Proofs on expressing nested GR(1) properties in GR(1)
|
|
|
- Βενέδικτος Παχής
- 5 χρόνια πριν
- Προβολές:
Transcript
1 Proofs on expressing nested GR(1 properties in GR(1 Ioannis Filippidis Control and Dynamical Systems California Institute of Technology December 22, 2017 Abstract This is a proof that any nested GR(1 property is equivalent to a GR(1 property, by adding an auxiliary variable that counts up to the nesting depth, which is at most equal to the number of states. In practice the nesting depth is small. The proof style below is described in [1]. The results are proved for stutter-sensitive properties, and stutter-sensitive temporal quantification (,. Wherever we invoke arguments about history-determined variables, these are analogous to the stutter-invariant case [2]. The rules of TLA + are assumed for declaring variables, so when writing q : a in a theorem statement, the identifier q stands for a fresh name in the context where the theorem is applied. For this reason, where possible we do not mention assumptions about what identifiers can occur when. assume The operators take Boolean values, except where otherwise noted. Definition 1 Let d Nat, H k Nat, Ξ m Nat. A chain condition is a formula of the form: m 1..d : P m 1 Q m l 0..Ξ m : ξ ml P m 1 m 0..d : Q m P m l 0..H m : η ml (P m Q m l 0..Ξ m : ξ ml Q m assume ChainCondition = The operators P m, Q m, ξ ml, η ml satisfy a chain condition (Definition 1. Definition 2 (Nested GR(1 property [3] Let φ is a nested GR(1 property. φ = m 0..d P m k m..d Q m ( Q m l 0..Ξ m 1
2 A nested GR(1 property is defined here as a liveness formula. Inserting a liveness formula of this form in a stepwise implication operator ( +, WhilePlusHalf, or some other choice can yield an open-system property. Proposition 3 let φ 1 = (( i A i B = ( i A i B in φ define φ 1 = (( i A i B = ( i A i B 1 2. suffices assume new σ, IsABehavior(σ prove σ = φ case σ = i A i 2 1. σ = ( i A i ( i A i 2 2. case σ = B 3 1. σ = B BY σ = i A i by 1 3, σ = φ 1 ( i A i B ( B ( i A i ( i A i B 3 4. σ = B i A i ( ( i A i B 3 5. qed by 3 3, case σ = B by 2 3 def φ 1, 2 4. qed by 2 2, case σ = i A i 2 1. σ = φ 1 by 1 4 def φ σ = 3 1. σ = i A i by qed by 3 1 def 2 3. qed by 2 1, qed by 1 3, 1 4 2
3 Proposition 4 prove let φ 1 in φ 1 = (a b = q : q = true ( q (b (q a q 1 1. suffices assume new σ, IsABehavior(σ prove σ = φ assume σ = φ 1 prove σ = The variable q is history-determined in Hist q : (q = true (q = b ( a q. It remains to show that φ 1 and Hist imply q. The case a implies b, so q. The case a is split as ( a (a a. For the subcase a, q starts and remains true. For the subcase (a a, some infinite suffix of σ has a from the second state onwards, and b, so q. Thus, q assume σ = prove σ = φ 1 The case (a b implies a b. The case (a b implies q. By q, eventually there is a (q q-step. Such a step implies b. The two cases are exhaustive, thus (a b qed by 1 2, 1 3 Proposition 5 prove ( ((a j b j c ( ( j b j (a c 1 1. ( (a j b j c ( ( j b j (a c 1 2. qed by 1 1, Proposition 3 with A i b j, i j, B (a c Proposition 6 prove ( ( j b j (a c q : ( j b j q = true (q = c (q a q proof by Proposition 4, rules for. From this point on we assume that history-determined variables (q, r, etc. do not occur implicitly (so c, a, etc. below are independent of those history variables, only explicitly where shown. 3
4 Proposition 7 define φ 1 = q : ( j b j q = true (q = c ( a q q = r, q : ( j b j q = true r true (r = c (r a (q = c (q a q prove φ 1 proof by the rules for introducing bound variables, r does not occur in any of the expressions a, c, b j, q. So r is a history-determined variable. Proposition 8 define φ 1 = r, q : ( j b j q = true (q = c ( a q q r = true (r = c ( a r = r : ( j b j r r = true (r = c ( a r prove φ φ 1 Within the consequent, q and r are both history-determined by the same formulas. Thus, (q = r, which together with q implies r in the consequent. We then eliminate q (recall the assumption that q, r do not occur in a, c, b j φ 1 Introduce a history-determined variable r in the consequent. Again, identical formulas imply that (r = q within the consequent, so q implies r. Omit the conjunct q qed by 1 1, 1 2 Proposition 9 prove ( ( (a j b j c q : q = true (q = c ( a q ( j b j q (1 by Proposition 5, Proposition 6, Proposition 7, Proposition 8. 4
