arxiv: v2 [math.gr] 14 Dec 2018

Transcript

1 arxiv: v [math.gr] 1 Dec 018 Sequences over finite fields defined by BN-pair decomposition of PSL (q) recursively Robert Shwartz Department of Mathematics Ariel University, Israel robertsh@ariel.ac.il Abstract Hadas Yadayi Department of Mathematics Ariel University, Israel hadas.halevi@msmail.ariel.ac.il Jordan-Hölder Theorem states that every finite group can be expressed as a product of its composition factors. Therefore, every solvable group is a product of different cyclic groups. This motivates a natural question of whether a finite group can be written as a product of different cyclic groups. In the case of a finite simple group of Lie-type, there is a BN pair decomposition, which allows for writing a group as a product of BNB, where B N are solvable groups. In this paper, we find decomposition of PSL (q) onto XB or XYB (depending on the characteristic of the finite field F q), where X Y are cyclic groups. We also show that the BN pair decomposition of the elements of X of Y leads to sequences over F q, which can be defined recursively, with very interesting properties. Keywords: finite simple groups of Lie-type, BN-pair decomposition, recursive sequences over finite fields. MSC 010 classification: 0E3, 0E, 0D06, 0D0, 0D05, 0F05. 1 Introduction Let G be a finite group. Consider the series G = G 0 G 1 G G n = 1. where, G i is a maximal normal subgroup of G i 1 for every 1 i n. Then K i = G i 1 /G i is a finite simple group for 1 i n, G = K 1 K K n i.e., every finite group is a product of finite simple groups. Jordan-Hölder theorem states that the set {K 1,K, K n } is an invariant of the group G, which does not depend on the choice of the maximal subgroup G i [3,,, 5]. Thus, K 1,K,...,K n are called the composition factors of the group G. The group G is solvable if all composition factors of the group are cyclic. Thus, every finite solvable group G is a product of cyclic groups. The decomposition of a finite group onto a product of different cyclic groups is called 1

2 OGS presentation [6], which has an importance in group theory, since it helps us to multiply two different elements in an efficient way. For example, taking the dihedral group Dih n, which is a product of the cyclic group a a n = 1 (isomorphic to Z n ) with the cyclic group b b = 1 (isomorphic to Z ). Every element of Dih n has a unique presentation in a form a i b j, where 0 i n 1, 0 j 1 (i.e., Dih n is a product of the cyclic group Z n with the cyclic group Z ). Considering the defining relation ba = a 1 b, we can easily multiply two elements of the form x 1 = a i1 b j1, x = a i b j. If j 1 = 0, then if j 1 = 1, then x 1 x = a i1+i b j1+j, x 1 x = a i1 i b j1+j. Therefore, it motivates us to check if a non-solvable group has an OGS presentation. Since every finite group is a product of its composition factors, which are simple groups, we can reduce the question to simple groups only. The classification of finite simple groups was completed in 1981 by Gorenstein [1]. The classification of Gorenstein states that there are three categories of non-abelian simple groups: The alternating group Alt n for n 5 (The even permutations); The simple groups of Lie-type; 6 sporadic finite simple groups. Since the most significant category of simple groups is the simple groups of Lie-type, it is interesting enough to try to answer the question of whether a finite simple group of Lie-type has an OGS presentation. The simple groups of Lie-type can be considered by matrix presentation. Moreover, J. Tits introduced BN pair decomposition [8, 9] for every simple group of Lie-type, i.e., there exists specific subgroups B N, such that the simple group of Lie-type is the product BNB, with the properties which we now describe. We use the notation of [7]. Definition 1.1 Let G be a group, then the subgroups B N of G form a BN pair if the following axioms are satisfied: 1. G = B,N ;. H = B N is normal in N; 3. W = N/H is generated by a set S of involutions, (W,S) is a Coxeter system;. If ẇ N maps to w W (under N W), then: G = ẇ w W BẇB; (Bw 1 B) (Bw B) = φ, for w 1 w in W;

3 5. (B S B) = w S (BwB) is a subgroup of G, for every subset S of S, where S is the subgroup of W generated by S. It is called the parabolic subgroup denoted by P S ; 6. For each ẇ ṡ as above, (BẇB)(BṡB) = BẇṡB, in case l(ws) > l(w) (where l(x) is the Coxeter length of x in W); 7. For each ẇ ṡ as above, (BẇB)(BṡB) = BẇṡB BṡB, in case l(ws) < l(w); 8. ṡbṡ B. Definition 1. Let G be a group with a BN pair, (B,N). It is a split BN-pair with a characteristic p, if the following additional hypotheses are satisfied: 1. B = UH, with U = O p (B), the largest normal p-subgroup of B, H a complement of U;. n N nbn 1 = T (recall H = B N). The finite simple groups of Lie-type has a split BN pair with a characteristic p, where p is the characteristic of the field over the matrix group is defined. In this paper we look at the easiest case of a simple group of Lie-type, which is PSL (q). In case of PSL (q) the following are satisfied: Claim 1.3 Let G = PSL (q), let B,N,H,U,S be the groups as defined in definitions , then the following observations hold: B is the subgroup in which coset representatives are the upper triangular matrices in SL (q); N is the subgroup in which coset representatives are the monomial matrices in SL (q) (i.e., there is exactly one non-zero entry in each row in each column); H = B N is the subgroup in which coset representatives are the diagonal matrices in SL (q). Thus, H is isomorphic to a quotient of the multiplicative group of F q. Thus, denote the elements of H by h(y) where y F q; S = N/H is isomorphic to Z. Denote by s the element of PSL (q), which corresponds to the non-trivial element of S; U is the subgroup in which coset representatives are the upper unipotent matrices in SL (q) (i.e., the upper triangular matrices with diagonal entry 1). Thus, U is isomorphic to the additive group of F q. Thus, denote the elements of U by u(x) where x F q. By Definition 1.1, PSL (q) is generated by u(x), h(y) s, where x F q, y F q, the following proposition holds: Proposition 1. Let G = PSL (q), where F q is a finite field, then the BN pair presentation of an element g G is: 3

