arxiv: v1 [math.gn] 24 Oct 2010
|
|
- Κόριννα Δάμαλις Παυλόπουλος
- 5 χρόνια πριν
- Προβολές:
Transcript
1 1 COMPACTNESS IN L-FUZZY TOPOLOGICAL SPACES JOAQUÍN LUNA-TORRES a AND ELÍAS SALAZAR-BUELVAS b arxiv: v1 [math.gn] 24 Oct 2010 a Universidad Sergio arboleda b Universidad de Cartagena Abstract. We give a definition of compactness in L-fuzzy topological spaces and provide a characterization of compact L-fuzzy topological spaces, where L is a complete quasi-monoidal lattice with some additional structures, and we present a version of Tychonoff s theorem within the category of L-fuzzy topological spaces. 0. Introduction Over the years, a number of descriptions of compactness of fuzzy topological spaces has appeared. As mathematicians sought to general topology in various ways using the concept of fuzzy subsets of an ordinary set, it is not surprising that searches for such properties were obtained with different degrees of success, depending on the structure of the underlying lattice L. One of the main goals of any theory of compactness is to investigate the problem to which extent the formulation of a theorem of Tychonoff is possible. The aim of this paper is to present a version of Tychonoff s theorem within the category of L-fuzzy topological spaces, when the underlying lattice L is a cqm-lattice with some additional structures. Following P. T. Johnstone ([10]), within the text of the paper, those propositions, lemmas and theorems whose proofs require Zorn s lemma are distinguished by being marked with an asterisk. 1 Partially supported by Universidad de Cartagena 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 54A40, 54D30, 06B23. Key words and phrases. GL-monoid; Co-GL-monoid; L-fuzzy topological space; L-fuzzy filter; L-fuzzy neighborhood system; L-fuzzy interior operator; Adherent point; Tychonoff theorem. 1
2 The paper is organized as follows: After some lattice-theoretical prerequisites, where we briefly recall the concept of a cqm-lattice, in section 2 we shall present the concept of compact L-fuzzy topological spaces. Finally, in section 3 we present a proof of the Tychonoff s theorem. 1. From Lattice Theoretic Foundations Let (L, ) be a complete, infinitely distributive lattice, i.e. (L, ) is a partially ordered set such that for every subset A L the join A and the meet A are defined, moreover ( A) α = {a α) a A and ( A) α = {a α) a A for every α L. In particular, L =: and L =: are respectively the universal upper and the universal lower bounds in L. We assume that, i.e. L has at least two elements cqm lattices. The definition of complete quasi-monoidal lattices introduced by E. Rodabaugh in [11] is the following: A cqm lattice (short for complete quasi-monoidal lattice) is a triple (l,, ) provided with the following properties (1) (L, ) is a complete lattice with upper bound and lower bound. (2) : L L : L is a binary operation satisfying the following axioms: (a) is isotone in both arguments, i.e. α 1 α 2, β 1 β 2 implies α 1 β 1 α 2 β 2 ; (b) is idempotent, i.e. = GL monoids. A GL monoid (see [6], [7], [8]) is a complete lattice enriched with a further binary operation, i.e. a triple (L,, ) such that: (1) is isotone, i.e. α β implies α γ β γ, α,β,γ L; (2) is commutative, i.e. α β = β α, α,β L; 2
3 (3) is associative, i.e. α (β γ) = (α β) γ, α,β,γ L; (4) (L,, ) is integral, i.e. acts as the unity: α = α, α L; (5) acts as the zero element in (L,, ), i.e. α =, α L; (6) is distributive over arbitrary joins, i.e. α ( λ β λ) = λ (α β λ), α L, {β λ : λ I L; (7) (L,, ) is divisible, i.e. α β implies the existence of γ L such that α = β γ. It is well known that every GL monoid is residuated, i.e. there exists a further binary operation (implication) on L satisfying the following condition: α β γ α (β γ) α,β,γ L. Explicitly implication is given by α β = {λ L α λ β. Important examples of GL-monoids are Heyting algebras and M V-algebras. Namely, a Heyting algebra is GL-monoid of the type (L,,,, ) (i.e. in case of a Heyting algebra = ), cf. e.g. [10]. A GL-monoid is called an MV-algebra if (α ) = α α L, [4], [5], see also [8, Lemma 2.14]. Thus in an MV-algebra an order reversing involution c : L L can be naturally defined by setting α c := α α L. If X is a set and L is a GL-monoid, then the fuzzy powerset L X in an obvious way can be pointwise endowed with a structure of a GL-monoid. In particular the L-sets 1 X and 0 X defined by 1 X (x) := and 0 X (x) := x X are respectively the universal upper and lower bounds in L X Co-GL-monoids. A co-gl monoid is a complete lattice with a further binary operation, i.e. a triple (L,, ) such that: 3
4 (1) is isotone, i.e. α β implies α γ β γ, α,β,γ L; (2) is commutative, i.e. α β = β α, α,β L; (3) is associative, i.e. α (β γ) = (α β) γ, α,β,γ L; (4) (L,, ) is co-integral, i.e. acts as the unity: α = α, α L; (5) acts as the co-zero element in (L,, ), i.e. α =, α L; (6) is distributive over arbitrary meets, i.e. α ( λ β λ) = λ (α β λ), α L, {β λ : λ I L; (7) (L,, ) is co-divisible, i.e. α β implies the existence of γ L such that α γ = β. Every co-gl monoid is co-residuated, i.e. there exists a further binary operation (co-implication) on L satisfying the following condition: α β γ α (β γ) α,β,γ L. Explicitly, coimplication is given by α β = {λ L α β λ. If X is a set and L is a co-gl-monoid, then the fuzzy powerset L X in an obvious way can be pointwise endowed with a structure of a co-gl-monoid. Remark 1.1. In this paper we will use the particular case in which = and the co-implication is α β = {λ L α β λ. In the sequel (L,, ) denotes an arbitrary GL-monoid and (L,, ) denotes an co-gl-monoid. 2. Compactness and L-fuzzy Topological Spaces In this section we recall some topological concepts (as in [9]) from the theory of L-fuzzy topological spaces. 4