5 Proposition 10 assume For all m 0..d, for any j with j 0..d j m, variable q m does not occur in any of P m, η kl, Q m. prove let φ 1 = m 0..d ((P m ( k m..d Q m = q 0,..., q d : m 0..d q m true in φ 1 ( q m = Q m ( P m q m ( k m..d q m 1 1. assume new m 0..d prove ((P m ( k m..d Q m q m : q m (q m = Q m ( P m q m ( k m..d q m proof Substitute a P m, b j η kl, c Q m, q q m in Proposition qed By hypothesis, 1 1, dm=0 ((P m ( Q m k m..d dm=0 q m : q m true q 0,..., q d (q m = Q m ( P m q m ( k m..d q m : d m=0 q m true (q m = Q m ( P m q m ( k m..d q m (2 Proposition 11 prove let φ 1 in φ 1 = m 0..d q m = true 1 1. define φ 1 = m 0..d q m = true ( q m = Q m ( P m q m ( k m..d = m 0..d q m = true ( q m = Q m ( P m q m ( k 0..d ( q m = Q m ( P m q m ( k m..d = m 0..d q m = true ( q m = Q m ( P m q m ( k 0..d 1 2. suffices assume new σ, IsABehavior(σ prove σ = φ 1 q m q m q m q m 5
6 1 3. assume σ = φ 1 prove σ = obvious 1 4. assume σ = prove σ = φ k 0..d : l 0..H k : η kl (P k Q k P k 2 2. k 0..(d 1 : P k Q k k 0..(d 1 : l 0..H k : η k P k Q k+1 by 2 1, k 0..(d 1 : r k..d : Q k Q r 3 1. k 0..(d 1 : Q k Q k k 0..(d 1 : P k Q k+1 by ChainCondition 4 2. k 0..d : Q k P k 4 3. qed by 4 1, k 0..(d 1 : r (k + 1..d : Q k Q r 4 1. r (k + 1..d : k < k + 1 r d k < r d 4 2. qed by 4 1, 3 1, NatInduction 3 3. k : Q k Q k 3 4. qed by 3 2, m 0..d : k 0..(m 1 : l 0..H k : η kl Q m 3 1. m 0..d : k 0..(m 1 : l 0..H k : η kl Q k m 0..d : k 0..(m 1 : k 0..(m 1 = 0..(d qed by 4 1, m 0..d : k 0..(m 1 : Q k+1 Q m 4 1. m 0..d : k 0..(m 1 : m (k + 1..d 5 1. k 0..(m 1 k m 1 k + 1 m 5 2. m 0..d m d 5 3. qed by 5 1, m 0..d : k 0..(m 1 : (k (m 1+1 = 0..m 0..d (the k +1 here is k in qed by 4 1, 4 2, qed by 3 1, 3 2, m 0..d : k 0..(m 1 : l 0..H k : ( (η kl Q k+1 (Q k+1 Q m η kl Q m 2 6. m 0..d : k 0..(m 1 : l 0..H k : η kl Q m 3 1. (A B ( A B 3 2. ( B ( B 3 3. (A B ( A B by 3 1, (η kl Q m ( η kl Q m by 3 3 with A η kl, B Q m 6
7 3 5. qed by 2 5, σ = m 0..d ( q m = Q m ( P m q m 2 8. m 0..d : σ = Q m q m 3 1. σ = Q m q m by qed by 3 1 and q m q m 2 9. m 0..d : k 0..(m 1 : l 0..H k : σ = η kl q m by 2 6, m 0..d : σ = ( k 0..(m m 0..d : σ = ( k 0..(m 1 by m 0..d : ( k 0..(m qed by 3 1, qed by 2 10, as follows: 1 5. qed by 1 3, 1 4 Proposition 12 let φ 1 η kl q m η kl k 0..(m 1 q m q m σ = σ = m 0..dq = true m 0..d (q m = Q m ( P m q m k 0..d η kl q m σ = m 0..dq = true m 0..d (q m = Q m ( P m q m k m..d η kl k 0..(m 1 η kl q m σ = m 0..dq = true m 0..d (q m = Q m ( P m q m k m..d η kl q m q m σ = m 0..dq = true m 0..d (q m = Q m ( P m q m k m..d η kl q m σ = φ 1 = m 0..d P m k m..d Q m q m = q 0,..., q d : m 0..dq m true m 0..d ( q m Q m ( P m q m ( η ml m 0..d q m in φ 1 7
8 by Propositions 10 and 11 Proposition 13 assume new m 0..d prove let φ 1 = ( Q m l 0..Ξ m = l 0..Ξ m in φ define φ 1 = ( Q m l 0..Ξ m = l 0..Ξ m 1 2. suffices assume new σ, IsABehavior(σ prove σ = φ assume σ = prove σ = φ Ξ m l=0 Ξ m l=0 proof Ξ m l=0 Ξ m l=0 Ξ m l= ( Ξ m l=0 (( Q m Ξ m l=0 proof ( Ξ m l=0 (( Q m Ξ m l= qed by 1 3, 2 1, assume σ = φ 1 prove σ = 2 1. case σ = Q m 3 1. l 0..Ξ m : ξ ml Q m by ChainCondition 3 2. l 0..Ξ m : Q m ξ ml by l 0..Ξ m : ( Q m ( by qed by 2 1, case σ = Q m 3 1. φ 1 Q m l 0..Ξ m 3 2. l 0..Ξ m l 0..Ξ m l 0..Ξ m by [4, p.93], (A B ( A ( B qed by 2 2, 3 1, qed by 1 4, 2 1, qed by 1 3, 1 4 Proposition 14 prove let φ 1 = ( η ml m 0..d = m 0..d l 0..Ξ m in φ 1 l 0..Ξ m 8
9 1 1. define φ 1 = ( η ml m 0..d l 0..Ξ m = m 0..d l 0..Ξ m 1 2. suffices assume new σ, IsABehavior(σ prove σ = φ σ = φ 1 obvious 1 4. σ = φ define F = η ml 2 2. case σ = F by 2 2 def F, φ 1, 2 3. case σ = F 3 1. ( F η ml 3 2. η ml m 0..d : l 0..H m : η ml 3 3. m 0..d : l 0..H m : η ml k 0..d : r 0..H k : ξ kr 4 1. m 0..d : l 0..H m : η ml P m Q m 4 2. m 0..(d 1 : P m P m m 0..(d 1 : q (m + 1..d : P m P q by 4 2, NatInduction 4 4. m 0..(d 1 : q (m + 1..d : P q P m 4 5. m 0..d : l 0..Ξ m : ξ ml Q m by ChainCondition 4 6. m 1..d : l 0..Ξ m : ξ ml P m 1 by ChainCondition 4 7. ξ ml P m 1 P m 2 P 0 r 0..(m 1 : l 0..Ξ m : ξ ml P r and m (r + 1..d : l 0..Ξ m : P r ξ ml 4 8. m 0..(d 1 : Q m Q m m 0..(d 1 : q m..d : Q q Q m and Q q Q q m 0..d : l 0..Ξ ml : ξ ml Q m proof m 0..d : l 0..Ξ m : Q m ξ ml m 0..q : l 0..Ξ m : Q q ( Q m ξ ml qed proof m 0..d : l 0..H m : η ml Q m k 0..m : θ 0..Ξ k : ξ kθ by 4 1, Also, m 0..d : l 0..H m : η ml P m k (m + 1..d : θ 0..Ξ k : ξ kθ by 4 7. These imply that k 0..d : θ 0..Ξ k : ξ kθ m 0..d : l 0..H m : η ml k 0..d : r 0..Ξ k : ξ kr by m 0..d : l 0..H m : η ml k 0..d : r 0..Ξ k : ξ kr by 3 4, ( A ( A 3 6. m 0..d : l 0..H m : η ml k 0..d 3 7. η ml k 0..d by 3 2, qed by 2 3, 3 7 def φ 1, 2 4. qed by 2 2, qed r 0..Ξ k ξ kr r 0..Ξ k ξ kr 9