4 If g / B, then g = u(a) s u(x) h(y), where a,x F q y F q ; If g B, then g = u(x) h(y), where x F q y F q. The proof is an immediate conclusion of the properties of U, H, S which have been shown in definitions 1.1, 1.. One can easily conclude from Proposition 1. the following property: Conclusion 1.5 Let G = PSL (q), where F q is a finite field, let g 1,g be two elements of G, where g 1 = u(a 1 ) s u(x 1 ) h(y 1 ) Then, if only if g = u(a ) s u(x ) h(y ). a 1 = a g 1 B = g B (i.e., g 1 g 1 B). Definition 1.6 Let G = PSL (q), let u(x), h(y), s be as defined in Claim 1.3, let û(x), ĥ(y), ŝ be the corresponding coset representatives in SL (q), then we can choose the presentative matrices as follows: ( ) 1 x û(x) = ; 0 1 ( ) y 0 ĥ(y) = 0 y 1 ; ( ) 0 1 ŝ =. 1 0 Now, we easily conclude the following multiplication laws between u(x), h(y), s. Proposition 1.7 Let G = PSL (q), let u(x), h(y), s be as defined in Claim 1.3, then the following relations hold: u(x 1 ) u(x ) = u(x 1 +x ); h(y 1 ) h(y ) = h(y 1 y ); h(y) u(x) = u(x y ) h(y); s u(x) s = u( x 1 ) s u( x) h(x); s h(y) = h(y 1 ) s. The proof comes directly from the properties of matrix multiplications. In the paper, we generalize Proposition 1. in the following way: Theorem.3 demonstrates that every element of g PSL (q) has a unique presentation of the form:

5 g = [u(a) s] k u(x) h(y), where 0 k q, F q has characteristic, a F q is chosen such that the polynomial x +ax+1 is an irreducible polynomial over F q ; g = [u(a) s] k [u(b) s u( b)] l u(x) h(y), where 0 k < q+1, 0 l 1 (i. e. l = 0 or l = 1), F q does not have characteristic, a F q is chosen suchthat the polynomial x +ax+1is an irreduciblepolynomial over F q, b is chosen in a way such that u(b) s is not a left-coset representative of [u(a) s] k in B for any 0 k q. Then, we look at the BN pair presentation of the elements [u(a) s] k [u(a) s] k [u(b) s u( b)], where we denote: [u(a) s] k = u(a k ) s u(x k ) h(y k ) This yields: [u(a) s] k [u(b) s u( b)] = u(b k ) s u(x k) h(y k). a recursive sequences a k, where 1 k q in case of F q has characteristic ; two recursive sequences a k, where 1 k < q+1, b l, where 0 l < q+1 in case of F q has an odd characteristic. In the paper, we find interesting properties of the two recursive sequences over F q, which help us to underst the structure of the simple group PSL (q). The recursive sequences a k, b l, α r (a), β r (a,b) over F q Inthis section, weintroducefourrecursivesequencesoverf q, whicharecloselyconnected to the BN pair presentation of PSL (q). These sequences a k, b l, α r (a), β r (a,b), where1 k t 1, 0 l t 1, 1 r t 1, a,b F q, suchthatthe polynomialx + ax+1 is irreducible over F q, t = which we describe too. q+1 gcd(,q+1), have some very noteworthy properties, Proposition.1 There exists a F q, such that x +ax+1 is an irreducible polynomial over F q the root ω of the polynomial over F q has order q +1 in the multiplicative group of the field. Proof. By looking at the constant coefficient of x +ax+1, it is obvious that the two roots of x + ax + 1 are ω ω 1. Since, all the coefficients of x + ax + 1 are in F q, ω q should also be a root of x + ax + 1. Therefore, either ω q = ω or ω q = ω 1. Notice, the case ω q = ω yields ω q 1 = 1, which implies ω F q, which contradicting our 5

6 assumption that ω is a root in F q of an irreducible polynomial with coefficients in F q. Thus, ω q = ω 1, which implies ω q+1 = 1. Since, the multiplicative group F q is cyclic of order q 1, there exists at least one element which order is a divisor of q 1. Thus, there exists ω which order is q +1 in F q. Proposition. Let a F q, such that the following holds: The polynomial x +ax+1 is irreducible over F q ; Let ω be a root of x +ax+1 over F q. Then ω has order q+1 on the multiplicative group F q. Then the order of the element u(a) s in PSL (q) is q+1 gcd(,q+1) (i.e., the element has order q +1, in case the characteristic of F q is, the element has order q+1 in case the characteristic of F q is odd.) Proof. Consider the matrix presentation of û(a) ŝ over SL (q), which is the following: ( ) ( ) ( ) 1 a 0 1 a 1 û(a) ŝ = = Thus, the characteristicpolynomial of the representativematrix of û(a) ŝ is: x +ax+1. We chooseasuch that the polynomial is irreducible, then it does not havemultiply roots. Therefore, by the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem, the order of the representative matrix of û(a) ŝ in SL (q) equals the order of ω, where ω is one of the roots of x + ax+1 in F q. By Proposition.1, it is possible to choose a such that ω has order q + 1 in the multiplicative group F q. Since, ω ω 1 are roots of a polynomial with coefficients in F q, we have ω k ω 1 for any positive integer k < q. By Proposition.1, there exists a such that the order of ω is q+1 in F q. In case of q = m, PSL (q) = SL (q), therefore, the element u(a) s has order q+1 in that case. Now, consider the case of odd q. In this case, look at the matrix ( ) ω 0 diag(ω,ω 1 ) = 0 ω 1, which is similar to the representative matrix of û(a) ŝ in SL (q). Notice, that in case q is odd, therefore ω q+1 = ω q+1 = 1 diag(ω,ω 1 ) q+1 = I. Therefore, u(a) s has order q+1 in PSL (q), in case q is odd. Theorem.3 Let G = PSL (q), where F q is a finite field of order q. Let a F q, such that the polynomial x +ax+1 is irreducible over F q. Then, every g G has a unique presentation in the following form: 6

