arxiv: v2 [math.lo] 21 Jun 2010
|
|
- Σήθι Πρωτονοτάριος
- 6 χρόνια πριν
- Προβολές:
Transcript
1 BLACK BOXES arxiv: v2 [math.lo] 21 Jun 2010 SAHARON SHELAH Abstract. We shall deal comprehensively with Black Boxes, the intention being that provably in ZFC we have a sequence of guesses of extra structure on small subsets, the guesses are pairwise with quite little interaction, are far but together are dense. We first deal with the simplest case, were the existence comes from winning a game by just writing down the opponent s moves. We show how it help when instead orders we have trees with boundedly many levels, having freedom in the last. After this we quite systematically look at existence of black boxes, and make connection to non-saturation of natural ideals and diamonds on them. Publication 309; Was supposed to be Chapter IV to the book Non-structure and probably will be if it materialize. 1
2 2 SAHARON SHELAH 0. Introduction The non-structure theorems we have discussed in [Sh:E59] rests usually on some freedom on finite sequences and on a kind of order. When our freedom is related to infinite sequences, and to trees, our work is sometimes harder. In particular, we may consider, for λ χ, χ regular, and ϕ = ϕ( x 0,..., x α,...) α<χ in a vocabulary τ: ( ): For any I χ λ we have a τ model M I and sequences ā η (for η χ> λ), where [η ν ā η ā ν ], lg(ā η ) = lg( x lg(η) ), such that for η χ λ we have: M I = ϕ(...,ā η α,...) α<χ if and only if η I. (Usually, M I is to some extend simply defined from I). Of course, if we do not ask more from M I, we can get nowhere: we certainly restrict its cardinality and/or usually demand it is ϕ representable (see Definition [Sh:E59, 2.4] clauses (c),(d)) in (a variant of) M µ,κ (I) (for suitable µ,κ). Certainly for T unsuperstable we have such a formula ϕ: ϕ(...,ā η n,...) = ( x) ϕ n ( x,ā η n ). n There are many natural examples. Formulated in terms of the existence of I for which our favorite anti-isomorphism player has a winning strategy, we prove this in 1969/70 (in proofs of lower bounds ofi(λ,t 1,T), T unsuperstable), but it was shortly superseded. However, eventually the method was used in one of the cases in [Sh:a, VIII, 2]: for strong limit singular [Sh:a, VIII 2.6]. It was developed in [Sh 172], [Sh 227] for constructing Abelian groups with prescribed endomorphism groups. See further a representation of one of the results here in Eklof-Mekler [EM], [EM02] a version which was developed for a proof of the existence of Abelian (torsion free ℵ 1 free) group G with G = G A (G =: Hom(G,Z)) in a work by Mekler and Shelah. A preliminary version of this paper appeared in [Sh 300, III, 4, 5] but 3 here was just almost ready, and 4 on partitions of stationary sets and D was written up as a letter to Foreman in the late nineties answering his question on what I know on this. 1. The Easy Black Box and an Easy Application In this section we do not try to get the strongest results, just provide some examples (i.e., we do not present the results when λ = λ χ is replaced by λ = λ <χ ). By the proof of [Sh:a, VIII 2.5] (see later for a complete proof): Theorem 1.1. Suppose that (*) (a) λ = λ χ (b) τ a vocabulary ϕ = ϕ( x 0, x 1,..., x α...) α<χ is a formula in L(τ) for some logic L. (c) τ,ϕ For any I χ λ we have a τ model M I and sequences ā η (for η χ> λ), where [η ν ā η ā ν ], lg(ā η ) = lg( x lg(η) ),
3 BLACK BOXES 3 such that for η χ λ we have: M I = ϕ(...,ā η α,...) α<χ if and only if η I. (d) M I = λ for every I satisfying χ> λ I χ λ, and lg(ā η ) χ or just λ lg(āη) = λ. Then (using χ> λ I χ λ): (1) There is no model M of cardinality λ into which every M I can be (±ϕ) embedded (i.e., by a function preserving ϕ and ϕ). (2) For any M i (for i < λ), M i λ, for some I satisfying χ> λ I χ λ, the model M I cannot be (±ϕ) embedded into any M i. Example 1.2. Consider the class of Boolean algebras and the formula ϕ(...,x n,...) =: ( n x n ) = 1 (i.e., there is no x 0 such that x x n = 0 for each n). For ω> λ I ω λ, let M I be the Boolean algebra generated freely by x η (for η I) except the relations: for η I, if n < lg(η) = ω then x η x η n = 0. So M I = I [λ,λ ℵ0 ] and in M I for η ω λ we have: M I = ( x η n ) = 1 if and n only if η / I (work a little in Boolean algebras). So Conclusion 1.3. If λ = λ ℵ0, then there is no Boolean algebra B of cardinality λ universal under σ embeddings (i.e., ones preserving countable unions). Remark 1.4. This is from [Sh:a, VIII,Ex.2.2]). Proof of the Theorem 1.1. First we note 1.5, 1.6 below: Fact 1.5. There are functions f η (for η χ λ) such that: (i): Dom(f η ) = {η α : α < χ}, (ii): Rang(f η ) λ, (iii): if f : χ> λ λ, then for some η χ λ we have f η f. Proof: For η χ λ let f η be the function (with domain {η α : α < χ}) such that: f η (η α) = η(α). So f η : η χ λ is well defined. Properties (i), (ii) are straightforward, so let us prove (iii). Let f : χ> λ λ. We define η α = β i : i < α by induction on α. For α = 0 or α limit no problem. For α+1: let β α be the ordinal such that β α = f(η α ). So η =: β i : i < χ is as required. 1.5 Fact 1.6. In 1.5: (a): we can replace the range of f, f η by any fixed set of cardinality λ,
4 4 SAHARON SHELAH (b): we can replace the domains of f, f η by {ā η : η χ> λ}, {ā η α : α < χ}, respectively, as long as α < β < χ η χ λ ā η α ā η β. Remark 1.7. We can present it as a game. (As in the book [Sh:a, VIII 2.5]). Continuation of the Proof of Theorem 1.1. It suffices to prove 1.1(2). Without loss of generality M i : i < λ are pairwise disjoint. Now we use 1.6; for the domain we use ā η : η χ> λ from the assumption of 1.1, and for the range: χ M i (it has cardinality λ as M i λ = λ χ ). We define i<λ I = ( χ> λ) { η χ λ : for some i < λ, Rang(f η ) is a set of sequences from M i and M i = ϕ(...,f η (ā η α ),...) α<χ }. Look at M I. It suffices to show: ( ): for i < λ there is no (±ϕ) embedding of M I into M i. Why does ( ) hold? If f : M I M i is a (±ϕ) embedding, then by Fact 1.6, for some η χ λ we have By the choice of f, f {ā η α : α < κ} = f η. M I = ϕ[...,ā η α,...] α<χ M i = ϕ[...,f(ā η α ),...] α<χ, but by the choice of I and M I we have M I = ϕ[...,ā η α,...] α<χ M i = ϕ[...,f η (ā η α ),...] α<χ. A contradiction, as by the choice of η, f(ā η α ) = f η (ā η α ). α<χ Discussion 1.8. We may be interested whether in 1.1, when λ + < 2 λ, we may (a): allow in (1) M = λ +, and/or (b): get λ ++ non-isomorphic models of the form M I, assuming 2 λ > λ + The following lemma shows that we cannot prove those better statements in ZFC, though (see 1.10) in some universes of set theory we can. So this require (elementary) knowledge of forcing, but is not used later. It is here just to justify the limitations of what we can prove and the reader can skip it. Lemma 1.9. Suppose that in the universe V we have κ < λ = cf(λ) = λ <λ, and ( λ 1 < λ)[λ κ 1 < λ] and λ < µ = µλ. Then for some notion forcing P: (a): P is λ complete and satisfies the λ + c.c., and P = µ, P 2 λ = µ (so forcing with P collapses no cardinals, changes no cofinalities, adds no new sequences of ordinals of length < λ, and P λ <λ = λ ). (b): We can find ϕ, M I (for κ> λ I κ λ) as in ( ) of 0, so with M I = λ (τ models with τ = κ for simplicity) such that: ( ): there are up to isomorphism exactly λ + models of the form M I ( κ> λ I λ λ). 1.1
5 BLACK BOXES 5 Remark: (c): In (b), there is a model M such that M = λ + and every model M I can be (±ϕ) embedded into M. (1) Essentially M I is (I +, ), the addition of level predicates is immaterial, where I + extends I nicely so that we can let a η = η for η I. (2) Clearly clause (c) also shows that weakening M = λ, even when λ + < 2 λ may make 1.1 false. Proof: Let τ = {R ζ : ζ κ} {<} with R ζ being a monadic predicate, and < being a binary predicate. For a set I, κ> λ I κ λ let N I be the τ-model: and N I = I, R NI ζ = I ζ λ, < NI = {(η,ν) : η I,ν I,η ν}, ϕ(...,x ζ,...) ζ<κ = ζ<ξ<κ Now we define the forcing notion P. It is P λ +, where (x ζ < x ξ & R ζ (x ζ )) ( y)[r κ (y) & x ζ < y]. P i,q j : i λ +, j < λ + is an iteration with support < λ, of λ complete forcing notions, where Q j is defined as follows. For j = 0 we add µ many Cohen subsets to λ: ζ<κ Q 0 = {f : f is a partial function from µ to {0,1}, Dom(f) < λ}, the order is the inclusion. For j > 0, we define Q j in V Pj. Let I(j,α) : α < α(j) list all sets I V Pj, κ> λ I κ λ (note that the interpretation of κ λ does not change from V to V Pj as κ < λ but the family of such I-s increases). Now Q j = { f : f = fα : α < α(j), f α is a partial isomorphism The order is: f 1 f 2 from N I(j,α) into N ( λ), κ w( f) =: {α : f α } has cardinality < λ, Dom(f α ) has the form κ β N I(j,α) for some γ < λ; β<γ and if α 1,α 2 < α(j) and η 1,η 2 κ λ, and for every ζ < κ, f α1 (η 1 ζ),f α2 (η 2 ζ) are defined } and equal, then η 1 I(j,α 1 ) η 2 I(j,α 2 ). if and only if ( α < α(j))(f 1 α f 2 α) and for all α < β < α(j), f 1 α f1 β implies Rang(f 2 α) Rang(f 2 β ) = Rang(f1 α) Rang(f 1 β ). Then, j is λ complete and it satisfies the version of λ Q + c.c. from [Sh 80] (see more [Sh 546]), hence each P j satisfies the λ + c.c. (by [Sh 80]). Now the P j+1 -name Ĩ j, (interpreting it in V Pj+1 we get Ij ) is: { Ij = κ> λ η κ λ : for some f Q j, α < α(j) and ν N I(j,α), G } lg(ν) = κ and f α (ν) = η.