10 P m Q m q m q m Q m Q m Q m P m Figure 1: The automaton that corresponds to the auxiliary variable p that reduces memory to d + 1. by 1 3, 1 4 Proposition 15 prove ( m 0..d (Q m l 0..Ξ m η ml m 0..d l 0..Ξ m by Propositions 13 and 14 Lemma 16 let φ 1 in φ 1 by Propositions 12 and 15 = m 0..d P m k m..d Q m ( Q m l 0..Ξ m = q 0,.., q d : m 0..d q m true ( q m Q m ( P m q m η ml m 0..d q m l 0..Ξ m 10
11 Proposition 17 prove let φ 1 in φ 1 = q 0,.., q d : m 0..d q m = true ( q m = Q m ( P m q m q m = p : p = d + 1 p = choose r 0..(d + 1 : m 0..d : (m < r Q m P m p > m (r d Q r P r p > r (p = d + 1 below is stutter-sensitive temporal quantification. Respose(q0,.., qd = m 0.. d : qm true (qm = Qm ( Pm qm qm phi1 = q0,.., qd : Response(q0,.., qd ChooseP(r = m 0.. d : (m < r Qm (r d Qr Pr (p > r Pm (p > m SMP(p = p = d + 1 (p = choose r 0.. (d + 1 : ChooseP(r SpecP(p = SMP(p (p = d + 1 phi2 = p : SpecP(p The satisfaction relation ( = below is of raw TLA+ theorem ReductionWithLinearMemory = assume new sigma, IsABehavior(sigma, ChainCondition prove sigma = phi1 phi2 proof 1 1. sigma = phi1 phi suffices assume sigma = phi1 11
12 prove sigma = phi2 obvious 2 2. sigma = p : SMP(p by def SMP p is history-determined we will prove liveness of p in SpecP 2 3. pick tau : IsABehavior(tau EqualUpToVars(tau, sigma, p, q0,.., qd tau = SMP(p Response(q0,.., qd by suffices tau = (p = d + 1 by 2 3 def SpecP, SMP, phi2 and that p does not occur in the spec 2 9. tau = ( r 0.. (d + 1 : ChooseP(r 3 1.case m 0.. d : Qm ( Pm (p > m 4 1. m 0.. d : (m < (d + 1 (Qm ( Pm (p > m by ChooseP(d + 1 (d (d + 1 by 4 1 def ChooseP 4 qed by case m 0.. d : Qm (Pm (p > m 4 1. pick z 0.. d : Qz (Pz (p > z t 0.. d : (t < z (Qt ( Pt (p > t by 3 2, SmallestNumberPrinciple choose the smallest such z (z d ( Qz (Pz (p > z by ChooseP(z z 0.. (d + 1 by 4 1, qed by r 0.. (d + 1 : ChooseP(r by 3 1, 3 2 which are exhaustive 3 qed by tau = p 0.. (d + 1 ChooseP(p by 2 3, 2 9 def SMP The next step ensures that if ever p < (d + 1, then qm, which starts a chain of Qm, leading to the bottom, and to (p = d + 1 again tau = p p m 0.. d : p = m qm 12
13 by 2 10, 2 3 (p 0..(d + 1, so if p decreases, then p = r 0..d. Since Choose(p, it is (Qr ( Pr (p > r, thus qr, by def Response (qm boolean (qm = Qm ( Pm qm (( qm (Qm qm by PTL 2 7. tau = (( qm qm Qm (( qm (Qm qm 3 1. tau = qm = true (qm = Qm ( Pm qm by 2 1, 2 3 def EqualUpToVars, phi 1 3 qed by 3 1, tau = m 0.. d : (( qm Qm 3 1. tau = m 0.. d : qm by 2 3 def Response 3 qed by 3 1, tau = (p = m (p 0.. d Qm p = m 3 1. Qm P(m 1.. P0 by ChainCondition 3 2. (p = m p 0.. d r 0.. (m 1 : (p > r obvious 3 3. ( Qm (p = m (p 0.. d r 0.. (m 1 : p > r Pr by 3 1, tau = ( ( Qm (p = m (p 0.. d (p m by 3 3, 2 10 def ChooseP Otherwise the second conjunct of ChooseP would be violated ( Qm (p = m (p 0.. d ( Qm (p m obvious 3 6. tau = ( ( Qm (p = m (p 0.. d (p m by 3 5 def ChooseP Otherwise (m < p so it must be (Qm ( Pm (p > m, which is not the case. 3 qed by 3 4, define TopOrLower(m = (0.. (d + 1 \ (m.. d 13
14 2 12. tau = (Qm qm p TopOrLower(m 3 1. tau = (Qm qm by 2 3 def Response 3 2. Qm Q(m Qd by ChainCondition 3 3. tau = (Qm (p / m.. d by 2 10, 3 2 def ChooseP The second conjunct of ChooseP would be violated by such a p as r tau = (p 0.. (d + 1 by 2 10, RawRuleINV tau = (Qm (p ((0.. (m 1 {d + 1} by 3 3, qed by 3 1, 3 5 def TopOrLower 2 qed by 2 5, 2 7, 2 11, 2 12 Initially p = d + 1 by def SMP. Assume p < p. Then by 2 5, m 0..d : (p = m qm. It is qm Qm. Until qm, it is ( qm qm. by 2 7 follows that Qm until qm qm. by 2 7, qm qm implies Qm. by 2 11, p = m = p while Qm, so while qm qm. by 2 12 Qm implies (p < p = m (p = d + 1. So ((p < p Qm (because we started with Qm, and Qm. So p is strictly decreasing until p = d + 1 (by induction over steps of the behavior sigma = phi2 phi suffices assume sigma = phi2 prove sigma = phi1 obvious 2 2. sigma = p : SpecP(p by 2 1 def phi sigma = q0,.., qd : m 0.. d : qm = true (qm = Qm ( Pm qm obvious q 0,..., q d are history-determined pick tau : IsABehavior(tau EqualUpToVars(tau, sigma, p, q0,.., qd tau = SpecP(p m 0.. d : qm = true (qm = Qm ( Pm qm by 2 2, suffices tau = m 0.. d : qm by 2 4 def phi 1, Response 2 6. suffices tau = m 0.. d : ((qm qm qm by 2 4, PTL whenever any q m becomes false, it eventually becomes again true. Thus, the goal from 2 5 follows tau = m 0.. d : ((qm qm ( Qm Pm by tau = m 0.. d : (p > m 14