7 If the field F q has characteristic : where 0 k q; If the field F q has an odd characteristic: g = [u(a) s] k u(x) h(y) g = [u(a) s] k [u(b) s u( b)] l u(x) h(y) where 0 k < q+1, 0 l 1 (i. e. l = 0 or l = 1), b is chosen in a way such that the left coset (u(b) s)b is different from all left cosets of the form [u(a) s] k B for 0 k < q+1 (i.e., s u( b) [u(a) s] k / B for any 0 k < q+1 ). Proof. First, we consider the case in which F q has characteristic. In that case, PSL (q) = SL (q), by Proposition., the order of the element u(a) s is q + 1, if x +ax + 1 is irreducible over F q. By Claim 1.3, the u(x) h(y) is the subgroup B, which can be considered as the upper triangular matrices in SL (q) (which is PSL (q) in case of q = m ). Therefore, B = u(x) h(y) is a subgroup of order q (q 1), where in case of q = m that order is prime to q +1, the order of of u(a) s. Since, the index of B in PSL (q) is q +1 too, the q +1 left-coset representatives of B in PSL (q) can be considered [u(a) s] k, where 0 k q. Thus, every g PSL (q) has a unique presentation of the form g = [u(a) s] k u(x) h(y) where 0 k q the F q has characteristic. Now, we consider the case where q is an odd prime. In this case, PSL (q) is a proper quotient of SL (q). Like in the case of q = m, the subgroup B = u(x) h(y) has index q+1 in PSL (q), but the order of B is q (q+1), by Proposition., the order of the element u(a) s is just q+1, if x +ax+1 is irreducible over F q. Thus [u(a) s] k, where 0 k < q+1 gives just a half of the left-coset representatives of B in PSL (q), where q is an odd prime. Now, we choose an element b F q, such that u(b) s / [u(a) s] k B, for any 0 k < q+1. Then, u(b) s u( b) is an involution conjugate to s, which does not belong to [u(a) s] k B, for any 0 k < q+1 too. Now, we show that the q +1 elements of the form [u(a) s] k [u(b) s u( b)] l, where 0 k < q+1 0 l 1, form a full left-coset representative of B in PSL (q) for an odd q. It is enough to show that all q +1 cosets of the form [u(a) s] k [u(b) s u( b)] l 7

8 are different, where 0 k < q+1 0 l 1. Assume [u(a) s] k1 [u(b) s u( b)] l1 B = [u(a) s] k [u(b) s u( b)] l B, where 0 k 1,k < q+1, 0 l 1,l 1. If l 1 = l = 0, the equation applies [u(a) s] k1 k B, which is possible only if k 1 k = 0, since, the order of [u(a) s] k1 k is otherwise prime to the order of B. If l 1 = l = 1, the equation applies [u(b) s u( b)] [u(a) s] k1 k [u(b) s u( b)] B, which is also possible only if k 1 k = 0 by the same reason. If l 1 = 1 l = 0, then the equation applies [u(b) s u( b)]b = [u(a) s] k1 k B, which is impossible by the definition of b. Thus, all the q +1 cosets of the form are different. [u(a) s] k [u(b) s u( b)] l B Proposition. Let G = PSL (q), a F q, such that the polynomial x + ax + 1 is q+1 irreducible over F q, t = gcd(,q+1), in case of odd q, let b F q, such that u(b) s is not a left-coset representative of [u(a) s] k in B for any 0 k < t. Consider the BN pair presentation of [u(a) s] k, for 1 k t 1, in case of odd q, consider the BN pair presentation of too, for 0 k t 1. If [u(a) s] k [u(b) s u( b)] [u(a) s] k = u(a k ) s u(x k ) h(y k ), then: [u(a) s] k [u(b) s u( b)] = u(b k ) s u(x k) h(y k), In case F q has characteristic, the q elements a 1,a,...,a q are all the q different elements of F q ; In case of F q has an odd characteristic, the elements q elements a 1,a,...,a t 1,b 0,b 1,...,b t 1 are all the q different elements of F q. 8

9 Proof. By Theorem.3, the q elements of the form [u(a) s] k arethe q different left-coset representativesof all the elements which are not in B, in case F q has characteristic. Thus, by applying Conclusion 1.5, a 1,a,...,a q are q different elements of F q, since q is finite, these elements are all the q different elements of F q, obviously. Similarly, in case of odd q, the elements where 1 k < t, [u(a) s] k, [u(a) s] l [u(b) s u( b)], where 0 l < t are the q different left-coset representatives of all the elements which are not in B. Thus, by the same argument as in the case of even q, we get the desired result. Now, we show a recursive algorithm to find a k b l, we also show some interesting properties of these elements. Proposition.5 Let G = PSL (q), t =., for 1 k t 1. Then, a t 1 = 0. Proof. q+1 gcd(,q+1), a k as defined in Proposition [u(a) s] t 1 = [u(a) s] 1 = s u( a) = u(0) s u( a) h(1). Thus by its definition in Proposition., a t 1 = 0. Proposition.6 Let G = PSL (q), t = q+1 gcd(,q+1), a k,b l as it defined in Propositions., for 1 k t 1 0 l t 1. Then, a k+1 = a a 1 k, b = b 0 = a b 1 b l+1 = a b 1 l. Proof. By Proposition., On the other h, [u(a) s] k+1 = u(a k+1 ) s u(x k+1 ) h(y k+1 ). [u(a) s] k+1 = u(a) s [u(a) s] k = u(a) s u(a k ) s u(x k ) h(y k ). Now, by Proposition 1.7, Therefore, s u(a k ) s = u( a 1 k ) s u( a k) h(a k ). [u(a) s] k+1 = u(a) u( a 1 k ) s u( a k) h(a k ) u(x k ) h(y k ). t 1, 9

