arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Oct 2016


 Πτοοφαγος Λαγός
 13 ημέρες πριν
 Προβολές:
Transcript
1 1 Representations of BihomLie algebras 1 Yongsheng Cheng 1,2, Huange Qi 1 1 School of Mathematics and Statistics, Henan University, Kaifeng , China 2 Institute of Contemporary Mathematics, Henan University, Kaifeng , China arxiv: v1 [math.rt] 14 Oct 2016 Abstract BihomLie algebra is a generalized HomLie algebra endowed with two commuting multiplicative linear maps. In this paper, we study cohomology and representations of BihomLie algebras. In particular, derivations, central extensions, derivation extensions, the trivial representation and the adjoint representation of BihomLie algebras are studied in detail. Keywords BihomLie algebras; Derivations; Cohomology; Representations of BihomLie algebras 1 Introduction The motivations to study HomLie structures are related to physics and to deformations of Lie algebras, in particular Lie algebras of vector fields. HomLie algebra, introduced by Hartig, Larson and Silvestrov in [7], is a triple L,[, ],α L consisting of a vector space L, a bilinear map [, ] : L L L and a vector space homomorphism α L : L L satisfying the following conditions [x,y] = [y,x], skew symmetry, [αx,[y,z]]+[αy,[z,x]]+[αz,[x,y]] = 0, Hom Jacobi identity for all x,y,z L. The main feature of these algebras is that the identities defining the structures are twisted by homomorphisms. The paradigmatic examples are qdeformations of Witt and Virasoro algebras, HeisenbergVirasoro algebra and other algebraic structure constructed in pioneering works [4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14]. The representation theory of Hom Lie algebras was introduced by Sheng in [12], in which, Homcochain complexes, derivation, central extension, derivation extension, trivial representation and adjoint representation of HomLie algebras were studied. In addition, cohomology and deformations theory of Homalgebras were studied in [1, 3, 8, 11, 13, 15]. In [6], the authors introduced a generalized algebraic structure endowed with two commuting multiplicative linear maps, called Bihomalgebras. When the two linear maps are same, then Bihomalgebras will be return to Homalgebras. These algebraic structures include Bihomassociative algebras, BihomLie algebras and Bihombialgebras. The purpose 1 Supported bythe NationalScienceFoundationofChinaNo andtheScienceandTechnology Program of Henan Province No
2 2 of this paper is to study cohomology, representations of BihomLie algebras. In particular, the trivial representation and the adjoint representation of BihomLie algebras are studied in detail. Derivations, central extensions and derivation extensions of BihomLie algebras are also studied as an application. The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we give the definition, properties of BihomLie algebras and a few examples of BihomLie algebra. In Section 3 we study derivations, inner derivation and derivation extension of multiplicative BihomLie algebras. In Section 4 we give representations of regular BihomLie algebras, and give their cohomology. In Section 5 we study the trivial representations of regular BihomLie algebras, and show that central extensions of a BihomLie algebra are controlled by the second cohomology in the trivial representation. In Section 6 we study the adjoint representation of a regular BihomLie algebra. We obtain that a 1cocycle associated to the adjoint representation is a derivation for BihomLie algebras. 2 BihomLie algebras Our aim in this section is to introduce more general definition of BihomLie algebras and properties from [6]. From now on, we will always work over a base field K. All algebras, linear spaces etc. will be over K. Definition A BiHomassociative algebra over k is a 4tuple A,µ,α,β, where A is a klinear space, α: A A, β: A A and µ: A A A are linear maps, with notation µa a = aa, satisfying the following conditions, for all a,a,a A: α β = β α, αaa a = aa βa BiHomassociativity. In particular, if αaa = αaαa and βaa = βaβa, we call it multiplicative Bihomassociative algebra. 2. A BihomLie algebra over a field K is a 4tuple L,[ ],α,β, where L is a Klinear space, α: L L, β: L L and [ ]: L L L are linear maps, with notation [ ]a a = [a,a ], satisfying the following conditions, for all a,a,a L: α β = β α, 2.1 [βa,αa ] = [βa,αa] skewsymmetry, 2.2 [ β 2 a,[βa,αa ] ] + [ β 2 a,[βa,αa] ] + [ β 2 a,[βa,αa ] ] = BihomJacobi condition.
3 3 3. A BihomLie algebra is called a multiplicative BihomLie algebra if α and β are algebraic morphisms, i.e. for any a,a L, we have α[a,a ] = [αa,αa ], β[a,a ] = [βa,βa ] A multiplicative BihomLie algebra is called a regular BihomLie algebra if α, β are bijective maps. Remark 2.2. Obviously, a BiHomLie algebra L,[ ],α,β for which α = β is just a HomLie algebra L,[ ], α. Similar with Lie algebras coming from associative algebras by commutator, BihomLie algebras can also be obtained by Bihomassociative algebras. Unlike the Hom case, to obtain a BihomLie algebra from a Bihomassociative algebra we need the maps α and β to be bijective. Next proposition comes from [6]. Proposition 2.3. If A,µ,α,β is a Bihomassociative algebra with bijective α and β, then, for every a,a A, we can set [a,a ] = aa α 1 βa αβ 1 a. Then A,[ ],α,β is a BihomLie algebra, denoted by LA. Example 2.4. We take an example of 2dimensional BihomLie algebra obtained from 2dimensional Bihomassociative algebra. Let {e 1,e 2 } be a basis of associative algebra A. The linear maps α,β: A A and µ: A A A are defined by αe 1 = e 1, αe 2 = 1 m e 1 + n 1 n e 2, βe 1 = e 1, βe 2 = e 2, µe 1,e 1 = me 1, µe 1,e 2 = me 2, µe 2,e 1 = ne 1, µe 2,e 2 = ne 2, where m,n are parameters in K, with m,n 0 and n 1. Then we get A,µ,α,β is a 2dimensional Bihomassociative algebra. In view of Proposition 2.3, we have [e 1,e 1 ] = 0, [e 1,e 2 ] = me 2 ne 1, [e 2,e 1 ] = n 1e 1 mn 1 e 2, [e 2,e 2 ] = n n m e 1 +e 2. Then A,[ ],α,β is a BihomLie algebra. BihomLie algebras can also be induced by Lie algebras and their homomorphisms [6].