6 6 SAHARON SHELAH This defines also fα j : I(j,α) I j, which is forced to be a (±ϕ) embedding and also just an embedding. So now we shall define for every I, κ> λ I κ λ, a τ model M I : clearly I belongs to some V Pj. Let j = j(i) be the first such j, and let α = α(i) be such that I = I(j,α). Let M I(j,α) = N I j ( and a ρ = fα j (ρ) forρ I(j,α)). We leave the details to the reader. 1.9 On the other hand, consistently we may easily have a better result. Lemma Suppose that, in the universe V, λ = cf(λ) = λ κ = λ <λ, λ < µ = µ λ. For some forcing notion P: (a): as in 1.9. (b): In V P, assume that ϕ and the function I (M I, ā I η : η κ> λ ) are as required in clauses (a),(b),(c) of ( ) of 1.1), ζ( ) < µ, and N ζ (for ζ < ζ( )) is a model in the relevant vocabulary, N ζ κ < µ (if the ζ<ζ( ) vocabulary is of cardinality < λ and each predicate or relation symbol has finite arity, then requiring just { N ζ : ζ < ζ( )} < µ suffices). Then for some I, the model M I cannot be (±ϕ) embedded into any N ζ. (c): Assume µ 1 = cf(µ 1 ), λ < µ 1 µ and V = ( χ < µ 1 )[χ λ < µ 1 ]. Then, in V P, if M Ii : i < µ 1 are pairwise non-isomorphic, κ> λ I i κ λ, and M Ii, ā i η (η I i ) are as in ( ) of 0), then for some i j, M Ii is not embeddable into M Ij. (d): In V P we can find a sequence I ζ : ζ < µ (so κ> λ I ζ κ λ) such that the M Iζ s satisfy that no one is (±ϕ) embeddable into another. Proof: P is Q 0 from the proof of 1.9. Let f be the generic function that is {f : f Q 0 }, clearly it is a function from µ to {0,1}. Now clause (a) is trivial. Next, concerningclause(b), G wearegiven N ζ : ζ < ζ( ). ClearlyforsomeA V of size smaller than µ, A µ, to compute the isomorphism types of N ζ (for ζ < ζ( )) it is enough to know f A. We can force by {f Q 0 : Dom(f) A}, then f B for any B λ\a of cardinality λ, (from V) gives us an I as required. To prove clause (c) use system argument for the names of various M I s. The proof of (d) is like that of (c) An Application for many models in λ Discussion 2.1. Next we consider the following: Assume λ is regular, ( µ < λ)[µ <χ < λ]. Let U α {δ < λ : cf(δ) = χ} for α < λ be pairwise disjoint stationary sets. For A λ, let U A = U i. i A We want to define I A such that χ> λ I A χ λ and A B M IA = MIB. We choose M i I A : i < λ : A λ with M IA = increasing continuous. i<λ M i I A, M i I A < λ, M i I A
7 BLACK BOXES 7 Of course, we have to strengthen the restrictions on M I. For η I A χ λ, let δ(η) =: {η(i)+1 : i < χ}, we are specially interested in η such that η is strictly increasing converging to some δ(η) U A ; we shall put only such η s in I A. The decision whether η I A will be done by induction on δ(η) for all sets A. Arriving to η, we assume we know quite a lot on the isomorphism f : M IA M IB, specially we know f ā η α, α<χ which we are trying to kill,and we can assume δ(η) / U B and δ belongs to a thin enough club of λ and using all this information we can compute what to do. Note: though this is the typical case, we do not always follow it. Notation 2.2. (1) For an ordinal α and a regular θ ℵ 0, let H <θ (α) be the smallest set Y such that: (i): i Y for i < α, (ii): x Y for x Y of cardinality < θ. (2) Wecanagreethat M λ,θ (α)from[sh:e59, 2]isinterpretablein(H <θ (α), ) when α λ, and in particular its universe is a definable subset of H <θ (α), and also R is, where: { R = (σ, t i : i < γ x,x) : x M λ,θ ( θ> α),σ is a τ λ,κ term and θ λ α, } x = σ ( t i : i < γ x ). Similarly M λ,θ (I), where I κ> λ is interpretable in (H <χ (λ ), ) if λ λ, θ χ, κ χ. The main theorem of this section is: Theorem 2.3. IĖ ±ϕ (λ,k) = 2 λ, provided that: (a): λ = λ χ, (b): ϕ = ϕ(..., x α,...) α<χ is a formula in the vocabulary τ K, (c): for every I such that χ> λ I χ λ we have a model M I K λ and a function f I, and ā η χ M I for η χ> λ with lg(ā η ) = lg( x lg(η) ) such that: (α): for η χ λ we have M I = ϕ(...,ā η α,...) if and only if η I, (β): f I : M I M µ,κ (I), where µ λ, κ = χ +, and: (d): for I, χ> λ I χ λ and b α M I, lg( x α ) = lg( b α ) for α < χ, f I ( b α ) = σ α ( t α ) we have: the truth value of M I = ϕ[..., b α,...] α<χ can be computed from σ α : α < χ, t α : α < χ (not just its q.f. type in I) and the truth values of statements of the form ( ν I χ λ)[ ν ǫ i = t βi (γ i ) ǫ i ] for α i,β i,γ i,ǫ i < χ i<χ (i.e., in a way not depending on I,f I ) [we can weaken this]. We shall first prove 2.3 under stronger assumptions. Fact 2.4. Suppose ( ): λ = λ 2χ, (so cf(λ) > χ) and χ κ. Then there are {(M α,η α ) : α < α( )} such that:
8 8 SAHARON SHELAH (i): for every model M with universe H <χ +(λ) such that τ(m) χ (and, e.g., τ H <χ +(λ)), for some α we have M α M, (ii): η α χ λ, ( i < χ)[η α i M α ], η α / M α, and α β η α η β, (iii): for every β < α( ) we have: {η α i : i < χ} M β, (iv): for β < α if {η β i : i < χ} M α, then M β M α, (v): M α = χ. Proof of 2.4: By below with λ,2 χ,χ here standing for λ,χ( ),θ there. Proof of 2.3 from the Conclusion of 2.4. Without loss of generality the universe of M I is λ in 2.3. We shalldefine foreverya λaset I[A] satisfying χ> λ I[A] χ λ, moreover I[A]\ χ> λ {η α : α < α( )}. For α < α( ), let U α = {η χ λ : {η i : i < χ} M α }. We shall define by induction on α, for every A λ the set I[A] U α so that on the one hand those restrictions are compatible (so that we can define I[A] in the end, for each A λ), and on the other hand they guarantee the non (±ϕ) embeddability. For each α: (essentially we decide whether η α I[A] assuming M α guesses rightly a function g : M I1 M I2 (I l = I[A l ]), and A l M α for l = 1,2, and we make our decision to prevent this) Case I: there aredistinct subsetsa 1,A 2 ofλand I 1,I 2 satisfying χ> λ I l χ λ, and a (±ϕ) embedding g of M I1 into M I2 and M α ( H <χ +(λ),,r,a 1,A 2,I 1,I 2,M I1,M I2,f I1,f I2,g ), where { R = {(0,σ x,x),(1+i,t x i,x)} : i < i x and x has the form } σ x ( t x i : i < i x ) (we choose for each x a unique such term σ), and I 2 U α I 2 ( U β ), and I 1,I 2 satisfy the restrictions we already have imposed on I[A 1 ], I[A 2 ], respectively for each β < α. Computing according to clause (d) of 2.3 the truth value for M I2 = ϕ[...,f(ā η α i),...] i<χ we get t α. Then we restrict: (i): if B λ, B M α = A 2 M α, then I[B] (U α \ (ii): if B λ, B M α = A 1 M α and t α is true,, then I[B] (U α \ U β ) =, or just β<α η α / I[B] (iii): if B λ, B M α = A 1 M α and t α is false, then I[B] (U α \ U β ) = {η α } or just β<α η α I[B] β<α β<α U β ) =,
9 BLACK BOXES 9 Case II: Not I. No restriction is imposed. The point is the two facts below which should be clear. Fact 2.5. The choice of A 1,A 2,I 1,I 2,g is immaterial (any two candidates lead to the same decision). Proof: Use clause (d) of 2.3. Fact 2.6. M I[A] (for A λ) are pairwise non-isomorphic. Moreover, for A B (subsets of λ) there is no (±ϕ) embedding of M I[A] into M I[B]. Proof: By the choice of the I[A] s and (i) of Still the assumption of 2.4 is too strong: it do not cover all the desirable cases, though it cover many of them. However, a statement weaker than the conclusion of 2.4 holds under weaker cardinality restrictions and the proof of 2.3 above works using it, thus we will finish the proof of 2.3. Fact 2.7. Suppose λ = λ χ. Then there are {(M α,a α 1,Aα 2,ηα ) : α < α( )} such that: ( ): (i): for every model M with universe H <χ +(λ) such that τ(m) χ and τ(m) H <χ (λ) (arity of relations and functions finite) and sets A 1 A 2 λ, for some α < α( ) we have (M α,a α 1,Aα 2 ) (M,A 1,A 2 ), (ii): η α χ λ, {η α i : i < χ} M α, η α / M α, and α β η α η β, (iii): for every β < α( ), if {η α i : i < χ} M β, then α < β+2 χ, and α+2 χ = β +2 χ implies A α 1 M α = A β 2 Mα, (iv): for every β < α if {η β i : i < χ} M α, then M β M α, (v): M α = χ. Proof: See Proof of 2.3: Should be clear, We act as in the proof of 2.3 from the conclusion of 2.4 but now we have to use the or just version in (ii),(iii) there, 2.3 Conclusion 2.8. (1) If T T 1 are complete first order theories, T in the vocabulary τ, κ = cf(κ) < κ(t), hence T unsuperstable and λ = λ ℵ0 T 1, then İτ(λ,T 1 ) = 2 λ (İτ see Definition [Sh:E59, 1.2(2)]). (2) Assume κ = cf(κ), Φ is proper and almost nice for Ktr κ, see [Sh:E59, 1.7], σ i (i κ) finite sequence of terms, τ τ Φ, ϕ i ( x,ȳ) first order in L[τ] and for ν i λ, η κ λ, ν η we have EM( κ λ,φ) = ϕ i ( σ κ i (x η ), σ i+1 (x η α )) holds if and only if α = η(i). Then 2 λ = {EM τ (S,Φ)/ =: κ> λ S κ λ}. Proof: (1) By [Sh:E59, 1.10] there is a template Φ proper for K κ tr, as required in part (2). (2) By
10 10 SAHARON SHELAH Discussion 2.9. What about Theorem 2.3 in the case we assume only λ = λ <χ? There is some information in [Sh:a, Ch.VIII, 2]. Of course, concerning unsuperstable T, that is 2.8, more is done there: the assumption is just λ > T. Claim In 2.3, we can restrict ourselves to I such that I 0 λ,χ I χ λ, where I 0 λ,χ = χ> λ { η χ λ : η(i) = 0 for every i < χ large enough }. Proof: By renaming Black Boxes We try to give comprehensive treatment of black boxes, not few of them are useful in some contexts and some parts are redone here, as explained in 0, 1. Note that omitting countable types is a very useful device for building models of cardinality ℵ 0 and ℵ 1. The generalization to models of higher cardinality, λ or λ +, usually requires us to increase the cardinality of the types to λ, and even so we may encounter problems (see [Sh:E60] and background there). Note we do not look mainly at the omitting type theorem per se, but its applications. Jensen defined square and proved existence in L: in Facts , we deal with related just weaker principles which can be proved in ZFC. E.g., for λ regular > ℵ 1, {δ < λ + : cf(δ) < λ} is the union ofλsets, each has square (as defined there). You can skip them in first reading, particularly 3.1 (and later take references on belief). Then we deal with black boxes. In 3.11 we give the simplest case: λ regular > ℵ 0, λ = λ <χ( ) ; really λ <θ = λ <χ( ) is almost the same. In 3.11 we also assume S {δ < λ : cf(δ) = θ} is a good stationary set. In 3.15 we weaken this demand such that enough sets S as required exists (provably in ZFC!). The strength of the cardinalityhypothesis(λ = λ <χ( ), λ <θ = λ <χ( ), λ θ = λ <χ( ) )varytheconclusion. In we prepare the ground for replacing λ regular by cf(λ) χ( ), which is done in As we noted in section 2, it is much nicer to deal with ( M β,η β ), this is the first time we deal with η β, i.e., for no α < β, {η β i : i < θ} i<θm α i. In 3.18, 3.19 (parallel to 3.11, 3.17, respectively) we guarantee this, at the price of strengthening λ <θ = λ <χ( ) to λ <θ = λ χ(1), χ(1) = χ( )+(< χ( )) θ. Later, in 3.41, we draw the conclusion necessary for section 2 (in its proof the function h, which may look redundant, plays the major role). This (as well as 3.18, 3.19) exemplifies how those principles are self propagating better ones follow from the old variant (possibly with other parameters). In we deal with the black boxes when θ (the length of the game) is ℵ 0. We use a generalization of the system lemma for trees and partition theorems on trees (see Rubin-Shelah [RuSh 117, 4], [Sh:b, Ch.XI]=[Sh:f, Ch.XI] [Sh:E62, 1.16], [Sh:E62, 1.19] and here the proof of 3.22; see history there, and 3.6). We get several versions of the black box as the cardinality restriction becomes more severe, we get a stronger principle.