15 by 2 4 def SpecP 2 9. tau = m 0.. d : (( Qm Pm (p m by 2 4 def SpecP, SMP, ChooseP we proved under 1 1 that ChooseP(p holds tau = m 0.. d : ((p > m (Qm ( Pm (p > m by 2 4 def SpecP, SMP, ChooseP tau = m 0.. d : (( Qm Pm ((p m (p > m by 2 9, tau = m 0.. d : (( Qm Pm Qm by 2 10, tau = m 0.. d : (Qm qm by tau = m 0.. d : (( Qm Pm qm by 2 12, qed by 2 7, qed by 1 1, 1 2 References [1] L. Lamport, How to write a 21st century proof, Journal of fixed point theory and applications, vol. 11, no. 1, pp , [2] M. Abadi and L. Lamport, An old-fashioned recipe for real time, TOPLAS, vol. 16, no. 5, pp , September [3] I. Filippidis and R. M. Murray, Symbolic construction of GR(1 contracts for systems with full information, in ACC, 2016, pp [4] L. Lamport, Specifying Systems: The TLA + language and tools for hardware and software engineers. Addison-Wesley,
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set
Every set of first-order formulas is equivalent to an independent set May 6, 2008 Abstract A set of first-order formulas, whatever the cardinality of the set of symbols, is equivalent to an independent
C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions
C.S. 430 Assignment 6, Sample Solutions Paul Liu November 15, 2007 Note that these are sample solutions only; in many cases there were many acceptable answers. 1 Reynolds Problem 10.1 1.1 Normal-order
Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs
Fractional Colorings and Zykov Products of graphs Who? Nichole Schimanski When? July 27, 2011 Graphs A graph, G, consists of a vertex set, V (G), and an edge set, E(G). V (G) is any finite set E(G) is
2 Composition. Invertible Mappings
Arkansas Tech University MATH 4033: Elementary Modern Algebra Dr. Marcel B. Finan Composition. Invertible Mappings In this section we discuss two procedures for creating new mappings from old ones, namely,
Lecture 2. Soundness and completeness of propositional logic
Lecture 2 Soundness and completeness of propositional logic February 9, 2004 1 Overview Review of natural deduction. Soundness and completeness. Semantics of propositional formulas. Soundness proof. Completeness
Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in
Nowhere-zero flows Let be a digraph, Abelian group. A Γ-circulation in is a mapping : such that, where, and : tail in X, head in : tail in X, head in A nowhere-zero Γ-flow is a Γ-circulation such that
The Simply Typed Lambda Calculus
Type Inference Instead of writing type annotations, can we use an algorithm to infer what the type annotations should be? That depends on the type system. For simple type systems the answer is yes, and
Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit
Ordinal Arithmetic: Addition, Multiplication, Exponentiation and Limit Ting Zhang Stanford May 11, 2001 Stanford, 5/11/2001 1 Outline Ordinal Classification Ordinal Addition Ordinal Multiplication Ordinal
Example Sheet 3 Solutions
Example Sheet 3 Solutions. i Regular Sturm-Liouville. ii Singular Sturm-Liouville mixed boundary conditions. iii Not Sturm-Liouville ODE is not in Sturm-Liouville form. iv Regular Sturm-Liouville note
Problem Set 3: Solutions
CMPSCI 69GG Applied Information Theory Fall 006 Problem Set 3: Solutions. [Cover and Thomas 7.] a Define the following notation, C I p xx; Y max X; Y C I p xx; Ỹ max I X; Ỹ We would like to show that C
Phys460.nb Solution for the t-dependent Schrodinger s equation How did we find the solution? (not required)
Phys460.nb 81 ψ n (t) is still the (same) eigenstate of H But for tdependent H. The answer is NO. 5.5.5. Solution for the tdependent Schrodinger s equation If we assume that at time t 0, the electron starts
ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER
ORDINAL ARITHMETIC JULIAN J. SCHLÖDER Abstract. We define ordinal arithmetic and show laws of Left- Monotonicity, Associativity, Distributivity, some minor related properties and the Cantor Normal Form.
Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor
Uniform Convergence of Fourier Series Michael Taylor Given f L 1 T 1 ), we consider the partial sums of the Fourier series of f: N 1) S N fθ) = ˆfk)e ikθ. k= N A calculation gives the Dirichlet formula
Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. ------------------ ----------------------------- -----------------
Inverse trigonometric functions & General Solution of Trigonometric Equations. 1. Sin ( ) = a) b) c) d) Ans b. Solution : Method 1. Ans a: 17 > 1 a) is rejected. w.k.t Sin ( sin ) = d is rejected. If sin
HOMEWORK 4 = G. In order to plot the stress versus the stretch we define a normalized stretch:
HOMEWORK 4 Problem a For the fast loading case, we want to derive the relationship between P zz and λ z. We know that the nominal stress is expressed as: P zz = ψ λ z where λ z = λ λ z. Therefore, applying
4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(1,1)
84 CHAPTER 4. STATIONARY TS MODELS 4.6 Autoregressive Moving Average Model ARMA(,) This section is an introduction to a wide class of models ARMA(p,q) which we will consider in more detail later in this
Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests
Other Test Constructions: Likelihood Ratio & Bayes Tests Side-Note: So far we have seen a few approaches for creating tests such as Neyman-Pearson Lemma ( most powerful tests of H 0 : θ = θ 0 vs H 1 :
Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees
Bounding Nonsplitting Enumeration Degrees Thomas F. Kent Andrea Sorbi Università degli Studi di Siena Italia July 18, 2007 Goal: Introduce a form of Σ 0 2-permitting for the enumeration degrees. Till now,
Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude
Approximation of distance between locations on earth given by latitude and longitude Jan Behrens 2012-12-31 In this paper we shall provide a method to approximate distances between two points on earth
Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016
Concrete Mathematics Exercises from 30 September 2016 Silvio Capobianco Exercise 1.7 Let H(n) = J(n + 1) J(n). Equation (1.8) tells us that H(2n) = 2, and H(2n+1) = J(2n+2) J(2n+1) = (2J(n+1) 1) (2J(n)+1)
Overview. Transition Semantics. Configurations and the transition relation. Executions and computation
Overview Transition Semantics Configurations and the transition relation Executions and computation Inference rules for small-step structural operational semantics for the simple imperative language Transition
Homomorphism in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Automata
International Journal of Fuzzy Mathematics Systems. ISSN 2248-9940 Volume 3, Number 1 (2013), pp. 39-45 Research India Publications http://www.ripublication.com/ijfms.htm Homomorphism in Intuitionistic
Sequent Calculi for the Modal µ-calculus over S5. Luca Alberucci, University of Berne. Logic Colloquium Berne, July 4th 2008
Sequent Calculi for the Modal µ-calculus over S5 Luca Alberucci, University of Berne Logic Colloquium Berne, July 4th 2008 Introduction Koz: Axiomatisation for the modal µ-calculus over K Axioms: All classical
EE512: Error Control Coding
EE512: Error Control Coding Solution for Assignment on Finite Fields February 16, 2007 1. (a) Addition and Multiplication tables for GF (5) and GF (7) are shown in Tables 1 and 2. + 0 1 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 3
3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS. NOTE: cos(α+β) cos α + cos β cos(α-β) cos α -cos β
3.4 SUM AND DIFFERENCE FORMULAS Page Theorem cos(αβ cos α cos β -sin α cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α NOTE: cos(αβ cos α cos β cos(α-β cos α -cos β Proof of cos(α-β cos α cos β sin α Let s use a unit circle
Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests
Statistical Inference I Locally most powerful tests Shirsendu Mukherjee Department of Statistics, Asutosh College, Kolkata, India. shirsendu st@yahoo.co.in So far we have treated the testing of one-sided
derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates
derivation of the Laplacian from rectangular to spherical coordinates swapnizzle 03-03- :5:43 We begin by recognizing the familiar conversion from rectangular to spherical coordinates (note that φ is used
Reminders: linear functions
Reminders: linear functions Let U and V be vector spaces over the same field F. Definition A function f : U V is linear if for every u 1, u 2 U, f (u 1 + u 2 ) = f (u 1 ) + f (u 2 ), and for every u U
Solutions to Exercise Sheet 5
Solutions to Eercise Sheet 5 jacques@ucsd.edu. Let X and Y be random variables with joint pdf f(, y) = 3y( + y) where and y. Determine each of the following probabilities. Solutions. a. P (X ). b. P (X
5. Choice under Uncertainty
5. Choice under Uncertainty Daisuke Oyama Microeconomics I May 23, 2018 Formulations von Neumann-Morgenstern (1944/1947) X: Set of prizes Π: Set of probability distributions on X : Preference relation
A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy. Equivalence Relation
International Mathematical Forum, 5, 2010, no. 67, 3301-3307 A Note on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Equivalence Relation D. K. Basnet Dept. of Mathematics, Assam University Silchar-788011, Assam, India dkbasnet@rediffmail.com
Homework 3 Solutions
Homework 3 Solutions Igor Yanovsky (Math 151A TA) Problem 1: Compute the absolute error and relative error in approximations of p by p. (Use calculator!) a) p π, p 22/7; b) p π, p 3.141. Solution: For
Matrices and Determinants
Matrices and Determinants SUBJECTIVE PROBLEMS: Q 1. For what value of k do the following system of equations possess a non-trivial (i.e., not all zero) solution over the set of rationals Q? x + ky + 3z
Econ 2110: Fall 2008 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 questions or comments to Dan Fetter 1
Eon : Fall 8 Suggested Solutions to Problem Set 8 Email questions or omments to Dan Fetter Problem. Let X be a salar with density f(x, θ) (θx + θ) [ x ] with θ. (a) Find the most powerful level α test
ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II
ST5224: Advanced Statistical Theory II 2014/2015: Semester II Tutorial 7 1. Let X be a sample from a population P and consider testing hypotheses H 0 : P = P 0 versus H 1 : P = P 1, where P j is a known
CHAPTER 25 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS
CHAPTER 5 SOLVING EQUATIONS BY ITERATIVE METHODS EXERCISE 104 Page 8 1. Find the positive root of the equation x + 3x 5 = 0, correct to 3 significant figures, using the method of bisection. Let f(x) =
SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES G11LMA Linear Mathematics Examination Solutions
SCHOOL OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES GLMA Linear Mathematics 00- Examination Solutions. (a) i. ( + 5i)( i) = (6 + 5) + (5 )i = + i. Real part is, imaginary part is. (b) ii. + 5i i ( + 5i)( + i) = ( i)( + i)
5.4 The Poisson Distribution.
The worst thing you can do about a situation is nothing. Sr. O Shea Jackson 5.4 The Poisson Distribution. Description of the Poisson Distribution Discrete probability distribution. The random variable
Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics
Lecture 15 - Root System Axiomatics Nov 1, 01 In this lecture we examine root systems from an axiomatic point of view. 1 Reflections If v R n, then it determines a hyperplane, denoted P v, through the
TMA4115 Matematikk 3
TMA4115 Matematikk 3 Andrew Stacey Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet Trondheim Spring 2010 Lecture 12: Mathematics Marvellous Matrices Andrew Stacey Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
Section 8.3 Trigonometric Equations
99 Section 8. Trigonometric Equations Objective 1: Solve Equations Involving One Trigonometric Function. In this section and the next, we will exple how to solving equations involving trigonometric functions.
