Lagrangian description of massive higher spin supermultiplets in AdS 3 space
|
|
- Ἄρης Ουζουνίδης
- 6 χρόνια πριν
- Προβολές:
Transcript
1 Lagrangian description of massive higher spin supermultiplets in AdS 3 space arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 17 May 017 I.L. Buchbinder ab, T.V. Snegirev ac, Yu.M. Zinoviev d a Department of Theoretical Physics, Tomsk State Pedagogical University, Tomsk , Russia b National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk , Russia c National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk , Russia d Institute for High Energy Physics, of National Research Center Kurchatov Institute Protvino, Moscow Region, 1480, Russia Abstract We construct the Lagrangian formulation of massive higher spin (1,0) supermultiplets in three dimensional anti-de Sitter space. The construction is based on description of the massive three dimensional fields in terms of frame-like gauge invariant formalism and technique of gauge invariant curvatures. For the two possible massive supermultiplets (s,s+1/) and (s,s 1/) we derive explicit form of the supertransformations leaving the sum of bosonic and fermionic Lagrangians invariant. joseph@tspu.edu.ru snegirev@tspu.edu.ru Yurii.Zinoviev@ihep.ru
2 1 Introduction Three dimensional field models attract much attention due to their comparatively simple structure and remarkable properties of three-dimensional flat and curved spaces. One of the achievements in this area is a construction of three-dimensional higher spin field theories (see the pioneer works [1], [], [3], for modern development see e.g. the recent papers [4], [5] and references therein). The aim of this work is to construct the massive higher spin supermultiplets in the threedimensional anti-de Sitter space AdS 3. As is well known [6], the AdS 3 space possesses the special properties since all the AdS 3 superalgebras (as well as conventional AdS 3 algebra itself) factorize into left and right parts. For the case of simplest (1,0) superalgebra (the one we are working here with) such factorization has the form: OSp(1,) Sp() so that we have supersymmetry in the left sector only. It means that the minimal massive supermultiplet must contain just one bosonic and one fermionic degrees of freedom. Recently we constructed such supermultiplets using the unfolded formalism [7]. In this paper we develop the Lagrangian formulation for these supermultiplets. It generalizes the Lagrangian formulation for massive supermultiplets in three dimensional Minkowski space given in [8]. Note here that the off-shell superfield description for the supermultiplets containing topologically massive higher spin fields was constructed recently in [9] 1. We develop the component approach to Lagrangian construction for supersymmetric massive higher spin fields in AdS 3 on the base of gauge invariant formulation of massive higher spin fields. It was shown long enough [11, 1] that massive bosonic (fermionic) spin-s field can be treated as system of massless fields with spins s,s 1,s,...0(1/) coupled by the Stueckelberg symmetries. Later, a frame-like formulation of massive higher spin fields has been developed in the framework of the same approach [13]. It allows us to reformulate the massive higher spin theory in terms of gauge invariant objects (curvatures). In massless four-dimensional higher spin theory such curvatures are very convenient objects and allow, e.g, to built the cubic higher spin interactions [14 17]. However the construction of curvatures proposed in [14 17] is essentially adapted only for theories in four and higher dimensions. Nevertheless the formalism of gauge invariant objects can be successfully applied to massive higher spin fields in three dimensions as well. It was shown that in three dimensions the gauge invariant Lagrangians for massive higher spin fields [18, 19] can be rewritten in explicitly gauge invariant form [0]. In this work we elaborate this formalism for Lagrangian construction of massive higher spin supermultiplets. A general scheme for Lagrangian formulation of massive higher spin supermultiplets looks as follows. Let Ω A,Φ A is a set of fields and R A,F A is a set of curvatures corresponding to frame-like gauge invariant formulation of massive bosonic and fermionic fields respectively. The curvatures have the following structure R A = DΩ A +(eω) A, F A = DΦ A +(eφ) A 1 The off-shell N = massless higher spin superfields and their massive deformations has been elaborated in [10]. List of references on component and superfield formulations of higher spin supersymmetric theories is given in our paper [7]. 1
3 where e e µ αβ is a non-dynamical background AdS 3 frame. Lagrangian both for bosonic and for fermionic massive higher spins are presented as the quadratic forms in curvatures expression [0] L B = R A R A, L F = F A F A (1.1) where L B is a bosonic field Lagrangian and L F is a fermionic one. Note that for massless higher spin fields in three dimensions such form of the Lagrangians is impossible. Then, in order to realize supersymmetry between the bosonic and fermionic massive fields we deform the curvatures by gravitino field Ψ µ α with parameter of supertransformations ζ α. In the case of global supersymmetry we consider gravitino field as a non-dynamical background and parameter of supertransformations as global (i.e. covariantly constant). Such a construction can be interpreted as a supersymmetric theory in terms of background fields of supergravity. Schematically the curvature deformations are written as R A = (ΨΦ) A, F A = (ΨΩ) A and supertransformations have the form δω A (Φζ) A, δφ A (Ωζ) A The restrictions on the form of deformations and supertransformations are imposed by requirement of covariant transformations for deformed curvatures ˆR A = R A + R A δˆr A (Fζ) A, δ ˆF A (Rζ) A Finally the supersymmetric Lagrangian for given supermultiplets is the sum of Lagrangians (1.1) where initial curvatures are replaced by deformed ones R,F ˆR, ˆF. Possible arbitrariness is fixed by the condition that the Lagrangian must be invariant under the supertransformations: δ ˆL = [ˆR A δˆr A + ˆF A δ ˆF A ] = R A (Fζ) A = 0 Aim of the current paper is to demonstrate how such a general scheme can actually be realized for supermultiplets in AdS 3. The paper is organized as follows. First of all we fix the notations and conventions. In section, following the above scheme we consider as an example, the detailed Lagrangian construction of massive supermultiplet (, 3 ). Such an example illustrates all the key points of the construction. The next sections are devoted to generalizations of these results for arbitrary massive supermultiplets. In section 3 we consider the gauge invariant formulation of massive fields with spin s andspin s+ 1 which will be used for supersymmetric constructions. In particular, we write out all field variables and gauge-invariant curvatures and consider the Lagrangian in terms of these curvatures. Further, following the above general scheme, we study two massive higher spinsupermultiplets. Supermultiplets (s,s+ 1 ) isstudied insection 4 and (s,s+ 1 ) is studied in section 5. In conclusion we summaries and discuss the results obtained. For completeness, we include in the paper two appendices devoted to frame-like description of massless fields in three dimensions. Appendix A contains the bosonic fields, Appendix B contains the fermionic ones.