4 4 Proposition 2.5. Let L,[ ] be an ordinary Lie algebra over a field K and let α,β: L L two commuting linear maps such that α[a,a ] = [αa,αa ] and β[a,a ] = [βa,βa ], for all a,a L. Define the linear map { }: L L L, {a,b} = [αa,βb], for all a,b L. Then L α,β := L,{ },α,β is a BihomLie algebra, called the Yau twist of L,[ ]. Example 2.6. Let L = sl2,k, chark 2, whose standard basis consists of X = 01,Y = ,H = Then [H,X] = 2X, [H,Y] = 2Y, [X,Y] = H. Two linear maps α,β : L L are defined by αx = X, αy = k 2 X +Y +kh, αh = 2kX +H, βx = X, βy = l 2 X +Y +lh, βh = 2lX +H, where k,l are parameters in K. Obviously we have α β = β α. Then for X,Y,H L, we have α[x,y] = αh = 2kX +H, On the other hand, we have α[h,x] = α2x = 2X, α[h,y] = α 2Y = 2k 2 X 2Y 2kH. [αx,αy] = [X, k 2 X +Y +kh] = H 2kX, [αh,αx] = [ 2kX +H,X] = 2X, [αh,αy] = [ 2kX +H, k 2 X +Y +kh] = 2kH +2k 2 X 2Y. Therefore, for a,a L, we have α[a,a ] = [αa,αa ]. Similarly, we have β[a,a ] = [βa,βa ]. In view of Proposition 2.5, we define the linear map { }: L L L, {a,b} = [αa,βb], for all a,b L. Then L α,β := L,{ },α,β is a BihomLie algebra. Namely, sl2,k,{ },α,β is a BihomLie algebra.
5 5 Remark 2.7. We present an example of a BihomLie algebra that cannot be expressed as a HomLie algebra. By Example 2.6, L = sl2,k,{ },α,β is a BihomLie algebra. If we set αx = X, αy = k 2 X +Y +kh, αh = 2kX +H, βx = X, βy = Y, βh = H, where k are parameters in K, with k 0. For every a,b L we have { }a b = [αa,βb] = [αa,b]. Now we check that L,{ },α is not a HomLie algebra. We only need to verify: { αx,{y,h} } + { αy,{h,x} } + { αh,{x,y} } = { αx,[αy,h] } + { αy,[αh,x] } + { αh,[αx,y] } = { X,[ k 2 X +Y +kh,h] } + { k 2 X +Y +kh,[ 2kX +H,X] } + { 2kX +H,[X,Y] } = { X,2k 2 X +2Y } + { k 2 X +Y +kh,2x } + { 2kX +H,H } =[αx,2k 2 X +2Y]+[α k 2 X +Y +kh,2x]+[α 2kX +H,H] =[X,2k 2 X +2Y]+[ 4k 2 X +Y +2kH,2X]+[ 4kX +H,H] =2H + 2H +8kX+8kX =16kX 0 since k 0. Thus, L,{ },α is not a HomLie algebra even though L = sl2,k,{ },α,β is a BihomLie algebra. Consider the direct sum of two BihomLie algebras, we have Proposition 2.8. Given two BihomLie algebras L,[ ],α,β and L,[ ],α,β, there is a BihomLie algebra L L,[, ] L L,α+α,β +β, where the skewsymmetric bilinear map [, ] L L : 2 L L L L is given by [u 1,v 1,u 2,v 2 ] L L = [u 1,u 2 ],[v 1,v 2 ], u 1,u 2 L,v 1,v 2 L, and the linear maps α+α,β +β : L L L L are given by α+α u,v = αu,α v, β +β u,v = βu,β v, u L,v L. Proof. It is easy to verify Eq.2.1 Eq.2.3 for L L,[, ] L L,α+α,β +β.
6 6 Definition 2.9. A subvector space H L is a BihomLie subalgebra of L,[ ],α,β if αh H,βH H and H is closed under the bracket operation [ ], i.e. [u,u ] H, u,u H. A morphism f : L,[ ],α,β L,[ ],α,β of BihomLie algebras is a linear map f : L L such that α f = f α, β f = f β and f[u,v] = [fu,fv], for all u,v L. Denote by φ f L L the graph of a linear map f : L L. Proposition A linear map f : L,[ ],α,β L,[ ],α,β is a morphism of BihomLie algebras if and only if the graph φ f L L is a BihomLiesubalgebra of L L,[, ] L L,α+α,β +β. Proof. Let f : L,[ ],α,β L,[ ],α,β is a morphism of BihomLie algebras, then for any u 1,u 2 L, we have [ u 1,fu 1, u 2,fu 2 ] L L = [u 1,u 2 ],[fu 1,fu 2 ] = [u 1,u 2 ],f[u 1,u 2 ] Thus the graph φ f is closed under the bracket operation [, ] L L. Furthermore, we have α+α u 1,fu 1 = αu 1,α fu 1 = αu 1,f αu 1 which implies that Similarly, α+α φ f φ f. β +β φ f φ f. Thus φ f is a BihomLiesubalgebra of L L,[, ] L L,α+α,β +β. Conversely, if the graph φ f is a BihomLiesubalgebra of L L,[, ] L L,α+α,β +β, then we have [ u 1,fu 1, u 2,fu 2 ] L L = [u 1,u 2 ],[fu 1,fu 2 ] φ f, which implies that [fu 1,fu 2 ] = f[u 1,u 2 ]. Furthermore, α+α φ f φ f yields that α+α u 1,fu 1 = αu 1,α fu 1 φ f, which is equivalent to the condition α fu 1 = f αu 1, i.e. α f = f α. Similarly, β f = f β. Therefore, f is a morphism of BihomLie algebras.
