Inverse boundary value problem for Maxwell equations with local data
|
|
- Ἀπόλλωνιος Αναγνωστάκης
- 7 χρόνια πριν
- Προβολές:
Transcript
1 Inverse boundary value problem for Maxwell equations with local data Pedro Caro, Petri la and Mikko Salo February 6, 9 Abstract We prove a uniqueness theorem for an inverse boundary value problem for the Maxwell system with boundary data assumed known only in part of the boundary. We assume that the inaccessible part of the boundary is either part of a plane, or part of a sphere. This work generalizes the results obtained by Isakov [I] for the Schrödinger equation to Maxwell equations. Introduction. Let Ω R 3 be a bounded domain with C, boundary, and let ε, µ, σ be C functions in Ω ε is the permittivity, µ the permeability, and σ the conductivity). We will assume that the coefficients satisfy the positivity conditions γ = ε + iσ/ω, ε >, µ >, σ in Ω..) Let D = i, let ν be the exterior unit normal to Ω, and consider the time-harmonic Maxwell equations for the electric field E and magnetic field H in Ω, { D H + ωγe =,.) D E ωµh =, with the boundary condition ν H = a on Ω..3) This is the magnetic boundary value problem for the Maxwell equations. Here we use to denote the vector product in R 3, and F is the curl of the vector field F. When posed in correct function spaces this problem admits a unique solution E, H) when the angular Supported by the Academy of Finland under CoE project 3476 The first author was also supported by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación de España, MTM5-765-C- Department of Mathematics, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 849 Madrid, Spain Department of Mathematics and Statistics, P.. Box 68, 4 University of Helsinki, Finland Department of Mathematics and Statistics, P.. Box 68, 4 University of Helsinki, Finland
2 frequency ω > does not belong to a discrete set of resonant frequencies. The impedance map Λγ, µ) is then defined by Λγ, µ) : a ν E Ω. In analogue with the Calderón problem of electrostatics see [C], [N] and [SU]), we consider the inverse problem of determining the electromagnetic parameters γ and µ from the boundary measurement Λγ, µ). Especially, in this work we assume that we can measure the values of Λγ, µ)a) only on a nonempty open subset Γ of Ω, and only for tangential boundary fields a supported in Γ. We further assume that the inaccessible part of the boundary Γ = Ω \ Γ is either part of a sphere, or part of a plane. Similar results were proved by Isakov [I] for the inverse boundary value problem for the Schrödinger operator. ur work extends this method to Maxwell equations. Let us now formulate the main results of this paper in a precise way. Given Ω as above, we define the spaces H DivΩ) = {F H Ω) 3 ; Divν F ) H Ω)}, T H Div Ω) = {a H Ω) 3 ; ν a =, Diva) H Ω)}, where Div denotes the surface divergence on Ω see for example [CP] and [PS] for more information). Provided that µ and γ are coefficients in C Ω) which satisfy.), then for ω outside a discrete set of resonant frequencies, the magnetic boundary value problem.) has a unique solution in HDiv Ω) H Div Ω) for any a T H Div Ω) see [PS]). The impedance map is well defined, and ur first main result is the following. Λγ, µ) : T H Div Ω) T H Div Ω). Theorem. Assume that Ω {R 3 ; x 3 < } is a C, domain. Let Γ = Ω {x 3 = } and Γ = Ω \ Γ. Assume we have two pairs of electromagnetic parameters γ j, µ j ) C 4 Ω) C 4 Ω), j =,, satisfying the positivity conditions.) and the following boundary conditions: γ =, µ = µ up to order one on Γ, and.4) { there exist C 4 extensions of γ j and µ j into R 3 which are.5) invariant under reflection across the plane {x 3 = }. Suppose that ω is not a resonant frequency for γ, µ ) or, µ ). If the impedance maps restricted to Γ coincide, Λγ, µ )a) Γ = Λ, µ )a) Γ for all a T H Div Ω) with suppa) Γ, then the electromagnetic parameters are equal, i.e. γ = and µ = µ in Ω.
3 Before formulating the second main theorem of our paper, we want to comment on the assumptions in Theorem. The condition.4) is not important, and we expect that a suitable boundary determination result would allow to remove this condition completely in the case of C coefficients such a result is given in [JM]). The condition.5) comes from the method of proof, which requires that the Maxwell equations are invariant under reflection across {x 3 = }. The following is a necessary condition for.5) to hold: ) l ) l γ = =, ν ν ) l ) l µ = µ = on Γ for l =, 3..6) ν ν For the sake of definiteness, we have stated Theorem in terms of the impedance map. However, the proof of Theorem extends to the case of restricted Cauchy data sets C Γ γ, µ) = {ν E Γ, ν H Γ ); E, H) H Ω) 3 H Ω) 3 solves.)}. In this setup Ω can be a Lipschitz domain and ω > any number, and the assumption C Γ γ, µ ) = C Γ, µ ) for two pairs γ j, µ j ) satisfying the conditions in Theorem will imply that γ = and µ = µ in Ω. This result allows domains with transversal intersections of Ω and {x 3 = }, in which case.6) is also sufficient for.5). It is well known see for example [MM], [S] and [S] and the references given in these articles) that Maxwell equations may not admit H -solutions even with boundary data in H Ω) if the domain is non convex: the solution may have a finite dimensional singular part near the conical singularity, so the image of the impedance map might be slightly larger than just T H Div Ω). However, all solutions needed in the proof are restrictions to Ω of H -solutions defined in a neighborhood of Ω actually they are defined in the whole R 3 ), and hence it is enough to restrict only to the part of the graph of Λγ, µ) that is actually needed. Let us now formulate our second main theorem: Theorem. Assume Ω B is a C, domain included in an open ball B of R 3 of positive radius, and let Γ = Ω B, Γ B, Γ = Ω \ Γ. Assume we have two pairs of electromagnetic parameters γ j, µ j ) C 4 Ω) C 4 Ω), j =,, satisfying the conditions of Theorem but with respect to B instead of {x 3 = }. If ω is not a resonant frequency and if the impedance maps restricted to Γ coincide, Λγ, µ )a) Γ = Λ, µ )a) Γ for all a T H Div Ω) with suppa) Γ, then the electromagnetic parameters are equal, i.e. γ = and µ = µ in Ω. The unique recovery of electromagnetic parameters from the scattering amplitude was first proven in [CP] under the assumption that the magnetic permeability µ is a constant. The unique recovery of general C -parameters γ and µ from full boundary data was then proved in [PS], and later simplified in [S], and the uniqueness for the inverse scattering 3
4 problem was proved in [Sa]. Boundary determination results were given in [McD] and [JM], and the more general chiral media was studied in [McD]. For a slightly more general approach and more background information, see also the review article [PS]. Note that in this work we need, for technical reasons, two more derivatives of the parameters compared to the full data problems. Inverse problems with partial data for scalar elliptic equations have attracted considerable attention recently. There are two main approaches: the first uses Carleman estimates [BU], [KSU] and the second uses reflection arguments [I]. In the first approach Ω can be any domain but one needs to measure part of Cauchy data in a small set Γ Ω and the other part in a neighborhood of Ω \ Γ. In the second approach it is enough to measure Cauchy data on a fixed small set Γ, but one has the restriction that Ω \ Γ has to be part of a plane or sphere. In this paper, we apply Isakov s reflection method [I] to the Maxwell system to prove Theorems and. As far as we know, these are the first partial data results for an elliptic system which are analogous to [I] an analog of [KSU] for a Dirac system was recently proved in [ST]). The strategy of the proof is similar to [PS] and [S]: we construct special solutions to the Maxwell system, insert them in a suitable integral identity, and recover the coefficients from an asymptotic limit. However, several issues arise when trying to combine this strategy with the reflection method. The integral identities in [PS] and [S] do not seem to go well together with partial data, and the final identity which we use for recovering the coefficients is new. In this identity, many terms survive in the asymptotic limit, and one needs to carefully manipulate these terms to determine the coefficients. Also, there are cross terms involving products of the original and reflected solutions. In [I] these cross terms were handled by the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma. In our case we need to prove a substitute for the Riemann- Lebesgue lemma, and here the C 4 -regularity of the coefficients is used. The structure of the paper is as follows. In the first section we augment the Maxwell equations into a Dirac type elliptic system and prove a crucial factorization result for a second order matrix Schrödinger operator. This follows in principle [S], but with somewhat different notations and some simplifications. In order to keep the article selfcontained, we have included complete proofs. In the second section we construct the complex geometric optics solutions CG solutions for short) needed in the proof. In this section, following Isakov [I], we also perform the reflection across {x 3 = } and analyze the behavior of CG solutions for Maxwell equations under this operation. In the third section we prove the integration by parts formula needed in our argument, and in the fourth section we perform the asymptotical computations needed in our proof. Theorem is then proved in section five, and finally using the Kelvin transform, the proof of Theorem is reduced to Theorem in the last section. Note that with the exception of the last section, we use the vector field formulation for our equations. nly when analyzing the behavior of Maxwell equations under the Kelvin transform does it become useful to revert to a formulation using differential forms. However, we feel that the major part of this work is easier to read when written in vector field notation. 4