4 Notations and conventions. We use a frame-like multispinor formalism where all the objects (3,,1,0-forms) have totally symmetric local spinor indices. To simplify the expressions we will use the condensed notations for the spinor indices such that e.g. Ω α(k) = Ω (α 1α...α k ) Also we will always assume that spinor indices denoted by the same letters and placed on the same level are symmetrized, e.g. Ω α(k) ζ α = Ω (α 1...α k ζ α k+1) AdS 3 space will be described by the background frame (one-form) e α() and the covariant derivative D normalized so that D Dζ α = λ E α βζ β Basis elements of 1,,3-form spaces are respectively e α(), E α(), E where the last two are defined as double and triple wedge product of e α() : e αα e ββ = ε αβ E αβ, E αα e ββ = ε αβ ε αβ E. Also we write some useful relations for these basis elements E α γ e γβ = 3ε αβ E, e α γ e γβ = 4E αβ. Further on the sign of wedge product will be omitted. Massive supermultiplet (, 3 ) example In this section we consider in details the Lagrangian realization for massive supermultiplet (, 3/) example using the method mentioned above in the introduction. We start with the gauge-invariant formulations of free massive fields with spin and spin 3/ separately. Using such formulations, we present the full set of gauge-invariant curvatures for them. Then we consider the deformations of these curvatures by background gravitino field Ψ α and find suitable supertransformations. As a result we construct the supersymmetric Lagrangian..1 Free fields Spin In gauge invariant form the massive spin- field is described by system of massless fields with spins,1,0. In frame-like approach the corresponding set of fields consists of (Ω α(),f α() ), (B α(),a) and (π α(),ϕ) (see Appendix A for details). Lagrangian for free massive field in AdS 3 have the form [18] L = Ω αβ e β γω αγ +Ω α() Df α() +EB α() B α() e α() B α() DA Eπ α() π α() +E α() π α() Dϕ +me α() Ω α() A+mf αβ E β γb αγ +4 me α() π α() A + M 4 f αβe β γf αγ m me α() f α() ϕ+ 3 m Eϕϕ (.1) 3
5 It is invariant under the following gauge transformations δω α() = Dη α() + M 4 eα βξ αβ δf α() = Dξ α() +e α βη αβ me α() ξ δb α() = mη α() δa = Dξ m 4 e α()ξ α() δπ α() = m mξ α() δϕ = 4 mξ (.) where m is the mass parameter and m = M, M = m +λ The curvatures invariant under gauge transformations (.) have the form R α() = DΩ α() + M 4 eα βf αβ m E α βb αβ m me α() ϕ T α() = Df α() +e α βω αβ me α() A B α() = DB α() Ω α() + M 4 eα βπ αβ A = DA m 4 e α()f α() +me α() B α() Π α() = Dπ α() f α() +e α βb αβ + m M eα() ϕ Φ = Dϕ+4 ma+mme α() π α() (.3) Here we have changed a normalization for the two zero forms B α() mb α() π α() mmπ α() (.4) It is interesting to point out that, unlike massless theory in three dimensions, the Lagrangian for massive spin (.1) can be presented in manifestly gauge invariant form L = 1 R α()π α() 1 T α()b α() m 4 m e α()b α() Φ (.5) Spin- 3 In gauge invariant formulation, the massive spin-3/ field is described by system of massless fields with the spins 3/, 1/. In frame-like approach the corresponding set of fields consists of Φ α, φ α. (see Appendix B for details). The free Lagrangian for mass m 1 field in AdS 3 has the following form L = i Φ αdφ α + i φ αe α βdφ β i M 1 Φ αe α βφ β im 1 Φ α E α βφ β i 3M 1 Eφ αφ α (.6) 4
6 It is invariant under gauge transformations where δφ α = Dξ α +M 1 e α βξ β δφ α = m 1 ξ α (.7) M 1 = m 1 + λ 4 One can construct the gauge invariant curvatures with respect (.7). After change of normalization φ α m 1 φ α they look like F α = DΦ α +M 1 e α βφ β 4m 1 E α βφ β C α = Dφ α Φ α +M 1 e α βφ β (.8) As in the previous spin- case, one notes that Lagrangian (.6) can be rewritten in terms of curvatures (.8) L = i F αc α (.9) The above results onspin- andspin- 3 fields arebuilding blocks forsupersymmetrization. Full set of gauge invariant curvatures contains (.3) and (.8) respectively. Corresponding expressions for Lagrangians in terms of curvatures are (.5) and (.9).. Supersymmetric system Before we turn to Lagrangian formulation for massive supermultiplet (, 3/) let us consider this supermultiplet in massless flat limit. That is we consider the sum of Lagrangians (.3) and (.6) in the limit m,m 1,λ 0. It has the form ˆL = Ω αβ e β γω αγ +Ω α() Df α() +EB αβ B αβ B αβ e αβ DA Eπ αβ π αβ +π αβ E αβ Dϕ i Φ αdφ α + 1 φ αe α βdφ β (.10) Such a Lagrangiandescribes thesystem offree massless fields with spins,3/,1,1/,0. One can show there exist global supertransformations that leave the Lagrangian (.10) invariant. These supertransformations with the redefinition (.4) have form δf α() = iβ 1 Φ α ζ α δa = iα 0 Φ α ζ α im 1 β 0 e αβ φ α ζ β δϕ = im 1 δ0 φ γ ζ γ δφ α = β 1 Ω αβ ζ β mα 0 e β() B β() ζ α δφ α = 4mβ 0 m 1 B αβ ζ β + mm δ 0 m 1 π αβ ζ β (.11) The parameters β 1,β 0,α 0, δ 0 are arbitrary but, as it will be seen later, they are fixed in massive case. The choice of such notations for them will be clear from in next section for 5
7 arbitrary higher spin supermultiplets. To prove the invariance we need to use the Lagrangian equations of motion for auxiliary fields π α(),b α() corresponding to spins 0 and 1 E α βdb βγ = E γ βdb βα, E α γdπ βγ = 1 εαβ E γδ Dπ γδ (.1) Thus, we see that in the massless flat limit the Lagrangian formulation of pure massive supermultiplets (, 3 ) we must get the supertransformations (.11). This requirement will provide us the unique possibility for construction of the correct supersymmetric massive theory. Deformation of curvatures Now we are ready to realize the massive supermultiplets. We do it deforming curvatures by background gravitino field Ψ α with global transformation in AdS 3 δψ α = Dζ α + λ eα βζ β (.13) The main idea is to deform the curvatures so that they transform covariantly through themselves. It means that for all the deformed curvatures ˆR A = R A + R A the following relations should take place δˆr A = δ ζ R A +δ 0 R A = (Rζ) A (.14) where δ 0 is the transformation (.13) and δ ζ is the linear supertransformation. Let us consider the following ansatz for deformation of spin- curvatures R α() = iρ 1 Φ α Ψ α iˆρ 0 e α() φ γ Ψ γ B α() = iˆρ 1 φ α Ψ α T α() = iβ 1 Φ α Ψ α A = iα 0 Φ γ Ψ γ im 1 β 0 e αβ φ α Ψ β Π α() = iˆβ 1 φ α Ψ α Φ = im 1 δ0 φ γ Ψ γ (.15) Also one introduces the corresponding supertransformations δω α() = iρ 1 Φ α ζ α iˆρ 0 e α() φ γ ζ γ δb α() = iˆρ 1 φ α ζ α δf α() = iβ 1 Φ α ζ α δa = iα 0 Φ γ ζ γ im 1 β 0 e αβ φ α ζ β δπ α() = iˆβ 1 φ α ζ α δϕ = im 1 δ0 φ γ ζ γ (.16) The form of the supertransformations is completely determined by the form of deformations for curvatures. Besides β 1,β 0,α 0, δ 0 parameters which remain arbitrary from the massless case, we have new arbitrary parameters ρ 1, ˆρ 1, ˆρ 0, ˆβ 1. All the parameters will be fixed by requirement of covariant homogeneous curvature transformation (.14). In addition there are two mass parameters M,M 1 an we will see that one is related to another. 6
8 Let us check the requirement (.14) for curvatures R α(),t α(). One one hand δ ˆR α() = iρ 1 DΦ α ζ α +iˆρ 0 e α() Dφ β ζ β +i M β 1e α() Φ β ζ β +i( M β 1 1 λρ 1)e α γφ α ζ γ +i( m ˆρ 1 1 λˆρ mmm 1 δ 0 )E α γφ α ζ γ +i( m ˆρ 1 1 λˆρ 0 1 mmm 1 δ 0 )E α γφ γ ζ α δˆt α() = iβ 1 DΦ α ζ α +i( mα 0 +ρ 1 )e α() Φ β ζ β +i(ρ 1 1 λβ 1)e α γφ α ζ γ and on the other hand +i( 4mm 1 β 0 4ˆρ 0 )E α γφ α ζ γ +i( 4mm 1 β 0 +4ˆρ 0 )E α γφ γ ζ α δ ˆR α() = iρ 1 F α ζ α iˆρ 0 e α() C β ζ β = iρ 1 DΦ α ζ α +iˆρ 0 e α() Dφ β ζ β +i(ˆρ 0 +M 1 ρ 1 )e α() Φ β ζ β +i(m 1 ρ 1 )e α γφ α ζ γ im 1ˆρ 0 E α γφ α ζ γ +i( M 1ˆρ 0 4m 1 ρ 1 )E α γφ γ ζ α δˆt α() = iβ 1 F α ζ α = iβ 1 DΦ α ζ α +i(m 1 β 1 )e α() Φ β ζ β +i(m 1 β 1 )e α γφ α ζ γ i4m 1 β 1 E α γφ γ ζ α (.17) Comparing the above relations, we obtain the solution M 1 = M λ, ρ 1 = M β 1, ˆρ 0 = δ 0 = 4β 0 = m 1 m β 1 For curvatures B α(),π α() we have on one hand δ ˆB α() = iˆρ 1 Dφ α ζ α iρ 1 Φ α ζ α M(M λ) (M λ) β 1, α 0 = m β 1 +i( ˆρ 0 + M ˆβ 1 )e α() φ β ζ β +i( M ˆβ 1 1 λˆρ 1)e α γφ α ζ γ δˆπ α() = iˆβ 1 Dφ α ζ α iβ 1 Φ α ζ α and on the other hand +i( mm 1 δ 0 M +ˆρ 1)e α() φ β ζ β +i(ˆρ 1 1 λˆβ 1 )e α γφ α ζ γ δ ˆB α() = iˆρ 1 C α ζ α = iˆρ 1 Dφ α ζ α iˆρ 1 Φ α ζ α +i(m 1ˆρ 1 )e α() φ β ζ β +i(m 1ˆρ 1 )e α γφ α ζ γ δˆπ α() = iˆβ 1 C α ζ α = iˆβ 1 Dφ α ζ α iˆβ 1 Φ α ζ α +i(m 1ˆβ1 )e α() φ β ζ β +i(m 1ˆβ1 )e α γφ α ζ γ (.18) Comparison of above relations yield ˆβ 1 = β 1, ˆρ 1 = ρ 1 7
