arxiv: v1 [math.ap] 10 Apr 2017

Transcript

1 C 1,θ -Esimaes on he disance of Inerial Manifolds José M. Arriea and Esperanza Sanamaría arxiv: v1 [mah.ap] 10 Apr 2017 Absrac: In his paper we obain C 1,θ -esimaes on he disance of inerial manifolds for dynamical sysems generaed by evoluionary parabolic ype equaions. We consider he siuaion where he sysems are defined in differen phase spaces and we esimae he disance in erms of he disance of he resolven operaors of he corresponding ellipic operaors and he disance of he nonlineariies of he equaions. Keywords: inerial manifolds, evoluion equaions, perurbaions Mahemaics Subjec Classificaion: 35B42, 35K90 1 Inroducion We coninue in his work he analysis sared in [1] on he esimaes on he disance of inerial manifolds. Acually, in [1] we considered a family of absrac evoluion equaions of parabolic ype, ha may be posed in differen phase spaces see equaion 2.2 below and we impose very general condiions see H1 and H2 below guaraneing ha each problem has an inerial manifold and more imporan, we were able o obain esimaes in he norm of he supremum on he convergence of he inerial manifolds. These esimaes are expressed in erms of he disance of he resolven operaors and in erms of he disance of he nonlinear erms. These resuls are he saring poin of he presen paper and are briefly described in Secion 2 see Theorem 2.3 One of he main applicaions of invarian manifolds is ha hey allow us o describe he dynamics locally or globally of an infinie dimensional sysem wih only a finie number of parameers he dimension of he manifold. This drasic reducion of dimensionaliy permis in many insances o analyze in deail he dynamics of he equaion and sudy perurbaions problem. Bu for hese quesions, some exra differeniabiliy on he manifold and some esimaes on he convergence on sronger norms like C 1 or C 1,θ is desirable, see [10, 2]. Acually, he esimaes from his paper and from [1] are key esimaes o obain good raes on he convergence of aracors of reacion diffusion equaions in hin domains, problem which is addressed in [2]. This is acually he main purpose of his work. Under he very general seing from [1] bu impossing some exra differeniabiliy and convergence properies on he nonlinear erms see hipohesis H2 below we obain ha he inerial manifolds are uniformly C 1,θ smooh and obain esimaes on he convergence of he manifolds in his C 1,θ norm. Le us menion ha he heory of invarian and inerial manifolds is a well esablished heory. We refer o [4, 16] for general references on he heory of Inerial manifolds. See also [15] for an This research has been parially suppored by grans MTM , MTM , ICMAT Severo Ochoa projec SEV MINECO, Spain and Grupo de Invesigación CADEDIF, UCM. Deparameno de Maemáica Aplicada, Universidad Compluense de Madrid, Madrid and Insiuo de Ciencias Maemáicas CSIC-UAM-UC3M-UCM, Spain. arriea@ma.ucm.es Universidad a Disancia de Madrid, Collado Villalba, Madrid. esperanza.sanamaria@udima.es 1

2 accessible inroducion o he heory. These inerial manifolds are smooh, see [7]. We also refer o [11, 9, 3, 16, 5, 8] for general references on dynamics of evoluionary equaions. We describe now he conens of he paper. In Secion 2 we inroduce he noaion, review he main hypoheses specially H1 and H2 and resuls from [1]. We describe in deail he new hypohesis H2 and sae he main resul of he paper, Proposiion 2.5 and Theorem 2.6. In Secion 3.1 we analyze he C 1,θ smoohness of he inerial manifold, proving Proposiion 2.5. The analysis is based in previous resuls from [7]. In Secion 4 we obain he esimaes on he disance of he inerial manifold in he C 1,θ norm, proving Theorem Seing of he problem and main resuls In his secion we consider he seing of he problem, following [1]. We refer o his paper for more deails abou he seing. Hence, consider he family of problems, { u 0 P 0 + A 0 u 0 = F0 εu0, u 0 0 X0 α, 2.1 and { u ε P ε + A ε u ε = F ε u ε, 0 < ε ε 0 u ε 0 Xε α, where we assume, ha A ε is self-adjoin posiive linear operaor on a separable real Hilber space X ε, ha is A ε : DA ε = X 1 ε X ε X ε, and F ε : X α ε X ε, F ε 0 : Xα 0 X 0 are nonlineariies guaraneeing global exisence of soluions of 2.2, for each 0 ε ε 0 and for some 0 α < 1. Observe ha for problem 2.1 we even assume ha he nonlineariy depends on ε also. As in [1], we assume he exisence of linear coninuous operaors, E and M, such ha, E : X 0 X ε, M : X ε X 0 and E X α 0 : X α 0 Xα ε and M X α ε : X α ε X α 0, saisfying, 2.2 E LX0,X ε, M LXε,X 0 κ, E LX α 0,X α ε, M LX α ε,x α 0 κ. 2.3 for some consan κ 1. We also assume hese operaors saisfy he following properies, M E = I, Eu 0 Xε u 0 X0 for u 0 X The family of operaors A ε, for 0 ε ε 0, have compac resolven. This, ogeher wih he fac ha he operaors are selfadjoin, implies ha is specrum is discree real and consiss only of eigenvalues, each one wih finie mulipliciy. Moreover, he fac ha A ε, 0 ε ε 0, is posiive implies ha is specrum is posiive. So, we denoe by σa ε, he specrum of he operaor A ε, wih, σa ε = {λ ε n} n=1, and 0 < c λ ε 1 λ ε 2... λ ε n... and we also denoe by {ϕ ε i } i=1 an associaed orhonormal family of eigenfuncions. Observe ha he requiremen of he operaors A ε being posiive can be relaxed o requiring ha hey are all bounded from below uniformly in he parameer ɛ. We can always consider he modified operaors 2

3 A ε + ci wih c a large enough consan o make he modified operaors posiive. The nonlinear equaions 2.2 would have o be rewrien accordingly. Wih respec o he relaion beween boh operaors, A 0 and A ε and following [1], we will assume he following hypohesis H1. Wih α he exponen from problems 2.2, we have A 1 ε EA 1 0 M LX ε,x α ε 0 as ε Le us define τε as an increasing funcion of ε such ha A 1 ε E EA 1 0 LX 0,Xε α τε. 2.6 We also recall hypohesis H2 from [1], regarding he nonlineariies F 0 and F ε, H2. We assume ha he nonlinear erms F ε : X α ε X ε and F ε 0 : Xα 0 X 0 for 0 < ε ε 0, saisfy: a They are uniformly bounded, ha is, here exiss a consan C F > 0 independen of ε such ha, F ε L Xε α,x ε C F, F0 ε L X0 α,x 0 C F b They are globally Lipschiz on X α ε wih a uniform Lipsichz consan L F, ha is, F ε u F ε v Xε L F u v X α ε 2.7 F0 ε u F0 ε v X0 L F u v X α c They have a uniformly bounded suppor for 0 < ε ε 0 : here exiss R > 0 such ha SuppF ε D R = {u ε Xε α : u ε X α ε R} SuppF ε 0 D R = {u 0 X α 0 : u 0 X α 0 R}. d F ε is near F ε 0 in he following sense, sup F ε Eu 0 EF0 ε u 0 Xε = ρε, 2.9 u 0 X0 α and ρε 0 as ε 0. 3