7 7 3 Derivations of BihomLie algebras In this section, we will study derivations of BihomLie algebras. Let L,[ ],α,β be a regular BihomLie algebra. For any integer k,l, denote by α k the ktimes composition of α and β l the ltimes composition of β, i.e. α k = α αk times,β l = β βl times. Since the maps α,β commute, we denote by α k β l = α α }{{} β β. }{{} k times l times In particular, α 0 β 0 = Id,α 1 β 1 = αβ, α k β l is the inverse of α k β l. Definition 3.1. For any integer k,l, a linear map D : L L is called an α k β l derivation of the regular BihomLie algebra L,[ ],α,β, if D α = α D, D β = β D, 3.1 and D[u,v] = [Du,α k β l v]+[α k β l u,dv], u,v L. 3.2 Note first that if α and β are bijective, the skewsymmetry condition Eq.2.2 implies [u,v] = [α 1 βv,αβ 1 u]. 3.3 Denote by Der α k β ll the set of αk β l derivations of the BihomLie algebra L,[ ],α,β. For any u L satisfying αu = u,βu = u, define D k,l u gll by By Eq.3.3, D k,l uv = [α k β l v,u], v L. D k,l uv= [α k β l v,u] =[α 1 βu,α k+1 β l 1 v] =[u,α k+1 β l 1 v]. Then D k,l u is an α k+1 β l derivation, which we call an inner α k+1 β l derivation. In fact, we have D k,l uαv = [α k+1 β l v,u] = α[α k β l v,u] = α D k,l uv, D k,l uβv [α k β l+1 v,u] = β[α k β l v,u] = β D k,l uv,
8 8 which implies that Eq.3.1 in Definition 3.1 is satisfied. On the other hand, we have D k,l u[v,w]= [ α k β l [v,w],u ] = [ u,α k+1 β l 1 [v,w] ] = [ β 2 u,[βα k+1 β l 2 v,αα k β l 1 w] ] = [ α k+1 β l v,[α k β l w,αu] ] [ α k β l+1 w,[βu,α k+2 β l 2 v] ] = [ α k+1 β l v,[α k β l w,u] ] + [ [u,α k+1 β l 1 v],α k+1 β l w ] =[α k+1 β l v,d k,l uw]+[d k,l uv,α k+1 β l w]. Therefore, D k,l u is an α k+1 β l derivation. Denote by Inn α k βll the set of inner α k β l derivations, i.e. Inn α k β ll = { [αk 1 β l,u] u L,αu = u,βu = u}. usual: For any D Der α k β ll and D Der α s β tl, define their commutator [D,D ] as [D,D ] = D D D D. 3.4 Lemma 3.2. For any D Der α k β ll and D Der α s βtl, we have Proof. For any u,v L, we have [D,D ] Der α k+s β l+tl. [D,D ][u,v]=d D [u,v] D D[u,v] =D[D u,α s β t v]+[α s β t u,d v] D [Du,α k β l v]+[α s β t u,dv] =[D D u,α k β l α s β t v]+[α k β l D u,d α s β t v ] Since any two of maps D,D,α,β commute, we have Therefore,we have +[D α s β t u,α k β l D v]+[α k β l α s β t u,d D v] [D Du,α s β t α k β l v] [α s β t Du,D α k β l v ] [D α k β l u,α s β t Dv] [α s β t α k β l u,d Dv] β l D = D β l,α k D = D α k,β t D = D β t,α s D = D α s [D,D ][u,v] = [ [D,D ]u,α k+s β l+t v ] + [ α k+s β l+t u,[d,d ]v ].
9 9 Furthermore, it is straightforward to see that [D,D ] α = D D α D D α = α D D α D D = α [D,D ], [D,D ] β = D D β D D β = β D D β D D = β [D,D ], which yields that [D,D ] Der α k+s β l+tl. For any integer k,l, denote by DerL = k,l Der α k βll. Obviously, DerL is a Lie algebra, in which the Lie bracket is given by Eq.3.4. In the end, we consider the derivation extension of the regular BihomLie algebra L,[ ],α,β and give an application of the α 0 β 1 derivation Der α 0 β 1L. For any linear maps D,α,β : L L, where α and β are inverse, consider the vector space L RD. Define a skewsymmetric bilinear bracket operation [, ] D on L RD by [u,v] D = [u,v], [D,u] D = [α 1 βu,αβ 1 D] D = Du, u,v L. Define two linear maps α D,β D : L RD L RD by α D u,d = αu,d, β D u,d = βu,d. And the linear maps α,β involved in the definition of the bracket operation [, ] D are required to be multiplicative, that is Then, we have α [D,u] D= = [α D,αu] D, β [D,u] D = [β D,βu] D. [u,d] D = [α 1 βd,αβ 1 u] D = α 1 β [D,α 2 β 2 u] D = α 1 β D α 2 β 2 u = αβ 1 Du. Theorem 3.3. With the above notations, L RD,[, ] D,α D,β D is a BihomLie algebra if and only if D is an α 0 β 1 derivation of the regular BihomLie algebra L,[, ],α,β. Proof. For any u,v L,m,n R, we have α D β D u,md = α D βu,md = α βu,md, and β D α D u,md = β D αu,md = β αu,md.
