Lagrangian description of massive higher spin supermultiplets in AdS 3 space

Μέγεθος: px
Εμφάνιση ξεκινά από τη σελίδα:

Download "Lagrangian description of massive higher spin supermultiplets in AdS 3 space"

Transcript

1 Lagrangian description of massive higher spin supermultiplets in AdS 3 space arxiv: v1 [hep-th] 17 May 017 I.L. Buchbinder ab, T.V. Snegirev ac, Yu.M. Zinoviev d a Department of Theoretical Physics, Tomsk State Pedagogical University, Tomsk , Russia b National Research Tomsk State University, Tomsk , Russia c National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University, Tomsk , Russia d Institute for High Energy Physics, of National Research Center Kurchatov Institute Protvino, Moscow Region, 1480, Russia Abstract We construct the Lagrangian formulation of massive higher spin (1,0) supermultiplets in three dimensional anti-de Sitter space. The construction is based on description of the massive three dimensional fields in terms of frame-like gauge invariant formalism and technique of gauge invariant curvatures. For the two possible massive supermultiplets (s,s+1/) and (s,s 1/) we derive explicit form of the supertransformations leaving the sum of bosonic and fermionic Lagrangians invariant. joseph@tspu.edu.ru snegirev@tspu.edu.ru Yurii.Zinoviev@ihep.ru

2 1 Introduction Three dimensional field models attract much attention due to their comparatively simple structure and remarkable properties of three-dimensional flat and curved spaces. One of the achievements in this area is a construction of three-dimensional higher spin field theories (see the pioneer works [1], [], [3], for modern development see e.g. the recent papers [4], [5] and references therein). The aim of this work is to construct the massive higher spin supermultiplets in the threedimensional anti-de Sitter space AdS 3. As is well known [6], the AdS 3 space possesses the special properties since all the AdS 3 superalgebras (as well as conventional AdS 3 algebra itself) factorize into left and right parts. For the case of simplest (1,0) superalgebra (the one we are working here with) such factorization has the form: OSp(1,) Sp() so that we have supersymmetry in the left sector only. It means that the minimal massive supermultiplet must contain just one bosonic and one fermionic degrees of freedom. Recently we constructed such supermultiplets using the unfolded formalism [7]. In this paper we develop the Lagrangian formulation for these supermultiplets. It generalizes the Lagrangian formulation for massive supermultiplets in three dimensional Minkowski space given in [8]. Note here that the off-shell superfield description for the supermultiplets containing topologically massive higher spin fields was constructed recently in [9] 1. We develop the component approach to Lagrangian construction for supersymmetric massive higher spin fields in AdS 3 on the base of gauge invariant formulation of massive higher spin fields. It was shown long enough [11, 1] that massive bosonic (fermionic) spin-s field can be treated as system of massless fields with spins s,s 1,s,...0(1/) coupled by the Stueckelberg symmetries. Later, a frame-like formulation of massive higher spin fields has been developed in the framework of the same approach [13]. It allows us to reformulate the massive higher spin theory in terms of gauge invariant objects (curvatures). In massless four-dimensional higher spin theory such curvatures are very convenient objects and allow, e.g, to built the cubic higher spin interactions [14 17]. However the construction of curvatures proposed in [14 17] is essentially adapted only for theories in four and higher dimensions. Nevertheless the formalism of gauge invariant objects can be successfully applied to massive higher spin fields in three dimensions as well. It was shown that in three dimensions the gauge invariant Lagrangians for massive higher spin fields [18, 19] can be rewritten in explicitly gauge invariant form [0]. In this work we elaborate this formalism for Lagrangian construction of massive higher spin supermultiplets. A general scheme for Lagrangian formulation of massive higher spin supermultiplets looks as follows. Let Ω A,Φ A is a set of fields and R A,F A is a set of curvatures corresponding to frame-like gauge invariant formulation of massive bosonic and fermionic fields respectively. The curvatures have the following structure R A = DΩ A +(eω) A, F A = DΦ A +(eφ) A 1 The off-shell N = massless higher spin superfields and their massive deformations has been elaborated in [10]. List of references on component and superfield formulations of higher spin supersymmetric theories is given in our paper [7]. 1

3 where e e µ αβ is a non-dynamical background AdS 3 frame. Lagrangian both for bosonic and for fermionic massive higher spins are presented as the quadratic forms in curvatures expression [0] L B = R A R A, L F = F A F A (1.1) where L B is a bosonic field Lagrangian and L F is a fermionic one. Note that for massless higher spin fields in three dimensions such form of the Lagrangians is impossible. Then, in order to realize supersymmetry between the bosonic and fermionic massive fields we deform the curvatures by gravitino field Ψ µ α with parameter of supertransformations ζ α. In the case of global supersymmetry we consider gravitino field as a non-dynamical background and parameter of supertransformations as global (i.e. covariantly constant). Such a construction can be interpreted as a supersymmetric theory in terms of background fields of supergravity. Schematically the curvature deformations are written as R A = (ΨΦ) A, F A = (ΨΩ) A and supertransformations have the form δω A (Φζ) A, δφ A (Ωζ) A The restrictions on the form of deformations and supertransformations are imposed by requirement of covariant transformations for deformed curvatures ˆR A = R A + R A δˆr A (Fζ) A, δ ˆF A (Rζ) A Finally the supersymmetric Lagrangian for given supermultiplets is the sum of Lagrangians (1.1) where initial curvatures are replaced by deformed ones R,F ˆR, ˆF. Possible arbitrariness is fixed by the condition that the Lagrangian must be invariant under the supertransformations: δ ˆL = [ˆR A δˆr A + ˆF A δ ˆF A ] = R A (Fζ) A = 0 Aim of the current paper is to demonstrate how such a general scheme can actually be realized for supermultiplets in AdS 3. The paper is organized as follows. First of all we fix the notations and conventions. In section, following the above scheme we consider as an example, the detailed Lagrangian construction of massive supermultiplet (, 3 ). Such an example illustrates all the key points of the construction. The next sections are devoted to generalizations of these results for arbitrary massive supermultiplets. In section 3 we consider the gauge invariant formulation of massive fields with spin s andspin s+ 1 which will be used for supersymmetric constructions. In particular, we write out all field variables and gauge-invariant curvatures and consider the Lagrangian in terms of these curvatures. Further, following the above general scheme, we study two massive higher spinsupermultiplets. Supermultiplets (s,s+ 1 ) isstudied insection 4 and (s,s+ 1 ) is studied in section 5. In conclusion we summaries and discuss the results obtained. For completeness, we include in the paper two appendices devoted to frame-like description of massless fields in three dimensions. Appendix A contains the bosonic fields, Appendix B contains the fermionic ones.

4 Notations and conventions. We use a frame-like multispinor formalism where all the objects (3,,1,0-forms) have totally symmetric local spinor indices. To simplify the expressions we will use the condensed notations for the spinor indices such that e.g. Ω α(k) = Ω (α 1α...α k ) Also we will always assume that spinor indices denoted by the same letters and placed on the same level are symmetrized, e.g. Ω α(k) ζ α = Ω (α 1...α k ζ α k+1) AdS 3 space will be described by the background frame (one-form) e α() and the covariant derivative D normalized so that D Dζ α = λ E α βζ β Basis elements of 1,,3-form spaces are respectively e α(), E α(), E where the last two are defined as double and triple wedge product of e α() : e αα e ββ = ε αβ E αβ, E αα e ββ = ε αβ ε αβ E. Also we write some useful relations for these basis elements E α γ e γβ = 3ε αβ E, e α γ e γβ = 4E αβ. Further on the sign of wedge product will be omitted. Massive supermultiplet (, 3 ) example In this section we consider in details the Lagrangian realization for massive supermultiplet (, 3/) example using the method mentioned above in the introduction. We start with the gauge-invariant formulations of free massive fields with spin and spin 3/ separately. Using such formulations, we present the full set of gauge-invariant curvatures for them. Then we consider the deformations of these curvatures by background gravitino field Ψ α and find suitable supertransformations. As a result we construct the supersymmetric Lagrangian..1 Free fields Spin In gauge invariant form the massive spin- field is described by system of massless fields with spins,1,0. In frame-like approach the corresponding set of fields consists of (Ω α(),f α() ), (B α(),a) and (π α(),ϕ) (see Appendix A for details). Lagrangian for free massive field in AdS 3 have the form [18] L = Ω αβ e β γω αγ +Ω α() Df α() +EB α() B α() e α() B α() DA Eπ α() π α() +E α() π α() Dϕ +me α() Ω α() A+mf αβ E β γb αγ +4 me α() π α() A + M 4 f αβe β γf αγ m me α() f α() ϕ+ 3 m Eϕϕ (.1) 3

5 It is invariant under the following gauge transformations δω α() = Dη α() + M 4 eα βξ αβ δf α() = Dξ α() +e α βη αβ me α() ξ δb α() = mη α() δa = Dξ m 4 e α()ξ α() δπ α() = m mξ α() δϕ = 4 mξ (.) where m is the mass parameter and m = M, M = m +λ The curvatures invariant under gauge transformations (.) have the form R α() = DΩ α() + M 4 eα βf αβ m E α βb αβ m me α() ϕ T α() = Df α() +e α βω αβ me α() A B α() = DB α() Ω α() + M 4 eα βπ αβ A = DA m 4 e α()f α() +me α() B α() Π α() = Dπ α() f α() +e α βb αβ + m M eα() ϕ Φ = Dϕ+4 ma+mme α() π α() (.3) Here we have changed a normalization for the two zero forms B α() mb α() π α() mmπ α() (.4) It is interesting to point out that, unlike massless theory in three dimensions, the Lagrangian for massive spin (.1) can be presented in manifestly gauge invariant form L = 1 R α()π α() 1 T α()b α() m 4 m e α()b α() Φ (.5) Spin- 3 In gauge invariant formulation, the massive spin-3/ field is described by system of massless fields with the spins 3/, 1/. In frame-like approach the corresponding set of fields consists of Φ α, φ α. (see Appendix B for details). The free Lagrangian for mass m 1 field in AdS 3 has the following form L = i Φ αdφ α + i φ αe α βdφ β i M 1 Φ αe α βφ β im 1 Φ α E α βφ β i 3M 1 Eφ αφ α (.6) 4