4 Wih H1 and H2 we were able o show in [1] he exisence, convergence and obain some rae of he convergence in he norm of he supremum of inerial manifolds. In order o explain he resul and o undersand he res of his paper, we need o inroduce several noaion and resuls from [1]. We refer o his paper for more explanaions. Le us consider m N such ha λ 0 m < λ 0 m+1 and denoe by Pε m he canonical orhogonal projecion ono he eigenfuncions, {ϕ ε i }m i=1, corresponding o he firs m eigenvalues of he operaor A ε, 0 ε ε 0 and Q ε m he projeion over is orhogonal complemen, see [1]. For echnical reasons, we express any elemen belonging o he linear subspace P ε mx ε as a linear combinaion of he elemens of he following basis {P ε meϕ 0 1, P ε meϕ 0 2,..., P ε meϕ 0 m}, for 0 ε ε 0, wih {ϕ 0 i }m i=1 he eigenfuncions relaed o he firs m eigenvalues of A 0, which consiue a basis in P ε mx ε and in P ε mx α ε, see [1]. We will denoe by ψ ε i = Pε meϕ 0 i. Le us denoe by j ε he isomorphism from P ε mx ε = [ψ ε 1,..., ψε m] ono R m, ha gives us he coordinaes of each vecor. Tha is, j ε : P ε mx ε R m, w ε p, where w ε = m i=1 p iψi ε and p = p 1,..., p m. We denoe by he usual euclidean norm in R m, ha is p = m following weighed one, p ε,α = m i=1 i=1 p2 i , and by ε,α he p 2 i λ ε i 2α We consider he spaces R m, and R m, ε,α, ha is, R m wih he norm and ε,α, respecively, and noice ha for w 0 = m i=1 p iψ 0 i and 0 α < 1 we have ha, w 0 X α 0 = j 0 w 0 ε,α I is also no difficul o see ha from he convergence of he eigenvalues which is obained from H1, see [1], we have ha for a fixed m and for all δ > 0 small enough here exiss ε = εδ > 0 such ha 1 δ p 0,α p ε,α 1 + δ p 0,α, 0 ε εδ, p R m Wih respec o he behavior of he linear semigroup in he subspace Q ε mxε α, noice ha we have he expression e Aε Q ε mu = e AεQε m u = e λε i u, ϕ ε i ϕ ε i. i=m+1 Hence, using he expression of e AεQε m from above and following a similar proof as Lemma 3.1 from [1], we ge e AεQε m LXε,X ε e λε m+1, 4

5 and, e AεQε m LXε,X α ε e λε m+1 max{λ ε m+1, α } α, 2.14 for 0. In a similar way, we have e Aε P ε mu = m e λε i u, ϕ ε i ϕ ε i. i=1 and following similar seps as above, for 0 we have, e AεPε m LXε,X ε e λε m, e AεPε m LX α ε,x α ε e λε m, 2.15 e AεPε m LXε,X α ε e λε m λ ε m α We are looking for inerial manifolds for sysem 2.2 and 2.1 which will be obained as graphs of appropriae funcions. This moivaes he inroducion of he ses F ε L, ρ defined as F ε L, ρ = {Φ : R m Q ε mx α ε, such ha supp Φ B R and Then we can show he following resul. Φ p 1 Φ p 2 X α ε L p 1 p 2 ε,α p 1, p 2 R m }. Proposiion 2.1. [1] Le hypoheses H1 and H2 be saisfied. Assume also ha m 1 is such ha, λ 0 m+1 λ 0 m 3κ + 2L F [ λ 0 m α + λ 0 m+1 α], 2.17 and λ 0 m 1 α 6κ + 2L F 1 α Then, here exis L < 1 and ε 0 > 0 such ha for all 0 < ε ε 0 here exis inerial manifolds M ε and M ε 0 for 2.2 and 2.1 respecively, given by he graph of a funcion Φ ε F ε L, ρ and Φ ε 0 F 0L, ρ. Remark 2.2. We have wrien quoaions in he word graph since he manifolds M ε, M ε 0 are no properly speaking he graph of he funcions Φ ε, Φ ε 0 bu raher he graph of he appropriae funcion obained via he isomorphism j ε which idenifies P ε mxε α wih R m. Tha is, M ε = {jε 1 p + Φ ε p; p R m } and M ε 0 = {j 1 0 p + Φε 0 p; p Rm } The main resul from [1] was he following: Theorem 2.3. [1] Le hypoheses H1 and H2 be saisfied and le τε be defined by 2.6. Then, under he hypohesis of Proposiion 2.1, if Φ ε are he maps ha give us he inerial manifolds for 0 < ε ε 0 hen we have, wih C a consan independen of ε. Φ ε EΦ ε 0 L R m,x α ε C[τε logτε + ρε],

6 Remark 2.4. Properly speaking, in [1] he above heorem is proved only for he case for which he nonlineariy F0 ε from 2.1 saisfies F 0 ε F 0 for all 0 < ε < ε 0. Bu revising he proof of [1] we can see ha exacly he same argumen is valid for he mos general case where he nonlineariy depends on ε. To obain sronger convergence resuls on he inerial manifolds, we will need o requiere sronger condiions on he nonlinearies. These condiions are saed in he following hypohesis, H2. We assume ha he nonlinear erms F ε and F0 ε, saisfy hipohesis H2 and hey are uniformly C 1,θ F funcions from Xε α o X ε, and X0 α o X 0 respecively, for some 0 < θ F 1. Tha is, F ε C 1 Xε α, X ε, F0 ε C1 X0 α, X 0 and here exiss L > 0, independen of ε, such ha DF ε u DF ε u LX α ε,x ε L u u θ F X α ε, u, u X α ε. DF ε 0 u DF ε 0 u LX α 0,X 0 L u u θ F X α 0, u, u X α 0. We can sae now he main resuls of his secion. Proposiion 2.5. Assume hypoheses H1 and H2 are saisfied and ha he gap condiions 2.17, 2.18 hold. Then, for any θ > 0 such ha θ θ F and θ < θ 0, where θ 0 = λ0 m+1 λ0 m 4L F λ 0 m α 2L F λ 0 m+1 α 2L F λ 0 m α + λ 0 m 2.20 hen, he funcions Φ ε, and Φ ε 0 for 0 < ε ε 0, obained above, which give he inerial manifolds, are C 1,θ R m, X α ε and C 1,θ R m, X α 0. Moreover, he C1,θ norm is bounded uniformly in ε, for ε > 0 small. The main resul we wan o show in his aricle is he following: Theorem 2.6. Le hypoheses H1, H2 and gap condiions 2.17, 2.18 be saisfied, so ha Proposiion 2.5 hold, and we have inerial manifolds M ε, M ε 0 given as he graphs of he funcions Φ ε, Φ ε 0 for 0 < ε ε 0. If we denoe by βε = sup DF ε Eu E EDF ε 0 u LX α u M ε 0,X ε, hen, here exiss θ wih 0 < θ < θ F such ha for all 0 < θ < θ, we obain he following esimae [ ] θ Φ ε EΦ ε 1 θ θ 0 C 1,θ R m,xε α C βε + τε logτε + ρε, 2.22 where τε, ρε are given by 2.6, 2.9, respecively and C is a consan independen of ε. 6