11 BLACK BOXES 11 It would be better if we can use for a strong limit κ > ℵ 0 = cf(κ), κ ℵ0 = sup { λ : for some κ n < κ and uniform ultrafilter D on ω, cf ( κ n /D ) = λ }. We know this for the uncountable cofinality case (see [Sh 111] or [Sh:g]), but then thereareotherobstacles. Now[Sh 355]givesapartialremedy,butlatelyby[Sh 400] there are many such cardinals. In 3.36, 3.37 we deal with the case cf(λ) θ. Note that cf(λ <χ( ) ) χ( ) is always true, so you may wonder why wouldn t we replace λ by λ <χ( )? This is true in quite many applications, but is not true, for example, when we want to construct structures with density character λ. Several times, we use results quoted from [Sh 331, 2], but no vicious circle. Also, several times we quote results on pcf quoting [Sh:E62, 3]. We end with various remarks and exercises. Fact 3.1. (1) If µ χ = µ < λ 2 µ, χ and λ are regular uncountable cardinals, and S {δ < λ : cf(δ) = χ} is a stationary set, then there are a stationary set W χ and functions h a,h b : λ µ and S ζ : 0 < ζ < λ such that: (a): S ζ S is stationary, (b): ξ ζ S ξ S ζ =, (c): if δ S ξ, then for some increasing continuous sequence α i : i < χ we have δ = α i, h b (α i ) = i, h a (α i ) {ξ,0}, i<χ n<ω and the set {i < χ : h a (α i ) = ξ} is stationary, in fact is W. (2) If in (1), a sequence C δ : δ < λ,cf(δ) χ satisfying ( α C δ )[α limit α = sup(α C δ )] is given, C δ is closed unbounded subset of δ of order type cf(δ), then in the conclusion we can get also S, Cδ : δ S such that (a), (b), (c) hold, and (c) : in (c) we add C δ = {α i : i < χ}, (d): S ξ S S ξ {δ < λ : cf(δ) < χ}, 0<ξ<λ 0<ξ<λ (e): W is a (> ℵ 0 )-closed, stationary in cofinality ℵ 0, subset of χ, which means: (i): if i < χ is a limit ordinal, i = sup(i W) has cofinality > ℵ 0 then i W, (ii): {i W : cf(i) = ℵ 0 } is a stationary 1 subset of χ, (f): for δ S ξ we have 0<ξ<λ C δ = {α C δ : otp(α C δ ) = sup(w otp(α C δ )),} (g): Cδ is a club of δ included in C δ for δ S, and if δ(1) Cδ, δ S, δ S ζ, δ(1) = sup(δ(1) Cδ ) and cf(δ(1)) > ℵ 0 0<ζ<λ then C δ(1) C δ, 1 we can ask / I if I is any normal ideal on {i < χ : cf(i) = ℵ0 }
12 12 SAHARON SHELAH (h): if C is a closed unbounded subset of λ, and 0 < ξ < λ then the set is stationary. {δ S ξ : C δ C} Proof: (1) We can find { h 1 ξ,h2 ξ : ξ < µ} such that: (a): for every ξ we have h 1 ξ : λ µ and h2 ξ : λ µ, (b): if A λ, A χ, and h 1,h 2 : A µ, then for some ξ, h 1 ξ A = h1, and h 2 ξ A = h2. This holds by Engelking-Karlowicz [EK] (see for example [Sh:c, AP]). For δ < λ let C δ be a closed unbounded subset of δ of order type cf(δ). Now for each ξ < µ and a stationary a χ ask whether for every i < λ for some j < λ we have ( ) ξ,a i,j : the following subset of λ is stationary: S ξ,a i,j = {δ S : (i) if α C δ, otp(α C δ ) / a then h 1 ξ (α) = 0, (ii) if α C δ, otp(α C δ ) a then the h 1 ξ (α) th member of C α belongs to [i,j), (iii) if α C δ then h 2 ξ (α) = otp(α C δ) } Subfact 3.2. For some ξ < µ and a stationary set a χ, for every i < λ for some j (i,λ), the statement ( ) ξ,a i,j holds. Proof: Ifnot, then foreveryξ < µandastationarya χ, forsomei = i(ξ,a) < λ, for every j < λ, j > i(ξ,a), there is a closed unbounded subset C(ξ,a,i,j) of λ disjoint from S ξ,a i,j. Let i( ) = {i(ξ,a)+ω : ξ < µ and a χ is stationary }. Clearly i( ) < λ. For i( ) j < λ let C(j) = {C(ξ,a,i(ξ,a),j) : a χ is stationary and ξ < µ} (i( )+ω,λ), clearly it is a closed unbounded subset of λ. Let C = {δ < λ : δ > i( ) and ( j < δ)[δ C(j)]}. So C is a closed unbounded subset of λ, too. Let C + be the set of accumulation points of C. Choose δ( ) C + S, and we shall define For α C δ( ) let h 0 (α) be: h 1 : C δ( ) µ, h 2 : C δ( ) µ. min{γ < χ : γ > 0 and the γ th member of C α is > i( )} if α = sup(c δ( ) α) > i( ), and zero otherwise. Clearly the set {α C δ( ) : h 0 (α) = 0} is not stationary. Now we can define g : C δ( ) δ( ) by: g(α) is the h 0 (α) th member of C α.
13 BLACK BOXES 13 Note that g is pressing down and {α C δ( ) : g(α) i( )} is not stationary. So (by the variant of Fodor s Lemma speaking on an ordinal of uncountable cofinality) for some j < sup(c δ( ) ) = δ( ) the set a =: {α C δ( ) C : i( ) < g(α) < j} is a stationary subset of δ( ), and let h 1 : C δ( ) µ be { } 0 if otp(α C h 1 (α) = δ ) / a, h 0 (α) if otp(α Cδ ) a.. Let h 2 : C δ( ) µ be h 2 (α) = otp(α C δ( ) ). By the choice of (h 1 ξ,h2 ξ ) : ξ < µ, for some ξ, we have h 1 ξ C δ( ) = h 1 and h 2 ξ C δ( ) = h 2. Easily, δ( ) S ξ,a i,j which is disjoint to C(ξ,a,i( ),j), a contradiction to δ( ) C by the definition of C(j) and C. So we have proved the subfact Having chosen ξ, a we define by induction on ζ < λ an ordinal i(ζ) < λ such that i(ζ) : ζ < λ is increasing continuous, i(0) = 0, and ( ) ξ,a i(ζ),i(ζ+1) holds. Now, for α < λ we define h a (α) as follows: it is ζ if h 1 ξ (α) > 0 and the h1 ξ (α)-th member of C α belongs to [i(1+ζ),i(1 +ζ +1)), and it is zero otherwise. Lastly, let h b (α) =: h 2 ξ (α) and W = a and S ζ =: { δ S : (i) for α C δ, otp(α C δ ) = h b (α), (ii) for α C δ, h b (i) a h a (α) = ζ, (iii) for α C δ, h b (i) / a h a (i) = 0 }. Now, it is easy to check that a, h a, h b, and S ζ : 0 < ζ < λ are as required. (2) In the proof of 3.1(1) we shall now consider only sets a χ which satisfy the demand in clause (e) of 3.1(2) on W [i.e., in the definition of C(j) during the proof of Subfact 3.2 this makes a difference]. Also in ( ) ξ,a i,j in the definition of Sξ,a i,j we change (iii) to (iii) : if α C δ, h 2 ξ (α) codes the isomorphism type of, for example, C δ C β,<,α,c δ,{ i,β : i C β }. β C δ In the end, having chosen ξ, a we can define C δ and S in the natural way. 3.1 Fact 3.3. (1) If λ is regular > 2 κ, κ regular, S {δ < λ : cf(δ) = κ} is stationary and for δ S, Cδ 0, is a club of δ of order type κ (= cf(δ)), then we can find a club c of κ (see 3.4(1)) such that letting for δ S, C δ = C δ [c ] =: {α Cδ 0 : otp(c0 δ α) c }, it is a club of δ and ( ): for every club C λ we have: (a): if κ > ℵ 0, {δ S : C δ C} is stationary, (b): if κ = ℵ 0, then the set {δ S : ( α,β)[α < β α C δ β C δ (α,β) C ]} is stationary. (2) If λ is a regular cardinal > 2 κ, then we can find C ζ δ : δ S ζ : ζ < 2 κ such that: (a): {S ζ : ζ < 2 κ } = {δ < λ : ℵ 0 < cf(δ) κ},
14 14 SAHARON SHELAH (b): C ζ δ is a club of δ of order type cf(δ), (c): if α S ζ, cf(α) > θ > ℵ 0, then {β C ζ α : cf(β) = θ, β S ζ and C ζ β Cζ α} is a stationary subset of α. (3) If λ is regular, 2 µ λ > µ κ, then we can find C ζ δ : δ S ζ : ζ < µ such that: (a): {S ζ : ζ < 2 κ } = {δ < λ : ℵ 0 < cf(δ) κ}, (b): C ζ δ is a club of δ of order type cf(δ), (c): if α S ζ, β Cα, ζ cf(β) > ℵ 0, then β S ζ and C ζ β Cζ α, (d): moreover, if α, β S ζ, β Cα ζ, then {(otp(γ C ζ β ),otp(γ Cζ α )) : γ C β} depends on (otp(β C α ),otp(c α )) only. (4) We can replace in (1)(a) and (b) of ( ) stationary by / I for any normal ideal I on λ. Remark 3.4. (1) A club C of δ where cf(δ) = ℵ 0 means here just an unbounded subset of δ. (2) In 3.3(1) instead of 2 κ, the cardinal min{ F : F κ κ & ( g κ κ)( f F)( α < κ)[g(α) < f(α)]} suffices. (3) In (b) above, it is equivalent to ask {δ S : ( α,β)[α < β α C δ β C δ otp((α,β) C) > α]} is stationary. Proof: (1) If 3.3(1) fails, for each club c of κ there is a club C[c ] of λ exemplifying its failure. So C + = {C[c ] : c κ a club} is a club of λ. Choose δ S which is an accumulation point of C + and get contradiction easily. (2) Let λ = cf(λ) > 2 κ, C α be a club of α of order type cf(α), for each limit α < λ. Without loss of generality β C α & β > sup(β C α ) β is a successor ordinal. For any sequence c = c θ : ℵ 0 < θ = cf(θ) κ such that each c θ is a club of θ, for δ S = {α < λ : ℵ 0 < cf(α) κ} we let: C c δ = { α C δ : otp(c δ α) c cf(δ) }. Now we define S c, by defining by induction on δ < λ, the set S c δ; the only problem is to define whether α S c knowing S c δ; now α S c if and only if (i) ℵ 0 < cf(α) κ, (ii) if ℵ 0 < θ = cf(θ) < cf(α) then the set {β C c α : cf(β) = θ, β S c α} is stationary in α. Let c ζ : ζ < 2 κ list the possible sequences c, and let S ζ = S c ζ and C ζ δ = C cζ δ. To finish, note that for each δ < λ satisfying ℵ 0 < cf(δ) κ, for some ζ, δ S ζ. (3) Combine the proof of (2) and of 3.1.
