AND CONVEX FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY CONVOLUTION WITH NEGATIVE COEFFICIENTS M.K.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn New Subclasses of Analytic Functions with Respect to Conjugate and Symmetric Conjugate Points
Global Journal of Pure Applied Mathematics. ISSN 0973-768 Volume, Number 3 06, pp. 849 865 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/gjpam.htm On New Subclasses of Analytic Functions with
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn Classes Of Analytic Functions Involving A Linear Fractional Differential Operator
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematical Sciences. ISSN 972-9828 Volume 9, Number 1 (216), pp. 27-37 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/ijpams.htm On Classes Of Analytic
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Fekete Szegö Theorem for a Subclass of Quasi-Convex Functions
Pure Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 1, 01, no. 4, 187-196 The Fekete Szegö Theorem for a Subclass of Quasi-Convex Functions Goh Jiun Shyan School of Science and Technology Universiti Malaysia Sabah Jalan
Διαβάστε περισσότεραON INTEGRAL MEANS FOR FRACTIONAL CALCULUS OPERATORS OF MULTIVALENT FUNCTIONS. S. Sümer Eker 1, H. Özlem Güney 2, Shigeyoshi Owa 3
ON INTEGRAL MEANS FOR FRACTIONAL CALCULUS OPERATORS OF MULTIVALENT FUNCTIONS S. Sümer Eker 1, H. Özlem Güney 2, Shigeyoshi Owa 3 Dedicated to Professor Megumi Saigo, on the occasion of his 7th birthday
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSome Properties of a Subclass of Harmonic Univalent Functions Defined By Salagean Operator
Int. J. Open Problems Complex Analysis, Vol. 8, No. 2, July 2016 ISSN 2074-2827; Copyright c ICSRS Publication, 2016 www.i-csrs.org Some Properties of a Subclass of Harmonic Univalent Functions Defined
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAN APPLICATION OF THE SUBORDINATION CHAINS. Georgia Irina Oros. Abstract
AN APPLICATION OF THE SUBORDINATION CHAINS Georgia Irina Oros Abstract The notion of differential superordination was introduced in [4] by S.S. Miller and P.T. Mocanu as a dual concept of differential
Διαβάστε περισσότεραUniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor
Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor Given f L 1 T 1 ), we consider the partial sums of the Fourier series of f: N 1) S N fθ) = ˆfk)e ikθ. k= N A calculation gives the Dirichlet formula
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSOME INCLUSION RELATIONSHIPS FOR CERTAIN SUBCLASSES OF MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH A FAMILY OF INTEGRAL OPERATORS. f(z) = 1 z + a k z k,
Acta Math. Univ. Comenianae Vol. LXXVIII, 2(2009), pp. 245 254 245 SOME INCLUSION RELATIONSHIPS FOR CERTAIN SUBCLASSES OF MEROMORPHIC FUNCTIONS ASSOCIATED WITH A FAMILY OF INTEGRAL OPERATORS C. SELVARAJ
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSECOND HANKEL DETERMINANT FOR SUBCLASSES OF PASCU CLASSES OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS M. S. SAROA, GURMEET SINGH AND GAGANDEEP SINGH
ASIAN JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS AND APPLICATIONS Volume 14, Article ID ama17, 13 ages ISSN 37-7743 htt://scienceasiaasia SECOND HANKEL DETERMINANT FOR SUBCLASSES OF PASCU CLASSES OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS M S
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOrdinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit
Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ting Zhang Stanford May 11, 2001 Stanford, 5/11/2001 1 Outline Ordinal Classification Ordinal Addition Ordinal Multiplication Ordinal
Διαβάστε περισσότεραResearch Article Some Properties of Certain Class of Integral Operators
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Inequalities and Applications Volume 211, Article ID 53154, 1 pages doi:1.1155/211/53154 Research Article Some Properties of Certain Class of Integral Operators
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNeighborhood and partial sums results on the class of starlike functions involving Dziok-Srivastava operator