7 Remark 2.7. As a maer of fac, θ can be chosen θ < min{θ F, θ 0, θ 1 } where θ F is from H2, θ 0 is defined in2.20 and θ 1, see 4.2. θ 1 = λ0 m+1 λ0 m 4L F λ 0 m α κ + 2L F λ 0 m α + λ 0 m + 3, As usual, we denoe by C 1,θ R m, X α ε he space of C 1 R m, X α ε maps whose differenials are uniformly Hölder coninuous wih Hölder exponen θ. Tha is, here is a consan C independen of ε such ha, DΦ ε z DΦ ε z LR m,x α ε C z z θ ε,α. where he norm ε,α is given by Noice ha he norm ε,α is equivalen o uniformly in ε and α. The space C 1,θ R m, X α ε is endowed wih he norm C 1,θ R m,x α ε given by, DΦ ε z DΦ ε Φ ε C 1,θ R m,xε α = Φ ε C 1 R m,xε α + sup z z,z R m z z θ ε,α LRm,Xα ε To simplify noaion below and unless some clarificaion is needed, we will denoe he norms C 1 R m,xε α and C 1,θ R m,xε α by C 1 and C 1,θ. Also, very ofen we will need o consider he following space of bounded linear operaors LP ε mxε α, Q ε mxε α and is norm will be abbreviaed by L. 3 Smoohness of inerial manifolds In his secion we show he C 1,θ smoohness of he inerial manifolds Φ ε and Φ ε 0 for a fixed value of he parameer ε. Moreover, we will obain esimaes of is C 1,θ norm which are independen of he parameer ε. Recall ha he C 1 smoohness of he manifold is shown in [16], where hey proved he following resul: Theorem 3.1. Le hypoheses of Proposiion 2.1 be saisfied. Assume ha for each ε > 0 he nonlinear funcions F ε, F ε 0 are Lipschiz C1 funcions from X α ε o X ε and from X α 0 o X 0 respecively. Then, he inerial manifolds M ε, M ε 0 for ε > 0, are C1 -manifolds and he funcions Ψ ε, Ψ ε 0 are Lipschiz C 1 funcions from P ε mx α ε o Q ε mx α ε and from P 0 mx α 0 o Q0 mx α 0. Remark 3.2. i Le us menion ha he relaion beween he maps Ψ ε : P ε mxε α Q ε mxε α resp. Ψ ε 0 : P0 mx0 α Q0 mx0 α and Φ ε : R m Q ε mxε α resp. Φ ε 0 : Rm Q 0 mx0 α is Φ ε = Ψ ε jε 1 resp. Φ ε 0 = Ψε 0 j 1 0, where j ε is defined by ii For he res of he exposiion, whenever we wrie Ψ ε, Ψ ε 0, Φ ε and Φ ε 0 we will refer o hese maps ha define he inerial manifolds. The proof of his heorem is based in he following exension of he Conracion Mapping Theorem, see [7]. 7

8 Lemma 3.3. Le X and Y be complee meric spaces wih merics d x and d y. Le H : X Y X Y be a coninuous funcion saisfying he following: 1 Hx, y = F x, Gx, y, F does no depend on y. 2 There is a consan θ wih 0 θ < 1 such ha one has d x F x 1, F x 2 θd x x 1, x 2, x 1, x 2 X, d y Gx, y 1, Gx, y 2 θd y y 1, y 2, x X, y 1, y 2 Y. Then here is a unique fixed poin x, y of H. Moreover, if x n, y n is any sequence of ieraions, hen x n+1, y n+1 = Hx n, y n for n 1, lim x n, y n = x, y. n In [7] and [16] he auhors use his lemma o show he exisence of an appropriae fixed poin which will give he desired differeniabiliy. In our case, we consider he maps Π ε 0 : F 0 L, R E 0 F 0 L, R E 0 and Π ε : F ε L, R E ε F ε L, R E ε given by and where and Π ε 0 : χ ε 0, Υ ε 0 T ε 0χ ε 0, D ε 0χ ε 0, Υ ε 0, Π ε : χ ε, Υ ε T ε χ ε, D ε χ ε, Υ ε, { F ε L, R= χ ε : P ε mxε α Q ε mxε α / χ ε p χ ε p X α ε L p p X α ε, p, p P ε mxε α, } suppχ ε {φ P ε mxε α, φ X α ε R}, 0 ε ε 0 E ε = {Υ ε : P ε mx α ε LP ε mx α ε, Q ε mx α ε coninuous : Υ ε pp X α ε p X α ε, p, p P ε mx α ε } 0 ε ε 0. Noice ha he las conidion in he definiion of E ε could be wrien equivalenly as Υ ε p L 1 for all p P ε mx α ε. The funcionals T ε 0, T ε are he ones used in he Lyapunov-Perron mehod o prove he exisence of he inerial manifolds, see [16], which are defined as T ε 0χ ε 0ξ = T ε χ ε η = e AεQ0 ms Q 0 mf ε 0 u ε 0sds, 3.1 e AεQε m s Q ε mf ε u ε sds, 3.2 8

9 wih u ε 0 = pε 0 + χε 0 pε 0, u ε = p ε + χ ε p ε, where p ε 0 [ϕ0 1,..., ϕ0 m] is he globally defined soluion of { p = A 0 p + P 0 mf0 εp + χε 0 p p0 = ξ [ϕ 0 1,..., 3.3 ϕ0 m] and p ε [ϕ ε 1,..., ϕε m] is he globally defined soluion of { p = A ε p + P ε mf ε p + χ ε p p0 = η [ϕ ε 1,..., ϕε m]. The funcionals, D ε 0 χε 0, Υε 0, D εχ ε, Υ ε are given as follows: for any ξ P 0 mx α 0, η Pε mx α ε, and D ε 0χ ε 0, Υ ε 0ξ = D ε χ ε, Υ ε η = 3.4 e A 0Q 0 ms Q 0 mdf ε 0 u ε 0sI + Υ ε 0p ε 0sΘ ε 0ξ, sds, 3.5 e AεQε m s Q ε mdf ε u ε si + Υ ε p ε sθ ε η, sds, 3.6 wih u ε 0, pε 0, u ε, p ε as above and moreover, Θ ε 0 ξ, = Θε 0 χε 0, Υε 0, ξ,, Θ εη, = Θ ε χ ε, Υ ε, η, are he linear maps from P 0 mx0 α o P0 mx0 α and from Pε mxε α o P ε mxε α saisfying { Θ = A 0 Θ + P 0 mdf0 εuε 0 I + Υε 0 pε 0 Θ 3.7 Θξ, 0 = I, and { Θ = A ε Θ + P ε mdf ε u ε I + Υ ε p ε Θ Θη, 0 = I, respecively. In fac, in hese works i is obained ha he fixed poin of he maps Π ε 0 and Π ε are given by χ ε 0, Υ ε 0 = Ψ ε 0, DΨε 0, χ ε, Υ ε = Ψ ε, DΨ ε wih Ψ ε 0 and Ψ ε are he maps whose graphs gives us he inerial manifolds see Remark 3.2 ii, which are given by he fixed poins of he funcionals T ε 0 and T ε and DΨ ε 0, DΨ ε are he Freche derivaives of he inerial manifolds. In order o prove he C 1,θ smoohness of he inerial manifolds Φ ε 0, Φ ε, we will show ha if we denoe he se E θ,m ε = {Υ ε E ε : Υ ε p Υ ε p L M p p θ X α ε, p, p P ε mx α ε } which is a closed se in E ε, hen here exis appropriae θ and M such ha he maps D ε 0 Ψε 0, and D ε Ψ ε, from 3.5 and 3.6 wih Ψ ε 0, Ψ ε he obained inerial manifolds, ransform Eε θ,m ino iself, see Lemma 3.7 below, which will imply ha he fixed poin of he maps Π ε 0 and Π ε lie in F 0 L, R E θ,m 0 and F ε L, R Eε θ,m, respecively, obaining he desired regulariy. Throughou his subsecion, we provide a proof of Proposiion 2.5 for he inerial manifold Φ ε for each ε 0. Noe ha he proof of his resul for he inerial manifold Φ ε 0, consiss in following, sep by sep, he same proof. Then, we focus now in he inerial manifold Φ ε wih ε > 0 fixed. We sar wih some esimaes