6 It is invariant under gauge transformations where δφ α = Dξ α +M 1 e α βξ β δφ α = m 1 ξ α (.7) M 1 = m 1 + λ 4 One can construct the gauge invariant curvatures with respect (.7). After change of normalization φ α m 1 φ α they look like F α = DΦ α +M 1 e α βφ β 4m 1 E α βφ β C α = Dφ α Φ α +M 1 e α βφ β (.8) As in the previous spin- case, one notes that Lagrangian (.6) can be rewritten in terms of curvatures (.8) L = i F αc α (.9) The above results onspin- andspin- 3 fields arebuilding blocks forsupersymmetrization. Full set of gauge invariant curvatures contains (.3) and (.8) respectively. Corresponding expressions for Lagrangians in terms of curvatures are (.5) and (.9).. Supersymmetric system Before we turn to Lagrangian formulation for massive supermultiplet (, 3/) let us consider this supermultiplet in massless flat limit. That is we consider the sum of Lagrangians (.3) and (.6) in the limit m,m 1,λ 0. It has the form ˆL = Ω αβ e β γω αγ +Ω α() Df α() +EB αβ B αβ B αβ e αβ DA Eπ αβ π αβ +π αβ E αβ Dϕ i Φ αdφ α + 1 φ αe α βdφ β (.10) Such a Lagrangiandescribes thesystem offree massless fields with spins,3/,1,1/,0. One can show there exist global supertransformations that leave the Lagrangian (.10) invariant. These supertransformations with the redefinition (.4) have form δf α() = iβ 1 Φ α ζ α δa = iα 0 Φ α ζ α im 1 β 0 e αβ φ α ζ β δϕ = im 1 δ0 φ γ ζ γ δφ α = β 1 Ω αβ ζ β mα 0 e β() B β() ζ α δφ α = 4mβ 0 m 1 B αβ ζ β + mm δ 0 m 1 π αβ ζ β (.11) The parameters β 1,β 0,α 0, δ 0 are arbitrary but, as it will be seen later, they are fixed in massive case. The choice of such notations for them will be clear from in next section for 5

7 arbitrary higher spin supermultiplets. To prove the invariance we need to use the Lagrangian equations of motion for auxiliary fields π α(),b α() corresponding to spins 0 and 1 E α βdb βγ = E γ βdb βα, E α γdπ βγ = 1 εαβ E γδ Dπ γδ (.1) Thus, we see that in the massless flat limit the Lagrangian formulation of pure massive supermultiplets (, 3 ) we must get the supertransformations (.11). This requirement will provide us the unique possibility for construction of the correct supersymmetric massive theory. Deformation of curvatures Now we are ready to realize the massive supermultiplets. We do it deforming curvatures by background gravitino field Ψ α with global transformation in AdS 3 δψ α = Dζ α + λ eα βζ β (.13) The main idea is to deform the curvatures so that they transform covariantly through themselves. It means that for all the deformed curvatures ˆR A = R A + R A the following relations should take place δˆr A = δ ζ R A +δ 0 R A = (Rζ) A (.14) where δ 0 is the transformation (.13) and δ ζ is the linear supertransformation. Let us consider the following ansatz for deformation of spin- curvatures R α() = iρ 1 Φ α Ψ α iˆρ 0 e α() φ γ Ψ γ B α() = iˆρ 1 φ α Ψ α T α() = iβ 1 Φ α Ψ α A = iα 0 Φ γ Ψ γ im 1 β 0 e αβ φ α Ψ β Π α() = iˆβ 1 φ α Ψ α Φ = im 1 δ0 φ γ Ψ γ (.15) Also one introduces the corresponding supertransformations δω α() = iρ 1 Φ α ζ α iˆρ 0 e α() φ γ ζ γ δb α() = iˆρ 1 φ α ζ α δf α() = iβ 1 Φ α ζ α δa = iα 0 Φ γ ζ γ im 1 β 0 e αβ φ α ζ β δπ α() = iˆβ 1 φ α ζ α δϕ = im 1 δ0 φ γ ζ γ (.16) The form of the supertransformations is completely determined by the form of deformations for curvatures. Besides β 1,β 0,α 0, δ 0 parameters which remain arbitrary from the massless case, we have new arbitrary parameters ρ 1, ˆρ 1, ˆρ 0, ˆβ 1. All the parameters will be fixed by requirement of covariant homogeneous curvature transformation (.14). In addition there are two mass parameters M,M 1 an we will see that one is related to another. 6

8 Let us check the requirement (.14) for curvatures R α(),t α(). One one hand δ ˆR α() = iρ 1 DΦ α ζ α +iˆρ 0 e α() Dφ β ζ β +i M β 1e α() Φ β ζ β +i( M β 1 1 λρ 1)e α γφ α ζ γ +i( m ˆρ 1 1 λˆρ mmm 1 δ 0 )E α γφ α ζ γ +i( m ˆρ 1 1 λˆρ 0 1 mmm 1 δ 0 )E α γφ γ ζ α δˆt α() = iβ 1 DΦ α ζ α +i( mα 0 +ρ 1 )e α() Φ β ζ β +i(ρ 1 1 λβ 1)e α γφ α ζ γ and on the other hand +i( 4mm 1 β 0 4ˆρ 0 )E α γφ α ζ γ +i( 4mm 1 β 0 +4ˆρ 0 )E α γφ γ ζ α δ ˆR α() = iρ 1 F α ζ α iˆρ 0 e α() C β ζ β = iρ 1 DΦ α ζ α +iˆρ 0 e α() Dφ β ζ β +i(ˆρ 0 +M 1 ρ 1 )e α() Φ β ζ β +i(m 1 ρ 1 )e α γφ α ζ γ im 1ˆρ 0 E α γφ α ζ γ +i( M 1ˆρ 0 4m 1 ρ 1 )E α γφ γ ζ α δˆt α() = iβ 1 F α ζ α = iβ 1 DΦ α ζ α +i(m 1 β 1 )e α() Φ β ζ β +i(m 1 β 1 )e α γφ α ζ γ i4m 1 β 1 E α γφ γ ζ α (.17) Comparing the above relations, we obtain the solution M 1 = M λ, ρ 1 = M β 1, ˆρ 0 = δ 0 = 4β 0 = m 1 m β 1 For curvatures B α(),π α() we have on one hand δ ˆB α() = iˆρ 1 Dφ α ζ α iρ 1 Φ α ζ α M(M λ) (M λ) β 1, α 0 = m β 1 +i( ˆρ 0 + M ˆβ 1 )e α() φ β ζ β +i( M ˆβ 1 1 λˆρ 1)e α γφ α ζ γ δˆπ α() = iˆβ 1 Dφ α ζ α iβ 1 Φ α ζ α and on the other hand +i( mm 1 δ 0 M +ˆρ 1)e α() φ β ζ β +i(ˆρ 1 1 λˆβ 1 )e α γφ α ζ γ δ ˆB α() = iˆρ 1 C α ζ α = iˆρ 1 Dφ α ζ α iˆρ 1 Φ α ζ α +i(m 1ˆρ 1 )e α() φ β ζ β +i(m 1ˆρ 1 )e α γφ α ζ γ δˆπ α() = iˆβ 1 C α ζ α = iˆβ 1 Dφ α ζ α iˆβ 1 Φ α ζ α +i(m 1ˆβ1 )e α() φ β ζ β +i(m 1ˆβ1 )e α γφ α ζ γ (.18) Comparison of above relations yield ˆβ 1 = β 1, ˆρ 1 = ρ 1 7

9 The transformation laws for curvatures A and Φ look like δâ = iα 0F α ζ α +im 1 β 0 e αβ C α ζ β, δˆφ = im 1 δ0 C γ ζ γ (.19) Now we consider ansatz for deformation of spin-3/ curvatures F α = β 1 Ω αβ Ψ β mα 0 e γ() B γ() Ψ α +δ 0 f αβ Ψ β +γ 0 AΨ α γ 0 e αβ ϕψ β C α = 4mβ 0 m 1 B αβ Ψ β mm δ 0 m 1 π αβ Ψ β ρ 0 ϕψ α One introduces the corresponding supertransformations δφ α = β 1 Ω αβ ζ β mα 0 e γ() B γ() ζ α +δ 0 f αβ ζ β +γ 0 Aζ α γ 0 e αβ ϕζ β δφ α = 4mβ 0 m 1 B αβ ζ β + mm δ 0 m 1 π αβ ζ β +ρ 0 ϕζ α (.0) Let us require the conditions (.14). The we have on one hand δ ˆF α = β 1 DΩ αβ ζ β +mα 0 e β() DB β() ζ α +δ 0 Df αβ ζ β +γ 0 DAζ α + γ 0 Dϕe α βζ β +( λβ 1 M 1 β 1 )e γ() Ω αγ ζ γ +(M 1 β 1 )e γ() Ω γ() ζ α +( 1 λδ 0 M 1 δ 0 )e γ() f αγ ζ γ +(M 1 δ 0 )e γ() f γ() ζ α +(M 1 γ 0 1 λγ 0)e α γaζ γ +( 4mM 1 α 0 16mm 1 β 0 +mλα 0 )E α γb γβ ζ β +(4mM 1 α 0 mλα 0 )E γ() B αγ ζ γ mmm 1 δ0 E α γπ γβ ζ β +(4M 1 γ 0 4m 1 ρ 0 +λ γ 0 )E α γϕζ γ δĉα = 4mβ 0 m 1 DB αβ ζ β + mm δ 0 m 1 Dπ αβ ζ β +ρ 0 Dϕζ α β 1 Ω αβ ζ β δ 0 f αβ ζ β γ 0 Aζ α and on the other hand +( mβ 0 λ 4mM 1β 0 )e γ() B αγ ζ γ +(mα 0 + 4mM 1β 0 )e γ() B γ() ζ α m 1 m 1 +( mm δ 0 λ mmm 1 δ 0 )e γ() π αγ ζ γ 4m 1 m 1 m 1 +( mmm 1 δ 0 )e γ() π γ() ζ α +( γ 0 +M 1 ρ 0 1 m 1 λρ 0)e α γϕζ γ δ ˆF α = β 1 R αβ ζ β +mα 0 e β() B β() ζ α +δ 0 T αβ ζ β +γ 0 Aζ α + γ 0 Φe α βζ β = β 1 DΩ αβ ζ β +mα 0 e β() DB β() ζ α +δ 0 Df αβ ζ β +γ 0 DAζ α + γ 0 Dϕe α βζ β δ 0 e γ() Ω αγ ζ γ +( mα 0 +δ 0 )e γ() Ω γ() ζ α M β 1 e γ() f αγ ζ γ +( 1 4 mγ 0 + M β 1)e γ() f γ() ζ α +(mδ 0 4M γ 0 )e α γaζ γ +( m β 1 +mγ 0 )E α γb γβ ζ β +(m β 1 +mγ 0 )E γ() B αγ ζ γ +( mm γ 0 +4mM α 0 )E α γπ γβ ζ β +(mm γ 0 +4mM α 0 )E γ() π αγ ζ γ +mmβ 1 E α γϕζ γ (.1) 8