5 Acknowledgement: The first author would like to thank Lassi Päivärinta and the Inverse Problems group at the University of Helsinki for their hospitality.. Augmented Maxwell system and reduction to Schrödinger equation. In this section we recall an argument used in [S]. Roughly, the idea is to augment Maxwell equations in such a way that, with a suitable rescaling of the fields, the system can be transformed into a Schrödinger equation. This argument can be written in a slightly more general setting than the one described above, see [PS]. Let U R 3 be an an open set along this section. Consider the time-harmonic Maxwell system in U given by { D H + ωγe =.7) D E + ωµh = where ω > is a fixed angular frequency, γ = ε + iσ/ω and µ, ε, σ C U) satisfy µ, ε >, σ in U. Taking the divergence of both equations in.7) we obtain the additional equations { D γe) = D µh) =. These will be useful in writing the Maxwell equations as an elliptic system. denoting α = log γ and β = log µ we may combine these into four equations D E + Dα E = D E + ωµh = D H + Dβ H = D H + ωγe =. Namely, This gives rise to the 8 8 system D D D D + Dα ωµi 3 Dβ ωγi 3 H E =. Here means that in these positions we may insert anything and would still get the same equations. We wish to consider 8-vectors X t = Φ H t Ψ E t ), where Ψ and Φ are additional scalar fields. We also want the system to be elliptic, in fact, we want the principal part to be a Dirac-type operator. To this end, consider two 4 4 operators acting on 4-vectors Φ H t ) t for instance) D P + D) = D D ) D, P D) = D D ). 5
6 These operators satisfy P + D)P D) = P D)P + D) = I 4, P + D) = P D), P D) = P + D). Motivated by the Pauli-Dirac operator in R 3, we choose the principal part to have the block form ) P P D) = D). P + D) bserve that P D)P D) = I 8 and P D) = P D). The following notations will also be used in the rest of the work. Let us denote ) ) P P b) a, b) =, P ± P+ b) a, b) =,.8) P + a) P a) where a, b C 3 ; and diaga, B) = A B where A and B are 4 4 diagonal C-matrices. When A = λ I 4 and B = λ I 4 with λ, λ C let us write ) λ I diagλ, λ ) = 4. λ I 4 Note that P a, b)p b, a) = diagb b, a a) and P ± a, b)p ± b, a) = diagb b, a a) for any a, b C 3. We shall write for short P a) and P ± a) when b = a, hence P a)p a) = a a)i 8 and P ± a)p ± a) = a a)i 8 for any a C 3. From these last equalities follow the anticommutation formulas ), P a)p b) = P b)p a) + a b)i 8.9) P ± a)p ± b) = P ± b)p ± a) + a b)i 8,.) for a, b C 3. Moreover, the commutation formula P ± a)p b) = P b)p ± a).) holds for a, b C 3. This formula follows easily from P + a)p + b) = P + a)p + b)) t = P b)p a). More generally P ± a, b)p c) = P c)p ± b, a),.) for a, b, c C 3. For the potential there is seemingly considerable freedom in the choice of the entries marked with. However, we later wish to reduce the Maxwell equations into a matrix 6
7 Schrödinger equation with no first order term so a proper choice of the extra entries will be crucial. We will take ωµ Dα V µ,γ = ωµi 3 Dα Dβ ωγ. Dβ ωγi 3 The augmented Maxwell system is then P D) + V µ,γ )X = in U. The solutions of this system for which Φ = Ψ = correspond to the solutions of the original Maxwell system in U. We may write the potential V µ,γ above in the form V µ,γ = ωdiagµ, γ) + P ± Dβ, Dα) + P Dβ, Dα))..3) Next we rescale the X as follows. Let be defined by Then where Y t = Y Φ Y H ) t Y Ψ Y E ) t ) Y = diagµ, γ )X. P D) + V µ,γ )X = diagγ, µ )P D) + W µ,γ )Y W µ,γ = κi 4 P +Dα) P Dβ) κi 4 and κ = ωγµ. Here we used that Hence ) = κi 8 + P ± Dβ, Dα) P D)diagµ, γ )Y ) = diagγ, µ )[P D) P Dβ, Dα)]Y. P D) + V µ,γ )X = P D) + W µ,γ )Y = when X and Y are related as above. This scaling is motivated by the following result. Lemma.. ne has P D) + W µ,γ )P D) W t µ,γ) = I 8 + Q µ,γ P D) W t µ,γ)p D) + W µ,γ ) = I 8 + Q µ,γ 7
8 where the matrix potentials are given by and Q µ,γ = Q µ,γ = with f = x j,x k f) 3 j,k=. Proof: We have α α αi 3 β β βi 3 κ + 4 Dα) )I 4 Dκ Dκ Dκ Dκ κ + 4 Dβ) )I 4 β β βi 3 κ + 4 Dβ) )I 4 Dκ Dκ α α αi 3 κ + 4 Dα) )I 4 P D) + W µ,γ )P D) W t µ,γ) = I 8 + W µ,γ P D) P D)W t µ,γ W µ,γ W t µ,γ. We claim that = W µ,γ P D) P D)W t µ,γ = α α αi 3 β β βi 3 P Dκ). This can be proved by a direct calculation. However, we will use symbol calculus which gives a slightly more elegant proof. In standard left) quantization, since the symbol of P D) is P ξ) and since ξ j P ξ) = ξj W µ,γ = for j =,, 3, we have W µ,γ P D) P D)W t µ,γ = pw µ,γ P ξ) P ξ)w t µ,γ = p 3 ξm P ξ)d xm Wµ,γ) t m= 3 ξm P ξ)d xm Wµ,γ) t = pp D)Wµ,γ). t m= 8
9 The second equality holds because W µ,γ P ξ) P ξ)w t µ,γ = P ± Dβ, Dα)P ξ) P ξ)p ± Dα, Dβ) =, which is true by.). Consequently W µ,γ P D) P D)Wµ,γ t = pp D)Wµ,γ) t = ) P D)P Dα) P Dκ). P + D)P + Dβ) n the other hand κ W µ,γ Wµ,γ t = + 4 Dα) )I 4 P + Dκ) P Dκ) κ + 4 Dβ) )I 4 since Dα + Dβ) = Dlogµγ) = κ Dκ. This shows the desired form of Q µ,γ. It remains to prove that Q µ,γ has the expression given. We have P D) W t µ,γ)p D) + W µ,γ ) = I 8 W t µ,γp D) + P D)W µ,γ W t µ,γw µ,γ. Note that W t µ,γ = W γ,µ. Hence, changing the role of µ and γ we obtain ), Wµ,γP t D) + P D)W µ,γ = W γ,µ P D) + P D)Wγ,µ t = ) P D)P Dβ) + P Dκ). P + D)P + Dα) and ) κ Wµ,γW t µ,γ = W γ,µ Wγ,µ t = + 4 Dβ) )I 4 P + Dκ) P Dκ) κ +. 4 Dα) )I 4 This shows the desired form of Q µ,γ. The crucial point in the above lemma is of course the vanishing of the first order terms. Also, it is worth pointing out that we will need both second order operators given in Lemma. in our work.. Construction of CG solutions. In this section we construct CG solutions for the rescaled Maxwell system and then we produce solutions for the original Maxwell system. In order to get such solutions we apply the Sylvester-Uhlmann method given in [SU]) to the matrix Schrödinger equation obtained in Lemma.. This argument was introduced in [S]. 9
10 For the sake of completeness we recall the Sylvester-Uhlmann estimate whose proof can be found in [SU], [S]. Let q L R 3 ; C) with compact support and < δ <. If ζ C 3 such that ζ ζ = k with ζ large enough, then for any f L δ+ there exists a unique u Hδ solving + ζ D + q)u = f. Moreover u H s C ζ s f δ L, δ+ for s with C a constant independent of ζ and f. The norms are given by f L = + x ) δ fx) dx δ R 3 and u H s = + x ) δ/ u. δ H s R 3 ) Assume that we can extend µ and γ to the whole space so that for some positive constants ε and µ we have γ ε, µ µ C 4 R 3 ), and let Q µ,γ = ω ε µ I 8 + Q µ,γ which is thus compactly supported. Denoting k = ωε µ we are thus led to the equation + k )I 8 + Q µ,γ ) Z =.4) Let θ R 3 any non-zero vector. Consider ζ C 3 such that ζ ζ = k and ζ = τ ζ + θ + τ ) := τ ζ + θτ), where τ is a free parameter controlling the size of ζ, and ζ = η + iη with η, η R 3, η η = and η = η =. Let Z = Z ζ) be a vector which does not depend on x and which is bounded with respect to the parameter τ. Proposition.. Assume that < δ <, and consider ε > such that < δ+ε <. There exists a CG solution of the form for the equation.4) in R 3, such that Z = e iζ x Z + Z + Z r ) D α Z L δ = τ ), D α Z r L δ = τ α +ε) ), for α. Moreover, if we denote then in R 3. R = lim τz M = lim Z, ζ D)I 8 R = Qµ,γ M.5)
11 Proof: Let ζ C 3 be as above, note that e iζ x + k )I 8 + Q µ,γ ) e iζ x Z + Z + Z r ) = = Q µ,γ Z + + ζ D)I 8 + Q µ,γ )Z + Z r ) in R 3. Let χ be a cut-off function which is identically on a neighborhood of {x R 3 : x < ρ} where ρ is so large that Ω { x < ρ}, and define For τ > let χ τ x) = χx/τ) and ζ D) f = e iξ x f π) 3 R ζ 3 ξ dξ. Z = τ χ τ ζ D) Q µ,γ Z ). It is well known that ζ D) : L δ+ L δ is bounded with norm of order ζ [SU]), hence Moreover, differentiating we get Z L δ C τ Q µ,γz L δ+ = τ ). D α Z L δ = τ ), for all α. Here we need the C 4 -regularity of the coefficients. n the other hand, let Z r be the solution of +ζ D)I 8 +Q µ,γ )Z r = +θτ) D)I 8 +Q µ,γ )Z + ζ Dχ τ ) ζ D) Q µ,γ Z ), satisfying D α Z r L C ζ α + θτ) D)I8 + Q µ,γ )Z + ζ Dχ τ ) ζ D) Q µ,γ Z ) δ, L δ+ for α. We then have the estimates Q µ,γ Z L δ+ = τ ), ζ Dχ τ ) ζ D) Q µ,γ Z ) Cτ ε ζ D) Q µ,γ Z ) L δ+ L δ+ε and + θτ) D)I 8 Z L δ+ C ζ D) Q τ µ,γ Z ) + C D ζ D) Q L δ τ µ,γ Z ) +Cτ ε + θτ) D) ζ D) Q µ,γ Z ). L δ+ε L δ
12 Let us explain the second inequality in more detail: consider ε > such that < δ+ε <. Then ζ Dχ τ ) ζ D) Q µ,γ Z ) = + x ) δ+ ζ Dχ τ ) ζ D) Q µ,γ Z ) dx L δ+ R 3 sup { + x ) ε ζ Dχ τ } + x ) δ+ε ζ D) Q µ,γ Z ) dx x suppχ τ ) R 3 Cτ ε) τ ζ D) Q µ,γ Z ). L δ+ε Therefore D α Z r L δ = τ α +ε) ), for α. Finally, R satisfies the equation.5) by the definition of Z and the continuity of ζ D). Considering Z as in Proposition. we have, by Lemma., that is a solution of the rescaled system Note that this solution can be written as Y = P D) W t µ,γ)z P D) + W µ,γ )Y =. Y = e iζ x Y + Y + Y r ).6) where and Y = P ζ)z, Y = P ζ)z W t µ,γz, Y r = P D) W t µ,γ)z + P D + ζ) W t µ,γ)z r,.7) Y L U) = τ), Dα Y L U) = ), Dα Y r L U) = τ α ε ).8) for α and U any bounded open subset of R 3. Recall that our aim is to construct CG solutions for the original Maxwell system. As we mentioned above, Y will produce a solution of the original Maxwell system if Y Φ = Y Ψ =. In order to get this condition we choose Z in a special way. Lemma.. If then we have for τ large enough. P ζ) k)z ) Φ = P ζ) k)z ) Ψ = Y t = Y H ) t Y E ) t )