10 Hence, Thus, Similarly, by Proposition., On the other h, [u(a) s] k+1 = u(a a 1 k ) s u(x k+1) h(y k+1 ). a k+1 = a a 1 k. [u(a) s] l+1 [u(b) s u( b)] = u(b l+1 ) s u(x l+1) h(y l+1). [u(a) s] l+1 [u(b) s u( b)]= u(a) s [u(a) s] l [u(b) s u( b)] = u(a) s u(b l ) s u(x k) h(y k). Now, by Proposition 1.7, Hence, s u(b l ) s = u( b 1 l ) s u( b l ) h(b l ). [u(a) s] l+1 [u(b) s u( b)] = u(a b 1 l ) s u(x l+1) h(y l+1). Thus, b l+1 = a b 1 l. Definition.7 Let a F q such that the root ω of the irreducible polynomial x +ax+1 has order q+1 over the multiplicative group F q+1 q let t = gcd(,q+1). Define α 1(a) = 0, for 0 k t 1 for non-negative integer r, define α k (a) to be: For k = r: For k = r+1: α r (a) = α r+1 (a) = r ( ) r i ( 1) i i i=0 a r i r ( ) r i+1 ( 1) i a r i+1. i i=0 Proposition.8 Let a F q such that the root ω of the irreducible polynomial x +ax+1 has order q +1 over the multiplicative group F q+1 q, let t = gcd(,q+1), let α r(a) be as defined in Definition.7 for 1 r t 1. Then For 0 k t. α k+1 (a) = a α k (a) α k 1 (a) 10

11 Proof. The proof comes directly by comparing the coefficients of a k i in the formula from Definition.7 for α j (j {k 1,k,k+1}) in both sides of the equations, using the following combinatorial identity ( ) ( ) ( ) k k 1 k 1 = +. i i 1 i Definition.9 Let a F q such that the root ω of the irreducible polynomial x +ax+1 has order q+1 over the multiplicative group F q+1 q, let b an element of F q, let t = gcd(,q+1), let α r (a) be as defined in Definition.7 for 1 r t 1. Then, β 1 (a,b) = 1, for 0 k t 1, define: β k (a,b) = b α k (a) α k 1 (a). Proposition.10 Let a F q such that the root ω of the irreducible polynomial x + ax+1 has order q+1 over the multiplicative group F q+1 q, t = gcd(,q+1), a k,b l as defined in Proposition., α r (a) as defined in Definition.7 for 1 k t 1, 0 l t 1, 1 r t 1. Then the following holds: a k = α k(a) α k 1 (a) ; b l = β l(a,b) β l 1 (a,b) ; α k (a) = k i=1 a i, where 1 k t 1; β l (a,b) = l i=0 b i, where 0 l t 1. Proof. The proof is in induction on k. By Definition.9, β 1 (a,b) = 1 for 0 k t 1. Thus β k (a,b) = b α k (a) α k 1 (a), Now, by Definition.7, by Proposition.6, β 0 (a,b) = b α 0 (a) α 1 (a) = b 1 0 = b. b 1 = a 1 b = ab 1 b a 1 = a = a 1 = α 1(a) α 0 (a) b 0 = b = β 0(a,b) β 1 (a,b) = b α 1(a) α 0 (a) b α 0 (a) α 1 (a) = β 1(a,b) β 0 (a,b). 11

12 Assume in induction for every l k. By Proposition.6, a l = α l(a) α l 1 (a) b l = b α l(a) α l 1 (a) b α l 1 (a) α l (a) a k+1 = a 1 a k Then, by the induction hypothesis, b k+1 = a 1 b k. Thus, Then, by Proposition.8, a k+1 = a α k 1(a) α k (a) b k+1 = a b α k 1(a) α k (a) b α k (a) α k 1 (a). a k+1 = a α k(a) α k 1 (a) α k (a) b k+1 = b [a α k(a) α k 1 (a)] [a α k 1 (a) α k (a)]. b α k (a) α k 1 (a) a k+1 = α k+1(a) α k (a) b k+1 = b α k+1(a) α k (a) b α k (a) α k 1 (a). Thus, the proposition holds for every 1 k t 1. q+1 Proposition.11 Let G = PSL (q), t = gcd(,q+1), a k as defined in Proposition., for 1 k t 1. Then, the following holds: a k a t k 1 = 1 for 1 k t ; a k +a t k = a. 1

13 Proof. The proof of the first part is in induction on k. First, we show the proposition for k = 1. By Proposition., We also have, Then, by Proposition 1.7, Therefore, Thus, Now, assume by induction [u(a) s] t = u(a t ) s u(x t ) h(y t ). [u(a) s] t = [u(a) s] = s u( a) s u( a). s u( a) s = u(a 1 ) s u(a) h( a). [u(a) s] t = u(a 1 ) s u(a) h(a) u( a). a t = a 1 = a 1 1. a t r = a 1 r 1 for every r k, we prove the correctness of the proposition for r = k +1. By Proposition., We also have, Since, [u(a) s] t k 1 = u(a t k 1 ) s u(x t k 1 ) h(y t k 1 ). [u(a) s] t k 1 = [u(a) s] (k+1) = s u( a) [u(a) s] t k by our induction hypothesis, we have, Then, by Proposition 1.7, = s u( a) u(a t k ) s u(x t k ) h(y t k ). a t k = a 1 k 1 [u(a) s] t k 1 = s u( a) u(a 1 k 1 ) s u(x t k) h(y t k ). s u( a+a 1 k 1 ) s = u([a a 1 k 1 ] 1 ) s u(a a 1 k 1 ) h( a+a 1 k 1 ). Now, by using Proposition.6, Therefore, Hence, a a 1 k 1 = a k. [u(a) s] t k 1 = u(a k 1 ) s u(x t k 1 ) h(y t k 1 ). a t k 1 = a 1 k 13