15 BLACK BOXES 15 (4) Similarly. 3.3 We may remark Fact 3.5. Suppose that λ is a regular cardinal > 2 κ, κ = cf(κ) > ℵ 0, a set S {δ < λ : cf(δ) = κ} is stationary, and I is a normal ideal on λ and S / I. If I is λ + saturated (i.e., in the Boolean algebra P(λ)/I, there is no family of λ + pairwise disjoint elements), then we can find C δ : δ S, C δ a club of δ of order type cf(δ), such that: ( ): for every club C of λ we have {δ S : C δ \C is unbounded in δ} I. Proof: For δ S, let C δ be a club of δ of order type cf(δ). Call C = C δ : δ S (where S λ stationary, S / I, C δ a club of δ) I-large if: for every club C of λ the set {δ < λ : δ S and C δ \C is bounded in δ} does not belong to I. We call C I-full if above {δ S : C δ \C unbounded in δ} I. 3.3(4) for every stationary S S, S / I there is a club c of κ such that C δ [c ] : δ S is I large. Now note: ( ): if C δ : δ S is I-large, S S, then for some S S, S / I, C δ : δ S is I full (hence S / I). [Proof of ( ): Choose by induction on α < λ +, a club C α of λ such that: (a): for β < α, C α \C β is bounded in λ, (b): if β = α+1 then A β \A α I +, where As clearly A γ =: {δ S : C δ \C γ is unbounded in δ}. β < α A β \A α is bounded in λ (by (a) and the definition of A α,a β ) and as I is λ + saturated, clearly for some α we cannot define C α. This cannot be true for α = 0 or a limit α, so necessarily α = β +1. Now S \A β is not in I as C was assumed to be I large. Check that S =: S \A β is as required.] Using repeatedly 3.3(4) and ( ) we get the conclusion 3.5 Claim 3.6. Suppose λ = µ +, µ = µ χ, χ is a regular cardinal and S {δ < λ : cf(δ) = χ} is stationary. Then we can find S, C δ : δ S and S ξ : ξ < λ such that: (a): S ζ S S {δ < λ : cf(δ) < χ}, ζ<µ (b): S ζ S is a stationary subset of λ for each ζ < µ, (c): for α S, C α is a closed subset of α of order type χ, if α S is a limit then C α is unbounded in α (so is a club of α), (d): C α : α S ζ is a square on S ζ, i.e., (S ζ is stationary in sup(s ζ ) and): (i): C α is a closed subset of α, unbounded if α is limit, (ii): if α S ζ, α(1) C α then α(1) S ζ and C α(1) = C α α(1), (e): for each club C of λ and ζ < µ, for some δ S ζ, C δ C.
16 16 SAHARON SHELAH Proof: Similar to the proof of 3.1 (or see [Sh 237e]). We shall use in 3.25 Claim 3.7. Suppose λ = µ +, γ a limit ordinal of cofinality χ, h : γ {θ : θ = 1 or θ = cf(θ) µ}, µ = µ γ, and S {δ < λ : cf(δ) = χ} is stationary. Then we can find S, C δ : δ S and S ζ : ζ < λ such that: (a): S ζ S {δ < λ : cf(δ) χ}, ζ<λ (b): S ζ S is stationary for each ζ < λ, (c): for δ S, (i): C δ is a club of δ of order type γ and (ii): otp(c δ ) = γ δ S S, (iii): α C δ sup(c δ α) < α α has cofinality h[otp(c δ α)], (d): if δ S ζ, δ(1) a limit ordinal C δ then δ(1) S ζ and C δ(1) = C δ δ(1), (e): for each club C of λ and ζ < λ for some δ S ζ, C δ C. Proof: Like 3.6. Claim 3.8. (1): Suppose λ is regular > ℵ 1, then {δ < λ + : cf(δ) < λ} is a good stationary subset of λ + (i.e., it is in Ǐgd [λ + ], see [Sh:E62, 3.3] or [Sh 88r, 0.6,0.7] or 3.9(2) below). (2): Suppose λ is regular > ℵ 1. Then we can find S ζ : ζ < λ such that: (a): S ζ = {α < λ + : cf(α) < λ}, ζ<λ (b): on each S ζ there is a square (see 3.6 clause (d)), say it is Cα ζ : α S ζ with C ζ δ < λ, (c): if δ( ) < λ, and κ = cf(κ) < λ, then: for some ζ < λ for every club C of λ +, for some accumulation point δ of C, cf(δ) = κ and otp(c ζ δ C) is divisible by δ( ), (d): if cf(δ( )) = κ, we can add in (c) s conclusion: C ζ δ C and otp(cζ δ ) = δ( ). Remark 3.9. (1) For λ = ℵ 1 the conclusion of 3.8(1), (2)(a), (b) becomes totally trivial; but for δ < ω 1, it means something if we add: for every club C of λ the set {α S ζ : otp(c ζ α) = δ} is stationary and {α S δ : otp(c ζ α) = δ,c ζ α C} is stationary. So 3.8(2)(c,d) are not so trivial, but still true. Their proofs are similar so we leave them to the reader (used only in [Sh 331, 2.7]). (2) Recall that for a regular uncountable cardinal µ, the family Ǐgd [µ] of good subsets of µ is the family of S µ such that there are a sequence ā = a α : α < λ and a club C µ satisfying: a α α of order type < α when λ is a successor cardinal, β a α a β = a α β and ( δ S C)(sup(a δ ) = δ & otp(a α ) = cf(δ)). We may say that the sequence ā as above exemplifies that S is good; if C = µ we say explicitly exemplifies.
17 BLACK BOXES 17 Proof: Appears also in detail in [Sh 351] (originally proved for this work but as its appearance was delayed we put it there, too). Of course, (1) follows from (2). (2) Let S = {α < λ + : cf(α) < λ}. For each α S choose Āα such that: (α): Ā α = A α i : i < λ is an increasing continuous sequence of subsets of α of cardinality < λ, such that A α i = α S, i<λ (β): if β A α i {α}, β is a limit ordinal and cf(β) < λ (the last actually follows), then β = sup(a α i β), (γ): if β A α i {α} is limit and ℵ 0 < cf(β) < λ then A α i contains a club of β, (δ): 0 A α i and β S & β +1 A α i {α} β Aα i, (ε): the closure of A α i in α (in the order topology) is included in A α i+1. There are no problems with choosing Āα as required. We define Bi α (for i < λ, α S) by induction on α as follows: { closure(a α i ) α if cf(α) ℵ 1, Bi α = { B β i : C a club of α} if cf(α) = ℵ 1. For ζ < λ we let: β C S ζ = {α S : α satisfies (i) Bζ α is a closed subset of α, (ii) if β Bζ α, then Bβ ζ = Bα ζ β and (iii) if α is limit, then α = sup(bζ α) } and for α S ζ let Cα ζ = Bα ζ. Now, demand (b) holds by the choice of S ζ. To prove clause (a) we shall show that for any α S, for some ζ < λ, α S ζ ; moreover we shall prove ( ) 0 α : E α := {ζ < λ : if cf(ζ) = ℵ 1 then α S ζ } contains a club of λ For α S define Eα 0 = {ζ < λ : if cf(ζ) = ℵ 1 then Bζ α = closure(aα ζ ) α}. We prove by induction on α S that E α Eα 0 contains a club of λ and we then choose such a club Eα. 1 Arriving to α, let E = {ζ < λ : if β A α ζ then ζ E 1 β and A β ζ = Aα ζ β}. Clearly E is a club of λ. Let ζ E, cf(ζ) = ℵ 1, and we shall prove that α S ζ E α Eα, 0 this clearly suffices. By the choice of ζ (and the definition of E) we have: if β belongs to A α ζ then Aβ ζ = Aα ζ A and Bβ ζ = closure(aβ ζ ) β, so ( ) 1 : β A α ζ B β ζ = closure(aα ζ ) β. Let us check the three conditions for α S ζ this will suffice for clause (a) of the claim. Clause (i): Bζ α is a closed subset of α. If cf(α) ℵ 1 then Bζ α = closure(aα ζ ) α, hence necessarily it is a closed subset of α. If cf(α) = ℵ 1 then Bζ α = { : C is a club of β}. Now, for any club C of B β ζ β C β, C A α ζ is a club of α (see clause (γ) above). By ( ) 1 above, B β ζ B β ζ = closure(aα ζ ) β. β C β C A α ζ
18 18 SAHARON SHELAH Note that we have gotten ( ) 2 : α E 0 ζ. [Why? If cf(α) = ℵ 1 see above, if cf(α) ℵ 1 this is trivial.] Clause (ii): If β B α ζ then Bβ ζ = Bα ζ β. We know that B α ζ = closure(aα ζ ) α, by ( ) 2 above. If β A α ζ then (by ( ) 1) we have B β ζ = closure(aα ζ ) β, so we are done. So assume β / Aα ζ. Then, by clause (ǫ) necessarily ε < ζ β > sup(a α ε β) and sup(aα ε β) Aα ε+1 Aα ζ. But β Bζ α = closure(aα ζ ) by ( ) 2, hence together A α ζ contains a club of β and cf(β) = cf(ζ), but cf(ζ) = ℵ 1, so cf(β) = ℵ 1. Now, as in the proof of clause (i), we get B β ζ = {B γ ζ : γ Aα ζ β}, so by the induction hypothesis we are done. Clause (iii): If α is limit then α = sup(a α i ). By clause (γ) we know A α ζ is unbounded in α, but Aα ζ Bα ζ (by ( ) 2) and we are done. So we have finished proving ( ) 0 α by induction on α hence clause (a) of the claim. For proving (c) of 3.8(2), note that above, if α is limit, C is a club of α, C S, and C < λ, then for every i large enough, C A α i, and even C Bα i. Now assume that the conclusion of (c) fails (for fixed δ( ) and κ). Then for each ζ < λ we have a club Eζ 0 exemplifying it. Now, E0 =: Eζ 0 is a club of λ+, hence for some δ E 0, otp(e 0 δ) is divisible by δ( ) and cf(δ) = κ. Choose an unbounded in δ set e E 0 δ of order type divisible by δ( ). Then, for a final segment of ζ < λ we have e δ C ζ δ. Note that for any set C 1 of ordinals, otp(c 1 ) is divisible by δ( ) if C 1 has an unbounded subset of order type divisible by δ( ), so we get a contradiction because by ( ) 0 δ( )) for some ζ E δ( ) ( so δ( ) S ζ ) by E 0 ζ Cζ δ E0 δ e, sup(e) = δ and e has order type divisible by δ( ). We are left with clause (d) of 3.8(2). Fix κ, δ( ) and ζ as above, we may add λ new sequences of the form C α : α S ζ as long as each is a square. First assume that for every γ, β < λ, such that cf(β) = κ = cf(γ), γ divisible by δ( ) we have then let ( ) 3 β,γ : thereisaclub E β,γ ofλ + suchthatfornoδ S ζ dowehaveotp(c ζ δ ) = β and otp(c ζ δ E β,γ) = γ, E =: {E β,γ : γ < λ, β < λ, cf(β) = κ = cf(γ), γ divisible by δ( )}. Applying part (c) we get a contradiction. So for some γ, β < λ, cf(β) = κ = cf(γ), γ divisible by δ( ) and ( ) 3 β,γ fails. Also there is a club E of λ + such that for every club E E for some δ S ζ, otp(c ζ δ ) = β, otp(cζ δ E) = γ and Cζ δ E = Cζ γ E (by 3.10 below). Let e γ = sup(e) be closed and such that otp(e) = δ( ) and ζ<λ ǫ e is limit ǫ = sup(e ǫ).