5 Definition 2.1. Given (L,, ) a cqm-lattice and X a non-empty set; an L-fuzzy topology on X is a map τ : L X L satisfying the following axioms: o1. τ(1 X ) =, o2. For f,g L X, τ(f) τ(g) τ(f g), o3. For every subset {f λ of L X the inequality τ(f λ ) τ( f λ ) holds. If τ is an L-fuzzy topology on X, the pair (X, τ) is an L-fuzzy topological space. If the set X is non-empty, then L X consists at least of two elements. In particular, the universal lower bound in (L X, ) is given by 0 X. When we take the empty subset of L X and we apply the axiom o3, we obtain o1. τ(0 X ) =. Definition 2.2. Given (X, τ) and (Y, η) L-fuzzy topological spaces, a map φ : X Y is L-fuzzy continuous iff for all g L Y, φ satisfies η(g) τ(g φ). In this way, we have the category L-FTop where the objects are the L-fuzzy topological spaces and the morphisms are the L-fuzzy continuous maps. On the set T L (X) of all L-fuzzy topologies on X we have a partial ordering: τ 1 τ 2 τ 1 (f) τ 2 (f), f L X. Remark 2.3. On the set L X L we introduce a partial ordering by (f,α) (g,β) (f g and β α) 5
6 Lemma 2.4. Let L be a complete lattice such that (L,, ) is a GL monoid and (L,, ) is a co-gl monoid, then (L X L,, ), where (f,α) (g,β) := (f g,α β), (f,α),(g,β) L X L, is a GL monoid. Proof. It is straightforward to check that for {(f λ,α λ ) L X L: (i) (f λ,α λ ) = ( f λ I λ, α λ I λ). (ii) (f λ,α λ ) = ( f λ I λ, α λ I λ). (iii) = (1 X, ) is the universal upper bound of (L,, ). (iv) = (0 X, ) is the universal lower bound of (L,, ). Consequently, is isotone, commutative and associative; (L,, ) is integral with respect to and acts as the zero element in (L,, ). (v) is distributive over arbitrary joins, i.e. for all (f,α) L X L, for all {(g j,β j ) j I L X L, (f,α) j I(g j,β j ) = (f,α) g j, j j I j Iβ = f j Ig j,α j Iβ j = (f g j ), j ) j I j I(α β = (f g j,α β j ) j I = [(f,α) (g j,β j )]. j I (vi) (L X L,, ) is divisible, i.e. (f,α) (g,β) f g and β α implies the existence of h L X and γ L such that f = g h and β γ = α, in other words (f,α) = (g h,β γ) = (g,β) (h,γ). 6
7 Remark 2.5. The residuation in (L X L,, ) is the binary operation given by (f,α) (g,β) = {(h,η) h f g, β η α h L X η L = (f g,β α), which satisfies the following condition (f,α) (g,β) (h,γ) (f,α) [(g,β) (h,γ)], (f,α),(g,β),(h,γ) L X L. It is also straightforward to check that (f,α) [(g,β) (h,γ)] [(g,β) (f,α) (h,γ)]. [(g,β) (f,α)] [(g,β) (h,γ)] [(g,β) (f,α) (h,γ)], whenever will be idempotent. Definition 2.6 (L-fuzzy filter). Let X be a set. A map F : L X L L is called an L-fuzzy filter on X if and only if F satisfies the following axioms: (FF0) F(1 X,α) =. (FF1) (f,α) (g,β) F(f,α) F(g,β). (FF2) F(f,α) F(g,β) F(f g,α β). (FF3) F(0 X,α) =. LetF LF (X)bethesetofallL-fuzzyfiltersonX. OnF LF (X)weintroduce a partial ordering by F 1 F 2 F 1 (f,α) F 2 (f,α), (f,α) L X L Proposition 2.7. The partially ordered set (F LF (X), ) has maximal elements. 7
8 Proof. Referring to Zorn s lemma, it is sufficient to show that every chain C in F LF (X) has an upper bound in F LF (X). For this purpose let us consider a non-empty chain C = {F λ λ I. We define a map F : L X L L by F (f,α) = F λ (f,α), and we show that F is an L-fuzzy filter on X. In fact (FF0) F (1 X,α) = F λ(1 X,α) = =. (FF1) (f,α) (g,β) F (f,α) = F λ(f,α) F λ(g,β) = F (g,β). (FF2) ( ) ( ) F (f,α) F (g,β) = F λ (f,α) F λ (g,β) = [F λ (f,α) F λ (g,β)] [F λ (f g,α β)] = F (f g,α β). (FF3) F (0 X,α) = F λ(0 X,α) = =. Definition 2.8. A maximal element in (F LF (X), ) is also called an L- fuzzy ultrafilter. Proposition 2.9. For every L-fuzzy filter U : L X L L on X the following assertions are equivalent (i) U is an L-fuzzy ultrafilter. (ii) U(f,α) = (U [(f,α) (0 X,ρ)]), for all (f,α) L X L, for all ρ α in L. 8
9 Proof. (i) (ii) Because of (FF2) and (FF3) every L-fuzzy filter satisfies the condition (FF3 ) U(f,α) (U [(f,α) (0 X,ρ)]), for all (f,α) L X L, for all ρ α in L. In order to verify (i) (ii) it is sufficient to show that the maximality of U implies (U [(f,α) (0 X,ρ)]) U(f,α), (f,α) L X L, ρ α in L. For this purpose, we fix an element (g,β) L X L, for that element we let G β := (U [(g,β) (0 X,ρ)]) and define a map Û : LX L L by Û(f,α) = U(f,α) { U [(g,β) (f,α)] G β. We must show that Û is an L-fuzzy ultrafilter. Firstly Û is an L-fuzzy filter: obviously Û satisfies (FF0). For the axiom (FF1), from the definition Û(f,α) = U(f,α) { U [(g,β) (f,α)] G β and Û(h,γ) = U(h,γ) { U [(g,β) (h,γ)] G β. Now, for (f,α) (h,γ) we have that U(f,α) U(h,γ), moreover, (g,β) (f,α) = { (k,δ) L X L (g,β) (k,δ) (f,α) which implies that { (k,δ) L X L (g,β) (k,δ) (h,γ) = (g,β) (h,γ), Û(f,α) = U(f,α) { U [(g,β) (f,α)] G β U(h,γ) { U [(g,β) (h,γ)] G β = Û(h,γ). 9
10 For the axiom (FF2), we must verify that In fact, Û(f,α) Û(h,γ) Û(f,α) Û(h,γ) Û(f h,α γ), = ( U(f,α) { U [(g,β) (f,α)] Gβ ) ( U(h,γ) { ) U [(g,β) (h,γ)] Gβ = U(f,α) [U(h,γ) { ] U [(g,β) (h,γ)] Gβ [ {U { { ] [(g,β) (f,α)] Gβ U(h,γ) U [(g,β) (h,γ)] Gβ = U(f,α) U(h,γ) [ U(f,α) { U [(g,β) (h,γ)] Gβ ] ({ U [(g,β) (f,α)] Gβ U(h,γ) ) ({ U [(g,β) (f,α)] Gβ { U [(g,β) (h,γ)] Gβ ) = U(f,α) U(h,γ) [{ U(f,α) U [(g,β) (h,γ)] Gβ ] ({ U(h,γ) U [(g,β) (f,α)] Gβ ) ({ U [(g,β) (f,α)] U [(g,β) (h,γ)] Gβ ) U(f h,α γ) [U ((f,α) [(g,β) (h,γ)]) G β ] (U ((h,γ) [(g,β) (f,α)]) Gβ ) (U ([(g,β) (f,α)] [(g,β) (h,γ)]) Gβ ) U(f h,α γ) [U [(g,β) (f,α) (h,γ)] G β ] [U [(g,β) (f,α) (h,γ)] Gβ ] [U [(g,β) (f,α) (h,γ)] Gβ ] = U(f h,α γ) [U [(g,β) (f,α) (h,γ)] G β ] = Û(f h,α γ). In order to verify (FF3), we have that 10