13 Proof: This proof was given in [S]. Here it is included for the sake of completeness. As we mentioned above Y is solution of so it is also solution of P D) + W µ,γ )Y =, P D) W t µ,γ)p D) + W µ,γ )Y =. From Lemma. we know that Y Φ and Y Ψ are solutions of { + k )Y Φ + q β Y Φ = + k )Y Ψ + q α Y Ψ =,.9) where the potentials q β = β κ + k 4 Dβ), q α = α κ + k 4 Dα) are compactly supported. Adding ±ki 8 one gets Y = e iζ x Ỹ + Ỹ + Y r ) where Ỹ = P ζ) ki 8 )Z and Ỹ = P ζ)z + ki 8 Wµ,γ)Z t. This shows that { + ζ D + q β )Ỹ + Ỹ + Y r ) Φ =,.) + ζ D + q α )Ỹ + Ỹ + Y r ) Ψ =. It is known that these equations have unique solutions in L δ for ζ large enough see [SU]). Since neither Ỹ Φ nor Ỹ Ψ belong to L δ unless Ỹ Φ = Ỹ Ψ =, we choose Z such that Ỹ Φ = P ζ) ki 8 )Z ) Φ =, Ỹ Ψ = P ζ) ki 8 )Z ) Ψ =. In this way we have Ỹ + Ỹ + Y r ) Φ, Ỹ + Ỹ + Y r ) Ψ L δ. Then, the unique solvability for ζ large implies that Y Φ = Y Ψ = for ζ large enough. An explicit choice of Z verifying the condition of last lemma may be done as follows. Let ζ a ζ k ζ Z = kb τ ζ b = ki 3 b τ ζ = ki 3 ζ b τ ζ k ka ki 3 a ζ ki 3 a = ki 8 + ) τ P ± ζ) + P ζ)) m,.) where we denoted m t = b t a t ) for any a, b C 3. The same choice was done in [S]. 3
14 Next we perform the reflection argument given by Isakov in [I]. As in the statement of Theorem, let Ω {x 3 < } be a C, domain. With respect to the standard Cartesian basis e = {e, e, e 3 }, we introduce the reflection x = x, x, x 3 ) x, x, x 3 ) =: ẋx) and the reflected domain Ω = {ẋx) R 3 : x Ω}. Consider = Ω intγ ) Ω. By the assumption.5), we can extend the coefficients µ j and γ j into R 3 as C 4 functions which are even with respect to x 3 for j =,. We still denote the extended coefficients by µ j and γ j. Note that these functions have the proper regularity to construct the CG solutions as above. For the pairs µ, γ ) and µ, ), and for a given vector ξ = ξ, ξ 3 ) R 3 satisfying ξ >, we construct CG solutions Z, Y, X and Z, Y, X in R 3 with complex vectors ζ and ζ, respectively. We choose ζ = ξ + i τ + ξ η + τ + k η 4.) ζ = ξ i τ + ξ η + τ + k η, 4.3) with τ a free parameter controlling the size of ζ and ζ, where η, η R 3 verify η = η =, η η = and η j ξ = for j =,. More precisely, for ξ = ξ, ξ, ξ 3 ) = ξ, ξ 3 ) we choose η = ξ ξ, ξ, ), η = η ξ ξ = ξ ξ ξ ξ 3, ξ ξ 3, ξ ). Note ζ j ζ j = k for j =,. Let us denote and ζ = ζ lim τ = ˇζ = lim ξ τ) = ζ τ ζ) lim ζ τ = η + iη ζ τ = η iη ξ τ) = ζ τ ˇζ). bserve that ξ τ) = ξ + τ ) and ξ τ) = ξ + τ ). Furthermore, if we denote R = M = lim τz lim Z Ř = ˇM = lim τz lim Z 4
15 then the equations ζ D)I 8 R = Q µ,γ M.4) ˇζ D)I 8 Ř = Q µ, ˇM.5) hold in R 3. We now fix another orthonormal basis f = {f, f, f 3 } with With respect to the basis f one has Therefore, ζ = ζ = i f = ξ ξ, ξ, ), f 3 =,, ) = e 3, f = f f 3..6) i τ + ξ 4 τ + ξ 4, ξ It is obvious that for any x, y R 3 ξ =, ξ, ξ 3 ) f, η =,, ) f = f, η = ξ, ξ 3, ξ ) f. τ + k ξ 3 ξ, ξ 3 + τ + k ξ ξ, ξ τ + k ξ 3 ξ, ξ 3 + τ + k ξ ξ ) f ) f. x y = 3 x j y j = j= 3 j= x f j yf j where x = x, x, x 3 ) = x f, x f, x f 3) f and y = y, y, y 3 ) = y f, y f, y f 3 ) f with x 3 = x f 3 and y 3 = y f 3. We next show that the reflection argument allows to construct CG solutions whose tangential magnetic fields ν H on Ω have support contained in Γ. To this end we introduce for j =,, where Ẋ j x) = diag I 4, I 4 )X j ẋx)) I 4 =. 5
16 It is an easy matter to check that Ẋ and Ẋ are solutions of P D) + V µ,γ )Ẋ = P D) + V µ, )Ẋ = in Ω but also in Ω). Therefore, for τ large enough, H = X = X + Ẋ, H = X = X + Ẋ E E are solutions of the same equations and ν H j Γ = for j =,. Let us state the result obtained as the following proposition. Proposition.3. Corresponding to pairs µ, γ ) and µ, ), and for a given vector ξ R 3 satisfying ξ >, there are CG solutions X and X of the augmented Maxwell equations in Ω such that where the terms X j satisfy P D) + V µ,γ )X = P D) + V µ, )X = X = diagµ, γ )Y + diag I 4, I 4 )Y ẋ)) X = diagµ, γ )Y + diag I 4, I 4 )Y ẋ)) and the rescaled fields Y j are given by.6) and.7) for complex vectors ζ j as in.) and.3), with ξ = ζ ζ. Moreover, for τ large enough the fields X j will solve Maxwell equations in Ω and the tangential components of their magnetic fields will vanish on Γ. 3. The orthogonality identity. We assume that ω is not a resonant frequency, so the Maxwell equations.) have a unique solution E, H) for any prescribed value of ν H on Ω as discussed in the introduction. ur uniqueness proofs are based on the following orthogonality relation involving solutions in Ω and impedance maps on Ω. Proposition 3.. Let µ, γ ) and µ, ) be two pairs of coefficients such that ω is not a resonant frequency for either. Let Λ and Λ be the corresponding impedance maps. Then, for any Xj t = ) Hj t Ej t satisfying P D) + V µ,γ )X = P D) + V µ, )X = in Ω one has XV µ,γ V µ, )X dx = i Ω 6 Ω Λ Λ )ν H ) H ds.
17 Proof: If u v) = the integration by parts identity Ω v u dx and u v) Ω = Ω v u ds P D)X X ) = ip ν)x X ) Ω + X P D)X ) holds. Since Ψ j = Φ j = for j =, one has that X V µ, X ) = X V µ, X ), hence Let X t = V µ,γ V µ, )X X ) = V µ,γ X X ) X V µ, X ) = V µ,γ X X ) X V µ, X ) = P D)X X ) + X P D)X ) = ip ν)x X ) Ω = i E ν H ) H ν E ) ds H ) t Ẽt be the solution of the boundary value problem { P D) + V µ, ) X = in Ω ν H = ν H on Ω. Since X on the boundary verifies Ω E ν H ) = E ν H ) we have V µ,γ V µ, )X X ) = i E ν H ) H ν E ) ds. Ω Finally, note that ip ν) X X ) Ω = P D) X X ) X P D)X ) = V µ, X X ) + X V µ, X ) = V µ, X X ) + X V µ, X ) = V µ, V µ, ) X X ) =. Here we used again that Ψ = Φ = Ψ = Φ =. From the last identity one gets i E ν H ) ds = i H ν Ẽ) ds. Therefore Ω V µ,γ V µ, )X X ) = i = i Ω Ω Ω H ν Ẽ) H ν E ) ds H Λ Λ )ν H ) ds, 7
18 which is the desired integral formula. We next plug the solutions constructed in Proposition.3 into the integral formula given in Proposition 3.. Since Λ a = Λ a on Γ for a T H Ω) with suppa) Γ, we have X V µ,γ V µ, )X dx = i Λ Λ )ν H ) H ds Ω Ω = i Λ Λ )ν H ) H ds. Γ Note that ν H Γ = means that the tangential components of H on Γ vanish. n the other hand, Λ Λ )ν H ) only has tangential components. Hence Λ Λ )ν H ) H = on Γ. Since the boundary term in the integral formula vanishes we get the relation X V µ,γ V µ, )X dx =. Following the same notation we write and we thus have Ω Ẏ j x) = diag I 4, I 4 )Y j ẋx)) X = X + Ẋ = diagµ, γ )Y + Ẏ) X = X + Ẋ = diagµ, γ )Y + Ẏ). Since for τ large enough the scalar components vanish, i.e. X Φ j = X Ψ j = for j =,, writing V µ,γ V µ, as in.3) gives where X V µ,γ V µ, )X = X diagωµ µ ), ωγ ))X = Y + Ẏ) diag µ, γ)y + Ẏ) µ = ω µ µ µ µ, γ = ω γ γ. If now we go back to the integral relation, we get = X V µ,γ V µ, )X dx = Y + Ẏ) diag µ, γ)y + Ẏ) dx Ω Ω = Y diag µ, γ)y dx + Ẏ diag µ, γ)ẏ dx + Y diag µ, γ)ẏ dx Ω Ω Ω + Ẏ diag µ, γ)y dx. Ω 8
19 We gather the first two terms and the last two terms cross terms) in different expressions. bserve that Ẏ diag µ, γ)ẏ dx = Y ẋ)) diag I 4, I 4 )diag µ, γ)diag I 4, I 4 )Y ẋ) dx Ω Ω = Y ẋ)) diag µ, γ)y ẋ) dx Ω = Y diag µ, γ)y dx Ω hence Y diag µ, γ)y dx + Ẏ diag µ, γ)ẏ dx = Y diag µ, γ)y dx. Ω Ω With a similar argument the cross terms become Ω Y diag µ, γ)ẏ dx + Therefore, = X V µ,γ V µ, )X dx = Ω Ω Ẏ diag µ, γ)y dx = Ẏ diag µ, γ)y dx. Y diag µ, γ)y dx + Ẏ diag µ, γ)y dx. 3.7) Below we will integrate by parts in many times. Even though may not be a Lipshitz domain, this procedure is easily justified by integrating by parts separately in the C, domains Ω and Ω and by noting that the contribution from {x 3 = } vanishes. Now, the terms on the right hand side of 3.7) may be simplified by writing Y + Ẏ )diag µ, γ)y dx = Y + Ẏ )diag µ, γ)p D) Wµ t,γ )Z dx. 3.8) Note now that P D)diag γ, µ)z ) = diag µ, γ)p D)Z + P D)diag γ, µ))z and = Y + Ẏ )P D)diag γ, µ)z ) dx = P D)Y + Ẏ)) diag γ, µ)z dx i Y + Ẏ )P ν)diag γ, µ)z ds integrating by parts. We know by.4) that µ = µ and γ = on Γ, and this is valid on as well. Since Y + Ẏ is solution for the rescaled system P D) + W µ, )Y + Ẏ) = 9
20 in, we have Y + Ẏ )P D)diag γ, µ)z ) dx = From 3.8) and the above observations we get = Y + Ẏ W µ, Y + Ẏ)) diag γ, µ)z dx. Y + Ẏ )diag µ, γ)y dx = 3.9) )W µ, diag γ, µ) + P D)diag γ, µ)) + diag µ, γ)w t µ,γ )Z dx. It is a straightforward computation to check where W µ, diag γ, µ) + P D)diag γ, µ)) + diag µ, γ)w t µ,γ = κ diag γ, µ) + κ diag µ, γ) + P ± D γ, D µ) + P D γ, D µ), From now on we denote for short µ = ω µ + µ µ µ, γ = ω γ + γ. U := κ diag γ, µ) + κ diag µ, γ) + P ± D γ, D µ) + P D γ, D µ). bserve that these computations could be written separately for Y and Ẏ, giving Y diag µ, γ)y dx = Y UZ dx, Ẏ diag µ, γ)y dx = Ẏ UZ dx. Recall that solutions of the rescaled Maxwell system and the Schrödinger system look respectively like lim Y = e iζ x Y + Y + Y r ), Z = e iζ x Z + Z + Z r ). Using the estimates in Proposition. and in.8, we have Y diag µ, γ)y dx = lim lim lim e iζ ζ ) x Y ) UZ dx e iζ ζ ) x Y ) UZ dx e iζ ζ ) x Y ) UZ dx.