Fourier Series. MATH 211, Calculus II. J. Robert Buchanan. Spring Department of Mathematics
Fourier Series MATH 211, Calculus II J. Robert Buchanan Department of Mathematics Spring 2018 Introduction Not all functions can be represented by Taylor series. f (k) (c) A Taylor series f (x) = (x c)
Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3
Lecture 2: Dirac notation and a review of linear algebra Read Sakurai chapter 1, Baym chatper 3 1 State vector space and the dual space Space of wavefunctions The space of wavefunctions is the set of all
Απόκριση σε Μοναδιαία Ωστική Δύναμη (Unit Impulse) Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο. Απόστολος Σ.
Απόκριση σε Δυνάμεις Αυθαίρετα Μεταβαλλόμενες με το Χρόνο The time integral of a force is referred to as impulse, is determined by and is obtained from: Newton s 2 nd Law of motion states that the action
2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)
![2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)](/thumbs/40/21364883.jpg "2. Let H 1 and H 2 be Hilbert spaces and let T : H 1 H 2 be a bounded linear operator. Prove that [T (H 1 )] = N (T ). (6p)")
Uppsala Universitet Matematiska Institutionen Andreas Strömbergsson Prov i matematik Funktionalanalys Kurs: F3B, F4Sy, NVP 2005-03-08 Skrivtid: 9 14 Tillåtna hjälpmedel: Manuella skrivdon, Kreyszigs bok
6.1. Dirac Equation. Hamiltonian. Dirac Eq.
6.1. Dirac Equation Ref: M.Kaku, Quantum Field Theory, Oxford Univ Press (1993) η μν = η μν = diag(1, -1, -1, -1) p 0 = p 0 p = p i = -p i p μ p μ = p 0 p 0 + p i p i = E c 2 - p 2 = (m c) 2 H = c p 2
Math221: HW# 1 solutions
Math: HW# solutions Andy Royston October, 5 7.5.7, 3 rd Ed. We have a n = b n = a = fxdx = xdx =, x cos nxdx = x sin nx n sin nxdx n = cos nx n = n n, x sin nxdx = x cos nx n + cos nxdx n cos n = + sin
Srednicki Chapter 55
Srednicki Chapter 55 QFT Problems & Solutions A. George August 3, 03 Srednicki 55.. Use equations 55.3-55.0 and A i, A j ] = Π i, Π j ] = 0 (at equal times) to verify equations 55.-55.3. This is our third
Practice Exam 2. Conceptual Questions. 1. State a Basic identity and then verify it. (a) Identity: Solution: One identity is csc(θ) = 1
Conceptual Questions. State a Basic identity and then verify it. a) Identity: Solution: One identity is cscθ) = sinθ) Practice Exam b) Verification: Solution: Given the point of intersection x, y) of the
1. Introduction and Preliminaries.
Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niš, Serbia Available at: http://www.pmf.ni.ac.yu/filomat Filomat 22:1 (2008), 97 106 ON δ SETS IN γ SPACES V. Renuka Devi and D. Sivaraj Abstract We
Finite Field Problems: Solutions
Finite Field Problems: Solutions 1. Let f = x 2 +1 Z 11 [x] and let F = Z 11 [x]/(f), a field. Let Solution: F =11 2 = 121, so F = 121 1 = 120. The possible orders are the divisors of 120. Solution: The
Second Order RLC Filters
ECEN 60 Circuits/Electronics Spring 007-0-07 P. Mathys Second Order RLC Filters RLC Lowpass Filter A passive RLC lowpass filter (LPF) circuit is shown in the following schematic. R L C v O (t) Using phasor
( y) Partial Differential Equations
Partial Dierential Equations Linear P.D.Es. contains no owers roducts o the deendent variables / an o its derivatives can occasionall be solved. Consider eamle ( ) a (sometimes written as a ) we can integrate
Homework 8 Model Solution Section
MATH 004 Homework Solution Homework 8 Model Solution Section 14.5 14.6. 14.5. Use the Chain Rule to find dz where z cosx + 4y), x 5t 4, y 1 t. dz dx + dy y sinx + 4y)0t + 4) sinx + 4y) 1t ) 0t + 4t ) sinx
Tridiagonal matrices. Gérard MEURANT. October, 2008
Tridiagonal matrices Gérard MEURANT October, 2008 1 Similarity 2 Cholesy factorizations 3 Eigenvalues 4 Inverse Similarity Let α 1 ω 1 β 1 α 2 ω 2 T =......... β 2 α 1 ω 1 β 1 α and β i ω i, i = 1,...,
LTL to Buchi. Overview. Buchi Model Checking LTL Translating LTL into Buchi. Ralf Huuck. Buchi Automata. Example
Overview LTL to Buchi Buchi Model Checking LTL Translating LTL into Buchi Ralf Huuck Buchi Automata Example Automaton which accepts infinite traces δ A Buchi automaton is 5-tuple Σ, Q, Q 0,δ, F Σ is a
Distances in Sierpiński Triangle Graphs
Distances in Sierpiński Triangle Graphs Sara Sabrina Zemljič joint work with Andreas M. Hinz June 18th 2015 Motivation Sierpiński triangle introduced by Wac law Sierpiński in 1915. S. S. Zemljič 1 Motivation
Coefficient Inequalities for a New Subclass of K-uniformly Convex Functions
International Journal of Computational Science and Mathematics. ISSN 0974-89 Volume, Number (00), pp. 67--75 International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Coefficient Inequalities for
Dynamic types, Lambda calculus machines Section and Practice Problems Apr 21 22, 2016
Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences CS 152: Programming Languages Dynamic types, Lambda calculus machines Apr 21 22, 2016 1 Dynamic types and contracts (a) To make sure you understand the
Lecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE
Lecture 21: Properties and robustness of LSE BLUE: Robustness of LSE against normality We now study properties of l τ β and σ 2 under assumption A2, i.e., without the normality assumption on ε. From Theorem