11 Û(0 X,α) = U(0 X,α) { U [(g,β) (0 X,α)] G β = {U [(g,β) (0 X,α)] G β = U [(g,β) (0 X,α)] G β. On the other hand, using the fact that ρ α, we conclude that ρ β α β which implies (g,β) (0 X,α) (g,β) (0 X,ρ). Therefore, i.e. U ((g,β) (0 X,α)) U ((g,β) (0 X,ρ)), G β [U ((g,β) (0 X,ρ)) ]. Now we invoke the residuation property of (L,, ) to obtain Û(0 X,α) = {U [(g,β) (0 X,α)] G β =. Now we must show that Û is an L-fuzzy ultrafilter on X. In fact, since Û(f,α) = U(f,α) { U [(g,β) (f,α)] G β, clearly U(f,α) Û(f,α), (f,α) LX L, but U is an L-fuzzy ultrafilter on X, therefore Û = U. In this way U(g,β) = U(g,β) { U [(g,β) (g,β)] G β = U(g,β) { U(1 X, ) G β = U(g,β) { G β = U(g,β) G β. Therefore, G β = (U [(g,β) (0 X,ρ)]) U(g,β), (g,β) L X L. 11
12 From the last inequality and (FF3 ) we obtain (ii). (ii) (i) We must verify that if U(f,α) = (U [(f,α) (0 X,ρ)]), for all (f,α) L X L, for all ρ α in L then U is an L-fuzzy ultrafilter on X. Suppose U Û, then ((Û [(f,α) (0X,ρ)]) ) ((U [(f,α) (0 X,ρ)]) ), therefore Û U, consequently U is an L-fuzzy ultrafilter on X. Proposition Let φ : X Y be a map and let F : L X L L be an L-fuzzy filter on X. Then (1) The map φ F : LY L L defined by φ F (g,β) = F(g φ,β), (g,β) L Y L is an L-fuzzy filter on Y. (2) The map φ U : LY L L is an L-fuzzy ultrafilter on Y, whenever U will be an L-fuzzy ultrafilter on X Proof. (1). We must show φ F satisfies the axioms of an L-fuzzy filter: In fact, (FF0) φ F (1 Y,β) = F(1 Y φ,β) = F(1 X,β) =, β L. (FF1) (f,α) (g,β) φ F (f,α) = F(f φ,α) F(g φ,β) = φ F (g,β), since (f φ,α) (g φ,β). (FF2) φ F (f,α) φ F (g,β) = F(f φ,α) F(g φ,β) F((f g) φ,α β) = φ F (f g,α β), since (f φ) (g φ) = [(f g) φ]. (FF3) φ F (0 Y,α) = F(0 Y φ,α) = F(0 X,α) =, α L. 12
13 (2). Let U : L X L L be an L-fuzzy ultrafilter on X, let (g,β) L Y L and let α L, then φ U (g,β) = U(g φ,β) = U [(g φ,β) (0 X,α)] = U[(g φ) 0 X,α β] = U[(g φ) (0 Y φ),α β] = U[(g 0 Y ) φ,α β] = φ U [g 0 Y,α β] = φ U [(g,β) (0 Y,α)]. We conclude from 2.9 that φ U : LY L L is an L-fuzzy ultrafilter on Y. Proposition Let φ : X Y be a surjective map and let F : L Y L L be an L-fuzzy filter on Y. Then the map φ F : LX L L defined by φ F (f,α) = {F(g,β) (g φ,β) (f,α), (f,α) L X L, is an L-fuzzy filter on X. Proof. We must show φ F satisfies the axioms of an L-fuzzy filter: (FF0) φ F (1 X,α) = {F(g,β) (g φ,β) (1 X,α) = {F(g,β) g φ 1 X, α β g L Y β L = F(1 Y,α) =, α L. 13
14 (FF1) (f,α) (g,β) implies φ F (f,α) = {F(h,δ) (h φ,δ) (f,α) = {F(h,δ) h φ f, α δ h L Y δ L h L Y δ L {F(h,δ) h φ g, β δ = {F(h,δ) (h φ,δ) (g,β) = φ F (gβ). (FF2) φ F (f,α) φ F (g,β) = = {F(h,δ) (h φ,δ) (f,α) {F(j,η) (j φ,η) (g,β) {F(h,δ) F(j,η) ((h j) φ,δ η) (f g,α β) {F(h j,δ η) ((h j) φ,δ η) (f g,α β) = φ F (f g,α β). (FF3) φ F (0 X,α) = {F(h,δ) (h φ,δ) (0 X,α) = {F(h,δ) h φ 0 X, α δ h L Y δ L = F(0 Y,α), since φ is surjective =. Definition 2.12 (L-fuzzy neighborhood system). Let X be a set. A map N : X L (LX L) is called an L-fuzzy neighborhood system on X if and only if, for each p X, the mapping N p : L X L L satisfies the following axioms: 14
15 (N 0 ) N p (1 X,α) =. (N 1 ) (f,α) (g,β) N p (f,α) N p (g,β). (N 2 ) N p (f,α) N p (g,β) N p (f g,α β). (N 3 ) N p (f,α) f(p). (N 4 ) N p (f,α) {N p (g,β) (f,α) (g,β) and g(q) N q (f,α), q X. Definition 2.13 (L-fuzzy interior operator). Let X be a set. A map I : L X L L X is called an L-fuzzy interior operator on X if and only if I satisfies the following conditions: (I 0 ) I(1 X,α) = 1 X, α L. (I 1 ) (f,α) (g,β) I(f,α) I(g,β). (I 2 ) I(f,α) I(g,β) I(f g,α β). (I 3 ) I(f,α) f. (I 4 ) I(f,α) I ( I(f,α) ). (I 5 ) I(f, ) = f. (I 6 ) If K L, I(f,α) = f 0 α K, then I(f, K) = f 0. Lemma (cf. [9]) Given an L-fuzzy topology T : L X L on a set X, the mapping I T : L X L L X defined by I(f,α) := I T (f,α) = {u L X (u,t (u)) (f,α), (f,α) L X L is an L-fuzzy interior operator on X. Lemma (cf. [9]) Every L-fuzzy interior operator I : L X L L X induces, for each p X, an L-fuzzy neighborhood system Np I : L X L L defined by N p (f,α) := Np I (f,α) = [I(f,α)](p). Proposition Let (X,T ) and (Y,σ) be a pair of L-fuzzy topological spaces, let φ : X Y be an L-fuzzy continuous surjective map, let 15
16 N p : L X L L be the L-fuzzy neighborhood system of a point p X induced by T, and let N φ(p) : L Y L L be the corresponding L-fuzzy neighborhood system of φ(p) in Y induced by σ. Then N φ(p) φ (N p ) where φ (N p ) : L Y L L is defined by φ (N p )(g,β) = N p (g φ,β), (g,β) L Y L. Proof. From lemma 2.14 we have that I σ (g,β) = {u L Y (u,σ(u)) (g,β), (g,β) L Y L is an L-fuzzy interior operator on X. The L-fuzzy continuity of φ implies that σ(u) T (u φ), u L Y. We therefore have that {u L Y u g, β σ(u) {v L Y v g, β T (v φ), which implies {u L Y u g, β σ(u) {v L Y v g, β T (v φ). In other words, I σ (g,β) {v L Y v g, β T (v φ). If ω = {v L Y v g, β T (v φ), then N φ(p) (g,β) = [I σ (g,β)](φ(p)) ω(φ(p)) = (ω φ)(p), and so (2.16.1) N φ(p) (g,β) (ω φ)(p). On the other hand, it follows from ω φ g φ, and N p (g φ,β) = [I T (g φ,β)](p) = {u L X u g φ, β T (u)(p), 16
17 and ω φ {u L X u g φ, β T (u), that (ω φ)(p) {u L X u g φ, β T (u)(p) = [I T (g φ,β)](p) = N p (g φ,β) = φ (N (g,β), p) and so (2.16.2) (ω φ)(p) φ (N (g,β). p) Finally, from and , we conclude that N φ(p) φ (N p ). Definition 2.17 (Adherent point). Let (X, τ) be an L-fuzzy topological space and N : X L (LX L) the corresponding L-fuzzy neighborhood system. Further, let F : L X L L be an L-fuzzy filter on X. A point p X is called an adherent point of F iff there exists a further L-fuzzy filter G on X provided with the following properties (i) G( ).1 X,α), α L. (ii) N p G and F G. Definition An L-fuzzy topological space (X, τ) is compact iff each L-fuzzy filter on X has at least one adherent point. Proposition Let (X, τ) be a compact L-fuzzy topological space, let (Y,σ) be an L-fuzzy topological space and let φ : X Y be a surjective, L-fuzzy continuous map. Then (Y, σ) is compact. Proof. Let F : L Y L L be an L-fuzzy filter on Y, then by 2.11, φ F is an L-fuzzy filter on X. Since (X,τ) is compact, φ F has an adherent point p X, i.e. there exists an L-fuzzy filter G on X with N p G and φ F 17 G.