10 Lemma 3.4. Le p 1 ε and p 2 ε be soluions of 3.4 wih p 1 ε0 and p 2 ε0 is iniial daa, respecively. Then, for 0, p 1 ε p 2 ε X α ε p 1 ε0 p 2 ε0 X α ε e [2L F λ ε m α +λ ε m ] Proof. By he variaion of consans formula, + 0 p 1 ε p 2 ε = e Aε [p 1 ε0 p 2 ε0]+ e Aε s P ε m[f ε p 1 εs + Ψ ε p 1 εs F ε p 2 εs + Ψ ε p 2 εs]ds. Hence, applying 2.15 and 2.16 and aking ino accoun ha Ψ ε, F ε are uniformly Lipschiz wih Lipschiz consans L < 1 and L F, respecively, we ge p 1 ε p 2 ε X α ε e λεm p 1 ε0 p 2 ε0 X α ε + 2L F λ ε m α e λεm s p 1 εs p 2 εs X α ε ds. By Gronwall inequaliy, as we waned o prove. p 1 ε p 2 ε X α ε p 1 ε0 p 2 ε0 X α ε e [2L F λ ε m α +λ ε m ], Lemma 3.5. Le Ψ ε F ε L, R wih L < 1 and Υ ε E ε, 0 < ε ε 0. Then, for 0, Θ ε p 0 ε, L e [2L F λ ε m α +λ ε m]. Proof. If z ε P ε mxε α, wih he aid of he variaion of consans formula applied o 3.8, we have for 0, Θ ε p 0 ε, z ε X α ε e AεPεm z ε X α ε + + e AεPεm s P ε mdf ε u ε si + Υ ε p ε sθ ε p 0 X ε, sz ε ds. α ε Hence as before, Θ ε p 0 ε, z ε X α ε e λε m z ε X α ε + 2L F λ ε m α e λε m s Θ ε p 0 ε, sz ε X α ε. Using Gronwall inequaliy, we ge Θ ε p 0 ε, z ε X α ε e [2L F λ ε m α +λ ε m] z ε X α ε from where we ge he resul. Lemma 3.6. Le 0 < θ θ F and M > 0 fixed. Le p 1 ε, p 2 ε P ε mxε α and consider Θ 1 ε = Θ ε p 1 ε,, Θ 2 ε = Θ ε p 2 ε, he soluions of 3.8 for some Υ ε Eε θ,m. Then, for 0, Θ 1 ε Θ 2 2L ε L + M p 1 ε p 2 θ + 1L F 2θ + 1 ε θ Xε α e 2θ+2L F λ ε m α +θ+1λ ε m. 10

11 Proof. Applying he variaion of consans formula o 3.8, for 0, Θ 1 ε Θ 2 ε L e AεPε m s P ε m[df ε u 1 εsi + Υ ε p 1 εsθ 1 εs DF ε u 2 εsi + Υ ε p 2 εsθ 2 εs] ds L wih u i εs = p i εs + Ψ ε p i εs, i = 1, 2. We can decompose he above inegral in he following way, + + Θ 1 ε Θ 2 ε L e AεPε m s P ε m[df ε u 1 εs DF ε u 2 εs]i + Υ ε p 1 εsθ 1 εs ds+ L e AεPεm s P ε mdf ε u 2 εsυ ε p 1 εs Υ ε p 2 εsθ 1 εs ds+ L e AεPε m s P ε mdf ε u 2 εs[i + Υ ε p 2 εsθ 1 εs Θ 2 εs ds = L We analyze each erm separaely. By hipohesis H2, 2.16 and Lemma 3.5, Applying Lemma 3.4, = I 1 + I 2 + I 3. I 1 2Lλ ε m α e λε m u 1 εs u 2 εs θ Xε αe 2L F λ ε m αs ds 4Lλ ε m α e λε m I 1 p 1 εs p 2 εs θ X α ε e 2L F λ ε m αs ds. 2L θ + 1L F p 1 ε p 2 ε θ X α ε e [2θ+1L F λ ε m α +θ+1λ ε m]. Since Υ ε Eε θ,m, 0 < θ θ F, and by Lemma 3.5, we have Applying Lemma 3.4, I 2 L F λ ε m α Me λε m I 2 This las erm is esimaed as follows, p 1 εs p 2 εs θ X α ε e 2L F λ ε m αs ds. M 2θ + 1 p1 ε p 2 ε θ X α ε e [2θ+1L F λ ε m α +θ+1λ ε m ]. I 3 2L F λ ε m α e λεm s Θ 1 εs Θ 2 εs L ds. 11

12 So, Applying Gronwall inequaliy, Θ 1 ε Θ 2 ε L 2L + M p 1 ε p 2 θ + 1L F 2θ + 1 ε θ Xε αe [2θ+1L F λ ε m α +θ+1λ ε m ] which shows he resul. +2L F λ ε m α e λεm s Θ 1 εs Θ 2 εs L ds. 2L θ + 1L F + M 2θ + 1 Θ 1 ε Θ 2 ε L p 1 ε p 2 ε θ Xε αe [2θ+2L F λ ε m α +θ+1λ ε m ], For he sake of noaion, here are several exponens ha repea hemselves very ofen and hey are kind of long. We will abbreviae he exponens as follows: We can prove now he following Lemma. Λ 0 = 2L F λ ε m α + λ ε m Λ 1 = λ ε m+1 θ + 1λε m 2θ + 1L F λ ε m α Λ 2 = λ ε m+1 θ + 1λε m 2θ + 2L F λ ε m α 3.9 Lemma 3.7. If we choose θ such ha 0 < θ θ F and θ < θ 0 wih θ 0 given by 2.20, hen here exis M 0 = M 0 θ > 0 such ha for each M M 0 and for ε small enough, we have D ε Ψ ε, maps Eε θ,m ino Eε θ,m. Proof. Le Υ ε E θ,m ε and p 1 ε, p 2 ε P ε mx α ε. In [16] he auhors prove D ε Ψ ε, maps E ε ino E ε. So, i remains o prove ha, wih M and θ as in he saemen. From expression 3.6, we have, D ε Ψ ε, Υ ε p 1 ε D ε Ψ ε, Υ ε p 2 ε L M p 1 ε p 2 ε θ X α ε, D ε Ψ ε, Υ ε p 1 ε D ε Ψ ε, Υ ε p 2 ε L e AεQεms Q ε m[df ε u 1 εsi + Υ ε p 1 εsθ 1 εs DF ε u 2 εsi + Υ ε p 2 εsθ 2 εs] ds, L wih p i εs he soluion of 3.4 wih p i ε0 = p i ε and u i εs = p i εs + Ψ ε p i εs, for i = 1, 2. In a similar way as in proof of Lemma 3.6, we decompose i as follows, D ε Ψ ε, Υ ε p 1 ε D ε Ψ ε, Υ ε p 2 ε L e AεQε m s Q ε m[df ε u 1 εs DF ε u 2 εs]i + Υ ε p 1 εsθ 1 εs ds+ L 12