10 δĉα = 4mβ 0 m 1 B αβ ζ β + mm δ 0 m 1 Π αβ ζ β +ρ 0 Φζ α = 4mβ 0 m 1 DB αβ ζ β + mm δ 0 m 1 Dπ αβ ζ β +ρ 0 Dϕζ α 4mβ 0 m 1 Ω αβ ζ β mm δ 0 m 1 f αβ ζ β +4Mρ 0 Aζ α mm δ 0 m 1 e γ() B αγ ζ γ + mm δ 0 m 1 e γ() B γ() ζ α mm β 0 m 1 c 0 e γ() π αγ ζ γ +(mmρ 0 + mm β 0 m 1 )e γ() π γ() ζ α m M δ 0 4m 1 M eα γϕζ γ (.) Comparison of the above relations gives us at M 1 = M λ δ 0 = Mβ 1, γ 0 = γ 0 = M(M λ) (M λ) β 1, ρ 0 = m m β 1 Thus imposing the condition of the covariant curvature transformations (.14) we fix the supersymmetric deformations up to common parameter β 1 and relation between mass M 1 = M λ. The law of supersymmetry transformations is given by (.16),(.0). The obtained result is in agreement with our recent work [7] where we studied the analogous supermultiplets (, 3/) in unfolded formulation. Invariant Lagrangian Now we turn to construction of supersymmetric Lagrangian corresponding to supermultiplets (, ). Actually in terms of curvatures it presents a sum of Lagrangians for spin (.5) 3 and spin 3/ (.9), where the initial curvatures are replaced by deformed ones R ˆR ˆL = 1 ˆR α()ˆπα() 1 ˆT α() ˆBα() m 4 m e α() ˆB α()ˆφ+ i ˆF α Ĉ α Using the knowing supertransformations for curvatures (.17),(.18),(.19),(.1),(.) it is not very difficult to check the invariance of the Lagrangian. Indeed δ ˆL = i(ρ 1 mm 4m 1 δ0 )F α ζ α Π α() i(ˆβ 1 β 1 )R α() C α ζ α i(β 1 m m 1 β 0 )F α ζ α B α() i(ˆρ 1 1 δ 0)T α() C α ζ α i( mm 1 4 m δ 0 +mα 0 )e α() ˆBα() C γ ζ γ i (m mˆρ 1 + γ 0 )e α() C α ζ α Φ iγ 0 Aζα C α + iρ 0 ˆF α Φζ α + 1 iˆρ 0e α() C β Π α() ζ β Taking into account the equations of equation for fields B α(),π α() which are equivalent to the following relations we see that the variation δ ˆL vanishes. Φ = 0, A = 0 e γ() Π γ() = DΦ 4MA = 0 9

11 3 Free massive higher spin fields For completeness in this section we discuss the gauge invariant formulation of free massive bosonic and fermionic higher spin fields in AdS 3 [18,19]. Besides, we present the gauge invariant curvatures, the Lagrangians in explicit component form and the Lagrangians in terms of curvatures for bosonic spin s and fermionic spin s+1/ fields. 3.1 Bosonic spin-s field In gauge invariant form the massive spin s field is described by system of massless fields with spins s,(s 1),...,0. In frame-like approach the corresponding set of fields consists of (7) (Ω α(k),f α(k) ) 1 k (s 1), (B α(),a), (π α(),ϕ) Free Lagrangian for the fields with mass m in AdS 3 have the form L = s 1 ( 1) k+1 [kω α(k 1)β e β γω α(k 1)γ +Ω α(k) Df α(k) ] k=1 +EB αβ B αβ B αβ e αβ DA Eπ αβ π αβ +π αβ E αβ Dϕ s + ( 1) k+1 (k +) a k [ Ω α()β(k) e α() f β(k) +Ω α(k) e β() f α(k)β() ] k k=1 +a 0 Ω α() e α() A a 0 f αβ E β γb αγ +smπ αβ E αβ A s 1 + ( 1) k+1 b k f α(k 1)β e β γf α(k 1)γ +b 0 f α() E α() ϕ+ 3a 0 Eϕ (3.1) k=1 where a k = k(s+k +1)(s k 1) (k +1)(k +)(k+3) [M (k +1) λ ] a 0 = (s+1)(s 1) [M λ ] 3 b k = s M 4k(k +1), b 0 = sma 0, M = m +(s 1) λ 10

12 It is invariant under the following gauge transformations δω α(k) = Dη α(k) + (k +)a k e β() η α(k)β() k + a k 1 k(k 1) eα() η α(k ) + b k k eα βξ α(k 1)β δf α(k) = Dξ α(k) +e α βη α(k 1)β +a k e β() ξ α(k)β() + (k +1)a k 1 k(k 1)(k 1) eα() ξ α(k ) δω α() = Dη α() +3a 1 e β() η α()β() +b 1 e α γξ αγ (3.) δf α() = Dξ α() +e α γη αγ +a 1 e β() ξ α()β() +a 0 e α() ξ δb α() = a 0 η α(), δa = Dξ + a 0 4 e α()ξ α() δπ α() = Msa 0 ξ α(), δϕ = Msξ One can construct the curvatures invariant under these gauge transformation. After change of normalization the curvatures look like B α() a 0 B α(r) π α() b 0 π α() (3.3) R α(k) = DΩ α(k) + (k +)a k e β() Ω α(k)β() k + a k 1 k(k 1) eα() Ω α(k ) + b k k eα βf α(k 1)β T α(k) = Df α(k) +e α βω α(k 1)β +a k e β() f α(k)β() + (k +1)a k 1 k(k 1)(k 1) eα() f α(k ) R α() = DΩ α() +3a 1 e β() Ω α()β() +b 1 e α γf αγ a 0 E α βb αβ +b 0 E α() ϕ (3.4) T α() = Df α() +e α γω αγ +a 1 e β() f α()β() +a 0 e α() A B α() = DB α() Ω α() +b 1 e α βπ αβ +3a 1 e β() B α()β() A = DA+ a 0 4 e α()f α() a 0 E γ() B γ() Π α() = Dπ α() f α() +e α βb αβ a 0 sm eα() ϕ+a 1 e β() π α()β() Φ = Dϕ+MsA b 0 e α() π α() B α(k) = DB α(k) Ω α(k) + b k k eα βπ α(k 1)β + a k 1 k(k 1) eα() B α(k ) + (k +) a k e β() B α(k)β() k Π α(k) = Dπ α(k) f α(k) +e α βb α(k 1)β + (k +1)a k 1 k(k 1)(k 1) eα() π α(k ) +a k e β() π α(k)β() (3.5) 11

13 In comparison with massive spin case, the construction of curvatures for higher spins has some peculiarities. Namely, in order to achieve gauge invariance for all curvatures we should introduce the so called extra fields B α(k),π α(k), k s 1 with the following gauge transformations δb α(k) = η α(k) δπ α(k) = ξ α(k) As we already pointed out above, in three dimensions it is possible to write Lagrangian in terms of the curvatures only. In case of arbitrary integer spin field, the corresponding Lagrangian (3.1) can be rewritten in the form L = 1 s 1 ( 1) k+1 [R α(k) Π α(k) +T α(k) B α(k) ]+ a 0 sm e α()b α() Φ (3.6) k=1 3. Fermionic spin-(s+ 1 ) field In gauge invariant form the massive spin (s+1/) field is described by system of massless fields with spins (s+1/),(s 1/),...,1/. In frame-like approach the corresponding set of fields consists of (8) Φ α(k+1) 0 k (s 1), φ α Free Lagrangian for fields with mass m 1 in AdS 3 looks like s 1 1 i L = ( 1) k+1 [ 1 Φ α(k+1)dφ α(k+1) ]+ 1 φ αe α βdφ β k=0 s 1 + ( 1) k+1 c k Φ α(k 1)β() e β() Φ α(k 1) +c 0 Φ α E α βφ β k=1 s 1 + k=0 ( 1) k+1d k Φ α(k)βe β γφ α(k)γ 3d 0 Eφ αφ α (3.7) where c k = (s+k +1)(s k) (k +1)(k+1) [M 1 (k +1) λ 4 ] c 0 = s(s+1)[m 1 λ 4 ] d k = (s+1) (k +3) M 1, M 1 = m 1 +(s 1 ) λ The Lagrangian is invariant under the gauge transformations δφ α(k+1) = Dξ α(k+1) + c k d k (k +1) eα βξ α(k)β + k(k+1) eα() ξ α(k 1) +c k+1 e β() ξ α(k+1)β() (3.8) δφ α = c 0 ξ α 1