19 BLACK BOXES 19 We define C ζ δ (for δ S ζ) as follows: if δ / E, C ζ δ =: Cζ δ \(max(δ E )+1), if δ E, otp(c ζ δ E ) e {γ} then C ζ δ = {α Cζ δ E : otp(α C ζ δ E ) e}, and if δ E, otp(c ζ δ E ) / e {γ} let ( ) C ζ δ = Cζ δ \ max{α : otp(c ζ δ E α) e {γ}}+1. One easily checks that (d) and square hold for C ζ δ : δ S ζ. So, we just have to add C ζ δ : δ S ζ to { C ζ δ : δ S ζ : ζ < λ} for any ζ,δ( ),κ (for which we choose ζ and E ). 3.8 Claim (1): Assume that ℵ 0 < κ = cf(κ), κ + < λ = cf(λ), S {δ < λ : cf(δ) = κ} is stationary, C δ is a club of δ (for δ S), and ( δ S)( C δ = κ), or at least sup C δ + < λ. Then for some club E λ, for δ S every club E E, the set {δ S : C δ E E} is stationary, where (2): Assume that S =: {δ S : δ acc(e )}. κ = cf(κ), κ + < λ = cf(λ), S {δ < λ : cf(δ) = κ} is stationary, C δ is a club of δ (for δ S), sup C δ + < λ, I δ is an ideal on C δ including δ S the bounded subsets, and for every club E of λ for stationarily many δ S, C δ E / I δ (or C δ \E I δ ). Then for some club E of λ, for every club E E of λ where the set {δ S : C δ E E} is stationary, S =: {δ S : δ acc(e ), δ = sup(c δ E ) and C δ E / I δ (or C δ \E I δ ) }. Remark: This also was written in [Sh 365]. Proof: (1) If not, choose by induction on i < µ =: sup( C δ + ) a club Ei λ, δ S decreasing with i, Ei+1 exemplifies that E i is not as required, i.e., Now, acc ( Ei i<µ {δ S (Ei) : C δ Ei Ei+1} =. ) ( is a club of λ, so there is δ S acc i<µ ) Ei. The sequence C δ Ei : i < µ is necessarilystrictly decreasing, and we get an easy contradiction. (2) Similarly Now we turn to the main issue: black boxes. 3.10
20 20 SAHARON SHELAH Lemma Suppose that λ,θ and χ( ) are regular cardinals and λ θ = λ <χ( ), θ < χ( ) λ, and a set S {δ < λ : cf(λ) = θ} is stationary and in Ǐgd [λ] (if θ = ℵ 0 this holds trivially; see [Sh:E62, 3.3] or [Sh 88r, 0.6,0.7] or just 3.9(2)). Then we can find W = {( M α,η α ) : α < α( )} (pedantically, W is a sequence) and functions ζ : α( ) S, and h : α( ) λ such that: (a0): h(α) depends on ζ(α) only, and ζ is non-decreasing function (but not necessarily strictly increasing). (a1): We have (α): Mα = Mi α : i θ is an increasing continuous chain, (τ(mi α ), the vocabulary, may be increasing), (β): each Mi α is an expansion of a submodel of (H <χ( ) (λ),,<) belonging to H <χ( ) (λ) [so necessarily has cardinality < χ( ), of course the order mean the order on the ordinals and, for transparency, the vocabulary belongs to H <χ( ) (χ( ))], (γ): Mi α χ( ) is an ordinal, [χ( ) = χ + χ + 1 Mi α ], and Mi α H <χ( ) (η α (i)), (δ): Mi α λ η α (i), (ǫ): Mj α : j i Mα i+1, (ζ): η α θ λ is increasing with limit ζ(α) S, η α (i+1) Mi+1 α. (a2): In the following game, (θ,λ,χ( ),W,h), player I has nowinning strategy. A play lasts θ moves, in the i-th move player I chooses a model M i H <χ( ) (λ), and then player II chooses γ i < λ. In the first move player I also chooses β < λ. In the end player II wins the play if (α) (β) where (α): the pair ( M i : i < θ, γ i : i < θ ) satisfies the relevant demands on the pair 2 and M i expand a submodel of (H <χ( ) (λ),,<) ( M i θ,η α ) in clause (a1). (β): for some α < α( ), η α = γ i : i < θ, M i = Mi α (for i < θ) and h(α) = β. (b0): η α η β for α β, (b1): if {η α i : i < θ} M β θ then α < β + (< χ( ))θ, see below, and ζ(α) ζ(β), (b2): if also λ <θ = λ <χ( ), then for every α < α( ) and i < θ, there is j < θ such that: η α j M β θ implies Mα i M β θ (hence Mα i M β θ ), (b3): if λ = λ <χ( ) and η α (i + 1) M β j then Mi α M β j (and hence x M α i x M β j ) and [η α i η β i η α (i) η β (i)]. Remark (1): If W (with ζ, h, λ, θ, χ( )) satisfies (a0), (a1), (a2), (b0), (b1) we call it a barrier. 2 so Mj : j i is an increasing continuous chain, M i χ( ) an ordinal, χ( ) = χ + χ + 1 M i, M ǫ : ǫ j M j+1 and γ ǫ : ǫ j M j+1 for j < i, M i H <χ( ) (γ i ) and γ i : j i M i+1
21 (2): Remember, (< χ) θ =: BLACK BOXES 21 µ θ. µ<χ (3): TheexistenceofagoodstationarysetS {δ < λ : cf(δ) = θ}follows,for example, from λ = λ <θ (see [Sh:E62, 3.3] or [Sh 88r, 0.6,0.7]) and from λ is the successor of a regular cardinal and λ > θ +. But see 3.15(1),(2),(3). (4): Compare the proof below with [Sh 227] Lemma 1.13, p.49 and [Sh 140]. Proof: First assume λ = λ <χ( ). Let S γ : γ < λ be a sequence of pairwise disjoint stationary subsets of S, S = S γ and without loss of generality γ < min(s γ ). We define h : S λ by γ<λ h (α) = the unique γ such that α S γ, and below we shall let h(α) =: h ( ζ(α)). Let cd = cd λ,χ( ) be a one-to-one function from H <χ( ) (λ) onto λ such that: cd( α,β ) is an ordinal > α,β, but < α+β + or < ω, and x H <χ( ) (cd(x)) for every relevant x. For ξ S let: W 0 ξ =: { ( M,η) : the pair ( M, η) satisfies (a1) of 3.11, sup{η(i) : i < θ} = ξ, and for every i < θ for some y H <χ( ) (λ), η(i) = cd( M i,η i,y ) }. So (a0), (a1), (b0), (b3) (hence (b2)) should be clear. We can choose ( M α,η α ) : α < α( ) an enumeration of (and ζ(α) = suprang(η α ), of course) because: ( ): if ( M,η ) ξ W 0 ξ, then Wξ 0 ξ S to satisfy (b1) {η θ λ : {η i : i < θ} M θ} M θ θ (< χ( )) θ. This, in fact, defines the function ζ as follows: we have ζ(α) = ξ if and only if ( M α,η α ) W 0 ξ. We are left with proving (a2). Let G be a strategy for player I. Let C δ : δ < λ exemplify S is a good stationary subset of λ, see 3.9(2), and let R = {(i,α) : i C α,α < λ}. Let A i : i < λ be a representation of the model A = ( H <χ( ) (λ),,g,r,cd ), i.e. it is increasing continuous, A i < λ, and A i = A; without loss of generality i A i A and A i λ is an ordinal for i < λ. Let G tell player I to choose β < λ in his first move. So there is δ S β (hence δ > β ) such that A δ λ = δ. Now, necessarily C δ α A δ for α < δ. Let {α i : i < cf(δ)} list C δ in increasing order. Lastly, by induction on i, we choose M i, η(i) as follows: η(i) = cd( M j : j i, η(j) : j < i, α j : j < i ), and M i is what the strategy G tells player I to choose in his i-th move if player II have chosen η(j) : j < i so far. Now, for each i < θ the sequences M j : j i, η(j) : j < i are definable in A δ with α j : j i as the only parameter, hence they belong to A δ. So sup{η(j) : j < θ} δ; however, by the choice of η(i) (and cd), η(i) sup{α j : j < i} and hence sup{η(j) : j < θ} is necessarily δ. Now check.