9 The transformation laws for curvatures A and Φ look like δâ = iα 0F α ζ α +im 1 β 0 e αβ C α ζ β, δˆφ = im 1 δ0 C γ ζ γ (.19) Now we consider ansatz for deformation of spin-3/ curvatures F α = β 1 Ω αβ Ψ β mα 0 e γ() B γ() Ψ α +δ 0 f αβ Ψ β +γ 0 AΨ α γ 0 e αβ ϕψ β C α = 4mβ 0 m 1 B αβ Ψ β mm δ 0 m 1 π αβ Ψ β ρ 0 ϕψ α One introduces the corresponding supertransformations δφ α = β 1 Ω αβ ζ β mα 0 e γ() B γ() ζ α +δ 0 f αβ ζ β +γ 0 Aζ α γ 0 e αβ ϕζ β δφ α = 4mβ 0 m 1 B αβ ζ β + mm δ 0 m 1 π αβ ζ β +ρ 0 ϕζ α (.0) Let us require the conditions (.14). The we have on one hand δ ˆF α = β 1 DΩ αβ ζ β +mα 0 e β() DB β() ζ α +δ 0 Df αβ ζ β +γ 0 DAζ α + γ 0 Dϕe α βζ β +( λβ 1 M 1 β 1 )e γ() Ω αγ ζ γ +(M 1 β 1 )e γ() Ω γ() ζ α +( 1 λδ 0 M 1 δ 0 )e γ() f αγ ζ γ +(M 1 δ 0 )e γ() f γ() ζ α +(M 1 γ 0 1 λγ 0)e α γaζ γ +( 4mM 1 α 0 16mm 1 β 0 +mλα 0 )E α γb γβ ζ β +(4mM 1 α 0 mλα 0 )E γ() B αγ ζ γ mmm 1 δ0 E α γπ γβ ζ β +(4M 1 γ 0 4m 1 ρ 0 +λ γ 0 )E α γϕζ γ δĉα = 4mβ 0 m 1 DB αβ ζ β + mm δ 0 m 1 Dπ αβ ζ β +ρ 0 Dϕζ α β 1 Ω αβ ζ β δ 0 f αβ ζ β γ 0 Aζ α and on the other hand +( mβ 0 λ 4mM 1β 0 )e γ() B αγ ζ γ +(mα 0 + 4mM 1β 0 )e γ() B γ() ζ α m 1 m 1 +( mm δ 0 λ mmm 1 δ 0 )e γ() π αγ ζ γ 4m 1 m 1 m 1 +( mmm 1 δ 0 )e γ() π γ() ζ α +( γ 0 +M 1 ρ 0 1 m 1 λρ 0)e α γϕζ γ δ ˆF α = β 1 R αβ ζ β +mα 0 e β() B β() ζ α +δ 0 T αβ ζ β +γ 0 Aζ α + γ 0 Φe α βζ β = β 1 DΩ αβ ζ β +mα 0 e β() DB β() ζ α +δ 0 Df αβ ζ β +γ 0 DAζ α + γ 0 Dϕe α βζ β δ 0 e γ() Ω αγ ζ γ +( mα 0 +δ 0 )e γ() Ω γ() ζ α M β 1 e γ() f αγ ζ γ +( 1 4 mγ 0 + M β 1)e γ() f γ() ζ α +(mδ 0 4M γ 0 )e α γaζ γ +( m β 1 +mγ 0 )E α γb γβ ζ β +(m β 1 +mγ 0 )E γ() B αγ ζ γ +( mm γ 0 +4mM α 0 )E α γπ γβ ζ β +(mm γ 0 +4mM α 0 )E γ() π αγ ζ γ +mmβ 1 E α γϕζ γ (.1) 8
10 δĉα = 4mβ 0 m 1 B αβ ζ β + mm δ 0 m 1 Π αβ ζ β +ρ 0 Φζ α = 4mβ 0 m 1 DB αβ ζ β + mm δ 0 m 1 Dπ αβ ζ β +ρ 0 Dϕζ α 4mβ 0 m 1 Ω αβ ζ β mm δ 0 m 1 f αβ ζ β +4Mρ 0 Aζ α mm δ 0 m 1 e γ() B αγ ζ γ + mm δ 0 m 1 e γ() B γ() ζ α mm β 0 m 1 c 0 e γ() π αγ ζ γ +(mmρ 0 + mm β 0 m 1 )e γ() π γ() ζ α m M δ 0 4m 1 M eα γϕζ γ (.) Comparison of the above relations gives us at M 1 = M λ δ 0 = Mβ 1, γ 0 = γ 0 = M(M λ) (M λ) β 1, ρ 0 = m m β 1 Thus imposing the condition of the covariant curvature transformations (.14) we fix the supersymmetric deformations up to common parameter β 1 and relation between mass M 1 = M λ. The law of supersymmetry transformations is given by (.16),(.0). The obtained result is in agreement with our recent work [7] where we studied the analogous supermultiplets (, 3/) in unfolded formulation. Invariant Lagrangian Now we turn to construction of supersymmetric Lagrangian corresponding to supermultiplets (, ). Actually in terms of curvatures it presents a sum of Lagrangians for spin (.5) 3 and spin 3/ (.9), where the initial curvatures are replaced by deformed ones R ˆR ˆL = 1 ˆR α()ˆπα() 1 ˆT α() ˆBα() m 4 m e α() ˆB α()ˆφ+ i ˆF α Ĉ α Using the knowing supertransformations for curvatures (.17),(.18),(.19),(.1),(.) it is not very difficult to check the invariance of the Lagrangian. Indeed δ ˆL = i(ρ 1 mm 4m 1 δ0 )F α ζ α Π α() i(ˆβ 1 β 1 )R α() C α ζ α i(β 1 m m 1 β 0 )F α ζ α B α() i(ˆρ 1 1 δ 0)T α() C α ζ α i( mm 1 4 m δ 0 +mα 0 )e α() ˆBα() C γ ζ γ i (m mˆρ 1 + γ 0 )e α() C α ζ α Φ iγ 0 Aζα C α + iρ 0 ˆF α Φζ α + 1 iˆρ 0e α() C β Π α() ζ β Taking into account the equations of equation for fields B α(),π α() which are equivalent to the following relations we see that the variation δ ˆL vanishes. Φ = 0, A = 0 e γ() Π γ() = DΦ 4MA = 0 9
11 3 Free massive higher spin fields For completeness in this section we discuss the gauge invariant formulation of free massive bosonic and fermionic higher spin fields in AdS 3 [18,19]. Besides, we present the gauge invariant curvatures, the Lagrangians in explicit component form and the Lagrangians in terms of curvatures for bosonic spin s and fermionic spin s+1/ fields. 3.1 Bosonic spin-s field In gauge invariant form the massive spin s field is described by system of massless fields with spins s,(s 1),...,0. In frame-like approach the corresponding set of fields consists of (7) (Ω α(k),f α(k) ) 1 k (s 1), (B α(),a), (π α(),ϕ) Free Lagrangian for the fields with mass m in AdS 3 have the form L = s 1 ( 1) k+1 [kω α(k 1)β e β γω α(k 1)γ +Ω α(k) Df α(k) ] k=1 +EB αβ B αβ B αβ e αβ DA Eπ αβ π αβ +π αβ E αβ Dϕ s + ( 1) k+1 (k +) a k [ Ω α()β(k) e α() f β(k) +Ω α(k) e β() f α(k)β() ] k k=1 +a 0 Ω α() e α() A a 0 f αβ E β γb αγ +smπ αβ E αβ A s 1 + ( 1) k+1 b k f α(k 1)β e β γf α(k 1)γ +b 0 f α() E α() ϕ+ 3a 0 Eϕ (3.1) k=1 where a k = k(s+k +1)(s k 1) (k +1)(k +)(k+3) [M (k +1) λ ] a 0 = (s+1)(s 1) [M λ ] 3 b k = s M 4k(k +1), b 0 = sma 0, M = m +(s 1) λ 10
12 It is invariant under the following gauge transformations δω α(k) = Dη α(k) + (k +)a k e β() η α(k)β() k + a k 1 k(k 1) eα() η α(k ) + b k k eα βξ α(k 1)β δf α(k) = Dξ α(k) +e α βη α(k 1)β +a k e β() ξ α(k)β() + (k +1)a k 1 k(k 1)(k 1) eα() ξ α(k ) δω α() = Dη α() +3a 1 e β() η α()β() +b 1 e α γξ αγ (3.) δf α() = Dξ α() +e α γη αγ +a 1 e β() ξ α()β() +a 0 e α() ξ δb α() = a 0 η α(), δa = Dξ + a 0 4 e α()ξ α() δπ α() = Msa 0 ξ α(), δϕ = Msξ One can construct the curvatures invariant under these gauge transformation. After change of normalization the curvatures look like B α() a 0 B α(r) π α() b 0 π α() (3.3) R α(k) = DΩ α(k) + (k +)a k e β() Ω α(k)β() k + a k 1 k(k 1) eα() Ω α(k ) + b k k eα βf α(k 1)β T α(k) = Df α(k) +e α βω α(k 1)β +a k e β() f α(k)β() + (k +1)a k 1 k(k 1)(k 1) eα() f α(k ) R α() = DΩ α() +3a 1 e β() Ω α()β() +b 1 e α γf αγ a 0 E α βb αβ +b 0 E α() ϕ (3.4) T α() = Df α() +e α γω αγ +a 1 e β() f α()β() +a 0 e α() A B α() = DB α() Ω α() +b 1 e α βπ αβ +3a 1 e β() B α()β() A = DA+ a 0 4 e α()f α() a 0 E γ() B γ() Π α() = Dπ α() f α() +e α βb αβ a 0 sm eα() ϕ+a 1 e β() π α()β() Φ = Dϕ+MsA b 0 e α() π α() B α(k) = DB α(k) Ω α(k) + b k k eα βπ α(k 1)β + a k 1 k(k 1) eα() B α(k ) + (k +) a k e β() B α(k)β() k Π α(k) = Dπ α(k) f α(k) +e α βb α(k 1)β + (k +1)a k 1 k(k 1)(k 1) eα() π α(k ) +a k e β() π α(k)β() (3.5) 11
13 In comparison with massive spin case, the construction of curvatures for higher spins has some peculiarities. Namely, in order to achieve gauge invariance for all curvatures we should introduce the so called extra fields B α(k),π α(k), k s 1 with the following gauge transformations δb α(k) = η α(k) δπ α(k) = ξ α(k) As we already pointed out above, in three dimensions it is possible to write Lagrangian in terms of the curvatures only. In case of arbitrary integer spin field, the corresponding Lagrangian (3.1) can be rewritten in the form L = 1 s 1 ( 1) k+1 [R α(k) Π α(k) +T α(k) B α(k) ]+ a 0 sm e α()b α() Φ (3.6) k=1 3. Fermionic spin-(s+ 1 ) field In gauge invariant form the massive spin (s+1/) field is described by system of massless fields with spins (s+1/),(s 1/),...,1/. In frame-like approach the corresponding set of fields consists of (8) Φ α(k+1) 0 k (s 1), φ α Free Lagrangian for fields with mass m 1 in AdS 3 looks like s 1 1 i L = ( 1) k+1 [ 1 Φ α(k+1)dφ α(k+1) ]+ 1 φ αe α βdφ β k=0 s 1 + ( 1) k+1 c k Φ α(k 1)β() e β() Φ α(k 1) +c 0 Φ α E α βφ β k=1 s 1 + k=0 ( 1) k+1d k Φ α(k)βe β γφ α(k)γ 3d 0 Eφ αφ α (3.7) where c k = (s+k +1)(s k) (k +1)(k+1) [M 1 (k +1) λ 4 ] c 0 = s(s+1)[m 1 λ 4 ] d k = (s+1) (k +3) M 1, M 1 = m 1 +(s 1 ) λ The Lagrangian is invariant under the gauge transformations δφ α(k+1) = Dξ α(k+1) + c k d k (k +1) eα βξ α(k)β + k(k+1) eα() ξ α(k 1) +c k+1 e β() ξ α(k+1)β() (3.8) δφ α = c 0 ξ α 1