14 Let us construct gauge invariant curvatures with respect (3.8). After change of normalization φ α c 0 φ α the curvatures have form F α(k+1) = DΦ α(k+1) d k + (k +1) eα βφ α(k)β c k + k(k+1) eα() Φ α(k 1) +c k+1 e β() Φ α(k+1)β() F α = DΦ α +d 0 e α βφ β +c 1 e β() Φ αβ() c 0 E α βφ β C α = Dφ α Φ α +d 0 e α βφ β +c 1 e β() φ αβ() C α(k+1) = Dφ α(k+1) Φ α(k+1) + c k d k (k +1) eα βφ α(k)β + k(k+1) eα() φ α(k 1) +c k+1 e β() φ α(k+1)β() (3.9) As in the case of integer spins in order to achieve gauge invariance for all curvatures we should introduce the set of extra fields φ α(k+1), 1 k (s 1) with the following gauge transformation δφ α(k+1) = ξ α(k+1) Finally the Lagrangian (3.7) can be rewritten in terms of curvatures only as follows L = i s ( 1) k+1 F α(k+1) C α(k+1) (3.10) k=0 In section 5 we will need the description of massive spin-(s 1/) field. It can be obtained from the above description by replacement s (s 1). So we have considered the free massive fields with spins s and spins s+ 1. Also, we have formulated the gauge invariant curvatures (3.4), (3.5), (3.9) and gauge invariant Lagrangians (3.6), (3.10). In the next sections we will study a supersymmetrization of these results and construct the Lagrangian description of the supermultiplets (s,s+ 1) (s,s 1). 4 Massive supermultiplet (s,s+ 1 ) In this section we consider the massive higher spin supermultiplets when the highest spin is fermion. For these supermultiplets we construct the deformation of the curvatures, find the supertransformations and present the supersymmetric Lagrangian. Massless flat limit Before we turn to realization of given massive supermultiplets let us consider their structure at massless flat limit m,m 1,λ 0. In this case the Lagrangian will be described by the system of massless fields with spins (s+ 1),s,..., 1,0 in three dimensional flat space L = s 1 ( 1) k+1 [kω α(k 1)β e β γω α(k 1)γ +Ω α(k) Df α(k) ] k=1 +EB αβ B αβ B αβ e αβ DA Eπ αβ π αβ +π αβ E αβ Dϕ + i s 1 ( 1) k+1 Φ α(k+1) DΦ α(k+1) + 1 φ αe α βdφ β (4.1) k=0 13

15 One can show that this Lagrangian is supersymmetric. Indeed, if the equations of motion (.1) are fulfilled, the Lagrangian is invariant under the following supertransformations δf α(k) = iβ k Φ α(k 1) ζ α +iα k Φ α(k)β ζ β δf α() = iβ 1 Φ α ζ α +iα 1 Φ α()β ζ β δa = iα 0 Φ α ζ α +ic 0 β 0 e αβ φ α ζ β, δϕ = ic 0 δ 0 φγ ζ γ δφ α(k+1) α k = (k +1) Ωα(k) ζ α +(k +1)β k+1 Ω α(k+1)β ζ β δφ α = β 1 Ω αβ ζ β +a 0 α 0 e β() B β() ζ α δφ α = 8a 0β 0 c 0 B αβ ζ β + b 0 δ 0 c 0 π αβ ζ β Here we take into account the normalization (3.3). Thus, requiring that massive theory has a correct massless flat limit we partially fix an arbitrariness in the choice of the supertransformations. Parameters α k,β k,β 0,α 0, δ 0 at this step are still arbitrary. Deformation of curvatures Again we will realize supersymmetry deforming the curvatures by the background gravitino field Ψ α. We start with the construction of the deformations for bosonic fields R α(k) = iρ k Φ α(k 1) Ψ α +iσ k Φ α(k)β Ψ β T α(k) = iβ k Φ α(k 1) Ψ α +iα k Φ α(k)β Ψ β R α() = iρ 1 Φ α Ψ α +iσ 1 Φ α()β Ψ β +iˆρ 0 e α() φ β Ψ β T α() = iβ 1 Φ α Ψ α +iα 1 Φ α()β Ψ β A = iα 0 Φ α Ψ α +ic 0 β 0 e α() φ α Ψ β, Φ = ic 0 δ 0 φα Ψ α B α(k) = iˆρ k φ α(k 1) Ψ α iˆσ k φ α(k)β Ψ β Π α(k) = iˆβ k φ α(k 1) Ψ α iˆα k φ α(k)β Ψ β Corresponding ansatz for supertransformations has the form δω α(k) = iρ k Φ α(k 1) ζ α +iσ k Φ α(k)β ζ β δf α(k) = iβ k Φ α(k 1) ζ α +iα k Φ α(k)β ζ β δω α() = iρ 1 Φ α ζ α +iσ 1 Φ α()β ζ β +iˆρ 0 e α() φ β ζ β δf α() = iβ 1 Φ α ζ α +iα 1 Φ α()β ζ β δa = iα 0 Φ α ζ α +ic 0 β 0 e α() φ α ζ β, δϕ = ic 0 δ 0 φγ ζ γ δb α(k) = iˆρ k φ α(k 1) ζ α +iˆσ k φ α(k)β ζ β δπ α(k) = iˆβ k φ α(k 1) ζ α +iˆα k φ α(k)β ζ β All parameters will be fixed from requirement of covariant transformations of the curvatures (.14). First of all we consider δ ˆR α(k) = iρ k F α(k 1) ζ α +iσ k F α(k)β ζ β δˆt α(k) = iβ k F α(k 1) ζ α +iα k F α(k)β ζ β (4.) 14

16 It leads to relation M 1 = M + λ between mass parameters M 1 and M and defines the parameters α k β k σ k ρ k = k(s+k +1)[M +(k +1)λ]ˆα (k +1)(s k) = [M kλ]ˆβ k(k +1) (s+k +1) = [M +(k +1)λ]ˆσ k(k +1) (s k) = k 3 (k +1)(k+1) [M kλ]ˆρ (4.3) where From the requirement that ˆβ = ˆα, ˆρ = sm ˆα, ˆσ = sm ˆα δ ˆB α(k) = iˆρ k C α(k 1) ζ α +iˆσ k C α(k)β ζ β δˆπ α(k) = iˆβ k C α(k 1) ζ α +iˆα k C α(k)β ζ β (4.4) one gets ˆρ k = ρ k, ˆσ k = σ k, ˆβk = β k, ˆα k = α k Requirement of covariant transformations for the other curvatures δ ˆR α() = iρ 1 F α ζ α +iσ 1 F α()β ζ β iˆρ 0 e α() C β ζ β δˆt α() = iβ 1 F α ζ α +iα 1 F α()β ζ β gives the solution δâ = iα 0F α ζ α ic 0 β 0 e αβ C α ζ β, δˆφ = ic 0 δ 0 Cγ ζ γ (4.5) ˆρ 0 = 1 8 c 0 β 1, δ0 = 4β 0 = c 0 β 1, α 0 = c 0 β 1 a 0 4sMa 0 Now let us consider the deformation of curvatures for fermion. We choose ansatz in the form F α(k+1) = α k (k +1) Ωα(k) Ψ α +(k+1)β k+1 Ω α(k+1)β Ψ β +γ k f α(k) Ψ α +δ k f α(k+1)β Ψ β F α = β 1 Ω αβ Ψ β +a 0 α 0 e β() B β() Ψ α +δ 0 f αβ Ψ β +γ 0 AΨ α + γ 0 ϕe α βψ β C α = 8a 0β 0 c 0 B αβ Ψ β b 0 δ 0 c 0 π αβ Ψ β ρ 0 ϕψ α C α(k+1) = β k B α(k+1)β Ψ β α k B α(k) Ψ α δ k π α(k+1)β Ψ β γ k π α(k) Ψ α 15

17 and ansatz for supertransformations in the form δφ α(k+1) = α k (k +1) Ωα(k) ζ α +(k +1)β k+1 Ω α(k+1)β ζ β +γ k f α(k) ζ α +δ k f α(k+1)β ζ β δφ α = β 1 Ω αβ ζ β +a 0 α 0 e β() B β() ζ α +δ 0 f αβ ζ β +γ 0 Aζ α + γ 0 ϕe α βζ β δφ α = 8a 0β 0 c 0 B αβ ζ β + b 0 δ 0 c 0 π αβ ζ β +ρ 0 ϕζ α δφ α(k+1) = β k B α(k+1)β ζ β + α k B α(k) ζ α + δ k π α(k+1)β ζ β + γ k π α(k) ζ α From the requirement that δ ˆF α(k+1) = α k (k +1) Rα(k) ζ α +(k +1)β k+1 R α(k+1)β ζ β +γ k T α(k) ζ α +δ k T α(k+1)β ζ β (4.6) we have the same relation between masses M 1 = M + λ. Besides, it leads to γ k δ k = = (s+k +1) k(k +1) (k+1) [M +(k +1)λ]ˆγ (s k 1) [M (k +1)λ]ˆδ (k +1)(k +)(k +3) where Requirement ˆγ = sm ˆα, ˆδ = sm ˆα gives us δĉα(k+1) = β k B α(k+1)β ζ β + α k B α(k) ζ α + δ k Π α(k+1)β ζ β + γ k Π α(k) ζ α (4.7) γ k = γ k, δk = δ k, α k = At last, requirement for the other curvatures yields solution α k (k +1), βk = (k +1)β k+1 δ ˆF α = β 1 R αβ ζ β a 0 α 0 e β() B β() ζ α +δ 0 T αβ ζ β +γ 0 Aζ α + γ 0 Φe α βζ β δĉα = 8a 0β 0 c 0 B αβ ζ β + b 0 δ 0 c 0 Π αβ ζ β +ρ 0 Φζ α (4.8) Now, all the arbitrary parameters are fixed. γ 0 = γ 0 = c 0 β 1, ρ 0 = c 0 β 1 a 0 4sMa 0 16