14 for every 1 k t. Now, we turn to the proof of the second part of the proposition. By Proposition.5, a t 1 = 0. Thus, a 1 +a t 1 = a+0 = a. Now, for k t 1, we have a k = a a 1 k 1 by using Proposition.6. Then by the first part of the proposition, for every k t 1. Thus, we get for every 1 k t 1. a 1 k 1 = a t k a k +a t k = a q+1 Conclusion.1 Let G = PSL (q), t = gcd(,q+1), a k as it defined in Proposition., for 1 k t 1. Then, the following holds: In case the characteristic of F q equals : a q = 1; In case the characteristic of F q does not equal, q 1: or aq 1 aq 1 = 1 = 1; In case the characteristic of F q does not equal, q +1: aq+1 = a. Proof. First, assume the characteristic of F q equals. Then, t = q+1. Thus, for k = q we have t k 1 = q +1 q 1 = q. Therefore, by Proposition.11, Hence, (a q ) = 1. a q = 1 in case the characteristic of F q equals. Now, assume the characteristic of F q does not equal. Then, q is odd, either q 1 or q +1. First, assume q 1. In this case, t = q+1 q 1, for k = we have t k 1 = q +1 q = q 1.

15 Therefore, by Proposition.11, Hence, either or (aq 1) = 1. aq 1 aq 1 = 1 = 1 in case q is odd, q 1. Now, assume q is odd, q +1. In this case, t = q+1 q+1, for k = we have Therefore, by Proposition.11 Hence, t k = q +1 aq+1 q +1 = a. = q +1. in case q is odd q +1. aq+1 = a Proposition.13 Let G = PSL (q), let t = Then, for every 1 l < k t 1, the following holds: q+1 gcd(,q+1). a k = a l [(a 1 a a l 1 ) (a k l a k 3 a k ) a k 1 ] 1. In particular: a k = a k 1 [a 1 a a k a k 1 ] 1. Proof. The proof is in induction on l. For l = 1, we get a k = a 1 a k 1 1, which holds by Proposition.6. Now, we prove the proposition for l =. First, by Proposition.6, a = a +a 1 1. Thus, by using again Proposition.6, we have Since by Proposition.6, we finally get a k = a a 1 k 1 = a + 1 a 1 1 a k 1 = a a k 1 a 1 a 1 a k 1. a k 1 a 1 = a 1 k, a k = a [a 1 a k 1 ] 1. Hence, thepropositionholdsforl =. Now, assumebyinduction, foreveryr l 1 < k: a k = a r [(a 1 a a r 1 ) (a k r a k 3 a k ) a k 1 ] 1. 15

16 we prove it for r = l. Similarly to the case of l =, by Proposition.6, we get Thus, a = a l +a 1 l 1. a k = a a 1 k 1 = a l + 1 a l 1 1 a k 1 = a l a k 1 a l 1 a l 1 a k 1 by using again Proposition.6. Since, a k 1 a l 1 = [(a 1 a a l ) (a k l a k a k 3 ) a k ] 1 by using our induction hypothesis, we finally get a k = a l [(a 1 a a l 1 ) (a k l a k 3 a k ) a k 1 ] 1. By substitution of l = k 1, which is the largest possible l < k, we derive the following result: a k = a k 1 [a 1 a a k a k 1] 1. Proposition.1 Let G = PSL (q) such that q is odd, t = q+1, a k, b l as it defined in Proposition., for 1 k t 1 for 0 l t 1. Then, the following holds: b 0 = b; b l = a l b 1 = a l b 1 b a 1 b a t l = 1 a l b a b a l, where 1 l t 1; l 1 b t 1 = 1 a b ; b l b l+1 a l a l 1 = a l+1 b 1 a l 1 b 1, where l t. Proof. First, b 0 = b by definition. By Proposition.10, b l = b α l(a) α l 1 (a) b α l 1 (a) α l (a) where 1 l t 1. Thus, l α l (a) = a i, i=1 b l = l 1 i=1 a i [a l b 1] l i=1 a i [a l 1 b 1] = a a l b 1 l 1 a l 1 b 1 = a l b 1 b a 1. l 1 Then, by Proposition.11, a l 1 1 = a t l = a a l. 16

17 Therefore, Now, we show b l = a l b 1 b a t l = 1 a l b a b a l. b t 1 = 1 a b. By Proposition.5, a t 1 = 0. Therefore, by substituting l = t 1 we get the desired result. Now, by using a l b 1 b l = a l 1 a l 1 b 1, we get where l t. b l b l+1 = a l+1 b 1 a l a l 1 a l 1 b 1, Proposition.15 Let G = PSL (q) such that q is odd, t = q+1, a k, b l as it defined in Proposition., for 1 k t 1, for 0 l t 1. Then: It is possible to choose either b = 1 or b = 1; If b = 1 or b = 1, then for all 0 l t 1: b l b t l = 1, where b t = b 0 = b; b l +b t l+1 = a. Proof. First, consider the case q + 1 (i.e., q 3 mod ). Then, t is even, therefore, t k 1 k for any integer k, such that 1 k t 1. Therefore, by Proposition., a t k 1 a k, where 1 k t 1. By Proposition.11, a t k 1 = a 1 k, therefore, a k ±1, for any integer k such that 1 k t 1. Thus, by Proposition., we may choose b = 1 or b = 1 in case q + 1. Now, consider the case q 1 (i.e., q 1 mod ). Then, t is odd, therefore, t k 1 = k if only if k = t 1 = q 1, where k is an integer such that 1 k t 1. Therefore, by the same argument as in the case of q 3 mod, a k ±1, for any integer k q 1 such that 1 k t 1. By Proposition.1, a q 1 = 1 or aq 1 = 1. Thus by Proposition., we may choose b = 1 or b = 1, such that b aq 1, in case q 1 too. Thus, we may assume either b = 1 or b = 1. We prove the second part of the proposition. For l = 1, we have by Proposition.6 b 1 = a b 1, for l = t 1, we have by Proposition.1 b t 1 = (a b) 1. 17