18 Now we form, using 2.10, the corresponding L-fuzzy filter image and we obtain from the surjectivity of φ the following relations F = φ (φ (F)) φ (G) and φ (N p ) φ (G). On the other hand, from 2.16 follows N φ(p) φ (N p ), which implies that F φ (G) and N φ(p) φ (G), hence φ(p) is an adherent point of F. This completes the proof of the proposition. In order to get a proof of our version of Tychonoff s theorem, we need the following lemmas: Lemma Let F = {(X λ,t λ ) λ I be a non-empty family of L-fuzzy topological spaces and let (X, T ) be its L-fuzzy topological product. Then for each p X, the mapping N p : L X L L defined by N p (f,α) = { N pλ (h λ,α) h Γ f, α τ λ (h λ ), where Γ f = {µ L X λ µ λ = 1 Xλ for all but finitely many indices λ, and (µ λ π λ ) f, is an L-fuzzy neighborhood system on X. Proof. We must show that N p satisfies the axioms of an L-fuzzy neighborhood system: (N 0 ). Let 1 LX λ defined by (1 ) λ = 1 Xα, for each λ I. Then 1 Γ 1X. Since (1) τ λ (1 Xλ ) = for all λ I, and so τ λ(1 Xλ ) = =, 18
19 (2) N pλ (1 Xλ,α) = for all λ I, and N p λ (1 Xλ,α) = =, then N p (1 X,α) = { We therefore have that N p (1 X,α) =. N pλ (h λ,α) h Γ 1X, α τ λ (h λ ) =. (N 1 ). It is our purpose to show that N p (f,α) N p (g,β), whenever f g in L X, and β α in L. Clearly f g implies that Γ f Γ g. Consequently, { τ λ (h λ ) N pλ (h λ,α) h Γ f, α { τ λ (h λ ). N pλ (h λ,β) h Γ g, β This verifies that N p (f,α) N p (g,β). (N 2 ). We must show that N p (f,α) N p (g,β) N p (f g,α β). Since N p (f,α) = { N p λ (h λ,α) h Γ f, α τ λ(h λ ) and N p (g,β) = { N p λ (j λ,β) j Γ g, β τ λ(j λ ), and since is distributive over non-empty joins, we have that N p (f,α) N p (g,β) = { N pλ (h λ,α) N pλ (j λ,β) h Γ f,j Γ g, α β = { [N pλ (h λ,α) N pλ (j λ,β)] h Γ f,j Γ g, α β τ λ (h λ j λ ) { τ λ (h λ j λ ) N pλ (h λ j λ,α β) h j Γ f g, α β = N p (f g,α β). (N 3 ). We must verify that N p (f,α) f(p), for each (f,α) L X L. τ λ (h λ j λ ) Since N pλ is an L-fuzzy neighborhood system on X λ, we have that N pλ (h λ,α) h λ (p λ ), for all λ I, and for all (h λ,α) L X λ L. Now, 19
20 let h Γ f, then h LX λ, h λ = 1 Xλ for all but finitely many indices λ I, and (h λ π λ ) f. Hence λ π λ )(p) = (h (h λ )(p λ ) f(p). We therefore have that N pλ (h λ,α) (h λ )(p λ ) f(p), which implies N p (f,α) = { N pλ (h λ,α) h Γ f, α τ λ (h λ ) f(p). (N 4 ). To show that N p (f,α) {N p (g,β) (f,α) (g,β), g(q) N q (f,α), q X, we must verify the following: N pλ (ω λ,α) {N pλ (v λ,β) (ω λ,α) (v λ,β), v λ (q λ ) N qλ (ω λ,α), q λ X λ implies N p (f,α) {N p (g,β) (f,α) (g,β), g(q) N q (f,α), q X. We observe from the hypothesis that, for ω Γ f and v Γ g, N pλ (ω λ,α) { N pλ (v λ,β) (ω λ,α) (v λ,β), v λ (q λ ) N qλ (ω λ,α), q λ X λ { N pλ (v λ π λ,β) (ω λ,α) (v λ,β), v λ (q λ ) N qλ (ω λ,α), q λ X λ. We therefore have that N p (f,α) {N p (g,β) (f,α) (g,β), g(q) N q (f,α), q X. 20
21 Lemma Let F = {(X λ,t λ ) λ I be a non-empty family of compact L-fuzzy topological spaces and let (X, T ) be its L-fuzzy topological product. Let U : L X L L be an L-fuzzy ultrafilter on X, then the following statements are equivalent: (1) U converges to an element p = (p λ ) in X. (2) For each λ I, πλ (U) converges to p λ, where π λ ;X X λ is the λth projection. Proof. (1) (2) is trivial. (2) (1). Suppose that π λ (U) converges to p λ, for each λ I. Then N pλ π λ (U). Therefore N pλ (h λ,α) πλ (U)(h λ,α) = U(h λ π λ,α) ( ) U (h λ π λ ),α U (f,α). It follows that N p (f,α) = { N pλ (h λ,α) h Γ f, α τ λ (h λ ) U (f,α). This establishes that U converges to an element p = (p λ ) in X. As a consequence of the previous lemmas, we get the main result: Theorem Let F = {(X λ,t λ ) λ I be a non-empty family of L-fuzzy topological spaces. Then the following assertions are equivalent: (1) (X λ,t λ ) is compact, for all λ I. 21
22 (2) The L-fuzzy topological product (X 0,T 0 ) of F in the category L-FTop is compact. References [1] J.Adámek, H. Herrlich, G. E. Strecker, Abstract And Concrete Categories: The Joy Of Cats, Wiley Interscince Pure And Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons (Brisbane/Chisester/New York/Singapure/Toronto), [2] G. Birkhoff, Lattice Theory, American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications, Volume XXV, The American Mathematical Society (Providence, Rhode Island), [3] N. Bourbaki, General Topology, Part 1, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Advanced Book Program Reading, Massachusetts, [4] C.C. Chang, Algebraic analysis of many valued logics, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 88(1958), [5], A new proof of the completeness of the lukasiewicz axiom, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 93(1959), [6] U. Höhle, Monoidal closed categories, weak topoi and generalized logics, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 42(1991), [7], M-valued sets and sheaves over integral commutative cl-monoids, Applications of category theory to fuzzy subsets (Linz, 1989), Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1992, [8], Commutative, residuated l-monoids, Non-classical logics and their applications to fuzzy subsets (Linz, 1992), Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1995, [9] U. Höhle, A. Šostak, Axiomatic fundations of fixed-basis fuzzy topology, Chapter 3 in: U. Höhle, S. E. Rodabaugh, eds, Mathematics Of Fuzzy Sets: Logic, Topology And Measure Theory, The Handbook of Fuzzy Sets Series, Volume 3(1999), Kluwer Academic Publisher (Boston/Dordrecht/London), [10] P. T. Johnstone, Stone spaces, Cambridge University Press (Cambridge), [11] S. E. Rodabaugh, Powerset Operator Foundations For Poslat Fuzzy Set Theories and Topologies, Chapter 2 in: U. Höhle, S. E. Rodabaugh, eds, Mathematics Of Fuzzy Sets: Logic, Topology And Measure Theory, The Handbook of Fuzzy Sets Series, Volume 3(1999), Kluwer Academic Publisher (Boston/Dordrecht/London), [12] AP. Šostak, Fuzzy functions and an extension of the category L-Top of Chang-Goguen L-topological spaces, Proceedings of the Ninth Prague Topological Symposium, Contributed papers from the symposium held in Prague, Czech Republic, August 19 25, 2001, , Topology Atlas, Toronto, 2002; arxiv:math.gn/ [13] S. Willard, General Topology, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company (Reading, Massachusetts/Menlo Park, California/London/Amsterdam/Don Mills, Ontario/Sydney), address: a jluna@ima.usergioarboleda.edu.co address: b elisalazar31@hotmail.com 22