18 Supersymmetric Lagrangian is the sum of free Lagrangians where the initial curvatures are replacement by deformed ones ˆL = 1 s 1 k=1 s 1 ( 1) k+1 [ ˆR α(k)ˆπα(k) + ˆT α(k) ˆBα(k) ]+ a 0 sm e α() ˆB α()ˆφ i ( 1) k+1 ˆFα(k+1) Ĉ α(k+1) (4.9) k=0 The Lagrangian is invariant under the supertransformations (4.),(4.4),(4.5),(4.6),(4.7),(4.8) up to equations of motion for the fields B α(),π α() Φ = 0, A = 0 e γ() Π γ() = DΦ sma = 0 (4.10) The Lagrangian (4.9) is a final solution for the massive supermultiplet (s,s+ 1 ). 5 Massive supermultiplet (s,s 1 ) In this section we consider another massive higher spin supermultiplet when the highest spin is boson. The massive spin-s field was described in section 3.1 in terms of massless fields. The massive spin-(s 1/) field can be obtained for the results in section 3. if one makes the replacement s (s 1). So the set of massless fields for the massive field with spin s 1/ is Φ α(k+1), 0 k s and φ α. The gauge invariant curvatures and the Lagrangian have the forms (3.8) and (3.10) where the parameters are c k = (s+k)(s k 1) (k +1)(k +1) [M 1 (k +1) λ 4 ] c 0 = s(s 1)[M 1 λ 4 ] (5.1) d k = (s 1) (k +3) M 1, M 1 = m 1 +(s 1 ) λ Following our procedure we should construct the supersymmetric deformations for curvatures. Actually the structure of deformed curvatures and supertransformations have the same form as in previous section for supermultiplets (s,s+1/). There is a difference only in parameters (5.1). Therefore we present here only the supertransformations for curvatures. Requirement (.14) for bosonic fields δ ˆR α(k) = iρ k F α(k 1) ζ α +iσ k F α(k)β ζ β δˆt α(k) = iβ k F α(k 1) ζ α +iα k F α(k)β ζ β δ ˆR α() = iρ 1 F α ζ α +iσ 1 F α()β ζ β iˆρ 0 e α() C β ζ β δˆt α() = iβ 1 F α ζ α +iα 1 F α()β ζ β δâ = iα 0F α ζ α ic 0 β 0 e αβ C α ζ β, δˆφ = ic 0 δ 0 Cγ ζ γ δ ˆB α(k) = iˆρ k C α(k 1) ζ α +iˆσ k C α(k)β ζ β δˆπ α(k) = iˆβ k C α(k 1) ζ α +iˆα k C α(k)β ζ β 17

19 gives us the relation M 1 = M λ between masses M 1 and M. Besides, it leads to σ k ρ k α k β k (s k 1) = [M (k +1)λ]ˆσ k(k +1) (s+k) = [M k 3 +kλ]ˆρ (k +1)(k +1) = k(s k 1)[M (k +1)λ]ˆα (k +1)(s+k) = [M +kλ]ˆβ k(k +1) where ˆβ = ˆα, ˆρ k = ρ k, ˆσ k = σ k, ˆβk = β k, ˆα k = α k ˆρ 0 = 1 8 c 0 β 1, δ0 = 4β 0 = c 0 β 1, α 0 = c 0 β 1 a 0 4sMa 0 ˆρ = sm ˆα, ˆσ = sm ˆα, ˆα = α s (s )[M (s 1)λ] From requirement of covariant supertransformations for fermionic curvatures δ ˆF α(k+1) = α k (k +1) Rα(k) ζ α +(k +1)β k+1 R α(k+1)β ζ β +γ k T α(k) ζ α +δ k T α(k+1)β ζ β δ ˆF α = β 1 R αβ ζ β a 0 α 0 e β() B β() ζ α +δ 0 T αβ ζ β +γ 0 Aζ α + γ 0 Φe α βζ β δĉα = 8a 0β 0 c 0 B αβ ζ β + b 0 δ 0 c 0 Π αβ ζ β +ρ 0 Φζ α δĉα(k+1) = β k B α(k+1)β ζ β + α k B α(k) ζ α + δ k Π α(k+1)β ζ β + γ k Π α(k) ζ α one gets γ k δ k = = (s k 1) k(k +1) (k +1) [M (k +1)λ]ˆγ (s+k +1) [M +(k +1)λ]ˆδ (k +1)(k +)(k +3) where γ k = γ k, δk = δ k, α k = α k (k +1), βk = (k +1)β k+1 γ 0 = γ 0 = c 0 β 1, ρ 0 = c 0 β 1 a 0 4sMa 0 ˆγ = sm ˆα, ˆδ = sm ˆα Supersymmetric Lagrangian have form (4.9) and it is invariant under the supertransformations up to equations of motion for auxiliary fields B α(),π α() (4.10). 18

20 6 Summary Let us summarize the results. In this paper we have constructed the Lagrangian formulation for massive higher spin supermultiplets in the AdS 3 space in the case of minimal (1,0) supersymmetry. For description of the massive higher spin fields we have adapted for massive fields in three dimensions the frame-like gauge invariant formalism and technique of gauge invariant curvatures. The supersymmetrization is achieved by deformation of the curvatures by background gravitino field and hence the supersymmetric Lagrangians are formulated with help of background fields of three-dimensional supergravity. In AdS 3 the space the minimal (1,0) supersymmetry combines the massive fields in supermultiplets with one bosonic degree of freedomand onefermionic one. As a result we have derived the supersymmetric andgauge invariant Lagrangians for massive higher spin (s, s + 1/) and (s, s 1/) supermultiplets. Acknowledgments I.L.B and T.V.S are grateful to the RFBR grant, project No a for partial support. Their research was also supported in parts by Russian Ministry of Education and Science, project No Appendix A. Massless bosonic fields In this Appendix we consider the frame-like formulation for the massless bosonic fields in three dimensional flat space. For every spin we present field variables and write out the corresponding Lagrangian. All massless fields with spin s 1 are gauge ones so that we also present the gauge transformations for them. Spin 0 It is described by physical 0-form ϕ and auxiliary 0-form π α(). Lagrangian looks like L = Eπ αβ π αβ +π αβ E αβ Dϕ Spin 1 It is described by physical 1-form A and auxiliary 0-form B α(). Lagrangian looks like It is invariant under gauge transformations L = EB αβ B αβ B αβ e αβ DA δa = Dξ Spin It is described by physical 1-form f α() and auxiliary 1-form Ω α(). Lagrangian looks like L = Ω αβ e β γω αγ +Ω α(k) Df α(k) 19

21 The gauge transformations have the form δω α() = Dη α(), δf α() = Dξ α() +e α γη αγ Spin k It is described by physical 1-form f α(k ) and auxiliary 1-form Ω α(k ). Lagrangian looks like L = ( 1) k+1 [kω α(k 1)β e β γω α(k 1)γ +Ω α(k) Df α(k) ] The gauge transformations have the form δω α(k) = Dη α(k), δf α(k) = Dξ α(k) +e α βη α(k 1)β 8 Appendix B. Massless fermions fields In this Appendix we consider the frame-like formulation for the massless fermionic fields in three dimensional flat space. For every spin we present field variables and write out the corresponding Lagrangian. All massless fields with spin s 3/ are gauge ones so that we also present gauge transformations for them. Spin 1/ It is described by master 0-form φ α. Lagrangian looks like L = 1 φ αe α βdφ β Spin 3/ It is described by physical 1-form Φ α. Lagrangian and gauge transformations have the form L = i Φ αdφ α, δφ α = Dξ α Spin k +1/ It is described by physical 1-form Φ α(k 1). Lagrangian and gauge transformations have the form L = ( 1) k+1i Φ α(k+1)dφ α(k+1), δφ α(k+1) = Dξ α(k+1) References [1] M. P. Blencowe A Consistent Interacting Massless High er Spin Field Theory In D = (+1), Class. Quant. Grav. 6 (1989)

22 [] M. A. Vasiliev Higher spin gauge theories in four-dime nsions, three-dimensions, and two- dimensions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D5 (1996) 763, arxiv:hep-th/ [3] S. F. Prokushkin, M. A. Vasiliev Higher spin gauge in teractions for massive matter fields in 3-D AdS spacetime, Nucl. Phys. B545 (1999) 385, arxiv:hep-th/ [4] A. Campoleoni, M. Henneaux Asymptotic symmetries of three-dimensional higher-spin gravity: the metric approach, JHEP 1503 (015) 143, arxiv: [hep-th]. [5] R. Bonezzi, N. Boulanger, E. Sezgin, P. Sundel An Action for Matter Coupled Higher Spin Gravity in Three Dimensions, JHEP 1605 (016) 003, arxiv: [hep-th]. [6] A. Achucarro, P. K. Townsend A Chern-Simons Action for Three-Dimensional anti-de Sitter Supergravity Theories, Phys. Lett. B180 (1986) 89. [7] I. L. Buchbinder, T. V. Snegirev, Yu. M. Zinoviev Unfolded equations for massive higher spin supermultiplets in AdS 3, JHEP 1608 (016) 075, arxiv: [hep-th]. [8] I. L. Buchbinder, T. V. Snegirev, Yu. M. Zinoviev Lagrangian formulation of the massive higher spin supermultiplets in three dimensional space-time, JHEP 10 (015) 148, arxiv: [hep-th]. [9] S. M. Kuzenko, M. Tsulaia Off-shell massive N=1 supermultiplets in three dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B914 (017) 160, arxiv: [hep-th]. [10] S. M. Kuzenko, D. X. Ogburn Off-Shell Higher Spin Supermultiplets in Three Dimensions, arxiv: [hep-th]. [11] Yu. M. Zinoviev On Massive High Spin Particles in (A)dS, arxiv:hep-th/ [1] R. R. Metsaev Gauge invariant formulation of massive totally symmetric fermionic fields in (A)dS space, Phys. Lett. B643 (006) 05-1, arxiv:hep-th/ [13] Yu. M. Zinoviev Frame-like gauge invariant formulation for massive high spin particles, Nucl. Phys. B808 (009) 185, arxiv: [hep-th]. [14] E. S. Fradkin, M. A. Vasiliev On the gravitational interaction of massless higher-spin fields, Phys. Lett. B189 (1987) 89. [15] E. S. Fradkin, M. A. Vasiliev Cubic interaction in extended theories of massless higherspin fields, Nucl. Phys. B91 (1987) 141. [16] M. Vasiliev Cubic Vertices for Symmetric Higher-Spin Gauge Fields in (A)dS d, Nucl. Phys. B86 (01) 341, arxiv: [17] Nicolas Boulanger, Dmitry Ponomarev, E.D. Skvortsov Non-abelian cubic vertices for higher-spin fields in anti-de Sitter space, JHEP 1305 (013) 008, arxiv: [hep-th]. 1

23 [18] I. L. Buchbinder, T. V. Snegirev, Yu. M. Zinoviev Gauge invariant Lagrangian formulation of massive higher spin fields in (A)dS 3 space, Phys. Lett. B716 (01) 43-48, arxiv: [hep-th]. [19] I. L. Buchbinder, T. V. Snegirev, Yu. M. Zinoviev Frame-like gauge invariant Lagrangian formulation of massive fermionic higher spin fields in AdS 3 space, Phys. Lett. B738 (014) 58, arxiv: [hep-th]. [0] Yu. M. Zinoviev Towards the Fradkin-Vasiliev formalism in three dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B910 (016) 550, arxiv: [hep-th].