22 22 SAHARON SHELAH The case λ < λ <θ = λ <χ( ) is similar. For a set A θ of cardinality θ we let cd A = cd A λ,χ( ) be a one-to-one function from H <χ( )(λ) onto A λ where: A λ = {h : h is a function from A to λ }. We strengthen (b2) to (b2) : let A i := {cd(i,j) : j < θ}fori [1,θ) anda 0 := θ\ {A 1+i : i < θ}so A i : i < θ is a sequence of pairwise disjoint subsets of θ each of cardinality θ with min(a i ) i and we have ( ): η α A i = cd Ai (( M α i,η α i). * * * What can we do when S is not good? As we say in 3.12(3), in many cases a good S exists, note that for singular λ we will not have one. The following rectifies the situation in the other cases (but is interesting mainly for λ singular). We shall, for a regular cardinal λ, remove this assumption in 3.15(1) (3), while 3.16 helps for singular λ. (This is carried in 3.17). Definition Let be an ordinal and for α < let κ α be a regular uncountable cardinal, S α {δ < κ α : cf(δ) = θ)} be a stationary set. Assume θ, χ are regular cardinals such that for every α < we have θ < χ κ α. Let S = S α : α <, κ = κ α : α <. If = 1 we may write S 0,κ 0. We say that S is good for ( κ,θ,χ) when: for every large enough µ and model A expanding (H <χ (µ), ), τ(a) ℵ 0, there are M i for i < θ such that: 3.11 M i A and S M i M j : j i M i+1, M i < χ, M i χ χ, χ = χ + 1 χ 1 +1 M i, and α <, α M j implies that sup[κ α ( M j )] belongs to S α. j<θ If = 1, we may write S 0,κ 0 instead S, κ. If < χ then we can demand M 0. j<θ Definition For regular uncountable cardinal λ and regular θ < λ let ˇJ θ [λ] be the family of subsets S of λ such that ({δ S : cf(δ) = θ} is not good for (λ,λ,θ). Claim Assume θ = cf(θ) < χ = cf(χ) κ = cf(κ). Then Proof: (1): {δ < κ : cf(δ) = θ} is good for (κ,θ,χ), i.e. is not in ˇJ θ [λ], (2): Any S κ good for (κ,θ,χ) is the union of κ pairwise disjoint such sets, (3): In 3.11 it suffices to assume that S is good for (λ,θ,χ), (4): ˇJθ [λ] is a normal ideal on λ and there is no stationary S {δ < λ : cf(δ) = θ} which belongs to ˇJ θ [λ] Ǐgd [λ], (5): In Definition 3.13, any µ > λ <χ is O.K.; and we can preassign x H <χ (µ) and demand x M i. (6): In 3.11 we can replace the assumption S {δ < λ : cf(δ) = θ} is stationary and in Ǐgd [λ] by S {δ < λ : cf(δ) = θ} is stationary not in ˇJ θ [λ] (which holds for S = {δ < κ : cf(δ) = θ}).
23 BLACK BOXES 23 (1): Straightforward (play the game). (2): Similar to the proof of 3.1. (3): Obvious. (4): Easy. (5): Easy. (6): Follows. Claim Assume that κ,θ,χ are as in 3.13 with χ. Then (1): the sequence {δ < κ i : cf(δ) = θ} : i < is good for ( κ,θ,χ). (2): If 1 < and S i : i < 1 is good for ( κ 1,θ,χ) then S i : i < 1 {δ < κ i : cf(δ) = θ} : 1 i < is good for ( κ,θ,χ). (3): If S i : i < 1 is good for ( κ,θ,χ) and i( ) <, then we can partition S i( ) to pairwise disjoint sets S i( ),ǫ : ǫ < κ i such that for each ǫ < κ i, the sequence S i : i < i( ) S i( ),ǫ {δ : δ < κ i,cf(δ) = θ} : i( ) < i < is good for ( κ,θ,χ), (4): S good for ( κ,θ,χ) implies that Si is a stationary subset of κ i for each i < lg( κ). Proof: Like 3.15 [in 3.16(3) we choose for δ S i( ), a club C δ of δ of order type cf(δ); for j < θ, ǫ < κ i(α), let S j i( ),ǫ = {δ S i( ) : ǫ is the jth member of C δ }; for some j and unbounded A κ i( ), S j i( ),ǫ : ǫ A are as required] Now we remove from 3.11 (and subsequently 3.18) the hypothesis λ is regular when cf(λ) χ( ). Lemma Suppose λ θ = λ <χ( ), λ is singular, θ and χ( ) are regular, θ < χ( ) and cf(λ) χ( ). Suppose further that λ = µ i, each µ i is regular > χ( )+θ +. i<cf(λ) Then we can find W = {( M α,η α ) : α < α( )} and functions ζ : α( ) cf(λ), ξ : α( ) λ, and h : α( ) λ, and {µ i : i < cf(λ)} such that ({µ i : i < cf(λ)} = {µ i : i < cf(λ)} and): (a0): h(α) depends only on ζ(α), ξ(α), [α < β ζ(α) ζ(β)], [α < β ζ(α) = ζ(β) ξ(α) ξ(β)], and ξ(α) < µ ζ(α) (a1): as in 3.11 except that: η α (3i) : i < θ is strictly increasing with limit ζ(α) and η α (3i+1) : i < θ is strictly increasing with limit ξ(α) for i < θ, and for every i < θ, sup( M α i µ ζ(α) ) < ξ(α) = sup( M α θ µ ζ(α) ) 6.7
24 24 SAHARON SHELAH sup( M α i cf(λ)) < ζ(α) = sup( M α θ cf(λ)), (a2): as in (b0):, (b1), (b2) as in 3.11 but in clause (b3) we demand i = 2 mod 3. Remark: To make it similar to 3.11, we can fix S a, Si a, Sb i, Sb i,a, µ i as in the first paragraph of the proof below. Proof: First, by 3.15 [(1) + (2)], we can find pairwise disjoint Si a cf(λ) for i < cf(λ), each good for (cf(λ),θ,χ( )) (and α Si a α > i & cf(α) = θ), and let S a = Si a. We define µ i {µ j : j < i} such that for each i < cf(λ) : [j i<cf(λ) Si a µ j = µ i]. Then for each i, by 3.16 parts (2) (3) (with 1,2,S 0,κ 0,κ 1 standing for σ 1, σ, Si a, cf(λ), µ i ), we can find pairwise disjoint subsets Sb i,α : α < µ i of {δ < µ i : cf(δ) = θ} such that for each α < µ α, (Sa i,sb i,α ) is good for ( cf(λ),µ i,θ,χ). Let Si b = {Si,α b : α < µ i }. Let cd be as in 3.11 s proofcoding only for ordinalsi = 2 mod 3, and for ζ Si a, ξ Si,j a let W 0 ζ,ξ = { ( M,η) : M satisfies (a1), ζ = sup{η(3i) : i < θ}, ξ = sup{η(3i+1) : i < θ} and for each i < θ, for some y H <χ( ) (λ), η(3i+2) = cd( M j : j 3i+1,η (3i+1),y) }. The rest is as in 3.11 s proof * * * The following Lemma improves 3.11 when λ satisfies a stronger requirement making the distinct ( M α,η α ) interact less. Lemmas were used in the proof of 2.4 (and 2.3). Lemma In 3.11, if λ = λ χ( ), χ( ) θ = χ( ), then we can strengthen clause (b1) to (b1) + : if α β and {η α i : i < θ} M β then α < β and x M α θ x M β θ. Proof: Apply 3.11 (actually, its proof) but using λ, χ( ) +, θ, instead of λ, χ( ), θ; and get W = {( M α,η α ) : α < α( ))}, and the functions ζ,h. Let cd be as in the proof of Let < be some well ordering of H <χ( ) (λ), and let U be the set of ordinals α < α( ) such that for i < θ, Mi α has the form (Ni α, α i,<α ) and ( Ni α, α i,<α ) (H <χ( ) (λ),,< ). Let α U, by induction on ǫ < χ( ) we define M ǫ,α i, η ǫ,α as follows: (A): η ǫ,α (i) is cd( η α (i),ǫ ), (which is an ordinal < λ but > η α (i) and > ǫ). (B): M ǫ,α i Ni α is the Skolem Hull of {η ǫ,α (j + 1) : j < i} inside Ni α, using as Skolem functions the choice of the < first element and making M ǫ,α i χ( ) an ordinal [if we want we can use η ǫ,α such that it fits the definition in the proof of 3.11].
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set May 6, 2008 Abstract A set of first-order formulas, whatever the cardinality of the set of symbols, is equivalent to an independent
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOrdinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit
Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ting Zhang Stanford May 11, 2001 Stanford, 5/11/2001 1 Outline Ordinal Classification Ordinal Addition Ordinal Multiplication Ordinal
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2 Composition. Invertible Mappings
Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan Composition. Invertible Mappings In this section we discuss two procedures for creating new mappings from old ones, namely,
Διαβάστε περισσότερα4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)
84 CHAPTER 4. STATIONARY TS MODELS 4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(,) This section is an introduction to a wide class of models ARMA(p,q) which we will consider in more detail later in this
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn density of old sets in Prikry type extensions.