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set May 6, 2008 Abstract A set of first-order formulas, whatever the cardinality of the set of symbols, is equivalent to an independent
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomomorphism in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Automata
International Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics Systems. ISSN 2248-9940 Volume 3, Number 1 (2013), pp. 39-45 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/ijfms.htm Homomorphism in Intuitionistic
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2 Composition. Invertible Mappings
Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan Composition. Invertible Mappings In this section we discuss two procedures for creating new mappings from old ones, namely,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Properties of Fuzzy Relations
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 8, 373-381 The Properties of Fuzzy Relations Yong Chan Kim Department of Mathematics, Gangneung-Wonju National University Gangneung, Gangwondo 210-702, Korea
Διαβάστε περισσότεραUniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor
Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor Given f L 1 T 1 ), we consider the partial sums of the Fourier series of f: N 1) S N fθ) = ˆfk)e ikθ. k= N A calculation gives the Dirichlet formula
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOrdinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit
Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ting Zhang Stanford May 11, 2001 Stanford, 5/11/2001 1 Outline Ordinal Classification Ordinal Addition Ordinal Multiplication Ordinal
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCommutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets S K Mala #1, Dr. MM Shanmugapriya *2 1 PhD Scholar in Mathematics, Karpagam University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu- 641021 Assistant Professor of Mathematics,
Διαβάστε περισσότερα1. Introduction and Preliminaries.
Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.yu/filomat Filomat 22:1 (2008), 97 106 ON δ SETS IN γ SPACES V. Renuka Devi and D. Sivaraj Abstract We
Διαβάστε περισσότεραC.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions
C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions Paul Liu November 15, 2007 Note that these are sample solutions only; in many cases there were many acceptable answers. 1 Reynolds Problem 10.1 1.1 Normal-order
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS
MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS FUMIE NAKAOKA AND NOBUYUKI ODA Received 20 December 2005; Revised 28 May 2006; Accepted 6 August 2006 Some properties of minimal closed sets and maximal closed
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS
Sahand Communications in Mathematical Analysis (SCMA) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016), 21-27 http://scma.maragheh.ac.ir SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS BAYAZ DARABY 1 AND JAVAD JAFARI 2 Abstract. In the mathematical
Διαβάστε περισσότεραReminders: linear functions
Reminders: linear functions Let U and V be vector spaces over the same field F. Definition A function f : U V is linear if for every u 1, u 2 U, f (u 1 + u 2 ) = f (u 1 ) + f (u 2 ), and for every u U
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExample Sheet 3 Solutions
Example Sheet 3 Solutions. i Regular Sturm-Liouville. ii Singular Sturm-Liouville mixed boundary conditions. iii Not Sturm-Liouville ODE is not in Sturm-Liouville form. iv Regular Sturm-Liouville note
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTHE SECOND ISOMORPHISM THEOREM ON ORDERED SET UNDER ANTIORDERS. Daniel A. Romano
235 Kragujevac J. Math. 30 (2007) 235 242. THE SECOND ISOMORPHISM THEOREM ON ORDERED SET UNDER ANTIORDERS Daniel A. Romano Department of Mathematics and Informatics, Banja Luka University, Mladena Stojanovića
Διαβάστε περισσότεραF A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I
F A S C I C U L I M A T H E M A T I C I Nr 46 2011 C. Carpintero, N. Rajesh and E. Rosas ON A CLASS OF (γ, γ )-PREOPEN SETS IN A TOPOLOGICAL SPACE Abstract. In this paper we have introduced the concept
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSome new generalized topologies via hereditary classes. Key Words:hereditary generalized topological space, A κ(h,µ)-sets, κµ -topology.
Bol. Soc. Paran. Mat. (3s.) v. 30 2 (2012): 71 77. c SPM ISSN-2175-1188 on line ISSN-00378712 in press SPM: www.spm.uem.br/bspm doi:10.5269/bspm.v30i2.13793 Some new generalized topologies via hereditary
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEE512: Error Control Coding
EE512: Error Control Coding Solution for Assignment on Finite Fields February 16, 2007 1. (a) Addition and Multiplication tables for GF (5) and GF (7) are shown in Tables 1 and 2. + 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 3
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in
Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in : tail in X, head in A nowhere-zero Γ-flow is a Γ-circulation such that
Διαβάστε περισσότεραST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II
ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II 2014/2015: Semester II Tutorial 7 1. Let X be a sample from a population P and consider testing hypotheses H 0 : P = P 0 versus H 1 : P = P 1, where P j is a known
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 67, 3301-3307 A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Equivalence Relation D. K. Basnet Dept. of Mathematics, Assam University Silchar-788011, Assam, India dkbasnet@rediffmail.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II
Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II October 18, 2012 1 Review First let us recall the situation. Let g be a simple algebra, with maximal toral subalgebra h (which we are calling a CSA, or Cartan Subalgebra).