6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.

6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq. 6.1. Dirac Equation Ref: M.Kaku, Quantum Field Theory, Oxford Univ Press (1993) η μν = η μν = diag(1, -1, -1, -1) p 0 = p 0 p = p i = -p i p μ p μ = p 0 p 0 + p i p i = E c 2 - p 2 = (m c) 2 H = c p 2

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Space-Time Symmetries

Space-Time Symmetries Chapter Space-Time Symmetries In classical fiel theory any continuous symmetry of the action generates a conserve current by Noether's proceure. If the Lagrangian is not invariant but only shifts by a

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

2 Composition. Invertible Mappings

2 Composition. Invertible Mappings Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan Composition. Invertible Mappings In this section we discuss two procedures for creating new mappings from old ones, namely,

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)

Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required) Phys460.nb 81 ψ n (t) is still the (same) eigenstate of H But for tdependent H. The answer is NO. 5.5.5. Solution for the tdependent Schrodinger s equation If we assume that at time t 0, the electron starts

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016

Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016 Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016 Silvio Capobianco Exercise 1.7 Let H(n) = J(n + 1) J(n). Equation (1.8) tells us that H(2n) = 2, and H(2n+1) = J(2n+2) J(2n+1) = (2J(n+1) 1) (2J(n)+1)

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Higher spin gauge theories and their CFT duals

Higher spin gauge theories and their CFT duals Higher spin gauge theories and their CFT duals E-mail: hikida@phys-h.keio.ac.jp 2 AdS Vasiliev AdS/CFT 4 Vasiliev 3 O(N) 3 Vasiliev 2 W N 1 AdS/CFT g µν Vasiliev AdS [1] AdS/CFT anti-de Sitter (AdS) (CFT)

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Higher Derivative Gravity Theories

Higher Derivative Gravity Theories Higher Derivative Gravity Theories Black Holes in AdS space-times James Mashiyane Supervisor: Prof Kevin Goldstein University of the Witwatersrand Second Mandelstam, 20 January 2018 James Mashiyane WITS)

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

HOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:

HOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch: HOMEWORK 4 Problem a For the fast loading case, we want to derive the relationship between P zz and λ z. We know that the nominal stress is expressed as: P zz = ψ λ z where λ z = λ λ z. Therefore, applying

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

EE512: Error Control Coding

EE512: Error Control Coding EE512: Error Control Coding Solution for Assignment on Finite Fields February 16, 2007 1. (a) Addition and Multiplication tables for GF (5) and GF (7) are shown in Tables 1 and 2. + 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 3

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3

Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 1 State vector space and the dual space Space of wavefunctions The space of wavefunctions is the set of all

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Symmetric Stress-Energy Tensor

Symmetric Stress-Energy Tensor Chapter 3 Symmetric Stress-Energy ensor We noticed that Noether s conserved currents are arbitrary up to the addition of a divergence-less field. Exploiting this freedom the canonical stress-energy tensor

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Απόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.

Απόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ. Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο The time integral of a force is referred to as impulse, is determined by and is obtained from: Newton s 2 nd Law of motion states that the action

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)

4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1) 84 CHAPTER 4. STATIONARY TS MODELS 4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(,) This section is an introduction to a wide class of models ARMA(p,q) which we will consider in more detail later in this

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013

Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013 Notes on Average Scattering imes and Hall Factors Jesse Maassen and Mar Lundstrom Purdue University November 5, 13 I. Introduction 1 II. Solution of the BE 1 III. Exercises: Woring out average scattering

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS

CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS CHAPTER 5 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS EXERCISE 104 Page 8 1. Find the positive root of the equation x + 3x 5 = 0, correct to 3 significant figures, using the method of bisection. Let f(x) =

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations

Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations 99 Section 8. Trigonometric Equations Objective 1: Solve Equations Involving One Trigonometric Function. In this section and the next, we will exple how to solving equations involving trigonometric functions.

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Problem Set 9 Solutions. θ + 1. θ 2 + cotθ ( ) sinθ e iφ is an eigenfunction of the ˆ L 2 operator. / θ 2. φ 2. sin 2 θ φ 2. ( ) = e iφ. = e iφ cosθ.

Problem Set 9 Solutions. θ + 1. θ 2 + cotθ ( ) sinθ e iφ is an eigenfunction of the ˆ L 2 operator. / θ 2. φ 2. sin 2 θ φ 2. ( ) = e iφ. = e iφ cosθ. Chemistry 362 Dr Jean M Standard Problem Set 9 Solutions The ˆ L 2 operator is defined as Verify that the angular wavefunction Y θ,φ) Also verify that the eigenvalue is given by 2! 2 & L ˆ 2! 2 2 θ 2 +

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Second Order Partial Differential Equations

Second Order Partial Differential Equations Chapter 7 Second Order Partial Differential Equations 7.1 Introduction A second order linear PDE in two independent variables (x, y Ω can be written as A(x, y u x + B(x, y u xy + C(x, y u u u + D(x, y

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Partial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013

Partial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013 The boundary element method March 26, 203 Introduction and notation The problem: u = f in D R d u = ϕ in Γ D u n = g on Γ N, where D = Γ D Γ N, Γ D Γ N = (possibly, Γ D = [Neumann problem] or Γ N = [Dirichlet

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume

On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume BULETINUL ACADEMIEI DE ŞTIINŢE A REPUBLICII MOLDOVA. MATEMATICA Numbers 2(72) 3(73), 2013, Pages 80 89 ISSN 1024 7696 On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume I.S.Gutsul Abstract. In

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Matrices and Determinants

Matrices and Determinants Matrices and Determinants SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Q 1. For what value of k do the following system of equations possess a non-trivial (i.e., not all zero) solution over the set of rationals Q? x + ky + 3z

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates

derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates swapnizzle 03-03- :5:43 We begin by recognizing the familiar conversion from rectangular to spherical coordinates (note that φ is used

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit

Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ting Zhang Stanford May 11, 2001 Stanford, 5/11/2001 1 Outline Ordinal Classification Ordinal Addition Ordinal Multiplication Ordinal

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Homework 3 Solutions

Homework 3 Solutions Homework 3 Solutions Igor Yanovsky (Math 151A TA) Problem 1: Compute the absolute error and relative error in approximations of p by p. (Use calculator!) a) p π, p 22/7; b) p π, p 3.141. Solution: For

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

( y) Partial Differential Equations

( y) Partial Differential Equations Partial Dierential Equations Linear P.D.Es. contains no owers roducts o the deendent variables / an o its derivatives can occasionall be solved. Consider eamle ( ) a (sometimes written as a ) we can integrate

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β

3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β 3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS Page Theorem cos(αβ cos α cos β -sin α cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α NOTE: cos(αβ cos α cos β cos(α-β cos α -cos β Proof of cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α Let s use a unit circle

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests

Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Side-Note: So far we have seen a few approaches for creating tests such as Neyman-Pearson Lemma ( most powerful tests of H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 :

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Example Sheet 3 Solutions

Example Sheet 3 Solutions Example Sheet 3 Solutions. i Regular Sturm-Liouville. ii Singular Sturm-Liouville mixed boundary conditions. iii Not Sturm-Liouville ODE is not in Sturm-Liouville form. iv Regular Sturm-Liouville note

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

= {{D α, D α }, D α }. = [D α, 4iσ µ α α D α µ ] = 4iσ µ α α [Dα, D α ] µ.

= {{D α, D α }, D α }. = [D α, 4iσ µ α α D α µ ] = 4iσ µ α α [Dα, D α ] µ. PHY 396 T: SUSY Solutions for problem set #1. Problem 2(a): First of all, [D α, D 2 D α D α ] = {D α, D α }D α D α {D α, D α } = {D α, D α }D α + D α {D α, D α } (S.1) = {{D α, D α }, D α }. Second, {D

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Exercises 10. Find a fundamental matrix of the given system of equations. Also find the fundamental matrix Φ(t) satisfying Φ(0) = I. 1.

Exercises 10. Find a fundamental matrix of the given system of equations. Also find the fundamental matrix Φ(t) satisfying Φ(0) = I. 1. Exercises 0 More exercises are available in Elementary Differential Equations. If you have a problem to solve any of them, feel free to come to office hour. Problem Find a fundamental matrix of the given

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER

ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER Abstract. We define ordinal arithmetic and show laws of Left- Monotonicity, Associativity, Distributivity, some minor related properties and the Cantor Normal Form.