Stud. Univ. Babeş-Bolyai Math. 58(23), No. 2, 7 8 Neighborhood and partial sums results on the class of starlike functions involving Dziok-Srivastava operator K. Vijaya and K. Deepa Abstract. In this paper,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in
Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in : tail in X, head in A nowhere-zero Γ-flow is a Γ-circulation such that
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFractional Calculus of a Class of Univalent Functions With Negative Coefficients Defined By Hadamard Product With Rafid -Operator
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS Vol. 4, No. 2, 2, 62-73 ISSN 37-5543 www.ejpam.com Fractional Calculus of a Class of Univalent Functions With Negative Coefficients Defined By Hadamard
Διαβάστε περισσότεραST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II
ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II 2014/2015: Semester II Tutorial 7 1. Let X be a sample from a population P and consider testing hypotheses H 0 : P = P 0 versus H 1 : P = P 1, where P j is a known
Διαβάστε περισσότερα4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)
84 CHAPTER 4. STATIONARY TS MODELS 4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(,) This section is an introduction to a wide class of models ARMA(p,q) which we will consider in more detail later in this
Διαβάστε περισσότεραBulletin of the. Iranian Mathematical Society
ISSN: 1017-060X Print ISSN: 1735-8515 Online Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society Vol 41 2015, No 3, pp 739 748 Title: A certain convolution approach for subclasses of univalent harmonic functions
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPalestine Journal of Mathematics Vol. 2(1) (2013), Palestine Polytechnic University-PPU 2013
Palestine Journal of Matheatics Vol. ( (03, 86 99 Palestine Polytechnic University-PPU 03 On Subclasses of Multivalent Functions Defined by a Multiplier Operator Involving the Koatu Integral Operator Ajad
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 67, 3301-3307 A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Equivalence Relation D. K. Basnet Dept. of Mathematics, Assam University Silchar-788011, Assam, India dkbasnet@rediffmail.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018
Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics(JRM) ISSN: 2395-028 SCITECH Volume 3, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION ublished online: March 29, 208 Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics www.scitecresearch.com/journals
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExample Sheet 3 Solutions
Example Sheet 3 Solutions. i Regular Sturm-Liouville. ii Singular Sturm-Liouville mixed boundary conditions. iii Not Sturm-Liouville ODE is not in Sturm-Liouville form. iv Regular Sturm-Liouville note
Διαβάστε περισσότεραC.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions
C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions Paul Liu November 15, 2007 Note that these are sample solutions only; in many cases there were many acceptable answers. 1 Reynolds Problem 10.1 1.1 Normal-order
Διαβάστε περισσότεραk A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +
Chapter 3. Fuzzy Arithmetic 3- Fuzzy arithmetic: ~Addition(+) and subtraction (-): Let A = [a and B = [b, b in R If x [a and y [b, b than x+y [a +b +b Symbolically,we write A(+)B = [a (+)[b, b = [a +b
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEvery set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set May 6, 2008 Abstract A set of first-order formulas, whatever the cardinality of the set of symbols, is equivalent to an independent
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 8.3 Trigonometric Equations
99 Section 8. Trigonometric Equations Objective 1: Solve Equations Involving One Trigonometric Function. In this section and the next, we will exple how to solving equations involving trigonometric functions.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Novel Subclass of Analytic Functions Specified by a Family of Fractional Derivatives in the Complex Domain
Filomat 31:9 (2017), 2837 2849 https://doi.org/10.2298/fil1709837e Published by Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.rs/filomat A Novel Subclass