10 10 Hence, we have On the other hand, α β = β α α D β D = β D α D. α D [u,md,v,nd] D =α D [u,v] D +[u,nd] D +[md,v] D =α D [u,v] nd αβ 1 u+mdv =α[u,v] nα D αβ 1 u+mα Dv, [α D u,md,α D v,nd] D =[αu,md,αv,nd] D =[αu,αv] D +[αu,nd] D +[md,αv] D =[αu,αv] αβ 1 nd αu+md αv. Since α[u,v] = [αu,αv], thus α D [u,md,v,nd] D = [α D u,md,α D v,nd] D if and only if Similarly, D α = α D,D β = β D. β D [u,md,v,nd] D = [β D u,md,β D v,nd] D if and only if Next, we have D α = α D,D β = β D. [β D u,md,α D v,nd] D =[βu,md,αv,nd] D =[βu,αv] D +[βu,nd] D +[md,αv] D = [βv,αu] αβ 1 nd βu+md αv, [β D v,nd,α D u,md] D =[βv,nd,αu,md] D =[βv,αu] D +[βv,md] D +[nd,αu] D =[βv,αu] αβ 1 md βv+nd αu, thus if and only if [β D u,md,α D v,nd] D = [β D v,nd,α D u,md] D D α = α D,D β = β D.
11 11 Furthermore, [ β 2 D u,md,[β D v,nd,α D w,ld] D ]D +[ ] βdv,nd,[β 2 D w,ld,α D w,md] D + [ β 2 Dw,lD,[β D u,md,α D v,nd] D ]D D = [ β 2 u,md,[βv,nd,αw,ld] D ]D + [ β 2 v,nd,[βw,ld,αu,md] D ]D + [ β 2 w,ld,[βu,md,αv,nd] D ]D = [ β 2 u,md,[βv,αw] lα Dv+nD αw ] D + [ β 2 v,nd,[βw,αu] mα Dw+lD αu ] D + [ β 2 w,ld,[βu,αv] nα Du+mD αv ] D = [ β 2 u,[βv,αw] ] [β 2 u,lα Dv]+[β 2 u,nd αw] + [ md,[βv,αw] ] [md,lα Dv] D D +[md,ndαw] D + [ β 2 v,[βw,αu] ] [β 2 v,mα Dw]+[β 2 v,ld αu] + [ nd,[βw,αu] ] [nd,mα Dw] D D +[nd,ldαu] D + [ β 2 w,[βu,αv] ] [β 2 w,nα Du]+[β 2 w,md αv] + [ ld,[βu,αv] ] [ld,nα Du] D D +[ld,mdαv] D = [ β 2 u,[βv,αw] ] [β 2 u,lα Dv]+[β 2 u,nd αw] + [ md,[βv,αw] ] D mlα D2 v+mnd 2 αw + [ β 2 v,[βw,αu] ] [β 2 v,mα Dw]+[β 2 v,ld αu] + [ nd,[βw,αu] ] D mnα D2 w+nld 2 αu + [ β 2 w,[βu,αv] ] [β 2 w,nα Du]+[β 2 w,md αv] + [ ld,[βu,αv] ] D lnα D2 u+lmd 2 αv, If D is an α 0 β 1 derivation of the regular BihomLie algebra L,[, ],α,β, then [ ] md,[βv,αw] =md[βv,αw] D =[md βv,α 0 βαw]+[α 0 β 2 v,md αw] = [α 0 β 2 w,md αv]+[α 0 β 2 v,md αw] = [β 2 w,md αv]+[β 2 v,md αw]. Similarly, [ nd,[βw,αu] ] D = [β2 u,nd αw]+[β 2 w,nα Du],
12 [ ld,[βu,αv] ] D = [β2 v,ld αu]+[β 2 u,lα Dv]. Therefore, the BihomJacobi identity is satisfied if and only if D is an α 0 β 1 derivation of L,[, ],α,β. Thus L RD,[, ] D,α D,β D is a BihomLie algebra if and only if D is an α 0 β 1 derivation of the regular BihomLie algebra L,[, ],α,β Representations of BihomLie algebras Lie algebra cohomology was introduced by Chevalley and Eilenberg [2]. For HomLie algebra, the cohomology theory has been given by [11, 12, 15]. In this section we study representations of BihomLie algebras and give the corresponding coboundary operators. We can also construct the semidirect product of BihomLie algebras. Definition 4.1. Let L,[, ],α,β be a BihomLie algebra. A representation of L is a 4tuple M,ρ,α M,β M, where M is a linear space, α M,β M : M M are two commuting linear maps and ρ : L EndM is a linear map such that, for all x,y L, we have ρ αx α M = α M ρx, 4.1 ρ βx β M = β M ρx, 4.2 ρ[βx,y] β M = ρ αβx ρy ρ βy ρ αx. 4.3 Let L,[ ],α,β be a regular BihomLie algebra. The set of kcochains on L with values in M, which we denote by C k L;M, is the set of skewsymmetric klinear maps form L Lk times to M: C k L;M {f : k L M is a linear map}. A kbihom cochain on L with values in M is defined to be a kcochain f C k L;M such that it is compatible with α,β and α M,β M in the sense that α M f = f α, β M f = f β, i.e. α M fu1,,u k = f αu 1,,αu k, β M fu1,,u k = f βu 1,,βu k. Denote by Cα,α k M L;M {f C k L;M α M f = f α,β M f = f β}. β,β M Define d ρ : Cα,α k M L;M C k+1 L;M by setting β,β M k+1 d ρ fu 1,,u k+1 = 1 i ρ αβ k 1 u i fu 1,,û i,,u k+1 i=1 + 1 i+j+1 f [α 1 βu i,u j ],βu 1,,û i,,û j,,βu k+1. i<j
13 13 Lemma 4.2. With the above notations, for any f Cα,α k M L;M, we have β,β M Thus we obtain a welldefined map d ρ : C k α,α M β,β M d ρ f α = α M d ρ f, d ρ f β = β M d ρ f. L;M C k+1 α,α M β,β M L;M. Proof. For any f Cα,α k M L;M, we have α M f = f α, β M f = f β. More precisely, β,β M we have d ρ f αu 1,,αu k+1 k+1 = 1 i ρ α 2 β k 1 u i f αu 1,,û i,,αu k+1 i=1 + i<j 1 i+j+1 f [α 1 βαu i,αu j ],βαu 1,,û i,,û j,,βαu k+1 k+1 = 1 i ρ α 2 β k 1 u i α M fu 1,,û i,,u k+1 i=1 + 1 i+j+1 f [βu i,αu j ],βαu 1,,û i,,û j,,βαu k+1 i<j k+1 = 1 i α M ρ αβ k 1 u i fu 1,,û i,,u k+1 i=1 + 1 i+j+1 α M f [α 1 βu i,u j ],βu 1,,û i,,û j,,βu k+1 i<j =α M d ρ fu 1,,u k+1.