18 Thus, in case of b = 1 or b = 1, b 1 b t 1 = (a b 1 ) (a b) 1 = (a b) (a b) 1 = 1. By Proposition.1, By Proposition.11, Thus, Thus, using b = 1 or b = 1: b l = 1 a l b a b a l, b t l = 1 a t l b a b a t l. a t l = a a l, b t l = 1 (a a l) b. a l b or Now, by Proposition.6, Thus, b l b t l = 1 a l 1 a+a l = 1, a 1 a l a l 1 b l b t l = 1+a l 1+a a l = 1. a+1 a l a l +1 b t l+1 = a b 1 t l b l +b t l+1 = a. Proposition.16 Let a F q such that the root ω of the irreducible polynomial x +ax+1 has order q+1 over the multiplicative group F q+1 q, t = gcd(,q+1), α r(a), β r (a,b) as it defined in Definitions.7,.9, respectively, let γ r (a,b) = α r (a)+b β r (a,b) for 1 r t 1. Then, the following holds: α t 1 (a) = 0; α t (a) = 1 or α t (a) = 1; α t k (a) = α k or α t k (a) = α k (a), where 1 k t 1; If b = 1 or b = 1, then β t k 1 (a,b) = b β k (a,b), where 0 k t 1; α l (a) α k 1 (a) α l 1 (a) α k (a) = α k l 1 (a), where 0 l k t 1; (α k (a)+1) (α k (a) 1) = α k+1 (a) α k 1 (a), where 0 k t ; 1+α k 1 (a) β k (a,b) = α k (b) β k 1 (b), where 0 k t 1; 18

19 1+γ k 1 (a) β k (a,b) = γ k (b) β k 1 (b), where 0 k t 1. Proof. By Proposition.5, a t 1 = 0, by Proposition.10, Thus, α t 1 (a) = 0. First, we prove a t 1 = α t 1(a) α t (a). α t (a) α k (a) = α t k (a), for every 1 k t 1. Notice, the statement holds for k = 1 for k = 0, since α 1 (a) = α t 1 (a) = 0. By Proposition.8, Thus, α t 1 (a) = a α t (a) α t 3 (a). α t 3 (a) = a α t (a). Therefore, the statement holds for k = 1 as well. Now, assume by induction, α t (a) α r (a) = α t r (a), for every r k, we prove the statement for r = k +1. By Proposition.10, Then, by our induction hypothesis, we get Then, by again using Proposition.10, Hence, by Proposition.11, Therefore, we get Thus, the statement α t (a) α k+1 (a) = α t (a) α k (a) a k+1. α t (a) α k (a) a k+1 = α t k (a) a k+1. α t k (a) a k+1 = α t k 3 (a) a t k a k+1. a t k a k+1 = 1. α t (a) α k+1 (a) = α t k 3 (a). α t (a) α k (a) = α t k (a) holds for every 1 k t 1. Now, by substituting k = t, we get α t (a) = α 0 (a) = 1. Hence, either α t (a) = 1 19

20 or in case q is odd. By the same argument, in case F q has characteristic. By using we have that either or in case q is odd α t (a) = 1 α t (a) = 1, α t (a) α k (a) = α t k (a), α t k (a) = α k (a) α t k (a) = α k (a), α t k (a) = α k (a) necessarily, in case F q has characteristic. Similarly, in case b = 1 or b = 1, by using Proposition.15, we get β t k 1 (a,b) = b β k (a,b), where 0 k t 1. Now, we turn to the last two parts of the proposition. If k = l, we have α k (a) α k 1 (a) α k 1 (a) α k (a) = α 1 (a), which leads to 0 = 0, since α 1 = 0. Now, assume k > l. Then, by Proposition.13, a l a k = [(a 1 a a l 1 ) (a k l a k 3 a k a k 1 )] 1. Now, by using Proposition.10, Thus, α l (a) α l 1 (a) α k(a) α k 1 (a) = α k l 1 (a) α l 1 (a) α k 1 (a). α l (a) α k 1 (a) α l 1 (a) α k (a) = α k l 1 (a). By considering the case k = l+1, then substituting k instead of l, we have Thus, [α k (a)] α k+1 (a) α k 1 (a) = α 0 (a) = 1. (α k (a)+1) (α k (a) 1) = α k (a) 1 = α k+1 (a) α k 1 (a). Now, by Definition.9, β k (a,b) = b α k (a) α k 1 (a). 0

21 Thus, 1+α k 1 (a) β k (a,b) = 1+α k 1 (a,b) [b α k (a) α k 1 (a)] = 1+b α k 1 (a) α k (a) α k 1(a). Now, by using we get α k 1(a) 1 = α k (a) α k (a), 1+α k 1 (a) β k (a,b) = α k (a) [b α k 1 (a) α k (a)] = α k (a) β k 1 (a,b). The last part of the proposition is a consequence of it. Since 1+γ k 1 (a) β k (a,b) = 1+[α k 1 (a)+b β k 1 (a,b)] β k (a,b) = [α k (a)+b β k (a,b)] β k 1 (a,b) = γ k (a) β k 1 (a,b). q+1 Proposition.17 Let G = PSL (q), t = gcd(,q+1), a k,b k,x k,y k,x k,y k as defined in Proposition., for 1 k t 1, α r (a), β r (a,b) as defined in Definition.7,.9, respectively, γ r (a,b) = α r (a) + b β r (a,b), as defined in Proposition.16, for 1 r t 1. Then, the following holds: x k = α k (a) α k 1 (a); y k = α k 1 (a); x k = β k 1(a,b) γ k 1 (a,b); y k = β k 1(a,b); [u(a) s] k = u(a k ) s u( α k (a) α k 1 (a)) h(α k 1 (a)); [u(a) s] k [u(b) s u( b)] = u(b k ) s u( β k 1 (a,b) γ k 1 (a,b)) h(β k 1 (a,b)). Proof. We prove the results of the proposition for x k, y k, x k, for y k on k. Recall, by Proposition., in induction [u(a) s] k = u(a k ) s u(x k ) h(y k ) [u(a) s] k [u(b) s u( b)] = u(b k ) s u(x k) h(y k). 1