21 Noting that ζ ζ = ξ and taking the limit in 3.7), we obtain = lim e iξ x Y ) UZ dx 3.3) lim e iξ x Y ) UZ dx 3.3) lim e iξ x Y ) UZ dx 3.3) lim Ẏ UZ dx. 3.33) 4. Some technical computations. In this technical section we compute the limit of the terms given in 3.3), 3.3), 3.3) and 3.33). Lemma 4.. The limit in 3.3) is given by lim e iξ x Y ) UZ dx = = k ζ b ) ζ b ) + ζ a ) ζ a )) e iξ x κ + κ ) µ + γ) dx +ω ζ b ) ζ b ) e iξ x µ ) dx + ω ζ a ) ζ a ) e iξ x γ ) dx µ γ +kω e [ ζ iξ x µ γ ) ] b ) ζ a ) D + ζ a ) ζ b ) D dx µ γ +kω e [ ζ iξ x µ γ ) ] b ) ζ a ) D + ζ a ) ζ b ) D dx. 4.34) µ Proof: Remember that with and Z = τ ki 8 + ) P ± ζ ) + P ζ )) m m t = b t a t ), Y = P ζ )Z. A simple commutation in the middle term after writing the definion of U, gives e iξ x Y ) UZ dx = k e iξ x P ζ )Z τ ) Um dx 4.35) + e iξ x Z τ ) P ζ )P ± ζ ) + P ζ ))κ diag µ, γ) + κ diag γ, µ))m dx 4.36) + e iξ x Z τ ) P ζ )P ± D γ, D µ) + P D γ, D µ))p ± ζ ) + P ζ ))m dx. 4.37)
22 Before computing the limit of 4.35) let us write Y = P ζ )Z = τ It follows from this expression that k lim τ kζ a ζ b )ζ kζ a kζ b ζ a )ζ + kζ b e iξ x P ζ )Z ) Um dx = ) = k e iξ x ζ b ) ζ t ζ a ) ζ t κ diag γ, µ) + κ diag µ, γ)) ) +k e iξ x ζ b ) ζ t ζ a ) ζ t P ± D γ, D µ) + P D γ, D µ)) +kω ] = k e [ ζ iξ x b ) ζ b )κ γ + κ µ) + ζ a ) ζ a )κ µ + κ γ) e [ ζ iξ x µ γ ) ] b ) ζ a ) D + ζ a ) ζ b ) D µ γ To compute the limit of the term in 4.36) observe that one has the relation. 4.38) b a b a dx dx dx dx. 4.39) τ Z ) P ζ )P ± ζ ) + P ζ )) = k τ m P ζ )P ± ζ ) + P ζ )) + 4τ m P ± ζ ) + P ζ ))P ζ )P ± ζ ) + P ζ )). 4.4) Using the commutation formulas.9),.) and.), and the fact that ζ ζ = ξ, we can see that P ± ζ ) + P ζ ))P ζ )P ± ζ ) + P ζ )) = = ζ ζ )P ζ ) P ± ξ)p ± ζ )P ζ ) + ζ ζ )P ± ζ ) P ξ)p ± ζ )P ζ ) +ζ ζ )P ± ζ ) + P ζ )) = P ± ξ)p ± ζ )P ζ ) P ξ)p ± ζ )P ζ ) + τ). 4.4)
23 Having in mind formulas 4.4) and 4.4), we compute the limit of 4.36): lim e iξ x Z τ ) P ζ )P ± ζ ) + P ζ ))κ diag µ, γ) + κ diag γ, µ))m dx = = k e iξ x m P ζ)p ± ζ) + P ζ))κ diag µ, γ) + κ diag γ, µ))m dx e iξ x m 4 P ± ξ) + P ξ))p ± ζ)p ζ)κ diag µ, γ) + κ diag γ, µ))m dx = k e iξ x m P ζ)p ± ζ)κ diag µ, γ) + κ diag γ, µ))m dx ] = k e [ ζ iξ x b ) ζ b )κ µ + κ γ) + ζ a ) ζ a )κ γ + κ µ) dx. 4.4) Here we used P ζ)p ζ) = ζ ζ =, P ± ζ)p ζ) = P ζ)p ± ζ) = ζ ζ ζ ζ and P ± ξ) + P ξ))p ± ζ)p ζ) =. Finally we study the limit of 4.37). Let us write where P ζ ) = τp ζ) + P ξ τ)) P ξ τ)) P ξ) as τ +. We have e iξ x Z τ ) P ζ )P ± D γ, D µ) + P D γ, D µ))p ± ζ ) + P ζ ))m dx = = e iξ x Z 4τ ) P ξ τ))p ± D γ, D µ) + P D γ, D µ))p ± ζ ) + P ζ ))m dx + e iξ x Z ) P ζ)p ± D γ, D µ) + P D γ, D µ))p ± ζ ) + P ζ ))m dx. We split Z into pieces depending of order of τ, ζ a Z = τ ζ b + τ 3 kb ka := τ M + τ M, 4.43)
24 and we set ˇM = lim Z = ˇζ a ˇζ b It follows that lim e iξ x Z τ ) P ζ )P ± D γ, D µ) + P D γ, D µ))p ± ζ ) + P ζ ))m dx = = e iξ x ˇM 4 P ξ)p ± D γ, D µ) + P D γ, D µ))p ± ζ) + P ζ))m dx + e iξ x M ) P ζ)p ± D γ, D µ) + P D γ, D µ))p ± ζ) + P ζ))m dx + lim e iξ x M ) P ζ)p ± D γ, D µ) + P D γ, D µ))p ± ζ ) + P ζ ))m dx. τ bserve that for any a C 3 the formula. P a)p ± D γ, D µ) + P D γ, D µ))p ± ζ) + P ζ))m = a Dγ / ζ a = 4ω a Dγ / a Dµ /µ ζ b a Dµ /µ holds. Using that ζ = τ ζ ξ + τ ), the limit is lim e iξ x Z τ ) P ζ )P ± D γ, D µ) + P D γ, D µ))p ± ζ ) + P ζ ))m dx = = ω e [ ζ iξ x µ γ ) ] b ) ζ b )ξ D) + ζ a ) ζ a )ξ D) dx µ +kω e [ ζ iξ x µ γ ) ] b ) ζ a ) D + ζ a ) ζ b ) D dx µ ω + lim e iξ x µ γ ) ] [ζ τ b )ζ b ) ζ D) + ζ a )ζ a ) ζ D) dx µ In the first term on the right, integration by parts gives ω e [ ζ iξ x µ γ ) ] b ) ζ b )ξ D) + ζ a ) ζ a )ξ D) dx µ = ω e [ ζ iξ x µ γ ) ] b ) ζ b ) ) + ζ a ) ζ a ) ) dx µ +iω e [ ζ iξ x µ γ ) ] b ) ζ b )ν D) + ζ a ) ζ a )ν D) ds. µ 4
25 Since νµ l = νµ l and νγ l = νγ l for l =, on Γ, the boundary term vanishes. n the other hand, for the last term on the right we integrate by parts to obtain e iξ x µ [ µ ) ] ζ D) dx = e iξ x ζ D) dx µ µ [ µ ) ] = e iξ x ζ ξ) dx = µ and e iξ x γ ζ D) dx = = [ γ ) ] e iξ x ζ D) dx = [ γ ) ] e iξ x ζ ξ) dx =. We introduced in order to get rid of the boundary terms in the integrations by parts. Eventually one has lim e iξ x Z τ ) P ζ )P ± D γ, D µ) + P D γ, D µ))p ± ζ ) + P ζ ))m dx = = ω e [ ζ iξ x µ γ ) ] b ) ζ b ) ) + ζ a ) ζ a ) ) dx µ +kω e [ ζ iξ x µ γ ) ] b ) ζ a ) D + ζ a ) ζ b ) D dx. 4.44) µ Putting 4.39), 4.4) and 4.44) together we get the final result. Lemma 4.. The limit in 3.3) is given by = [ +ω e iξ x + +ω lim e iξ x Y ) UZ dx = ] e iξ x κ [ ζ a ) ζ a )κ γ + κ µ) + ζ b ) ζ b )κ µ + κ γ) dx ζ a ) ζ a ) Dγ γ D + ζ b ) ζ b ) Dµ µ ) ] D dx µ µ ] e [ ζ iξ x R E ) ζ a )κ γ + κ µ) + ζ R H ) ζ b )κ µ + κ γ) dx e [ ζ iξ x b ) R E ζ) µ D ζ a ) µ R H ζ) γ ) ] D dx [ µ ω ζ b ) e iξ x ζ D) R ) ] Ψ dx µ [ γ ω ζ a ) e iξ x ζ D) R ) ] Φ dx, 4.45) 5
26 where with R t = RΦ R H ) t RΨ R E ) t ) = Ř Ř = lim τz. Proof: Since Y = P ζ )Z Wµ t, Z we have e iξ x Y ) UZ dx = e iξ x Z ) P ζ )UZ dx 4.46) e iξ x Z) W µ, UZ dx. 4.47) We can write and set M = Then the limit of 4.47) is lim Z = W µ, = κ I 8 P ± Dβ, Dα ) ζ a ζ b ˇM = lim Z = ˇζ a ˇζ b lim e iξ x Z) W µ, UZ dx = = e iξ x κ ˇM U M dx + e iξ x ˇM P ± Dβ, Dα )U M dx = e iξ x κ ˇM κ diag γ, µ) + κ diag µ, γ)) M dx + e iξ x ˇM P ± Dβ, Dα )P ± D γ, D µ) + P D γ, D µ)) M dx ] = e iξ x κ [ ζ a ) ζ a )κ γ + κ µ) + ζ b ) ζ b )κ µ + κ γ) dx [ +ω e iξ x ζ a ) ζ a ) Dγ γ D + ζ b ) ζ b ) Dµ µ ) ] D dx. 4.48) µ µ In the second equality we just wrote down U and we used ˇM P ± D γ, D µ) + P D γ, D µ)) M =. and ˇM P ± Dβ, Dα )κ diag γ, µ) + κ diag µ, γ)) M =. 6
27 We now compute the limit of the right hand side of 4.46): lim e iξ x Z ) P ζ )UZ dx = = e [ ζ iξ x R E ) ζ a )κ γ + κ µ) + ζ R ] H ) ζ b )κ µ + κ γ) dx +ω e [ ζ iξ x b ) R E ζ) µ D ζ a ) µ R H ζ) γ ) ] D dx +ω e [ ζ iξ x b ) R Ψ µ ζ D) + ζ a ) µ R Φ γ ) ] ζ D) dx. Integrating by parts one gets e iξ x µ RΨ ζ D) dx = µ = [ µ ) ] e iξ x RΨ ζ D) dx µ [ µ e iξ x ζ D) R ) ] Ψ dx µ and e iξ x γ RΦ ζ D) dx = = [ γ ) ] e iξ x RΦ ζ D) dx [ γ e iξ x ζ D) R ) ] Φ dx. nce again, we introduced in order to get rid of the boundary terms. Finally lim e iξ x Z ) P ζ )UZ dx = = e [ ζ iξ x R E ) ζ a )κ γ + κ µ) + ζ R ] H ) ζ b )κ µ + κ γ) dx +ω e [ ζ iξ x b ) R E ζ) µ D ζ a ) µ R H ζ) γ ) ] D dx [ µ ω ζ b ) e iξ x ζ D) R ) ] Ψ dx µ [ γ ω ζ a ) e iξ x ζ D) R ) ] Φ dx. 4.49) Putting 4.48) and 4.49) together we get the final formula. 7
28 Lemma 4.3. The limit in 3.3) is given by = +ω lim e iξ x Y ) UZ dx = e [κ iξ x γ + κ µ) ζ b ) ζ R H ) + κ µ + κ γ) ζ a ) ζ R ] E ) dx e [ ζ iξ x a ) ζ R H γ ) D ζ b ) ζ γ R E µ ) ] ) D dx µ [ µ ω ζ b ) e iξ x ζ D) R ) ] Ψ dx µ [ γ ω ζ a ) e iξ x ζ D) R ) ] Φ dx, 4.5) where with R t = RΦ R H ) t RΨ R E ) t ) R = lim τz. Proof: We use the computations done in 4.38) for Y = P ζ )Z and look at the limit lim e iξ x Y ) UZ dx = lim e iξ x P ζ )Z) UZ dx ) = e iξ x ζ b ) ζ t ζ a ) ζ t U R dx. 4.5) We insert the definition of U in 4.5) and we compute ) e iξ x ζ b ) ζ t ζ a ) ζ t U R dx = = e [κ iξ x γ + κ µ) ζ b ) ζ R H ) + κ µ + κ γ) ζ a ) ζ R ] E ) dx ) + e iξ x ζ b ) ζ t ζ a ) ζ t P ± D γ, D µ) + P D γ, D µ)) R dx = e [κ iξ x γ + κ µ) ζ b ) ζ R H ) + κ µ + κ γ) ζ a ) ζ R ] E ) dx [ +ω e iξ x R Ψ µ ζ b ) ζ D) ζ b ) ζ µ R E µ ) ] ) D dx µ [ +ω e iξ x R Φ γ ζ a ) ζ D) + ζ a ) ζ γ R H γ ) ] ) D dx. γ 8
29 Integrating by parts one gets e iξ x µ RΨ ζ D) dx = µ = [ µ ) ] e iξ x RΨ ζ D) dx µ [ µ e iξ x ζ D) R ) ] Ψ dx µ and e iξ x γ RΦ ζ D) dx = = [ γ ) ] e iξ x RΦ ζ D) dx [ γ e iξ x ζ D) R ) ] Φ dx. This gives the final result. The last technical lemma shows that the cross terms do not contribute to the limit. Lemma 4.4. The limit in 3.33) satisfies Proof: Recall that lim Ẏ UZ dx =. 4.5) Ẏ = e iζ ẋ Ẏ + Ẏ + Ẏ r ) Z = e iζ x Z + Z + Z r ), where Ẏ j = diag I 4, I 4 )Yj ẋ) for j =,, r. Note that writing the dot product in terms of the basis f in.6) one has φ τ x) := ζ x ζ ẋx) = ξ x f + τ + k ξ ξ xf 3. Since we chose f 3 = e 3 we have that x f 3 = x 3, hence Ẏ UZ dx = e iφτ Ẏ + Ẏ + Ẏ r ) UZ + Z + Zr ) dx ) = τ + k ξ ξ = τ + k ξ ) ξ ) i τ + k ξ ξ D x3 e iφτ Ẏ + Ẏ + Ẏ r ) UZ + Z + Z r ) dx e iφτ D x3 [Ẏ + Ẏ + Ẏ r ) UZ + Z + Z r )] dx e iφτ ν 3 Ẏ + Ẏ + Ẏ r ) UZ + Z + Z r ) dx. 9