13 + + e AεQεms Q ε mdf ε u 2 εs[υ ε p 1 εs Υ ε p 2 εs]θ 1 εs e AεQε m s Q ε mdf ε u 2 εsi + Υ ε p 2 εs[θ 1 εs Θ 2 εs] = I 1 + I 2 + I 3. Following he same argumens used in ha proof and since Υ ε E θ,m ε Similarly, for I 2, I 1 4Lλ ε m+1 α p 1 ε p 2 ε θ X α ε I 2 L F λ ε m+1 α M p 1 ε p 2 ε θ X α ε we ge ds+ L ds = L e Λ1s ds 4Lλε m+1 α p 1 ε p 2 Λ ε θ Xε α 1 e Λ 1s ds L F λ ε m+1 α M Λ 1 p 1 ε p 2 ε θ X α ε. And finally, applying Lemma 3.6, I 3 2L F λ ε m+1 α 2L + M p 1 ε p 2 θ + 1L F 2θ + 1 ε θ Xε α which implies, I 3 2L F λ ε m+1 α Λ 2 2L + M p 1 ε p 2 θ + 1L F 2θ + 1 ε θ Xε α. e Λ 2s ds Puing everyhing ogeher we obain D ε Ψ ε, Υ ε p 1 ε D ε Ψ ε, Υ ε p 2 ε L 4L + ML F λ ε m+1 α p 1 ε p 2 Λ 1 θ + 1Λ ε θ Xε α 2 Bu since Λ 2 Λ 1, see 3.9, and θ > 0, we have D ε Ψ ε, Υ ε p 1 ε D ε Ψ ε, Υ ε p 2 ε L 4L + ML F λ ε m+1 α 2 Λ 2 p 1 ε p 2 ε θ X α ε Bu if we consider 8Lλ ε = m+1 α + M 2L F λ ε m+1 α p 1 ε p 2 Λ 2 Λ ε θ Xε α 2 θ 0 = λ0 m+1 λ0 m 4L F λ 0 m α 2L F λ 0 m+1 α 2L F λ 0 m α + λ 0, m hen, direc compuaions show ha if θ < θ 0 and ε is small, hen 2L F λ ε m+1 α Λ 2 η for some η < 1. This implies ha if we choose M large enough hen which shows he resul. 8Lλ ε m+1 α + M 2L F λ ε m+1 α M Λ 2 Λ 2 13

14 We can prove now he main resul of his subsecion. Proof. of Proposiion 2.5 Again, we do only he proof for Φ ε being he proof for Φ ε 0 compleely similar. Since Φ ε = Ψ ε jε 1 and j ε is an isomorphism, see Remark 3.2 and 2.10, o prove Φ ε C 1,θ R m, Xε α for some θ, is equivalen o prove Ψ ε C 1,θ P ε mxε α, Xε α. In [16], he auhors prove he exisence of he unique fixed poin Ψ ε, Υ ε = Ψ ε, DΨ ε F ε L, R E ε of he map Π ε : Ψ ε, Υ ε T ε Ψ ε, D ε Ψ ε, Υ ε. We wan o prove ha, in fac, his fixed poin belongs o F ε L, R Eε θ,m. We proceed as follows. Le {z n } n 0 F ε L, R Eε θ,m be a sequence given by z 0 = Ψ ε, 0, z 1 = Π ε z 1 = T ε Ψ ε, D ε Ψ ε, 0,... z n = Π n εz 0. Noe ha he firs coordinae of z n is T n εψ ε which coincides wih Ψ ε for all n = 1, 2,... since Ψ ε is fixed poin of T ε. Hence, by Lemma 3.7, {z n } n 0 F ε L, R Eε θ,m wih θ and M described in his lemma. By Lemma 3.3, lim z n = Ψ ε, DΨ ε. n Hence, since E θ,m ε is a closed subspace of E ε and z n E θ,m ε Ψ ε, DΨ ε F ε L, R E θ,m ε. for all n = 1, 2,..., hen Tha is, Ψ ε C 1,θ P ε mx α ε, X α ε, for 0 < ε ε 0, wih 0 < θ θ F and θ < θ 0, see Then, Φ ε C 1,θ R m, X α ε as we waned o prove. 4 C 1,θ -esimaes on he inerial manifolds In his secion we sudy he C 1,θ -convergence, wih 0 < θ 1 small enough, of he inerial manifolds Φ ε 0, Φ ε, 0 < ε ε 0. For ha we will obain firs he C 1 -convergence of hese manifolds, and, wih an inerpolaion argumen and applying he resuls obained in he previous subsecion, we ge he C 1,θ -convergence and a rae of his convergence. Before proving he main resul of his subsecion, Theorem 2.6, we need he following esimae. Lemma 4.1. Le Θ ε 0 j 1 0 z, = Θε 0 Ψε 0, DΨε 0, j 1 0 z, and Θ εjε 1 z, = Θ ε Ψ ε, DΨ ε, jε 1 z, be soluions of 3.7 and 3.8, for z R m and 0. Then, we have, P ε meθ ε 0j0 1 z, Θ εjε 1 z, P ε me LP 0 m X0 α,pε mxε α C[βε + [τε logτε + ρε] θ ]e [4+κ+2θL F λ ε m α +θ+1λ ε m +3θ] + + EDΨε 0 DΨ εp ε me e [4L F λ ε m α +λ ε m ], 2 where C is a consan independen of ε, 0 < θ θ F and θ < θ 0, and κ is given by