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGenerating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations
Applied Mathematics 06 7 98-07 Published Online January 06 in SciRes http://wwwscirporg/journal/am http://dxdoiorg/036/am067009 Generating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations Yasha iasamidze
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER
ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER Abstract. We define ordinal arithmetic and show laws of Left- Monotonicity, Associativity, Distributivity, some minor related properties and the Cantor Normal Form.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIntuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 7, 202, no. 6, 769-776 Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals of Near Rings P. K. Sharma P.G. Department of Mathematics D.A.V. College Jalandhar city, Punjab, India pksharma@davjalandhar.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics
Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics Nov 1, 01 In this lecture we examine root systems from an axiomatic point of view. 1 Reflections If v R n, then it determines a hyperplane, denoted P v, through the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.
Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequalit for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x,, z X. Prove that d(x, z) d(, z) d(x, ). (ii): Reverse triangle inequalit for norms:
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCongruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 24, no. 5, 239-246 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/.2988/ija.24.422 Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 Ligong An and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStatistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests
Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Shirsendu Mukherjee Department of Statistics, Asutosh College, Kolkata, India. shirsendu st@yahoo.co.in So far we have treated the testing of one-sided
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIntuitionistic Supra Gradation of Openness
Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences 2(3) (2008), 291-307 An International Journal c 2008 Dixie W Publishing Corporation, U. S. A. Intuitionistic Supra Gradation of Openness A. M. Zahran 1, S. E.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANSFORMATION SEMIGROUPS
GANIT J. Bangladesh Math. oc. IN 606-694) 0) -7 DIRECT PRODUCT AND WREATH PRODUCT OF TRANFORMATION EMIGROUP ubrata Majumdar, * Kalyan Kumar Dey and Mohd. Altab Hossain Department of Mathematics University
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3
Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 1 State vector space and the dual space Space of wavefunctions The space of wavefunctions is the set of all
Διαβάστε περισσότερα5. Choice under Uncertainty
5. Choice under Uncertainty Daisuke Oyama Microeconomics I May 23, 2018 Formulations von Neumann-Morgenstern (1944/1947) X: Set of prizes Π: Set of probability distributions on X : Preference relation
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs
Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs Who? Nichole Schimanski When? July 27, 2011 Graphs A graph, G, consists of a vertex set, V (G), and an edge set, E(G). V (G) is any finite set E(G) is
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCoefficient Inequalities for a New Subclass of K-uniformly Convex Functions
International Journal of Computational Science and Mathematics. ISSN 0974-89 Volume, Number (00), pp. 67--75 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Coefficient Inequalities for
Διαβάστε περισσότερα12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem
Tutorial 12: Radon-Nikodym Theorem 1 12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem In the following, (Ω, F) is an arbitrary measurable space. Definition 96 Let μ and ν be two (possibly complex) measures on (Ω, F). We say
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSEMIGROUP ACTIONS ON ORDERED GROUPOIDS. 1. Introduction and prerequisites
ao DOI: 10.2478/s12175-012-0080-3 Math. Slovaca 63 (2013), No. 1, 41 52 SEMIGROUP ACTIONS ON ORDERED GROUPOIDS Niovi Kehayopulu* Michael Tsingelis** (Communicated by Miroslav Ploščica ) ABSTRACT. In this
Διαβάστε περισσότεραBounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees
Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees Thomas F. Kent Andrea Sorbi Università degli Studi di Siena Italia July 18, 2007 Goal: Introduce a form of Σ 0 2-permitting for the enumeration degrees. Till now,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018
Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics(JRM) ISSN: 2395-028 SCITECH Volume 3, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION ublished online: March 29, 208 Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics www.scitecresearch.com/journals
Διαβάστε περισσότεραk A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +
Chapter 3. Fuzzy Arithmetic 3- Fuzzy arithmetic: ~Addition(+) and subtraction (-): Let A = [a and B = [b, b in R If x [a and y [b, b than x+y [a +b +b Symbolically,we write A(+)B = [a (+)[b, b = [a +b
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)
Uppsala Universitet Matematiska Institutionen Andreas Strömbergsson Prov i matematik Funktionalanalys Kurs: F3B, F4Sy, NVP 2005-03-08 Skrivtid: 9 14 Tillåtna hjälpmedel: Manuella skrivdon, Kreyszigs bok
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOperation Approaches on α-γ-open Sets in Topological Spaces
Int. Journal of Math. Analysis, Vol. 7, 2013, no. 10, 491-498 Operation Approaches on α-γ-open Sets in Topological Spaces N. Kalaivani Department of Mathematics VelTech HighTec Dr.Rangarajan Dr.Sakunthala
Διαβάστε περισσότεραConcrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016
Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016 Silvio Capobianco Exercise 1.7 Let H(n) = J(n + 1) J(n). Equation (1.8) tells us that H(2n) = 2, and H(2n+1) = J(2n+2) J(2n+1) = (2J(n+1) 1) (2J(n)+1)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA General Note on δ-quasi Monotone and Increasing Sequence
International Mathematical Forum, 4, 2009, no. 3, 143-149 A General Note on δ-quasi Monotone and Increasing Sequence Santosh Kr. Saxena H. N. 419, Jawaharpuri, Badaun, U.P., India Presently working in
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSequent Calculi for the Modal µ-calculus over S5. Luca Alberucci, University of Berne. Logic Colloquium Berne, July 4th 2008
Sequent Calculi for the Modal µ-calculus over S5 Luca Alberucci, University of Berne Logic Colloquium Berne, July 4th 2008 Introduction Koz: Axiomatisation for the modal µ-calculus over K Axioms: All classical
Διαβάστε περισσότεραIterated trilinear fourier integrals with arbitrary symbols
Cornell University ICM 04, Satellite Conference in Harmonic Analysis, Chosun University, Gwangju, Korea August 6, 04 Motivation the Coifman-Meyer theorem with classical paraproduct(979) B(f, f )(x) :=
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 3: Ordinal Numbers
Chapter 3: Ordinal Numbers There are two kinds of number.. Ordinal numbers (0th), st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th,..., ω, ω +,... ω2, ω2+,... ω 2... answers to the question What position is... in a sequence? What