30 The boundary term vanishes because we assumed that l νµ = l νµ and l νγ = l ν for l =, on Γ. Since Ẏ and Z are constant vectors with respect to x we have D x3 [Ẏ + Ẏ + Ẏ r ) UZ + Z + Z r )] = D x3 Ẏ + Ẏ r ) UZ + Z + Z r ) +Ẏ + Ẏ + Ẏ r ) D x3 UZ + Z + Zr ) +Ẏ + Ẏ + Ẏ r ) UD x3 Z + Zr ). Note that from the asymptotic behavior in.8) and in Proposition. one can see that D x3 Ẏ + Ẏ r ) UZ + Z + Zr ) = D x3 Ẏ r ) UZ + ), Ẏ + Ẏ + Ẏ r ) D x3 UZ + Z + Zr ) = Ẏ ) D x3 UZ + ), Ẏ + Ẏ + Ẏ r ) UD x3 Z + Zr ) = Ẏ ) UD x3 Zr + ), in L ); moreover, D x3 Ẏ r ) UZ = τ ε ) L ) n the other hand, we know by 4.38) and 4.43) that Ẏ ) UD x3 Zr = τ ε ). L ) Y ) t = ) ζ b )ζ t ζ a )ζ t + ) := τ τ L ) t + ), Z) t = ζ a ζ b ) + τ ) := τ τ M ) t + τ ) in L ). Therefore lim Note that Ẏ = lim = lim UZ dx = lim + τ + k ξ ) ξ τ + k ξ ) ξ τ τ + k ξ ξ e iφτ Ẏ ) D x3 UZ dx + ) [ e iφτ D x3 Ẏ r ) UZ dx ] e iφτ Ẏ ) UD x3 Zr dx e iφτ Y ẋ)) diag I 4, I 4 )D x3 UZ dx L ) diag I 4, I 4 )D x3 UM = e iφτ L ) diag I 4, I 4 )D x3 UM dx. = ωζ a )ζ a ) ζ D)D x3 γ ωζ b )ζ b ) ζ D)D x3 µ µ. Since the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma implies that µ lim e iφτ D j D x3 dx = lim µ we have proved the result. e iφτ D j D x3 γ dx =, 3
31 5. Proof of Theorem. Assuming the conditions in Theorem, we have proved that the identity in 3.3) 3.33) holds and that the terms in that identity have the limits given in Lemmas 4. to 4.4. In this section we show the equations verified by the coefficients and then give a proof of Theorem. Proposition 5.. Let ξ R 3. With appropriate choices of the constant vectors a, a, b and b one has the following equations: a) If we choose b = b = ˇζ and a = a = ζ [ e iξ x β β ) + ] 4 [Dβ ) Dβ ) ] + κ κ dx =. 5.53) b) If we choose a = a = ˇζ and b = b = ζ [ e iξ x α α ) + ] 4 [Dα ) Dα ) ] + κ κ dx =. 5.54) Proof: In order to get these equations from the previous lemmas we will need the equations.4) and.5). Let us write these equations by components: ζ D) R Φ = α κ + k Dα 4 ) ) ζ a ) ζ D)I 3 RH = ζ b )Dκ ζ D) R Ψ = β κ + k Dβ 5.55) 4 ) ) ζ b ) ζ D)I 3 RE = ζ a )Dκ, ˇζ D)ŘΦ = α κ + k Dα 4 ) )ˇζ a ) ˇζ D)I 3 Ř H = ˇζ b )Dκ ˇζ D)ŘΨ = β κ + k Dβ 5.56) 4 ) )ˇζ b ) ˇζ D)I 3 Ř E = ˇζ a )Dκ. We take complex conjugates in 5.56) in order to get the information required. ζ D) R Φ = α κ + k Dα 4 ) ) ζ a ) ζ D)I 3 RH = ζ b )Dκ ζ D) R Ψ = β κ + k Dβ 4 ) ) ζ b ) ζ D)I 3 RE = ζ a )Dκ. 5.57) These equations are valid in R 3. Multiplying the second and fourth equations of 5.55) and 5.57) by ζ one gets ζ R H = ζ b )κ k) ζ R E = ζ a )κ k) ζ R 5.58) H = ζ b )κ k) ζ R E = ζ a )κ k). 3
32 To see the last identities we used the decay of R j for j =, at infinity, and the fact that ζ R H ζ b )κ, ζ R E ζ a )κ, ζ R H ζ b )κ and ζ R E ζ a )κ are entire functions in the variable ζ x. Let us denote T ) = ω ζ b ) T ) = ω ζ a ) T 3) = ω ζ b ) T 4) = ω ζ a ) [ µ e iξ x ζ D) R ) ] Ψ dx µ [ γ e iξ x ζ D) R ) ] Φ dx γ [ µ e iξ x ζ D) R ) ] Ψ dx µ [ γ e iξ x ζ D) R ) ] Φ dx which are terms from 4.45) and 4.5). Then from the first and third equations in 5.55) and 5.57) one gets ω ζ b ) ζ b ) ω ζ a ) ζ a ) Noting that one can write ω ζ b ) ζ b ) ω ζ a ) ζ a ) where T 5) = ω ζ b ) ζ b ) T 6) = ω ζ a ) ζ a ) T ) + T ) + T 3) + T 4) = [ e iξ x β β ) κ + κ 4 Dβ ) + ] [ 4 Dβ ) µ ) ] µ e iξ x [ α α ) κ + κ 4 Dα ) + 4 Dα ) ] [ γ µ β µ µ µ β ) = D D µ µ µ µ α γ γ γ γ α ) = D D, γ γ T ) + T ) + T 3) + T 4) = T 5) + T 6) [ e iξ x µ µ µ µ ] D D µ µ µ µ β β ) dx e iξ x [ γ D γ γ D γ γ α α ) dx ] dx. ] dx, [ e iξ x κ + κ 4 Dβ ) + ] [ 4 Dβ ) µ ) ] dx µ [ e iξ x κ + κ 4 Dα ) + ] [ 4 Dα ) γ ) ] dx. 3
33 Note that µ µ D µ Denoting we get Dβ µ D µ D = µ µ γ γ γ D D = γ Dα D T 7) = ω ζ b ) ζ b ) T 8) = ω ζ a ) ζ a ) γ µ Dβ µ D µ Dα D e iξ x β β ) dx e iξ x α α ) dx γ. T ) + T ) + T 3) + T 4) = T 5) + T 6) + T 7) + T 8) [ ω ζ b ) ζ b ) e iξ x Dβ µ D µ Dβ µ ] D dx µ [ ω ζ a ) ζ a ) e iξ x Dα γ D Dα γ ] D dx γ ω ζ b ) ζ b ) e iξ x µ ) dx µ ω ζ a ) ζ a ) e iξ x γ ) dx. We consider the next terms from 4.34) and 4.45) T 9) = ω ζ b ) ζ b ) e iξ x µ ) dx µ T ) = ω ζ a ) ζ a ) e iξ x γ ) dx γ T ) = ω e [ ζ iξ x γ a ) ζ a )Dα D + ζ b ) ζ b )Dβ D hence ) ] dx, µ T ) + T ) + T 3) + T 4) + T 9) + T ) + T ) = T 5) + T 6) + T 7) + T 8) [ +ω ζ b ) ζ b ) e iξ x Dβ µ D + µ Dβ µ ] D dx µ [ +ω ζ a ) ζ a ) e iξ x Dα γ D + Dα γ ] D dx. We note that µ µ γ γ D = Dβ Dβ ), D = Dα Dα ) µ µ 33 µ
34 hence T ) + T ) + T 3) + T 4) + T 9) + T ) + T ) = T 5) + T 6) + T 7) + T 8) +ω ζ b ) ζ b ) e iξ x µ [Dβ ) Dβ ) ] dx 4 µ +ω ζ a ) ζ a ) e iξ x γ [Dα ) Dα ) ] dx. 5.59) 4 Considering the terms T ) = e [ ζ iξ x R E ) ζ a )κ γ + κ µ) + ζ R ] H ) ζ b )κ µ + κ γ) dx T 3) = e [κ iξ x γ + κ µ) ζ b ) ζ R H ) + κ µ + κ γ) ζ a ) ζ R ] E ) dx T 4) = k ζ b ) ζ b ) + ζ a ) ζ a )) e iξ x κ + κ ) µ + γ) dx ] T 5) = e iξ x κ [ ζ a ) ζ a )κ γ + κ µ) + ζ b ) ζ b )κ µ + κ γ) dx from 4.34), 4.45) and 4.5); and using 5.58) we have that = + Therefore T ) + T 3) = ] e [ ζ iξ x a ) ζ a )κ k)κ γ + κ µ) + ζ b ) ζ b )κ k)κ µ + κ γ) dx ] e [κ iξ x γ + κ µ) ζ b ) ζ b )κ k) + κ µ + κ γ) ζ a ) ζ a )κ k) dx. T ) + T 3) + T 4) + T 5) = = ζ a ) ζ a ) e iξ x κ κ µ + κ γ) dx + ζ b ) ζ b ) e iξ x κ κ γ + κ µ) dx. 5.6) Now we make the choice b = b = ˇζ and a = a = ζ. The equations 5.55) and 5.57) imply that R j E = for j =,. Considering all the terms from the technical lemmas in Section 4, we see that the only surviving terms in 3.3) 3.33) are those which appear on the left hand sides of 5.59) and 5.6). Thus these computations give [ e iξ x β β ) + µ [Dβ ) Dβ ) ] + κ 4 µ ω κ γ + κ µ) +κ κ + 4 Dβ ) [ 4 Dβ ) µ ) ]] ) dx =. µ 34
35 If we choose a = a = ˇζ and b = b = ζ, we get that R j H = for j =, for the same reason as above. We consider again all the terms from the lemmas in Section 4 and we get [ e iξ x α α ) + γ [Dα ) Dα ) ] + κ 4 ω κ µ + κ γ) +κ κ + 4 Dα ) [ 4 Dα ) γ ) ]] ) dx =. Finally, by a direct computation we see that κ ω κ µ + κ γ) + κ κ ) γ =, κ ω κ γ + κ µ) + κ κ ) µ µ =, hence the result is obtained. The preceding arguments are valid for all ξ R 3 with ξ >, since this was the assumption on ξ in the construction of reflected CG solutions. However, the continuity of the Fourier transform proves the result for all ξ. The above proposition shows that the coefficients satisfy the following equations in : α α ) + 4 Dα + α ) Dα α ) + ω µ γ µ ) =, β β ) + 4 Dβ + β ) Dβ β ) + ω µ γ µ ) =. Let u = γ / and v = µ /µ. The equations become log u) + γ ) Dγ Dlog u) + ω µ γ µ ) =, log v) + µ µ ) Dµ µ Dlog v) + ω µ γ µ ) =. Multiplying the equations by γ and µ µ we obtain Finally, these may be written as D γ Dlog u)) + ω µ γ µ )γ =, D µ µ Dlog v)) + ω µ γ µ )µ µ =. D Du) + ω µ u v )u =, D µ Dv) + ω µ u v )v = in. This is a semilinear elliptic system for u, v C 4 ). The assumptions in Theorem imply that u = v = and ν u = ν v =. The following formulation of the unique continuation property will therefore imply that γ and µ µ in, thus proving Theorem. 35
36 Lemma 5.. Let a, b be non-vanishing complex functions in C ) with positive real part, and let p, q be complex functions in L ). Suppose that u, v C ) satisfy in D adu) + pu v )u =, D bdv) + qu v )v =, and also u = v = and ν u = ν v =. Then u v in. Proof: Let u = + a z and v = + b w. Using the identities we obtain the equations Here p, q L ) are given by D ada z)) = a z + a ) z), a D bdb w)) = b w + b ) w), b u v = ab) zw + b z + a w)uv + ), z + a ) a z + pzw + b z + a w) =, w + b ) b w + qzw + b z + a w) =. p = a pab) uv + )u, q = b qab) uv + )v. Thus, there is C > such that the following differential inequalities for z, w C ) are valid almost everywhere in : zx) C zx) + wx) ), wx) C zx) + wx) ). We also have z = w = and ν z = ν w =. The unique continuation property holds in this setting, which can be seen by applying a scalar Carleman estimate to both z and w for details see [KSaU]). Thus z and w vanish identically in. 6. Proof of Theorem. Here we prove an analog of Theorem for the case where the inaccessible part is part of a sphere. Following the idea in [I], this reduces to the hyperplane case by using the Kelvin transform. We first need to check how the Maxwell equations behave under the Kelvin transform. For this it is convenient to consider E and H as complex valued -forms in Ω that is, a vector field E, E, E 3 ) is identified with the -form E dx + E dx + E 3 dx 3 ). We equip Ω with the Euclidean metric e, and introduce the Hodge star operator e which maps a -form X dx + X dx + X 3 dx 3 to the -form X dx dx 3 + X dx 3 dx + X 3 dx dx. If d is the exterior derivative, the Maxwell equations in form notation are { de = iωµ e H in Ω. dh = iωγ e E 36