15 Remark 4.2. We denoe by EDΨ ε 0 DΨ εp ε me he sup norm, ha is EDΨ ε 0 DΨ ε P ε me = sup EDΨ ε 0p DΨ ε P ε mepp ε me LP 0 m X0 α,xα ε, 4.1 p P 0 m Xα 0 Proof. Wih he Variaion of Consans Formula applied o 3.7 and 3.8, and denoing by Θ ε 0 = Θ ε 0 j 1 0 z, and Θ ε = Θ ε jε 1 z,, we ge + EΘ ε 0 Θ ε P ε me = Ee A 0P 0 m e AεPε m P ε me+ Ee A 0P 0 m s P 0 mdf ε 0 u ε 0sI + DΨ ε 0p ε 0sΘ ε 0s e AεPεm s P ε mdf ε u ε si + DΨ ε p ε sθ ε sp ε me ds := I + We esimae now I and I. Noice firs ha I LP 0 m X α 0,Pε mx α ε is analyzed wih Lemma 5.1, from [1] obaining, I LP 0 m X α 0,Pε mx α ε C 4 e λ0 m +1 τε Moreover, for I we ge, he following decomposiion: = I = Ee A 0P 0 m s P 0 mdf ε 0 u ε 0sI + DΨ ε 0p ε 0sΘ ε 0s e AεPε m s P ε mdf ε u ε si + DΨ ε p ε sθ ε sp ε me = Ee A 0P 0 m s P 0 m e AεPεm s P ε me DF0 ε u ε 0sI + DΨ ε 0p ε 0sΘ ε 0s +e AεPεm s P ε m EDF0 ε u ε 0s DF ε Eu ε 0sE I + DΨ ε 0p ε 0sΘ ε 0s +e AεPεm s P ε m DF ε Eu ε 0s DF ε u ε s EI + DΨ ε 0p ε 0sΘ ε 0s I +e AεPεm s P ε mdf ε u ε s EI + DΨ ε 0p ε 0s I + DΨ ε P ε mep ε 0sE Θ ε 0s +e AεPε m s P ε mdf ε u ε s I + DΨ ε P ε mep ε 0s I + DΨ ε p ε s EΘ ε 0s +e AεPε m s P ε mdf ε u ε si + DΨ ε p ε s EΘ ε 0s Θ ε sp ε me = I 1 + I 2 + I 3 + I 4 + I 5 + I 6. Now we can sudy he norm I LP 0 m X0 α,pε m Xα ε analyzing he norm of each erm separaely. By Lemma 3.5, Lemma 5.1 from [1] and 2.16 we have, I 1 LP 0 m X0 α,pε m Xα ε 2L F C 4 τεe λ0 m +1 e 2L F λ 0 m α +1s. 15

16 Wih he definiion of βε from 2.21 and again Lemma 3.5 and 2.16 I 2 LP 0 m X α 0,Pε mx α ε 2λ ε m α βεe λε m e 2L F λ ε m αs. To sudy he erm I 3, again, from 2.21, 2.16, Lemma 3.5 and he properies on he norm of exension operaor, see 2.3, for 0 < θ θ F, Remember ha, and for 0 < ε ε 0, Then, I 3 LP 0 m X α 0,Pε m Xα ε 2κλ ε m α L Eu ε 0s u ε s θ X α ε e λε m e 2L F λ ε m αs. u ε 0s = p ε 0s + Ψ ε 0p ε 0s = p ε 0s + Φ ε 0j 0 p ε 0s, u ε s = p ε s + Ψ ε p ε s = p ε s + Φ ε j ε p ε s. Eu ε 0s u ε s X α ε p ε s Ep ε 0s X α ε + Φ ε j ε p ε s Φ ε j 0 p ε 0s X α ε + Φ ε j 0 p ε 0s Φ ε 0j 0 p ε 0s X α ε p ε s Ep ε 0s X α ε + j ε p ε s j 0 p ε 0s 0,α + Φ ε EΦ ε 0 L R m,x α ε. Applying now Lemma 5.4 from [1], we ge j ε p ε s j 0 p ε 0s 0,α κ + 1 p ε s Ep ε 0s X α ε + κ + 1C P τε p ε 0 X0 Applying also Theorem 2.3, we ge Hence, Φ ε EΦ ε 0 L R m,x α ε C[τε logτε + ρε] Eu ε 0s u ε s X α ε κ + 2 p ε s Ep ε 0s X α ε + κ + 1C P τε p ε 0 X0 + C[τε logτε + ρε]. To esimae now p ε s Ep ε 0 s X α ε we follow Lemma 5.6 from [1] and o esimae pε 0 X 0 we use Lemma 5.5 from [1] also. Puing all hese esimaes ogeher, we ge Eu ε 0s u ε s X α ε LF κ + 2 λ ε m 1 α τε logτε + ρε + K 2e 2s τε e [κ+2l F λ ε m α +λ ε m]s + +κ + 1C P τεr + C F e λε msθ + C[τε logτε + ρε] C[τε logτε + ρε]e [κ+2l F λ ε m α +λ ε m +3]s, wih C > 0 independen of ε. Observe ha since s 0, we have e [κ+2l F λ ε m α +λ ε m +3]s 1. Hence, I 3 LP 0 m X α 0,Pε mx α ε 2κλ ε m α LC[τε logτε +ρε] θ e λε m e [2+κ+2θL F λ ε m α +θλ ε m +3θ]s. 16

17 By Lemma 3.5, we have, I 4 LP 0 m X α 0,Pε m Xα ε λ ε m α L F EDΨ ε 0 DΨ ε P ε me e λε m e 2L F λ ε m αs. By Secion 3, DΨ ε Eε θ,m Lemma 5.6 from [1], we have, for 0 < θ θ F and θ < θ 0. Applying esimae 2.3, Lemma 3.5 and I 5 LP 0 m X α 0,Pε m Xα ε κl F λ ε m α Mτε logτε +ρε θ e λε m e [2+κ+2θL F λ ε m α +θλ ε m +3θ]s Finally, he norm of erm I 6 is esimaed by, I 6 LP 0 m X α 0,Pε m Xα ε 2λ ε m α L F e λε m s EΘ ε 0s Θ ε sp ε me LP 0 m X α 0,Pε m Xα ε. Puing all ogeher, I LP 0 m X α 0,Pε mx α ε CL F Lλ ε m α [ βε+τε logτε +ρε θ] e λε m e [2+κ+2θL F λ ε m α +θλ ε m +3θ]s +λ ε m α L F EDΨ ε 0 DΨ ε P ε me e λε m e 2L F λ ε m αs + +2λ ε m α L F e λε m s EΘ ε 0s Θ ε sp ε me LP 0 m X α 0,Pε mx α ε. Then, EΘ ε 0 Θ ε P ε me LP 0 m X α 0,Pε m Xα ε I LP 0 m X α 0,Pε m Xα ε + C 4 e λ0 m +1 τε+ I LP 0 m X α 0,Pε m Xα ε [ CL F Lλ ε m α βε+τε logτε +ρε θ] e λε m e [2+κ+2θL F λ ε m α +θλ ε m +3θ]s ds +λ ε m α L F EDΨ ε 0 DΨ ε P ε me e λε m +2λ ε m α L F e λε m e 2L F λ ε m αs ds+ e λε ms EΘ ε 0s Θ ε sp ε me LP 0 m X α 0,Pε m Xα ε ds. So, we have, EΘ ε 0 Θ ε P ε me LP 0 m X0 α,pε mxε α [ C βε + τε logτε + ρε θ] e [2+κ+2θL F λ ε m α +θ+1λ ε m +3θ] + +2λ ε m α L F e λε m Applying Gronwall inequaliy, + EDΨε 0 DΨ εp ε me e [2L F λ ε m α +λ ε m] + 2 e λε ms EΘ ε 0s Θ ε sp ε me LP 0 m X α 0,Pε mx α ε ds. EΘ ε 0 Θ ε P ε me LP 0 m X α 0,Pε m Xα ε 17