14 Let us construct gauge invariant curvatures with respect (3.8). After change of normalization φ α c 0 φ α the curvatures have form F α(k+1) = DΦ α(k+1) d k + (k +1) eα βφ α(k)β c k + k(k+1) eα() Φ α(k 1) +c k+1 e β() Φ α(k+1)β() F α = DΦ α +d 0 e α βφ β +c 1 e β() Φ αβ() c 0 E α βφ β C α = Dφ α Φ α +d 0 e α βφ β +c 1 e β() φ αβ() C α(k+1) = Dφ α(k+1) Φ α(k+1) + c k d k (k +1) eα βφ α(k)β + k(k+1) eα() φ α(k 1) +c k+1 e β() φ α(k+1)β() (3.9) As in the case of integer spins in order to achieve gauge invariance for all curvatures we should introduce the set of extra fields φ α(k+1), 1 k (s 1) with the following gauge transformation δφ α(k+1) = ξ α(k+1) Finally the Lagrangian (3.7) can be rewritten in terms of curvatures only as follows L = i s ( 1) k+1 F α(k+1) C α(k+1) (3.10) k=0 In section 5 we will need the description of massive spin-(s 1/) field. It can be obtained from the above description by replacement s (s 1). So we have considered the free massive fields with spins s and spins s+ 1. Also, we have formulated the gauge invariant curvatures (3.4), (3.5), (3.9) and gauge invariant Lagrangians (3.6), (3.10). In the next sections we will study a supersymmetrization of these results and construct the Lagrangian description of the supermultiplets (s,s+ 1) (s,s 1). 4 Massive supermultiplet (s,s+ 1 ) In this section we consider the massive higher spin supermultiplets when the highest spin is fermion. For these supermultiplets we construct the deformation of the curvatures, find the supertransformations and present the supersymmetric Lagrangian. Massless flat limit Before we turn to realization of given massive supermultiplets let us consider their structure at massless flat limit m,m 1,λ 0. In this case the Lagrangian will be described by the system of massless fields with spins (s+ 1),s,..., 1,0 in three dimensional flat space L = s 1 ( 1) k+1 [kω α(k 1)β e β γω α(k 1)γ +Ω α(k) Df α(k) ] k=1 +EB αβ B αβ B αβ e αβ DA Eπ αβ π αβ +π αβ E αβ Dϕ + i s 1 ( 1) k+1 Φ α(k+1) DΦ α(k+1) + 1 φ αe α βdφ β (4.1) k=0 13
15 One can show that this Lagrangian is supersymmetric. Indeed, if the equations of motion (.1) are fulfilled, the Lagrangian is invariant under the following supertransformations δf α(k) = iβ k Φ α(k 1) ζ α +iα k Φ α(k)β ζ β δf α() = iβ 1 Φ α ζ α +iα 1 Φ α()β ζ β δa = iα 0 Φ α ζ α +ic 0 β 0 e αβ φ α ζ β, δϕ = ic 0 δ 0 φγ ζ γ δφ α(k+1) α k = (k +1) Ωα(k) ζ α +(k +1)β k+1 Ω α(k+1)β ζ β δφ α = β 1 Ω αβ ζ β +a 0 α 0 e β() B β() ζ α δφ α = 8a 0β 0 c 0 B αβ ζ β + b 0 δ 0 c 0 π αβ ζ β Here we take into account the normalization (3.3). Thus, requiring that massive theory has a correct massless flat limit we partially fix an arbitrariness in the choice of the supertransformations. Parameters α k,β k,β 0,α 0, δ 0 at this step are still arbitrary. Deformation of curvatures Again we will realize supersymmetry deforming the curvatures by the background gravitino field Ψ α. We start with the construction of the deformations for bosonic fields R α(k) = iρ k Φ α(k 1) Ψ α +iσ k Φ α(k)β Ψ β T α(k) = iβ k Φ α(k 1) Ψ α +iα k Φ α(k)β Ψ β R α() = iρ 1 Φ α Ψ α +iσ 1 Φ α()β Ψ β +iˆρ 0 e α() φ β Ψ β T α() = iβ 1 Φ α Ψ α +iα 1 Φ α()β Ψ β A = iα 0 Φ α Ψ α +ic 0 β 0 e α() φ α Ψ β, Φ = ic 0 δ 0 φα Ψ α B α(k) = iˆρ k φ α(k 1) Ψ α iˆσ k φ α(k)β Ψ β Π α(k) = iˆβ k φ α(k 1) Ψ α iˆα k φ α(k)β Ψ β Corresponding ansatz for supertransformations has the form δω α(k) = iρ k Φ α(k 1) ζ α +iσ k Φ α(k)β ζ β δf α(k) = iβ k Φ α(k 1) ζ α +iα k Φ α(k)β ζ β δω α() = iρ 1 Φ α ζ α +iσ 1 Φ α()β ζ β +iˆρ 0 e α() φ β ζ β δf α() = iβ 1 Φ α ζ α +iα 1 Φ α()β ζ β δa = iα 0 Φ α ζ α +ic 0 β 0 e α() φ α ζ β, δϕ = ic 0 δ 0 φγ ζ γ δb α(k) = iˆρ k φ α(k 1) ζ α +iˆσ k φ α(k)β ζ β δπ α(k) = iˆβ k φ α(k 1) ζ α +iˆα k φ α(k)β ζ β All parameters will be fixed from requirement of covariant transformations of the curvatures (.14). First of all we consider δ ˆR α(k) = iρ k F α(k 1) ζ α +iσ k F α(k)β ζ β δˆt α(k) = iβ k F α(k 1) ζ α +iα k F α(k)β ζ β (4.) 14
16 It leads to relation M 1 = M + λ between mass parameters M 1 and M and defines the parameters α k β k σ k ρ k = k(s+k +1)[M +(k +1)λ]ˆα (k +1)(s k) = [M kλ]ˆβ k(k +1) (s+k +1) = [M +(k +1)λ]ˆσ k(k +1) (s k) = k 3 (k +1)(k+1) [M kλ]ˆρ (4.3) where From the requirement that ˆβ = ˆα, ˆρ = sm ˆα, ˆσ = sm ˆα δ ˆB α(k) = iˆρ k C α(k 1) ζ α +iˆσ k C α(k)β ζ β δˆπ α(k) = iˆβ k C α(k 1) ζ α +iˆα k C α(k)β ζ β (4.4) one gets ˆρ k = ρ k, ˆσ k = σ k, ˆβk = β k, ˆα k = α k Requirement of covariant transformations for the other curvatures δ ˆR α() = iρ 1 F α ζ α +iσ 1 F α()β ζ β iˆρ 0 e α() C β ζ β δˆt α() = iβ 1 F α ζ α +iα 1 F α()β ζ β gives the solution δâ = iα 0F α ζ α ic 0 β 0 e αβ C α ζ β, δˆφ = ic 0 δ 0 Cγ ζ γ (4.5) ˆρ 0 = 1 8 c 0 β 1, δ0 = 4β 0 = c 0 β 1, α 0 = c 0 β 1 a 0 4sMa 0 Now let us consider the deformation of curvatures for fermion. We choose ansatz in the form F α(k+1) = α k (k +1) Ωα(k) Ψ α +(k+1)β k+1 Ω α(k+1)β Ψ β +γ k f α(k) Ψ α +δ k f α(k+1)β Ψ β F α = β 1 Ω αβ Ψ β +a 0 α 0 e β() B β() Ψ α +δ 0 f αβ Ψ β +γ 0 AΨ α + γ 0 ϕe α βψ β C α = 8a 0β 0 c 0 B αβ Ψ β b 0 δ 0 c 0 π αβ Ψ β ρ 0 ϕψ α C α(k+1) = β k B α(k+1)β Ψ β α k B α(k) Ψ α δ k π α(k+1)β Ψ β γ k π α(k) Ψ α 15
17 and ansatz for supertransformations in the form δφ α(k+1) = α k (k +1) Ωα(k) ζ α +(k +1)β k+1 Ω α(k+1)β ζ β +γ k f α(k) ζ α +δ k f α(k+1)β ζ β δφ α = β 1 Ω αβ ζ β +a 0 α 0 e β() B β() ζ α +δ 0 f αβ ζ β +γ 0 Aζ α + γ 0 ϕe α βζ β δφ α = 8a 0β 0 c 0 B αβ ζ β + b 0 δ 0 c 0 π αβ ζ β +ρ 0 ϕζ α δφ α(k+1) = β k B α(k+1)β ζ β + α k B α(k) ζ α + δ k π α(k+1)β ζ β + γ k π α(k) ζ α From the requirement that δ ˆF α(k+1) = α k (k +1) Rα(k) ζ α +(k +1)β k+1 R α(k+1)β ζ β +γ k T α(k) ζ α +δ k T α(k+1)β ζ β (4.6) we have the same relation between masses M 1 = M + λ. Besides, it leads to γ k δ k = = (s+k +1) k(k +1) (k+1) [M +(k +1)λ]ˆγ (s k 1) [M (k +1)λ]ˆδ (k +1)(k +)(k +3) where Requirement ˆγ = sm ˆα, ˆδ = sm ˆα gives us δĉα(k+1) = β k B α(k+1)β ζ β + α k B α(k) ζ α + δ k Π α(k+1)β ζ β + γ k Π α(k) ζ α (4.7) γ k = γ k, δk = δ k, α k = At last, requirement for the other curvatures yields solution α k (k +1), βk = (k +1)β k+1 δ ˆF α = β 1 R αβ ζ β a 0 α 0 e β() B β() ζ α +δ 0 T αβ ζ β +γ 0 Aζ α + γ 0 Φe α βζ β δĉα = 8a 0β 0 c 0 B αβ ζ β + b 0 δ 0 c 0 Π αβ ζ β +ρ 0 Φζ α (4.8) Now, all the arbitrary parameters are fixed. γ 0 = γ 0 = c 0 β 1, ρ 0 = c 0 β 1 a 0 4sMa 0 16
18 Supersymmetric Lagrangian is the sum of free Lagrangians where the initial curvatures are replacement by deformed ones ˆL = 1 s 1 k=1 s 1 ( 1) k+1 [ ˆR α(k)ˆπα(k) + ˆT α(k) ˆBα(k) ]+ a 0 sm e α() ˆB α()ˆφ i ( 1) k+1 ˆFα(k+1) Ĉ α(k+1) (4.9) k=0 The Lagrangian is invariant under the supertransformations (4.),(4.4),(4.5),(4.6),(4.7),(4.8) up to equations of motion for the fields B α(),π α() Φ = 0, A = 0 e γ() Π γ() = DΦ sma = 0 (4.10) The Lagrangian (4.9) is a final solution for the massive supermultiplet (s,s+ 1 ). 5 Massive supermultiplet (s,s 1 ) In this section we consider another massive higher spin supermultiplet when the highest spin is boson. The massive spin-s field was described in section 3.1 in terms of massless fields. The massive spin-(s 1/) field can be obtained for the results in section 3. if one makes the replacement s (s 1). So the set of massless fields for the massive field with spin s 1/ is Φ α(k+1), 0 k s and φ α. The gauge invariant curvatures and the Lagrangian have the forms (3.8) and (3.10) where the parameters are c k = (s+k)(s k 1) (k +1)(k +1) [M 1 (k +1) λ 4 ] c 0 = s(s 1)[M 1 λ 4 ] (5.1) d k = (s 1) (k +3) M 1, M 1 = m 1 +(s 1 ) λ Following our procedure we should construct the supersymmetric deformations for curvatures. Actually the structure of deformed curvatures and supertransformations have the same form as in previous section for supermultiplets (s,s+1/). There is a difference only in parameters (5.1). Therefore we present here only the supertransformations for curvatures. Requirement (.14) for bosonic fields δ ˆR α(k) = iρ k F α(k 1) ζ α +iσ k F α(k)β ζ β δˆt α(k) = iβ k F α(k 1) ζ α +iα k F α(k)β ζ β δ ˆR α() = iρ 1 F α ζ α +iσ 1 F α()β ζ β iˆρ 0 e α() C β ζ β δˆt α() = iβ 1 F α ζ α +iα 1 F α()β ζ β δâ = iα 0F α ζ α ic 0 β 0 e αβ C α ζ β, δˆφ = ic 0 δ 0 Cγ ζ γ δ ˆB α(k) = iˆρ k C α(k 1) ζ α +iˆσ k C α(k)β ζ β δˆπ α(k) = iˆβ k C α(k 1) ζ α +iˆα k C α(k)β ζ β 17