37 Assume that is not in Ω. The Kelvin transform is given by xx) = x x, F x) = x x) = x x. If Ω = F Ω), then F is a conformal transformation from Ω, e) onto Ω, e): F e = x 4 e. Let Ẽ = F E, H = F H, µ = F µ, and γ = F γ. The following is the transformation law for the Maxwell equations under the Kelvin transform. Lemma 6.. ne has { de = iωµ e H dh = iωγ e E in Ω { dẽ = iω µ x e H d H = iω γ x e Ẽ in Ω. Proof: We use the following identities valid for k-forms η in a 3-manifold: df η = F dη, F e η) = F ef η, ce η = c 3/ k e η. Here c is any positive smooth function. If de = iωµ e H, then dẽ = df E = F de = F iωµ e H) = iω µ F e H = iω µ ex 4 e H = iω µ x e H. The other direction and the other equation are handled analogously. Next we check how the impedance map transforms. Note that in the form notation, the boundary condition in the Maxwell equations corresponds to fixing the tangential -form e ν H) on Ω, where ν = ν dx + ν dx + ν 3 dx 3 is the outer unit normal written as a -form. Lemma 6.. Let Λ be the impedance map in Ω with coefficients µ, γ), and let Λ be the impedance map in Ω with coefficients µ x, γ x ). If T is a tangential field on Ω, then Λ T ) = F ΛF ) T ). Proof: We take ρ to be a boundary defining function for Ω, that is, ρ is a smooth function R 3 R and Ω = {ρ > }, Ω = {ρ = }. Then ρ = F ρ is a boundary defining function for Ω. The unit normal is the -form ν = d ρ F dρ = = F dρ = F x dρ ) = x F ν, d ρ e F dρ F F ) e dρ F ) e dρ e using that F ) e = x 4 e and ν = dρ/ dρ e. 37
38 Let Ẽ, H) be a solution to the Maxwell system in Ω with e ν H) e Ω = T. Then on Ω one has e ν Ẽ) = x e F ν E) = x F F ) eν E)) = F e ν E)). Similarly e ν H) = F e ν H)), and therefore Λ T ) = e ν Ẽ) = F Λ e ν H)) = F ΛF ) T ). We now assume that µ j, γ j ) are two sets of coefficients satisfying the assumptions of Theorem, and let Λ and Λ be the corresponding impedance maps. Let B be an open ball with Ω B, and suppose that Γ Ω is such that Λ T Γ = Λ T Γ for tangential fields T supported in Γ. Assume that Γ = Ω \ Γ satisfies Γ = Ω B and Γ B, that is, the inaccessible part Γ is part of a sphere. We wish to show that µ = µ and γ = in Ω. To this end, choose coordinates so that B = Bx, ) where x =,, ), and assume that the origin is not in Ω. Let Ω = F Ω) be the image of Ω under the Kelvin transform. From Lemma 6. we obtain that Λ T ) eγ = Λ T ) eγ for tangential fields supported in Γ = F Γ). Since the Kelvin transform maps Γ onto a subset of {x 3 = }, we are in a situation where the inaccessible part of the boundary is part of a hyperplane. Also the other conditions in Theorem are satisfied; in particular,.5) follows from its analog for B which reads { there exist C 4 extensions of γ j and µ j into R 3 which are preserved under the map x F R F x), where F is the Kelvin transform and R is the reflection x, x, x 3 ) x, x, x 3 ). Consequently, Theorem implies that µ x = µ x, γ x = x in Ω. It follows that µ = µ and γ = in Ω, thus proving Theorem. References [BU] [C] Bukhgeim, A. L., Uhlmann, G., Recovering a potential from partial Cauchy data. Comm. PDE 7 ), p Calderón, A. P., n an inverse boundary value problem. Seminar on Numerical Analysis and its Applications to Continuum Physics Río de Janeiro, 98), pp , Soc. Brasil. Mat., Río de Janeiro,
39 [CP] [I] [JM] [KSaU] [KSU] [McD] [McD] [MM] [N] [PS] [PS] [S] [S] [ST] [S] Colton, D., Päivärinta, L., The uniqueness of a solution to an inverse scattering problem for electromagnetic waves. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 9 99), no., Isakov, V., n uniqueness in the inverse conductivity problem with local data. Inverse Probl. Imaging 7), no., p Joshi, M., McDowall, S. R., Total determination of material parameters from electromagnetic boundary information. Pacific J. Math. 93 ), 7 9. Kenig, C. E., Salo, M., Uhlmann, G., Inverse problems for the anisotropic Maxwell equations. Preprint 9). Kenig, C. E., Sjöstrand J., Uhlmann, G., The Calderón problem with partial data. Ann. of Math. 65 7), p McDowall, S. R., Boundary determination of material parameters from electromagnetic boundary information. Inverse Problems 3 997), McDowall, S. R., An electromagnetic inverse problem in chiral media. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 35 ), no. 7, Mitrea, D., Mitrea, M., Finite energy solutions of Maxwell s equations and constructive Hodge decompositions on nonsmooth Riemannian manifolds. J. Funct. Anal. 9 ), no., Nachman, A. I., Reconstructions from boundary measurements. Ann. of Math ), no. 3, la, P., Päivärinta, L., Somersalo, E., An inverse boundary value problem in electrodynamics. Duke Math. J ), no. 3, la, P., Päivärinta, L., Somersalo, E., Inverse problems for time harmonic electrodynamics. Inside out: inverse problems and applications, 69 9, Math. Sci. Res. Inst. Publ., 47, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 3. la, P., Somersalo, E., Electromagnetic inverse problems and generalized Sommerfeld potentials. SIAM J. Appl. Math ), no. 4, Salo, M., Semiclassical pseudodifferential calculus and the reconstruction of a magnetic field. Comm. PDE 3 6), no., p Salo, M., Tzou, L., Inverse problems with partial data for a Dirac system: a Carleman estimate approach. Preprint 9). Saranen, J., Über das Verhalten der Lösungen der Maxwellschen Randwertaufgabe in Gebieten mit Kegelspitzen. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 98), no.,
2 Composition. Invertible Mappings
Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan Composition. Invertible Mappings In this section we discuss two procedures for creating new mappings from old ones, namely,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPartial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013
The boundary element method March 26, 203 Introduction and notation The problem: u = f in D R d u = ϕ in Γ D u n = g on Γ N, where D = Γ D Γ N, Γ D Γ N = (possibly, Γ D = [Neumann problem] or Γ N = [Dirichlet
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEvery set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set May 6, 2008 Abstract A set of first-order formulas, whatever the cardinality of the set of symbols, is equivalent to an independent
Διαβάστε περισσότεραC.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions
C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions Paul Liu November 15, 2007 Note that these are sample solutions only; in many cases there were many acceptable answers. 1 Reynolds Problem 10.1 1.1 Normal-order
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExample Sheet 3 Solutions
Example Sheet 3 Solutions. i Regular Sturm-Liouville. ii Singular Sturm-Liouville mixed boundary conditions. iii Not Sturm-Liouville ODE is not in Sturm-Liouville form. iv Regular Sturm-Liouville note
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3
Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 1 State vector space and the dual space Space of wavefunctions The space of wavefunctions is the set of all
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath221: HW# 1 solutions
Math: HW# solutions Andy Royston October, 5 7.5.7, 3 rd Ed. We have a n = b n = a = fxdx = xdx =, x cos nxdx = x sin nx n sin nxdx n = cos nx n = n n, x sin nxdx = x cos nx n + cos nxdx n cos n = + sin
Διαβάστε περισσότερα6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.