14 14 Similarly, d ρ f βu 1,,βu k+1 k+1 = 1 i ρ αβ k u i f βu 1,,û i,,βu k+1 i=1 + 1 i+j+1 f [α 1 ββu i,βu j ],β 2 u 1,,û i,,û j,,β 2 u k+1 i<j k+1 = 1 i ρ αβ k u i β M fu 1,,û i,,u k+1 i=1 + 1 i+j+1 f [α 1 β 2 u i,βu j ],β 2 u 1,,û i,,û j,,β 2 u k+1 i<j k+1 = 1 i β M ρ αβ k 1 u i fu 1,,û i,,u k+1 i=1 + 1 i+j+1 β M f [α 1 βu i,u j ],βu 1,,û i,,û j,,βu k+1 i<j =β M d ρ fu 1,,u k+1. The proof is completed. Proposition 4.3. The map d ρ is a coboundary operator, i.e. d 2 ρ = 0. Proof. For any f Cα,α k M β,β M computations, we have L;M, we have d 2 ρf C k+2 α,α M β,β M L; M. By straightforward d 2 ρfu 1,,u k+2 k+2 = 1 i ρ αβ k u i d ρ fu 1,,û i,,u k+2 i=1 + 1 i+j+1 d ρ f [α 1 βu i,u j ],βu 1,,û i,,û j,,βu k+2. i<j
15 15 It is not hard to deduce that ρ αβ k u i d ρ fu 1,,û i,,u k+2 i 1 = 1 p ρ αβ k u i ρ αβ k 1 u p u 1,,û p,,û i,,u k p=1 + k+2 p=i+1 1 p 1 ρ αβ k u i ρ αβ k 1 u p u 1,,û i,,û p,,u k p+q+1 ρ αβ k u i i<p<q f [α 1 βu p,u q ],βu 1,,û i,,û p,,û q,,βu k p+q+1 ρ αβ k u i p<q<i f [α 1 βu p,u q ],βu 1,,û p,,û q,,û i,,βu k p+q ρ αβ k u i p<i<q f [α 1 βu p,u q ],βu 1,,û p,,û i,,û q,,βu k+2,
16 16 and d ρ f [α 1 βu i,u j ],βu 1,,û i,,û j,,βu k+2 = ρ αβ k 1 [α 1 βu i,u j ] f βu 1,,û i,,û j,,βu k i p+1 ρ αβ k u p f [α 1 βu i,u j ],βu 1,,û p,,û i,,û j,,βu k+2 + p=1 j 1 p=i+1 1 p ρ αβ k u p f [α 1 βu i,u j ],βu 1,,û i,,û p,,û j,,βu k+2 k p 1 ρ αβ k u p f [α 1 βu i,u j ],βu 1,,û i,,û j,,û p,,βu k+2 j+1 i p+1 f [ [α 2 β 2 u i,α 1 βu j ],βu p ],β 2 u 1,,û p,,û i,,û j,,β 2 u k p=1 j 1 p=i+1 k+2 p=j+1 + p,q 1 p f [ [α 2 β 2 u i,α 1 βu j ],βu p ],β 2 u 1,,û i,,û p,,û j,,β 2 u k p 1 f [ [α 2 β 2 u i,α 1 βu j ],βu p ],β 2 u 1,,û i,,û j,,û p,,β 2 u k ±f[α 1 ββu p,βu q ],β[α 1 βu i,u j ],β 2 u 1,,û i,j,p,q,,β 2 u k In 4.10, û i,j,p,q means that we omit the items u i,u j,u p,u q. By the fact that [α 1 ββu p,βu q ] = β[α 1 βu p,u q ], we get 1 i+j = 0. i<j By the BihomJacobi identity, [ β 2 a,[βa,αa ] ] = [ β 2 a,α[α 1 βa,a ] ] = [ β[α 1 βa,a ],αβa ] = [ [α 1 β 2 a,βa ],αβa ] = [ [α 1 β 2 a,βa ],αβa ],
17 17 thus [ β 2 a,[βa,αa ] ] + [ β 2 a,[βa,αa] ] + [ β 2 a,[βa,αa ] ] = 0 is equivalent to [ [α 2 β 2 a,α 1 βa ],βa ] + [ [α 2 β 2 a,α 1 βa],βa ] + [ [α 2 β 2 a,α 1 βa ],βa ] = 0. We get that 1 i+j = 0. i<j At last, we have that 4.6= ρ [β k u i,αβ k 1 u j ] f βu 1,,û i,,û j,,βu k+2 = ρ [β k u i,αβ k 1 u j ] β M fu 1,,û i,,û j,,u k+2 = [ ρ αβ k u i ρ αβ k 1 u j ρ αβ k u j ρ αβ k 1 u i ] fu 1,,û i,,û j,,u k+2. Thus we have k+2 i=1 1 i i<j 1 i+j = 0. The sum of the other six items is zero. Therefore, we have d 2 ρ = 0. The proof is completed. Associated to the representation ρ, we obtain the complex Cα,α k M L;M,d ρ. β,β M Denote the set of closed kbihomcochains by Zα,β k L;ρ and the set of exact kbihomcochains by Bα,β k L;ρ. Denote the corresponding cohomology by H k α,βl;ρ = Z k α,βl;ρ/b k α,βl;ρ, where Zα,βL;ρ k = {f Cα,α k M L;M : d ρ f = 0}, β,β M B k α,β L;ρ = {d ρf : f C k 1 α,α M β,β M L;M}. In the case of Lie algebras, we can form semidirect products when given representations. Similarly, we have