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS

CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS Shiah-Sen Wang The graphs are prepared by Chien-Lun Lai Based on : Precalculus: Mathematics for Calculus by J. Stuwart, L. Redin & S. Watson, 6th edition, 01, Brooks/Cole Chapter

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

MATH423 String Theory Solutions 4. = 0 τ = f(s). (1) dτ ds = dxµ dτ f (s) (2) dτ 2 [f (s)] 2 + dxµ. dτ f (s) (3)

MATH423 String Theory Solutions 4. = 0 τ = f(s). (1) dτ ds = dxµ dτ f (s) (2) dτ 2 [f (s)] 2 + dxµ. dτ f (s) (3) 1. MATH43 String Theory Solutions 4 x = 0 τ = fs). 1) = = f s) ) x = x [f s)] + f s) 3) equation of motion is x = 0 if an only if f s) = 0 i.e. fs) = As + B with A, B constants. i.e. allowe reparametrisations

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

The Simply Typed Lambda Calculus

The Simply Typed Lambda Calculus Type Inference Instead of writing type annotations, can we use an algorithm to infer what the type annotations should be? That depends on the type system. For simple type systems the answer is yes, and

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Finite Field Problems: Solutions

Finite Field Problems: Solutions Finite Field Problems: Solutions 1. Let f = x 2 +1 Z 11 [x] and let F = Z 11 [x]/(f), a field. Let Solution: F =11 2 = 121, so F = 121 1 = 120. The possible orders are the divisors of 120. Solution: The

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

forms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with

forms This gives Remark 1. How to remember the above formulas: Substituting these into the equation we obtain with Week 03: C lassification of S econd- Order L inear Equations In last week s lectures we have illustrated how to obtain the general solutions of first order PDEs using the method of characteristics. We

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Reminders: linear functions

Reminders: linear functions Reminders: linear functions Let U and V be vector spaces over the same field F. Definition A function f : U V is linear if for every u 1, u 2 U, f (u 1 + u 2 ) = f (u 1 ) + f (u 2 ), and for every u U

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes

6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes 122 CHAPTER 6. ARMA MODELS 6.3 Forecasting ARMA processes The purpose of forecasting is to predict future values of a TS based on the data collected to the present. In this section we will discuss a linear

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

( ) 2 and compare to M.

( ) 2 and compare to M. Problems and Solutions for Section 4.2 4.9 through 4.33) 4.9 Calculate the square root of the matrix 3!0 M!0 8 Hint: Let M / 2 a!b ; calculate M / 2!b c ) 2 and compare to M. Solution: Given: 3!0 M!0 8

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Srednicki Chapter 55

Srednicki Chapter 55 Srednicki Chapter 55 QFT Problems & Solutions A. George August 3, 03 Srednicki 55.. Use equations 55.3-55.0 and A i, A j ] = Π i, Π j ] = 0 (at equal times) to verify equations 55.-55.3. This is our third

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2

Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 24, no. 5, 239-246 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/.2988/ija.24.422 Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 Ligong An and

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Partial Trace and Partial Transpose

Partial Trace and Partial Transpose Partial Trace and Partial Transpose by José Luis Gómez-Muñoz http://homepage.cem.itesm.mx/lgomez/quantum/ jose.luis.gomez@itesm.mx This document is based on suggestions by Anirban Das Introduction This

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

1 String with massive end-points

1 String with massive end-points 1 String with massive end-points Πρόβλημα 5.11:Θεωρείστε μια χορδή μήκους, τάσης T, με δύο σημειακά σωματίδια στα άκρα της, το ένα μάζας m, και το άλλο μάζας m. α) Μελετώντας την κίνηση των άκρων βρείτε

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Section 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas

Section 7.6 Double and Half Angle Formulas 09 Section 7. Double and Half Angle Fmulas To derive the double-angles fmulas, we will use the sum of two angles fmulas that we developed in the last section. We will let α θ and β θ: cos(θ) cos(θ + θ)

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Homework 8 Model Solution Section

Homework 8 Model Solution Section MATH 004 Homework Solution Homework 8 Model Solution Section 14.5 14.6. 14.5. Use the Chain Rule to find dz where z cosx + 4y), x 5t 4, y 1 t. dz dx + dy y sinx + 4y)0t + 4) sinx + 4y) 1t ) 0t + 4t ) sinx

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Strain gauge and rosettes

Strain gauge and rosettes Strain gauge and rosettes Introduction A strain gauge is a device which is used to measure strain (deformation) on an object subjected to forces. Strain can be measured using various types of devices classified

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates

Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates Kiryl Tsishchanka Areas and Lengths in Polar Coordinates In this section we develop the formula for the area of a region whose boundary is given by a polar equation. We need to use the formula for the

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Math221: HW# 1 solutions

Math221: HW# 1 solutions Math: HW# solutions Andy Royston October, 5 7.5.7, 3 rd Ed. We have a n = b n = a = fxdx = xdx =, x cos nxdx = x sin nx n sin nxdx n = cos nx n = n n, x sin nxdx = x cos nx n + cos nxdx n cos n = + sin

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

SOLVING CUBICS AND QUARTICS BY RADICALS

SOLVING CUBICS AND QUARTICS BY RADICALS SOLVING CUBICS AND QUARTICS BY RADICALS The purpose of this handout is to record the classical formulas expressing the roots of degree three and degree four polynomials in terms of radicals. We begin with

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

ω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω

ω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ω ω + 1 ω + 2 ω + 3 ω + 4 ω2 ω2 + 1 ω2 + 2 ω2 + 3 ω3 ω3 + 1 ω3 + 2 ω4 ω4 + 1 ω5 ω 2 ω 2 + 1 ω 2 + 2 ω 2 + ω ω 2 + ω + 1 ω 2 + ω2 ω 2 2 ω 2 2 + 1 ω 2 2 + ω ω 2 3 ω 3 ω 3 + 1 ω 3 + ω ω 3 +

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude

Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude Jan Behrens 2012-12-31 In this paper we shall provide a method to approximate distances between two points on earth

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions

SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES GLMA Linear Mathematics 00- Examination Solutions. (a) i. ( + 5i)( i) = (6 + 5) + (5 )i = + i. Real part is, imaginary part is. (b) ii. + 5i i ( + 5i)( + i) = ( i)( + i)

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions

C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions Paul Liu November 15, 2007 Note that these are sample solutions only; in many cases there were many acceptable answers. 1 Reynolds Problem 10.1 1.1 Normal-order

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Relativistic particle dynamics and deformed symmetry

Relativistic particle dynamics and deformed symmetry Relativistic particle dynamics and deformed Poincare symmetry Department for Theoretical Physics, Ivan Franko Lviv National University XXXIII Max Born Symposium, Wroclaw Outline Lorentz-covariant deformed

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set

Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set May 6, 2008 Abstract A set of first-order formulas, whatever the cardinality of the set of symbols, is equivalent to an independent

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 19/5/2007

ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 19/5/2007 Οδηγίες: Να απαντηθούν όλες οι ερωτήσεις. Αν κάπου κάνετε κάποιες υποθέσεις να αναφερθούν στη σχετική ερώτηση. Όλα τα αρχεία που αναφέρονται στα προβλήματα βρίσκονται στον ίδιο φάκελο με το εκτελέσιμο

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests

Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Shirsendu Mukherjee Department of Statistics, Asutosh College, Kolkata, India. shirsendu st@yahoo.co.in So far we have treated the testing of one-sided

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

9.09. # 1. Area inside the oval limaçon r = cos θ. To graph, start with θ = 0 so r = 6. Compute dr

9.09. # 1. Area inside the oval limaçon r = cos θ. To graph, start with θ = 0 so r = 6. Compute dr 9.9 #. Area inside the oval limaçon r = + cos. To graph, start with = so r =. Compute d = sin. Interesting points are where d vanishes, or at =,,, etc. For these values of we compute r:,,, and the values

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Variational Wavefunction for the Helium Atom

Variational Wavefunction for the Helium Atom Technische Universität Graz Institut für Festkörperphysik Student project Variational Wavefunction for the Helium Atom Molecular and Solid State Physics 53. submitted on: 3. November 9 by: Markus Krammer

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation

A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 67, 3301-3307 A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Equivalence Relation D. K. Basnet Dept. of Mathematics, Assam University Silchar-788011, Assam, India dkbasnet@rediffmail.com

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Math 6 SL Probability Distributions Practice Test Mark Scheme

Math 6 SL Probability Distributions Practice Test Mark Scheme Math 6 SL Probability Distributions Practice Test Mark Scheme. (a) Note: Award A for vertical line to right of mean, A for shading to right of their vertical line. AA N (b) evidence of recognizing symmetry

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs

Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs Who? Nichole Schimanski When? July 27, 2011 Graphs A graph, G, consists of a vertex set, V (G), and an edge set, E(G). V (G) is any finite set E(G) is

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

DERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION FOR AN APPLIED FORCE Revision C

DERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION FOR AN APPLIED FORCE Revision C DERIVATION OF MILES EQUATION FOR AN APPLIED FORCE Revision C By Tom Irvine Email: tomirvine@aol.com August 6, 8 Introduction The obective is to derive a Miles equation which gives the overall response

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Non-Abelian Gauge Fields

Non-Abelian Gauge Fields Chapter 5 Non-Abelian Gauge Fields The simplest example starts with two Fermions Dirac particles) ψ 1, ψ 2, degenerate in mass, and hence satisfying in the absence of interactions γ 1 i + m)ψ 1 = 0, γ

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Second Order RLC Filters

Second Order RLC Filters ECEN 60 Circuits/Electronics Spring 007-0-07 P. Mathys Second Order RLC Filters RLC Lowpass Filter A passive RLC lowpass filter (LPF) circuit is shown in the following schematic. R L C v O (t) Using phasor

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Derivation of Optical-Bloch Equations

Derivation of Optical-Bloch Equations Appendix C Derivation of Optical-Bloch Equations In this appendix the optical-bloch equations that give the populations and coherences for an idealized three-level Λ system, Fig. 3. on page 47, will be

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

PARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities

PARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities PARTIAL NOTES for 6.1 Trigonometric Identities tanθ = sinθ cosθ cotθ = cosθ sinθ BASIC IDENTITIES cscθ = 1 sinθ secθ = 1 cosθ cotθ = 1 tanθ PYTHAGOREAN IDENTITIES sin θ + cos θ =1 tan θ +1= sec θ 1 + cot

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Notes on the Open Economy

Notes on the Open Economy Notes on the Open Econom Ben J. Heijdra Universit of Groningen April 24 Introduction In this note we stud the two-countr model of Table.4 in more detail. restated here for convenience. The model is Table.4.