22 By substituting k = 1, we have, u(a) s = u(a) s u(0) h(1) = u(a 1 ) s u( α 1 (a) α 0 (a)) h(α 0 (a)) = u(a 1 ) s u(x 1 ) h(y 1 ). Thus, x 1 = α 1 (a) α 0 (a) y 1 = α 0 (a). By using the multiplication laws which we described in Proposition 1.7, we have also, Thus, u a s u b s u b = u(a b 1 ) s u( b) h(b) u( b) Now, assume by induction = u(b 1 ) s u( b b 3 ) h(b) = u b1 s u( b [1+b ]) h(b) = u(b 1 ) s u( β 0 (a,b) γ 0 (a,b)) h(β 0 (a,b)) = u(b 1 ) s u(x 1) h(y 1). x 1 = β 0 (a,b) [α 0 (a)+b β 0 (a,b)] y 1 = β 0 (a,b). x r = α r (a) α r 1 (a), y r = α r 1 (a), x r = β r 1(a,b) [α r 1 (a)+b β r 1 (a,b)], y r = β r 1(a,b) for r k, we prove the correctness of the proposition for r = k +1. By using our induction hypothesis, Proposition 1.7, the identity α k 1 (a) = 1+α k(a) α k (a) from the last part of Proposition.16, the following holds: [u(a) s] k+1 = u(a) s [u(a) s] k = u(a) s u(a k ) s u( α k (a) α k 1 (a)) h(α k 1 (a)) = u(a a k 1 ) s u( a k ) h(a k ) u( α k (a) α k 1 (a)) h(α k 1 (a)) = u(a k+1 ) s u( α k(a) α k 1 (a) ) h( α k(a) α k 1 (a) ) u( α k (a) α k 1 (a)) h(α k 1 (a)) = u(a k+1 ) s u( α k(a)+α k (a) α k (a) ) h(α k (a)) α k 1 (a) = u(a k+1 ) s u( α k(a) [1+α k (a) α k (a)] ) h(α k (a)) α k 1 (a) = u(a k+1 ) s u( α k (a) α k 1 (a)) h(α k (a)).

23 Thus, x k = α k (a) α k 1 (a) y k = α k 1 (a), for every 1 k t 1. Similarly, [u(a) s] k+1 [u(b) s u( b)] = u(a) s [u(a) s] k [u(b) s u( b)] Thus, = u(a) s u(b k ) s u( β k 1 (a,b) γ k 1 (a,b)) h(β k 1 (a,b)) = u(a b k 1 ) s u( b k ) h(b k ) u( β k 1 (a,b) γ k 1 (a,b)) h(β k 1 (a,b)) = u(b k+1 ) s u( β k(a,b) β k 1 (a,b) ) h( β k(a,b) β k 1 (a,b) ) u( β k 1 (a,b) γ k 1 (a,b)) h(β k 1 (a,b)) = u(b k+1 ) s u( β k(a,b) [1+β k (a,b) γ k 1 (a,b)] ) h(β k (a,b)) β k 1 (a,b) = u(b k+1 ) s u( β k (a,b) γ k (a,b)) h(β k (a,b)). x k = β k 1 (a,b) [α k 1 (a)+b β k 1 (a,b)] = β k 1 (a,b) γ k 1 (a,b), y k = β k 1 (a,b), for every 0 k t 1. Example.18 Consider F q for q = 9. Since q is odd, we have t = 9+1 = 15. The polynomial x +x+1 is irreducible over F 9. Let ω be one of the roots of the polynomial over F 9. Since, ω 15 = 1, the order of ω is 30 over F 9. Thus, we can choose a =, we get the following values for a i, where 1 i 1: a 1 = a = 1 = 1 = = 11 a 1 a 3 = 1 = 1 = 8 = 5 a 11 a = 1 = 1 = 7 = 6 a 3 5 a 5 = 1 = 1 = 19 = 1 a 6 3

24 a 6 = 1 a 5 = 1 1 = 7 = 6 a 7 = 1 a 6 = 1 6 = 5 = 8 a 8 = 1 a 7 = 1 8 = 8 = 5 a 9 = 1 a 8 = 1 5 = 6 = 7 a 10 = 1 = 1 = 1 = 19 a 9 7 a 11 = 1 a 10 = 1 19 = 6 = 7 a 1 = 1 a 11 = 1 7 = 5 = 8 a 13 = 1 = 1 = 11 = a 1 8 a 1 = 1 = 1 = = 0. a 13 Now, we choose a value for b, such that b a i, where 1 i 1. Therefore, we may choose b = 1, we get the following values for b i, where 0 i 1: b = b 0 = 1 b 1 = 1 b 0 = 1 1 = 1 = 3 b = 1 b 1 = 1 3 = 10 = 3 b 3 = 1 b = 1 3 = = 9 b = 1 b 3 = 1 9 = 13 = 0 b 5 = 1 = 1 = 16 = 17 b 0 b 6 = 1 = 1 = 1 = 1 b 5 17 b 7 = 1 = 1 = 18 = 15 b 6 1 b 8 = 1 b 7 = 1 15 = 31 = b 9 = 1 b 8 = 1 = 15 = 18