18 18 Proposition 4.4. Let L,[, ],α,β be a BihomLie algebra and M,ρ,α M,β M a representation of L. Assume that the maps α and β M are bijective. Then L M := L M,[, ],α α M,β β M is a BihomLie algebra, where α α M,β β M : L M L M are defined by α α M x,a = αx,α M a and β β M x,a = βx,β M a, and, for all x,y L and a,b M, the bracket [, ] is defined by [x,a,y,b] = [x,y], ρxb ρ α 1 βy α M β 1 M a. The proof is straightforward from the definition of the BihomLie algebra, we are no longer a detailed proof. 5 The Trivial Representations of BihomLie Algebras In this section, we study the trivial representation of regular BihomLie algebras. Now let M = R, then we have EndM = R. Any α M,β M EndM is just a real number, which we denote by r 1,r 2 respectively. Let ρ : L EndM = R be the zero map. Obviously, ρ is a representation of the regular BihomLie algebra L,[, ],α,β with respect to any r 1,r 2 R. We will always assume that r 1 = r 2 = 1. We call this representation the trivial representation of the regular BihomLie algebra L,[, ], α, β. Associated to the trivial representation, the set of kcochains on L, which we denote by C k L, is the set of skewsymmetric klinear maps from L L ktimes to R, namely, C k L {f : k L R is a linear map}. i.e.c k L = k L. The set of kbihomcochains is given by C k α,β L = {f k L f α = f,f β = f}. The corresponding coboundary operator d T : C k α,β d T fu 1,,u k+1 = i<j L Ck+1 α,β L is given by 1 i+j+1 f [α 1 βu i,u j ],βu 1,,û i,,û j,,βu k+1. Denote by Zα,β k L and Bk α,β L the corresponding closed kbihomcochains and exact kbihomcochains respectively. Denote the resulting cohomology by Hα,β k L. Namely, Z k α,β L = {f Ck α,β L : d Tf = 0}, B k α,β L = {d Tf : f C k 1 α,β L}, H k α,β L = Zk α,β L/Bk α,β L.
19 19 Proposition 5.1. With the above notations, associated to the trivial representation of the regular BihomLie algebra L,[, ],α,β, we have Hα,β 0 L = R, H 1 α,β L = {f C1 α,β L f [βu,αv] = 0, u,v L}. Proof. Obviously, any s R is a 0Bihomcochain. By the definition of coboundary operator d T, we have d T s = 0. Thus we have Hα,β 0 L = R. For any f C1 α,β L, we have d T fu,v = f [α 1 βu,v] = f α [α 1 βu,v] = f [βu,αv]. Therefore, f is closed if and only if f [βu,αv] = 0, u,v L. The conclusion follows from the fact that there is no exact 1Bihomcochain. i.e.bα,β 1 L = 0. Thus we have H 1 α,β L = {f C1 α,β L f [βu,αv] = 0, u,v L}. In the following we consider central extensions of the multiplicative BihomLie algebra L,[, ],α,β. Obviously, R,0,1,1 is a multiplicative BihomLie algebra with the trivial bracket and the identity morphism. Let θ Cα,β 2 L, we have θ α = θ and θ β = θ. We consider the direct sum g = L R with the following bracket [u,s,v,t] θ = [u,v],θαβ 1 u,v, u,v L,s,t R. Define α g,β g : g g by α g u,s = αu,s,β g u,s = βu,s. Theorem 5.2. With the above notations, g,[, ] θ,α g,β g is a multiplicative BihomLie algebra if and only if θ Cα,β 2 L is a 2cocycle associated to the trivial representation, i.e. d T θ = 0. Proof. Obviously, since α β = β α, we have α g β g = β g α g. Then we show that α g is an algebra morphism with the respect to the bracket [, ] θ. On one hand, we have α g [u,s,v,t] θ = α g [u,v],θαβ 1 u,v = α[u,v],θαβ 1 u,v. On the other hand, we have [α g u,s,α g v,t] θ = [ αu,s, αv,t ] θ = [αu,αv],θ αβ 1 αu,αv. Since α is an algebra morphism and θ αβ 1 αu,αv = θαβ 1 u,v, we deduce that α g is an algebra morphism. Similarly, we have β g is also an algebra morphism.