ω ω ω ω ω ω+2 ω ω+2 + ω ω ω ω+2 + ω ω+1 ω ω+2 2 ω ω ω ω ω ω ω ω+1 ω ω2 ω ω2 + ω ω ω2 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω ω+1 ω ω2 + ω ω+1 + ω ω ω ω2 + ω
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 ω ω + 1 ω + 2 ω + 3 ω + 4 ω2 ω2 + 1 ω2 + 2 ω2 + 3 ω3 ω3 + 1 ω3 + 2 ω4 ω4 + 1 ω5 ω 2 ω 2 + 1 ω 2 + 2 ω 2 + ω ω 2 + ω + 1 ω 2 + ω2 ω 2 2 ω 2 2 + 1 ω 2 2 + ω ω 2 3 ω 3 ω 3 + 1 ω 3 + ω ω 3 +
ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΚΡΗΤΗΣ. Ψηφιακή Οικονομία. Διάλεξη 10η: Basics of Game Theory part 2 Mαρίνα Μπιτσάκη Τμήμα Επιστήμης Υπολογιστών
ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΚΡΗΤΗΣ Ψηφιακή Οικονομία Διάλεξη 0η: Basics of Game Theory part 2 Mαρίνα Μπιτσάκη Τμήμα Επιστήμης Υπολογιστών Best Response Curves Used to solve for equilibria in games
Chap. 6 Pushdown Automata
Chap. 6 Pushdown Automata 6.1 Definition of Pushdown Automata Example 6.1 L = {wcw R w (0+1) * } P c 0P0 1P1 1. Start at state q 0, push input symbol onto stack, and stay in q 0. 2. If input symbol is
Partial Differential Equations in Biology The boundary element method. March 26, 2013
The boundary element method March 26, 203 Introduction and notation The problem: u = f in D R d u = ϕ in Γ D u n = g on Γ N, where D = Γ D Γ N, Γ D Γ N = (possibly, Γ D = [Neumann problem] or Γ N = [Dirichlet
Μηχανική Μάθηση Hypothesis Testing
ΕΛΛΗΝΙΚΗ ΔΗΜΟΚΡΑΤΙΑ ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΚΡΗΤΗΣ Μηχανική Μάθηση Hypothesis Testing Γιώργος Μπορμπουδάκης Τμήμα Επιστήμης Υπολογιστών Procedure 1. Form the null (H 0 ) and alternative (H 1 ) hypothesis 2. Consider
Solution Series 9. i=1 x i and i=1 x i.
Lecturer: Prof. Dr. Mete SONER Coordinator: Yilin WANG Solution Series 9 Q1. Let α, β >, the p.d.f. of a beta distribution with parameters α and β is { Γ(α+β) Γ(α)Γ(β) f(x α, β) xα 1 (1 x) β 1 for < x
Lecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals
Lecture 34 Bootstrap confidence intervals Confidence Intervals θ: an unknown parameter of interest We want to find limits θ and θ such that Gt = P nˆθ θ t If G 1 1 α is known, then P θ θ = P θ θ = 1 α
CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS
CRASH COURSE IN PRECALCULUS Shiah-Sen Wang The graphs are prepared by Chien-Lun Lai Based on : Precalculus: Mathematics for Calculus by J. Stuwart, L. Redin & S. Watson, 6th edition, 01, Brooks/Cole Chapter
Main source: "Discrete-time systems and computer control" by Α. ΣΚΟΔΡΑΣ ΨΗΦΙΑΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΔΙΑΛΕΞΗ 4 ΔΙΑΦΑΝΕΙΑ 1
Main source: "Discrete-time systems and computer control" by Α. ΣΚΟΔΡΑΣ ΨΗΦΙΑΚΟΣ ΕΛΕΓΧΟΣ ΔΙΑΛΕΞΗ 4 ΔΙΑΦΑΝΕΙΑ 1 A Brief History of Sampling Research 1915 - Edmund Taylor Whittaker (1873-1956) devised a
Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets
Commutative Monoids in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets S K Mala #1, Dr. MM Shanmugapriya *2 1 PhD Scholar in Mathematics, Karpagam University, Coimbatore, Tamilnadu- 641021 Assistant Professor of Mathematics,
A Conception of Inductive Logic: Example
A Conception of Inductive Logic: Example Patrick Maher Department of Philosophy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign This paper presents a simple example of inductive logic done according to the
Jesse Maassen and Mark Lundstrom Purdue University November 25, 2013
Notes on Average Scattering imes and Hall Factors Jesse Maassen and Mar Lundstrom Purdue University November 5, 13 I. Introduction 1 II. Solution of the BE 1 III. Exercises: Woring out average scattering
Appendix to Technology Transfer and Spillovers in International Joint Ventures
Appendix to Technology Transfer and Spillovers in International Joint Ventures Thomas Müller Monika Schnitzer Published in Journal of International Economics, 2006, Volume 68, 456-468 Bundestanstalt für
9.09. # 1. Area inside the oval limaçon r = cos θ. To graph, start with θ = 0 so r = 6. Compute dr
9.9 #. Area inside the oval limaçon r = + cos. To graph, start with = so r =. Compute d = sin. Interesting points are where d vanishes, or at =,,, etc. For these values of we compute r:,,, and the values
w o = R 1 p. (1) R = p =. = 1
Πανεπιστήµιο Κρήτης - Τµήµα Επιστήµης Υπολογιστών ΗΥ-570: Στατιστική Επεξεργασία Σήµατος 205 ιδάσκων : Α. Μουχτάρης Τριτη Σειρά Ασκήσεων Λύσεις Ασκηση 3. 5.2 (a) From the Wiener-Hopf equation we have:
MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS
MINIMAL CLOSED SETS AND MAXIMAL CLOSED SETS FUMIE NAKAOKA AND NOBUYUKI ODA Received 20 December 2005; Revised 28 May 2006; Accepted 6 August 2006 Some properties of minimal closed sets and maximal closed
Depth versus Rigidity in the Design of International Trade Agreements. Leslie Johns
Depth versus Rigidity in the Design of International Trade Agreements Leslie Johns Supplemental Appendix September 3, 202 Alternative Punishment Mechanisms The one-period utility functions of the home
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential. be continuous functions on the interval
Chapter 6: Systems of Linear Differential Equations Let a (t), a 2 (t),..., a nn (t), b (t), b 2 (t),..., b n (t) be continuous functions on the interval I. The system of n first-order differential equations
DESIGN OF MACHINERY SOLUTION MANUAL h in h 4 0.