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomomorphism of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Groups
International Mathematical Forum, Vol. 6, 20, no. 64, 369-378 Homomorphism o Intuitionistic Fuzz Groups P. K. Sharma Department o Mathematics, D..V. College Jalandhar Cit, Punjab, India pksharma@davjalandhar.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMatrices and Determinants
Matrices and Determinants SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Q 1. For what value of k do the following system of equations possess a non-trivial (i.e., not all zero) solution over the set of rationals Q? x + ky + 3z
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomomorphism and Cartesian Product on Fuzzy Translation and Fuzzy Multiplication of PS-algebras
Annals of Pure and Applied athematics Vol. 8, No. 1, 2014, 93-104 ISSN: 2279-087X (P), 2279-0888(online) Published on 11 November 2014 www.researchmathsci.org Annals of Homomorphism and Cartesian Product
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Lambda Model Characterizing Computational Behaviours of Terms
A Lambda Model Characterizing Computational Behaviours of Terms joint paper with Silvia Ghilezan RPC 01, Sendai, October 26, 2001 1 Plan of the talk normalization properties inverse limit model Stone dualities
Διαβάστε περισσότεραJordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 4(2), 2011, pp
Jordan Journal of Mathematics and Statistics (JJMS) 4(2), 2011, pp.115-126. α, β, γ ORTHOGONALITY ABDALLA TALLAFHA Abstract. Orthogonality in inner product spaces can be expresed using the notion of norms.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath221: HW# 1 solutions
Math: HW# solutions Andy Royston October, 5 7.5.7, 3 rd Ed. We have a n = b n = a = fxdx = xdx =, x cos nxdx = x sin nx n sin nxdx n = cos nx n = n n, x sin nxdx = x cos nx n + cos nxdx n cos n = + sin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics
Fourier Series MATH 211, Calculus II J. Robert Buchanan Department of Mathematics Spring 2018 Introduction Not all functions can be represented by Taylor series. f (k) (c) A Taylor series f (x) = (x c)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSpace-Time Symmetries
Chapter Space-Time Symmetries In classical fiel theory any continuous symmetry of the action generates a conserve current by Noether's proceure. If the Lagrangian is not invariant but only shifts by a
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 3 Solutions
Homework 3 Solutions Igor Yanovsky (Math 151A TA) Problem 1: Compute the absolute error and relative error in approximations of p by p. (Use calculator!) a) p π, p 22/7; b) p π, p 3.141. Solution: For
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume
BULETINUL ACADEMIEI DE ŞTIINŢE A REPUBLICII MOLDOVA. MATEMATICA Numbers 2(72) 3(73), 2013, Pages 80 89 ISSN 1024 7696 On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume I.S.Gutsul Abstract. In
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPartial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013
The boundary element method March 26, 203 Introduction and notation The problem: u = f in D R d u = ϕ in Γ D u n = g on Γ N, where D = Γ D Γ N, Γ D Γ N = (possibly, Γ D = [Neumann problem] or Γ N = [Dirichlet
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Note on Characterization of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Ideals in Γ- Near-Rings
International Journal of Computational Science and Mathematics. ISSN 0974-3189 Volume 3, Number 1 (2011), pp. 61-71 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com A Note on Characterization
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFuzzifying Tritopological Spaces
International Mathematical Forum, Vol., 08, no. 9, 7-6 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com https://doi.org/0.988/imf.08.88 On α-continuity and α-openness in Fuzzifying Tritopological Spaces Barah M. Sulaiman
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008
Tridiagonal matrices Gérard MEURANT October, 2008 1 Similarity 2 Cholesy factorizations 3 Eigenvalues 4 Inverse Similarity Let α 1 ω 1 β 1 α 2 ω 2 T =......... β 2 α 1 ω 1 β 1 α and β i ω i, i = 1,...,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPROPERTIES OF CERTAIN INTEGRAL OPERATORS. a n z n (1.1)
GEORGIAN MATHEMATICAL JOURNAL: Vol. 2, No. 5, 995, 535-545 PROPERTIES OF CERTAIN INTEGRAL OPERATORS SHIGEYOSHI OWA Abstract. Two integral operators P α and Q α for analytic functions in the open unit disk
Διαβάστε περισσότεραON FUZZY BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES IN ŠOSTAK S SENSE (II)
Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 25 (2010), No. 3, pp. 457 475 DOI 10.4134/CKMS.2010.25.3.457 ON FUZZY BITOPOLOGICAL SPACES IN ŠOSTAK S SENSE (II) Ahmed Abd El-Kader Ramadan, Salah El-Deen Abbas, and Ahmed Aref
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPhys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)
Phys460.nb 81 ψ n (t) is still the (same) eigenstate of H But for tdependent H. The answer is NO. 5.5.5. Solution for the tdependent Schrodinger s equation If we assume that at time t 0, the electron starts
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEcon 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1
Eon : Fall 8 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 Email questions or omments to Dan Fetter Problem. Let X be a salar with density f(x, θ) (θx + θ) [ x ] with θ. (a) Find the most powerful level α test
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΑπόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.
Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο The time integral of a force is referred to as impulse, is determined by and is obtained from: Newton s 2 nd Law of motion states that the action
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSecond Order Partial Differential Equations
Chapter 7 Second Order Partial Differential Equations 7.1 Introduction A second order linear PDE in two independent variables (x, y Ω can be written as A(x, y u x + B(x, y u xy + C(x, y u u u + D(x, y
Διαβάστε περισσότεραProblem Set 3: Solutions
CMPSCI 69GG Applied Information Theory Fall 006 Problem Set 3: Solutions. [Cover and Thomas 7.] a Define the following notation, C I p xx; Y max X; Y C I p xx; Ỹ max I X; Ỹ We would like to show that C
Διαβάστε περισσότεραarxiv: v1 [math.ra] 19 Dec 2017
TWO-DIMENSIONAL LEFT RIGHT UNITAL ALGEBRAS OVER ALGEBRAICALLY CLOSED FIELDS AND R HAHMED UBEKBAEV IRAKHIMOV 3 arxiv:7673v [mathra] 9 Dec 7 Department of Math Faculty of Science UPM Selangor Malaysia &
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions
SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES GLMA Linear Mathematics 00- Examination Solutions. (a) i. ( + 5i)( i) = (6 + 5) + (5 )i = + i. Real part is, imaginary part is. (b) ii. + 5i i ( + 5i)( + i) = ( i)( + i)
Διαβάστε περισσότερα4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)
84 CHAPTER 4. STATIONARY TS MODELS 4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(,) This section is an introduction to a wide class of models ARMA(p,q) which we will consider in more detail later in this
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSolution Series 9. i=1 x i and i=1 x i.