20 20 Furthermore, we have and [β g u,s,α g v,t] θ =[ βu,s, αv,t ] θ = [βu,αv],θ αβ 1 βu,αv = [βu,αv],θ αu,αv = [βu,αv],θu,v [β g v,t,α g u,s] θ =[ βv,t, αu,s ] θ = [βv,αu],θ αβ 1 βv,αu = [βv,αu],θ αv,αu = [βv,αu],θv,u. By 2.2, since θ is a skewsymmetric 2linear map, we obtain that [β g u,s,α g v,t] θ = [β g v,t,α g u,s] θ. By direct computations, on the hand,we have [ β 2 g u,s,[β g v,t,α g w,m] θ ]θ +c.p. u,s,v,t,w,m = [ β 2 u,s,[ βv,t, αw,m ] ] θ +c.p. u,s,v,t,w,m θ [ β = 2 u,s, [βv,αw],θ αv,αw ] +c.p. u,s,v,t,w,m θ = [ β 2 u,[βv,αw] ] +c.p.u,v,w+θ αβu,[βv,αw] +c.p.u,v,w. Thus by the BihomJacobi identity of L, [, ] θ satisfies the BihomJacobi identity if and only if Namely, θ αβu,[βv,αw] +θ αβv,[βw,αu] +θ αβw,[βu,αv] = 0. θ βu,[α 1 βv,w] +θ βv,[α 1 βw,u] +θ βw,[α 1 βu,v] = 0. On the other hand, d T θu,v,w =θ [α 1 βu,v],βw θ [α 1 βu,w],βv +θ [α 1 βv,w],βu = θ βw,[α 1 βu,v] θ βv,[α 1 βw,u] θ βu,[α 1 βv,w]
21 21 Therefore, g,[, ] θ,α g,β g is a multiplicative BihomLie algebra if and only if θ C 2 α,β L is a 2cocycle associated to the trivial representation, i.e. d T θ = 0. We call the multiplicative BihomLie algebra g,[, ] θ,α g,β g the central extension of L,[, ],α,β by the abelian BihomLie algebra R,0,1,1. Proposition 5.3. For θ 1,θ 2 Z 2 L, if θ 1 θ 2 is a exact, the corresponding two central extensions g,[, ] θ1,α g,β g and g,[, ] θ2,α g,β g are isomorphic. Proof. Assume that θ 1 θ 2 = d T f, f Cα,β 1 L. Thus we have θ 1 αβ 1 u,v θ 2 αβ 1 u,v =d T f αβ 1 u,v =f [α 1 β αβ 1 u,v] =f[u,v]. Define ϕ g : g g by ϕ g u,s = u,s fu. Obviously, ϕ g is an isomorphism of vector spaces. The fact that ϕ g is a morphism of the BihomLie algebra follows from the fact θ α = θ,θ β = θ. More precisely, we have ϕ g α g u,s = ϕ g αu,s = αu,s f αu = αu,s fu. On the other hand, we have α g ϕ g u,s = α g u,s fu = αu,s fu. Thus, we obtain that ϕ g α g = α g ϕ g. Similarly, we have ϕ g β g = β g ϕ g. We also have ϕ g [u,s,v,t] θ1 =ϕ g [u,v],θ 1 αβ 1 u,v = [u,v],θ 1 αβ 1 u,v f[u,v] = [u,v],θ 2 αβ 1 u,v =[ϕ g u,s,ϕ g v,t] θ2. Therefore, ϕ g is also an isomorphism of BihomLie algebras.
22 22 6 The Adjoint Representations of BihomLie Algebras Let L,[, ],α,β be a regular BihomLie algebra. We consider that L represents on itself via the bracket with respect to the morphisms α,β. Definition 6.1. For any integer s,t, the α s β t adjoint representation of the regular BihomLie algebra L,[, ],α,β, which we denote by ad s,t, is defined by ad s,t uv = [α s β t u,v], u,v L. Lemma 6.2. With the above notations, we have ad s,t αu α = α ads,t u; ad s,t βu β = β ads,t u; ad s,t [βu,v] β = ads,t αβu ads,t v ad s,t βv ads,t αu. Thus the definition of α s β t adjoint representation is well defined. Proof. For any u,v,w L, first we show that ad s,t αu α = α ads,t u. ad s,t αu αv=[α s β t αu,αv] =α [α s β t u,v] = α ad s,t uv. Similarly, we have ad s,t βu βv = β ads,t uv. Note that the skewsymmetry condition implies ad s,t uv = [α s β t u,v] = [α 1 βv,α s+1 β t 1 u], u,v L. On one hand, we have ads,t [βu,v] β w=ad s,t [βu,v] βw = [ α 1 β 2 w,α s+1 β t 1 [βu,v] ] = [ α 1 β 2 w,[α s+1 β t u,α s+1 β t 1 v] ].