19 gives us the relation M 1 = M λ between masses M 1 and M. Besides, it leads to σ k ρ k α k β k (s k 1) = [M (k +1)λ]ˆσ k(k +1) (s+k) = [M k 3 +kλ]ˆρ (k +1)(k +1) = k(s k 1)[M (k +1)λ]ˆα (k +1)(s+k) = [M +kλ]ˆβ k(k +1) where ˆβ = ˆα, ˆρ k = ρ k, ˆσ k = σ k, ˆβk = β k, ˆα k = α k ˆρ 0 = 1 8 c 0 β 1, δ0 = 4β 0 = c 0 β 1, α 0 = c 0 β 1 a 0 4sMa 0 ˆρ = sm ˆα, ˆσ = sm ˆα, ˆα = α s (s )[M (s 1)λ] From requirement of covariant supertransformations for fermionic curvatures δ ˆF α(k+1) = α k (k +1) Rα(k) ζ α +(k +1)β k+1 R α(k+1)β ζ β +γ k T α(k) ζ α +δ k T α(k+1)β ζ β δ ˆF α = β 1 R αβ ζ β a 0 α 0 e β() B β() ζ α +δ 0 T αβ ζ β +γ 0 Aζ α + γ 0 Φe α βζ β δĉα = 8a 0β 0 c 0 B αβ ζ β + b 0 δ 0 c 0 Π αβ ζ β +ρ 0 Φζ α δĉα(k+1) = β k B α(k+1)β ζ β + α k B α(k) ζ α + δ k Π α(k+1)β ζ β + γ k Π α(k) ζ α one gets γ k δ k = = (s k 1) k(k +1) (k +1) [M (k +1)λ]ˆγ (s+k +1) [M +(k +1)λ]ˆδ (k +1)(k +)(k +3) where γ k = γ k, δk = δ k, α k = α k (k +1), βk = (k +1)β k+1 γ 0 = γ 0 = c 0 β 1, ρ 0 = c 0 β 1 a 0 4sMa 0 ˆγ = sm ˆα, ˆδ = sm ˆα Supersymmetric Lagrangian have form (4.9) and it is invariant under the supertransformations up to equations of motion for auxiliary fields B α(),π α() (4.10). 18
20 6 Summary Let us summarize the results. In this paper we have constructed the Lagrangian formulation for massive higher spin supermultiplets in the AdS 3 space in the case of minimal (1,0) supersymmetry. For description of the massive higher spin fields we have adapted for massive fields in three dimensions the frame-like gauge invariant formalism and technique of gauge invariant curvatures. The supersymmetrization is achieved by deformation of the curvatures by background gravitino field and hence the supersymmetric Lagrangians are formulated with help of background fields of three-dimensional supergravity. In AdS 3 the space the minimal (1,0) supersymmetry combines the massive fields in supermultiplets with one bosonic degree of freedomand onefermionic one. As a result we have derived the supersymmetric andgauge invariant Lagrangians for massive higher spin (s, s + 1/) and (s, s 1/) supermultiplets. Acknowledgments I.L.B and T.V.S are grateful to the RFBR grant, project No a for partial support. Their research was also supported in parts by Russian Ministry of Education and Science, project No Appendix A. Massless bosonic fields In this Appendix we consider the frame-like formulation for the massless bosonic fields in three dimensional flat space. For every spin we present field variables and write out the corresponding Lagrangian. All massless fields with spin s 1 are gauge ones so that we also present the gauge transformations for them. Spin 0 It is described by physical 0-form ϕ and auxiliary 0-form π α(). Lagrangian looks like L = Eπ αβ π αβ +π αβ E αβ Dϕ Spin 1 It is described by physical 1-form A and auxiliary 0-form B α(). Lagrangian looks like It is invariant under gauge transformations L = EB αβ B αβ B αβ e αβ DA δa = Dξ Spin It is described by physical 1-form f α() and auxiliary 1-form Ω α(). Lagrangian looks like L = Ω αβ e β γω αγ +Ω α(k) Df α(k) 19
21 The gauge transformations have the form δω α() = Dη α(), δf α() = Dξ α() +e α γη αγ Spin k It is described by physical 1-form f α(k ) and auxiliary 1-form Ω α(k ). Lagrangian looks like L = ( 1) k+1 [kω α(k 1)β e β γω α(k 1)γ +Ω α(k) Df α(k) ] The gauge transformations have the form δω α(k) = Dη α(k), δf α(k) = Dξ α(k) +e α βη α(k 1)β 8 Appendix B. Massless fermions fields In this Appendix we consider the frame-like formulation for the massless fermionic fields in three dimensional flat space. For every spin we present field variables and write out the corresponding Lagrangian. All massless fields with spin s 3/ are gauge ones so that we also present gauge transformations for them. Spin 1/ It is described by master 0-form φ α. Lagrangian looks like L = 1 φ αe α βdφ β Spin 3/ It is described by physical 1-form Φ α. Lagrangian and gauge transformations have the form L = i Φ αdφ α, δφ α = Dξ α Spin k +1/ It is described by physical 1-form Φ α(k 1). Lagrangian and gauge transformations have the form L = ( 1) k+1i Φ α(k+1)dφ α(k+1), δφ α(k+1) = Dξ α(k+1) References [1] M. P. Blencowe A Consistent Interacting Massless High er Spin Field Theory In D = (+1), Class. Quant. Grav. 6 (1989)
22 [] M. A. Vasiliev Higher spin gauge theories in four-dime nsions, three-dimensions, and two- dimensions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D5 (1996) 763, arxiv:hep-th/ [3] S. F. Prokushkin, M. A. Vasiliev Higher spin gauge in teractions for massive matter fields in 3-D AdS spacetime, Nucl. Phys. B545 (1999) 385, arxiv:hep-th/ [4] A. Campoleoni, M. Henneaux Asymptotic symmetries of three-dimensional higher-spin gravity: the metric approach, JHEP 1503 (015) 143, arxiv: [hep-th]. [5] R. Bonezzi, N. Boulanger, E. Sezgin, P. Sundel An Action for Matter Coupled Higher Spin Gravity in Three Dimensions, JHEP 1605 (016) 003, arxiv: [hep-th]. [6] A. Achucarro, P. K. Townsend A Chern-Simons Action for Three-Dimensional anti-de Sitter Supergravity Theories, Phys. Lett. B180 (1986) 89. [7] I. L. Buchbinder, T. V. Snegirev, Yu. M. Zinoviev Unfolded equations for massive higher spin supermultiplets in AdS 3, JHEP 1608 (016) 075, arxiv: [hep-th]. [8] I. L. Buchbinder, T. V. Snegirev, Yu. M. Zinoviev Lagrangian formulation of the massive higher spin supermultiplets in three dimensional space-time, JHEP 10 (015) 148, arxiv: [hep-th]. [9] S. M. Kuzenko, M. Tsulaia Off-shell massive N=1 supermultiplets in three dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B914 (017) 160, arxiv: [hep-th]. [10] S. M. Kuzenko, D. X. Ogburn Off-Shell Higher Spin Supermultiplets in Three Dimensions, arxiv: [hep-th]. [11] Yu. M. Zinoviev On Massive High Spin Particles in (A)dS, arxiv:hep-th/ [1] R. R. Metsaev Gauge invariant formulation of massive totally symmetric fermionic fields in (A)dS space, Phys. Lett. B643 (006) 05-1, arxiv:hep-th/ [13] Yu. M. Zinoviev Frame-like gauge invariant formulation for massive high spin particles, Nucl. Phys. B808 (009) 185, arxiv: [hep-th]. [14] E. S. Fradkin, M. A. Vasiliev On the gravitational interaction of massless higher-spin fields, Phys. Lett. B189 (1987) 89. [15] E. S. Fradkin, M. A. Vasiliev Cubic interaction in extended theories of massless higherspin fields, Nucl. Phys. B91 (1987) 141. [16] M. Vasiliev Cubic Vertices for Symmetric Higher-Spin Gauge Fields in (A)dS d, Nucl. Phys. B86 (01) 341, arxiv: [17] Nicolas Boulanger, Dmitry Ponomarev, E.D. Skvortsov Non-abelian cubic vertices for higher-spin fields in anti-de Sitter space, JHEP 1305 (013) 008, arxiv: [hep-th]. 1
23 [18] I. L. Buchbinder, T. V. Snegirev, Yu. M. Zinoviev Gauge invariant Lagrangian formulation of massive higher spin fields in (A)dS 3 space, Phys. Lett. B716 (01) 43-48, arxiv: [hep-th]. [19] I. L. Buchbinder, T. V. Snegirev, Yu. M. Zinoviev Frame-like gauge invariant Lagrangian formulation of massive fermionic higher spin fields in AdS 3 space, Phys. Lett. B738 (014) 58, arxiv: [hep-th]. [0] Yu. M. Zinoviev Towards the Fradkin-Vasiliev formalism in three dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B910 (016) 550, arxiv: [hep-th].
6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.
6.1. Dirac Equation Ref: M.Kaku, Quantum Field Theory, Oxford Univ Press (1993) η μν = η μν = diag(1, -1, -1, -1) p 0 = p 0 p = p i = -p i p μ p μ = p 0 p 0 + p i p i = E c 2 - p 2 = (m c) 2 H = c p 2
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSpace-Time Symmetries
Chapter Space-Time Symmetries In classical fiel theory any continuous symmetry of the action generates a conserve current by Noether's proceure. If the Lagrangian is not invariant but only shifts by a