18 [ C βε + τε logτε + ρε θ] e [4+κ+2θL F λ ε m α +θ+1λ ε m +3θ] + + EDΨε 0 DΨ εp ε me e [4L F λ ε m α +λ ε m ], 2 wih C > 0 a consan independen of ε and 0 < θ θ F wih θ < θ 0. We show now he convergence of he differenial of inerial manifolds and esablish a rae for his convergence. For his, we define θ 1 and θ as follows, θ 1 = λ0 m+1 λ0 m 4L F λ 0 m α κ + 2L F λ 0 m α + λ 0 m + 3, 4.2 and, θ = min {θ F, θ 0, θ 1 }. 4.3 Proposiion 4.3. Wih Φ ε 0 and Φ ε he inerial manifolds, and if θ < θ, we have he following esimae [ ] θ EDΦ ε 0 DΦ ε C 1 R m,xε α C βε+ τε logτε +ρε 4.4 where C is a consan independen of ε. Proof. Taking ino accoun he esimae obained in Theorem 2.3, i remains o esimae EDΦ ε 0 DΦ ε L R m, LR m,x α ε, ha is, Bu we know ha, sup EDΦ ε 0z DΦ ε z LR m,x α z R m ε. sup EDΦ ε 0z DΦ ε z LR m,x α z R m ε = = sup EDΨ ε 0j0 1 zj 1 0 DΨ ε jε 1 zp ε mej0 1 LR m,x α z R m ε = = sup z R m EDΨ ε 0j 1 0 z DΨ εp ε mej 1 0 zpε me LP 0 m X α 0,Xα ε = = sup EDΨ ε 0p ε 0 DΨ ε P ε mep ε 0P ε me LP 0 m X0 α,xα ε = EDΨ ε 0 DΨ ε E. p ε 0 P0 m Xα 0 We have applied j 0 p ε 0 0,α = p ε 0 X α 0 for any pε 0 P0 mx 0, see Then, for z R m, wih he definiion 3.6, and denoing again by Θ ε 0 = Θε 0 j 1 0 z, and Θ ε = Θ ε jε 1 z,, we have EDΨ ε 0j0 1 zj 1 0 z DΨ ε P ε me j0 1 zpε me j0 1 z = = Ee A 0Q 0 m s Q 0 mdf ε 0 u ε 0sI + DΨ ε 0p ε 0sΘ ε 0sj 1 0 z e AεQε m s Q ε mdf ε u ε si + DΨ ε p ε sθ ε sp ε mej 1 0 z ds = 18 I

19 as Bu, he inegrand I can be decomposed, in a similar way as above in he proof of Lemma 4.1, I = Ee A 0Q 0 m s Q 0 m e AεQε m s Q ε me DF0 ε u ε 0sI + DΨ ε 0p ε 0sΘ ε 0sj0 1 z + +e AεQε m s Q ε m EDF0 ε u ε 0 DF ε Eu ε 0sE I + DΨ ε 0p ε 0sΘ ε 0sj0 1 z +e AεQε m s Q ε m DF ε Eu ε 0 DF ε u ε s EI + DΨ ε 0p ε 0sΘ ε 0sj0 1 z +e AεQεms Q ε mdf ε u ε s EI+DΨ ε 0p ε 0s I+DΨ ε P ε mep ε 0sE Θ ε 0sj0 1 z +e AεQε m s Q ε mdf ε u ε s I+DΨ ε P ε mep ε 0s I+DΨ ε p ε s EΘ ε 0sj0 1 +e AεQε m s Q ε mdf ε u ε si + DΨ ε p ε s EΘ ε 0s Θ ε sp ε me j0 1 z = I 1 + I 2 + I 3 + I 4 + I 5 + I 6. Applying Lemma 5.3 from [1] and Lemma 3.5, I 1 X α ε 2C 5 L F l α ε se [ 2L F λ ε m α +λ ε m+1 λε m 1]s z 0,α. Following he same seps as in he proof of Lemma 4.1, we obain, I 2 X α ε 2λ ε m+1 α βεe [ 2L F λ ε m α +λ ε m+1 λε m]s z 0,α, I 4 X α ε λ ε m+1 α L F EDΨ ε 0 DΨ ε E e [ 2L F λ ε m α +λ ε m+1 λε m ]s z 0,α. For he sake of clariy we will denoe by Λ 3 = 2 + κ + 2θL F λ ε m α + λ ε m+1 θ + 1λε m 3θ Λ 4 = 4 + κ + 2θL F λ ε m α + λ ε m+1 θ + 1λε m 3θ. 4.5 Then, we have, I 3 X α ε 2κλ ε m+1 α LC[τε logτε + ρε] θ e Λ 3s z 0,α, I 5 X α ε κl F λ ε m+1 α MC τε logτε + ρε θ e Λ 3s z 0,α, and for he norm of I 6 we apply Lemma 4.1, [ I 6 X α ε 2λ ε m+1 α L F C βε + τε logτε + ρε θ] e Λ4s + λ ε m+1 α L F EDΨ 0 DΨ ε E e [ 4L F λ ε m α +λ ε m+1 λε m]s z 0,α. 19

20 Puing everyhing ogeher, I X α ε I 1 X α ε + I 2 X α ε + I 3 X α ε + I 4 X α ε + I 5 X α ε + I 6 X α ε, so, I X α ε ds 2C 5 L F z 0,α +2λ ε m+1 α βε z 0,α l α ε se [ 2L F λ ε m α +λ ε m+1 λε m 1]s ds+ e [ 2L F λ ε m α +λ ε m+1 λε m]s ds+ +2κλ ε m+1 α LC[τε logτε + ρε] θ z 0,α +λ ε m+1 α L F EDΨ 0 DΨ ε E z 0,α +κl F λ ε m+1 α MC τε logτε + ρε θ z 0,α e Λ 3s ds+ e [ 2L F λ ε m α +λ ε m+1 λε m]s ds+ +2λ ε m+1 α L F C [βε + τε logτε + ρε θ] z 0,α +λ ε m+1 α L F EDΨ 0 DΨ ε E z 0,α e Λ 3s ds+ e Λ 4s ds+ e [ 4L F λ ε m α +λ ε m+1 λε m ]s ds. By Lemma 3.10 from [1], he gap condiions described in Proposiion 2.1 and 0 < θ < θ, see 4.3, for ε small enough, C[βε + τε logτε + ρε θ ] + 12 EDΨε0 DΨ ε E z 0,α Hence, C [EDΨ ε 0j0 1 z DΨ εp ε mej0 1 zpε me]j0 1 z X α ε [βε + τε logτε + ρε θ] EDΨε 0 DΨ ε E z 0,α. Since Ψ ε and Ψ ε 0 have bounded suppor, we consider he sup norm described in 4.1 for u 0 P 0 mx α 0 wih u 0 X α 0 2R, wih R > 0 an upper bound of he suppor of all Ψ ε, 0 < ε ε 0, and of Ψ ε 0. So, EDΨ ε 0 DΨ ε E = = sup p P 0 mx α 0, p X α 0 2R EDΨ ε 0p DΨ ε P ε mepp ε me LP 0 m X α 0,Xα ε = sup z R m, z 0,α 2R EDΨ ε 0j0 1 εp ε mej0 1 me LP 0 m X0 α,xα ε [ C βε + τε logτε + ρε θ] EDΨε 0 DΨ ε E. which implies, EDΨ ε 0 DΨ ε E 2C [ βε + τε logτε + ρε θ], 20