23 23 On the other hand, we have ads,t αβu ad s,t v w ad s,t βv ad s,t αu w = ad s,t αβu [α 1 βw,α s+1 β t 1 v] = = ad s,t βv [α 1 βw,α s+2 β t 1 u] [ α 1 β[α 1 βw,α s+1 β t 1 v], α s+1 β t 1 αβu ] [ α 1 β[α 1 βw,α s+2 β t 1 u], α s+1 β t 1 βv ] [ β[α 2 βw,α s β t 1 v], α s+2 β t u ] [ β[α 2 βw,α s+1 β t 1 u], α s+1 β t v ] skewsymmetry = [ βα s+1 β t u, α[α 2 βw,α s β t 1 v] ] + [ βα s β t v, α[α 2 βw,α s+1 β t 1 u] ] = [ α s+1 β t+1 u, [α 1 βw,α s+1 β t 1 v] ] = = + [ α s β t+1 v, [α 1 βw,α s+2 β t 1 u] ] [ α s+1 β t+1 u, [α s β t v,w] ] + [ α s β t+1 v, [α 1 βw,α s+2 β t 1 u] ] [ β 2 α s+1 β t 1 u, [β α s β t 1 v,α α 1 w ] ] + [ β 2 α s β t 1 v, [β α 1 w,α α s+1 β t 1 u ] ] = [ β 2 α 1 w, [β α s+1 β t 1 u,α α s β t 1 v ] ] = [ α 1 β 2 w, [α s+1 β t u,α s+1 β t 1 v] ]. Thus, the definition of α s β t adjoint representation is well defined. The proof is completed. The set of kbihomcochains on L with coefficients in L, which we denote by Cα,β k L;L, are given by C k α,β L;L = {f Ck L;L f α = α f,f β = β f}. The set of 0Bihomcochains are given by: C 0 α,βl;l = {u L αu = u,βu = u}. Associated to the α s β t adjoint representation, the coboundary operator
24 24 d s,t : C k α,β L;L Ck+1 α,β L;L is given by d s,t fu 1,,u k+1 k+1 = 1 i [α s+1 β t+k 1 u i,fu 1,,û i,,u k+1 ] i=1 + i<j 1 i+j+1 f [α 1 βu i,u j ],βu 1,,û i,,û j,,βu k+1. For the α s β t adjoint representation ad s,t, we obtain the α s β t adjoint complex C k α,β L;L,d s,t and the corresponding cohomology H k L;ad s,t = Z k L;ad s,t /B k L;ad s,t. We have known that a 1cocycle associated to the adjoint representation is a derivation for Lie algebras and HomLie algebras. Similarly, we have Proposition 6.3. Associated to the α s β t adjoint representation ad s,t of the regular BihomLie algebra L,[, ],α,β, D Cα,β 1 L;L is a 1cocycle if and only if D is an α s+2 β t 1 derivation, i.e. D Der α s+2 β t 1L. Proof. The conclusion follows directly from the definition of the coboundary operator d s,t. D is closed if and only if d s,t Du,v = [α s+1 β t u,dv]+[α s+1 β t v,du]+d[α 1 βu,v] = 0. D is an α s+2 β t 1 derivation if and only if D[α 1 βu,v]=[α s+2 β t 1 α 1 βu,dv]+[α 1 β Du,α s+2 β t 1 v] =[α s+1 β t u,dv] [α s+1 β t v,du]. So D C 1 α,β L;L is a 1cocycle if and only if D is an αs+2 β t 1 derivation. Proposition 6.4. For any integer s,t, Associated to the α s β t adjoint representation ad s,t, we have H 0 L;ad s,t = {u L αu = u,βu = u,[u,v] = 0, v L}; H 1 L;ad s,t = Der α s+2 β t 1L/Inn α s+2 β t 1L. Proof. For any 0Bihomcochain u Cα,β 0 L;L, we have d s,t uv = [α s+1 β t 1 v,u] = [α 1 βu,α s+2 β t 2 v], v L.
25 25 Therefore, u is a closed 0Bihomcochain if and only if which is equivalent to [α 1 βu,α s+2 β t 2 v] = 0, α s 2 β t+2 [α 1 βu,α s+2 β t 2 v] = [u,v] = 0. Therefore, the set of closed 0Bihomcochain Z 0 L;ad s,t is given by Z 0 L;ad s,t = {u Cα,β 0 L;L [u,v] = 0, v L}. Obviously, B 0 L;ad s,t = 0. Thus we have H 0 L;ad s,t = {u L αu = u,βu = u,[u,v] = 0, v L}. By Proposition 6.3, we have Z 1 L;ad s,t = Der α s+2 βt 1L. Furthermore, it is obvious that any exact 1Bihomcochain is of the form [α s+1 β t 1,u] for some u C 0 α,β L;L. Therefore, we have B 1 L;ad s,t = Inn α s+2 βt 1L, which implies that H 1 L;ad s,t = Der α s+2 β t 1L/Inn α s+2 β t 1L. References 1. Ammar F., Ejbehi Z., Makhlouf A., Cohomology and deformations of Homalgebras, J. Lie Theory , Chevalley C., Eilenberg S., Cohomology theory of Lie groups and Lie algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc , Cheng Y., Su Y., CoHomology and universal central extension of HomLeibniz algebras, Acta Math. Sinica Ser. B, , Cheng Y., Su Y., Quantum deformations of HeisenbergVirasoro algebra, Algebra Colloq., , Cheng Y., Yang H., Lowdimensional cohomology of the qdeformed HeisenbergVirasoro algebra of Homtype, Front. Math. China, , Graziani G., Makhlouf A., Menini C., Panaite F., Bihomassociative algebras, BihomLie algebras and Bihombialgebras, Symmetry, Integrability and geometry. SIGMA , 086, 34 pages.
26 26 7. Hartwig J.T., Larsson D., Silvestrov S.D., Deformations of Lie algebras using σderivations, J. Algebra , Hassanzadeh M., Shapiro I., Sütlü S., Cyclic homology for Homassociative algebras, J. Geom. Phys , Liu Y., Chen L., Ma Y., Representations and moduleextensions of 3homLie algebras, J. Geom. Phys , Makhlouf A., Silvestrov S., Homalgebras and Homcoalgebras, J. Algebra Appl , Makhlouf A., Silvestrov S., Notes on formal deformations of homassociative and homlie algebras, Forum Math , 715C Sheng Y., Representations of HomLie algebras, Algebr. Represent. Theory , Sheng, Y., Xiong, Z., On HomLie algebras, Linear Multilinear Algebra , Yau D., HomYangBaxter equation, HomLie algebras, and quasitriangular bialgebras, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor , Yau D., Homalgebras and homology, J. Lie Theory ,