DESIGN OF MACHINERY SOLUTION MANUAL -7-1! PROBLEM -7 Statement: Design a double-dwell cam to move a follower from to 25 6, dwell for 12, fall 25 and dwell for the remader The total cycle must take 4 sec
Models for Probabilistic Programs with an Adversary
Models for Probabilistic Programs with an Adversary Robert Rand, Steve Zdancewic University of Pennsylvania Probabilistic Programming Semantics 2016 Interactive Proofs 2/47 Interactive Proofs 2/47 Interactive
12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem
Tutorial 12: Radon-Nikodym Theorem 1 12. Radon-Nikodym Theorem In the following, (Ω, F) is an arbitrary measurable space. Definition 96 Let μ and ν be two (possibly complex) measures on (Ω, F). We say
SCITECH Volume 13, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION Published online: March 29, 2018
Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics(JRM) ISSN: 2395-028 SCITECH Volume 3, Issue 2 RESEARCH ORGANISATION ublished online: March 29, 208 Journal of rogressive Research in Mathematics www.scitecresearch.com/journals
On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume
BULETINUL ACADEMIEI DE ŞTIINŢE A REPUBLICII MOLDOVA. MATEMATICA Numbers 2(72) 3(73), 2013, Pages 80 89 ISSN 1024 7696 On a four-dimensional hyperbolic manifold with finite volume I.S.Gutsul Abstract. In
SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS
Sahand Communications in Mathematical Analysis (SCMA) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2016), 21-27 http://scma.maragheh.ac.ir SOME PROPERTIES OF FUZZY REAL NUMBERS BAYAZ DARABY 1 AND JAVAD JAFARI 2 Abstract. In the mathematical
Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequality for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x, y, z X.
Math 446 Homework 3 Solutions. (1). (i): Reverse triangle inequalit for metrics: Let (X, d) be a metric space and let x,, z X. Prove that d(x, z) d(, z) d(x, ). (ii): Reverse triangle inequalit for norms:
Generating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations
Applied Mathematics 06 7 98-07 Published Online January 06 in SciRes http://wwwscirporg/journal/am http://dxdoiorg/036/am067009 Generating Set of the Complete Semigroups of Binary Relations Yasha iasamidze
ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC = DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION #2. h 0 h h 0 h h 0 ( ) g k = g 0 + g 1 + g g 2009 =?
Teko Classes IITJEE/AIEEE Maths by SUHAAG SIR, Bhopal, Ph (0755) 3 00 000 www.tekoclasses.com ANSWERSHEET (TOPIC DIFFERENTIAL CALCULUS) COLLECTION # Question Type A.Single Correct Type Q. (A) Sol least
Section 9.2 Polar Equations and Graphs
180 Section 9. Polar Equations and Graphs In this section, we will be graphing polar equations on a polar grid. In the first few examples, we will write the polar equation in rectangular form to help identify
ECE 308 SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS FALL 2017 Answers to selected problems on prior years examinations
ECE 308 SIGNALS AND SYSTEMS FALL 07 Answers to selected problems on prior years examinations Answers to problems on Midterm Examination #, Spring 009. x(t) = r(t + ) r(t ) u(t ) r(t ) + r(t 3) + u(t +
Space-Time Symmetries
Chapter Space-Time Symmetries In classical fiel theory any continuous symmetry of the action generates a conserve current by Noether's proceure. If the Lagrangian is not invariant but only shifts by a
Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II
Lecture 13 - Root Space Decomposition II October 18, 2012 1 Review First let us recall the situation. Let g be a simple algebra, with maximal toral subalgebra h (which we are calling a CSA, or Cartan Subalgebra).
Pg The perimeter is P = 3x The area of a triangle is. where b is the base, h is the height. In our case b = x, then the area is
Pg. 9. The perimeter is P = The area of a triangle is A = bh where b is the base, h is the height 0 h= btan 60 = b = b In our case b =, then the area is A = = 0. By Pythagorean theorem a + a = d a a =
The challenges of non-stable predicates
The challenges of non-stable predicates Consider a non-stable predicate Φ encoding, say, a safety property. We want to determine whether Φ holds for our program. The challenges of non-stable predicates
Notes on the Open Economy
Notes on the Open Econom Ben J. Heijdra Universit of Groningen April 24 Introduction In this note we stud the two-countr model of Table.4 in more detail. restated here for convenience. The model is Table.4.
Chapter 3: Ordinal Numbers
Chapter 3: Ordinal Numbers There are two kinds of number.. Ordinal numbers (0th), st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th,..., ω, ω +,... ω2, ω2+,... ω 2... answers to the question What position is... in a sequence? What
General 2 2 PT -Symmetric Matrices and Jordan Blocks 1
General 2 2 PT -Symmetric Matrices and Jordan Blocks 1 Qing-hai Wang National University of Singapore Quantum Physics with Non-Hermitian Operators Max-Planck-Institut für Physik komplexer Systeme Dresden,
k A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +
[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +](/thumbs/73/69566903.jpg "k A = [k, k]( )[a 1, a 2 ] = [ka 1,ka 2 ] 4For the division of two intervals of confidence in R +")
Chapter 3. Fuzzy Arithmetic 3- Fuzzy arithmetic: ~Addition(+) and subtraction (-): Let A = [a and B = [b, b in R If x [a and y [b, b than x+y [a +b +b Symbolically,we write A(+)B = [a (+)[b, b = [a +b
Potential Dividers. 46 minutes. 46 marks. Page 1 of 11
Potential Dividers 46 minutes 46 marks Page 1 of 11 Q1. In the circuit shown in the figure below, the battery, of negligible internal resistance, has an emf of 30 V. The pd across the lamp is 6.0 V and
Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2
International Journal of Algebra, Vol. 8, 24, no. 5, 239-246 HIKARI Ltd, www.m-hikari.com http://dx.doi.org/.2988/ija.24.422 Congruence Classes of Invertible Matrices of Order 3 over F 2 Ligong An and
The Probabilistic Method - Probabilistic Techniques. Lecture 7: The Janson Inequality
The Probabilistic Method - Probabilistic Techniques Lecture 7: The Janson Inequality Sotiris Nikoletseas Associate Professor Computer Engineering and Informatics Department 2014-2015 Sotiris Nikoletseas,