Διαβάστε περισσότερα2 Composition. Invertible Mappings
Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan Composition. Invertible Mappings In this section we discuss two procedures for creating new mappings from old ones, namely,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPhys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)
Phys460.nb 81 ψ n (t) is still the (same) eigenstate of H But for tdependent H. The answer is NO. 5.5.5. Solution for the tdependent Schrodinger s equation If we assume that at time t 0, the electron starts
Διαβάστε περισσότεραConcrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016
Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016 Silvio Capobianco Exercise 1.7 Let H(n) = J(n + 1) J(n). Equation (1.8) tells us that H(2n) = 2, and H(2n+1) = J(2n+2) J(2n+1) = (2J(n+1) 1) (2J(n)+1)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHigher spin gauge theories and their CFT duals
Higher spin gauge theories and their CFT duals E-mail: hikida@phys-h.keio.ac.jp 2 AdS Vasiliev AdS/CFT 4 Vasiliev 3 O(N) 3 Vasiliev 2 W N 1 AdS/CFT g µν Vasiliev AdS [1] AdS/CFT anti-de Sitter (AdS) (CFT)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHigher Derivative Gravity Theories
Higher Derivative Gravity Theories Black Holes in AdS space-times James Mashiyane Supervisor: Prof Kevin Goldstein University of the Witwatersrand Second Mandelstam, 20 January 2018 James Mashiyane WITS)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:
HOMEWORK 4 Problem a For the fast loading case, we want to derive the relationship between P zz and λ z. We know that the nominal stress is expressed as: P zz = ψ λ z where λ z = λ λ z. Therefore, applying
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEE512: Error Control Coding
EE512: Error Control Coding Solution for Assignment on Finite Fields February 16, 2007 1. (a) Addition and Multiplication tables for GF (5) and GF (7) are shown in Tables 1 and 2. + 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 3
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3
Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 1 State vector space and the dual space Space of wavefunctions The space of wavefunctions is the set of all
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSymmetric Stress-Energy Tensor
Chapter 3 Symmetric Stress-Energy ensor We noticed that Noether s conserved currents are arbitrary up to the addition of a divergence-less field. Exploiting this freedom the canonical stress-energy tensor
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΑπόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.
Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο The time integral of a force is referred to as impulse, is determined by and is obtained from: Newton s 2 nd Law of motion states that the action
Διαβάστε περισσότερα4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)
84 CHAPTER 4. STATIONARY TS MODELS 4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(,) This section is an introduction to a wide class of models ARMA(p,q) which we will consider in more detail later in this
Διαβάστε περισσότεραJesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013
Notes on Average Scattering imes and Hall Factors Jesse Maassen and Mar Lundstrom Purdue University November 5, 13 I. Introduction 1 II. Solution of the BE 1 III. Exercises: Woring out average scattering
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS
CHAPTER 5 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS EXERCISE 104 Page 8 1. Find the positive root of the equation x + 3x 5 = 0, correct to 3 significant figures, using the method of bisection. Let f(x) =
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 8.3 Trigonometric Equations
99 Section 8. Trigonometric Equations Objective 1: Solve Equations Involving One Trigonometric Function. In this section and the next, we will exple how to solving equations involving trigonometric functions.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραProblem Set 9 Solutions. θ + 1. θ 2 + cotθ ( ) sinθ e iφ is an eigenfunction of the ˆ L 2 operator. / θ 2. φ 2. sin 2 θ φ 2. ( ) = e iφ. = e iφ cosθ.
Chemistry 362 Dr Jean M Standard Problem Set 9 Solutions The ˆ L 2 operator is defined as Verify that the angular wavefunction Y θ,φ) Also verify that the eigenvalue is given by 2! 2 & L ˆ 2! 2 2 θ 2 +
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSecond Order Partial Differential Equations
Chapter 7 Second Order Partial Differential Equations 7.1 Introduction A second order linear PDE in two independent variables (x, y Ω can be written as A(x, y u x + B(x, y u xy + C(x, y u u u + D(x, y
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPartial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013
The boundary element method March 26, 203 Introduction and notation The problem: u = f in D R d u = ϕ in Γ D u n = g on Γ N, where D = Γ D Γ N, Γ D Γ N = (possibly, Γ D = [Neumann problem] or Γ N = [Dirichlet
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOn a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume
BULETINUL ACADEMIEI DE ŞTIINŢE A REPUBLICII MOLDOVA. MATEMATICA Numbers 2(72) 3(73), 2013, Pages 80 89 ISSN 1024 7696 On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume I.S.Gutsul Abstract. In
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMatrices and Determinants
Matrices and Determinants SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Q 1. For what value of k do the following system of equations possess a non-trivial (i.e., not all zero) solution over the set of rationals Q? x + ky + 3z
Διαβάστε περισσότεραderivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates
derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates swapnizzle 03-03- :5:43 We begin by recognizing the familiar conversion from rectangular to spherical coordinates (note that φ is used
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOrdinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit
Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ting Zhang Stanford May 11, 2001 Stanford, 5/11/2001 1 Outline Ordinal Classification Ordinal Addition Ordinal Multiplication Ordinal
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 3 Solutions
Homework 3 Solutions Igor Yanovsky (Math 151A TA) Problem 1: Compute the absolute error and relative error in approximations of p by p. (Use calculator!) a) p π, p 22/7; b) p π, p 3.141. Solution: For
Διαβάστε περισσότερα( y) Partial Differential Equations
Partial Dierential Equations Linear P.D.Es. contains no owers roducts o the deendent variables / an o its derivatives can occasionall be solved. Consider eamle ( ) a (sometimes written as a ) we can integrate
Διαβάστε περισσότερα3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β
3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS Page Theorem cos(αβ cos α cos β -sin α cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α NOTE: cos(αβ cos α cos β cos(α-β cos α -cos β Proof of cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α Let s use a unit circle
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOther Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests
Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Side-Note: So far we have seen a few approaches for creating tests such as Neyman-Pearson Lemma ( most powerful tests of H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 :
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExample Sheet 3 Solutions
Example Sheet 3 Solutions. i Regular Sturm-Liouville. ii Singular Sturm-Liouville mixed boundary conditions. iii Not Sturm-Liouville ODE is not in Sturm-Liouville form. iv Regular Sturm-Liouville note
Διαβάστε περισσότερα= {{D α, D α }, D α }. = [D α, 4iσ µ α α D α µ ] = 4iσ µ α α [Dα, D α ] µ.