On density of old sets in Prikry type extensions. Moti Gitik December 31, 2015 Abstract Every set of ordinals of cardinality κ in a Prikry extension with a measure over κ contains an old set of arbitrary
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 3: Ordinal Numbers
Chapter 3: Ordinal Numbers There are two kinds of number.. Ordinal numbers (0th), st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th,..., ω, ω +,... ω2, ω2+,... ω 2... answers to the question What position is... in a sequence? What
Διαβάστε περισσότεραω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ω ω + 1 ω + 2 ω + 3 ω + 4 ω2 ω2 + 1 ω2 + 2 ω2 + 3 ω3 ω3 + 1 ω3 + 2 ω4 ω4 + 1 ω5 ω 2 ω 2 + 1 ω 2 + 2 ω 2 + ω ω 2 + ω + 1 ω 2 + ω2 ω 2 2 ω 2 2 + 1 ω 2 2 + ω ω 2 3 ω 3 ω 3 + 1 ω 3 + ω ω 3 +
Διαβάστε περισσότεραC.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions
C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions Paul Liu November 15, 2007 Note that these are sample solutions only; in many cases there were many acceptable answers. 1 Reynolds Problem 10.1 1.1 Normal-order
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExample Sheet 3 Solutions
Example Sheet 3 Solutions. i Regular Sturm-Liouville. ii Singular Sturm-Liouville mixed boundary conditions. iii Not Sturm-Liouville ODE is not in Sturm-Liouville form. iv Regular Sturm-Liouville note
Διαβάστε περισσότεραORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER
ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER Abstract. We define ordinal arithmetic and show laws of Left- Monotonicity, Associativity, Distributivity, some minor related properties and the Cantor Normal Form.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραderivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates
derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates swapnizzle 03-03- :5:43 We begin by recognizing the familiar conversion from rectangular to spherical coordinates (note that φ is used
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEE512: Error Control Coding
EE512: Error Control Coding Solution for Assignment on Finite Fields February 16, 2007 1. (a) Addition and Multiplication tables for GF (5) and GF (7) are shown in Tables 1 and 2. + 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 3
Διαβάστε περισσότεραST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II
ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II 2014/2015: Semester II Tutorial 7 1. Let X be a sample from a population P and consider testing hypotheses H 0 : P = P 0 versus H 1 : P = P 1, where P j is a known
Διαβάστε περισσότεραConcrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016
Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016 Silvio Capobianco Exercise 1.7 Let H(n) = J(n + 1) J(n). Equation (1.8) tells us that H(2n) = 2, and H(2n+1) = J(2n+2) J(2n+1) = (2J(n+1) 1) (2J(n)+1)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic
Lecture 2 Soundness and completeness of propositional logic February 9, 2004 1 Overview Review of natural deduction. Soundness and completeness. Semantics of propositional formulas. Soundness proof. Completeness
Διαβάστε περισσότεραUniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor
Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor Given f L 1 T 1 ), we consider the partial sums of the Fourier series of f: N 1) S N fθ) = ˆfk)e ikθ. k= N A calculation gives the Dirichlet formula
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSplitting stationary sets from weak forms of Choice
Splitting stationary sets from weak forms of Choice Paul Larson and Saharon Shelah February 16, 2008 Abstract Working in the context of restricted forms of the Axiom of Choice, we consider the problem
Διαβάστε περισσότεραProblem Set 3: Solutions
CMPSCI 69GG Applied Information Theory Fall 006 Problem Set 3: Solutions. [Cover and Thomas 7.] a Define the following notation, C I p xx; Y max X; Y C I p xx; Ỹ max I X; Ỹ We would like to show that C
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFinite Field Problems: Solutions
Finite Field Problems: Solutions 1. Let f = x 2 +1 Z 11 [x] and let F = Z 11 [x]/(f), a field. Let Solution: F =11 2 = 121, so F = 121 1 = 120. The possible orders are the divisors of 120. Solution: The
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCardinals. Y = n Y n. Define h: X Y by f(x) if x X n X n+1 and n is even h(x) = g
Cardinals 1. Introduction to Cardinals We work in the base theory ZF. The definitions and many (but not all) of the basic theorems do not require AC; we will indicate explicitly when we are using choice.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPhys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)
Phys460.nb 81 ψ n (t) is still the (same) eigenstate of H But for tdependent H. The answer is NO. 5.5.5. Solution for the tdependent Schrodinger s equation If we assume that at time t 0, the electron starts
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSINGULAR CARDINALS AND SQUARE PROPERTIES
SINGULAR CARDINALS AND SQUARE PROPERTIES MENACHEM MAGIDOR AND DIMA SINAPOVA Abstract. We analyze the effect of singularizing cardinals on square properties. By work of Džamonja-Shelah and of Gitik, if
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:
HOMEWORK 4 Problem a For the fast loading case, we want to derive the relationship between P zz and λ z. We know that the nominal stress is expressed as: P zz = ψ λ z where λ z = λ λ z. Therefore, applying
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in
Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in : tail in X, head in A nowhere-zero Γ-flow is a Γ-circulation such that
Διαβάστε περισσότεραApproximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude
Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude Jan Behrens 2012-12-31 In this paper we shall provide a method to approximate distances between two points on earth
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOther Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests
Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Side-Note: So far we have seen a few approaches for creating tests such as Neyman-Pearson Lemma ( most powerful tests of H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 :
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)
Uppsala Universitet Matematiska Institutionen Andreas Strömbergsson Prov i matematik Funktionalanalys Kurs: F3B, F4Sy, NVP 2005-03-08 Skrivtid: 9 14 Tillåtna hjälpmedel: Manuella skrivdon, Kreyszigs bok
Διαβάστε περισσότεραarxiv: v4 [math.lo] 15 Jun 2010
DIAMONDS arxiv:0711.3030v4 [math.lo] 15 Jun 2010 SAHARON SHELAH Abstract. If λ = χ + = 2 χ > ℵ 1 then diamond on λ holds. Moreover, if λ = χ + = 2 χ and S {δ < λ : cf(δ) cf(χ)} is stationary then S holds.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.
Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequalit for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x,, z X. Prove that d(x, z) d(, z) d(x, ). (ii): Reverse triangle inequalit for norms:
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 67, 3301-3307 A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Equivalence Relation D. K. Basnet Dept. of Mathematics, Assam University Silchar-788011, Assam, India dkbasnet@rediffmail.com
Διαβάστε περισσότερα3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β
3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS Page Theorem cos(αβ cos α cos β -sin α cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α NOTE: cos(αβ cos α cos β cos(α-β cos α -cos β Proof of cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α Let s use a unit circle
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStatistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests
Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Shirsendu Mukherjee Department of Statistics, Asutosh College, Kolkata, India. shirsendu st@yahoo.co.in So far we have treated the testing of one-sided
Διαβάστε περισσότερα6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.
6.1. Dirac Equation Ref: M.Kaku, Quantum Field Theory, Oxford Univ Press (1993) η μν = η μν = diag(1, -1, -1, -1) p 0 = p 0 p = p i = -p i p μ p μ = p 0 p 0 + p i p i = E c 2 - p 2 = (m c) 2 H = c p 2
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe challenges of non-stable predicates
The challenges of non-stable predicates Consider a non-stable predicate Φ encoding, say, a safety property. We want to determine whether Φ holds for our program. The challenges of non-stable predicates
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMatrices and Determinants
Matrices and Determinants SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Q 1. For what value of k do the following system of equations possess a non-trivial (i.e., not all zero) solution over the set of rationals Q? x + ky + 3z
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Simply Typed Lambda Calculus
Type Inference Instead of writing type annotations, can we use an algorithm to infer what the type annotations should be? That depends on the type system. For simple type systems the answer is yes, and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPartial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013
The boundary element method March 26, 203 Introduction and notation The problem: u = f in D R d u = ϕ in Γ D u n = g on Γ N, where D = Γ D Γ N, Γ D Γ N = (possibly, Γ D = [Neumann problem] or Γ N = [Dirichlet
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs
Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs Who? Nichole Schimanski When? July 27, 2011 Graphs A graph, G, consists of a vertex set, V (G), and an edge set, E(G). V (G) is any finite set E(G) is
Διαβάστε περισσότερα6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes
122 CHAPTER 6. ARMA MODELS 6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes The purpose of forecasting is to predict future values of a TS based on the data collected to the present. In this section we will discuss a linear
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 3 Solutions
Homework 3 Solutions Igor Yanovsky (Math 151A TA) Problem 1: Compute the absolute error and relative error in approximations of p by p. (Use calculator!) a) p π, p 22/7; b) p π, p 3.141. Solution: For
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 9.2 Polar Equations and Graphs
180 Section 9. Polar Equations and Graphs In this section, we will be graphing polar equations on a polar grid. In the first few examples, we will write the polar equation in rectangular form to help identify
Διαβάστε περισσότεραON INCOMPACTNESS FOR CHROMATIC NUMBER OF GRAPHS SH1006 SAHARON SHELAH
ON INCOMPACTNESS FOR CHROMATIC NUMBER OF GRAPHS SH1006 SAHARON SHELAH Abstract. We deal with incompactness. Assume the existence of non-reflecting stationary subset of the regular cardinal λ of cofinality
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions
SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES GLMA Linear Mathematics 00- Examination Solutions. (a) i. ( + 5i)( i) = (6 + 5) + (5 )i = + i. Real part is, imaginary part is. (b) ii. + 5i i ( + 5i)( + i) = ( i)( + i)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTHE GENERAL INDUCTIVE ARGUMENT FOR MEASURE ANALYSES WITH ADDITIVE ORDINAL ALGEBRAS
THE GENERAL INDUCTIVE ARGUMENT FOR MEASURE ANALYSES WITH ADDITIVE ORDINAL ALGEBRAS STEFAN BOLD, BENEDIKT LÖWE In [BoLö ] we gave a survey of measure analyses under AD, discussed the general theory of order
Διαβάστε περισσότεραBounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees
Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees Thomas F. Kent Andrea Sorbi Università degli Studi di Siena Italia July 18, 2007 Goal: Introduce a form of Σ 0 2-permitting for the enumeration degrees. Till now,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΜηχανική Μάθηση Hypothesis Testing
ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΚΡΗΤΗΣ Μηχανική Μάθηση Hypothesis Testing Γιώργος Μπορμπουδάκης Τμήμα Επιστήμης Υπολογιστών Procedure 1. Form the null (H 0 ) and alternative (H 1 ) hypothesis 2. Consider
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3
Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 1 State vector space and the dual space Space of wavefunctions The space of wavefunctions is the set of all
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 2. Ordinals, well-founded relations.
Chapter 2. Ordinals, well-founded relations. 2.1. Well-founded Relations. We start with some definitions and rapidly reach the notion of a well-ordered set. Definition. For any X and any binary relation
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics
Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics Nov 1, 01 In this lecture we examine root systems from an axiomatic point of view. 1 Reflections If v R n, then it determines a hyperplane, denoted P v, through the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 8.3 Trigonometric Equations
99 Section 8. Trigonometric Equations Objective 1: Solve Equations Involving One Trigonometric Function. In this section and the next, we will exple how to solving equations involving trigonometric functions.