6.1. Dirac Equation Ref: M.Kaku, Quantum Field Theory, Oxford Univ Press (1993) η μν = η μν = diag(1, -1, -1, -1) p 0 = p 0 p = p i = -p i p μ p μ = p 0 p 0 + p i p i = E c 2 - p 2 = (m c) 2 H = c p 2
Διαβάστε περισσότεραUniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor
Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor Given f L 1 T 1 ), we consider the partial sums of the Fourier series of f: N 1) S N fθ) = ˆfk)e ikθ. k= N A calculation gives the Dirichlet formula
Διαβάστε περισσότεραforms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with
Week 03: C lassification of S econd- Order L inear Equations In last week s lectures we have illustrated how to obtain the general solutions of first order PDEs using the method of characteristics. We
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS
CHAPTER 5 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS EXERCISE 104 Page 8 1. Find the positive root of the equation x + 3x 5 = 0, correct to 3 significant figures, using the method of bisection. Let f(x) =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραderivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates
derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates swapnizzle 03-03- :5:43 We begin by recognizing the familiar conversion from rectangular to spherical coordinates (note that φ is used
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEE512: Error Control Coding
EE512: Error Control Coding Solution for Assignment on Finite Fields February 16, 2007 1. (a) Addition and Multiplication tables for GF (5) and GF (7) are shown in Tables 1 and 2. + 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 3
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSrednicki Chapter 55
Srednicki Chapter 55 QFT Problems & Solutions A. George August 3, 03 Srednicki 55.. Use equations 55.3-55.0 and A i, A j ] = Π i, Π j ] = 0 (at equal times) to verify equations 55.-55.3. This is our third
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 8.3 Trigonometric Equations
99 Section 8. Trigonometric Equations Objective 1: Solve Equations Involving One Trigonometric Function. In this section and the next, we will exple how to solving equations involving trigonometric functions.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOther Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests
Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Side-Note: So far we have seen a few approaches for creating tests such as Neyman-Pearson Lemma ( most powerful tests of H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 :
Διαβάστε περισσότεραConcrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016
Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016 Silvio Capobianco Exercise 1.7 Let H(n) = J(n + 1) J(n). Equation (1.8) tells us that H(2n) = 2, and H(2n+1) = J(2n+2) J(2n+1) = (2J(n+1) 1) (2J(n)+1)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPhys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)
Phys460.nb 81 ψ n (t) is still the (same) eigenstate of H But for tdependent H. The answer is NO. 5.5.5. Solution for the tdependent Schrodinger s equation If we assume that at time t 0, the electron starts
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008
Tridiagonal matrices Gérard MEURANT October, 2008 1 Similarity 2 Cholesy factorizations 3 Eigenvalues 4 Inverse Similarity Let α 1 ω 1 β 1 α 2 ω 2 T =......... β 2 α 1 ω 1 β 1 α and β i ω i, i = 1,...,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:
HOMEWORK 4 Problem a For the fast loading case, we want to derive the relationship between P zz and λ z. We know that the nominal stress is expressed as: P zz = ψ λ z where λ z = λ λ z. Therefore, applying
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAreas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates
Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOrdinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit
Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ting Zhang Stanford May 11, 2001 Stanford, 5/11/2001 1 Outline Ordinal Classification Ordinal Addition Ordinal Multiplication Ordinal
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAreas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates
Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 3 Solutions
Homework 3 Solutions Igor Yanovsky (Math 151A TA) Problem 1: Compute the absolute error and relative error in approximations of p by p. (Use calculator!) a) p π, p 22/7; b) p π, p 3.141. Solution: For
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSecond Order Partial Differential Equations
Chapter 7 Second Order Partial Differential Equations 7.1 Introduction A second order linear PDE in two independent variables (x, y Ω can be written as A(x, y u x + B(x, y u xy + C(x, y u u u + D(x, y
Διαβάστε περισσότερα3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β
3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS Page Theorem cos(αβ cos α cos β -sin α cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α NOTE: cos(αβ cos α cos β cos(α-β cos α -cos β Proof of cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α Let s use a unit circle
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCongruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 24, no. 5, 239-246 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/.2988/ija.24.422 Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 Ligong An and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραECE Spring Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes 2
ECE 634 Spring 6 Prof. David R. Jackson ECE Dept. Notes Fields in a Source-Free Region Example: Radiation from an aperture y PEC E t x Aperture Assume the following choice of vector potentials: A F = =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραb. Use the parametrization from (a) to compute the area of S a as S a ds. Be sure to substitute for ds!
MTH U341 urface Integrals, tokes theorem, the divergence theorem To be turned in Wed., Dec. 1. 1. Let be the sphere of radius a, x 2 + y 2 + z 2 a 2. a. Use spherical coordinates (with ρ a) to parametrize.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραProblem Set 3: Solutions
CMPSCI 69GG Applied Information Theory Fall 006 Problem Set 3: Solutions. [Cover and Thomas 7.] a Define the following notation, C I p xx; Y max X; Y C I p xx; Ỹ max I X; Ỹ We would like to show that C
Διαβάστε περισσότερα4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)
84 CHAPTER 4. STATIONARY TS MODELS 4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(,) This section is an introduction to a wide class of models ARMA(p,q) which we will consider in more detail later in this
Διαβάστε περισσότεραProblem Set 9 Solutions. θ + 1. θ 2 + cotθ ( ) sinθ e iφ is an eigenfunction of the ˆ L 2 operator. / θ 2. φ 2. sin 2 θ φ 2. ( ) = e iφ. = e iφ cosθ.
Chemistry 362 Dr Jean M Standard Problem Set 9 Solutions The ˆ L 2 operator is defined as Verify that the angular wavefunction Y θ,φ) Also verify that the eigenvalue is given by 2! 2 & L ˆ 2! 2 2 θ 2 +
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMatrices and Determinants
Matrices and Determinants SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Q 1. For what value of k do the following system of equations possess a non-trivial (i.e., not all zero) solution over the set of rationals Q? x + ky + 3z
Διαβάστε περισσότερα6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes
122 CHAPTER 6. ARMA MODELS 6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes The purpose of forecasting is to predict future values of a TS based on the data collected to the present. In this section we will discuss a linear
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStatistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests
Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Shirsendu Mukherjee Department of Statistics, Asutosh College, Kolkata, India. shirsendu st@yahoo.co.in So far we have treated the testing of one-sided
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions
SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES GLMA Linear Mathematics 00- Examination Solutions. (a) i. ( + 5i)( i) = (6 + 5) + (5 )i = + i. Real part is, imaginary part is. (b) ii. + 5i i ( + 5i)( + i) = ( i)( + i)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΑπόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.
Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο The time integral of a force is referred to as impulse, is determined by and is obtained from: Newton s 2 nd Law of motion states that the action
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Pohozaev identity for the fractional Laplacian
The Pohozaev identity for the fractional Laplacian Xavier Ros-Oton Departament Matemàtica Aplicada I, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (joint work with Joaquim Serra) Xavier Ros-Oton (UPC) The Pohozaev
Διαβάστε περισσότερα9.09. # 1. Area inside the oval limaçon r = cos θ. To graph, start with θ = 0 so r = 6. Compute dr
9.9 #. Area inside the oval limaçon r = + cos. To graph, start with = so r =. Compute d = sin. Interesting points are where d vanishes, or at =,,, etc. For these values of we compute r:,,, and the values
Διαβάστε περισσότεραVariational Wavefunction for the Helium Atom
Technische Universität Graz Institut für Festkörperphysik Student project Variational Wavefunction for the Helium Atom Molecular and Solid State Physics 53. submitted on: 3. November 9 by: Markus Krammer
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 8 Model Solution Section
MATH 004 Homework Solution Homework 8 Model Solution Section 14.5 14.6. 14.5. Use the Chain Rule to find dz where z cosx + 4y), x 5t 4, y 1 t. dz dx + dy y sinx + 4y)0t + 4) sinx + 4y) 1t ) 0t + 4t ) sinx
Διαβάστε περισσότεραST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II
ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II 2014/2015: Semester II Tutorial 7 1. Let X be a sample from a population P and consider testing hypotheses H 0 : P = P 0 versus H 1 : P = P 1, where P j is a known
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSpace-Time Symmetries
Chapter Space-Time Symmetries In classical fiel theory any continuous symmetry of the action generates a conserve current by Noether's proceure. If the Lagrangian is not invariant but only shifts by a
Διαβάστε περισσότεραParametrized Surfaces
Parametrized Surfaces Recall from our unit on vector-valued functions at the beginning of the semester that an R 3 -valued function c(t) in one parameter is a mapping of the form c : I R 3 where I is some
Διαβάστε περισσότεραReminders: linear functions
Reminders: linear functions Let U and V be vector spaces over the same field F. Definition A function f : U V is linear if for every u 1, u 2 U, f (u 1 + u 2 ) = f (u 1 ) + f (u 2 ), and for every u U
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSolutions to Exercise Sheet 5
Solutions to Eercise Sheet 5 jacques@ucsd.edu. Let X and Y be random variables with joint pdf f(, y) = 3y( + y) where and y. Determine each of the following probabilities. Solutions. a. P (X ). b. P (X
Διαβάστε περισσότερα= {{D α, D α }, D α }. = [D α, 4iσ µ α α D α µ ] = 4iσ µ α α [Dα, D α ] µ.
PHY 396 T: SUSY Solutions for problem set #1. Problem 2(a): First of all, [D α, D 2 D α D α ] = {D α, D α }D α D α {D α, D α } = {D α, D α }D α + D α {D α, D α } (S.1) = {{D α, D α }, D α }. Second, {D
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas
09 Section 7. Double and Half Angle Fmulas To derive the double-angles fmulas, we will use the sum of two angles fmulas that we developed in the last section. We will let α θ and β θ: cos(θ) cos(θ + θ)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOrbital angular momentum and the spherical harmonics
Orbital angular momentum and the spherical harmonics March 8, 03 Orbital angular momentum We compare our result on representations of rotations with our previous experience of angular momentum, defined
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS
CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS Shiah-Sen Wang The graphs are prepared by Chien-Lun Lai Based on : Precalculus: Mathematics for Calculus by J. Stuwart, L. Redin & S. Watson, 6th edition, 01, Brooks/Cole Chapter
Διαβάστε περισσότεραInverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. ------------------ ----------------------------- -----------------
Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. 1. Sin ( ) = a) b) c) d) Ans b. Solution : Method 1. Ans a: 17 > 1 a) is rejected. w.k.t Sin ( sin ) = d is rejected. If sin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe semiclassical Garding inequality
The semiclassical Garding inequality We give a proof of the semiclassical Garding inequality (Theorem 4.1 using as the only black box the Calderon-Vaillancourt Theorem. 1 Anti-Wick quantization For (q,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic
Lecture 2 Soundness and completeness of propositional logic February 9, 2004 1 Overview Review of natural deduction. Soundness and completeness. Semantics of propositional formulas. Soundness proof. Completeness
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 67, 3301-3307 A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Equivalence Relation D. K. Basnet Dept. of Mathematics, Assam University Silchar-788011, Assam, India dkbasnet@rediffmail.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018
Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics(JRM) ISSN: 2395-028 SCITECH Volume 3, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION ublished online: March 29, 208 Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics www.scitecresearch.com/journals
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.
Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequalit for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x,, z X. Prove that d(x, z) d(, z) d(x, ). (ii): Reverse triangle inequalit for norms:
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNumerical Analysis FMN011
Numerical Analysis FMN011 Carmen Arévalo Lund University carmen@maths.lth.se Lecture 12 Periodic data A function g has period P if g(x + P ) = g(x) Model: Trigonometric polynomial of order M T M (x) =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραApproximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude
Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude Jan Behrens 2012-12-31 In this paper we shall provide a method to approximate distances between two points on earth
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCoefficient Inequalities for a New Subclass of K-uniformly Convex Functions
International Journal of Computational Science and Mathematics. ISSN 0974-89 Volume, Number (00), pp. 67--75 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Coefficient Inequalities for
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAppendix A. Curvilinear coordinates. A.1 Lamé coefficients. Consider set of equations. ξ i = ξ i (x 1,x 2,x 3 ), i = 1,2,3
Appendix A Curvilinear coordinates A. Lamé coefficients Consider set of equations ξ i = ξ i x,x 2,x 3, i =,2,3 where ξ,ξ 2,ξ 3 independent, single-valued and continuous x,x 2,x 3 : coordinates of point
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)
Uppsala Universitet Matematiska Institutionen Andreas Strömbergsson Prov i matematik Funktionalanalys Kurs: F3B, F4Sy, NVP 2005-03-08 Skrivtid: 9 14 Tillåtna hjälpmedel: Manuella skrivdon, Kreyszigs bok
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEcon 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1
Eon : Fall 8 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 Email questions or omments to Dan Fetter Problem. Let X be a salar with density f(x, θ) (θx + θ) [ x ] with θ. (a) Find the most powerful level α test
Διαβάστε περισσότεραJesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013
Notes on Average Scattering imes and Hall Factors Jesse Maassen and Mar Lundstrom Purdue University November 5, 13 I. Introduction 1 II. Solution of the BE 1 III. Exercises: Woring out average scattering
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNonlinear Fourier transform for the conductivity equation. Visibility and Invisibility in Impedance Tomography
Nonlinear Fourier transform for the conductivity equation Visibility and Invisibility in Impedance Tomography Kari Astala University of Helsinki CoE in Analysis and Dynamics Research What is the non linear
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExercises 10. Find a fundamental matrix of the given system of equations. Also find the fundamental matrix Φ(t) satisfying Φ(0) = I. 1.
Exercises 0 More exercises are available in Elementary Differential Equations. If you have a problem to solve any of them, feel free to come to office hour. Problem Find a fundamental matrix of the given
Διαβάστε περισσότεραANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?
Teko Classes IITJEE/AIEEE Maths by SUHAAG SIR, Bhopal, Ph (0755) 3 00 000 www.tekoclasses.com ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION # Question Type A.Single Correct Type Q. (A) Sol least
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics
Fourier Series MATH 211, Calculus II J. Robert Buchanan Department of Mathematics Spring 2018 Introduction Not all functions can be represented by Taylor series. f (k) (c) A Taylor series f (x) = (x c)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFinite Field Problems: Solutions
Finite Field Problems: Solutions 1. Let f = x 2 +1 Z 11 [x] and let F = Z 11 [x]/(f), a field. Let Solution: F =11 2 = 121, so F = 121 1 = 120. The possible orders are the divisors of 120. Solution: The
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMA 342N Assignment 1 Due 24 February 2016
M 342N ssignment Due 24 February 206 Id: 342N-s206-.m4,v. 206/02/5 2:25:36 john Exp john. Suppose that q, in addition to satisfying the assumptions from lecture, is an even function. Prove that η(λ = 0,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNonlinear Fourier transform and the Beltrami equation. Visibility and Invisibility in Impedance Tomography
Nonlinear Fourier transform and the Beltrami equation Visibility and Invisibility in Impedance Tomography Kari Astala University of Helsinki Beltrami equation: z f(z) = µ(z) z f(z) non linear Fourier transform
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in
Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in : tail in X, head in A nowhere-zero Γ-flow is a Γ-circulation such that
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Simply Typed Lambda Calculus
Type Inference Instead of writing type annotations, can we use an algorithm to infer what the type annotations should be? That depends on the type system. For simple type systems the answer is yes, and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραD Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation
D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation MATH 467 Partial Differential Equations J. Robert Buchanan Department of Mathematics Fall 2018 Objectives In this lesson we will learn: a change of variable technique
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSymmetric Stress-Energy Tensor
Chapter 3 Symmetric Stress-Energy ensor We noticed that Noether s conserved currents are arbitrary up to the addition of a divergence-less field. Exploiting this freedom the canonical stress-energy tensor
Διαβάστε περισσότερα= λ 1 1 e. = λ 1 =12. has the properties e 1. e 3,V(Y
Stat 50 Homework Solutions Spring 005. (a λ λ λ 44 (b trace( λ + λ + λ 0 (c V (e x e e λ e e λ e (λ e by definition, the eigenvector e has the properties e λ e and e e. (d λ e e + λ e e + λ e e 8 6 4 4
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics
Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics Nov 1, 01 In this lecture we examine root systems from an axiomatic point of view. 1 Reflections If v R n, then it determines a hyperplane, denoted P v, through the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIntegrals in cylindrical, spherical coordinates (Sect. 15.7)
Integrals in clindrical, spherical coordinates (Sect. 5.7 Integration in spherical coordinates. Review: Clindrical coordinates. Spherical coordinates in space. Triple integral in spherical coordinates.
Διαβάστε περισσότερα( y) Partial Differential Equations
Partial Dierential Equations Linear P.D.Es. contains no owers roducts o the deendent variables / an o its derivatives can occasionall be solved. Consider eamle ( ) a (sometimes written as a ) we can integrate
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOptimal Parameter in Hermitian and Skew-Hermitian Splitting Method for Certain Two-by-Two Block Matrices
Optimal Parameter in Hermitian and Skew-Hermitian Splitting Method for Certain Two-by-Two Block Matrices Chi-Kwong Li Department of Mathematics The College of William and Mary Williamsburg, Virginia 23187-8795
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs
Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs Who? Nichole Schimanski When? July 27, 2011 Graphs A graph, G, consists of a vertex set, V (G), and an edge set, E(G). V (G) is any finite set E(G) is
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS
MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS FUMIE NAKAOKA AND NOBUYUKI ODA Received 20 December 2005; Revised 28 May 2006; Accepted 6 August 2006 Some properties of minimal closed sets and maximal closed
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIterated trilinear fourier integrals with arbitrary symbols
Cornell University ICM 04, Satellite Conference in Harmonic Analysis, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea August 6, 04 Motivation the Coifman-Meyer theorem with classical paraproduct(979) B(f, f )(x) :=
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNotes on the Open Economy
Notes on the Open Econom Ben J. Heijdra Universit of Groningen April 24 Introduction In this note we stud the two-countr model of Table.4 in more detail. restated here for convenience. The model is Table.4.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 26: Circular domains
Introductory lecture notes on Partial Differential Equations - c Anthony Peirce. Not to be copied, used, or revised without eplicit written permission from the copyright owner. 1 Lecture 6: Circular domains
Διαβάστε περισσότεραORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER
ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER Abstract. We define ordinal arithmetic and show laws of Left- Monotonicity, Associativity, Distributivity, some minor related properties and the Cantor Normal Form.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTutorial problem set 6,
GENERAL RELATIVITY Tutorial problem set 6, 01.11.2013. SOLUTIONS PROBLEM 1 Killing vectors. a Show that the commutator of two Killing vectors is a Killing vector. Show that a linear combination with constant
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II
Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II October 18, 2012 1 Review First let us recall the situation. Let g be a simple algebra, with maximal toral subalgebra h (which we are calling a CSA, or Cartan Subalgebra).
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExercise 1.1. Verify that if we apply GS to the coordinate basis Gauss form ds 2 = E(u, v)du 2 + 2F (u, v)dudv + G(u, v)dv 2
Math 209 Riemannian Geometry Jeongmin Shon Problem. Let M 2 R 3 be embedded surface. Then the induced metric on M 2 is obtained by taking the standard inner product on R 3 and restricting it to the tangent
Διαβάστε περισσότερα12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem
Tutorial 12: Radon-Nikodym Theorem 1 12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem In the following, (Ω, F) is an arbitrary measurable space. Definition 96 Let μ and ν be two (possibly complex) measures on (Ω, F). We say
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPractice Exam 2. Conceptual Questions. 1. State a Basic identity and then verify it. (a) Identity: Solution: One identity is csc(θ) = 1
Conceptual Questions. State a Basic identity and then verify it. a) Identity: Solution: One identity is cscθ) = sinθ) Practice Exam b) Verification: Solution: Given the point of intersection x, y) of the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραw o = R 1 p. (1) R = p =. = 1
Πανεπιστήµιο Κρήτης - Τµήµα Επιστήµης Υπολογιστών ΗΥ-570: Στατιστική Επεξεργασία Σήµατος 205 ιδάσκων : Α. Μουχτάρης Τριτη Σειρά Ασκήσεων Λύσεις Ασκηση 3. 5.2 (a) From the Wiener-Hopf equation we have:
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMATH423 String Theory Solutions 4. = 0 τ = f(s). (1) dτ ds = dxµ dτ f (s) (2) dτ 2 [f (s)] 2 + dxµ. dτ f (s) (3)
1. MATH43 String Theory Solutions 4 x = 0 τ = fs). 1) = = f s) ) x = x [f s)] + f s) 3) equation of motion is x = 0 if an only if f s) = 0 i.e. fs) = As + B with A, B constants. i.e. allowe reparametrisations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραk A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +
Chapter 3. Fuzzy Arithmetic 3- Fuzzy arithmetic: ~Addition(+) and subtraction (-): Let A = [a and B = [b, b in R If x [a and y [b, b than x+y [a +b +b Symbolically,we write A(+)B = [a (+)[b, b = [a +b
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 9.2 Polar Equations and Graphs
180 Section 9. Polar Equations and Graphs In this section, we will be graphing polar equations on a polar grid. In the first few examples, we will write the polar equation in rectangular form to help identify
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStrain gauge and rosettes
Strain gauge and rosettes Introduction A strain gauge is a device which is used to measure strain (deformation) on an object subjected to forces. Strain can be measured using various types of devices classified
Διαβάστε περισσότερα( ) 2 and compare to M.
Problems and Solutions for Section 4.2 4.9 through 4.33) 4.9 Calculate the square root of the matrix 3!0 M!0 8 Hint: Let M / 2 a!b ; calculate M / 2!b c ) 2 and compare to M. Solution: Given: 3!0 M!0 8
Διαβάστε περισσότερα1 String with massive end-points
1 String with massive end-points Πρόβλημα 5.11:Θεωρείστε μια χορδή μήκους, τάσης T, με δύο σημειακά σωματίδια στα άκρα της, το ένα μάζας m, και το άλλο μάζας m. α) Μελετώντας την κίνηση των άκρων βρείτε
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS
Sahand Communications in Mathematical Analysis (SCMA) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016), 21-27 http://scma.maragheh.ac.ir SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS BAYAZ DARABY 1 AND JAVAD JAFARI 2 Abstract. In the mathematical
Διαβάστε περισσότερα