25 b 10 = 1 = 1 = 1 = 1 b 9 18 b 11 = 1 = 1 = 17 = 16 b 10 1 b 1 = 1 = 1 = 0 = 13 b b 13 = 1 = 1 = 9 = b 1 13 b 1 = 1 = 1 = 3 = 10 b 13 b 0 = 1 = 1 = 3 = 1. b 1 10 It is easy to verify the results of Propositions.11,.15, where for 1 i 13, we have a i a 1 i = b i b 15 i = 1 a i +a 15 i = b i +b 16 i =. Now, we find α(a) β(a,b) for a = b = 1. We use Proposition.10. α 1 () = 0 α 0 () = 1 α 1 () = = a 1 α () = 15 = a 1 a α 3 () = 7 = a 1 a a 3 α () = 6 = a 1 a a 3 a α 5 () = 6 = a 1 a a 3 a a 5 α 6 () = 11 = a 1 a a 3 a a 5 a 6 α 7 () = 18 = a 1 a a 3 a a 5 a 6 a 7 α 8 () = 3 = a 1 a a 3 a a 5 a 6 a 7 a 8 α 9 () = 3 = a 1 a a 3 a a 5 a 6 a 7 a 8 a 9 α 10 () = = a 1 a a 3 a a 5 a 6 a 7 a 8 a 9 a 10 α 11 () = 1 = a 1 a a 3 a a 5 a 6 a 7 a 8 a 9 a 10 a 11 α 1 () = 5 = a 1 a a 3 a a 5 a 6 a 7 a 8 a 9 a 10 a 11 a 1 α 13 () = 8 = a 1 a a 3 a a 5 a 6 a 7 a 8 a 9 a 10 a 11 a 1 a 13 α 1 () = 0 = a 1 a a 3 a a 5 a 6 a 7 a 8 a 9 a 10 a 11 a 1 a 13 a 1 5

26 β 1 (,1) = 1 β 0 (,1) = 1 = b 0 β 1 (,1) = 3 = b 0 b 1 β (,1) = 11 = b 0 b 1 b β 3 (,1) = 1 = b 0 b 1 b b 3 β (,1) = 8 = b 0 b 1 b b 3 b β 5 (,1) = 0 = b 0 b 1 b b 3 b b 5 β 6 (,1) = 1 = b 0 b 1 b b 3 b b 5 b 6 β 7 (,1) = 7 = b 0 b 1 b b 3 b b 5 b 6 b 7 β 8 (,1) = 1 = b 0 b 1 b b 3 b b 5 b 6 b 7 b 8 β 9 (,1) = 0 = b 0 b 1 b b 3 b b 5 b 6 b 7 b 8 b 9 β 10 (,1) = 8 = b 0 b 1 b b 3 b b 5 b 6 b 7 b 8 b 9 b 10 β 11 (,1) = 1 = b 0 b 1 b b 3 b b 5 b 6 b 7 b 8 b 9 b 10 b 11 β 1 (,1) = 11 = b 0 b 1 b b 3 b b 5 b 6 b 7 b 8 b 9 b 10 b 11 b 1 β 13 (,1) = 3 = b 0 b 1 b b 3 b b 5 b 6 b 7 b 8 b 9 b 10 b 11 b 1 b 13 β 1 (,1) = 1 = b 0 b 1 b b 3 b b 5 b 6 b 7 b 8 b 9 b 10 b 11 b 1 b 13 b 1 Notice, for every 0 i 1, we have β i (,1) = α i () α i 1 (), as it defined in Definition.9, for every 1 j 1, we have α j () = α j 1 () α j (), as it defined in Definition.7. Notice, also, for every 1 i 1, we have α i = α 13 i, for every 0 j 1, we have β j = β 1 j, as it stated in Proposition.16. 6

27 3 Conclusions future plans The results of the paper provide intriguing connections between the BN pair presentation the OGS presentation of PSL (q), which is a family of finite simple groups, where q. These connections allows for studying very interesting properties of some important recursive sequences over a finite field F q. The results motivate us to further research in open questions about the connections between the mentioned presentations (BN pair OGS) of PSL n (q) for n > other families of simple groups of Lie-type. Acknowledgement The paper based on the final project of Hadas Yadayi for graduation at the department of mathematics in Ariel university under the supervision of Dr. Robert Shwartz. I m Hadas Yadayi, an undergraduate student at the department of mathematics in Ariel University, would like to thank a lot to Dr. Robert Shwartz, for his very professional extra-ordinary supervision. It was a real privilege a honor for me to share of his exceptional scientific knowledge about finite simple groups, especially about BN pair decompositions, its connections to recursive sequences over finite fields. Therefore, I would like to say a lot of thanks to Dr Shwartz. References [1] D. Gorenstein, The Classification of Finite Simple Groups, Plenum Press, New York, MR 86i:00 [] O. Hölder, Zurckfhrung einer beliebigen algebraischen Gleichung auf eine Kette von Gleichungen Math. Ann., 3 (1889) pp [3] C. Jordan, Thorme sur les quations algbriques C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 68 (1869) pp [] C. Jordan, Trait des substitutions et des quations algbriques, Paris (1870) pp [5] O. Schreier, Ueber den JordanHlderschen Satz, Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg, 6 : 3 (198) pp [6] R. Shwartz, R. M. Adin, Y. Roichman, Major Indices Perfect Bases for Complex Reflection Groups, The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 15 (008) Research paper 61. [7] R. Steinberg, Lectures on Chevalley Groups, Yale University (1967). [8] J. Tits, Algebraic abstract simple groups, Annals of Mathematics. Second Series. 80 () (196) pp

28 [9] J. Tits, Buildings of spherical type finite BN-pairs, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 386,Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York (197). 8