Lecturer: Prof. Dr. Mete SONER Coordinator: Yilin WANG Solution Series 9 Q1. Let α, β >, the p.d.f. of a beta distribution with parameters α and β is { Γ(α+β) Γ(α)Γ(β) f(x α, β) xα 1 (1 x) β 1 for < x
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe challenges of non-stable predicates
The challenges of non-stable predicates Consider a non-stable predicate Φ encoding, say, a safety property. We want to determine whether Φ holds for our program. The challenges of non-stable predicates
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:
HOMEWORK 4 Problem a For the fast loading case, we want to derive the relationship between P zz and λ z. We know that the nominal stress is expressed as: P zz = ψ λ z where λ z = λ λ z. Therefore, applying
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Two-Sided Laplace Inversion Algorithm with Computable Error Bounds and Its Applications in Financial Engineering
Electronic Companion A Two-Sie Laplace Inversion Algorithm with Computable Error Bouns an Its Applications in Financial Engineering Ning Cai, S. G. Kou, Zongjian Liu HKUST an Columbia University Appenix
Διαβάστε περισσότεραApproximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude
Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude Jan Behrens 2012-12-31 In this paper we shall provide a method to approximate distances between two points on earth
Διαβάστε περισσότεραω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ω ω + 1 ω + 2 ω + 3 ω + 4 ω2 ω2 + 1 ω2 + 2 ω2 + 3 ω3 ω3 + 1 ω3 + 2 ω4 ω4 + 1 ω5 ω 2 ω 2 + 1 ω 2 + 2 ω 2 + ω ω 2 + ω + 1 ω 2 + ω2 ω 2 2 ω 2 2 + 1 ω 2 2 + ω ω 2 3 ω 3 ω 3 + 1 ω 3 + ω ω 3 +
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGAUGES OF BAIRE CLASS ONE FUNCTIONS
GAUGES OF BAIRE CLASS ONE FUNCTIONS ZULIJANTO ATOK, WEE-KEE TANG, AND DONGSHENG ZHAO Abstract. Let K be a compact metric space and f : K R be a bounded Baire class one function. We proved that for any
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Simply Typed Lambda Calculus
Type Inference Instead of writing type annotations, can we use an algorithm to infer what the type annotations should be? That depends on the type system. For simple type systems the answer is yes, and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe semiclassical Garding inequality
The semiclassical Garding inequality We give a proof of the semiclassical Garding inequality (Theorem 4.1 using as the only black box the Calderon-Vaillancourt Theorem. 1 Anti-Wick quantization For (q,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn Annihilator of Fuzzy Subsets of Modules
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 3, 2009, no. 10, 483-488 On Annihilator of Fuzzy Subsets of Modules Helen K. Saikia 1 and Mrinal C. Kalita 2 1 Department of Mathematics, Gauhati university, Guwahati-781014,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn density of old sets in Prikry type extensions.
On density of old sets in Prikry type extensions. Moti Gitik December 31, 2015 Abstract Every set of ordinals of cardinality κ in a Prikry extension with a measure over κ contains an old set of arbitrary
Διαβάστε περισσότεραArithmetical applications of lagrangian interpolation. Tanguy Rivoal. Institut Fourier CNRS and Université de Grenoble 1
Arithmetical applications of lagrangian interpolation Tanguy Rivoal Institut Fourier CNRS and Université de Grenoble Conference Diophantine and Analytic Problems in Number Theory, The 00th anniversary
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 8.3 Trigonometric Equations
99 Section 8. Trigonometric Equations Objective 1: Solve Equations Involving One Trigonometric Function. In this section and the next, we will exple how to solving equations involving trigonometric functions.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 2. Ordinals, well-founded relations.
Chapter 2. Ordinals, well-founded relations. 2.1. Well-founded Relations. We start with some definitions and rapidly reach the notion of a well-ordered set. Definition. For any X and any binary relation
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStrain gauge and rosettes
Strain gauge and rosettes Introduction A strain gauge is a device which is used to measure strain (deformation) on an object subjected to forces. Strain can be measured using various types of devices classified
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAbstract Storage Devices
Abstract Storage Devices Robert König Ueli Maurer Stefano Tessaro SOFSEM 2009 January 27, 2009 Outline 1. Motivation: Storage Devices 2. Abstract Storage Devices (ASD s) 3. Reducibility 4. Factoring ASD
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFinite Field Problems: Solutions
Finite Field Problems: Solutions 1. Let f = x 2 +1 Z 11 [x] and let F = Z 11 [x]/(f), a field. Let Solution: F =11 2 = 121, so F = 121 1 = 120. The possible orders are the divisors of 120. Solution: The
Διαβάστε περισσότεραderivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates
derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates swapnizzle 03-03- :5:43 We begin by recognizing the familiar conversion from rectangular to spherical coordinates (note that φ is used
Διαβάστε περισσότεραParametrized Surfaces
Parametrized Surfaces Recall from our unit on vector-valued functions at the beginning of the semester that an R 3 -valued function c(t) in one parameter is a mapping of the form c : I R 3 where I is some
Διαβάστε περισσότερα6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.
6.1. Dirac Equation Ref: M.Kaku, Quantum Field Theory, Oxford Univ Press (1993) η μν = η μν = diag(1, -1, -1, -1) p 0 = p 0 p = p i = -p i p μ p μ = p 0 p 0 + p i p i = E c 2 - p 2 = (m c) 2 H = c p 2
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn Intuitionistic Fuzzy LI -ideals in Lattice Implication Algebras
Journal of Mathematical Research with Applications Jul., 2015, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 355 367 DOI:10.3770/j.issn:2095-2651.2015.04.001 Http://jmre.dlut.edu.cn On Intuitionistic Fuzzy LI -ideals in Lattice
Διαβάστε περισσότερα3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β
3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS Page Theorem cos(αβ cos α cos β -sin α cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α NOTE: cos(αβ cos α cos β cos(α-β cos α -cos β Proof of cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α Let s use a unit circle
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSecond Order RLC Filters
ECEN 60 Circuits/Electronics Spring 007-0-07 P. Mathys Second Order RLC Filters RLC Lowpass Filter A passive RLC lowpass filter (LPF) circuit is shown in the following schematic. R L C v O (t) Using phasor
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM
SOLUTIONS TO MATH38181 EXTREME VALUES AND FINANCIAL RISK EXAM Solutions to Question 1 a) The cumulative distribution function of T conditional on N n is Pr T t N n) Pr max X 1,..., X N ) t N n) Pr max
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMain source: "Discrete-time systems and computer control" by Α. ΣΚΟΔΡΑΣ ΨΗΦΙΑΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΔΙΑΛΕΞΗ 4 ΔΙΑΦΑΝΕΙΑ 1
Main source: "Discrete-time systems and computer control" by Α. ΣΚΟΔΡΑΣ ΨΗΦΙΑΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΔΙΑΛΕΞΗ 4 ΔΙΑΦΑΝΕΙΑ 1 A Brief History of Sampling Research 1915 - Edmund Taylor Whittaker (1873-1956) devised a
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe k-α-exponential Function
Int Journal of Math Analysis, Vol 7, 213, no 11, 535-542 The --Exponential Function Luciano L Luque and Rubén A Cerutti Faculty of Exact Sciences National University of Nordeste Av Libertad 554 34 Corrientes,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic
Lecture 2 Soundness and completeness of propositional logic February 9, 2004 1 Overview Review of natural deduction. Soundness and completeness. Semantics of propositional formulas. Soundness proof. Completeness
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAffine Weyl Groups. Gabriele Nebe. Summerschool GRK 1632, September Lehrstuhl D für Mathematik
Affine Weyl Groups Gabriele Nebe Lehrstuhl D für Mathematik Summerschool GRK 1632, September 2015 Crystallographic root systems. Definition A crystallographic root system Φ is a finite set of non zero
Διαβάστε περισσότερα