21 wih θ < θ. Hence, for θ < θ, sup EDΦ ε 0z DΦ ε z LR m,x α z R m ε 2C Applying Theorem 2.3, hen EDΦ ε 0 DΦ ε C 1 R m,x α ε C Which concludes he proof of he proposiion. [ βε + τε logτε + ρε θ]. [ βε + τε logτε + ρε θ]. Wih his esimae we can analyze in deail he C 1,θ -convergence of inerial manifolds for some θ < θ, small enough. We inroduce now he proof of he main resul of his subsecion. Proof. of Theorem 2.6 We wan o show he exisence of θ such ha we can prove he convergence of he inerial manifolds Φ ε o Φ ε 0, when ε ends o zero in he C1,θ opology for θ < θ and obain a rae of his convergence. Tha is, an esimae of Φ ε EΦ ε 0 C 1,θ R m,x α ε. Le us choose θ < θ as close as we wan o θ, where θ is given by 4.3, so ha Proposiion 4.3 holds. As we have menioned, Φ ε EΦ ε 0 C 1,θ R m,x α ε = Φ ε EΦ ε 0 C 1 R m,x α ε + DΦ ε + sup EDΦε 0 z DΦ ε EDΦε 0 z z,z R m z z θ ε,α = I 1 + I 2. For θ < θ, I 2 can be wrien as I 2 = I 21 I 22, where LRm,Xα ε DΦε EDΦ ε 0 I 21 = z DΦ ε EDΦ ε 0 z LR m,xε α z z θ ε,α I 22 = DΦ ε EDΦ ε 0z DΦ ε EDΦ ε 0z 1 θ θ LR m,x α ε Noe ha, since for each ε > 0, Φ ε = Ψ ε j 1 ε all z, v R m, DΦ ε zz = DΨ ε jε 1 zjε 1 z, DΦ ε 0zz = DΨ ε 0j 1 0 zj 1 0 z. = θ θ, and Φ ε 0 = Ψε 0 j 1 0 hen by he chain rule, for Also, noice ha from he definiion of j ε, j 0, we have j ε P ε me = j 0 or equivalenly j 1 P ε me j0 1. Then, applying 2.13 o he denominaor, I 21 DΨ ε j 1 ε z DΨ ε j 1 ε z jε 1 +EDΨ ε 0 j 1 0 z EDΨ ε 0 j 1 0 zj 1 0 LR m,xε α 1 δ θ j 1 0 z j 1 0 z θ X 0 α 21 ε = θ θ

22 Since in he previous subsecion we have proved DΨ ε Eε θ,m, wih θ < θ 0, in paricular we have DΨ ε Eε θ,m, wih θ < θ. Wihou loss of generaliy we consider DΨ ε E θ,m ε. Moreover, jε 1 LR m,p ε m Xα ε = P ε me j0 1 LR m,p ε m Xα ε κ, see 2.12 and 2.3. Then, we obain I 21 Mκκ + 1 θ z j 1 0 z θ X0 α 1 δ θ j0 1 z j 1 0 z θ X0 α θ j0 1 = Mκκ + 1 θ θ 1 δ θ. Noe ha, Hence, for θ < θ, I 22 2 DΦ ε EDΦ ε 0 L R m, LR m,x α ε 1 θ θ. Φ ε EΦ ε 0 C 1,θ R m,x α ε Φ ε EΦ ε 0 L R m,x α ε + DΦ ε EDΦ ε 0 L R m, LR m,x α ε + + Mκκ + 1 θ θ By Theorem 2.3 and Proposiion 4.3, we have 1 δ θ 2 DΦε EDΦ ε 0 L R m, LR m,x α ε 1 θ θ. Φ ε EΦ ε 0 C 1,θ R m,xε α [ C[τε logτε + ρε] + 2C βε + τε logτε + ρε θ ] + + which shows he resul. θ Mκκ + 1 θ 1 δ θ 4C [βε + τε logτε + ρε θ ] 1 θ θ C [βε + τε logτε + ρε θ ] 1 θ θ, References [1] J.M. Arriea, E. Sanamaría, Esimaes on he disance of Inerial Manifolds, Discree and Coninuous Dynamical Sysems A, 34, Vol 10 pp [2] J.M. Arriea, E. Sanamaría, Disance of aracors for hin domains, In preparaion [3] A. V. Babin and M. I. Vishik, Aracors of Evoluion Equaions, Sudies in Mahemaics and is Applicaions, 25. Norh-Holland Publishing Co., Amserdam, [4] Baes, P.W.; Lu, K.; Zeng, C. Exisence and Persisence of Invarian Manifolds for Semiflows in Banach Space Mem. Am. Mah. Soc. bf 135, 1998, no

23 [5] A. N. Carvalho, J. Langa, J. C. Robinson, Aracors for Infinie-Dimensional Non- Auonomous Dynamical-Sysems, Applied Mahemaical Sciences, Vol. 182, Springer, [6] Shui-Nee Chow, Xiao-Biao Lin and Kening Lu, Smooh Invarian Foliaions in Infinie Dimensional Spaces, Journal of Differenial Equaions , no. 2, [7] S. Chow, K. Lu and G. R. Sell, Smoohness of Inerial Manifolds, Journal of Mahemaical Analysis and Applicaions, 169, no. 1, , [8] J. W. Cholewa and T. Dloko, Global Aracors in Absrac Parabolic Problems, London Mahemaical Sociey Lecure Noe Series, 278. Cambridge Universiy Press, Cambridge, 2000 [9] Jack K. Hale, Asympoic Behavior of Dissipaive Sysems, American Mahemaical Sociey [10] Jack K. Hale and Genevieve Raugel, Reacion-Diffusion Equaion on Thin Domains, J. Mah. Pures e Appl , no. 1, [11] Daniel B. Henry, Geomeric Theory of Semilinear Parabolic Equaions, Lecure Noes in Mahemaics, 840. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, [12] Don A. Jones, Andrew M. Suar and Edriss S. Tii, Persisence of Invarian Ses for Dissipaive Evoluion Equaions, Journal of Mahemaical Analysis and Applicaions 219, [13] P. S. Ngiamsunhorn, Invarian manifolds for parabolic equaions under perurbaion of he domain, Nonlinear Analysis TMA 80, pp 23-48, 2013 [14] Genevieve Raugel, Dynamics of parial differenial equaions on hin domains. Dynamical sysems Monecaini Terme, 1994, , Lecure Noes in Mah., 1609, Springer, Berlin, [15] James C. Robinson, Infinie-dimensional dynamical sysems. An inroducion o dissipaive parabolic PDEs and he heory of global aracors, Cambridge Texs in Applied Mahemaics. Cambridge Universiy Press, Cambridge, 2001 [16] George R. Sell and Yuncheng You, Dynamics of Evoluionary Equaions, Applied Mahemaical Sciences, 143, Springer [17] N. Varchon, Domain perurbaion and invarian manifolds, J. Evol. Equ ,