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 6/5/2006

ΚΥΠΡΙΑΚΗ ΕΤΑΙΡΕΙΑ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ CYPRUS COMPUTER SOCIETY ΠΑΓΚΥΠΡΙΟΣ ΜΑΘΗΤΙΚΟΣ ΔΙΑΓΩΝΙΣΜΟΣ ΠΛΗΡΟΦΟΡΙΚΗΣ 6/5/2006 Οδηγίες: Να απαντηθούν όλες οι ερωτήσεις. Ολοι οι αριθμοί που αναφέρονται σε όλα τα ερωτήματα είναι μικρότεροι το 1000 εκτός αν ορίζεται διαφορετικά στη διατύπωση του προβλήματος. Διάρκεια: 3,5 ώρες Καλή

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation

D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation D Alembert s Solution to the Wave Equation MATH 467 Partial Differential Equations J. Robert Buchanan Department of Mathematics Fall 2018 Objectives In this lesson we will learn: a change of variable technique

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

상대론적고에너지중이온충돌에서 제트입자와관련된제동복사 박가영 인하대학교 윤진희교수님, 권민정교수님

상대론적고에너지중이온충돌에서 제트입자와관련된제동복사 박가영 인하대학교 윤진희교수님, 권민정교수님 상대론적고에너지중이온충돌에서 제트입자와관련된제동복사 박가영 인하대학교 윤진희교수님, 권민정교수님 Motivation Bremsstrahlung is a major rocess losing energies while jet articles get through the medium. BUT it should be quite different from low energy

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II

Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II October 18, 2012 1 Review First let us recall the situation. Let g be a simple algebra, with maximal toral subalgebra h (which we are calling a CSA, or Cartan Subalgebra).

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Phys624 Quantization of Scalar Fields II Homework 3. Homework 3 Solutions. 3.1: U(1) symmetry for complex scalar

Phys624 Quantization of Scalar Fields II Homework 3. Homework 3 Solutions. 3.1: U(1) symmetry for complex scalar Homework 3 Solutions 3.1: U(1) symmetry for complex scalar 1 3.: Two complex scalars The Lagrangian for two complex scalar fields is given by, L µ φ 1 µ φ 1 m φ 1φ 1 + µ φ µ φ m φ φ (1) This can be written

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

The kinetic and potential energies as T = 1 2. (m i η2 i k(η i+1 η i ) 2 ). (3) The Hooke s law F = Y ξ, (6) with a discrete analog

The kinetic and potential energies as T = 1 2. (m i η2 i k(η i+1 η i ) 2 ). (3) The Hooke s law F = Y ξ, (6) with a discrete analog Lecture 12: Introduction to Analytical Mechanics of Continuous Systems Lagrangian Density for Continuous Systems The kinetic and potential energies as T = 1 2 i η2 i (1 and V = 1 2 i+1 η i 2, i (2 where

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Econ 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1

Econ 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8  questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1 Eon : Fall 8 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 Email questions or omments to Dan Fetter Problem. Let X be a salar with density f(x, θ) (θx + θ) [ x ] with θ. (a) Find the most powerful level α test

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Tridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008

Tridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008 Tridiagonal matrices Gérard MEURANT October, 2008 1 Similarity 2 Cholesy factorizations 3 Eigenvalues 4 Inverse Similarity Let α 1 ω 1 β 1 α 2 ω 2 T =......... β 2 α 1 ω 1 β 1 α and β i ω i, i = 1,...,

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

SCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018

SCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018 Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics(JRM) ISSN: 2395-028 SCITECH Volume 3, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION ublished online: March 29, 208 Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics www.scitecresearch.com/journals

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

k A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +

k A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R + Chapter 3. Fuzzy Arithmetic 3- Fuzzy arithmetic: ~Addition(+) and subtraction (-): Let A = [a and B = [b, b in R If x [a and y [b, b than x+y [a +b +b Symbolically,we write A(+)B = [a (+)[b, b = [a +b

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Right Rear Door. Let's now finish the door hinge saga with the right rear door

Right Rear Door. Let's now finish the door hinge saga with the right rear door Right Rear Door Let's now finish the door hinge saga with the right rear door You may have been already guessed my steps, so there is not much to describe in detail. Old upper one file:///c /Documents

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Forced Pendulum Numerical approach

Forced Pendulum Numerical approach Numerical approach UiO April 8, 2014 Physical problem and equation We have a pendulum of length l, with mass m. The pendulum is subject to gravitation as well as both a forcing and linear resistance force.

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

b. Use the parametrization from (a) to compute the area of S a as S a ds. Be sure to substitute for ds!

b. Use the parametrization from (a) to compute the area of S a as S a ds. Be sure to substitute for ds! MTH U341 urface Integrals, tokes theorem, the divergence theorem To be turned in Wed., Dec. 1. 1. Let be the sphere of radius a, x 2 + y 2 + z 2 a 2. a. Use spherical coordinates (with ρ a) to parametrize.

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in

Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in : tail in X, head in A nowhere-zero Γ-flow is a Γ-circulation such that

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval

Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

F-TF Sum and Difference angle

F-TF Sum and Difference angle F-TF Sum and Difference angle formulas Alignments to Content Standards: F-TF.C.9 Task In this task, you will show how all of the sum and difference angle formulas can be derived from a single formula when

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II

ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II 2014/2015: Semester II Tutorial 7 1. Let X be a sample from a population P and consider testing hypotheses H 0 : P = P 0 versus H 1 : P = P 1, where P j is a known

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

General 2 2 PT -Symmetric Matrices and Jordan Blocks 1

General 2 2 PT -Symmetric Matrices and Jordan Blocks 1 General 2 2 PT -Symmetric Matrices and Jordan Blocks 1 Qing-hai Wang National University of Singapore Quantum Physics with Non-Hermitian Operators Max-Planck-Institut für Physik komplexer Systeme Dresden,

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Geodesic Equations for the Wormhole Metric

Geodesic Equations for the Wormhole Metric Geodesic Equations for the Wormhole Metric Dr R Herman Physics & Physical Oceanography, UNCW February 14, 2018 The Wormhole Metric Morris and Thorne wormhole metric: [M S Morris, K S Thorne, Wormholes

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

CHAPTER 48 APPLICATIONS OF MATRICES AND DETERMINANTS

CHAPTER 48 APPLICATIONS OF MATRICES AND DETERMINANTS CHAPTER 48 APPLICATIONS OF MATRICES AND DETERMINANTS EXERCISE 01 Page 545 1. Use matrices to solve: 3x + 4y x + 5y + 7 3x + 4y x + 5y 7 Hence, 3 4 x 0 5 y 7 The inverse of 3 4 5 is: 1 5 4 1 5 4 15 8 3

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Solutions to Exercise Sheet 5

Solutions to Exercise Sheet 5 Solutions to Eercise Sheet 5 jacques@ucsd.edu. Let X and Y be random variables with joint pdf f(, y) = 3y( + y) where and y. Determine each of the following probabilities. Solutions. a. P (X ). b. P (X

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Lecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals

Lecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals Lecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals Confidence Intervals θ: an unknown parameter of interest We want to find limits θ and θ such that Gt = P nˆθ θ t If G 1 1 α is known, then P θ θ = P θ θ = 1 α

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees

Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees Thomas F. Kent Andrea Sorbi Università degli Studi di Siena Italia July 18, 2007 Goal: Introduce a form of Σ 0 2-permitting for the enumeration degrees. Till now,

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

The challenges of non-stable predicates

The challenges of non-stable predicates The challenges of non-stable predicates Consider a non-stable predicate Φ encoding, say, a safety property. We want to determine whether Φ holds for our program. The challenges of non-stable predicates

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

DESIGN OF MACHINERY SOLUTION MANUAL h in h 4 0.

DESIGN OF MACHINERY SOLUTION MANUAL h in h 4 0. DESIGN OF MACHINERY SOLUTION MANUAL -7-1! PROBLEM -7 Statement: Design a double-dwell cam to move a follower from to 25 6, dwell for 12, fall 25 and dwell for the remader The total cycle must take 4 sec

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Orbital angular momentum and the spherical harmonics

Orbital angular momentum and the spherical harmonics Orbital angular momentum and the spherical harmonics March 8, 03 Orbital angular momentum We compare our result on representations of rotations with our previous experience of angular momentum, defined

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. ------------------ ----------------------------- -----------------

Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. ------------------ ----------------------------- ----------------- Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. 1. Sin ( ) = a) b) c) d) Ans b. Solution : Method 1. Ans a: 17 > 1 a) is rejected. w.k.t Sin ( sin ) = d is rejected. If sin

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Problem Set 3: Solutions

Problem Set 3: Solutions CMPSCI 69GG Applied Information Theory Fall 006 Problem Set 3: Solutions. [Cover and Thomas 7.] a Define the following notation, C I p xx; Y max X; Y C I p xx; Ỹ max I X; Ỹ We would like to show that C

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

1 Lorentz transformation of the Maxwell equations

1 Lorentz transformation of the Maxwell equations 1 Lorentz transformation of the Maxwell equations 1.1 The transformations of the fields Now that we have written the Maxwell equations in covariant form, we know exactly how they transform under Lorentz

Διαβάστε περισσότερα

Lecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic

Lecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic Lecture 2 Soundness and completeness of propositional logic February 9, 2004 1 Overview Review of natural deduction. Soundness and completeness. Semantics of propositional formulas. Soundness proof. Completeness

Διαβάστε περισσότερα