Διαβάστε περισσότερα5. Choice under Uncertainty
5. Choice under Uncertainty Daisuke Oyama Microeconomics I May 23, 2018 Formulations von Neumann-Morgenstern (1944/1947) X: Set of prizes Π: Set of probability distributions on X : Preference relation
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCongruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 24, no. 5, 239-246 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/.2988/ija.24.422 Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 Ligong An and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPCF: THE ADVANCED PCF THEOREMS E69 SAHARON SHELAH
PCF: THE ADVANCED PCF THEOREMS E69 SAHARON SHELAH Abstract. This is a revised version of [Sh:430, 6]. Date: January 21, 2016. The author thanks Alice Leonhardt for the beautiful typing. I thank Peter Komjath
Διαβάστε περισσότεραk A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +
Chapter 3. Fuzzy Arithmetic 3- Fuzzy arithmetic: ~Addition(+) and subtraction (-): Let A = [a and B = [b, b in R If x [a and y [b, b than x+y [a +b +b Symbolically,we write A(+)B = [a (+)[b, b = [a +b
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNOTES ON SQUARES, SCALES, AND REFLECTION
NOTES ON SQUARES, SCALES, AND REFLECTION MAXWELL LEVINE 1. Some Basic Facts Proposition 1. If κ
Διαβάστε περισσότεραarxiv:math/ v1 [math.lo] 15 Oct 1996
ISRAEL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS 95 (1996), 61 114 FURTHER CARDINAL ARITHMETIC BY arxiv:math/9610226v1 [math.lo] 15 Oct 1996 Saharon Shelah Institute of Mathematics The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραKnaster-Reichbach Theorem for 2 κ
Knaster-Reichbach Theorem for 2 κ Micha l Korch February 9, 2018 In the recent years the theory of the generalized Cantor and Baire spaces was extensively developed (see, e.g. [1], [2], [6], [4] and many
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS
CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS Shiah-Sen Wang The graphs are prepared by Chien-Lun Lai Based on : Precalculus: Mathematics for Calculus by J. Stuwart, L. Redin & S. Watson, 6th edition, 01, Brooks/Cole Chapter
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSolutions to Exercise Sheet 5
Solutions to Eercise Sheet 5 jacques@ucsd.edu. Let X and Y be random variables with joint pdf f(, y) = 3y( + y) where and y. Determine each of the following probabilities. Solutions. a. P (X ). b. P (X
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAbstract Storage Devices
Abstract Storage Devices Robert König Ueli Maurer Stefano Tessaro SOFSEM 2009 January 27, 2009 Outline 1. Motivation: Storage Devices 2. Abstract Storage Devices (ASD s) 3. Reducibility 4. Factoring ASD
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS
CHAPTER 5 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS EXERCISE 104 Page 8 1. Find the positive root of the equation x + 3x 5 = 0, correct to 3 significant figures, using the method of bisection. Let f(x) =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραforms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with
Week 03: C lassification of S econd- Order L inear Equations In last week s lectures we have illustrated how to obtain the general solutions of first order PDEs using the method of characteristics. We
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomomorphism in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Automata
International Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics Systems. ISSN 2248-9940 Volume 3, Number 1 (2013), pp. 39-45 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/ijfms.htm Homomorphism in Intuitionistic
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEcon 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1
Eon : Fall 8 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 Email questions or omments to Dan Fetter Problem. Let X be a salar with density f(x, θ) (θx + θ) [ x ] with θ. (a) Find the most powerful level α test
Διαβάστε περισσότεραReminders: linear functions
Reminders: linear functions Let U and V be vector spaces over the same field F. Definition A function f : U V is linear if for every u 1, u 2 U, f (u 1 + u 2 ) = f (u 1 ) + f (u 2 ), and for every u U
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS
MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS FUMIE NAKAOKA AND NOBUYUKI ODA Received 20 December 2005; Revised 28 May 2006; Accepted 6 August 2006 Some properties of minimal closed sets and maximal closed
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE
Lecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE BLUE: Robustness of LSE against normality We now study properties of l τ β and σ 2 under assumption A2, i.e., without the normality assumption on ε. From Theorem
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSpace-Time Symmetries
Chapter Space-Time Symmetries In classical fiel theory any continuous symmetry of the action generates a conserve current by Noether's proceure. If the Lagrangian is not invariant but only shifts by a
Διαβάστε περισσότεραModels for Probabilistic Programs with an Adversary
Models for Probabilistic Programs with an Adversary Robert Rand, Steve Zdancewic University of Pennsylvania Probabilistic Programming Semantics 2016 Interactive Proofs 2/47 Interactive Proofs 2/47 Interactive
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAbout these lecture notes. Simply Typed λ-calculus. Types
About these lecture notes Simply Typed λ-calculus Akim Demaille akim@lrde.epita.fr EPITA École Pour l Informatique et les Techniques Avancées Many of these slides are largely inspired from Andrew D. Ker
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomomorphism of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Groups
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 6, 20, no. 64, 369-378 Homomorphism o Intuitionistic Fuzz Groups P. K. Sharma Department o Mathematics, D..V. College Jalandhar Cit, Punjab, India pksharma@davjalandhar.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II
Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II October 18, 2012 1 Review First let us recall the situation. Let g be a simple algebra, with maximal toral subalgebra h (which we are calling a CSA, or Cartan Subalgebra).
Διαβάστε περισσότεραANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?
Teko Classes IITJEE/AIEEE Maths by SUHAAG SIR, Bhopal, Ph (0755) 3 00 000 www.tekoclasses.com ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION # Question Type A.Single Correct Type Q. (A) Sol least
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas
09 Section 7. Double and Half Angle Fmulas To derive the double-angles fmulas, we will use the sum of two angles fmulas that we developed in the last section. We will let α θ and β θ: cos(θ) cos(θ + θ)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGenerating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations
Applied Mathematics 06 7 98-07 Published Online January 06 in SciRes http://wwwscirporg/journal/am http://dxdoiorg/036/am067009 Generating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations Yasha iasamidze
Διαβάστε περισσότεραInstruction Execution Times
1 C Execution Times InThisAppendix... Introduction DL330 Execution Times DL330P Execution Times DL340 Execution Times C-2 Execution Times Introduction Data Registers This appendix contains several tables
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOnline Appendix I. 1 1+r ]}, Bψ = {ψ : Y E A S S}, B W = +(1 s)[1 m (1,0) (b, e, a, ψ (0,a ) (e, a, s); q, ψ, W )]}, (29) exp( U(d,a ) (i, x; q)
Online Appendix I Appendix D Additional Existence Proofs Denote B q = {q : A E A S [0, +r ]}, Bψ = {ψ : Y E A S S}, B W = {W : I E A S R}. I slightly abuse the notation by defining B q (L q ) the subset
Διαβάστε περισσότεραJesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013
Notes on Average Scattering imes and Hall Factors Jesse Maassen and Mar Lundstrom Purdue University November 5, 13 I. Introduction 1 II. Solution of the BE 1 III. Exercises: Woring out average scattering
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΑπόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.
Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο The time integral of a force is referred to as impulse, is determined by and is obtained from: Newton s 2 nd Law of motion states that the action
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath221: HW# 1 solutions
Math: HW# solutions Andy Royston October, 5 7.5.7, 3 rd Ed. We have a n = b n = a = fxdx = xdx =, x cos nxdx = x sin nx n sin nxdx n = cos nx n = n n, x sin nxdx = x cos nx n + cos nxdx n cos n = + sin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS
Sahand Communications in Mathematical Analysis (SCMA) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016), 21-27 http://scma.maragheh.ac.ir SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS BAYAZ DARABY 1 AND JAVAD JAFARI 2 Abstract. In the mathematical
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMA 342N Assignment 1 Due 24 February 2016
M 342N ssignment Due 24 February 206 Id: 342N-s206-.m4,v. 206/02/5 2:25:36 john Exp john. Suppose that q, in addition to satisfying the assumptions from lecture, is an even function. Prove that η(λ = 0,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSrednicki Chapter 55
Srednicki Chapter 55 QFT Problems & Solutions A. George August 3, 03 Srednicki 55.. Use equations 55.3-55.0 and A i, A j ] = Π i, Π j ] = 0 (at equal times) to verify equations 55.-55.3. This is our third
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 19/5/2007
Οδηγίες: Να απαντηθούν όλες οι ερωτήσεις. Αν κάπου κάνετε κάποιες υποθέσεις να αναφερθούν στη σχετική ερώτηση. Όλα τα αρχεία που αναφέρονται στα προβλήματα βρίσκονται στον ίδιο φάκελο με το εκτελέσιμο
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMain source: "Discrete-time systems and computer control" by Α. ΣΚΟΔΡΑΣ ΨΗΦΙΑΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΔΙΑΛΕΞΗ 4 ΔΙΑΦΑΝΕΙΑ 1
Main source: "Discrete-time systems and computer control" by Α. ΣΚΟΔΡΑΣ ΨΗΦΙΑΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΔΙΑΛΕΞΗ 4 ΔΙΑΦΑΝΕΙΑ 1 A Brief History of Sampling Research 1915 - Edmund Taylor Whittaker (1873-1956) devised a
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008
Tridiagonal matrices Gérard MEURANT October, 2008 1 Similarity 2 Cholesy factorizations 3 Eigenvalues 4 Inverse Similarity Let α 1 ω 1 β 1 α 2 ω 2 T =......... β 2 α 1 ω 1 β 1 α and β i ω i, i = 1,...,
Διαβάστε περισσότερα9.09. # 1. Area inside the oval limaçon r = cos θ. To graph, start with θ = 0 so r = 6. Compute dr
9.9 #. Area inside the oval limaçon r = + cos. To graph, start with = so r =. Compute d = sin. Interesting points are where d vanishes, or at =,,, etc. For these values of we compute r:,,, and the values
Διαβάστε περισσότεραInverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. ------------------ ----------------------------- -----------------
Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. 1. Sin ( ) = a) b) c) d) Ans b. Solution : Method 1. Ans a: 17 > 1 a) is rejected. w.k.t Sin ( sin ) = d is rejected. If sin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals
Lecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals Confidence Intervals θ: an unknown parameter of interest We want to find limits θ and θ such that Gt = P nˆθ θ t If G 1 1 α is known, then P θ θ = P θ θ = 1 α
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIntuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 7, 202, no. 6, 769-776 Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings P. K. Sharma P.G. Department of Mathematics D.A.V. College Jalandhar city, Punjab, India pksharma@davjalandhar.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAreas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates
Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTheorem 8 Let φ be the most powerful size α test of H
Testing composite hypotheses Θ = Θ 0 Θ c 0 H 0 : θ Θ 0 H 1 : θ Θ c 0 Definition 16 A test φ is a uniformly most powerful (UMP) level α test for H 0 vs. H 1 if φ has level α and for any other level α test
Διαβάστε περισσότερα1. Introduction and Preliminaries.
Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.yu/filomat Filomat 22:1 (2008), 97 106 ON δ SETS IN γ SPACES V. Renuka Devi and D. Sivaraj Abstract We
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStrain gauge and rosettes
Strain gauge and rosettes Introduction A strain gauge is a device which is used to measure strain (deformation) on an object subjected to forces. Strain can be measured using various types of devices classified
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNew bounds for spherical two-distance sets and equiangular lines
New bounds for spherical two-distance sets and equiangular lines Michigan State University Oct 8-31, 016 Anhui University Definition If X = {x 1, x,, x N } S n 1 (unit sphere in R n ) and x i, x j = a
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 8 Model Solution Section
MATH 004 Homework Solution Homework 8 Model Solution Section 14.5 14.6. 14.5. Use the Chain Rule to find dz where z cosx + 4y), x 5t 4, y 1 t. dz dx + dy y sinx + 4y)0t + 4) sinx + 4y) 1t ) 0t + 4t ) sinx
Διαβάστε περισσότεραthe total number of electrons passing through the lamp.
1. A 12 V 36 W lamp is lit to normal brightness using a 12 V car battery of negligible internal resistance. The lamp is switched on for one hour (3600 s). For the time of 1 hour, calculate (i) the energy
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCommutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets S K Mala #1, Dr. MM Shanmugapriya *2 1 PhD Scholar in Mathematics, Karpagam University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu- 641021 Assistant Professor of Mathematics,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExercises 10. Find a fundamental matrix of the given system of equations. Also find the fundamental matrix Φ(t) satisfying Φ(0) = I. 1.
Exercises 0 More exercises are available in Elementary Differential Equations. If you have a problem to solve any of them, feel free to come to office hour. Problem Find a fundamental matrix of the given
Διαβάστε περισσότερα