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 3 Solutions
Homework 3 Solutions Igor Yanovsky (Math 151A TA) Problem 1: Compute the absolute error and relative error in approximations of p by p. (Use calculator!) a) p π, p 22/7; b) p π, p 3.141. Solution: For
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOther Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests
Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Side-Note: So far we have seen a few approaches for creating tests such as Neyman-Pearson Lemma ( most powerful tests of H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 :
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStatistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests
Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Shirsendu Mukherjee Department of Statistics, Asutosh College, Kolkata, India. shirsendu st@yahoo.co.in So far we have treated the testing of one-sided
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS
MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS FUMIE NAKAOKA AND NOBUYUKI ODA Received 20 December 2005; Revised 28 May 2006; Accepted 6 August 2006 Some properties of minimal closed sets and maximal closed
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCERTAIN PROPERTIES FOR ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY A GENERALISED DERIVATIVE OPERATOR
Journal of Quality Measureent and Analysis Jurnal Penguuran Kualiti dan Analisis JQMA 8(2) 202, 37-44 CERTAIN PROPERTIES FOR ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS DEFINED BY A GENERALISED DERIVATIVE OPERATOR (Sifat Tertentu
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA General Note on δ-quasi Monotone and Increasing Sequence
International Mathematical Forum, 4, 2009, no. 3, 143-149 A General Note on δ-quasi Monotone and Increasing Sequence Santosh Kr. Saxena H. N. 419, Jawaharpuri, Badaun, U.P., India Presently working in
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomomorphism in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Automata
International Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics Systems. ISSN 2248-9940 Volume 3, Number 1 (2013), pp. 39-45 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/ijfms.htm Homomorphism in Intuitionistic
Διαβάστε περισσότεραInverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. ------------------ ----------------------------- -----------------
Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. 1. Sin ( ) = a) b) c) d) Ans b. Solution : Method 1. Ans a: 17 > 1 a) is rejected. w.k.t Sin ( sin ) = d is rejected. If sin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραProblem Set 3: Solutions
CMPSCI 69GG Applied Information Theory Fall 006 Problem Set 3: Solutions. [Cover and Thomas 7.] a Define the following notation, C I p xx; Y max X; Y C I p xx; Ỹ max I X; Ỹ We would like to show that C
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn class of functions related to conic regions and symmetric points
Palestine Journal of Mathematics Vol. 4(2) (2015), 374 379 Palestine Polytechnic University-PPU 2015 On class of functions related to conic regions and symmetric points FUAD. S. M. AL SARARI and S.LATHA
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.
Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequalit for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x,, z X. Prove that d(x, z) d(, z) d(x, ). (ii): Reverse triangle inequalit for norms:
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)
Uppsala Universitet Matematiska Institutionen Andreas Strömbergsson Prov i matematik Funktionalanalys Kurs: F3B, F4Sy, NVP 2005-03-08 Skrivtid: 9 14 Tillåtna hjälpmedel: Manuella skrivdon, Kreyszigs bok
Διαβάστε περισσότεραConcrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016
Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016 Silvio Capobianco Exercise 1.7 Let H(n) = J(n + 1) J(n). Equation (1.8) tells us that H(2n) = 2, and H(2n+1) = J(2n+2) J(2n+1) = (2J(n+1) 1) (2J(n)+1)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΑπόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.
Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο The time integral of a force is referred to as impulse, is determined by and is obtained from: Newton s 2 nd Law of motion states that the action
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMatrices and Determinants
Matrices and Determinants SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Q 1. For what value of k do the following system of equations possess a non-trivial (i.e., not all zero) solution over the set of rationals Q? x + ky + 3z
Διαβάστε περισσότεραON A SUBCLASS OF UNIFORMLY CONVEX FUNCTIONS INVOLVING CHO-SRIVASTAVA OPERATOR
Novi Sad J. Math. Vol. 39, No. 1, 29, 47-56 ON A SUBCLASS OF UNIFORMLY CONVEX FUNCTIONS INVOLVING CHO-SRIVASTAVA OPERATOR G. Murugusundaramoorthy 1, S. Sivasubramanian 2, R. K. Raina 3 Abstract. The authors
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEE512: Error Control Coding
EE512: Error Control Coding Solution for Assignment on Finite Fields February 16, 2007 1. (a) Addition and Multiplication tables for GF (5) and GF (7) are shown in Tables 1 and 2. + 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 3
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCommutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets S K Mala #1, Dr. MM Shanmugapriya *2 1 PhD Scholar in Mathematics, Karpagam University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu- 641021 Assistant Professor of Mathematics,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραderivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates
derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates swapnizzle 03-03- :5:43 We begin by recognizing the familiar conversion from rectangular to spherical coordinates (note that φ is used
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS
Sahand Communications in Mathematical Analysis (SCMA) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016), 21-27 http://scma.maragheh.ac.ir SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS BAYAZ DARABY 1 AND JAVAD JAFARI 2 Abstract. In the mathematical
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCongruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 24, no. 5, 239-246 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/.2988/ija.24.422 Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 Ligong An and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3
Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 1 State vector space and the dual space Space of wavefunctions The space of wavefunctions is the set of all
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSecond Order Partial Differential Equations
Chapter 7 Second Order Partial Differential Equations 7.1 Introduction A second order linear PDE in two independent variables (x, y Ω can be written as A(x, y u x + B(x, y u xy + C(x, y u u u + D(x, y
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs
Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs Who? Nichole Schimanski When? July 27, 2011 Graphs A graph, G, consists of a vertex set, V (G), and an edge set, E(G). V (G) is any finite set E(G) is
Διαβάστε περισσότερα6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes
122 CHAPTER 6. ARMA MODELS 6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes The purpose of forecasting is to predict future values of a TS based on the data collected to the present. In this section we will discuss a linear
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEntisar El-Yagubi & Maslina Darus
Journal of Quality Measurement Analysis Jurnal Pengukuran Kualiti dan Analisis JQMA 0() 04 7-6 ON FEKETE-SZEGÖ PROBLEMS FOR A SUBCLASS OF ANALYTIC FUNCTIONS (Berkenaan Permasalahan Fekete-Szegö bagi Subkelas
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFinite Field Problems: Solutions
Finite Field Problems: Solutions 1. Let f = x 2 +1 Z 11 [x] and let F = Z 11 [x]/(f), a field. Let Solution: F =11 2 = 121, so F = 121 1 = 120. The possible orders are the divisors of 120. Solution: The
Διαβάστε περισσότεραANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?
Teko Classes IITJEE/AIEEE Maths by SUHAAG SIR, Bhopal, Ph (0755) 3 00 000 www.tekoclasses.com ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION # Question Type A.Single Correct Type Q. (A) Sol least
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:
HOMEWORK 4 Problem a For the fast loading case, we want to derive the relationship between P zz and λ z. We know that the nominal stress is expressed as: P zz = ψ λ z where λ z = λ λ z. Therefore, applying
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe semiclassical Garding inequality
The semiclassical Garding inequality We give a proof of the semiclassical Garding inequality (Theorem 4.1 using as the only black box the Calderon-Vaillancourt Theorem. 1 Anti-Wick quantization For (q,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS
CHAPTER 5 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS EXERCISE 104 Page 8 1. Find the positive root of the equation x + 3x 5 = 0, correct to 3 significant figures, using the method of bisection. Let f(x) =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραArithmetical applications of lagrangian interpolation. Tanguy Rivoal. Institut Fourier CNRS and Université de Grenoble 1
Arithmetical applications of lagrangian interpolation Tanguy Rivoal Institut Fourier CNRS and Université de Grenoble Conference Diophantine and Analytic Problems in Number Theory, The 00th anniversary
Διαβάστε περισσότεραReminders: linear functions
Reminders: linear functions Let U and V be vector spaces over the same field F. Definition A function f : U V is linear if for every u 1, u 2 U, f (u 1 + u 2 ) = f (u 1 ) + f (u 2 ), and for every u U
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNew bounds for spherical two-distance sets and equiangular lines
New bounds for spherical two-distance sets and equiangular lines Michigan State University Oct 8-31, 016 Anhui University Definition If X = {x 1, x,, x N } S n 1 (unit sphere in R n ) and x i, x j = a
Διαβάστε περισσότερα3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β
3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS Page Theorem cos(αβ cos α cos β -sin α cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α NOTE: cos(αβ cos α cos β cos(α-β cos α -cos β Proof of cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α Let s use a unit circle
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions
SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES GLMA Linear Mathematics 00- Examination Solutions. (a) i. ( + 5i)( i) = (6 + 5) + (5 )i = + i. Real part is, imaginary part is. (b) ii. + 5i i ( + 5i)( + i) = ( i)( + i)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραApproximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude
Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude Jan Behrens 2012-12-31 In this paper we shall provide a method to approximate distances between two points on earth
Διαβάστε περισσότερα6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.