PHY 396 T: SUSY Solutions for problem set #1. Problem 2(a): First of all, [D α, D 2 D α D α ] = {D α, D α }D α D α {D α, D α } = {D α, D α }D α + D α {D α, D α } (S.1) = {{D α, D α }, D α }. Second, {D
Διαβάστε περισσότεραExercises 10. Find a fundamental matrix of the given system of equations. Also find the fundamental matrix Φ(t) satisfying Φ(0) = I. 1.
Exercises 0 More exercises are available in Elementary Differential Equations. If you have a problem to solve any of them, feel free to come to office hour. Problem Find a fundamental matrix of the given
Διαβάστε περισσότεραORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER
ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER Abstract. We define ordinal arithmetic and show laws of Left- Monotonicity, Associativity, Distributivity, some minor related properties and the Cantor Normal Form.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS
CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS Shiah-Sen Wang The graphs are prepared by Chien-Lun Lai Based on : Precalculus: Mathematics for Calculus by J. Stuwart, L. Redin & S. Watson, 6th edition, 01, Brooks/Cole Chapter
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMATH423 String Theory Solutions 4. = 0 τ = f(s). (1) dτ ds = dxµ dτ f (s) (2) dτ 2 [f (s)] 2 + dxµ. dτ f (s) (3)
1. MATH43 String Theory Solutions 4 x = 0 τ = fs). 1) = = f s) ) x = x [f s)] + f s) 3) equation of motion is x = 0 if an only if f s) = 0 i.e. fs) = As + B with A, B constants. i.e. allowe reparametrisations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe Simply Typed Lambda Calculus
Type Inference Instead of writing type annotations, can we use an algorithm to infer what the type annotations should be? That depends on the type system. For simple type systems the answer is yes, and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFinite Field Problems: Solutions
Finite Field Problems: Solutions 1. Let f = x 2 +1 Z 11 [x] and let F = Z 11 [x]/(f), a field. Let Solution: F =11 2 = 121, so F = 121 1 = 120. The possible orders are the divisors of 120. Solution: The
Διαβάστε περισσότεραforms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with
Week 03: C lassification of S econd- Order L inear Equations In last week s lectures we have illustrated how to obtain the general solutions of first order PDEs using the method of characteristics. We
Διαβάστε περισσότεραReminders: linear functions
Reminders: linear functions Let U and V be vector spaces over the same field F. Definition A function f : U V is linear if for every u 1, u 2 U, f (u 1 + u 2 ) = f (u 1 ) + f (u 2 ), and for every u U
Διαβάστε περισσότερα6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes
122 CHAPTER 6. ARMA MODELS 6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes The purpose of forecasting is to predict future values of a TS based on the data collected to the present. In this section we will discuss a linear
Διαβάστε περισσότερα( ) 2 and compare to M.
Problems and Solutions for Section 4.2 4.9 through 4.33) 4.9 Calculate the square root of the matrix 3!0 M!0 8 Hint: Let M / 2 a!b ; calculate M / 2!b c ) 2 and compare to M. Solution: Given: 3!0 M!0 8
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSrednicki Chapter 55
Srednicki Chapter 55 QFT Problems & Solutions A. George August 3, 03 Srednicki 55.. Use equations 55.3-55.0 and A i, A j ] = Π i, Π j ] = 0 (at equal times) to verify equations 55.-55.3. This is our third
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCongruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 24, no. 5, 239-246 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/.2988/ija.24.422 Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 Ligong An and
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPartial Trace and Partial Transpose
Partial Trace and Partial Transpose by José Luis Gómez-Muñoz http://homepage.cem.itesm.mx/lgomez/quantum/ jose.luis.gomez@itesm.mx This document is based on suggestions by Anirban Das Introduction This
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAreas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates
Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the
Διαβάστε περισσότερα1 String with massive end-points
1 String with massive end-points Πρόβλημα 5.11:Θεωρείστε μια χορδή μήκους, τάσης T, με δύο σημειακά σωματίδια στα άκρα της, το ένα μάζας m, και το άλλο μάζας m. α) Μελετώντας την κίνηση των άκρων βρείτε
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSection 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas
09 Section 7. Double and Half Angle Fmulas To derive the double-angles fmulas, we will use the sum of two angles fmulas that we developed in the last section. We will let α θ and β θ: cos(θ) cos(θ + θ)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραHomework 8 Model Solution Section
MATH 004 Homework Solution Homework 8 Model Solution Section 14.5 14.6. 14.5. Use the Chain Rule to find dz where z cosx + 4y), x 5t 4, y 1 t. dz dx + dy y sinx + 4y)0t + 4) sinx + 4y) 1t ) 0t + 4t ) sinx
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStrain gauge and rosettes
Strain gauge and rosettes Introduction A strain gauge is a device which is used to measure strain (deformation) on an object subjected to forces. Strain can be measured using various types of devices classified
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραAreas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates
Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath221: HW# 1 solutions
Math: HW# solutions Andy Royston October, 5 7.5.7, 3 rd Ed. We have a n = b n = a = fxdx = xdx =, x cos nxdx = x sin nx n sin nxdx n = cos nx n = n n, x sin nxdx = x cos nx n + cos nxdx n cos n = + sin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSOLVING CUBICS AND QUARTICS BY RADICALS
SOLVING CUBICS AND QUARTICS BY RADICALS The purpose of this handout is to record the classical formulas expressing the roots of degree three and degree four polynomials in terms of radicals. We begin with
Διαβάστε περισσότεραω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ω ω + 1 ω + 2 ω + 3 ω + 4 ω2 ω2 + 1 ω2 + 2 ω2 + 3 ω3 ω3 + 1 ω3 + 2 ω4 ω4 + 1 ω5 ω 2 ω 2 + 1 ω 2 + 2 ω 2 + ω ω 2 + ω + 1 ω 2 + ω2 ω 2 2 ω 2 2 + 1 ω 2 2 + ω ω 2 3 ω 3 ω 3 + 1 ω 3 + ω ω 3 +
Διαβάστε περισσότεραApproximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude
Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude Jan Behrens 2012-12-31 In this paper we shall provide a method to approximate distances between two points on earth
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions
SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES GLMA Linear Mathematics 00- Examination Solutions. (a) i. ( + 5i)( i) = (6 + 5) + (5 )i = + i. Real part is, imaginary part is. (b) ii. + 5i i ( + 5i)( + i) = ( i)( + i)
Διαβάστε περισσότεραC.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions
C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions Paul Liu November 15, 2007 Note that these are sample solutions only; in many cases there were many acceptable answers. 1 Reynolds Problem 10.1 1.1 Normal-order
Διαβάστε περισσότεραRelativistic particle dynamics and deformed symmetry
Relativistic particle dynamics and deformed Poincare symmetry Department for Theoretical Physics, Ivan Franko Lviv National University XXXIII Max Born Symposium, Wroclaw Outline Lorentz-covariant deformed
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEvery set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set May 6, 2008 Abstract A set of first-order formulas, whatever the cardinality of the set of symbols, is equivalent to an independent
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 19/5/2007
Οδηγίες: Να απαντηθούν όλες οι ερωτήσεις. Αν κάπου κάνετε κάποιες υποθέσεις να αναφερθούν στη σχετική ερώτηση. Όλα τα αρχεία που αναφέρονται στα προβλήματα βρίσκονται στον ίδιο φάκελο με το εκτελέσιμο
Διαβάστε περισσότεραStatistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests
Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Shirsendu Mukherjee Department of Statistics, Asutosh College, Kolkata, India. shirsendu st@yahoo.co.in So far we have treated the testing of one-sided
Διαβάστε περισσότερα9.09. # 1. Area inside the oval limaçon r = cos θ. To graph, start with θ = 0 so r = 6. Compute dr
9.9 #. Area inside the oval limaçon r = + cos. To graph, start with = so r =. Compute d = sin. Interesting points are where d vanishes, or at =,,, etc. For these values of we compute r:,,, and the values
Διαβάστε περισσότεραVariational Wavefunction for the Helium Atom
Technische Universität Graz Institut für Festkörperphysik Student project Variational Wavefunction for the Helium Atom Molecular and Solid State Physics 53. submitted on: 3. November 9 by: Markus Krammer
Διαβάστε περισσότεραA Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 67, 3301-3307 A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Equivalence Relation D. K. Basnet Dept. of Mathematics, Assam University Silchar-788011, Assam, India dkbasnet@rediffmail.com
Διαβάστε περισσότεραMath 6 SL Probability Distributions Practice Test Mark Scheme
Math 6 SL Probability Distributions Practice Test Mark Scheme. (a) Note: Award A for vertical line to right of mean, A for shading to right of their vertical line. AA N (b) evidence of recognizing symmetry
Διαβάστε περισσότεραFractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs
Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs Who? Nichole Schimanski When? July 27, 2011 Graphs A graph, G, consists of a vertex set, V (G), and an edge set, E(G). V (G) is any finite set E(G) is
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION FOR AN APPLIED FORCE Revision C
DERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION FOR AN APPLIED FORCE Revision C By Tom Irvine Email: tomirvine@aol.com August 6, 8 Introduction The obective is to derive a Miles equation which gives the overall response
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNon-Abelian Gauge Fields
Chapter 5 Non-Abelian Gauge Fields The simplest example starts with two Fermions Dirac particles) ψ 1, ψ 2, degenerate in mass, and hence satisfying in the absence of interactions γ 1 i + m)ψ 1 = 0, γ
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSecond Order RLC Filters
ECEN 60 Circuits/Electronics Spring 007-0-07 P. Mathys Second Order RLC Filters RLC Lowpass Filter A passive RLC lowpass filter (LPF) circuit is shown in the following schematic. R L C v O (t) Using phasor
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDerivation of Optical-Bloch Equations
Appendix C Derivation of Optical-Bloch Equations In this appendix the optical-bloch equations that give the populations and coherences for an idealized three-level Λ system, Fig. 3. on page 47, will be
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities
PARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities tanθ = sinθ cosθ cotθ = cosθ sinθ BASIC IDENTITIES cscθ = 1 sinθ secθ = 1 cosθ cotθ = 1 tanθ PYTHAGOREAN IDENTITIES sin θ + cos θ =1 tan θ +1= sec θ 1 + cot
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNotes on the Open Economy
Notes on the Open Econom Ben J. Heijdra Universit of Groningen April 24 Introduction In this note we stud the two-countr model of Table.4 in more detail. restated here for convenience. The model is Table.4.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 6/5/2006
Οδηγίες: Να απαντηθούν όλες οι ερωτήσεις. Ολοι οι αριθμοί που αναφέρονται σε όλα τα ερωτήματα είναι μικρότεροι το 1000 εκτός αν ορίζεται διαφορετικά στη διατύπωση του προβλήματος. Διάρκεια: 3,5 ώρες Καλή
Διαβάστε περισσότεραD Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation
D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation MATH 467 Partial Differential Equations J. Robert Buchanan Department of Mathematics Fall 2018 Objectives In this lesson we will learn: a change of variable technique
Διαβάστε περισσότερα상대론적고에너지중이온충돌에서 제트입자와관련된제동복사 박가영 인하대학교 윤진희교수님, 권민정교수님
상대론적고에너지중이온충돌에서 제트입자와관련된제동복사 박가영 인하대학교 윤진희교수님, 권민정교수님 Motivation Bremsstrahlung is a major rocess losing energies while jet articles get through the medium. BUT it should be quite different from low energy
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II
Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II October 18, 2012 1 Review First let us recall the situation. Let g be a simple algebra, with maximal toral subalgebra h (which we are calling a CSA, or Cartan Subalgebra).