6.1. Dirac Equation Ref: M.Kaku, Quantum Field Theory, Oxford Univ Press (1993) η μν = η μν = diag(1, -1, -1, -1) p 0 = p 0 p = p i = -p i p μ p μ = p 0 p 0 + p i p i = E c 2 - p 2 = (m c) 2 H = c p 2
Διαβάστε περισσότεραforms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with
Week 03: C lassification of S econd- Order L inear Equations In last week s lectures we have illustrated how to obtain the general solutions of first order PDEs using the method of characteristics. We
Διαβάστε περισσότεραORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER
ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER Abstract. We define ordinal arithmetic and show laws of Left- Monotonicity, Associativity, Distributivity, some minor related properties and the Cantor Normal Form.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Two-Sided Laplace Inversion Algorithm with Computable Error Bounds and Its Applications in Financial Engineering
Electronic Companion A Two-Sie Laplace Inversion Algorithm with Computable Error Bouns an Its Applications in Financial Engineering Ning Cai, S. G. Kou, Zongjian Liu HKUST an Columbia University Appenix
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics
Fourier Series MATH 211, Calculus II J. Robert Buchanan Department of Mathematics Spring 2018 Introduction Not all functions can be represented by Taylor series. f (k) (c) A Taylor series f (x) = (x c)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE
Lecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE BLUE: Robustness of LSE against normality We now study properties of l τ β and σ 2 under assumption A2, i.e., without the normality assumption on ε. From Theorem
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSome new generalized topologies via hereditary classes. Key Words:hereditary generalized topological space, A κ(h,µ)-sets, κµ -topology.
Bol. Soc. Paran. Mat. (3s.) v. 30 2 (2012): 71 77. c SPM ISSN-2175-1188 on line ISSN-00378712 in press SPM: www.spm.uem.br/bspm doi:10.5269/bspm.v30i2.13793 Some new generalized topologies via hereditary
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPhys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)
Phys460.nb 81 ψ n (t) is still the (same) eigenstate of H But for tdependent H. The answer is NO. 5.5.5. Solution for the tdependent Schrodinger s equation If we assume that at time t 0, the electron starts
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic
Lecture 2 Soundness and completeness of propositional logic February 9, 2004 1 Overview Review of natural deduction. Soundness and completeness. Semantics of propositional formulas. Soundness proof. Completeness
Διαβάστε περισσότερα1. Introduction and Preliminaries.
Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.yu/filomat Filomat 22:1 (2008), 97 106 ON δ SETS IN γ SPACES V. Renuka Devi and D. Sivaraj Abstract We
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSecond Order RLC Filters
ECEN 60 Circuits/Electronics Spring 007-0-07 P. Mathys Second Order RLC Filters RLC Lowpass Filter A passive RLC lowpass filter (LPF) circuit is shown in the following schematic. R L C v O (t) Using phasor
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath221: HW# 1 solutions
Math: HW# solutions Andy Royston October, 5 7.5.7, 3 rd Ed. We have a n = b n = a = fxdx = xdx =, x cos nxdx = x sin nx n sin nxdx n = cos nx n = n n, x sin nxdx = x cos nx n + cos nxdx n cos n = + sin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSolutions to Exercise Sheet 5
Solutions to Eercise Sheet 5 jacques@ucsd.edu. Let X and Y be random variables with joint pdf f(, y) = 3y( + y) where and y. Determine each of the following probabilities. Solutions. a. P (X ). b. P (X
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEcon 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1
Eon : Fall 8 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 Email questions or omments to Dan Fetter Problem. Let X be a salar with density f(x, θ) (θx + θ) [ x ] with θ. (a) Find the most powerful level α test
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSOLVING CUBICS AND QUARTICS BY RADICALS
SOLVING CUBICS AND QUARTICS BY RADICALS The purpose of this handout is to record the classical formulas expressing the roots of degree three and degree four polynomials in terms of radicals. We begin with
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSolution Series 9. i=1 x i and i=1 x i.
Lecturer: Prof. Dr. Mete SONER Coordinator: Yilin WANG Solution Series 9 Q1. Let α, β >, the p.d.f. of a beta distribution with parameters α and β is { Γ(α+β) Γ(α)Γ(β) f(x α, β) xα 1 (1 x) β 1 for < x
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe k-α-exponential Function
Int Journal of Math Analysis, Vol 7, 213, no 11, 535-542 The --Exponential Function Luciano L Luque and Rubén A Cerutti Faculty of Exact Sciences National University of Nordeste Av Libertad 554 34 Corrientes,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCertain Subclass of p Valent Starlike and Convex Uniformly Functions Defined by Convolution
Int. J. Oen Problems Comt. Math., Vol. 9, No. 1, March 2016 ISSN 1998-6262; Coyright c ICSRS Publication, 2016 www.i-csrs.org Certain Subclass of Valent Starlie and Convex Uniformly Functions Defined by
Διαβάστε περισσότεραProblem Set 9 Solutions. θ + 1. θ 2 + cotθ ( ) sinθ e iφ is an eigenfunction of the ˆ L 2 operator. / θ 2. φ 2. sin 2 θ φ 2. ( ) = e iφ. = e iφ cosθ.
Chemistry 362 Dr Jean M Standard Problem Set 9 Solutions The ˆ L 2 operator is defined as Verify that the angular wavefunction Y θ,φ) Also verify that the eigenvalue is given by 2! 2 & L ˆ 2! 2 2 θ 2 +
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTrigonometric Formula Sheet
Trigonometric Formula Sheet Definition of the Trig Functions Right Triangle Definition Assume that: 0 < θ < or 0 < θ < 90 Unit Circle Definition Assume θ can be any angle. y x, y hypotenuse opposite θ
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAreas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates
Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS
CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS Shiah-Sen Wang The graphs are prepared by Chien-Lun Lai Based on : Precalculus: Mathematics for Calculus by J. Stuwart, L. Redin & S. Watson, 6th edition, 01, Brooks/Cole Chapter
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPractice Exam 2. Conceptual Questions. 1. State a Basic identity and then verify it. (a) Identity: Solution: One identity is csc(θ) = 1
Conceptual Questions. State a Basic identity and then verify it. a) Identity: Solution: One identity is cscθ) = sinθ) Practice Exam b) Verification: Solution: Given the point of intersection x, y) of the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II
Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II October 18, 2012 1 Review First let us recall the situation. Let g be a simple algebra, with maximal toral subalgebra h (which we are calling a CSA, or Cartan Subalgebra).
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Simply Typed Lambda Calculus
Type Inference Instead of writing type annotations, can we use an algorithm to infer what the type annotations should be? That depends on the type system. For simple type systems the answer is yes, and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIntuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 7, 202, no. 6, 769-776 Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings P. K. Sharma P.G. Department of Mathematics D.A.V. College Jalandhar city, Punjab, India pksharma@davjalandhar.com
Διαβάστε περισσότερα