Διαβάστε περισσότεραPhys624 Quantization of Scalar Fields II Homework 3. Homework 3 Solutions. 3.1: U(1) symmetry for complex scalar
Homework 3 Solutions 3.1: U(1) symmetry for complex scalar 1 3.: Two complex scalars The Lagrangian for two complex scalar fields is given by, L µ φ 1 µ φ 1 m φ 1φ 1 + µ φ µ φ m φ φ (1) This can be written
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe kinetic and potential energies as T = 1 2. (m i η2 i k(η i+1 η i ) 2 ). (3) The Hooke s law F = Y ξ, (6) with a discrete analog
Lecture 12: Introduction to Analytical Mechanics of Continuous Systems Lagrangian Density for Continuous Systems The kinetic and potential energies as T = 1 2 i η2 i (1 and V = 1 2 i+1 η i 2, i (2 where
Διαβάστε περισσότεραEcon 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1
Eon : Fall 8 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 Email questions or omments to Dan Fetter Problem. Let X be a salar with density f(x, θ) (θx + θ) [ x ] with θ. (a) Find the most powerful level α test
Διαβάστε περισσότεραTridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008
Tridiagonal matrices Gérard MEURANT October, 2008 1 Similarity 2 Cholesy factorizations 3 Eigenvalues 4 Inverse Similarity Let α 1 ω 1 β 1 α 2 ω 2 T =......... β 2 α 1 ω 1 β 1 α and β i ω i, i = 1,...,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018
Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics(JRM) ISSN: 2395-028 SCITECH Volume 3, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION ublished online: March 29, 208 Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics www.scitecresearch.com/journals
Διαβάστε περισσότεραk A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +
Chapter 3. Fuzzy Arithmetic 3- Fuzzy arithmetic: ~Addition(+) and subtraction (-): Let A = [a and B = [b, b in R If x [a and y [b, b than x+y [a +b +b Symbolically,we write A(+)B = [a (+)[b, b = [a +b
Διαβάστε περισσότεραRight Rear Door. Let's now finish the door hinge saga with the right rear door
Right Rear Door Let's now finish the door hinge saga with the right rear door You may have been already guessed my steps, so there is not much to describe in detail. Old upper one file:///c /Documents
Διαβάστε περισσότεραForced Pendulum Numerical approach
Numerical approach UiO April 8, 2014 Physical problem and equation We have a pendulum of length l, with mass m. The pendulum is subject to gravitation as well as both a forcing and linear resistance force.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραb. Use the parametrization from (a) to compute the area of S a as S a ds. Be sure to substitute for ds!
MTH U341 urface Integrals, tokes theorem, the divergence theorem To be turned in Wed., Dec. 1. 1. Let be the sphere of radius a, x 2 + y 2 + z 2 a 2. a. Use spherical coordinates (with ρ a) to parametrize.
Διαβάστε περισσότεραNowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in
Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in : tail in X, head in A nowhere-zero Γ-flow is a Γ-circulation such that
Διαβάστε περισσότεραChapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
Διαβάστε περισσότεραF-TF Sum and Difference angle
F-TF Sum and Difference angle formulas Alignments to Content Standards: F-TF.C.9 Task In this task, you will show how all of the sum and difference angle formulas can be derived from a single formula when
Διαβάστε περισσότεραST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II
ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II 2014/2015: Semester II Tutorial 7 1. Let X be a sample from a population P and consider testing hypotheses H 0 : P = P 0 versus H 1 : P = P 1, where P j is a known
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGeneral 2 2 PT -Symmetric Matrices and Jordan Blocks 1
General 2 2 PT -Symmetric Matrices and Jordan Blocks 1 Qing-hai Wang National University of Singapore Quantum Physics with Non-Hermitian Operators Max-Planck-Institut für Physik komplexer Systeme Dresden,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραGeodesic Equations for the Wormhole Metric
Geodesic Equations for the Wormhole Metric Dr R Herman Physics & Physical Oceanography, UNCW February 14, 2018 The Wormhole Metric Morris and Thorne wormhole metric: [M S Morris, K S Thorne, Wormholes
Διαβάστε περισσότεραCHAPTER 48 APPLICATIONS OF MATRICES AND DETERMINANTS
CHAPTER 48 APPLICATIONS OF MATRICES AND DETERMINANTS EXERCISE 01 Page 545 1. Use matrices to solve: 3x + 4y x + 5y + 7 3x + 4y x + 5y 7 Hence, 3 4 x 0 5 y 7 The inverse of 3 4 5 is: 1 5 4 1 5 4 15 8 3
Διαβάστε περισσότεραSolutions to Exercise Sheet 5
Solutions to Eercise Sheet 5 jacques@ucsd.edu. Let X and Y be random variables with joint pdf f(, y) = 3y( + y) where and y. Determine each of the following probabilities. Solutions. a. P (X ). b. P (X
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals
Lecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals Confidence Intervals θ: an unknown parameter of interest We want to find limits θ and θ such that Gt = P nˆθ θ t If G 1 1 α is known, then P θ θ = P θ θ = 1 α
Διαβάστε περισσότεραBounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees
Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees Thomas F. Kent Andrea Sorbi Università degli Studi di Siena Italia July 18, 2007 Goal: Introduce a form of Σ 0 2-permitting for the enumeration degrees. Till now,
Διαβάστε περισσότεραThe challenges of non-stable predicates
The challenges of non-stable predicates Consider a non-stable predicate Φ encoding, say, a safety property. We want to determine whether Φ holds for our program. The challenges of non-stable predicates
Διαβάστε περισσότεραDESIGN OF MACHINERY SOLUTION MANUAL h in h 4 0.
DESIGN OF MACHINERY SOLUTION MANUAL -7-1! PROBLEM -7 Statement: Design a double-dwell cam to move a follower from to 25 6, dwell for 12, fall 25 and dwell for the remader The total cycle must take 4 sec
Διαβάστε περισσότεραOrbital angular momentum and the spherical harmonics
Orbital angular momentum and the spherical harmonics March 8, 03 Orbital angular momentum We compare our result on representations of rotations with our previous experience of angular momentum, defined
Διαβάστε περισσότεραInverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. ------------------ ----------------------------- -----------------
Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. 1. Sin ( ) = a) b) c) d) Ans b. Solution : Method 1. Ans a: 17 > 1 a) is rejected. w.k.t Sin ( sin ) = d is rejected. If sin
Διαβάστε περισσότεραProblem Set 3: Solutions
CMPSCI 69GG Applied Information Theory Fall 006 Problem Set 3: Solutions. [Cover and Thomas 7.] a Define the following notation, C I p xx; Y max X; Y C I p xx; Ỹ max I X; Ỹ We would like to show that C
Διαβάστε περισσότερα1 Lorentz transformation of the Maxwell equations
1 Lorentz transformation of the Maxwell equations 1.1 The transformations of the fields Now that we have written the Maxwell equations in covariant form, we know exactly how they transform under Lorentz
Διαβάστε περισσότεραLecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic
Lecture 2 Soundness and completeness of propositional logic February 9, 2004 1 Overview Review of natural deduction. Soundness and completeness. Semantics of propositional formulas. Soundness proof. Completeness
Διαβάστε περισσότερα